#geometry-and-trigonometry
1 messages · Page 110 of 1
It might be a trick question. 🙃 When nothing else is specified in ATC communications, a turn means a "standard rate turn", in which it takes 30 seconds to fly through a quarter-circle turn. A DC-9 needs to be going at least 100 knots to stay aloft, which means the radius of a standard rate turn is at least half a (nautical) mile. This is significant compared to the explicit figures of 3/4 and 1 miles in the problem, so assuming that the plane immediately starts flying in heading 138° is going to give wrong results.
Don't mind me, I'm just criticizing the problem author for imagining impossible situations.
Okay. Take a piece of graph paper and declare one of the grid points to be the airport.
wasnt you though, give the ai credit
And what I was complaining about is that a flying aircraft cannot just turn on a dime like that diagram pretends it does. In reality it would look more like this. But you don't have enough information to take that into account, since you don't even know how fast the plane is going.
(That mock-up looks vaguely like the turn radius doesn't influence the final bearing, but I think that's just an effect of my imperfect image sketching.)
for sure
we pointed at what you need to do my friend, read up on nautical bearing, make a drawing, do trig
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bearing_(navigation)
In navigation, bearing or azimuth is the horizontal angle between the direction of an object and north or another object. The angle value can be specified in various angular units, such as degrees, mils, or grad. More specifically:
Absolute bearing refers to the clockwise angle between the magnetic north (magnetic bearing) or true north (true ...
Is there a thread here that teaches geom and trigo from noob to pro
do you know what those terms (complementary, supplementary..) mean?
and do you still need help with that?
uhh mb I already got it figured out
okay
Someone here has try a beautiful joruney through meth Olympiad geometry?
Where do I go to find AoPS books?
Specifically AoPS: Intor to Geometry
and lets assume im "on a budget"
dm
@rotund drum i got 100% on my geometry test
dang congrats!
Thx
Problem statement: 2 perpendicular lines (L1 and L2) are drawn and point O is marked at the intersection of these 2 lines. 14 points are then marked on both of the two lines (excluding O). Any two consecutive points are separated by 1cm. For both lines, these 14 points are marked on the same side of O. These points are numbered 1,2,3,...,14 on both lines where 1 is assigned to the point closest to O on either line and so on. Now point 1 of L1 is joined to point 14 of L2; point 2 of L1 is joined to point 13 of L2 and so on. A curve is obtained, what is the equation of this curve? Take suitable axis to solve this problem.
We can take L1 and L2 as X and Y axis (WLOG). This will setup the coordinate system. Sketching out the curve, it looks beautiful. Feels as if it is a rectangular hyperbola. However, I'm not so sure about that.
hey, im tryna learn trig and i know the basics, can someone guide me on where to go after this?
This is what the curve looks like.
What have you learnt in the basics?
you should also learn the trig values of some important angles like 0,30,45,60,90 degrees after this
The basic ones like cos^2(x) + sin^2(x)=1
You can just use a calculator for that purpose.
oh
And derive this, for instance this trigonometric identity can be derived through Phythagoras theorem.
where i live calculators arent allowed in exams and stuff so i think we're expected to memorise it
should i learn this-
Oh well, memorize them in that case.
Yes, that is basically counts as a algebraic proof.
If you remember sin and cos for a certain angle, you can compute tan by sin/cos
So, you might as well avoid learning the tan ratios. (In case you're not comfortable with memorizing)
,tex .rocket trig
I will recommend learning sin then reverse the order and you get cos then divide sin and cos values to get tan. Learning sin is must, learning tan after sin is very useful as derivating takes time, learning cos is very optional, you can find cos of any term in mind by thinking of opposite sin value in no time
A trick for sin values, they follow a pattern: √0/2, √1/2, √2/2, √3/2, √4/2
Huh. I vividly remember drawing such diagrams back in grade school, before we had the knowledge to do anything with them other than "look, that's a pretty curve". :-)
I don't think it's a rectangular hyperbola, actually -- it reaches the axes at (0,15) and (15,0), and if you continue the pattern with negative coordinates for one of the points, the curve continues inwards in the first quadrant. My immediate guess would be that it's a parabola with its axis pointing 45° upwards.
i dont see any way you could do it without calculus actually
Can we rigorously prove that its a parabola?
How will we do that?
gimme a minute
like uh we can write the general equation of the tangent as x/t + y/(15-t) = 1
so we get slope of the curve in terms of a random variable t
Yes
lemme see if and how we can eliminate it
So far it's just a gut feeling.
An approach could be to assume it's a parabola and figure out a parametric equation for it, something like t -> (3.75-t, 3.75+t) + at²(1,1), with the constant a chosen such that the curve goes through (15,0) and (0,15) at t = ±7.5.
Then (using calculus) compute the tangent to the parabola at an arbitrary t, find its two axis intercepts and if we're lucky they might turn out to sum to 15.
Can we use (15,0) as 14 points are marked in the original problem?
Or perhaps start by choosing a different scale such that the curve touches the axes at (4,0) and (0,4) instead -- then the symmetry center at the midpoint between (2,0) and (0,2) will have nice coordinates at (1,1).
i mean uh there is a way? solve this for t in terms of x and y and put that in dy/dx = -(15-t)/t i dont think the eqn would end up pretty though
I'm imagining continuing the already given pattern with lines between (0,0) and (15,0, and between (0,15) and (0,0).
