#competition-math
1 messages · Page 3 of 1
wait a second, since i know that $(a^n - b^n)$ divides $a - b$, i can use the extended induction principle
Ruben
for "extended induction principle" i mean that i suppose that P(0), ..., P(n-1), P(n) are true
Yes.
I dont understand what this question is asking
Do you know what a "balance scale" is?
A balance scale is something that is level to the horizontal plane when equal weights are placed on it's two sides
It's basically asking how many combinations of 3, 5 and 7 can you make
"weights can be placed on either side" makes it a bit more complicated than that.
E.g. we can weigh out 2 grams of something by putting our 3-gram weight on the left and 5-gram weight on the right, and then adding "something" to the left until the scale balances.
I'm not sure there's a simple clever way to do it, but each of the three fixed weights can be either on the left or on the right or not on the scale at all; that gives only 3·3·3=27 combinations to try, but some of them actually weigh the same difference.
We can cut down the range of possibilities a bit by deciding that the heaviest weight must always be on the left place; then there are only 14 possibilites (of which one is "all three weighs are off the scale" which measures 0 grams and may or may not count ...)
I counted all the possibilities and removed the ones that weigh the same as another possibility
And got 11
Someone else might figure out a clever way
But I guess this works too
,w find (x^3-y^3)/(x^3+y^3) if x+y=sqrt(6), xy=1
Yeah
No need to ask “Can I ask…?” or “Does anyone know about…?”—it’s faster for everyone if you just ask your question! See https://dontasktoask.com/
help me with this
find x so that 1 / sqrt(x + 1) + 1 / sqrt(x + 4) = 1 / sqrt(x + 2) + 1 / sqrt(x + 3)
,w 1 / sqrt(x + 1) + 1 / sqrt(x + 4) = 1 / sqrt(x + 2) + 1 / sqrt(x + 3)
Wolfram says no solutions
but the way to typically approach this sort of question is to set x = u - 2.5
so you'd have u - 1.5, u + 1.5, u - 0.5, and u + 0.5 which is symmetric
ok
Cube
not quite
if you follow this process and see what you get, you have 7 + 4 + 1 + 8 + 5 + 2 + 9 + 6 + 3 + 0 + ... with 66 digits
then you have 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7 + 8 + 9 + ... with 22 digits
then you have 3 + 6 + 9 + 3 + 6 + 9 + .. with 7 digits
so all the 3rd digits have become 9s
I don't get the hint
the key is that you can loop back around, 0, 7, 4, given that the pattern repeats in the 1st sequence
ah I guess it's similar, like the digits that remain after each pass are first 1 mod 3, then anything mod 3, then 0 mod 3
wow that's smart
no thanks
My humble opinion, competition math is nothing but grindMAXXing until you can find out "that" pattern from reading the question. I swear geometry solutions are insane.
"Uh draw a parallel line to bisector blablablabla- oh this is just 2013 "insert country here" selection P2!"
Insane.
not really true. recognizing a config in a geo problem and citing it isn’t that crazy, and in contest you’re probably not going to remember the name of whatever problem so you’re just going to prove that problem anyways
$f(x)=c$, for $c=0\cup 1\le c<2$
Max
I wanted to point out you have to grind the questions. The geometry one was one of the examples. You can't ignore the advantage of knowing obscure questions and theorems. Take some of the algebra questions for example, I have seen plenty of solutions consisting of obscure theorems, just they happened to know it because of grinding
this is not from imo or shortlist, psure this is someone’s OC
Well ofc you have to grind for all kinds of math
yes but not in this degree
If you take math seriously you probably will
Usually you are in a comfy position to understand the topic you are reading by doing the exercises and questions the book gives you
it is not the case in competition math
The reason why people find geometry theorems obscure is because it’s barely taught in school
Why?
I would disagree, they just feel " random"
for oly geo you definitely have to know a lot more "nonstandard" results
I feel like geometry is the most intuitive subject
standard high school geo is just so dogshit that there's a significant content gap between the two
Combinatorics is the really the only one where you feel it is the mathematics
Proof is just by considering cases. Set $x=0$, you get two cases.
One of the cases being $\floor{f(y)}=1$, inputting that into the original equation gets you $f(x)=c$ for $1\le c < 2$. Then consider the other case which is $f(0)=0$. If that is the case then choose $x\in[0,1)$. You then find that $f(x)=0$ for $x\in[0,1)$. Take $y\in[0,1)$, then for $z\in\mathbb{R}$ you can choose a $y\in[0,1)$ and $x\in\mathbb{R}$, such that $\floor{x}y=z$. Using this you find $f(z)=0$.
Max
Well ik this isn’t from imo or shortlist but this was posted on aops iirc
And it wasn’t from a contest
bro what
😭
Again, it is because you have to recognize the patterns and configurations.
I hate the geometry most, since practically, all the grinding is useless because computers immediatly output the answer
ok yeah idk how I didnt recognize that
lol
There was a similar problem posted recently
dunno maybe I am delusional
No it was someone creation
Computers can only do so much geometry, same with other branches of math
don’t you just binge competition math problems till you are good at competition math
Computers can d any IMO geometry questions with no sweat. I agree on your second point
but being good at competition math doesn’t translate to anything meaningful
No need to generalize
I don’t think computes can do any imo problem
alphageometry exists
I would disagree
Many imo problems are just angle chase (which computes can do), but harder ones don’t use angle chases
they can do, especially the geo ones.
I think I could make a problem alpha geometry could not solve
you can just rewrite the question in algebraic, bayesian or whatever numerical method and bash through it really
if it’s about being creative, why train for it? Training makes you more inherently creative? Sounds tautological
Well this is part of the problem, how do you know the coordinates of a certain point for example?
Again, I disagree. For P6 questions, maybe. But for other questiosns you know what you will do after reading
Sounds like you’re just stealing someone else’s creativity and then making your own “creativity” based off that
Like, my point is grinding and such. Putting them to numerical problems takes skill, and is actually practial AND you dont have to grind
it is antibash for the competitiors in that competition, it is still very bashable
I meant conveying the given conditions to algebraic expressions
Hmm not sure if this is true
An example I’ve seen is angles being in an arithmetic progression
How do you encode this algebraically?
Even if you are able to, it’ll be extremely messy and I doubt even the computer will be able to bash through it all
Maybe, but this is really the extreme case isn't it? My point still stands
There are plenty of problems with weird angle conditions
If you can construct the problem in geogebra (or in paper really it doesnt matter) , and result is immediately shown, it is very bashable
And if you can’t?
even maybe it is not, grindMAXXIng is still the case
Wdym grindmaxxing
sorry it is an internet slang, just grinding questions like a maniac
is the canadian IMO guy still here?
