#precalculus
1 messages · Page 74 of 1
like the basics, without the use of derivative
wait isn't L'Hospital only work well with any limits of some exponents like 0^0 or 1 power infinity???
Just like using limits or actually understanding how to prove things about them and that?
apply that on basic function would only make it harder for student I think
?
It is simpler to multiply by the conjugate here
I think L'Hopitals would make things a bit more messy with the square roots
sure
using
well then like any basic calculus book should work
there's no AB or BC in precalc
jesus, what is it with schools and wack-ass course names
Idk
Yeah it’s very weird
!da2a
No need to ask “Can I ask…?” or “Does anyone know about…?”—it’s faster for everyone if you just ask your question! See https://dontasktoask.com/
Suggestions please?
isolate m
How do you do that? I tried to divide both sides by -2m+1 but I don't know the sign of it yet.
wait
Case by case
check if it's true with m = -2/3
Like -2m+1 < 0 and >0?
then divide both sides by 3m+2
If you were to solve for x, you'd divide by THIS term
So you want to consider when THIS is either positive, negative or zero
if the inequality is true for all real x, the right hand side must be bigger or equal to the maximum value of sin x
(the zero check is the easier one to do - test m = -2/3 (which would make that term zero), which is what this is insinuating)
Do I have to do this case by case too?
hmm
Yes: whether it's positive or negative will affect how the inequality flips
Aight, thanks.
And whether it's positive or negative is dependent on whether m is greater than or less than -2/3
hello, are they any books or courses online from udemy/youtube people would recommend for precal to calculus 1-2 ?
i’m at cal 2 learning integrations for the summer for next year but i find i need to brush up on the old concepts
Stewart Calculus or Thomas Calculus
-1 <= sin(x) <= 1
so -1 < (-2m+1)/(3m+2) <= 1
Okay
I just want to know
one thing
where did sal khan
get the 3 from
This sounds dumb or idk if I'm slow
But the 3 is messing me up
can i have help on this 🙏
you can take the concentration of hydrogen ions in eggs divide by concentration of hydrogen ions in baking soda
hey guys i can t figure out the convexity inequality
m trynna use it to demonstrate the holder s inequality
I think its dividing the pH of baking soda with the ph of eggs
so its 8.3/7.8
you have to use the logarithms
Lowk hate trigonometry 💅
Hi
I’m on a grind too🙏
Hopefully it’s fun
Managed to learn trig before the precalc book gets here
What are "energy points" for? Is there a final boss made of tensors you must defeat?
56$ for a book is criminal.
I hope it has at least 1000 pages of value.
it's a Khan Academy reward system
Yeah I tried finding on what had a good condition and the cheapest price ($10 shipping too😭)
And so that was the only thing I found
Dayum.
I'm sorry to hear that.
Knowledge should NOT cost that much.
I mean it’s a college textbook that is a hard cover with nearly 1k pages I think it’s reasonable price😭
Glad I didn’t have to pay $200
For a new one
I suppose.
Still, saddens my heart.
I have so many books to buy and can't afford to because of crazy prices. It's not paper costing, it's publishers. 😟
I bet it's Saleem Watson's fault.
😭
✅
Thanks nature for the support.
$56 isn’t too bad for a textbook, comparatively at least. A new Stewart textbook costs like $200 usually it’s a completely scam especially for that
This is the schematic for a Square Root computer; it has a third dimension (the Z dimension) of a width of 2.
if you build this machine, you can fill it up with a liquid and it will calculate the square root of the volume of liquid poured into it
Haha that's like the minimum you can find for a math book
Haha I paid mine 45, checkmate.
Wait until you have to purchase spivak and his solution manuel 🗿
Haha jokes on you I am not from the US and A.
spivaks still on the cheaper side compared to others
Any high school student?
Other calculus books ?
Or books in general
how do i start learning precalc?
do i have to know other forms of math b efore this?
Just basic algebra
oh thats it? so like algebra 1 is good enough right?
I'm not familiar with american courses but if you know how to solve basic equations and manipulate graphs of functions it should be okay
Look at axler precalc book and see if the beginning of the book looks familiar to you
👍
um…I'm not sure about that
I did precalculus after algebra 2 and geo
but if that works for you, go ahead
precalc is meant for ppl who finished alg 2 and a basic knowledge of trig, so I'd say u should at least make sure u know that
alright so i have to learn alg 2 and trig correct?
if thats the case ill start with those and continue
why are you set on learning precalc
precalc is what will start my journey to "high" levels of math
and I do want to learn, just stuck on where to start
what grade r u in just wonderding?
incoming freshman lol
i gotta get ahead
ok?
