#geometry-and-trigonometry
1 messages Ā· Page 123 of 1
ok i tried again i got that
my delta math crashed guys TOT
its not letting me submit it
the one time i got it right
i remember the days of delta math
TOT
sir i most certainly did NOT SUBMIT IT YET PLZ LEMME SUBMIT
thank you guys
š
it finally worked and i got it right
Nerdyasianguy
Very close to a Hagge circle
suchitRole icon, he/him ā 4:58 PM
can any one say some importent properties of hyperbola
what,s this
A normal geo problem?
tan(x) = sin(x)/cos(x)
idk if this fits the channel, but does this degenerate shape have a name?
i was trying to see if i could make a sort of extended cube - where each vertex only connects to 3 edges - and accidentally came up with this weird thing
you take a cube, remove half the faces so you only have a corner of the cube, and then merge the 3 vertices that stick out (shown in image 4)
help?
!status
Ok
What grade are you in?
Grade? Nah Iām not in America
And I study above my level anyway so it doesnāt matter
Could u teach me?
It's (obviously) impossible to teach you such a huge topic here, especially from scratch
I suggest you pick a textbook and/or watch some courses online, e.g. on YouTube or on KhanAcademy
Khan academy is great
im learning trig its so easy omg
its a geometry group chat for kids at my school
<@&268886789983436800> seems questionable
@winter shadow not your personal army
This is a good way to get banned from here fwiw.
So, please don't do anything like this again
Any ideas? I think the median triangle of ABC will be relevant but i haven't solved this
Any help ?
This is an ellipse with F being a focal point
Why does sin(x)/x=1?
I want directing, not a straight answer please and thank you.
sin(x)/x never EQUALS 1, it approaches 1 as x->0.
really you should be saying lim[x->0] sin(x)/x = 1
look up "small angle approximation" for proofs
Thanks a lot
Watch a YouTube video about it
Yeah I thought if that
I think I can help
First
What's the angle inside the triangle
Well we know that F²+B²=4 by Pythagorean's
It's what I was thinking
BN^ 2 = BF^2 + FN^2 - 2BFFN cos(F)
How you want to find FN as some parameter of the ellipse
The question wants BN
Bump
F is 120 so BN² = BF²+FN²+2BFFNcos(30)
Which is
BN²= BF²+FN²+2BF(sqrt3/2)
Oh
Im stupid
||Use BF and the 30 angle to find minor and major axis lengths||, ||let F' be the other focus, then FN+F'N is fixed and you can find it||, ||on the other hand in triangle F'FN with F'FN=150 degree, FF' is known so you can apply cosine rule||,||now you have 2 equations for 2 variables which is sufficient||. ||After we get FN, use cosine rule again to find BN||
i got 1.73
but I used simple trif
trig
sin(120)=x/2
but thats not a right triangle
sigh'
I found FN = 2/7
Is it right?
Merhaba arkadaÅlar! š 10. Sınıf Tarih Maarif Modeli müfredatına uygun olarak hazırladıÄımız bu videoda, Osmanlı Devleti'nin baÅarısının üç ana sütununu iÅliyoruz: Ordu, Hukuk ve Toprak Sistemi. Tımar sisteminin ekonomi ve orduya katkısını, YeniƧeri OcaÄı'nın profesyonelliÄini ve Osmanlı adalet sisteminin (İstimal...
arkadaÅlar bu kanalı takip edermisiniz
kendisi benim ocamda
he is my teacher
How do you find the circumcenter and other centers/stuff of these 3 points? I'm learning analytical geometry right now but learning about the midpoint formula makes me wonder what happens if there's 3 points, how can you find the midpoint of all 3 points in 2 dimensions?
the midpoint of two points has the average of their coordinates
Yep
Ohhh, should I maybe add up all 3 points and divide by 2?
what is the "midpoint of three points" though
Well my thought process is that if you can find the distance that is equidistant from 2 points, then the same must be true for 3 points right? Where like this red point should be in a coordinate that is equidistant in length from all 3 points?
well the point equidistant from those points is the center of the circle they all lie on
Ah so something like this?
yeah
Cool!!!!!!
if you think of the 3 points as vertices of the triangle, this is one of the triangle centers (which one?)
centroid?
hard to tell
Ah so then it's just a circumcenter right?
indeed
i see
if I know the diameter of the circle, and divide it by 2 then I just have to figure out where the radii of 2 of the vertices have to meet to figure out where the circumcenter is?
Like this?
Fascinating stuff on the wikipedia about circumcircles.
i am so thrown off here
what am i missing here
the equation is marked as good but then when i actually put it into the calculator i get wrong answer
perhaps a silly question, but have you tried to answer it in radians or as a positive angle (360-14.2)? I donāt see anything else wrong with it, although shouldnāt it be in de fourth quadrant?
you must be wrıte -7.78 X 1.97
did @south leave?
