#help-0
1 messages · Page 687 of 1
no solution, only guidance
sure
like books
?
guidance pls
i just want to learn all school math
trigonometry?
this is the basics in highschool
algebra II/trig go together
depends on the school
where is my guidance
can i get books
im tired 🥱
its w/e
learn geometry first
then learn precalc
@slate monolith but what is the book
????
there are thousands of books online
for geometry
idk lel
Hey, so we haven't really gone over this material but I'm still curious, how would you solve a problem that says something like this:
After rolling two 40-sided die, what is the probability that their sum is ≥ 15?
P > 0
damn that was fast
ikr
but what does that mean
oh lmao
so far we're doing these kind of problems but we're counting the number of possibilities by hand
ah
so like 6-sided die and sums ≥ 11
yeah
well ur experince is the same as mine
yes
mhm
= 1,600
wait are we counting moves that have the same pair
Application of binomial theorem(multinomial theorem)
@fickle dock So, for the first die, you have a 1. How many values on the second die give you a sum of 15 or greater?
is this busy rn
yeah sorry
40 - 14 + 1
no worries
You have 14 as the lowest number that works with 1 to give a sum greater than or equal to 15.
why the +1 then
but does it not count 0
There are 40.
You take away 14 of those, which are the first 14 values.
You add the 1 back in.
[15 .. 40]: 40 - 14
[14 .. 40]: 40 - 14 + 1
ok makes sense
OK, so the first die is a two. How many values of the second die work?
and as you're increasing the roll of the first dice by one, you're decreasing the amount of possible rolls of the second dice by 1
40 - 15 + 1
Not exactly.
If you have a two, it's even easier to get at least 15, so more work.
40 - 13 + 1
oh ok yeah
and that pattern should follow until you get to 15
or nevermind jesus I'm dumb
Because everything works.
ya
So, when does that happen? When the first die is 14.
Because the second die can be as low as 1, and that works.
so when the first dice is 14 through 40, then the amount of possibilities for the second dice is 40
Chai T. Rex
O.o
So, we start of i at 27. We add 1 to i to get 28. We add 1 to i to get 29. And so on until we hit 39.
Then we add all those numbers together.
oh that's for the limited rolls of dice #2
Yes, that's for when you have only some rolls of die two working.
ya
40 different rolls of the second die times 40 - 14 + 1 different rolls of the first die.
for the rest of the rolls the value is already ≥ 15 so there's 40 - 14 + 1 possibilities for each roll
Chai T. Rex
,w Sum[i, {i, 27, 39}] + 40(40 - 14 + 1)
I see, yeah that clarifies it a lot
Yes, that's right.
cool! 🙂
See if it reduces. If not, that's your answer.
it does not
OK, so that's it.
so you could use the binomial theorem for this as well?
Sorry, too tired to see how right now.
No problem.
@hearty cliff Get f(x) by itself.
Chai T. Rex can you help me after you help him? If possible.
In #help-1 I sent my problem but nobody responded cause they might be busy.
i did that but after that im stuck
What do you have now?
Chai T. Rex
oh okey
Then, take derivative of both sides.
thank you so much
No problem.
anyone help me with this please
i am getting negative
like v^2 = -2(25-x^2)
why is there no negative 2
why only regular 2
I don't get how it doesn't give me the same answer
logₑ(4/15)/logₑ(3)
logₑ(4/15) = -logₑ(15/4)
why would it
∴ logₑ(4/15)/logₑ(3) = logₑ[(15/4)-3] = logₑ(3/4) no?
it seems like you mess up between the change of base and quotient rule
wrong use of log law
i think you're thinking ln(a-b)=ln(a)/ln(b) right?
its the other way around
ye
ln(a)-ln(b)=ln(a/b)
nw
$\frac{\log_e\left(\frac{4}{15}\right)}{\log_e(3)}$
111211211111221312211
111211211111221312211
$\frac{\log_e\left(\frac{4}{15}\right)}{\log_e(3)}=-1+\log_3\left(\frac{4}{5}\right)$
111211211111221312211
thanks @jagged imp !
nw
ah okay
im not sure how to say it, but like its supported on word and such
so you can probably write in microsoft word and export the file as pdf
The Word thingy kinda sucks, best to do for a begginer is to use some browser-based editor like Overleaf
hmm ok, i dont usually use it outside of here
hey
i got this question
so i did
i used one of the gradient formula
$\sin kx = k \cos kx$
MEOWBRO 父
but im getting the wrong answer when i plug in
what did you plug in?