In my opinion, precalc is kinda a waste of a course. This might be frowned upon, but I would actually recommend doing geometry and algebra in great detail and then going kinda straight to calculus
but if u want u can also touch on discrete math or other things first
precalc is just a bunching of random topics
i do like the idea of fully understanding geometry and algebra, any ideas on how to start?
do alg trig etc individually
whats the most optimal way of learning these?
khan academy if u like learning online
My favorite books are the AoPS books, but you do have to pay for those and they are a bit of money (still, for textbooks of that length and quality they are unbeaten in terms of price)
otherwise you just buy some good textbooks or get online copies if available #book-recommendations and practise
I agree. I just bought a precalc text book and I skipped around 5 chapters because there was stuff I already knew. The first half is literally just algebra
I literally just went to trig
Precalc is basically just parametric/polar, conics (which are arguably algebra 2), sometimes more on complex numbers, and also vectors/matrices
if you know of a reputable crash course thats in your budget you should consider enrolling
crash course?
like a course that introduces you to these topics in a way that will lead up to calc
or just a course that covers these in general
i would go for the second one since these chapters have a wide range of applications outside of calc as well
how much time do you have before uni begins?
“Incoming freshmen”
yep
yes i read that, does freshman not mean 1st yr undergrad
freshman here also is 1st year of hs 
ah
well then you shouldnt be in a hurry to be finishing these topics then, you presumably have time, so a crash course wouldnt be suited for your needs
I am in the same situation as this guy I also am a incoming freshman (I took algebra 1 in 8th grade now I’m learning Precalc
)
well my main goal is to take the highest level of math I can and do it asap, im already skipping a level of math
HOW?
well, you have to make sure your foundations are solid
don't be too much in a hurry
or else you might not understand what comes later

Well I took a geometry and algebra 2 course over the summer which I managed to finish it really quick as I have a good understanding in math.
these chapters shouldnt be considered as a lead up to calc, but as chapters that have their own essence
if u skipped alg 2, I suggest u take precalc and not go directly to calc
did your school have those courses instated already>
Yeah
But I have seen difference with other courses
They teach the same content but sometimes in a different order
yeah, the school im entering does teach by grade but they kinda just do the core principles of algebra and geometry
I’m assuming you’re in the US but there should be a curriculum your school teaches from the state. Like how I am from Texas here and we learned from the TEKS curriculum. There are multiple textbooks that follow TEKS and I didn’t learned from them but I did review them as they were at a thrift bookstore and they followed the curriculum exactly.
You should probably get a textbook that teaches your state curriculum
thats a good idea
You’ll have knowledge of majority (if not all) that a average junior has been taught from your school
Overall my recommendation is you follow a course/textbook from your states curriculum
I no longer go off this branch anymore
what do you do now?
I wanted to learn precalc by James Stewart as I heard his calculus book is good and well it is overall really good imo
wait so the person who creates the book will have different methods?
Sometimes
what makes his so intriguing?
The amount of exercise and examples this guy has put on the book is incredible
His teaching in text is really good
Another main reason
Is because most US colleges uses his textbook

it's pretty vast though
it covers everything from calc 1-3
so you might get overwhelmed
but if you feel like u wont its good
well the topics in the book are sequential though
theres no mixing in that aspect
just dont skip ahead and get scared
Yeah I understand
I’m going to be really careful with calc book
Like it’s my own child😭
wait so in school what level of math are you planning to take?
Well
it's 1300 pages so just keep it at home kek
I haven’t told my counselor I took algebra 2 so I have to tell her that soon so algebra 2 atm but once I tell them I will be learning precalc as I can’t prove my credit from a guy who made a house based off integral😭 (unless I take a test for it though which maybe)
im so far behind
No you’ll be fine
I am only doing it because I like math I didn’t care too much of being ahead
you are miles ahead of me
If it makes you feel better😭
i do enjoy math, but i care more about being ahead
I learned algebra 2 in like a week😭
y
no matter how far ahead u will be
u ll always be behind someone else
learn it cause u like it not to beat others at it
yeah exactly, i might as well start now so its less of a load later
dont rush tho
is it that easy? or is it some other factor?
In my mind yes it was really easy
I literally got a full 100 on that course😭
You learnt this part in a week?
I learned probably and statistics in my geometry class
Sequence in my algebra 1 class
Matrices and vectors not really🤷
Hmm, I vaguely thought "algebra 2" was a portion of high-school math, but matrices sound not particularly high-school to me.
AI overview😭
But also tbf many places teach by a different curriculum
My state in algebra 2 did not cover trigonometry at all
I learned it while my book was getting shipped to me ( through khan academy (I love sal))
Well you do learn it in hs where we are, but ig it must not be in the alg 2 course in the us
what do we think about openstax for precalculus ?
no idea, it's stupid
remove the precalc channel i say
but that would get shot down so im not gonna suggest it
😭
I had a friend who used it before she said it was pretty good
alright thank you
I think u do basics of it in precalc
In some schools
doesnt seem too hard
sequences and series is rlly easy
so is prob and stats
id say maybe vectors and matrices takes some time
All of that cannot be done in a week
i mean depends on whether ur spending evry minute on math
except for sleep
and eating
or its like a diff type of schedule
Still not possible to do it all well
depends who ur talking abt
like if its me and u
barely possible
no offense to u
but like if it was a genius
then possible
matrices are in some precalculus courses
they teach you their applications in solving systems of equations
finding determinants, inverses and elementary row operations
Yeah, row operations w matrices are usually in Algebra 2. But nothing too crazy
For me matrices were only taught to solve system of equations
you can also solve for coefficients with them
you can just fit a curve onto a set of points but it will require the r x c to get bigger
Perhaps, yes
tbf if theyve had background knowledge it shouldnt be too hard to connect the dots
ooh, I just learned about matrices and how to multiply them


there's a deeper reason as to why they multiply that way (though not that deep i would say)
Anyone one wana do matrices group study with me in depth?
