#geometry-and-trigonometry
1 messages · Page 74 of 1
Then what is COT^2 + Tan^2
it's not an equation cause it's just an expression
where's the right hand side of this?
RHS is 0
knew it
set cot A = u, so you have a quadratic
$\sqrt{3} u^2 - 4u + \sqrt{3} = 0$
south
then $\tan^2 A = \frac{1}{\cot^2 A}$
south
multiply both sides by cot^2 A to check, if you are skeptical
Thank you very very much mann
no worries
this?
cos(alpha + beta) = cos(alpha) cos(beta) - sin(alpha) sin(beta)
oh wait sin(beta/2) you mean
yeah I'd write $2 \sin(\beta/2) \cos(\beta/2) = \sin \beta = +\sqrt{1 - (\sqrt{5}/5)^2} = \sqrt{\frac{4}{5}}$
so if $\sin(\beta/2) = x$, square both sides to get $x^2 (1 - x^2) = \frac{4}{5} \cdot \frac{1}{2^2} = \frac{1}{5}$
two of the roots are negative so we exclude them, cause beta is in the 2nd quadrant and so sin is positive
south
jesus christ that is one nasty trig problem
Tbh idk if im doing it right
Cause this is what I'm doing 💀💀
Oh shoot I forgot to write the square for sin(sqrt(30)/5)
$\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} + \frac{\sqrt{5}}{10}}$ is correct
I have zero idea how you got there
south
What 😭😭
Ohhhhh
Wait im stupid
It's because I wrote cos(-sqrt(5)/5)
And that confused me since I thought I couldn't do anything
But it littrially showed the cos in the question
😭😭😭
do you know why you choose the positive sign, so not $\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} - \frac{\sqrt{5}}{10}}$?
south
it's cause we also got the solutions to cos beta = sqrt(5)/5 when we squared both sides
Since in the formula has a - and your cos is also -, they cancel eachother out making it a positive
wait how did you get there
no but your quadratic equation you got has two values for x^2 = ... right?
this is just wrong
you can't square the inside of sin
you can't get from sin(sqrt(30)/10) to sin(30/100)
Tbh idk how you got to the quadratic equation 😭😭
oh you're allowed to use the half-angle formula?
after what I wrote just sub u = x^2
Yeah
That's what we're supposed to use
😭
Yeah
Wait, so this is right, right?
right then I get what you mean now
then what you did originally is correct
except it doesn't simplify to what you circled
simplifies to this
And I still dont know how to simplify it to look like this 😭
I js knew how to set it up
you know that $\frac{\frac{a}{b}}{c} = \frac{a}{bc}$ right
south
Yeah
cool
then you should be able to see it
you should go back a step to the $\frac{1 + \frac{\sqrt5}{5}}{2}$
south
then it's just $\frac{1}{2} + \frac{\sqrt{5}}{5 \cdot 2}$
south
ohhh
So we jus multiply by 1/2 first
I kinda did that last
Or I multiplied 5 by the 1, to get 5/5 + sqrt(5)/5 and then multiplied 1/2
Nvm I got it now
I jus did sum stupid
Thank you 🙏
Wait a minute
Since the whole thing is being square rooted, wouldn't there be a way to simplify it a little bit more?
Like this?
unfortunately no but you're onto something
Sry I didn't mean simplify any roots or anything, but rationalizing it
if you have $\sqrt{2 + 3 \sqrt{5}}$, you can test if $(a + b \sqrt{5})^2 = 2 + 3 \sqrt{5}$
south
or if $a^2 + (b \sqrt{5})^2 = 2, 2ab \sqrt{5} =3 \sqrt{5}$
south
Then it would become this
Would you have to square "sin(sqrt(30)/5)"? So it would be sin^2(sqrt(30)/5)
Right?
no
why would you square it
if you have $\sqrt{(a + b \sqrt{5})^2}$ that's just $a + b \sqrt{5}$, so we've denested the square root
south
Causeee, you have to so it on both sides right?
