#geometry-and-trigonometry
1 messages · Page 381 of 1
in your identity, k = 0,1,..., n - 1. that means we would choose the left endpoints of each subinterval x₀, x₁, ..., xₙ₋₁
relate the varaibles in your identity into this problem:
α ← a, β ← Δx, n ← n
Δx = (b-a)/n
Δx is the width of each subinterval
we would stick to the 2nd image
with left endpoints.
apply your identity to get
,, \sum_{k=0}^{n-1} \sin (a+kΔx) = \frac{\sin\left[a+(n-1)\frac{\Delta x}2\right] \sin\left[n\frac{\Delta x}2\right]}{\sin{\frac{\Delta x}2}}
vin100
\begin{gather*}
\sum_{k=0}^{n-1} \sin (a+kΔx) = \frac{\sin\left[a+(n-1)\frac{\Delta x}2\right] \sin\left[n\frac{\Delta x}2\right]}{\sin{\frac{\Delta x}2}}
\end{gather*}
oh no it should be the step preceding this in the derivation
,, \sum_{k=0}^{n-1} \sin (a+k\Delta x)=-\frac{\cos\left[a+\left(n-\frac12\right)\Delta x\right] - \cos\left[a-\left(\frac12\right)\Delta x\right]}{2\sin{\frac{\Delta x}2}}
vin100
,, \sum_{k=0}^{n-1} \sin (a+k\Delta x)=-\frac{\cos\left[a+\left(n-\frac12\right)\Delta x\right] - \cos\left[a-\left(\frac12\right)\Delta x\right]}{2\sin{\frac{\Delta x}2}}
vin100
multiply both side by $\Delta x$ as we're going to find the left-handed Riemann sum
vin100
,, \sum_{k=0}^{n-1} \sin (a+k\Delta x) \Delta x=\atop -\left{\cos\left(b-\frac{\Delta x}2\right) - \cos\left(a-\frac{\Delta x}2\right)\right}\frac{\frac{\Delta x}2}{\sin{\frac{\Delta x}2}}
vin100
explain what?
i changed $a+\left(n-\frac12\right)\Delta x$ to $b-\frac{\Delta x}2$ because in our construction, the strip width is the length of interval $b-a$ divided by the number of subintervals $n$, i.e. $\Delta x = (b-a)/n$.
vin100
as the number of subintervals $n$ goes up, the subinterval width $\Delta x$ goes down. it's intuitive to see that the shape of these strips resemble more the curve
vin100
Geogebra activity used: https://www.geogebra.org/m/RCVce5W4
so it's intuitive to expect that total area of these strips $$\sum_{k=0}^{n-1} \sin (a+k\Delta x) \Delta x$$ get close to a particular number
vin100
the RHS of the above equality
$$-\left{\cos\left(b-\frac{\Delta x}2\right) - \cos\left(a-\frac{\Delta x}2\right)\right}\frac{\frac{\Delta x}2}{\sin{\frac{\Delta x}2}}$$
suggests the approximation $-(\cos(b) - \cos(a))$.
vin100
sorry $-(\cos(b) - \cos(a))$ isn't an approximation. it shld be the left-handed Riemann instead. how close are these two numbers? to simplify writing, let $h = \frac{\Delta x}{2}$. as $h$ is getting smaller and smaller, it's easy to see that $\sin h$ and $\cos h$ are getting closer and closer to 0 and 1 respectively, but how close?
this Riemann sum approximation has two factors. we'd express the approximation error for each factor in terms of $h$, before we consider the error when these two factors multiplied.
start with a simple observation
vin100
vin100
from the Pythagorean identity, we expect $\cos h$ to be close to 1.
vin100
Is this for me ?
i'm explaining the real meaning of the identity that DV Game posted: #geometry-and-trigonometry message
Oh ok
that is, the left Riemann sum of the sine function, from which we define its area under the graph.
,, 1 - \cos h = 1 - \sqrt{1 - \sin^2 h} = \frac{\sin^2 h}{1 + \sqrt{1 - \sin^2 h}}
vin100
,, \frac{\sin^2 h}{\underbrace{1 + \sqrt{1 - \sin^2 h}}_{\ge 1}} \le h^2
vin100
,,\therefore 1 - h^2 \le \cos h \le 1
vin100
vin100
,, 1 \le \frac{h}{\sin h} \le \frac{1}{\cos h}
vin100
,, \le \frac{1}{1-h^2} \le 1 + 2h^2
vin100
when $h^2 \le \frac12$. in fact, $h$ would be much small than that.
I saw a mathematically provable claim in my field of study (not math.)
I translated the claim into the following mathematical model:
Let there be five three dimensional unit vectors a, b, c, d, and e
These vectors have two properties. One property is that the total sum of the five vectors is zero. And the other property is that adjacent pairs of vectors (a and b, b and c, … e and a) all have the same angle between them.
