#help-0
1 messages · Page 432 of 1
%20x500,000
Which is?
Right, so if you have a total savings of 41,400, would you have enough for that down payment?
No need to subtract, it's just asking whether you have enough or not :)
Exactly :)
Closed by @granite iron
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone help me?
@fair forge Has your question been resolved?
yes
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
So, for the first question you move your shape 7 units to the right and 2 up
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have a question how those formulas are called in English, so I could find some videos about them in YouTube
what dot should I move?
@fathom ravine Has your question been resolved?
General solutions of trig equations ig? I don't think there's rlly a name for these
btw, "ig" stands for "I guess" (btw stands for "by the way")
Oh, I got it, thanks!
anything else?
How do you understand that sinx=0 has only this answer "pk"? Like people use circle and a triangle inside to explain it, but I just don't understand
Like here
What is opp and hyp? Are they parts of a triangle which has 90° angle?
What is opp and hyp?
opposite and hypotenuse, respectively, in a right triangle (with respect to some angle ofc)
Here's an easier way: The value of sin is given by the y coordinate of the corresponding pt on the unit circle
so if our sine is zero, what must be the y coordinate be?
If y is zero, then we have a point in x
0 or p, right?
y = 0 b/c sin is 0
and the only time when y = 0 is when you have a point on the x axis
which occurs whenever you have an angle that's an integer multiple of pi
Yup
Or, really, we cant have a p/2 or 3p/2 because they lie on y, but because we have sinx=0 so our y has to be zero, so we can only have p period
I started understanding it!
I gotta go now tho 👋
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I find BE?
any idea what your supposed to use? you can try solving for equation of line and circle but im not sure if that is the best method. Setting D as origin, you have the line DE with equation y=-8/6x and the equation of the circle is (x-3)^2+(y-k)^2=3^2. Do abit of substitution and solve for k where discriminat=0(This means circle and line intersect at one point). Then 8-k will give you EB
let the circle be tangent to that DE line at P
and let BE = x
PE = EB = x by the circle tangents theorem thingy
the hint is to find the full length DE in terms of x and use pythag
@fickle star Has your question been resolved?
thanks and I just tried this
but it returns a really long decimal number and it took me a while to get an answer I don't think is right
right now im trying to think of some other way to use length of DE
Thanks for this also I got 1* from it, which I think is right? Im gonna search up what the circle tangents theorem is now
how about dropping a perpendicular from E to AD
im not sure how that'll work but i'll think about it, thx
same
@fickle star @fickle star@fickle star
is answer =1
let BE = X
DA = DE-X
DE = 10
DA = 8+X
( dropping a perpendicular from E to AD)
8+x = 10-x
x=1
I got the same thing, this is a question from my friend so I needa ask her for the answersheet
If I remember I'll dm you if it's correct or not according to the book 🙂
okay
could you please help me try to solve this, I spent so much time on trying to figure it out:
@fickle star Has your question been resolved?
holy hell
what id try first is try to get x1 x2 x3 in terms of lambda
and then plug them in two equations
its so not cool
😭
this is where I am getting stuck:
everything before is correct
<@&286206848099549185>
<@&286206848099549185>
Hi, how can I help you?
Hi im trying to solve this problem
this one
this is my work on its EX 9.4
my work is above in the pdf
whats that
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
?
it seems like an acronym, could you use the full name?
@small tinsel Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
there exist ε > 0 such that | e^x - 0 | < ε and there is N such that x < N
e^x < ε
log e^x < log ε
x < log ε
N = log_e (ε)
which satisfies the conditions hence
lim x -> -infinity e^x = 0
is this a corrrect proof!

@turbid patio bro are u writing to help 😅 if yes pls react smth a emoji
been typing for a while
lol
You've got all the pieces right, but it's just worded oddly.
Usually, you do some work to find a suitable N, and then you write the proof, with your work from before explaining why such N is right.
So here, you tried some ε and found that N = ln(ε) works.
Now, you can say that :
for any given ε > 0, let N = ln(ε). Then, for any x < N, we have x < ln(ε) <=> e^x < ε, as required.
yeh kinda bad with wording u put it nice way

thanks
.close
Closed by @devout nova
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone please explain this to me (SAT question)
@upper dagger Has your question been resolved?