like what are you talking about now
Or does that "what you do on one side you do to the other" jus bs
that's correct
that's the first rule of algebra
I don't understand where you pulled sin(sqrt(30)/5) from
oh
what is n plus 1k plus g+gf+edf+++gtf+fg+ghfg+hfg+hgf+h+fghfz+fh+y+rtgse+td+bin
hi
Find the least positive integer n such that there are at least 1000 unordered pairs of diagonals in a regular polygon
with n vertices that intersect at a right angle in the interior of the polygon.
im not your friend
We can be
hi
Hey
wat math are you
Yeah, i will do in my college entrance exam
I sent
See ya then imma sleep
are you india
No
oh
Turkiye
Aight
That's lovely
ok
the entirety of geometry united and became oofdude
goodbye
I already did
how would i find the intersection when i’m give the p(a), p(b), and the union
I had U and upside down U on my test. completly blanked out but passed.
lol
When I know the angle and opposite of a right triangle I use sin function but if I know the angle and hypotenuse I would use tangent?
for what
any tips (and/or practice materials) to master trig, my brain always forgets it
It depends what you want. Tangent doesn't go with hypotenuse.
When you have hypotenuse and angle:
If you need adjacent then cosine
If you need opposite then sin
whats angle DEC
also the setup doesnt seem to be accurate...
what about it?
there’s something off with the setup though, tan(65) != 3
,w tan(65 degrees)
yea this problem is bad
So how do I do it
my hands hurts
but I did all of these out of pure boredom
ignore the scratched out part I got bored I wrote random stuff down
wait how do you factor using a TI84 calculator
you dont? it doesnt have a CAS
thank u
help, i dont get this topic at all
its symmetry btw
i get that symmetry is dividing a shape into 2 equal parts and all
and rotational symmetry is when u rotate a object the amount of times it looks the same
oh bruh you're here as well
btw this question has been answered in another server
but you are welcome to try!
I figured it out dw
GUALA
Guys, I CANT do trig, hold up
Regarding the second image and first problem, the two angles displayed are equal because of where they are placed. I think the word for the position of the two angles is concurrent but anyways, you would just set them equal and solve from there.
So it would be:
10x - 17 = 8x + 1
And you’d solve for X
:Break:
Anyways, I am going to be VERY active here cause I don’t know anything abt trigonometry
How do I explain that is a rhombus?
IT SAYS ITS A RHOMBUS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ignore that part
I know
DIAGONALS BISECG
,
IT IS PARALELLOGRAM
RIGHT?
THEN YOU CAN FIND OUT IF DIAGS ARE PERPENDICULAR!!!!
OR IF DIAGONALS BISECT OPPOSITE ANGLES!
OR THAT ALL 4 SDIES ARE SAME
ABCD is a rhombus because it is a truth that is given by the question
4 SIDES SAME IS RHOMUS BROOO
if the question says its a rhombus, it's a rhombus
you are required to use the conditions given in order to solve it
he said ignore that part
he wants to know properties of
because there is no other given condition
l
Oh yeah the properties
the properties of a rhombus are as follows:
all properties of a parallelogram
all sides have the same length
the diagonals perpendicularly bisect each other
get a macbook
Uhm it’s school Chromebook’s sir
the diagonals of a rhombus arent necessarily congruent
no one said that
side AB is 26 and BE is 10
Yes
veo who said they are congruent?
JAMES
to get AE
STOP
gulp did
specifically here
I hate ocean monument
Where
ARE PERPENDICULAR
Guy
guy what
Does perpendicular form a right angle
are you fuc kidd me
bUTT
IT DOESNt
IT DOES
IT DOEs
IT DOEs
DO YOU KNOW WHAT PERPENDICULAr
PERPENDICUKAR
PENPENCDILAPENCULAR
Wtf is wrong with you
Is it your first time seeing a rainbow?
I don't think its june anymore
Im not sure what this has to do with geometry anyway
And yes that’s what perpendicular means
yes
Find some congruent and isocoles triangles
Just rederive them to use
NOOO
STOP
NO
DIAG OF RHOMBUS BISECT OPP ANGLES
SO IT IS HALF OF THE OTHER ONE
SIMPLE
2(2y+10)=6y
!
