#help-0
1 messages · Page 646 of 1
what is wrong here
what are the drop-down options for point A?
and most importantly, why does it have two contour lines passing through?
I dont know...
what really?
i would put 'not a critical point' but im honestly not sure
Can anybody tell me the formula to find the truing point (linear equations)
as far as i can tell, yes
the turning point of... what?
Oh idk
??
I just needed like a formula
a formula for what
do you know calculus?
No I’m in year 8
okay then you'll need the special case for parabolas
for y = Ax^2 + Bx + C, the turning point occurs at x = -B/(2A)
is the turning point the lowest or highest point?
then it should be -b/4a
im sure its the first option
why would it be -b/(4a)
((-b + d )/ 2a + (-b - d) / 2a )/2 right? @vale wigeon d = sqrt(b^2-4ac)
ahh, I realise my mistake
can i get some help with this problem im not sure if im doing it right
so far i have csc(2θ)=-2 and csc(2θ)=-3 but im not sure if its right or what to do next
Do you know the general solution for the equation sin(theta)=sin(alpha)?
no i dont think i know about sin(theta)=sin(alpha)
It's alright, try to convert this csc(2θ)=-2 into this form sinx=siny, then we will proceed from there
alright give me a second to figure it out
this was the answer btw
got it after a few guesses
what is $$d^3x/d^3y$$
toadmilk
what does it represent
you typed this wrong?
this channel is occupied
looks like it was meant to be third derivative
oh sorry I thought it was done
ah sorry alacris
is this right?
this one is for csc(2θ)=-2?
yes
i wasnt quite sure what to do with the 2 and then i was looking at a similar problem in my text book and i tried to do the same thing so im not really sure
Can you show your steps please?
You need to treat the 2theta as you normally treat a single theta. Then divide by 2 at the very last step
How's sin(2theta) = -2?
i meant to put csc(2theta)
Try again then
alright give me a second
The original question was cosec(2theta)=-2
I told them to convert it to sine form
sin(2pi) is still not 2
Please show all your steps
i dont know what to do with that my text book doesnt have any examples like that
yes i just dont know what to do with 1/sinx
@stable pecan can you help me
If 1/sinx = -2, then what is sinx=?
Post it in another (free) channel, I will be there
If sin x= sin y, then you can write x = nπ + (-1)^n y, If y ∈ [-π/2, π/2]
7π/6 doesn't belong in the interval [-π/2, π/2]
rewrite sin(7π/6) so that the angle inside sine belongs to the above interval
Otherwise correct
should it be pi/6 then?
yes
what is the part about the y
If you already have sin2theta =-1/2 you can just immediately find values for 2theta
yes
Writing it as -sin(pi/6) complicates things😅
But we need to find the general solution
oh so the pi/6 is equal to y?
which part
at the beginning
It will be -pi/6
Sorry, I missed the lack of negative sign there
Do you mean this - If sin x= sin y, then you can write x = nπ + (-1)^n y, If y ∈ [-π/2, π/2] ?
yes
Which part do you not understand?
Do you want to know why y has to belong in the interval [-π/2, π/2]?
Sketch the triangle with corners in (1, 1), (2, 1) and (1, 3) and parameterize its edge so that the points
are completed in the specified order.
can someone give the solution to this
would help a brother out
im confused about when you said sinx=siny and im also a little confused about the y in the interval
how would i do this?
wow 3 different questions in the space of a minute in one channel
im impressed
maybe use another one
If sinx = siny, then we know that x = nπ + (-1)^n y, right? That's what you did in the last step of your solution as well
can u help me
Please post in another channe;
you will need to rewrite sin(7π/6) so that the angle inside sine belongs to the interval [-pi/2,pi/2]
how can I find x so that 2x, 3x+1 and (x^2)+2 r the first 3 terms of an arithmetic sequence
how many three digit numbers in base 9 have the property that each digit increases by 1 when the number is converted to base 8?
wow is that 4 different questions ontop of the already ongoing one in like 10 minutes?