He did
on another account he said he was unable to access his south acc or smth
I don't think so
oh
You can still see him in IBO discord server
Hey I have a question which bothers me all the time
We know that trigonometry is used in triangles, (name says it)
Well but, if we talkin about sin0, cos0, etc, how can we talk about 0 degree?
Cuz if theta is 0 degree, then it would no longer be a triangle, but coincident lines?
Trigonometry isnāt valid there,
And moreover, we know that hypotenuse is the longest side of the triangle, greater than Perpendicular and the base, but if we are talking about sin0,cos0 etc, we are saying that base=hypotenuse and perpendicular=hypotenuseā¦.. WHAT-?
This really bothers my mind šš
unit circle
you use the unit circle to define values such as sin0 cos0 etc etc
wait lemme show how
green is the radius one thetha is the angle between the sides
wait let me give them a name
also made it a bit clearer.
OC is the radius. And AB perpendicular to OC
so from here
since OA = 1
sin(thetha) would just be the side AB
similarly. cos(thetha) would just be the side OB
try to figure out why and if you cant. Ask
the radius is one. i.e OA = OC = 1 unit
now as thetha reaches zero. The base reaches the radius OC. So when thetha becomes zero. sin(thetha) being the perpendicular. Would also be equal to it. but since theres no perpendicular. sin(thetha) must be zero
similarly. you can say about cos(thetha)
@kindred scaffold
please help
guys in the solution, i don't understand how they got the fractions in the second line
!trigonometry
#geometry-and-trigonometry - euclidean geometry, coordinate geometry, trigonometry
from the last part of the first line, expand (1 + cos theta)^2
is woud be helpful to learn Cevaās theorem and Menelausā theorem? I can't found good resources to learn them
not really unless you're gonna grind competition math...if you're curious it's really not a lot to learn, it's just two theorems
Ohh š®
it makes this so simpler if we take unit circle
You explained very nicely and clearly, thanks for that!
All understood š
Wait
One last confusionā¦
Isnāt sin(theta)= perpendicular/Hypotenuse? 
So if we put theta zero, there literally isnāt anymore hypotenuse and no triangle is there!
the right triangle definition works only for angles strictly between 0 and 90°
Not including 0 and 90?
Oh well
But that means then we arenāt focusing or right angle triangle here?
Like AOB is right angled triangle?
(I mean I know it is right angle triangle, but we arenāt focusing on this fact, right?)
thank you so muchhh
hi all! just need some tips of using identities. i have learnt a bunch of them but struggle with which ones to use when ecspecially when doing induction questions. and example question is above in which i struggled to know when and where to use them. ik to try and find the way to the k+1 term but i still really struggle. anything to keep in mind apart from just practising these types of questions
that right triangle is only there so that sin(thetha) and cos(thetha) can be AB/OB and OB/OA respectively.
since then.
because it's a unit circle.
The values just become the sides AB and OB
and then we can see what their values are for every and every angle
think of it like uh
in a unit circle. The x and y value of a point on the circumference is given by cos(thetha) and sin(thetha) respectively where thetha is the angle made by the point from the x-axis (if I'm sure)
soh cah toa
How do i memorize all these formulas for ellipse circle hyperbola and parabola for trig it felt like there was so much info thrown at me that it all just slipped out my head
do questions on them?
cant really comment much since i havent been taught that yet
I did 
what if you
try to mess around with the formulas
or try to derive it yuorself
You are a 10th grader?
Lmk if you need help with 10th maths (CBSE),I have studied it
When using the distance formula, is it ok to represent delta x and delta y or the change in them like this where it's subscripted? h is just a variable name I assigned for the height of a triangle in the coordinate grid/plane to figure out it's length because I know 2 points of it.
For reference, this is the original diagram, I'm trying to figure out the area of trapezoid COWL.
I guess change in x or delta x shouldnt be used as distance formula is just pythagoras theorem for coordinates of two points
Can you check my work?
I'm not sure how to simplify 4sqrt5+2sqrt45+15
Um sqrt 45 is just 3sqrt5
Ty!
