#geometry-and-trigonometry
1 messages ยท Page 90 of 1
barycenter is the center of mass
so just the centroid for a triangle
Does anyone have tips for geometry in currently failing the class because the tests are waited and idk how most of this stuff works
im sorry but ,i have question too
How does the people call the Similar Triangles but not accroding rule( like if there is ฮใA B C traingle on koridnate A(-4,0) B(-1,2) C(0,0) and the similar traingle is A1B1C1 A1(8,0)B1(2,2)C1(0,0) )
Didn't get an answer on the
math-discussion channel so i'll try my luck here then.
(Please feel free to prove it in ANY way you like, i don't care if it's not being taught in highschool)
Can we somehow RIGOROUSLY prove that rectangles exist?
To be more specific,
let's say i draw 2 parallel straight lines and then i draw another 2 parallel straight lines that are perpendicular to the other 2.
How would we RIGOROUSLY prove that all opposite edges of the shape are equal? ๐ค
I couldn't prove triangle congruence theorems before proving that rectangles exist... ๐ค...
(surface area is measured using square unit, i used surface area to prove the theorems so that requires me to prove that rectangles/squares exist first ๐ค)
Can you? ๐
I guess we gotta pick a very good definition for parallel straight lines in order to prove this ๐ค...
What do you mean?
The lines are paralleled already,
that's in the assumption.
I'm trying to prove that the opposite edges are equal
I'd like to see your
definition of 2 parallel straight lines
first, we need that, i think
You said "draw 2 parallels" without saying what the definition of 2 parallels is
That works for me,
anything else?
I mean is there any other definition of 2 parallel straight lines that might work in this case?
No no, i meant
is there any other definition of
2 parallel straight lines that we may use in this case instead of the
"there's also the definition of parallels as lines of fixed distance"?
Just wanna know the options ๐
Ok,
so now we gotta prove that it's possible to
draw 2 parallel straight lines according to the definition
" there's also the definition of parallels as lines of fixed distance"
How can we RIGOROUSLY prove that it's possible to draw such lines
I'm not sure if that's an axiom
Is this another way of defining parallel straight lines?
"parallels as lines of fixed distance".
This is a DEFINITION.
Such thing exists or not is not in the definition ๐ค
It's like defining a term that might not exist.
Now we gotta prove that it exists.
Well then there's nothing to prove here if we accept the assumption that such thing does exist an axiom.
Which is not what i wanna ask.
I'm not convinced that there's no other way but accepting that it's an axiom ๐ค
If i did then i would have shared it already instead of asking ๐
What if we pick another definition of parallel straight lines?
Can we work with that?
@strange narwhal
all i know is parallel lines aint gonna intersect ๐ญ
If i choose this as the definition, can you prove it now?
Please use the Direct Message,
i'm going to sleep now, it's pretty late here ๐
@strange narwhal
Please, someone tell me what C is
i did this but idk if its correct
no answer key eiter
youre cutting it in a way that doesn't make it very easy
imagine the cross section that contains angle BHE
in other words, draw the ||rectangle BCHE||
ohh
thanks
i think i can take on from here
nvm i use pytahoges
@solid needle Check my answer please, i got 68
,w arcsin(5/sqrt(29))
3 sigfigs
wowwww...???
you only gave 2
oh cmon
68.2
i don;t understand what this thing spewed outtt ๐ญ
dont come on me, im just following the instructions on your assignment ๐
oh is this the answer
yeah learn to use wolframalpha as a tool
very useful
dont overrely on it obviously since it is a calculator
but do know that its there to help you check your work or provide insight when you get stuck or if you want to play around
Iโve used it before, and itโs probably one of the most powerful calculators
Dude, are you familiar with
Calculators, like physical
the 991cw in specific
unfortunately not, sorry
Alright, thatโs fine, thanks for the help I didnโt think of taking a cross section like that
Oof,โonly thing left to study is constructions ๐ข
ADB is a right angle triangle, AB is 3, AD is 2 and BD is x (say), use pythagores, x^2 = 9 + 4
x = rt 13
for part 2, you can say tan theta = ad/db => tan theta = 2/3 and theta = tan inverse (2/3)
you can convert it into sin using identites
has anyone seen functions like this before? I found these two functions while solving motion equations
these appear to be trig functions that "phase" into each other very nicely and are solutions to the time it takes to reach a maximum velocity given an initial velocity and acceleration vector
do u have the equation for them?