Alright.
In general we have lines between (s,0) and (0,15-s) for s = 1,2,3,...,14 but the pattern really ought to continue if we pick arbitrary s, including 0 and 15.
And I'm hoping those lines will all turn out to be tangents to the parabola I'm betting on.
i dunno doesnt look parabola-ey to me
,w graph y = x^2/10
I think it should be a parabola
well only way to know for sure is solve the diff eqn
Here's what I did:
Equation of tangents can be written as : x/t +y/(15-t)=1. Now let us assume some point (h,k) on the curve so h/t + k/(15-t)=1
Simplifying gives a quadratic in t and its roots should be equal! Because, for (h,k), there should be only one tangent?
,w graph y=x^2/10 and (y-sqrt(2))^2-x^2 = 1
Does this work?
could be either tbh
Consider this, fitted by eye
damn looks identical so i guess thats correct
This is what I got
not a parabola that i can say lol
but should be correct
Hmm, looks wrong to me that it doesn't seem to be symmetric in x and y.
your method sounded about right
bro but look at his method i dont see a flaw
lemme simplify the eqn and check it
its an ellipse
click the more thingy
h^2-ab<0 is the condition right?
yeps
Parabola-..
Well?
🤡 why the fuck is h^2-ab<0 in that case
@grave pond Your guess was correct
Calculation error?
Oh, and with a slider in Desmos, the tangent seems to follow beautifully. Not a proof, but encouraging.
huh? 1^2 - (-15)(-15)<0 is true bruh
(Pity one cannot share Desmos constructions without being logged in anymore).
a,b are coefficients of x^2 and y^2?
so h^-ab=0
there was nothing here tropo dont ban me
Why lmao
rip..
Such a shame.
Actually, plotting my parabola and your (y-x-15)²=60x shows they seem to overlap precisely, even though your expression doesn't look symmetric around x=y at first.
Rewriting to y=x+15-sqrt(60x) should at least make it simple to get an equation for the tangent :-)
how a white boy get goated wit the sauce
go to #chill
I'm taking IGO tmr, any advice?
My expectations aren't too high, if i get 2 questions right, that'd be a great success for me
@sly urchin hey bro wanna play chess
Sure, gotta say i'm quote rusty, haven't been training in months
Let's take it to the DM
@sly urchin what's your rating
Is it necessary for a parabola to be symmetric about y=x? Anyways, I think we got the correct expression.
there's nothing that states that a parabola needs to be symmetric around any particular line
of course all parabolas have exactly one line of symmetry
from the diagram, you can see that at least all of the intersection points are symmetric across y = x
Yes, so does that make it necessary for the curve (which turns out to be a parabola) to be symmetric about y=x?
I have no idea
you can reverse-justify that because there is a unique conic that passes through any 5 (non-collinear) points
like, that specific parabola satisfies the envelope condition, so it's the only one that works
What's an 'Envelope' condition? I haven't heard about it.
a curve formed like this is called an 'envelope'
so, the condition for the envelope to occur
A random parabola doesn't need to be symmetric about that line in particular -- but since your original construction is symmetric about it, the curve it converges to should also be.
how would i solve this
let x be the number of 7cm pieces and y be the number of 11cm pieces
then 7x+11y = 200
and x and y are both natural numbers, so you need to solve this diophantine equation
You can somewhat wing it: You want to use as many 11cm pieces as you can, so first try 18 pieces, leaving 2 cm, which cannot be filled by 7cm pieces.
Then try 17, 16, 15, 14, .. pieces of 11cm each, until what is left over can be covered exactly by 7cm pieces.
What special characters does a parabola have to posses to be called an envelope
The leftovers are 2, 13, 24, 35, 46, 57, 68, ..., and we look for the first of those numbers that is a multiple of 7.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Envelope_(mathematics) is a better explanation than I'd be able to type up.
11x+7y=200
i mean youd have to just guess with numbers
Damn it could be extended to other curves as well.. that's kind of scary lol
There are more systematic procedures based on the extended euclidean algorithm and Bezout's identity, but they are not worth the trouble when the numbers are as small as 11 and 7.
did anyone take the igo already and wants to discuss
Does anyone have a solid book/pdf for mensuration of volumes which V=1/3bh
Hey I got a question can someone help me out pls?
!da2a
No need to ask “Can I ask…?” or “Does anyone know about…?”—it’s faster for everyone if you just ask your question! See https://dontasktoask.com/
Wdym? Are you referring to the angles or to the vertices? Cause the vertices are already written there
angle A is always opposite to side a
angle B is always opposite to side b
and angle C is always opposite to side c
so it's always (opposite side to the angle you want)^2 = (adjacent side)^2 + (adjacent side)^2 - 2(adjacent side)(adjacent side) cos(angle you want)
whatever's across from that little bendy straw looking thing (called angle) is gonna be your opposite, and whatever's next to it is your adjacent. although this is a little weird since it's not a right triangle
I've never had to use the law of cosines formula
but its this apparently? $cos A = (b² + c² - a²) / (2bc)$
drew
never knew TeXit makes ^2 into arrowed down s'es
thats a weird little nook and cranny detail
apparently a is your opposite (the one that goes straight across from the angle), and b and c are your adjacent angles for the equation
this would give you 45/60
which is the same thing as asking 4.5/6
which is 0.75???