<@&268886789983436800> can you get this guy to calm the hell down
ok
I explain
the diag.
bisect opp angles
oh shopot
I got it wrong
wait
so
bisect angles right?
RIGHT?
so
the angle will equal
180-something
1/2 of that
can we bring to help channel?
It might be better to move to a help channel, but this channel is also okay for help.
What….
Being generally hostile, flooding the chat or spamming caps lock doesn't help
Ok so how do you do the math
BRBUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUH
Ok
BCD
IS
180-ADC
AND 1/2BCD is ACB
ACB = 2y+10
AND
CDB IS 1/2(ADC)
bruh
its easier to think on paper
CDB IS HALF
OF THE BIGGER ANGLE
kaer!x can you hlep?
Could someone please help me out? I got x = 29 degrees and y = 119 degrees but i'm not sure if i did anything wrong :(
Seems right to me
aradia pelase help gulp
Sorry for the hazard 😞😞😞
let me see hang on
help gulppoo
16y + 20 = 180
Nvm
I got it
GULPYOUROWNPOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOP
is it not
Yes it is
its what i got as well
bro
I said it was not not correct smart
I
Photo math it its correct
im pretty confident its correct
are you not smart?
not not = yes
Ok two negatives makes positive
aradia Im surprize you dont knows that
NIOO
Being condescending about dumb things like this falls into the territory of being hostile to other users imo.
what?
Oh oops
I.e. the thing I told you to stop doing just a bit ago
So I just set them equal to each other
I didnt use caps locks I used shift
correct! 🤟
I genuinely do not care what key you used.
Got it
What
?
you mean button? what is a key
Just making sure
Are you trying to argue about the difference between a button and a key with me?
I jsut don't know what a key is
You’re so helpful
👍
I was in your shoes so I know how it feels
I passed my acceleration exam
Okay, now you know I suppose.
what is caps locks?
Okay, last chance for you to stop interacting in bad faith here.
Calm down @unique nacelle
Let’s just do math
Peacefully
Can you help me or no
@unique nacelle
Diffferent problem
nevner posted bro
oofdude i recommend not being so aggressive to other people
step 1 is to graph the points
if you graph them, you can see the slope of the line from point A to point B is 1
the slope of the line from point B to point C is -1
the slope of the line from point C to point D is 1
and the slope of the point from point D to point A is -1
now we know that sides AB and CD are parallel
and sides BC to DA are parallel
this guarantees a parallelogram
but then, we can tell that sides AB and BC are perpendicular (if the product of the slopes of two lines is -1, the two lines are perpendicular)
which makes it a rectangle
and finally, we can see every line is the same length,
which confirms it as a square
I photo marh it
?
i don't think this is geometry but ok
|x-a-c| is either x-a-c or -(x-a-c)=-x+a+c
depending on the value
thus,
x-a-c<b (i)
and
-x+a+c<b
multiply both sides of the bottom inequality by -1
x-a-c>-b
which can be rewritten as
-b<x-a-c (ii)
therefore
-b<x-a-c<b from (i) and (ii)
idk im learning this with "parabolas" and other stuff that i dont know so i guessed
ok thanks!
For #27 am I solving for 180?
what??
If you mean
Equating -14x-4x to 180 then yep
u just set the sum to be equal to 0
Hello guys, can anyone explain to me how to solve both these equations, but can we begin with the x) one first?
These are the hardest equations on the website i am currently scrolling and it seems like photomath overcomplicated the solution, so maybe there are more straightforward ones
wouldn't it be nice if you could change the $1 - \sin 2x$ to $1 - \cos 2x$?
south
we can actually do this by $1 - \sin(2(\pi/4 - u)) = 1 - \sin(\pi/2 - 2u) = 1 - \cos 2u$
south
so the right hand side becomes $\cos(\pi/4 - u) - \sin(\pi/4 - u)$
$= \cos(\pi/4) \cos u + \sin(\pi/4) \sin u - \sin(\pi/4) \cos u + \cos(\pi/4) \sin u$
$= \sqrt{2} \sin u$
south
so we just have $2 \sin^2 u = \sqrt{2} \sin u$ or that $\sin u = 0, \frac{1}{\sqrt2}$
and don't forget to change $u$ back to $x$
south
I want to know what is the slope if the equation is y=18 and x=0
0 nd not defined
hello
in the actual competition I would just make AB equal to CD so we have 3.5^2
What textbook are you using?