What Canadian imo guy
the gold winner that was active here
I don't think it is him tho
well it doesnt translate to anything practical
other than "art"
How do you know?
I was saying how do you know that it doesn’t translate to anything
Like, in the practical world, applied mathematics. The grinding stuff is really not, practical but more like art
That is why juries also like traditional solutions for geo problems
and hate bashings
It’s not about the discipline of grinding, it’s about what you learned
it is not about if I would apply it. If I WOULD it would be practical
I think jury prefers non bash solutions because they are more “in the spirit” of Olympiad geometry
indeed
From personal experience, some of them just think that bashing is ugly, meanwhile the traditional solutions are "beatiful"
Of course
Why would it be transferable when comp math is timed and requires no advanced mathematics
which is in essence should be not allowed in a competition, especially in a rigirous math competition
well majority of algebra questions can be solved with advanced math
The opportunity cost of devoting your time to comp math is time you could’ve spent learning more pure math
By advanced math, i’m talking about math you’d see at research level
You learn a lot of pure math learning comp math
Yes
The Chinese bootcamps where they raise comp children starting from elementary grade
just honestly, it is just grinding
It is grinding, and I agree that you grind more in comp math in other types of math
But I wouldn’t disregard comp math as useless
Like what
like geometry stuff
and some of the algebra questions
that can be easily solved with uni level math
what kinda algebra questions
maximizing minimizing questions for example
you could bash throught it with lagrange or something I really dont remember
even if it was more than 4 variables
Euclidean Geometry is pretty much useless in higher level math (for now), so maybe I can see an argument for that
Is it the easiest way though?
Lagrange multipliers are a powerful technique but they often take too long and someitmes don’t work on problems
By easy if you mean fast then no
and if you will make this argument, then my point still stands
Yes I see
Like I wish they would reconstruct the competition to one or two question a day with long timers. Maybe it would halt the grinding a bit or something. The Soviets really did it badly
Many olympiads are like that
I think mot putting such “useless” questions in competitions is better
I haven’t really struggled with time that much in Olympiad so idk
I meant change the structure of the questions ( I really don't know how) so it would require lots of time
Maybe I am just mad I could not get selected for IMO idk
Hmm, research questions are expected to take decades to solve, and Olympiad problems are expected to take ~an hour to solve, I’m not sure if there’s a reasonable in between
The proof is always the hardest part.
Many times in competitions I've reached the answer but not figured the proof fully.
In one competition I got exactly the answer, missed one small part of rigour and lost 5 out of the 7 marks
Other than to just make the problems harder
Making new questions is also a problem. Majority of questions are really just redesign of older questions. Not even talking about generalisations
I think new ideas will always pop up, I wouldn’t say a majority of questions are
well a bit exagiration, but a good sum of them are
Like combining two different questions, ( I definetly saw this in IMO, I don't remember), using multiple different question's parts on just one question, generalising a question for n, changing the topic of the question (for example from algebra to geometry)
I had to go to bed
Congrats, that is science, making your own based on ones output etc
starting to hate calc

8
bro this youtube channel should help for competion math
Good video but it would be great if you add videos about combinatory, chances, and building
thanks and will do
thanks
how do I help people with math?
mb
sorry i couldn't meet your expectations
Ok thanks
Be at a much higher level than then
Certainly helps a lot, although not necessary
It can be made up for with teaching experience
the “contest math channel” space is way too saturated as is
as participation numbers additionally continue to plummet
I mean handouts >>> videos anyway
Can someone ask me a question and see if I am good
It just depends on your audience
do I go to the help section
I mean
What are you teaching? What is your experience in what you are teaching?
Oh wait you mean in this discord
💀
yeah
You want?
uh no
sorry
yeah but he look it literally i think
its ok though
some of the content is decent though and i commend the effort still!
Anybody from MIT ??
how to get good at math-competition. Yea, can anyone recommend me any channel?
do you mean youtube channels?
you can check this server, isn't very large but maybe you find something cool there
https://discord.gg/mods
idk any youtube channels but you will only get better solving a lot of problems i think, is generic but what i have already heard is that you know, maybe you can try to avoid seeing the solutions and if you are struggling with a problem you can ask for help and learn more about the subject, that will probably help you to think better and have more creativity.
I don't have experience, that is all things that i have already heard
joined right way thanks
oh um sometimes i check the answer immediately if I can't do it hehe
me either, it is hard to stop
Are you on college or high school?
1 year to go from college for me :v
hmm, bad
i think
do you think you can go to imo before that?
international math onlympiad
OH hold on
dont you know?
you mean the students that was chosen from school
after being executed 1 by 1, some last man standing will be send there?
is it like that
well, it depends. in my country you have to take a obrigatory math exam, depending of your score you can take the national math olympiad, depending of your score you can take a exam to go to the imo team
where are you from
Indonesia
This article describes the selection process, by country, for entrance into the International Mathematical Olympiad.
The International Mathematical Olympiad (IMO) is an annual mathematics olympiad for students younger than 20 who have not started at university.
Each year, participating countries send at most 6 students. The selection process var...
In Indonesia, National Mathematical Olympiad is held as a part of National Science Olympiad (Olimpiade Sains Nasional), and has been held annually since 2002. About 100-120 students who pass the province-level test will be eligible to participate in the National Mathematical Olympiad, which is held in August or September. About thirty students are chosen to get into the first training camp, which is held at October through November. About half of them will go to second training camp and participate in the Asian Pacific Mathematics Olympiad. At the end, six students are selected to represent the country. The selection depends on the results of regular tests held every week in every training camp, IMO simulation test and APMO.
yep yep
Sounds accurate
well im cooked i failed :v
i think it is late for you to take the imo, you have to have less than 20 years, be enrolled in high school or under and dont be enrolled in college
ye my school not allowing third year students joining province or the imo things anymore, only first or second
sad
well imma just tryna win other olympiad outside there
i don't know any olympiad for college, maybe the majority of them are for high school students but maybe you find something
I'm high school
im 16
the problem is that the most prestigious exams take some time to get in you know
it is :v
in my coutry i will be able to take the imo in 2 years only if i make everything perfect
anyways, good luck for you
thanks u too

in october i will make an exam, the 300 best scores can take the national olympiad and those who get a gold medal can take some exams, the best scores go to the imo team
the national olympiad is in december of 2025
so i will be able to go to the imo in 2026
i think it is even harder and take more time in countries like usa and china
yes
oh
have you already took obm?
idk rules
maybe who knows but look at this
olympiad for each subjects but they only give chances for X and XI students
yeah, this year is OBMEP and i will be able to go to OBM only in 2025
i could take another exam and go this year but i was not prepared and it was 2 days before the first phase of obmep so i preferred to study more for obmep
and about imo?
