#f1-technical
1 messages · Page 35 of 1
https://veloviewer.com/segment/2294858/Eau+Rouge here you go
0.22 km ride with 22 m of climbing, average grade of 9.0 %. Check it out!
How does downshifting reduce braking distance
the lower the gear, the more engine braking you get
At the consequence of slightly unsettling the car
You and I probably won’t feel it given how good F1 transmissions are
But its been talked about in lap vids before
does anybody kniw what happened to sainz
why not ask yourself F1-75
How does the MGUK slow down the car quicker under braking
Exactly how engine braking works
On braking, you need to reduce the kinematic energy in form of vehicle speed
So that can go through the heat being generated by the brakes
Additionally harvesting it through mgu k will result in faster dissipation of this kinetic energy
And hence you will brake faster
The MGU-K jams on magnetic resistance to generate more electric energy
There is a physical linkage for the braking force as a result of the engine's rotating mass (Crank, Transmission, etc) and the MGU-K.
However the MGU-K is considered to be a secondary contribution of the 'Engine-Brake' factor. The significance of this contribution is unknown
Engine braking is prodominantly accomplished through engine processes (mainly stressed induced in the compression chamber) where a vaccum is formed (a low/no fuel mixture present) which causes the pistons to slow down
⚠️ THE MGU-K DOES NOT CAPTURE HEAT ENERGY FROM THE BRAKES, This is a very common misconception
⚠️ MGU-K (alone) is not engine braking!
F1 MGUK systems uses a rotating three-phase system that is connected to the crank-shaft fed to the rear wheels.
In a braking scenario, the rear wheels are spinning with lots of kinetic rotational energy which will spin the rotor part of the MGUK (via the Crankshaft, transmission, etc)
Because of the configuration of what is essentially magnets and the MGU-K Following Faraday's law, the rotational movement will generate a resistance as mentioned by @edgy anchor. The work done by the kinetic rotational energy of the wheel is transmitted to the electrical energy of the MGU-K (via the mechanical means i.e. crankshaft). The spin of the rear wheels is being resisted by the rear wheels due to these electromagnetic forces (resistance).
Summary:
Braking Force = Aero Drag (large contribution) + Engine & Transmission Forces + MGUK + Other Friction. (Underlined is loosely 'Engine Brake')
MGUK Resistance = MGUK Revolutions at Controlled % (where % proportional to variable electrical current PID/electromagnetism)
Electromagnetism is actuated.
I believe the guy is only asking how the cars slow down faster with an mgu k, so you only need to explain that you have another sink to absorb that kinetic energy. So the energy can dissipate at a faster rate.
That detailed explanation was very welcome.
You explored the scope of heat in the brakes and its presence of its generation - which is true, but can be muddled up in the explanation.
Thanks.
How about MGUH?
MGUH is a bit more complicated, would like to see people's take on it before I get home from work aha
Yeah I know that it stops turbo lag but I’m still a little bit muddled on how it saves energy and interacts with MGUK
Also
If the MGUK linked directly to the crank, what about the gearbox?
.
Why tf did Ferrari in the early turbo hybrid era open their wastegates on the straight?
Isn’t that just straight up lost energy or does it help performance.
Your wastegate will open with power to limit boost pressure
You can't just keep ramping pressure especially with fuel flow rates unless you're... Idk Mark Blundell in a 1990 Nissan
Very simply put it's a generator/motor on the turboshaft. At high speeds it's activated to harvest energy (which will reduce the power of the turbocharger but at high speeds that is fine); while under acceleration from low speeds it acts as a motor, spinning the turbocharger and "filling" the turbolag
The braking power of the MGU-K at least is significant enough that if it fails, that can be a big problem for the rear brakes.
So when it’s at high speed, those exhaust gases are converted into electrical energy stored in the ES?
Understandable
Any idea on the maximum boost teams are allowed?
They're unrestricted
I was trying to explain how heat is one way and mguk another addition. But I get your point.
what's the difference between the turbo pressure and the boost?
the energy of the gases is converted into electric energy, yes.
It doesn't interact with MGU K, totally different systems.
Ok. Thanks
MGU K is basically taking kinetic energy from all the moving parts- the drive train and the power train.
Exhaust gases are still getting pumped out through the turbocharger, so you can provide boost to the intake or you can charge a motor on that same shaft
I am not very clear on all the use cases though
Thats MGU H
Maybe someone can share all the use cases for MGU H and K.
When and which is used in F1 to harvest. E.g. the MGU K while braking is one condition
Do you have a reason for it? Maybe I am missing out on something.
I just read this article which said
‘
In the second phase of acceleration, once a certain reference speed of the turbo and engine has been reached, the MGUH supplies energy directly to the MGUK to accelerate it further
Oh that way
The article could be written wrong, the author maybe missed out the part of the energy store.
So they are not interacting mechanically for sure. Maybe it means that at a certain time, the MGU H might be producing electricity and the MGU K still has room to utilise
Again, I am not very clear on the use cases. Let's wait for someone to shed some more light on what all times MGU H is used in F1 to harvest energy.
If mguh is producing and mguk is consuming, even if there is the battery in between, you can say that both these systems are interacting.
Yeah I guess, but the article says ‘directly’
Let’s see what someone more informed says
Meanwhile can you share that article? :)
It’s in Italian, but sure.
Did anyone say they were different things?
I assume the 3.5 bar is intake pressure, which if absolute would be 2.486 Bar aboge atmosphere
The MGU-H basically regulates the rpm of the turbo when doing speedy and puts resistance on the turbo shaft, so the exhaust gas push against that resistance to generate electricity, which feeds the battery, which feeds the MGU-K
Thanks
Is it the MGU H working on straights before the braking zone and then both H and K at the braking zone?
