#geometry-and-trigonometry
1 messages · Page 78 of 1
Better than nothing🤷
Well thanks
you're free to search for one! tons of material on yt, pick whatever works for you
but yeah, good luck
Ok, thanks a lot
Yeah, I will defientlt make sure to us these.
hello guys
I dont get this,
I dont see -2 on the graph
its -6 but i dont get how it's -6
So this was the answer but i dont get how
The space between 0 and -5 has 4 divisions
The second one from the right would be -2
I got another one, so id be finding the space between it? @silver roost
In that case there are 2 divisions between 0 and -3
Which correspond to -1 and -2
Think of it like a ruler with the millimeter divisions unmarked
-2 is between -1 and -3
okay how does that relate to whats on the line though?
There are 2 unmarked divisions between 0 and -3
Since there are only 2 numbers between 0 and -3, we can just say that those divisions correspond to -1 and -2
uhhh
well the angle next to 18x+9 is 3y
that's what i was trying to imply
18x + 9 equals 117, and 117 + 3y equals 180, so 18x+9 + 3y = 180
I was gonna do that
But I second guessed
Myself
i get it now
omg theres another question with even a bigger number line
So then x= 6
And y= 21
Then
@ancient kindle thank you, smart man, your explanation helped me through the whole problem
What are the different types of angles besides corresponding and consecutive interior and exterior and alternate exterior and all the stuff, this is a sample SAT geometry question which I couldn’t get because of the angels being weird but Geometry is where I struggle
anyone willing to teach me basic trigo
<@&286206848099549185>
hi
do u know about angle of elevation and depression
<@&286206848099549185>
can you send a photo
sometimes there is only word given problem
draw a diagram representing the situation as a right triangle, then use the tangent function to find the angle by taking the arctangent (tan^-1) of the ratio between the "opposite" side (vertical height) and the "adjacent" side (horizontal distance); essentially, the formula is: "angle of elevation = arctan (height / distance)" where "height" is the vertical distance to the object and "distance" is the horizontal distance from the observer to the object.
idk how to make a figure
ok
idk how to get BC p2 and h
which is the height of the tower right
yes
oh its num 1
ye
so to find the side
youd do tan of an angle
and then the opposite side of that angle / adjacent side no?
and that way u can find either the opposite side or adjacent
for example if the opposite side is 3m
and the angle is 48*
then u do tan48 = 3/x
and if the adjacent side is 3m
u do tan48 = x/3
and if u have both sides you just do the inverse of tan
to find theta
so if u need to find the opposite u need to use tan?
tan(10) = 180/p1
then p1=tan(10)180
yes
u did multiplication here
if you're finding adjacent
let opposite = 3
tan(angle) = 3 / x
x * tan(angle) = 3
x = 3 / tan(angle)
so thats an example of how
youre just playing around w the x
am i suppose to divide
yes
ohhh
yippee
hm
u create a tan equation to figure out a side in TRIANGLE ABC or DCB
and then from there youd use another equation to find the value of BC
yes there is
side AB is 180ft
and then u could use that to find side DB
and then use that to find side BC
maybe
i dunno
geometry too hard
Hello everyone I need help in Analytical Geometry
"The equation of the straight line given its slope and intercepted part of y-axis" concept
@gray osprey
hint: the tangent at the point where the quarter-circle and the semicircle meet is perpendicular to both the radius of the quarter-circle, and the semicircle
same thing for the quarter-circle and the circle actually
what theorem do you use a lot in geometry questions, especially ones that involve circles?
