#help-0
1 messages · Page 643 of 1
Anyone know how to do b?
d
please don't give away answers directly
the question also seems to be from an ongoing test. . .
oh ok sorry
Why today it rainbow
i didnt understand
Ok
quick question how do you calculate the speed of something when you know the time and distance
Hey there!
I want to show how to create the set of Integers by using the 'inverse of the equation a+x=0' and the natural numbers. Would the union of the set of natural numbers with a set that contains all x where x = -a for each element a in the set of natural numbers satisfy that?
how to find domain?
no
until you tell us what f is, we cannot say whether or not it is injective
it may be injective, or it may not be injective, depending on the function
and then all you are told about the function is that its domain is N and its codomain is R^+?
nothing else? no formula? no properties?
no equation?
it need not be injective
not every function from a smaller set to a larger set is injective
you could have the function which sends every natural number to sqrt(2)
that'd be a constant function
nowhere near injective
just because a function CAN be injective doesn't mean it MUST be injective
OH
WHY DIDNT YOU TELL ME
okay
well in this case
yeah, the function f(x) = x^2 is injective when its domain is N
can someone help me with this question pls?
At the point B we can tell that x = 0 right?
No, y = 0.
yes mb
0=4x-8
8=4x
/4 /4
2=x
So B is at (2, 0)
@fallen rain Good, now you know x and you know y.
oooo thanks
for (a) can i just sub in the values to the change-of-base formula as a fraction or does it have to be a whole number
cause i tried fraction and it didnt work
for a, you shouldnt use change of base law
since it wouldnt get you very far
try to use power law instead
and also, change of base works for fractions too
channel might be busy, you should move, also could you take a better shot? its a bit too bright
i dont think ive used the power law before
its one of the basics one, log(a^b)=b * log(a)
you can rewrite b/c as (c/b)^(-1)
so just negative recoprical
waler
oh i though it would be negative since there is a -1
alr ty
Can someone explain this question please? Does the question asks how many possibilities are there
or type of the triangle
21! 
like equal side triangle right triangle

Do you know the length property of sides of triangle
yes I do know
apply that
|a-b|<c<a+b
ye
I am asking that what question wants
oh okay then
Upsi 
could anybody help with determining length of a trapezoidal prism
I was gonna call it wrong but then I remembered the answer is 19 and not 21
🤣
Is the answer 6?
how did this get the
dA = (2 - x) dy
??
<@&286206848099549185>
ye
hint: p^2 + 2p + 1 = (p+1)^2 >= 0 always
i dont understand something about this model
if you integrate the top one and plug 0 and 4 in as the limits the distance travelled is 54.4
if you integrate the bottom
this channel was occupied
@sick phoenix didn't confirm that they were satisfied with my answer
ok ill wiat
maybe they have followup questions to ask me
someone help please
Check the domain: 0 ≤ t ≤ 4 and t > 4
okay integrate the bottom and plug 4.1 in
the t-4 bit will be very small
and 24 x 4 = 96
so it just jumps to 96
how does it go from 54.4 to 96. .... in 0.1 seconds
Yup i got it!
since (p+1)^2 >= 0, root of equation are real for all values of p
q = ?
then q = 6r + 16
:o
if not idk
no prob
This says quiz...
Why would you help someone cheat on a quiz...
So?
now he knows so whats the problem
You get taught before assessments... not on them
but I forgot
btw I'm bad at english tho so sometimes I don't understand what's the main point of the question.
can someone help me with this
use this
thx
i'm stuck with part b
not sure how to start
it's just the proving if they lie on a plane part that im stuck with
other than that i can do the rest
but the first part im stuck on
ok well reading b and c kinda hints at a
i've already got a
oh you meant first part of b
if three vectors give as a result of the mixed product 0, then they lie on the plane
If you know determinants, then the question just becomes computing a det
${P_1,P_2,P_3,P_4}$ are coplanar if the volume of the parallelpided is 0
Mosh
and the volume is determined using determinants
hmm
$det([\vec{P_1P_2}|\vec{P_1P_3}|\vec{P_1P_4}])=0$
Mosh
where the matrix is defined as the 3 column vectors present
yes
just notation I learned for when you write vectors as the columns
im confused
so i write a 3x3 matrix with the vectors ^^ and find determinant of said matrix?
you're writing B-A, C-A, D-A, you make those the columns of a matrix and compute the det
why is this not 10*(3x-1)^9?
