#geometry-and-trigonometry
1 messages · Page 327 of 1
How do i find x from
pi sin2x = 0
pi sin2x? Or do you mean sin 2pix?
Where does the 2 come from?
still wrong
Uhmmm -pisinpix
yes
Soo.. how do i solve for x here?
you know the general solution?
$sin x = sin \alpha\
sin x = sin (n\pi + (-1)^n \alpha)\
x = (n\pi + (-1)^n \alpha)$
not OK livvney:
No :(
alpha here = 0
so you have pix = npi
or x = n where n is any integer
So there's no exact value for what x is?
there can be infinite solutions for this. But if you want a principal solution, it has to lie between 0,2pi
let's see what you have done so far
there can be infinite solutions for this. But if you want a principal solution, it has to lie between 0,2pi
@upper karma okay thank you sm
by pinging mods ur almost asking to get banned
mods moderate
read #❓how-to-get-help for how to properly get help around here
(5y - 21) + (6x + 32) = 180
ok
As they together form that straight line
Right, but you know x
Hey what is formula to find the cross section area of a prism?
@royal citrus you mean the base area?
the CAST / ASTC mnemonic, tells you which trig functions evaluated in which quadrants are positive
@soft zodiac yes, you need to verify if the golfing terms are set up correctly. Now after you give a sketch with known figures and wanted unknown figure I can verify the geometric solution.
@upper karma What is an arithmetic sequence?
can I get some help with proving this
consider constructing a line through <z parallel to AB and CD
Im just confused about the entire thing and where to start proving it
refer to above comment
You can copy it onto a piece of paper and draw it there
Alright it turns out I wasn't supposed to know that
My teacher said that one was just to see if any of us were ahead but it scared the shit out of me it was on a quiz
But you are right I was supposed to draw the line
This is what it would be
WHY ARE YOU YELLING
have you done problems that go like "sin(θ) = blah and θ is in such and such quadrant, find cos(θ)" before?
i mean, sin(x/2) can only be found up to sign if all you have is cos(x)
but you can use the formula sin^2(x/2) = (1 - cos(x))/2 if sign isn't an issue
How would I find the length
by thinking about what length is & your intuitions about it
you had a 9-foot plank and you sawed 3 feet off one end, how much is left over?
@upper karma
how did they subtract the sins? how did we get -4sin3tetha
Ann:
yeah rotate the picture
,rotate
we dont give out answers here
(looks like a test)
Nono...its just a past paper question for homework sent by my teacher...
I got through btw so it's fine now....
In your opinion which is harder and why, Trigonometry or Statistics?
@dark jacinth lovely question. It would have been great if we had such questions to solve for coordinate
I'm not sure what you mean
I meant we never had questions with so much background and all that. Quite precise find out the line from A to B quick
Talking about the question, just find out the equation of the line from A to C, points are given
I am not sure how to set up the parametric equation
I see, wait a min
thanks 🙂
Once you study it, the question will be really simple to do
Can y’all guys help me solve trig equation or do I have to go somewhere else
Post it here
The help channels are solely for help with math, so feel free to post your question. Asking whether you can ask a question or if anyone knows about some specific topic is unnecessary, so please try to avoid questions of that nature.
did you do anything? Or just posted it here?
-2 +- the square root of 124 all over 6 can that be simplified
yes
(-2 +- sqrt(124))/6 = (-1 +- sqrt(31))/3
Hello fellow mathematicians
I have a question if somebody would care to explain
From where in this 364. Second to last expression could i deduce that alfa is only possible to be between pi/2 and 0
The problem was to prove that the first equation is equal to the last one
I can deduce that alfa must be smaller than pi because sin alfa must be higher than 0
@shadow wadi About which expression are you talking about
Both the left and the right side (the entire equation)?
It says: if alpha is* then prove that *this * equals that
And i must find from where can i limit the alpha to these values
What a nice question
translation?