Let's say you study and we help when you need help.
Answer is no.
If you are deeply studying matrices and get many doubts, you can create a thread for it(probably by asking mods to create one) and ask your doubts in thread, whoever is interested will help/join.
are trig identities and solving trig functions difficult?
like will I need to memorize the identities or something like that?
trig functions are harder than others, so many manipulations and formulas needed 
Meh, just a few.
Sin/cos of sums, sums of sin/cos, a few things about dissected angles and doubled angles and you're pretty much good to go.
I have it this week and need to get nearly 100’s on all assignments to get an A 😅
hopefully it’s not that bad
What happens if you get an A- or a B+?
I don’t get to take AP calc
Unjust.
which is the whole reason I took summer class
assuming I don’t get a 93 yeah
Asking because I'm not familiar with that system.
which is dumb because no other school does it like dumb
yeah exactly
if I don’t have a 93% they don’t allow me to take it as I’m not ready
You're almost there.
The step is small.
0.9/0.93 of the work has been done.
Ask whatever you got trouble with and much good luck to ya.
solving logarithms is what brought me down
What's up with them?
teacher only explained the easy ones expecting us to then apply what we know to difficult ones
I got a 79 on that test because I had no clue what to do 💀💀
Dayum.
You should really try and keep up with those.
Have you tried using YT or Khan Academy (I personally never used this last one).
Or asking here for help.
I feel like it should a 85 atleast like you’re not doing bad if you have an 85 because just 90 is crazy
why calculus?
differentiation is mainly a calculus topic
No, it's precalculus. Precalculus is not basic calculus; it's what you learn before calculus
see channel description
for precalc: "anything in the us precalc curriculum goes here, examples include: trigonometry, logarithmic and exponential functions, function sketching, etc."
for calc: "differential and integral calculus (of a single variable), sequences and series"
ohh
Should I skip this since section: modeling harmonic motion since this is mainly for calculus? I’m using James Stewart’s precalc book
Someone can you teach me differentiation 😭
Khan Academy then AP Calc AB
got it!
Don't crosspost between several different channels. It's wasteful because people risk using time on typing answers that have already been posted elsewhere.
precalc is so much harder than calc
aren't they mastery points
different name
Both of those are for rewarding people
Why is it different for me and that other person like the name
how?
Ohhhhh
it just is
I disagree
but yeah it definitely depends on how it’s taught
bro precalc is so weird at our school
american education system is horrible
wish it was like india or china instead
why?
Pressumebly because U.S' system deprives the people of critical thinking. A kid growing up in the U.S will very likely be destined for having a career in content creations or in some situations, finance and buisness because there's no appeal there that motivates an ordinary child to go into stem, and the majority of the perception in schools is that "math is boring". That mentality is what is killing and will kill the deprived people there of any success. If you look at China-Hong Kong, Shanghai, Beijing, Hangzhou, but particuarly Shenzhen-it's a city that is completely technologized that generations to come will have the privelge of been raised in an environment that promotes technology, innovation, science, and what have you.
I'm not entirely sure about how it is in India given their infrastructure but I do see investments being made into IT and they're very patriotic people for chess but also in their success in the Moon Chandrayaan-3 mission
The immense patriotism Indians have will most definitely contribute to their success in the future
it depends on where in the us u live in
and also the critical thinking shi is not true at all
in countries like india or china, they force u to memorize math for 8 hours a day
which is not at all encouraging u to develop your critical thinking skills
and all the tech in the cities like shanghai, beijing and blah blah blah is all on the surface level, it is very different from chinese people daily life
i live in the us and my scjool is 90% asian and im telling u from their experience
southeast asian: Yea we got that experience too
but they hate applications of derivative
and also derivative of Trigonometries....
those kind of stuff is kinda scary
Since im business and commerce class, our math course is rather eassier than Science stream...