so you can definitely set up a direct equation for the quarter-circle and the semicircle, if you call the radius of the semicircle R for example
the radius of the circle, r, will take some more work after you find R
I found it
But now l need to find the radius of the smaller circle
It’s 4/9 but idk how to explain it
any tips for memorizing theorems for proofs
Look Say cover eye check
now THIS is true sigma male advice
You can also try to build things like patterns to get further understanding
Like insights into why the theory works
But if you don’t know how like me look say cover eye check is the sigma way
got it thanks
Derive it and use it a lot
Over time you'll recall it pretty fast
what if i have a test on it sayyyy in about 9 hours
This might be unconventional but take a photo on your phone and when your in the toilet outside walking look at the thereom say it in ur head try recall it then take a break
The unconventional bit is if that doesn’t work repeat everything in your head just before the test then write it down somewhere as soon as you get ur paper
thats hardly unconventional
unconventional is like
okay well i wont get into details but thats not unconventional dw
Idk English is not my thing lol
nah ur good
But take a photo on ur phone trust me it’ll help you
ok bet
Also just before you go to bed and when you wake up tomorrow look at it then
for proofs questions, especially two column proofs, is there always gonna be a set answer and order or can answers vary??
answers can vary
oh SIGMALICIOUS
ok what the-
in part because despite the rigour you might assume from grade school geometry
you aren't actually given a set of axioms to work with
for instance, one text assumes SAS congruence as a given, then derives all the other forms of congruence from that
I recommend this text
Euclid's Elements is not taught in most places anymore, for better or for worse
I've added more of my own thoughts on this
also in Lockhart's Lament, there's the idea that two-column proofs are presented as the only form of valid proof in geometry
when a proof could be a paragraph
or even a picture, with enough explanation
studying geometry like this can dull the mind rather than inviting you to see why certain things are true for yourself, by experimenting and hypothesising
going back to this, it really sucks that trigonometry is taught as a separate thing, when in reality it's one interconnected whole
it stops students from making connections, such as:
SAS, SSS are cases of the cosine rule
ASA, AAS are cases of the sine rule
you can use the cosine rule to show that if two triangles are SAS, they are SSS for example (and hence congruent, if that's your definition)
uhhh yeah im just doing geometry so idk what ur talking about rn
my point is that mathematics isn't authoritative
you can't say 2 + 2 = 5 but there's a lot of human involvement and subjectivity as well
oh oh okay i see
I guess that's what makes maths beautiful
you have a way to check if your teacher is right or not, if they tell you something wrong
Can sb help me in this task?
I made the drawing
And i know that the quadrilaterals LNDF and CMKE are similar to each other
But idk what,s next
Anyone?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ptolemy's_theorem
found this off a quick google search. may be relevant to you
In Euclidean geometry, Ptolemy's theorem is a relation between the four sides and two diagonals of a cyclic quadrilateral (a quadrilateral whose vertices lie on a common circle). The theorem is named after the Greek astronomer and mathematician Ptolemy (Claudius Ptolemaeus). Ptolemy used the theorem as an aid to creating his table of chords, a t...
dont know how you would obtain lengths though
I don’t understand trigonometric equations
I think that by applying Ptolemy's theorem the result can be achieved
,rotate
Someone know if there exist a solutions manual for shively l. Introduction to modern geometry?
There's not enough information; this problem is just straight up impossible
If one more angle or side length was known it will be possible via trig but we dont have that
A could be anywhere above or below B
Trigonometry is so paper-consuming
Wait let me think guys
That's an excuse, We know you eat and chew on papers in private.
We can't
thats what i said
Suppose there is a circle with radius 6 cm and center point O . There is a point P located outside the circle such that the distance from P to O is 15 cm. From P, two tangent lines are drawn to the circle, touching it at points A and B. Draw chord AB inside the circle. If angle AOB = 90 degrees , what is the area of triangle ( POA )?
tried anything ?
here is what i think after drawing it ,
since PA is tangent and OA is a radius so this means OA is perpindicular to PA meaning PAO = 90 degrees,
now we have PO = 15 cm and OA = 6 CM , we can just say that PA^2 = OA^2 + OP ^2 .
now i can say that area of POA = 1/2 * OA * PA
but someone drew my attention to how can AOB be 90 degrees if PA and PB are tangents and O is the center of the circle
you got the pythogoreas theorem wrong
rest of it is good
why not ?
good point
:p
Yeah the whole question has a logical flaw, So i voted it unsolvable and skipped
(XYZ)-angle; (LND)=(DFE)=(OEB)=180-(CMK), (NLD)=(LAD)=(BCK)=(EMK), (CME)+(NFE)=180.