I'm croatian accidentaly so I can understand it 😄
He put the translation above the image
oh im blind lol
Hahahahah nastavit cemo na engleskom da svi kontaju
It says in the text of the problem that you should assume alpha is smaller than pi/2 and greater than 0. There is nothing to deduce.
@main lintel any help with my problem?
@dark jacinth Have you solved a)
no, thats what I am confused about
im not sure how to set uo the parametric equation
Do you know to set the coordinate system?
Yeahh bro
Well, otherwise you can get negative sin(alpha)
And on the left side you have sum of squares which is positive
So you cannot match it.
They could have maybe allowed alpha to go to PI
So your question is why they constrained by PI/2 instead of PI?
But they invalidate the equation when cos alpha goes negative
Yes
This constrain is just pure torture to me
Why?
I cannot look at it without understanding it
Yeah but you yourself know that mathematics really rarely cares about ease of solving
Can you show your entire solution on paper to check if the solution does not require PI/2
If you seem sure, you can post the question to the book author, he should be willing to correct.
Yeah bro its really not tidy hahahahha
Although if you are right it is not necessarily the error in the question. THe opposite would be.
Book author has been dead for decades i think hahaha
Show the electronic solution then.
Just says true.
@main lintel do you have any idea on how to solve my problem?
I asked you a question before @dark jacinth
Well sin alpha must be positive because of addition of squares on the left side so alpha is 0-pi
And if i take that and pull the equation to the end it makes perfect sense
Bro i have a similar one ill try to solve it now and ill hit this group up again i hope youll be here then @main lintel
Gimme 10 min max to write it nicely
@dark jacinth Do you know where the center of coordinate system is, the x, y and z axis?
You dont need that logic. Perhaps it can be extended, but it is not necessary.
GH midpoint is (10,12,4)
@dark jacinth THe center of the coordinate system.
im not sure what that is
Do you know to visualize the coordinate system with respect to the points and the object
not necessarily
What is parametric equation?
@main lintel
I mean what is a "parametric equation" in this context is slighly ambiguous.
So you are not sure what a parametric equation is?
not in this context
Broooo I'm done wolfram alpha also outputs a condition alpha 0-pi
Do you have a book and a course that goes along with these questions, perhaps it has similar example in it @dark jacinth
Must be an authors mistake
no, this is new
I mean it is not strictly a mistake. It is just that the condition where the equation is true can be loosened.
Bro that sentence is on point
Perhaps alpha from 2pi to 3pi is also the solution
2kpi-(2kpi +1 ) is the range
K- integer
So 3pi to 4pi
4pi to 5pi
And so on
Function is a repeating one
Anyways bro you helped me validate my mathematical knowledge so thank you very much @main lintel
Koji si razred
Završio sam faks davno.
FER u Zagrebu
E r je sta
pogledaj na netu
Elektrotehnika i racunarstvo
Mislio sam il je to il je ekonomija i racunovodstvo
Koliko ti je sad godina
I think in this context parameterized equation might be an equation of the vector (let's call it r) describing the motion like:
r = 2t i + t ** j** - t k
what do each of the variables represent?
Alternatively you can make a parameterized point like (2t, t, -t)
t is the parameter, and i,j,k are unit vectors in the coordinate system.
30, nije računovodstvo. Glupo su nazvali, programiranje je R.
Have you ever seen something like that?
Where is this question from if you don't have the related backing course on it?
Ja sam konto studirat na etfu smjer automatike i elektronike koliko savjetujes to
Kako ti je sad na poslu pretpostavljam da radis
FER se prije zvao ETF, al su dodali R da naglase programersku komponentu. A šta ja znam fora je to, ako hoces ic radit u njemacku. Sa programiranjem mozes od doma isto.
Why are you solving it then? For fun? Or?
Have you ever learned about vectors?
Dobro je, ima se.
yes, I have
And you know what is i,j,k?
no
Jesam konto hahahaha, jedan mi je jaran sad otiso u bosch radit
Isplati li se ludjacki ucit za prosjek ono 9.0 do 9.5 hocu li bit ista spremniji il
Federacija
Nije mi zadaca spremam prijemni
Znam da je za 6 mjeseci al sam trigonometriju radio prije 2 godine zadnji put
@shadow wadi Help Dax, it's a nice excercise.