like we just touched cal 1, right now our science stream in our grade is like in cal 2 or something
oh im talking about grade 12 in our country btw
if you confused
idk if you guys know this but Asian countries mostly after grade 10 usually is complusory to learn AT LEAST Cal 1
china is like grade 10, for us Science: grade 11, Business: Grade 12
I see that for a nation nearly 30 - 40 years ago what was once like India in some regard in terms of underdevelopment, then industralized itself to the level that the nation has its own credible space station, space programs, phones, vehicles, high speed rail, internet, ship building, and their enormous scale of manufacturing within their country and outside isn't something you base it off the basis that they "memorize math for 8 hours". They clearly work hard and they're motivated. What's interesting to me is the incredible achievements they will achieve within the next century as the generations will grow accustomed to that environment
yeaaa
nowadays like 2-3 years
you see those like indians TEACHING YOU How to solve MATH like calculus and integration
YT Shorts those
My friend even heard of 9yo indians solving calculus problems
like you can see the point here
Read a while ago that there's this India prodigy that is a professor somewhere, incredible feats
Nah what I am saying is that the math taught in the american education system is barely sufficient
Until AP calculus
then it is okay
bruh I don’t think ap calc is very good
And I don’t think like the JEE for example is known for requiring deep thinking or critical thinking
what do u mean by cal? calculus?
thats bound to happen when ur country’s population is 1.4 billion
same with china
precaldiscussy
I feel like if I reply to this with another dirty innuendo I’ll get a warning
Yea calculus
We just said cal for short
True
or calc for short
nah man I was on call tutoring a 7th grader who could barely multiply fractions and simplify them
and i know a 6th grader in india (my cousin) doing pre calculus
wild
say calc, but even here most people take it 11th grade, but i guess its cuz where i live its predominantly asian
im taking calc next yr
in 11th grade
Well, as smart as humans are, it's more so how the nation is governed and the benefits the young are born into that prompts them to become successful, and the power of your nation is truly bolstered by how many people are exposed to such an atmosphere
Ain't no way
Not really a country thing
Anybody could do it if they wanted to
It's not like people here are told to study precal in 6th
(I mean they might be by parents and coaching and whatnot, but it's not in syllabus)
I think a difference between here and the US is that some people start learning adv stuff too early through coaching institutes, to prepare for boards and/or competitive exams, sometimes that has a positive effect and sometimes it doesnt
I solved this question right using the weird formula but I tried to solve it using sigma notation
for some reason chatgpt said it would be this
why are we raising 3/4 to x-1 instead of multiplying it
Try writing out expressions for a_2, a_3, a_4, ... and see how they look.
oh wait I think I get it
for a_2 it would be 8 * 3/4
which is 6
for a_3 it'd have to a_3-1 * 3/4 which is just 6 * 3/4
which is the same as 8 * (3/4)^2
Okay tysm!
Exactly.
<@&268886789983436800>
Do you know what derivatives are
Or limits
FR!?
this type of stuff is discussed here?
am i ahead or behind if i take pre calc in 10th grade
1 year ahead of average I think
thank you twan
depends on where you are
but as @opaque cobalt said, you're likely ahead
welcome to the mathcord btw 
some stuff to find area beneath stuff and know how curvy a line is (graph of a function)
its a fancy way of doing division and multiplication 
“know how curvy a line is” ?
slope 🫦
why is bro doing this
hollow purple
What is that website?
I'm self studying precalc
Khan academy 🔥
Oh ok thx
nice nice
@viscid thistle dm
Does anyone happen to know maths here
no. nobody.
mhm im afraid not.. maybe pick a maths related server next time?
ah alr goot u
can I just skip factoring quadratics by grouping since the quadratic formula just does that a lot easier
if u learn the method on how to factor
youll rarely use quad formular
quaf formula takes a long time and u can make more mistakes
every other factoring method is wayyyy more effient
so the quad formula really just odes 1 thing and it's just to factor quadratics?
I've learned by grouping now
I appreciate all the help
normally u only use to factor the problems that arent factorable
it should be ur last resort
but ig u can skip factoring if u want to go for speed
if ur self studying alg 2or pre clac
Yeah, I'm planning on resuming my engineering degree this fall and I started from the ground since it's been 15 years since I was at uni and I forgot a lot. I'm currently just finishing up algebra 1 and still have a lot to go so I'm not necessarily wanting to rush but I also don't have a ton of time to familiarize myself
algebra 1 on khan academy that is
but they sprinkle in a lot of stuff
oh i see
like I already understand refreshed exponential functions and arithmetic and geometric sequences etc
yeah factoring isnt gonna like kill you but like if would be beneficial
special cases are more important
esp for alg 2 or just all of math tbf
honeslty I'm mostly worried about algebra and making sure I know it well
calc is not so bad if algebra is okay
you should be fine if you know all the functions
how to solve, graph , do the inequality version
stuff like that
Yeah I know basic inequalities and understand them well enough for now
The main problem is that I also need to brush up on phyisics and chem but I'm certain I've went over a lot of non important material wasting my time with the math so far... I don't want a bad foundation which would be horrible but it would be nice to know exactly what I need to know so I can focus on that
im assuming that depends on what kind of engineering you want to do
well I didn't finish my first year so it's just a basic start covering calc, physics, chem etc
I haven't majored in anything yet
hadn't*
I'm in ontario and I'm not sure what I would pick second year but probably mechanical or maybe electrical
oh alr
If I do fine my first year
or rather all I'm worried about atm is just doing well my first year
you should be okay if u have the basics down
Thanks for your help! It's too bad I'm pressed for time because it's actually a lot of fun learning this stuff
not just wrote memorization but actually understanding it makes it soo much easier to piece it all together
I tried my best on concluding what I learnt yesterday
never heard of her
No, what is this math thing? 😨
Anyone mind helping
Reconstructing row 3 by subtracting row 1 from it
1 - 1 = 0
3 - (-2a) = 3 + 2a
(a^2 + 2a + 4) - 2 = a^2 + 2a + 2
Hong Kong's DSE?