💀 i was taught this as like a formula lmfao-
Like length of common tangrnt of two circles touching each other = 2sqrt(r1 r2)
How did you do that btw
I didnt
I was curious to see the latest version and the brainrot was already there
wait wtf lol
Lmfaoooo
can anyone help me with Trignometry i am in grade 10th CBSE ik the basics but idk how to solve the identities
We'd need a question
Hi, so how do i solve it?
Sorry man, you lost me at the first step
I dont understand your solution
I would appreciate it
cos(pi/2 - x) = sin(x), sin(pi/2 - x) = cos(x), those don't ring a bell?
then you need to revise your trig identities
I already deliberately avoided writing cos x - sin x in the form R cos(x + alpha)
Sin2x = 2 sinx cosx
And 1 = sin^2(x) + cos^2(x)
So the lhs = sin²(x) + cos²(x) - 2 sinxcosx
Which is just
oh that's clever
Trigonometry Lial 11th edition
I mean you still have to solve cos x - sin x = -1
cos x - sin x = 0 is the easy part
so you need the R cos(x + alpha) form as I said
And then it will be variable substitution right? (sin x + cosx) = t
Thanks
t^2 - t = 0
Are there any solutions not of the form 2npi+ pi/2-
Mm
yes
,w 1 - sin(2x) = cos(x) - sin(x)
I just meant the cosx - sinx =-1 thingy but sure
(sin x - cos x)^2 = (cos x - sin x)^2 = (cos x - sin x)
ah so cos x - sin x = 1 not -1
Yeah, I got the same values for x). You can get it down to (cosx-sinx)(cosx-sinx-1)=0, so then either cosx=sinx, which is x=π/4 + πn, n is an integer (since sin x and cos x are both positive in quadrants 1 or 3), or cosx-sinx=1, which holds on the unit circle for x=2πn, n is an integer, or x=3π/2 + 2πn, n is an integer.
The other one should be x=πn, n is an integer or x=3π/4+πn, n is an integer, which you would be able to extract once getting to (sinx+cosx)^2(cosx-sinx)-(sinx+cosx)=0, then (sinx+cosx)((sinx+cosx)(cosx-sinx)-1)=0, where you have a difference of squares that ends up simplifying to the double angle identity cos2x.
I was really confused at the start though because I thought it was asking to prove, and it clearly does not work for the same values of x when comparing the LHS and the RHS 
(This is a foreshadow to all of you planning on taking post secondary math: You will look at problems for sometimes hours and realize you missed the smallest of details that end up changing everything. Trust me, it happens more than you think)
maybe we should say that the sum of angles in ABCD equals 360 degrees, and as we have two pairs of equal angles, it will be 2*(A+B)=360; A+B=180, but they are one-sided angles at AD, BC and secant AB, so AD||BC. the same way A+D=180 and AB | | CD as well. so we have two pairs of parallel straight lines and ABCD is a parallelogram
stop bro lol
but im not sure that we can use the sum of angles
The main thing to keep in mind with b) is that if you extend all of those lines, what you really have are sets of parallel lines on transversals. Once you make that realization, you can then use the property of co-interior angles to show that the diagonals are equal (you would need a couple steps, but it’s similar to what geshka was trying to mention)
You could also use the property of alternate interior angles and supplementary angles to help with the claim (again, with support of the transversal lines)
are you not smart lol: JK
bro
rhombus diag. are perpen
rectangle doens't always have perpen diags bruv.
this can be done with alternate angles
if you're asking about how to prove that b) is correct, when the fact that the shape is a parallelogram is given
if you're asking about how to prove the quadrilateral is a parallelogram, when b) is given
oops
fixed image
if B and D are set as θ, A and C must add up to 360 deg - 2θ
which means A and C are both 180 deg - θ
if we extend any side (for example, AD), we can see that due to the rules of corresponding angles, the other two sides that meet (AB and DC) must be parallel to each other
Hello I was wondering if someone would help me. I am not sure what to do with X.
