#help-0
1 messages · Page 543 of 1
we know what the triangles are
Yes so why are we paying attention to E
If you find it unnecessary and just want to get a high grades in your work, just ask your teacher
If they disagree, thats none of their fault
And it means you need to work better/concentrate more in class
refer back to my shitpost example
do you know how to clearly label that marked blue angle
Imma take a guess here bro thx for helping me anyway
Can somone explain? 😀
98743, I believe it would help you to first simplify the expression.
Notice that you have n! / (n + 2)!. Since both of them include 1·2·3·...·n, you can cancel these terms out, and then you're left with (n + 1)(n + 2) in the denominator.
Further, instead of working with f, since you're looking for the value of f'', you can attempt term-by-term differentiation, which will help you simplify the expression further.
At that point, the expression will become one that you will likely know a formula for it, which will help you find the exact value.
No Bad Days, I believe it would help you to first solve the inequality using real numbers:
a² ≤ 2a => a² - 2a ≤ 0
from which you'll get a range of a values that satisfy the equation. Then, you must pick the positive integers from these. (Notice that you're asked for positive integers, so 0 doesn't count.)
Eh...?
0, 1, 2
Calculate both the missing side lengths in both triangles with cos or sin.
@coral pilot b > a, that means b - a > 0
@alpine sable try another channel
@coral pilot You have 0 < a < b < 1, in this, you have b > a, which means b - a > 0
You can multiply both sides by -1, and multiplying by -1 reverses the inequality sign, so you get a - b < 0
That means 1 is true, now for 2, you should know that if a > 0, then 1/a > 0
Positive?
Bc a, b is greater than 0 n 1/ab is greater than zero
Yes so ab yields something positive
therefore 1/ab is positive
if ab was negative it would be negative
Awesome! Ty! 😆
free now?
I’m done for now
Ale
Alr
can some1 help w/ this ^^
The problem is basically that I can only calculate one of the lengths
b
you shouldn't override their labelling
well
let me show you why it's a problem if you don't
so let's say we want to find a
we use sin
the formula is c * sin(V) = a
don't blindly apply formulas
instead of fixating on the variables being used in the formula
consider what they're actually supposed to represent
that's where the problem comes
instead you should consider stuff like
sin(alpha) = opp/hyp
which could be applied to all triangles despite what variables are being used in the problem
what's alpha?
the angle labelled in the diagram
These are the formulas I have
Sin(V) = mod/hyp = a/c
Cos(V) = hos/hyp = b/c
Tan(V) = mod/hos = b/a
To find the side a
c * sin(V) = a
b * tan(V) = a
To find the side b
c * cos(V) = b
a / tan(V) = b
To find the side c
a / sin(V) = c
b / cos(V) = c
In this case, we want to find a and we use sin
mod? hos?
Yes it's called other words in my language
they're supposedly linked to a diagram
pay close attention to the location of the variables
Yes
you should focus more on
sin(V) = mod/hyp
cos(V) = hos/hyp
tan(V) = mod/hos
I know whether to use which one
they're no need to explicitly state the variables being used in those established formula
those were used to represent the sides of the triangle they used.
eg in this case.
sin(alpha) = mod/hyp
and in this question, your mod is a
and hyp is b = 3.61
which gets you
sin(56.31°) = a/3.61
I've done the first one
it's 3
My mod is a
Yes
Hyp
3,61
what's this then
relative your your angle alpha, its the adjacent side: (hos)
Yes ok
do you know pythagoras theorem?
u can use that too after you found your mod
wait
2 se
c
Here ramonov
But do I have to look from the numbers a, b and c in the drawing?
anybody know calc A
yes. you should use the variables they used.
its not
c is not a standard variable used to label a hypotenuse
the hypotenuse is the side opposite the right angle: B
in that drawing
in this case the appropriate variable would be b
c represents the hyp for a right triangle with a right angle at C
yes
yes
So we wish to find a
We have the hyp and hos
We use cos
No wait
nvm
I take that back
We have the
hyp
and wish to find the mod
So we use the sine relation
3,61 * sin(56.31) = 3 = a
a = that
yes
So now we gotta find c
we have the mod and hyp, right?
