#f1-technical
1 messages · Page 34 of 1
Weather contributed a lot tho
You reckon that Traction Control would allow the lap times to increase with the current 2022 cars?
As seen in this comparison video, drivers just stomp on the accelerator out of the corners with the TC on https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U0kcD-MRDP4
2007 footage from youtube id "Finity": https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCisptUcTUbwWgykNId4Rksg
Congrats @amber kraken, you're now on lap 15
Of course they wouls
should have compared the 2009 q3 or something to 2007
2008 was stupid wet in monza
Does thing that make cars rely on machinery that is faster than the human reaction make a car faster with faster reaction?
As norteq said, carburetor, a fully mechanical system of mixing fuel and air.
isn't the DRS one?
its kind the opposite
it reduces drag and "lift" if you would invert the wing
but yeah
well obviously, i don't think we have any parts on a F1 car that produces lift
well, some do but to increase downforce of other parts
the most obvious i think is the upper crash structure on the mercedes if you ask me
I think thats just there to redirect airflow
Highly doubt it will generate lift any more than other parts that are just “there” (from an aerodynamic perspective, there may be very valid reasons why they’re there from a mechanical etc)
Also it looks like it’ll just stall instantly on the suction side, so its not gonna generate much lift anyway
Active aerodynamics are being looked at for 2026
the main objective here is to not produce lift tho
Downwashing flow will create lift but to make everything more efficient to make the downforce then it's worth it because there'd be more downforce over the lift generated
ye like you said, in the first place they may produce lift, but create therefore more downforce on other components
what do you guys think of ferrari making progress on development?
wanna hear some thoughts
Would Senna's crash have been fatal if the Halo was implemented at its time? I believe according to post crash analysis what actually ended up killing him was || the wheel flying into the cockpit and fracturing his skull ||
Idk if I'm meant to censor graphic shit here ?
But in any case
It's hard to tell, I think there also was a suspension component involved?
IIRC there were multiple injuries that all on their own could have been fatal
It was a suspension rod that went through his helmet iirc
That would have happened with or without the halo
It's kinda weird that instead of the Halo they didn't just go for some super protective transparent bubble kinda thing
Halo seems to limit visibility pretty hard
A bubble of poke bullet proof glass or something similar would be relatively impact resistant and projectile resistant too but idk for sure
Wait actually that'd just turn the car into a pressure cooker if the engine caught fire
I disagree.
the only visibility being blocked is what is directly in front of you
but since we have these cool things called eyes and brains, they fill in the gap between the halo and what's on each side, so that the actual column is pretty much invisible
regardless
drivers never look straight ahead anyways
the shield (as said in the article Norteq linked) distorted vision too much, and the Aeroscreen without central pillar wasn't strong enough
there's a reason why even Indycar, despite choosing the Aeroscreen, still basically has a Halo-like structure underneath including the central pillar
The Aeroscreen when tested by Dixie and Vettel initially had more of a convex thing going on like a fighter cockpit, but I guess they didn't consider the type of precision that requires so at the time it distorted the view which is worrying when you have to deal with depth
counterpoint
Also, the aeroscreen would block the breeze and would make the cockpit really hot which moght lead to needing to implement a cooling system then it can cause more trouble
looks at Indycar
They have a pipe cooling system and a nostril design so that air can still pass through
Yea true
Lmao
Big change
that’s correct, the chances a halo would have prevented that are way less than a wheel.
so the answer is… maybe? but the part of luck is still as huge as it was then
Yeah at the end of the day risk 0 doesn’t exist
And if it did, I don’t think those guys would want it, they’re also in it for the adrenaline rush
senna's crash normally wouldn't have been fatal even in a 1994 car
harder to make a comparison to having the halo because it's ignoring stuff like raised cockpit sides and different survival cell geometry which would have likely been enough on their own
He definitely would still be alive in one of today’s cars
Thankfully for all current and aspiring drivers
Red flag graphic
Did anyone notice if yellow highlighted the respective sectors?
yellow flag*
a ferrari crashed a few years before + caught on fire and the driver didnt die
injured probably but not dead
forgot who it was
berger
Is there any website that keeps track of components used by driver? Ie: ice exhaust ers battery?
It would be nice to see for tracking long term strategy
Gerhard Berger in 1989 had a similar crash but of course the cars were slightly different especially in width which contributed to some of the differences of the outcome, which set the car on fire and "burnt his balls." Both Senna and Berger walked in that area to discuss what to do because you can't extend the barrier away because you go down a hill into a river, and did unfortunately come to the conclusion that someone's not gonna fair well at Tamburello
@edgy anchor spoiler it pleas :p
Idk how to
|| on each side of the link
Thanks 🅱️
SAFER Barriers nowadays yeah
Would asphalt be safer
Yeah sure rEsPecT tRaCk LiMiTs but in that case, maybe increasing odds of surviving the corner is preferable?
but those are made for low angle impacts
like at oval
s
sand
in that case it wouldn’t have prevented the crashes
as for the tamburello, it’s a shame they didn’t think of a chicane.
hindsight is rarely there when you could use it
20 seconds from ignition to flames on car out. Wow.
Wdym low angle?
They're right angles
where you hit the wall at a low angle
if I recall, that's the primary function for ovals and when it works best
What does that mean tho?
What does low angle mean as opposed to flat on which both these oval and tamburello crashes have?
actually that is exactly what I wanted to explain
I had sat for an hour after reading skippy's message trying to explain what I meant with no luck 😢 thank you for that
mspaint comes in clutch
I mean, it kinda goes both ways
It would be weird for all the best engineers to literally come from just one country
Even “German Engineering”
On the other hand, most of them are based in Britain and don’t want to relocate away from family
Ferrari sorta get away with it because they’re Ferrari and Italy is not regarded as a terrible place to be
at the end of the day its the experience which is required so adding engineers from other countries doesn't necessarily make the team stronger, thats why we see many teams trying to move engineers from redbull, merc, ferrari etc to their own teams as the engineers have ideas due to their experience to make the teams pu faster
I mean it kind of does
Peak Ferrari was when the Italians weren’t in power
Then the Italian nationalist wanted change cus Ferrari wasn’t Italian enough
source
trust him bro
Yh truest him bro
That's one way
But you can also build teams ground up
Binotto said that they already knew about these reliability problems, that is just poor engineering.
