#help-0

1 messages · Page 687 of 1

visual kernel
#

here is the graphs

alpine sable
#

what is all school math program

#

to the peak, like calculus

slate monolith
#

like the most u can do?

slate monolith
visual kernel
#

sure

alpine sable
#

like books

slate monolith
visual kernel
#

guidance pls

alpine sable
#

i just want to learn all school math

slate monolith
alpine sable
#

trigonometry?

slate monolith
#

this is the basics in highschool

#

algebra II/trig go together

#

depends on the school

visual kernel
#

where is my guidance

alpine sable
#

can i get books

slate monolith
slate monolith
#

what grade are u in now

alpine sable
#

for all the program

#

i only learned trigonometry just now

#

and idk geometry

visual kernel
#

do u think channel is for talking about booksj

slate monolith
#

alright fine

#

nvm

slate monolith
slate monolith
#

then learn precalc

alpine sable
#

@slate monolith but what is the book

slate monolith
#

there are thousands of books online

alpine sable
#

for geometry

slate monolith
#

idk

#

google it

#

"geometry free book"

alpine sable
#

idk lel

slate monolith
#

sounds like u dont wanna try

#

theres nothing to not know

#

google it

fickle dock
#

Hey, so we haven't really gone over this material but I'm still curious, how would you solve a problem that says something like this:
After rolling two 40-sided die, what is the probability that their sum is ≥ 15?

fickle dock
#

damn that was fast

slate monolith
#

ikr

fickle dock
#

but what does that mean

slate monolith
#

oh no I was joking

#

its ofc greater than 0

fickle dock
#

oh lmao

slate monolith
#

what is ur experience with stats

#

and probability

fickle dock
#

so far we're doing these kind of problems but we're counting the number of possibilities by hand

slate monolith
#

ah

fickle dock
#

so like 6-sided die and sums ≥ 11

slate monolith
#

so lik regular dice

#

okay

fickle dock
#

yeah

slate monolith
#

well ur experince is the same as mine

fickle dock
#

lol

#

so we divide it into two parts

slate monolith
#

yes

fickle dock
#

first, all possible rolls, let's call them S

#

which would be 40^2

slate monolith
#

mhm

fickle dock
#

= 1,600

slate monolith
#

wait are we counting moves that have the same pair

fickle dock
#

yes

#

why not

strong furnace
oak chasm
#

@fickle dock So, for the first die, you have a 1. How many values on the second die give you a sum of 15 or greater?

fickle dock
#

40 - 15 - 1 I believe

#

so 24

alpine sable
#

is this busy rn

fickle dock
#

yeah sorry

oak chasm
#

40 - 14 + 1

alpine sable
#

no worries

oak chasm
#

You have 14 as the lowest number that works with 1 to give a sum greater than or equal to 15.

fickle dock
#

why the +1 then

oak chasm
#

40 - 14 takes away the 1 to 14.

#

You need to add the 14 back in.

fickle dock
#

but does it not count 0

oak chasm
#

There are 40.

#

You take away 14 of those, which are the first 14 values.

#

You add the 1 back in.

#

[15 .. 40]: 40 - 14
[14 .. 40]: 40 - 14 + 1

fickle dock
#

ok makes sense

oak chasm
#

OK, so the first die is a two. How many values of the second die work?

fickle dock
#

and as you're increasing the roll of the first dice by one, you're decreasing the amount of possible rolls of the second dice by 1

#

40 - 15 + 1

oak chasm
#

Not exactly.

#

If you have a two, it's even easier to get at least 15, so more work.

#

40 - 13 + 1

fickle dock
#

oh ok yeah

oak chasm
#

[14 .. 40]: 40 - 13
[13 .. 40]: 40 - 13 + 1

#

So, you see the pattern.

fickle dock
#

and that pattern should follow until you get to 15

oak chasm
#

We have 27, 28, 29, 30, etc.

#

Then when you hit 40, it stays at 40.

fickle dock
#

or nevermind jesus I'm dumb

oak chasm
#

Because everything works.

fickle dock
#

ya

oak chasm
#

So, when does that happen? When the first die is 14.

#

Because the second die can be as low as 1, and that works.

fickle dock
#

so when the first dice is 14 through 40, then the amount of possibilities for the second dice is 40

ocean sealBOT
#

Chai T. Rex

fickle dock
#

O.o

oak chasm
#

So, we start of i at 27. We add 1 to i to get 28. We add 1 to i to get 29. And so on until we hit 39.

#

Then we add all those numbers together.

fickle dock
#

oh that's for the limited rolls of dice #2

oak chasm
#

Yes, that's for when you have only some rolls of die two working.

fickle dock
#

ookay I see what this is

#

that's the binomial theorem?

oak chasm
#

No.

#

This is separate.

#

Do you see the second part?

fickle dock
#

ya

oak chasm
#

40 different rolls of the second die times 40 - 14 + 1 different rolls of the first die.

fickle dock
#

for the rest of the rolls the value is already ≥ 15 so there's 40 - 14 + 1 possibilities for each roll

ocean sealBOT
#

Chai T. Rex

oak chasm
#

,w Sum[i, {i, 27, 39}] + 40(40 - 14 + 1)

ocean sealBOT
oak chasm
#

Let me double check.

