#f1-technical
1 messages · Page 29 of 1
I wouldn't think so.
They are getting away with a tighter packaging because of how the radiators sit
It looks like they have theirs sat at the front, like what the 1992 ferrari had done
Where do you think the issue of aero could come into play?
i have no knowledge of aero, i just guessed a chonkier side would cause more drag?
They look very differently
That haas is the early development version so it can change more
I remember when it was said that the cars are going to look very similar
Ain't looking like it yet
The double floor design as they call it, one of the two distinct design philosophies predicted for the 2022 cars.
so yeah i think it is definitely primarily an aero focused difference
i think its explained more in depth here?
interesting to see how this plays out i'd expect the tighter back end to be the winning package in most circumstances but i guess this could be the exception
I've seen it suggested AMRs sidepod philosophy helps bring forward the low pressure zone for the diffuser, which in turn helps offset the decreased front wing down force
I adored these flick ups, I hate that they were banned coz after they were banned they've just left dead space in that area, especially since the sidepids got tighter every year
after looking at the sheer design differences between the haas and the AM, i guess these rules allow for more design freedom than i thought
is it just me who thinks the HAAS livery actualy looks good?
Just u
nah u have the creator of the livery in this server he's with u
brandon i think
it does look good
:D
White is cool
da
Monaco 2018, what are the strings coming out of the front suspension?
I think it's the cable that holds the wheels
tyre teathers that keeps it from flying off
the tyre
damn if that exploded that crash was harder than I thought
wheel tethers*
the tyres aren't tethered
each hub has 3 zylon tethers passed through the suspension arms to keep it attached to the tub
looks like this if an end is failed
Can someone explain the pushrods?
what do you want to be explained about them
Push rod largely got used from 2014 onwards because it was more aerodynamically optimized. The system allows certain components to be moved out of the way of airflow, and it also has a lower center of gravity. and if I recall, it gives better weight distribution, but also much more high speed stability
The first 1000 people to use this link will get a free trial of Skillshare Premium Membership: https://skl.sh/chainbear02211
Suspension! A bouncy enigma! Even more so in F1 as you can't really see any of it - it's all hidden and tiny inside the nose. So let's have a look at what suspension is, why we need it and how F1 cars' suspension is desig...
Aight, time to watch that.
Also thanks.
Also, it seems like the Ferrari engine is much slimmer than mercs
It was the car in very early development
But not the final one
Only guesses
Nah it's very different from the show car
Theres no way the Merc engine called for a rear end that big lol
You could probably fit 2 engines in there
rocket engine on the amr
? Look at the mclaren now it's much thinner
Completely opposite
seems like McLaren went with the same cooling solution as Haas
Also McLaren's seems a bit earlier spec too
is the high wing on the aston martin because of ground affect?
yes most likely to get as much clean air under the floor as possible
we'll see that with nearly every car this year
Or rather, every car, unless one of the teams found out a way to have the wing lower with no compromises to the high wing
Bro for a reg book that's meant to cut the fat of the endless readjustments to make an amalgamation of something
I cannot make any damn sense of it
I believe the front wings would've dropped further had there not been the minimum height, but I have no clue how to read the regs that'd prove me right or otherwise
Look at Haas as well
You have size zero Haas and chunky Aston Martin
McLaren seems to have both
Oh most definitely
Aston likes getting air under their cars 
Yeah but the front wing isn't like high tho
That’s some Newey magic right there
I wonder if they used the Valkyrie for some inspiration when designing the AMR22
Getting some of that indirect Newey influence
Since when the Valkyrie was designed, Aston Martin was still Red Bull’s title sponsor
It’s pretty high
great comparison here
most likely, but it could also be the height that the picture was taken.