i mean 3/6 is 0.5 because half of 6 is 3.. wait
3.5 would be some irrationally long number
4 would be as well
ahh im not gonna sit here and act like ik what im talking about
dippin peace

wait is it the same way that quarters of time work?
like 15, 30, 45, 60?
so technically 45/60 is a set of 4th's
i guess if you look at it like that then obviously the 3rd/4th would be .75
but who tf automatically thinks of quarters of time when they see 45 and 60
use ^2 instead
,, \cos A = \frac{b^2 + c^2 - a^2}{2bc}
κλαουντ ☁ (cloud)
hey guys
hi
Anyone have an efficient way to do this
Let length = x and width = y
x² + y² = 8² = 64
(x-2)² + (y-2)² = (4sqrt(2))² = 32
=> x² - 4x + 4 + y² - 4y + 4 = 32
=> (x² + y²) - 4(x + y) = 24
=> 64 - 4(x + y) = 24
=> 4(x + y) = 40
=> x + y = 10
(x + y)² = 10² = 100
(x² + y²) + 2xy = 100
64 + 2xy = 100
2xy = 36
Area = xy = 18 (E)
insane problem with not much data
guys im learing trig for no reason, my brother just taught me a trick forvalues of sin/cos/tan of 0,30,45,60,90-
like choose one finger and take the no. of fingers above/below that
-1=<sinx=<1. That means the range of sinx is [-1,1]. Let t be some real number in [-1,1]. Can we always find a 'x' such that sinx=t?
yoh bro why this math so difficult
Yes, this is what stated in Intermediate Value Theorem
You're not gonna believe how simple the problem is
FBD,ABC and EDC are congruent triangles
may I ask how and what can I use it to prove the parallelogram?
FB=DE=FA and FD=AE=AC if you could prove they're congruent
that makes FDEA parallelogram
but how can I prove it congruent though
yeah tysm
Wait
can you explain more on how to prove bca and dce is congruent?
first 2 lines should be angle DBA
yeah indeed
not BDA
It's the same process really
I'll look that up.
Is this rectangle even possible? The two diagonals should be equal but here it looks like one diagonal is 8cm and the other diagonal is (4√2+√2+√2)cm or 6√2 cm. And 8 is not equal to 6√2. Am I missing something?
becuase the 4rt2 line isnt aligned with the actual diagonal
and adding the rt2+rt2 wont get you a straight line
guy can i ask some thing how to get good score on math exam
Start caring about the course early enough that you know the material once the exam happens.
sm1 teach me the basics 
of?
coordinate geometry
for the basics, you could try something like khan academy
good idea
Are you new started geometry?
No, I've done geo for a while now
What kind of geo are you studying
One message removed from a suspended account.
Hmm, if you assign names to the angles marked with one, two, and three ticks, then together with alpha, beta, and C you have six variables.
Angle sums in triangles ABC, AEC, AEF and DEF gives you four equations in the six variables, and if you eliminate the three first variables, you'd have a single equation left after all the algebraic dust settles, which will hopefully rearrange to the one you're supposed to prove.
One message removed from a suspended account.
Which result do you actually get, rather than something with 900°?
I get the desired conclusion by adding up ||the angle sums of 8(DEF)+3(ABC)-4(AEF)-2(AEC)||.
One message removed from a suspended account.
One message removed from a suspended account.
8+3-4-2 = 5
One message removed from a suspended account.
One message removed from a suspended account.
could i use geometry or trig to determine the ideal racing line
if so, is there like any other concepts that id have to use?
Guys, I know it is not geometry by itself, but I'm studying applied geometric algebra, does anyone wanna go with my now?
Me*
you should ask in #advanced-algebra
go to #get-advanced-access to get access
or if you're not talking about exterior algebras such as Clifford algebra, please clarify what exactly you mean by 'geometric algebra'
Hello, everyone!
What are some book recommendations for AMC10? I aim to make USAJMO this year but have my 8th grade (next year), my 9th grade, and my 10th grade years.
I use all books on the AOPS Book Store, handouts, AMC books, formula books, and other resources found on https://mathematics.gg/books.
I mean this yeah
Okok
wht grade r u in rn
I think 7th probably..
Well I think you can do a lot of practice tests and mocks for the AMC 10, aside from the books. For books, you can do Mastering AMC 10/12 by Sohil Rathi and other contest preparation books. There's also Alcumus and MathDash for practice.
7th? so hes 12
he can be 13
yea
Hi im doing this quiz and from what i understand U and N are not on the same line, so how is it they are collinear?
My geometry got pissed af today from a student he did 8+6=2
a set of points are collinear if you can draw a single line which passes through all those points
ooooooooooh so its a question of IF you can draw not its its already drawn through
that makes sense thank you 🙏
you're welcome!