I know how to find r but how do I find x?
find r, and see if you can solve for x
you forgot to square the entire (x-0.9)^2 and (x+0.9)^2
also you shouldn't have canceled out the xs anyway, they were both positive
ohh i see! I understand
but u can't use that?
you should be using <A = <C and <B = <D
we don't know they are parallel right off the bat
oh yep nvm thanks i get it now
You’re told it’s a parallelogram from the beginning. Anything the question directly tells you is something you can use. If it just said “quadrilateral”, it would be a different story
yo someone check if this right or not
looks good to me
wrong the isosceles trapizoid at the bottom is inaccurate
the base angles are congurent?
i wish the geometry im doing was actually like applicable in life
physics is interesting ig
its probably the basis for something that you'll learn later that you can use irl
yeah
its not really applicable to real life
i guess its just preparing you for a field of study in the future
that can be
what is it?
no the drawing is worng the legs arent congruence
I didn’t even draw anything…
Help!!!
<@&286206848099549185>
uh
who is this guy..
can anyone help me?
the question is"if sec theta +tan theta=p,obtain values of sec theta,tan theta,sin theta in terms of p
<@&286206848099549185>
use chat gpt
preparing for mid term exams
Not enough information to solve it in my opinion. Do you have a picture to go with the problem statement? I can provide this diagram for you to steal for a cheat sheet regarding the laws of sine and cosine…
Does anybody have any good references about perpendicular conics passing through cyclic quadrilaterals? That is conics whose asymptotes intersect at a right angle? Is this conic unique? Does it always exist? Any help would be great. (By conic I am referring to a hyperbola)
i think the word youre looking for is "rectangular hyperbola"
in general, a conic passing through A,B,C is a rectangular hyperbola if and only if it also passes through the orthocenter of triangle ABC
Oh so a rectengular hyperbola through ABCD would pass throguh the orthocenters of ABC, BCD, ACD and BDC?
Thats what Im trying to prove so
Oh great thank you.
Do you know if this is a known fact?
Like that ABCD and the orthocenters pass through one conic?
it is somewhat known(?)
not too widely known
fyi the center of that hyperbola is called the poncelet point of ABCD
Yeah, I know, Im just interested in it cause Im writing a paper about a generalization of the Euler Line for cyclic n-gons, and came across this fact while trying to generalize the center of the nine-point circle, playing around in geogebra. Wondering how easy it it to prove. Do you know maybe any papers talking about it?
I mean the hyperbola
hmm
that sounds very interesting
i looked on the internet and found this
altho i cannot access it :p
$\sec^2 \theta = 1 + \tan^2 \theta = p^2 - 2p \tan \theta + \tan^2 \theta$
so $p^2 - 2p \tan \theta - 1 = 0 \implies \tan \theta = \frac{p^2 - 1}{2p}$
the rest is straightforward if you know your identities
“If you know”
south
seems like they do
Is this class 10 NCERT??
yas
I tell you I never did ncert examples, it's good to know people are doing it now
Hello I was wondering if I could get some help understanding my Trigonometry. I asked about this question the other day and I thought I understood but then I realized I did not.
!nogpt
Please do not trust ChatGPT or similar AI tools for mathematical tasks, as they often generate output which "sounds correct" but has numerous factual or logical errors. Use of these AI tools to answer other people's help questions is strictly against server rules (see #rules).
It wants you to use the Pythagorean theorem, and algebraically manipulate it in order to find formulas for a^2 and b^2 or in your case the short leg and long leg
atleast im fairly sure thats what its asking, I'm about to cook dinner so i unfortunately cant help with the specifics rn
havent seen a problem like that before XD
Yes my teacher never taught us in class anything like this. It's not even in the text book so I was confused. I've just been guessing while trying to use the Pythagorean theorem
hi
someone
can help me with this question?
in a rhomboid ABCD, AC=30 and BM=9 where M is the midpoint of CD, calculate the maximum value of AD
have you tried taking the square of both terms?