Or do we act like we stay in angle c and sees what we have?
wdym stay in angle c
stick with the angle at A for convenience
yes
alternatively you could use pythag since you have a now
though trig would be more accurate
ok.
so what is the last line called
hosliggende
so to find c, you could use
cos(V) = hos/hyp
yes, you already found the mod
now you want to find the hos
and that why you should use something like
cos(V) = hos/hyp
so you can find it
since you know the angle and the hypotenuse
well we have the hyp and mod, so we could also use sin
a trig function relates 3 things. if you know 2 of them you can find the third
you already used sine to find the mod side: a
So you can't use sin twice or wha
similarly you can use cosine to find the hos: c
well you can... but it'd mean extra work
It's just confusing
what is stopping you from using cos?
We have the mod and hyp, meaning if you have these 2 sides and wants to find the hos
you should apply the sine relation
wrong
you're going back to the old variables again
Okay wait
if you have mod and hyp, you can use sine
focus on these
sin(V) = mod/hyp
cos(V) = hos/hyp
tan(V) = mod/hos
if you have hos and hyp, you can use cosine
u used 3.61 * sin(56.31) because you wanted to find mod
knowing V, and the hyp you can use sine to determine mod
similarly
knowing V, and the hyp you can use cosine to determine hos
therfore we use cos
yes
you should really think of the relative positions instead of only variables
let me explain
dun wry, we'll help u understand it
So here, we have to find the hos. The only formula where something with the hos isn't in is Sin(V) = mod/hyp = a/c, thus I think I should use the sine relation
I know that's with the old variables,
whut
because sin(V) does not have hos, you do not use sin(V) to find hos
cos(V) = hos/hyp
you know V
you know hyp
and you want to find hos
hence cos would be something you could use
well that's what we do to find hos
since it's the only one it isn't in
we also have the mod
that extends your options to using tan as well
ok maybe let me ask a different question
but it wouldn't be as accurate since you probably rounded your value for a
why did you not use 3.61*cos(56.31)
cox
you also stated they wanted you to use sine and cosine
coz
Given a rectangle, the perimeter is p units and the area is a units^2 If the length and width are tripled,
What is the perimeter of the new rectangle?
What is the area of the new Rectangle?
it seems so easy but i’m so confused
nice
Okay so
oh i’m sorry for interrupting
Because we have the hyp and we wish to find the mod, therefore we use sin
Sin(V) = mod/hyp
ok now i give you this statement
sure
Because we have the hyp and we wish to find the hos, therefore we use cos
does it make sense?
no
coz we also have the mod
what do u do when u have 2 sides and wish to find the 3rd?
choose whichever method you want that could be applied
that is the beauty of trigonometry
the problem comes when we have 2 sides and wish to find the 3rd
just because you know what the mod side is now doesn't mean you can't stop using something
assuming you didn't already find the mod side a,
you should be recognise that similarly you could've used cosine first to determine the hos side c
what sides do we have
hyp and the angle
thats ez
so 3.61 and 56.31 degrees
you have the hyp and wish to find the hos
yes
don't use the old variables
so u use cos
so what is the hos?
its not a problem to calculate
wdym
it's the same
you can choose whatever method you want
just because you found a first doesn't mean you suddenly can't use cos(A) = hos/hyp anymore
just because you have more information doesn't mean you must use all of it
you've even implied it yourself
cos(V) = hos/hyp
could be used to determine the hos side
and that's all you need to do
don't overcomplicate it
What’s the answer
what is the slope and y intercept of -3x + 2y = 6
25a?
a person having a monthly salary of rs 3600 earns 15% raise. Find his new monthly salary??
