#geometry-and-trigonometry
1 messages · Page 119 of 1
Is this right so far?
No no wait.
Hmmm
Do I put the 1200²+1700² on the left?
Or?
Dawg I straight up FORGOT ABOUT 52
Yeah this shit is what happens when you study trigonometry for 5 hours
The other day I was actually cooked
Ahhh riiiight!
I know Sal puts the degree mode on too
Damnnn
I simply do an arccos and it just gives the degree anyway
Shouldn't it be - though?
Did I get it right?
thats not what i got
1348.369823
Damn I made a mistake then.
i had a plus lol
When we have 2 sides in cos
Law
Do we just subtract that from the unknown side?
Like
well if you have c then its just square root but if its a or b than you minus the (a^2) and munis the c^2 and then multiply everyhing by -1
c²=1200²+1700²-2*1200*1700 cos(52)
Yeah I know about the multiplication by -1.
It always gives a negative for these anyway.
Would c²-1200²-1700² work?
No?
Ahhh wait.
If we knew about c it would work.
But we're finding the c here.
Okay okay, soooo...
Is the answer 1348 then...?

I don't wanna make a mistake here...this is the bonus question
well your solving for c
Yea
,w sqrt(1200²+1700²-212001700 *cos(52degrees))
got the same thing
Yupppp
thats alot of decimals
You gotta teach me how to do these calculations with the bot man 😭
😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭
Is there a guide?
Its just ,w bla bla
No I mean
Seeing the answer visually like this?
Ohhhh wait
Right right I'm slow
,w
Alright.
what happened to my pie 😢
What in the world is that symbol 😭🙏
Integrals are soon for me btw
I'm doing precalculus
,w int _0 ^R 2pirdr
This is the third trigonometry section on Khan academy
The integral symbol, I'm really curious what integrals do. (Don't spoil, I want to be surprised)
I'm treating math as a show lol
Right now I'm barely in Season 1
The world of math is a vast ocean
And I know a raindrop rn
Its a snake
Probably not
Dangit
Alright gang I'm gonna stop studying now my head legit hurts
And I've been holding the bathroom for 30 minutes trying to solve these questions
(And succeeding!)
Although my worst nightmare is back
Sinusoidal equations...
I was awake until 3-4 am trying to solve that.
Let's see if this time things will be different with my formidable foe...

But everything aside WOW I am having FUN MAN!
5 videos back to back...am I cooked tomorrow?
Lol
yoooo
wait they spelled sign wrong
Wdym
What's the correct one?
Soo can toa
nope
"sine" and "sign" are different words meaning different things
No need to ask “Can I ask…?” or “Does anyone know about…?”—it’s faster for everyone if you just ask your question!
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
What is T_<5,2> read as?
a Transformation that transforms an object by 5 pts of abscissa and 2pts of ordinate
Thanks
chat im dogwater at trigno metry
can any1 tell me some book or vids to absolutey master this
Damn I couldn't find them.
Can someone remind me how to find the intervals?
Google gives nothing.
Ahhh it's -1 and 1.
Right right.
Huh? The video now says it's -pi/2, 0...bruh.
Which one is right?
God damn it
I chose B but it was false
I eliminated 2 other options
Oh WOW...I'm DUMB. I literally
Wow
Nevermind.
Ok I managed to finish it.
4/4
I got no clue how to solve these...
Help 🙏
I'm absolutely gonna need pen and paper for this.
Ping me
I really don't understand this^
.
The video didn't have this range
I just don't get these ranges in general.
Wait
I googled it wrong I think
Let me check again
Ohhhh.
Yeahhhh now I understand slightly more!!
Okayyy I get this now.
I just rewatched everything, let me think of a way to solve this...
cos(12x+2πn)=-1
cos(-12x+2πn)=-1
How do I continue from here?
(12x+2πn)=arccos(-1)?
Hmmmmm.
Arccos(-1)=180°...
Soooo...
180/12
15°-360°
Is one answer?
Damn it's not in the answers list
Rip
Oh wait.
360/12.
Ahhh.