The claim is that given the above two statements, all five vectors must be coplanar.
I tried to go about proving or disproving this but I didn’t get very far
vin100
,,1 \le (1+2x)(1-x) = 1 + (1-2x)x \iff 0 \le 1 - 2x \iff x \le \frac12
vin100
the approximation error of the second vector is done
,, \frac{h}{\sin h} - 1 \le 2h^2
vin100
when $h^2 \le \frac12$
vin100
for the first factor, we'll first compare $\cos(b+h)$ with $\cos b$.
vin100
,, |\cos(b+h) - \cos(b)| \le |\cos b (\cos h - 1)| + |\sin h| \le h^2 + h
vin100
is this correct? im not really sure
in each figure, you are asked to find two trigo quantities. there're two figures, so there should be four figures. you've only done half of the work
the above inequality is due to compound angle formula, $|cos x|, |sin x| \le 1$ and $|a+b| \le |a|+|b|$
vin100
so we expect that the first factor to have an approximation error of $2h + 2h^2$
vin100
$h^2$ would be much smaller when compared to $h$. say $h = 0.01$, then $h^2 = 0.0001$.
vin100
now proceed to the approximation error of the product of these two factors
Hmm, I'm sure my teacher didn't teach us that yet because we're still on introduction to trigonometry.
instead of directly writing them it would be much more meaningful to use some simpler symbols to illustrate a much more general observation
wdym? you're asked to find $\tan J$ and $\tan K$ in each figure. there're two figures, so you have to find four numbers in total. in your screenshot, there're only two found.
vin100
,, \begin{aligned}
& |fg - L_1 L_2|\
&= | {\color{blue}{f(g - L_2)}} + {\color{red}{L_2(f - L_1)}}| \
&\le |f| |g-L_2| + |L_2| |f - L_1|
\end{aligned}
for question 1
tan j = 24/32
tan k = 32/24
for question 2
tan j = 8/15
tan k = 15/8
is this correct now?
vin100
so when $f$ and $g$ are close to $L_1$ and $L_2$ respectively, their product $fg$ is close to $L_1 L_2$.
vin100
\begin{alignat*}{2}
f&=-[\cos(b-h)-\cos(a-h)] &\qquad g&=\frac{h}{\sin h} \
L_1&=-(\cos b - \cos a) & L_2&=1
\end{alignat*}
vin100
It's easy to see that $|f| \le 2$, so
vin100
vin100
the coefficients '2' and '6' are never an accurate estimate of the actual approximation error. they just give a simple range of it, much larger than the actual range, because I've given simplified arguments at several places, say $1+\sqrt{1-\sin^2 h} \ge 1$ while estimating $\cos h$.
vin100
Hence we see that
,, \left|\sum_{k=0}^{n-1} \sin (a+k\Delta x) \Delta x - [-(\cos(b) - \cos(a))]\right| \le \Delta x + \frac32 (\Delta x)^2.
vin100
|left Riemann sum - theoretical value| <= Δx + negligible terms
as Δx gets smaller and smaller, the left Riemann sum would get nearer to the theoretical value
a more rigorous way to say this is that for all 0 < Δx < 1 (any reasonable small number, not so important), we have the above inequality
by changing $\sum$ to $\int$, and $\Delta x$ to $\dd{x}$, we denote
vin100
I thought I was going to look at trigonometry
,,\int_a^b \sin x ,\dd{x} = -(\cos(b) - \cos(a))
vin100
The story starts from a trigo identity previous posted about the sum of sines: #geometry-and-trigonometry message
nice
I will work both the sum and the errors by hand to get a better understanding
I already knew about Riemann sums
I asked about an interesting trig problem
actually we've just proved the definite integral of sine without using differentiation
And it turned out to be that cool
Haha! Yes!
in fact, integration was historically a subject separate from differentiation
And then you can get the indefinite integral
well me neither
well there can be some reasons
just because of the integral and derivative meanings are area and speed respectively, even though they're inverse of each other
See you know what these terms mean
I don't even know where to begin
God I have a lot to learn
me too...
I don't understand why are positive-definite matrices are cool for example
fct is factorization right?
what is alpha there
oh
it's the digit '2' 🙂
Actually the first triangle is a right triangle with the right angle being at the bottom
basically that's geometry rather than algebra
it's important to be able to mix alg and geom when doing trig
sorry i've forgotten the details of linear algebra. i've just wiki a bit. one of the equiv cond. of P(S)D mat. is sym/herm + +ve eig val
sym/herm mat allows two nice prop: 1. diag 2. ortho
diagonalizability allows simple decomposition
yeah I remember, it is symmetric and it is doing some z*Mz > 0 for any vector (with corresponding size of course) where * is the complex conjugate of a vector
orthongonal column vector basis allows simple orthogonal projection
well symmetric is cool because A=A^T
and orthogonal is A^T = A^-1
yeah, in 2d it can be seen very nicely
ok I read wiki
positive eigenval is good
also there is decomposition A = B*B
Cholesky decomposition iirc
sorry for delayed response i'm very excited about explaining deep stuff. observe that $P$ lies on the unit circle, so $P=(\cos \theta, \sin \theta)$ for some $0 \le \theta \le 2\pi$.