Thank you man you helped me so much
No problem
How to get good at proofs
We had this proof in this class
Really difficult for me
I was able to get the first 3 or 4 steps
2
what was the approach they took?
Ok
it's too blurry
help you with what
Do better with other hard proofs
I guess so
And these take me so long
yeah most proofs are like 5 lines or less
especially if this is your first year of high school or something
This one was 10 lines
you don't have that much experience to begin with
It’s like the highest level math u can fake
interesting
So he’s making it really hard
thought they would teach you precalc then
No our school has acc geo trig a2 in one year
And then a2 precalc
the approach I was thinking of was to show that angle FAB = angle FBA
which is true iff angle CAE = angle DBC
There’s not enough info to prove that tho
which is true iff triangles CAE = CBD by say SAS
ohhhh okay
yeah doing trig and geo in the same year makes a ton of sense
And algebra 2
I went on a rant here btw and it's related
when?
O
Second semester
jesus all that in one year
We finish geometry in first
And then trig is combined with Alg 2
Alg 2 is insanely fast
you can show this though
CE = ED from the question, triangle CED is isosceles
angle DCE is shared
AC = BC from the question
and then work backwards, iff means $\iff$
south's secret twin brother
so the conclusion using alternate angles in parallel lines would be angle FDE = angle FED
no worries
yeah it did take me some time but I've seen stuff like this before
it really seems like your teacher did it this way too
oh no they were showing the sides DF = FE instead
yeah, hope this helped give you a new perspective
the beautiful thing about geometry is that it can be really creative
you've barely scratched the surface of Euclidean geometry
💀
in schools they teach a lot of coordinate geometry, distance formula, tangents and normals, whatever
that can be boring when it's just drill and kill
I mean not many people will be doing maths at a pace and intensity similar to yours
especially in North America man
so yeah don't feel intimidated
your teacher has high expectations yes, but that's cause they want you to do well
it's more damaging, especially for minority individuals, when teachers give them low expectations
😔
you'll see this a lot throughout the education system: at college don't be surprised if the first week or two is easy, cause they need to review previous material (or otherwise students won't even understand anything later on)
and then the material just flies by
yeah it's a different area of maths
I’m gonna do sm practice
oh man like when I did topology I got absolutely dragged by the course
don't be disheartened there's a first time for everything
Wait I got an ap world exam next period
good luck!
Thanks
can someone help me with my njgpa assessment? it’s for algebra geometry & trig
i circled the ones i didn’t know in red and the ones i particularly knew in blue
does anyone know how to prove that if the lines are perpendicular, then they have opposite reciprocal slope?
this will help you more than explaining it could
I tried watching that vid lol I couldn’t make sense of it
It’s number 14. I got the first restriction of x<-8 but I’m not sure how to the other restriction
is this correct?
Yes
Why
X is hipotenuse
Pitágoras
Nooo
I think I made a mistake, the result is correct
The result is the same
(im not the best explainer sorry in advance)
Remember that side lengths are always positive, meaning that the 2 given lengths are greater than 0 (4x + 48 > 0 and 8-x > 0)
With this information you can simplify the inequalities. You end up with 8 > x and x > -12
hope that helps!
Hi guys I'm seeking for solution and human being language explanation of this problem, kinda stacked at 0 point
We have a rectangle with dimensions of m x n meters, on the surface of which there is a satellite at the initial position with coordinates (x, y) (where the initial position is not on any of the sides of the rectangle). It can move around the inside of the rectangle and bounce off its walls (see picture). Assume that the satellite has negligible dimensions and consider the angle a V in the range 0 < a < 360°
- We have specified the maximum distance D that the satellite can cover. As a function of D, determine how many different pairs (d,a) exist, where d < D denotes the distance traveled by the satellite at the angle at which it begins to move, such that the satellite stops at exactly one of the corners of the rectangle?