God dang it it was false
For a second I had a lot of hope I got it right
Oh wow
I'm DUMB
I did get it right
But chose the wrong answer
😭😭😭
And arc cos range is 0, 180°
But wait.
Why was option D incorrect?
I'm gonna stop here and wait for someone to reply to this I suppose.
cos(12x) = -1 means
12x = 180 + 360n degrees.
Divide by 12 both sides to get your answer
Why no cos(-12x) as well?
I actually did get that answer yeah.
You can do that, on which case you would get
x = -15 - 30n degrees, but shifting n to -(n+1) gives you the original answer anyway. They're the same thing
Huh
Sorry n to -(n+1)
So
Try substituting -(n+1) into n in the x = -15 -30n. Don't you get x = 15 + 30n? I suggest to do this with pen
Right after I leave my room to take a break 😭
Why +1?
You'll see when you carry out the calculations. Another way to think about this is that cos(-12x) =cos(12x) anyway, so nothing changes
OH
OHHHH
now I get it.
Even if I got -12x it'd be the same?
Yeah
👍
👍
22/7 or 3.14
Or (2√2/9801) summation from n =0 to ∞ ( (4n)! (1103+26390n)/ (n!)⁴(369)^4n
Or its mainly ratio of circumference to the diameter
It's 1/pi in Ramanujan's series
3.1415926535.......
wrong.
3.14159265358979323846264338327950288419716939937510...
OH CMON
YOU CANT SAY WRONG THEN JUST EXTEND FROM WHERE I LEFT OFF
😭
engineering ending: 3
Both of you are wrong
Clearly π = π
@real mango part a or b
b
can't we just say that it's impossible because area can't change after reassembling 
there is a difference of 1 sq unit in the 2 areas
-# I did look up on google why it said to use part a and it was the same thing area difference of 1 unit but twisted as in above picture. It was to teach something but there could be better way to teach you this 
is this correct
yeah that should be fine 
and for a
those first two are APPROXIMATIONS, it must be stressed
open a help channel and ping me, I can help with that
guys if i want to count the shape in a figure how to do it? and that too the figure is of rectangle which has 2 diagonal lines nd we have to count the traingles
is there any trick or formula?
can you rephrase the question
and/or provide an image
its hard to understand what you mean
yes there are formulas
let me send you link wait
https://youtu.be/ntMWGoYiO28?si=m4faSlIkkrQSRs87 @edgy karma
Count Triangles in 3 Seconds | Fastest Trick for Counting Figures | Square Root in 3 seconds - Crazy Math Trick | Math Olympiad | Harvard University Entrance Exam Interview | This question frightened 300K+ examinees! | Hard Geometry Exam Question | Only 1% of Students Got this Math Question Correct | 3 Seconds Trick Number System (SSC CGL, CHSL,...
i can't thank you enough buddy thank you so much it has the foundation idea of how to solve it and i helped me a lot thanks i finally got the answer of the question i was trying from last 2 days
Guys I’m genuinely confused. Am I misunderstanding something here? (This is a question in the textbook I’m given)
Ja
rearrange to solve for cos(C)
ok so with this formula
your a, b, c are your sides
Mhm
and your A, B, C are your angles
in the question you are given the 3 sides a, b, c, which are 12, 6 and 8
and its asking you to find angle A (opposite to side a)
so when i say rearrange, you want to add/subtract and multiply/divide things by both sides to isolate A
so your formula is a^2 = b^2 + c^2 -2bcCos(A)
so subtract b^2 and c^2 from both sides
so now you have a^2 - b^2 -c^2 = -2bcCos(A)
now divide both sides by -2bc
so you have (b^2 + c^2 -a^2) / 2bc = Cos(A)
now take the inverse Cos of both sides to get
Cos^-1 ( (b^2 + c^2 -a^2) / (2bc) ) = A
and plug in all the values for a, b and c
put it in your calc and you will get your angle A
My brain is exploding hold on
haha all good take ur time
Huuuu
This is what I’m getting at
How does ‘a’ turn from positive to negative in the third equation thingy
Aaaaaa
ohhh ok
its because we divided by -2bc
so the negative flips the sign of all of them
notice how b^2 and c^2 become +ve and a^2 becomes -ve