I'm impressed
is this better
use another channel, please
you too
sorry
yes
It's correct
I hope you can do csc(2θ)=-3 on your own now?
It's similar
yeah i think i can do that
yes
alright thanks
it says "simplify", polla
@alpine sable this is a matter of careful exponent manipulation
perhaps it'll help to rewrite all roots as fractional exponents
maybe even make a temporary substitution like x := sqrt(a) to make your own life a little easier
if you want, you can write ``$f(x) \to 1$ as $x \to 2$''
Ann
how do i find the exact value of cos (-19pi/6)
Student desmos scientific calculator on google
yeah i meant showing work and stuff
add a suitable integer multiple of 2pi to the angle so that it falls between 0 and 2pi
yes done that, got 5pi/6
then look at the unit circle
that is correct, 5pi/6 is exactly what you should be getting.
does converting it to degree help?
if it helps you then yes
so that's 210 degrees
yes
unit
Πολλά άτομα είναι
you want the sqrt to have an 18 under it instead of a 2
yeah
so find that sqrt(9) in 36 that makes the sqrt into sqrt(18)
It's easy, just multiply them
Πολλά άτομα είναι
well thats 6, not 36.
Well that's root 36
yeah no worries i was having trouble wording it in an easily parsable way in the first place
Πολλά άτομα είναι
ye
Πολλά άτομα είναι
yes.
Akhandanand Tripathi
k cool cheers
nw mate
easy is relative

What happens to the slope if you take the reciprocal of a function?
Assuming, it isn't 0
I knew what I wanted but didn't know how to do it
Okay
wym by the slope, as in for straight lines? If so, the recirpocal of a straight line isn't necessarily a straight line
if you're talking about the derivative of the reciprocal, you'd have to consult the chain rule
No, not a straight line necessarily
Any function
Yeah derivative
Well if the derivative of f(x) is f'(x), chain rule tells us that the derivative of 1/f(x) is -f'(x)/(f(x))^2
so its not really very clean
You used the division rule, right?
I wanted to prove it
Uh you can use the quotient rule for this but I used the chain rule
with the "outside" function being g(u)=1/u and the "inside" function being f(x)
Oh pretty smart.
Thanks
@jagged imp any way to prove the multiplication rule, using chain rule?
by multiplication rule you mean product rule(this)?
yep
might be a language barrier thing but i've never heard it called multiplication rule
anyway, its not proved with the chain rule
you have to do it from the definition of the derivative/first principles
Oh
there's another method too i just found, i can link you to a site with both methods if you like
Sure!
the other method than the limit definition is implicit/logarithmic differentiation if you wanted to try it yourself
In this section we prove several of the rules/formulas/properties of derivatives that we saw in Derivatives Chapter.
if you scroll down its listed under product rule
there's also khan academy or something along those lines if you'd prefer a video
nw mate
can someone help me make the venn diagram? I'm also confused on how to measure the percentage in part b for example, am I taking 36% of 43?
I think this is it?
any other ways to get the area of a circle than r x r x pi ?
$A=\pi \left(\frac d2\right)^2$ ?
PristineWolf
so A=Circumference x R:2 is not ok ?
what's R?
radius
no it's not okay
does it work ?
PristineWolf
cool
i misunderstood
no
-3/2 cos(2x),
but also, if all you wanted is an answer, you could've gone to wolfram alpha
try taking the derivative of $-\frac32 \cos(2x)$ and you'll see.
Ann
hopefully you will have enough sense not to claim that the derivative of cos(2x) is -sin(2).
the derivative of a composition is not the composition of the derivatives.