👀
do you have more chances?
good to know, at least i have more than 1 year between obmep and obm
idk, i think i go well studying by myself
of course
Evaluate
no thanks
Understandable
Hi, I'm currently studying for the AMC 8 and 10. I have been considering about taking John Hopkins CTY course for High School Competitive Mathematics Prep. https://cty.jhu.edu/programs/online/courses/high-school-competitive-mathematics-prep-cpm I am already a CTY student but I have not taken any courses yet. Has anyone taken this course? If so, how good is it?
Broaden your skills in problem-solving to foster mathematical creativity and prepare yourself for contests like the American Mathematics Competition (AMC). You'll learn to think at an even more advanced level as you tackle challenging problems and explore a variety of math topics, including advanced concepts from number theory, probability, alge...
probably 0
yeah
Cause the sums can simplify or even result in zero due to symmetry
oh
it’s probably roughly isomorphic to a lot of the other popular contest prep classes out there - maybe it’ll be helpful to you, maybe it won’t
What are you’ll doing?
I'm going to 8th grade, and I'm trying to study for the AMC 8. I'm new to math competitions in general and took a few classes over the summer. Do you guys have any tips on how to study and what topics I should focus on?
try a few past tests first to get an idea of what the problems are like
I did the test last year ( didn't study) so I have a rough guess of what the problems are
try another one, just to jog your memory
people usually recommend books like AoPS volume 1 or some of their intro books for studying
the AoPS forums have tons of resources to study from as well
though your primary goal should be to
do lots of problems just above your level
what are some good sources for these problems
AoPS forums have thousands of problems from a variety of sources
if you want AMC 8 problems specifically
you can look through their contest collections
np
love math
if you get a problem wrong be sure to read through the solution carefully
studying for contests is not a passive activity
you constantly update your own intuitions/processes as you work through problems
And never go directly for the soluction, the most important is thinking about the problems, that is the unique way you can improve or problem solving and creativity
np, good luck for u
thanks
perseverance is also a big thing
don’t give up on a problem that you can’t solve until you’ve made a good honest effort at it
(in a contest, you’d probably want to more quickly skip to a problem that you can do, but when studying generally the above works best)
i saw a guy saying that if you are struggling with a problem you can study more the theory, make some easier problems and then come back
The main roadblock I hit whenever I try practice problems is that I make silly mistakes or I forget the principles needed to solve it
maybe that can help you
practice practice practice!
practice more i think
Yes.
👍
aops wiki has a big list id imagine
and lots of universities and other organizations have competitions in a variety of settings
are you doing MATHCOUNTS as well? ik those don’t start until winter but just curious
I'm considering it
doesn’t hurt to try
taking exams for practice i think is only useful for practicing mind things and avoid anxiety i think, so i think you can focus on making previous exams
I don’t have a good pulse on how modern AMC 8s compare in difficulty to the ones I took in middle school
start with some of the older ones?
np
modern ones are getting harder
Do Mathcounts
If you do good you are either gonna get a free trip to dc or Orlando
sus, considering that you need to be in middle school to do that
and the minimum age for Discord is 13
???
2024 AMC 10A problems and solutions. The test will be administered in November 2024.
i didnt spell it wrong, its jus a diff spelling from the future.
or you're Bri'ish
ew
8th grade exists
yeah they'd have to be in a narrow age range is what I'm saying
Hey guys do u know any good guides and tips if I am trying to qualify for IMO
I am from India
so my qualification lvl may be different
bro im doing amc in a few days 💀💀💀
wrong AMC, the Australian one should be in a few days
this is the American one
amazing math competition 💀💀💀
cringe
how is that relevant
I mean that acronym for AMC is cringe
what even is this?
heyy can someone please help with this ^^ (thanks for posting max)
What????
what if you were held back?
Find a recursive expression for a_n and use it to get the generating function as a rational function.
Yeah we said recurrence relation earlier but so many difficulties with it
Make sure that the recursive formula is correct by computing some small values. Changing the order of the sums can be helpful for evaluating double sums if you have those
I have a recurrence relation and I managed to use it to get the generating function as a rational function
(and then rest is easy)
The number of terms depends on n though, it is not constant. But you can still solve for the generating function
isn't this legit just the gen func at x = 1/11
Ok but what is the gen func?
It seems nontrivial to get
ping me if you want hints or spoilers
@reef condor ^
Yo, I love AMC8, AMC10, AIMEs and MATHCOUNTS!
Those are my favorite things to do in the world!
I'm so glad I found this channel.
But there’s other serves that are solely dedicated to comp math
can I post questions I need help with in this channel
Yes but usually people only post questions here when that is about math competitions and maybe you will have to wait more time to someone answer you so i recommend you to post your questions in math help like #help-5 or maybe post in #prealg-and-algebra #geometry-and-trigonometry #precalculus
at math-help you can ask about every math problem, but in the other channels a good practice is to ask only about the specific subject like pre calculus in #precalculus
IMO if they are about competition math they are fine. I feel like help is mostly saturated with pre-university stuff. While competition math is pre-university, you need to know stuff that even most people doing pure math degree won't learn until late into their degree or at all
Like competition math number theory knowledge can be made into an undergraduate number theory course, and then you still can't solve more difficult number theory problems without knowing how to apply it
I have two years for study with 6 hours per day, do you guys think is it possible to study for IMO and IOI with that time? XD
it is possible.
but you might not be successful...
that is tough
Spoilers please
Hi everyone, this problem might be old, but can someone explain the simple solution to me? Twenty random cards are placed in a row all face down. A turn consists of taking two adjacent cards where the left one is face up and the right one can be face up or face down and flipping them both. Show that this process must terminate. (with all the cards facing up).
From the movie the brilliant young mind(2014).
Your problem statement is flawed. You need to be able to turn a face down card face up and then turn the card to the right of it (if it exists).
Interpret the row of cards a number written in binary where face up corresponds to zero and face down corresponds to one. Now notice that any move you make will decrease the number because any digit contributes more to the number than all digits that come after it combined. Since the smallest number that can be represented like this exists (zero) the process must terminate after finitely many steps. Also if we have any face down cards i.e. our number isn't zero, we can still make at least one move so the process hasn't terminated. Therefore the process terminates precisely when all cards are face up.