curious on the source of this question
one of the source of hk publisher
nice
Thanks man
Thx 🙌
so we want a 1 in the end of any diagonal of the matrix?
okay, you know how you can expand the determinant along any row/column?
cofactor expansion riggt
yeah
Yeah I know
so expanding along the first column, you get:
1 * some determinant + 0 * some determinant + 0 * some determinant
AHHHH
only the 1st determinant survives
YEAH ur right
so what we want is to have a row or column with as many zeroes as possible
the more zeroes the better
Yeah
notice how (third column) = 2 cos(2) * (second column)
Yeah common factor of 2 cos2
so you can just multiply everything in the 2nd column by 2 cos 2
??!
then you get 2 cos 2 sin 2, 2 cos 2 sin 2
2 cos 2 sin 8, 2 cos 2 sin 8 etc
it doesn't matter that the determinant got multiplied by 2 cos 2 when you do that
cause then the determinant is 0
Ahhh
just subtract the 2nd and 3rd columns and you get a column all 0s
Ah when a column or a row has the common factor non zero, the det is 0?
yeah, so that's how you know that constant multiple implies det = 0
you're actually looking for one of the columns to be a linear combination of the other
like, 3rd column = 1 * 1st column + (-2) * 2nd column
cause then you can apply the column operations to make two columns the exact same
the exact same thing applies for rows
Yeah yeah ah
thanks mate
no worries mate
how does this work?
oh right, so if you have a 3x3 matrix
multiply the 1st row by x and the determinant gets multiplied by x
multiply the 2nd row by x and the determinant gets multiplied by x
so if you multiply every single number in the matrix by x, the determinant gets increased by x^3
now we're multiplying every single number by x^(-1) instead, so the determinant gets changed by x^(-3), and hence we need to multiply back by x^3 to not change the expression
similarly the last equality comes from (-1)^3 = -1
well, 1 / (-1)^3
Ah so multiplying each row by x multiplies the whole thing by x^3
yeah so for a 4 by 4 matrix you'd have det(kA) = k^4 * det(A)
with the k^4
hi new
lin-ear algebra
what have you tried
seems reasonable
dyk if theyre correct
,calc 5*pi/3
Result:
5.235987755983
yea seems right
how do i make it from -2pi to 2pi
Adjust the plotting interval
If your using a graphing calc set the domain to about -6.28 to 6.28
,w plot 2sin(1/2(x+pi/3))+1 from -2 pi to 2 pi
@drowsy wolf
Hi, I’m Aditya — a high schooler exploring a symbolic system for prime numbers. I’m building a small informal group (3–5 people) to discuss, refine, and generalize this structure. Interested?
Sure
U can dm me
hi
someone please explain this to me. I think it is A but im not sure
i plugged in the numbers (-1, 0, 1) and it seems to be decreasing to a certain number but it doesnt seem to be either 0, 3/5 or 9/4
and when i plugged in 0 and 1, the output was a negative number which means the more positive x gets, the more negative y value i get
so it cant be either B, C, or D
so im convinced its A but can someone smarter than me confirm
the problem is $x \to \infty$
south
if you want to investigate the behaviour of this function for yourself, you should instead be substituting x = 10, 100, 1000 etc
its not though
this was a past AP college board question on the actual AP Precalc test
it must have a solution, either A, B, C or D.
yes, and?
can you see the picture clearly
there isnt x to infinity solution
the question itself is asking for behaviour as x→inf
but you're considering stuff around x=0 which is irrelevant
no.. its asking what number the graph approaches as x increases to positive infinity
yes
so its hillarious that he would say the answer is x to infinity
noone is saying that
he literally said that problem is x --> infinity positive
he's saying that's what the question is asking for
im saying that the answer is A,B,C or D
right... so you plug in numbers which I am doing
but you're plugging in the wrong numbers
there's the mega shortcut way of just considering the leading coefficients for this type of question
since the degree is the same and the limit is to infinity
what is it
or there's the justification behind that where you divide the numerator and denominator based on the degree of the denominator,
in this case start with dividing the numerator and denominator by x^2
it clearly doesn't factor
are you even reading what i'm saying
and i don't need to divide it via polynomial division bc thats not supposed to be what i do in the question
ur just a bad tutor
ok
take the highest-degree terms and divide them when you have the limit of x to infinity
so just $\lim_{x \to \infty} \frac{3x^2}{5x^2} = \frac{3}{5}$
south
be careful though, cause if you had something like $\frac{3x^2}{5x} = \frac{3x}{5}$
south
the limit as $x \to \infty$ would be $\infty$ instead
south
ohh
ok so its 3/5
wow, thanks for being so helpful. I really appreciate it
(4th hand of the challenge of making the question harder and more complex after solving it)
good morning, lets
point P (1, -1) and point Q (5, 3) are points of the curve y=x²-5x+3
normals to the curve at P and Q intersect at point R.