Ill try
@main lintel to find the shortest path id use calculus basics do a first derivative then equal it to zero and find the value of his position on A-C but I really dont think hes familiar with calculus
First solve a)
@dark jacinth
So basically according to my math skills if you put the coordinate system in point a with x axis pointing perpendicular to ab line and y axis being colinear with ab line parametric equation should sound like this for AC line : y=AB/BC *x
Note that ab is equal to -(its actual length)
Because were going down on the y axis
Are you mid something or can I ask a question? 😊
So the linear function limited to AC is y=kx (k being the parameter) sounding like ab/bc
Yeah dax is not answering go ahead @ocean smelt
@dark jacinth b) part requires calculus are you able to do simple derivatives
So is there a mathematical way to cut a circle of radius x at other points than its “equator” and find the arc length of the remaining piece?
(This is for a 2D shape I want to revolve around an axis but I want to calculate the parameters needed)
As a description you could say I am trying to find the segment needed to cover the topmost 30% of a sphere, does that make sense?
@ocean smelt So you want to make a straight line cut on the circle and calculate the length of the respectivev arc?
Well you need to start from your condition I guess, you want this arc when revolved around some axis to cover 30% of the sphere.
Exactly
First when you say 30% of the sphere do you mean its surface or volume?
Surface
But is it really so easy that i let it revolve < 180°?
(Thinking out loud now)
If the revolution goes both ways, ie + & - from the starting point, I should be able to accomplish it
Right? Say I revolve it only 120°
You will revolve the arc around the axis that goes from the circle center throuh the center of the arc
You revolve it 180 degrees exact to make the full "hat"
I will revolve the arc around the axis that goes through the core of the sphere
Yeah, and everything less than 180°, done equally both forward and backward will create a hat but a “toppier” one..?
Like those that chimney cleaners wear 😂, zero ear warmth, that’s what I need
I dont know what you want to achieve
I have over done this
You said you want to cover topmost 30% of the sphere by surface.
Yup
That means you want to construct a hat.
A hat is all I want indeed
Exactly
I wanted to call it a cap
Or well, your graphic covers it! Exactly what I want! 😃
Was pretty sure a cap is a good term, but didnt use it at the end
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spherical_cap @ocean smelt
Thank you! 😃
They say that using height (that is h on the above image) the formula for the area is 2*PI*r*h
And the full sphere area's formula is 4*pi*r^2 @ocean smelt
If you want to cut it mechanically perhaps might be easier to calculate the length of the arc from the top of the cap to the cutting line.
So you can use that flexible meter on the surface to determine the cutting spot.
Can someone pm me
<@&268886789983436800> ^^ ( they don't want their questions public... that seems suspicous)
No using this server to cheat. If you do I will ban you right now.
I just asked for help
well you never really asked your question 
What’s wrong asking for help in pm? I’m not trying cause any problems.
We just have strict no cheating policies here. It just seems a bit unorthodox for someone to be hush hush about math questions
Oh ok
academic dishonesty is not epic
looks correct but i would expand it first just to be sure
expand it :0?
(3x+y)(3x+y)(3x+y)
np!
can someone help me with a?
how would we know which is the proper value of x?
wym
did you get two possible values?
check whether your values of x result in positive angles
poor handwriting
wish I could help
if you can post a picture of this question from the book, then I can take a look at your math
@round isle
The equation of the straight line which passes through the point (−4,3) such that the portion of the line between the axes is divided internally by the point in the ratio 5:3 is
is there a diagram with the question?
you can have two possible orientations of the line
one with positive gradient and another with negative gradient
is there a diagram with the question?
