#graduate-applications
1 messages · Page 19 of 1
but those relationships involve good grades in their courses, going to office hours, and potentially doing research with them if theyre willing
but perhaos that is more a sign that my relationship with them was not as good as I imagined
or perhaps they don't think I'm a fit for grad school
¯_(ツ)_/¯
i mean a professor cant necessarily determine this just from A- and B-
but like if all you did academically with this prof was take their courses, then whats there to write about?
that's true
honestly even getting a letter from a prof where all you did with them is get As in their courses isnt an outstanding letter
because itll just be like "good student, got As"
it's tough getting undergrad research opportunities here. most undergraduate RA positions are funded and competitive, profs don't want to take on unfunded students
oh well
how much does the prestige of the masters-granting institution matter if I'm going the research masters -> PhD route
i mean the thing about undergrad research is that most of the time you gotta be okay with it not being super organized
UG research usually looks something like "can you give me a small list of approachable problems and i can keep in contact with you about the one(s) i choose to undertake?"
at least from how ive seen it
grades are also very important. From what ive heard more so than other fields
How much does GRE boost chances?
General GRE or math gre
General GRE essentially does not matter at all unless you do badly on the math portion
Math GRE you want to do not too badly to not get filtered out at schools that care, but doing well isn't that big of a boost
How to forge good relationships with math faculty? I approached 1 prof asking if he'd be open for supervision (independent learning project), he said no. What to do now?
Ask lots of questions in class
Participate
Learn the art of asking good questions. They're teaching the subject because it's what they are passionate about.
Showing your passion and interest gets you in the door. Also they could have said no for reasons that have nothing to do with you.
There's always that.
Hmmm, I study at open uni in an online math program, and typically the classes are taught by ALs (associate lectures), so I don't actually have a chance to see a professor.
Dang lol. Well the principle still stands. Look up some of the research a professor has done, demonstrate some understanding and ask open-ended questions about it
Discuss with them for awhile
Over a period of some weeks
Ohhhh.
Makes sense now! 😀
Thanks bro. I'll try my Best!!!
And don't put all your eggs in one basket man.
And GENUINELY be interested. Don't twist yourself into pretzels trying to make an impression. if you don't have an interest in their work just leave them alone lo.
Yeah that's seems like the most sensible thing to do. Though his research did seem exciting so I think I'm good on that part. I just gotta, do and learn the math now!👍
And don't get discouraged if you get turned down. Again, a lot of times it has nothing to do with you.
(Why does this sound like dating advice?)
🤣 lmao
How hard is it to get into a Canadian masters at a top university (Toronto, Waterloo, McGill, UBC) compared to applying to math PhDs in America as an American student? I’m not seeing much information about this and so I’m having a hard time determining how to approach those apps
Also, do Canadian programs care more about grades and statistics/scores and less about researxh since they’re accepting to a masters? How do expectations/weightage differ, in general?
Is there a reason why it has to be that professor specifically
if you are international student then it's super hard comparing to applying for us schools
i think its similar to applying to comparable US schools
For masters?
International as in non-Canadian? This seems at odds with what Jek is saying
canadian masters and us phd seem similar if the institutions are comparable
these things are very hard to compare. I dont think its much harder to get into top canadian masters than top US PhDs. I think top US PhDs are more competitive.
yes
i did my undergraduate in toronto
Is it okay to ask for letters of recommendation before you've finalised the list of schools you're applying to? If so, how long before you finalise is it okay to ask?
Yes
Well
You should be finalizing it soon anyways
Because deadlines are starting to come up
Are they? This is what I have
This is Canada for context
Is it different in the US?
all i see is that your deadlines are coming up
btw i never told my professors where i was applying to, i just sent all the requests at once
not sure if i was supposed to
I sent them a preliminary list of places when I asked them, and then I sent them my updated spreadsheet of places and deadlines once I finalized my list
Do you mean that I should already have gotten past this point, or do you mean that it's better to do it sooner rather than later regardless?
Hey folks, I need advice on applying to grad school in pure math with a Math finance degree, I have taken measure theory,
Algebra 1, which covered Groups, subgroups, normal subgroups, homomorphisms, quotient groups, coset decomposition, basic (commutative) ring theory: Rings, subrings, homomorphisms, ideals, quotient rings, modules over rings, submodules and quotient modules, fraction field; further group theory: Groups operating on a set, Sylow theorems.
Complex Analysis, which covered the complex number system. Analytic functions. Cauchy's Integral theorem and formula. Applications including the maximum modulus principle, Taylor expansion and Laurent expansion. Harmonic functions. The residue theorem with applications; calculus of residues, argument principle, and Rouche's theorem. Basics of analytic continuation.
Would this be suffice as prereqs for pure math grad school? or would you suggest switching to a pure maths degree that allows me to take topology, functional analysis and algebra 2: which includes field extensions and finite galois theory. In which I would have to extend my degree by a semester.
Alright, so lacking topology and algebra 2 would still be ok given my background? Because I have looked at several schools and they require a course on topology, as well as algebra 2 which includes field extensions and galois theory
Hello. I'm a bit in a pinch. Actually, I'm royally screwed.
After getting my master's, I didn't want the stress of applying for a PhD immediately. Instead, I applied to teach calculus at a bunch of universities, but got rejected everywhere. Tired of wasting my time, eventually I decided to get a “normal” (i.e., non-math) job and focus on caring for my grandmother as well.
And, well, now I've been laid off, so I'm left with no money, no math connections, nothing. When I skim the scrollback in channels like #advanced-algebra, #algebraic-geometry and #alg-top-geo-top, I realize that I know no math, in spite of my degree. So what are my chances to succeed if I were to apply to a PhD program now?
I should just go back to looking for another “normal” job, right?
well, its not a very competitive courseload in the first place, im not sure the extra 2 courses will matter to the adcom
20+
😭 thats like 2k+
you can apply to 5-10 if your advisor has a list of targets, and like 1-2 reaches
Isn't this like literally impossible if you have narrowed your interests even slightly
meaning a max of 1-2 schools in the top20
i feel like unless youve done a significant amount of nontrivial research it is always dubious to have narrowed down your interests past the point where you really shoehorned yourself into a small number of schools
there are a few examples like logic that are exception
I don't think I can find 20+ schools to apply to in the US unless I apply to all the top ones and I haven't narrowed my interests too much beyond "algebraic number theory"
But maybe I'm doing a bad job
If you’re on snap/food stamps most schools will waive fee from my understanding
Just have to send proof
good to know, unfortunately im not on food stamps but 2k is still a lot of money
not to mention how does one do that many apps while writing quality essays for each?
i feel like quality would go down immensely if i applied to that many
you are writing one essay, and one sentence mentioning the people you want to work with
one sentence?
the people reading the essay (if it even gets read) are mathematicians, they rather you be doing math than writing an essay
the evidence mostly comes from your transcript and your letter writers
alright, so basically write a good SOP and then edit 1 or so paragraph where u briefly discuss the professors u wanna work with
for each school
yep
adding onto this, many programs also waive the fee for first-generation and URM students. google the name of the school and "fee waiver" to see if they do so proactively; if not, shoot them an email and sometimes they'll give you one anyway
i think the advice ive heard is like
request a reference at the very least one month before first deadline?
You can get fee waivers if you receive money from FAFSA
Apply to 10-15 schools. 10 is already a lot but it's a good number of schooos
It can be a bit longer than one sentence tbf. Keep around a paragraph to discuss the people ypu want to work with in your statement (mention 2-3 people at the school).
idrk anyone that applied to 20+ tbh
definitely not. Most peoples interests are not that narrow.
ive got 11 on my list. one is my alma mater, then 5 are what i would consider "reach" and 5 are what i would consider "realistic"
i applied everywhere that i wanted to go and gave me a fee waiver + one target
i know someone that spent 3k+ on aplications
all three of my roommates last year
20+ is crazy, I was going to do 4 and got fed up after 3
i dont think its crazy, especially in the current market
My prof recommended like 15
15 was standard in previous years
i personally know multiple people who applied 10+ and still got in nowhere. their lists were reasonable too, with plenty of targets
Everyone knows this year is going to be bad, but unclear how bad it will be
My prof said that math should be relatively insulated because most positions are TA
Lots of departments are having teaching budgets cut
But I think the real issue is wrt the job market being so shit so tons of people are going to be applying
Mmmmm yeah that changes things
And who knows how long this government shutdown is going to last
I applied to 16 and got into 2 last year
i feel like it was 10-15 with 15 being the higher end of standard. Applying to more than 15 was rare.
i applied to like 18 because I was applying to both cs and math and wasnt sure which i wanted to do and didnt apply to safeties. That was a decent bit more than anyone i know .