They will come back out of it, that's how the cycle goes :)
I thought you meant Vertical angles, sorry
Also yes... The... Safer at Tambur i would've said would be the perfect type of angles they were hitting
Whats a wind tunnel?
tunnel with a massive fucking fan in it
used to figure out how air goes thru a car
this is the kind of absolutely fucking terrible take that i come to this server for
yeah no lol, umm.. I just suck at explaining shit
Okay fair, but I think all you meant to put was Shallow angle, at least that's how I know it
Not even Schumacher managed to do that
Just took his people from his double WDCs at Benetton and hijacked Ferrari together
Idk much about f1 car specifics
But couldn’t more resistive shocks help reduce porpoising
resistive as in stiffer?
Then you just bounce on the bumps
Some drivers would have just stop and either do a 3/5 point turn or just reverse out of this situation. But I guess Seb had the momentum and the right throttle application to flick spin his AM out of the escape road https://twitter.com/longlivesv5/status/1535948501250711553
he showed real skill there
when hamilton was struglling to get out the car they said his pit crew couldnt help him cause he was in parc ferme ! how?
Smth about drivers can’t be touched before they’re weighed I believe
Sebs god tier at doing that
That’s bullshit to me they should allow people to help someone if they are hurt
yeah man
even latifi 10 second penalty was super super harsh
Standard penalty though
And it was 100% avoidablr
Kinda
I don’t really know how this stuff works like I said so idk
I disagree
All personnel know they have a limited amount of time to be on the grid
the mechanic decided to come back onto the grid and push latifi into his starting box
you compete as a team, you get punished as a team
i have a feeling if he would have started the formation lap from where he was before he got pushed back (in front of his slot), he may have been penalized anyway because of some other random FIA rule
It doesn't really matter if you start the formation lap from in front, but i feel like they would've got him on some technicality
that's not what i mean
i mean that if the mechanic decided it was important enough to re-enter the track and push his car back behind the line after everyone's been told to leave, that's probably some kind of requirement, even for the formation lap
so it is possible he could've gotten penalized either way, whether he started the lap from exactly where he was or whether someone came to push him back to the right spot. obviously the latter of those two situations is what ended up happening
nothing to do with latifi specifically
i agree, but a 10 second stop go penalty realistically is like 30-40 seconds considering entry/exit into the pit. when latifi came out the pit he was +42 seconds. that's too harsh for what the violation actually was
that's the kind of punishment you should get for like endangering other drivers or something more serious
The mechanic put himself in danger though
I think it's a more than reasonable punishment
@small crag
hmmm
i guess i didn't think of it that way
yeah, ok, i see what you're saying
i was seeing it more like how you're not allowed to touch a driver until their weigh-in after the race
that the violation was the mechanic touching the car after being asked to leave, as opposed to him endangering his life by doing that
i was seeing it as more of a technical violation
before the time when mechanics were forced to leave the grid after a set time
there was a mechanic who noticed something wrong on the back of someones car before the formation lap started
so he jumped behind their car to fix it
and you know what happened?
he was hit by the car behind them.
1981 at Zolder
|| https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pnE3w7kFgs0 || The mechanic was okay and made a full recovery
Originally captured and posted by TBK-
that looks fucking crazy
really glad to hear the mechanic survived and continued on in F1
i guess almost every little safety procedure has some sort of history to why it needed to be implemented lol
Or it was just to lay down rubber
E
Congrats @hushed sigil, you're now on lap 10
ik that aerodynamicists are like 10x smarter than me but why dont they just put skids at the back so the car doesnt stall out the diffuser?
Cus it’s not allowed in the rules
If the skids get damaged the car will crash and it will be big
Imagine a car going through a fast corner and the skid breaks
And looses a lot of downforce mid corner
The new aerodynamic rules are going about as well as I thought, who's is to say a shit show
Too much, too soon with a budget cap at thaat.
Engines have similar problems. There's a massive switch in fuel composition with simultaneous development freeze...
Just reminds me of what williams did at Baku this year
The went near Latifi and pushed him a bit back
How will active suspension help porpoising
it allows you to dynamically adjust damping rates in response to changing loads
this can already somewhat be done with suspension geometry but its not that powerful
Active suspension would straight up remedy porpoising because the suspension will be programmed never to bottom out
If it were reintroduced it would certainly be regulated and be homogeneous among the teams.
It would not be for at least 2-3 years.
damn bro that's netflix and chill....
yep, he's just watching some F1 for free
this is totally technical stuff 
Bro who tf deleted wtf
I was sharing some technical stuff
Mods wouldn't understand it
Keep it out of here, thank you.
No fun allowed 😔
We have a shitposting channel, this is for actual discussions only.
Has anyone got a chart of current engine sets drivers are on
How many EX are drivers allowed? I haven’t seen that anywhere else
I see, thanks
Remember that they can still use the old engines so these numbers doesn’t mean that someone is guaranteed a penalty soon
They can but 2/3 of their turbos can’t be used and the last one remaining has done 6 races
They can’t do all the remaining races this season on that turbo so atleast one new turbo is going to be needed
Most likely they will need a few more as well through the season
You talking about Ferrari?
Yes
The 6 races part initially confused me
This season has gone so fast
Did Charles take a new PU for Baku/Monaco? Or was it the old PU from before Spain that blew up
New one taken in Spain damaged
And another new one damaged in Baku
The turbo 1 from race 1 did the rest of the races
They used the Spain PU for Baku
But now it’s completely written off, afaik
So he only has two now
Very Intense on the steering wheel.
Onboard Telemetry From Bottas Sakhir 2020 Q3.
I love this guy's channel.
Goes in depth of what drivers do during a lap
Huh. Interesting https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/article.tech-tuesday-the-clever-red-bull-underfloor-that-has-made-porpoising-less-of.7EbdEh2AlOnKqBebMJPZqF.html
there's also this by kyle.engineers https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xUv_1eUbpBc
At the Monaco GP Sergio Perez gave us a great opportunity to look at the underside of the Red Bull RB18. From this we got some of the best underbody shots of 2022, and in this video we look at the aero effects of all the detailing going on down there.
00:00 Introduction
01:40 Main Strakes
07:18 Sausage Strakes
10:15 Main Tunnel and Kick
12:05 ...
and an analysis of other floors used in Monaco by b sport https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kFqYNJJb6_0
Let's have a closer look at the latest floor pictures that traditionally appeared during the Monaco Race Weekend.
What are the general development trends?
How do teams try to reduce bouncing and add performance?
Who is developing in which direction?
Pictures:
www.auto-motor-und-sport.de
www.f1technical.net
www.lemonbin.com
Hasan Bratic
@nicola...
Damn is this where liberty dies?