Both the MGU-K and H are working almost all the time
the MGU-H can send energy directly to the MGU-K, bypassing the energy store
no limitation on how much energy is sent to the MGU-K this way
just the wording you used , it got me confused 🙂
"Any idea on the maximum boost teams are allowed?"
"They're unrestricted" "But they're limited to about 3.5 bar"
They're not regulation limited
:o
But as a result of the amount of fuel they have, they have a top end
It's just ironic, they bring the turbo back and then ruin it by having an MGU-H
You lost me there. How does it ruin the turbo?
Because the fun of a turbo is the lag sound on acceleration but the MGU-H doesn't allow that to happen
Let's make the turbo linear with wayyy more money involved
XD
The MGU-H itself is very expensive already, and has no road relevance
turbo lag isn't fun if you want efficiency
And do you want efficiency at all costs
Like even without the MGU-H these PUs would still be a lot more efficient than the V8s and V10s of the recent past
so make the V10 Hybrid to invalidate it completely for the bois
4 more years
2026 engines will sound better though ?
Thanks for the clarification, I wonder what failure mode would cause that, Surely wouldn't it be a case of a failsafe measure to have zero resistance or is that not possible/how it works.. Open for speculation
In case of the most prominent example I can think of, when both Mercedes' MGU-K failed in Canada in 2014 (causing rear brakes to overheat on both cars), I think it was a failure in the high voltage control system that controls the flow of electricity between battery and MGU-K.
I wonder if they'll go the Formula E route and remove the rear brakes entirely on the 2026 cars, could be a good idea as they gotta find a way to fill up a much bigger battery and motor
Ah failing in a way that induces braking 😭
in FE they already don't use the mechanical rear brakes a lot, not sure they can just get rid of them in F1
And their gen 3 car will remove them all together, and if you gotta provide energy to a more powerful MGU-K and keep the car somewhat light then it could be a good idea to do that with the new power units
that would have to be a LOT more power though
F1 is significantly faster after all
I do agree that it would be cool though. It would also mean less brake dust is produced of course.
If Max and Lewis somehow managed to continue on after this collision, I bet both of them would have been hindered by aero issues. Not sure how it would have effected Lewis but Max definitely would have had a large loss of pace, considering the floor of the right sidepod had crunched in itself after coming down hard on Lewis' airbox
considering the rear wing of lewis's car was damaged + possible suspension damage, im not sure he'd be able to continue at all
And if what WTF1 said in his video about sausage kerbs is true, one on the inside of the second part of Rettifilo was responsible for launching Max on top of Lewis.
pretty sure max's diffuser was badly damaged too
the saussage kerbs are just stupid and annoying
what difference does having endplates on the rear wing (pre 2022 cars) make in comparison to the 2022 car wings
he would probably end up 2nd, Daniel was flying
Sausage kerbs should be banned
It kinda set his rear to the side but ultimatively the car was launched from the tyre to tyre contact.
There are many sausage kerbs related incidents but IMO this one isn't really one of them
The point being made is that the kerb played a role in the accident. I suspect that if that was a different kind of kerb, the outcome would have been very different.
Maybe, but I think the sausage kerb's role was rather minor. The big difference is that in that case it was not the kerb that actually launched the car
Does anyone have a list/link of all the outsourced parts for an F1 powertrain.
I only know of Bosch for fuel ignition and Magnetti Marelli.
Do drivers just inhale engine exhaust for the entirety of the race and their entire careers in the sport?? isnt that dangerous for their health in terms of their long term effects?
They inhale brake dust a lot iirc
And it’s an even bigger problem this year since it’s faced right on the driver
hell no
there are filters located in front of the drivers face in the helmet which prevents inhalation of such particles
if u see at the front side there is a filter
The... Where does this come from? They're in a car with exhausts behind them
When they are following a car i guess
What would happen if there's a crash and for example 14/20 competing cars are out and can't get back to the pitlane on their own power in Lap 1 the race would be cancelled or something?
But would the race restart with all drivers? because a restart with 6 drivers... IDK
There's a rule now that if the grid has less than 14 cars at the start of the race the race will be cancelled to avoid another Indy 2005
Well, if there’s a red flag because 14 cars crashed, then the race has already started
The Silverstone second start was from Lap 2
So I don’t think that rule will apply for this
If I recall, that rule lays under FIA discretion.
Sausage kerbs should be banned
Of course, but they're gonna probably wait until someone actually dies because of it, because I don't understand why they keep using them
I dont see why not. I think in that case fans would still rather see a race than no race.
6 remaining cars after a crash isnt as ridiculous as 6 remaining cars because the rest just pulled out.
(I know there was the whole tyre thing but the situation was still ridiculous)
Remember in Mugello the 2nd restart only had 13 drivers
Although it would be crazy to see for example the 3 bottom Teams fighting for the win. Even a Podium can seal a battle at the bottom of the Grid
Yeah
How does a disappearing skid block work.
Is there springs,softer material above the skid and plank, where the block can be pushed into?
Also, for the 1mm wear, is that on the titanium elements, or the wood.
What this?
Can anyone annotate?
Is that huge piece on top, an inter cooling package or a plenum?
Did red bull come up with it or was it mandated to them by the FIA?
i believe what happened was FIA asked for frontal impact driver protection and these are what the teams came up with
So Merc invented the halo 😮
yep
i think functionally the aeroscreen was the best, the halo was the most natural and looks the best (maybe im just used to it at this point), and whatever Ferrari came up with was only proven to be quite good at making Sebastian Vettel dizzy
then again, Indycar now has arguably the best of both worlds too
a halo with an aeroscreen
Wb this
the halo looks good (on cars that are after 2016)
holy shit I thought that was an F2 car for a split second
The FIA also thought so but it didn't pass the crashtests back then
the Indycar version probably would