I applied to 15
all three of your roommates applied to over 20 math phd programs? That's interesting.
I feel like the number is slowly going up
i think you should apply to as many as you want (I did). im just surprised to hear people say 15-20+ is standard.
applications are getting harder and harder each year, so people are sending out more and more applications
When I speak to people irl they made it seem like i applied to a lot
the US game always seems way more intense than in europe
Because everyone I know are applying to 2-5 schools max
i applied to 21 and got into 2
i couldnt get a fee waiver for my safety so i didnt apply
applications have been consistently pretty bad since covid
but were on an upward trend until last year
17,22,23 lol so technically not but as an average
I applied to like 17 or 18 places for grad school
Wait really? All the professors I’ve spoken to this year have said they don’t know.
Should I take another year off to do more research then?
I felt pretty confident that my better application this year will greatly boost my chances
Currently there's no guarantee that it will be better next year
If you do want to do a PhD, then you should apply this year regardless
Will this year be worse than last year? Cuz i only got one interview last year
well last year was a lot of uncertainty, but uhh things look a lot more certain (and not in a good way) this year
how people interpret that idk
What exactly is the logic? They already know about decreased funding so they’ll be more selective in the beginning?
Yeah
So like even big names won’t help much?
in what way
funding cuts have already happened
uh
it’s quite varied in the impact, but as far as i can tell pretty much every (?) university that i’m aware of has been affected in some way
but most of the funding for grad students is from grants, no?
Recently I have been thinking about applying to PhD in Applied Math. I have an undergrad degree in economics but last year I took a couple of real analysis courses and I still have the chance of taking more math classes. I would appreciate any help as to whether it would be possible for me to pursue that path, maybe at a midtier school and also how I could look for schools that could be a good fit for me.
yeah when i said funding cuts i really meant grants were cancelled
Yeah a friend of a friend had her to-be-advisors grant cut and they reneged their offer
that’s brutal
this is in the US right?
yes, outside of us i think people usually know roughly where they are going as they are applying
yeah, the funding cuts have been brutal
i'm canadian and i think only applying domestically, so hopefully it'll be a bit easier
my department keeps being forced to downsize
this means less taships
not sure what people are on about when they say taships arent affected tbh
i guess research is more affected
but yeah unis funding are getting cut across the board
recitation sections for a lot of math classes were cut at my school
Is it about the US specifically? Or is it a global phenomenon?
pretty sure us specifically
If I go off to Europe to do my masters, will it help me with going to a PhD here?
Where is here
America
ok now will it help compared to what
its hard to say whether it will help for many reasons. Three simple reasons are this heavily depends on what you mean by help, what your current application looks like, and what American universities you're shooting for.
As a weaker American applicant, it may be time to seriously pursue international locations
Who knows, maybe I'll never return to America 😂
i dont think applying outside of america is necessarily the correct move
im considering applying to some places in central europe but the thing is all the programs i found that interested me don't have their apps open until like march/april of next year... when the american programs will be sending out decisions
how much does this apply to math
im double majoring in an almost completely unrelated field but probably looking more at the (applied) math direction (or a more math-y engineering or potentially bio program) for this round of applications
unfortunately one of my two most recent math profs declined to write so im faced with the possibility of having to either ask a prof i barely know from two years ago, or asking across fields
I am a little bit nervous because I only have two reccomenders rn and one of them is out of field
I am doing 2-3 ish research projects rn and I am wondering when I should ask one of them to be a letter writer (GIven that I could have not really asked earlier)
you should ask asap. they should have at least one months notice
Yeah I’ve only considered one school outside of the US: Weitzman
Europe has some good schools for tcs too
?
yeah i really need to pick two more profs and contact them
just really nervous
Probably better to ask across fields
How big is the difficulty leap going directly from undergrad to a PhD program vs. doing an explicit master's inbetween? I'm pretty torn on which avenue to take, since I have a lot of hobbyist experience w abstract algebra/real analysis/complex analysis/diff eq, but looking at a lot of PhD prelim exams they are...quite tough 👀 dunno how well incoming students are expected to do on them, but definitely humbling to look over lol
my interest (set theory) is fairly distant from that general content, but im not sure if that's a boon or a bane...
The real question is, will you get straight into a PhD programme? In America this is the standard route and you kinda do the masters along the way. In the UK and Europe unless you have a proven track record as an exceptional student and already know what you want to work on with a person happy to work with you you’re likely to just be told no
yeh europe's a longshot, i'd prolly be looking the US. the harder schools (UC's, namely) would be preferable for me, but there are some slightly easier to get into ones for logic/foundations as well.
i had a small research position in my last semester of undergrad w/ under real analysis prof (who is a set theorist), but i didn't publish anything.
i knew it was somewhat common to go direct-to-PhD in the US, but it's interesting that you say it's in fact the standard route, wasn't aware of that.
Yeah I’m in the UK so I know the UK and EU stuff a little better, there will be people who can help you better for US specific stuff but stand alone masters as far as I understand are not that common in the US and applying directly to a grad school is the typical route
As far as how much you’re supposed to know about quals before you go I couldn’t say, I suspect the answer is along the lines of “Maybe not all of it, but it shouldn’t look totally foreign” but I’ll leave that for people who actually know what they’re talking about
Also just as an FYI, this is probably going to be a brutal year to get into a grad programme with all of the funding cuts going around, so maybe just bare that in mind, I imagine things are going to be silly competitive for a while
if you are looking at the top schools then you should expect to at least be able to pass parts of the quals on admission
if you are interested in set theory, then im told by my logician friend that you should probably know basic analysis (i.e. the stuff you would see in a real analysis qual, e.g. measure theory)
as long as the adcom is under the impression you have that knowledge, who cares if you actually pass the qual...
ok ok thanks for the insider perspectives. for me the analysis quals were easiest, still not themselves easy, but I could read all of the solutions with little to no problem and solve a lot of them, just takes me a while. for complex analysis + abstract algebra they were a bit harder, but i also have less experience with those in a classroom, i.e. non-hobbyist context so if I practice in the meantime im not too worried. diff eq tho..... 👀
well tbf i just suck at diff eq in general so
Yeah I’m glad I’m not in the US there’s no reason to make me try to do DEs, just a mistake for everyone
i guess i just wanted to make sure it's an accurate impression that they'll be taking into account that what id be specializing in isn't as tied to those courses
cuz im not rly worried about proving my bonafides for set theory stuff, that stuff I'm conversant enough in to at least prove im not a fraud lol
This depends on the nature of the prelims
Some graduate schools have prelims which go over topics which you should know before entering but some cover graduate topics solely
graduate admissions Frequently Asked Questions More information for international students Dear Prospective Applicant, Thank you for your interest in graduate studies in the Department of Mathematics at UCLA. Applications are accepted for Fall quarter matriculation only. The application deadline is December 13. Application review process begins...
here's information on ucla's phd admissions process
ucla's qualifying exams have a reputation for being very difficult (especially the analysis qual)
Yeah one of my profs in UG is analyst who did his PhD and his early career at UCLA and that man always had some crazy expectations and set tough exams. Great lecturer though, really nice guy, but it does seem to produce that culture
Hi
How much does it hurt me not to take the GRE
well for one u cant apply to schools that require it, notably like ucla or berkeley
but otherwise from what ive read is that it can help a decent bit if youre from an unknown school
how relevant is GPA for grad applications?