Area is just 7sqrt5 + 15
Thanks!!
i figured it out, i was supposed to add 180 to the result
How do you find out the coordinates of all the points on a circle with a certain radius?
there are an uncountably infinite number of points on a circle's circumference, but with the circle with center (a,b) and radius r, the formula for that circle is (x-a)^2+(x-b)^2=r^2
plug in any x value [-r,r], and find ur y
<@&268886789983436800>
Tysm!
you can also use trigonometry if you know the angle it makes with the x axis right?
x or y axis
polar coords
yes
: )
how do i practice geo and trig
do questions
Understand the concept and start solving questions
wait im new in here do we do complex numbers as well
like anything euler's identity related
or does that classify as precalc
i think that should be preaclc
calc
precalc
ok ty
Do you eventually learn an easier/less-tedious method to calculate perimeters/area of shapes in the coordinate plane than having to use the distance formula?
a less tedious method would be to write "similarly" on everything which is similar to something else š š
I don't understand, if you meant this example then it's pretty clear imo that even if you didn't get the stripes on the lines which say that they're congruent in length to each other that the coordinates make it clear that they'd have the same length
I did the latter before realizing that it was already given that they're congruent 
You can use ladder method for obtaining area
Idk about any other formula for getting perimeters
Ty
Use distance formula
what does tangent give information for
because cosine and sine give the x and y intercepts
Civil Service Pigeon
Civil Service Pigeon
obviously there's more but my fingers are cold so 
arctan is the inverse of tan
ah
ie, if tan(a)=b, arctan(b)=a
arcsin, arccos, arctan, etc
yes
hyperbolics too
you'll learn them eventually
very useful
not hyperbolic geo
Arcsin etc can be used to find the angles
well hyperbolic trig applies to hyperbolic geo doesnt t
yes
thankfully i know that lol
Nice
wait im doing a problem here
so sin and cos only give the intercept points right
or is it length
it would be the same thing wouldnt it?
for a unit circle
hm?
(sin,cos) defines a specific point on the unit circle
for a line?
just use distance formula
for a triangle in a unit circle sorry
oh that triangle š
ye, sinx gives height
early trig
no theta keyboard shortcut, so i have to use x š¢
so whats the point of arctan finding the inner angle if arcsin and arccos both do that
hm?
arctan works iff tan(a)=b
sin and cos work similarly
so they all output angles
but i was under the assumption that they output the angle of the hypotenuse to x
no, it's the inverse
not the reciprocal
arcsin(sina)=a
arccos(cosb)=b
arctan(tanc)=c
same for arcsec, arccsc, and arccot
are sec csc and cot the hyperbolic functions
no
sec=1/cos
csc=1/sin
cot=1/tan
what are they unabbreviated
hm?
secant, cosecant, and cotangent
sine, cosine, and tangent
ok so those are ratios
mhm
ok nevermind i get what reciprocals are now
does this all look good
yes, gj
oh i have errors in there
areas r right
i have x written over the hypotenuse in the first one
didn't check the calculations tho š
lol
CAB = 180-(45+30)
CAB = 105
CAO = CAB - OAB
CAO = 105 - (180-90-30)
CAO = 45
I mistook 30deg as a measurement for the whole ABO
Yeah..
The final answer is 60 °
Yeah...
How to find OAB?
OAB is an isosceles triangle
AOB = 90deg
So there is 90deg left
Divide it by two
You get 45deg (OAB)
Um in this Q, ACB and AOB will be equal that is 90, because angles subtended by same arc are equal so CAB will be 60 (by angle sum property). Now OAB = OBA = 45, so CAO will be 60 - 45 = 15, but you said answer is 60, how?
how are you taking isoscles if its not given that o is the centre of the circle?
I guess its pretty common to assume that O is the centre
and o is for origin
i get it but stll
ya
That is if we are talkin about points whose coordinates are given
This is a 1 mark Q of 9th or 10th Grade, think like that for once
Imma need some help [precalc] if n= tan A - sin A and (m²-n²)²=16mn prove that m=tan A + sinA
what's the relation between the direction ratios when 2 lines are intersecting?
this is what google says, just wanted to confirm
Um as far as i remember, if the below thing is true (a1/a2 is not equal to..), then the two lines are said to be parallel or have no solution that means they dont intersect
for parallel lines a1/a2 = b1/b2 = c1/c2 (in 3d)
I am talkin about 2d, just x and y
i'm talking abt 3d
Um idk about 3d, sorry
š
Man i just watched dhurandhar and your pronouns made me remember it again
I did a same Q like this, but m and n were given like that, it was just to prove that m² - n² = 4(mn)^1/2
I dont think there's another way rather than just assume that m = TanA + SinA
Then add m and n and subtract them also, now multiply both results and you will get m² - n²
Then keep this result aside and multiply m and n, after getting the value, check it by putting in the given equation (m² - n²)² = 16mn or m² - n² = 4(mn)^1/2
If LHS = RHS then this means our assumption was correct
I could not find any other way to prove m = TanA + SinA
@hard crater
If m and n were given then it is possible to prove m² - n² = 4(mn)^1/2
But to find m, its difficult or i guess not possible without assumption
ig i have a similar question, see if you get any ideas from here
yeah
i cant see any ends trying to find it any other way
<@&268886789983436800>
I just derived the equation of a parabola! 