4 * cos(4*0.3) = 3.9
seems good
isnt the right answer
was your calculator in degree modes?
yes
it should be in radians
because we consider trig functions to be in radians
trig functions are graphed according to radians
i see ok
this is bad and wrong and you should not be using the equals sign that way
that's like saying 1 = 0 to mean "the derivative of 1 is 0"
how then?
how what
if you want to write "the derivative of sin(kx) is k cos(kx)" then write that
$\dv{x} \sin(kx) = k \cos(kx)$
Ann
is that what you were asking about?
don't rely on other people being able to decipher what you meant from "how?"
the "how" was pretty obvious
you made a statement
and immediately after i replied with "how"
guys how to do 1j?
have you been able to do parts a-i?
yea
all of these problems follow the same principle
make a substitution like u := sin(x) or u := cos(x) or u := tan(x), whichever is appropriate from context, and get an algebraic equation
you should write $\tan^2 x$ if you insist on not putting parentheses around the x.
Ann
ok
but yes that'll reduce your equation to a quadratic in disguise
Is anyone good with proving quadrilaterals
I've been trying to work out how to prove quadrilaterals since this morning
And no matter how many people explain it to me, I don't understand it one bit which is out of character for me because I generally pick things up immediately.
How come my teacher stated all of this then?
yeah i just gave you for two sides ...similarly you can prove all the sides are equal
Right. How does that rekate to diagonals bisecting each other at right angles though?
relate*
with that you can prove that the triangles are congruent
just try to remember the properties of a rhombus
103 * ?^103 = (roughly)42
90 * ?^90 = (roughly)35
what is (roughly)?
I have a problem with my statistics
I have 1 variable and 2 response variables. I want to test for the correlation between the two. What statistics testing should I use?
MANOVA too?
<@&286206848099549185>
Does anybody know of a book/website for algebra 1 and/or the beginning of geometry I am kinda looking more for algebra but either would work
I think that Khan academy is favorite among alot of people
is there no dutch translation for khan academy? @minor crypt
wait there's translations
when I went on the website it was german 🤷♂️
dont they have like a shit ton of videos
I refuse to believe all of them are translated to German
this is all they offer in Dutch
only maths up to "the beginning of algebra"
not really beginning
more like the laws of algebra
idk how much 🤷♂️
I hope its more than what they offer in Dutch at least
use triangle stuff
than its 90?
what is 90
you are asked to find the height of the building or what
how tall
motherfucker ping me one more time I dare you
what
can anyone help?
was this negative 12 gotten from these two numbers?
x / 45 = tan(45°) try to go from there
i didnt understand
do you know trig?
then its probably not the way they want you to solve it
thats 1st grade thing
they used integration by parts , now in the second part the derivative of (3t+5) is 3 and integral cos(t/4) is 4sin(t/4) so these two get multiplied to give you 12 ...check the formula for integration by parts to be more clear
maybe you can learn special right triangle first
yea
but its asking a resolution for me
a photo
of resolution
its in portuguese
but it dont say anything
yes
we have a scheme
you can use tan(theta) here
Hi! could someone have a look on a rather standard lwa of large numbers question I just posted?
https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/4186080/sum-of-centered-random-variables-with-finite-variance-converges-almost-surely
oih ok
Can someone help me, how would I solve
Solved
A question : do we have this assertion
When a sequence converge in L^p(0.T;X) implies the convergence in X!?
X is a banach space
Can somebody please help with this
I tried looking in different places I thought that would be a very common question
use binomial theorem
I am unsure how to use binomial theorem, could you please explain?