this photo is not definitive of the real size comparison (it might be)
that’s because this stuff can easily be manipulated with how much zoom was used to take the photos
to get real size you need to scale both to the same dimensions based on something that’s the same, which would be wheels perhaps, to get a real idea of how big each car is
but again that’s also variable based on zoom
point is these images aren’t precise
now it can absolutely be that McLaren’s car is longer, but we don’t know yet
we need both cars in the same spot taken with the same height camera to get a real perspective
Wheels or halo because halo design is fixed and teams aren’t allowed to tamper with it
Uhhu
there was a proper comparison of the cars i believe on the f1 instagram and the mclaren is longer just not by as much as that photo shows
We're not sure if this is really the same zoom or resolution so we can't judge from here
also does the sidepod on the AMR22 act as a downwash wing ?
a bit I think
It's also made because floor leading edge is downwashing aggressively on the top surface, so there is a probability that there'll losses and separations on the top surface that could go downstream that is undesirable, so with the sidepod acting as down washing wing you can end up with overall downwash and the losses don't come too big.
They made the body work a bit flat to make air go straight hit and there's a big difference is bodywork. McLaren uses the black to make the car look slim while Aston Martin is right out flat. And huge noticeable difference in the spoiler. Will be interesting to see these things with Drs open. Front wing is just A Ruler in McLaren. Just a Straight line
So for vaccum?
yup
Looks like someone voided the NDA
On the other hand we got a scarbs analysis
Looks like someone is about to catch a massive lawsuit
https://youtu.be/VYBzndSFVpw also looks like McLaren purposefully made the render inaccurate
At first glance, McLaren's new car certainly looks like a vanilla repackage of their old car into the 2022 regulations, instead of a brand new concept. However, with these things it's all about the detail, and that's what we are going to run through on their car. In this video we go through and analyse the aero details on the car, and why and ho...
For the first time in 10 years of watching j can spot the difference between the cars
It's cash to see the variety in just 2 cars with the same engine supply
Going to be very interested to see the lap times of the aston and Mclaren which are so different
do you think redbull will be fast enough this season
they haven't shown their car, there's absolutely no way we can know
You have to assume yes, with the resources they have. I mean they are big enough to buy everyone in this sever. But nothing on the car yet
If I recall, the teams wanted to push the air up as high as possible without hitting the beam wing, because that'd in turn give less dirty air to the car behind
Definitely interesting, I haven't looked at their undercut on the sidepod too closely, so I can't really give much to say on it. The wide chassis with flat radiators is also a very different design than what most of us are used to seeing
Mostly curious as to if the other teams will follow the concept of the high front wing, to have as much clean air going under the car as possible
I imagine their concept wouldn't work too well in the slow corners, if Scarbs word is to be believed
High speed tracks is definitely where this car will shine, especially since their concept is basically relying on the Venturi tunnels to generate most of the downforce
Is the Aston the only team to show off their actual car?
lmao
there has been about 4 videos of it running
Sorry forgot to add the word only
Since the Haas, McLaren and AT look like liveried show cars
oh oh oh
McLaren? Not really
A lot technicalities on the model they revealed
And they're planning running the same "Filming Day test" that Aston Martin ran in a while
Only Red Bull have shown literally just a recoloured showcar. All other teams had details that were very different from it as well as from each other
^
I don't think any other team (besides Red Bull, of course) is going to show just a show car anymore tbh
They have no reason to
Not even Mercedes
Because they're revealing at such a time that it'd be virtually impossible for their competitors to plagiarise
I've spotted elements of it on the Aston
I think Redbull was behind schedule
so they didn't get an early rendition ready
bad bull amirite
Sponsors have due dates of when they want their exposure, so I think it's very likely they couldn't meet the demands in time, and had to resort to a showcar
Why?
Why else would they be the only team so far to only give a showcar, I get the whole point of keeping cards close, but AlphaTauri, which is Redbulls second team, gave us a rendition of their cars concept.
But Red Bull actually being unprepared seems like a even bigger stretch than “hiding their cards”
Where did the “RB didnt have a car ready” thing start?