and another thing
the cos^-1 surrounds the whole fraction
wdym
your goal is to solve for A (the angle)
so you move all the sides (a b and c) to the other side of the equation
The second equation thing, the a^2 is next to the -b, then as a fraction it’s next to the c^2
well 5 + 3 is the same as 3 + 5
all that changed was that, since we divided by -2ab (notice the negative), the signs of b^2, c^2, and a^2 all flip
so instead of it being -b^2 -c^2 and +a^2
its now so instead of it being +b^2 +c^2 and -a^2
( A = cos^{-1}( \frac{b^2+c^2-a^2}{2bc}) )
WesStreet99
this is your final formula
i can show you how i got it very slow and step by step if it still isnt clicking
Hold on lemme put it in my calculator
ok
I wish I could email my math teacher but it’s summer holidays fahhh
its ok let me type smth out
( a^2 = b^2 + c^2 -2bccos(A) )
( a^2 - b^2 - c^2 = -2bccos(A) )
( \frac{a^2 - b^2 - c^2}{-2bc} = cos(A) )
( \frac{-(a^2 - b^2 - c^2)}{2bc} = cos(A) )
( \frac{-a^2 + b^2 + c^2}{2bc} = cos(A) )
( cos^{-1}( \frac{b^2 + c^2 -a^2}{2bc}) = A )
WesStreet99
there
HUH okay give me a sec
read it line by line
the top is the original formula you have to youse
use
and you rearrange to solve for the angle A
your problem here is that you dont square the b and c in the denominator
its just b and c
Oh yeah I didn't see that thanks
OH OKAY YEAH I GOT THE ANSWER
But i still need this whole thing like verbally explained
I get it
But I don't get it
ok im glad u got it
basically im sure you teacher gave you the cosine rule formula
which is typically expressed as ( c^2 = a^2 + b^2 -2abcos(C) )
WesStreet99
Bc for the previous questions when solving for A, I just swapped the c parts for the a parts and it gave me the correct answer
Either that or sometimes the textbook is wrong
i have no idea how that calculator works
is it because there is an n in front of the Solve?
wtffff ive never used a calculator like that before
so ur telling me u usually dont have to isolate the A?
No
With b and d, I was able to just use nsolve
This is my older brother's old calculator he got in 2019. He put bloody pokemon emerald on it
so r u telling me you never rearrange equations
because your calculator can solve stuff anyway
even if it isnt in the form x = blah blah blah
Yes unless if the teacher says to do so before the calculation
damnnnn
ye well idk why the calc said no solution
but like at least it worked when u rearranged ig
Lwk I need a verbal explanation as why everything is what it is
like how the formula works
Yes and the whole rearranging thing, like why is it the way it is
I get some of it but not all of it
its just a regular algebraic manipulation
just like how if you have x + 5 = 14
you subtract 5 on both sides
to get x = 9
your trying to solve for x
in the case of the cosine rule
you trying to solve for the unknown angle 'A'
so put all the other values on the other side of the equation to isolate angle A
then u can put in the numbers and it comes out to A = 117.8
So we're trying to remove the A from the cosine part
well thats the last step yes
but the full thing is your trying to get A on the LHS and all the other stuff on the RHS
so you begin by subtracting b^2 and c^2 from both sides
then dividing by -2bc on both sides
then taking the inverse cosine of both sides
so A is left by itself
I hate how I'm unable to understand this
Bc I learn best visually, step by step, and verbally 😭
yeah i understand
but its no different to x +5 = 14
like if i had 4x -22 = 2x
how would u do this
( 4x - 22 = 2x ) solve for x
WesStreet99
nice and big writing for u
yeah sure
so the question asks us to solve for x
the strategy to solve linear algebraic equations like this (linear meaning the unkown variable x has a degree of 1. not x^2 or x^5, only x) is to move the letters (variables) to the LHS and the numbers to the RHS
so we have 4x - 22 = 2x
lets move the letters to the left side
there is a 2x on the right so we need to move that
how can we do this?