Your y^2 turned into y
and your 4 and y look too similar
Yep my bad 
Are your y's curved? I'm not sure how to change that, other than writing x curved for one of the diagonals or making the bottom of the y more slanted to the left.
i loop the tail of my y
and the top part of my 4 looks more triangular (like how it appears here)
Ty!!
Like this?
Yea
Thanks
Thank @silent plank not me
It doesssss!!!!
that are grade 10th questions
I don't see CBSE questions of grade 10 are very elegant, I mean standard and basic is just of name, both are just simple.
Proving, and proving converse are different.
You just need to know how to solve - axⓠ+ bx² + cx + t type equations.
This is whats asked generally, the one which he gave is not possible ig without assumption
The sign is wrong
It should be tⓠ- n² - 4t(n)^1/2
How do you solve this?
There are two variables, one is t that is root m and other is n = Tanx - Sinx
I need help with 4 please
Um a tennis ball is just a sphere
I crammed my economics hw so my brain is fried
Oh yes, solve that, @ab
It requires area of material required for 100 such balls so calculate total surface area of 1 sphere that is 4 pi r² and multiply it by 100
Oh okay thanks
It's easier to solve power 4 e. of above type
How tho? Idk how to solve 4 degree equation
No solve, its going to cut down
What grade are you in?
I'm in 10.
Of course you can solve this, if you know abelian theory, this have radicals, no matter how long.

That was just a proof of a linear equation, you turned it into a 4 degree shit and now this formula 
Ahhh! Verification, is correct but still not suitable.
Anyways one may assume m = s/c + sk, and prove k = 1,by comparing too.
Oh Maths Gurus hlo
Pi/3
woah the derivative of the volume/area of geometric shapes is the circumfrence/surface area
but what about squares
because the area is x² but the circumference is 4x
and cubes too
x³ but the surface area is 6x²
4pi(3.5)²*100
I guess circumference is used for curved surfaces
maybe hes asking about perimeter?
any clue how to get obtuse ABC?
oh ye i meant perimeter
BAD will be 30° (360-330)
Join B to AD to form right triangle then the remaining angle in that right triangle will be 60° (remember)
Join B to CD at point E, another right triangle will be there, now CBE will be 59° (360-301)
Now as you joined B to E and B to AD at a point, a square is formed there, so Obtuse ABC will be 90+59+60 = 209° (because obtuse angle is greater than 180°)
Hope it helps and check the answer as Idk if this is correct or not, just my solution
Thanks
I tried doing it like that, and now my writing looks really pretty! Thank you!
Whatās directrix
Is it the length or the distance
it's actually just a straight line
search it up
Ok
too lazy to define rn
Ok
How do u this?
triangle sum theorem and rhombus diagonal rule
Alr thank u
Finally constructed a pentagon!
It isn't the most elegant, but at least it's mine...
Did you also summon a demon in the process by chance?
šš
I can assure you I didn't.
š¤Ø
"Q.) The base of an isoceles triangle is 16cm. if its area is 48cm^2. Find its perimeter"
im stuck on this question
is there a better way to do it than to just use herons formula and square it?
ohh thanks

(6,8,10) triple warning
mhm yes itās a scalar multiple of the (3,4,5) triple
But writing out words takes more effort than just writing the square root expression
Hence why I just chose to āuseā the Pythagorean theorem
Even if I used the triple to shortcut the actual result
Update: it turns out that my pentagon was very slightly irregular. My virtual compass wasn't representing the angle with enough precision.
so was it an error in the construction or was it merely a precision defect in your software?
yo
Why can't you just add the vertical angles that correspond to APD and DPC to get 174=major-arc-ADC?
Is it because AP is not parallel to PC and DP is not parallel to PB?
They're not necessarily parallel (and can't be otherwise this wouldn't be a circle with 360 degrees) because AC and DB aren't given as diameters, right?
is there any more information given in the problem?
but yes you don't know what APD and DPC are, so idk how you would work with them
certainly AP doesn't look parallel to PC and similarly with DP and PB
I thought that you could say DPC=70 because of vertical angles and that APD=104 because of vertical angles
but you can't
i can't
that would wok if APC and DPB were straight lines, but they don't appear to be on the diagram
Yeah, I got confused, I thought for a second that they were straight lines and so i was really confused when my answer got flagged as incorrect.
tysm!!! ā¤ļø
one clue that you can also get is that if AP and PC were colinear, then angle APC would equal 180 degrees, which it does not
wok
That makes sense! Tysm
Is it possible to calculate any exact trig value without a calculator?
Would you say that point P is collinear with line segment AC if you wanted to describe the collinearity of that line segment?
Maybe this? https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/501660/is-there-a-way-to-get-trig-functions-without-a-calculator
Not exactly, but with Taylor approximation, you can get pretty close
(Its not easy to find the approximation with Taylor by hand though)
What is Taylor approximation?
its a way to approximate functions using polynomials
Its not pre-university (doesnt mean that you shouldnāt learn more about it)
But just so you know
Dont understand anything from geometry
Make specific questions and we will try to help you!