Guys what are adjacent angles?
angles that are, quite simply, adjacent 
Chat dose anyone know how to answer this
7th
We have $\frac{pi\cdot d}{2}=28$. Then $\pi\cdot d = 56$ and $d=\frac{56}{\pi}$. $d$ is the side length of the square part of the figure, and there are 3 sides of the square part which are also part of the perimeter. Therefore, there is $3d = 3\cdot\frac{56}{\pi}=\frac{168}{\pi}$. Adding the $28$, the total perimeter is $\frac{168}{\pi}+28$, which is $81.476...$ and rounds up to $\boxed{81.5}$
C++
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
C++
Yo do this
That's easy
We have $\frac{pi\cdot d}{2}=26$. Then, $\pi\cdot d = 52$ and $d=\frac{52}{\pi}$. $d$ is the side length of the square part of the figure, and there are 3 sides of the square part which are also part of the perimeter. Therefore, there is $3d = 3\cdot\frac{52}{\pi}=\frac{156}{\pi}$. Adding the $26$, the total perimeter is $\frac{156}{\pi}+26$, which is $75.656...$ and rounds up to $\boxed{75.7}$.
C++
Real.
I already did it
!nosols
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
Okay sir.
$l$ and $m$ aren't given to be parallel, so you can't necessarily say this.
Civil Service Pigeon
10 and 15 are. Not 10 and 13 though.
What is 10 and 13 then
none of these
Yo can u help me
I don’t understand it
What makes an angle interior or exterior
Aren’t they all interior?
Alternate exterrior angles are angles outside the 2 lines interrior is inside
Which two lines
Help
?
Are 9 and 10 consecutive exteriors?
Like the 2 lines that are crossed by a transversal if the two angles are somewhere between the 2 lines its interior and if its outside its exterior you cant have one angle on two sides of the same line
help im crashing out
the triangle with angles 5 and 6 is an isosceles traingle
so 5 is 68 degrees and 6 and the other angle r the same
i got it thx
i think 6 is the mistke
mistake
not sure abt what it is
6 is the base angle, and 5 is the apex angle
Only the two base angles are equal
https://discord.com/channels/268882317391429632/1430047214436094063 can anyone help?
(solved)
Someone pls help with this problem
"Plot the following points with polar coordinates (r, 0):
a) (2, pi/4)
b) (3, pi/6)
c) (1, - pi/4)
d) (2, - 5 pi/6)"
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
It's (r, theta) but Idk how to write
Screenshot doesn't work on my tab coz the volume buttons are destroyed
(r, theta) means a line of length 'r' units pointing at theta degrees from positive x-axis with one end at origin
it represents the point at which the other end of the line points
So r is on the unit circle and theta is the origin?
no not on the unit circle
on unit circle means r=1.
It means on a circle having radius r units
Then r is the hypotenuse
yes
now you know r is the hypotenuse in the circle of radius r units and theta is the angle that the hypotenuse makes with the positive x axis
Doubt here
yes ask
theta isn't a coordinate
hypotenuse is a 'line' that has one end at origin and the angle between this line and the horizontal is theta
so like i can send a diagram
So r is radius of circle and theta determines where on the circle its end point is
Right?
yes
this point which this r touches the circle is the point that (r, theta) refers to
Ohhh
you have to find coordinates of this point
now, if you draw a perpendicular line from this point on the x axis, you get a nice right angle triangle where the perpendicular line represents the y coordinate of the point and base represents the x coordinates of the point
think how can you find the x, y from the triangle, use trigonometry
Ik the angle and the hypotenuse so...
try anything sin, cos, tan and see what works
(cosθ , sinθ)?
so can you write formula for x,y in terms of r, theta just so I know you got this?
@worldly zephyr
Um
no
no
near
end it man, i will just send the formula in few min
you know hypotenuse=r
Wait. Isn't cosθ the value of x?
So then r sin theta = opp
Is it not a unit circle?
Not always ig
in this case rcostheta
Nahhh for unit circle r=1 unit
But rsintheta also works no?
yup
x=r costheta
y=r sintheta
Yes I thought it was a unit circle.
Okayy
no x≠r sin theta as then it would mean sin theta = x/r = base/hypotenuse which is wrong
For y
Yeah it does because when r = 1 then it's just sinθ
so you get it right? so you can solve those questions
Thank you so much
X= costheta y = sintheta for unit
Yep.
@worthy eagle sry if I was a little thick skulled
👆
np bye 
Yep this question.
Wait lemme get it brb.
if x = cbrt(28) and y = cbrt(27) then find the value of (x + y) - (1) / (x² + xy + y²)
How do I do this.
I think it would be useful to say that it's about cubes? Like x³ + y³ = (x + y)(x² + y² - xy)
Or the identity of difference of cubes? x³ - y³ = (x - y)(x² + y² +xy)
Ok so
Use this
?
But what u can do here is
?
Let me complete😅
Kk.
-1/x^2+xy+y^2
Multiply and divide this part by x-y
So in denominator u will get x^3-y^3
Ye because difference of cube
N the value of it is 28-27
So it becomes x-y/28-27
So u only have to solve x+y-(x-y)
Ohhh
Yepp
Thanks.
👍
Hey! Guys can you help me in Trigonometry?
you can send your question right away no need to ask 
!da2a
No need to ask “Can I ask…?” or “Does anyone know about…?”—it’s faster for everyone if you just ask your question! See https://dontasktoask.com/
Actually! I wanna know how someone think while solving a question. How does it comes in mind just after seeing a question? I am just curious.