@glass lichen first determinant is 0
wolvel pls use another channel
Yeah, so the volume is 0 which means they're coplanar
ok
yeah, whats the signature of f?
so they're on the same plane, and now i can find the area of the parallelogram that they make?
it is just a derivative of a complex function
how is (3x-1)^10 = ((3*(3x)-1)^10) where g(x)=3x and f(x)=(3x-1)^10?
f(g(x))=(g(x)-1)^10,g(x)=3x
the constant in the sum does not affect the derivative in any way
norm of the cross product
then it would be 30x*(x-1)^9?
Finding the area of a parallelogram using the cross product.
Followup: see http://youtu.be/9o9yx95rFAo for details on how to draw the parallelogram
yes, I seem to have lost the multiplier 30
i dont understand, all other people explained the chanin rule same way you did
can you link me to some place so i can stop bothering you
on wikipedia in the rules of differentiation there is
Hey, does someone mind helping me with a quick question. I'm doing a question that asks me to find the times in which the difference between two functions is 10
how would i find that?
its a cos and sin function
doesnt explain why or how you can write 3x-1 as f°g where f=x-1 and g=3x
Subtract them, set it equal to ten, solve for x
as phrased that would occur infinitely many times, since the domain of cosine and sine are R
ive done that but it comes up with a weird answer : 20cos(3pix)+5sqrt3 +5
and i dont know how to convert that into specific points
3x-1 is not a table function, so it must be considered as a derivative of a complex function
what?
it's a line.. why would you use chain rule on that?
It's hard for me to explain, let someone else
@fading jay thanks for your attention, cool username
$f(x)=(3x-1)^{10} \ f(3x)=(3[3x]-1)^{10}$
Mosh
$g(x):=3x \implies f(g(x))=(3[3x]-1)^{10}$
Mosh
why does g(x):=3x?
it's defined in your original question
i dont get it. i didnt ask for 9x-1^10
for some reason, (3x-1)^10 gets rewritten as (3*(3x)-1)^10, why is that?
@alpine sable You replace x with the input.
The input is 3x.
You replace x with the input, which is 3x, so x becomes 3x.
where did you get input or 3x?
$f(x)\mapsto (3x-1)^10\f'\mapsto(\frac{d}{dx}(3x)*\frac{d}{dx}\Big((3x-1)^10\Big))$
Betelguse
ok so just apply chain rule.. inside function is 3x-1, outside is x^(10)
OK, so use the chain rule.
finally, thanks
that makes perfect sense
how is the replied message different to the picture i just sent btw?
Because you multiply that by the derivative of the inside.
Mosh
@glass lichen sorry for pinging, but quick question
that determinant thing u posted ^^
is that the area for a parallelepiped?
volume*
yes
oh sweet as
11t?
yes
121
yep
101
thank you
no worries
its not random
he did very well work with me and befor i start to explain it 2 hours
i just ask him again
its very complicated
"random users" refers to just pinging someone out of the blue with the expectation they will help. I didn't say Ram was random. . .
Is this channel available?
yes
i just found the total loss since initial buy is wrong on my sheet
dca 1 is not correct calculated
i hope ramonov is here 😄 he is the excel king 
men
like maths questions deosnt make any sence
To be honest, Idc they do make sense or what I need explanation :p
don't undersant

You can't know the exact time
There are measurement errors
If you want do it precise, you do need precise time and we do have it
but idk how to solve it
I think channel is occupied isn't it
d/dt (minute hand angle) = 60 d/dt (hour hand angle) = constant should work
At 2 o' clock minute hand angle - 0 and hour hand angle- 60 angle
but idk what does d/dt mean
Can you explain it?
Well that’s right atm, and you know the hour hand moves 60 times slower
So just set the two angles to be equal and solve for time
I thin i get it
well let's thing about like sections:
60 sections a clock.