hi im someone
what's a rhomboid?
hi
isn't that just a parallelogram ? lol
xd
been too long since my geometry days, im sorry, my brain doesn't wanna work
😭
this is most likely your illustration
!nosols
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
!nogpt
Please do not trust ChatGPT or similar AI tools for mathematical tasks, as they often generate output which "sounds correct" but has numerous factual or logical errors. Use of these AI tools to answer other people's help questions is strictly against server rules (see #rules).
i keep confusing how to do that
(a+b)^2
= (a+b)(a+b)
= a^2 + ab + ba + b^2
= a^2 + 2ab + b^2
its just distributive property
some may call it foiling
so due to the pythagorean theorem the setup here is
(x-1.3)^2 + (x+1.3)^2 = r^2
also commutative ab + ba -> 2ab
sirf value hi to put krni hai
@upper karma calculation is lenghthy
Well the question is lengthy nothing you can do bout that
Shit probably cancels out
Hi, I proved this but just a little query. Which definition of isosceles are they using?
-
Exactly two sides of a triangle are equal
-
At least two sides of a triangle are equal?
I feel like depending on the definition the answer can change?
If they're using definition 1) then we can't tell? Maybe AB = AC = BC and it's equilateral...
1 would be weird
It is still a definition though
so for the A <- B direction, we can say that by the angle bisector theorem CB/BM = CA/AM and since AM = BM we have CA = CB
but can't CA = CB also perhaps equal AB?
Of course it can
and you are right
What i'm saying is that if they used 1 definition, then the answer would be unsatisfying
Yeah but like it's still a valid definition, shouldn't they specify what definition of isoceles they're using?
So from the view point of making the exercise definition 2 is more likely
If you are so unsure just add a
note: assuming regular triangle is also considered isosceles```
Lol i'm self studying
is this not just a diagonal of the rectangle?
no
I saw this exact problem in one of help channels as well. Maybe with different numbers
can you help me
i cant figure it out
im trying to find x here but i cant do it
the perpendicular bisector of the fold must pass through B and D
cause it's a reflection, so the reflection direction is perpendicular to the fold line
what he said
then by similar triangles 8:12 = b:8
b = 64/12 = 32/6 = 16/3
x = sqrt(b² + 8²) = sqrt(256/9 + 64/1) = sqrt(256 + 576)/3 = sqrt(832)/3 = (8/3)sqrt(13) i think?
if no mistake
wow
i have a doubt ,x sin3theta+ y cos3theta= sin theta cos theta
x sin theta= y cos theta
to prove-x2+y2=1
Can you send photo of the question
It's hard to understand if it is power or coefficient
if the trapezoid is isosceles, then the diagonals are congruent by SAS:
both triangles share the blue angle, the base, and the same diagonal sides
the other way is harder, starting out from if the diagonals are the same length
Yep i solved this exactly like you did it
I’m talking about the “only if”
,rotate
what part do you need help in?
have someone here the list of all points that can be represented by the notation X_i (for example : point X_25 (center of the homotethy ......))?
C is considered a side on a right triangle for law of cosines right?
Y would be my third angle
the law of cosines can be applied to any triangle
Yea I meant is Y an angle but C is a side
I might have to show the problem
Nvm I got it
Anyone have tips on when to use law of sine vs cosine
Like when to differentiate when I need to use cosine vs sine
You are asking this like they are similar
Oh i guess they are related actually nvm
But just try both and see if one of them is applicable
I personally always think about it like you could change the measures of stuff. And then it's like, oh but if these 3 values are fixed, then this other value also has to be fixed. And then i figure out what the formula for it is.
Q1- (i) (we have to find angle AOB and OAB)
Q3 (i)(ii)(iii)(iv)
what is P in angle APB??
btw if i consider the angle shown as 50, then angle AOB = 130, and angle OAB = 25
- i) x = 22.5
- ii) x = 50
- iii) x = 60
,rotate
,rotate
,rotate
- iv) x = 230
btw class 9 RD SHARMA?
