#help-0
1 messages · Page 542 of 1
what happens to 30xy
just multiply the right side and then you get the left, @neat ruin
well, 2ab must be 30xy, @alpine sable
so it becomes 15?
no, it is 30xy
30xy
30xy doesn't become anything. We are just trying to identify our "a" and our "b" so that we can use the formula.
wanna hop in a vc?
sure, give me 3 min
is this right?
"translation 5 units left" means like shifted to the left by 5 units, right?
Then it should be $\log_2({-x+5})$, I think, @stuck delta .
uosɹǝdʎddɐɥʎɹǝʌ
okay awesome thank you
thank you!
you're welcome
howdy! I have a relatively simple question about simplifying radicals. my textbook gave me this example -
i'm a bit confused as to how that simplifies to 10sqrt(101)
give me 2 min to type it out, @olive warren
just lift 10^2 out
exactly
ahh, great, then I don't have to type it xD
makes sense now since it becomes 100(101) and then sqrt of 100 is 10
yes, exactly
i'm out here in calc 10 years out of school trying to remember how to do algebra l o l
xD I can relate...
I think circle.
@limber atlas you messed up your (a^2)^(-3/2)
@storm spoke because I drew it in GeoGebra xD
ohs :D
oh it's supposed to multiply not add right?
yes
ty
why is my name a number
why would you think it is an ellipse though, @storm spoke ?
I asked my friends and they said it is an ellipse
and they look kind of similar
to circle
Can someone help me with this
@manic quail
@tidal patrol Just solve for x, there are multiple ways to do it
If i find X what do i do next?
@tidal patrol m=x
only if x is an integer though

@tidal patrol remove the fractions by multiplying by the denominator
i got -15/8
@storm spoke technically you are right anyway, because a cirlce is also just a special kind of ellipse
how are you getting -15/8
,w (-2/(x-3))=(2/(x+3))+1/2
uosɹǝdʎddɐɥʎɹǝʌ
Somebody probably is 69 then, right?
?
oh sorry thats my pot
bot
it's set to do that to every message on the channels 1-9 every 1 minute
with the most recent message
hey coding in linux isn't easy
it's very easy
anyway
?
$\frac{1}{3}bh=V$
uosɹǝdʎddɐɥʎɹǝʌ
<@&286206848099549185> how do i get access to the pde channel?
go to the bots channel and get the advanced rank
Gave you the Advanced selfrole.
what don't you understand, @flat pagoda ? There is a formula for this...
$V=\frac{1}{3}bh$
168995235206721
can someone explain to me why the 1/2 ?
wdym
is this correct? I think that the statement is false because of the Congruent Corresponding Chords Theorem
the Congruent Corresponding Chords theorem is:
In the same circle, or in congruent circles, two minor arcs are congruent if and only if their corresponding chords are congruent
We know that AB and CD are congruent chords since ABCD is a rectangle, but we do not know if circles P and Q are congruent circles
57651
wow
not 0?
if that doesnt give enough of a hint
guys how do u be good at math
$5*2$
72303911
$\frac{F_b}{\Delta L}$
72303911
$\frac{F_b}{\Delta L} = \frac{\mu_0 I^2}{2\pi r}$
72303911
if you look at my picuture, 20^2+x^2=r^2 where r is the radius, however r=50-x
this is the picture im reffering to if you're unsure
Help😩
lol what
How do I do this?
Thank you
@alpine sable no server adverts
Umm did you understand like what I did?
Yeah I do
Cool then
I'm comparing it to my notes right now thanks
I am somewhat new to proofs and am confused by a proof in a real analysis text book. The textbook is "understanding analysis" by Stephen Abbott. In the book theorem 1.2.6 goes as follows: Two real numbers a and b (real numbers) are equal if and only if for every real number e > 0 it follows that |a - b| < e.
In the textbook he proves it in two parts. The first being simple. That is if a = b then |a - b| = 0. Such that |a - b| = 0 < e which is true since all e numbers are greater than 0
The second part of the proof is what confuses me. He shows a proof for (for all e > 0 => |a - b| < e) => a = b. He proves by contradiction such that a =/= b. Then says let e0 = |a - b| > 0. Then a contradiction is formed such that |a - b| < e0 since e0 = |a - b|. Even if this is correct I do not see how this proof by contradiction satisfies => a =/= b being a contradiction
if (for all e > 0 => |a - b| < e) is a contradiction that would seem to imply (for all e > 0 => |a - b| < e) => a = b is a tautology. Since F => T = T. All this seems to indicate is that the LHS of the implication is a contradiction such that modus ponens cannot be applied. But I do not see how this would then cause us to include that a = b?