Speed of Minute hand: 1 section / min
Speed of Hour hand: 1/12 section / min
If we start at 2 and try to find a straight line
Well we want to think of relative speed so it need to fill the gap of 12-2 (on the clock) then 30 sections for a straight line
12-2 space is 10, + 30 for straight line
40/relative speed = 40/(1-1/12)
let me try
1 section is the distance a minute hand goes a min
Uhhh hour hand does not move 1/12th of a clock face per minute
It’s 60 times slower that’s all you need
sections
everything is in sections
Define section?
a section is the distance a minute hand goes a minute
yeah
Got you
at 2:10:54
Sounds about right
but like degree is too hard to think about it
Same thing doe
you have to totally surpass 180+60 degree
0.5 is how many dgrees the hour hand goes a minute)
(180+60)/(6-0.5)
same answer as the other ssolution
so the answer is $$43\frac{7}{11}$$
Hyl1s
minute
Yeah but it’s non dimensional
(180+60)/(6-0.5)=40/(1-1/12)
,w (180+60)/(6-0.5)
60 and 12 is constant in this formula right?
and I wsadt like $$60 + \frac{2}{12}=3$$?
Numbers are typically constant yes
the answer isn't a constant-
it's a decimal
you have for 12 hours 360 degrees so for 1 hour 30 degree . for 5 minutes it's 30 degrees = 6 degree per minute.
similary for the hour hand it has 60 minutes to move through 30degree so it's 0.5°/minute;
Now, At 2o'clock minutes hand will be at exact 12 and hour hand will at exact 2. Therefore gap between them will be equal to 2 division equals to 60°.
Therefore, time required to cover 60°gap = 60/5.5 minutes = 120/11 min = 10+ 10/11 min. i,e equals to 10 min 54.54sec.
which is a constant
I was talking about the formula Wew lads gave to me
yea answer is decimal
decimals are constants what?
it's not dependant on any variable so it's constant
anyway you just gotta think, at t = 0 the hour hand is 60 degrees ahead of the minuite hand cause it's 2 o'clock AND the hour hand travels 12 times slower than the minuite hand
so when the angles are equal we must have that the minuite hand has travelled the same distance as the hour hand
=> 60+t/12 = t as we have that d/dt(hour hand angle) = 1/12 => hour angle = 1/12t + constant, at t=0 hour angle = 60 => constant = 60 and d/dt(minuite angle) = 1 => minuite angle = t+constant and minuite angle at t = 0 is 0 => constant = 0, then equating the angles we get what I already wrote
Can anyone help me with this question?
I know sin theta = y/r but I'm not sure how to apply that to a decimal
https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/359052604149465088/849633216482246706/unknown.png
arcsin both sides is step 1
I tried your method and get a different answer than wew lads' formula
I get $$36\frac{2}{3}$$
Hyl1s
minute
oh lmao
problem algebra?
@harsh acorn
,w 40/(1-1/12)
yea it is same now
t=t/12+60 => t(1-1/12) = 60 => t = 60/(11/12) = 60*12/11
got no idea where 40s coming from imma be real
40 is total numbers of section
1 section - 6 degree
we need to go 240 degree for a straight line
#help-0 message this is how you do I I don't like this rescaling stuff with "sections"
just look at the inital conditions and the angular velocities of each
or!
proof by googling: they cross at 2:10:54
which is 65.4 degrees roughly
I didin't get this
which is the solution to t=t/12+60
I moved the t/12 to the other side and factored out the t
oh difference between minute and hour
t=t/12+60 => t-t/12 = 60 => t(1-1/12) = 60
yeah XD, we could call it x?
why we wrote 60 there?
don't we need 240?
straight line -180 and we had 60
the inital condition of the hour hand is 60 degrees ahead of the minuite hand
the hands overlap when the angles are equal that's why you equate the angles
@harsh acorn Which grade math is that?
but question asks for straight line isn't it
It is math olympiad question
grade 6-9
maybe 10 too
@subtle mantle question asks for straight line not overlap
ahhhhhhhh.