@round isle no diagram
(-4, 3) is in the 2nd quadrant, so you should redo your diagram
and there are two possible lines as I mentioned
so, two possible equations
Is my solution correct (mathematically , skip diagrams)
@round isle
Solution that I found on internet
disregard my previous remark that there are two possible equations. Yes, this solution is correct
disregard my previous remark that there are two possible equations. Yes, this solution is correct
@round isle why
And why is my solution wrong ?
you didn't even draw the correct diagram
the point is in the second quadrant
not the first one
you didn't even draw the correct diagram
@round isle don't see the diagram
Is the mathematics wrong ?
I don't think so
post your picture again
your method is incorrect
please use the line ratio formula
What is incorrect
do you know the line ratio formula
Yaa
And used it
The thing is they took the ratio of 5:3 opposite of what I hv taken
I don't understand why
how would i prove that sin(180 - x) = sin(x)?
Compound angle identities
can someone explain why POT is not right angled?
or is it? I initially thought it was
I am also thinking POT is a right angle.
As T leans towards only to the east, it should be on the x-z plane, and OP is on the y-axis, so it must be perpendicular to x-z plane which T is laying on.
Sorry, I don't know how to explain without the regular Cartesian coordinates x,y,z
EXACTLY
some people were telling me it was not right angled
I was thinking of the analogy of a cone - if you rotate POT around the "N (north) - axis", you get a cone
and the cross section will be a triangle, half of which will give the right angled POT triangle
So I could use POT to solve part ii)?
Why can’t my working out do it though?
Sorry if it’s messy
OHHHH I SEE IM SO STUPID ITS COS NOT SINE in the first triangle i drew
Reading...
@dusky surge unfortunately that only solved one problem
My brain's stuck😂
Lemme grab my paper
I used this
$a^2+d^2=(d \cos{\theta} \cot{\alpha})^2 +(d \cos{\theta})^2$
Biscuit:
Oh, I see what's the problem of yours.
Angle PTM is not θ
That's why it cannot be sinθ
what a bad diagram though
Find a point that is equidistant from the following:
( 3, 12 ), ( 5, -2 ), and y = −4
? i know i have to use distance formula and parobolas but im confused
@night basin its a system of equations
$\sqrt{(3-x)^2 + (12-y)^2} = n$
$\sqrt{(5-x)^2 + (-2-y)^2} = n$
will be your two first equations
maximo:
then for any point, the distance in the x direction to y=-4 will be 0
since the closest distance is a perpendicular line to y=-4
so we have
set those two equal?
$\sqrt{(0)^2 + (-4-y)^2} = n$
maximo:
so now you have 3 equations
$\sqrt{(3-x)^2 + (12-y)^2} = n$
$\sqrt{(5-x)^2 + (-2-y)^2} = n$
$\sqrt{(0)^2 + (-4-y)^2} = n$
maximo:
you're interested in finding x and y. I would start by setting the bottom equation equal to any of the top equations
it will let you solve for y in terms of x
How can I find a biggest square root for 225
15
So it’s 15squre root of 15?
oh
Trying get this to radicle form
Just don’t know how to do the 225 square root area one
sqrt(225) = 15
It’s a perfect square ?
@onyx cloud so $\sqrt{(0)^2 + (-4-y)^2} = \sqrt{(5-x)^2 + (-2-y)^2}$ ?
I got it thanks
How in the world do you do this
So far I got 21 times 5 x times 6 equal 105 divide 6 equal 17.5
please describe your work more clearly
that looks like complete nonsense to me
I belive I have to mutply and then divide
ramonov:
what's the product of those fractions supposed to give you?