If you want to know how you’d do it, you use a u substitution u=2x, du = 2dx so 3sin(2x)dx
-> 3/2sin(u)du and then you just integrate sin(u)du normally
Some stuff js harder, if you do the y=2x substitution, it should be more clear
set the two functions equal to each other
that is, 6x - x^2 = x + 4
this is a quadratic and has 2 solutions, which are the values of x at which the curves intersect
you then evaluate either of the two functions at these 2 values of x to get the y coordinate (it doesn't matter which function, since the two are equal at these values of x)
this will yield 2 points of the form (x,y)
is this a calculus course?
ok
the area is an integral
you can integrate the difference of the two functions
and the integration limits are the x coordinates you just found
the y values are the functions
integrate top-bottom
due to the linearity of integration, yes
it is rather integral (f2 - f1), but as you said, you can split this into two integrals
hi guys
i'm solving this equation
2x + 2 -5 = 4x + 3
--- ---
6 6```
x = 31
-----
12
right?
$$2x+\frac26-5=4x+\frac36$$
heuwuernwufntmkiearsetnuyyyf
Do you mean this @marble seal ?
Still need help with this?
yes please
Lets move to another channel
yes
let @manic quail and @marble seal use this
okay what channel?
my answer is $$x=\frac3136
Could you please first tell me if the equation I wrote is the equation you meant?
yes
my answer is
x = 30
---
12
noiiiiiiiiice
That isn't your answer though 0.0
$$2x+\frac26-5=4x+\frac36 \ | \ -2x$$
$$\frac26-5=2x+\frac36 \ | \ - \frac36$$
$$-\frac16-5=2x \ | \ \times \frac12$$
$$x=\frac{-\frac{1}{6}-5}{2}$$
heuwuernwufntmkiearsetnuyyyf
and $$x=\frac{-\frac{1}{6}-5}{2} \Longleftrightarrow x=\frac{-1-30}{12}=\frac{-31}{12}$$
heuwuernwufntmkiearsetnuyyyf
why like this 😄
I solved the equation, what do you mean?
i solve it in easier way
Your solution was wrong though?
,rotate
oh my bad
,rotate
hahahhaha
,rotate
Okay, great, that's fine too.
ty 🙂
Hello, I got a question regarding a 3d world. I have 2 points. The point YOU are at, and the point you WANT to go to.
I get the distance in between these 2 points and I'll substitute it as D.
I would like to get the time it'd take to travel from point A to point B accounting for not only the X but also the Y
Right now I have
time = D / speed but I wanna also include the Y axis which this does not, how could I do such a thing?
that's the correct formula for constant speed
but it doesn't count for the Y axis, only X
it's the distance between the two points, i.e. for two points (x1, y1, z1), (x2, y2, z2) D = sqrt((x1-x2)^2+(y1-y2)^2+(z1-z2)^2)
so it takes all of the coordinates into account
np
can someone help me
(int from -inf to 230 (1/(sqrt(2pi)10)(e^((x-g)²/(210)))))=0.034
how can i get the average (g) out of this
its the gauss function
no, that's $z^{\frac{3}{2}}-a^{\frac{3}{2}} = \sqrt{z^3}-\sqrt{a^3}$$
Wew Lads Tbh
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
third try's the charm
@subtle mantle @lean gust thank you
somenone have a exemple test of math in english level (terminale or prepa ) last years of high school or first year of university in maths or physique
can i know the solution of this plz
write in paper it's not clear
x +10 15 - x 12 2x - 12
------ - ( --------- - ------- ) = -----------
6 3 2 18
ah
better?
yes
(x+10)/6-((15-x)/3-6) = (2x-12)/18
,calculate (x+10)/6-((15-x)/3-6) = (2x-12)/18
The following error occured while calculating:
Error: Invalid left hand side of assignment operator = (char 29)
😦
why - 108?
x=6
i did it + 108
wait
i haven'ta good computer
r u sure?