(a) use the Pythagorean Identity to find $k$
(b) use symmetry of the unit circle
(c) that should be clear when you've the diagram in (b)
vin100
anyways thank you, vin100, very much for explaining everything, didn't think I'd get that!
now I just gotta go
I will observe the stuff you found a bit later
u r welcome have a gd day
@upper karma i see that you wrote sin instead of cosine for the second part
be careful not to mix up the two
you're on the right track
the idea is correct, just a minor error
alright tnx
[redacted]
[redacted]
OH WAIT
i see what you did there
nvm
you're correct
im just going too fast
idk i just followed the formula of my teacher
yes its correct
im just use to doing it super fast
just fix the sine cosine part
you'll be fine
sorry i felt asleep after typing math for hours
nice try
I would rather write
\begin{align*}\sin 32^\circ &= \frac{x}{18} \ x &= 18\sin 32^\circ \ &= 9.5 :\text{ (cor. to 1 d.p.)} \ \cos 32^\circ &= \frac{y}{18} \ y &= 18\cos 32^\circ \ &= 15.3 :\text{ (cor. to 1 d.p.)} \end{align*}
vin100
p.s. when i was in secondary school, i would even skip the two lines containing fractions to save time
yes i forgot to change sine to cosine
The acute angle between the terminal arm of an angle in standard position and the x-axis when the terminal lies in quadrant 2,3, or 4 is called the related acute angle
Guys is this true?
- The point P (-15, -8) is on the terminal side of the angle ϴ in normal position. Determine the
value of trigonometric ratios for ϴ
Yo I’ve been having trouble with these, I’m not that smart when it comes to math so I need help lol
Even with trying to look up the answers I could literally only get one right if that explains how not good at math I am
Bruh moment
thats a lot of different types of questions
you should familiarize yourself with all area formulas
anyone
mind helping me?
Write the equation in standard form for the ellipse with center at the origin, vertex (0,11), and co-vertex (
–
8,0).
guys in trignometry can you get expressions like $sin^3 (theta)$
Alpha | Sync
sure you can
The coordinates of a point lies on the x-axis and at a distance of 9 units from the y-axis is -
cause it's 105 degrees not 90
what do you need to do
Show that BMN is equilateral
Show that BMN is equilateral
What does that mean?
D, E are on the same side of line AB
It means that that like they are not on the opposite side, like if you connect them it won't intersect AB
I created a digram
but not sure how to prove it
Thanks for showing the diagram. Now I can understand the question
Just the point G is the point N
hey is DAB congruent to MBN?
Hey so I just proved that ABE is congruent to DBC
hey yeah wait
imma take the problem from there
thank you
yess
You're welcome but we're not done yet
they are congurent I checked
too many triangles get confusing sometimes 💀
Nice observation
yes i know
i wanna work on the further stuff on my own
can you dm me
Who are you talking about?
to you I want to see a soulution
Wait, shouldn't it be?
looks like it is
because I solved it that way 😅
well looks like it but it isn't cause you can also choose point C to be wherever you like on the line AB
ok but you are proving something which isn't true lol
wait I'll either spot a mistake or prove it somehow
though no
they are just similar
aaand I needed similarity
then I'll just solve
You only have to find 3 pairs of congruent triangles and then doing some stuff with length and angles and you're done
And that's what I did
I mean I got MB = MN and angle NBC = angle MBE, and I need to prove that angle EBN = angle DBM and I am done
bruh I forgot about another pair (ΔAMB and ΔDBN) and the angles ABM and DBN share the same angle, and the rest is 60 degrees
I am actually stupid
yeah, it is congruent to ΔDBN
AME is a straight line
No problem
do you guy know about Euclid's line and Euclid's circle?
why does cos 0°=1
look at the unit circle
well you can also say cos 0 is 1 cause cos = base/hypotenuse and when cos 0 then base and hypotenuse are the same like they're the same line so it's 1
you can read this https://socratic.org/questions/why-is-cos-0-1
Thx
ratios of sides of a right-angle triangle can define sin, cos & tan for acute and right angles (with the exception of tan 90°, of course). using the unit circle can define these trig funct of any angle.
