#vrchat-general-2
1 messages · Page 1160 of 1
took me about 800 hours, no world uploaded. A lot of avatars though, just because I tend to upload changes/fixes on new ids :p
Nice.
u really hurt my online feelings u big online bully!!!
i hate being trusted
u really hurt my online feelings u big online bully!!!
@waxen harness I love you.
I'm clicking off of this server for a while. Have a nice night everyone! I didn't mean to give this game any hate. It's my most played game of all time. Just wish some things were handled better is all
bet you love it when people are aggressive.
I'm about to pay $10 a month for VRC+ to get u BANNED
known user is that perfect balance
I'm about to pay $10 a month for VRC+ to get u BANNED
@waxen harness 😮
i'll pay for vrc+ once the game is more optimized and has better security xd
I want to apologize if I came off as too aggressive. I am truly sorry. I'm going to head to bed.
@mild cradle Good night.
I remember myself being in a similar spot when I got upset about all the breakage in the recent update... In the end I realized it wasn't something to get so upset over... (but not before needlessly arguing with a good friend :/)
oh ur a wizard or something howw do u know that
i like this new reply feature in discord
I agree. it's the equilibrium.
I've never looked at this discord until I saw that vrc+ tweet
Um... uh... cough science?
Sometimes I wish I could appear as "Known User" despite being trusted, lol
thank god someone agrees- honestly being trusted is kinda embarrassing, i wish you could show yourself as a known user and user since you've already been those two before
thank god someone agrees- honestly being trusted is kinda embarrassing, i wish you could show yourself as a known user and user since you've already been those two before
@grand gull You can-
also why do they limit trust for steam users
I usually only come here to watch the announcements and open-beta-announcements...
wizard
^^^ Agreed on trusted should be able to show as knwon
being shown as known user- no you cant??
In my opinion, what would be really unacceptable would be putting previously existing free features behind a pay-wall.
you cAN
No, no! I am a deity. It's even in my name.
being shown as known user- no you cant??
@grand gull Sorry, they said "and user."
cough google
my bad- i was trying to say like "i wish you could show yourself as known user, just like you can as user" oops
In my opinion, what would be really unacceptable would be putting previously existing free features behind a pay-wall.
@analog schooner I don't really see any indication of this happening.
I feel like we've all become good friends in this chat
always have been.
I sure hope not.
it would be weird to hide as known user tbh
though i wouldnt like that idea...
my bad- i was trying to say like "i wish you could show yourself as known user, just like you can as user" oops
@grand gull Ohhh ok np. I'm gonna sleep because it's been 21 hours since I last slept and...I will let you in on a secret. I'm cranky.
alright then, i wish you have a goodnight
Okay everyone go to sleep, we will regroup in 10 hours to get back to screaming at vrc devs
i'm very glad they finally came up with a business model aimed at the players
@shell abyss fix your game
aight. gonna go back to work
That's what we like to see
bored and no wifi
anyone got popcorn
oh no its a real guy
It’s okay, the EU is about to wake up and they can take over the aimless arguing for the rest of us from here
@plain blaze i do
they now have a financially linked reason to care about our experience and our opinion of the goings on as players which is good
omg that's good to hear, keep up the good work
Really digging the new look honestly. Looks sharp https://i.imgur.com/RHdPM5e.png
how do i get vrchat+ lol
Maybe EU will actually realize this is a potential way to keep big social networkings claws out of VRC?
Trust colors are gone, that's a 10/10 for me
#open-beta-info currently. When it's live they'll reveal more info about how to pay
and a "I paid" patch added ;)
hmm. I know some problem solving/mystery worlds that'll break when you don't know the order of the trust colors... (there was some question where that was important)
worth
hiya
aw heck yea only 10.99 a mo sweet
oh boy
This is even LESS of a deal than when trust ranks came out lol
tbf, i just wanna be able to have to not worry about getting trolled in public lobbies
PrEmIuM AvAtArS
Premium avatars won't happen
PrEmIuM AvAtArS
@stuck swan Is not going to be a thing
drama for that lasted 4 days... i'll give this one 2.
They must experience the same circle from start to end to start again, it’s prophesized
Are the masses upset over vrchat+? I'm confuz
I think most of them got banned for spamming lemon emojis.
Because people are butthurt about a system that involves money
I just hope they don't introduce things which will divide people
I'm going back to bed.
trust color nametags devided people, and they're gone now.
Ah yes the masses, let us complain about giving money to a game you can play for free
yeah, they did...
People are being paranoid over this? IMO you should be more paranoid when something is free of charge these days... (see: facebook, google, twitter, heck... discord too...)
(i.e. I'm very happy to pay if it means more indepence from big corps, and data gathering)
I remember something about customized nametags being a bannable offense, that still a thing or is the vrc+ the be all end all in that case?
Yes
Most likely that TOS change was due to this upcoming stuff
complaining is only justified if they restrict features to non vrc+ members, its merely a way to support the game
Thought as much
You don't see people complaining about discord nitro tbh
^^^^
How does vrchat pay for servers anywho? Their own money?
If features are restricted before things are implemented, they might not be associated y'know
Investors
In my opinion the best part of this update is being able to turn nameplate transparency to zero. https://i.imgur.com/fkvdFZo.png
Oh that's actually dope
They did when it was announced, then they got tired of complaining when they realized it wasn’t a big deal. I expect similar with vrc+
this
Exactly
Can't wait to see trashy E-Boys flex it lmao
Hahasame dude.
Nameplate opacity sounds neato
Well I'm subbing to it when it's out, and I'm subbing because I want to keep VRChat running
^
this X2
You can sub and keep your nameplate without an icon, if you want. 
Yup
Why is there no cap to uploaded avatars but a cap to favorite avatars? Isn't it much more storage intensive to hold a whole avatar than just store the id's of each players favorite avatars?
1.) To encourage people to upload their own content
2.) To not discourage people to upload their own content
Avatar worlds would be pretty bad if they could only upload 16 avatars
Doesn't the addition of a paid medium for an increase not void such reasoning?
Yeah
Good to see the spam-a-thon is finally over.
The increase is only to the amount of public avatars you can favorite
Indeed
Yes, thats what we said
After a while, you kind of want to upload your own customized avatar anyway.
My guess is that it's easier for the network to send information to you for personal avatars, whereas it takes more networking to send information for public avatars
That may be the case but the case still stands
Still why is there no limit to the number of avatars you can upload
Every public avatar is someone else's upload. The two are the same thing, really.
@ocean arch Loading metadata for your avatars vs public avatars should be no different
Nah, I doubt there's actually any technical difference between your own and public avatars.
If you own a avatar world, your upload category is PACKED.
There’s no strong incentive for vrc to limit user content creation, hence no upload limit
Maybe? I mean your personals will only show up in the world you're in, whereas publics can be loaded into any world
Probably storage is cheap enough, and people aren't abusing the system at large?
Then why is there a limit to favorite avatars?
Technically you could have a local list of avatars you favorited that link to a specific string to said avatar data, making any storage negligible at best
To encourage people to upload their own content.
The real answer is it's been 16 favorites this long to make this update seem like it's mind blowing
Why? Why should people need to upload their own content? The game is VRChat, not VRUnityAndBlender
If you were around in 2018 or earlier, then you would understand the pain that there were NO favourites at all
If they made the limit 16+ on favorites, the game would blow up and your game would crash duh
When there were only 3 favorites, people wanted more. When it was upped to 16, people still wanted more. Trust me. Upping it to 25, and the next day, people will say they want more. lol
the avatar favorites was just a artificial limitation. there is no reason why it would be 16
This game doesn’t exist without user generated content
Yeah, there was never really a technical limitation to it.
Still, I've been wanting to both: have at least some more public fav avatars + support this thing for a while now, so now I can do both at once, I guess. (Even non-paying users will get 25 slots now)
VRUnityAndBlender is a good name
I was around 2017, the addition was a welcome one, progression not regression
Without avatar creators y'all would still be using the VRChat default avatars
(looks at my 16 favorites)
(looks at my 50-ish uploaded avatars)
yup, id die if they set a limit to uploads
Not really liking the "Increased Trust" perk. Sounds like paying for ranks basically
The reason it is limited is to encourage people to upload their own content instead of just using everyone else's. If no one uploaded content, the game wouldn't exist.
Yes but why should the average user be forced to upload their own avatars to go beyond the favorite limit?
Yeah I mean you could update it to discourage the use of clients, this just seems like an encouragement
A bunch of default bananas running around, let's go that's hype af
Ranks have been useless anyway except for new user and visitor
not everyone know 3d my friend.
And those people have 16 favorites.
If favorites was unlimited, people would still upload avatars. Expecting people to not is just silly.
The real reason is because they can't make a good menu and having higher than 60 (average) avatars in the avatars menu would start to lag your game.
Not really liking the "Increased Trust" perk. Sounds like paying for ranks basically
@vocal shard It is supposedly very little. Probably only to get you able to upload directly if your account is new.
Besides, someone having paid is more trustworthy. They have a monetary disincentive to being trolls, for one.
I haven't even used all 16 slots, because I tend to use my own avatars
They are working on revamping the UI. Please read through their announcements
You don't need to know 3d to upload content. You can upload anything you have the rights to.
yeah. so you need to know unity and.. THATS 3D
You need to know Unity, and even that is too much for people
Uploads white png image
Unity has nothing to do with 3D modeling. 
The real reason is because they can't make a good menu and having higher than 60 (average) avatars in the avatars menu would start to lag your game.
@vocal shard Already have more than 60 in my own uploads... Usually works fine. Sometimes the earlier ones take a while to load, though
who is talking about modeling. 3d is 3d
You don't even need blender to make avatars. You can use Maya or max or whatever.
in my opinion they should paywall uploading avatars given it costs money to host and hold them, but taking away that feature would cause uproar so
What isn't 3D?
Based on Hardware btw. Calling a bunch of avatar images is just messy in that menu. Doesn't cull the images at all but loads them all at once and hides them behind a shader.
a 3d program. a game, a software that generate image at 3d. thats 3d
Do what OTHER GAME does and make people pay a flat rate to upload more than 16 or so avatars
anybody who can install steamvr and vrchat can learn the necessary skills to download a premade avatar, stick it in unity, and upload it to vrchat. it's really not complicated. you dont need to be a 3D artist to put your own stuff in the game
this
If such happened the game would literally plummet
@night iris
Paywall adult content and piss off the erpers lol
in my opinion they should paywall uploading avatars given it costs money to host and hold them, but taking away that feature would cause uproar so
@night iris I agree. Convert your hard earned dollars into VRBux and use them to upload your content!
You don't need to pay anything to upload more than 16 avatars. You can upload as many as you want, for free. There is no reason they would charge for this.
who is talking about modeling. 3d is 3d
"Oh god, I can't play CS:GO because it is 3D Goddamn!!"
there is no fee to upload more than 16 avatars?