@gray isle
I'm back
Technically
You could do like this
You act like you don't know a
You have the hyp, and you wish to find the hos
Cos(V) = hos/hyp
Therefore you use cos
which is what we've been saying
However
What if you start with 2 sides
With one given angle
And wish to find the 3rd side
What are you gonna do
you can choose whatever valid method you want
you just have more options
knowing a doesn't stop you from using cos here
it's essential to choose the right one
but it would also let you use something like tan
Yes
These numbers are just examples
That probs are incorrect
How would you go on by findidng a?
these are all right angle triangles?
the markings on that top left triangle are quite bad
by convention lowercase letters should usually be opposite the capital angles/vertices
How would you go on by finding the side a
bare in mind, this is just an example I made
hos
a = hos
b = ?
c = ?
so what is b?
mod
hyp
ok good
b could be hos and a could be mod
A
mod = a
hyp = c
hos = b
well, that's easy
it's if we have 2 sides
and wish to find the 3rd
yh
how do you find hos in terms of cos(V) and hyp?
by isolating???
yes
i may or may not be around, so just ask someone for help if i'm not around when you return
Remember: the thing is what to do when you have 2 sides/an angle and wish to find the 3rd
Okay sure
i'll just state this
is abs^3 cosx just cos^3x ?
you just need 1 side and an angle
-5 right
Can someone please help me rn
I’m reviewing for my test next period which is in 10 minutes
And there’s a question on the study guide which I have no idea how to do
Can someone please show me their solving process
@covert glade u still around?
Yea
are u able to form an equation for y in terms of y_0 and t, where t is time in years and y_0 being the base population at year 0
use the basic law of exponential growth
anyway i think u dun have much time, so i'll go through it as much as i can
so u start with the top equation, which is the basic law
now when t = 20, u get the next equation
and since you are also told the population quadruples, it equals 4y_0
from there you solve for k
now you have the equation for the population
to find the rate of growth, you differentiate the equation wrt t
and it simplifies to ky
hello does this server have another age restriction other than 13?
like some servers do
probably not
anyway
im a junior at highschool and im getting interested in calculus and im wondering where should i start learning
you may want to try #precalculus
thankss
@74742 THANK YOU so much
help please
would i plug in sin t for x and then do chain rule so multiply everything by -cosine?
- cos t / 25 - sin t^2 potentially
what's the question. . .?
you posted an integral and didn't tell us the question
ok so why are you plugging bounds in before evaluating the integral?
thought it was like the fundamental theorem of calculus
like if it was a constant on bottom and x on top u just plug in x into the parent function
that's for differentiating
you said evaluating the integral
83247839
Hey guys, I have a practice problem here. Can anyone assist me with this? This is my first time doing long polynomial division in algebra
A text version of this would be ((x)/(2)-(2)/(x)) and (1-(x^(2))/(4))
stil so confused
have you learned partial fractions. . ?
no
Ok... can you post the explicit question to make sure you're actually suppose to evaluate it?
can you just post the question?
it says find dy/dx
Yes... that's differentiating, not evaluating the integral
so apply FTC1
yes, and use chain rule on the sin(t)
so multiply whole thing by -cos t?
derivative of sin isnt -cos
yes
yes
are you also differentiating that?
yes
then yes
thank you so much
Can someone help me with this integral
10135367627
yes
it can go out the integral

❤️

The shaded area of the figure shown is modeled by the expression 5x^2 + 20x + 19 . Dimensions for the inside rectangle are x + 1 and x + 2 , as shown.
Find an expression, in simplified form, for the perimeter of the larger rectangle.
, rotate
I think if I can find the initial velocity, the question can be solved easily
hey guys
if i have a p-series like 2/n^3
can i pull the 2 out
of the series
when i'm doing a comparison test
b/c for a problem like this: https://gyazo.com/ae666817a4ce59c23b734a13adea9e76
the highest order terms are n/n^3 => 1/n^2
however, 1/n^2 is smaller than the sum, but if I did 2/n^2 then it'll be greater
and thus by the comparison theorm and p-series it'll converge
is that a valid proof?
im not familiar with this stuff, but shouldnt you be able to write down a general formula in terms of n?
ie sum to n?
method of difference i think its called
oh but i' masking my question as it related to the comparison theorm
what the hell is the logic behind this
if i take a random X value im supposed to find y
never been taught that
thanks for the name ill look it up
oh bruh thats easy as shit
what the hell is this asking me to do?
If the degree is 3, there should be at least 3 zeroes, but they only gave you 2, so you need to find the last zero.