With busted backs
can anyone explain this way too technical for my brain 💀💀
Measuring the g force going up and down the cars reach and set a limit to it
^ this
ty
so teams will be forced to raise their rides probably
ferrari are fucked
idk y they just couldnt allow active suspension
it costs money, that's also the reason why they removed it in the first place.
also they don't want aids in the cars, in case that's not obvious
It should still be allowed imo it would make the cars faster and reduce porpoising but it would need to be heavily regulated
Ik it won't come back but im saying it would be the ideal fix to end porpoising
i think it's a cheap trick for teams who have fucked up their packages and should have known better
We've got our hands on TD039 & tell you all the details. New porpoising limits will be set before FP3. If a team can't supply a setup deemed to be safe, they have to raise ride by 10mm. Cars will be disqualified. if still above the limits.
AMuS (German): https://t.co/tzlPqzeoHr
620
132
Yea I kinda agree its kind of a get out jail free card
But the drivers are really suffering out there
Hopefully teams can fix it soon
Because it is possible
Cause redbull nailed it
frankly, almost everyone has gotten it right
Not Mercedes
Ferrari porpoise but its under control kind of
Idk about the other teams though
everyone has some
Mercedes have the most though?
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FVPJwvLWIAA9Gyx?format=jpg&name=medium i've seen this, but idk where this data comes from so it might be iffy
(if someone has the source for this data, pls share)
I saw a graph somewhere on Twitter which showed teams porposing before and after upgrades but idk where it is
W
@wanton bronze this is not the scope of this channel
It was a technical question man, lol. It was a is it true or is there a chance still? And have a discussion on it
Why u keep deleting it as it was a banter message wtf just wanted to see what other people think of the rule
there was no question in your messages 😉
The only way I could ever see it coming back, is as a standardized part. There would be 0 chance in hell the FIA bring back something with high development costs in an era where they want to reduce costs
FIA wants to create more competition and close battles but don’t want to reduce costs. This is controversial, active suspensions are key not to have another one-team domination these years on
Leclerc will take 10 place penalty.
I forgot how the pen system works, it is 10 for ICE and then later ICE is 5.
Turbo is 5
But Charles is taking new ICE AND turbo so shouldn’t this be a 15 place pen? (5 turbo 10 ICE)
they want to recycle "old" parts as much as possible. the penalties will be made public during the course of the weekend, he might not get a single penalty... at the risk of more failures
F1TV graph looks different
this is the real data we want
Would this ‘amplitude’ be measured by the IMS or will they have to fit a different sensor?
Also, how would the FIA determine a ‘stable setup’ since the cars behaviour and its bouncing changes when it’s on high/low fuel and perhaps also tyres.
Too much bounce > FIA angry = raise the ride height by 10mm as a penalty
it seems they already have the data, so i don't see why they would need a new sensor for that.
they will surely have some error margin if they have to give in fines 🙂
as for the stable setup, i don't know. it's surely in a document on the FIA. website but i've not seen it
Also this. Anyone? 👀👀👀
Mercedes is the only team that has a stable porpoising 😂
Well
What a time for leclerc to take his first career win when he doesn't start from pole
I'm jk
I hope he gets a podium at least
Latifi going to do a Latifi slam
SC
Hit the wall
Change race leader
Charles will deffo get a podium.
I hope he wins
But I don't think 😭
Sainz will have to turn into Checo and manage to hold up verstappen and checo for like 15 laps do Charles can catch up
😭
the data is F1 directly isn't it
Yea
Just one safety car at the right time
Leclerc is back on it
Our new low down force rear wing brought us speed
Idk if ferrari brought upgrades or not but we will need upgrades
But then max and checo catch up 1 lap later just like in abu Dhabi despite him making a 30 seocnd gap 😭
Who creates technical directive rules for F1 n shit. Is it Bin Sulayem or Ross Brawn FOM?
neither, TDs come from the FIA's technical department
Do you know who is the head/main figures of that?
Tombazis is SS tech director, bauer is f1's tech delegate
FIA are going to fix bouncing soon, that will be good
Will mclaren be competitive ?
great question
they might
what will this affect of new ride height effect RB?
it might not as the RB18 is already operating well at a higher ride height
merc is a bit doomed unless there car is deemed safe
not sure how aston martin will fare as they share the same suspension
oh mercedes car is made for low downforce?
no high downforce
No.
they have the highest downforce package?
so they are going to be competing with haas?
not necessarily
look at spain
there had the least porpoisingthere
if they can recreate what they did at spain they will be fine
I hear it had more to do with track surface than anything
the track is smoother at barcelona cause it's a proper track not a street track that may have many bumps and dips
they could be competitive at canada cause the track surface might be smooth
canada is not a street track ?
merc is doomed
their chance is silverstone
i think williams is in the same situation as merc
very true
williams has no sideponds or minimal like merc
he was in concention for the win without being torpedoed by kmag
yes and no
theoretically less sidepods mean more aero efficiency.
However it's not working for merc
maybe because they are down of power
I think how the package as a whole operates affects the downforce
more bad news
so fia are going to punish the teams who are puting their drivers in bouncy situations
so they can get performance
i think merc is working on better suspension
cause their rear suspensions is not great at the moment
will they get it done for canada
but i guess its too late since the cars are in canada already
something had to be done
the rate of bouncing was juust going to cause a large assicent or continue to tear up cars
isnt that what they just did
^
youre hired
it is a recent technical directive put in place
@lavish ledge keep memes and bants out of this channel please 🙂
oh ok my fault 😂
I will never understand people saying that George has outperformed Lewis in the same car. Lewis has said that both of them are on very different setups, Lewis’s being the more experimental.
It’s like they don’t want to listen
Ofc they don’t want to listen, even with his record beating history they say it’s just the car, don’t waste your time
much technical thank you very insight
lewis is the most hated driver in f1 history, its no suprise they wont listen
the only facebook posts i know where he doesnt get abuse is the mercedes amg petronas f1 team
facebook account
facebook is a very technical place to discuss
@rotund kelp
hello, yes?
just the gif lol
what does harvesting mean
and why do the lights flash at the back when the car is apparently harvesting
Charging the battery with heat from breaks
Lights just let you know when the car is harvesting
Can anyone give me a run-down of the new porpoising rules? seem to me that most people and teams are unhappy with it, but to me reducing porpoising for the most harsh teams seems like a good idea
It's like a tolerance for the maximum amount of Vertical G-Force, and then if the setup can't do it then they'll be penalised or whatever
So why are RB crying? that seems like the ideal rule change
well, in the meantime, they're doing stuff based on the measurement of the planks
so who knows
Cuz they ain’t got so much of a problem with it. I quote Max “it’s up to each team to figure it out”
But isnt that exactly what the FIA is doing? Each team decides how they fix it, but you gotta fix it! The FIA isnt demanding ride hight increase if the g forces are low
Sounds perfectly reasonable to me that the drivers shouldn't get chronic back pain in order to maximize pace? Of course people say "the drivers signed off on it", but if they didn't they'd be replaced with someone willing to break their backs for a WDC
I think most can agree that it's good to go for this way as opposed to just arbitrarily implementing Ride Height limits when we already have Planks
It just feels like a slap to the face when Mercedes are the big complainers
Idk, i think 10G spinal compressions are a net negative for the sport, Mercedes or not...