we can subtract by 2x from both sides
what u do two one side YOU MUST DO TO THE OTHER
that keeps the LHS and RHS equal
so we subtract 2x from both sides so we have 4x - 22 - 2x = 2x -2x
now we can combine like terms
4x - 2x is 2x
and 2x - 2x is 0 of course
so now we have 2x - 22 = 0
now lets move the numbers to the right
add 22 on both sides
2x -22 + 22 = 0 +22
so 2x = 22
now we divide by 2 both sides to get x by itself
so x = 11
does that make sense?
we use inverse operations to manipulate the equation to get x on one side, and the number on the other side
Girl hold on, I'll read and process this in like 30 min. I need to shower

Yep
I think I’m remembering
I think I get it
okok good
its the same thing with cosine rule
or we're doing is manipulating the equation
to solve for A
Guys i need help, i know this term in my native language but not in English
Mind sharing a diagram? I did not understand reflection of BC or I don't know the term maybe then
What don't you understand about the reflection?
Like reflection of the side?
Of the line, yeah
Then I don't know it
Maybe i worded that badly
what's your native lunguge?
Given ∆ABC. The points E on AC, F on AB. ∠AEF=∠ABC then EF is called the...
Vietnamese
Basically it's a line parallel to the tangent at A of (ABC)
sry not mine , but you can translate the term by ggl translater
and am not that edvansed in math to understand whay your talking about
Well i tried, it sucked
that's Thale's
nah wait
That's the first thing i did
And it said that's not a term
Like wtf
you mean this?
I found the term
send it
Antiparallel
oh
By looking at wiki pages
You know it?
i don't now how to help sry bud
no
good for you
The term i was looking for is antiparallel
alr have a good day mate
Rookie/Dumb question: Can you do trigonometry without a calculator?
ofc
depends
you can but calculations will be limited
#geometry-and-trigonometry message
Can anyone guide me on how to solve the first part using Dumpty point? I saw that T is the A-Dumpty of ∆AEF but couldn't prove it
Man, where did you get those questions?
you cite pythagorean theorem, but that only applies to right triangles. how do you know they're right?
Omg
I thought that applied to every triangle, I forgot
Is it clear from the image that it's 90 degrees? Or do I not have enough information?
no, you should only assume an angle is right if it is marked as such
Ty!
I'm gonna play the video and see what he did, I don't know how to move forward.
Tysm for checking it! 🫶
You may find it a good exercise to try to generalise the pythagorean theorem to non-right triangles (as in the cosine rule)
if you cannot do basic trigonometry values without a calculator, you cant do trigonometry
like
but trig in general
calculator is recommended
memorise some values tho
if someone is determined enough i believe they should be able to get approx values through sine series and coscie series iirc
How does calculator solve trigonometry? Like what if I have to solve for tan(0.028rad), how'd I do it?
gng i was having a lot of issues with when to add / subtract pi in inverse trigno metric functions
can any1 recommend somethin
understand the unit circle
reference angles, supplementary identities
periodic properties
should be plenty of resources online
you should claim a help channel if you get stuck on a specific question
Does anyone know the geogebra app
If so, chat why isn't my circle thing closing
There's sum wrong with my sequences
if only your screenshot showed what your sequences even are lmfao
cause rn it doesnt
do you have a laptop you could do this on, instead of a phone screen?
I was planning on showing them if someone that knew geogebra appeared
Unfortunately no but I'll try to screenshot it
Or just send it here
Can you open it?
😭😭
How about now
hm ok now i can open it but can't seem to figure out the issue
I would expect it to be closed but there's that gap for some reason. It's okay if you can't figure out, thank you for trying
I don't wanna just connect with segments cuz the professor will see it
I'll send an example he showed us
Are you crocheting with math?
Atp idk what bro wants us to do ✊
The subject is called geometrical representations
Usually in problems where variables are triangle side lengths, the Ravi subsitution can be used. What about with quadrilateral side lengths, are there any similar subsitutions?
My bro, I really wish I could understand you rn
I barely knew what I was doing when making this
I think I'll just let it be, even if it's not closed
I have no clue how to close it
That wasn't directed to you, i was asking my own question
Alr alr
hello can someone like help me with geometry im failing and i like cannot understand proofs at all
show specific questions you're stuck on
for uninterrupted help its recommended you claim your own channel #❓how-to-get-help @echo storm
In terms of this picture i think its a good way to start from proving that JHI is an orthotriangle of LMG or AJ is an external angle bisector of HJI
.
