#geometry-and-trigonometry
1 messages · Page 232 of 1
yeah i got x=15 as well
so since youve found the measure of that angle to be 79
you can find y and z
take the angle measured as 3y+2
and see how you can form a 180 degree angle from that

close, somewhat
don't rush through it like that
so you have 180 = 3y + 2 + 79
which goes into 180 = 3y + 81
which goes to 99 = 3y
ohhhhhhhh
i'm assuming you accidentally got 111 for 180-79 instead
anyways, i think you'll be fine with finding y from this
and finding z should be of a similar difficulty level


Anyone willing to do tutoring for 30 or less minutes in Trig? I happen to get stuck a lot when trying to utilize my identities.
And we would utilize the mathematics voice channel?
<@&286206848099549185>
Just ask your questions and I'm sure someone will help you
Yeah, though I just feel like I am missing something, and like to have a bit of guidance on exactly what I am misunderstanding.

Guys I know that the function sin(x) is symmetric at the origin.. because it's an odd function.. But I don't understand this question.. what is f(x) = x - sin x ??
"x - sin x " <<< what is that
I know if it's odd by looking at the graph
The graph helps, definitely. However, there's an algebraic way to check as well, in case you don't have a graph
I remember something that has to do with f(x) = -f(x) or something
An odd function is a function that satisfies
f(-x) = -f(x)
That is, it's a function that you can pull a negative out of
And how would this help me with the question?
Does f(x) = x - sin(x) satisfy the definition of an odd function?
Try computing f(-x), it should be interesting
f(x) = x - sin(x) < Can you tell me what's that 2nd x ?
Same as the first, they're both x
you can make nice little right triangles and use inverse trig functions
How do I approach this?
xItzDia:
im pretty sure this isn't the chat for logic stuff
for this question do I solve for sin or cos?
nvm
ya but this is english ?
what even
the handwriting is hard to read
and its not even math
@keen scaffold what is this
honestly the "more formal" statement may be easier to grasp
In this video I show Why the angle sum of a triangle is 180 https://youtu.be/nPYRo4oG7N8 Hope you all have a great tuesday! 🥰👍
The Angle Sum of a Triangle is 180 degrees. In this video, we will be taking a look at WHY the interior angle sum of a triangle has 180 degrees. 🕛 TIMESTAMPS...
stephen hawking lmao
and you use 5 minutes 18 seconds to show that
did you prove that alternate angles on || lines are equal?
it's for pEoPlE wHo ArEnT eXpErTs @quiet mason
lol
@silent plank No, not sure how to prove it. Tried to explain the reason behind it using intuition
why is trigonometry so hard
what exactly are you finding hard about it
what is Z class?
oh are you finding alpha?
well it's hard to tell what this even is bc you haven't given the problem statement, only a fragment of its solution
it seems more calculus than trig
okay il take a screenshot of the question
this is calculus
i see you've rewritten the equation of line AB as y = -2x + 6
you may notice that A and B are its x-intercept and y-intercept, respectively.
;-;
i’m so confused 🥺
which of these answers make sense?
are there perpendicular lines here?
@calm lintel
oh i figured it out 🙏
Think this was answered in a question channel before?
loll
yeah :p
thank you though i was just frustrated and posted it in 2 cause i didn’t know which one
just post in 1 channel please
got itt
I'm currently taking algebra 1 and really want to learn geometry/algebra 2 so that I can skip it in HS. It seems that most people take geometry after algebra 1 and then algebra 2. Would it be fine taking geometry even though I'm not finished with algebra 1?
just one
I really doubt I could learn both
gotta make a 90+ on a test that is assigned to those with a high enough grade in math. with a 90+ you don't have to take the course in HS and it counts as if you already took it
yeah
you could self learn geometry
you know where to start or how to do it?
oh i see
seems to line up pretty well with what we're leaning in algebra 1
sounds good
can somebody explain how i'd simplify this in terms of sine and cosine
do you know how tan and cot relate to sin and cos?
show your work on paper
get some paper and do it on that, then show me
if you're not going to help then just move on and i'll wait for someone else.