Ricciardo also said his back hurt like hell, probably not Mercedes only, theyre just the worst
Chief... Hmmm
who knows, maybe RB will have little to no changes anyway to comply with the vertical g forces reqs, and are just whining for no reason
why is it when a driver comes in the pit the crew puts those vacuume cleaners into the air ducks
and brack discs
is it to warm or to cool?
cool, because otherwise without the constant cooling air coming through the brake ducts they will catch on fire
spontanious combustion
I wonder how the High Rake concept helped Red Bull in the V8 era. Because the High Rakes were present in their 2010-2013 cars
why silverstone so important
Because it’s a race on the calendar that drivers can score points at, just like every other race on the calendar?
Home race of the most influential nation in f1
Still considered a home race for like 6/10 teams
no bc everyone is like silve3rstone big updates stuff
Exactly
Easier for teams to bring upgrades to a track that’s like 30 min drive away
It’s a track where it does have long straights, long, middle and short turns so it’s a Spain 2.0
^^ it’s pretty much spain 2.0 as it has all the corners and straights which other circuits have in the calendar. but it’s important cuz its all in one place aka spain and silverstone
and as said since almost every team is based in (or has some presence in) the country it is much easier to transport the upgrades
AM for example is based almost on it's doorstep
🚨| Mattia Binotto was sceptical of how Mercedes managed to install a second floor stay so quickly.
🗣 “Toto says they did it overnight. Ferrari would not be capable of doing this.”
“I’m surprised that a team is so strong to manage it overnight. I can only trust what he says.”
1207
did mercedes second floor help them?
when is he not skeptical
They took it off.
oh ok
however
according to Mercedes, their bouncing hasn't been from porpoising at canada....?
other teams were skeptical too and there were reports that binotto and toto had an argument
and christian horner was in it too
🚨| There was an ‘angry exchange’ between Mattia Binotto and Toto Wolff yesterday regarding the porpoising technical directive.
Christian Horner was involved too.
Netflix was also present.
14337
418
it didn't really help them as they didn't run the second floor stay in qualifying or in the race
Merc only ran it in FP2, then they didn't do so again
Its the one where all the workers in the factory can easily show up and watch their hard work on track
What's lock up
its when a driver breaks too hard and the tire locks up
So they can't turn like what happened to Hamilton once?
the tyre stops rotating and just slides, destroying itself in the process
tyres only have a finite amount of grip, and asking the car to accelerate, turn, brake etc. all uses up that grip. when the braking force on the wheel is more than the grip the tyre has available then the wheel stops turning and starts sliding
which is shit for performance because a static wheel has a much lower coefficient of friction than a rotating one
so if you're locking up the fronts and trying to turn, all of the grip of the tyre is now being 'used' as it's sliding across the surface and there's none available to turn
in theory you want to be braking in a straight line with just under enough force to lock up, because that means you spend the least amount of time braking
in practice you do actually brake and steer at the same time but that's the fundamentals of it
Needs that 12% slip for peak traction y'kna
it's #f1-technical 😉
he didn't even mention about abs lmao
because f1 cars don't have ABS?
it was banned a while ago
yes
i don't really understand the ban on active expension anymore
what FOM is asking teams to do with underbody aerodynamics is far more expensive and more complex compared to adjustable suspension
they might change their mind and allow for a standard active suspension kit tbf
but i think they want to keep everything passive in the car, outside of the electronics you need for the PU and a few things that are adjustable on the steering wheel
so that the driver is useful and not just a simple machine operator that turns the steering wheel and the machine does the rest for him
..read the channel name
If all the porpoising fixes will inherently slownthe car, why the complaints?
you've just answered your own question
@merry delta no, the complaints from RB and Ferrari abt in season fixes
if I am not mistaken, they're more so complaining about formalities when it comes to "technical directives", "technical regulations", and other verbiage
along with stating "Fix your own car, teams that have already fixed it shouldn't be affected"
@merry delta but no has fixed it... ferrari is porpoising, haas just raised the height and now are slow,
some are dealing with it better than others though
Asking too much from brakes
(Brakes/tyres cold, braking whilst turning too much)
No abs (anti lock braking) like on road cars, so if you lock up (ask too much), the tyre stops rotating, which increases braking distance
Porpoising is still allowed(for now), the rules just state a ‘quantitative limit on vertical oscillations’ so a car can bounce perhaps but not too hard/often. We will find out more in the next few races.
Thanks and btw, why are some cars so much faster than the others and why do other teams race agaisnt them if they don't stand a chance, what are williams or mclaren gaining from it?
If you’re referring to Hamilton Baku 2021:
Hamilton had a switch kept on by mistake called ‘brake magic’. He uses this switch to heat up the front tyres and brakes for good grip into turn 1. It’s done by increasing the brake bias A LOT, to the front tyres.
Around 70-80% of the braking force to the front tyres.
He was meant to switch this off at the race restart, back to the usual limit of 50-60%, but he didn’t by mistake.
80% on the front tyres, whilst braking with so much force into turn 1, doesn’t work. It’s asking too much from the front tyres.
Instant lock up
Huge lock up.
Teams are mostly faster due to higher budgets, better personnel and infrastructure.
Williams come from an engineering and racing background. They have a low budget.
They just love racing.
It’s the passion, they don’t turn out a huge profit but it’s what hundreds of workers who work there love.
McLaren are similar, but have a target to promote their brand and sell more road cars.
Back in the 20s and 30s, people would buy the cars that were popular (winning races).
It’s why we love brands like Ferrari and Porsche, because they’re engrained within motorsport history.
It’s a huge marketing scheme, but also a very fun way to waste money.
They earn supernormal profits, but not a crazy amount. It’s mostly all reinvested.
They gain less being at the back of the grid but it’s still huge exposure for sponsors and their own companies.
It’s expensive marketing.
They still get a large chunk of F1 money at the end of each season and big sponsorship contracts.
Isn't there a budget cap this year so these big differences in performance due to more money spent wouldn't happen?
Correct. And yes.
2022 - $140million
2023 onwards - $135million
Do the smaller teams not have $140m?
They have it. And will spend it.
And the big teams won't go past it right?
Correct
Then why are some of them still so slow
And why were redbull faster than renault when their engines were bought from them?