It is something they look at?
i had like a 4.0 but it was also not at a super relevant school. in CS too rather than math, technically
*in undergraad
I mean they do care about your performance in undergrad
simply put yea
well ig the 4.0 can only help, or at worst be neutral if it's only a minor consideration
That the test is worth it?
no i was answering this
They’re both me lol
that yes they consider your undergrad performance, gpa, etc but yk they also consider everything else so
oh
well ye thats what ive seen anyways
good test score could maybe offset a lower gpa probably but like not a crazy low one yk
I have two stains rn but everything else has been fine and that’s what Im worried about. :/
I’m in the 3.2 range rn and if I’ll be in the 3.3 if I do well this sem
So like I’m just really trying to gain how marginal it would be for me
I would probably take it to offset that gpa
A 4.0 should help but your coursework matters a lot
or try anyways
Okay now I’m conflicted :,). I’ve had people tell me that it will and will not do much. If I got a perfect or even just a high score on it would it be equivalent to a 3.4-3.5 range gpa?
i hesitate to say equivalent but yes a very good score could show the schools that you do indeed have a solid understanding of undergraduate math. but also as someone else here said gpa is only one part of your entire app
That’s fair
I think getting a really good score on the math gre could help a lot. It isnt equivalent to a gpa because they measure different things. It could tell them that you at least know the basics well and have potential but might be lazy or whatever.
the mgre tells schools how good your lower div math is
Yeah because like 50% of the exam is like Calculus
:,) right
What is a good website to look at rankings of schools in the US?
If I (4th year UG) withdraw from a graduate class (smooth manifolds) that I am taking this semester, will I be extremely cooked? I am worried that this will send the message to programs that “this student can not handle graduate level coursework”
I'm not well-equipped to give advice, but am wondering what the alternative would be. Failing the class? Not having time to do well in other classes?
What does your class load look like?
Numerical, Stochastic processes, topics in applied math, writing gen ed, smooth manifolds
Yeah i was thinking that the alternatives would be worse
Do you feel like you’re following the content? How have homework and exams been?
Do you think you’ll need it in the future for what you want to do?
Smooth manifolds? Idk, chances are I’ll have to take topology in grad school anyway.
Well sort of what Casey was getting at what are things looking like now? Are you failing or just looking at a C? Etc.
If it's a withdrawal
It will be on my transcript
App deadline?
I’m asking because if you like it and you’ll have to retake any, I would ride it out if it wont hurt your gpa or if you think it’ll benefit to have the knowledge
Most of them are after final grades are due at most schools
Like a lot of 15th deadlines
@wet ruin @limber zephyr my guess is that I could barely pass SM if I stay in. My other classes are ok now but obviously I’d do better in them if I dropped SM.
Oh that app dealine lol
Retroactive withdrawal 😛
But that requires medical reasons or exceptional circumstances obviously just joking around
If you arent psyched about the class I’d say go ahead and drop it
I think it’s equally as interesting as any other area, I don’t really know what I want to specialize in at this point
Are you taking other graduate courses?
Numerical analysis
The graduate version of it
I mean I’m taking smooth manifolds rn and kind of struggling with it as well but like I really want to learn it and it’s the only hard course Im taking rn for math
I figured XD
Vector Bundles go brrrrrrr
Yeah it took me a while to wrap my head around how Lee defines the tangent space
why do u say that?
as in y retake topology
Alg topo
oh that’s different lol, i see
I don’t actually know
Statements of Purpose for MS are useless
I'm paying you, if I have the GPA and research, let me in
dont most grad programs make you retake the pillars
Writing these stupid antiquated ways of deciphering whos "Fit for the challenge of an MS"
give the PhD's more writing they love it (or will learn to) /rant over
Point set is really only interested in defining what a topology is and generalizing continuity
Algebraic Topology is basically using category theory to make a topological question an algebraic one in some sense
Like instead what can I say about these topological spaces, what can I say about these groups and extracting info from that.
I “skipped” point set it’s boring
Joke
I self studied it to get into smooth manifolds
A C in a grad class is failing
You still get grades? I thought it was pass/fail
Like I was expecting 2 exams
mid term and final
and GL
In grad classes? Yes you get grades.
Its also common to have homework and maybe a project depending the the course and school
In my masters, all of my classes are cross listed with undergrad classes, just with different exams and modified homeworks
but that’s CS
i was wondering like how u takin manifolds if u need topology but makes sense
uhh i think? unless u can pass the qualifying exams. but i imagine a grad top sequence is like not point set top lol or like it goes through point set top in a month max
prob depends on school tho so idk
my school’s ug topology class never runs
ah rip
my schools top class had like 8 students enrolled lol im surprised it isnt canceled
I got a no-credit grade for a grad class somehow albeit this being in my last sem of undergrad when I was completely checked out
I do not recommend this whatsoever
at my school it is
im in undergrad but taking the grad topology course and its pointset, covering spaces, and fundamental group
for a whole sem?
uhh lemme get the syllabus
i mean that makes sense
i mean were using munkres
i guess thats a good indicator of what were covering
yea yea i mean thats standard
ye ur prob right, i was js saying cuz if hes doing manifolds then he woulda alrdy done this class and presumably would be able to pass a top qual, which i assume means u dont need it anymore
I guess thats more typically for an ug class
tbf i go to my state school
its the best for math where i live but still a lot of grads coming in dont have a super crazy background
I went to a shitty state school
ye same in my state school, the grad top class covers the same but its just covering it very quickly
Wouldnt be surprised if the grad version taught the same thing at my old uni
the undergrad topology course here is only point set
and as i said grad top is that plus covering spaces and fundamental group
so at the very least it is more advanced content
Good point. We didnt cover all of munkres
were doing all of munkres except the heavily analytic stuff
mainly bc most of that is covered either in undergrad analysis 2 or the grad analysis sequence
That makes sense
oh really? Like, in terms of how it's viewed or is it actually?
Thanks for letting me know
PhD students in the US are required to maintain a >3.0 gpa to remain in good standing
So a B is borderline failing
Yep a B doesn’t look good
a B for a grad student outside the field of research means you did what you were supposed to
a B as an undergrad looks kinda bad
I would not say that
Really course dependent. In my experience you have to do very bad to get a B.
multiple friends got a C in measure theory and i got a B, legitimately might be a grad school killer
i was average
I only had one 4.0 semester in undergrad (A- is my worst enemy), but 4.0 grad seems kinda managable if you do 2 courses + research, or 3 courses + no research
y would a B as an undergrad look bad if the content is supposedly harder? ofc an A is preferred but it sounds like ur saying a B in a grad class looks worse than a B in say the equivalent ug class?
Yes because professors grade easier in grad classes
this is only true for certain professors, and is especially true for non core courses
yea i imagine in a topics course its easy to get an A but like in core algebra/topology/analysis?
highly depends on course format as well
as an undergrad, grad algebra was easy to get an A because everything could be take home, but my current algebra course is 100% exam grade
makes sense, mine is like 75% midterm/final and then the rest weekly psets
makes ug look like cake im ngl
actually its bc my ug algebra was take home exam lol so its the opposite to urs
Oof
My undergrad analysis 2 is not that easy
undergrad classes are usually nontrivial even if the content is much easier tho
@blissful crystal calmate
go do ur hw bruh
how much time does a first year phd student spend on learning all the relevant areas of math before doing their research? How much knowledge does a supervisor expect beyond the basic undergrad courses?
If you're in a direct-from-undergrad PhD program, you should probably expect to spend close to full time the first year on learning existing stuff, and very little creative research.
your research presumably has more prerequisites than just qual stuff
it is still probably 1-2 years of learning existing stuff even if you pass out of the quals
Depends on the field
My first year I was doing TCS research but I’m a ways away from doing math research I think
Yeah, the research frontier in CS is more readily accessible than in math.
Back when I started university I thought I was going to be a mathematician, but I switched topics towards the end of undergrad because I found I could at least state some research questions in CS, but had no idea what the relevant questions in math were even about.
Got a few publications out of my M.Sc. work too (and to be frank, I think they're more original and impressive than what I eventually turned in as a PhD thesis).
i would say much much more accessible, even my friends in TCS are able to do cutting edge research after only about a semester or two of taking classes
eh this is an overstatement. Most undergrads are not doing very interesting research in TCS. Even if it is still research. Its similar to math REUs. There are plenty of areas of math that have problems accessible to undergrads/early grad students.
fair enough
Can I ask my letter writer for advice on a personal statement/statement of intent?
thank yall for the answers! i was just somewhat afraid that the undergrad classes i took are not enough and that maybe ppl are already hyperfocused on one subject before phd (also that my interests are not narrowed down yet).
a professor told me it is quite rare for students to know what they want to do in grad school when applying. Many have an idea, or perhaps a small list of subjects, but in general rarely one specific topic and almost never a specific question. They also said many people change what they decide to focus on/what they like in grad school. Basically, its okay if you dont know for sure yet
Of course! Ideally this person should be a supervisor or tutor of some description anyway, at the very least an academic you have an connection with, so they’re the natural person to speak with
if thats the case how much does the "whats ur area of interest (select up to 2 or 3)" and "list your preferred supervisor" questions on grad application actually matter then?