I like python
C++ is fun though *sniff*
Sure is
i don’t even know how to find any zeroes
don’t know why people keep calling me a python
I like both
only the colors tho
complex conjugate root theorem
oh right your question xd
i got a stroke reading that, I’m probably too young
If a polynomial with R co-efficients has complex roots, then the complex roots come in their conjugate pairs
in use
uh what
ok can someone just do one problem for me, then send a picture so i know the procedure for the rest?
do you know what conjugates are?
only in languages
lol
if their real values are the same but the imaginary are opposite, theyre conjugates
for example
3+2i and 3-2i are conjugates
so i just find the conjugate and that’s it?
this 
if a polynomial has complex roots, then theyre conjugate of each other
in your first example you have degree 3 which means it has 3 roots and are given the roots - 1 and i
-1 is a real root
however i is a complex root
and the other complex root would be its conjugate
what is 2+2 = ?
wait give me a moment to process this information, my brain works very slowly
take your time
so would the other conjugate be -i?
yes
ty now i can finally finish
np
huh, that’s strange though, my teacher basically taught me that other method for no reason
what other method
Hello I stumbled upon this on my homework and have no idea how to do it. Can someone help a young lad out?
,rotate
are you familiar with trig identities?
is this similarity?
If you can find out 2 of the angles, then they are similar
yes it's similarity, no need for trig
use cosine rule to find out the angle
Just prove the ratios of similar sides are the same.
yea that would be much easier I suppose lol
How would I prove that if they are the same?
read what @steep briar wrote
how do i solve this? use law of sines
sin(x)/23 = sin(27)/11
yes, thats what i have so far
how do i solve for that
So isolate for x
yea solve for x
can you cancel something that is under a sqrt in a quotient?
example?
wait
that's right
ill send a pic
yep
ok
damn srk, the movies thing isnt paying enough?
what?
Can I cancel the tangents?
,rotate
n
i just like math
no since there's the +1
oh yeah lmao i just saw it
and even if the +1 wasn't there, the tangents wouldn't cancel
how do i solve 11sinx=23sin27 algebraically ?
you already did. . .?
ohh ok thanks
ok
they wont cancel but the powers would subtract
Hello, on the problem I posted above about 15 minutes ago. I figured out that they were similar but idk what theorem? Can someone help?
Could you send the problem again?
Is this channel busy?
well, there are like 10 open questions in this channel xD
This is pretty unrelated but not sure where to ask this: Does anyone know how I can get the x->2 under the lim in Microsoft Word instead of just a regular subscript?
Khan Academy
Hello. I am studying function transformations. I saw a question, to plot the curve of y = |x^2 -2x -3|. So I first used y = f(x) -> y = |f(x)|, then I am stuck. I factorize the equation like so : y = (x+1)(x-3). But my question is, can I use x -> x + 1 transformation here? Just confused.
which specific vid?
just insert a equation
an
all the ones on factoring
thats what I'm doing
there's an option for limits
all the ones i can find are on quadratic equations
All of the problems on that worksheet are quadratic equations
Sorry I meant specifically for latex
oh idk that
Going through the UI menu manually is a bit cumbersome to constantly do
It takes 6 days for 6 groups of 6 programmers to write 6 programs of 600 lines each, how many days would it take for 7 groups of 7 programmers to write 7 programs of 700 lines each?
anyone?
Well it claims that WYV and WYX are the same angle
So law of sines could be used here
How would I set up the equation in?
<@&286206848099549185> I need help with this question
Well do you know the law of sines?
Not all that well. Can you teach me how to use it?
^
yes please
what do you need, @alpine sable ?
you just use simple trigonometry.
So $\frac{a}{\sin{a}} = \frac{b}{\sin{b}} = \frac{c}{\sin{c}}$
ɟɟnʇsopᴉᴉɥ
@alpine sable If that isn't enough let's go into the question-4 channel
I know
I did that earlier
d = 5,83 * sin(59,04) = 5
I need e
idk how to
how do you find the 3rd side when you know 2 sides
Idk how to do that. Could you set it up so I can see what it looks like?
Well when I talk about sine it relates to angles
When a side is used in an angle formula it relates to the angle opposite the side
So hopefully u can go from that
I’m still lost. What numbers would I plug into the formula to get the answer?
I can give you the answer
You have to know how to make the formula for future use like a test
Look at what angles are opposite of the sides and show me what you got
I don’t understand I’m sorry
Hmm
I'll start you off
I think you should do 10/sin(Y)
And compare it to something else
I’ve never worked with sin. Can I friend you and message you some of my notes?
gaussian elim w/ matrices or just elimination?