Uh... A game like VRChat is 3d. What are you on about
yooooo chill that's the best part about VRCHAT
VRChat is a good opportunity to learn unity :3
I'm not talking about this game, I'm talking about OTHER GAME
Don't forget the $10 subscription fee to use the SDK!
Man, I'm glad alot of you aren't in charge of VRChat. Lots of bad ideas here lol
god. language is a hard thing to make other to understand. So is a common way to describe it in my language ok.
Clearly you haven't been reading announcements
If you need to upload more than 16 or 25 avatars you are clearly invested in the game. If you need to favorite more than 25 you are just a casual player that wants avatars
charging people to make content for your product is completely ass backwards lol
Why would VRChat charge people for providing content to the game?
Why would VRChat charge people for favoriting content?
They should just fuck around and make VRC a $60 game
I'm just wondering if the subscription gets tied to the VRC account, or the Steam account, because I have 2 accounts for testing avatars, and fallback shaders, and alternate between them on occasion
Because that's being a consumer. Being a consumer can be charged. You don't charge people for creating content.
running servers costs money. running hosting space costs money. Development costs money. It's reality my dude
VRChat is using Unity engine which is a 3d game engine. The assets you make are either sprites (2d) or 3d assets from 3d software.
they don't, if you need more slots and dont wanna pay you can just favorite avatar worlds, ya know.
Like making people pay to upload more than 25 avatars makes WAY more sense than making people pay to access more already uploaded avatars
Would be nice to be able to pay to have a way to manage sub-accounts, tbh. Useful to be able to create sub-accounts to host events etc.
Although maybe with the coming guilds system...?
People who upload content are doing VRChat a service by providing content for other people to enjoy. This is why there is no limit.
So why is there a favorite limit? And why is there private avatars?
because ron said so
There is a limit because server stability
convenience can be monetized
The limit has nothing to do with server stability.
The favorite limit is artificial. But it has it's reasons, and they have been stated.
Private avatars make sense, the limit...eh
favorite avatars is saved locally tho
No they arent
Then why did the Devs make an announcement 8 months ago that modded clients were bypassing this and causing stability issues?
Favorite avatars are limited in order to encourage people to upload content instead.
^
That seems so backwards that its stupid. Why force people to make their own stuff? Like I said, it's VRChat, not VR3DContentCreationn
they probably tiptoed with monetization to try and not cause huge amounts of uproar. by picking things which are currently not already given they ain't stepping on the toes of the public experience
this. and to keep people checking out avatar worlds on a semi-regular basis
Clearly you haven't been reading announcements
@ocean arch I'm in the secret discord for uber cool people who get to see the plans for VRChat's future, I don't need to reread announcements.
That may be a stretch, but I guess
Well, thankfully, you are incorrect, and, double thankfully, not in charge of calling the shots.
Listen my man Adeon has a green rank, we are all dumb and should agree with him
^

So basically the official fake rumours server. Got it
Personally I think people would still check out avatar worlds... but I'm not in charge of this thing.
Some people just want to play the game and have a large selection of avatars to choose from, not be forced to learn unity and blender. Uploading avatars is a choice that shouldnt need a limit to encourage
25 is a pretty large selection
okay look. you can't charge people to make stuff for your game, and they never ever will
. you CAN charge people for convivence. ergo, VRC+ will provide you with convinience at the exchange of your money
So basically the official fake rumours server. Got it
@ocean arch Well it's only officially fake if VRChat says so.
You will be happy to hear you do not need any knowledge in Blender to upload content.
If so, why does paying get you more slots?
It does encourage people to upload, though. I made my first uploads because I had to free favorite slots
Just an incentive for people who want more than 25.
tbh I've always found getting attached to public avatars made by users other than you a bit odd.
Those avatars can disappear at any time for any reason, but if you made it you likely have the files to reupload it if something goes wrong.
The hardest part about uploading content is having/creating the model itself tbh.. it’s easy to upload in Unity.
Okay? Then explain how they are going to get around Intellectual Property allegations by corporations like EA and Ubisoft?
If so, why does paying get you more slots?
@graceful sigil Just a bonus for supporting the thing.
You still need knowledge of 3d and unity, and its very hard to make custom content that is just from unity. Everything you upload would be pre made
is that worse than using public avatars?
Because rather than contributing to help VRChat by uploading content, you are paying them money. For this reason, the need to limit favorite avatars (to encourage you to upload your own) is no longer needed, as you are helping the game in another way (money). I feel you already know the answer to all of these questions, however.
so the only way is to pay for an avatar. get a free avatar (lol) or use copyright avatars... got it
Okay? Then explain how they are going to get around Intellectual Property allegations by corporations like EA and Ubisoft?
@ocean arch Being monetized doesn't change their legal standing in any way. They are already accepting DMCA claims, and have been for a long while. I can only guess that it's still underground enough that the likes of EA haven't cared yet.
Yes, of course it is. I would much rather choose from a public avatar than go to forbidden site and upload a premade package
@cloud sluice no the guy is talking about paywalled avatars
Okay? Then explain how they are going to get around Intellectual Property allegations by corporations like EA and Ubisoft?
@ocean arch Oh that's easy, see they're planning to sell to EA and Ubisoft so we can get cool lootboxes and I can't keep this up I'm laughing too hard.
Booth, Gumroad, etc.
there are plenty of legit sites to get free and paid avatars that are VRC ready that, if you wanted to, can be completely customized to your liking
Okay well you see I specialise in that industry so I find you very hard to believe
And there are plenty of worlds with customized avatars that people would much rather favorite due to convenience, rather than upload their own content
Yeah, I've been using one for well over a year now, they're pretty nice. Easy to modify too depending on the content creators have made for the model.
VRC lootboxes, the rarest model you can get has toggle clothes and shit
Okay well you see I specialise in that industry so I find you very hard to believe
@ocean arch You didn't read the whole sentence.
Yes, paying the creators is to be expected, I think. Honestly, most paid avatars are actually really cheap, considering the amount of work that goes into them... Then again there are others of really high quality that are completely free, and CC0 and stuff. There's lots to chose from!
Good thing you can still do that lol 25 favorits is more than enough honestly.
I don't think that the game is on the position to "take" a fixed fee into a premium service, specially when you don't make the content of the game you only provide the platform, as apple with the apple store or steam, first release the game out of beta for that. Meanwhile you can ask for support, from 1$ to unlimited, and that way the community will support you.
That's mostly my take as a creator.
So then why have an increased limit for paying? It all comes back to that
ya just for free, i think that's good enough
The amount of people out there that know Unity and Blender thanks to VRChat is cool. It really isn't hard to learn, maybe like, a couple of weeks to get used to it, improving over time. Worth learning really
I'd like to confirm that I talked to Tupper about adding lootboxes to VRChat. One of the possible loot would have been more favorite slots. I'd also like to clarify it was entirely me doing the talking, he was just standing there.
You've been answered multiple times. It's an incentive lol
If you don't want to learn it, you'd be happy to know people do commission work
If anything, I'd like to see VRC get better at supporting the smaller creators when their for sale avatars get made into public avatars when they shouldn't according to the contract...
Then I do not agree that you should have to pay for that particular incentive
yes but that doesn't change the fact that having a limit to favorites is something that encourages uploading content, which is something that VRChat wants, so if you don't want to deal with limits, then you have the option to pay them to have a bunch of slots instead of paying an artist to make a custom avatar
I mean I guess this is better than allowing advertising and product placement in the game. I'd rather have users who are willing to support the game paying the devs than some corporation. They gotta get paid somehow.
25 is a damn upgrade, im content with it. having to struggle between an odd 16 favorites list is pain
OK that's fine. You're wrong, but go ahead lol 25 is plenty of favorites, you really don't need that many
Why even have a limit at all?
I mean, honestly I've been happy with 15 avatars and I make avatars anyway so it doesn't matter much to me
People whined over 3 favorite slots, then they whined over 16. They will whine about 25 too. It will never end lol
are you just gonna keep asking this question until someone says exactly what you want to hear? lol
Probably multiple reasons. Incentivizes looking at worlds, maybe server space or something
I want 1,000
The new increase in favorites is nice but the reasoning behind its initial and continued restriction is odd at best, atleast from the pool of people i'm aware of, restricting general ease of access to avatars has at worse just made them quickly revisit old worlds rather than make their own content, but that's just my two cents
Deal! The only catch is you have to upload them yourself
Because placing a limit on favorite avatars is just such a weird decision that makes no sense to the average player
i missed a part, did anyone from the VRC team said anything about this in the last 30 min?
nah nah nah that's WAY to much work now I want 2,000
A lot of thigns don't make sense to the average player, the average player is honestly pretty stupid
I understand it makes no sense to the average player - they don't need to understand it. It's there for the reason I've already described
@potent fern not in this channel, no. Announcements is what you're after
You keep replying to my questions with the same questions that I ask the same questions too.
i feel like (said average) people who arent on the vrc discord are gonna suddenly see 25 favorite slots and cheer
even not average plays are honest to god dumb
true true
because i'm giving you the answer to your question. and your response isn't to ask a follow up, or accept* my answer, but to ask the same question again
ok, so no response yet. got it.
Most people genuinely don't care and just wanna hang out in an avatar and go to worlds. That's the bare minimum VRChat really needs to offer and it does so fairly well.
Yeah. Most people don't follow discord updates. The update will just drop on live and people will 1.) Think the new nametags look amazing (they really do, check them out on beta if you haven't.) and 2.) Be happy that they can now have 25 favorites
It's not that it doesn't make sense, it's just a huge inconvenience. The average player wants more avatar slots. Why restrict it? Very few players will actually go through the effort of uploading content, and fewer will make custom content.
I mean, let's be real. The only reason why people are in this channel now is because supporting the Devs with money is apparently an offense and people aren't happy with what's given. The rest outside of the channel don't care lol
"The average player wants more avatar slots" and they're getting them, neato! Looks like the average player is getting what they want lol
but why have a restriction in the first place? No one wants to be forced to make their own avatars
To be fair I think most of the people who cared posted a lemon and got kicked for spam
You've been answered.Explore worlds, server space stuff, etc
They restrict it to incentivize uploading avatars lol. That IS the answer. Just because you don't wanna learn how to do it, or don't think it is a GOOD reason, doesn't mean it isn't the reason.
He's asked the same question like 6 times now lol
Yeah I mean there's like . What? 40k roughly online here so I don't think the majority cares anyway about this
and the incentivizing uploading avatars, yeah
Do you honestly think that people who wouldn't normally upload avatars would go learn unity and blender just because of the limit
Yes, I did
Yes
So whats the problem now?
People who want to upload avatars have already uploaded them, there's no reason to incentivize it
Content creators didn't really have a problem with favorites. They didn't like cloning.