#

Yep, a quick computer program agrees.

fickle dock
#

I see, yeah that clarifies it a lot

oak chasm
#

@fickle dock Do you see where to go from here?

#

To get the final answer?

fickle dock
#

1509/1600

#

just plug it in

#

I hope

oak chasm
#

Yes, that's right.

fickle dock
#

cool! 🙂

oak chasm
#

See if it reduces. If not, that's your answer.

fickle dock
#

it does not

oak chasm
#

OK, so that's it.

fickle dock
#

so you could use the binomial theorem for this as well?

oak chasm
#

Sorry, too tired to see how right now.

fickle dock
#

haha that's fine

#

thank you so much for the help

oak chasm
#

No problem.

hearty cliff
#

can you guys help me?

alpine sable
#

Dude that looks hard as hell

#

lmao I'm dumb

oak chasm
#

@hearty cliff Get f(x) by itself.

alpine sable
#

Chai T. Rex can you help me after you help him? If possible.

#

In #help-1 I sent my problem but nobody responded cause they might be busy.

hearty cliff
oak chasm
#

What do you have now?

hearty cliff
#

in integral part

#

is last eq true?

ocean sealBOT
#

Chai T. Rex

hearty cliff
#

oh okey

oak chasm
#

Then, take derivative of both sides.

hearty cliff
#

thank you so much

oak chasm
#

No problem.

dire patrol
#

anyone help me with this please

#

i am getting negative

#

like v^2 = -2(25-x^2)

#

why is there no negative 2

#

why only regular 2

flat vale
#

I don't get how it doesn't give me the same answer

#

logₑ(4/15)/logₑ(3)

#

logₑ(4/15) = -logₑ(15/4)

jagged imp
#

why would it

flat vale
#

∴ logₑ(4/15)/logₑ(3) = logₑ[(15/4)-3] = logₑ(3/4) no?

rigid smelt
#

it seems like you mess up between the change of base and quotient rule

jagged imp
#

wrong use of log law

#

i think you're thinking ln(a-b)=ln(a)/ln(b) right?

#

its the other way around

flat vale
#

ye

jagged imp
#

ln(a)-ln(b)=ln(a/b)

flat vale
#

ah fk

#

stupid me

#

thx

jagged imp
#

nw

flat vale
#

idk how to put this in latex form

#

can someone write this eq in latex form for me?

jagged imp
#

$\frac{\log_e\left(\frac{4}{15}\right)}{\log_e(3)}$

ocean sealBOT
#

111211211111221312211

jagged imp
#

ok lhs done

#

$=-1+\log_3\left(\frac{4}{5}\right)$

ocean sealBOT
#

111211211111221312211

jagged imp
#

$\frac{\log_e\left(\frac{4}{15}\right)}{\log_e(3)}=-1+\log_3\left(\frac{4}{5}\right)$

ocean sealBOT
#

111211211111221312211

flat vale
#

thanks @jagged imp !

jagged imp
#

nw

flat vale
#

is there a website where i can create math question?

#

and export it as a pdf?

rigid smelt
#

you can do it in latex

#

just download the program

#

its free afaik

flat vale
#

ah okay

rigid smelt
#

im not sure how to say it, but like its supported on word and such

#

so you can probably write in microsoft word and export the file as pdf

pliant estuary
rigid smelt
#

hmm ok, i dont usually use it outside of here

ivory otter
#

hey

#

i got this question

#

so i did

#

i used one of the gradient formula

#

$\sin kx = k \cos kx$

ocean sealBOT
#

MEOWBRO 父

ivory otter
#

but im getting the wrong answer when i plug in

rigid smelt
#

what did you plug in?

ivory otter
#

4 * cos(4*0.3) = 3.9

rigid smelt
#

seems good

ivory otter
#

isnt the right answer

rigid smelt
#

oh im not sure about the 3.9

#

but you plugged in the right numbers

#

,w 4cos(40.3)

ivory otter
#

what

#

wait what

rigid smelt
#

was your calculator in degree modes?

ivory otter
#

yes

rigid smelt
#

it should be in radians

ivory otter
#

why does it want radian mode?