• The major teams have been preparing for years, they have more staff and more infrastructure to build the new reg cars earlier, so they bypassed the cost cap.
e.g. Mercedes has around 3x the staff of Haas for example.
• Major teams have better infrastructure. And staff. The best work for the best.
e.g. Mercedes have their own wind tunnel, whilst the smaller teams don’t.
also the big teams still have at least another 2 years of R&D advantage over the midfielders
I put this down to Renault not getting their act together. Poor management and probably not as good engineers. Also, their budget isn’t as high.
But their tenure has been a disappointment.
hence why many engineers and analysts have said that you won't see the full effect of the cost cap till 2024-2025 at the earliest
Yep
Plain and simple, Red Bull have much better engineering talent + like Didier put, Renault going through their phase of Cyril's trash management
There was a time, 2010-2015-ish, where Red Bull had a works partnership with Renault, but that ended shortly after Renault came back in 2016, and only two years later their relationship deteriorated beyond repair
I just watched that in the netflix show
I have a lot of questions
actually, that's no longer true about Williams. their engineering is rather dated compared to the rest of the grid, kinda like a falling behind the times sort of thing. for a while they were carried by the overpowered hybrid Mercedes engine in the early era, but once other PUs got better they just fell behind the midfield.
they have an equal budget now, but are now owned by Dorilton who are investors looking to make a profit. it's as you'd expect, but being profitable and being front of the field are not necessarily the same thing. when Williams were languishing at the back of the field in the dirty air era, they were actually the most profitable team on the grid because they didn't spend as much as they got from sponsors.
McLaren is just a marketing brand on it's own at this point. 10 years ago they were British Ferrari rivals, taking them head on in both F1 and the supercar market. nowadays they are less interested in winning championships than they are in marketing a brand. under Zak Brown's leadership they have instead acquired an Indycar team, entering Extreme E, and now bought Mercedes EQ for Formula E all within the span of 5 years. you can't tell me that's a team focused on winning the F1 world championship.
i do agree that the top teams are faster due to better personnel and infrastructure
Haas spent the entirety of 2021 (an equal budget cap year) focused on 2022 from beginning to end, while Mercedes spent that same year in a monumental title fight. not to mention, 50% more wind tunnel time than Mercedes. this year, the Ferrari PU in the back of that Haas is more powerful than the Mercedes, and yet the car is still slower than the flawed bouncy Mercedes from the beginning of the season. the driver differences between Hamilton/Russell and Magnussen/Schumacher are not big enough to justify a gap like this
Should F1 allow for different engine types like how it was with LMP1?
They would all be nerfed to produce the same amount of HP though
Would be fuckin nice to see V6s competing against v8s or v10s
fuck it even V4s
I think it can be done, even without BOP or whatever gimmickness if you made the regs balance them out with just the right amount of boost for turbo boiyos
Like the 3.5's vs 1.5 turbos if they had done so later on when N/A revs had hit the bigtime
My friend says everyone wants to strokes is that correct?
What
Doesn't matter nvm
two stroke engines
I don't see the point personally when there's even less relevance
i think so yea. the regs are too restrictive and don’t allow for innovative solutions outside of them.
That would be awesome
there were also some aero changes, but it largely was the tires
I've heard that the most important parts of an F1 car are the tires, it's the 4 things that actually let the car interact with the road
they implemented some aero changes that raised the front wing as well. i forgot about the rear wing if there was anything
They also reduced rear wing overhang and whatnot that led to increased development of the sidepod appendages which induced more drag
wow
where does the sc go after the start of the race?
into the pits
yep, tires are the most important.
everything you do on the car happens through those 4 contact patches.
at the start of a race it's the Medical car following the field. And I think it usually makes a full lap, then returns to the pits
that way if any big crash happens in the first lap (which has typically the highest risk for that) the medical car is there as soon as possible
id like to make an f1 based project(physics) for school
any ideas on what to make it on
HS or college?
Hs
Proposing a porpoising solution - Something to do with fluid mechanics or aero
i think ill make it on aero
I think for hs drs system world be nice tbh
My engineer is glitched while talking now.
If the Top 8 score points in the Sprint race, why did they didn't just used the 2003-09 points system?
likely because sprint races are still kinda an experiment, and the FIA doesn't want to push away fans for some (currently) inconsequential race as a sprint
El Flan in Action
Why do you want to pursue an F1 project? Is it a school project for grades?
Merc watching closely
Merc bringing a new floor
We have the Red Bull, the Green Bull, and now the Ugly Bull
I'm actually surprised that Williams is bringing such a big upgrade, but I hope it helps to improve the car
any alfa upgrades this week?
Nope
fuck
Blue Bull 
H
Blue balls
which software is used by mercs and ferrari to track telemetry data ?
how come i can't play online games on f1 22? i just doesn't let me join a session
Verify your game files
doesnt look bad tbh
Wonder what the Aston Martin upgrades are
doesn't make a difference on their result tbh
they all changing sidepods
i see only the ferrari powered teams and alpine not going for a red bull style sidepod
Maybe this is kinda technical but heres a comparison of max and Lewis’s driving styles (it’s similar) quite fascinating
Lewis Hamilton needs no intro easily all-time greats and arguably better than the likes of Schumacher and senna. Regarding his technique, on entry he likes to brake late (sometimes locking up the inner front tires) and very fast then trailbrake perfectly till he gets the rear rotated, and smashing the throttle on exit but controls it with wheel control and his driving lines. He likes to vary the late, early or normal entry lines, sometimes even on the same lap, according to the behavior our of his car, he is always prepared for what the car has to throw at him. His adaptability is one of his strongest weapons, but this wouldn’t help him without his outstanding precision, in this regard he and Verstappen are above the current field. Another trademark of his driving is his ability to transfer load very rapidly, which helps him especially on circuits with many chicanes. Furthermore Lewis never likes to leave the car “empty” a phenomenon that the driver never leaves the car coasting on entry or mid corner like some drivers do for example Leclerc and similar to Schumacher in a way.
Max Verstappen Most Raw Talent on the grid, and gave Lewis a run for his money albeit in a faster car for 3/4th of the 2021 season. His driving technique is more akin to a precise 12-hour operation conducted by a brain surgeon according to a thought-out plan, than to the hot-headed behaviour of a young man in his twenties. The biggest trademark of Max’s speed is that he steers for a minimal amount of time and as the car starts to rotate, he controls it with the pedals, this is also an important aspect of his good tire management. Max is special he has superb precision his “inner clock” is calibrated perfectly, that enables him to arrive at every corner at the same exact point and in the exact way as he planned to do. He does this at every stage of the race regardless of speed or tire life. And very similar to Lewis he never leaves the car “empty”.