- We have specified the maximum number of reflections of the satellite N. Let us calculate that the reflection by the corner of the rectangle is counted as two reflections. How many different pairs (n,a) exist, where n < N denotes the number of reflections of the satellite on the edge of the rectangle and and the angle at which it starts to move, such that the satellite stops exactly at the corner of the rectangle after exactly n reflections?
As can be seen in the image below. if we have a 3 x 3 kilometer square, starting position as in the picture and allowing at most one bounce, there are 12 different solutions. The answer in this case is V, so 12.
This task is purely theoretical, in addition to the correctness of the solution, pay attention to the procedure and justification, why your procedure is correct - why the model can be described in a certain way, why some property or algebraic modification applies, etc. Without a proper explanation of the important non-trivial steps, you will not be awarded full points.
And here some more things that I find and origanal task, in discord screenshots is some explanation of this problem but it make no sense to me
damn south ur on this servver!
fyre
@south nymph taks ur here also 
If you draw a line from the end of the 10m line all the way down, you split it into a rectangle and a right triangle
Use trig to find the portion of x on the triangle and rectangle properties for the portion on the rectangle
how would i find the angle tho
Np
i think i did it wrong bc i got 8.3 i did
tan(75)=21/x-10
*x-10 *x-10
(x-10)*tan75=21
/tan75 /tan75
x-10=21/tan(75)
+10 +10
x=31/tan(75)
=8.3064
also is this right
Is correct?
yes
Find the ratio of the areas of ABC and EBD, then use the famous: "The ratio of the areas of similar triangles is proportional to the ratios of the squares of corresponding sides."
I hope you see the similar triangles.
Lmao why wouldn't I be ye
yeah idk what drug i was on☠️
i remembered ur a math major
LOL
btw are u done with ur course? and what meth degree iz it south
Not yet
It's a general maths degree
Stats applied and pure
oh niceee
what are u going to be career wise?
(let me stop asking so many questions)
Is A a right angle?
Yes indeed.
So you already have two similar triangles
how to do this question
Yep, the lad probably got it.
find the mean of -6 and -2
which has to equal a/2
how to do this question
this is the wrong figure
no it's not
I mean the question wording is horrendous
I think I know what they are referring to though
this is the figure
ik
you can just reflect triangle ABD across AB then
and it will be the same
that's the trick
btw we have to find the height and use the basic tan formula ig
nah the solution is elegant, you only need Euclidean geometry
I mean do it with tan if you want
I have a question where I have that the cos of an angle(the angle is called F) is 6/11, and I need to find what SinF is. Could anyone help me with that?
And the answer has to be in surd form which I’m pretty sure means it has to have a root in it
draw a right triangle with adj = 6 and hyp = 11
use Pythagoras to find the opposite side
then you have sin = opp/hyp
Thanks, let me try that out real quick
Or use trig identity
f(x)=cos(3pi.x) what is the period of fx
.
because cos(x) has a period of 2pi, by function transformations, f(x) has a period of (2 pi)/(3 pi) = 2/3
,rccw
try finding the diagonal length on the base first
the angle between that diagonal and the 2 kN is also 30 degrees
I don’t understand a thing trust me
oh yes
no ig its 60
yeah and then use the 60 degree angle to find Fx
i found Fz but couldn’t find Fx and Fy
and the other 30 degree angle you drew to find Fy
how
yup i noticed but idk what kinda calculs to use to find them I have the correction of it and it doesn’t make sense
wait lemme send it
if you do it then $F_x = 2 \cos 30 \cos 60$ and $F_y = 2 \cos 30 \sin 60$
or $F_y = 2 \cos 30 \cos 30$, same thing
south's secret twin brother
because x = 2 cos 30 first
no worries!
hopefully this example has made you realised why there are two trig functions in spherical coordinates
ohh gotcha
makes sense ty
what?
What?