x +10 15 - x 12 2x - 12
------ - ( --------- - ------- ) = -----------
6 3 2 18
x +10 15 - x 12 2x - 12
------ - --------- + ------- = -----------
6 3 2 18
x +10 15 - x - 12 2x - 12
------ - --------- = ------- + -----------
6 3 2 18
where
oh u removed the bracket so the sign changed
continue plz
3x 3*(10) 3* (15) -3x - 3* ( 12 ) 2x 12
--- + --- - ----- ---- = ------- + ------ - ----- 36 3 6 3 3 2 18 18
tf is that formatting?
lol
3x 3*(10) 3* (15) -3x - 3* ( 12 ) 2x 12
--- + --- - ----- ---- = ------- + ------ - ----- 36 3 6 3 3 2 18 18
wait wait lemme stay more simple 😄
Okok
find x
want me to solve it ?
hi guys , can i just know how to solve this in a simple and step by step way? (please be simple)
2x - z = 4
3y + z = 2```
dont suggest breaking rules..
lol
sorry my bad
do you know linear algebra?
ie augmented matrices
I forgot it
wasnt asking you
nah
ok so from eqn 1, what's z?
Oh are they required to use matrices
again... im not asking you these questions
they said they didn't know Lin Al, so I'm just walking through subs
Ah right kk👍
From equation 1, $$z=5-x-y$$ this means that 1a into 2 and 3 gives $$2x-(5-x-y)=4$$ and $$3y+(5-x-y)=2$$
Mosh
what do you mean ?
find x in terms of z and y in terms of z and plug them into the first equation
from the two equations below
yo sorry if im interrupting something but is a horizontal compression by a factor of 1/2 the same as a horizontal stretch by a factor of 2
Can anyone help undestrand how should I work out the x-coordinate of G?
For the y-coordinate it's just a triangle but I cant figure out the relation between s and xG
tooooooooooooooo long
ooo ok thanks
yes
have you tried?
yes im just to stupid
not possible, explain how you've tried
This precalculus video tutorial provides a basic introduction into the gaussian elimination - a process that involves elementary row operations with 3x3 matrices which allows you to solve a system of linear equations with 3 variables. You need to convert the system of equations into an augmented matrix and use matrix row operations to write it ...
ty i need it
@dusk gazelle
let me know if u can help
I need to find the taylor series for the function and show that it converges. Could someone help with the approach?
I have found the taylor series of exp(t^3) but am unsure on how to continue from here.
Does integrating from 0 to t yield the desired taylor series?
I thought it was open. My bad. Thanks
is it resolved now
Oh so it is still me
ok
Okay; I have seen the example but I am still unsure since i integrate from 0 to x
and not 0 to 1
Isn't that the same as taking the indefinite integral and have c=0?
So just integrate each term of the taylor series of exp(t^3)
guys does anyone know how to do this?
what have you tried?
with or without are both fine
I solide it ×=6 but he didn't undrestand
Not quite. Here you want to integrate $\sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{t^{3n}}{n!}$ from 0 to x with respect to $t$.
dackid (jump king +)
So I am essentially integrating each term in the series
So I found to be the taylor series of exp(t^3).
Look at my series. They are the same thing
I see that now! So I can integrate directly in a sum?
@coral pagoda
Yep, mainly because the Maclaurin series for e^u is convergent for all u. So when u=t^3, the taylor series also converges.
is there anyway you can help me if i dm you something
No, this is the only problem I am helping with. I have other things to do today
k
That's why I found the Taylor Series in 0.5 seconds 
Okay so the whole problem is essentially this. The taylor series is given by the integral from 0 to t wrt x of the sum that you linked. Then I have to give an argument that the taylor series must converge to my function for all x
That's super easy to do. Just use the ratio test
To show that the taylor series must converge to my function for all x is the same as finding the radius of my taylor series to be infinity?
Indeed
Sure is! Happy to help mate
Correct
Can anyone help undestrand how should I work out the x-coordinate of G?
Can anyone help me understand how should I work out the x-coordinate of G?