if anybody wants to help with that problem please dm or @ me
You put zero effort into solving this problem, so you're right, I won't help you
i have already typed out what i could given the extent of my knowledge. i am lost on that problem and there is nothing else i can do. if you can't understand that then please stop responding
@weary drift what did you expect him to put on his paper
im just curious idk what else he would write down
I expected him to at least cooperate and show out his thought process on paper. If he doesn't want to do that, then you can take it from here
i have already typed out what i could given the extent of my knowledge. i am lost on that problem and there is nothing else i can do. if you can't understand that then please stop responding
but his thought process was convert it to sin and cos
then he was lost from there
eh doesn't matter, i got it @vagrant steeple
so you said sin/cos + cos/sin = 1/x
He did nothing but type out a single line of text. Have fun with this one, galileo
1/x
ignore the 1/x side
lets just manipulate sin/cos +cos/sin
any idea how we could find common denominators here?
cross multiply?
try it
sin^2/ cos^2 ?
send what you find
almost
what does cross multiply mean
what would multiply the whole thing by?
sin^2cos + cos^2sin
what about the bottom
sincos
squared?
uh
you might wanna write that out so you can actually see it
wait
so you got
sin^2cos + cos^2sin
i did
no
just the sincos
mhm
oh
i se
the way i said to do it takes to much time
lets restart with
cos/sin + sin/cos
what happens if you multiply
(cos/sin) times (1/1)
just a build up into the explanation, its not a trick question 🙂
it stays the same?
yeah
you were right, cos/cos = 1
so, we can multiply (cos/sin) times (cos/cos)
because we are techinically multiplying it by 1
if we multiply cos/sin by cos/cos, what do we get?
cos^2/sin
sincos on the bottom
sin^2/sincos
sin/sin
and thats just equal to 1
so its ok
now we can add the two because they're the same value as they were before
but now they have common denominators
sin^2 + cos^2 = 1
so what do we get when we add sin^2/sincos + cos^2/sincos?
1/sincos ?
close, this
$\frac{sin^2}{sincos} + \frac{cos^2}{sincos}$
Meir:
cool
so the answer would be 1/sincos
ooh
you simplified alreayd
nice!
do you think you could relay all the steps to me now?
this might be on a test
you could look back at our convo
no problem man
good luck, you can ping me if anything looks at all fuzzy
ill be better about now lol
alright. i'll come back if i get stuck on another problem
dont be shy to 😄
Can anyone help me with trigonometry? I have a problem I'm stuck on

An isosceles triangle has an area of 24 square centimeters and the angle between the two equal sides is (5pi)/6. What is the length of the two equal sides?
Anyone?
what formulas do you know for finding the area of a triangle?
what are they asking you to do?
Isosceles triangle: 2 sides are congruent and the base isnt.
The angle in where the 2 sides meet is 5pi/6 (150 degrees)
Find the length of the 2 sides.
what formulas do you know for finding the area of a triangle?
Area : 24 cm^2
A : 1/2 * b * h
any other formulas (that involve trig)?
My teacher is garbage. I cant find any in my notes and I wrote down everything.
You go to his office for help and he acts like you're a dunce no matter what.
are you familiar with
Area = 1/2 ab sin(C)
I've heard of it but I dont remember how to use it. Learned in highschool.
$\frac{1}{2}ab\sin(C)$ is just an application of the original $\frac{1}{2}bh$ formula
Jiramide:
lowercase letters represent sides, capital letters represent the angle opposite those sodes
But I dont have any side lengths.
2 are congruent. Meaning it would be (1/2)x^2sin(C)?
yeh. Can you simplify that radical?
Hi, I know it’s late but could someone explain this to me? I have a quiz on arcs and chords tomorrow and I have no clue on what to do.
constructing a few lines to the centre may help
alright. How should I go about it then?
whats the relation between mAngle BOE and mAngle BDE
They share common points?
yes, more specifically they are subtended by the same arc
where are those angles formed?
where is angleBOE
the center?
the arc?
wdym by arc
In that case, do angle BOE and angle BDE follow the first row and thus are the same?