How do I find the local rate of change on a parabola? The points are (-10, -4)
i got an super hard question in #help-3, can someone who smart as fack take a look at it
Hello
Anybody know if a negative number squared equals a negative or positive
a negative number squared will always be positive
Ok thank you
Ok sorry I have another question
What is the local rate of change on this parabola at the point (-10, -4)?
how can i find this ^
What if im doing discriminants and you know how b^2-4ac and there are no other numbers except for a being x^2, what do I do?
This is the equation= x^2 -14x +49=0 how do I solve this
fill it in
if its just x^2
b and c would be 0
is there a method u have to use to
you can factor that quadratic
hint: ||x^2-7x-7x+49||
or use quadratic formula
could someone help
@gray isle you here bro?
could sm1 help me
<@&286206848099549185>
ANYONE?
it is
@alpine sable are u here
like here
this is the practise project
im at the final part
i solved for the system of equations
which i can show
@sturdy glen diff channel bro
this busy
yeah i was typing it all up before
no worries
it had been open for like half an hour
Here's what I'll do. Let $m_1$ and $m_2$ be the slopes of $y_1$ and $y_2$ respectively.
Now find where $y_1$ and $y_2$ are equal. That is, when [m_1x+30=m_2x.]
With some quick algebra, we see that [x=\frac{30}{m_2-m_1}.]
Now plug in the $m_1$ and $m_2$ and see if your answer matches.
117726
@ripe turret your x value is extremely close to being correct.
@coral pagoda oh my x value is wrong?
Never round until the end lad
That's why I waited until the end to deal with the messy arithmetic
You saw my process
i dont get it
how does our answer match
if we plug both m1 m2
in the 2nd equation
,w {89/1236}*{2314500/4789}
,w {17165875/493267} + 30
That does not help with the problem at all
No, I said plug in the slopes m_1 and m_2 in to the final result I have for x
$x=\frac{30}{m_2-m_1}$
117726
As did I
117726
What do you end up getting
I have no idea what you did wrong with your arithmetic
I didn't try to plug in the messy stuff to avoid that problem
,w {89/1236} - {67/500}
You flipped the order
,w 30/{4789/77250}
slope 1 is 89/1236
ok
Now a good thing to check is that the y-values are indeed the same.
There's no reason they shouldn't be, but it's good to get in the habit of it
it would be negative
There is no reason it should be negative
Here, try this. Instead of trying to figure out what happened with your arithmetic, try to see if you can prove me wrong.
Ah, that does it :p
It's good to simplify the problem like I did to not accidentally plug in the wrong values.
The less arithmetic you have to do, the better
,w {67/500}*{2317500/4789}
that is y?
I mean, just find what it is in decimal form
my calc doesnt fit it
Not sure what you mean
Well, 64.8455 when rounded
But yes
And that sounds like a pretty realistic number
answer would be 483.92 km right
What does x and y represent
Well, then yeah.
What map question?
Yea. Any location less than 483 km should have the car ride cost less than a plane trip to the same location
@coral pagoda ok wait 1 sec
Because the owner wanted our names to all be contained in π 😆
Not quite, but you have the right line of thinking
There ya go!
Nah, likely just gonna be for a day
Where is your starting point?
from my city
Okay. Draw a circle where the city is the center and the radius is 483 km
so we draw a circle on the location of were we started
Yes indeed
As long as it's to scale, sure
do we need to do that?
ok idrc about where it is at this point
so that and we draw a really big circle with the radius of 483 on each side
how tf we do that
@coral pagoda
How do you think?
idk
I think you do. And if not, you can look up a tutorial on youtube
Depends on if that's okay with your teacher. 🤷
Yea, you have a scale.
I am not saying that is the actual scale here, I do not know what it is for your map
@coral pagoda it doesnt allow you to show a scale
how tf would you do it
do i just print it and copy it ?
No, just be mindful of the scale.
Email your teacher to see if the digital circle is good enough
i did
Okee dokee. Then wait til they reply
Factorise 2(r-s)^2-r+s
hey guys this question was in my grade 10 math paper and i couldn't solve it can anyone explain it please?