#

how do i know if it wants that

rigid smelt
#

because we consider trig functions to be in radians

#

trig functions are graphed according to radians

ivory otter
#

i see ok

vale wigeon
#

that's like saying 1 = 0 to mean "the derivative of 1 is 0"

ivory otter
#

how then?

vale wigeon
#

how what

#

if you want to write "the derivative of sin(kx) is k cos(kx)" then write that

#

$\dv{x} \sin(kx) = k \cos(kx)$

ocean sealBOT
vale wigeon
#

is that what you were asking about?

ivory otter
#

yes

#

thanks

vale wigeon
#

don't rely on other people being able to decipher what you meant from "how?"

ivory otter
#

the "how" was pretty obvious

#

you made a statement

#

and immediately after i replied with "how"

hollow pelican
#

guys how to do 1j?

vale wigeon
#

have you been able to do parts a-i?

hollow pelican
#

yea

vale wigeon
#

all of these problems follow the same principle

#

make a substitution like u := sin(x) or u := cos(x) or u := tan(x), whichever is appropriate from context, and get an algebraic equation

hollow pelican
#

oh is it like this

vale wigeon
#

you should write $\tan^2 x$ if you insist on not putting parentheses around the x.

ocean sealBOT
hollow pelican
#

ok

vale wigeon
#

but yes that'll reduce your equation to a quadratic in disguise

alpine sable
#

Is anyone good with proving quadrilaterals

#

I've been trying to work out how to prove quadrilaterals since this morning

#

And no matter how many people explain it to me, I don't understand it one bit which is out of character for me because I generally pick things up immediately.

vapid swift
#

so AB=AD

alpine sable
#

How come my teacher stated all of this then?

vapid swift
#

yeah i just gave you for two sides ...similarly you can prove all the sides are equal

alpine sable
#

Right. How does that rekate to diagonals bisecting each other at right angles though?

#

relate*

vapid swift
#

with that you can prove that the triangles are congruent

#

just try to remember the properties of a rhombus

alpine sable
#

103 * ?^103 = (roughly)42
90 * ?^90 = (roughly)35
what is (roughly)?

pulsar aspen
#

I have a problem with my statistics

#

I have 1 variable and 2 response variables. I want to test for the correlation between the two. What statistics testing should I use?

#

MANOVA too?

pulsar aspen
#

<@&286206848099549185>

dire pilot
#

Does anybody know of a book/website for algebra 1 and/or the beginning of geometry I am kinda looking more for algebra but either would work

pliant estuary
minor crypt
#

too bad we dont have something like that in my native language; Dutch

sleek elbow
#

is there no dutch translation for khan academy? @minor crypt

minor crypt
#

pogwhat wait there's translations

sleek elbow
minor crypt
#

dont they have like a shit ton of videos

#

I refuse to believe all of them are translated to German

#

this is all they offer in Dutch

#

only maths up to "the beginning of algebra"

#

not really beginning

#

more like the laws of algebra

sleek elbow
minor crypt
#

I hope its more than what they offer in Dutch at least

random pelican
#

how do i find

#

how tall the structure is

#

<@&286206848099549185> HI

alpine sable
#

use triangle stuff

random pelican
alpine sable
#

what is 90

random pelican
alpine sable
#

you are asked to find the height of the building or what

random pelican
alpine sable
#

motherfucker ping me one more time I dare you

random pelican
alpine sable
#

blocked

#

bye

random pelican
#

what

random pelican
alpine sable
#

was this negative 12 gotten from these two numbers?

sleek elbow
random pelican
#

i didnt understand

sleek elbow
random pelican
#

oh, im at 8 grade

sleek elbow
random pelican
#

thats 1st grade thing

vapid swift
toxic thorn
#

yea

random pelican
#

but its asking a resolution for me

#

a photo

#

of resolution

#

its in portuguese

#

but it dont say anything

#

yes

#

we have a scheme

void thicket
#

you can use tan(theta) here

alpine sable
#

Hi! could someone have a look on a rather standard lwa of large numbers question I just posted?
https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/4186080/sum-of-centered-random-variables-with-finite-variance-converges-almost-surely

random pelican
#

oih ok

chrome olive
#

Can someone help me, how would I solve
Solved

indigo junco
#

A question : do we have this assertion
When a sequence converge in L^p(0.T;X) implies the convergence in X!?

#

X is a banach space

chrome olive
#

Can somebody please help with this

#

I tried looking in different places I thought that would be a very common question

muted raft
#

use binomial theorem

chrome olive
#

I am unsure how to use binomial theorem, could you please explain?

glass lichen
#

$(a+b)^n=\sum_{i=0}^n\binom{n}{i}a^ib^{n-i}$

ocean sealBOT
chrome olive
#

That's useful thanks

glass lichen
#

That's.. binomial theorem

#

like was suggested already...

slim elbow
#

Can someone tell me how to calculate this? I think I’m supposed to use LCM but I don’t know how to do it. If anyone can do it explain it to me.

glass lichen
#

,rotate

ocean sealBOT
languid python
#

whats 1+1-1+10

sleek elbow
#

thats an interesting question to post 🤔

spiral solar
#

hey. i recently learnt that the polar form of i = 1[cos(pi/2) + i.sin(pi/2)]
can some one explain how we got pi/2 ?

sage summit
#

pi/2 is the number in (-pi; +pi] such that cos(pi/2) = 0 and sin(pi/2) = 1

spiral solar
#

ohh

#

thanks

alpine sable
#

What is the foundations of all mathematics I’ve been currently learning a little bit of category theory and think it’s the foundations of all mathematics although I’m not sure

halcyon meteor
#

nvm ill go to a different channel ig

placid zinc
#

Set theory is the usual foundation

alpine sable
#

Set theory but what about the thing where a set inside of a set paradox?

glass lichen
#

that was why sets were redefined from Cantor's original one

placid zinc
#

In regards to your original question - why does that matter?