O is the center and D is on the arc or the edge of the circle
so which theorem should you be using?
Is it the second row in the chart? Because it runs through the center and the circumference?
I’m sorry for giving you guys a hard time with my dense-ness . Thank you for explaining all this.
wdym by
Because it runs through the center and the circumference?
I guess I said that because the second row in the chart is a theorem that connects both the center and the circumference
the 2nd row specifically involves the diameter
which of those theorems involve
an angle at the center AND
an angle at the circumference?
The third one?
yes
Does that make mBDE 50 degrees?
yes
oh, nice! thank you so much for your help!
this is a right triangle
you might consider recalling the definitional mnemonic known as SOH CAH TOA
opp/adj?
opp/hyp
yes, sin(A) = a/c
then to solve for B it would be 90-A right?
sure, you can do that.
how about to find b?
so i did c^2-a^2 then sqrt the answer
you used the Pythagorean theorem, great
so why did you need to ask me
when you were able to do it
for confirmation i guess after you explained i was overthinking it.
make a picture
Is the range of the function CSC(x) = (−∞,−1]∪[1,∞) ? or we don't include -1 and 1 ?
can someone explain to me why cos x - sin x = 0 can lead to tan x = 1?
my guess is that
cos x - sin x = 0
cos x = sin x
0 = sin x / cos x
im asking bc this appeared in a marking scheme and i dont understand why
what do you get when you divide cos(x) by cos(x)?
what do you mean this is cos(x)/sin(x)?
i mean in terms of trig identities
0 = sin x / cos x
therefore sin x / cos x = tan x
and tan x = 1
** sorry i meant sin x / cos x
how did you go from cos(x)=sin(x) to 0=sin(x)/cos(x)
^
@maiden rain why would we not include -1 and 1 when csc actually returns those values for x=±π/2?
im just speculating here bc i dont understand the reasoning
this appeared in the official markscheme and i dont know why
at no point does "0 = sin(x)/cos(x)" actually appear in that paper...
Oh right, I got 1 out of csc(90) , Thanks Ann
yes thats why i said it was /my guess/
i dont understand how cos x - sin x = 0 leads to tan x = 1
whats the reasoning
cos x = sin x
sin x / cos x
no
which equals tan x
no
cos x / cos x = sin x / cos x
yes.
well there you have it
ah ty
Hi, I have a question regarding sequences.
no it's not
what you said both includes pi/2 (which it shouldn't) and doesn't include pi (which it should)
no, it should not
Sorry I meant cos(x)
ok so when does cos(x) equal zero
When it's at pi/2
pi/2 is by far not the only point
or 3pi/2
there are infinitely many points
Yeah
But I don't understand the answers here
It's definitely one of the 2 at the bottom
the notation in the answer options is somewhat dodgy but yes
The 3rd one. Like Ann said, "R - nπ" doesn't include π in the domain, but includes π/2, which shouldn't happen since tan(π/2 or 3π/2) = ∄. @maiden rain
@wary turtle What's " ∄ " ?
tan(π/2 or 3π/2) = ∄.
bad notation
he meant "doesn't exist"
or rather "is undefined"
I wanna cry 😦 , I didn't realise what " n " meant until now 😦
I totally understand it now. I feel so bad.. I wanna get better I'm frustrated 😢
,rotate -90
Sorry. I was quite in a hurry when replying, but yeah, it meant "doesn't exist".
@proud valve that's too small
np
thanks tho
what have you tried?
i tried to add the angles together but them realized that wouldn't work. I'm honestly just confused with this. My entire homework is just problems like this one.
what would the sum of those angles be equal to?