Also, the number of cards doesn't matter and the initial state of the cards (face up or down) doesn't matter.
Okay first we want to find a recurrence relation.
||Consider a string of length n+1. It begins with some number of ones.
If the number is 0 i.e. it begins with a star then it has the same value as the length n string without the star and all length n strings appear exactly once by truncating a length n+1 string starting with a star. This gives us the term a_n into our recurrence relation.
If the number is n+1 then the number consists only of ones and has the value (10^{n+1} - 1)/9 and we include this into our recurrence relation.
If the number is k such that k is between 1 and n (inclusive) then it will be followed by a star and some length n+1-k-1 = n-k string and in fact each length n-k string appears exactly once. We get n-1 terms sum k=1 to n (10^k - 1)/9 a_{n-k} into our recurrence relation. Note that a_0 = 1 because because the empty string corresponds to empty product which is equal to one.
Our recurrence relation is a_{n+1} = a_n + (10^{n+1} - 1)/9 + sum k=1 to n (10^k-1)/9 a_{n-k}. It will be more convenient to work with a_k instead of a_{n-k} so we will reindex the sum and the final form of the recurrence relation is a_{n+1} = a_n + (10^{n+1} - 1)/9 + sum k=0 to n-1 (10^{n-k}-1)/9 a_k.||
Now that we have a recurrence relation we will find the generating function.
|| We take the recurrence relation for each n, multiply both sides by x^n and sum from n = 0 to inf to get
sum n = 0 to inf a_{n+1} x^n = (sum n = 0 to inf a_n x^n) + (sum n = 0 to inf (10^{n+1} - 1)/9 x^n) + (sum n = 0 to inf (sum k=0 to n-1 (10^{n-k}-1)/9 a_k x^n)).
We have four sums, let's evaluate them independently. Denote the generating function of a_n by f(x).
First term is just the generating function shifted and the second term is the generating function i.e.
sum n = 0 to inf a_{n+1} x^n = (f(x) - 1)/x
sum n = 0 to inf a_n x^n = f(x).
The third term is difference of two geometric series i.e.
sum n = 0 to inf (10^{n+1} - 1)/9 x^n = 10/9 sum n = 0 to inf (10x)^n - 1/9 sum n = 0 to inf x^n = 10/(9(1-10x)) - 1/(9(1-x)) = 1/((1-10x)(1-x))
The fourth term is the difficult one. We have a double sum. We notice that iterating from n = 0 to inf and from k = 0 to n-1 iterates through precisely the same numbers as iterating from k = 0 to inf and from n = k+1 to inf i.e.
sum n = 0 to inf (sum k=0 to n-1 (10^{n-k}-1)/9 a_k x^n) = sum k = 0 to inf (sum n=k+1 to inf (10^{n-k}-1)/9 a_k x^n)
Now we perform an index shift on the inner sum because it is nicer to start from n = 0. We also take a_k and out of the inner sum because it doesn't depend on n.
= sum k = 0 to inf a_k (sum n=0 to inf (10^{n+1}-1)/9 x^{n+k+1})
We can now take the x^{k+1} part of the power of x out of the inner sum and we notice that we are left with the difference of geometric series we already evaluated as the third term. We will manipulate it further and notice that the sum we are left to evaluate can be represented in terms of the generating function
sum k = 0 to inf a_k (sum n=0 to inf (10^{n+1}-1)/9 x^{n+k+1})
= sum k = 0 to inf a_k x^{k+1} (sum n=0 to inf (10^{n+1}-1)/9 x^n)
= sum k = 0 to inf a_k x^{k+1}/((1-10x)(1-x))
= x/((1-10x)(1-x)) sum k = 0 to inf a_k x^k
= x/((1-10x)(1-x)) f(x)
Combining the terms gives us
(f(x)-1)/x = f(x) + 1/((1-10x)(1-x)) + x/((1-10x)(1-x)) f(x)
We can now solve for f(x)
(1 - x - x^2/((1-10x)(1-x))) f(x) = 1 + x/((1-10x)(1-x))
=> f(x) = (1 + x/((1-10x)(1-x)))/(1 - x - x^2/((1-10x)(1-x))) = ((1-10x)(1-x)+x)/((1-x)(1-10x)(1-x) - x^2) = (1-10x+10x^2)/(1-12x+20x^2-10x^3)
||
Now that we have the generating function we can find the answer
|| Notice that the sum is just our generating function in the power series form evaluated at 1/11 with the zeroth term missing. Thus we get f(1/11) - 1 = 142/89 so p+q=231.
||
It would be a bit more interesting if we insist that there must be a "card to the right of it" so we can never flip the rightmost card alone.
Then we would need a parity argument that we can never end with just the rightmost card needing to be flipped.
hi guys, just wanted to ask a question about something i am unsure about and i am asking here because idk where else i can ask, i am currently studying in vancouver and i was wondering if i can take the amc 10 there or if i need to go to somewhere else i tried searching online but i didnt really find anything that tells me
maybe i am bad at research but i will greatly appreciate it if somebody helps me out <3
Mario, Yoshi, and Toadette play a game of "nonconformity": They each choose rock, paper, or scissors. If two of the three people choose the same symbol, and the third person chooses a different symbol, then the one who chose the different symbol wins. Otherwise, no one wins.
If they play 4 rounds of this game, all choosing their symbols at random, what's the probability that nobody wins any of the 4 games? Express your answer as a common fraction.
Not really the right channel #probability-statistics
(unless this is much harder than I think it is? Seems like a common probability problem)
Like I said you'll get more luck in #probability-statistics
Hint:
What's the probability on no one winning on a particular round?
Yes
Which one do you think it is?
I know √7 is bigger than √45
But i can't compare the third one
Anyone wanna help 🙏
Like i know we can take lcm of all these powers which is 12
It is III
[ \sqrt[3]{11} \approx 2.223 < \sqrt[4]{45} \approx 2.545 < \sqrt{7} \approx 2.646 ]
Got 3 from using the calculator. But is this a calculator paper ?
this seems like it would be no calculator
I said the answer is the third option
Ok i solved 🙂
But i need to do it fastly
I only have 36 sec to solve this
@shy sorrel @pallid tundra @formal plover Thanks for the response 😊
Your welcome, so was it the third option
No probs.
Yes
OK, well it honour to help such a brilliant individual. I'm out.
this is 1/81 right
probability that everyone chose the same symbol = 3/27, probability that everyone chose differently = 6/27, that means that for each round, there is 1/3, so 1/3^4 = 1/81
Yes
yup thats right
One plus one equals window accept it
Referring to the tig780 post?