This is rearranging variables. You have p=1 (from the last 5 words) so m.v=1.q solve for v, and you get your answer
i got the right answer doing this but how is p = 1 if it says the price level increases by 1
would it not be p + 1
Ah no, it’s asking for change in monetary velocity. We’re solving v= p * (Q/M) and taking the derivative with respect to p I guess,
@upper dagger Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @upper dagger
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Using the multiplicativity of the Legendre symbol and the law of quadratic reciprocity, calculate 155/991
Yea
@fallow wadi Has your question been resolved?
do you know what "multiplicativity of the legendre symbol" and "law of quadratic reciprocity" mean?
I suggest looking them up in your course notes
which really is the first thing you should do if you encounter something in an exercise which you dont know
alright
i need to solve it in 1h
is this task simple or hard?
if its hard im gonna go sleep and just get the points somewhere else to pass the course
@mortal trellis
rather simple once you get the idea
okay then i will read it
meanwhile u can give me some tips n tricks
:) @mortal trellis
how about you actually try doing something first?
wait its
wrong
@mortal trellis
this isnt the correct law right
the (q/p) is meant to be on left, correct?
same thing
are you confusing this notation with fractions?
i guess
@fallow wadi Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
VOLUME Ana Maria has a rectangular prism with dimensions 20 inches by 35 inches by 40 inches. She would like to replace it with a cube with the same volume. What should the length of a side of the cube be? Express your answer as a radical expression in simplest form.
__ in.
u good bro
but what's the prism's volume
this question is stumpingme
mhm
do i just cbrt it
yeah
this is right but they want simplest form
oh i guess it doesn't matter lole
!done
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
Closed by @fervent patrol
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Context: I submitted a quiz(Rational Equations & Inequalities for my Adv Funcs class) and this question gave me a bit of trouble. I ended up guessing it correct.
Question: What's the correct approach, or method to go about it?
Second pic is my approach: I tried to simplify and solve for k while setting x = 0
how did you get (3) and how did you substitute it into (2)
I derived equation (3) from equation (1), which is the left-side of the original equation. Then proceeded to substitute that for x in equation (2)
not sure if that's valid or not tho
you can't just decide to multiply the numerator and denominator of a random fraction and say it's equal to x
oh yeah.. actually that makes a lot of sense now that i look at it
(at the fact that I can't do that)
but is my approach with substituing here the right approach
because I'm still a little confused if that's how I should have went about it
@summer swallow Has your question been resolved?
WHAT IS THE DERIVATION OF PLANCK'S CONSTANT ??
@summer swallow Has your question been resolved?
@summer swallow Has your question been resolved?
@summer swallow Has your question been resolved?
@summer swallow if you multiply both sides by (x-3)(x+2) you'll get (x-1)(x+2) = (k-9x)(x-3)
You can multiply this out to get an equation that looks like ax^2 + b(k) x + c(k) = 0 where a is just a number, but b and c both depend on k.
Now, when a quadratic has only one solution, this is a special case called a double root, and the discriminant is equal to 0. So you have b(k)^2 - 4ac(k) = 0
Then you just solve this equation for k to find out your critical point.
Note that, you then have to double check your answer with the two values of k you get to ensure they result in a valid solution. Because you multiplied through by (x-3)(x+2) if your solution for k implies x has a solution at 3 or -2 it's invalid.
Appreciate you helping out
After multiplying both sides and getting the equation down to ax^2 +b(k)x+c(k)=0, like you mentioned(1st picture). I tried two different approaches.
The first one was the completing the square method to solve the quadratic(2nd picture with black/red text), while trying to consider k in the equation, but I got a stuck near the end of it because in order to find x I'd need to know k. If I could go further, I feel like it'd be somewhat to do with substitution.
The second method(3rd picture with purple/blue text), is my attempt at using b(k)^2-4ac(k) = 0. I did get a value for k at the end, but it was not equal to 14 or 54 like my quiz suggests, so I'm assuming I messed up or went about it wrong somewhere
<@&286206848099549185>
Reposting context for any new helpers: I submitted a quiz(Rational Equations & Inequalities for my Adv Funcs class) and this question gave me a bit of trouble. I ended up guessing it correct.