#

Some things can't be sets. Doesn't mean they still aren't a useful foundation

alpine sable
#

Because I wanna learn math from the ground up ive still learned a few subjects other than category theory and appreciate them but they seem a little specific

placid zinc
#

But you bring up an interesting new question, that basic set theory seems to have issues. We do fix them with a better version of set theory

alpine sable
#

I like to read math in very constructive way like building definitions but you have to know the most basic roots to construct it I remember one guy saying if I wanna learn to bake a cake I would have to learn to construct the entire universe first

glass lichen
#

that's stupid, ill just say it

alpine sable
#

Alright

#

I just like it that way

glass lichen
#

Learn cosmology to pour flour into a bowl

alpine sable
#

I’m not interested in natural sciences more of a formal sciences

sleek mist
#

Am I typing the command to solve this matrix the wrong way? I'm getting something different than on the example here

glass lichen
#

since the augmented matrix isnt [I|b]

sleek mist
ionic jewel
#

the 3x3 matrix is not the identity matrix

#

the calculator is right, the written work is right but incomplete, if you finished it you would get the same answer

ruby pier
#

Why arent all of these true?

clever locust
#

They are lol

ruby pier
#

I'm pretty sure they are too

thorn kindle
#

Rule out the ones with division

ruby pier
#

Because of 0?

thorn kindle
#

Yes

clever locust
thorn kindle
#

But the other statements are always true over R

ruby pier
#

What about the third and fifth option?

clever locust
#

If the denominators are zero, then both are undefined, but the statement is still true

ruby pier
#

Yeah 0 was the only counter example I could think of

clever locust
#

All are true

thorn kindle
#

Not over R at least

glass lichen
thorn kindle
#

Which is presumably the domain

clever locust
#

To be fair, there is nothing saying they are on R either lol, it just says they are equal

#

So I think it's very fair to assume all expressions are defined

thorn kindle
#

Not really

clever locust
#

?

#

Yes

thorn kindle
#

Given the level of this question i doubt youd be dealing with the extended reals or some wheel math

ruby pier
#

I agree with AMD but what about the other expressions? Im pretty sure those are definitely true

clever locust
#

Either way, the question is just stupid and not well defined

#

Imo

ruby pier
#

I agree

clever locust
#

If we assume we are working with R and the standard arithmetic operations, which we most likely are, then all (except the division ones in the cases of zeros) should be true

alpine sable
clever locust
#

So it's a bad question

slim elbow
clever locust
#

For example, take the fifth option, which should give us the left hand side as

$$x-y=x-x=0$$

and the right hand side as

$$y-x=x-x=0$$

and as we OBVIOUSLY have

$$0=0$$

it is true

ocean sealBOT
#

Lorago

clever locust
#

The fact that it is marked as incorrect is just wrong

sullen karma
# ruby pier

51 percent answered correctly its just a bad question

clever locust
#

You should tell you teacher/professor that their questions in wrong lol

ruby pier
sullen karma
#

oh

tiny acorn
#

Is it correct

#

<@&286206848099549185>

tiny acorn
queen wigeon
tiny acorn
coral pagoda
#

Yea, you understand what's being presented so far. Good job!

tiny acorn
#

thx

coral pagoda
#

Only thing I recommend is for you to switch the first semi-colon in (iii) for a comma. That way the way you answer things are consistent

tiny acorn
#

thx

fervent valley
#

(e^x)(1-x)-1=0 how do u solve this? (changed again)

quartz stone
#

e^(x(x-1)) = 1

fervent valley
#

no

quartz stone
#

oh thanks

fervent valley
#

now its right

#

I know x=0 is solution, but i dont know how to see if there are others

quartz stone
#

Ok if it's that one it's a bit easier iirc

fervent valley
#

?

quartz stone
#

Derivative of this is -xe^x

#

e^x is always positive too 🙂

vague coral
#

?

#

I think no

#

(0,1) isnt a solution of y=-x+2

quartz stone
#

pao was but hopefully we can finish off soon

#

Your question also seems quite simple if it's a case of the textbook being wrong

vague coral
quartz stone
#

It should be y = -x + 1

fervent valley
quartz stone
fervent valley
#

because its a maximum, no?

quartz stone
#

The first derivative is 0 at a maximum, and the second derivative is either negative or 0

#

But anyways, this is for local maximum

fervent valley
#

oh yea, sorry i messed up

#

i get it now

#

thanks

quartz stone
#

If you want global maximum, you can show that the function always decreases outside some range

quartz stone
#

So you find all the maxima within some range and pick the maximum one from there, and show the derivative is positive before that range and negative after that range, and then you have proof it's the maximum

#

-xe^x is always negative after 0 and always positive before it for example

warped phoenix
#

How would I solve

ocean sealBOT
#

TheMane3

warped phoenix
#

to find the roots (x-int's.)?