Don't troll here.
ye
this is their only message so far
and they just joined today
judging by that i doubt they joined to partake in any actually productive discussion
this is all i see 🤔 are their other messages in the social channels?
Mine has more as far as server wide stuff.
icic
Prove that 1^∞ is not equal to 1
Surely $\lim_{x\rightarrow \infty}1^x=\lim_{x\rightarrow\infty}1=1$
Max
i think you could use log too
What if I transform 1 to 2/2, 3/3 and so on
So 1^∞ becomes (2/2)^∞ = 2^∞/2^∞ which gives the undefined answer
or maybe you can think that log 1^∞ = ∞ * log 1
you can't multiple numbers by infinity but you know that log 1 is 0
so it would be ∞ * 0
From your solution it gives 0=0 am I right?
They are essentially "equal infinities"
So next time I should ask this kind of problem in other categories?
Ye
But log1 is not 0 as the 1 is not exact
Its ever so slightly bigger than 0
So 0*infinity indeterminate form
Nvm sorry i didnt see that you had answered it
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-UvTWUEGDO8&themeRefresh=1 you can check it later if you want
🎓Become a Math Master With My Intro To Proofs Course!
https://www.udemy.com/course/prove-it-like-a-mathematician/?referralCode=D4A14680C629BCC9D84C
Many Thanks to Eddie Price for helping make this video possible!
►WEBSITE
https://www.brithemathguy.com
►BECOME A CHANNEL MEMBER
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UChVUSXFzV8QCOKNWGfE56YQ/join
#...
- No you can’t
- Infinity is not a real number
- Google indeterminate form’
I asked Google Gemini to come up with a probability problem at the level of IMO, this is what it came up with: A $n \times n$ grid is painted with $n$ distinct colors, such that each color appears exactly once in each row and each column. Let $S$ be the set of all possible colorings of the grid. For two colorings $C_1, C_2 \in S$, we say that $C_1$ and $C_2$ are related if there exists a sequence of colorings $C_1 = D_1, D_2, \ldots, D_k = C_2$ in $S$ such that for each $i$, $D_i$ can be obtained from $D_{i-1}$ by swapping the colors of two adjacent rows or two adjacent columns.
Determine the number of equivalence classes of $S$ under this relation.
Max
Well, it's not a "probability problem", but otherwise looks interesting.
yeah true
i asked for another and it gave the classic recurrence relation probability problem
Alice and Bob play a game with a standard six-sided die. Alice rolls the die first. If she rolls a 6, she wins. Otherwise, Bob rolls the die. If Bob rolls a 6, he wins. Otherwise, they continue taking turns rolling the die until one of them rolls a 6.
What is the probability that Alice wins the game?
is it 6/11
i tried solving it a diff way than i usually do
yeah i believe so
you just solve it iteratively, so if no one wins on the first go, it's like you've started again then u got an equation for p
not sure how u did it but thats the go to way on this
yeah typically i use infinite geometric series but im trying to use that way more
so this time i did
now i’m ready for putnam trust guys
You can also say: Alice and Bob keep rolling dice simultaneously until at least one of them get a 6. Alice wins if she has a 6 in the final roll.
The we're just looking for a conditional probability.
interesting perspective
How would you even start this
tbh i wasn’t sure what the notation on the top meant but im assuming it’s saying the recursive sequence is formed by repeatedly applying the function f
essentially the recursion is a recursion
it is recursioning
so i’m assuming it’s irrelevant for this lol
Yeah but when they say S_n are the referring to a set
Oh that makes sense, the {a_n} threw me off
does it make more sense where to start now
Hmmm
Maybe
Could we compare that part to the function, like the sum of the first n terms and the function using the first n+m-1 terms to find the first n+m terms, so we could adjust the S_n equation to include m?
Actually
That might not be useful
Okay
It's natural numbers tho, pretty sure it starts at n=1
I'll give a hint and this is the important trick you should at least try on questions like this:
||consider $S_{n+1}-S_n$||
ive been reading about characteristic equations of recurrence relations in this competition prep book but it doesn't really go in depth about why they work
can someone here provide a proof for that?
forgive the poor answer, but I believe it's cause they end up being the eigenvalues of translation operator
you see smth similar come up in constant coefficient homogenous linear differential eqns
can i put competition math for any grade here?
oh okay
How do i start learning competition math?
Search up art of problem solving and do problems from their website
guys, what aops books do you recommend me? Should i start with the first one?
That's because you pretty much need a course in basic linear algebra which is usually taught in the 1st year of college to have the prerequisites
if you’re starting out with no contest background I’d recommend the intro series (intro algebra, number theory, counting, geometry)
intro algebra might be the gentlest introduction (and closest to what you’d be doing in a standard math class)
yo is anyone giving amc
Isnt aops paid?
Not a proof but more like intuition.
when you have fib sequence you know its related to :
$$x^2 - x - 1 = 0$$
But that basically just means
$$x^2 = x + 1$$
Now if you multiply by $x$ you will get
Or just
$$x^3 = x^2 + x = 2x + 1$$
Multiply by $x$ again.
$$x^4 = 2x^2 + x = 2(x + 1) + x = 3x + 2$$
$$x^5 = 5x + 3$$
So basically you have
$$x^n = F_n x + F_{n - 1}$$
Now denote the solutions of $x^2 - x - 1 = 0$ with $u , v$
Then you have
$$F_n (u - v) = u^n - v^n$$
Or just $$F_n = \frac{u^n - v^n}{u - v}$$
Ofc not
Pluton
sooo where do i start
Forums
i have no contest background but i am already studying algebra, combinatories, geometry... for 2/3 months, do you think that the intro esries keep being a nice series for me?
And about the contest preparation, do i need a contest background to undertand better the book?
the intro books (for algebra and geometry) are written to be somewhat more difficult/rigorous versions of the standard textbooks
and the difficulty curve is a lot gentler than some of the higher level aops books
Do you guys have any suggestions for books for the AMC 8
More specifically on number theory, combinatorics, and probability
the aops intro books
What book/s should I read for BMO1?
help?
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
Could you stop spamming that?
Give that for all $n$: [0<a_n\le a_{2n}+a_{2n+1}] Prove that $\sum_{n=1}^\infty a_n$, diverges
Max
Nice problem, me and a friend found a method for proving it but not sure where our proof goes wrong (the solution from the competition is way more complicated), I'll post later in case people wanted to try it first
(from Putnam)
||a1 <= a2+a3 <= a4+a5+a6+a7 <= a8+a9+...+a15 <= ...||
This works in particular when a_n = 1/(n+1), so the harmonic series diverges.
||We did S (a_n)<=S(a_2n+a_2n+1), subtracting both sides you get a_1<=0, which contradicts the original statement, but feels wrong, perhaps the Riemman rearrangement theorem has been broken here? we werent sure||
The assumption forces all terms to be positive, so Riemann rearrangement doesn't apply.
you should only use #geometry-and-trigonometry next time, instead of posting your question here as well
I'll leave it to you to show the green angles are in fact equal
True, so the argument is valid?