$2(r-s)^2-r+s=2(r-s)^2-(r-s)$
12221131112213122111112112111
do you see it now?
ahh i see thanks
nw
hello
i need help with this chemistry question
Naturally occurring silver consists of two isotopes (107Ag47 and 109Ag47) and has a relative atomic mass of 107.87. Calculate the percentage of the lighter isotope.
<@&286206848099549185>
Do you know the formula
107x + 109(1-x) = 107.87
the abundance of Silver-107
Yes
expand out 109(1-x) and do algebra
uhm? not needed
You're not needed
What is x?
You already solved for it. No need to plug it back in
Just convert to a percentage
what?
0.565 = 56.5%
hi
hi
hey the question was for which values of x will R be
- Undefined
- Real
lmao idk i was just saying hi
hmm thats a hard one to compute
6802458
maybe try u = sinx?
@rapid olive you should know that you cant put negative values inside a square root
if you want a real output
du = cosxdx
integral e^sinx*sinx seems a bit 
i tried
It works out quite nicely
won't work
e^sinx * sinx, u = sinx, du/dx = cosx, hm so we have e^u * u du/cosx
sin(x) = u = u/1
cos(x) = sqrt(1 - u^2)
hm so we have e^ u * u/sqrt(1 - u^2)
i think we can integrate u/sqrt(1 - u^2) and differenciate e^u
using by parts
see what happens
hm
@rapid olive If you didn't understand, what we need is $\frac{-7}{x-3} \geq 0$
4437
thanks
use E
Guys, I have a geometry test in like 1 hour, anyone willing to help me?
hello hello please I need help with like the easiest question ever
loga(18) x log3(a)
I am doing this on Khan Academy and I got the result of log18/log3
but why is the answer log 3 (18)
Oi I gots another problem😬
how did it go from log 18/log 3 to log 3 (18)
......help
Why does it burn wen I pee??
THANK YOU I JUST REALIZED @upbeat gorge
HAHAHAH log a(b) = log x b/log x a
i forgot ooops
thank you thank you
My pp hurts pls help
or dysuria
There must be a mathematical equation to fix my dick
yes there is
ill teach you
you have 1 dik right?
delete that 1
and boom your pain is gone
Na I got multiple
Aah makes sense
you gotta get rid of all the roots
doesn’t that equal to 1
U tryna get sum @rapid olive 😏
no
its whatever you want it to be
i seriously am struggling with this its too early can any one please assist me?
<@&286206848099549185>
You do not have a question
?
anyway
@rapid olive you can find angle A by knowing that the sum of al angles in the triangle is 180
you are given a right triangle and a known angle B = 52,7 degrees
after that use trig to find one more side or hypothenuse, and after that pythagorean theorem for the remaining thing
Well fuck me side ways
exactly what they stated.
factor out (x+3)
Okey i mean i know what factoring is
I mean what i will do is it will equal
X^2+3x -×-3 ?
Dont you multiply them by the number outside the parentheses
if the end goal is to factorise, you don't need to
What is confusing me how the +3 did become -1 and where did the x on the left desspier
Shoudlnt it become -3 ?
both your terms have a common factor of (x+3)
that was factored out
ab - ac = a(b-c)
Oh
Uhhhh
If 30 percent = 15 how can i find how much 100 percent is = to
Well since 30 is 15 i know that 90percent is 45
But how can i find what is the 10 percenr ,_,
Cant you take 15 x 100/30 to get 50?
Oh yeah that make sense
Tho i did find a way. From internet
Tho thanks
15/3 = 5
5 x 10 = 50
100% = 50

Lol this is supposed to be an easier chapter btw
Yea just find angle ACB by ASP of a triangle and add the three angles which should be equal to 180 degrees since they lie on a straight line so you can find y
Wait
I think x is 5 not 15
I thought of this but the thing is they didnt say it's a straight line so i cant assume that i think
Hmm
100% of something=something
Calculate one of the acute angles of the right-angled triangles using either cosine or sine. Find here
the second acute angle by utilizing that the sum of the angles in a triangle is 180 °.