point R extend to point S and point T, which are the x intercepts of the curve, and forms a triangle.
circle U can be represented by the function, x^2 - 6x + y^2 + 6y - 7 = 0
find the area of the intersection between circle U and triangle RST
What resources should I use to learn pre calculus in a month? I’m trying to Clep out of pre calculus but I also really want to learn/understand it. I study for around 5 hours a day
You could learn from openstax
Free precalc text book https://openstax.org/details/books/precalculus-2e
Has a lot of practice questions
you are a hero my friend
hello
What does this corollary mean?
guys where shall I start with calculus
limits
Wdym?
i don't understand what it says
A function can be continuous and fail to be differentiable somewhere
if a function has a measurable slope everywhere it has a limit everywhere
for the function f(x)=|x|, the limit does not exist at 0, it is not differentiable at 0, but it is continuous
the opposite, however, is not true
if a function has a derivative at that point, then it must also be continuous at that point
a function can be perfectly continuous and still fail to have a derivative somewhere
(right?)
yup
Oh, so a differentiable function is continuous, but it's not necessary for a continuous function to be differentiable!
Yeah the converse is not true
yeah that's it
Thank you guys
a simple counterexample to the converse is y = |x|
continuous everywhere
differentiable everywhere but x = 0
(take the limits of (f(x + h) - f(x))/h from the left and right of x = 0: they disagree)
provide the question in #geometry-and-trigonometry
go ask it there anyways
i’m a high school sophomore, and i’m taking ap pre calc this year, but my algebra 2 teacher was not good and i didn’t exactly learn much from her, how much will that play into pre calc?
algebra is decently imp in pre calc
idk what they teach in algebra 2 though
do you have a topics list or smth
it was a lot of quadratic functions and polynomials as well as some exponential and logarithmic equations, we also did like an hour of probability stuff
Im relatively good with math but this year i'll be taking pre-calculus & calculus so idk how i'll fair:/
you can take both? precalc and calc at the same time?
technically yes, but that would be an insane workload
usually it's precalc and algebra 2 that can be taken at the same time
ohh alright
can someone reply to my question in
the thread that says "can someone check this for me"
I said, i should just go all in since i wanna get a STEM major anyway
That function does have a limit at 0
mathematics as a package of topics like precalc, algebra 1-2, etc. is kinda strange to me 
where i'm from, they're more like units of a subject rather than its own standalone thing so you can't opt out of what would be equivalent to precalc and stuff
maybe i'm being silly and not understanding stuff, could be both 
i see
Just reading what the excerpt said lol
Someone please differentiate this function with respect to x
ask Mr. Wolfram
Sir Wolfram
Ik, but what's the command
do you know how to take derivatives in general?
and the chain rule in particular?
yes
ok then do it lol
also, there's #calculus
let's see if it's the same
,w differentiate 2√(cot(x²)) wrt x
but this one is just confusing me
this does not match with the answer
,w differentiate 2√(cot(x²)) with respect to x
how did u get your answer
its written in the book
,w plot -(2x csc(x²))/√(cot(x²))
what?
not the same. is your book wrong
idk, it's the national council of education's book
lemme compare them
my teacher is confused too
worst case, you might be trolling and u made that up lolz
no it's ok i was jk
\begin{align*}
-\frac{2x\csc(x^2)}{\sqrt{\cot(x^2)}} &= -\frac{2\sqrt2}{\sin(x^2)\sqrt{\sin(2x^2)}} \\
-\frac{x\csc(x^2)}{\sqrt{\cot(x^2)}} &= -\frac{\sqrt2}{\sin(x^2)\sqrt{\sin(2x^2)}} \\
-\frac x{\sqrt{\cot(x^2)}} &= -\frac{\sqrt2}{\sqrt{\sin(2x^2)}} \\
-\frac{x\sqrt{\sin(x^2)}}{\sqrt{\cos(x^2)}} &= -\frac{\sqrt2}{\sqrt{2\sin(x^2)\cos(x^2)}}
\end{align*}
imma try simplify it
Google Gemini got it
so what u got
I'll send an image
glass
\begin{align*}
-\frac{2x\csc(x^2)}{\sqrt{\cot(x^2)}} &= -\frac{2\sqrt2}{\sin(x^2)\sqrt{\sin(2x^2)}} \\
-\frac{x\csc(x^2)}{\sqrt{\cot(x^2)}} &= -\frac{\sqrt2}{\sin(x^2)\sqrt{\sin(2x^2)}} \\
-\frac x{\sqrt{\cot(x^2)}} &= -\frac{\sqrt2}{\sqrt{\sin(2x^2)}} \\
-\frac{x\sqrt{\sin(x^2)}}{\sqrt{\cos(x^2)}} &= -\frac{\sqrt2}{\sqrt{2\sin(x^2)\cos(x^2)}} \\
-x\sqrt{\sin(x^2)} &= -\frac1{\sqrt{\sin(x^2)}}
\end{align*}
glass
Solution by Gemini
that's not an image
sorry, was too big to fit into an image
also, AI's are unreliable for maths
it has worked for me
and Wolfram is an AI too...