So if I cross multiply and divide I get an decimal answer which will be the x
what's written above is an expression only
and tells you nothing about x
applying proportionality what you could start with is:
$$\frac{x}{21} \red{=} \frac{5}{6}$$
ramonov:
Ok I see I got that so far
that's not what what you have written on the page
don't need to do the full cross multiplication
multiplying both sides of the equation by 21 is enough
I am confused
21 is a value you could multiply to x/21 to get what you want: x
hence to obtain the value of x, while maintaining equality, you can multiply both sides of the equation by 21
That’s what I got when I redid my work
its recommended that you write things on a new line
so that the rhs of one equation doesn't get mixed with the lhs of the next equation
I see
and doing the full cross multiplication is just making more work for yourself
mathematically correct yes
leave it as a fraction
105/6?
can be simplified since both num and denom have a common factor of 3
I got 35 over 2
if you understand where cross comes from, you'll realise that it results in more work here
yes, that is indeed equivalent to 17.5
I see thanks
$\frac ab = \frac cd \implies ad = bc$ because:
that's the result you get from multiplying both sides by the product of the denominators $bd$: \
$$bd \times \frac ab = bd \frac cd$$
ramonov:
however since your goal here is to get x, you only need to multiply both sides of the equation by 21
applying the principle above, by doing the full cross multiplication,
you've effectively multiplied both sides by 6,
only to divide both sides by 6 immediately after
But there is nothing wrong with doing the long way do
mathematically no, just very inefficient
ramonov:
hi
(and demonstrates average understanding and/or that you're blindly following formulas)
I think I have to follow the formula or I won’t pass
you don't have to follow it exactly every time when fractions are involved
as per the ridiculous example abouve
@vestal pendant this channel looks like it's still occupied, please proceed with a free one.
ok
where if you have x/1 = 3/2,
you don't need to go through those 2 extra steps and just reach the conclusion that
x = 3/2
from the reasoning behind cross multiplication:
multiplying both sides by the product of the denominators,
its just as valid to multiply both sides of the equation by one of the denominators
and if that's all that's required to get the result, that's sufficient
or in the case of x/1, that's simply just x
apply properties of congruent figures
x and y
its not that, im confused on how to fidn x and y,
or am i dumb
lemme try it rq
i got this @silent plank
wdym by this and that?
use point labelling
yes
FG is improperly marked with 2 lines
you're also missing some important markings
what do you know about GW?
o
which side does that correspond to
gd
capitals but ok
yes
yep
❤️
Need an expert to help me with triangle proportianty
@upper karma first you need to realise that it's every element above this linear function, and the linear function is: y = ax + b
so, y = 3 when x = 0 and y = 0 when x = 6 (as you can see in the graph)
3 = a.0+b = b
0 = 6.a + 3
so, a = -1/2 and b = 3
y = -x/2 + 3 is our line. since we want every element above this one, we need to write it as: y > -x/2 + 3
no
i'll be busy soon
<@&268886789983436800> ok this has gone too far, at #help-8 Sanj9 was already warned over not helping here with graded quizzes, yet this is another time they post it here (now the pic is deleted)
May I have some asstince on setting this up
I just need help setting it up I know how to solve it
express the missing side of the small triangle in terms of x, applying segment addition postuate
So since I gotta find both x and y
I am first going start with x
Can I do 42 divide by 2?
dividing 42 by 2 won't really help you
express the length of that red line in terms of x
So what can I do
applying segment addition postuate
no
Oh
you aren't told anything about it being an isoscles triangles
right now we're only focusing on the very left part of the diagram
I am only given 42 do
and x
right now, without setting up more equations,
you should be able to get an expression for the red line in terms of x,
and then continue from there
42x?
no
I got no clue
black line has length :a
mango line has length: b
what's the length of the green line?
But Idk what x is
Can you show me how to solve it then I can use it as an example to solve my next problom
?
where are you getting that?
what do x, 40 , 14, and 35 have anything to do with each other?
also you haven't responded to my previous question
x + red = ?
Equal y?
no
focusing only on the left side of the diagram
only on this:
ignore everything else for the question i'm asking
I am so confused
properties of addition...
going back to this example
if you join a line of length a together with a line of length b,
you'd get the green line of length a + b right?