I learn this b4 so just askin 🤣
what is b4
before
oh ok
then you want to equate minuite angle + 180 to hour hand angle
yeah
I mean technically if they overlap they're on the same line but fair enough
I think they want us that they made 180 degree angle
so you have t+180 = t/12+60 I'm pretty sure
left side t+180 means position of minute hand right?
it's position of the minuite hand+180 degrees
,w t+180 = t/12+60
why I get negative?
anyway answer is absolute answer of this I think
lemme see
they're kinda analogous to anything to do with velocity and displacement
^^
except in Z/Z360 cause wacky clock face moment
i have question about creating some algorithm
its quite hard to explain so i drew some basic image for explaintation
there are two circles that both have radius size of 1 there are also two variables, distance between them and fov of one circle looking at other one
i wanted to make algorithm that i could use for calculating chances of one circle hitting another with pre defined fov and range between them
what's the distrubution of the angle and distance?
i mean i can use any value here
i wanted to make formula which i can use for calculating that
no I mean like, is it uniform? normal?
angle can be any 0-360
what is one plus one
probably less than 1000
depends, in a ring of characteristic 2 it's zero
oh ok
lemme draw something cause I like this problem
aight bro
so you wanna find the probability of x > 1/2 given a random angle theta and a random distance d?
hmm
i put in random distance and random angle
and then count probability of it hitting circle
and no fov cant be like that
middle is always on circle
yeah I know I just cut it in half to make the next bit clearer
low fov can make chances go to 100% cause of circle size
you know that tan(theta/2) = opposite/adjacent = x/d => x = d*tan(theta/2) so you just need to find the odds that dtan(theta/2) >1/2
it's basic trig
what I'm confused is that if the circle is in the FOV then the other circle can always see it
are you kinda asking like, what % of the FOV is taken up by the circle?
i think thats same thing but in reverse
but yes that still works
percentage of hitting circle
got it right
then you'd need the proportion r/x where r is the radius of the circle - which is 1 as you said
and we know that x = d*tan(theta/2)
so the probability of hitting the circle is 1/d*tan(theta/2)
is that the solution already
we need to look at x as an arc length instead
so the arc length is d*(theta/2), so just take out the tan from the formula and it'll be correct
is this channel in use
nope I don't think so
A carpenter is building an open box with a square base for holding firewood. The box must
have a surface area of 8 m2. What dimensions will yield the maximum volume? What is the maximum volume?
this is an optimization question for calculus, does anyone know a good way to start this?
make a function which give you squares
I don't understand
What a square must have?
what's teh m2?
oh
sa=6a^2
8=6a^2
sqrt4/3
is one side
then do volume =max
find the derivative of volume and equal it to 0 and see if the left is positive and the right is negative
@pale terrace
Can anyone help me with proving these? I'm not sure what identities to use here
tanx=sinx/cosx
b) $\cos^2 x = 1 - \sin^2 x$
Fede Bosio
where did you get sa = 6a^2 from
what about the six part
a^2=area of a square
can anyone tell me how do i integrate sin3πtdt with limits 0 to t
and it has six sides
3.14159
can you write that out for me?
oh my bad I forgot that thank you 😆
np
[ \int_0^t \sin (3\pi t) , dt ]
I need assistance with my homework
Fede Bosio
exactly
whats the answer
If anyone is able to assist please tell me so
use u sub
multiply the outside by 1/3pi
and the inside by 3pi
then use u sub
sub?
u substitution
Call $u = 3\pi t$
Fede Bosio
np
Does anyone know how i could prove a quadratic equation congruent to 0 mod p (p prime) without actually finding the solutions?
eg x^2 -3x+2 = 0 mod 373
Sorry, what do you mean by "prove" the equation?
Prove that it has at least one solution?
i have a question that says i have to determine if the quadratic equation x^2-3x +2 = 0 mod 373 has any solutions without explicitly finding them
???
yeah, kinda weird, right?
thats all i have to go on
Mosh
yeah but the n is not needed because we have Z373
it doesn't say in Z373
x^2-3x +2 = 0 mod 373
yes
can i have example related to that with 8 fov and 25 distance?
just have no idea how to write it down
The question is pretty straight forward. I forgot geometry but there are theorems based on parallel lines.
and certain shapes have a certain amount of degree when all the angles are added up.
search it up lol
like a triangle = 180 degrees
I think you should use the Law of Quadratic Reciprocity
you first calculate the discriminant of the quadratic polynomial, and then apply the law to the discriminant to find if it's a square modulo 373
for the left top I would try something like:
(360 - 2 * 76) / 2 to get one angle
Hey, i need help. My math teacher assigned us hw that she never taught us.