22x + 4 ?
you should have a sum that doesn't depend on a variable
yes but also what is the angle sum of supplementary angles
supplementary is two angles that equal 180 degrees
not quite
what else is there?
what you typed implied that they are both 180 degress
i guess. I'll be honest I'm very confused by this
the angle sum of supplementary angles is 180 degrees
and you are told that angles 14x and 8x + 4 are supplementary
are you able to form an equation with this information?
yes, wouldn't it be 14x + 8x + 4?
but what numerical value is it equal to
what does 14x + 8x + 4 equal to?
since 14 and 8 are like terms could you add them?
numerical value
the angle sum of supplementary angles is 180 degrees
i understand that the angles sum will be 180 degrees but I don't understand how I am supposed to get the numbers to it
using an equation
convert
the sum of (14x) and (8x + 4) is 180 degrees
into a mathematical equation
would 14x + 8x = 4 be a proper equation?
no
well it would be an equation since it has an = sign,but not the correct one for this equation
seriously...
what numerical value to you get when you add your two angles?
do you know what 14x + (8x + 4) would be

i understand that the angles sum will be 180 degrees
...

@ebon plume
I thought that if I did 22x + 4 that's wrong
not an equation
how would that be wrong
but what numerical value is that equal to
i understand that the angles sum will be 180 degrees
I'm just very confused man. I don't know what numerical value it'll add up too. That's about what my problem is at this point
i understand that the angles sum will be 180 degrees
i understand that the angles sum will be 180 degrees
i understand that the angles sum will be 180 degrees
i understand that the angles sum will be 180 degrees
i understand that the angles sum will be 180 degrees
i understand that the angles sum will be 180 degrees
Literally read it
Yes
oh ok thanks
You guys got it now?
i understand that the angles sum will be 180 degrees
@redd#4951
he left
damn
he left the server

i have a heavy feeling that was a troll tho
lmao
You bots
indeed
You literally told yourself the answer
the guiding questions aren't hard
if they really needed the help, they probs wouldn't leave
All you needed to tell him was 22x + 4 = 180
It honestly felt like you were the troll here.
Probably left cause he realized there's no point asking for help here 😛
he contradicted himself so many times lmaooo
What did he contradict exactly?
He obviously had no idea about what he had to do.
If I had to guess, he was probably in 6th grade.
All I see here is bunch of retards ganging up on a kid
sounds like he didn't know what the word "sum" means
"i understand that the angles sum will be 180 degrees but I don't understand how I am supposed to get the numbers to it"
He didn't know how to make the equation. That's it.
Congrats, you proved you have a slight longer dick than a prepubescent child
In this video, I go in depth on Midpoints. Hope some of you find it valuable and that you enjoy your Thursday! 🥰👍https://youtu.be/9Yt6iW8OipA
Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.
what kind of depth is even possible on that
I managed to make 5mins about it 😉
"😉"
actually, I'm inclined to disagree, but you didn't really go into depth yet
For example:
The midpoint of the hypothenuse of a right triangle is the circumcentre
Parallelogram diagonals intersect at their midpoint
The midpoint of one diagonal of a kite lies on the other diagonal
If I connect the midpoints of two sides of a triangle, I get a line parallel to the third side.
If I draw the circle passing through the midpoints of the sides of a triangle, they also pass through the base of the altitudes, the midpoint of AH, for vertex A and orthocentre H, and the circle is tangent to the incircle and 3 excircles
@sudden locust Consider this depth
not deep enough
still can go on
If you take the altitude of a triangle (orthocentre H, base of altitude M) and extend it to the circumcircle intersecting at X, then M is the midpoint of HX
The nine point centre is the midpoint of the line connecting the orthocentre and the circumcentre
If you connect each vertex of a triangle with the midpoint of the other side, you get three lines that are concurrent, intersecting at the centroid
i would actually watch the video if it included all that
and the video starts with pictures of stephen hawking,benedict cumberbatch,elon musk
nah, we don't need that
btw
can someone give me a TL;DW of the vid
the midpoint of a and b is (a+b)/2
lmao
the midpoint of a and b is (1/2, 1/2, 0)
and the midpoint of an arc is like -vw when the other coords are v^2 and w^2 but that's kinda boring
6:05 to 6:51
Drop a like, subscribe, notifications, and long outro
@crisp grove Haha! Great pic 😅
Was pretty much me, just woke up from a nap so you are pretty much spot on!
