#help-0
1 messages ยท Page 676 of 1
A bus travels 40kms in 30 minutes. If the speed of the bus remains same, how far can it travel in 3hrs?
find out in 1 minute
wait
?
No this is direct variation
yeah
i am doing tabulation form
i did 30/40 = 3/x answer came 4
convert hours into minutes
180
,calc 180*40
Result:
7200
30/40=180/x
how do i solve arcsin x - arccos x =0
80 km?
um you did it wrong
you can do either way
get this much?
A work force of 420 men with a contractor can finish a certain piece of work in 9 months. How many extra men must he employ to complete the job in 7 months?
@alpine sable
i got 240
its wrong again
BRUH WHAT DO U MEAN
oh sorry
read the question wrong
Idk if this helps explain it
answer is correct
i guess
A work force of 420 men with a contractor can finish a certain piece of work in 9 months. How many extra men must he employ to complete the job in 7 months?
yeah its wrong
tell the number
so if we put 420= x1
9=y1
y2=7
and need to find x2
lol
Well quickly practice the stuff you don't know
and post here for help
aight
so we get (420x9)/7=x2
where did 420 and 9 came from
oh 3rd question
this one
i have to go, so you'll get x2= 540, and since it asked for how many extra men you'll get 120 .@alpine sable
,calc 420*9
Result:
3780
,calc 3780/7
Result:
540
so x2= 540?
by x2 do you mean 2*x or like x squared
@twin haven x2= 540?
...
its
31.4159 aprrox
Option B in your case
wtf
No
By option b i mean the second one sorry
the 31.4mm
Yes
If you do the maths it will spit out 31.4
Wait
Is this an exam?
<@&268886789983436800>
Sorry bud that's against the rules
b&
Thanks mate ๐
lmao can someone help with this im baffled
it equals 2
so x^2
x^2 = 16
you can either use logarithmic or square root to solve
so blurry
ikr
what's that thing under the root
ok pog
in this context i means "is divisible by:"
oh fair
and the condition implies that n is also an integer
Probably, it means prove 10^n + 18n - 28 is divisible by 27 for all natural numbers N
that looks more like x than 4
note the font used for x
im referring to the radicand
yeah
Should have used LaTeX.
hey
so
dont really understand what they want me to do hear
im just learning vectors
i know what the triangle law of addition is
its just vector1 + vector2
and then we get the resultant vector
ye i know whaat you mean, but according to the book AC + CD = AD was one of the solutions
i know that if the vector goes down its like a minus
but idk why they say it is
so what you mean is that i cant add AC + BC = AB ?
you can
because the arrow is goig to the same direction?
because according to the triangle rule, the resulted vector is not AB
two magnitudes going against eachother?
im not sure redundant is a good word
no thats not the problem
the problem is that when they added, they result in another vector thats not vector AB
you have to follow according to the triangle rule
in my country there is also another rule which is also called the parallelogram rule, im not sure if you have this in your country
but im confused how it doesnt result in another vector that is AB
triangle law, but clever
...
Join Vectors from head to tail
Ok there is something i must have missed learning this
like i said you have to follow the triangle rule
you'll have to shift bc further to join tail of BC to head of AC
if you want to add AC and BC, you have to translate BC such that the head of AC meets the tail of BC
or if you know the parallelogram rule, or whatever its called idek, you can see that vector BC is also vector AD
so AC+BC=AC+AD
and acoording to the parallelogram rule, the resulting vector is the diagonal of the parallelogram with sides AC and AD
I see
ajuze
doesnt this mean that there are no critical points cuz the gradient is never 0?
resolved
does a right angle triangle always have the opposites and adjacent side the same for hypotenuse. like how if you have a hypotenuse of 5 the other sides are 3 and 4. is it always 3 and 4 or could there be any other combination to make 5
a hypotenuse doesn't have an adjacent or opposite SIDE, but it does have an opposite ANGLE
nope, that would mean the right angle would be adjusted so u can have different lengths
damn
hence no more right triangle
it is blurry
diagram kinda scuffed though
yh
PQ is 50m
OQR is 30 degrees
OPR is 60 degrees
and POR, QOR and POQ are 90 degrees
angle of elevation is different from angle of depression
yes but you will end up with the same three triangles
hence not changing the value of OR and the other triangles
just the orientation would change
and why is it an angle of depression
the questions says angle of elevation
yeah the wording is just bad
angle of elevation from P to the top of the tower is 60ยฐ
i actually only need a 2d diagram for this
what is R in the diagram for?
the top of the tower
oh
wait nvm
RPO = 60
RQO = 30
i was confused by the diagram
yh mb
i get it now
shit camera
what angles did u write at the top?