For the y-coordinate it's just a triangle but I cant figure out the relation between s and xG.
It's a rotating half disk
does not really say anything apart from this
G is the barycenter of the disk
i can find it's y-coordinate just by tackign l-lsin\theta where l is the height of the line with A
but i cant seem do find anything for the x-coordinate
Anyone can do this?
@dense snow Is that a SAT mathlevel2 question?
I don't think so
oh my bad channel in use
any body?!1
Which channel can I use to ask questions ?....
36 I think
8²/100 is 64/100 that leaves remainder 36
N is 8 I believe
how about this
uh.. y 8^2?
np lol
no thats just gauss 8
why 8?
N is 41 because 129^2 mod 100 is 41
When I understand this right, then we have a 6x6 square in the middle to build the rectangles
Is the minimum relation of an equation the vertex?
Reflexive and Transitive
Not symmetric
@random crypt do you know what it's asking?
Uhh kinda
you're given the derivative factorized. critical numbers are when the derivative is zero, right?
Yeah
if you have a factorized polynomial of a single variable, how do you read off the roots?
nope, easier
I dont know.
this channel is taken
🥺my bad
@random crypt so if you have an expression like f(x) = (x+2)(x-3), if either of the terms in parenthesis is 0, the whole expression is zero, so you have a root
how would you make one of the terms in parenthesis equal to zero?
how do you pick x such that it sends (x+2) to zero
and how do you pick x such that it sends (x-3) to zero
both of those selections of x are roots
you're already given the factored expression
so the roots of f(x) = (x+2)(x-3) would be x=-2, x=3
make sense?
what are the roots of f(x) = (x+2)^4
5,-2,0
where'd you get that from
From the whole equation
oh that's your whole answer
Yeah
yep you got it
as easy as checking the definition of critical number
they're the roots of a derivative of a function, and you have the derivative of a function
so you have the answer
Ohhh that’s it ?...
yep 🙂
so when is a function increasing, given its derivative?
F>0
yep
Ok
from roots of the derivative, you know the endpoints of the intervals
the critical points of f are the roots of the derivative of f, same thing
check if the derivative is positive or negative between each interval -- it has to be only one of these, since for the answer to change it must cross zero
So do I plug in the critical numbers in the function
you can check the value between them
Like between 0 and -5?...
Help
channel is taken
so your intervals are [-inf, -2], [-2, 0], [0, 5], [5, inf] (don't forget the 5 is positive)
this was correct
Ohh
you swapped it a few minutes later
Ohh
Sorry
Do I plug in a number between negative infinity and -2 into the function?...
So ex: -1?
Give me one second I’m plugging everything in and I’ll show you what I did
Wai twai wati…
How do we even get these numbers? I understand @fluid ember ‘s because 8 is a side length and 8^2 mod 100 is 36
The if n is 41,41^2 mod 100 is 81, which isn’t ananswer
@autumn apex
looks right
So then what do I do
just remember what you were after, i.e. ^
We were trying to find the interval of increase or decrease of f
if a function's derivative is positive in a given interval, you know that function is increasing in that interval
use the sign of the derivative at each value you checked to decide for that interval
channel is taken.
OK I know if f’>0 then it’s increasing and vide versa
Vise
After I figure it out and plugged all these numbers in
I don’t know how to tell which one is increasing or decreasing
@autumn apex
Here
you calculated values where f'>0 and f'<0, so you know where f is increasing and decreasing, right?
They all came out negative except f’(1)
yep
Is this right ?...
so if you want a local maximum, and you know two adjacent intervals (shared critical point) have negative derivatives...
yep
channel is taken
So what does it mean to find the location of the local maximum and the local minimum
if a function's derivative is 0 at a point you know, and the interval on either side is negative, what does that imply for the original function at that point you know?
So I know that the derivative is X=0
It’s one of the derivatives
**
It implies that it’s interval decreases
on both sides, yep
channel taken.