It seems vaguely true to me (though idk how well my experience generalizes).
I think it's also going to vary some amount based on region, specific schools and personal context.
Given that some places require a masters degree to apply to grad programs and students who have done more math will have more well developed senses of what they like.
But I know a fair amount of people who went into grad programs knowing vaguely what fields they were interested in but not to a high level of specificity.
I think at my uni those questions actually end up determining who reviews your application (partially) rather than being a do or die component of your application decision.
So, for example, everybody in my cohort did an interview and that interview typically consisted of the grad program director, the dept head and one faculty member related to what we said our interests were.
I think in Europe, Asia, and other places it's actually quite normal to get into a PhD program with the intent to work with a specific professor on a project. I'm sure lots of different countries vary a lot. However in the US, this is mostly not the case. I would think of selecting what you're interested in as just a way to say what faculty are interested. You don't want to name a faculty in your statement that's no longer accepting students. But having a broad-stroke of "I'm really interested in geometry-topology" or stating what you find interesting is just a chance for you to share (and convince) the grad admissions people to let you in
is this even if we took a lot of grad level classes in undergrad?
Field dependent but probably yeah, I cant imagine theres many recent grads out there who have a research level understanding of say homotopy theory
That will be mostly guesswork from my side, but the general vibe I get is that there are several years of study between a completed typical undergrad curriculum and most points on the research frontier, and it will be limited how much of all that can realistically be shifted into undergrad.
i see
also usually with phd, is it that we're taking classes while writing our thesis while also teaching a class and/or assisting our supervisor with research?
It depends on the uni and the country. From what I understand its not uncommon to take some courses in your first year then move onto just seminars etc and work on your thesis. Some people may have teaching responsibilities too, which could be optional or could be required
also another issue i'm having is deciding between these three paths:
- probably theory and theoretical ml
- combinatorics + graph theory + theoretical cs
- computer vision
how feasible would it be to either do both the first two or the first and the third?
cause i always hear that i should specialize as much as possible
Idk if you should specialize as much as possible but its hard to get to a place where you can consistently contribute to multiple fields.
There are people that do 1 and 2 but those areas are not disjoint.
are graph theory and theoretical cs oftentimes grouped together?
cause graph theory is the foundation behind the theory behind graph algorithms in cs right?
Uh idk what you mean by grouped together
like if i did both, would that be considered one field or two
cause both are closely linked
sorry if this is a strange/dumb question
Thanks!
Idrk what your question is. But, It depends on what you work on. Plenty of people in tcs would say theyre interested in graph theory and combinatorics. Idk how many would claim theyre graph theorists.
The fields have a lot in common but they focus on different things.
To what extent are master's applicants in Europe expected to know what subject they're interested in compared with in Canada/US? How fast are you expected to specialise?
oh i see
so i would likely have to go with one or the other in order to be successful
the issue is i really can't decide haha
and i'm running out of time
cause in 3 years i'll be applying for grad, but i have planned classes in pretty much everything lol
Why do you have to decide soon?
Idk bc i dont know you. It is possible to work on both math and tcs, but generally the math problems you work on are related to the tcs ones and vice versa.
well it's not a massive deal if i don't, but it would help cause then i can take more grad level classes in the field i'll be pursuing rather than having them more spread out
i see, so it's still possible
As an undergrad you should try to get a broad education. If possible, take advanced ug and grad classes in many fields.
yeah at the moment i'm taking probability theory and combinatorics at the undergrad level
it's funny how i became interested in both
for probability i just took it to fulfill the stats class requirement for cs major, and then for combinatorics i switched into it cause discrete maths was boring lol
and i don't regret either decision one bit
You should know your broad kinda theme but not exactly what you want to do, on my statements I mentioned that I’m broadly interested in algebra, particularly noncommutative rings, but also in algebraic topology and homological algebra and then gave some more specific examples of stuff I’ve looked at
from what I’ve gathered from speaking to other people in my course that’s pretty standard, most people are into “applied PDEs” or “algebra with a number theoretic flavour” stuff like that
Noncommutative rings, AT, and homological algebra sounds pretty specific to me 😅
Although I'm thinking of saying pretty much exactly "algebra with a number theoretic flavour" anyways
not really
I guess everything's relative. Every professor I've spoken to has said they don't really know how it works in Europe, but they have the general impression that (a) you need to specialise faster and (b) you have less freedom to change your mind, whereas I've met grad students here who did a master's in calculus of variations and their phd in algebraic geometry
This happens, a PhD student in number theory at my uni did his masters on regularity for PDEs. I’m sure there’s other more drastic changes too. While it is true that generally in Europe people will be a bit more specialised than in people in the US (on average) you don’t need to know exactly what you want to do and there is room to change
Like you should have a rough idea by the time you’re getting to PhD level, if you’ve never touched algebra and all of a sudden you’re applying to work on some problem in AG you might struggle, but it’s not completely inflexible and it’s going to vary from place to place, there’s still CDTs here and they’re naturally more flexible
Interesting. What country is this if I can ask? I've also been cautioned that things can vary a lot between schools or countries (and by others that things are similar, generally following the bologna standard nowadays)
Centre for Doctoral Training?
I’m in the UK, the system here is a little different to a lot of mainland Europe but I still know enough people who have went to or came from Europe and I’m looking there myself just now so I’ve got a decent idea of how it goes
But yes things can vary a lot between unis and countries in Europe
Yeah, there’s like a hundred other names for them but that general structure is starting to become more common here now, though the classic apply to a professor for a specific problem thing does still exist
I've never heard of those; I'll have to look into them
On that topic, are you able to comment on how important it is to find someone who's willing to supervise you before a master's (or a PhD)?
In Canada, my understanding is that it's not explicitly necessary but it is helpful for admission, especially at schools with larger depts
If we're talking masters studies, they tend (in my European experience) to be a lot more streamlined with centralized admission procedures than getting hired as a PhD student, so having contact with a prospective supervisor is comparatively less important.
Of course, having a supportive contact on the inside to help you navigate the local bureaucracy is never a bad thing, but on the flip side, a random professor in such a place might not consider it their responsibility to recruit/attract foreign masters students.
Just to be clear, you're saying that the admissions process is more streamlined for MSc programs than for PhD programs, and not that this is more the case in Europe compared to Canada/US?
The first of those.
For masters, doesn’t matter, you’ll find someone when you get there. For PhDs reaching out can definitely be helpful and in some cases essential, but as I said there are more places moving towards the American grad school, CDT style system where that’s less important to do
You’ll just have to look and see what’s offered. In either case I think reaching out is a good idea, especially if it’s someone you’d really like to work with, to make sure they’re actually available
But the answer to a lot of this, for PhDs at least, is that it’s going to change so much from department to department that you’ll just have to look at the individual schools
(Continental?) Europe generally considers "PhD student" (post MSc) to be a job you're hired for, and there it matters a lot who will be funding your salary. If a professor has a grant he/she can fund PhD students with, they have a lot of say on who gets hired into those positions -- on the other hand, universities often also fund some PhD students out of their general budget, and then there tends to be more of a set application process with fixed deadlines and some amount of central decisionmaking.
Where I did my UG has 2 CDTs and also people who just advertise their own projects, it’s just going to depend a lot
This is very helpful. Thanks @half meadow @paper granite
Don't worry about specialization right now. The most important thing you should do is try to form relationships with professors so that you'll have people that can vouch for you when you end up applying to graduate school.
also how important is the major
cause i'm a cs major, but i'm leaning towards a phd in math
though that's something i still haven't quite decided on, cause i like machine learning and computer vision as well
Why not do a major in math then?
It's going to be hard to get into a math Ph.D. without a really solid foundation in math
that would mean i'd have to do a whole 4 semesters of a language 😭
i can thank my uni for that lol
i'm still taking a lot of math classes
But are you planning on taking the entire undergraduate math curriculum and not getting the major...?
i'd say half and half between math and cs
i'd have to check, but it could be
i'm doing a math minor though
i just don't want to spend time on learning a language cause that would take up a lot of time
time that could be spent on math...