30 and 60 since angle sum of triangle
and the triangles are all right angle
could we maybe use trig
since its the special trig triangles
How 
questions says to express answer in exact form with a rational denominator
well
i did 15 x 6
cross multiplication
care appropriate grouping symbols i.e. (a-15)/a
Who wants to take a guess at what I am trying to solve.
too blurry
Really?
honestly i panicked and did random shit till i found the answer
idk, some ellipse equation
5 minutes due assignment lol
Nu
wat is it?
cure 2 cancer
beats me
There is none
I mean there is, but you probably won't like it
Ahhh
$[f(g(x))]' = f'(g(x)) \cdot g'(x)$
TC159
@alpine sable anything else? ๐
basically
f(g(x)) is the composite function
$[(f \circ g)(x)]' = (f' \circ g)(x) \cdot g'(x)$
TC159
Maybe you understand better with this notation?
f'(g(x)) = the derivative of f evalulated at g(x)
it's not the derivative of f after g
$[f(g(x))]' = f'(g(x)) \cdot g'(x)$
TC159
Anyway this is basically it, If you want i can give you a simple proof by definition
The derivative of the composite function
the derivative of: the composite function: f after g
the derivative of: f evaluated at g(x)
All of these are equivalent, choose the one that you prefer ^^
$h(x) \coloneqq f(g(x))$
TC159
$h'(x) = \lim_{\delta \to 0} \frac{h(x+ \delta) - h(x)}{\delta}$
TC159
69420
$\Delta y = y_2 - y_1 \ \Delta x = x_2 - x_1$
TC159
If there's a function f such that y = f(x)
69420
That's actually wrong
That's a wrong definition
You can't take the absolute value
Yes, but you can't take the absolute value
because the quotient of two positive values is always positive
and the derivative can be negative at a point
Who taught you that definition?
Anyway, in calc 1, y is often times an image of x through some function f
so we can rewrite that as $\Delta y = f(x_2) - f(x_1)$
TC159
So you have $f'(x) = \lim_{\Delta x \to 0} \frac{f(x_2) - f(x_1)}{x_2 - x_1}$
TC159
Exactly
69420
let's now make a change of variable since x_2 - x_1 -> 0 doesn't make much sense
since you have 2 variables
$\delta \coloneqq x_2 - x_1 \iff x_2 = x_1 + \delta$
TC159
Alright cool?
so you have that
$f'(x_1) = \lim_{\delta \to 0} \frac{f(x_1 + \delta) - f(x_1)}{\delta}$
TC159
substitute x_1 for an arbitrary value (x) and you have:
$f'(x) = \lim_{\delta \to 0} \frac{f(x + \delta) - f(x)}{\delta}$
TC159
Basically
Can anyone explain me what is that
definition of derivative at a point
in this case the derivative of f at point x
$\frac{\dd}{\dd x} f(x)$
TC159
Find the first term, formula of the nth term and the 20th term of these
a.5,10,15,20
b.2,-1,-4,7
c.3,6,9,12โ
What d u guys think, is this arithmetic sequence or gemetric sequence? I think this is arithmetic
This is arithmetic
Ok thanks
ok firstly, dont ping instantly
wait for 15 minutes, then ping once
also, in this question
what do you think we should do?
or what do we have to do?
can anyone help me with this, its a complex number equation
? 
just know that complex equations or expressions include i, or the imaginary unit, which is equal to sqrt(-1)
should i use the root of a complex number formula
just manipulate the equation
z^2=-1
yep and then
and then countinue?
root both sides
on left side get z only
on the right side i get real part and imaginary part?
that means z=sqrt(-1)
ah sorry, my bad, i forgot that rule /gen
now use the definition of the imaginary unit
and find the squared root with these formulas
i ended up solving it myself!