Can someone please help me?
please ask in an open channel instead
check for one where the last question asked has been answered
k
so @random crypt if you know the function decreases on either side of this value, what does that imply (in terms of local minima and maxima) for that function?
The point where it most decreases is the local minimum?...
I’m not sure to be honest
think about it like this -- is f decreasing or increasing or neither when f' = 0 (remember, f'(-2) = 0)
so f' > 0 means f is increasing, right?
Yes
what about when f' = 0
hi
channel is taken @naive dock
am soory
But it’s not decreasing or increasing
right, you might want to plot a parabola on a sheet of paper and think about it for a moment
so if the parabola opens upward, where is the minimum
for f(x) = x^2 yes
Is that what you’re asking
yes, just trying to get you to understand the local minima/maxima are able to be understood in terms of the derivative
so what is the derivative at that point?
and is f increasing or decreasing on either side?
I have a function already graft in front of me
local minima and maxima are also referred to as stationary points, i.e. derivative is zero
yeah unfortunately the scale makes it a bit hard to tell
Is it like this
plot from -4 to 0 to see
that's looking like -4.5 to -3
I think it says the maximum is negative to zero but I don’t know how they got there
-2,0 *^
it should look like this
Ok
How am I supposed to use the answer for part B to find the locations of the local maximum local minimum
Because I’m not allowed to use it from a graph
you know what local minima and maxima are, right?
what happens to a function on either side of a local maximum? Decrease or increase?
Increase
Like it’s the height pint in a graph
And local min is the lowest point on graph
Highest *^
Point *^
you've got it reversed
Oh
a parabola opening upwards has a minimum but no maximum
And vice Versa ??
a parabola opening downwards has a maximum but no minimum, and you know the function on either side of a downward opening parabola is doing what, increasing or decreasing?
the first derivative
Decreasing?... because it’s going downwards ?...
So does that mean the local minimum means the function is increasing on either side
yep
Ohhh
So I already found at the interval increases from 0 to 5
Does that mean I already found my local minimum????
you know things about f' which tell you whether f is increasing or decreasing
you know f'(-2) = 0, so f can't be increasing or decreasing at that value
kinda like the symmetry point of the parabola, right?
Yaha
and you know on either side f'<0, which means f is doing what on either side, increasing or decreasing?
yep
so if you know f(-2) is a stationary point, you have two options for what happens on either side of f(-2), both increasing or both decreasing
^
correct
Ok ok
So when the question as to find a location
Does that mean we have to give a certain exact point
Or not
yes
so "where is the local maximum of f given F" is the same as "around what point is f decreasing on both sides"
But we really got where it decreases
So where in decreases is what it means to say the local maximum ?
I’m so dumb. I’m sorry
the derivative of f will be zero at a maximum or minimum
you know where those points are
-2
you have a set of possibilities: f is increasing AND decreasing around a point == NOT a stationary point == NOT a maximum or minimum; f is decreasing on either side of a point == local maximum; f is increasing on either side of a point == local minimum
you only need to evaluate this around the critical points, and use your answer from b that had info about f decreasing and increasing in the various intervals
the answer must be a critical point, f' = 0
Can you please show me on paper what you’re talking about because I think I understand what you’re saying but ...
How am I supposed to know that this point can be increasing or decreasing
the derivative carries that information
you know everywhere f is increasing or decreasing already -- you did that bit
when I said 'f is increasing AND decreasing == NOT a stationary point' that means that value won't be one of the ones you found (-2, 0, 5), so that isn't a case you're worried about
So if it’s the most negative then it’s the local maximum which means it’s 5, infinity ?....
make sure you understand the conditions I listed
you're looking for local minima and maxima, and there's one of each in this case. Knowing what happens around the critical points tells you which of the exactly 3 possibilities is true for that point: local maximum (a stationary point), local minimum (a stationary point), neither (not a stationary point)
channel is taken
Mb
I apologize. This is my third time retaking this class
I’m failing it for a reason
I Understand what you’re saying but it’s just not clicking
you're clear on what a local maximum and minimum are though, right?