Uhmm... I'll send a picture with the original points
Well that's basically proving AJ ⊥ JG (or in the original problem: AT ⊥ AD)
If that could be proven then T is the A-Dumpty point of ∆AEF. Note that D is the circumcenter of (AEF)
I got 2 solutions for the first part of this problem btw (1 by calling a few more points and using similar triangles to angle chase, and 1 by complex coordinates), i just wanted to use the Dumpty point
I got solution by inversion in G
Can u share complex solution?
Let o=0, a=1 => e=2b-1, f=2c-1. Let X,Y be the reflection of T through AB, AC then x=1+b-bt̅, y=1+c-ct̅.
We also have EX//AM//FY so (x-e)/(m-a) and (y-f)/(m-a) ∈ ℝ
=> (2-b-bt̅)/(m-1)=(2-b̅-b̅t)/(m̅-1), (2-c-ct̅)/(m-1)=(2-c̅-c̅t)/(m̅-1)
=> (c(2-b-bt̅)-b(2-c-ct̅))/(m-1)=(c(2-b̅-b̅t)-b(2-c̅-c̅t))/(m̅-1)
Some simple calculations give t= -m(m̅-1)/m̅ (m̅-1)
=> |t|=1 => T ∈ (O)
I'm terrible at inversion, ugh
Radius GA ?
GP*GA
if sinA+cosA = sqrt(2). Prove that tanA+cotA = 2.
This just feels right but i literally cant prove it
do i multiply both sides by something or what
if i uhh square both sides. You get 1+2sinAcosA = 2
Express tanA + cotA in sin and cos
sinA/cosA + cosA/sinA
-> sin^2(A)+cos^2(A)/cosAsinA
-> 1/sinAcosA
oh oh wait
sin A + cos A = sqrt2 sin(A + pi/4)
There's a way without this but that's easier if you know
This too
i do NOT wanna mess with radians yet
Well, you should though
You can't learn trig and choose not to learn about radians
theres not a single question on radians in my book. For trigonometry that is
yet 😭
all i know till know is how to convert radians to deg
Man i'm starting to like inversion
I know there are some people obsessed with inversion out there and I wish to be one of them
I'm not fan of it but its very useful in some moments, additionally if u use inversion and symmetry
Is anything going wrong, i am a bit stuck here
The problem i sent has a different solution using inversion too btw
Around A, "ratio" AB.AC (idk the word in English)
Like sqrt(AB*AC)? Its logical due to inversion+symmetry translate isogonal lines such as median and symmedian
Eh... It's the inversion around A that turns (O) into BC
Any inversion in A turn O into BC
What identies do you know about trig functions and squares
Personally I would manipulate that fraction a little bit before I plug anything in
(but you could also just continue from what you have once you work out how sin and cos are related)
am I correct?
yeah that works
😀
im using khan academy to prem myself for trig within 4 weeks, should i use something else or am i taking the right path?
sin(x) = opposite/hypotenuse
from that, sin(x) * hypotenuse = opposite
let me name the sides of your triangle rq
sin(a) = xy/xz
cos(b)= xz/1
so sin(a) * cos(b) = xy/xz * xz which is xy which is... that
what do you mean "assume"?
you cant assume. you can only conclude it from given information (unless its already given...)
if we knew that xz and xk are cos(b) and sin(b) then from pytha's, we can conclude that the hypotenuse^2 = sin(b)^2 + cos(b)^2
which is = 1.
im trying to derive trig sum and differences from scratch using the idea that the sum of 2 angles can be illustrated as drawing an initial angle, and then another angle ontop of it. so would the initial triangle, A have the hypotenuse 1?
can I see what you started with?
like the first two triangles you drew
and then you went on and assumed the hypotenuse of the triangle with angle B = 1
did you... assume that?