#โhow-to-get-help: 3. Stick to one channel and don't post the same question in multiple channels.
you dont really have to-
sqrt(-1)=i
its as simple as that-
im on university so its kinda weird for me that its as simple as that
well, thats awesome!
huh
thanks for the help
the real part is 0, the imaginary part is 1i
maybe this is what u wanted
probably, it just says solve the equation
<@&286206848099549185> Can someone explain me on dm
Yes
yep
all I want is a definition
when n=1 you get f(1) = f(1-1) + 5 = f(0) + 5 = 6+5 = 11
this
since u were given a recursive formula use it to get the next few terms
please
then u'll be able to find the difference d between each term @gray wind
if an integer is even it can be written as 2k for some integer k. You can reduce the problem to some relatively simple casework from there.
$$y^3<50$$ $$y_{max}=2$$
$$x^2<50$$ $$x_{max}=6$$
$$c<50$$ $$c_{max}=50$$
I can explain further from there I recognise that was very vague
Hyl1s
I don't know how to write <= in latex
\leq
not sure if you got my point
its not 25*3 since that assumes that every possible combination of values for a, b, c is a soln
for instance, 2^3+6^2+24>50
Not sure what you mean by that. You've got the right direction in finding bounds but the process there is to find a bound on a, then do casework from there
and it would be simplified quite a bit by the first thing i told you
what i mean by this is that a=2 implies that b=2, 4, or 6(8+b^2+c<=50 implies b^2+c<=42 therefore b can't be above 6 or we would pass 42). count the amount of possibilities each of these cases.
I got stuck with a question , can someone help me?
Given a circle with radius x cm, what is the maximum number of equilateral triangles of side length 1 cm that can fit in the circle without overlapping or overflowing the circle? x is an integer.
are you looking for the upper bound or the maximum triangles that can fit in a circle
because I have no idea how to solve the latter.
maximium triangles that can fit in
if x=1-t how does dx/dt = -1
yes
yeah,how
it's a line with slope -1
i think im doing somethingreallystupid but i dont get it
i mean i dont udnerstsnad how they got there
so you've never done a derivative before..?
yea
$\dv{x}x^n=nx^{n-1}$ you've never seen this?
Mosh
uh i dont think i have, or maybe i ahve and i've forgotten it, im just getting bakc into math
i just googled it and i found the same thing
ok well they just applied power rule.. or like I said, it's a line with slope -1
a programming question about mathematics
Quick statistics question... what is the danger of using a z test with a small sample size?
what have you tried?
18 : 15
30 : ?
it says 30 in the pic bro
if you do it with 30 you should get the right answer
quadratic equation on all 3, at least one of the discriminants had to be 0
you can assume one is negative to show one of the other is true for each
o ok
how is the transformation invariant in x axis when it maps 0 to 3
does it mean that if a point is on the x axis it will stay in the x axis?
yes, the x axis doesn't vary
so if it's on 1,0 it won't ever get mapped to anything other than 0 on the y = 0 right?
is it a test?
? nah this is just a homework thing for an online course I am doing
ok.. and yes, [0,1] -> [0,1]
you're writing in the form [x,y] right?
im writing a coordinate vector, yes
[x,0] -> [whatever, 0] right?
$[1,0]\to [1,0]$
Mosh
bro we don't/can't know that
A runner starts running directly west from her home for 7.2 km. Then, she runs N20ยฐE for 6km.
After that, she decides to run directly home. How long will it take her if she jogs at 3km/h? (
bro occuppied
does someone know how to even approach the limit of this series?
can't use lhopital rule
Hyl1s
iam solving a differential equation for my exam and came across this, i have solved this kind of problem using z-transform and initial conditions before but, where only one variable is there, here there is a relation between x and y like 2xn+1=yn, iam not sure how to solve it...can someone help? (its okay if u can only help with second question)
where is n approaching?
+infinite
well, how will you solve 1 - (+infinity)?
1-(infinite) will be -infinity
All right, I am doing these types of things and it's a bit confusing
So this is an established rule, this is an accepted solution?