Looks valid to me.
So weird, the answer on the Putnam site is so long, was convinced it couldn't be correct
in number theory, do you have some videos you can recommend? bcuz I can't seem to find anything on YT. mod and everything is not explained well in all videos, please rec some resources for it
not really competition math but how do u get good at tmua papers?
I am studying algebra with a book right now and I have three more for geometry, number theory, and counting. I want to get them done as soon as possible, but I don't want to make it that hard, so should I do them all simultaneously?
GL to those in the IMC this week
8 new goated uni level comp problems to be released this week 🙏
@eternal acorn hi
WHY HERE OF ALL PLACES
Vanellope von Schmugz
2 variable and 2 equations, you can get the value of x and y frm there and then compute it in the below eqn
I don't know how much this will help but try multiplying the top equation by x and the bottom by y
Subtract the two equations: $$4(y-x)-4(x^2-y^2)=0$$ $$-(x-y)-(x-y)(x+y)=0$$ $$(x-y)(x+y+1)=0$$
See what you can do from here
It’s pretty straightforward
Civil Service Pigeon

Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
Vanellope von Schmugz
the easiest way is to chest the unique answer and see x=y by inspection lol
I feel like that's valid since it's literally the reflection across the line y=x so that's necessarily the points of real intersection
Touché
like I'm saying, assuming what the question assumes, that there is only one real solution and praying it works out
where does that come from, the partial derivatives or something
Fewer calculations -> good
well, that misses the point of this way of thinking, since you're going through a different path
you're talking about a different solution than @ivory ember
that is a true statement..
oh, your original message to me refers to your solution when I'm talking about the other solution
the point is to side step all that work like he's saying here
How do I solve any world problems. I am bad at solving them
Read the sentence and write the infos that are given
Use ur logics to see what the question asks and what is given
you can probably troll this with x=y
well, the top part defines two curves. So intuitively there should exist finitely many points which satisfy the top
exactly
x=y=1/2 i think
Is this a valid proof?
Yeah
Felt kinda lack luster... Thank you!
Hello, sorry if this is not my channel, I'm new to this but I need help please 😦 (I'm not good at English and I don't have time to put everything in the translator)
Hello, I introduce myself, my name is Axel and I need help with these exercises (ignore the Spanish words), please, if you could help me, I would appreciate it.
please 😦
for number 1, add the coordinates of A to the coordinates of P, to get the coordinates of Q
for part a, (7,-3)+(-3,7)=(4,4) so Q=(4,4)
and similarly for the other ones
for number 5, you’re looking for the vector you have to travel to get from P to Q
subtract the coordinates of P from the coordinates of Q: the first coordinate of the result will be your coefficient for i, and the second will be your coefficient for j
I heard AMC got ridiculously hard today, can anybody confirm?
the australian one btw
What year?
the senior one
I didnt take the senior one but I took the intermediate one
was it harder than usual(assuming you joined back then)
Well I didnt join back then but its harder than what I usually take
For me based on past papers it seemed easier but maybe it was because of heat of the moment
I've had seniors telling me that
Albeit most of the answers I just guessed in the final 3 minutes so
easy back then
I mean that past papers were harder and this was easier
But maybe because I just guessed some of the questions and I didnt bother doing 3 of the 0-999 questions
Oh well
Tim uses plug-in timers to automate his indoor plant lighting. Each timer has a plug on the back, a socket on the front, and a motorised dial that rotates once for every 24 hours that the plug has power. When the time on the dial is between 9:00 and 17:00, the timer switch is on, so that any power on the plug is switched through to the socket. For fun, he plugs together three of his timers, all set to time 0:000:00, with a lamp plugged into the front socket. How many hours until the lamp turns on?
familiar(from amc allegedly)
?
the wording is so confusing though I think its just 24*9
basically the timer is plugged 24/7 but the dial on the timer only rotates once every day, and if the dial is on the 9:00 part then the power is switched on through the socket
The dial on one of the timers only moves when it has power.
Yeah the timers are plugged in series
ie. The socket of one is plugged into the output of the previous
is it or its a separate for each?
So for the first 9 hours, only the first timer rotates.
Then the first timer switches on, and the second timer starts rotating.
At 17:00, the first timer switches off, and the second timer stops rotating. By this time, the second timer has only reached 08:00 on its dial, so it hasn't ever switched on yet.
The next day at 09:00, the second timer gets power again, and at 10:00 the second timer has finally reached 09:00 and starts powering the third timer.
only the third timer is required to power up the lamp?
i'm confused, theres a lot of variables
It’s just a series electrical circuit
But the third timer is powered by the output from the second
Which is powered by the output from the first
Which is (finally) powered by the socket
its so mindboggling, how does the dial helps here?
The dial determines when power will leave the socket of a clock
It’s value must be between 900 and 1700
And when the dial is within that range, the next device will power - if it is the lamp, we are done, but if it is another clock, then that clock will start ticking
I feel like the solution is simple but you need a lot of comprehension
probably didn't help the fact that I don't use plug-intimers
how does the first timer rotates on the first 9 hrs?
The first timer always has power.
Behold my mad diagramming skills!
Each clock turns at a rate of one revolution per 24 hours but only when it has power.
So the second clock only ticks when the first switch is on, and the third clock only ticks when the first and second switches are both on.
hmmmm
OH I COMPLETELY misunderstood
dial = revolution, now I understand
thanks for this
would that mean that after 17:00 on the first day, the dial on the 1st timer would go to 10:00 until it go again to 9:00?
The dial on the first timer always turns. So it always shows the actual current time.
Yeah that part (and the whole problem tbh) is very poorly written
ohhh so it only took 33 to get it work again
the 2nd
Yes, 33 hours after starting, the first switch will go on for the second time.
Thus, 34 hours after starting, the second clock will have collected 9 hours of power, so then the third clock gets power for the first time.
yup then it ends at 67 hours right?
that part make the 3rd timer at 8
though the 2nd timer will end at 17
or it demands another return?
I haven't simulated that far out.
Uh, no, there's no special significance to 33·n hours.