solution looks good to me
my solution also goes the same path
What did you think? A person at Discord solving all your problems?
i can see
a program that isn't an AI
i can't understand your logic
not all prrograms are AI
but would u know if it answered right?
i had to read the pdf to check that it did it right
imma complete this in #latex-testing
i can't
ah i made a mistake. it should be csc^2
yep they're equal
true for more complex maths
but at this level certain ai can solve it with ease
oh man i have a great proof
let x=0.999...
then 10x=9.999...
10x-x=9x=9.999...-0.999...
9x=9
x=1
0.999....=1
np!
Wow.
Si is unreliable for a lot of stuff
May be a dumb question
This function is undefined at x=2 , still i can see the continues graph in desmos ? can anyone explain
It’s not actually continuous, if you click on the graph of the function at x=2 it should say (2, undefined)
Thank you
try to mouse over until you hit where the point with x=2 would be
it'll say (2, undefined)
3 methods to prove that 0.999... = 1
- Using Algebra
- Using Infinite Geometric Series
- Using Visualization
If you have any questions, don't hesitate and feel free to ask.
In case you want me to make a video about a certain topic, feel free to tell me in the comments.
#algebra
#geometricseries
#mathfacts
how can?
glass
then subtract 1 on both sides and replace x with 9•(1/10)
so you'll get 0.999… on the RHS
wait
wrong wait
should be:
0.9/(1-0.1) = 0.9+0.09+0.009+...
I have 2 other proofs
^
1/(1-x), not x²
how can the LHS be equal to 9?
for example if:
999 = x
then
9990 = 10x
so
999-9990 = -9x
and 999-9990 is not 9
regardless of the 9s are finite or not
uhh
sorry
when you subtract the 2nd line from the first
all 9s digits cancel out besides the ones place
the issue you are making here is that you are not extending this infinity
b/c it "goes out forever" all the digits would cancel out
here is a simpler to understand method (maybe)
the issue with all this is that it assumes ...999 exists and can be manipulated like a normal real number
the issue is that there are infinitely many 9's, meaning you can't just add a zero to it. Doing so is meaningless
and of course, this yields ridiculous results like 999999999..... = -1
10-adic has entered the chat:
I understood the point to be that one shouldn't expect the formal shift-and-subtract argument to be convincing for 0.999...=1 because the very similar argument for ...999=-1 concludes something that's not actually true about the real numbers.
In other words, TimesZeroed seems to be implicitly arguing that an acceptable argument for 0.999....=1 needs to go into details about what real numbers mean and how their decimal expansions work, instead of just assuming as given/known that infinite decimal expansions are meaningful and that school arithmetic algorithms work for them.
I'm aware...
And also 9 repeating (assuming thats a thing) thats not a finite number
It doesn't exist in R
I was just wondering if it was rage bait or not...
I wonder how many more people it will take before someone introduces p-adic numbe- oh wait it's me isn't it
A theorem of arithmetic says that there exists infinite numbers between any two distinct numbers.
Like 0.99999999 and 1 are diatinct as there is 0.999999991,0.9999999901... between them.
I challenge you to find me to find a number between 0.99999...∞ and 1. There aint any
This is one of the most confusing areas of maths dw.
Long time ago a person zeno was wondering that to travel to A and B one must travel half the distance and then a fourth the distance then an eighth a distance then 16th a distance..... And so on
So one can never reach the point B. But this is clearly not the case as i can clearly reach it
But now modern mathematicians agree that 1/2+1/4+1/8+.... Is exactly equal to 1.
And thereby explaining physical motion
You can look upto zenos paradoxes and once u start studying calculus i hope the idea gets more crisp
you can just not?
oh the unununnium guy lol
yea
lmfaoooo bro said "once you start studying calculus"
Wha
enterlessguy was pointing the finger at you as the mansplainer
I mean why tf is such a huge drama over my innocent statement 😭
Me no understand
People think it was a bit pretentious to assume that Enterlessguy didn't know what limits are.
... just because he expressed doubt at the sincerity of a calculation with an infinite sequence of nines to the left of the decimal point.