So, for triangle ABC, I did this:
A= Cos(A) = 2/2,24
A = Cos^-1(0,89)
A = 27,13
Idk if it's correct though
bad notation with the ** A =** Cos(A)
also lowercase c for cos
i just said
bad notation with the A = Cos(A)
How do you want it?
the A = in front doesn't belong there
V =
just
cos(A) = 2/2.24
like about a third of a degree off
Yh
,w arccos(2/2.24) * 180/pi
A = cos^-1(2/2,24)
A = 26,77
it'd round to 26.77
Okay
how do I find the x ints of the polynomial x^6-7x^3-8?
i know that you distribute them and factor them and stuff
but i've only seen it work for 4-term polys
diagrams aren't necessarily drawn to scale
and they don't look equal
ope, i didn't know someone was in the middle of solving,
Hey, if t = negative value or positive value, but im expecting a positive value (because the logic of the problem), whats the usual practice to handle this with notation?
What does | n | < 3 stand for?
absolute value of n is less than 3
So anything bigger doesnt count?
Yes
just explain why you chose the value and why the other value is not viable
Thanks
aight
Wait so that would mean that the lowest number would be negative infinite?
no
The absolute value of x, otherwise written as $|x|$, is defined as $|x|=x$ if $x\geq 0$ and $|x|=-x$ if $x<0$
625
So 0?
So |0| =0, |1|=1, |-1|=1
Hi confused
Yes
Oh ok
So in this case if |x|<3 then x must be between -3 and 3, EXCLUSIVE
Meaning -3 and 3 themselves don’t count
.
You have to write it as -3<x<3
Because decimals, fractions, and irrationals exist
Too many real numbers fit in that interval
Is PQR right?
yes
This is the hypotenuse
but it's hard to see the others
can somebody help me?
Kristian wants to buy a bicycle for DKK 4,995. He does not have the money, but he can either borrow it from his big sister, who must have 10% interest when he pays the money back, or from the bicycle dealer. At the bicycle dealer, he must pay DKK 1,500 in payment and then pay DKK 350 per month for 12 months. Which loan offer is the cheapest?
thats my question
and i need help ):
i also need to explain the calculation
benyt renteformlen
@alpine sable
what
1500 + 12 * 350
- 12?
danish?
how did u know that
yes
because I'm from Denmark as well
and it says DKK
oh
nice
hej
hej
men
jeg har brug for hjælp lol
kan jeg godt dm dig det?
nej bare snak her
altså spørgsmålet på dansk.
ok
jeg sender den som er på dansk
ok?
okay
Kristian vil købe en cykel for 4.995 kr. Han har ikke pengene, men han kan enten låne dem af sin storesøster, som skal have 10% i rente, når han betaler pengene tilbage, eller hos cykelhandleren. Hos cykelhandleren skal han give 1.500 kr. i udbetaling og derefter betale 350 kr. om måneden i 12 måneder. Hvilket lånetilbud er det billigste?
jeg skal også have udregningen af det der.
Mange tak hvis du kan hjælpe mig
jeg er rigtig dum i matematik loL
Ja samme her
Hvilken klasse går du i?
Ved cykelhandleren er det 1500 + 350 * 12 = 5700 kroner
Renformlen er K_n = K_0 * (1 + r)^n
jeg går i 7 klasse
4995 * (1 + 0,10)^1
Tror det er sådan
Cykelhandleren = 1500 + 350 * 12 = 5700 kroner
Hos storesøsteren = 4995 * (1 + 0,10)^1 = 5494.5 kroner
men
hvad er
(1 + 0,10)^1
loLLL
wtf
K_n er resultatet, K_0 er startværdien, r er stigningen pr. år (i decimaler; altså bliver 2% til 0,02), og n er antallet af år der går.
Hos storesøsteren er lånetilbuddet det billigste
kan du ikke bare give mig en anden udregning istedet for (1 + 0,10)^1
pls
det er confusing.
Det er formlen for udregning af renter
Der er ikke andre
um
REEEEEEEEEEE
$Renteformlen = K_n = K_0 * (1 + r)^n$
48947
jeg har ikke lært det der
så hvis læreren spørger mig havd det er
så er jeg fucked
fordi vi har ikke lært det der (1 + 0,10)^1
det er confusing for mig
jeg skipper bare
opgavet
;-;
okay kan prøve igen
nej vent
hvad
jeg gider ikke skrive det der (1 + 0,10)^1
jeg vil skrive udregningen på en anden måde
f
vent
Is this channel being used??
yes
Ok
okay glem det der
ok jeg skipper
Nej, det er ikke en god ide
Matematik er opbygget sådan at opgaverne bliver sværere og sværere og forholder sig til de opgaver du tidligere har løst
jamen
jeg ved ikke hvad jeg skal
loL
det er svært
$Renteformlen = K_n = K_0 * (1 + r)^n$
48947
48947
Hvad er K_0 her?
jeg ved det ikke
Hvis K_0 er startværdien, hvad er K_0 så?