they are solutions to a quadratic equation in terms of theta
can you send the original question ?
this graph looks interesting
the red curve is a sin curve where for sin(ax), ax= -ve value
trying to find the amplitude and translation
and for sin(ax) its the same which is blue
(i think u can see how u finish from here)
the area of a triangle in three ways
For the second problem how do I solve this?
no
i havent in fact
can someone help me, i just started geometry unit and like im confused on the SSS ASA stuff i dont understand them ๐ญ๐ฃ
and im confused because sometimes u need to visually write the angle itself and that makes no sense because clearly other sides are also congruent, why do we NOT need to also write them down??
can you see an angle bisector in this diagram?
are you around? if you are, i can walk you through this
opposite angles in isosceles trapezoids r supplementary
so 4x + 36 = 80
x = 11
perimeter is 76
It's by symmetry; sum of angles in a quadrilateral is 360
By symmetry, angles F = G and E = H
F + E = G + H
So each side is half of 360 = 180
that makes no sense
indeed
have you seen this proof?
WLOG let side c be the base and you can do that
so it also holds pairwise, e.g sin B / b = sin C / c if a is the base, and hence the law of sines follows
silly little question but are the cartesian spatial axes not considered "concurrent"?
depends on your exact definition of "concurrent"
two non-parallel lines always intersect at a single point
which isn't useful
so many people say that concurrent is when 3 (or more) lines all intersect at the same point
what's your definition of "concurrent"?
also like are we talking in 2D?
that's what i was unsure of T . T
in some places they use "plane" in the definition, in others they don't
what's the exact definition you got?
that 3 or more lines in a plane are considered concurrent if they intersect at the same point
ah, that makes more sense
though in some youtube videos there was no mention of "plane"
yeah they're considering 3D geometry then
like that's again another subjectivity in what the word even means
so in 2D geometry the definition is exact (since all lines would be in the same plane by default), but in 3D it depends?
yep
why have it be that way though
personally speaking I would say that 2 lines in 2D absolutely do concur, if they aren't parallel or the same line (they need to meet at a single point)
people are fallible
they don't often clarify what they mean
also more symbols doesn't mean more clarification a lot of the time
words just work better
wait coinciding lines aren't considered concurrent?
i guess so
yeah everything seems to say that they must meet at a single point
i'll try to figure out with questions from the exam i'm preparing for ig then
the definition that fits my use-case
thanks for answering!
np!
It made me so FUCKING happy when I saw it come out the same as when I had solved it manually. I wanted to cry joy but I'm in public rn lol. I'm just amazed at how far tech has gone
Made a program for the calculator
I just enter whatever sides or angles are avaible
And boom
I get all I need
9th grade math was boring so I had to teach myself this stuff lol
congrats, very cool
Thank you. I could probably program some way to go to the moon lol
There's 230-ish lines of code available lol
HP15C HOLY FUCK
IS THAT AN ACTUAL HP 15C
i used to have one of those...
11c. I got a 15c ordered
77 dollars for a 15c is epic
They're great calculators
Simple to learn yet does complex stuff
out for dinner atm
alr
will be home in about an hour
ok ill come back
here now
OOPS
u there? ๐
yeah
so you said you wanted help with triangle congruence theorems?
do you have anything specific you want to go over?
231 lines of program is such a bottleneck. Instead of buying a new calculator, I'll do it the German engineering way and buy 10 hp11cs
I'm gonna be honest you can probably calculate a trajectory to the moon with 10 hp11cs
That gives 2000 some lines of program
Can somebody help me realise where we got this from๐ญ the only numbers that are as such is that CN:NS = 1:3
For number 6 would you use pythagorean or sum however it's spelt to find the shared side and then figure it out from there?
Because of the picture to the right. JN=CN, so MJ=CF, so DC=2CF, so DF/CF=3 and that equals KF/XF.
Can someone hop on a call, I really need help. I got a test tomorrow and don't know wtf to do.
what's the test over?
rahhh
My homework sheet says unit 6. On here is logarithms, graphing functions and interest rates, both quarterly and annually. If you could help that would be amazing.