Bro do u need ans for this?
who are you talking to
xD
Lol
What is the ans
how are you getting ssa
wdym by c is the a
wdym by the both have c
can you clearly indicate which things you're saying are congruent in the pic
Abc = cde
that’s what I have to prove
C is a congruent point because they both use the single point
AB=CD because that’s given
AC=CE because C is the midpoint
I is dunno what proves BC and DE
having a common point doesn't say anything about congruence
in congruence justifications,
S refers to congruent sides
A refers to congruent angles
H: hypotenuse, L: leg (these two aren't relevant to the question)
try identify which other angles / sides are congruent
This exact question got asked like 2 weeks ago 💀 It's impossible mate
.
what is angle CAB?
ah that's neat
this is what i got so far
then all that remains to do is to find angle CAD
Angle ACE = 83
yep
that's correct but that probably isn't useful
mhm
try finding CAD instead
hint: bowtie
yeah icl i either have not learnt that or have learnt it but in a different name
the circle theorem is called angles in the same segment
see, it looks just like a bowtie actually
oh yes i see ive learnt that one
lemme see if i can aply it here
ACD = 37
DAC = 46
alr thanks so much man i can probably do it from here
I just started doing right triangles on like em circles
And this is how I know I’m cooked
so...trig? 
I mean he did say he's cooked
when i think of trig i dont think of cooked
unless its those horrendous trig problems
with ridiculous identity manipulations
I mean like he called it "right triangles on like em circles"
sounds like normal trig 🫠
i have a geometry test on monday i am so cooked
i was sick the first day of the unit and missed so much info
😭
Not impossible
Bro we got all the Gevin
This is rhs triangle
Angel b is right angle
Then there is an angle with 30 and Angle with 60
Then if u remember at last there is a rull tell us that rhs triangle the ab is half the hypotenes
Then wait let me draw it
if you are given all the angles (not mentioned in your original image) then yeh, it's possible
Yeah
Wait bro I'm drawing
This is all my mind got but wait
We can use angle c
Wait
How did you find AB = 2AC
Lol cuz it's a rhs triangle
Define rhs
Right hypotenes side triangle
So basically a right angled triangle?
Ngl i dont think that rule is a thing
So we will use tan
Bro in Egypt we learned that
I still didn't learn the sqrt
Sqrt is square root
What did u find x to be?
So 11 or sqrt 3?
If x = sqrt 3
---------
11
Yeah
Then x can be
X can be 0 < x < infinity
Idk bro it's not mine we really learn that in Egypt
I think u misheard it or smth
Wdym
Like u thought it was smtg else
No i just want to know what do you mean by misheard it
Yeah like u thought it was a rule or smth but it was smth else
U think that really
Yeah because there is literally an infinite amount of answers
I will ask my teacher today
Unless its given that AB is X and AC is 2x
If it is given by the question then yes ud be correct but if not then its impossible
What's your solution to this?
It's not that it's impossible it's that there are infinite possible values for AB and AC
yeah that clearly has infinitely many solutions
Sucks to be you , respecting geometry is a crime
Wait let me send it
That is all what i got
What do u want
Why
As a right hypotenes side triangle
Where is it given that AB = 1/2 AC
Not given
How do you assume then?
Rhs triangle
Does that mean a triangle with sides 3 , 4 and 5 is not right angle ?
Whats rhs triangle?
Rhs is used to prove two right angle triangles are congruent
This is the triangle that have
Right angle
Hypotenes
And normal side
There's not called rhs triangle
Its a right angle triangle
This is what we learned in Egypt man
So you mean egypt ppl are dumb to teach wrong stuff?
Please don't talk in bad way
U used it to try to get the ab
I know i feel like i did a problem in it but of course it's able to solve
U think it cant be solved
If you dont trust me
I dont think ITS true
Ab and ac has infinite possible values
Yeah that's a problem
Thats a problem?
EXACTLY
Yeah but
THATS WHAT I MEAN BROTHER
But?