I'm just worried about what they mean with "monetizing VRChat". I think it's nice that they might be trying to help model and world creators get boosted/ease the commissioning process but that'll be hard to manage since a lot of "commissions" are just game rips or TDA models that they really shouldn't be for sale (TDA rules say you can't mainly because of Piapro/Hatsune Miku rules). Alternatively it could mean they might be butting world/avatar uploads behind a paywall which makes legal issues for them either way unless they're very police-y about what is uploaded/monetized for VRC.. Only reason why people like Nintendo haven't sued yet is because the game is free and uploading the content (aka mods) are free.
the problem is i want the best jiggle physics and i dont have them
@vocal shard I hope you like ads.
nope. i know plenty of users that are in vrchat from a time ago and dosent know anything of unity or blender
@waxen harness lmao
And a lot of them uploaded avatars in the first place because they already had 16 favorites, they WERE incentivized by the system you're complaining about
If they mean ads, yikes.
Yes. because I did :D
I really doubt that.
What they mean by monetizing is "keeping the game alive", @vocal shard. What they have announced will not change your experience drastically at all, but are extra benefits like that of Discord Nitro.
For now, anyways. They said it's the first step in the article.
I have a quick question about that new subscription though, is it based on account or is it per steam? I got two accounts that I use and would like the benefits on both.
So the 10 mil sponsor is dead already 👀
used for japan trip
HTC pulled out a while ago, so yes
It is based on your account, and is in no way linked to your steam account
Kk
I think $10 a month is a bit much for what's on offer right now; I'd be cozy paying like $5 or so. As long as they don't lock avatar/world uploading behind a paywall I'll probably still log into the game, VRC+ or not.
wtih vrc + is like thw whole know and trusted user thing going?
Well anyway enough arguing, I really don't understand why you guys think that inconveniencing most casual players just so an interested few will upload their own is a good decision, and I will never understand
For a few days it will be. But the good news is colored nametags are now gone, so that's one less thing to divide people.
You've been given multiple answers. You stupidly stick to the ONE answer you don't like. Shut up already man
^
Again. With discord nitro it was 10 originally but over time they made an option for 5 instead. I wouldn't be surprised the idea might come into mind for them with a "Classic" approach
Also this lol
i learned how to upload because the avatars out there that i did like didn’t have any gesture emotes nothing, they just existed and nothing else
being able to customize avatars yourself to whatever you virtually want is nice
rip i only got my known two days ago
Meant that for Adeon's comment, thank god rank names are gone, most idiotic thing they ever put in the game imo, imagine giving out different colors based on trust, lol
Am I supposed to not dispute the answer I don't agree with? Isn't that the point of arguing?
I'm just worried about what they mean with "monetizing VRChat". I think it's nice that they might be trying to help model and world creators get boosted/ease the commissioning process but that'll be hard to manage since a lot of "commissions" are just game rips or TDA models that they really shouldn't be for sale (TDA rules say you can't mainly because of Piapro/Hatsune Miku rules). Alternatively it could mean they might be butting world/avatar uploads behind a paywall which makes legal issues for them either way unless they're very police-y about what is uploaded/monetized for VRC.. Only reason why people like Nintendo haven't sued yet is because the game is free and uploading the content (aka mods) are free.
time to wipe a good chunk of content from the game and ban the people who uploaded it
to avoid getting sued!
Your dispute is anecdotal at best.
Rank colors being gone is a blessing
Again. With discord nitro it was 10 originally but over time they made an option for 5 instead. I wouldn't be surprised the idea might come into mind for them with a "Classic" approach
@ocean arch Yep, hopefully they do that or simply lower the price. I think most people would be cozier with $5 for what's on offer rn unless they add more stuff that's more worth the price.
so is the trust system going aswell or just nameplates?
And so is yours. A survey would be needed to really understand what's going on, but it would be biased torwards more vrchat interested players because of voluntary response bias
Trust system isn't going anywhere. It's useless anyway except for new user and visitor for security
i'm p sure from the trailer that the color of username is still colored based on rank, all the ones in the video were yellow because all on dev team so all friends. does seem way less visible tho
time to wipe a good chunk of content from the game and ban the people who uploaded it
to avoid getting sued!
@teal glacier God, if that happened it'd be the end of the game lol; hopefully no paywall locks will ever happen.. literally all the e-person fox tda models will get thanos snapped
It's not. Colored nametags are gone: https://i.imgur.com/RHdPM5e.png
It's white by default
I mean there's going to be people who replace Trusted rank vs paid rank as an ego flex to shit on others
oh then hell yeah
The only time they'd be forced to wipe content is if a DMCA happened and companies would likely need to DMCA each player/avatar one by one
Wouldn't matter as much since it's a free ticket to a rank I have hidden in my safety settings anyway
Or rather, rank colors*
But I do agree that the price should be 5 bucks for the current iteration of the system, if it's supposed to be a subscription then you gotta get your money's worth. You can have the current system as vrchat + and the next one with more features could be 10 bucks as well as a higher tier, give ppl some choice
Fair
I'll pay the 10 for the early supporter clout 🙃
imj ust wondering cause i do a lil bit of streaming and just yea had crap time with user and new users not knowing bout what lewd or nsfw avatars theyve got out and it ending with me getting a warning, so to be able to hide vis and new avtars is kinda helpful there
The only time they'd be forced to wipe content is if a DMCA happened and companies would likely need to DMCA each player/avatar one by one
@rigid crescent True, it's possible that companies may just go to VRChat and tell them content from their games are a no-no. Stuff like Nintendo content is pretty easy to spot. Either way, if the avatar paywall happens, it's going to be a nightmare.
I mean, I'll pay it too, but if I were to look at it from a critical pov then there's no way the current features are worth 10 bucks a month.
I mean I paid early for nitro and it ended up for me with an early supporter badge. I don't mind the 10 anyway
Honestly, I'd pay 10$ a month for them to just fix the current Master bug that sticks the master in a random chair, or for a revamp of the camera. XP I don't need anything else. Thaaaaanks lol
they definitely not getting rid of that feature, they just improved the way hidden avatars look with them scaling properly in the latest update so i dont think theyd go through that effort just to remove it in the next patch lol
You get a lot out of nitro tho for $10 on discord
For today, yeah. Originally it was just a gif and emojis
Discord nitro is so good for the livestream by itself
okay cools
I think the better idea would be to copy Discord's sub model, you have a 5 dollar tier and a 10 dollar tier. The thing is that on the site it said "More features coming later" but "later" in vrchat language can usually take a year or two, I'd say there's more pressure on them to put out stuff it people are paying for it.
I just wonder what the heck else they can add besides a potential "ad-free" version or more avatar slots
I just hope content isn't restricted to then turn around as a premium feature, much like i feel custom nameplates turned out to be in its own way
just throwing my opinion into the ring: I come from Second Life, and we have to pay a lot more there than in VRChat, and with less features. I previously was running a Sim (persistant world) for $215, and that was on a DISCOUNT. I've since sold my sim and am not spending $215+$10 (preimum), and seeing thsi isn't that bad
I wouldn't be surprised they'll do it later. Again really they announced theyll be adding more to VRC+ over time so give it some time
...actually, I could see that. Like $5 and it doubles your favorites limit (50)
It won't. I can assure you that given how companies need to be wary of IP regulations
I expected nameplates to become a monetized thing after they cracked down on stuff that edits your nameplate
@teal glacier God, if that happened it'd be the end of the game lol; hopefully no paywall locks will ever happen.. literally all the e-person fox tda models will get thanos snapped
@vocal shard
i mean, they're either gonna lose alot of money from lawsuits or they're gonna have to purge all that content, either way it's bad
makes me wonder if they discussed this with a legal team of sorts
Good thing it aint your job then and someoen else has to suffer that problem. But there are options to add official ingame stores and all within VRC for example.
And then im not talking about selling kitbashes as that shit aint allowed kekw
I don't think anything will really happen to vrc
I expected nameplates to become a monetized thing after they cracked down on stuff that edits your nameplate
@vocal shard
Same tbh
The new nameplates are more compact and nice honestly. Keeps places like room of the rain not filled with multi-coloured boxes in the air
at the very least, I'd rather VRChat attempt to earn their own money rather than the alternative, and that is being bought out by Facebook, Microsoft, or whoever wants to open their pocketbooks
@vocal shard
i mean, they're either gonna lose alot of money from lawsuits or they're gonna have to purge all that content, either way it's bad
makes me wonder if they discussed this with a legal team of sorts
@teal glacier That's only if the avatar paywall happens; as long as the content is free to upload and use (unless officially endorsed by the company) it should be alright. If they do this, they'll have to purge the content or endure lawsuits like you said. If they introduce some sort of commission feature, it'll also have to be heavily regulated to make sure the content is 100% OK to be monetized.
wow someone from second life! ya second life needs to pay if u wanna create ur own world, that's too pricey
Oh no... VRChat wants a little money to fix the things everyone has screamed about being broken...
They can't. There's no other alternative. Welcome to game development where life is hard
Actual curious post: They stated you can take a photo in game, or upload a photo to use as a tag. What kind of Abuse prevention could there be for this? this game is already fairly lewded by people. How long until I see red rockets and bewbz on peoples tags?
I've always wanted to support the VRC team, but I do think they just opened a can of worms for themselves, because now people will expect regular updates, considering there'll be a sub model, which is not something we've had before (Both the sub and regular updates)
So I do think it was a risky move
you guys have to admit the new nameplates are clean af though
I used to work for High Fidelity, which was another VR company. During the time of operation, AltSpace was goign to close their doors, until Microsoft purchased them. I'd say that isn't too much of a stretch to assume the same for VRChat.
@teal glacier That's only if the avatar paywall happens; as long as the content is free to upload and use (unless officially endorsed by the company) it should be alright. If they do this, they'll have to purge the content or endure lawsuits like you said. If they introduce some sort of commission feature, it'll also have to be heavily regulated to make sure the content is 100% OK to be monetized.
@vocal shard
Hmm, fair, i was under the impression that monetizing the game was enough to set off the copyright problem 🤔
learn something new every day
IMVU is also really pricy, I used to play that myself. The difference is that you're paying IMVU creators directly with credits/currency that's exchanged for real money, and the only money the website/app gets is from premium features which had a lot of content behind them. You'd get free stuff from buying credits as well. Also IMVU content is usually 100% original, copyright stuff got taken off the game pretty often
Oh god, I STILL have my creator license with them
People are really mad about this whole optional thing you can choose not to pay for?
Yeah but if you're in Australia running a small indie company, the pay is down to you and if you can't support it, then you're screwed.
Yay controversy!
Garry's mod is a buy to play game and I don't think I've heard about any cases where they ran into copyright issues
New nameplates are pretty nice, though personal non-monetary customization would be in my best interest, but i digress
@vocal shard
Hmm, fair, i was under the impression that monetizing the game was enough to set off the copyright problem 🤔
learn something new every day
@teal glacier If that were true, it'd mean that games like L4D2 would be in big trouble for copyright infringement too
Sadly. Heck, the fact they even are giving free stuff away and people still complain about it... Oh well.
Yes. It's so comedic
Can anyone give me more details about this whole vrchat plus stuff? Like what's this actually changing other than whats showed in the video?