Kristian vil købe en cykel for 4.995 kr. Han har ikke pengene, men han kan enten låne dem af sin storesøster, som skal have 10% i rente, når han betaler pengene tilbage, eller hos cykelhandleren. Hos cykelhandleren skal han give 1.500 kr. i udbetaling og derefter betale 350 kr. om måneden i 12 måneder. Hvilket lånetilbud er det billigste?
Hvad er startværdien?
fweji0fweji9wef
ved ikke
bro slår snart mit hoved ind i muren
hvor mange penge starter han med
hvad vil han købe en cykel for, hvor mange penge?
@alpine sable hvor mange penge vil han købe en cykel for
står på første linje
🇩🇰
Can someone help this guy?
Kristian wants to buy a bicycle for DKK 4,995. He does not have the money, but he can either borrow it from his big sister, who must have 10% interest when he pays the money back, or from the bicycle dealer. At the bicycle dealer, he must pay DKK 1,500 in payment and then pay DKK 350 per month for 12 months. Which loan offer is the cheapest?
With this assignment ^^
Wait, you can borrow money from bicycle dealers in Denmark?

Fierce competition for Danish banks
Weird init
However
The question poses it as if you're paying the dealer in separate installments
Which is something decisively different from borrowing money due to the (seeming?) lack of interest
I think the problem is that he doesn't understand the interest rate formula
@alpine sable Hvormeget kan man få at 253.000 kr hvis man får 12,5% af det?
Hvordan kan jeg finde ud af det?
can you apply the divergence theorem to a surface integral along a surface which doesn't encompass a volume, like for example a hemisphere?
nevermind i figured it out
if i added 9 and mod 10 what would be the answer
how do u solve it
2263105026747
Fermat's last theorem: Are a and b allowed to be the same?
Hello
Direct: He said to me, “You are not a genius.”
Indirect: He told me that I am not a genius.
Why not He told me that I was not a genius?
<@&286206848099549185>
Because you never use two past tense verbs together
For example, my dad used to DRINK not my dad used to drank
Although he told me that I was not a genius is used very commonly and is acceptable in daily life
I thought simple present tense is changed simple past tense in indirect speech
Yes but this is part of the dialogue
What is the dialogue?
“You are not a genius”
Only the tense of when the dialogue is said is changed
The dialogue remains untouched in terms of tense
But this
Direct: He said, “I am a Cash of Clans player.” (present indefinite)
Indirect: He said that he was a Cash of Clans player.” (changes to past indefinite)
This one changes the tense
And not the first example?
No actually I think the first example should be he told me that I was not a genius
I mixed up the rules the dialogues change too
Like he said “I am going” changes to he said that he was going
Bruh my English skills are rlly rusty id recommended asking for help from a reliable source
Literally haven’t talked to anyone since the pandemic lmao
Hello I would like some help on my homework i am working on functions and i dont really understand what a function is may somebody please explain?
Functions are mathematical objects that take an input, or several inputs, and give an output based on the input given, often performing mathematical operations on the input.
For example, the function:
f(x) = x + 5
is a function that has one input: x, and gives an output which is the input plus 5.
For example, if you take 2 as an input, the output is:
f(2) = 2 + 5 = 7.
(The output is 7.)
ok thank you
how would i go ab solving this
Which of the sets of ordered pairs represents a function?
A = {(−4, 5), (1, −1), (2, −2), (2, 3)}
B = {(2, 2), (3, −2), (9, 3), (9, −3)}
acc nvm i think i got it
None right?
Cos the same input has two outputs
And a relation is a function only when every input has a unique output
thats what i was thnking
$0,125 * 253.000 = 31.625 kroner$
48947
Eller 253.000 / 8
Calculate both the missing side lengths in both triangles with cos or sin.
I did this for the side a
sin(56,31) = 3,61/x
x * sin(56,31) = 3,61
x = 3,61/sin(56,31)
a = 4,33
But it seems incorrect as the hypotenuse is always the biggest side
help?
<@&286206848099549185>
Yo, so my assignment is I have to find the missing sides...