In the trigonometry book I was reading it is stated on law of cosines that:
Angles A and B may be found by the law of sines, the smaller of these angles should be found first, for if the larger is obtuse some "CONFUSION" may arise.
what is that confusion, and how can I prevent this confusion, also is there an ambiguous case for the law of cosines?
There is no ambiguous case for law of cosines
that confusion can arise because of how the value of sine is
for angles between 0 and 90 degrees,
and for angles between 90 and 180 degrees
why are so many people cooked?
How?
How ?
Yep
I want to know how, answers are written in the book
What textbook do you use?
Does anyone have recommendations regarding books on Geometry? Introductory or intermediate level.
can sm1 solve this please?
I'll be able to send in half an hour
Its easy
First try reading the properties thoroughly
Divide both sides by cos^2 theta
Write sec^2 x as 1+ tan^2 x
done.
Then let tan theta = x, which will give you a quadratic in x
Solve for its roots
The values of x obtained will also be values of tan theta
Tell if any problems arise
what if we dont let tan theta x?
and just write
2tan^2theta-3tan theta+1=0
doneee
I was gonna say it, but more often people have a little trouble dealing with quadratics this way(without letting x)
just square and add the 1st and 2nd equations
then find mn
by writing tan^2(x) = sin^2(x)/cos^2(x)
sanskriti mam are u indian @fervent lava i think so by your name
names can be misleading, argue that she's Indian on the basis of the NCERT and RD questions, its much more objective
PS : its a joke
is x^2=y^2 considered a hyperbola?
something involving this appeared on a test earlier today and idk if i got it right
alright, thanks :)
have you ever thought maybe the hyperbola doesn't LIKE being called a degenerate? 😤
Yeah, who came up with the name degenerate for conic sections 😔
correct
10th grader

if 0 < a < b < c then prove that 1/2 ac > area of triangles with side (a,b, c)
Does this work:
for a< h = b < c -> 1/2 ac > 1/2 ab and it works for this case too
i'm guessing these are the only two cases
well a = h case is trivial```
Btw i'm looking to do this geometrically not with trigo, thanks
How could I solve an unknown triangle with trig if I only have 2 angles and 1 side given
Idk how I could apply law of cosine for instance
well if you have 2 angles of a triangle, you have 3 angles of the triangle lol
you can apply law of cosines if you have only two sides and one angle, but you can use law of sines if you have two angles and one side (or also two sides and one angle)
i just noticed there doesnt seem to be a simple way to write the infinite solutions of sin(x) = 1/x
i challenge anyone here to find a way to calc them
Yeah I don’t think there’s a closed form solution
You’d wanna use newtons method or something
What info is there in the previous q?
Just go on finding the locations of every point. G -> E -> F -> I -> A -> B
The problem is just too much work
None
But how so you find their locations
G from being the midpoint of two known points and so on
each of the points has special properties, which you can use
yep midpoint formula, finding the perpendicular then intersection for point E is another procedure
then FI has the same slope as AB
so then you just need to equate the line AB (slope AB, passes through A) with the perpendicular at point C
does A_1 > A_2 suggest that s_1 > s_2
where A_i is the area of a triangle and s_i is the semiperimeter of the respective triangle
I used this fact in one of my proofs and now it feels iffy lol
I’m not understanding the symmetry thing
So does that mean I can just look at something declare it’s symmetrical and call them equal?
South you get this?
what part are you talking about, exactly?
since D and E are midpoints of the EQUILATERAL triangle, the line between them creates another similar EQUILATERAL triangle
It says DG=EF by symmetry that’s my problem,
well
everything on either side of this line is symmetrical
because its a circle, so the circle is symmetrical. and the triangle is equilateral, which is symmetrical in this way
i don't know how to PROVE it cuts line GF in half, im thinking about it, but to me its obvious
intuitionally
and like thats not a good thing i should be able to know why lol
but it does seem like they are symmetrical
so GD and EF would be equal
Well I’ve had problems in geometry where I assume to much bc it’s intuitive and then I’m wrong and I was supposed to prove it first n blah blah
But I get what u mean
yeah, exactly, thats why im tryna think of a way to prove it 😂
or at least show somehow
oh well we know <BDG = <BEF
Yea idk why they just make a blank statement like that I’m ngl it does seem like one of those things u can assume from the pic you showed
that doesnt help
yea
like we know every object here is symmetrical
idk how to prove the line is symmetrical about the line i draw but
it really makes sense that it is lol
oh oh i know
Ima just start declaring things are equal by symmetry now tho, just cuz I said so and bc they look the same
the line i drew is a diameter
I like this method
🤣
length of AD is equal to length of BC?