Hence data insufficient
Why i feel that it can be solve
Yeah
Nope , it just can't be
I need a bit of help with Geometric Constructions
are any of you familiar with voronoi diagrams?
just post your question here
enjoy solving this if anyone is up for a challenge
75
did you do this question before, lol
or did you spy on the help channel
75 is correct
or did you Google it
Nope, it is just pretty easy
wow
here's what I did btw
I did it this way
ohhhhhhhh
yeah I wanted to draw that line but I didn't see how at first
yeah that makes so much sense now
bro this is 8th grade material
it's in Cambridge's entrance test for engineering so
congrats if you know how to do it
it is 
a REAL engineer would measure it 😁
Pythagorean theorem just went out the window in Egypt ig
Let s be the side of a cube. What is the body diagonal the cube?
⚠️ SPOILER ⚠️ the answer is ||s√3||
but how would you find it?
wdym the "body diagonal the cube"
the diagonal from one corner to the opposite corner
so...the line?
idk what's the proper term for it
yea that line segment
thats not the answer is it
maybe i can find a picture
like this
i said body to distinguish it from the surface diagonals
what is the diagonal of the cube? the diagonal is a line
do you mean length or smthn?
yes the length
oh...
let s be the length of each side
can't you just use the distance formula lol ._.
sqrt(s^2 + s^2 + s^2) = sqrt(3s^2) = sqrt(3)s
or, like the "pythagorean theorem" in 3d 💀
i see. interesting
yea. I just knew how the formula was derived
from what I read, you find the surface diagonal of the bottom surface
then use Pythagorean theorem to find the diagonal. your sides would be the bottom surface diagonal and the other side
,,r=\sqrt{2s^2}=s\sqrt{2}\
d=\sqrt{r^2+s^2}=\sqrt{(s\sqrt{2})^2+s^2}=s\sqrt{3}
yeah that works as well
0_א
Wrote down the unit circle (I have a quiz on it tomorrow so Im trying to remember it)
can someone help me with this
tell me if you find a short cut to remembering all that
Quad 1, denominators 6,4, and 3
Quad 2, (x/cos) is negative and numerators are 1 less than denominator
Quad 3, (X and Y/ Cos and sine are both negative) numerator is 1 more than denominator
Quad 4, (Y/sine is negative) numerator is quad 2’s numerators + the corresponding denominator
30,150,210, and 330- denominator of 6
45,135,225, and 315 - denominator of 4
60,120,240, and 300 - denominator of 3
This is how I’m trying to remember it
Also
0/360- (1,0)
90- (0,1)
180- (-1,0)
270- (0,-1)
you remember the difference formula for sine?
yeah i figured it out thanks
damn even this is annoying to remember all together
This was easy to remember after I recognized the pattern
polar is related to things near the north pole, such as a polar bear
a pole is something you ram your head against when you're doing math
💀
nah polar is an axis, where you determine points by the radius and angle rather than the x coordinate and y coordinate
can we take an example
sure
do you mean polar coordinates?
yeah
is that not what ur talking about? 💀
oh im not talking about them
what ARE you talking about then?
I'm talking about the pole and polar
hm idk then 😂
do you have an example of what ur talkin about?
hm yea idk
,w polar of a point
idk
,w polar of a point circle
Wolfram Alpha doesn't understand your query!
Perhaps try rephrasing your question?
Click here to refine your query online
,w polar of a point circle
Wolfram Alpha doesn't understand your query!
Perhaps try rephrasing your question?
Click here to refine your query online
it's called power of a point
@graceful talon
ohhh
ah, fair
idk
someday i will need the definition
there are polars of points also though
Rewrote my unit circle notes cause i have a quiz next class
A) Range of f(x)
B) Period of f(x)
C) Check if the following are true or not:
a) f(x) = 4 has real roots
b) f(x) = 1 has real roots
D) Range of f inverse (x)
I got the tangent
wait is this correct?
solved, nvm
I think the 2nd one is correct, Idk if you have solved it or not.
Yo
Anyone here know how to graph the points in between the x coordinate and the period in a trig function?
Or find the points
Better way to say it
Parent points are 0, pi/2, pi, 3pi/2, and 2pi or are you talking about something else?
If Cos is x and Sin is y on the unit circle, what are cosecant and secant?