Then should I take lcm? or convert that 1/sec^2 to cos^2
is it asking to evaluate (sin^2 (1) + 1)/(1 + tan^2 (1))?
the formatting looks weird
Yeah 🧐
HSC extension 2 Mathematics
No bro 💀💀💀💀💀💀
so how can u understand me 😂
what are you asked to find?
if x then there's not enough info cuz you need the height of the cross section from the base
It’s a silly question
Cos I searched it up
we have functioning internet here
does anyone have a good strategy on memorizing the unit circle
what?
just memorise the values of cos and sin 30, 45, 60, 0 and 90
or do a logic asosiation with pithagoras, to understand why it happens
and then
??
in I quadrant. sin and cos arent negative.
in II quadrent. cos is negative. sin isnt
in III quadrant. cos and sin are negative
in IV quadrant. sin is negative. cos isnt
yeah that also works but he did want help im memorising their values
which can be confusing considering cos60 and sin30 are equal
and that you could accidentally interchange those values
no bro, like, you just relate it in the diferent dot, and, doing it, you memorize it cause i want (if you understand, you memorize)
i saw that 🤨
what? i do not do anything 🤨
🤨
What's the problem
XD, you don't catch it
U need help then ask otherwise u can chat in #chill
what? my english isn't pretty well
i was helping someone with trigonometry
Alr
ooooo
Is it a multiplication sign or an addition sign?
To the power
No like it is 2^(sin²x) + 2^(cos²x) or 2^(sin²x) × 2^(cos²x)
?
No it's plus
Oh
It's an addition
can you use derivative?
I think it uses the Pythagoras identity?
Nah
sin²x + cos²x = 1
Nope
Oh it autocorrected 😭
Have u heard of arithmetic mean
Pythagorean*
Or geometric mean?
I mean no but I can try.
To atleast simplify.
Dms are open.
whats trigonometry
Tri gono metry
Measurement of triangle
Three gooner meter?
bruh
triangle 📐
this guy can't be serious right 🙏
ratios of the sides of a right angled triangle
Ik
oh wait
That guy was just fooling around
wrong ping 😭
This has 1 bread
now it has none
😭who stole my bread
Dude wrong channel
not me definently
can soimeone solve this this might be in my test tmrw
solve for x
im going to sleep
im cooked
you have a right triangle with hypotenuse = 15 cm and base = 12 cm
yeah if you're sleepy it's not a good idea to solve this
wake up and try again
actually, x could be anything I didn't realise it's a square, so here you go
isn't the height of the rectange = 9? Because you can draw a diagonal in the middle of the rectangle and the length of that diagonal is equivalent to the hypotenuse of the triangle on the top. Therefore, you can form pythagoras theorem with 12^2 + h = 15^2 where h is the height of the rectangle.
how do you know that the length of that diagonal is equivalent to the 15 cm?
I mean if you turned the top triangle into a rectangle with the height of h as well, wouldn't the diagonals be congruent? This is at least how I think of it...
that's only true if the height of the triangle is equal to the height of the rectangle
If I can add on.
If either the base or the perpendicular are shown to be equal.
Then x = 15cm through converse of midpoint theorem.
Question,
Is it supposed to be a square?
no, not a square
Kk.
I'll try my best. Brb.
Can't do it.
For me there's not enough information.
Sorry.
exactly, I concluded the same
draw the small right triangle and the rectangle
let the rectangle have any height
then you can always draw the diagram, so x can be anything
If it's not a square, then I think its impossible
However, there are ticks on all 4 sides of the rectangles, so doesn't that mean all 4 sides are equal?
Wait I can try
Which class question is this ?
ninth
What is the question?
ABCD is a rhombus. DO is an altitude from point D which bisects AB
find all angles of the rhombus.
this is the original question. I made that one myself
Do you have answer key ?
nope
well inspect ∆AOD and see what's special about it
AD = 2OA?
And the fact that its right angled
yea
actually another way to look at it is that DO is AB's perpendicular bisector so DA = DB
hello can someone help me :(?
just send the question.
In the Oxyz space, given a cylinder with axis Ox, radius equal to 2. Given point A(0; 4; 4), call M a point on plane (Oxy) so that AM touches the cylinder and creates plane (Oxy) at an angle of 15 degrees. Determine the abscissa xM (xM>0) of point M?
( I use google translate so it may have some mistakes)
got it thanks
only that part.
that part was the only thing i needed, Thanks/.
wait, I didn't spot that
the markings were too faint
is it an isoceles triangle too?
tbh it shouldnt be one
why am i even asking
ofc I am not how could a three gooner meter major be serious
@muted osprey
Hii
any1 suggests good book s for beginning geo for maths oly
like evan chan doesnt have good theory
Could anyone explain to me how the sides of a triangle are connected to the angles? Such as how is sin(30) = opposite/hypotenuse, how is the acute angle connected to the ratio of the opposite to the hypotenuse?
the largest angle is opposite to the longest side
same goes for the smallest
this is because if you change the size of an angle in a triangle, the opposite side also changes accordingly
for the Trigonometry part I have actually made a video about it
Reason why Trigonometry uses right-angled triangles and why it works
If you have any questions, don't hesitate and feel free to ask.
In case you want me to make a video about a certain topic, feel free to tell me in the comments.