@sly marlin Eyy, thanks for you insight. Appreciete it buddy 🥰👍
uhh
What up? 😉
funny
What is funy? The picture from @crisp grove ? If so I agree 😅 👍
hm
Hey guys i need some help in solving a task i cant wrap my head around

is that 61°?
yes
do you know what type of triangle you have?
according to my teacher it is not a right triangle
do you think that it is?
well all the other tasks that have right triangles are marked with 90° and are not in a circle
even if it looks like the hypotenuse goes through the diameter
I do know the answer but i do not know how to get to it
the answer should be 11.8 but i don't know how to get there
that didn't answer my question about whether you think its a right triangle
Well I do think it is but my teacher said its not
what was your justification?
the hypotenuse looks like it goes through the center as a diameter
bad way to explain it
angle at the circumference subtended by the diameter is 90°
okay
so yes, it is indeed a right triangle. no idea why your teacher is saying it isn't
i didnt completely understand that but i get the gist of it
(not native english speaker)
and you can find the diameter using trig
okay but, how?
do you know your trig ratios?
sin, cos, tan
(tan would be sin/cos)
alright
which trig ratio do you think you should use here?
cos?
nope
where is the 10.3 relative to the 61° angle
yes
okay what step is next?
sin(61°) = opp/hyp = ?
alright let me try
THANK YOU!
Thank you so much for taking your time to help me ramonov
np
good luck
remember to justify things properly with theorems/identities you should've been taught
what have you tried so far
well i got really confused so i`ve been trying to solve this thing for a hour or so
yes but WHAT have you tried?
(also, an hour? this is definitely at least 4 times as long as the problem merits)
i guess i havent tried anything, well ive tried but i got it all wrong i have no idea of how to solve it now
can you show me your failed attempt
maybe you were going in the right direction and messed up the arithmetic or sth
i tried Pythagoras but i 5 is the whole ab so, i`m lost rn
ok
well
alright
i can give you a hint
consider the area of this triangle
and to be more specific, this area can be calculated in two ways, one of which involves the height
two ways so there is another way
o
to divulge more details would spoil the entire solution
There is an equation for that
Digicat195:
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for details. (You may edit your message)
with that, you can calculate the h
@celest swift
area of a triangle is bh/2
3 could be the base and 4 could be the height
a=34/2
a=6
5 could be the base and h could be the height:
a = bh/2
6=5h/2
12=5h
12/5=h
Can somebody proof check my geometry proof
If you need help reading the hand writing @ me
If you add congruent segments to congruent segments the sums are congruent @thorn linden
can someone help me solve for x, q and r are parallel btw
did you mean corresponding angles
yes
what was the reason for 10 @glad timber
yeh
@silent plank never mind the proof is wrong
from what i glanced, you would need to involve congruent triangles
Yeah I was rushing through it, totally forgot to set the triangles congruent
yeh. restart the whole thing.
would you be able to prove that triangle a ABR and ARK are congruent?
you can't just assume #3
um they r congruent by sas right
no
you can't assume they're right angles ie they are already perpendicular
you would need to use a different congruency test
what information are you able to get from AE bisects BK at R?
Honestly not sure. Could i use vertical angles to solve the proof?
what does bisect mean?
splitting it into 2 parts
what's the relation between those two parts
they are congruent
so which segments would be equal from that information?
br and bk aren't equal.
br is a part of bk
rk sorry
is that enough information to prove congruency?
wouldnt it be SSS?
yes
you'd still need 3-4 more steps to prove that they're perpendicular
actually, you could do something tricky
wdym?
nvm about that last comment
ok haha
what would be your steps after proving congruency?
oh I usually use cpctc after
isnt there some posulate that when 2 lines are perpendicular they form 4 right angles
you would only need to show that one of them is right
cpctc?
corresponding parts of congruent triangles are congruent
that isn't sufficient to show that its 90°
im not really sure then
its intuitive why they're 90° but in these proofs you need to explicitly write why.
if 2 angles are both congruent and supplementary they form right angles
that would right?