I haven't tried proving the trig angle difference/addition
so I dont know.
but yeah you practically dont assume that a right triangle has a hypotenuse of 1...
but if you're tryna build smth up from there
then again, I never tried this before.
perhaps wait until another person sees this.
best of wishes.
okok thanks for ur time and patience!
does anyone have a sheet which I can use to remember n practice trig identities
Check the pinned messages on this channel
hey anyone here can help me p with this question
i mean i cant even think an approach
thats what i am asking
so you are clueless?
no idea how to start
was this in a test?
@jovial forge
what is the value of bc?
yes its a sample que
the value BC is given
14
yes
what is the incircle property?
i used tanget theorems
and this question will be solved with some topics which is not in our syllabus but its in sample paper so ig i need to do this
i wanted like question sheets
if u have
Well I do, but it isn't in English, have you tried find one on google?
What is intercept theorem of quadrilaterals
Nice
I figured it out
can anyone give me a hint on how to make an approach for this problem
1+1 = 2
I would start by making a rough sketch
what do u mean
1+1 = 2
Don't troll.
Man ita easy
I have that on my textbook
Make the first eqn by the area of traingle in terms of 1/2 ×bh and make the second as the area of triangle which was like sqrt[(s-a)(s-b] .... i forgot the formulae name. And since there is only one variable (due to tangent theroem) you can solve it
Yeah that formula is √{s(s-a)(s-b)(s-c) where s is the half perimeter of the triangle and a b c are it's sides

It's called heron's formula aka brahmagupta's formula
Ohh
Use the property of auxiliary circle and write the coordinates in paramentric form
I will send you how
since the unit circle's radius is just 1 that means you can always find what y is based on what x is usibg pythagorean theorem
since itd just be x²+y²=1
you can't use $\frac{1}{2}bh$ because h is not given
Flax.
you can create the circles radius by construction
and take it as h
wdym create the circle's radius? the inradius is given to be 4cm you have to use A = rs
join BO,OE,OF and try to do it
sorry i mean OB,OD,OC,OE,OA,OF
do you want me to do it? If you are having real trouble doing it
brahmagupta's formula is for cyclic quadrilaterals, heron's formula is just a special case.
ohh you mean using pythagorean theorem to find BO, AO and CO, I didn't get that b4
eitherway point O does not lie on AD or BE or CF
The points D, E and F are touchpoints of the incircle inside of the triangle. Point D can therefore be denoted as $T_A$ because it's opposite to the vertex A, and Point E will be $T_B$ and Point F will be $T_C$. Therefore the lines $\overline{AD}$, $\overline{BE}$ and $\overline{CF}$ become $\overline{AT_A}$, $\overline{BT_B}$ and $\overline{CT_C}$ and I define these lines to be "Gergonne Cevians" (not Gergonne Line). Gergonne Cevians can pretty much never be Altitudes if the triangle is non-equilateral.
yeah
Flax.
no not pythogoras, maybe you can but that wasnt my way
i will just do it and send you nvm
am too lazy to type
Can anyone tell me the shortest formula to find prime numbers?
just square sinA+cosA, you will get
(sinA+cosA)² = (√2)²
sin²(A)+cos²(A)+2sinAcosA= 2
{we know sin²(A)+cos²(A)=1}
So, 1+2sinAcosA=2
2sinAcosA=1
sin2A=1
sin2A=sin(π/2)
2A=(π/2)
A=(π/4)
tan(π/4)+cot(π/4)= 1+1=2 (Proved!)
All primes greater than 3 are in the form 6k (plus or minus) 1
So for example plug in 1 for k it’s either 7 or 5
If you plug in 2 it’s either 11 or 13
and so on
Does this help @steep mango
$6k \pm 1$
varq
yes
the texit bot renders latex
and also runs wolfram
amongst other things
yall help me
im getting so caught up on this easy ass question its only 2 marks i dont know what im missing
c)
you should be able to just equate coefficients, no?
(since a and c are non-parallel)
im overcomplicating things but its confusing me because i dont have 2 expressions for op
what
and c is stating that i should
don't you have one from part a and one from part b
rip
so then
you have OP = wavelength(a+1/2c) and weirdu(-a-c)
is it do with the c being half less in the second part?
i thought that symbol meant wavelength
anyway thats not important
just call them k and z
or something
how did you get $\overrightarrow{OP}=\mu(-\mathbf{a}-\mathbf{c})$?