Question: What's the correct approach, or method to go about it?
First picture penultimate line
You combined like terms wrong
-(26+k)x
And -2+3k
You also forgot to write the -2
ahh yes, but I think I corrected it in the later steps but let me look at it again
at least the -2 I remember forgetting
You did not as far as I can tell
if you look at the second picture you can see I did -6k
you probably want to find a way to cancel x
.
ahh yeah sorry, I just went back and saw that you’re doing -(26 + k)x
and oo that makes a lot more sense too
and same with -2 + 3k
okay so if I had my like terms correct, and went with the approach in the third picture
should I get the result I’m looking for?
would that be how to go about it
doesn't matter if you do quadratic formula or complete the square
quadratic formula is literally completing the square
but yes if you do the steps correctly in either approach you'll get the right answer
Closed by @summer swallow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
What is the factor theorem?
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can anyone help I got a really hard question
How do i find the circumference in centimeters, of 81pi cm.
.close
Closed by @gray isle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
@gaunt elmchannel had someone else name on it, to claim a channel, just post the question directly in the channel
don't reply the bot message
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how to do research in mathematics?
do anyone have maybe some papers that can giveme an idea?
right now I having trouble in setting a research problem
I mean, I know research cant be so different from doing mathematics (the process of thinking) , but I have no idea where to begin
If someone has had a Introduction to research class and has some notes or recorded classes I would appreciate it a lot
I mean, you come up with a problem and try to solve it
read through papers and see what questions they leave open
Basic process is
- Find open problem
- Solve it
An introduction to research class is basically a masters degree
ok , that seems reasonable at first glance , but the but difficulties appear soon.
how I know what problem to choose?
How I know what problem may be adequate?
What field are you good ar
What problem seems solvable for you
mathematical logic / set theory and in general discrete matheamtics
I am looking , maybe , for some solved problem in the field , so i can try it by myself
do you have an advisor?
Not yet
"An introduction to research class is basically a masters degree"
how can i do a master degree free then (sorry for the stupid question , but no way i could get this by now)
what?
have you done graduate mathematics / research?
@mortal trellis
I am sure that the problem is not doing the research , the problem is setting the sketch for doing research
why not?
well , not exactly a "master degree" , but the experience
I am not asking about certification
I am asking about the action of doing research
literally doing it
well I mean you can just start
that's where my algorith fails
you'll just have to use a few years to actually understand relevant stuff
I dont know
can you explain how understanding implies more years?
I know mastery implies more years
But , I mean , the fact of understanding with the purpose of research , isnt that research?
bro, you have done it , please , give me an idea how to start
I am not asking you to write me a book , just What would you say to yourself from the past if you had wanted to start doing research at an earlier age?
well first you have to understand what others did
before you can produce new stuff
that's the point, research is an action , such as idk , composing music, or walking , right?
producing new knowledge is the social part of research , cause has impact, but if I discover something is new to me, then ¿is that also research?
I would call that learning
but how can I do that?
I mean , I am not sure if that is classical learning
but my idea , is not to solve what well trained mathematicians cannot , idk by magic
my purpose is to get training on research , It doesn't matter if it is "artificial" , as long I dont know the answer
so , since I have never done research , I have no idea how to do it.
then i was asking for notes , etc.
(the most I could find was a chapter in book that in summary said , try things by yourself)
well thats a good summary
research is doing random stuff until you find something which helps
so , did you did graduate work?
and what you did was to sort of improvise with what you al ready knew , until you got something?
and how did you find a problem?
basically my problem right now is not having a "problem"
and then I read papers for ages to even understand what the problem is
so , what should I do?
did you understand it finally?
more or less
well you dont seem to want to do the actual usual things. like going to university and getting an advisor
but what do you mean by usual?
like doing it , or waiting to the moment until the corresponding moment
?