and that when I say stationary point, I mean one of those two possibilities
That if F is decreasing on either side and it is local max
F is increasing on either side it has a local minimum
and you know 'increasing on either side' means, if I move left OR right from this point, I get a higher value
Yes
and that if a function is increasing on either side, it must 'level off' at that point?
i.e. derivative of the function is zero there
Yes
so you have a set of information which is necessary to find the answer of 'where are the stationary points'
what information do you use?
The critical points?...
you use whether or not the function increases/decreases on both sides of the critical points
How do I do that
Like I already chose for numbers that’s in between the critical points
And I already sent that to you
the critical points tell you where the function's derivative is zero
and "function's derivative is zero" means "stationary point"
I already plugged in the critical points and none of them came out zero
the critical points are exactly the ones where f'=0
don't lose track of what you're trying to find out
what would it mean for f(-2) to be a stationary point?
could it be increasing on one side and decreasing on the other?
So if F is any of the critical points that means zero
yep, "critical point" is just a term that lets you talk about the "critical points of f" which is information about F
namely, F=0
What do I plug in and what do I do to know exactly which one is that local l maximum/min
Like I’m understanding everything you’re saying it’s just I don’t know which one is a local Max on which one is the local minimum
also just to be clear, you're using F to mean derivative of f, right?
Yes
a local maximum, in terms of critical points, is "to the left AND right of this critical point of f (F=0), f is decreasing (F<0)"
a local minimum, in terms of critical points, is "to the left AND right of this critical point of f (F=0), f is increasing (F>0)"
f(-2) is a local maximum because f decreases on either side, and you know this from your previous answer
I thought -2 was one of the critical numbers
it is
in order to be a local maximum or minimum it must be a critical number
a function can't decrease on both sides or increase on both sides of a point unless it's a critical number
barring the case of a singularity, but not relevant here
Can you show me a piece of paper how you found that -2 Decreased on both sides
the graph I linked shows it
this is f' or F
it's a bit hard to tell but at -2, the curve touches y=0
you already know this though, F(-2) = 0 from part a
and YOU found out that f decreases on either side by checking a value inside each interval
the signs of the values you found by plugging in values -3, -1, 1, 6 tell you whether f is increasing or decreasing, because they told you whether F>0 or F<0 at those points
so you know f(-2) is decreasing on either side because you checked at -3 and -1 and determined F<0 for both
^^^
Is is f(6) is the local min
F(5)
I’m literally the most stupidest human you’ll ever meet
There’s a reason I failed this class twice
it's important to take breaks if you've been working too long
brain doesn't work great without breaks
Im wrong aren’t I ..
I’m sorry if I wasted your time
I’m just trying my best to learn
it's ok I just had to make sure I wasn't giving a wrong answer
the places where the derivative of f equals 0, i.e. -2, 0, 5, are the places where f changes direction
so critical points are where local minima and maxima are
I may have inadvertently confused you by using increasing and decreasing the way I did
No no. Trust me. The amount of ppl that tried to explain calculus to me is insane.
You’re the best person of explaining it to me.
I understood from you the most
a good way to develop the intuition would be to plot the derivative you were given (F) and its integral (f)
you'll see what the function does relative to its derivative, and how the values of the derivative associate to minima and maxima of f
np
And helping me step by step
I can't stress enough, you should take a break if you haven't
brain drain will take you from perfectly competent at calculus to 'how does algebra work'
I’ll try. I kinda can’t Bc I work 3 jobs supporting my family. And right now is the only time I can finish my school work
oh you only need to take a few minutes for a break
trust me, working a problem straight through without breaks while you're brain drained will take longer than doing the problem with breaks
Can x^2 = 4py be converted to ax^2 + bx + c = y?
yes why not
(x² + 0.x + 0)/4p = y
In
9 51 15/17
— = —————
17 98
15/17 Put Into A Decimal Is 0.882......