Made in Python with Manim
#manim #python #taylorseries #maths #maths #sin #sinus
Literally anything, I just can't remember what to do or use.
What is sin(x)?
It's the sine of an arbitrary angle, I think.
Iām at high school math and we havenāt covered it I guess
But is basicly a periodic function that has a relation between degrees of an angle of a right triangle and its sides
You will, its fun
Weāve covered some trigonometry but not this yet
Also it definitely is fun!
Sin gives you the length of a segment, right?
Mmm yeah, its the vertical segment of the triangles from the circumference of radius 1
How about for an arbitrarily right triangle? it just gives the ratio then? Like with a right triangle with hyp=5
But in general is the division between the opposide side of the angle and the hypothenus
Yeah, then its a ratio
So is it easier in the context of a unit circle?
Yes , because the radius is 1, so thereās no denominator
Right
And you can generalize sin and cos for angles bigger than pi/2
Because Sine=Opposite/Hypotenuse and anything over 1 is itself.
Yep
Can anyone answer my question on MSE? Iāve tried to solve it many times, but Iām stuck. I need the solution to learn these kinds of math problems (which are very common) and to continue my 2D physics engine.
https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/5122141/line-segment-sliding-acros-2-surfaceslines?noredirect=1#comment11040579_5
I watched a video on Taylor series but it has a lot of prerequisite so Iām not yet able to apply it
Also I realise that I do in fact know what sin x is but didnāt realise because Iāve been doing trigonometry with a formula triangle instead of algebraically
But yeah, Iāll try and make a start on calculus and hopefully Iāll be able to understand it
i dont think thats possible is it?
The green one can use Pythagorean theorem
then nothing else
literally nothing else š
And laws of cosine
wsg yall
How to prove that the Gergonne point of a triangle is the Lemoine point of its intouch triangle?
If I understood correctly, this is should be just by definition of symmedian for intouch triangle
it is (not certain anymore, my eyes deceived me and I saw two whole right triangles)
anyone do gcse
!da2a
Asking the actual question right away is more likely to get responses.
Asking "Can I ask...?" or "Does anyone know about...?" doesn't give people enough information to decide whether they can help, and answering can feel like a promise to help with the actual question, which they might find themselves unable to.
I do
can someone help me understand how to find the values to this problem?
reposted in help channels ^
Oh yeah
igcse yeah
chat i am in grade 10 studying trignometry rn and cant seem to understand what sin cos and tan are, sm1 mind explaining, will help me greatly!
i already know for right triangle, i dont understand when we start using circles
soh cah toa is easy, but circles i dont really know
hmm alr
so in a circle
in a unit circle
all the radii are
1
which we consider the hypotenuse
its just quadrants
This trigonometry video tutorial provides a basic introduction into the unit circle. It explains how to evaluate trigonometric functions such as sine and cosine using the circle regardless if the angle is in radians or degrees. You can find the exact value of a trigonometric function if you have access to the unit circle.
Trigonometry - Fre...
,tex .unit circle
where are factoids
Heavily recommend watching both of these, especially TR-15Z as it shows where the common values are derived from:
https://youtu.be/oJgBJfstOOU?si=MF0KFGhovLHSqQEw
https://youtu.be/i9ahDcV-bVg?si=7vrKzUtus5wUx_8T
The Unit Circle is introduced and the duality between angles and points on a circle is manifest when the cosine and sine of an angle are shown to be the x- and y-coordinates of its point on the unit circle. This is an extension of trig ratios (which only apply to acute angles in quadrant 1) to trig functions which apply to all possible angles.
...
A proof of the sine and cosine values for the common angles (30°, 45°, 60°, etc.)
Series introduction including complete video list:
TR-00: [https://youtu.be/U23JMdBIJ0M]
International A level, Intl A Level, IAL, Edexcel, Pearson exam board, CIE, Cambridge exam board, P3, P2, Year 10, Class 11
I forgot the identity to find the second time. Isn't it something along the lines of 0.927... + 2pi?
$\cos(x)=y \implies x=\arccos(y)+2\pi n$ or $x=\left(2\pi-\arccos(y)\right)+2\pi n$, where $n$ is an integer
Civil Service Pigeon
you can justify this to yourself with the unit circle + periodicity
Thank you!
How to prove heron's formula
Every point on the circle is from an angle + radius of the origin, you can create a triangle to map the origin going to the point on the circle, and trigonometry can be used to find that point
Ty
do you guys know how to make the dotted/dashed lines graphing out the movement of the points on these circles appear as a trail left behind by them, instead of simply being line equations?