Yes
similarly here, you'd have x + red and you are told that the combined lengths of those segments is 42.
so what I was looking for was simply:
x + red = 42
Oh I se
and then:
red = ?
and like before apply proportionality and properties of similar triangles
I am confused can you like show me an example with numbers
Like the problom I posted if you can help me solve it I can use it as reference
x + red = 42
subtracting x from both sides; red = 42 - x
would be the length of the segment i marked in red
you could setup an equation like before
however you could apply:
$$\frac{x}{42} = \frac{14}{14+35}$$
here, which is simpler
?
bot lag
I just replace the x with y-11?
no
Y-11 over 40 14/35
not quite
Hmm
what's the side length of the right side of the larger triangle?
35 + 14 yes
hence applying ratio of corresponding sides:
$$\frac{y-11}{40} = \frac{14+35}{35}$$
ramonov:
Thanks
Wait ramnov
Last question
What do I do if I don’t have the whole length ?
Take look at that example
you're given that the whole length is x
and you can use that to set up an equation
solving that will get you the value of x
you're not applying your ratios properly
no
Wait 33/15
You mean I have to use 24?
what you use depends on everything else being used
Replace the 33 with 24?
no
x/10 is the ratio of one of the longer sides to its corresponding shorter side
hence what its equal to would have a similar setup
The shorter side is 15 and 24
yes
yes
Yyeyegsgs
x/10 = 39/15
I start to get it now
What do I do about the y in middle do to find y there is no corresponding
don't pick random values just because they're there
I see the pattern now
from similar triangles, 2y-3 corresponds to the line its parallel to
(the line with length 33)
And 24 is parlele to 26?
where's 26 coming from?
the only lines parallel here are the lines being marked as parallel
(marked by those arrows)
what's it
2y-3over15 equal 24over33
write full equations and the context in which you're using values
ugh use () and / instead of the word over
hard to read af
incorrect
don't pick random values just because they're there
you're not using the word parallel properly
the only lines parallel here are the lines being marked as parallel
(marked by those arrows)
specifically the lines with lengths (2y-3) and 33
depends on how you're setting up your equation,
write the whole thing
still no
Where is incorrect
try describing in words what your ratios represent
depends on your intentions
I am trying find y atm
(2y-3)/10 is the ratio of 2 adjacent sides of the small triangle
15/33 is the ratio of one of the sides of the small triangle and another side of the large triangle
setting them equal to each other doesn't make sense
I see
So that why 15 and 33 are not correct
They are other sides
Then what whould it be
or multicoloured pen
or snipping/editing tool on the computer
I got a pencil
it may help if you colour/shade the edges of the small triangle,
and larger triangle
I just don’t know where to place the numbers since the y is in the middle
well (2y-3) is the length of a side in the smaller triangle right?
Like in the middle ye
33 is the corresponding length of the larger triangle
So it matches up with the 2y ye
the ratio of the two: (2y-3)/33
will have the same ratio as the lengths of another smaller side and its corresponding longer side
But the question is where is one of those 2 numbers
10 or 15,
the other sides lengths of the smaller triangle
24 is not the side length of a triangle
So 24 is not in this equation at all
i didn't say that
So there could be a possibility
it 'could' be depending on your choices
if you chose the 10, the corresponding side in the larger triangle will have length x which you found to be 26
if you chose to use the 15, the corresponding side will have length (15+24)
I see
I get it now
If we choose the 15
It be 15+26
Wait no so how will I set it up then
I got the 39/33
What is below the y
repost the image
why are you adding 15 and 26?
still no
The 39 is in wrong place ?
its not about whether one value is in the wrong place
its about the relative positions of everything
Can you post how it whould look like I think now I am confusing my delft
well (2y-3) is the length of a side in the smaller triangle right?
33 is the corresponding length of the larger triangle
the ratio of the two: (2y-3)/33
will have the same ratio as the lengths of another smaller side and its corresponding longer side
Self and over complicating it
pink/purple = green/red = mango/blue
alternatively you could also do stuff like
pink/mango = purple/blue
pink/green = purple/red
etc
15 and 15+24
bruh mango more like papaya
identify which sides correspond to each other and set up the appropriate ratios
mango is more yellow
well here that's the colour of my gmo mangos
What does corospomding mean
I still don’t get it can you show me an example with like the numbers like you did last question
pink/purple = green/red = mango/blue
replace colours with the indicated side lengths
Is the y going to be under 33 or across
wdym?