#righttriangles
#angle
#mathconcepts
and just to clarify, this is true for all triangles, not only right-angled ones
for a non right-angled triangle there can be a longest side
but there is no 'hypotenuse'
your best bet to properly understand this is to draw a 30-60-90 triangle yourself (you can construct an equilateral triangle with a pencil, a ruler, and compass, then split it into 2 equal parts)
same for a 45-45-90 triangle
now for each angle, 30, 60, 45, measure the opposite side to that angle and the hypotenuse
then you can plot a graph on paper, with 30, 45, 60 on the x-axis, and the ratio on the y-axis
oh yeah and the graph also goes through (0, 0)
I never said it only applies to right triangles
I know
just to clarify, cause you changed the context away from right triangles + they're definitely very new at this
oh
can someone help me: A parallelogram is drawn in a triangle with sides of 3 cm and 5 cm, and a diagonal of 6 cm. Find the sides of the triangle, if it is known that the diagonals of the parallelogram are respectively parallel to the sides of the triangle, and its shorter side lies at the base of the triangle.
,rotate
damn
one thing I see is that ∆BAC is just ∆ODK but scaled up by 3
you can use Apollonius's theorem to find the length of OK
alright i will just clear my mind for a sec
thanks
welp im cooked
does anyone knows how to bring the complex number at hold?...I can't really solve the questions
do you have a specific example of a question where you are stuck? that is kind of vague
LOL thank you, 2 days later i managed to memorize it
hello, can someone teach me mass point geometry? i really don’t understand
no
there are always some set of statements you must take as true in order to prove further statements
so you can prove a postulate true only if you start from some different set of postulates
Guys what was/is your guyese geometry honors grades
Use #chill to ask
Yepp by indirect method
no, a postulate's entire PURPOSE is to be a STARTING POINT for any subsequent proofs.
what you may be able to prove is that some postulate holds in a model of geometry that you're constructing
??
to find OK without Apollonius Theorem you can make use of the Cosine Rule
Let <FKD = x, then <EDK = 180-x
Triangle FKD:
5² + 3² - 2×5×3×cos(x) = 6²
34 - 30cos(x) = 36
-30cos(x) = 2
cos(x) = -1/15
Triangle EDK:
5² + 3² - 2×5×3×cos(180-x) = EK²
34 - 30×-cos(x) = EK²
34 + 30cos(x) = EK²
EK² = 34 + 30×-1/15 = 32
EK = sqrt(32) = 4sqrt(2)
OK = EK/2 = 2sqrt(2)
Triangle ABC is similar to triangle ODK with ratio 3:1
So AC = 3×3 = 9, AB = 3×3 = 9, and BC = 2sqrt(2)×3 = 6sqrt(2)
Can smb help me with this pleassseee
Hint: Divide into smaller shapes then use Trigonometry to find the lengths of the unknowns
Where 😭
Ooooh okay
Gotcha
I’m stuck after
I lowk don’t jnkw the next step
Nvm I got it thank you for the help I appreciate it!
alg
I might need ur input though just in case if that’s okay
Ahh
Nothing
I thought he was asking abt theorems
I just read the proof part
Didn't see it's axioms
kk
There's actually a proof for this in our book. I can send it here.
Nvm. My network disagrees 💔
Divide the figure into different shapes
Try to divide into triangles, square and rectangle
Drop perpendiculars to do so
Use basic geometry to deal with triangles
Could you send it if you can please?
Yeah sure. Lemme check if my network agrees.
It was split onto two pages so the photos are kind of janky.
Thanks so much dude!
hi, why does the unit in "unit circle" imply that the radius will be one?
come to the of it even in unit vectors its implied to be one too
The word unit itself means one.
OHHHH
1 is used as unit probably because its the multiplicative identity element and just makes things easy
No problem. Just tell me if you don't understand something.
The way the book writers wrote it is kinda confusing sometimes.
Why coordinates are cos and sine of theta and respective values
What's the doubt
that's the unit circle definition of sin and cos
I just thought of posting it
it's a definition
Ya
cos(theta) = opp / hyp
if you now let hyp = 1, then the opposite side must be cos(theta)
rs aggarwal
yep i have it
having doubt in these two.
and in this question. Its the answer none of them because a square is also a rhombus and a rectangle is also a ||Gm?
that's correct
so they are saying that DB = BC for example
but what do you know about sides DC and BC?
and given that all four angles sum to 360 degrees, you should be able to replace the variables using the equalities, then rearrange for angle DGH
ohhh so its an equilateral triangle. Which means C is 60. and A is 60. And similarly ADB is also equilateral. So that means that the angles are 60,120,120,60
yep!
got 'd' for the second one
yeah, d is correct
nice work!
oh lmao there's an obvious typo in the question statement
which of the following is true about DGH, it should be
yeah
thats like the only reason i got confused 😭
now this question.
First of all, no figure. So i made this figure
you have to show that angle EOF is 90
so do you show angle DEA and CFB 45?
Or do something else entirely
Those two angles would be 45 only if the rhombus is a square, which is a very specific and special case. So that won't work for your proof.
You can also have a situation when those angles are 30 and 60 deg, and so on.