$(a+b)^n=\sum_{i=0}^n\binom{n}{i}a^ib^{n-i}$
Mosh
That's useful thanks
Can someone tell me how to calculate this? I think I’m supposed to use LCM but I don’t know how to do it. If anyone can do it explain it to me.
,rotate
deal with the signs first
whats 1+1-1+10
hey. i recently learnt that the polar form of i = 1[cos(pi/2) + i.sin(pi/2)]
can some one explain how we got pi/2 ?
pi/2 is the number in (-pi; +pi] such that cos(pi/2) = 0 and sin(pi/2) = 1
What is the foundations of all mathematics I’ve been currently learning a little bit of category theory and think it’s the foundations of all mathematics although I’m not sure
nvm ill go to a different channel ig
Set theory is the usual foundation
Set theory but what about the thing where a set inside of a set paradox?
that was why sets were redefined from Cantor's original one
In regards to your original question - why does that matter?
Some things can't be sets. Doesn't mean they still aren't a useful foundation
Because I wanna learn math from the ground up ive still learned a few subjects other than category theory and appreciate them but they seem a little specific
But you bring up an interesting new question, that basic set theory seems to have issues. We do fix them with a better version of set theory
I like to read math in very constructive way like building definitions but you have to know the most basic roots to construct it I remember one guy saying if I wanna learn to bake a cake I would have to learn to construct the entire universe first
that's stupid, ill just say it
Learn cosmology to pour flour into a bowl
I’m not interested in natural sciences more of a formal sciences
Am I typing the command to solve this matrix the wrong way? I'm getting something different than on the example here
well the stuff on the right isnt complete
since the augmented matrix isnt [I|b]
wdym by [I|b], and it's not complete? The matrices is for irreducible partial fraction decomposition, and i've been solving matrices with a calculator the entire time
the handwritten work is not complete
the 3x3 matrix is not the identity matrix
the calculator is right, the written work is right but incomplete, if you finished it you would get the same answer
They are lol
I'm pretty sure they are too
Rule out the ones with division
Because of 0?
Yes
? why
But the other statements are always true over R
What about the third and fifth option?
If the denominators are zero, then both are undefined, but the statement is still true
Yeah 0 was the only counter example I could think of
All are true
You cant set undefined expressions equal to each other
Not over R at least
[I|b] means the identity matrix augmented with a constant vector, and the working on the right is incomplete cause it's not the identity matrix
Which is presumably the domain
To be fair, there is nothing saying they are on R either lol, it just says they are equal
So I think it's very fair to assume all expressions are defined
Not really
Given the level of this question i doubt youd be dealing with the extended reals or some wheel math
I agree with AMD but what about the other expressions? Im pretty sure those are definitely true
Fair lol but you could just be dealing with R / {0} in the cases where 0 causes them to be undefined
Either way, the question is just stupid and not well defined
Imo
I agree
If we assume we are working with R and the standard arithmetic operations, which we most likely are, then all (except the division ones in the cases of zeros) should be true
find the LCM after dealing with the signs.
3/7 - 6/11 - 8/11 + 5/22
the LCM of 7, 11, 21, 22 is 462 (21*22)
198/462 - 252/462 - 176/462 + 105/462
put them all over 462 to help simplify.
(198 - 252 - 176 + 105)/462 = -125/462
So it's a bad question
Okay, thanks man. Appreciate it
For example, take the fifth option, which should give us the left hand side as
$$x-y=x-x=0$$
and the right hand side as
$$y-x=x-x=0$$
and as we OBVIOUSLY have
$$0=0$$
it is true
Lorago
The fact that it is marked as incorrect is just wrong
You should tell you teacher/professor that their questions in wrong lol
I dont have the origin of the question a friend sent to me and I was like wtf
oh
If not teach me how
looks good
oh ok
Yea, you understand what's being presented so far. Good job!