Have been struggling with this question lately, and would really appreciate it if someone could help confirm my answers or help find a better solution. What also confuses me a lot is the last statement From lighthouse B, lighthouse A has a bearing of 45°
fax this made trig so much easier
The 45° information means that lighthouse A is directly northeast of lighthouse B.
So the angle you've marked 45° on your sketch is wrong.
The direction from B to the boat is 237°-180° = 57°, so angle B in the triangle is 57°-45° = 12°.
(Which makes the triangle pretty obtuse, so it looks like for question (b) one needs to assume that the shore is a straight line extending northeast past lighthouse A).
Wait wouldn't also change the bearing placement for lighthouse A as well tho?
What does "bearing placement" mean there?
Yah the angle at A will just be 180° minus the agles at B and the boat.
I trying to draw this out
The relevant background fact here is that "bearing" always mean a direction measured relative to due north_.
I'm still trying to understand and visualize your solution. But may I ask why did you subtract 57° by 45° to find angle B? Also my concern from before was that when you said that 45° meant that lighthouse A would be NE of lighthouse B, wouldn't that change the 285° bearing of lighthouse A from the boat?
How would that change the sailor's direct measurement that the problem explicitly gives us?
The lighthouse is where it is. The sailor saw it in the direction he saw it, and wrote down what that direction was.
But may I ask why did you subtract 57° by 45° to find angle B?
The boat sees lighthouse B i direction 237. Someone standing at that lighthouse can look back along that line and see the boat in direction 57. Since the lighthouse sees the boat in direction 57 and the other lighthouse in direction 45, the angle of the triangle at the corner is the difference between those two bearings.
I understand the part where lighthouse B sees the boat in direction of 57°, however when you say the lighthouse B sees lighthouse A in direction of 45° is what confuses me, because where would that be? Is it angle A? Or B?
45 is the angle between due north and the direction the lighthouse keeper at B sees the light from A in.
It is not one of the angles in the boat-A-B triangle.
Wait wait
Right.
From I how I see this now is that
Lighthouse B was had an alternative angle, and to get angle 12°, I had to subtract 45° (caused by the NE shift of Lighthouse A) from the direction of Lighthouse B to the Boat which as 57°
The angle of the boat was difference of 285° and 237° which as 48°
And now to find angle A, I have to subtract 180° by 48° by 12° = 120° is that correct @grave pond?
I know my diagram of angle A looks acute, but I understand the correct value
Yes.
Okay then, I think I have the peices now to find out the distances of the lighthouses for the boat. Using sine law.
Thank you so much for the needed support, @grave pond, I really appreciate you.
yw
anyone plz tell this ques
That sounds bizarre. First is looks like ABC is an arbitrary triangle, but then immediately it redefines C to mean the midpoint of AB, and the rest of the exercise looks like it makes sense with this new definition.
It would make so much more sense if we cross out the words "of ΔABC".
draw some auxiliary lines passing through A and B perpendicular to CZ, then observe some similar right triangles.
guys wuts cos 45
Google it
sin/cos
$\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}$
D00M_Re1ated
how do u draw it on a unit circle
i didnt want the formula
do you have to do that?
no i just wanted to know
im not really sure if you can
the proof of how u draw a tan on unit circle
u can draw it but
like
how does it work
so basically u draw a tangent on point P where point P is where ur terminating ray touches the circumference
oh
huh
distance of point P till where tangent touches y axis is cotan theta
interesting
YE YE
oh
how do u proove that that is tangent
Proof: similar triangles
sin x / cos x = tan x / 1
OPE and OFP are similar
you can try an example with a specific point
like use a certain angle on the unit circle
and try it yourself
they are congruent
???
yes...
sin theta in ope is
there is only one triangle
Also the angle is not given to be 45 degrees so you would have no idea
angles gonna be same dud
cuz tangent of a circle is perpendicular to point P
right?
so if angle ope is x then angle fpe = 90-x
then ur other angle in both the triangles will be the same
and u have 90 degree angles so they are congruent
No bruh
I already said it
they congruent
No obviously one triangle is much bigger duh???
how
Can you read carefully
wait lemme think
yeah ok so how do u use similar triangles to prove that the length PF = sine/cosine
not a trianlge
o ok
so u want to know hypotenuse
yes
no u cant use tan
ah
Alpha | Sync
all good
Ann
thanks
FP/OP=PE/OE
oh so sin/ cos = slope = tan
Alpha | Sync
OF is irrelevant
Yes but we’re not looking at hyp
I already gave you what sides you should look at
but what u are giving is
fp/op
=
pe/oe
oh ur looking at the slope of both triangles?
I guess you could say that
then how does tangent relate to sin/cos
I used op as the shorter side of the big triangle, not the hyp of the smaller one
Just substitute the known values into this
Yep
Yea
same thing for finding cotan right?