So you shouldn't try to impose additional conditions on the problem
do you have a plan in mind where those diagonals would become useful?
showing that AC and ED are equal?
mhm
cant think of anything
well, extending your argument from here, you can assume angle DEA = x, and try to prove that the angle CFB = 90-x.
also, for your figure, I suggest making the ticks the same for AB and AD, since ABCD is not only a parallelogram, but more specifically a rhombus
yeha
lemme send the new pic wait
oh wait
in this. Since DBCF is a ||Gm, Angle CDB and angle CFB are equal
angle CDB is 180 - (90 + angle PCD)
and DEA = Angle PCD (from ||gm DEAC)
so if i take angle PCD as x. And DOC as y.
90 - x + x + y = 180
-> 90 + y = 180
-> y = 90
thanks. I did it
just tell me if theres a problem in my method,
wait a minute
because im sure there is one
oh, okay, so you are using the result that diagonals of rhombus are perpendicular?
yep
thanks
I was thinking something simpler, like let angle DEA = x, so angle EAD = 2x (since EA = AD makes the triangle isosceles).
That leads to angle CBF = 2x (from parallel lines)
And since triangle CBF is also an isosceles triangle, you can calculate angle CFB = 90 - x, which would lead to triangle EOF be right angled at O
the hell

In the future, please show what you've done so far when asking for help (it gives us more context to work with and prevents us from wasting our time explaining things unnecessarily). \ \
What I would do here is divide both sides of $a sin^2 \theta+b \cos^2 \theta=c$ by $\cos^2 \theta$ to obtain
$$a \tan^2 \theta+b=m \sec^2 \theta.$$
Consider how you can use this to solve for $\tan \theta$ (which is particularly relevant since we can use that in the third equation $a \tan \theta=b \tan \phi$).
Civil Service Pigeon
Let there be a triangle ABC where cosBAC = 1/7. The tangent of the circumcircle of triangle ABC at point C intersects the tangent of the circumcircle of triangle ABC at point B and point A at point D and F respectively. The line AD intersects the circumcircle of triangle ABC at E. It's known that cosEBC = 1/2. There is a point G that lies on the side that is different to point B facing AC such that AF is parallel to BG and angle AFC = angle FGC. If the value of FG/FA = a\sqrt{b} / c where a and c are coprime natural numbers and b is a natural number that is not divisible by any perfect square other than 1, find the value of a + b + c
can anyone help? im unfamiliar with these types of problems so I havent really made any useful progress on it
Do you have a diagram?
Btw the problem is kinda heavy you should consider open a help channel
i tried making it in geogebra however im having trouble with where to place point G as angle afc and angle fgc always looks very different in size
this is what i have
alright wait im gonna try and open
Civil Service Pigeon
rewriting the question so it reads more easily ^
better diagram: https://www.geogebra.org/calculator/hqpzusnr
In the future, please show what you've done so far (even if you don't think it's relevant, a quick list of your observations can save us a lot of trouble since we don't waste time explaining things unnecessarily).
@remote shale
see if this helps though
since it looks quite different from your diagram
I gave you the link so you can test if the diagram actually satisfies the diagram if you want to
oh I should probably give you a hint just in case
prove that ||FG/FA = AB/AC|| and ||AB/AC = BE/CE||
I don't know which of these should go first so
flip a coin ig
Can someone help me verify if this curve drawn in my notebook is a Jordan curve?
And if it is a Jordan curve, can it provide a counter example for Inscribed square problem?
👍
okay i understand

hm yes the point G placement looks VERY different
Is my whole approach to the question incorrect- (i feel its just the way im thinking abt the question)
can someone help me with my math homework im confused:
just apply exponential laws
yup
oh nvm thats easy how did u know this stuff bro ur smart
like the first question is a mix of 1 and 5
thxs
$a^n = \underbrace{a\times a\times a \times … \times a}_{n \text{ times}}$
GigaGoat
yes i understand that
So $a^n \times a^m = \underbrace{a\times a\times a \times … \times a}{n \text{ times}} \times \underbrace{a\times a\times a \times … \times a}{m \text{ times}}$
GigaGoat
ohhhh that makdes sense
r u also in 8th grade learning this stuff??
🗣️🔥
oh ok
ok i will thx
Oohh, this looks fun
Lmk if u get stuck
Messi goated
My friend akhilesh is also messi fan and good at math
just curious is this an olympiad problem?
which direction is the current flowing?
The answer is cos^-1 (1/2) ??
answer is 60 degree
uh down? (gravity)
i got my mistake- the two shld be at the slope
Shoot
Actually there is a direct formula for such problems
U can derive it
#help-6 its here
🙏
Hey guys, I’m not sure if this applies to geometry and trigonometry but what is a vector in mathematics? I know in physics it is just something that has a size and direction but is that the same in mathematics?
kind of
In math vector has direction and magnitude ( length )
So it's kind of the same thing, Finn
yep it is the same
anyone in 10th rn?
Listen, maths is a tool. Vector is also a tool applied in physics just as u apply calculus in physics as such. Vector is in the Cartesian plane coordinate system
U use it as atool in physics
For example
Well it's not completely the same thing tho, like how force in physic is fixed in place sometimes
In projectile motion
U take u as a vector
And use respective components
Of u sintheta and u costheta
U know
Physics is like a sister to maths
Tbh
Force is what
Mass times acceleration
What is acceleration
dv/dt
Or simply, velocity /time
So maths is involved
But u use it as a tool
Like without multiplication or division
None of this would exist
math is involved in anything bro
Exactly
Thank you
For understanding my point


WHY do I have to use the midpoint theorem in questions ABOUT CIRCLES?