A ramp in the shape of a triangular prism has a volume of 58.24 ft3. The base of the ramp has a length of 5.2 feet and a width of 6.4 feet as shown in the diagram. What is the height of the ramp?
Thanks
didnt know about this, thanks ill try it now!
can someone jsut help me come up with a f(x) equation for a Ferris wheel
Me neither 😆
channel free?
Here I have an idea, u can extrapolate the figure and form a cuboid and volume will be twice
this is correct right?
should be 0=2-4cos(t)
the value?
what is this?
cube
it's saying the l w and h
are the same
since all = x
and a cube has l w and h are the same
Answer
create a proportion
nvm
i finished the wheol test
bye
Should I do ft/in or in/ft
any way is fine
make sure the other side is the same

multiply the 3 by 1/2
ok
actually
type it into a calculator
if it allows
@mighty zenith
I can run you through the process on how to do it
you there?
thank uu
np
is this channel open?
yes
thx.
How do you write the equation of a polynomial with linear roots at x = 3, x=0, x=-1, and a quadratic root at x=2. With the polynomial also going through the point (1,-5)?
guys help i actually dont know what to do..
list out the factors of 36 in pairs
and see which pair adds to 13
its a diamond problem so you are trying to see which two number mulitply at the top and add at the bottom
oh
ok
TY
9 and 4?
yeah i think so
help? -- How do you write the equation of a polynomial with linear roots at x = 3, x=0, x=-1, and a quadratic root at x=2. With the polynomial also going through the point (1,-5)?
It is recommended to not give answers. If someone needs assistance, teach/explain the concept instead of giving answers
sorry my bad
are you allowed to say since 564 = -7 mod 571 then x^2-7x+12= 0 mod 571 is equivalent to x^2+564x+12=0 mod 571??
could someone help me on my homework
6 * 6
No !
The smallest possible sum is 3 and the biggest one is 12. How can you have 36 sum possibilities?
the smallest ist 2
Stop trolling
it says how many different sums, same value answers r possible
and even then it would be 5 *6 not 6 *6
No !!!!!
@hollow helm Hint^
I have a question about my choice of te course that i will choose next year in my first year of university. Like i've mentionned before I like math and physics, but can't choose. So therefore there exists a "twin bachelorc" in my country to do both. But i am wondering if it isn't too much to do both, is there anyone that has experience with both courses?
Is this the whole proof?
as someone who has mates who do maths and physics its definitely much more work than just doing either straight but at my uni you wouldnt go as into depth into physics compared to maths e.g: no labs and stuff
so basically you want to prove that whatever value epsilon>0 you add there is an element in ur A that is smaller than 0+epsilon, wich means that 0 is the biggest lower bound (or how you call it idk)
so you have to find an n where 1/n < epsilon and if you rearrange stuff you find that any n> 1/epsilon is a valid solution, wich is what you had to proof
@formal solar
because the fact that 0 is a lower bound is easy to see
you just are proving here that there is no bigger lower bound
by finding a value that is smaller than any number that is a bigger by a random amount than 0
basically what he does in short that any number bigger than 0 can't be a lower bound
would this just be the sum of x^(2n+1)
please don't solve it just answer the question
Do tou want to know if it converges/diverges, or do you want to know the value of it?
I think the answer is no, not sure tho
is this correct?
why wouldn't it be
You know the cos pi/3 and sin pi/3
So just fill it in and try
guess so
would it be an infinite sum?
it's asking us to evaluate when x is less than 1 though
its an infinite sum but you can't just throw away a factor of it
or I'm not getting what you mean
Yes
so?
wait x isn't the thing that's getting iterated upon
Determine the locus of points P such that PA² + 3PB² = k², with k constant.