Who can give me a hard math prob
Riemann Hypothesis
Idek what that is but if you can solve it, apperently you get a $1mil reward
find x and y
x + y = 10
xy = 50
Can someone tutor me bro I'm so slow
stop spamming
how
also it's already solved
That's cool, but I'm still tryna figure this interest rate bs out for my test tmr, I need heeeelp
this is the final answer
it's on the calculator screen
yeah so 0.35 is one of the answers, approximately
but how about number 2
then you just need to calculate $\frac{-6 - \sqrt{(-6)^2 + 4(1)(2)}}{2}$
,calc (-6 - sqrt((-6)^2 - 4 * 1 * 2))/2
Result:
-5.6457513110646
can somebody be my tutor for a min please?
me artin
I need iiiiiit'
we don't tutor here but you can go to #โhow-to-get-help
what you learning
south
trigomontry ?
yea
oh thats kinda easy
yea
I learned it never cuz Im a bum and watch ig reels in class
I added you
if you can vc it would help tremendously
practice
@silent plank im not sure if this person is intentionally trolling or not because this person asked this yesterday, and around 5 other people spent about on hour with this guy #help-43 message from this point on, going through it step by step and saying either that the answer is wrong or some other nonsense to people helping him even when it wasnt ๐ญ
practice, practice, and practice.
but one big thing i see people not do, and which gets in the way a lot, is not drawing diagrams.
whenever you see a geometry problem, it is never a bad idea to make a diagram for it
?
wait i will send u
now try to understand where exactly there is a /
maybe this way?
,rotate
,rotate
,rotate
,rotate
you can press the emojis next time
Ok
oh sorry
Can anyone solve for me ๐๐ป
you'll learn more if you try a bit yourself
.
Np
!noans
The purpose of this server is to help you learn, not to hand out answers. Do not ask someone to give you the answer directly.
yeah so what have you tried so far
So I came here
show us one of your failed attempts
I think their image is loading Ann
yeah 1 + sin A is definitely not -cos^2 A
Ohh don't worry I got the answer
ok...........
just saying, common denominator and the numerator and denominator will cancel partially
Well, if you first bring everything to a common denominator, and then use the fact that the sum of the squares of the sine and cosine of one angle = 1, then the problem is literally solved in 2 steps
denominator is written incorrectly
should be (1+sin(A))**ร**cos(A) not +
Hello ?
just ask
?
he's saying that if u have a question just ask, don't say "hey guys can i have some help"
you should just post your question upfront
post where?
here. or open a help channel instead if you want.
well show it anyway maybe there's something good in there
!noans
The purpose of this server is to help you learn, not to hand out answers. Do not ask someone to give you the answer directly.
i erased it..
blech.
ok
let's start with some thinking then
first, do you know what a kite is?
ok, and do you know how to find the area of a kite?
yeahh
can you say how?
product of diagonal divided by two
ok good
right, so the diagonals of our kite are AB and XY. we now have two goals: find each one of these.
do you agree?
yeahh
ok right
now, to find the length of AB, the easiest way is to find the coordinates of A and B themselves.
do you see how to do that?
we solve equation of the line and equation of circle simultaneously?
yes, exactly.
ok. do that, then send your work here & ping me.
?? indeed
how on earth are we supposed to read the coordinates of any points from these shoddy ass diagrams? ๐
What the shit are the numbers even representing
- 0 slope
- -n/2m slope
- (2d-b)/(c-2a) slope
!nosols
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
ah ok
ik thats x is 18 but how
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
1
is there any other information from the diagram you can see that helps you?
no thats all that is given
ok hint: what do you know about OA, OB, OD?
radiuses all equal
correct
did you realize that already and just didnt think that was relevant or did you just now see that
ik that but thought it ws irrelevant
ok pro general tip
in geometry, we can translate statements about one thing, like side lengths, into statements about other things, like angles
for instance, if you know the triangle congruences, like SSS and SAS, you know that for instance knowing all the sides to a triangle gives you all the angles
and its not just side lengths and angle measures, other geometric concepts like area or arc measure all matter too
just keep that in mind, never think any bit of info is useless
what do you know about triangle OAB now
yes perfect
so circles give us radii which are super useful for things such as, but not limited to, finding isosceles triangles
having so many radii all be equal in length is very very useful
so maybe we can draw some missing ones?
triangles are easier to analyze than quadrilaterals after all
AOE?