I mean , by usual you refer to going to a graduate program , or by asking for help with a professor
?
so you are suggesting me , that i should go to the mathematics faculty at my university and ask for advice there?
yes
ok
there's the possibility they will said me "no , you shouldn't do research at your age, you should focus on other things"
or maybe they are not going to pay attention
have you experienced that?
I mean , that has happened to me before, in different situations, I am not sure how to avoid that from happening
not exactly tha example before
18
not exactly with research , just 2 times
other were with linear algebra , when i was in 7th grade , etc
what even is your background in math
engineering math (computations)
Olympiad mathematics (not gold level)
and discrete mathematics
so
how about you actually just go to university and get a degree?
if you wanna do math anyway
well , I cant tell you my whole life in chat , but to give context
next year i will study mathematics
right now , I am in a special situation , where I am studying other thing and have free time
so , any ways
what's the problem with doing research
?
I mean , why not
well you dont seem to want to do the things that people suggest
of either going to university or like the book you said you read, just trying things
but , you think asking a professor would be useful?
pick up a random textbook or paper and try understanding it for example
I am already studying mathematical logic
well depends on the prof obviously
this idea , aobut doing research ,relies, in according to what I have seen , is that research is fun
depends on who you ask, but sure
and I would like to do it
but simply trying things (which i have done, but not as research)
is creative , but I feel sometimes doning that puts me far from the topic I am studying,
so for example , the other day i was thinking in some theorem of abstract algebra, and then I begin thinking and trying things by myself
but
I would like to find a research problem in mathematical logic , so I could keep myself in the topic
and that's what i have no idea how find one
ok , thanks any ways
I think i would go to the mathematics departament and ask for advice there, since I know a professor there
but , idk , i feel that they will say me , "just try things by yourself"
and i will get stuck
yeah , but , I am stuck in finding a problem, so I have not even begin and I am already stuck , I've been trying for at least a month to find a problem that suits
I will keep trying then , i guess
thanks
🫡
.close
Closed by @thick juniper
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Options are, 1: free-throw percentage or, field-goal percentage.
2; intercept, correlation coeficcient, or coeffiecent of determination or slope
3: 0, or (1.or -1)
@empty grotto Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@empty grotto Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Looking for an explanation on how this becomes this
The inverse sin
are you familiar with inverse functions?
Or you could reference the unit circle
ye, just look at the unit circle and see for which angle the sine is sqrt(3)/2
technically this solution (pi/3) is incomplete though...
what exactly is a unit circle?
the unit circle is how we extend trigonometric functions (which we defined for angles less than 90 degrees aka pi/2 with right triangles), to all angles
Yeah, this hasnt been taught in my lessons (much like quite a lot of things)
There are gaps in the teaching material and I have no teachers to ask questions about so I'm just trying my best to understand how to turn that first equation into the second
so for acute angles, every output of the sin function must have a unique input
there are special triangles you are expected to remember which give known results for the value of trig functions at certain angles (30, 45, 60 degrees)
alright
the first one comes out of cutting a square in half, the second one comes out of cutting an equilateral triangle in half
either way the output is the same, but if they expect the answer in radians then you do have to convert to radians
that is where that fraction came from
I got it now I think, thank you so much!!!!!\
@broken jetty Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @broken jetty
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how to solve this?
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
ok so we want the integral of something to find the area right
yes
well do you have any ideas what/how we shouldintegrate
since definite integral is equal to area under the curve
can i do integral of cosx from 0 to pi/4?
for the first part
or does sinx also contribute to it
draw a picture of cos(x) from 0 to pi/4
and then sketch the region of area you would get if you integrated
oh i see
can i find definite integral of cosx then minus definite integral of sinx? For the first part
integral of sinx minus integral of cosx?
yep
alternatively
you can notice that the two integrals are symmetric
the area from 0 to pi/4 is the same as the area from pi/4 to pi/2
so a nice way to save some time would be to just compute 2 * the first integral
@warm shale Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
give channel pls
you have it now
@solemn sierra Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi
Is summation notation differentiable?
and you can write a sum of finitely many functions in summation notation
Idk
Something like that (i just made it up)
This is called taylor series, right?
x would need to be an integer
this function is either nonsense or not continuous
so no
im kinda getting what you mean and i think answer is yes
if youd made the E a little less spiky and a little more curvy it'd work very nice
$\sum_{n=1}^{3} e^{nx}$
slayla
The onew i make up has an interesting "curve"
this is not continuous
Wait so the summation has to be defined
it obv needs to be defined
what would it mean for a summation to be "undefined"
By defined i mean having a number on the sigma
i don't wanna say 'need' but let's go with yes anyway
to this question
since sometimes summation can be along a set
I guess it can be infinity?
it can
yes but that's a different story
Maybe it can be broken down to geometric series with | r | < 1
you mean a series?