#

i already set f(x) to 0

#

but then what

quartz stone
#

Have you been taught the Raphson method?

warped phoenix
#

umm no

#

this is algebra II

quartz stone
#

Because I hear you saying "set f(x) to 0"

#

Hmm

ionic jewel
#

isnt there also that p,q method

quartz stone
#

Guess?

ionic jewel
#

rational root?

quartz stone
warped phoenix
#

how do i guess/do rational root? 😅

ionic jewel
#

i mean the real answer is just use a calculator, but rational root is easy enough here

quartz stone
#

I don't know what algebra 2 is, but if you've just been taught long division, they probably want you to guess

ionic jewel
#

i forgot how to do it though lol

warped phoenix
#

"Analyze your polynomial (using your calculator)"

#

i can use my calculator

ionic jewel
#

bruh

warped phoenix
#

but i would need to set x as something right

ionic jewel
#

that makes it a lot easier

#

just graph it

#

all the rational roots are between -4 and 4

#

so it should be easy enough to find

quartz stone
#

x = sqrt(2) is one

#

Perhaps they want you to factorise it if it's possible

ionic jewel
#

,w x^5+x^4-x^3-4x^2-2x+4=0

quartz stone
#

Wait hmm

#

Why - x^4?

warped phoenix
#

how do i zoom in to my calculator to see the x intercepts?

quartz stone
warped phoenix
#

ti-84+ ce

#

it has a screen

warped phoenix
#

like an actual led screen

quartz stone
#

bunny: it's -x^3 btw

quartz stone
#

Ah thanks

ionic jewel
#

ah yes what a nice looking solution

quartz stone
#

I mean not that horrible

ionic jewel
#

i was talking about the third one

#

and the complex ones for that matter

#

but idk how you would possibly find sqrt(2)

#

obviously rational root thm doesn't work since nothing there is rational

quartz stone
ionic jewel
#

there's also a function that finds the roots

quartz stone
#

I'll check though

ionic jewel
#

i don't have my calculator, but it's like the 4th? button on the top row

quartz stone
#

,w factorise x^5+x^4-x^3-4x^2-2x+4

ionic jewel
#

gets you into graph functions

#

then you can find the roots like that

quartz stone
#

hmmm

ionic jewel
#

(n(n+1))^2/4

#

oops

quartz stone
#

Well either i divide it by hand or

ionic jewel
#

(x^2 - 2) (x^3 + x^2 + x - 2) = 0

#

this is the factoring

quartz stone
#

Ye

ocean sealBOT
ionic jewel
#

he wouldn't have found it

#

the best solution here is just using Wolfram lol

quartz stone
#

I mean given sqrt(2) and -sqrt(2) you could

#

Lol that typo

ionic jewel
#

he wasn't given those

#

but true

warped phoenix
#

how do i do long division with polynomials

quartz stone
warped phoenix
#

ik what synthetic divison is but not long divison

ionic jewel
#

even then the cubic is unsolvable too (for humans)

quartz stone
#

The only use is if they told you there were integer solutions

warped phoenix
#

im zooming into my graph but i can never get y = 0 so i can look at x

#

the closest i get to is y = 1e-8

ionic jewel
#

why are you zooming in

warped phoenix
#

to see the x intercepts

ionic jewel
#

it should just look like this

warped phoenix
#

it does

#

but i need the roots

ionic jewel
#

yeah

warped phoenix
#

from my calculator

ionic jewel
#

theres a calculator function for that

warped phoenix
#

oh

#

what is it

ionic jewel
#

can you send an imagine of your calc by any chance

warped phoenix
#

sure

ionic jewel
#

i dont remember and i dont own a TI anymor

rich vessel
#

If is the radius of circle 1 and R of circle 2, and nr=R, what distance will circle one make traveling on circle two when it revolves once?

warped phoenix
#

@ionic jewel

#

That’s what it looks like

solar pebble
#

Newton raphson hehe

warped phoenix
#

It looks the same as it does on desmos

solar pebble
#

don't shoot me

ionic jewel
#

press [2nd] then [trace]

#

then choose the "zero" option

warped phoenix
#

Now what

ionic jewel
#

then you have to set the left and right bounds on the graph

warped phoenix
#

What is that

ionic jewel
#

so first pick a location just to the left of the first root on the graph

#

oh the graph

#

then pick one slightly to the right

#

then it will tell you the root

#

you can use arrow keys to move them

#

oh then you have to make a guess too

warped phoenix
#

Well it’s moving me across the line

ionic jewel
#

here i found a tutorial

warped phoenix
#

Ok

#

I did left and right bound

#

How do I guess

#

@ionic jewel

ionic jewel
#

pick a point as close to the root as you can

warped phoenix
#

Ok my cursor is over it

#

Do I press enter

ionic jewel
#

yea

#

then itll tell you the root

warped phoenix
#

x = 0.81053571

ionic jewel
#

uh that might be one of them

#

yea

#

looks right

#

now you have to do it twice more

warped phoenix
#

:0

ionic jewel
#

to get the other two

warped phoenix
#

woahhhh

#

thats cool

#

my teacher is asking if there are any multiplicities

#

whats that

slate monolith
#

basically (x-a)^2

#

same root value

warped phoenix
#

oh so if there are two identical roots?