yeah
would that split the 7x into 3.5x
good question
if youre not sure, you better verify
geometry is full of "it looks like x" but isnt
see if you can prove it
otherwise if you know what the inscribed angle theorem is, that would be much easier, you wouldnt even need to draw the radii
i gotta dip, if you still need help hopefully someone else can take it from here
good luck
thank you
don't think about splitting actually
just use the angle in the centre theorem to look at the angles around point O
hence you must have (360 - 4x) + (360 - 14x) + (360 - 12x) = 360
actually, drawing OC and then using the isosceles triangles thing also does work
so if you call OCB = c, then OCD = 6x - c
so you get BOC = 180 - 2c and COD = 180 - 2(6x - c) = 180 - 12x + 2c
and so BOC + COD = 360 - 12x indeed
that's how the circle theorem I showed you can be proved
how would you solve this like idc about the answer
that means AE must be the diameter
yeah
as its perpendicular
yeah so then angle ACE = 90 and hence BAC = 70
the 20 degree is useful only for adding up and finding i assume?
now then KAC is an isosceles triangle so you can use that to find angle CKB
its called a tangent if i remember correctly?
yeah like it turns out that that one angle determines everything else, given the setup

no, a tangent intersects the circle only once

tangents and circles come up a lot but not for this question
which congruence theorem are you using?
actually
its a random question a friend was solving that i screenshotted as it seemed intresting
yeah I know, and the key step is this
been a while since i last touched geo so its badge
so is that statement correct
it's too vague

you need to revise SAS, SSS, ASA, AAS congruence
look up the ambiguous case for example
(given sides 10, 6, and a 30 deg angle not in between the sides)
like you weren't very specific so I had to keep asking you to clarify
I think you're actually asking about two congruent triangles
corresponding parts of congruent triangles are equal
so then you can just compare the same sides in both triangles, and they'd be equal
same with the angles
a
When youre trying to solve for x in a sinusodial equation for example
6sin(8x) + 4 = 5
which equals
(sin^(-1)(1/6) + 2ฯn)/8 = x
why does x have multiple solutions?
the context is this video hold on
Given the algebraic solution set for a cosine equation, find which solutions fall within an interval.
its like rlly weird to me cuz why did he only tried finding the intervals from [-ฯ/2, 0]?
i think i get why x have multiple solutions but i still dont get the interval
x has multiple solutions since something like cos(1) and cos(361) are the same
Hi guys
Why sin(90-x)=cosx and cos(90-x)=sinx
?
think about the unit circle
sin goes 0 1 0 -1
cos goes 1 0 -1 0
by making x negative sin does loop other way around
0 -1 0 1
add 90 i start from 1
1 0 -1 0
that's cos
Than you
I don't know if I'm asking in the right channel but does anyone know what the name of this is called, I have come across this motion pattern while programming tween related stuff (accidentally) many times before, and it's really beautiful
<@&268886789983436800> crypto scam/ad
Poor texit
why tf is it -180
are you familiar with sin(x) = sin(180-x)?
would you agree that sin(x) = sin(x - 360)?
you just go once around the circle and end up in the same spot
so then
sin(x) = sin(180-x)
could be
sin(x - 360) = sin(180 - x - 360) = sin(-180 - x)
right?
yeah i can imagine it being equal
but how can i know which one to use
my first instict was to do 180+30 since sin = -30*
?
i'm not sure what you're asking
when i tried solving this way this wasnt in the solutions
then i skipped and found out they used -180 - x to get a different solution than mine
why would you do 180 + 30 since arcsin(-0.5) = -30
you have two solutions for 4x between -180 and 180, and both are below the x-axis (because sin(4x) = -1/2)
it just made sense in my head since wouldnt 180+30 equal to sin -1/2 too if sin -30 = -1/2
-30 = -1/2 ๐ญ
oh intervals ๐ญ
oh you were ignoring the intervals here i see
supplementary identity is usually presented as
sin(t) = sin(180-t)
180 - (-30) = 180 + 30 = 210
sin of that would be -1/2,
but its outside your interval so not quite what you want
there isn't anything wrong with using the identity that way
but you'd want to then subtract 360
oh, already answered
do all sin equations normally have an interval of 180 and -180 unless stated otherwise
no
i mean they have a period of 360 degrees but if its not specified there is usually no domain restriction
ok ty yall ๐
Vanellope von Schmugz
you pinged everyone in a server of 200k+ members?
you serious?
also we don't do your questions for you
!noans
The purpose of this server is to help you learn, not to hand out answers. Do not ask someone to give you the answer directly.
Ok
JUST TO BE SURE.
This channel is in the Pre-University section.