Isn't any symmation called a series
Really?
thats how i remembered it
who wants to see evolution
series usually means infinite series
Oh
In mathematics, a series is, roughly speaking, the operation of adding infinitely many quantities, one after the other, to a given starting quantity. The study of series is a major part of calculus and its generalization, mathematical analysis. Series are used in most areas of mathematics, even for studying finite structures (such as in combina...
anyone wanna see evolution? for math
Sure?
bruh
and voila, its evolution
you 'continued' it 
Z is integers, R is real numbers
not sure if its helpful here really lol
i just wanted to showcase evolution
👍
its just a visual joke
thats just showing the evolution, how it becomes less spiky and more curvy
and evolves into integral symbol
I usually write sigma like that lol
worst joke i ever heard in my entire life
It is not that bad
the middle one looks like the squiggly thing in my eye
$\xi$
slayla
that one?
oh i never watch that show
by "in my eye" i thought you meant
like
from your perspective
it looks a squiggly thing
you're so right
@vagrant ravine Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @vagrant ravine
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what steps are taken to simplify 45-(210-4X45) to 5X45-210
first of all 45-(210-4x45) = 45-210+4x45
2nd, 1x45+4x45=5x45
so 45-210+4x45 = 5x45-210
how did you get from 45-210+4x45 to 5x45-210
do you understand this?
ah ok i figured it out. was confused where the 1x45 came from but I see it can be rewritten as -210+45+4*45 which is the same as -210+1x45+4x45. ty
.close
Closed by @strong viper
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Jacob L
you course taught you incorrectly
did you mean Q instead of R for the set of rationals
Jacob L
It's always just going to be a countably infinite number or a finite number. You aren't counting the number of numbers in R or [0,1]. You're counting the number of digits of a real number.
R is real numbers not rational
How many digits does the number 1.11111.... have?
but to answer your question, the root of any number that is not itself the square of a rational number, is irrational
There are infinitely many digits, but it's a countably infinite number of digits.
I'm sure there is a function for it. I just don't know off the top of my head a nice arithmetic way to express it.
This is irrelevant.
If a number r has finitely many digits it has a unique representation in base 10 when you exclude repeating digit representations.
You can count powers in that representation to get the number you want.
That gives you the existence of the function I think.
I just don't know a nice formula for it.
Take something like 0.123
That is 1(1/10)+2(1/100)+3(1/1000) right?
Notice how there are 3 digits and 1000 is 10^3?
We can always do tricks like this to count digits when we are talking about numbers with only finitely many digits when we ignore repeating decimals.
So like we have to disallow stuff like 0.99999... for 1
Now look at this 12.345
That is 1(10^1)+2(10^0)+3(10^-1)+4(10^-2)+5(10^-3)
So we can't just count read the last power of 10 off or anythinf.
But we can just add the magnitudes of the biggest and smallest powers I think.
Sorry mixed it up
The biggest power in front of the decimal point is 1, the smallest power is -3
Oh magnitude as in absolute value
But I was also off by 1
You see how if we add 3 and 1 we'd get 4 but our original number had 5 digits?
We just need to add 1.
We're just counting the number of powers of 10 here is all
Which is the same as counting digits.
The point is that we can write out any number with finitely many digits this way, which tells us those "biggest" and "smallest" powers exist (and are unique).
So, we have a mapping that takes numbers with finitely many digits and spits out the number of digits based on the process we just did.
That is a function.
This tells us the function exists.
But calculating it is a different story.
I want to say you can just scale by some power of 10 and count digits but that doesn't work.