This community has a lot of toxic teens. So an large part of the community in here will shit on anything the devs do. Even if its objectively a good thing for the game and community they will find a way to hate it.
humans will be humans
waiting for ui update so my VRC+ subscription grants me access to dark mode 
🍞
About that: the content is hosted by Valve or by other services, not Garry's Mod developers themselves, so that's why they haven't had any issues. VRChat is a different beast since they host... everything
@teal glacier If that were true, it'd mean that games like L4D2 would be in big trouble for copyright infringement too
@vocal shard
fair game, thank you!
I think people are just mad because the $10/month price for so little (right now) is a ripoff, and others are wondering if this means that the game will continue to become monetized. ie advertisements or avatar/world upload paywalls
We dont know yet- Read the blogpost and you will know we are getting 2 game changes that are for everyone with extra for subscription people. In the future other things will get added but we dont know what or when.
i'm definitely more scared about avatars and worlds costing money to upload in the future bc copyright and also i am a broke bitch, it'd kill the game if they did that
I find it hilarious, because the same people who are mad are also probably the same ones who scream about things not working and what not.
Ofc, the only ones that are mad about this are the usual 16 year olds that have no money to spend. But I like everyone else would expect more regular updates being made to the game after a monetized system gets put into the game.
but yeah dont get VRC+ on the promise of future features, buy it if you want to support the game monetarily and to a lesser extent if you like the few features it offers now. if not just keep playin' the game for free normally 🤷♂️
I'm scared of legal implications and possible feature cutoff to reinforce payments
Human beings are pretty toxic about everything in general, so
🍞
Where can I find the blogpost?
my thoughts exactly @quartz jetty
I like the idea of VRChat+ but the pricetag at the moment is way too high for what it offers. New nametags and more favorite slots are always welcome tbh
I ain’t no simp !
....so... just for the record, there are other places other than VRChat... who also have montetization options... and don't have feature cutoffs as a result. I doubt VRChat will fall into the wrong boat
Oh no, how dare them try to get money to fix the things that are broken
I think vrchat should have a donation thing
I kinda wonder what happens to the favorited avatars after the subscription expires
if you dont want to pay money for an early access game, dont spend money on it; its that easy. its still free and receiving free updates
Fix things? They think nothings wrong!
I have mentioned nametag customization, as small as it is, it was cutoff and added as a premium feature
I reget to say I forget their name (forgive me, I think it was George), but I did speak to a VRC higher up, and they really know their stuff and are very professional. I doubt they'd want to upset people, so I doubt feature cutoffs would be a thing
I mean if it really helps, think of the subscription as a monthly donation?
donating to an company isnt realistic for them. It comes with a lot of problems to an company even if they get the money
Your right
bottom line, as long as content uploading/creation stays free, i'll keep playing and maybe support it if vrc+ has more features (that don't impact the experience/used to be free) later justifying the $10 tag. i like the new nameplates, hopefully there's still a speech indicator when people talk cause i'm hard of hearing and it helps me notice whos speaking lol can anyone on the beta tell me if this is true?
VRChat fixing things? whos gonna tell em?
Oh no, how dare them try to get money to fix the things that are broken
@stoic saddle
they patched the game 32 times since 2020, and every single one fixed bugs
Bug fixes are -not- new content
I doubt that
if you like the game then use it to support it, if not, don't. your money, do what you please

donating 20 dollars a month cause you feel obligated isnt the same as donating 100 dollar once cause you want to. bug fixes are still updates too.
Give us new features !
its also free to add to that
Huh shocking news, but VRchat is run by a very small team. It might be surprising to you, but maybe they need to hire new people?
Give us new shit Idc what the fuck it is GIVE US SOMETHING
@vocal shard Did you even look at Udon and Av3 or the new camera stuff so far?
Speaking from experience, since I did apply as support previously
Subscription offers predictable income by end of month, and some form of predictability is better than nothing.
"Wanna upload your own avatars and worlds? Get vrchat+!"
Wait the subscription is $20 a month?????
no, $10
As long as they dont make any VRChat+ exclusive lobbies and maps or paywall any excisting stuff im gonna continue playing
doubt that, unless they wanna kill the playerbase lol
it'd be nice if they used the vrc+ money to hire modders to help improve the game, if some of the more popular client features i've heard about are implemented it'd be really cool
Ah yes the team who spend insane amount of resources on making an advanced system for both will throw there most important and the systems they enjoy most from the community behind a paywall 🙃
Arvu, you cannot defend the team from everything, there's legit criticism that you cannot brush off that a majority of the regular players have had problems with.
so what happen if you stop paying for vrc+? they remove all yout 25+ avatars?
that kind of exists in form of private lobbies? 🤷♂️
If content uploading is ever paywalled, that's when i'll jump ship for sure
it's ALWAYS FREE TO UPLOAD! just stop bullshitting for no reason
chances are you will be able to remove faves but not add them until you're back to the normal limit
Might be best to ask in the beta channels as there its being tried on.
Honestly, if they limited uploads to a similar limit, I'd understand since honestly, that has been rather abused if you know how the backend stuff works
Nah i meant more like public lobbies but only with vrc+
I guess people forgot to read
As always, the core experience of playing VRChat remains free. The VRChat+ subscription is a way for you to show your support to VRChat, and get some cool bonuses as our way of saying thanks.
Nah, I don't think VRC+ worlds are a good idea at all
thats just private lobbies with extra steps
You are implying that a majority of VRChat's populous can read.
And extra money
Password protected VRChat+ Lobby
Hi, 25yr-old with a decent disposable income here, and I think VRC+ is a pretty shitty move in its current iteration
Your right, but the fact is it does cost money to upkeep a game like this, and even with the so called corporate funds they got (which if I recall that contract is long over) they still need some kind of income
so ... vrchat+ ouch
sad but true, im happy to see that they finally take some monetization from users who love vrchat
Technically that was a thing before
@feral obsidian
Huh, the more you know
So... don't get it then. It's optional.
I mean... xd
Oh yeah, I agree, I want to and will support the vrchat team, I've asked about a way to support them for 2-3 years now that is not merch related ofc
ok but when are the marketable vrpill plushies coming out
I fucking love it when people go ' oh no i dont fall into that group i still hate it' but dont say why 👀
Mail cash to their PO box
vrc+ only worlds yes yes yes
Yeah... kind of hard to jump into VRChat and say "I'm wearing my "VRChat" shirt while in VRChat."
marketable default avatar plushie
They got at least 15 million so far. Its hard for me to know because im not a game dev but is this what a 15 million game feels like?
Every private room has its own generated password, and before you could generate an instance with your own, sadly it's no longer possible
@feral obsidian
marketable nikei plushie says "is that a custom avatar" and "is that a custom vrchat plushie" when you squeeze his hand
I have a business idea for them, so we can create avatars and upload them, right.
VRChat build a plushie, let's go
That's really not a valid argument. Game developers employ psychologists for many reasons, one of which is to ensure that their schemes of monetization are as effective at getting people to buy them as possible. The big names are extremely guilty of this, and the same argument is often used to defend their skins. "It's optional" doesn't really apply when they're locking desired content behind the paywall. People have been requesting more favourite slots (which costs them literally nothing, for the record, and is a simple bump of an arbitrary number) since the favouriting system was added.
build-an-avatar workshop!
@potent fern That honestly feels like an bad faith question. But running an company tha tis scaling up is extremely expensive. Same applies to server costs and reworking systems. They cant just throw money at things to solve a problem as they dont have incomes yet.
Normally in the buisness world this type of money comes with rules of what the team needs to do (think of making Udon, Av3 or even VRC+ as an example)
They might need this amount of money to run the company for years and years until they are making a profit.
That is a disaster in the making
create your own avatars, infinite favorite 5Head
Stop sniffing so much glue. They literally said the base game wont get impacted by it. Your getting a shit ton of free stuff so far and you still complain as your not getting everything for free.
I do
So.... when are the devs gonna listen to Quality Assurance?
just make ur own avatars, it's FREE!
100% of the game's meaningful content is produced by the community on behalf of VRChat, so I also don't think the "it's free!" argument holds any water
Like I said earlier though, once you add in a monetization system to the game, knowing the vrchat players, people will get more demanding for more frequent updates, and I too would ofc be in that category.
Every other sub model has new content coming to it on a regular basis so this I would expect from the monetization here too.
Ah shit i forgot the game only gave us polished tools to make advanced avatars and worlds
The base software needed for making an avatar has a mandatory subscription in itself
Bro is AV3 even real 😔
Lol no.
?????
It literally doesnt, you can make any and all avatars for free.
neither Unity or blender has a mandatory subscription
lol what. even a broke idiot like me has blender.
I think there would be much less backlash if they hadn't added two incredibly basic features behind the paywall and instead left it as just a subscription to support them
unity is free unless you plan on making a game or something
I assume you mean a license?
Ah, I missed 20 pages of avatar creation then
no its still free, unless you make over 100k a month
And you GOT more free slots for favorites. I used to work for a competing service, and honestly you are analyzing way too deep on this one. This isn't the same as skins, because skins are already on your system and a boolean flag says "Yes can use or No cannot." This is custom models and content, hosted on their servers, being sent to everyone. Space isn't free, bandwidth isn't free, and running the servers isn't free.
So yeah, it's optional. By a long mile. The most I can think of is the icon/nametag thing being a bit of an odd cutoff, considering that images usually don't use a lot of space, but who knows what may change in the future.
Even then your game has to reach a certain point before they take a small percentage.
even then its still free unless your game makes a large enough amount of money from its sales, shadra
I only read up the official FAQ and ended up with needing a license
ah wasnt 100% on that, regardless it's still free unless you're planning on some big fat stacks
The nameplate thing didn't surprise me so I expected that, I think that's fair, I just hope this means that all trust system nameplates are being removed and we all go back to having the same colored nameplate (apart from vrc+ subs ofc)
Its an Honest question because I have no idea how those things cost, server upkeep, employee salary , etc.
Is making a profit even a goal for VrChat or is is only used as a tech demo and an incentive for people to buy VrHeadset.
vroid studio is also completely free
You do need a license for unity, though it can be a free one
Favourite slots don't impose increased storage requirements, except for berhaps a few bytes per favourited avatar. Favourites don't store a copy of the avatar, they reference the originally uploaded avatar by its ID. Favouriting an avatar just adds its unique ID to the list of your favourites stored in the database
I would like to personally assure everyone that VRChat has never employed a psychologist, or even someone who would pass muster with one
Wait someone actually thought that
I guess I'm going back to drawing up my own avatar, so which software do I pick up?