Does that mean the majority of people here can only answer Pre-University questions? ๐ค
can like able, or can like allowed to?
what did you try
HI guys
You are literally wolowitz
hi
If the bearing of Q from P is 150 degrees, find the bearing of P fom Q
try drawing a diagram
you should get something like this
memes go in #chill
hellou
if I have a family of curves x^2 + y^2 -2ax + 2ay = 8a + 8 (a != 2) with each member being a circle and I've determined a common point (-2,2) by using x=-2 and y=2 to eliminate the parameter a, have I also determined that this is the only common point?
A short answer is not. In this case it the only point because the centers also lie on a line passing through (-2,2).
why does centers lying on the line passing through (-2,2) narrow it down to one point?
Because if two different circles have two common points then their centers lie on a perpendicular bisector of the segment between these two points.
but perpendicular bisector does not pass through any of these two common points.
send
Guys who can do these easy substitutions just for warm up?
sin^2(x) + ? = 1
sin 3x = 3 sin x - ?
tan x = sin x/?
why?
!da2a
No need to ask โCan I askโฆ?โ or โDoes anyone know aboutโฆ?โโitโs faster for everyone if you just ask your question! See https://dontasktoask.com/
how do you solve these two
equal cords have equal arcs if it's in the same or congruent circle
why the hell is geometry so overly complicated
,rccw
whoops sorry
this seems like a very straightforward geometry problem to me
what are you struggling with
Is this not just trig
the steps
where i even start
i never really got geometry so
idk how it can be straightforward
im getting in my geometry class so I'm not sure
if this is straightforward i must be a dumbass bc no way
oh no I wouldnโt expect you to know how to do it with trig
Thatโs algebra 2 crap
Havenโt taken geometry yet so I couldnโt tell you how to do it the intended way
have you learned the trig functions yet, like sin and cos
but this is the triangle right?
i don't think it is expecting you to do it any other way
Actually 75 would be in the top right corner but you get the point
nope
Alright then yeah you wouldnโt know how to do it with trig
well yeah sin cos and tan
but i kinda forgot them
ok so
that's why
with sin/cos/tan this is really straightforward and simple
do you at least remember the definitions of sin/cos/tan
Sin=Opp/Hyp, Cos=Adj/Hyp, Tan=Opp/Adj
This is an example problem of how youโd solve it
take a deep breath, relax
so the mnemomic soh-cah-toa makes it really easy to remember the ratios
if you sound out, verbally say "soh cah toa"
do you think you can remember that?
what are these steps โ ๏ธ
Write this down if you canโt remember it immediately
he's throwing you a bunch of steps at the same time
just focus on one step at a time with me
I wasnโt trying to make them understand the example problem, just showing them what it looks like to solve it
๐ฅ
You could technically use the altitude to determine the value of this but thatโs some mid-trig stuff
so whats the answer
!noans
The purpose of this server is to help you learn, not to hand out answers. Do not ask someone to give you the answer directly.
we can help you understand the problem and the concepts
we arent going to directly give you the answer
You donโt learn anything if we tell you the answer directly
We can teach you, itโs not really a big deal
Trig is defo one of the more annoying subjects in my opinion
so if i just have the angles how do i start
If youโre comfortable with calling in a dm or smth thatโd make it easier
No pressure
not rlly sorry
alright sure
tan is opp/adj sin is hyp/opp cos is adj/opp?
Read it like โratio, numerator, denominatorโ
S = sine, C = cosine, T = Tangent
O = Opposite, A = Adjacent, H = Hypotenuse
alright
If you canโt memorize it just yet itโll be fine, Iโll keep writing it down until you can confidently remember the ratios ๐
oh sin is opp/hyp
mhm
cos is adj/hyp
๐
ok
15?
for the first one
oh wait no
60
i was thinking about the wrong thing
Yeah
now the same applies to this
Sin has no definitive value so it canโt be simplified
since sin canโt be simplified
X = 2*sin(30)
sin30 has a definite value
but sine by itself does not
youโd either write X as being equal to 2sin(30) or 1 because 2sin(30) = 1
how does 2sin(30) = 1
because sin(30) = 0.5
itโs important to understand that we measure trig ratios in degrees (DEG) and not radians (RAD)
big difference
oh
also important
sin(x), cos(x), tan(x) and any other trigonometric ratios are not proportional
sin(15) does not equal 0.25
itโs a little bit off
the reason why itโs not proportional is an entirely different thing thatโs difficult to explain
Am I moving too fast?