that would work right*
needs a justification of why they're supplementary
well because they r on a line and angles on a line add up to 180
my geo teacher doesnt make us do this in class haha this is way more detailed
yeh its stupid but you do have to write it
angles on a straight line are supplementary
really wowza
okay after that i can say congruent and supplementary angles form right angles
and then vertical angles?
don't need vertical angles.
you only need to show that one of them is 90° and the lines are perpendicular
when one is 90°, the other(s) will also be 90°
makes sense
if you only had AR and BK,
there are only 2 90° angles and they are still perpendicular
do i also need to state that angle arb and angle ark are perpendicular or is stating that they are just right angles okay
angles aren't perpendicular. perpendicular describes the relationship between lines.
the conclusion would be AE perp BK.
the reasoning would be something like angleARB = angleARK = 90°
or definition of perpendicular lines
one more quick question im trying to prove that angle P is congruent to angle S. angle p and s are just the straight lines right?
@silent plank
it isn't very clear what angle P and S actually are.
they aren't part of any shapes and seem to be just points
ah. construct lines PR and SQ
ohhh
R and Q??
uh angles PRS and PQS
they should look like that right
PR perp RS, means the right angle should be at PRS
similar with the other triangle
don't make RS and PQ vert/horizontal
however, even if the diagram is not to scale, you should still be able to complete the problem
Oh okay
it is implied that angle P and angle S refer to the minor angles
ie angle RPQ and angle RSQ
no. you don't know whether PT = TS
hint: ||you don't even need to know that RT = TQ||
would vertical angles work for this problem?
yes
oh.
did you get it?
i think so? angle rpt and qst are vertical angles
then u use vertical angle theorem to say that they r congruent
no, RPT and QST are not vertical angles
but there are vertical angles elsewhere in your diagram
im so confused
what's the definition of vertical angles,
and which angles on that diagram are vertical angles?
opposite angles of 2 intersecting lines
which angles of your triangles fit that description
did i write it wrong or smt? does it need to be ptr and stq instead
jesus i was overthinking that so hard lmaooo
so now i can say the 2 angles are congruent
you'd have to justify that your triangles are either similar or congruent first
how can i find sine/cosine from hypotenuse length and angle?
or is that impossible
did you mean find the unknown sides?
do you know your trig ratios?
nope
(soh cah toa)
i dont need a lesson in trig
i just need to know this for something im making
to clarify,
i know the hypotenuse's length
i do not know the adjacent/opposite
i know what theta is
yes, that would be sufficient
what are the operations?
it sounds like if you're doing something like this
that relies on trig rations,
you should learn them
i know
im a month or two away from being taught in school
it is fine if this requires the inverse operations, btw
i mean you can literally just google trig,
and come back with stuff you don't understand
ratios*
lol don't know why, comes out as "rations" when i write it as well
alright
i used this to make an incredibly convoluted and unnecessarily complicated way to compute rotations of yaw and pitch
Hey guys
I had a test today and it seems that one of the questions are wrong
Could anyone take a look at it and see if the get the sum of 181 degrees
I know a triangle is supposed to be 180 degrees so thats why im worried
,calc sqrt(4.3^2+11.5^2)
The following error occured while calculating:
Error: Value expected (char 17)
Result:
12.277621919574
You get 181 because of rounding error
We calculated that the hyp is 12.277... with Pythagorean theorem
ah okay
But it says 12.2 on the picture
So when you calculate angles with that, the angles will be off slightly
oh okay
but idk if i did it correctly still or not
even if the answer is wrong
some people got 69.5 degrees on the biggest angle
Meanwhile i got 70.5 degrees
What would be "correct" If it was 12.2
So 70.5 degrees would be the correct answer?
like i did my calculations right but the 12.2 was wrong?
no
the sum is wrong
yes they should give yall marks
or show the calculation that hyp was 12.3
That i understand but did i do my calculations right
to teacher
we're all 3 sides given to you?