I think it’s similar
What is k in this identities?
you should not ping people out of the blue like that 🤨 
try relating b to other angles then
why not?
see the
point at which angle b forms for example?
can you see it now?
theres a lot of ways (you can also consider that fact that line 3 is parallel to line 2)
corresponding angles will be equal
well
theres a lot of ways
but if you consider the fact the sum of angles on a straight line is 180 degrees
and look carefully at the figure
unknown angle has a relation with c
isnt it?
no?
??
you know what that small symbol means in c and the unknown angles?
Yes
so?
what equation do you get?
x?
or c?
yes
so, solve for c
Ok
can you find the other angles now?
give it a try
what do you get?
yes
yes
which one?
yes
so the triangle with b as its exterior angle is isosceles
yes
they are related?
also you have the third angle as 2c
vertically opposite
wdym by thats?
yes
you can
you can use anything
that works
did you get it?
how do I find the values of the angles x y z using trigonometry?
solved it
What is your question? All of question 7? @vestal siren
yeah
Starting with 7a, you are asking what percentage [of all students] surf. So you will need the grand total first.
Are you able to find the grand total?
for what
Yes. So the percentage of students that surf should be all students that answered “Yes” to surfing, divided by the grand total, multiplied by 100.
so 100/77?
Not quite.
is it flipped
77
That is for skateboarders, not surfers.
That is for surfers that also skateboard.
You want to look at the marginal total, meaning everyone that surfs and skateboards and everyone that surfs but does not skateboard.
You already wrote it down in the margin.
i’m confused now
If I tell you that the number of surfers is 97, do you know how I got it?
You divide by the grand total first, which you said was 166 earlier.
Then, multiply by 100.
For 7b, no. That would be the proportion of students that don’t surf. You want the ones that don’t skateboard.
The 166 part is correct though.
Just need a different numerator.
so 24
More than just those 24 answered no to skateboarding.
You want the entire “no” column for skateboarding.
45 or add more
Underneath the “Skateboarding” label, there is “Yes” and “No”. Anyone in the “No” column cannot skateboard.
89
okay i got it
How do you find the third point in a triangle if you know the coordinates of the first and second point?
A(0, 1, 0) and B( 0, -1, 0)
i think need more info
Well I guess you could assume that the triangle is equilateral
You'll probably need to show more context if you want an answer that's not just "half of the square of S times the sine of theta".
i was asking a sub for help on a problem in geometry and he handed me a sticky note for finding the area of an equilateral triangle
Hmm, it is indeed the area of an isosceles triangle if S is the length of the two equal legs and theta is the angle between them.
Apparently you're supposed to substitute theta=60° yourself?
yeah
but does it still find the area of an equilateral triangle if you substitute s for side length and theta for 60?
Yes, an equilateral triangle is a special case of an isosceles one.
You can view it as an instance of the general area of a triangle: area = ½ab·sin(C).
check whether the inequality -π/2 ≤ -π/3 ≤ π/2 is true
Is there any alternative methods?
what alternative do you need to the definition of an interval?
i mean for this one in particular if you're so averse to what i just said you could instead verify that |-π/3| ≤ π/2 or something...
honestly. why do you need alternative methods for verifying whether a point lies in an interval
the study of the relationship between lengths and angles, to put it broadly.
often in relation to triangles specifically, whence comes the name.
Hello i got a geometry problem and id really need an idea to solve it out
AC distributes the trapeze in 2 similar trianglea
Triangles
Some ideas?
<@&286206848099549185>
@royal portal do you still need help with this?
@dark sparrow yes please
i would begin by noting that angles BCA and CAD are equal
this should help pin down what pairs of sides correspond to each other
I need pink area
a Circumference of two circles have a difference of 30cm.Find how much their radius differ(of the 2 circles)
I need all area
try using pick's theorem
||A = 8 + 4/2 - 1 = 9||
can anyone send me some good practice problems
in geometry? i recommend the 400 propositions in chapter 6 of 📖 Machine Proofs in Geometry downloadable at http://www.mmrc.iss.ac.cn/~xgao/publ.html
this is another textbook problem that can be solved using the area method
source: Machine Proofs in Geometry
for secondary school students, just treat the areas as positive.
together with Zhang's Elimination Point method (消點法)
source: see bottom line of the above screenshot
free points: A,B
constructed points:
- C,D: ABCD is a square; F: AF = (2/5) * AB
- E = AD ∩ CF; K = BD ∩ CF
your desired ratio is |FK:EF|. we apply the Co-Side Theorem to eliminate E and K from this ratio. (sorry i made a careless mistake in the second ratio: the denominator shld be ADC minus ADF.)