thx
Only thing I recommend is for you to switch the first semi-colon in (iii) for a comma. That way the way you answer things are consistent
thx
(e^x)(1-x)-1=0 how do u solve this? (changed again)
e^(x(x-1)) = 1
no
oh thanks
now its right
I know x=0 is solution, but i dont know how to see if there are others
i was gonna say i knew a solution but couldn't prove it was all
Ok if it's that one it's a bit easier iirc
?
pao was but hopefully we can finish off soon
Your question also seems quite simple if it's a case of the textbook being wrong
It should be y = -x + 1
but when u calculate 2nd derivative, u have f''=-(e^x)(1+x), which is only zero for x=-1, not x=0
why must second derivative be 0?
because its a maximum, no?
The first derivative is 0 at a maximum, and the second derivative is either negative or 0
But anyways, this is for local maximum
If you want global maximum, you can show that the function always decreases outside some range
hmmmm
So you find all the maxima within some range and pick the maximum one from there, and show the derivative is positive before that range and negative after that range, and then you have proof it's the maximum
-xe^x is always negative after 0 and always positive before it for example
How would I solve
TheMane3
Have you been taught the Raphson method?
isnt there also that p,q method
Guess?
rational root?
ye
how do i guess/do rational root? 😅
i mean the real answer is just use a calculator, but rational root is easy enough here
I don't know what algebra 2 is, but if you've just been taught long division, they probably want you to guess
i forgot how to do it though lol
bruh
but i would need to set x as something right
that makes it a lot easier
just graph it
all the rational roots are between -4 and 4
so it should be easy enough to find
,w x^5+x^4-x^3-4x^2-2x+4=0
how do i zoom in to my calculator to see the x intercepts?
Depends what calculator you have
thanks!
like an actual led screen
bunny: it's -x^3 btw
Ah thanks
ah yes what a nice looking solution
I mean not that horrible
i was talking about the third one
and the complex ones for that matter
but idk how you would possibly find sqrt(2)
obviously rational root thm doesn't work since nothing there is rational
Move the cursor to where you want to zoom and press enter
there's also a function that finds the roots
I think you can factorise it into a quadratic and a cubic
I'll check though
i don't have my calculator, but it's like the 4th? button on the top row
,w factorise x^5+x^4-x^3-4x^2-2x+4
hmmm
Well either i divide it by hand or
Ye
how do i do long division with polynomials
don't worry
ik what synthetic divison is but not long divison
even then the cubic is unsolvable too (for humans)
The only use is if they told you there were integer solutions
im zooming into my graph but i can never get y = 0 so i can look at x
the closest i get to is y = 1e-8
why are you zooming in
to see the x intercepts
it should just look like this
yeah
from my calculator
theres a calculator function for that
can you send an imagine of your calc by any chance
sure
i dont remember and i dont own a TI anymor
If is the radius of circle 1 and R of circle 2, and nr=R, what distance will circle one make traveling on circle two when it revolves once?
Newton raphson hehe
It looks the same as it does on desmos
don't shoot me
Now what
then you have to set the left and right bounds on the graph
What is that
so first pick a location just to the left of the first root on the graph
oh the graph
then pick one slightly to the right
then it will tell you the root
you can use arrow keys to move them
oh then you have to make a guess too
Well it’s moving me across the line
here i found a tutorial
pick a point as close to the root as you can
x = 0.81053571
:0
to get the other two
woahhhh
thats cool
my teacher is asking if there are any multiplicities
whats that
oh so if there are two identical roots?
yes
ahhh ty
well 2 or more
right
@slate monolith if they're opposite they're not multiplicities id assume right
x = (-1.41, 0) and x = (1.41, 0) in my case
they are not
oh ok
ty for showing me the trace thing
thats really cool
how do i find relative minimums and maximums though?
yes they have to be the exact same value
calculus
idk calc....
well u can find the vertex if its a quadratric
thats basically it
vertex is max/min depending on concavity
its a polynomial function tho not a quadratic 😭
are u given the graph
yes
she wants us to write out tho
show the q
we have to use our calculator
not desmos
without calc u cant
oh dang
ask them
the derivative of tanh is 1/cosh^2, so can I just do 1/(cosh 4)^2?