Civil Service Pigeon
oh god mightve done too much math today
horrible mistakes
should have -a + c right?
read carefully
yeah...
What?
\begin{align*}
\overrightarrow{AC} &= -\mathbf{a}+\mathbf{c} \
\overrightarrow{AP} &= \mu(-\mathbf{a}+\mathbf{c}) \
\overrightarrow{OP} &= \overrightarrow{OA}+\overrightarrow{AP}
\end{align*}
Civil Service Pigeon
oh i forgot the second part holy crap
right i think i have it now..
how do i make one of them images?
sorry man i was trying to figure it out , i mean the math you are uploading
is it code into a discord bot or something?
texits the name
thanks i already got this figured out though
was worth the time i spent looking 
sorry, my brain isnt super in gear, is it like this ?
$$\overrightarrow{OP} = \lambda(a + \frac{1}{2}c)$$
$$\overrightarrow{OP} = \mu(-a + c) + a$$
danny ✭🌈
can it delete that
not really needed
sorry i meant, $\overrightarrow{OP} = \lambda(a + \frac{1}{2}c)$
$\overrightarrow{OP} = \mu(-a + c) + a$
right
.
this pmo
i dont need it to keep repasting what ive already wrote
how do i disable it for me
bot auto-activates whenever it sees latex
you can click the trash can emoji to delete it tho
until it times out
then you're just kinda stuck with it there
you can disable the latex auto detection if you want
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
1
How do I utilize the ratio of lengths here
The typesetting looks like a JEE problem
The only way I can think of is using trig
Forgive my bad handwriting
Hmm
I mean it's pretty obvious with unit circle
The only thing to worry about is computing cos(pi/12)
class 10 cbse ch cirlces
Ye exactly lol
You write like you're in 10th grade
m
Chill bro
As someone in 10th grade I can confirm that it’s good handwriting 👍🏾
Fr better than my shi ahh writing.
All the specific notations and arrows makes it look like he is a 10th grade CBSE student
I don’t know what cbse is but I agree
hey guys is this proof good
The calculation of D_qr is overkill
It's correct but there is a much simpler way to see it
And technically the should be an absolute value for the length of D_qr which goes away when you square it
For parallel lines?
Yes
If you have the two lines in y-intercept form, just compare their respective slopes and see if they are equal
If you don’t have their slopes, you can make the two equations for y equal to another
Jake
Then
$m_1x+b=m_2x+b$
Jake
If $x \nexists$ for $m_1x+b_1=m_2x+b_2$, then $m_1 = m_2 \land b_1 \neq b_2$
Koja Mori
@slim plinth
Yes
y need prove tho
State board
Basically in india when u give 10&12 exam
The paper are checked by government officials and exam is held at different different school across the city
Also permanent record is kept in case u lost ur result
Oh cool
yeh same in Pakitan too
Help
I got 3 right
Now I gotta solve this one.
10/10√3
I'm not sure with this one.
√3/3 right?
Now I find arctan of that.
In radians!
0.52.
Is that right?
Now...
Is that the right answer?
nope
Oh
you need the exact form
so as a fraction of pi, this is?
No I know I know I meant if the radian was right at least.
Ahhh. The question did indeed have a pi.
π/6?
yep!
yeah, so without thinking you just do (10 sqrt3)^2 + (10)^2 then sqrt
if you recognise the triangle though, the 1 - sqrt3 - 2 one
The arguement of this one is in the 3th quadrant since the angle is arctan(pi/6) so the principal argument is pi/6 - pi so you get
-5pi/6
you just scale that up by 10
so 10 - 10sqrt3 - 20
20 is the hypotenuse and that's r
Ohhhh
30 60 90?
yep!!
Yeah I did mention the third quadrant, almost forgot about that man
What grade math is this specifically I'm not asking for help but I do just want to know?
Thanks Elfie!
Why did we subtract pi?