\begin{align*}
\frac{FK}{CF} &= \frac{FK}{FK + KC} = \frac{\triangle BDF}{\triangle BDF + \triangle BDC} \
\frac{EF}{CF} &= \frac{EF}{CE - EF} = \frac{\triangle ADF}{\triangle ADC - \triangle ADF}
\end{align*}
vin100
here i'm too lazy to type $S_{\triangle ABC}$ for the area of $\triangle ABC$. I just write $\triangle ABC$ to represent its area instead.
vin100
apply the definition of $F$ to further simplify the expressions
vin100
\begin{align*}
\triangle BDF &= \frac12 \left(1 - \frac25 \right) , AB^2 = \frac{3}{10} AB^2 \
\triangle ADC &= \triangle BDC = \frac12 AB^2 \
\triangle ADF &= \frac12 \cdot \frac25 AB^2 = \frac15 AB^2
\end{align*}
vin100
divide the first ratio by the second ratio, and the answer will come out.
i omit AB² to save time
,, \frac{FK}{EF} = \frac{\frac{\frac{3}{10}}{\frac{3}{10}+\frac12}}{\frac{\frac15}{\frac15+\frac12}} = \frac{\frac38}{\frac27} = \frac{21}{16}
vin100
,, \frac{FK}{EF} = \frac{\frac{\frac{3}{10}}{\frac{3}{10}+\frac12}}{\frac{\frac15}{\frac12-\frac15}} = \frac{\frac38}{\frac23} = \frac{9}{16}
vin100
i made a mistake at the first time. the second one is right.
i need help with this i can show you what i have so far but i doubt it’s right
the so-called "mapping notation" isn't the one used for elements.
,tex \verb|\mapsto| gives $\mapsto$ in \LaTeX
vin100
That's cool
I am still cool for randomly discovering this spiral by playing around on geogebra
Intro to trig with a lurking mystery about cos(x)^2
Full playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLZHQObOWTQDP5CVelJJ1bNDouqrAhVPev
Home page: https://www.3blue1brown.com
Brought to you by you: https://3b1b.co/ldm-thanks
Contents:
Introduction - 0:00
Q1 Graph of (cos θ)² - 2:14
Q2 Translations of cos θ to (cos θ)² ...
How the fuck is trigonometry linked to frequency wave looking graphs
God
Math never fails to confuse the fuck out of me
what is the standard way to find the number of triangles given SSA?
I managed to make this unholy formula as a discriminant (negative means zero triangles, zero means one triangle, positive means two triangles)(trig functions in degrees): $(\frac{sin(90-\angle A)}{sin(\angle A)})^2(4a^2-4c^2)+4a^2$
alshfik
Hi, anyone to help me check my answer? I got 7.5, but the reference answer is 17.5 ! I don't know where I made a mistake.
oh, I has found the mistake! I should use the perp not the proj~
ABC is an acute triangle, furthermore there are two X and Y such that ACX and CBY are isosceles right-angled triangles (with the right angles at X and Y). M is the midpoint of AB. How can I prove that XMY is also a isosceles right triangle?
@strange umbra are you allowed to use complex numbers? i have a feeling there might be some very aethetically pleasing proof of this if you are
sure
interpret the coordinate system you've plotted this on as the complex plane, so that A is at 0, M is at some real point a, B is at 2a, and C is at some point z in the first quadrant
i claim that, after some algebra and observing some 90- and 45-degree angles in the picture, you can get $X = \frac{1+i}{2} z$ and $Y = (1+i)a + \frac{1-i}{2} z$
Ann
and then (identifying complex numbers with vectors) we get $\overrightarrow{MX} = -a + \frac{1+i}{2}z$ and $\overrightarrow{MY} = ia + \frac{1-i}{2}z$, and so $\overrightarrow{MX} = i\overrightarrow{MY}$ just as we want.
Ann
though i do freely admit that i am skipping over a lot of details here.
I think it's easier if you let M be the origin
Let A be a complex number a, C is at c, et cetera
The info that AXB is an isoceles right triangle is equivalent to
(c-x)*i=a-x
Similarly for BYC
Just make sure you get orientation right since multiplication by i is a 90 degree rotation counterclockwise
We wanna prove YMX is isoceles right
It helps to place the origin at M
This way we just need to prove that y*i=x
Also since M, the origin, is the midpoint of AC we have a+c=0
thx a lot guys 👍
What is 1/3 plus 9/9 ?
Whoops should be a+b=0
do you know how to add fractions?
Anybody familiar with normal distribution?
can someone please help me with this problem?
its find the area of a n-sided polygon with a perimeter of 242 and an apothem spanning 18 units
cans omeone help
@velvet flicker are you able to use CAS?
if the angles are 28 and 49
the last angle would be 103
i find mf using the sine theorem
and then use the cosine theorem to find AF
since the length can't be negative, AF would be 15.49 and M would be 7.46 if im not mistaken with the angles
since the way that you write the angles are different from mine
@loud shard
my fault brodie 🤣🤣
Yo, having trouble going from 2/tan theta to -2csc(theta)
Anyone has a clue they can toss?