I know I should use some kind of time slider, but how do I incorporate that into the graph?
https://www.desmos.com/calculator/6tejaeooel
dont question the name btw
I'm talking about the parametrics
\left(30\cos a+10\cos-5a,30\sin a+10\sin-5a\right)\operatorname{for}0\le a\le8\pi
Thanks!
aight ty
Beautiful geometry.
Itās easy to fall in love with geometry when it sounds like this. šš¶ āI built this app to turn math formulas into melodies. š¤ āš² Cosmic Tunes is out now on Google Play! ā
its...interesting
dare i say peculiar?
guys gen how do I get better at geometry?? My english abilites are much superb, but my math not so much
make diagrams for every question, and in these diagrams give names to everything relevant
I just like donāt get how to set up an equation, especially with all of the theorems and such
Like im supposed to be smart im in the smart boi math class
kinda vague tbh
theres a lot of different equations that could crop up
do you have any specific examples of questions you have struggled with
Ignore the other tabs..
Anywho, others find it very simple but it just hasn't clicked with me yet.
so it's specifically with angles, ok
what's the most fundamental thing you can say about angles in a certain very simple kind of shape
Most share congruent diagonals and many paralells??
In Q11, join W to Y
In Triangle ZWY, ZW=ZY
So Angle ZWY=ZYW, then use angle sum property
Now do this in triangle WXY
And find the two angles
This is my way of solving it at first
Hope this helps
This is a good way of explaining it thank you!!
Does anyone have a list of identities for these kinds of problems? The ones I'm finding online are missing some of them.
Legit can't do triangles š
Geometry is so hard man
I can do all of math but not geometry
I was scared to ask such a simple question here but yeah
I hope you guys don't judge
use coord bash
Reposted here: #help-20 message
We don't care about this. However, when asking for help, please show what you've done so far - it gives us more context and saves time from explaining things unnecessarily. \ \
Since we had the equal lengths $AD$ and $BC$ that are not part of the same triangle, we are motivated to construct a \textit{new} triangle. Consider constructing $\triangle ADE$ on $\overline{AD}$ that is congruent to $\triangle CBD$ and angle chase.
Civil Service Pigeon
Okay but I legit couldn't do anything here
triangle BCD is fairly simple to angle chase tbf
I can't do these kind of questions at all
I started from the beginning but still don't understand it
Like this?
No clue
Ugh is there a tip for this stuff man
The whole tests are full of questions like this and I can't do any of them unfortunately
"on AD" means that one of the sides should be AD
Oh
eh these angle puzzle questions before trig are basically all constructing things
try to look for the odd thing out and force it into being useful
like BD=CD is easy to use because they're both part of the given triangle BCD
so you can say that CBD=BCD from that directly
but AD=BC, not so much
so you should make a construction that you can use it (this is what I meant by "force it into being useful")
So I draw this
Man what do I do next
Okay
Again, there's some easy angles you can fill in
like BD=CD is easy to use because they're both part of the given triangle BCD
so you can say that CBD=BCD from that directly
start with this
mhm
mhm
How do you just construct a triangle like that man like how am I supposed to think of that
š what do I doooo
I need to figure out geometryyyyy
You have a triangle with side BC, so try to construct a congruent triangle with side AD
This?
mhm
But how do I use that
did you fill in all of the angles that you possibly can
Hmmm
Idk man I don't see anything
I'm trying hard
But
I just don't see anything
It's just 70
ADB is 70 as the questions says
Note that we constructed congruent (aka identical triangles)
this means that the corresponding angles in these triangles are all the same
AED 160?
mhm
mhm
Sooo...
so $\angle ADE+\angle BDE=\angle ADB$
Civil Service Pigeon
60?
mhm
Okay how do I use that 60
Hmm
Ahhhh I'm so god damn dumb man
What do I do
With 60
No clue
try making another construction
$\triangle EBD$ is equilateral, yes.
Civil Service Pigeon
$\angle EBD=60^{\circ}$, not $\angle ABD$.
Civil Service Pigeon
go back to angle chasing
||look at the angles around E||
Should I use the 160 degrees?
yeah that would be relevant
I'm referring to these three angles
literally the angles with vertex E
mhm
So then what?
Well
I would need to find out
Only ABD
EBD is 60 and we need to add something to ABD
To find x
but you drew BE
alright nvm
angle chase the remaining two triangles
EBD and AEB
For AEB I gotta use 140 right?
yes
140+x+EB=180?
Civil Service Pigeon
sure
Man
EAB is x-10
ššš
I should just start over the whole topic
Angle chasing is killing me
Do you know a place I could learn this type of stuff?
sum of angles in a triangle...