I mean at 66 hours, 2nd timer reopens again and after an hour, it reaches 17:00 and 3rd reaches 8:00
I'm using it as reference for the timer of the 1st
Definitely not. 66 hours after starting, the first timer will be at 66 mod 24 = 18 hours, so by that time it won't even be sending power to the second timer.
oh i'm dumb, it should be 24n+9
(FWIW, I found a video showing a representative example of these timers in use. Beware weird kitschy soundtrack: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=By8J4LreT9E)
at n = 1, 2nd timer starts at 8:00 and ends with 16:00 after 8 hrs
then n = 2, 2nd timer starts at 16:00 and ends with 00:00 after 8 hrs
then n = 3, 0:00 starts then 8:00 with 16:00 at ends, but we only need one more hour for all 3 to actually work together, so its 24(3)+9+1 = 82
So, now that we've hopefully agreed what the task is about, I think it's easiest to solve it by working backwards:
The third timer needs 9 hours of power before it turns on.
How many hours of power does the second timer need to receive in order to pass on 9 hours? That must be 9 + 24 + 1 = 34 hours.
How long does it take for the first timer to have delivered 34 hours of power? 34 is 4×8 + 2, so it takes 9+4×24+2 = 107 hours from start.
4 days is more than 82 hours.
Consider the situation after 4 days:
- The first timer ticks correct time, as it always does.
- The second timer has seen 4×8=32 hours of power, so it is one hour from turning on.
- The third timer has seen 8 hours of power.
At 09:00 on the fifth day, the second timer starts getting power.
At 10:00 on the fifth day, the second timer starts sending power to the third one.
At 11:00 on the fifth day, the third timer has finally seen 9 hours of power, and switches on.
first day 17:00 -> 8:00 - > 0:00 -> lamp(off)
2nd day 17:00 -> 16:00 -> 7:00 -> lamp(off)
intermission(3rd day) 10:00 -> 17:00 -> 8:00 -> lamp off
3rd day 17:00 -> 0:00 -> 8:00 -> lamp(off)
4th day 17:00 -> 8:00 -> 8:00 -> lamp(off)
5th day 11:00 -> 10:00 -> 9:00 ->lamp(on)
OKAY I GET IT
I fr though 8 it opens
Vanellope von Schmugz
Well, have you tried just plugging this directly into the quadratic formula or completing the square? Your substitution does make the coefficients into rationals, but it isn't necessary to do that and feels like extra work for nothing.
You are going to use the same tool to solve the equation after doing your substitution as without doing it in the first place.
Doesn't matter how you factorize it, using quadratic formula is perfectly valid way to factorize a quadratic polynomial. The other method I suggested, i.e. completing the square, is the standard way of factoring quadratic polynomial and that is how you prove the quadratic formula
Your substitution doesn't achieve anything useful in terms of factoring that polynomial. Same method works before and after doing that and the substitution is just extra work when you do it and when you reverse it
Quadratic formula?
I don't think it's worth calling it factoring once you stop using integer coefficients
7sqrt(3) is not an integer
oh ok I see
maybe substitute x by x*3sqrt3 to cancel out the 9 no idea if that makes it more convenient or not
looks like it does actually
it becomes 6x^2+7x+1=0 so you have (6x+1)(x+1) now you're done basically
This seems familar, yes
Albeit im not sure if I would be able to talk about it because the paper says you cant distribute it until a certain date
I wasnt able to solve it because the wording is weird and I couldnt comprehend it
and there was two easy algebra questions
aabb*c = cbbc and that easy sfft about xy +x + y = 2024 etc
I agree
i didnt solve the aabb thing because i was more focused on the question after it
the xy + x + y question was so easy when you realize the trick
no need for sfft
its 341 assuming a b c are distinct
nope
?
xy + x + y = 2024
zy + z + y = 2024
then you get x=z then you can solve the third equation as a quadratic
of course x = z = 26
that is definitely harder
then you get y = 74 easily by dividing 2025 by 27
the problem after that was the dial problem
that is definitely the intended trick
way too hard to comprehend
then after that was a triangle problem which im not sure where to even start
it was really easy to see after you realize that the dial that rotates means that it makes a full revolution after 24 hrs
is that the 18 24 30?
yea thats what i think it meant but hindsight is 2020
its the right triangle one yes
with the line passing through P or something
Im sure theres a really smart way to do that problem but im lost on how to find it
go look at help 22 and scroll back(I accidentally ghosted the two helpers 😭 😭
or search incenter at the search bar and you would see the thread
they got 630, and I can see it already
nah im not going to be able to make that up within 75 minutes
its a 30 item qs, I assume that the first 25 was piss easy and can be solved atleast 30 mins
i really need to think smarter
nah the first 10 are baby
11-20 is slightly harder but if you think harder it will be fine
21-25 is harder
by the time i reached 21-25 i had like 5 minutes left because i focused on 26-30 too much lo
joining a f2f contest, you should have priorities like solving problems you can easily see a solution
and not waste time to experiment(unless you are in a 3 hour contest then you are good)
to maximize the points and get a lot of time toyour advantage
im guessing that the first 10 problems are just there to make you comfortable because damn
ill just think harder next time
basically the easy trick is
(x+1)(y+1) = 2025
(y+1)(z+1) = 2025
(z+1)(x+1) = 729
thus it suffices that x = z < y
thus sqrt(729) = z+1 = x+1 = 27 thus x = z = 26
2025/(z+1) or (x+1) = 75 as they are both equal to 27, thus y+1 = 75, y = 74, so 74+26+26 = 126
1 minute solve
idk where the quadratic come from
bec x=z
xz + x + z = 728
x^2 + 2x - 728 = 0
(x-26)(x+28)=0
and since the problem states x,y,z is positive you can discard the negative solution
thats one way but i'm too lazy to see 26*28 but it works
the result is easier for me to factor 
does anyone know what subjects aops algebra book covers? I am thinking about start to read but idk if it is below my level
algebra?
yeah
the subject is algebra idk what u mean then?
It's a wide spectrum tho
introductory algebra or intermediate algebra? what level do u want?
Well, I would like to know about introductory algebra. Is this a high school book?