If I recall, it was first said by Dieter in a twitter sound space back in january
I don’t believe it
Newey considers starting next year’s cars by September to be a disaster
Theres no way even with just 6 months they have absolutely nothing built further than a 2019 F1 concept show car
he didn't say nothing ready, he said nothing presentable ready, not a full car
I respect that they may have their own version of the 22 car
but (as far as I know) Aston are the only team to actually show a car on track
and maybe I'm just being a filthy casual here... but the Aston is the only car that looks dramatically different from the show car, the AT looks almost identical
yes, that's true
the AT front nose is clearly not the one that'll be on the real car
I'd suspect their nose will look more like the others yeah
shorter and the lowest front wing element doesn't touch the nose
my thoughts exactly
I'm no big Aston fan.... but my god does their car look good
those louvres along the sidepods are something else
or gills
whatever they want to call them
VENTSCH
Apparently it's the quick and easy method of the two major choices that the teams had. I doubt they'll be good
https://pledgetimes.com/f1-car-2022-we-will-see-two-very-different-philosophies/
It's literally in the article, the team isn't happy because they chose that route. It's also stated that it's easier to achieve results but at the same time will probably be less competitive in the end.
I am curious, what was the point in choosing that concept, if they knew it has the likely potential to not be as competitive
its honestly not surprising
that AM once again went for the quickest and easiest for "results"
results in quotations cuz that seems only short term
Less risk? Less money
Surely that wouldn't align with their long term plans, which this seems to contradict.
honestly i have no idea what their long term plans are anymore
cuz it seems like a pretty heavy focus on results NOW
Mercedes when they built up Brackley and Brixworth, recruited only the best engineers and staff
key example, James Allison from Schumacher-era Ferrari and Alonso-era Renault
the most impressive resumes on the grid (Newey turned it down)
not washed up downfall-of-McLaren Whitmarsh
not guys like Mattiacci who to this day we still don't know what his role exactly is other than he lost Fernando
they didn't go copying cars or recruiting big names with less than stellar records like Aston is doing
Another part of me, wonders if this is an attempt to satisfy their sponsors who weren't happy after 2021's performance, completely scrapping the whole long term deal, in an attempt to show up with a high performing car, that peaks the earliest, keeps the sponsors happy and the money flowing, despite the same 2021 performance fate eventually happening
sorry if it sounded like a massive run on sentence, a little tipsy
its like he just wants Lance to get his name in the WDC list once, and whatever happens after that is whatever
Even in the AM campus hes building in plans for “downsizing”
They could be banking on some early points/podiums
I think their technical team is just not as good as they think they are
I'm trying to remember, what other team was it that tried hiring big names but ultimately failed in the end
Toyota?
Toyota certainly threw money at the problem
Giorgio said that the team isn't happy with the direction, it's the director who decided to use that method
But I dont remember a single person from there
director, Max Szwaj?
Idk the name it's in the article
oh Andy Green
Hes the Chief Technical Officer at AM since 2016, but i think thats for road car cuz Stroll wasnt in the picture yet
Yeah, forgot about that
alfas one looks really fucking complex
alfas is also pretty high
they either got nothing or something
i think to let more airflow
exactly
hopefully we got smth right
also is it my brain or does it look like half of the wing is missing
on the right side
ur eyes
seks
look at the front wing
yes\
i thought the triangle one was the best until now
tho its bigger now
and without secondary ones
podiums baby
im fucking pumped about this season
from the technical aspect on its own as il study to be a mechanical engineer
pushrod suspension both at the back and front 👀
this was scarbs
very interesting to say the least
Honestly i love these new cars in terms of looks
I feel like they finally managed to get the halo to look alright with the rest of the design
If Sauber is going both rear and front push rod
How likely would it be then if Ferrari and Haas go double push rod
pretty good looking car tbh
none
alfa made its own rear suspension
backing away from the previous ferrari deal
can someone explain why they put the sponsors logos OVER the camouflage seams pointless
i don't think the purpose of the camo is to hide which car it is. it's there so that you can't clearly identify the design of few aero components or should i say it makes it HARDER to identify
just saying put ads on a car that isn't meant to be seen seems weird that you would take the time to do it
Remember when everyone was so confident of most teams using the pull rod suspension at the front then only Mclaren shows up with it
The variety is cash
Just a showcar
I'm pretty sure that's the real thing
how can that be a showcar lmao
Idk, I seen a lot saying it's showcar or testing car idk
showcar testing would be the most useless thing ever
extra money wasted aswell
^^
why would they make a completely fake car to just show off lol
its their normal car, just with a testing livery
especially this complex
It don't make sense that the reveal is on 27th and they shakedown already before reveal lmao
bro
because they have that option?