Think their inverses are still the same on the x y axis
So cosecant at 30 degrees would be 2/root3
you can construct them from the unit circle like so
but most of the time it's easier to just use 1/cos and 1/sin
i think you can also do like which side of the triangle you choose to have length 1
if hypotenuse is 1, the sides are sin and cos
if x-side is 1, the hypotenuse is sec and y-side tan
and if y-side is 1, hypotenuse is csc and x-side is cot
$$\sin^2\theta+\cos^2\theta=1\\$$
$$\tan^2\theta+1=\sec^2\theta\text{ (divided by} \cos^2\theta\text{)}$$
$$1+\cot^2\theta=\csc^2\theta\text{ (divided by}\sin^2\theta\text{)}$$
0_א
I have a skill issue
does it ask for the diameter?
yup
I got the answer right
but apparently I didn't
like it says the answer is 18 but I didn't enter in the right 18 apparently
bro you're so bad the answer is obviously not 18, clearly the actual answer is 18 🤦♂️
I know I know

I'll fix it next time
you'd better 😤
😭
naw fr
still somehow screws it up
my best guess is you probably put a space in front or something but 🤣
maybe it thought it was 78 because the font
I checked that
no space
just plain tomfoolery
maybe it wants a space? 
went from 90% to 80% off of that lol
making things up at this point
it should be pinned too
A circle has an area of 33 pi cm squared and a central angle of 11pi over 6 rad find radius
my teacher says its 6cm but when i solve it i dont get anywhere near that
using the formula a=1/2rsquared theta
nvm i got it
hello, I'm working on a vector problem, and i am wondering how the answer for the total x and y values were found, because the addition looks wrong. here is the marking schedule with the calculation that im confused about
the thing im confused about is how (992.82) + (-239.41) = x value of 1232.23, and how (-119.62) + (-657.78) = y value of -538.16
Hi! Does anyone know an efficient method to solve this?
I'm trying using tan half angle t substitution, but I'm hoping there's a solution that doesn't require as much algebra
I think you should simplify the RAEs first
what is RAE
the ratio
rational algebraic expressions
its used in our country
its in the form of p(x)/f(x)
I see. Thanks
hi there, am I just supposed to ignore the 3.25 cause it's not lining up with the graph? I checked if it's a rounding error and it wasn't, please ping if u could help
where is there a 3.25?
Can someone link to a decent proof for the area of rectangle/triangle
I have probably been using those formulas everyday without knowing a proof
Nd yea dont mention the math stack exchange page almost all the solutions there assumed integer side length
Guys
BD and AE are the bisectors of triangle ABC. A line parallel to AE is drawn through point D and intersects side BC at point F. Find BC if FC = 5cm
Help me
Did you draw out a picture of it?
be patient
Sorry
Its like
12 am
For me
I havent sleep for days
I beg you
Help me someone
Who Should i ping
To get help
like i said, be patient. if someone is willing to help, they will; spamming is not going to take it anywhere
I am stupid I didnt do anything
@hoary prism Iiiii beg u and sorry for sppam
Hhelp me
are you aware of the basic proportionality theorem and other similar theorems related to triangles
those will help in this question
similarity too
yeah
bro calm tf down first of all
second of all notice that CFD and CEA are similar
find the scaling factor and then work out the rest
What is scaling factor
I just eant the solution please help me then i will understand everything
And I am 8th grade
in a similar triangle if you know that one of the sides is scaled by some amount then you know that the rest of the sides are scaled by the same amount
so you know how AC and DC are related in these two triangles, the length of DC is half of the length of AC because D is the midpoint
what can you say then about the length of EC based on the length of FC?
We cant know it fc is just a part of it not a half
see here
we can know the relationship between FC and EC because we know the relationship between two other corresponding sides
FC is 5, what does that make EC
10?
20?
Ah thx
np, but just a word of advice if you're really persistent like this people are gonna be less inclined to help out
But i didnt learned abt it in school i could be suspicious btw AE is paralel to DF maybe we can make another solution?
what other kind of solution?