Like when we set it up is it going to be below it
wdym
2y-3/33
as long as its consistent with everything else it doesn't matter
$\frac21 = \frac21$ is just as valid as $\frac12 = \frac12$
it all depends on what you're setting it equal to
also please use sufficient parentheses
ramonov:
no, that would be incorrect
How will it be set up then
pink/purple = green/red = mango/blue
I did that do the pink 2y the purple 33
10
what's that supposed to be for?
that would be incorrect.
would also be incorrect
how would i do it
angle sum on a line?
yes
your ratios are still incorrect
also that sort of mentality is not welcome here
pink/purple = green/red = mango/blue
Sorry
green = ?
Green is 15
red = ?
15+24
green/red = ?
Which is 33
what's 33?
the numerical value of green/red can be obtained by substituting green and red with the numerical values you just stated
Can you please show me with with numbers
Then I can do another example I just need a reference
if $\green{\text{green} = 15}$ and $\red{\text{red} = 15+24}$, is it not clear that:
$$\frac{\green{\text{green}}}{\red{\text{red}}} = \frac{\green{15}}{\red{15+24}}$$
ramonov:
How can I have 15 twice
wdym
It says green
Oh I seee
...
just like how (2y-3) is the value of the length of the pink line
33 is the length of the purple line
and you didn't seem to have an issue with those two
$\frac{2y-3}{\text{"blank"}}$???
So I am right 33 goes below the 2y
*2y-3
Ye
if the other position and values of everything else remain the same, then yes
AstragaleDB9:
what formula would i use to find the volume? thanks
volume of a trapezoidal prism
Area of the trapezoid multiplied by the length
Heya, would anybody be willing to jump into my dms and help me with just a little bit of geometry?
K well I’m just having a little trouble with 24-26
looks like you already got some decent working for the first part
(3x+8)*2=2x+24
just solve for x
and substitute back into 3x+8
Ok but it would all cancel out right?
what do you mean>
Oh hold on I think I’ve got it
you can solve for a nice solution
So the answer to 24 would be 12 + 8?
I got x = 4
thats wrong
Oh ok thanks
you can basically do all them the same way
Thanks a ton that’s really helpful
Thanks your the best
np
mid segment is half of the base
the base is the line parallel to the midsegment
for for 3 its legit just 26/2
But how do we know it’s half of 26?
So what am I dividing by for 4?
Ah ok that makes sense
So x is also 6?
yes
Ok thank you sm for helping me tonight I really wouldn’t have been able to do it without you
yall I need so much help😭
Inverse variation and hyperbolas
My teacher did not explain it well. He's great usually but I had no idea what he was on about today
I'm going to send through some questions
Ignore highlight, that's just something the previous owner of the textbook did
,rccw
so the unspoken assumption here is that unit cost varies inversely with number of boxes produced?
yep!
I have a, b and c
(although a I was iffy on)
D is my main problem atm. Hyperbolas make no sense to me skdjfk
what do you need help with?
number 1 and 2
well number 1 asks you to plot points
so, I suggest you do that
position vector is just a vector that goes from the origin to the given point
I don't get it
what grade are you in?
9th
Bruh
@upper karma Just plot from (0,0) to the given coordinates
That’s where your vector ends
In this case, vector is just a line
Just draw a line connecting the points
anybody remember how to prove brahmaguptas formula given herons formula? I'm tutoring someone, and that's a question and I don't remember how
I'm also really tired and don't feel like deriving it rn
if nobody remembers I'll just go ahead and derive it
nvm ima just go ahead and derive it myself
It's fine, I was just being lazy, and couldn't find it online
Herron -> Brahmagupta is here:
https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1020&context=mathmidexppap
@upper karma