Some one can help me?
try putting it in numbers
How can we proof it?
idk its been like ten thousand years since ive done something like this
if you have specific notes from your class id follow those
maybe use standard form
that is a question from a brazilian book. It was not from my class
[
\begin{split}
P &= (x, y)
\
A &= \left(a_0, a_1\right)
\
B &= \left(b_0, b_1\right)
\end{split}
\implies
\begin{split}
PA^2 &= {\left(x-a_0\right)}^2 + {\left(y-a_1\right)}^2
\
PB^2 &= {\left(x-b_0\right)}^2 + {\left(y-b_1\right)}^2
\end{split}
]
Fede Bosio
draw all with accuracy to isomorphism 3 vertex connected graphs with 5 edges that have at least 2 singular loops and no multiple loops
would appreciate all the help 😄
what does this mean haha
bigger than or equals to
I forgot all about probability functions so I fear giving misinformation
Solve the inequality for X (uppercase) and calculate the obtained probability by using the given probability mass function
Exactly
no problem 😄
hey can i have help
taken
the sum of two terms of an infinite geometric sequence is 12 and each term is equal totwice the sum of all the term following it. Find the first term,commonratio and geometic sequence
plz it is so urgent
I believe the absolute min is x=2 or 5. I am not sure what to write as an explanation.
\begin{align*}
{PA}^2+3{PB}^2 &= k^2
\
{\left(x-a_0\right)}^2 + {\left(y-a_1\right)}^2+3\left({\left(x-b_0\right)}^2 + {\left(y-b_1\right)}^2\right) &= k^2
\
{\left(x-a_0\right)}^2 + {\left(y-a_1\right)}^2+3 {\left(x-b_0\right)}^2 + 3 {\left(y-b_1\right)}^2 &= k^2
\
\left( {\left(x-a_0\right)}^2 + 3 {\left(x-b_0\right)}^2 \right) + \left( {\left(y-a_1\right)}^2 + 3 {\left(y-b_1\right)}^2 \right) &= k^2
\end{align*}
Fede Bosio
then expand, factor, complete the square, etc.
this is more of a physics question
i have a question
they r asking to find the determinant
i tried collecting a,b and c
then use b^2 -4ac
but in the end ans has t and p
very confusing
pls help
what did u take as a, b and c?
👍
hi i have a question pertaining to symmetric equations in R^3
ask
what does vector representation mean?
thats the thing that respresents the magnitude by the line segments
im not sure of my idea but i thinking its like, if one vector is a multiple of another vector, then are those two vectors essentially representations of one vector?
yup
thanks!
np
they are supplementary angles and are essentially equal to the angles opposite to them
Ohh thanks
need some guidance on how I should approach this q
it says that to compute the integral I might need to use the trigonometric substitution x+a = sin theta but not exactly sure how that would be incorporated
someone able to help me with this
5x + 15x = 180degress because angle of a straight line is 180degrees.
20x = 180
then u can find x
I dont understand it thats the issue
understand what exactly?
is this a calculus question? cause then i can't help you sorry
i see
def calc related yeah
do you know the angle of a straight line?
no
I know legit nothing about it
ok.....
is that just the answer?
or is there more that I have to solve
well, you have to find the value of x
and...it's gonna be pretty hard if you don't know basic geometry
would you be able to help me find x?
sure, but i'd prefer u understand how i got the answer
so you don't need to keep asking for help
I mean yea I want to learn it as well but I dont got much time I have 10 mins until its due
yes please
like I said I would like to learn it but I need to submit it
is that all I would put?
yea pretty much. It's more than enough
Mb dont do what i said
I mean wouldn'tit be 180-83-26
nope
look at the 26 part
the 26 is not inside the triangle.
so you can't directly put that value
there's a right angle there, that means : 26 + something = 90
which means something = 64
and that 'something' is what's inside the triangle and what's supposed to go here instead of 26
X=147
wait...........i just realised something....
180-x=64?
why......are you subtracting from 180 in the first place tho?
because isnt the triangle 180
X=180-(180-64-83)
that correct?
👍
180-64-83=33
@gaunt sparrow you able to help me and teach me in like 5 mins
x+4<−7
its due in 3 mins
well how about this, I can give you the answer and you can submit and then after submitting, understand with all the time u got
is that cool with you?
yea.
https://gyazo.com/0604accbb7694a2cd4458d651a1db424
Could someone explain this
Is it because (-1) is the exponent
sorry, i don't know logarithms properly yet
yeah log(x⁴) = 4log(x) for example, here this is the same with (-1)
$-\log(x+2) \ =\log((x+2)^{-1})$
want to dm drag so you can teach me?
Mosh
sure
hii has anyone taken algebra II/trig here?
hey, what is your question ?
actually, i have a few questions is that okay?
i will do my best
it’s for a homework assignment, but i’m not really getting what my teacher is teaching D:
THANK YOU SMM!!!