It's 180
eh there's just a few things you need to know (for this question at least):
- Angles in a triangle add to 180 degrees
- Angles around a point add to 360 degrees
- Angles opposite congruent sides in a triangle are also congruent
The rest is having problem solving skills
now use that on triangle ABE
$\angle EAB=(x-10)^{\circ}$, $\angle AEB=140^{\circ}$, $\angle ABE=\dots$ add to $180^{\circ}$
Civil Service Pigeon
x-10+140+y?
note that AE=EB.
yes
š
good job
Thank you bro
How do you notate whether you're referring to the convex or concave part of an angle?
Outer/inner angle
i think the notation -60 degree means that 60 degree is the outer angle
cause u generally measure angle from positive x axis
anti clockwise
could be talking about in case with triangles and stuff
where there isnt a clear coordinate plane
could just use greek alphabet
i mean u can assume any axis to be x or y
as far as i understand genearlly i use -ve sign to show its the outer angle
like angle ABC -160* means that its the outer angle
not really sure if thats the correct way to denote it
yeah but like
lets assume you'd have a triangle
you would have a side of a triangle
would u use that side as your x axis?
ye i understood what u mean
that approach wont make sense there
i mean for a triangle if any angle is greater then 180 then its obvious that its the outer
are we talking about supplementary angles?
or like
idk lol
u could have
theta
and then denote the outer angle as theta'
...since when lmao
I mean my teachers and me generally use that
also it makes more sense i would say
mainly in phy
even math.stackexchange says this
its not standard
but generally used
I have never seen this notation, neither in my country, nor in many other geometry exercises here in this server š¤·āāļø
whats a good way to remember the 30-60-90 triangle
derive it yourself
by bisecting an equilateral triangle with side length 2
and applying pythagoras
you're more likely to remember if you go through the process of where the values come from
and in the event that you do forget, you'll know how to obtain them again
alr
wdym by sidelength 2
do you mean the bottom or the diagonal
i mean the sides
of the triangle
each side of an equilateral triangle has the same length
set them as 2 for convenience
do you know that angle AEB is pi/7...?
actually, hold on.
what exactly is x? is it the distance from any corner to the center of the coin? then how do you know AB = x * 2pi/7?
x is the equidistant point of all vertices
I thought I was allowed because it's almost like it was an regular polygon with 7 sides
Also I just noticed it was supposed to say segment ab
what i did is divide 2pi by the number of sides, that should give me the angle of each side, i then just use arc length formula
yeah but that isnt gonna be the center of arc AB then
if you wanted to say arc AB = x * 2pi/7 then the arc would need to be centered on the center of the coin. but it is not
I subtracted the area of the isosceles triangles from the whole sector
Help me solve this question (Q from JEE main sample)
Angle chasing yields that the chord subtends a right angle. Further hint: ||distance from the centre to this chord||.
Ok fine I check
Ye, that's exactly how the mark scheme has done it
Idk why I didn't think of it š
what is mark scheme
na bro, u inspired me, u did the major part
Who will solve this tricky one ??
Use concept, length of focal chord= 4a cosec²ø
[cos(pi+j)] in the form of [a+bj]
?
this is unrelated
Correct
[
\sin \theta = \frac{3}{5}, \quad 0^\circ < \theta < 90^\circ
]
[
\text{Find the exact value of } \cos \theta.
]
wonhaukau
help
3/5 of 90 is 67
3 4 5 triangle
oh
so cos is 4/5
big brain
[
\cos \theta = \frac{5}{13}, \quad 0^\circ < \theta < 90^\circ
]
[
\text{Find the exact value of } \sin \theta.
]
wonhaukau
how should i learn it
whatās that
i know but iām lazy
š
like i donāt wanna do sqrt of anything negative anything
i already know pyth
as u call it
you wont get negative
practice it bro youll need it
[
\tan \theta = -1
]
[
\text{Find all values of } \theta \text{ for } 0^\circ \le \theta < 360^\circ.
]
[
\text{In a right-angled triangle, } \tan \theta = \frac{5}{12}
]
[
\text{Find the value of } \theta \text{ to the nearest degree.}
]
wonhaukau
Okay, I found a list of trigonometric identities, and I can almost reliably find the first solution now.
... so how do I get the second solution? I know 180 + -56.44 is 123.56, but I don't know if A is the second solution.
is there a way to actually solve tan(theta) = 5/12 w/o calculator
Recall that
$$\sin x=y \implies x=\arcsin(y)+2n\pi, (\pi-\arcsin y)+2n\pi$$
where $n$ is an integer. This can be justified by considering the unit circle and periodicity.
Civil Service Pigeon
Exact form in terms of $\arctan(5/12)$. The calculator is just giving you a decimal \textit{approximation} (read: not exact form) of this. If you wanted to approximate by hand, you theoretically could use something like the series expansion
$$\tan x=x+\frac{1}{3} x^3+\frac{2}{15} x^5+\dots$$
and use enough terms to get a sufficiently accurate answer. (Use something like the Lagrange error bound to determine how many terms you need.) This is what the calculator is doing under the hood anyway.