???
theyre not going to just pray to god that theyre going to have a good car
every team does
they need to test it
They literally gonna do barcelone testing before they reveal the car
well its just a livery lmao
and even then, the only thing that matters to us is the livery
hence the testing liveries
I didn't know that shit lol mb, but Idk just feels weird to have reveal 12days away but you already show the car in shakedown idk lol
theyre not showing the livery
You get the point considering I don't think we're gonna see much of the cars in barcelone
Plus they're gonna use the same testing livery in Barcelona
ah ok, every has a "filming day" available before actual testing
they probably dont go all out like in testing
just the basics
Afaik filming day is allowed anytime of the year
i mean considering how many leaks we have had for liveries i wouldnt be surprised on testing day
have we seen leaks from other cars?
afaik only the ones that have been released got leaked a few hours/days before
Is it me or hass looking kinda sus on their design, only thing is if that ferrari engine good this year as they are making out to be.
are venturi tunnels underneath all the same (mandatory to be the same) or however the team desires?
Making a showcar driveable is just unnecessary work too lol
exactly lol
idk
More surface area than a circle for the same “diameter” (one side to other)
Of course the generic answer is affecting the chassis flow lol
Hydraulic Diamater provides greater mass flow rate than a for a same circular or eliptical diameter (for turbulent flow).
I believe the shape is as a consequence of the regulations and planar restrictions
wondering why the front wings on the new cars are so high off the ground compared to last year's?
I think someone explained it in this channel
Something about maximises the air to the underfloor
They want more air under the car
that and also they were removed because they were seen as a costly solution
and they look ugly as fuck
Disagree
||idk but that snapdragon looking sexy||
but Teams will have little impact in their design, in order that they don't use them to damage the overall intent of their introduction.
||Snapdragon tiny logo||
EL PLAN?
Owait fuck ur right
I reckon Ferrari,Aston Martin and Alpine will be the only teams using gills on the sidepods
@river sluice please post with spoiler tags until the car is officially released
sorry
👀
we can see that
ono
Do the rules forbid any nuclear power on the cars

even if they didn’t, do you really want nuclear power running around the track
bro
like circuit would not exist only if one mistake is made
the whole of monaco will go down if one driver error happens
bahrain will sink
albert park lake will become albert park sea
Not really
It’ll get contaminated at most. Producing a nuclear explosion is much different from producing nuclear power—two very different technicalities
Theoretically (strictly theoretically), it is possible, given our current understanding of nuclear mechanics
But it would be utterly inefficient and tiresome to upkeep + maintain, and incredibly expensive to develop
Forget in a motor-racing scenario, nuclear-powered engines are far fetched even for road moving vehicles as of now
the vehicles being powered by nuclear energy means fission has to happen in the vehicle. it's precisely like an atom bomb inside then right?
I would explain
But it is way too much to type
So read this
What is the difference between the nuclear material in a bomb, versus a reactor? A nuclear reactor works by using the energy that is released when the nucleus of a heavy atom splits. That process is called fission. In reactors, fission occurs when uranium atoms are hit by slow-moving neutrons. Absorbing these excess neutrons sometimes causes the...