slate monolith
#

yes

warped phoenix
#

ahhh ty

slate monolith
#

well 2 or more

warped phoenix
#

right

#

@slate monolith if they're opposite they're not multiplicities id assume right

#

x = (-1.41, 0) and x = (1.41, 0) in my case

ionic jewel
#

they are not

warped phoenix
#

oh ok

#

ty for showing me the trace thing

#

thats really cool

#

how do i find relative minimums and maximums though?

slate monolith
slate monolith
warped phoenix
#

idk calc....

slate monolith
#

well u can find the vertex if its a quadratric

#

thats basically it

#

vertex is max/min depending on concavity

warped phoenix
#

its a polynomial function tho not a quadratic 😭

slate monolith
#

are u given the graph

warped phoenix
#

yes

slate monolith
#

just circle the points

#

u cant find the exact value but u can eyeball

warped phoenix
#

she wants us to write out tho

slate monolith
#

show the q

warped phoenix
#

@slate monolith

slate monolith
#

oh lol

#

u have the points

#

desmos does it for u

warped phoenix
#

we have to use our calculator

slate monolith
warped phoenix
#

not desmos

slate monolith
#

without calc u cant

warped phoenix
#

oh dang

slate monolith
#

ask them

mighty berry
#

the derivative of tanh is 1/cosh^2, so can I just do 1/(cosh 4)^2?

#

1/745.74 wasn't correct, so I'm not sure how else to do it

vale wigeon
mighty berry
#

is that not how you find the area of a region bounded by a function?

vale wigeon
#

it is not

#

you're mixing up derivatives and integrals.

#

what you need here is $\int_0^4 \tanh(x) \dd{x}$

ocean sealBOT
mighty berry
#

... that would explain a lot

#

okay, thanks!

#

side question, does cosh^2 x = (cosh x)^2?

vale wigeon
#

yes that's what the notation cosh^2(x) means

mighty berry
#

or for any trig function I suppose

#

okay great, thank you!

steel bronze
#

can u guys help me

#

im so dumb

#

im in year 8

#

and this shit hard

sleek elbow
#

post your question @steel bronze

mighty berry
sleek elbow
#

oh I see

mighty berry
#

in that case, I'm going to post another question if no one minds...

#

for this one, wouldn't it just be the integral of cosh x? since cosh^2 x - sinh^2 x = 1, then can I make the integrand cosh x / cosh^2 x?

vale wigeon
#

the integral of **1/**cosh(x), if you insist

#

but there's a reason they write it that way

mighty berry
#

oh, why? my professor didn't go in depth on this

vale wigeon
#

you can make a substitution that makes the integral reasier to calculate

#

u := sinh(x)

mighty berry
#

ohhh, so it becomes 1/1+u^2?

#

wait, isn't that the derivative of inverse tangent?

#

would it be tan^-1 (sinh x)?

alpine sable
#

Who can help with this

vale wigeon
mighty berry
#

oops, uh, 1/(1+u^2)?

vale wigeon
#

yes

mighty berry
#

woah that's cool, I didn't think about using hyperbolic with inverse

#

thanks!

alpine sable
#

Ann can you help?

slate monolith
alpine sable
#

I sent a picture

#

Look

slate monolith
#

15m and 21 degrees

#

go from there

alpine sable
#

Do i put sin x (15) 21

slate monolith
#

use ur calculator

alpine sable
#

I am

slate monolith
#

what is sin

glass lichen
alpine sable
glass lichen
#

what are you multiplying..?

alpine sable
glass lichen
#

and * means times in type

slate monolith
#

yes

#

what is sin the ratio of

alpine sable
alpine sable
slate monolith
#

what is sin(x) = ?

#

generally speaking

alpine sable
#

I WORKED IT OUT

#

Its

#

15sin(21)

#

Right

#

Thennm

#

Thenn

glass lichen
#

that's the vertical segment, yes

arctic jay
#

Trying to learn polynomials for my free time and I got this question on a paper I found.

The question was if x - 2 was a factor of 3x^3 - ax^2 - 6x + 8

Find a and the remaining factors.

I got a by putting x = 2 into the equation (from x - 2 = 0). I'm not sure how I identify or even get the 'other' factors

slate monolith
#

then factor that quadratic

arctic jay
#

Oh I see

#

Is there a long division method for this? Been most comfortable using that

#

Nvm found it

glass lichen
arctic jay
#

i'd never used long division for algebraic expressions ;-;

#

But I just got it!