1/745.74 wasn't correct, so I'm not sure how else to do it
but why would you take the derivative of tanh(x)?
is that not how you find the area of a region bounded by a function?
it is not
you're mixing up derivatives and integrals.
what you need here is $\int_0^4 \tanh(x) \dd{x}$
Ann
... that would explain a lot
okay, thanks!
side question, does cosh^2 x = (cosh x)^2?
yes that's what the notation cosh^2(x) means
post your question @steel bronze
oh I see
in that case, I'm going to post another question if no one minds...
for this one, wouldn't it just be the integral of cosh x? since cosh^2 x - sinh^2 x = 1, then can I make the integrand cosh x / cosh^2 x?
the integral of **1/**cosh(x), if you insist
but there's a reason they write it that way
oh, why? my professor didn't go in depth on this
you can make a substitution that makes the integral reasier to calculate
u := sinh(x)
ohhh, so it becomes 1/1+u^2?
wait, isn't that the derivative of inverse tangent?
would it be tan^-1 (sinh x)?
parentheses.
oops, uh, 1/(1+u^2)?
yes
Ann can you help?
just ask
use sin to find the vertical distance
15m and 21 degrees
go from there
Do i put sin x (15) 21
what is sin
why is there a random x?
Its times
what are you multiplying..?
Wdym whats sin do you want me to explain socatoah and the sin rule
and * means times in type
im asking u to explain it
yes
what is sin the ratio of
Idk thats why im here mayn😭
Of
that's the vertical segment, yes
Trying to learn polynomials for my free time and I got this question on a paper I found.
The question was if x - 2 was a factor of 3x^3 - ax^2 - 6x + 8
Find a and the remaining factors.
I got a by putting x = 2 into the equation (from x - 2 = 0). I'm not sure how I identify or even get the 'other' factors
divide P(x) by x-2
then factor that quadratic
Oh I see
Is there a long division method for this? Been most comfortable using that
Nvm found it
you use long/synthetic division to divide polynomials.. yeah
i'd never used long division for algebraic expressions ;-;
But I just got it!
3x^2 + x - 4
and then factorise I got (3x+4)(x-1) which is the expected answer
but which identity
double angle
sin^2(x)+cos^2(x) = 1
expand cos(a+a) then work from there
dont use it
use the sin(2a)
u legit dont need cos(2a)
actually you need it at the end if you want it to be fully simplified
Hello Guys, i want to start learning math from very bigginig level, what do you recommend from where i should start learning, in the way that i can see real use in science or everyday life, i want to learn than calculus
what grade are u in now
Eyo I need some help
eee
What do I do after this 0 = √3 - x² + 7x - 1?
Or I did something wrong in the beginning
yeah
what grade math is that?
9th
(2 sqrt(3))^2 == 2^2 x sqrt(3)^2
I studied scholl, but not well, and i want to start from beggining
so basic algebra?
So, I got 12 in the right
i would honestly just go through khan academy until you get to calc
which is that -12
be more specific
how old are u
I am confused
guys how to proof limit when x goes to 0 of xLn(x) without using hopital???
(バカ) baka
I am 24
dont
huh
what?
well you cant use lhopitals rule
i cant think of anything else
ofc u can
I now this one but i don't want to use hopital
well yeah
xln(x) has to change, but he doesn't want to use lhopitals
hmm
well idk then
google it
@sage jacinth So the thing that I did wrong was the first line ye?
wolfram probably just uses lhopital
yea you are supposed to end up with x^2-7x=0 after subtracting the right hand side
k thanks
gimme a minute rq
didn't find any answer to it 🥲
I usually proof limits without using hopital in case of 0/0 because it's just the derivative of the upper function
@slate monolith any suggestions
solve for x
factorize with x
Alright, lemme get the delta first
how are u 24
also have you guys seen MSolved Tutoring?