Blendor
says the psychologist 👀
I only read up the official FAQ and ended up with needing a license
@feral obsidian some things needed in avatar creation do require payment, like dynamic bones and some shaders or models; but unity/blender are free -- some other modeling programs (metasequoia, maya, 3dsmax) are paid and some alternatives are also free (vroid, pmx editor, hitogata). i'd recommend blender, vroid, or pmxeditor for beginners; unity is absolutely required to upload so grab the right version
Bruh when you reach a point where one of the dev's has to actually come out and say something xD
Ah yes, Blendor
I definitely wasn't intending on implying that, as your team is obviously far too small for such a thing
vroid studio also probably work if you want an Anime Avatar
what’s up with the lemons? why are people posting lemons? I’m so confused
I'm actually three psychologists in a coat, stacked up so that we can get into R-rated movies
A new favorite object is created, so that's not entirely true
👍
Can my VRC+ money go towards hiring a therapist to spend like 6 hours ingame while they come up with an award winning thesis on VR weirdos
what’s up with the lemons? why are people posting lemons? I’m so confused
@vocal shard some sort of spam-protest i gather
I KNEW IT!
Its a full company so there goal in the end should be making money. Unless they plan to get bought up by an larger company, but even then the normal end goal is making a profit.
People buying headsets to play Vrchat doesnt give money to VRC, it sadly gives money only to facebook or steam (or what other company you buy it from).
At best VRC might get some technical support or a free VRC headset to test there game on because its so big, but a free headset once a year wont keep the company running.
wait nvm i know what it is lmfao
Just hire an journalist and get a 20x more whack thesis
Ikr, vrchat has basically just been making Oculus, Valve and Vive more money, lmao
Not having full access still bothers me a bit, especially shaders
I'll poke around vroid
I really liked that one journo that wrote something last year
Shaders are mostly fully accessible
I honestly probably would have subscribed if there weren't any features locked behind it and it was fully just to support the development of the game. I'm subbed to a bunch of Patreons for that reason
you can still use whatever shaders you like in unity within reason
@feral obsidian the best free shaders are poyomi, silent, and yes even standard.. dynamic bones is on sale right now iirc
how's this chat doing?
well, hl:a did a bigger push on that
why is vrchat+ pay to win, gives you increased trust :/
It started out looking like a slam piece but then they were like "lol honestly these dudes are just a bunch of weirdos they're not that bad afte rall"
Not sure what you read but that aint a thing kekw
"pay to win"
Win what exactly ? you just talk and shitpost in the game
trusted rank means nothing u know
vrc64
it's a joke bro
i need to win in shitposting /s
VRC+ increases your competitive friendship ELO, you heard it here first
Yo im rolling for venti
So the way I understand it is that we're all going back to having the same nameplates, right? No longer split based on trust?
talking? what's that? people just stare at mirrors all day lmao
honestly the ranks mean nothing yea, it's all about you were able to not be vote kicked from worlds long enough to be that rank
I talked about something like VRC+ with a friend almost a year ago, but as a one-time payment
The subscription sounds pretty hefty tbh compared to services like spotify, which offer a bigger benefit in general
Psst System, if you need more reasons for people to get VRC+ try making VRC+ only instances, that will do the trick 👀
Can i just donate money to VRchat team via patreon or something? I don't see any link from official web site.
It's not out yet Joo
lol vrc+ instances oh my god
there's probably a whole host of legal complications of a Corporation doing patreon
Yeah, Patreon can suck it
@vocal shard If you want to donate to the team just use the subscription model for a while. Its a lot more stable and safe for the team and you get extra stuff from it even.
I would like to personally assure everyone that VRChat has never employed a psychologist, or even someone who would pass muster with one
@dark harness If I pay you guys the ten dollars whose foot pics am I getting?
I hate you, even if i don't know you personally.
Insert sensible and fully optional donation box here
OMG yes please
talking only with elite members of vrchat
VRC+ only instances would be a bad idea, crashers can force their way into invite lobbies already, so whats the point
Invisible avatars are now dead
Can someone actually give me an exact number of employees VRChat has?
i know i know, im a genius, vrc team, if you need more monetization ideas, hit me up
ofc buying a headset doesnt give VRC money directly but for example, HTC was one of the company giving out funding to vrc, vrc then use this funding in development, people see the game and decide to invest into VR, giving money to HTC ( either Headset or Vive tracker)
Im not saying this is how it is, just one possible interaction I had in my head.
How many in Quality Assurance?
0
dumb subscription thing theyre adding sometime soon, and its not worth the price
VRC+ is a magical new subscription you can pay for a game that's already free C:
officially, hiding your nameplate has been a bannable offense for a while
Asking again though, are nameplates all gonna be the same now? Apart from people with vrc+ ofc.
I’ve been analyzing the chat here and it seems to be about 18% negative, 25% positive, 55% questions, and 2% lemons.
but how do i bu
lemons :)
that is worrying. why would nameplates not have color to show user rank
did you make an excel spreadsheet ?
yeah, they changed it so that modifying the nameplate in any way is bannable in preparation for this update
I don't like this way, i don't like this idea of VRC+ and i don't support it in any ways. But if VRc team need money i can give it to them, and i don't want to be "more privileged" than others for that.
well the lemons didnt have any chances D :
That is the reason why facebook bought specific game companies. VRC isnt part of this group and the first funding ground that included HTC probally was meant as a boost for 'games that can grow big'.
That does not mean it would happen again after that or that its a close to realistic way to survive for the team.
I see a future of worse elitism :D
HELLO
i think you got your lemon percentage wrong my dude
Elitism is already in the game
full-body tracking is much more prevalent of a elitism
how do i buy it
it's not available for purchase yet
This is literally just an ingame Patreon. All your getting is some extra avatar slots, that others also got increased. More options on nameplate edditing, what others also still can do.
so now, the ultimate chad is: fbt + index + veteran rank + Tactsuit X40 + VRchat plus?
In fact, if trust nameplates are going away now then that'll help reduce elitism imo, I don't think "oh lol I paid more money than you" will really be that good of a diss in vrc
There are no lemons in Ba Sing Sei
"Oh you don't have a PCVR headset, FBT, VRChat+? You're broke."
Tbh, I don’t like the idea of a subscription service boosting your rank.... I don’t think it’s fair for the content creators who work hard to get the rank they have.
Yet another way to separate the VR community :D
oh oh, i have another great idea for VRC+ feature
4k camera and stream camera
take notes system 👀
"wow look at this loser who doesn't have VRC+ scrub" "wow look at this loser who paid for a free game" it goes both ways, if anyone seriously says either of those things its pretty easy to just mute em for being dumb
Pog, it's System!
that big founding round was in 2019 I think? obviously when we look at the situation now and the status of HTC, this might not happen again. ( which could explain why now VRCteam is looking into other avenue for monetization.) And I dont believe vrchat has facebook money to buy their own oculus.
"Available on Steam soon, coming to other platforms later" from the announcement video
Inb4 lootboxes with special shaders/effects for nameplates
lmao
that would be epic
happened earlier if i recall right. your thinking about other seeding rounds in this game.
Also they for sure dont have enough money to become a facebook like system as you said.
the mute is now behind VRC+ buy our monthly subscription to continue muting and we'll throw in a bonus girlfriend
Vrchat gacha game, let's go, admins being 5 stars
money should have nothing to do with rank or "Supporter Badge". you know who the real supporters are? The content makers! imagine some new player who sits mute in front of a mirror all day gets a supporter badge because he paid. But content creator (like Jar or Lucifer M Star who's maps dominate vrchat) DON'T get the supporter badge all because they dont pay 10 dollars a month.
facebook's own system (horizon?) is likely to siphon a lot of users away from vrchat when it releases
the mute is now behind VRC+ buy our monthly subscription to continue muting and we'll throw in a bonus girlfriend
@vocal shard Pay an extra ten dollars and said gf will be a girl IRL.
is it a monthly thing
$20 for 2750 VRCoins! one lootbox will cost 1323 VRCoins, or 5 lootboxes for 3001 VRCoins!
I agree with Pop
I simp for vrchat 5 star pulls
Give it a week and no one will care, just like no one cared about name tag color after a week of it being added.
@stable trellis why did you say my numbers
They stated they want to add more badges, I hope they sent all gated behind VRC+
Ranks should not be a thing you can buy.
Ranks shouldn't even be a visible thing to begin with
The lootboxes are 3001 coins each and you can only get 3000 per payment
Ability to stare in a mirror is now locked behind VRChat+!
absolutely lol. same thing happened with Nitro / Nitro+
but i heard about this vrc+ thing
Ranks are no longer visible by default as of the beta update
@languid beacon That makes me very happy, thank god, it was about time.
is it a monthly subscription
Idk
They still show up when you have the quick menu open but even that can be disabled if you want
I hope that stays that way adeon
click the link in #announcements , it is all the info the community has rn

Im not aware if vrc had other monetization since then that was not involving players directly. so how they can keep running the game is beyond me.
I am totally fine with monetization like thee sub services they announced today.
I just think that what you get for the price is a bif off. Either add more in the deal or reduce the cost, even if it would mean reduce the features that come with it.
I don't like the way gray and blue users are being treated just because they're new, it feels super fresh to interact with them but I think them being treated shitty by vrc regulars just decreases their chances of returning
So if the rank system is truly invisible for the most part now then that'll go a long way.
The price is mainly about supporting the devs, not the extra bits
i made a majority of my longer term friends when i was New User, ranks really dont mean anything aside from safety settings and yeah making it less visible is definitely a good thing
honestly performance rank is a much more useful piece of information for me
<very poor> gang
Weighted performance when?
Hey can someone pop down that link
I think people see 10$ and then start comparing with other services what they can get.
As for supporting the game, its easier if the amount is lower a bit lower.
Im trying to find the right word s for it but
Giving out 5$ as support feels easier to pass ( even if you dont get much out of it yourself. While giving 10$ feels like you should also get something in return.
we might be arguing over 5$ and thats not a lot but i was thinking of patreon for example. where you often have very low tier like 1$ and 5$, You dont get much from it but it more as a support for the content creator.
loving the VRC+ idea!
Hoping we'll see EU servers/ local hosts at some point.
i see alot of opportunity in it
$10 as of rn might seem alot but i think the outcome can be really good
Subbing to free content on twitch, PepeLaugh
Yeah, have to see what the "more features coming soon" are before deciding it's worth $10 a month TBH
this is all for a better VRChat i am sure
Pay what you want donation box is the safest bet, albeit likely the least reliable one, as you'd be waiting for actual donations whilst here there's an incentive
Ability to stare in a mirror is now locked behind VRChat+!
@timid cairn dumbest thing ive heard all night 👍
cusom icons and another 75 save slots are nice and all but I doubt i'm gonna make full use of the 25 that I'm gonna have
VRC needs money .. Lets call this for what it is, Since OCT the servers are burning and they need money to fix the broken shit before it gits much much worse .
i mean i pay $70 a month for my phone and all that gets me is spam calls and a social media addiction. $10 a month for VRC+ is a bargain in comparison
My problem with "more features coming soon" is that usually it takes them a long ass time to implement features they've mentioned, so they should've probably not included that in the presentation
Whoever is complaining about VRC+ is silly, ur not losing anything by not paying, actually ur still getting more
well yeah, it was obvious that they'd need to monetize the game somehow eventually
20k people on OFF peak times have broght this to a head .