Actually, it isn't I saw here in the site
Don't worry, I'll search about the topics of the book, thx
intro covers more or less the content of a standard algebra 1 course
intermediate covers algebra 2 + a number of contest topics
FEs, harder sequence/series problems, inequalities
intro covers a bit more and some alg 2 stuff
Inter covers way more
I don’t remember it covering FE’s
But it’s been a few years so that might be the case
chapter 19
Is the FE chapter in depth
it goes over some of the common techniques but is probably not enough on its own for olympiad FEs
i am starting too but i can help you with something i think. what have you been doing and where are you from?
alright, what grade are you currently in?
do you know aops? there are really great problems there to you practice. That is probably one of the best ways to study, practicing. People really like their books too
The mainly subjects at imo for example are algebra, geometry, counting, number theory and precalculus
there are aops books for each subject as you can see here : https://artofproblemsolving.com/store
you should know about the selection process to get into usa team, i guess you are pretending to take imo right?
try always to think about thee problems, that is important. Reading answer without thinking about the problem arent usefull at all
im grade 9
does this work for me as well?
try to do alcumus, its free
I think that helps a bit
aops also has classes for high school comp math
try those
but unfortunately its not free
also practice past competitions
of course
aops books have a lot of exercises that is the most important thing in my opnion. You can check aops exercises too. There are a lot of resorces
start by looking at previous tests of easier tests and as you improve you can try harder problems
amc, aime, usamo and imo i think
if you are from us
thanks
what is competition math?
is this the correct way to study for math comp?
i practice -> if cant solve look at the solution -> understand the solution -> answer the question myself
it's in the name
most high school competitions have a decent sampling of algebra, trigonometry, functions, Euclidean and coordinate geometry, maybe classical inequalities as well
it's an entirely different mindset and focus to the maths you do at school
Yea
You should also study random courses
But depends on what lvl of study you are at
For university level, I've seen problems where you needed a good understanding of lie groups, I've seen others that required p-adic numbers 🤷
thanks
Why olympiad questions is so hard?
Because it is olympiad?
no, i don't agree at all. I think that a batter way to study would be
Thinking about the problem for some time seems to be really helpful, looking at the solution if you don't understand the problem won't help you, try to understand the problem before looking the solution, you answer the problem and then see the solution, if your answer is wrong, that is not a problem at all, you read the solution, understand and answer the question with your own words ( if you understood the solution you will be able to do that ). There are some problems that a hint won't help or will almost answer the question when the question is solved with a single idea, in this cases you can just try more and study more about. If you have already tried for a lot of time, looking at the solution isn't a big problem but that means you have to practice even more
btw, i saw that here
https://github.com/bqi343/cp-notebook/blob/master/Resources/Competition Math.md
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bSdp2WeyuJY
it is not specifically about math the second one but a lot of things makes sense for math competitins too
because it actually involves nontrivial applications of a much wider range of mathematical tools?
is competition and olympiad the same thing
wat
how to get better at amc 10 problems 22 - 25
Do aime
Depends on how far you are
Cuz if the problem is solved with a single idea then asking for hints is hardly useful
(Which is most amc) vs. oly where it’s many steps
i dont do competition math but usually solutions should only be viewed after seriously trying the question
you shouldn't be running to solutions for every question you see and can't solve
Hi I’m gold medalist on math Olympiad 3x
My parents tortured me 10 hours a day as a little kid until I got all questions right on every AMC 12 in one sitting
Then they did the same for the USAMO
I poisoned my teammates at the MOP and secured my spot in the IMO
wow! did you have to poison the competitors at the IMO to get first place?
No I actually had answer key
was it hard to memorize?
Well my life was on the line so no
Parents said they would kill me
Chinese water torture
do you have any tips for how to discreetly administer poison?
what's the best type of poison to use?
What are your future goals ?
Might consider this for a coding olympiad
who does the australian AMC
how does one approach this besides bashing small cases
australians
How so Xor ???
exclusive or?
You probably can’t
Actually
n must be even since otherwise contradiction (four odd^4 has even sum)
Then it’s just 1,2,p,2p (and this one has bounds on p), or 1,2,4,p (also bounds on p) or 1,2,3,4 and that’s probably it
1 2 3 5 may also be an option
Yeah
no
The answer is probably in 1,2,4,p
Nvm
Well it doesn’t actually work, but you still have to check
1 2 p 2p ends up being 17(p^4 + 1) which forces p=17
34^4 by hand hooray
i would advise against it unless strictly necessary
it may be easier to check that 17^4+1 has no smaller prime factors in other ways
what the fuck is this kid saying
(Orz NT ways)
Actually it’s not that bad with QR bashing or maybe not idk
what are you on about
Sus
Idts
(unless i messed up) that’s the 12p2p case complete with 17(17^4+1) as the answer, forcing floor(n^(1/5)) = 17
1234 is not an option as 1^4 + 2^4 + 3^4 + 4^4 not divisible by 4
1235 not divisible by 2
O wait nvm
124p results in p|1^4 + 2^4 + 4^4
I see what u meant
which is around 273
Well QR eliminates 3 mod 4 primes so it helps ig
QR?
this is divisible by 3, 7 and 13
oh but 4 won’t divide
this case is also impossible
answer is 17 working out shown above
@pallid tundra
We have -1 as a quadratic residue
Because 17^4 = -1 mod p
It’s also a quartic residue but whatever
Quartic or biquadratic reciprocity is a collection of theorems in elementary and algebraic number theory that state conditions under which the congruence x4 ≡ p (mod q) is solvable; the word "reciprocity" comes from the form of some of these theorems, in that they relate the solvability of the congruence x4 ≡ p (mod q) to that of x4 ≡ q (mod p...
Reduces our bashing to 1 mod 8 primes so gg
Quadratic residue
Oars
oars?
Well it’s pretty simple in the quadratic case - x^2 = -1 mod p has solutions only when p is 1 mod 4
= orz
orz?
if a,b and c are in gp, then x cannot be-
a+b+c=xb
3?
assuming a, b, c are not equal
also likely cannot be 0 but don’t quote me on that
b/r + b + rb = xb
r + 1 + 1/r = x
please give a logical solution
i think |r+1/r|>=2 so x is either >=3 or =<-1
this should be the solution
what if i don’t want to
??
Is this is a multiple choice question that you forgot to include the options to
yes @ivory ember
why the heck did you start to answer it then?????
i enjoy solving math questions
Then just pick the option that’s not in the interval
Tbf, they provided a full solution. Your poor communication isn’t their fault.
@ivory ember fine. next time i would see the internet rather than seeing your dumb discord channel!
ohk
are u a robot or a person?
a text emoji for kneeling on the ground
"orz" is a stylized rendering of a person genuflecting towards the left.
o is the head, z is the legs
The joke is it would be more or less homophone with "orz" if you pronounce the latter as a word.
Oars has the same pronounciation
I would suggest not caring too much about comp math slang
comp math brainrot is bad
this is true
Vanellope von Schmugz
An easier way is to just know that this is true (for example, see unique lagrange interpolation polynomial).