Went to 2cos(theta)/sin(theta but not sure what to do from there
So you're trying to find the coordinates of the new square
Do you have an idea of what C' might be?
sorry i dont you think we can get in a call and i screen share bc i really need to get a 80 so i can boost my grade so i can pass
let me know if not its fine
@lunar grail
uh no call plz
we cant get in a call and i screen record the ixl?
you dont have to talk
@lunar grail
no thanks, we can just type here
count 2 units to the right, and 8 units up from C
-4,-5 and -4, 3?
-4, 3 would be C'
oh
so then find the other points using that same method
and then tell me your full answer and I'll see if you missed it
i got it right yay
this one is easier! Because instead of going to the right you only need to count 10 units down
so try counting from R down
-7,-9?
Yes
would U be -7,0
yes, U' would be
would T be 2,0
and would u actullay be 2, -9
sorry got it mixed up
would S be -7,0
yes
no this was wrong sorry I was in another chat
So use the same methods as before
nice, going to bed, have a good night!
I need some help with this problem
angles ABE and EBC are two equal halves of angle B
use this to write down an equation in x, solve it for x, then find the measure of angle ABE
(english is not my primary language, i hope all my english math terms are correct)
Hello
I want to find a point P(x(t),y(t),z(t)) where the point is always on the intersection of a sphere and a plane.
Let's say the sphere is: x²+y²+z²=2²
ex 1: the plane is: z=0
For this example it's pretty easy, I found P(2cos(t), 2sin(t), 0)
ex 2: the plane is x-z=0
For this I found P(√(2)cos(t), 2sin(t), √(2)cos(t))
Ex 3: the plane is x- 0.2y - 0.4z = 0
For this I did not find a solution and is why i am here.
This is how i tried it.
z = (x-0.2y)/0.4
x²+y²+((x-0.2y)/0.4)² = 4
x²+y²+6.25x²-2.5xy+0.25y² = 4
7.25x²+1.25y²-2.5xy = 4
In the previous example i did not have the xy term so I could easily make an ellipse out of this and convert it to cos and sin. Then I'd have x(t) and y(t) and could find z(t) with the equation of the plane. I think this example is also an ellipse but not aligned properly around the x and y axis. So i think this wil get me something of the form P(a*cos(t), b*cos(t-c), d*cos(t-e)) I am not sure of this.
Does LHS=RHS?
How 4 goes at the numerator?
(1/3) ÷ (1/4)
@steel ibex I was wrong sorry they arnt equal
They called "complex fractions"
1/3/4 = 1/12 not 4/3
Thank you, for your clarification 👍
The formula to calculate the area of a regular polygon is, Area = (number of sides × length of one side × apothem)/2, where the value of apothem can be calculated using the formula, Apothem = [(length of one side)/{2 ×(tan(180/number of sides))}].
helppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppp
math is so math
or im just dumb
im probably just dyumb
dumb
I don't understand the "English" in it like I'm not sure if away is the hypotenuse distance or whatevs
i think its like this
then use pyth theorem
It does because the 1 / 3 / 4, not 1 / 3 / 4, since the equality sign is on the first division. So the LHS and RHS are indeed equal
yes...
I need help with this
make a right triangle with an altitude from <x then use trig
How?
use the law of cosines
I have this question on an assignment of mine, super confused as to where to begin, I have a unit circle and a diagram I drew of it but idk where to go from there
in the figure, cd is a line segment of the diameter, and bc is perpendicular to cd, prove that abcd is concyclic. Can someone give me some hints to deal with it?
How I do it
Step 1. Prove that ∠BAD = 90°
Hint: this picture
@astral hull From the above picture, draw the line segment AD. You can see that ∆OAD is isosceles
guys i didnt understand equations for sinusoidal graphs
and how u use them for finding amplitude, period and range
amplitude is just half the difference between the highest point of the graph and the lowest point of the graph
(max-min)/2
$\sin(\pi/2 - x ) = \cos x$. right if i change sin into $\sin^2 $ and cos into $\cos^2$. will the eq be alright??
moltres109
thanks for giving me a new perspective. Is APO always collinear?
Yes. Because those two circles have the same tangent point
Oh i see it the common tangent point. Thanks a lot
No problem
no im talking about the equations
like $ \frac -1/2 \cos 3x $
uh...
$y=-1/2 \cos 3x$
ok
wh
what does the equation mean
Alpha | Sync
Is the answer just 6?