#

3x^2 + x - 4

#

and then factorise I got (3x+4)(x-1) which is the expected answer

keen crane
#

can someone help with b

slate monolith
#

its just simplifcation

keen crane
#

but which identity

ionic jewel
#

double angle

keen crane
#

how would you use cos(2a) identity for 1-2sin^2(a)

slate monolith
#

u plug it in

sage jacinth
#

expand cos(a+a) then work from there

slate monolith
#

use the sin(2a)

#

u legit dont need cos(2a)

sage jacinth
#

actually you need it at the end if you want it to be fully simplified

slate monolith
#

uh no

#

since u go from 2a to a

lament horizon
#

Hello Guys, i want to start learning math from very bigginig level, what do you recommend from where i should start learning, in the way that i can see real use in science or everyday life, i want to learn than calculus

orchid kayak
#

Eyo I need some help

slate monolith
#

eee

orchid kayak
#

What do I do after this 0 = √3 - x² + 7x - 1?

#

Or I did something wrong in the beginning

hushed pasture
alpine sable
#

what grade math is that?

orchid kayak
#

9th

hushed pasture
#

(2 sqrt(3))^2 == 2^2 x sqrt(3)^2

sage jacinth
#

yes

#

so you should get 12 on the right

#

then you can factor and solve for x

lament horizon
sage jacinth
#

so basic algebra?

orchid kayak
#

So, I got 12 in the right

sage jacinth
#

i would honestly just go through khan academy until you get to calc

orchid kayak
#

which is that -12

sage jacinth
#

then you can switch off to a textbook

#

yea its 12 on the right side

orchid kayak
#

O

#

wait

slate monolith
#

how old are u

orchid kayak
#

I am confused

hushed pasture
#

guys how to proof limit when x goes to 0 of xLn(x) without using hopital???

ocean sealBOT
#

(バカ) baka

lament horizon
slate monolith
orchid kayak
#

Lemme see it

hushed pasture
sage jacinth
slate monolith
#

i cant think of anything else

slate monolith
sage jacinth
#

its not in an indeterminant form

#

no, you can't

slate monolith
#

lnx/(1/x) is indeterminant

#

u just transform it

sage jacinth
#

oh

#

not in that form though

hushed pasture
slate monolith
#

well yeah

sage jacinth
#

xln(x) has to change, but he doesn't want to use lhopitals

slate monolith
#

well idk then

#

google it

orchid kayak
#

@sage jacinth So the thing that I did wrong was the first line ye?

sage jacinth
#

wolfram probably just uses lhopital

sage jacinth
orchid kayak
#

k thanks
gimme a minute rq

hushed pasture
#

didn't find any answer to it 🥲

#

I usually proof limits without using hopital in case of 0/0 because it's just the derivative of the upper function

lament horizon
#

@slate monolith any suggestions

orchid kayak
#

So this will turn to x² - 7x = 0

#

What do I do next?

sage jacinth
#

solve for x

hushed pasture
orchid kayak
#

Alright, lemme get the delta first

slate monolith
sage jacinth
#

also have you guys seen MSolved Tutoring?

orchid kayak
sage jacinth
#

ive watched two of this guys videos

#

and they both had wrong info

slate monolith
#

lmao

sage jacinth
#

hmmm

full canopy
#

to prove that x^x goes to 1 you need the first limit

orchid kayak
#

I forgot how I factorize with x for only a + b = 0

hushed pasture
sage jacinth
#

yea and the graph is wrong

orchid kayak
#

how I factorize with only the ''a'' and ''b''?

#

Which is 1 and -7

sage jacinth
#

x(x-7)

orchid kayak
#

Mk

sage jacinth
#

you just remove the x

noble crypt
#

anyone wanna take up this one? i found this online

slate monolith
noble crypt
#

well i know the answer already

slate monolith
#

;-;

noble crypt
#

just challenging you guys

#

:-)

sage jacinth
#

im pretty sure its just d

noble crypt
#

Why you say that?

slate monolith
#

cause x/y > y/x

#

yeah its just d

noble crypt
#

Hey hey hey i wanted HIM to explain

slate monolith
noble crypt
#

its not d btw

#

its

#

a

sage jacinth
#

its z

#

problem solved

#

its a or d

noble crypt
#

It is A

ionic musk
#

i get why y<0

hushed pasture
#

it's d

noble crypt
#

No its A

sage jacinth
#

it could be both

noble crypt
#

i have the explanation for it as well

ionic musk
#

but why is x<y?

queen wigeon
#

d does not take into account that x and y cannot be 0

sage jacinth
#

oh

#

true

slate monolith
#

well yes but

orchid kayak
#

Alright I did it

#

Thanks for helping

slate monolith
#

it says 1 solution

#

not all solutions

noble crypt
alpine sable
#

can someone please help me with expanding brackets i learnt it long ago and ive kinda forgotten everything

vague coral
alpine sable
#

oh

#

Ohhhh i get it now

#

thank you so much

vague coral
#

google is a thing but np

ionic musk
alpine sable
#

I know

noble crypt
#

lol

alpine sable
#

I just don't know where to start from

noble crypt
#

i have so many more of these math riddles

ionic musk
#

can show us another one?

noble crypt
ionic musk
#

thx

full canopy
#

@hushed pasture for your limit i think u can use squeeze theorem
lnx<x for all positive x so you can write 0<xlnx<x^2 and apply the limit to see 0<xlnx<0

devout plank
#

anyone good with calculus?

hushed pasture
full canopy
#

no problem 🙂

ionic musk
noble crypt
#

Wrong.

ionic musk
#

wait

#

gimme a min

#

its C,D and E

noble crypt
#

Its just D

ionic musk
#

oh

noble crypt
#

Fucntions that are netiher odd or even show no symmetry whatsoever

flat apex
#

Yep

noble crypt
#

and thats the only oen that fits that

ionic musk
#

but

alpine sable
#

oh god i have my maths test tommorow

ionic musk
#

i think i get it

#

wait could we use apps like geogebra?