You have to remember you're competing for spots against people who have exhausted all the math classes at their undergraduate institutions, done REUs over the summer, done independent reading with professors, etc.
lol
oh yeah true
i mean, i'll be doing a lot of that too though
i have grad level math classes planned starting sophomore year
and might do paper readings this summer
i think i'll have even more than a lot of math majors. i just prefer sticking to cs because it's in the engineering department, for which i have all gen eds done
whereas for the department with the math major, i'd have to take a language and some other gen eds
how does independent paper reading work
is it like you go through some papers with the professor and then assist them with research?
independent reading is just the term for when you read a textbook on an advanced topic and then usually meet with a professor weekly or something to discuss what you learned, ask questions, etc. Basically they just help facilitate u reading an advanced topic
doesnt really have anything to do with research typically (although it can be in preparation for research), undergrad research or REUs are something different
oh
interesting
so do people cold email for this, or is it only if professor puts up an offer
i would think second cause seems strange to cold email about this, but not sure
in my experience u just ask but sometimes theres programs (at my school anyway) where professors or TAs offer doing an independent reading
i would go up and ask in person for sure, unless youve taken a class w them in the past or something and they have reason to know u
independent readings are useful because well 1 u learn a new advanced topic and 2 the professor often gets to know u and can be a possible letter writer
oh then i think maybe near the end of the semester i can ask my probability and combinatorics professors if they're running independent readings
would be cool especially because probability professor does research in algebraic topology
I'm doing a PhD scholarship application, I've detailed my relevant undergraduate/postgraduate projects and the specfic area that I'm interested in pursuing for PhD in a lot of detail given their requirements for the application
The last thing I mention is a brief paragraph that details my latest experience of a research internship I did, where I actually worked on new research. However, given the word limit, I've refrained from discussing the mathematical details completely since it's in an area of pure mathematics that I'm not looking to pursue for PhD at all (sorry for the ambiguity, I don't want to give away too many information) so I don't think it's worth explaining any of the content since it's completely irrelevant to what I want to do next -- however I have highlighted how I've now actually done current research and that's confirmed to me I want to do a PhD.
Can anyone think of a sentence I could add which very quickly shows why I'm not outlining it without looking 'bad' in a sense? Like before I had "despite [irrelevant area] being unrelated to [my area]," as a bridge but thought it sounded less-positive and detracted from the point I was making.
If you're close to the word count limit, then no need to mention anything
I can always cut words
I just really feel I should just add one small line to explain why I haven't detailed the research I did during the internship -- Since to someone who isn't in the maths world, where isn't as obvious to them that these two areas are very unrelated, I feel they'll find it weird that I've kind of 'avoided' talking about it if I don't
hope that helps ^
What is a good GRE Score
Math GRE or general GRE
or a better question whats a good enough math gre score where u can submit it to score-required top/higher tier universities and not have ur application dropped immediately
i would also like to know
i know that CU boulder likes to see 550 or higher and Berkeley wants you in the top 50th percentile, but what about the others
true, although i feel like 50th percentile is low for berkeley. prob is secretly higher
also would like to know whats a good score to submit for "optional math gre", i suspect it is 900+ 
i suspect the same 💔
I'm in Canada. How much does "brand name" matter to (potentially) US/UK/Asian universities taking on PhD students coming out of a Canadian MSc.
not necessarily in math could be something adjacent
you suspect correctly
prayge for a 900🙏
Does "basic degree" mean undergrad equivalent?
So if I only have a UK Master's I still need the TOEFL/IELTS?
Since for some reason the last 2 bullet points are US only
I would presume so, it’s probably worth reaching out to someone in their admissions though, I would imagine that a UK masters should suffice
Especially given where I think you did you masters
Yeah, I'll try. Though it seems most unis have something like that unfortunately so it's likely I'll still have to take it. 😔
At least I can just do it online
Yeah it’s still rather annoying, rather not have to sit pointless tests I imagine
I know of two people who got into Berkeley and Stanford respectively last cycle but they were also at the top of my year in the graduating math class (strong undergrad research + many grad classes taken) so they presumably didn't need to take the mGRE
from what i've heard, if you did a well known undergrad with strong enough grades to be competitive for these types of schools, the GRE essentially can only hurt you
im abit confused about when is the correct time that I should be applying. I am currently in my final year sem 1, my results for this sem come out mid-dec and in my final year sem 2, the results for that final sem come out next year mid-june. And graduation is officially in July
Does it make sense for me to be applying for fall intakes now in the US(starting around september)? or am i suppose to be applying for the next cycle instead.
You should be applying now
thanks for the reply
Yeah it’s a little annoying how early you have to do it, I’ll be applying to stuff in the coming weeks and I’ll be lucky if I’ve even picked my masters thesis yet. Yes I’ll have my UG stuff to show, but I’ll have literally nothing for this step yet
Just kinda how it goes
yes I would rather apply post graduation, alot of my higher level mods and my yearlong final year project would not be included if i applied now
but i would have to wait a full year since the places im looking at basically only have one intake in the fall
You certainly can take a year out if that’s what youd prefer, but Unis know about it though so there will be some acknowledgment of it made
What level of undergraduate research do schools like Princeton/MIT/Harvard/etc. usually expect?
depends on the field
The highest in fact so just plan on maxing out whatever you can
Briefly, Thomas Forster tells me that he has acquired funding for two studentships in Wellington NZ (a delightful place!) for students who want to do a Ph.D. in set theory, in particular working with him on NF or perhaps some adjacent topic. He has an intriguing page of possible thesis topics here. Please spread the […]
Briefly, Thomas Forster tells me that he has acquired funding for two studentships in Wellington NZ (a delightful place!) for students who want to do a Ph.D. in set theory, in particular working with him on NF or perhaps some adjacent topic. He has an intriguing page of possible thesis topics here. Please spread the word if you have suitable students — and for more details, email Thomas.
Idk but you can look at the websites of graduate students there you may be able to find out what they did as undergrads. not sure its productive though.
Itd be better to look at the most recent admitted grad students due to the increased competition
but where would u look at that
I assume it's fine if I'm going to another Canadian school for PhD (for example)
Also I don't intend to take the MGRE
What GRE score does UCLA and UC Berkley look for
taking MGRE on Friday. Do not feel very prepared. I'm confident I can clear Boulder's 550 point threshold, but not berkeley's 50th percentile one
Omg :,)
I was thinking about signing up to take it on Saturday or Sunday
where i live there wasnt any spots available on the actual weekend
also im seeing my favorite band friday night so would have been a bad idea to take it the next morning LOL
I’ve heard >80th percentile, depends on the paper what exactly that translates to from a points perspective maybe minimum around 800/820 points
For this
Yeah unfortunately
hopefully my research experience and very strong connection can overcome a bad mgre
if not im not too miffed bc berkeley is not my top choice anyway
JHU is and they're not requiring any test scores
in retrospect submitting sub 80 was definitely suicidal
You don't have to submit the mGRE if it wasn't so good
even when required in the application??? that doesnt seem right
not sure i agree
Yeah, I can't say about that
even if its required you dont have to submit it
nobody is forcing you to submit it
they might ignore your application without it
well nobody's forcing anyone to do anything but clearly that's not a useful fact here
Good luck with boulder!!! (sko buffs)
thamk ❤️
Things feel so Joever
facts
<@&268886789983436800>
I know recommendation letters are generally supposed to be from professors in the math department, but if I am applying to a master's with a logic concentration and the closest thing my university has to a logician is a professor in the philosophy department that I've taken a "philosophy of math" class with, is that a suitable person to ask for a recommendation letter?
Why wouldn't they be suitable
Made a typo, they're a philosophy professor and not a math professor
Pretty sure philosophy and mathematical logic have fairly close ties but that could just be specific to my uni
Ok philosophy is still quite suitable if you are interested in logic
there are many places where logicians are only in the philosophy or cs departments
One of my rec letters was a guy in aerospace you'll be fine
Both the uni where I did my UG and where I’m going my masters only offers logic in the philosophy department
Well what if you did amazing research are they gonna let go of you for a couple percents?
probably not
gg
woe
just the ay''+by'+y=0 and converse of clairaut's theorem is sufficient
also my experience is that my oct exam was extremely easy compared to the September one
almost feel like they give easier exams the more money u put in, p2w
hi, i think im overly stressing abit about application details but asking a prof to write lor for 7 applications is okay right?