this should be the way to go if that's the case
are you sure this is even solvable?
seems like there are infinitely many solutions
you can go ahead and ask
okay so $\frac{5}{\sqrt3 + \sqrt5} \frac{\sqrt3 - \sqrt5}{\sqrt3 - \sqrt5}$
south
Yeah but I need it in this form
do you know what the difference of two squares is?
(a + b)(a - b) = ....
Idk I'm a new y11
A video explaining how to rationalise the denominator. This is one of the trickier topics in GCSE Maths.
Exam Question Booklets:📝
🔗Exam Question Edexcel Style: https://www.1stclassmaths.com/_files/ugd/9f3fb0_280a1db631944b1a9890ce933b416c17.pdf
🔗Exam Questions AQA Style: https://www.1stclassmaths.com/_files/ugd/9f3fb0_0d9ef8cac3a7421685f31f29...
here are some worked examples
btw this channel, 1st Class Maths, explains really well
Thx
start from around 9:06
or earlier if you don't understand the more simpler examples
That was kinda helpful by the end but idk how to put it in the form 5/2 (-root 3 + root 5)
after you simplify you get $\frac{5 (\sqrt{3} - \sqrt{5})}{-2}$
south
so write this as $\frac{5}{2} \cdot -1 \cdot (\sqrt{3} - \sqrt{5})$, so that we can distribute the negative inside the bracket
south
doing this gives you the answer
K thx
np!
My Trig class just opened up yesterday, so I guess i'll be hanging around.
same
Trying to prove Miquel's Theorem. The paper says "Just chase a few angles," but I have no idea on how angles would connect to the point, can I get a hint as to where to start?
Q.1
Q.2:
Let's say you have been given the angle ABC and the sides AB and AD.
We do not know the lenght of BD so let a line pass through like that.
AD is given so we can draw a circle with center A with radius AD.
The third vertex lies in the circumference of the circle and also on the line BC.
There is only one intersection of theirs that gives the angle ABC the measure that was provided; the other intersection gives a triangle in which the measures are not as such.
So my question is: Isn't ASS theorem non-ambiguous?, i.e., it forms a certain triangle?
Q.3.
Is this proof of mine of the basic proportionality theorem correct considering the fact that I am allowed to use similarity?
EI is parallel to GH.
FJ is the perpendicular to GH from F.
Angle GJF = 90 degrees and therefore the angle EKF = 90 degrees.
Triangle EKF is similar to triangle GJF.
JK:KF = GE:EF (this can be proved using similarity as:
GF/EF = FJ/KF.
(EF+EG)/EF = (FK+KJ)/(KJ)
1 + EG/EF = 1 + FK/KJ
EG/EF = FK/KJ.)
Similarly, IH:IF = JK:KF.
This implies that GE:EF = IH:IF,
which completes our proof.
I have another proof but I am quite certain it's correct.
It utilizes the mid point theorem and it's correct.
Which itself can be gotten by this theorem of basic proportionality.
im doing homework 😔
real 😂
this was a genuine question? well no I sleep and go to my classes and occasionally socialize and stuff
but most the time im just at home, chillin, doin homework
ok beta whatever you say
Please answer to my questions.
whats ur question?
above see it
oh
oh same anjali?
Yes.
.
yeah
hey i have small question
in regard the following
according to this synthetic proof
I would like to know how OP = BP * CP / AP
this prove that all the alttitude meets at one point
i do not see it
do you get why OP/BP = CP/AP?
then multiply both sides of this by BP
oh hmm
it's the reasoning after okay
but i do not really see how that will show that all 3 altitude intersect at one point
still
so if you can elaborate
do you have a link to the ProofWiki page?
sure
found it