#

for ur online math riddles?

noble crypt
#

i mean if u want to sure

ionic musk
#

can u give another riddle

#

pls

noble crypt
#

Try this one

ionic musk
#

ty

wraith cairn
#

thunderstorm here

ionic musk
#

are there multiple answers for this riddle?

noble crypt
#

Nope, only one letter is correct

ionic musk
#

ok its c

#

correct?

noble crypt
#

tell me why you think its c

alpine sable
#

oh god i can't remember what ive done since the beginning of the year nononnonononnonono

ionic musk
#

because y is a functino of x

#

in B y isnt a functION OF X

#

in B, x is the function of y

#

D and A arent function

#

idk what A and D are but all i know is that they aren't functions

#

only C was a correct functino

#

E i didnt try to figure out what it was

#

because C sounded the most correct to me

noble crypt
#

The phrase y i s afunction of x means that the value of y depends upon the value of x

ionic musk
#

woah

noble crypt
#

are you sure

cunning robin
#

mhm

noble crypt
#

c is your final answer

ionic musk
#

yes

ebon quail
noble crypt
#

correct

#

y is a function of x literally means any function that exists lol

ionic musk
#

eyyy

#

where did u find these online riddles?

alpine sable
cunning robin
#

33°

alpine sable
#

help

ionic musk
#

i dont understand english terms

alpine sable
ionic musk
#

2pi . r

alpine sable
ionic musk
#

116pi

cunning robin
cunning robin
alpine sable
#

thanks bro

cunning robin
alpine sable
alpine sable
cunning robin
#

ahh okk mb

alpine sable
alpine sable
#

@cunning robin

#

help

#

help

#

pls

bold mist
leaden ocean
#

I dont really understand the question here, can someone help me wrap my head around it and where to start please, thanks

whole prairie
#

What is the limit process for derivatives?

whole prairie
#

Thank you

glass lichen
#

Mixing notation sully

slate monolith
glass lichen
#

dy/dx and f(x) are different notations

#

$f'(x)=\lim_{h\to 0}\frac{f(x+h)-f(x)}{h}$

ocean sealBOT
slate monolith
#

i didnt make it

glass lichen
#

I never said you did

#

I can read the watermark from the website

slate monolith
#

ah

merry burrow
#

Is dis right

jagged imp
#

yes.

merry burrow
#

I’ll show the full thing

#

It wants me to solve it

minor crypt
#

thats correct my child

merry burrow
#

My dots are correct?

#

LES GOO

void reef
#

could someone please explain me the second part?

#

I don't understand how it goes from P(GS n PP) to P(PP | GS) * P(GS)

astral stump
#

help im dumb! anybody able to help me figure out what i need

#

some way to take the "U" numbers and enter a formular to get the "Y" numbers

#

v and w are a fraction of U

gray isle
#

y = 1/u

astral stump
#

y=100/u worked thank you thank you thank

#

so simple im dummy

woven flume
#

how do I process x^2^8-r

#

is there a way to simplify this

gray isle
#

Not really no

#

is what exactly what's been given to you?

woven flume
#

I'm trying to find the coefficient of x^4

gray isle
#

Ok, that's different

#

${(a^m)}^n = a^{mn}$

ocean sealBOT
#

ℝamonov

woven flume
#

that looks wrong

gray isle
#

it's one of the most common exponent laws

woven flume
#

uh

#

how do I explain

frosty cloak
#

I am stuck

woven flume
#

this

gray isle
#

yes those aren't equal

woven flume
#

is the notation I sent not the first one?

frosty cloak
gray isle
#

but that's not what you have in your question

woven flume
#

oh ok

frosty cloak
#

@velvet pulsarmatic

gray isle
#

are those PARENS when you applied binomial theorem invisible to you

woven flume
#

maybe im just dumb

#

lmao

#

wait

#

UHHH

#

-rotate

#

idk the command rip

gray isle
#

Comma not -

woven flume
#

,rotate

ocean sealBOT
woven flume
#

is this working right

frosty cloak
#

Guys how I can solve this

oak chasm
#

@frosty cloak Sorry, this channel is busy. Please see the rules and tips for getting help in #❓how-to-get-help.

frosty cloak
#

Based on this ( BEEKEEPERS KEEP BEES ) and I need to count total numbers of bits required to encode the text using the three that was built first

oak chasm
#

@woven flume One problem is that a negative sign inside a power should remain inside the power. You should have (-3)^r.

woven flume
#

oh ok

#

fixed

#

anything else?

gray isle
#

and you messed up (-3/x)^4

woven flume
#

how so