Like say you have .123, then 1000(0.123)=123 and you just apply the log formula.
But this doesn't work well
Picking the power of 10 is annoying and you basically need to already know the digits
And 0.001 won't work for this.
What is W?
I think I get the idea you are going for, but I think this doesn't work.
The log(x) formula needs a +1
The f(10x) thing you are trying to do will fail because of the 0.0001 issue I mentioned earlier.
If you're willing to accept floors and ceilings though, then you can use that to define the integer and fractional parts of a number.
We already know how to calculate the integer part from the log formula here
So all we really need to worry about is counting the number of digits for fractional parts.
The f(x), f(10x) thing is kind of hiding something recursive in the background.
If you didn't notice that.
Like, if you took a number 0.123 and multiplied it by powers of ten until it were an integer you'd end up multiplying it by 10 3 times.
The NUMBER of times you do this multiplication is the thing you want.
Probably something like this works better
Define g(x) = 0 if x is an integer
Define g(x)=1+g(10x) if x is not an integer.
Now take x to be a number with a terminating decimal representation like we mentioned before.
Define our digit counting function f as follows
f(x)=[floor(log(int(x)))+1]+g(frac(x))
int denotes integer part, frac denotes fractional part.
These are definable from the floor function.
We already know the integer digit counting function works.
The g function just adds one and scales its input by ten.
So, something like this happens
g(0.123)=1+g(1.23)=2+g(12.3)=3+g(123)=3+0=3
You can verify yourself this works for the weird edge case of stuff like g(0.0001) as well.
Okay, for time complexity notice floors, mods and basic arithmetic like this is fast. It should be linear time I think.
This is absolutely not worth a paper lmao.
This is like an intro programming course exercise in the form of basic arithmetic.
Like, I've absolutely written programs to do this in my cs classes.
Well I guess it depends on what you mean by a paper?
Paper for what?
Mathematics research paper for what?
Is this like a hw thing?
So, actual mathematics research is super specialized. I wouldn't expect anything you do to be publishable. But for fun you can write papers for yourself on whatever you like.
It doesn't matter if it's simple arithmetic or anything else.
What I would say is like, focus on learning the basics rather than trying to publish this kind of stuff though.
Writing is good for learning.
But putting out a bunch of stuff into the public eye you make for practice could be awkward as you get more skilled.
For the actual problem you should work out to yourself why this works as well as filling in the edge cases. I ignored negatives, irrationals and the number 0 for this formula.
I may also have a silly arithmetic mistake in there I didn't notice lmao.
Or maybe not.
@alpine sable Has your question been resolved?
What do you do for irrationals vs rationals?
Also what about 0?
Sounds fine to me.
It's mostly to avoid gaining a reputation as a crank
You know those people who spend a bunch of time spouting nonsense about math that doesn't make any sense?
Well there's a difference between a little bit of error making because you are still learning vs just spouting nonsense because you decided you were right and don't care to learn ya know?
My number theory prof used to tell us to study by lecturing to our teddy bears lol.
You can always correct things later if you go that route I suppose.
Do you know anything about integration?
Defining the riemann integral from first principles and proving the fundamental theorem of calculus would be kinda nifty for somebody in calculus.
It's accessible in that every calc textbook does it, but very few calc students would carefully work through that on their own.
There are also vaguely related topics like line integrals and riemann-stieltjes integrals that are sort of approachable conceptually that could be fun to write about.
For either I wouldn't expect or look for anything super rigorous to say. Mostly something expository to do with what they are, what they do intuitively, what applications they have etc.
Also ode stuff might be nifty.
There are also nifty counterexamples worth thinking about in analysis.
Continuous everywhere differentiable nowhere functions.
A bunch of other weird ones.
Oh yes I forgot.
You know some modular arithmetic?
Roughly yeah.
If you have say {0,1,2,3,4}
You can define a new + operation on this set by using the normal addition and taking the remainder after.
Remainder mod 5
You can define multiplication similarly.
{0,1,2,3,4} means "the set containing 0,1,2,3,4"
An operation on a set is a function that takes in two numbers from a set and spits out a number from that set.