Yes
okay thank you
waif wut ;-;
i mean
theres a testing site near my campus
that was just the only oen
for tha tlocation
my letter writers had to do something around 25, and then im asking them again this year for more lmao
25 schools!?
no literally like
diff eq and linear/abstract alg are gonna murder me
everything else i can do pretty reliably
no but schools arent the only thing that require letters
mm true
alas i already have a masters so i cant do GRFP
altho they seem to allow folks with bachelors-masters which is what I did so.... maybe i can??? i read the rules the other day it wasnt super clear
cant
im gonna be broke as fuck man 😭
i mean ur phd program should be funded
definitely dont go to one thats not 😭 unless ur crazy rich ig
well, you have to get into one first
true
yeah im only looking at funded ones but like
the funding is 30k a year if ur lucky 😭
right now im living in a whole house completely alone, savoring it before i need to live in a shoebox with 3 roommates for 6 years
i remember looking at my 23k offer
i got 19k offer from UIC
yeah uic is actually atrocious
something like that
chicago is affordable but not THAT affordable
i hope UPitt gives a decent one if I get in there
pittsburgh's sposed to be very affordable i hear
on their website is says like 23.5k (https://www.mathematics.pitt.edu/graduate/admissions-and-financial-aid)
Admission Requirements To qualify for admission to full graduate status, an applicant must have a bachelor's degree in mathematics or a closely related field, a minimum overall QPA of 3.0 (relative to a possible maximum of 4.0) in all undergraduate subjects, and a minimum QPA of 3.25 in the mathematics curriculum. It is desirable that the applic...
if you can get an offer, private will almost always be much better than public
union benefits are common as well
yeah thats true... all my previous degrees are from private schools tho i kind of want to go to a public one for my phd
for what reason
ya that is an odd statement
i want to hear your reasoning because i cannot think of a single reason
its not like you're paying for your education anymore
i dont know if i really have one beyond like. id just feel a bit weird if ALL of my higher education was from private institutions. maybe its just my politics messing with something
🤨
my list leans mostly public i think.
JHU, UCB, UCI, UTA, ASU, U of Arizona, UW Seattle, WashU, Rice, UPitt
that's austin not arlington for UT lol
JHU is public?
no
ah
mostly public but not entirely
ok public vs private aside that's a small list
yeah not many places i found that had what i wanted
very small especially in current climate
should apply to 50+ nowadays. Apply to every school in the US.
I applied to like 16 or 17 places
50+???
cost is alot, apply for waivers that you can find
my wallet shrieked at the thought of all those app fees
50 is crazy but 20 is not unreasonable
look all the app fees suck but you can get waivers for things like doing REUs
i think ive only found one fee waiver im actually elligible for XD
if i was applying this cycle id apply to 20+
also it's the next 6 years of your life
I had a friend who applied to 21. His reasoning was that he estimated his chances of getting into a program as 5%, so by applying to 20, he'd get 100%. And then, he wanted above 100% for the peace of mind.

never did an REU
not in any honors society
not in any marginalized group/org associated to those statuses
if that is how they do probability I hesitate to ask if they got into any places
I'm pretty sure he was joking
so am I lol
this was exactly my reasoning
i have a stats masters, i can tell you with certainty, every event is 50/50. it either happens or it doesnt
ok at the least CMU has free application, can't hurt
CMU 
honors society doesnt matter. Not being in a marginalized group helps.
but CMU doesn't have enough people doing what i want
for being eligible for fee waivers it helps
by not enough, do you mean, how many
i looked for places with at least 3 people in or very close to what i want to do (minimal surfaces)
I think CMU had like 1 and a half
because where im at, there is 1 analyst, and i didnt know that there was only 1 analyst
this is also my current interests
but there's just one guy doing it? and no one else like even close to that?
Switch to ML
no, there is only one classical analyst
o
there are far more people doing minimal surfaces
i seee
i did not realize when i applied for analysis though
wait what makes private better than public here. just better salary?
Should I make a second account for my graduate school application if the first site isn't available from the university I originally applied through?
I would call them and ask
Chat how do you write a personal statement
or a statement of purpose, any advice would be great
Thats too vague
Have you looked up advice on google? What you should write depends a lot on your person situation. I think it helps to read some examples and read general advice online. Then think about what you want to convey and how. Then ask people for feedback.
Will schools consider automatically consider you for their master's program if they reject you from the PhD program? I'm straight out of undergrad and know I want to do a PhD but don't want to put all my eggs in one basket and get rejected from every grad school I apply to. I'm more than willing to get a master's first if it will help my eventual application to a PhD program
Not in general, but some school will.
when Rice (and other schools) asks for the list of math courses you've taken, do they really want a list of... ALL... the math courses ive taken? or is this an opportunity to highlight the ones that are most relevant to my interests/that i did particularly well in
All of them
understandable
should I count statistics couses as well?
Sometimes there is a field for non-math stem classes where you could put stats classes
If there is no other field and stats is relevant to your interests then yeah put them
word
thanks!
can i talk ab GRFP app here?
ah, ty
np
Hello, I want to ask about research experience for pure math phd application. I am an international student and haven't really had research experience, even as an exposition.
But, I have been associated to a local math institution whether I am taught advanced math well above my undergrad curriculum and they will defiantly write a strong lor...
I am worried that no written evidence might be a hurdle.
Should I be worried about my chances of getting an offer...
An international classmate in my cohurt got in without research experience, they did a masters however, ofc they had a thesis.
Ah im an undergrad tho...I will be writing an undergrad thesis/some manuscript but it'll be after December or so.
oh, then idk. i got in as an undergrad, but i was doing research and im not a international student
Could you give an idea as to how that research was structured? Like, were you assisting a prof or independently. Also, did you have some written work ready while applying.
well, i did two reus. and i looked for someone to do a thesis with, after that i became a bit more brave in asking to work wiith professors
but no, i dindtv have anything out when applying, i jsut said in preperation even tho we werent that ahead
Oh thanks for the information. Does reu result in publication?
its still in prep, the other is in arxiv
Oh then im in a similar position as well cuz
Okk thanks for the insights!! It was a great help

Also one more thing
About these so called "safety schools". How do people pick them? Just based on rank?
idk tbh, i guess so? i didnt
i just picked around my area, i wanted to stay close to family
Alright. Thanks for all the help 🫡
do top grad school toss your application to trash after seeing a gpa that's not 3.9 or 4.0? 
also how much do recomm matter compared to gpa?
letters of rec might be the most important part honestly. maybe not THE most important but certainly more important than gpa
How much is being domestic relevant? Does being canadian give you a better chance compared to other internationals?
No
good to hear 🔥
Does anyone have any suggestions for east coast (ish) schools with good complexity theory profs that arent like top 20? Last year I only applied to schools in like the top 30 and my advisors want me to add more schools outside that range.
Right now I have Drexel, University of Rochester, UIC, and Boston College. Inside the top 30 I have Northeastern, UChicago, TTI Chicago, BU, and UMD
Have you checked the csrankings site? You can sort based on complexity theory
yeah thats what Ive been using. I know a few professors names from papers and just being mentioned, but was hoping you guys would know more
like once someone said that UPenn actually has a lot of complexity professors, but I only saw Anindya De on the website
most smaller schools do not have a lot of complexity theory. I also think rankings for CS are a bit weird. What complexity are you interested in? I dont view BU as having a lot of complexity. I feel like theyre much more algorithms, privacy, ML adjacent stuff.
Maybe Georgetown. They have https://golovnev.org.
Im not entirely sure. I really liked my classes on constructive and foundational complexity theory, but those arent really active fields anymore. I also really like thinking about complexity of toy problems, which is what my current research is on.
what are "toy problems"
super abstracted versions problems that are often turned into toys/games
like VLSI/PCB became the app flow free
maybe dartmouth too
i personally dont know anyone that does that sort of thing.
yeah its not like a specific research interest, its mostly just a type of problem
I just find that if I have a way of visualizing/handling the problem I focus on it more
thank you though for the suggestions
umd has complexity people ?? this is news to me as an undergraduate interested in complexity at umd
dude you have bill gasarch
i guess i should check csrankings then
yeah but afaik he’s not as active in complexity anymore
he mostly just teaches ramsey theory
i’ll talk to some of his students to double check but the last thing i heard was that he’s not super active in modern complexity research
he still does do research tho
My undergrad has one or two big people working in complexity theory afaik
oh thanks
if you dont mind saying, where is that?
I think uni systems that ask for your uni grades should have something like this https://www.kalzumeus.com/2010/06/17/falsehoods-programmers-believe-about-names/
number 1: “GPA is a meaningful concept that can reasonably be calculated at any uni”
Classic essay about how software routinely bumbles human names.