In a bomb, on the other hand, you need nearly pure fissile material, said Arjun Makhijani, a nuclear engineer and president of the Institute for Energy and Environmental Research. That is, material that is capable of sustaining such nuclear chain reactions. Most nuclear bombs are made up of isotopes of uranium 235 or plutonium 239.
“Commercial reactors have just a few percent fissile material in them, and bombs have more than 90 percent,” Makhijani said.
and a power plant, yes
There’s a reason as to why nuclear power plants don’t just explode. It all depends on on the percentage of fissile material that is utilised, and in most power-generating scenarios (like say, an F1 car), only a very small percentage would be used—not enough to cause an explosion
you can probably do a simple calculation, how much fuel do cars need, how much energy is that, convert it into the mass of enriched uranium needed to get the same
but also, these turbine engines don't work for racing cars, it might be good for things like indy 500 or nascar
but last time i checked, they're not efficient at having lots of throttle / off throttle cycles compared to piston engines
Okay so, if we are to dive deeper into this, then lead-cooled fast reactor would most probably be used to power the car, and the “lead” part of that statement should tell you enough about exposure
Because lead blocks most nuclide emissions, iirc
But yes, as Reb said, technology that is usually used for submarines and ships, which have a set amount of power output for a long period of time, is not really suitable for an environment that demands variable power output over a short period of time
Utilising all four permitted wing structures on the nose, instead of the three that has been common in the other revealed cars
interesting
does alfa go into the revealed car section?
cuz i think they have 4 aswell
but its hard to say with the camo
Their nose stops at the third structure iirc, the fourth structure on the Alfa acts independently
So Ferrari didn't go for a pull rod
From the looks no.
So that means that either McLaren got it incredibly correct or horribly wrong, because Ferrari was the only other team that everyone anticipated to incorporate a pull rod design
taken from Slendis and CS, but thought it was worth reposting here
people doubting the use of the pushrod when the haas was revealed lol
wow now i really can't wait for what Mercedes came up with if the Ferrari looks this good
But from the people I have heard, it's doesn't make a huge difference. Maybe I need to rewatch that explanation
I'm actually enjoying what the teams are doing with body work to direct the air flow, it's actually quite cool
Amr22 v f175
Front wing looks like they r at the same level
Slightly better picture for the f175
Where's this flap on the other side of the f175?

im now wondering if aston was hiding side pods like that or if theyll show up with them for testing
Wow look at all those sPoNsOrS
***Hook Text Here
➤ Join our Driver61 Community Discord! - https://discord.gg/YCqFxF27VS
➤ Subscribe for more incredible motorsport: https://goo.gl/AbD2f9
➤Follow us on:
➤ Instagram- @official_driver61 - https://bit.ly/D61Insta
➤TikTok - @official_driver61 - https://bit.ly/D61TikTok
➤ iPad Drawing sponsored by Concepts, you can get an ...
Is it possible to have a suspension that doesn’t use a push or pull rod
To my understanding i don't think so
An unrodded suspension on a way
The first 1000 people to use this link will get a free trial of Skillshare Premium Membership: https://skl.sh/chainbear02211
Suspension! A bouncy enigma! Even more so in F1 as you can't really see any of it - it's all hidden and tiny inside the nose. So let's have a look at what suspension is, why we need it and how F1 cars' suspension is desig...
I don't think in F1 its possible
unless you use the wishbones as a lever to act on springs inside the chassis but that would put large bending forces on the wishbones
probably a stupid question but is that 3 wing elements or is it just the lighting?
wait no its definitely a stupid question
lol
Hello there
this is a strange question, but im going to write an essay about the 2022 cars for school, and I was wondering what topics I should cover. So if you have any ideas let me know.