Civil Service Pigeon
oh ok

thats gonna be a really long process
ooh maclaurin series
for tanx i never bothered š
How do i make one of these
latex
emiya
hey all,
would anyone please be able to prove that the angle at the centre of this image is 2x
the proofs usually go like this but i dont see how to apply it to the first diagram
thank you !! yep all makes sense !
š erm actually so i understand the examples on khan academy but im trying to apply it to the question i shared and idk its not working š
those cases should be exhaustive
is this not just case C
i believed it was im still trying to make it make sense...i will look at it for a few more mins
yes it is c ... i understand it now š thank you š
Thank you so much! I finally figured out how to use this!
I finally got a question right, and not by pattern-guessing the answers.
"In circle P there exists a quadrilateral that has all 4 vertices on the circle, and each angle is also an inscribed angle. Prove that any two opposite inscribed angles must sum to 180 degrees." Is this a correct way to frame a question for a proof that I'm trying to do? I'm trying to generalize that for any quadrilateral that has all 4 of its vertices on a circle that the opposite angles inside of it sum to 180 degrees.
I'm aware that there already exists a proof for this, but at the end of this video I'm watching the instructor encourages to try and generalize this for any case; when the angles aren't given.
||well, we can draw diagonals for any inscribed quadrilateral making 8 angles, and arrange them into the form 2(angle1+angle2+angle3+angle4) using the fact that angles that intercept the same arc are equivalent. Then, it's easy from there||
Sorry, to reiterate: I'm just wondering if my question is correctly said for what I'm trying to do "In circle P there exists a quadrilateral that has all 4 vertices on the circle, and each angle is also an inscribed angle. Prove that any two opposite inscribed angles must sum to 180 degrees." I don't want to get spoiled the steps.
oh, i see š . well, ur question is mathematically sound, but u could just say "proof of cyclic quadrilateral theorem", as that's the name for it.
Thank you very much!!
Is this working out and conclusion all correct?
why is the volume of a sphere (4/3)pir³
id assume it has something to do with its surface area being 4pir² but uh
why specifically
hello+
what a good server
I just want to know, Im doing mathcounts soon is there any important formulas that i need to know?
@everyone
Can I say that the cyclic quadrilateral theorem holds because x and y add up to 360 degrees and so half of them must add up to 180 degrees?
that works, nice!
Tysm!!!!!! ā¤ļø
Desperately need help understanding this
can you show what the dropdown gives you as options
the sine is an odd function, using that fact you should be able to find which of those options equals -3 sin (-2x), try for a bit if you fail to get it come back here
The hell does it mean to have a negative angle
Is it impressive that I solved this in my head?
yes!
Thanks! Iāve done a lot of practice, so I remember what to use and when for what Iām trying to solve at a given portion of the problem, and itās a bit tedious for me to use a calculator other than when itās difficult otherwise or time consuming so I try hard to rely on my brain, and I happened to get to the solution for this specific problem before I needed to use any calculator! 
math is so fun when you start to understand and do things in your brain 
Yayyyyy
@long geyser excellent emoji right there
in the react to k's message
Yayyyy ty 
i agree!

Tuff schedule for sophomore year?
Hardest class is phys ed right there
Fr
my russian 4d theory. ts terrible
can you please explain how you solved it? Im trying to but cant yet
Of course, this is how I solved it step by step:
The problem was on Khan Academy https://www.khanacademy.org/math/geometry/hs-geo-circles/hs-geo-inscribed-shapes/a/challenge-problems-inscribed-shapes
The explanation is on the website too.
The images are from Khan Academy.
This can seem quite daunting to try to do every step at once, but when you do it step by step it becomes way simpler. First you are given a diagram/figure with information about it, and you're trying to find the length of a major arc in the circle. From there you can see that the inscribed angle that intercepts arc BCD is BAD, so if you know the measure of it then you can double that measure to get the angle of the arc that it intercepts because of the angle at the center theorem. Knowing the arc measure of its angle lets you solve for known proportions of the circle which will let you find the length of the arc that you're trying to solve for, which completes the solution to the problem. You also have to know algebra and geometry terminology, if you'd like I'd love to explain some more if that interests you.
How do I do this?
angle 3 = angle 4 (By CPCT)
So AB = AC
As Angle 1 = Angle 2
So AD = AE
Now in AB = AC
Divide by AD
AB/AD = AE/AD
As AD = AE, we can write it as
AB/AD = AC/AE
By Converse of Basic Proportionality Theorem
DE is Parallel to BC
So Angle 1 = Angle 3 and Angle 2 = Angle 4
By Angle Angle Similarity,
Triangle ADE is Similar to Triangle ABC
@tough token
Hope this helps!
no idea