That is correct
That I do not know
Guys, if anyone can clarify, what is the value of n - (+infinity) were n > 0
what is the point of intercetion between y= 2.5x -3 and 2.5x + 27
Are you sure it is exatcly like that? It doesnโt have an elementary antiderivative (it contains erf function)
@hasty seal Ok!
it's question #8...
Yep sounds like it wants you to use graphing tools and not actually find the antiderivative
@uncut depot -(1^2) is not the same as (-1)^2
how
first one is -(1^2) which is -(1*1) = -(1) = -1 and second one is (-1)(-1) = 1
,w integral from -2 to 0.3863 e^(-t^2) dt
si
thanks !!!!
Hello can anybody help me? I am pretty confused
find the roots of the quadratic
then you can figure out between which roots is negative and which is positivr
What do I need to know to understand what this is saying? Seems like Looks like this involves differential equations (as it mentions), linear algebra (from rank), and discrete math in it being described as surjective. I've taken all three before but I can't seem to piece together this definition.
Assuming bolded means vector:
q.. = f(q, q. , u, t)
implies that you have something like this:
Acceleration = Control vector * (Position vector * time + Velocity * time)
But that seems like a nonsensical result, so what is it trying to say here?
hey anyone has any knowledge on fetch execute cycle?
affine is sort of advanced linear algebra
it just means linear+constant
so like v=Ax is linear, v=Ax+b is affine
the sentence does say "as we will see", so you don't have to understand why right now
t
,rotate
where tf did -3421 come from on the left side?
Same problems different solutions....
how is 28+400 equal to -3421?
It's -342 \ :-6
ok, how is 28+400=-342?
-400
you add 400 to both sides...
like how you subtracted 28 from both sides on the right side..
The problem is with the right side
the right side is correct
the left side has bullshit
the right side obeys all the rules and does math correctly
What is the problem with the left?
28+400 is not -342
It's not 400 it's -400
you add 400 to both sides to isolate for -6y
What I did wrong?
Mosh
28+-400 is -372
Mosh
What is this
So what will cancel both of them?
adding 400 to both sides...
alright
We in the middle
@glass lichen
you dont need to ping me. . .
What i did wrong in the left side?
damn beef
When I put this to photo math it's say that y is 62
u just add the values together so all the f values and g values are together @bleak meadow
the channel is still in use
what does that mean
that's plain english
does it mean i canโt say things
kk ty
sorry @glass lichen
it was my fault
?
(-20)^2
not -20^2. . . .
this is why you give all the information instead of an oddshot of the problem
(-20,62) is one of the solutions to that system
Lemme try
can i get some help on this... its more a meme than an equation but it would help me out a lot doing this, for a friend btw ๐ณ
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/680928395399266314/856947283688685665/dbd600c869e4e89bea2c51e640254a10.jpg
(-20)^2 and -20^2
Or, if you meant the difference b/w (-20)^2 and 20^2...
yeah say what you mean then
Sorry
if anybody has a solution dm me
$(-20)^2=(-20)(-20)=400 \ -20^2=-(20)(20)=-400$
Mosh
you don't deserve the sauce.
then solve it yourself.
what are you supposed to do with 5 different numbers
x takes on 5 different values I believe
the third line isn't even an equation
it's an expression
I have no idea what you're trying to do.

the smut artist missed a parenthesis
Can I visualize or plot this function?
f(x) = (a/16)*0.85+(25*0.6*b*((25/99)*((100-c)/100)))
I can't find a website to see how this function looks. Is there another way to do this?
@alpine sable That looks like a constant function.
It probably is now that I look at it
Is it possible to change it slightly so it could be plotted in some way?
You could fill in a, b, and c.
You can also do a 4D plot somehow where the axes are a, b, c, and the result of the function.
Yes, that's exactly what I want! Would I have to program that myself? @oak chasm
sorry to bother but i was wondering if im allowed to ask for an explanation for a question thats in my summer work?
as long as its not academic dishonesty it should be ok
it isnt but it is a question on my assignment
cause i cant remember from class, last time we did this was in first quarter
sure just post your problem and some1 can probably help you
Hey! Just wondering how I would go about solving a question like this?