ok, there are a few formula to know:
cosinus of the angle = adjacent over hypotenuse
sinus of an angle = opposite over hypotenuse
and finaly tangent of an angle = opposite over adjacent
yeah, my teacher made us memorize those lol
so for example
I think you should start by writing down the law of sin and the law of cosine if that is what you're going to use
first thing you know that b is the hypotenuse
a/sinA = b/sinb = c/sinc
if A is the angle between a and b, then cos(A) = c/b
This only applies for right traingles
ow sorry i though this was one
Maybe that's what it is though, idk
Doesn't say it is though
Especially since all angles are to be calculated
i’m so confused T^T
So in that case we can use the Alkashi Theorem
It's not a right triangle (I checked with the pythagorean theorem lol), so don't use what Aurélian said
huge sorry
Did you miss the part where they said they were to use the law of sine and the law of cosine?
ah it’s okayyy
Ask somewhere that's not busy.
ok
where ?
Here
Either way, that should be cleared up now, so I'll leave it to you to explain
okay
So, For any triangles, you can applied a "generalised Pythagorean Theorem", It is very near to the original one.
Let's denote a, b, c the three length of a triangle with b the hypotenuse
The formula is: b² = a² +c² -2ac cos(B) with B the angle between a and c
From here, you can deduce cos(B) given a, b and c
cos(B) = (b²-a²-c²)/(-2ac)
So B = Arccos((b²-a²-c²)/(-2ac))
For the angle A and C you can use the previous formula by switching a, b and c:
a² = b² + c² − 2bc cos(A)
c² = a² + b² − 2ab cos(C)
This is a regression line calculator result
Which number is a, and which number is b?
you get results in radian if the calculator you are using was configure to
you can switch back to degree, by multiplying the result in radian by 180/pi
my calculator is set in degrees
I am needing help with determining the equation for trig graphing. Kind of lost in this unit and not sure what info to pull from this. Any help would be great as I got multiple questions like this.
so you get result in degree, what is the issue ?
Does this channel look free?
Same question to you.
because the angle measure seems too small for the triangle...
let me know what you got
There are channels you can ask for help in where you don't completely interrupt someone else's discussion.
i got 0.47
Can anybody help me with this trigonometry?
What channel is open
Look in the channels yourself and see. Discord shows timestamps, use that.
this is the right value but in radian
You really should look in the chat before you send. I literally just told two other people that this channel is busy.
Damn my bad
so, would the answer be 27?
so even if you set your calculator in degree, the arccos function seems to send result in radian
yes !
ah thank you!!
you should find A = 27°, B = 122° and C = 31°
yes, that’s what i got for the rest!
nice
It did
i have a couple more questions that are similar to the previous one is that okay?
No. A channel is not free because someone is taking 3 minutes to think and digest information.
yeah
thank you! you’re the best
did my friend do this correctly?
ok, for this one you can easily deduce the B angle since the sum of A, B and C is always equals to 180°
ah righttt
next, you can combine two form of the previous formula to get a length given an other and you 2 angle
or more simple use the sine Rule
this thing
can someone check if i am right
yes you're right
ow ok, anyway
ow indeed 🤪
for this one you can use the sine rule to find the angle C, and then deduce the Angle B, and finally deduce the last length using the cosine formula
exactly the same here
wait i’m a bit confused
can someone check if i am right, i am unsure about my math homework
yes, again
i plugged the numbers into the formula, but my teacher didn’t explain that well afterward
ahh i have 30 mins left omg
yes?
you can use the sine rule: a/sin(A) = c/sin(C) <=> sin(C) = (c/a) sin(A)
for this one:
...
thank you but i am just going to accept my F KSGSKSH
thank you for your help!
alright, you're welcome
can someone check
Is it for a test?
you're right
Does anyone know how I would solve this?
apply properties of a right triangle
can someone help we with this homework question
STOP RIGHT THERE
next time don't give them solution
i mean don't do this again right after this
otherwise i'll ban you for good
is this taken
stardust already toook this place
k
whats the equation to find the sum from a sigma notation? is it just Sn = n/2(a1+an) like regular finite arithmetic series?
huh ?