Overall Max and Lewis are leagues above the rest of the grid, both have somewhat similar driving styles and one of the few drivers that i think can hop in each others cars and drive them to where they are now.
Finally done
Good write. Would love to look at supporting data as well if you have any.
Driving styles are generally not covered in great detail.
I mean, max u could see it in his onboards easily ausria 2019 or 2020 I forgot but mainly the throttle and brake graphs on tv are actually rlly useful to differentiate drivers
For Lewis same thing really and even jenson has said it in a podcast
Kov has also said some things abt lewis and his driving
From 2011 Lewis
there's a story behind Lewis' driving style
ye
If I recall, his dad and Jos trained their kids similarly
kept pushing them to the limit in karts while training until they went past the limit
brake at the last possible minute, get on the power as early as possible
it’s no wonder why they are considered the most elite F1 drivers of this century
May explain max’s perfect rotation of that Redbull
and also why no matter how difficult the car is to drive, he just figures it out on a dime
Especially when both Lewis and Max are on the back foot
I think that’s when you see their best
Both of them know how to perform under pressure
Imo max is the top 4 greatest in history
Lewis the greatest
And then its a battle between senna Shumacher and max
I’d have to look at more old footage to make the judgement
In terms of his driving
He does
I mean personally im a lewis fan but u cant deny max has talent enough talent to be in the top 5 greatest
I put lewis higher up the list due to
Race Pace (he usually compromises his qualifying setup for a race geared setup mainly Low Drag
The way he battles (He picks the safer option which is use his low drag to overtake in a straight line)
Sportsmanship (He got robbed in 2021 2016 and more but he has always congratulated the other party something arguably they wouldn’t do)
Adaptability (Its Lewis Hamilton we’ve seem him shine in changing conditions even with lower drag compared to his teammate)
Max though has very good car control like unmatched

Even if F1 was a spec series he would be top 3 nearly every race lmao
He’s talking overall
and usually when you talk about the best drivers, it’s at the end of their careers and you compare achievements
i mean, give it 13 years or so and we'll see how 37 year old multiple WDC Max Verstappen handles it against 24 year old version of himself lol
the one singular reason I rate Hamilton above Schumacher is that he's never been in any major cheating scandals
i.e. the shady traction control Benetton in 1994 (suspected by none other than Senna and Newey)
Adelaide 1994
complete DSQ from the 1997 season
Monaco 2006
AFAIK that has never been confirmed if not completely debunked? So I wouldn't exactly put that on the list
it also wouldn't be something that's Schumi's fault
just like e.g. Spygate wasn't on Hamilton
well, hes potentially driving an illegal car
they even found software for TC on the car
if the team builds an illegal car that's not the drivers' fault
that is definitely not on Hamilton. if Hamilton was part of it, Alonso would have dragged him down with him for it
exactly, but I don't think any illegal things on the car that Schumacher drove would be his fault either
Jerez and Monaco were fully on him because, well, he controlled the car
theres no excuse for 1997
I'd maybe add that time in Hungary on the list where he almost put Barrichello into the pit wall
key point is, what are your standards when you put a guy thats literally been disqualified for unsportsmanlike conduct as the greatest of a sport lol
cuz if thats okay, then what are rules for? everyone else should just go for it too
I think you can praise a driver for their achievements and still condemn them for dirty actions they've done, and acknowledge that they're not a saint.
And generally I'd say in the past things often were much "dirtier" than they are today in F1. That doesn't make certain things that have happend great. But it also means things are seen differently. Like that famous duel between Villeneuve and Arnoux. It's seen as a great battle nowadays, but I couldn't imagine a battle today where the drivers literally bump into each other that hard
... 2007 Data share?
Hamilton uninvolved
there is literally nothing that suggests otherwise. think about it, if Hamilton was involved and then lied about it, wouldn't Alonso have called foul in half a second and dragged Hamilton down with him in court?
Well even if he didn't know, he drove the car
Copying parts of another's car, if that part is legal, doesn't make it not legal
I don't remember McLaren actually copying parts of the Ferrari after they had obtained the info
If I recall, the entire point of McLaren taking data from Ferrari, was to prove Ferrari had an illegal car
but that doesn't matter if they copied or not
since copying has been legal for a long time
Oh wow, I thought they'd used the data to improve their own as a cross reference
Which is why you can't really ban that thing technically coz you can't just... Undo specific knowledge
hey i need some help with my racing set up
my thrustmaster tmx pedals have not been working in f1 2022 and idk what to do
wrong chat m8
Why does a f1 car slow down during harvesting
With the MGU-K, rotational (kinetic) energy from the rear axle gets turned into electrical energy, and this "transformation" of energy slows the car down
It's always put so pseudo-simply when people don't know what that means
The MGU-K is a combination of a Starter and an Alternator, it jams on the voltage to get resistance to work like a brake
But you're spinning a core in a winding trying to keep it still, you get electricity
I mean, sometimes a simple explanation of something more complicated still gets the point across?
Well like... I know it's not your fault but when it's the whole converts Kinetic energy from the rear brakes it's like, okay, while right... What does that look like
Better explanation for me and understood
But why does the light flash behind the during this process. Is it dangerous for the car behind
yeah, kind of a warning that the car in front will be slower
Good chance for you to overtake then no?
Welp, ignore me then, sorry
usually that's when the driver brakes anyway I think?
hey, more detailled explanations aren't bad in general ^^
there is one thing I never understood about the ERS, mainly the MGU-H
and that is, why is it called "H", as in "heat". Ultimatively it's still just a generator at the turboshaft isn't it?
Imagine the MGU-K right... But on the turbo... Which doesn't propel itself
So you keep having to balance keeping it going, and limiting it's boost/speed with the resistance from recharge
which is why usually it's only harvesting at high-speed rather than under acceleration when the turbocharger is needed most, right?
Yea
Like you're putting resistance on the shaft that the exhaust gas pushes against
But you don't wanna stall it out
but still the "heat" in the name confuses me
I know the exhaust gases spinning the turbo are hot, is that it?
What did Mercedes’ change to be so fast today?
Their car just works at smoother circuits
There seem to be some talks about roll hoops after Zhou's crash now
could someone explain to me where it is located and what it does?
The roll hoop of a Formula 1 car provides a critical part of the overall safety cell for the driver. Mounted at the top of the chassis, behind the driver's head, the roll hoop must support the weight of the car during a rollover accident and protect the driver's head.
@viscid shoal
its like barely/circumstantially equal to frontrunner pace on it's good days
probably still weaker on balance and dependent on track
but it's getting there
one upgrade at a time
On the subject of Zhou, if the incident happened on lap 2, when the cars are going down the Hamilton Straight at much higher speeds, is it possible the results could've potentially been worse?