That part I didn't get about tan honestly
okay, the period of tan is 180 degrees
if you think about tan t = (sin t)/(cos t)
= y/x by the unit circle definition
what this means is that tan represents the slope
The arguement in the 3rd quadrant is π + θ
Since the principal argument is between -pi and pi we can subtract 2π from 7π/6 or just write it as θ-π
30 degrees and 210 degrees have the exact same slope
it's just the arrows are pointing in opposite directions (from the origin)
so that's why you need to check the quadrants
Ohhhh
You go with a 210
Yeah you just remember the extreme values and add/subtract acxordingly
Similar to how trig equations are solved
the value of tan gives you the slope, but every slope has 2 equally valid angles
if that makes sense
Yeahh
Yes but principal arguement is between -180 and 180 so you subtract 360 from it
Wait let me understand this
it's not hard to draw it if you want to have a proper think
For tan?
draw 30 degree and 210 degree vectors
they make a straight line
same for any angles 180 degrees apart
Yeah I can visualize that!
For complex numbers
A number can have infinite arguements which is why we define the principal arguement between -180 and 180
Ohhh
Okay
So since that's 2π
But why did we subtract it 🙏
.
Wait so let me think
We found a π/6, but that's the first quadrant.
Adding/Subbing 2pi is basically doing a full rotation
i.e you have the same angle
Since 7pi/6 was greater than the 180 we subtracted 2pi to get it between -180 and 180
So we just go to the same angle
Which is 180 degrees apart
So we subtract π
Or nah
Hmmm
We take the +ve x axis as a 0 degree angle
Our theta was pi/6
But we need the theta to be in the third quadrant
So we start at the third quadrant(-ve x axis) which is an angle of pi and add a further pi/6 to it to get our required angle
Ehich is how we get 7pi/6
But 7pi/6 > pi
Generally we consider the principal arguement to be between -π and π
So to get the principal argument we rotate the angle by 360 backwards
i.e subtract 2π
OHHHHH
Texhnically in the question they said the angle can be between 0 and 2π so 7π/6 is actually correct
But the majority of complex numbers usually asks for the principal arguement
Yes
Okay
Its the equivalent angle of pi/6 in the third quadrant
Okay thank God I get it lol
Yeah
For example if you ever want to find where sinx is -1/2
We know sin is negative in the third quadrant
And sinx = 1/2 at pi/6
Wait let me see
Yeah
Another valid answer would be 2pi - pi/6
Which is the equivalent in the 4th quadrant
11pi/6
Wait I didn't get that
Or wait
Adding pi
Ohhh wait adding or subtracting 2pi is the same thing anyway
Yes
And to find the negative equivalent you can just add one pi
We use these logics in physics often in the form of phasar diagrams
Sounds exciting lol
Depends on the quadrant
For example for the seconr quadrant
You can either do π-θ or π/2 + θ
Yeppp
LET'S GOOOO
I spent 40 minutes getting one right btw before this
😭
And this is BASIC apparently
As far as complex numbers go yeah
Beautiful thing to study but it can get difficult
There's a portion of questions that require a lot of calculation
And later on it merges into conic sections and geometry
Damnnn that's awesome LOL
Yeah we're doing the triangle inequality stuff
Chat...we might be a little cooked.
I have GENUINELY no idea what the hell to do here.
I'm gonna rewatch the explanation then come back.
Nope. I don't get it. 🙏
Try putting it on polar form
Sqrt3 should remind you of 30-60-90 triangles
(or the hint literally lets you skip figuring out the polar form and skip straight to the value)
Hmmm.
Oh
2*(cos30)+i sin(30)?
Correct?
But we multiply that by 5
Polar form is this though no?
Where did I make a mistake?
Do you know what e^(ix) is?
Yes
You have mismatched parents so it's hard to tell what u meant lol
Oh wait
No it's just wrong
Your 2 needs to multiply the whole thing
Is that all?
Anyway from there you can convert to re^ix
Okay
Though so far I've only dealt with polar and rectangular how do I write it like that?
So let me write it again
2*((cos30)+i sin(30))?
Yes
Do it that way then
And the modulus is just multiplied normally
32*((cos150)+i(sin150))
This feels wrong tho
I feel like I'm missing something?
No?