And 9 x 98 is 882
Is this just a coincidence?
I THINK NOT
how to find vertex of parabola in x^2 = 4py
Vertex will be (0,0)
The formula is -b/2a for x coordinate of the vertex and if you put x=-b/2a in eqn you shall get y coordinate
Of the vertex too
The marks obtained by four students in a math test are displayed in the table shown here.
Which of the following ranges is most appropriate to represent the numerical data on the vertical axis of a Bar Chart?
A. 10 to 50
B. 0 to 100
C. 0 to 50
D. 10 to 100
I suck at charts but I’m pretty sure it has to be B or D as A and C don’t go to 100
maybe its d because the lowest score is 45% so it isnt necessary to go to 0
thank you
Lol thank rawrbin
Hey rawrbin
In
9 51 15/17
— = —————
17 98
15/17 Put Into A Decimal Is 0.882......
And 9 x 98 is 882
Is this just a coincidence?
it's a coincidence.
Lol
I’ve been looking over this for an hour
Trying to find a formula that gets something like this
This Bar Chart shows the weight in kilograms of fruits sold in one day.
Why is the Bar Chart misleading?
A. The heights of the bars do not represent the correct numbers.
B. The vertical axis shows unequal intervals.
C. The horizontal axis is missing one type of fruit.
D. The width of the bar representing Jackfruit is more than the width of other bars.
i got another
9*98 / 1000 = (3^2)(7^2)/(2^2)(5^3) ~= (3)(5)/(17)
can someone help?
I think this channel is taken
damn
you can factorize ratios of integers into prime numbers and compare them more directly
Oh WAIT
thank you again rawrbin
nvm I know that I just didn’t know what the arrow sign meant
why is 8th grade math so hard
if you mean ~= yeah that's a bad font, just means approximately
exponent
np
So the exponent here would be what?
there are several exponents in what I posted
nope that's multiplication
I’m smooth brain
so if you have 2^3 that means 2 times 2 times 2
just count how many multiplicative 2's you throw together
A particle is moving in a circle of diameter 20m. What is its displacement in 1 round, 1.5 rounds, 2 rounds, and 2.5 rounds
could someone explain this
you're missing a part of your problem
oh crap
what is a 'round' in terms of the movement of the particle
np
This Bar Graph shows the percent increase in the prices from the year 1981 to 1999.
What is a problem with the way this graph has been drawn?
A. The scale along the vertical axis is divided into unequal intervals.
B. The widths of the bars are not equal.
C. The vertical scale used is too large for this data.
D. The heights of the bars do not represent the correct percent increase.
thank you again rawrbin :)
Eh, is this math?
its technically physics but i think it comes here
part of this question still seems to be missing
Okay hang on, I know how to solve it😄
this is what it says online, still dont get it
oh wait by 'rounds' do they mean full orbits?
oh ok
ye
agh what a horrible use of terminology
sorry i shoulve menitoned
np
*mentioned
so what's the displacement of a particle if it goes around the circle once?
yeah, they do that a lot in the powerpoints they give in my class
according to the answer i sent it says 0, i still don't get htis
*this
displacement being distance [accumulated] between start point and end point
and presumably 'distance' here means how long was its path
IDK how to complete square outside of this form ax^2 + bx + c = y
so you accumulate perimeter as you travel (distance), but if you travel an integer multiple of a round the displacement must remain zero
How to solve this?
@versed osprey
circumference = diameterpi
= 203.14
1 circle = 1circumference
1.5 circles = 1.5circumference
This is how to solve distance😄
Sorry I can't read it😔
sure
ok one sec brb\
oh ok, im clear with the distance part now, i don't get the displacement part, ill brb
displacement is at most one diameter, it's the distance between the start point and end point ignoring the path you took