Like we are learning tables and things that have 4 sides and the sides are paralel
2 are pararel and 2 as well
Table is the thing which 2 sides are paralel and 2 are not
like a trapezoid?
Idk maybe
What is the difference between a triangle and a square asking for a friend?
in this case it would just be overcomplicating the problem
square is a polygon with 4 sides all of equal length and all sides intersecting at right angles, triangle has 3 sides not necessarily of equal length
Yeah but how is that different from a triangle
edited
yeah on the bottom is a trapezoid, on the top is a parallelogram
Thanks man you helped my friend out a lot
i dont see how its related here
idk how to interpret your question tbh, given any triangle you can glue another copy of the triangle onto one of its matching edges and form a quadrilateral, here its not necessary to do that
cause youre just computing something about a similar triangle inside the triangle
Ah ok
I have one more question
Prove that the midpoints of a pair of opposite sides and diagonals of a quadrilateral without parallel sides are vertices of a parallelogram
i mean the best way i can think of to do this is by agreeing that we have some notion of a unit length, and that a 1x1 square has an area of 1, then you can build any rectangle out of 1x1 squares and derive the length*width formula from there, and for triangles do a similar thing where you notice that any triangle can be formed out of two right triangles glued together and derive the formula for an area of a right triangle by noticing that its always half of the rectangle with width and height equal to the two legs of the right triangle that meet at the right angle
attempt it and see where you get stuck
is someone here good in projective geometry
How is the second picture a side viwe of the first picutre
Bro just observe the triangle ACE in this, in that triangle DF is parallel to AE, then if you know the Basic Proportionality theorem, you can write
CF/FE = CD/DA
→ CF/FE = 1 (since CD = DA)
→ CF = FE = 5 cm
And since BC = BE + EC
→ BC = EC + EC (since BE = EC)
→ BC = 2EC = 2(EF + FC)
→ BC = 2(5+5) = 20 cm.
can someone help with this question? Me and one other dude are stumped.
"In convex pentagon ABCDE, segment AB is parallel to segment DE. The measure of angle B is 139 degrees, and the measure of angle D is 174 degrees. What is the measure, in degrees, of angle C?"
I think for the square you need to make the condition stricter by specifying that the angles are right angles
That only works for integer side length
yeah youre right
what i said has nothing to do with integers tho
your unit length can be whatever
the same argument works if you have a 2.5x2.5 square if you want
or a pi by pi square
it would just scale
Howd you do this?
say i wanted to build a 10x5 rectangle or something and i started with a pi by pi square, then i can just scale it down by dividing each side by pi and get to a 1x1 square with an area of 1, then i have 5 rows and 10 columns of squares so 50 total, then summing up the areas you get 50
nothing's dependent on integers here
i could also multiply each side of the 10 by 5 rectangle to get 10pi by 5pi
and then not scale the square
The proof to why we can scale down stuff?
i mean its just how real numbers work, if i stick this on a grid and say that my square is bounded by 4 coordinates, then i can send that to a square that's scaled down and describe the coordinates of those
so in this case its like
lets say (0,0), (0,pi),(pi,0),(pi,pi) are the corners of the square we start with
💀 is that like an axiom?
each side is of pi length, then scaling it down i get to (0,0),(0,1),(1,0)(1,1)
well its the notion of distance that youre working with implicitly
But we dont exactly know if scaling down doesnt change the area i mean yes we know but we havent proved it
the distance between any two points (a,b) and (c,d) is just sqrt((a-c)^2 + (b-d)^2) and analogously for higher dimensions
Ye
i mean you kinda have to take on faith that we can define a unit length and a unit area for this, otherwise i think to go deeper we'd need to talk about measure theory
So like if you consider this we havent proved that area(old square)= pi^2 area(new square)
how so?
if you want you can like
draw them, and then split the remainder of the bigger square into smaller rectangles
then add them up
💀 thats just sad one of the most basic formula and no proof in sight
idk
Hmmm
i mean this is just a euclidean space axiom
Thanks anyways