@timid cairn ah sorry ppl have been saying some weird sh*t lately
Mirrors should be vrc+ tbh, thx
i just don't think, for me personally, that what's currently listed as benefits of VRC+ are worth the $10
you can always not give out ur money and nothing will change
its a decision not mandatory. ur not paying for the game. ur just supporting it.
and giving it potential for good updates
I paid more in the past for subscription games like MMO but with VRC, being a game that was free for so long and then suddenly having a cost ( as an option ofc) has a shocking effect for a lot people. We can see this just by reading this chat for the last 3- 4 hours.
@fading flare That's what most people seem to agree on rn
Give me 90+ frames 24/7, then I’ll debate on buying.
also cuz the game is buggy af and has poor security and crashes. that's what makes the 10 dollars a month sound bad
VRC has been struggling just to keep it running, . They are also struggling to monitize with the current build.
I think the price - intially is maybe a bit much, however I really want to support the devs so they can actually bring better devs on the team to create better content for the game.
Impossible unless they limit what users can upload with avatars.
Also, I see this as an absolute win. The richer can waste money to support vrchat so we get better features. 😁
I'm interested in what they mention in their blog post when it comes to long time goals for content creators being able to support themselves. Hopefully that means a way for avatar makers to sell avatars without having to sell unity packages
and it's a lot less harmful than microtransaction mechanics
This can either go one of two ways - the devs take the cash and go, but I doubt it. OR they work towards improving the experience for the entire community - which I feel will occur
Vrc, partner with Mihoyo and give us some primogems with your sub, thx. I gotta get me Zhongli when he's released in two weeks
lmao
bruh
@fading flare still would rather buy the unity package tbh, would always like to put my own little spin on something like a rexouium
What can I say, I simp for 5 star daddys
just pulled a 5 star nameplate lets gooo
Just pulled my 5 star Tupper card, woo
I do too, but there are a lot of creators that don't like selling unity packages out of (legitimate) piracy concerns, and giving them the ability to sell without anyone breaking the TOS would be a nice thing
they probably continue to sell the package on the websites and a cheaper version on the vrchat store with no customisation
You need to spend additional play coins to unlock your new special nameplate
damn i keep pulling the same 3 star trash emojis
Nameplate lootboxes, ngl, I'm whaling for that shit
For three play coins I can assist you on your path
feeeed me my cooooins mr freemaaaaaaaaa
Look gordon a rope
guys guys, listen. vrc+ mirrors.
I doubt they're going to do any loot boxes
Mirrors exclusive to vrc+ pls
VRC++ Doors
Eh, rec room is still as good as it ever was after introducing monetization, I doubt VRC is gonna change
I would pay for just good regular updates, not just 20+ bug fixes
okay so what would be your suggestion for an income source for vrchat hotdogwater
vrchat lootboxes
hah, regular updates instead of bugfixes stares off into the distance as a veteran of second life
What have they locked behind a paywall?
Paywatyewant donation bawx
custom nameplate icons
Ehh, don't stress out about it, I doubt much is gonna change tbh, I just hope we won't get to the point where we have ads in our loading screen, etc
@coarse rock Locked? Nothing really. They only give you extra stuff of what you already have so far. Read the blogposts in #announcements
as opposed to the basic ones I guess? the name plate icons in general are new to begin with, so it's not like anything existing is getting moved behind a paywall
75 avatar favorite slots, and a jpeg next to your name
aka nothing important that makes me feel like im losing out by not buying into it for any other reason than supporting the game financially
^^^^^^^ I was mainly trying to figure who the F was crying about the devs adding in a non-forced method to support the devs
You guys do realize that advertising money makes almost jack shit right? Unless you got to tier brands advertising you dont even get 0,001 dollar from most advertisements a view
A lot of us saw this coming from a mile away when they started cracking down on things that edit your nameplates, nameplates was always the easiest thing they could've monetized
Isn't the core game still free?
Yes and always will be as they have stated clearly
100% literally says in the medium post
My only suggestion is a hands free donation box, pay what you want, simple, no hassle, though inconsistent
This.
That wouldn't really push people to support the devs as much - which is why they added smaller things you can receive by supporting via VRC+
you can't rely on donations to pay the bills
Why are so many people complaining then? It's optional
that's not terribly great for business to have super inconsistent monthly Revenue
Why do you think they're adding VRC+? They can easily figure out what their monthly revenue is - and then they can actually hire quality developers that they might not have been able to afford previously, etc.
That's the point, it's incentivating people to buy into it rather than relying on actual voluntary donations
and investors aren't going to want to keep throwing that their money at their face forever
People act like its the end of the world if they dont have that extra 75 fav slots bruh
VRC got - I think around 15 million in 2016 via HTC and I think Facebook, they stretched it this long, so I'm quite impressed.
I'm afraid it could be just beginning of something horrible in future.
also I would point out they can't use all of it in one year because then they wouldn't have any money for next year
With the small team, and the amount of money, I'm impressed. Obviously the game itself isn't "perfect" but I can definitely work with it, and the potential the addition of VRC+ has
They got other seeding rounds too
But keep in mind, those often come with a promise of making systems like Udon or Av3
One thing I could see them potentially adding to VRC+ is a prop inventory with universal props people could pull out to use no matter where they are. Kinda like the props in Pokerstars VR. Just simple things that you can hold.
then you wont pay them anymore and jump to another social game or not really jump since friends n all, just no pay
Hello
@fading flare Ehhh - I like that idea, but it might be quite difficult to do something like that. More in the sense that not every model / avatar will be the same
So should I get vrc pulse or not
It sounds doable, loading an entity into the world like your avatar does, though it should be limited to avoid propspam abuse
That's true, I was thinking more in the sense of just things to hold and throw around and such rather than things to try and attach to your avatar. Like if you're hanging out in a theater being able to pull out a bottle of soda without having to rely on the map maker having put one there
if you want to
You... can add your own props to your avatars before uploading?
True, but not what we were talking about @stoic saddle
There's no need, but if you do have the money and want to support VRChat or have extra features, go for it.
I mean, you can literally already do it yourself though? Why put something you can already do behind a paywall lol
To not get banned and support the devs? @stoic saddle
Nvm didnt see you meant the avatar stuff
Oh no not that
@stoic saddle They're more discussing "universal" items, in the sense that it wouldn't matter the model you were in, you would be able to spawn certain items. And yes, you can still do that for every model if you so please, but Clover was probably talking about making a system that would spawn items in - much easier.
so not avatar specific and more so general
yeah
The only real extra features I want to see are the ones we actually shouldn't see, such as server stability, account security, etc
if so, place a limit on how many u can spawn tho
vrc will certainly never remove anything from the base experience, but long term worst case scenario is they add annoyances in the free version that you can pay to get rid of with VRC+ (ads, queue systems?, idk lol). its basically apple's whole business model to create a problem and sell you the solution to it and they're doing great financially lol
(obviously this is baseless speculation)*
^
Oh god please no queues
oh jeez 2b2t queue in vrchat NO!
ads in a game? bruh, ublock for games when
Imagine having an ad play whenever you change worlds oh god
also likely some sort of in-game shop for premium avatars where they take like 15% of the price
🤷♂️ I tell people to wait a month or so after VRC+ is actually live before making true opinions on it.
oh definitely, it would have to be like, only two things spawned at a time per avatar or something lol. Idea is meant to be things to hold or fidget with so no need for more than one for each hand
They would have to slowdown the loading then for me kekw
🤷♂️ "Premium Avatars" could mean literally anything, and could easily get them sued if misusing certain assets, etc. I doubt it'll happen in that style @graceful pewter
Hi
Hello
time for a nice relaxing mirror sesh with the homies CALL of DUTY 38 now available *gunshot noises* *explosion*
Download Throttling
Make mirrors VRC+ 🙏
Do it please
Hiya
why mirrors
Do not make mirrors VRC+
well virtual Market already exists selling paid avatars just the transactions are happening off-site currently including Square Enix selling nier automata avatars officially
"Are you enjoying VRChat, well use code: VRCHATISGOOD to get your free champion in RAID SHADOW LEGENDS"
Yeah
The blog post sure makes it sound like they wanna make some kind of official market for avatars and worlds or something eventually
Was reading the chat from earlier, and I'm so glad I'm not a gamedev. Really depressing reading a bunch of children railing on the devs for being terrible coders when they know nothing about what they're talking about. Too many bad takes. I'll get VRC+ as soon as it releases.
^
yeah they are trying to hire folks to sort out how to do it official Market
Why ya think most devs are never in the discord around these times or barely interact with the community. They never do anything good and even if there patch is perfect, it aint enough.
which is a good thing for everyone as long as the're not taking too huge of a cut and blocking outside transactions
I keep having to remind people that VRChat literally started as a small project that exploded onto the scene and not a single one of them was prepared for it
@umbral reef You'd be wrong, actually. I've hung out with plenty of the devs in game, I've had some really nice conversations with them as well.
ingame, not this discord.
Ingame they wont get 200 people shitting on then constantly. At worse they get annoyed but there is nothing a block button there wont solve or moving lobbies.
People will hate on any changes, good or bad. Though don't let it affect you too much if you do strive to be a game dev.
there's a difference between hanging out with like 30 people in a VR chat room and being in a room of 10000 people on Discord
a feature i really, desperately want for VRC is something along the lines of blizzard's 2FA app where, instead of having to type a RNG code every time i log in, i just tap a notification on my phone instead
typing those codes in VR keyboard is a nightmare lol
Vrchat is awesome made me very happy that game, please just buy vrc+ to support the devs so that it doesn’t get shut down I’d be sad if that happened
Yeah, I totally hear ya. It's terrible. Having a community to connect to the devs offers a world of opportunity for a project's growth and can lead to a positive feedback loop, but when filled with utter toxicity, it just leads to bitterness.
I'm scared to even look at reddit right now lol
lmao good idea, lemme check
Well, I guess I can't necessarily speak on the discord, however, I feel like there's just too many people chatting that the devs can't really speak to everyone. Which I guess could be good, could be bad. 🤷♂️ It's just something that developers deal with. @umbral reef
Very true. It literally exploded, and I think it's a really important staple for VR, but as a programmer myself, this project seems very expensive to support, and I've been hoping they'd do at least something for monetization for ages now.
im expecting 100 upvotes 768 comments on reddit lol
I wonder what the Japanese Community is thinking at the moment
prepare wallet
prolly something like あっ、そっか
I'm a professional programmer, and I often do research into gamedev because it really interests me, but I don't know if I could deal with such toxicity after putting so much blood, sweat, tears, stress, time, and money into something, haha.