no its fine
This
yes
Instead of saying side AD, weโll call it side X
We want to use the ratio where X is over 85
yes
in the top left corner
We know from the problem that angle ACD, or the top left corner, = 75 degrees
so if we take tan, or opp/adj of 75
tan(75)
ok
and you'd do the same thing for both sides?
well since you already have 85 and tangent gave you the value of X, then you can use Pythagorean theorem to determine the hypotenuse
if you mean the other side of 85 then yes
Thereโs your X value
So now you just have to find the value of X and add it to 317.2243186
Yeah
Given one side length and and two angles you can find everything in a right triangle
btw
If you have two angles then you know the third
If you have two sides then you know the third for a right triangle
so 35ยฐ tan x/85?
yep!
:D
I am gonna nitpick a little and say that you should usually put 85 before tan(35) as a general rule of variables
but you did it right
thatโs correct
ok so now i just add both 59.51 and 317.22?
mhm
Thatโll give you the value of side AB
it said to the nearest meter
so Iโd assume 377
but yes 376.73 is the correct answer to the decimal point
Iโm not saying I wonโt teach you
Just like
You seemed kind of fed up with geometry so I didnโt want to teach you more than you needed to know
didnโt wanna overwhelm you or anything yk
I should probably explain the trig ratios then
theyโre super silly
Sine is actually a very strange function in the sense that it is constant
itโs a perpetual wave, such as cosine is
tangent is scary so Iโm not really gonna talk about it
You donโt need to worry about sin/cos/tan graphs for a bit
Sine, Cosine and Tangent arenโt proportional because theyโre measured in pi radians
so they're all like waves
can someone help me with a geo problem?
Iโll teach you law of sines and law of cosines in a sec, just let me do this
so hyp is 20
yup
angle
$B_1\left and\left B_2\left\left equal\left 45\left degrees$
Stoneheart
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
The square at angle B
yes?
represents a 90 degree angle
ik
alright
alr lol
we donโt know the angles of A?
So the angles A1 and A2 are equal
ur in 8th grade?
Yh
I took an online geo course so I skipped it in school
now taking ap precalc and ap stat
anyway
yeah
slipped past me
but, u don't even need that to figure out the altitude
sqrt 8*12
just becaus there is an altitude from the right angle to the hyp. it means that the triangles are similar
from there we can set up proportions to find the side lengths and altitude of the original triangle
I just can't figure out how to find the perimiter of the triangle
AEC
yeah
ABC is a right triangle
yes
wait I don't think thats right...
It should be
hold on
but BC isn't the altitude
yeah ik
I used pythag to find BC
the altitude is part of a right triangle with BC being the hypotenuse
yeah I'm with u
ik
i've already solved for those
how do we find AE and EC
I just don't know where to go from there
either angle of A = 19.61576023
hold on, I think I got it
Sorry just doing the math to check ur answer
Iโll tell you in a sec
23.575
@left bolt
I can teach you more now
Yeah
ok nice
all good
ok
done with that
next thing you should probably learn is law of Sines
Itโs used for non-right triangles
Sorry Iโm too tired to write all that in my notes rn
Use this Google image
make sure you enlarge it
Lami's theorem right
.
law of sines
but yeah
Lamiโs theorem
First time Iโve heard somebody call it that
Functions are interesting enough to keep your attention
I like math in general
Integration is just a lil confusing
Iโve learned most of differentiation and limits for the most part
Integration has a lot of brainstorming involved some times
I need to work on continuity and integration
They can use whatever principle they want and it becomes quite diffficult to decode that
Continuity and differentiability is an important step
should move to calculus ig
yeah
alright
Itโs not very important for you right now but in the case that you go into non-right triangles then you should use law of sines and law of cosines
oh do you not have calculus channel
Precalculus its showingg
That's what you are talking about?
oh no
Thereโs a channel for uh
calculus
But itโs in early university section so you donโt have access
youโd have to change roles
How to change roles
Scroll to top and press โChannels & Rolesโ and pick Undergraduate
augh
no
one lower
Yeah
Undergraduate
Wow, a new dimension opened
Someone help solve me this
is anybody taking online geometry on pearson connexus
?
i tried swapping 5sinxsinx with 5(1-cosxcosx) but i realise i should divide the whole thing with cosx*cosx ?
but then i lose a solution?