yes
They did a rounding when presenting lenghts of the 3 sides, so they have to accept the answer if it is off because of the rounding
As seen in the picture if you scroll a bit up
as long as youre using legitimate ratios you should be fine
since with those side lengths, it isn't actually a right triangle
its not?
y'all stop confusing him even more :c
its very close to one
Your answer is good, and the 1 degree difference is only because the problem had the lenghts rounded.
thats all
depending on which sides you use your trig ratios on, you'll get slightly different angles
Alright thank you DarK
Ramonov to my understanding the hypotenuse is wrong and therefore it is not a right triangle due to a rounding error
yeh. but for the question you would treat it as one
,w arctan(11.5/4.3) in degrees
,w arcsin(11.5/12.2) in degrees
,w arccos(4.3/12.2) in degrees
I used sin-1 (11.5/12.2)
yeh that's fine
calculators allowedd?
Okay so i did correctly
yes calculators were allowed
the test is over now but i wanted to make sure i didnt mess up so i could learn from my mistakes
it doesn't necessarily mean that the hypotenuse is wrong, just that (at least 1 length is wrong)
yes
What should i say?
use exact values. or leave finding an unknow side to the student
Alright but what do i tell him is wrong with the question?
pythag doesn't work,
hence it's not a right triangle.
it wasn't even rounded properly,
for calculations, it is assumed that it is (a right triangle) and will return different angle values depending on the trig function being used
Chuck them that.
worded it a bit better
lol be kind tho
And the last thing
What are these marks you guys are talking about?
like points on a test?
yeh
yah
Okay
finding an angle like this is worth 1 point? (2 max)
if they offer more, consider getting a new teacher
bahahha
It is our first time with trig like i told you yesterday
2 points is max yes
He is a pretty good teacher but he is "out there"
dw ur doing fine
he went on a trip to himalaya this summer to meditate for a month
Yeah thanks for helping me man
I think he teaches 1st and 2nd but i am not sure
norway has a different school system
He isnt bad by any means
He is not the type of teacher to just give us the answer, he wants us to work it out ourselves
¯_(ツ)_/¯
Alright i sent it to my teacher
@celest swift you're welcome

two of these are given
actually, no
all three of these are given
so to answer your question, you get these by reading the problem.
@rapid nexus
so oa = 6, whats the column vector for it
what do you think it is
it's parallel to i
and is six times as long
give it a little thought
just 6i
which of a, p, q can you figure out?
btw this is #geometry-and-trigonometry
probably not a good idea here @tribal spire
...
let's take this to #help-0, the only channel in which i didn't delete your copy of the q
Is there another name for Euclidean Geometry?
Would it be Plane & Solid Geometry instead?
yes
help
which ones harder
geometry or trigonometry
or algebra II
and also
what’s the hardest type of math
there is no objective answer to either of these questions
nice save
i’m too childish to be in this
there is literally a chat called “advanced math” @dark sparrow so there is clearly some type of math considered the hardest .
not really
i mean like let me put it this way: at university level, you very often can pick two people, and each will be good at one thing and find the other's thing hard
ohh
that makes sense
but it we are being HONEST
geometry is harder than any algebras
Also, for someone without any prior knowledge that leads up to it, of course it can look like the hardest - even though it still can be hard, but it's more subjective.
all the “metrys” are harder than the “gebras”
shapes are harder than anything else
and circles are THE devil
meh
geo was alright to me but 2-col proofs are so bad even the devil would not take credit
2-col? @dark sparrow
yeah, math statement on the left, reasons on the right
I just let my reasons flow anytime I need them
an example of [REDACTED]
If I have a wave function that's being "dampened" over time, but the peaks go down at a different rate to the troughs goings up, what would explain that?
By that I mean this (roughly, as I only have a few points at evenly spaced intervals, not the whole curve)
The different rates I'm refering to are the red vs the purple in this image
The red line (being the closest point I had to the maximum point of the cycle for every cycle) goes down at a steeper rate than the purple line (being the same as red but for the minimum) goes up
And as a note, everything before the beggining of that purple line is kind of unreliable data, so it can be disregarded
how to do dis