Yeah as expected, it's going crazy on reddit
probably a lot more game for this considering how much they spend on anime figurines
haha, reddit posts about the introduction of "classism" with VRC+. Yeah it's gone even stupider there than I could have anticipated
VR headsets are much more of a classism then a little name tag
The toxicity is highly localized, to put it simply. Most people I run into in VRChat are very nice and super thankful for the work the team does.
and fullbody, the ultimate classism
I'm not a programmer, but I have paid attention to a lot of online stuff, including things such as how games and streamers handle sudden popularity. It's actually a scary thought, that you could just go viral and BOOM thousands of people see you
Don't let that discourage you from exploring ideas you have. 😄
people hate on discord new reply
people hated on discord when they did small changes to the chat
people hated on steam when the new UI released
people hated when HL game went VR
those who hate/hated fade overtime somehow and then they love it
Didn’t they remove that anyway? Idk about pc users but in the quest community, anyone below green was always made fun of simply for being new to the game and from what I heard, they’re removing name colours and letting you customise it if you buy vrc plus?
😠
Vrchat gacha game, let's go
(less caps this time)
Wait tupper, as your a robot, do you eat Ram sticks as a snacc or do you still eat sweets?
i admire your positivity haha, i would have cracked the 5th time someone blamed me personally for an update having problems lol. congrats on the release announcement 
Like I said, don't let it affect you too much. You can see what people are hating on if it means trying to improve it or make it more simple. But if it's just reckless hate, then there's no point of trying to appeal to them. Just do what you think is right, not what others want.
can VRC+ users have reactions enabled here?
I'm...what? People actually make fun of new players? I have literally never seen that?
I'm relieved to hear that, really. Major props. It's a shame how little people understand of the unique challenges you have with a project like this, and I think you guys have made many great strides on what I'm sure we all hope is a long road. I really want to support you all on it.
galaxy brain over here
I dont really know about that vrc+ thingie at this point of time. In my honest opinion:
I know that they have to get some sort of income at some point of time. But right now it feels a bit rushed, since the game has some things that should be higher prioritized like safety settings that actually work as intended (reported an issue twice by now), performance updates and especially voice issues when you are hosting the instance. In my opinion vrc+ could be tiered like;
vrc+ 5$ (doing 50 fav avatars + badges and those nameplate things, didnt look completly into it)
vrc+ 10$ (100 fav avatars + more badges)
vrc+ 25$ (yeah, give them a shiny nameplate or something, for those who want to give you more money)
That would be a more friendly approach in my eyes. Give them who dont want to spent a lot an oppurtunity to support you, and these who want to spent a lot the possibility to do so as well without creating a major rift between low/high tier payers.
i'd spend 5$ rather than 10$ ngl
Again it’s the quest community. If you don’t use an oculus quest or involve yourself in the quest community you may not have seen it
You have a point, especially with HL. 🙂
Yeah, I've often thought about what an experience like that would be like, and I feel like it really takes a certain type of strength to be able to deal with it. Can easily drive some people mad. Definitely scary, even though there are positives to it as well. It's a life changing thing.
@stoic saddle They do, I'm in publics all the time and gray / blue users get treated like shit by mostly trusted users, I see it all the time, so them removing the ability to see rank colors is gonna help them out a lot
HL:A made me want VR as well as VRChat, still saving for one
Glad to hear that, don't let the negativity affects you badly. You can see the negatives if it means to improve the game, but if it's mindless hate, then it's best to ignore them.
Literally the only time I have to block anyone for their behavior is when they're "trusted" so I might be in that weird place with this lol
lol
I personally love the new players that come to this game, they feel fresh to interact with and it's fun to introduce them to the nuts game that is VRC
I never got to see my name turn purple 😔
awwh
I played HL:Alyx when testing out the Quest; it was a thrilling experience and I bought both the Quest and HL: Alyx. 🙂
its not too late birdy, start grinding now upload 100 worlds maybe dont do that many
you still have time to realize that its....... meaningless haha
I remember when most of these things happened. It always drains hope from me, aha, but it's always refreshing to know that there are reasonable people out there.
i was blue for a long time, it really depends on how u act in the lobbies, ive met people just chatting with me out of nowhere, its nice if u act like a normal person and not scream or whatever
yo when is vrc plus going to be live?
My headset and laptop were sold 5 months ago 😎😎😎
welp time for photoshop then
Yep
ym guys
Sound advice. I think it's never good to be close minded and act like you're above criticism, because I don't think anyone or any project is. It's important to be open minded and find out which bits of criticism are made in good faith while not losing sight of what's important to you. Still, it takes a good bit of mental fortitude to wade through all of that mud 😩
yup. ive been hanging out here watching the carnage and there has been a lot of solid criticism and genuinely good suggestions, but theres also been a lot of weirdly personal attacks towards the dev team and "just fix the game"s as if theres just a switch they can flip lol
even then fixing the game requires time and money
It's like I said earlier. People have been asking for game fixes for like a year, and the devs are like "Alright but we need to have a business model and income" and people angrily scream "NO NOT LIKE THAT!"
I feel like the best way to "educate" them is to ask them to make their own game. And if there are flaws in said games, we'll say "just fix the game" and see how they'll feel. 😉
Speaking of fixing the game. Does anyone know when they'll fix crouching on 3.0 avatars?
?
I don't think we should condemn that directly. I mean we don't have to subscribe.
exactly. sadly the "just fix the game" switch is only in Unity+ which costs $10 a month so we end up right back where we started
ahaha, it's unfortunate that they don't have the empathy to put themselves in someone else's shoes without having to live it personally
In my experience making 3.0 avatars, whenever they crouch I go into a couching animation with no IK
Why don't we give them that experience?
It's like you would subscribe to a streamer.
I use my own experience as a streamer. If I expect my numbers to improve, I need to have enough money to pay for better equipment/games etc. And to do that, I might need to do something to get my viewers to subscribe. You know what I mean?
They’ve probably been losing a bunch of money on server costs, development, etc. so they need to turn a profit somehow
Yup, I'd been reading the chat of a few hours ago, and it was just sad. To spew hate not acknowledging anything that's changed over the project for years, pretending the devs are just rolling in money not doing anything, it's just so frustrating
It's completely voluntary, so what's so immoral about that?
Yeah, I know what you mean.
the only issue i've had with 3.0 avatars and crouching are that the default animations are kind of weird and a bit too dependent on whether I'm looking forward/up or slightly down
Yeah, what is wrong with that. We should be proud, because VRChat
because VRchat is a good VR game, it would be a shame if it had to be taken down.
I wonder what the Japanese Community is thinking at the moment
@graceful pewter They're mostly excited at being able to financially support VRC, it seems.
My point is that you shouldn't have to. Having a bit of empathy is common decency. It's not hard to try to imagine someone else's perspective without having personally lived through it, instead of just slinging hate about things you don't personally know about
I can't wait for the live stream from the new mansion with the ferrari collection or whatever the heck people think the devs did with the money?
I'm not surprised given there also a lot more on board with premium avatars
Welp, now we are all quest users
never said there was anything wrong with it
I think we should be proud.
We should be proud. They literally made a new (somewhat) language for VRChat, and that's probably not easy to do? Or cheap?
people really think that not a single day goes by in the VRChat office (socially distanced, ofc) where not a single dev looks at the canny bug reports and feature requests. but game development is so incredibly complicated and users are typically shielded from how messy it is that entitlement and ignorance turns very quickly into hostility. dont really think it will get better any time soon, gamers will be gamers lol
Just enjoy it while VRChat still exists, maybe VRC will no longer exist in the next few years. It can be
i think the $6.99 and $69/ year is a missed opportunity. ik its less but i think much more would like that and more people will support it.
True.
I think you're looking too deep into it, VRChat is a business at the end of the day and they need to make money so they're introducing this, nothing is going to change if you don't pay for it so people shouldn't get upset about it. No big deal, if you have the extra money to spend and you want more avatar slots or whatever then go for it
aw hell yea dude, I hope they fill up a swimming pool with dolla bills to flex on all the children 😂 what amazing lives these people must live where they think everything is easy to make and so nothing should need to cost any money 🤷♂️
true
Speaking of streaming, I'm gonna go stream some Deady Spacey 2. So I'll leave the VRChatting talks for now.
Bai bai 👋
Take care @magic void 👋
wait, game developers have a cost of living and need to make an income to sustain a service?
They'll bring back the Zzz emoji as a VRC+ feature :3
That would be stupid if so, Clover
One thing I think they need to improve is optimization, for all of my friends at least, there's a lot of lag and we have pretty decent PCs, if its an issue with the engine or something then I get that but it's definitely something I'd like to see improved. going into Void club and lagging my ass off kinda sucks sometimes but i'm used to it
Seems everyone gets 25 favorites now?
Thats true too :)
tbh im waiting for VRC++ for a more modern, object oriented Vrchat
Yeah I feel like it isn't enough
If they optimize the game then im gonna buy VRC+, otherwise hell no lol
No, i like VRC+. They made a wonderful game to me. So why i dont support that ^^
9 more avatars gives me a lot more flexibility
Yeah, and it can be very time consuming to try to add additional transparency and let everyone in on every little thing you're doing. Ultimately can mean you get a lot less done. But yeah, I think it's ignorance that plays a bit role in creating entitlement and hostility, and unfortunately you can't expect everyone to exude decency, ahaha. It is what it is. I just hate to see toxicity rain upon people who are doing their best to make such a cool project. I hope the best for their mental health.
idk if its a good idea for tiers. it would seem as P2W then, depending on what they add.
you guys gotta realise P2W here is not the way they wanna keep it fair for all. just additional benefits that wont change the supporters from everyone else
what actually happened to the Zzz emoji anyway? Was there ever any reason given for it's removal? It was useful for explaining to people that I wasn't talking due to my partner sleeping right behind me
Sure, the optimization of this game is just not that nice. But I think the people you get to know there are great ^^
mostly its the creators that arent optimised not the game, sure there's some things that could be fixed tho
The ZZZ emoji had to be retired after a trademark dispute with the band Empire of the Sun*
- this is not true, I don't actually know
xD
XD
There's no way this game is optimized, there's many other games with way better graphics that are more intense and I get way better fps
I know! Such a surprise! I was raised to believe servers sprouted off trees, but now they're telling me they have to pay for the land they plant them in and to maintain the trees that they sprout off of, or something like that..
what do u mean better graphics? we have the option to use whatever graphics we want
yup im the same way lol. but that's why game devs are so passionate about their stuff, the pay isnt great and everyone is angry at you for some reason. but if youre making good stuff, that one person who says 'good job i love your game' can definitely make up for it
most video games don't have to deal with user-generated content
You also have to consider that most of the maps have been created by other players in Unity.
or cramming 60 people into a small box
I've said this about other games... If you're so angry and salty about changes a game makes, or just don't like a game, maybe instead of complaining about the game, go find something else to do?
Yeah that's kinda facts, It's a hard issue to solve
true
also something like fortnite spreads the hundred people over a couple of kilometers
this 30 sec slow mode kind of poo poo
Are the devs going to be cracking down on client users now that one of the main client features is a paid feature? (and everyone and their mum is using a client these days)
VRChat haters are like the next "Fortnite bad" crowd or something
the reason u lack fps is the world optimisation/ peoples avatars. Dont put the blame on the game. the game itself runs on a wireless Oculus
But because of the crashers ...
That's the "excuse" I hear
true
I'm here to tell people VRChat+ isn't that bad an idea.