How the venturi tunnels generate downforce
maybe its the blur, but the shark fin looks weird
like it looks like there is a dip behind the intake and the sharkfin
its very tightly packaged overall
a little off topic, but I found it really cool that you're apart of decalspotters
what is that FW endplate
also shouldnt ye spoiler it you prick
Quick question, but how do people rate Gary Anderson from the race
cool
solid engineer, wrote some pretty decent articles over the years
Aight, read his article on Ferrari, it doesn't seem like the Ferrari car is impressive
A bit worrying personally
He's usually pretty critical
Oh aight then, im fairly new to F1 so
can someone explain the benefits and drawbacks of pullrod vs pushrod? Ik what they are but Idk the advantages and disadvantages of each
dont worry, they have 0 clue
no one knows
not even the teams engineers know where they stand
#Binotto ha svelato che il doppio splitter è stato subito valutato positivamente e installato sulla #F175 dopo averlo visto sulla Aston Martin AMR22 #Formu1a #F1 https://t.co/JrcpkmpwOz https://t.co/Gm8dN6Uldn
129
Ferrari stole the double bib from amr
can't say if it's a good or bad sign
maybe why the new rules were enforced (too much dirty air etc.) and depending when the essay is due, you could theoretically include some early analysis which design ideas proved to be good and which didn't (pretty sure a lot of articles will be released after pre-season testing by the usual
sources)
depends on when it's due, switching back to the 2017 cars might be a better idea because more content
we still know fuck all about which design is actually good
Funny, I’m doing the exact same thing
I’d reccomend writing the essay on whether or not the racing improves
it is
whats all the craze on the sidepod?
It's flat outside with a concave section inside which isn't used on any other car
And seems to be only related to the MP4-26
Unless you didn't mean Ferraris
I really hope that Ferrari got some more HP out of their engine.
IIRC they were down about 50hp.
So is the fuel now about E10?
e 10 it is
It's mandated to be at least 10% Eeeeee, indeed
Looks slick
yoo it looks diff
I mean thats what 64p does to a mf
true ye
that’s why it’s there in case anyone was wondering
it’s a very elegant aero manipulation
also, look at that cooling and the sidepod inlets
this wouldn’t count as a loophole, would it?
i dare you to touch those sidepod inlets while it's running
I guess not
But not what the FiA thought they would do
Yesss
why
it’s not a vacuum, you wouldn’t get sucked in
science
If you take the livery off of every car they are almost all distinguishable from each other right now
the radiator is very close by
the double dip rear wing will be interesting
it’s far more radical than anything we’ve seen so far
hell, even more than the Ferrari
The wavy floor edge really caught my eye
A very characteristic, rounded and narrow, nose as well
Dang that's so cool
The Mercedes AMG W13 features a ultra long nose like the Ferrari.
#AMuS #F1 https://t.co/S7Ey4tVYzz
So with the varying concept designs, how spread out are we expecting the field to be?
They probably won't
Although they are also the most likely have the strongest power unit still, and boast one of the best technical teams on the grid
So, we'll have to see
It is amazing how different the cars are and how close in pace they are on track
I feel that their competition with Red Bull will still be rather apparent, considering that Adrian Newey's a ground effect and chassis design maestro (whose skills will be on full display this season, considering that bodywork is a huge factor this time)
We don't know about the pace part yet, but hopefully the regulations accomplish what they intended to 🤞
Why are Mercedes and Haas quite similiar, tho haas revealed first
I mean looking at the body structure and the front wing (without the front nose)
So Ferrari side pods are the highest?
What about mercedes?
The side pods look very wide, won't that cause alot of drag?
more drag above = better downforce from the floor and diffuser
A) the first single element beam wing we've seen (unless there's a very shallow leading edge slat)
B) the @SomersF1 mouse hole
C) very aggressive outer floor
D) interesting use of the tyre thermal camera presumably to interrupt the shedding of the top endplate vortex https://t.co/Sb2MTIHaQo
How fast do you reckon these cars will be at high speed courses?