(It's practice btw, not a test!)
a_n=7n+4 is just a function with domain natural/whole numbers so you would have for example a_1=7*1+4
yes
can anyone help?
<@&286206848099549185>
1 and 3 are opposite angles
how do i go about solving that though?
opposite angles are equal...
I know that, but how do I prove using the expressions that angle 1 is 10 degrees?
solve the equation you get..
start by correlating the values to the picture of the diagram, then apply the principles of opposite angles to solve for x. the rest should just be some brainwork
cant explain well cause im bad at that but hopefully that helps
alright back to slaving away
Hi , I need to solve this question with steps and comment steps does anyone have any ideas
can you please help me
why is it asking for 4 decimal places then down to 2 tho
I used it, but there are some deficiencies in my solution according to what the teacher wanted
$(g+f)(2)=g(2)+f(2)$
Mosh
So itโs 2?
no
Or 4
yes
(f-g)(x) = f(x) - g(x)
can someone help me please
c?
no
But when I calculate it myself, I get -768
,w -24-16(-2)/6^2/9
its because that division sign in the problem is garbage
and its unclear what it means
,w -24 - 16(-2) * 1/(36)*(1/9)
stop guessing, show your work
ur multiplying all the terms when you shouldnt be
-24-26(-2) = 0 minus 24 minus (26 times negative 2)
idk what im suppose to start from
My question is the top part
,w (-24-16(-2))
no i dont understand it
thats the top part
its just the definition of (f-g)(x)
yes
then you have -24 + 32
yw but you need to understand why you cant just multiply those
the way I do it in my head is
-24 - (16*-2) = -24-(-32) = -24 + 32
that way you make sure you dont miss the negatives or anything
Alrighty, thanks
"input it"?
How to solve 8x < 7x
there are no solutions of x
divide both sides by x to get 8 < 7
and since 8 is never less than 7, thats clearly false
how u do it bunny
x cannot be negative ?
It's an inequality bunny
yeah i realized that right after i sent it lul
Regarding this, I'm having a big brain fart right now.. would -16(-2) not be positive??
yeah ok subtract 7x from each side x < 0
my bad first, i forgot multiplying by negative numbers flipped the sign on inequalities
is it possible to find one unknown side of an isoceles triangle given only the length of the two equal sides?
this is the question in particular
8?
c2 = a2 + b2
i did try that but i get a decimal
im thinking that its wrong
so i decided to ask here
if you guys think its fine then i will write it as my answer
Well if it is icoceles, that means that 2x+6.8=8x+1.4
x=0.9
which means the last side is 1.3416407865
that is the answer
The answer is a decimal
my last side is 12.16223664
assuming it is an icoseles triangle.
wat
where did 8.6 come from
2x+6.8=8x+1.4
O i see I dumb
O
i need help badly with some trigonometry ive been stuck on for nearly 3 hours
Good Luck
that's not even right, this may or may not be a right triangle
still don't multipost
you don't have enough information to solve for the third side, but you can solve for x
this has been an abhorrent experience and i wish this faulty server good luck
good bye
bye!
Honorable.
,w (1.9 * 10^-6)^2(5.6 * 10^2)^3
yep looks right
don't ping me
Srry
lol
lol
someone will be more prompted to help you if you explain what you do know
I donโt know how to start it
start the engine
hi! could anyone here help with econometrics / statistics? Not school-related and probably undergraduate-to-graduate level help needed
look up the polar equation for an ellipse
then you can find how the changes to your equation move the directrix or whatever
Oh
btw
im in 8th too
pretty much what i do for these questions are
- write out the equation
- figure out every way i can write it
- look at the options and click all of the ones that are on my list
I wasnโt focused during online section
I just see
A quick lesson on how to do it
Or a helper
"Getting even number from 1-10." that's an example of an outcome, right?
what, sorry?
We were asked to determine whether the sentence is an Experiment or an Outcome
@limpid spade
@alpine sable pls don't multipost
then which channel should i choose, cuz they are in diff category
#help-0 is general, #multivariable-calculus is specific. both are ok for this q but only pick one
ok i see
Can someone help me factor this y=-16x^2+280? I dont know how to find factors of huge numbers like that unless I go through dividing it by every number :((
you can start small - are there any small factors you can see common in both terms?