I did not expect him to and. I was trying to acquaint him with zenos paradoxes of motion and i also gave another explanation (that no number exist between 0.9... and 1)
And the other ppl had gave the other explanation
And people think it's a bit pretentious of you to assume Enterlessguy needed to be told that.
Since he's not the one who asked about 0.9999....=1.
Oh so it is a crime to tell someone about something they might not know.
Also he did express skepticism tho
So i told him
The other guy was satisfied with the proof
Ig
Enterlessguy expressed skepticism about TimesZerored posts that were about ...99999 rather than 0.99999...
I was trolling
albeit really badly
it caused this chaos so ig it may have worked
Aw, and here I managed to extract a meaningful point from it.
,w differentiate cos(x)cos(2x)cos(3x) w.r.t x using Logarithmic differentiation.
just type wrt no dots
hllo
WA does not show work
y=px+3√(a^2p^2+b^2) and dy/dx=p
can someone help me with this problem?
i'm confused and i need someone to help me unconfused myself
According to my opinion,
if p is costant case, dy/dx = p;
oter p is not costant case:
Let me about that
what
whats the problem here?
what
because if you integrate the thing you get y=px+C which is the same thing so eh 
to all who took precalc, did precalc help you with actual calculus?
the topics covered are essential
the course/class may come come under a different name or be delivered differently
it's 12th grade. IDK what's the difference btw precalc and calc
precalc is stuff like functions. limits, continuity while calc is actual differentiation and intgration from what i know. we dont have a division of calc and per calc here either
Then I study both precalc and calc. But I only see the precalc channel.
its cuz you chose pre university math
you can change it to undergraduate math in #info
that's where I am, right?
not sure
im in 12th myself but i chose undergraduate since i wanted access to calc channel
there are lots of other channels too that you gain access to but i never use them
basically only use the ones in pre university and calc
It's an unfortunate consequence of the way Discord handles welcome screens that you only some channels are visible to you by default.
However, there's a "show all channels" checkbox in the context-dropdown menu for the server name which will let you have a list of all channels you have permissions for, including #calculus.
Thanks, dude. Now, I have access to #calculus too!
I'm about to take the AoPS Precalculus Course and I'm so scared 😟
I'm going into 9th grade this year, and I want to skip algebra 2 and go to pre cal. What should I do?
Free way to learn is a textbook from openstax
I suggest you research about how being placed a level ahead works at your school (by talking to your counselor if there’s a placement test you could do or online class) as we don’t know how your school works.
khan academy hands down
fr
Help guys am I just stupid or is calculus hard
time will tell
Bruh have u just considered the possibility u are annoying and wierd?
Who tf spams a physics jee question in a maths server and in channels like calculus and precalc?
bro be respectfulllll
this is a MATH server... not a physics one
be considerate u are in 11th grade
That is true, but we are a little bit flexible usually. You can see we have helped a lot with physics as well, as long as helpees collaborate and behave well, such as @hearty crow here.
If one can't help because they don't want or are not able, don't worry, there's plenty of other helpers
ah here you are
hi sir
ask in r/jeeneetards, waha help karne ko log milenge
How do I get into the calculus channel
is it possible to go from pre-calculus to statistics?
Yes they're completely unrelated
You just need some basic knowledge for alg 1
There might be a few proofs or techniques that use algebraic manipulating
Oh alright
Mai bhi aurous se hu 😭
so how to determine this?
- odd / even?
- period?
- amplitude?
How to know that?
You can infer from the graph
So, the function is even if what?
The function is even if for any x, we have f(x) = f(-x)
i.e. the y-axis is a line of symmetry
mhm.
The function is odd if for any x, we have f(x) = -f(-x)
i.e. the origin is a rotational point of symmetry
So that means this graph is even?
So, what i get is that, if a function is a rotational point of symmetry (And i don't know what that is), than the function is f(x)=f(-x)
No that's f(x) = -f(-x)
so this is what you mean by 'rotational point of symmetry'
oohh....
This is showing what you get if you reflect the left side to the right side
It doesn't match up
So it's not even
I see, i see.
And do you have the proof that if a function is f(x)=-f(-x), than it is odd?
If you rotate the left side 180° around the origin (brown), it becomes the green part
So that's what you mean of 'rotational of symmetry'?
Yeea
is this true for all function, or just trigonometric function?
im shaking
that is calculus
Rotating a point (x, f(x)) by 180° around the origin takes it to (-x, -f(x)), so f(-x) = f(-x)
Or equivalently f(x) = -f(-x)
Yeah
sin is odd, cos is even
Physics 👾
i take that as 'only for trigonometric function'
There are other functions that can be odd or even too
odd -- π rotation along y axis
I am asking if that condition is true for all function.
Yea
All functions are either odd, even or neither (non symmetric graphs)
By analyzing the graph?
The period means how much you have to shift the graph left/right for it to match itself
That's obviously not accurate to answer my question lol
Lol
Well in this case is 1π
Is that correct?
2π
so 2π?
Yup
Wait... it could be 4π too