Nah it was 6
Alpha | Sync
what value does c change
like a changes amplitude, 2pie/mag b changes period, and midline changes d
what does c change
ye i got it
what i meant was
how do u calculae if theres a phase shift or not
bruh
ok u didnt get the quesiton
i was asking how u calculate phase shift if ur given only 1 graph
look at where the sinusoid crosses its midline
i don't have the energy to describe this in full or with any sense of formality right now
ye i got it
its basically the offset of the first up going point on the x xis where y=0
rigt?
right*?
Would the answer be 3 sqrt(3)?
no
Oh. How would I figure out the answer?
Easiest way would be to use Pythagorean theorem on all 3 right triangles to obtain 3 equations
And then solve for z
Well no actually
I think
By similar triangles 3/z = z/30
And then solve for z directly
This is much faster
Would you cross multiply?
Yeah you can do that
So 45 is the answer?
Yeah
@vagrant ore I think it's 9
Nope
yes
ah yeah but how'd it get to sqrt3/3?
draw a 30°-60°-90° triangle
and observe that the side opposite 30° (a.k.a. pi/6) is 1 and the side adjacent to it is sqrt(3)
One way to think about it is that if you take a right triangle with one angle being pi/6, then the side opposite of the pi/6 angle will be 1, the side adjacent to the pi/6 angle will be sqrt(3), and the hypotenuse will be 2. So, another way to think about pi/6 is that it is the angle that gives a right triangle with sides of 1, sqrt(3), and 2.
gotcha thanks!
why is sin(3.45098) = 0.060... on a calculator while sin(3.45098) on symbolab is -0.30447...
The two values are actually the same; it's just that your calculator is in radian mode while Symbolab is in degree mode. To convert from radian to degree, multiply by 180/π. Therefore, sin(3.45098) in radian is actually sin(3.45098 * 180/π), which is equal to -0.3044737347536959.
OH THANK YOU
what about inverse signs?
other way around, the calculator is doing it in degree mode while symbolab is in radian mode
what do they mean when they say "find the measure" ?
is it the angle of the acute central angle?
"the angle of the angle" is kind of weird
but yes you're asked to find the size of the angle
ie how many degrees it has
quite lost on this one, are the given values enough?
because from my previous examples, it would normally have pi on the arc length
yes, your angle will be 34/39 radians
ohh and then convert that to degrees?
yes
gotcha ty !
Yes, this is for a test. No, I don’t want the answer directly. I need someone to define some of these
I need definitions for Congruent and perpendicular.
Congruent* is basically another way to say "identical". Perpendicular is when two lines meet at right angle (90°)
(*In geometry)
That’s… actually more simple and helpful than anything I’ve seen on Google. Thanks!
You're welcome
(1;-3)
You’re fine, im kinda stupid and don’t know half of math lol
And I graduate in 2 weeks…
how many units dilate
I need help
this should help
memorizing the trig ratios will help a lot in the future
I have a question or two. How can I calculate the green line length if I know the placements of two points (A and B) on the circle boundaries? What is this problem called (so I can research it more)?
What if the angle is 35 instead of 30?
Then the result cannot written exactly using root signs; you have to resort to trig tables or a calculator anyway.
So for this problem would I do 15sin(35)?
i’m not sure i follow
Yes.
but to find x u can use SOHCAHTOA i think
A whole bunch of angles in the diagram are the same, and the length of each of HE and GE becomes the side length of the square, divided by the sine of one of the identical angles.
I don't understand
How do I do this?
find area of the circle so 3.14*6^2
So 113.1
the portion of the shaded region plus the triangle is: 113.1*(5/12)
5/12 is the 150/360
So the answer should be 47.125 then
now have to find the area of the triangle and subtract it from 47.125
What would the height be?
yea but to find the height will have to split the triangle into 2 triangles
Ok
so then will have 2 right triangles
Yes
so each triangle angle is 90 + 75 + 15
just find the area of the sector
then find area of triangle
and do area of sector minus area of triangle
How would I do those?
Oh ok
fax
So area of a triangle
Huh?
sorry
$0.5 \cdot a \cdot b \cdot \sinC$
that’s the equation for area of triangle
But for my problem what would the variables be
ok
so
label the sides on ur triangle
btw calculator is allowed right
but yea so you can technically make any side a and b
in this case you’d want them to be sides that you know the length of
Yes
and you’d want sinC to be an angle that you know right
so you have all the information needed
Yes
what do u think a and b will be
So like this?
Ok
So now what?
what’s the area of the triangle
I don't know
How? It's only variables
?
i don’t get what u mean
you have
the variables
a and b are equal to 6
you labeled it correctly
sinC = sin(105)
make sure your calculator is in degrees
Sin(105) is 0.9659
g
calculate the area of the triangle using the formula i gave
Which one?
$0.5 \cdot a \cdot b \cdot sinC$