For derivatives and anti derivatives
generally speaking, from a Function I can derive it, then anti derive the derivative to find the function again
And if I anti derive a function, I can derive the antideriv to find the function?
differentiation then integration returns the function up to a constant
integration then differentiation returns the function as it was
What does it mean to return the function up to a constant?
well if you take the derivative, any constant disappears. So if you integrate (anti differentiate) back again, you cannot know if the constant was 2, or 3, for example, @rare kiln ...
ahh true true
So generally speaking, any time I anti derive a function or anti derive a derivative, i will always need that +C, right?
yes
That makes sense, and now I understand this.
The hard part is remembeing general trig anti derivs/derivs :<
I agree xD I can also only remember sine and cosine xD
hi uhm have an amazing day people <33
You too bro
ty
♥️
💔
what is here supposed to be done?
I'm trying to say that the total profit can be represented by that. Meaning like 21 x how much u want to sell it plus 16 how much u want to sell this thing minus 25 because that's how much u spent on advertising
well great, but what is your question? xD
Looking for someone to check my 10 questions and see if they’re right (practice)
So basically a person wants to sell 21 CD's and 16 games. He spent 25$ for advertising it. Write an expression for how much he'll receive for selling the CD's and games.
then your expression should be correct
Well I was wrong, and now I know how to do this type of question. The answer was 21d+16g. I minus 25 because that's how much he spent on advertising but it never asked for profit.
fuc
I just wanted to know if my expression can be like that
If I can write that and my math teachers would give me marks
Let's say if it did ask for profit would my expression be right? t(c, g)=21c+16g-25?
yes
Can you put two variables inside there?
you can indeed
My tutor says you can't because it's f(x)=x+x it's never f(x)=x+x+y
but can't I just put f(x, y)=x+x+y
you can definitely have multiple variables in an equation
Thanks now I know
How can the divergence of this series be proved?
The sequence of terms does tend to 0
alternating series test
The terms tend to 0
I cannot use the other piece of the alternating series test to prove divergence
wait, it isn't a divergent sum. What do you mean?
you're welcome
Can anyone help me in dms
how would I find the rate of growth of y when just given points
the answer is 6.691
why is this wrong though?
nvm got it, used wrong bounds for integral
should be 2/3 to pi/2
The cost c (in dollars) for the fuel and maintenance of a go-cart is given by c=15x+1000, where x is the number of rides. It costs $20 per ride. How many rides does it take to break even?
pls help me 🙂
it costs $15 to operate the cart for each ride, but you get $20 for each ride
you can think of being paid as subtracting from the cost
so you can subtract 20x to represent you gaining money
now you have 15x + 1000 - 20x
that simplifies to -5x + 1000
the x-intercept of this line represents breaking even
so find the x-intercept
.
hello
@glacial kettle don't mass ping other users
I need help lol
simplify?
or what
,w 3.4x - 2.5x + 7.6y - 8.4x
,w simplify 3.4x - 2.5x + 7.6y - 8.4x
3.4x-2.5x = 0.9x
0.9x -8.4x = -7.5x
only 1 y term so u just leave that the same
so
Hello, I was doing number 12 and I think I was doing something wrong. Can anyone help?
7.6y - 7.5x
lambda
help
huh
do you not knwo the slope formula
-3
<@&286206848099549185> pls help
cant really see the qn
solve using substitution?
You have to use the Letter choice by solving with substitution and elimination and the last one graphing
yeah
oh simultaneous eqns
And I need to show work for all
No only 3 out of the four
let me guide you through A then
Please do
so substitution is basically you let something be a subject of the eqution
so for instance now i want x to be the subject, so i move y to the right side of x+y = 9, which would become x = 9-y
you follow?