Or would the gravel have slowed down the car enough?
Do drivers have access to tyre temp data on their steering wheel?
Yes
you didn’t answer the question, did you?
I see, thank you
well then good thing the halo was there
Agree
the halo saved his ass
It was taken off
No as in it failed and gave way
Oh
Yeaaa, very arguable that the Halo saved him from some serious damage
So I guess the extra 10 Kn required for the roll bar wasn’t good enough for the heavier cars
Maybe they have to bump it up to 80Kn
40,000Mn
and fyi
The roll hoop is not supposed to deform or crumple like it did here
that's a textbook failure, and Zhou is extremely lucky the halo took over it's job for him
I think being a short driver saved him
Had that been ocon one of the taller drivers it could have been worse
F1 should definitely try to bolster the roll hoop structure for the 2026 rules
These cars weigh a few hundred pounds more than awhile ago and therefore can't withstand the weight
They can certainly take measures sooner
hey guys I heard when Charles lost his front wing endplate that be lost 5 points of downforce, what does that mean?
Totally ripped
anyone know how many gs zhous crash was
probably not too many compared to other big crashes
a lot of energy dispersed from the spinning and the flip
Albon's crash most likely had higher g forces
thinking about zhous crash
and yes the halo does save lives
but what if a spring went into the drivers head like massas incident a few years ago
the halo has a few unprotected parts
and if we look at massas spring incident the spring came from the side
the halo's job is to act as a secondary roll structure (and to protect large objects from hitting the driver)
so how could the halo protect it from other accidents like that?
but what about small objects?
wouldnt it be necessary?
that's why we have helmets
Massa's crash made helmets a lot safer
They are a ton more rigid now, than they were back then

Now I don't quite know the FIA's thinking behind this, but if I recall, when driver cockpit safety devices were being designed, the original purpose was to protect the drivers from stray tyres (as were very common years ago)
The halo deflected a piece of Leclerc's endplate from hitting him just two days ago
just off to the side
That's the idea of the Aeroscreen
the issue with the aeroscreen is cooling
but safer
the halo is cooler but less safe
Also you can't really run an Aeroscreen with F1's propensity to run overhead intakes
The cooling argument is pretty flawed
It wouldn’t be that hard for the teams to add inlets in the nose to the drivers feet or a duct in front of a screen
Not sure on the overhead intakes
Would be inclined to think the teams would use the sidepods more and increase the height of the intake to get cleaner air
we've had them since 1989 without discontinuity. it's probably possible to get rid of them, but obviously you have to redesign everything and wonder if the PU would be satisfied without the airboxes
Consider that teams like Ferrari have a very small intake I don’t see why it has to be removed or isn’t possible for the teams to achieve
A roll hoop has to exist there anyway for the safety triangle so who says a intake has to exist there
anybody got an article on what the new floor should be, stifness or something?
What led to the downfall of BRM considering they were a Works Team I'm surprised of how bitter it was its demise
Why don’t they just put a durable clear plastic piece to fit over the halo, like the aero screen? I know it would be ugly but it would save drivers from small debris, while the halo protects from large debris/ cars and a secondary roll hoop like Zhou, and then obviously the roll hoop itself? I’d imagine the car would be very safe that way
cooling and politics
that sort of solution is found in Indycar, but F1 hasn't adopted it as well
What politics
Brave to say the Aeroscreen is more ugly
Heritage of the series
These the same people who were against the halo because it wasn’t in f1 dna or something
well IMO as far as open/closed cockpit is concerned it doesn't make a big difference whether the Halo has a screen or not
Agree
I feel like they wouldn’t fit well on an F1 car though
The indy car noses have a slope all the way up
Most f1 noses have a “deck”
not this year though 😄
Oh god
the halo was one of the competing solutions for safety
so I assume that the same thing would happen with an aeroscreen and people/teams would object for reasons
well yeah but ultimatively it was the only thing passing the crashtests
true
Red Bull came up with an aeroscreen
Mercedes with the halo
And Ferrari came up with whatever this was supposed to be
That’s a windshield
How in God's name is that even a safety feature
If anything this is a liability lmfao
The Mercedes looks so normal with the Halo lol
what kind of penalty can a driver get if they crash into the Safety/Medical Car?
Michal Masi: “so you have chosen death”
@iron gazelle no memes here.
I LOVE the new alo
the new alo?
they meant Halo, missed the h.
Yes
Does anyone have the fia document for new parts brought by the team
What is the actual technical rules on the planks. Is the 2 plank idea a loophole or just flat out banned?
Any why so many directives, when they’re not even binding or don’t even make a difference?
This is upgrades.
Thanks
I’m not sure about engine/gearbox stuff
What number is that document in the fia site
It’s not from the FIA site, idk where tbh. I found from Twitter
Ah would be nice to find the source so I don’t have to ask others
The FIA has agreed to push back the implementation of its technical directive relating to porpoising until the Belgian Grand Prix, to allow teams more time to make the necessary updates. (Originally was set to come into force at the next race in France).
- Chris Medland.
i can prove that the net zero campaign is bullshit
Whay do you mean?
Merc 2014 moment?
single cylinder wtf
ah right a prototpe
i thought it was an actual single cylinder lmao
why are the Alpines only good at certain tracks?
it's there engine and aero package
Watch they’re gonna be begging for Mercedes to come back after Max wins 73949278342 titles

Muh 160hp single cylinder 
imo it suits good with Indy cars, but not F1
Maybe so but that depends on how it's designed to accommodate it, right?
Yes
I mean the halo looked shit too but now I just can’t think of a car without it and looks good
Guys do you think F1 could bring back the V8s with zero carbon fuel?
Probably not
F
Can someone please explain how the throttle pedal input mechanism works + what was Charles’ issue in some more detail?
Twitter. @hard quailfabrega. I don’t know where he got them from
Albert is real good
pinged some random guy
we are more or less always going to see at least the MGU-K and some form of a turbocharger on F1 engines going fowards
at current fuel tank sizes and power outputs V8 engines can't make it to race distance
nobody in F1 also really wants refueling back
I hope they just do no regs like in the 90s
But then everyone would probably still use a v6
i am too dumb to speak in this chat 😭
What happens if your engine shuts down in main straight before you cross the line but you still manage to take the checkered flag? You get the win anyways?
yes
Yes
Even DNFs are classified based on order of race distance completed
If you crossed the finish line, you completed all of it
Lewis was driving on 3 wheels in Silverstone few years ago
And then awarded points based on position i.e. 1st lol
But that was a puncture, not terminal damage like broken suspension
as long as you get over the line faster than they can get a black-orange then black flag out you're good
That's what "Did Not Finish" means. If you cross the line, you finish the race
90% of the race at the bare minimum
I find that a silly rule, if you didn't finish you didn't finish, should be that simple
But what if for example you DNF in the final lap and the driver behind you is 2 laps down? That's why the 90% rule is there
But you can still keep the position while putting DNF on the box score
And what if he's P4 for example, in the points
Then he gets 12 pts in F1s case, whether it's a DNF or not
hey guys, i made a website to compare quali lap times, like in this message, do u want me make it public ?