Math is math
Why does this question use the midpoint theorem man 😭
Math is math mate, we have anything we make use of it all
Like how coordinate geometry is more algebra than geo
Because it's property in mid point theorem
That the line which is parallel is half of base
Yeah I know.
Then what's the problem?
Nothing.
But now I am curious.
Os there any other way to do it or no?
Is*
What you did ?
Used mid point theorem
I did the midpoint theorem one
To show AD=DB and CO=OB
Is there another way?
That's just a thing because OD is perpendicular to AB
Yeah perpendicular to chord bisect the chord
And CO = OB both are radius
This is the easiest approach
Yeah.
Are you from India?
?
Is there any constants besides π,√n and golden ratio that can be estimated using geometric construction?
you're looking for https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constructible_number
I notice you used 'estimated'
there are some constructions which require tools beyond a straightedge and compass, for example using origami folding or using a marked ruler (neusis constructions)
these are also exact constructions
and then there are also inexact constructions like this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L1EMeqg7TIk
Draw regular nonagon with compass.
How to Draw a 9-sided inscribed in a given circle.
Step-by-step Super easy!
midpoint theorem isnt entirely necessary here
Like what are the examples of exact constructions?
read this page
you can use the converse of the corresponding angles property for the first part, and show that the triangles ACB and DOB are similar for the second part
Also what is your point on Rational distance problem for 4 sided polygon?
what do you mean by 'what is my point'?
I never mentioned anything about that
Your point is like your opinion about it
And the topic is about rational distance problem for 4 sided polygons
I don't care
https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/4839673/four-rational-pythagorean-triples-in-a-square
you might be interested in this related problem if you're asking though
The chapter’s name is Circles, a chapter in 9th and 10th grade here
And the book appears to be some extra guide book
if you've already proven the midpoint theorem somewhere else, that gives you the result straight away
Circle chords bisect line: JEE 2023 worked solution
This is my first attempt at making a maths video! Please be gentle on me!
actually this theorem is pretty powerful
I've used it to solve this JEE problem
Fr?
I knew there should be another way.
read this @shut thorn
Ohhh.
Thanks.
that's basically how the midpoint theorem is proven
oh lmao
there's another way where you use the fact that the perpendicular of an isosceles triangle to the base cuts the base at its midpoint (OA = OB so OAB is isosceles)
so then since angle ABC = angle DBO, SAS similarity tells you that AC/DO = AB/DB = 2
oh yeah perpendicular bisector of chord = radius
mhm
that's just a property of isosceles triangles if you think about it
this one is more elementary
Guys i just found weird proof about x^-1 = 1/x. I understand it now 
note i did not make it on my own i googled it
wait this isnt the right channel my bad sorry
maybe in #prealg-and-algebra or #precalculus
Do Leibniz's geometrical theorem about the centroid in a triangle, which states:
If M is the centroid in ABC, and P is a random point, then:
PA²+PB²+PC² = MA²+MB²+MC²+3*PM².
And one of the vector equalities, in particular:
If M is the centroid in ABC, and P is a random point, then:
PM = 1/3(PA + PB + PC), where all of those are vectors
have anything in common? (can one maybe be derived from the other, even?). Since they have the same conditions, and in both equalities it can be made so that there is a 3 being multiplied by PM.
can one maybe be derived from the other, even?
yes ofc
$\norm{p-a}^2+\norm{p-b}^2+\norm{p-c}^2=\norm{m-a}^2+\norm{m-b}^2+\norm{m-c}^2+3\norm{p-m}^2$
Civil Service Pigeon
Standard expansion yields
$$3\norm{p}^2-2p \cdot (a+b+c)+(\norm{a}^2+\norm{b}^2+\norm{c}^2)=3\norm{m}^2-2m \cdot (a+b+c)+(\norm{a}^2+\norm{b}^2+\norm{c}^2)$$
@old raft @grave pond
Civil Service Pigeon
hi
send question here
hiii
And hence $(p-m) \cdot (3m-(a+b+c))^2=0$
Civil Service Pigeon
thus m = (a+b+c)/3
6x3= 18 the white area?
@frank pebble apologies for the segmented response, I got cut off above
I mean you could go do it
Please do not ping individual helpers unprompted.
ermmmm
That is still not how you compute the area of a trapezium.
I need learn
anyways
@forest dew 1/2(sum of parallel sides)(height)
minor remark, but in the future, please try not to cut ppl off in they're in the middle of typing something (see above)
alright.
and we're moving to help channel because I'm severely burdened by guilt from interrupting other people working
have you been introduced to areas yet
valorine i thought this is what we see in math
sorry but this is not what we see in math
i realized now
Ill just watch
Huh? There's no reason why only one person can be typing at the same time.
no worries. So after m = (a+b+c)/3, we know M is a centroid, and from there we derive the vector equality as usual?
Whoops, I think I misunderstood your point here. Sorry.
Still, having parallel conversations is the kind of things that can happen in the topic channels; that's how they differ from help channels.
hi
hey!
Can Somebody help me?
You'll never find out unless you ask a question.
depends... whats the question?