But I got it right tho the math teacher didn’t say it was wrong
I’m doing substitution for it
wait a minute i think my mental calculations failed me lmfao
Bruh
I took Z common, both numerator and denominator
Still one Z was left in denominator
Someone help me
this is the entire question bro
I know
I'm using wolfram alpha to get an answer
\wa lim z to infinity [zsinT/(z^2 - 2zcosT + 1)]
Nope the bot doesn't help
Oh you know how to solve manually? Answer is 0
It's 0
Yeah how you do it
Okay
consider factoring out z instead of z^2
U will have z-2cosT+1/z
In the denominatior
And sinT in numerator
Now plug in z = infinity in the equation
U will get inf - 2cosT + 1/inf = inf
Oh I see thanks bro @spark totem i got maths semester exam this afternoon
All the best!
I'm trying to show this, but I have not been able to figure out how to relate |f(x) - f(y)| to |x-y|
thks
I tried radicalizing, but that still gives me a mess when I consider |f(x) - f(y)|
This is what I get without radicalizing
And ^ is what I get with radicalizing
Can someone point me in the right direction as to how I can relate either of these to |x-y| so as to demonstrate uniform continuity?
hi is anybody available to help?
just making sure that im correct
if you square a square so like
(x^2)^2 does it = x^4
well, now that i think about it, what else would it be
Yes
(a^x) ^y = a^xy
yes got it, did the computation
How do you check your answer in substitution <@&286206848099549185>
by reading rules
If your question has not been answered for a minimum of 15 minutes, you may use the Helpers tag once. Please do not try to bump your question using this ping unnecessarily. Do not abuse this ping. Do not individually ping users with the Helpers tag without their express permission.
yaya sorry, i kept working a bit and got what i thought should've been right, far as i can tell it matches the derivatives perfectly
but it says it's wrong
bella, please find a room that's not in use
Wdym
i'm in the middle of trying to figure out the answer to my problem
oml. i'm blind. tysm
So
thanks dude
Can u help me
?
I font get it
At all
I'm so confused and I need this grade plz help guys
Can I dm you for help
I also need some help?
is there any other information included? I don't think it's possible to calculate arclength without the radius or the area
Yeah nope that's it man
it is asking for arclength, yes? not the angle?
Yeah the arc length
maybe try leaving r in the equation then, so
What would the equation be ?
arclength=r(theta)
What's theta I'm really slow
Radians would be ?
I just explained that
^
I dont know how to do this man
i'm telling you xD
mhm
the angle in radians. so for angle POM it'd be 165pi/180
or whatever that reduces to
11pi/12
i suggest finding all the angles first, then just calculating the arcs
is there any rule for doing this?
I have to determine the smallest natural numbers m and n if:
m * 864 = x ^ 2
n * 864 =y ^ 3
x and y are any natural numbers
if u can help pls dm or @ me
will try
Can someone help me asap wih a question
,rotate
Intro Stats
Was having some trouble with A
Would finding the point estimator just be adding the values together and dividing by the number of values present?
Not sure how to approach this
Could use a hand
i think the point estimator is just the sample mean yeah
intuitively nothing else would feel right
hi. what's the conjugate of (a+bi)e^(ic) ?
got it
thanks ann
are a, b and c known to be real?
@vale wigeon i dunno, the question is just given as find the conjugate and that is what is given
are you sure
yes
in any case, conjugation behaves nicely with all arithmetic operations
hell, even $\overline{e^z} = e^{\overline{z}}$
uu∀
so even w/o knowing $a, b, c \in \bR$ you can use that and the fact that conjugation ``distributes over'' all four basic arithmetic operations to get $(\overline{a} -i \overline{b}) e^{-i \overline{c}}$
uu∀
i can only find simple examples like: the conjugate of a+bi is a-bi. the example however has three variables and a product and i can't find anything on how to find the conjugate for such an expression
since you have a complex exponential, it generally yields another complex number
so there exists some c + id = e^z
then you can use all your usual properties that are easy to test
gakuteru, are you familiar with the fact that $\overline{z_1+z_2} = \overline{z_1} + \overline{z_2}$ and $\overline{z_1z_2} = \overline{z_1} \cdot \overline{z_2}$ for ALL $z_1, z_2 \in \bC$?
uu∀
no

you can prove it yourself though, those are pretty standard properties
once you have seen once that those properties are true, you're golden
hey guys i got an question
i can understand thing yellow line, like 8=3+5
and 15 is 3x5
but the blue line is little confusin, cuz √3^2 is 9 instead of 8
wait what is sqrt
square root
ok