I know its not f1 technical, but can you tell me how you can host a website by yourself?
In dms or something
by buying a domain name like something.net then buying a vps (virtual private server) to host the website backend and then link it to the domain name with cloudflare
or u can host it locally on your computer
but only u can acces to it
F1 TV's Albert Fabrega shows Will Buxton the safety elements that protect Formula 1 drivers inside the car.
Watch the full episode - https://f1.com/TechTalk_AUT
For more F1® videos, visit http://www.Formula1.com
Follow F1®:
http://www.instagram.com/F1
https://www.facebook.com/Formula1/
http://www.twitter.com/F1
https://www.twitch.tv/formula1
...
Why did the engines slow down after 2016
hmmm?
they've only gotten better
except maybe this year if switching to E10 meant a small power decrease since originally they ran different fuel
but if you're talking about top speed, its cuz the cars have more drag
got wider and more downforce with it tho
Does anyone know like anything I could do in highschool to prepare to be an F1 engineer other than just getting good grades to get into a good uni
I've been researching and thinking but I genuinely can't think of anything I can be doing before college to prepare other than just learning about how cars work in depth
Probably just do engineering programs and show interest
Ive seen this thing where they do F1 in schools I assume you dont live in a country that has that but maybe do some research into that
Maybe
But I live in America so I now over here we don't have any F1 programs but im thinking about just researching on my own with textbooks
Until college
It depends on how they designed their car and set it up, some of the cars will be more suited to "twistier tracks" because of the downforce, and the overall balance they generate in the corners, whereas other teams would have designed cars that are suited for tracks where they can exploit their low drag potential
Red bull for example was a fantastic car when it came how sticky the car was to the track but lacked a little bit on straights
During 2016 Valterri hit 378kph top speed around Baku and Hulkenberg hit 370 at Mexico.
We’re nowhere near that in the last few years.
360 Monza ?
Have a social presence perhaps, learn a lot of knowledge online and develop a greater understanding of the sport.
A large portion of aero performance gains probably originate from greats such as Newey etc because they understand the sport and regulations better than anyone.
What year?
The Merc 2016 engine is definitely the most powerful engine of all time.
If you disregard the 80s turbos.
Idk what they changed in engine rules from 2016-2017.
the engines are not slower, the aero is just different. cars then had less downforce and less drag, which helps for a higher top speed.
2019 ? can't really remember
Oil ?
Because oil was used for some teams for combustion
Means
But was reduced after the FIA found it sus
Among other factors
what they changed was the aero load, and the tyres width.
look at what a 2016 and 2017 car look like, it’s quite obvious 🙂
I heard somewhere that the initial combustion in f1 engines isn’t within the cylinder.
Or the initial spark or something
.
are you looking for a pre combustion chamber?
Yeah because the cars literally got wider
Top speed is dependent on drag and less on engine power
Cd = Fd / [(0.5)(density)(velocity squared)(Area)]
The area straight up got bigger for the same velocity and density, the drag force has to increase because Cd is mostly constant
Obviously its more complicated than that if you pick at it hard enough, but the base point is that the widened area had the greatest effect in the drag formula, causing drag force to increase and top speed to decrease
The initial spark is used in a Pre-Ignition chamber, so the fuel is injected out of it like a traditional injector until the spark hits and that last amount is essentially spraying out fire
Cool
Btw
How does the 2019 Honda have that unique gurgling noise on the off throttle
Is it something to do with the wastegate?
some basic telemetry software ? Not advanced and paid like McLaren's Atlas which all teams use
cars were way lower drag if i believe
So providing if the V6 Turbos could rev up to higher RPMs that would mean that there would be a lot more stress and wear to the Power Units/Engines and their components right? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pwfJWj6FnVU
Simulation/emulation using original audio sources.
I have used audio pitch warping, filtering, distortion and compression to try to reproduce a realistic sound.
They end up sounding quite alike the V8's.
My next video with the bonus at the end will sound a bit more realistic :)
Sources:
https://youtu.be/eDjLovtcXW8
Yes
thx a lot
Np
What’s the difference between a skid block and the plank.
And why does it say that the skid block is titanium when it is a wooden piece
Skid block
Is what creates the sparks ?
And the plank
Is the underbody of the car
Show me the titanium
Does it say so in the regs ?
Yes
Uhmmmm....can you send me a copy and the article pls
Because ....if you say right...the regs are just 
It’s just a wooden piece
I thought the skid block is the whole thing but if it’s that then fair enough
The skid plank is no longer only wood
@edgy anchor is this annotation accurate?
Those small points I'd assume are, but I also believed that those could be ballast points, tho now I say that... Sounds dangerous
that's an old car
titanium in the plate is a 2014-2015 introduction
skid plate sits at the front of the plank
Can you point out the titanium?
Maybe not, but I "assume yes"
What adds more speed, Drs or ers
im no F1 professional, so take this with a grain of salt, but i assume DRS since it decreases drag
this could also help you @blissful yarrow
Drs, on the straights
Oh thanks
Ers
What
Does anyone know what these rods do for the 2022 cars other than seemingly connecting the floor to the side pods?
They just support the floor so it doesn’t bend as much at high speeds when loads are higher
What was the thing with Merc at Canada having 2 floor stays, but then removing it due to fear of protest.
Is a single floor stay an exception made by the FIA?
Also internal floor stays
Fia allowed 2 stays then didn’t allow it after a week
Merc in anticipation of the 2 stay being legal made adjustments to their floor to accommodate it but turned out their new floor was terrible
But isn't RB and Ferrari the one who need to change their floor?
No thats a difference fia technical change
What’s the ‘fear of protest’ part then?
Ok
So it would only be legal for a week
Rb and Ferrari said that they believe merc got insider info from fia about 2 stays being allowed
Oh ok thanks.
Oh
Does anyone know the angle of incline or radillion and ea rouge?
Yo what if you used pure mayonnaise as fuel my estimation is 600 kph
I was scrolling through lewis hams onboard for the q3 session the 2018 spa gp and stumbled upon this weird radio message, what is it and why does this happen?