I understand clients are against TOS, but I think they're beneficial for the game
The crashers don't force the client users to fly around or keep swapping between a load of different avatars though. Hence why the use of clients to stop "crashers" is just a poor excuse for their use.
If you go to a map that's created by a random person and fill it with avatars that are created by random people, in your opinion, what do you think that the people who make the game can do to allow the content that they didn't make to perform well? When you give your opinion, please don't state that other games work better if those games are ones where the whole game and its contents are made by the developers themselves, because you should see why that is a disingenuous comparison.
and most video games are not targeting 90 frames per second
vrc team doesn't typically discuss the ins and outs of their moderation, but official word is clients are against ToS and using any of them is bannable. it is what it is for better or worse
Honestly, I find VRC deals surprisingly well with a lot of people in a small area as it is, as far as performance goes (instances tend to break in subtle ways though...) Some other platforms I've played on tend to have my FPS reach unplayable levels at around 20 people. I've been able to function somewhat in VRC even as instances reach 80 players.
its a really good opportunity, the money can be put to good use and what people request.
maybe in the future we get to see EU servers?
That then can make it so much better for worlds that are ping reliant
Look, every time I somehow get kicked out of VRChat it just can't be the game or my internet connection or my PC that just can't be it can't.
@balmy tendon Pretty sure it is, as that's not common. @stable trellis I know what the "official word" is. But the use is prolific right now with nothing being done about it.
Thats why some users are using a client, to not get crashed or something.
I think of it like a streamer. If a streamer wants better equipment, to give the viewers a better experience, they may have to do something to get them to donate/subscribe
thats why u use safety settings
Sounds like a poor excuse. The rest of us are doing fine not getting crashed without having to use some magical "crash blocker".
Thats what i already said ^^
Yeah, just look at SL, it's amazing it runs as well as it does given it's having to constantly stream in completely arbitrary assets from several regions that are running on separate machines with no real loading times. And yet people are constantly complaining about it running like trash.
Maybe if people would stop uploading super high detail models meant for rendering or high end single player games into multiplayer (VR) things we wouldn't have so many issues. Yeah there's definitely a lot of optimization that could go on on the game's end to make things better, but that's still not gonna help when most people are running around in poorly optimized avatars with a billion materials and shaders in a room full of 20 people
Voice Crasher ^^ Connect crasher they are so many
Does anyone know if I can change my profile pic or character from the website and not in the actual game
SL literally has lost code that's so deeply embeded that no one actually knows what the original purpose of the code is
When I play Beat Saber, I play Beat Saber with a lot of mods, and I think "thank god for all of these excellent mods, what a great community this game has".
On the other hand, when I'm playing a multiplayer game and someone floats by, glowing, and then headshots everybody in the room, I usually think "christ, what a butthole, the devs should do something about that".
The crashers and everything suck, but I think it's also a part of VRC. Sure, in a perfect world crashers don't exist and everyone is having fun and being creative with their external clients, but you can't have the good without the bad. If you ban everyone with clients, then that whole area is just destroyed, it would be like banning people with optifine from minecraft and banning people who are using hacks. I just don't think that's right. If you ban people for being malicious then that's fine, but don't ban people who have melonloader and just have it so they can interact with their friends dynamic bones
yeah HL in VR really did a massive push for it which im glad it did
yea true
@dusk pier you can already be banned just for using modded clients, and has been that way a long time, though. even benign ones
once it becomes part of the game, crashers will always find their way after a few weeks trust me we cant put this on them
yeah, it's ancient and held together with duct tape at this point, but VRChat has a lot of the same kind of things going on that lead to it not being as "optimized" from the user perspective as a game with baked in assets
VRChat is REALLY hard to stream properly TBH. It can be incredibly fun, but I'm just a desktop person, so for me, it does get a bit bland after a bit. Plus people are afraid to stream it right now because of DMCA garbage going on
@dark harness Pretty much. If they used it for personal improvements it wouldn't even be noticeable. But when people keep teleporting onto me, or floating past, or telling me exactly where other people are on the map and how far away they are... well... that's not cool.
Yes and I think that's really sad. Why do you want to spoil the game for others?
Yeah I know, and i'm saying that just isnt right. The company has the right to do whatever they want with the game and ban you for basically whatever reason they want, but that doesn't mean it's right.
the reason the game closes instead is to not fry your $1000+ GPU
the easiest solution^
It was depressing at the time to see how many people were extremely upset by it, when it makes no sense for Valve not to stand by a platform they've invested in for so long by not making a 1st party flagship game. All the people saying that it was just to sell their VR kit, when the game is fully compatible with every kit on the market lol. But yeah, HL:A is one of the most amazing games I've played and it really did a huge deal for VR, and I'm really hoping we'll see more titles like that.
Maybe in the future a VM like Udon, but for the client, could be a thing to allow certain client mods?
Like WoW addons?
System, i do wanna ask idk if you guys have the answer, but do you guys ever plan something for EU users? 
Just tried the Beta. Some things I like. Some things I don't. I hope they push out more clarification on the intended function on these new systems. Like abuse protection from uploading any image as an Icon. Or what the intended behavior of the Favorite list is if someone Unsubs for a month, do they loose the 75 additional avatars even if they resub for the next month? Or do the avatars just get hidden and reshow if you resub. I would also hope for clarification on the "boost" in Trust Ranking for paid members because it seems fairly counter intuitive to the notion of "Trust". Much of their statements thus far have been fairly vague. Clarification would help justify the cost.
My biggest worry came from an image in the Beta that states new features would be released for VRC+ users, which gives the impression that moving forward, new features and additions to the game will be paywalled. and that is worrisome too. Clarification would be appreciated in the coming days.
yuh its pretty easy to see "hey this user is using a modded client" but nearly impossible to see "hey this user is using a modded client capable of these exact non-malicious enhancements"
as for enforcement, im pretty sure that all comes down to reports which are, for the most part, reviewed by humans and not by some kind of algorithm (though ive never interacted with the mod team so who knows)
if this VRC+ goes well atleast
VRC+ is here to stay, they gotta find some way to monetize the game
And i like the Idea ^^
while valve is lazy they do make the best of something with their games, showed the vr's potential and set some standards
As long as they don't add features that are "pay to win" i don't care at all.
some people out here rioting about vrc+ but I'm out here rioting cause system probably doesn't have a 30 second chat cooldown
xDDD
how do you win VRC anyway?
lmao
Fr this 30 sec slow mode stooopid, this shit should be going 300mph like a twitch chat
rekting the 12 yo ofc /s
as a EU user, I don't really mind the US servers that much... maybe because I'm mostly hanging out with JP users, who get similar ping times as well (just so happens the US is pretty much in the middle between the atlantic and the pacific)
all the best discussion happens in blazing fast twitch chat emote spam, after all
I don't think I'm allowed to talk much about our roadmap. I can say that we've talked about integrating Udon with our UI to build inline mods (and we think that would be really cool) and worldwide Photon servers (and we think THAT would be really cool) and we haven't ruled them out
untrue, i know people with much lower and worlds that require low ping would be so much better :p
the 4 tiles in the promo video that say "and more.." really shouldve actually had something in them, if you want people to commit to a sub
I've always wondered why VRChat went with Udon instead of integrating an adaptive and established language like LUA.
cannot wait for some UI changes poggers
@frigid peak you could probably compile Lua to Udon VM
honestly as long as i can play my animations and keep making avatars im good
I got an idea, add somehow to add "verified" mods that the VRC staff thinks is okay for the game, and then add a way if people don't like the mods to disable them in their worlds. For example if I'm making a friends+ world and don't want dynamic bones to be interactive I can turn it off in the interface when I'm making the world
So, we definitely still need a QA tester - and, more importantly, a server person for my team - but I've been crunching so hard on VRChat+ I haven't actually had time to even go through the submissions that are in there. Which, uh, is kind of funny, because if we hired someone, I'd have more time to go through stuff like that.
yeah, playing Murder with people in europe can be a bit of a pain sometimes with the desynch lol.
May I ask if you think you will ever support making web requests in Udon? As a web developer, I yearn for the day when I can create APIs to supplement a world, could lead to some really cool experiences, and can connect VRC to all sorts of technologies.
I got a server company that I can get you crazy deals if you need server hosting, i'm personally best friends with the CEO and can get you in touch
@dark harness When can you subscribe?
Maybe we need to hire someone to hire people >_> some sort of... "person to deal with humans... as a resource". I don't think a job like that exists right now
i cant wait for the future then. i wish you all the best with this VRC+ idea. whoever built it is amazing.
its not P2W and its support. i hope the money goes to good use. and last update was amazing especially with that camera option and blocked avatar height.
Just wanna personally thank you for that. its great
if we're paying $10 a month extra, does that mean eye tracking + 7 tracker support, because of the increased data? :P
id like a us east server really
my words
I'm petitioning for a deskchan gif in this server.
subscription service without european servers 
honestly i feel like if people didn't abuse clients and use them for like malicious stuff i feel like they would be allowed you know just like flying and the little stuff
It’s not a good idea.
make the API vrc+ access only
making games is a pain pain pain pain pain in the ass, I spent 3 days coding a clicker game for my computer science class and it was a bitch, so I get that making games is impossible and there's some times when players think they know what's best for the game, but on the development end something completely different is what needs to be done
there is a unused EU server from what i have heard of from others
I feeling u <3 xD
Is this still a thing? Havent seen anyone with such stuff, i guess only once when my avatar forced changing
imagine working for VRC
that'd be so cool
i can see the headline now "Silicon Valley tech startup VRChat Inc. innovates in its field by hiring first position of its kind: hu-man ree-source man-a-ger" WSJ will gas y'all up for months and the non-existant stock will go through the roof
kind of interesting how the Vibe is quite different between the two rooms between public lounge and vrchat general
vrchat general gang gang
Are you the same Knight I see in the Pug? 
At the end of the day, it's the developers game. Sure, we can have an influence as players, but the devs have made the game and it's their choice on what direction they want to take it. Yeah it might suck ass if they make everything pay to win but they have the right to, i'm not saying it won't come with consequences to the players but they got the right to do it,
forcing changing is gone ive been forced change before the udon update luckily they did fix that but ive seen some people fly and stuff in lobby's so yeah clients are still a thing
I've got to board public lobby so I can defend VRChat+ honor
i mean i have an avatar in my fav that can fly, VR users can fly easier with it i think
Just got to switch my profile picture real quick
yeah there are avis that can fly but people like to use noclip and stuff
I just use playspace mover, ez clap
We really don't want to make the game play-to-win. The team is filled with a bunch of people who are mostly gamers, too - and they shoot down all of my great monetization schemes, like "gatcha lootboxes but we fill them with real human bones and each bone has a QR code on it that grants you a random private avatar from a creator who didn't expect it"
well theres that too lol
ive always said that vrchat deserved money, but it should either be a one time game purchase of $15-20 or something closer to a discord nitro fee of $4.99 a month, with the current content
Alright, I'm ready to board public lobby