Never heard of him
lmao
to prove that x^x goes to 1 you need the first limit
I forgot how I factorize with x for only a + b = 0
well it's 0^0 which means math error😂
yea and the graph is wrong
x(x-7)
Mk
you just remove the x
did u try it yet
well i know the answer already
;-;
im pretty sure its just d
Why you say that?
Hey hey hey i wanted HIM to explain
did u just assume their gender
It is A
i get why y<0
it's d
No its A
it could be both
i have the explanation for it as well
but why is x<y?
d does not take into account that x and y cannot be 0
well yes but
can someone please help me with expanding brackets i learnt it long ago and ive kinda forgotten everything
google is a thing but np
i would have never thought about it that way
I know
lol
I just don't know where to start from
i have so many more of these math riddles
can show us another one?
thx
@hushed pasture for your limit i think u can use squeeze theorem
lnx<x for all positive x so you can write 0<xlnx<x^2 and apply the limit to see 0<xlnx<0
anyone good with calculus?
i like this one man thank you very much, i stuck in it during the exam, i tryna proof because i wasn't sure about it but this one is such a good proof
no problem 🙂
i think its F
Wrong.
Its just D
oh
Fucntions that are netiher odd or even show no symmetry whatsoever
Yep
and thats the only oen that fits that
but
oh god i have my maths test tommorow
i mean if u want to sure
ty
thunderstorm here
are there multiple answers for this riddle?
Nope, only one letter is correct
tell me why you think its c
oh god i can't remember what ive done since the beginning of the year nononnonononnonono
because y is a functino of x
in B y isnt a functION OF X
in B, x is the function of y
D and A arent function
idk what A and D are but all i know is that they aren't functions
only C was a correct functino
E i didnt try to figure out what it was
because C sounded the most correct to me
The phrase y i s afunction of x means that the value of y depends upon the value of x
woah
are you sure
mhm
c is your final answer
yes
https://www.chegg.com/homework-help/questions-and-answers/imagine-taking-hershey-kiss-cutting-half-placing-half-kiss-coordinate-grid-flat-wide-base--q58971304
could someone explain to me why the function y has the power to the 4 please?
33°
i dont understand english terms
2pi . r
can you help me @cunning robin ?
4pi*(2)^(1/2) so d
sure wait
thanks bro
since bd bisects the angle ABC, it means ABD + CBD = ABC
dont tell them answers give them hints so they learn how to do it themselves
ahh okk mb
so what woukd the degrees be?
@cunning robin
help
help
pls
Autocorrelation function question!
I'm trying to find the autocorrelation in a time series of dihedral values (0 to 360 degrees)
I wrote myself some Fortran to do it on reals following https://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/eda/section3/eda35c.htm
But that's for reals. What changes do I need to make this work for angles?
(Code here https://pastebin.com/h2JV5CaG)
I dont really understand the question here, can someone help me wrap my head around it and where to start please, thanks
What is the limit process for derivatives?
Thank you
Mixing notation 
wut
Mosh
its called googling
i didnt make it
ah
yes.
thats correct my child
could someone please explain me the second part?
I don't understand how it goes from P(GS n PP) to P(PP | GS) * P(GS)
help im dumb! anybody able to help me figure out what i need
some way to take the "U" numbers and enter a formular to get the "Y" numbers
v and w are a fraction of U
y = 1/u
ℝamonov
that looks wrong
it's one of the most common exponent laws
I am stuck
this
yes those aren't equal
is the notation I sent not the first one?
but that's not what you have in your question
oh ok
@velvet pulsarmatic
are those
when you applied binomial theorem invisible to you
Comma not -
,rotate
is this working right
Guys how I can solve this
@frosty cloak Sorry, this channel is busy. Please see the rules and tips for getting help in #❓how-to-get-help.
Based on this ( BEEKEEPERS KEEP BEES ) and I need to count total numbers of bits required to encode the text using the three that was built first
@woven flume One problem is that a negative sign inside a power should remain inside the power. You should have (-3)^r.
and you messed up (-3/x)^4
how so