Just like how the usual arithmetic ops (ignoring division) are functions on the reals.
Well + for the real numbers takes in two real numbers and spits out a real number.
So if we define + and * on 0,1,2,3,4 like I mentioned earlier now we have a system of arithmetic where 4+1=0
Because the remainder of 4+1 (which is 5) after division by 5 is 0.
You remember how if ab=0 with normal arithmetic then either a or b is 0?
In our 0 thru 4 arithmetic this holds (you can brute force check every case).
We can define similar systems of arithmetic for 0,1,...,p-1 for any prime p
And they will all have this property
What I mean is that with our new 0 thru 4 arithmetic, we also have the property that ab=0 implies a is zero or b is zero.
I'm just abbreviating 0,1,2,3,4
Yeah these are finite sets of naturals.
This
Do the usual ops you already know and take the remainder at the end.
Gotcha
Try it on 0,1,2,3,4,5 and see if the ab=0 thing works for that.
(This will be ops mod 6 now fwiw)
@alpine sable Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@manic sundial Has your question been resolved?
Can someone help me with the second exercise?
@manic sundial Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey math heads I got a question
I’m trying to bake a cake that takes 3 different ingredients but if I mix a certain combination of these ingredients it will make a chocolate cake all the other combinations will be a basic cake the catch is that I can only use 6 of each ingredient but I have to use at least 1 of each using trial and error how many different combinations is possible using this my desired outcome is to make the chocolate cake
so if somehow you add too much cocoa powder, it will become vanilla, blimey
Exactly
so you need to keep the ratios correct or what?
I need to find the right ratio
But the end goal is to really figure out how many trial and errors of making the cake it would take
How many possible different combination
@winged sinew Has your question been resolved?
@winged sinew Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I already asked this but now I am asking if my calculations are right
Option A
24000* 1.04=24960
24960* 1.04=25958,4
25958,4* 1.04=26996,736
26996,736* 1.04=28076,61
28076,61* 1.04=29199,67
Sum of all the equaitons: ca. 135189
Option B
25000+26000+27000+28000+29000=135000
So option A is more
,w 24000+sum from n=1 to 5 (24000*(1.04)^5
so can you explain that bit in detail 😅
,w 24000+sum from n=1 to 5 (24000+1000n)
the first one is just the starting salary is 24000
then + 24000*1.04
then + 24000*(1.04)^2
...
- 24000*(1.04)^5
this is what I did except you did one more
the way you wrote it excludes the salary of the first year
24000
you only included the raises
So the question really asks how much you earned in 6 years?
yeah
in that sense you don't get a raise in your first year
first year + 5 years of raising salary
hmmm
Damn why tf do I get so many different opinions on a question like this
I am not sure what to believe and this will be on my exam
thats just how i read it in any case, it would only make sense to me that the raises apply to subsequent years after the first
otherwise it would just be your starting salary, not really a raise
it wouldnt change the result of which is better any way since theyd both have that
In my opinion we are calculating directly from the raise and not including the starting salary
yeah
I am closing this topic again thank you!
.close
Closed by @warm fractal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
.close
Closed by @warm fractal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$\lim_{x\to \infty} {x^{\frac{3}{2}}\left(\sqrt{x+1}+\sqrt{x-1}-2x\right)}$
Arian
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
$\lim_{x\to \infty} {x^{\frac{3}{2}}\left(\sqrt{x+1}+\sqrt{x-1}-2x\right)}$
Arian
How to solve this?
Open a new channel
Ok
OK, will read instructions
OK, thanks
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How can I prove the difference of surfaces between the equilateral triangle and the circular sector is minimal if the radius of the sector is equal to the height of the triangle?
i can prove that with my common sense, idk with math though
well, you can do something, since the area of triagle is fixed, you can prove that area of circular sector is maximum when r = h, hence keeping difference minimal
That what I asked
write an expression for the area, then use derivatives to minimise it
area of sector = (angle / 2pi) * r^2
for eq. triangle angle is always 60, hence area is max when r is max
wouldn't that be overkill
nah i'd like multiple methods
how to?