Ok so this is ETH Zürich
They basically give a section to fill out course names and “Grade (if available)”
But I’m not sure if that latter means like “Grade (but if you took this not for credit it’s fine you don’t need anything here)” or “Grade (and if you put nothing down, we expect the info later)”
If you audited something you can just pick Course Name (audited)
It is people who are reviewing these applications
Got fed up figuring out which courses I could exactly list
Wrote an email
Let’s see what they say in the morning
I feel like you're overthinking this
that's reassuring because i audited one course but it ended up as an unsuccessful audit because I had to quiet quit after a few weeks because i was overworked by my for-credit courseload that semester 😭
this is me with every single class with no exams
the worst part is
that class was measure theory
WHICH IS WHAT I WANT TO STUDY FOR MY PHD (geometric measure theory)
well, gmt is a whole different beast
true, but you can't learn that without regular measure theory first lol
this sounds like people from the MIT hardness group
though it's mostly the other way around; they study the complexity of games
Yeah that’s what i mean
they study the games which are super abstracted versions of other problems
i'm not familiar with other research groups that do this kind of research
but you might want to look into the FUN conferences
Ooh that does look fun
You could apply to my current school. There's one prof working in geometric measure theory and there a few other analysts
👀
Yeah I had this issue applying to Bonn, I think contacting them is the right call because I didn’t and I’m pretty sure that’s what fucked up my application (my rejection said there was an issue with my documents)
Fortunately this was re one of my friends, and EPFL, not me
The ETH stuff is separate
just took the subj GRE today. No clue how I did, but if my ETS thingy for the test looks like this it won’t be sending any scores out without my choosing, right?
didn’t really prepare as much as I would’ve liked since this was a fairly last minute thing. Just want to make sure I don’t need to squirm over accidentally having done one of the “free” score sends
well that kinda sucked
Did you write the exam today too lol
yes
lets just say im definitely not gonna get into berkeley. irvine and boulder i might still have a shot at but not very confident
I wasn’t planning to take the gre at all originally lol
But I also went to a known quantity R1 public school, and work full time. But now since gov is shutdown in on furlough so I said fuck it
My only one that kinda wants it is nyu
and that’s like
winning the lottery level odds for me lol
irvine wasnt originally on my list but connor mooney is too cool to pass up an opportunity to work with
im aiming for like Pitt range stuff mostly
boulder just wants you to do 550 or better which i think could have just happened
ayy pitts on my list too!
i wanna work w Schikorra
Lewicka also does cool stuff
but schikorra is doing exactly what im into
I like Lennard’s stuff
but that’s on a more pure angle too
I’m a little application inclined myself
seems cool
i like the stuff thats right in the middle
controls and interface phenomena are neat to me
I like applications of functional analysis
They were asking some gnarly stuff on there man
I was genuinely surprised by a couple things I saw
why so many nasty integrals/derivatives 😭😭
the one algtop question made me happy though hahaha
I probably guessed for like 15-20 of them
I think if I’d had more time I would’ve been able to confidently answer 10 of those
but whatever
as long as they don’t sent it anywhere without my knowledge I’m no worse off than I would’ve been
Pareto improving
i didnt even answer all the qs LOL
last 10 minutes or so i was just trying to make educated guesses
yeah same
I randomly guessed for like 15 of them lmfao
it’s cool if I don’t get in anywhere this time around I’ll just go hog wild studying next spring
so wait, you said the only place you're applying to that wants it is NYU
are you just sending it everywhere anyway??
Has the difficulty of subject gre changed in recent years? I can only find old practice tests online
Harder in a more calculations in less time way or have the questions gotten better
both
what
no
I’m gonna wait and see what my score is
lol
if I did good enough to warrant sending it everywhere I’ll eat the cost
but if I don’t get in anywhere this time around I’ll try to get a good score on the next go around and send it everywhere
but that’s a lot of speculation to get to that point
It’s so lame they can’t give us the score until November
like cmon it’s a multiple choice test
ah gotcha
what next go around
EXACTLY!!!
this is the last weekend u can take gre this year right?
ah makes sense, hopefully we all get in fr
that’s what I’m saying
There’s not gonna be a second go around cus we all getting in!!!
I know!!! Omg That was crazy 😭
damn the gre was harder than I expected 👀 no idea how close I was to the baseline tho
u’d have to be borderline lucky to actually work out every question in time like frig
Most qs were like: what skill do you think you’re testing for? 🤦♀️
Is it wrong to say I hope other people did badly? 😭
Is it graded according to the performance that year or always uniformly?
by performance on that day i think lol
so naturally yes it would help ur score if everyone else did bad
sorry for asking this many times
i don't think im very competitive right now so i kind of need to "reinvent" myself in masters if i want to have any kind of a future in academia
i feel like this person right now
maybe worse, considering that my mediocre grades go back further than that (but it's inconsistent mainly, i've had good grades in between as well)
i think this is very common for people like me, who are unable to keep up with the pace that is expected of us
a gap year is impractical for me (too late to do it anyway, already halfway through a very difficult term)
therwise i would really want to take a break
Do not let grades come between you and the unquenchable zeal of studying
yeah for sure
ig it's just harder to cope w procrastination when the pressure is so high (and i find that even when i do work i sometimes get so stressed that i can't really think clearly anymore
but i gotta start somewhere
often the first step is what makes the most impact
are you in the states? if not then probably a research masters
but if you aren't in the us then they're actually mandatory before a phd
yea i think math is just hard lol, im getting humbled rn and it really makes u question
How many days after the test do you see your results on the mGRE?
Hi. Canada unis don’t require GRE—Math scores… but will they boost my chances if I include them (provided I score high 🥲)?
Will be applying to Waterloo and uofT 🥺
about 2 week
i had a dream last night that i got like. 400. which is not ideal. hopefully the real score is at least 150 more points lol
isnt 400 the lowest score
different practice tests had different numbers as the lowest
i think one was like 390 another was 240
either way hopefully i didnt do that bad. twas only a dream
i wonder if we might see an almost bimodal score distribution for friday's exam. because i get the sense there were two kinds of people taking it: the ones who knew they needed it a long while ago, and chose the latest date so as to have as much time as possible to get super duper prepped. they will all score very high. then there's the ones like me, who hadn't anticipated to be required to take it, found out in mid-september that programs there were intending to apply to are now requiring it, and so signed up for the latest date in an attempt to get as much time as possible to prep but nonetheless will not do as well because 1 month of prep is just not that much
How should I talk about my future career goals in my personal statement if I'm not sure what I want to do after I get the phd
Is it bad to say that I'm split between wanting to go into academia and industry after I get the PhD?
well, your goal should be "research"
focus on that moreso than specifics about academia/industry/government
yeah im having a lot of trouble with a hw that's not supposed to be that difficult
also
Is it bad etiquette to send out the official lor request across different days instead of just sending them out in the same day?
If you're requesting from the same person, don't artificially spread them out.
If different persons, who cares.
it's been kinda weird reading this channel as a Canadian and wondering if I should be taking the GRE
Is it generally possible to ask graduate departments to change minor aspects of your application (namely, your potential supervisors) after submitting?
is that a minor aspect of your application?
My concern is I need to list supervisors, but I need to know prior that they are taking students. But I've been told that it's preferable to have applied before contacting potential supervisors...
I'm doing my application process in the inverse order, so I think you're probably on the right track
There is also the problem where your application package may mention people you're interested in working with, but supervisors will want to see your application package before telling you if they would want to work with you (or, presumably, even telling you if they are accepting students)
Which is the right track? Submit my app then email supervisors? Or email supervisors, then submit the app?