The book did a similiar problem that way, but i dont know how to check if cosx=0 is a valid solution or not at the end
use ^ for exponents
Lol
you don't want to have to type out (LONGEXPRESSION)*(LONGEXPRESSION) to talk about (LONGEXPRESSION)^2
anyway can you show what equation you got to just before you divided both sides by cos^2(x) (or planned to)?
i think i got it but thanks will use ^. I divided by (cosx)^2 @dark sparrow
ok but where did you get to just before dividing by cos^2(x)?
show your work
Sin 52ยฐ times 481 equals 0.788 then i multiplied it by 481 and got 379
Am I right
@dark sparrow
so you calculated 481 * sin(52ยฐ)?
yeah that's the wrong calculation to be doing lol
this is a side profile of the pyramid
Itโs 481
@cloud ice
for the trig problem
Youโd want to determine the side adjacent to 52 first
Unless you want to go into reciprocals
did i do this right
how do you know the height of the half cylinder?
well it gives us the height of both
27 feet or 324 inches
volume is L โข W โข H so you just multiply
the height of the rectangle + the half cylinder = 2.5
The formula for the volume of a cylinder is $pi\left r^2\left h$
Stoneheart
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
so
yeah but its a half cylinder
$0.5\left pi\left r^2\left h$
Stoneheart
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
It tells us the height of the entire railing is 2.5
but not the height of each individual part
Unless it says somewhere that the height of both is equal then we donโt know the height of each individual part
oh
ok i read it again it said the railing is 2.5 inches tall
the length was the 27 ft
whats the equation for rectangular prisms
Dunno
alright
@wet pond so i kinda did it right
2025 was a number i needed to get but i fucked the cylinder part up and skipped a step
Alr
Is this normally considered geometry? I thought it was because of ratios in math (so it would relate to similar triangles), but another website says that it's more of an algebra/precalculus concept.
it's algebra that is used in geometry so...
That makes sense. So it's basically both.
yea. i mean without context this looks more like an algebra problem but could be incorporated into a geometry problem
so yea
this is not how the \left command is used.
$V = \frac{1}{2} \pi r^2 h$
Ann
is this what you wanted to write?
I dont know much, but is latex a software where we can write mathematical equations without having to struggle trying to settle the format in a single line?
LaTeX isn't a software at all. it's a markup language
TeXit, our bot, allows you to render LaTeX code into equations
๐ ok
I'm just wondering is this fully simplified?
My own process went to csc^2, but I expected it to finish at 1/sin^2
does it make a difference?
it depends only on whether you consider csc a function deserving of its own name
So it's a personal preference thing?
precisely
There's also this problem I'm wondering about
How do you know what to use to start simplifying this?
Because with my process I just distrubuted sec first which gave me a completely different answer
what answer did it give you
Sec - SinSec
1/Cos - Sin/Cos
(1 - Sin)/Cos
They're squared obv I just didn't bother to type the squares
your thing can be simplified further still
never do this
Oh yeah actually
1 - Sin^2 = Cos^2
Cos^2 / Cos^2 = 1
So they actually do lead to the same thing
yes they do
what have you tried so far?
Can someone give me prooving trigonometry questions for practice for 11th class?
ping me when you send
Whats the apporoach to proving LHS = RHS in trig questions
Hi guys
Does ||A|A|=|A|A||?
In matrix and determinant
multiplication between matrices and scalars is commutative yes
What do you guys get for this problem? I got about 35 but I think the Quizlet explanation mixed up a term and got something wildly different
Thank you
Anyone could help me with triangles math please??
don't ask to ask
just ask your question(s)
Well I have a test tomorrow about similarity and congruence of triangle where I have to calculate how much a side of a triangle is long based on other sides of a different triangle and I donโt understand well
Also Iโm sorry if my English is bad I speak Spanish
Things like this is what Iโm given for tomorrow test
Does it true ?
In matrix and determinant
can you write this in a manner that's less purposefully confusing with notation
Say $x \neq y, x,y \in \mathbb{R}^2$. Define the line to be $L = {ta + (1 - t)b : 0 \leq t \leq 1}$. How to show there is $a = (z,w) \in L$, such that $z,w \in \mathbb{Q}$
Spice
Any1 know how to get x
Who pinged me
whar
I donโt really understand whatโs going on here, otherwise Iโd help
similar triangles!
well you are missing information, cause the bigger triangle's base is definitely not x
and this is a cursed question cause 36/90 is not 40/80, so it's an impossible setup