that's not a proof
you just gave info on the ex
well it is, but since youre asking precisely about the derivative proof, id help you with that tii
too*
what's the function of a sector?
ar(triangle) = A (constant)
ar(circle) = (pi/6) * r^2
difference = A - pi/6 r^2
d(difference)/dr = -2r
thus difference is a decreasing function and decreases with r
hence for diff to be min, r is max, which is height of triangle
uh
is that good enough
bruh why
i want many methods
remember, to find the points of maxima/ minima we always differentiate
bro cmon
what is wrong with that?
nothing, but howd you do that with integral?
when i hear differentiation i hear analysis
its good you like figuring out stuff
you mean area of a sector
its (angle of sector)/360(degress) * radius^2
i'll integrate the difference of functions
one for the sector
one for the triangle
integrate from 0 to x and just half of the shape
because it's easier
Do you guys know what Geometry is?
ye
uh ok
Why is statement 5 "Theorem 1"?
if you want help find another channel
wdym
and delete ur msgs
lol
@random hull Has your question been resolved?
@sharp sail i found the difference of surfaces
using integration
it's an expression related to x
@random hull Has your question been resolved?
7×60
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone explain this to me (14)
A linear regression shouldn’t be a residual plot
Because it’s not a residual regression
well its the residual for the linear regression
you can analyze and make conclusions on the regression line using the residual
yeah id say so
.close
Closed by @wintry garnet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Thank
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I was wondering if somebody can help me point out my mistake when i was adding multiple compound fractions. My answer and the textbook's answer differ slightly, so I was wondering if it's possible to have different answers based on the way i factored out my polynomial? If my answer is wrong, I was hoping somebody can point out any mistakes i made. Thank you.
Thank you for the confirmation @charred flint. I had a quick question as well. Is there rule which states constraints in which way i am allowed to factor out a negative? Or is it up to my discretion?
for example: (-17c^2+17c). Do i have to factor out the negative? Or can i just factor out just 17?
there's no rule for that
sometimes it definitely makes it look nicer but sometimes it's 50/50
@lusty wraith Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is harmonic series just 1/AP series
yea
so then 1,1/5,1/9,1/13.... is hp right?
ye
Closed by @wary salmon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
2
show work
where
well idk if its right
i put a+b into two functions
it got the first and last answers in the multiple choice
why two?
idk which one to do
consider the given restriction
a>=1 and b>=3
cause a and b follow different rules for the function
mhm
what are the range of values the whole
a + b
can attain
did you do g(a+b)=g(a)+g(b)
lemme try
oh ok
it was a question of whether you did
not telling you to do that
what are the range of values the whole
a + b
can attain
i thought you did g(a+b)=g(a)+g(b)
nah
hint:add the inequalities
good
hint:add the inequalities
$a \ge 1 \
b \ge 3$ \
add each side
bruh
like in the bracket?
ℝαμΩℕωⅤ
do you know what add means
yes ofc bro
do you know what side means
add the stuff on the left side
add the stuff on the right side
don't overthink
a+b> _ 4?
yes
idk how to get the sign
OHH
= to represent that in text
ah ok
now that you know that the input
a + b > = 4
do you now know which piece you should be using?
x^2 ???
yes
yes
Closed by @vapid tide
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
for part di are we assuming q1 = 3?
and how did they get part dii?
heres the answer:
@outer cliff Has your question been resolved?
q1 is 3 yes, you can see where the box begins.
ohhh didnt notice the graph behind it
Then if half spend less than a, then a reasonable estimate is the mean. Since it splits the data
yeah 7
I was confused why it was 7
didnt notice the graph lol
ok tysm for the help
.close
Closed by @outer cliff
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
no clue where to begin
recognize that the sum in the parentheses is a geometric progression
over (-z)
what u mean?
o
you could notice that in the second bracket, you can factorise the z^2-z as z(z-1), z^4-z^3=z^3(z-1) and so on until z^14-z^13 factorises to z^13(z-1) from which you have (z-1)(z^1+z^3+z^5+...+z^13) which the second paranthesis in here can be further factored
are you sure this is ideal during an exam?
yes, it is actually a fast way of factorising the second bracket rather than using synthetic division