Also yeah I realise this is much more important for PhD appls, but these are for MSc programs
u of t won't take it, waterloo (pmath) will take it optionally. It probably doesn't help very much at Waterloo fwiw, most profs (pmath) I know there think the gre is pretty stupid
Waterloo CO (note: Waterloo has different departments for pure math, combinatorics and optimization, and applied math) recommends the GRE for non-canadian students and will take it for canadians, but I don't know how much they honestly care about it if you did a well-known undergrad
I don't think AMath will take it.
overall, unless you need it for another university or are following CO's recommendation, and these are the Canadian places you're applying to, I'd save the $300
this is the thing when you've submitted your part of an application and then request your lor writers to submit the letter, right?
i still need to schedule meetings to talk to them about my plans
i feel really pessimistic right now
im on track to have very bad (if probably??? passing) grades in my two crosslisted grad courses this term
hi! the ucla website seems to claim that there's no required word count for the SOP but that 1-2 pages is typical; however, the actual application seems to have a 500 word count max
am i being silly?
wacky. tbf 500 words is 1.5 pages at 12pt double spaced font tho
yeah im wondering if im somehow misunderstanding what the portal actually wants
because presumably if there were an inconsistency they would have been bothered by lots of students about it already
Feeling like I'm gonna get rejected everywhere, even though I'm applying to mid(ish) tier schools. Craving any kind of comfort but brutal honesty is welcome 😭
well, with 5 schools, youre asking to be rejected everywhere
I have a couple others, I just didn't put them cus
I have my institution on that list and didn't wanna doxx myself anymore than I already have
Solid application but with the state of funding you should be applying to more safeties 100%
see pins
Sorry about that ! Did you receive a recommendation letter from your professor? I think what you wrote in your personal statement is important as well in your application process
"Chancing" discussions are not allowed here. Essentially nobody in the channel has enough experience and recent data to make any meaningful numerical estimation of your individual chances. (Having oneself applied in recent years produces anecdotes, not data -- people with long experience of sitting on a selection committee might conceivably be capable of a somewhat qualified guess, but even if one or two of them were to be on Discord, they're most certainly going to keep their mouths shut).
Thus any responses you get will be pretty much useless relative to what you're asking for, and the risk of such discussions turning toxic takes precedence in our moderation policy.
Hello math wizards, I'm applying for a research position (not masters or PhD) and writing my first SoP.
Is it advisable to cite a few research papers within the document?
For a research position, I'd say yes -- not just to "cite so-and-so many papers", but to demonstrate you are familiar enough with the state of the art in the field you're proposing to do research in to put your plans in context.
Question for anyone who applied to a different field from your UG or Masters, who did you pick as letter writers?
I’m considering applying to PhDs in quantum compiling/ optimisation as well as maths and I’m wondering if I should change my letter writers.
I took a course in my UG with a pretty big name in the field (though it’s a very close knit community anyway) and I’m wondering if it would be better to ask him for my second letter than my second maths option. My concern is that he doesn’t know me all that well, I took his course, I did well, but I did also talk to him about working on additional material and he gave me additional assignments for it that I did well on.
I guess my question is, is it better to get an decent letter from someone very relevant or a good letter from someone pretty irrelevant
This is as a second letter mind you, my UG thesis supervisor will certainly be my first in any case (I’m unlikely to have made any meaningful progress on my masters thesis by the time I’m sending these out)
Okay, I mean in reality I think its useful to check how delusional one is, but I get your point
And anyways, the point of a ‘chance me’ post isn’t to get a numerical answer. Its to receive feedback on the overall strength of one’s application, relative to others
At the end of the day who cares? Send out some applications, you’ll get what you get.
As tropos said, none of our opinions matter and talking about it only brings bad vibes
There’s much discussion about this in the channel pins
Yeah we don't allow any sort of chance me posts here
If I’m spending around $60 per application, it’s nice to know what schools I actually have a chance at. That’s all.
We honestly couldn't tell you
Damn the US sucks
In any case, see what I said before lol
It's probably better to talk to professors irl about that
Well, no worries, sorry
I'm considering either adding a double major or doing a master's degree to add a year to my non-PhD studies, since otherwise I would have only two years of undergrad, which doesn't seem like enough to do research to me
Which of these options is better for PhD admissions in the US?
I can't chance your application but I can give some more context for one of the schools you're applying to in DM's
A double major + extra research would be a better fit since expectations for Masters students are usually higher
Added you
does anyone have any insight on this btw?
Just do 500 words then
i mean, sure i could submit a heavily reduced sop, but presumably someone has filled out this application last year or is working on it now and is facing the same inconsistency if it actually exists and might have insight.
not to mention one of the profs websites talks about the varying lengths that students can submit etc., which makes me think im misunderstanding something
i just want to avoid emailing them unless i have to, since i think others probably have asked about this already
I would imagine if others have asked they’d update the website
Don’t fuck your application over on the basis of a simple admin issue that you can easily clear up would be my advice
So I’m back to square 1
I think this is better suited to the people who would be writing letters for you
Any idea as to how hard it is to get into UToronto master’s program?
I’ve heard mixed things
Impossible if you don’t apply. May as well give it a bash and see what happens
funnily enough this might not actually be true. I didn't apply for the masters program im currently in
sometimes it depends on the school and idk specifically about UToronto so I cant say for sure
I mean what did some random uni contact you lol?
No i applied to the PhD program and they rejected me but accepted me to a masters there
Ok well that’s different
should a 890 89% on subject gre be submitted or skipped if its optional? barely missed 900
how is this a question?
Bait used to be believable
so i should submit? idk the standards of gre i assumed u have to be 900+ or something💀
for schools like berkeley and ucla etc
cuz most of my target doesn't even take gre im only thinking abt submitting gre to reach
89th percentile shows that you did better on the test than 89% of people who took it
How can that possibly reflect poorly on you?
Any tips on how to save space with citations for GRFP? For instance, can I include only 1 author (X et al) for each?
do you have them all in one line already
if not then thats the first step
holy tech
presumably still formatted correctly lol
just that idk if some schools, especially those that are reach for me, have higher expectations if I am applying for pure math, that's all. I'm sure 890 is a good score, but idk if it is competitive enough for those schools that I should submit.
ty, good idea
got it working now
(i am still over the limit)
if im not mistaken berkeley requires mgre scores regardless of how good or bad they are
right, i just realized that, but my point was abt school similar to uc berkeley that might not require mgre
gotcha. yeah idk, i do get your concern, but objectively 89th percentile is remarkable and you're prrrrobably only helping your shot if you submit. but that's completely speculation on my part. i certainly dont have the luxury of wondering if i did well enough. scores arent back for the 24th yet but i can tell u right now i dont think i cracked 600 lol
Thanks for the input
. Hope for the best for ur mgre. i thought u r a postgrad from your roles 
yeah, i have a masters. but its big kid degree time for me
if a school would sneer at an 890, they're likely to assume the worst if you don't submit it at all
it's important to keep in mind that the ONLY people taking the math subject gre are also people applying to math phd programs
it probably wont hurt to submit, and probably only helps if you go to a school that isnt a top math school
my non top are mostly in canada and they dont care abt mgre
im talking about your current institution
anyways thanks for all of yalls input
which is in canada
i still dont see how being canadian is relevant
am i misinterpreting somehing? im just saying all my non top schools are in canada and they dont want mgre. So this is mainly a top school issue
The math GRE is more important if you are coming from a smaller, lesser known school
OH
thats what they meant mb
🤦♂️
i thought they meant if im applying to the institution im in
I mean I’m also Canadian and had never heard of these tests before joining this server
How optional is the "optional" personal history statement? (not the statement of purpose)
I assume this is not really optional but I have no idea what to actually write for it
I would include it
You want to give them as much information as possible.
One university I am applying for has two rounds one ending soon and one in april. If I apply to the current round and get rejected is that likely to affect my chances in the second round? I am asking because I have just started my master thesis so I dont have much to show for it yet so if it does matter I would apply later
I am a second year student. I want to do a maths phd out of undergrad. Does anyone have any recommendations for things I should do to maximize this other than get good grades and participate in undergrad research?
Dont overload yourself with math classes. Be realistic about what you can handle. You should push yourself but dont overdo it.
don’t be like me and neglect to actually do research 
if I can get a job offer before apps are due I might just not bother this cycle tbh
i learned this lesson this semester 
you will quickly realize that time is not your only enemy, your mind will genuinely begin to sabotage you if you dont take time to take care of yourself and let the difficult ideas develop naturally
Gl graduators
What should go in a personal/research statement for PhD applications in Europe?
I've got
Interest areas/own reading
Summer project
Courses/Masters Thesis
Subsequent Career objectives
rn
(All of this has an implicit ("and how it relates to the PhD topic" after)
How screwed am I if I don't have 3 math people
Not really screwed? I think a letter can still be immensely beneficial if it can attest your skills in teaching, research (not necessarily math), attentiveness and work ethic etc. A strong letter is a strong letter regardless of who's it written by (assuming it's a non-mathematician academic)
My 3rd one is my boss whose programming class I have TA'd for for 3 years