(also reply to my messages so i get ping'd)
(x+2)(xโ3)
how did u get that
wdym? I need help with finding what can factor
let's start small - do you see how 2 is a factor of both terms?
Wdym by both terms- Dont you just look for factors for c
let's start with a simpler example:
can you do y = 2x^2 + 10x + 12
erm I can try but im not familiar with factoring anything larger than 1 in front of a
okay, i'll go through that step by step then
okay
actually before that, can you factorise
y = 2x + 4
yeah hold on
lol im struggling I put (x+2)(x+2) but I checked it and its not right :/
oh wait
theres no a ๐ฎ
wait whatttt
right, because (x+2)(x+2) would give you a quadratic function, but 2x+4 is a linear function
so when i ask you to factorise 2x+4 i want it to be a constant (a number) times something
Oh I didnt even know you could factor a linear function
if i told you 2x+4 = 2(x+2), does that look familiar?
yeah
it might have been a while but you've definitely done something like that before
Thats linear?
yes
OH
knowing that, can you factorise 6x + 9?
How do i know gcf of 3x^3-9x^2 as the number above
we're doing a question here, ask in an empty room please
@ashen wave
do you think you can factorise y = 6x + 9?
Factoring doesn't always mean $$ax^2 +bx + c \rightarrow (x+a)(x+b)$$, it also means "pull" out the largest gcd from each term, if possible
dldh06
yes we're getting there
oh
no :/
do you see how 3 is common in both the terms "6x" and "9"?
because 3 is common to both terms, you can "pull it out" of the expression
so you divide 6x by 3 (to get 2x), and 9 by 3 (to get 3) and put the rest together:
6x + 9 = 3(2x+3)
does that make sense?
Yeah I guess
can you try 10x + 15?
I can try
i believe in you, just follow the method i described with 6x+9
๐ ๐ ๐
great, can you try the next one?
4a + 8b - 12
hint: ||check what's common to all three terms||
y=4a+8b-12=4(a+2b-3)
we are still using this room, please use another room
perfect! you even got the negative i snuck in there
lol xD
can you try:
16a + 32b - 48c
so this is wrong?
we are still using this room, please use another room
idk if I got this one right but is it 16a+32b-48c=16(a+2b-3c)?
oh @viral patio
Sorry I keep on forgetting to ping you
with that, do you think you can first pull out any constant terms in
y=-16x^2+280
and then you can try to factorise the quadratic part
ok Ill try
y=-16x^2+280=8(-2x^2+35)???
Can I get help next
great!
now that you have that - how familiar are you with using things like "completing the square" or "the quadratic equation", or "the difference of two squares"?
you don't need to ask, just post your question in an empty room - and only ping helpers after 15 mins
Kk
All you do is complete the square for both
erm I only am familiar with quadratic equations nothing more
3(2x + 3)
sorry didint notice i will
so if i asked you to factorise, say, x^2 - 2?
Yeah I can do that
I guess it depends on what you mean by factor
when I hear factor I think of the prime factors.
what about 2x^2 - 3? how would you factorise that?
@gleaming obsidian do you have a question? if so, ask in an empty room please, we're using this one
But in the real numbers you can divide anything by anything
because fractions are real numbers as well
I do
can I ask it?
ask in an e m p t y r o o m
@gleaming obsidian if so, ask in an empty room please, we're using this one
@ashen wave any update?
Anyone familiar with Lines and Planes? (Vectors)
if you have a question, just post it
Umm alright so i basically for Hw i got a chart that so far looks like this.
For the last column would it be the second point?
so usually when you want to solve a system of equations, you want to find some point (or multiple points) that satisfy ALL of the equations at once
it may be a bit tough to visual (because they're planes in 3d space) - but are there any such points?
Looks like this in 3-d
right, so are there any point or points that lie on ALL three planes?
Nope
so what does that tell you about the number of solutions?
One
you've just said that there are no points that lie on all three planes, but you've also said that there is one solution?
Wait non?
๐๐คฃ oops
so what is your answer?
great, anything else?
Umm there is one more similar equation but let me try it first
I will ping you