I'm trying to find start off by finding the side a and using sin for that. The formula to find the side a with sin is:
c * sin(V) = a
The problem is that there isn't a number for the side c, what do I do here?
uhh idk wdym
idk all i know is that if u have all 3 angles
c is always the longest side
u can find all the sides
how
hm
law of sines
3.00
okay yea
But now c
we use sin
again
well we have to find
either b or a
well acc a
so sin and a
8u already have a
isnt there a formula where u take thea angle over the side
becuase u have eveything u need
im pretty sure theres a formula
i just dont know what ur cirriculum is
wait
no
thats incorrect
hold up
the problem is there aint a formula to find the side b with s
bro i dont think u know how this works
okay well how was i supposed to kn-ow u switched it
<@&286206848099549185>
why are u switcing the sides
his writing or what was there
what was there
lmfao
What do you need help with
thats what i was saying
F
What are you trying to do\
remember triangle 180 - 56.31 - 90
ye
Then you the sine law
The ratio between anggle to side should be the same in sine law
so sin(B) / b = sin(A) / a = sin(C) / c
which means sin(90) / 3,61 = sin(56,31) / a = sin(C) / c
so actually you don't even need angle c
sin(90) / 3,61 = sin(56,31) / a
ok listen up
So I started finding side a (listed the side in the pic to clear up confusion)
I used the sin relation, which you have to do in this case. So I did:
3,61 * sin(56,31) = 3 = side a
However, now it got confusing, because I have to find side b, and I have side a and c right now, so what do I do now?
no
you said you found side a
it's like this,
I think your labeling may not be to the diaggram
I need to find b
why not keep the same labelingg
that's not true but ok we can work with that
so you have side c and a
you can solve for b using either sine law
ion think we have to use Pythagorean here as that's not what the assignment says
Well it's a valid option but if it restricts you from doing that then
Use the sine law
The rules of finding side b
c * cos(V) = b
a / tan(V) = b
well, i dont see sin here
sin(56,31) / b = sin(90) / 3,61
so thats not true
You have to realize the variable could be anything
just because you don't see b doesn't mean it doesn't work
The side a
c * sin(V) = a
b * tan(V) = a
The side b
c * cos(V) = b
a / tan(V) = b
The side c
a / sin(V) = c
b / cos(V) = c
Actually if you want just plug the known sides into a triangle calculator
U don't have to show me whether to use which one
just a question is that 5631 or 56.31
Well those are the answers, if you did the sine law like I said you'd also get thhe same answer
brb
sin(33.69) / a = sin(90) / 3.61
sin(33.69) = 0.27700831a
0.554699216 = 0.27700831a
a = 2.00246417
same as the calculator showed
anyay gl
Hi is this available
But I don’t know what those parallel lines create
I think it’s congruent with AA
<@&286206848099549185>
help ping
Please ping after and minimum of 15min
And the parallel lines create similar triangles
Which gives you a very famous identity known as thales theorem, which states Ad/AB = AE/AC = DE/BC
Sure, im just letting you know
But what does it similar with AA
Like I know one is reflexive
But the other is I don’t know
What does the parallel line create
seems you know some terms related to parallel lines.
if you don't know which one to apply here, reread the definition
Where should I draw correspondin angles
I’ve tried but there’s not really an angle I think I could draw ;c
there should be nice diagrams showing those types of angles
and it should be clear what you have when comparing them to what you have in the question
Should I put the corresponding angles on
E and C
Parallel lines is the only thing I don’t get about this topic
I don’t know bro pls help
No that’s not it
are you familiar with the 3 point labelling system?
to unambiguously label angles
Notice how they both share same angle name A
That’s the reflexive one
But I don’t know the other congruent angles they have that makes them similar
I only need one more and I’m done with this question
should I put the corresponding angles on
E and C
be more clear about which angle at E you mean
I can assure you there are two
theres a point E,
and at E there are multiple angles
Do you know the answer bro?
yes
Bro then pls tell me
we've been trying to lead you to what you need to do
we've implied that corresponding would be appropriate here however
theres a point E,
and at E there are multiple angles
Name them appropriately to not confuse anyone
are you familiar with the 3 point labelling system?
taking this to a ridiculous level. if you just say angle Z, noone will know which angle you're refering to
just like in this case, if you say angle E, we have nfi which angle you're referring to
Bro give me the answer and tell me the lesson after
not give u the answer. if you cant understand the problem. learn the basics of it.
Pretty sure you wont understand it with the answer
idk how u can ever get help then bub
so much shit around E
But the triangle are