fast
I need 230mph+ speeds at monza
you're not even driving the car

Has anyone gotten a look at Ferrari’s rear diffuser? There’s gotta be something interesting going on back there
not exactly a good look but it exists
Ahh lol yeah it’s tough to see much detail
Doesnt look too complex tho
Thats a good looking Silver Arrow
Wonder how it would be in black tho lol
black is usually imo not a very good color
at least on road cars
Black often hides detail on cars and needs to be very glossy to work right in certain conditions
as one friend of mine put it, "if it only looks good in black, its not a good looking car"
I mean, most “details” after a week of driving are mud and dirt so I dont think hiding it is much of a loss lol
they show up on black paint even more
Unless you have a literal dark horse in a black livery
Wow
They're running the sidepods as aero surfaces, and it is to maximize the wing-like effects.
looks so similar to ferrari
huh
i don't see any resemblance
front wing
not sure about that either
even though quality is low it looks like the front wing is similar, with a not too sharp turn
the back is totally different though
More like the AT03 ngl
new rb18 shot
Looks like a double T tray floor
wait a minute
and that adds the list of the teams running a pull rod suspension in front
Are they running pull rod?
looks like it
bold
yes
very bold
At the moment is seems that only McLaren and Red Bull are running a pull rod suspension
also an interesting nose cone

⚫
Unpopular opinion:
Haas and mercedes are quite similiar, looking at the body part and the frontwing (except the front nose)
So Mercedes copied haas
indeed
But it really is surprising
Based haas fan
Either Haas' 2 years paid off to come close to a good car or mercedes has a problem
notice how the car on the left clearly is a Mercedes, even Ferrari buy things from Merc
Hamilton buys thing from Ferrari
Perhaps he has a laferrari because amg simply can’t deliver his project one 
merc is using pullrod for the rear so does that count lol
isn't everyone doing that
no
I was speaking about the front suspension layout
then yea its just them for now
Nah not everyone
I think I saw someone with a push rod rear
the alfa romeo?
yes
I think in the first pic that's just weird artifacts from bad quality. Whatever it is in the new, high-res pic, it's more likely something in the background from the truck. It's not in the correct position to be any alleged extra-wing
Oooooh
Same for the FW44
I wish we had a top down view of it
I think W13/Haas and the Williams FW44 have the same sidepod philosophy. Maximize floor size, down wash
Small side pods and coke bottle
What happens when rain gets into the louvered sidepods?
it immediately gets blown backwards by the wind
This makes my head hurt
Its sooo complex
well its f1 ofc its complex
looks stamped on
interesting note from b sport
mercedes have a temp panel for any needs of extra cooling
Just watched this right now😂
Pull rod

Good eye!
This makes Ferraris top air inlet look very small
So the red bull thing is legal?
i stand by what i said yesterday
Besides, I think the FIA said they're satisfied that no team has found any such loopholes? Certainly Red Bull would have asked the FIA if something like this was ok.
Also nothing like this can be seen on any other footage of the car
We're on home territory here, but doesn't mean I can't still break down all the details of the Mercedes W13! At first glance many people have been uninspired by the more or less carryover of the rear bodywork, however this car is all about the details.
00:00 Introduction
01:08 Renders vs Real Car
02:04 Front Wing
07:29 Mid Floor
14:10 Cooling...
More technical insight will be given to fans. Teams have to let the FIA know what new parts they have brought (shared with journalists) and we will ‘show’ the cars before FP1 and after Qualifying - with a senior team member ‘telling’ about the weekend. Hence ‘show and tell’.
211
inchresting
How adjustable will the rear wings be this year? Will teams still be able to run slim low-downforce configurations like they have before on tracks like Monza, Montreal and Paul Ricard?
So the RB has its front nose connected to the 3rd element, while merc abd ferrari have theirs connected to the 4th element
So RB may will not be in top 2 this year
that makes no sense
based on this alone?
I believe that the yellow strip in the bottom image is just the rear of the garage but seen through the gap between the beam wing and the lower rear wing element, as pictured
not a wing itself
?
Yes they will
beautiful view of that double dip rear wing
Veeeeeery tightly packaged car, it seems
no. You can't base which car is quicker on a noise choice. Plus, two cars can be equally quick with a different package and two cars can be different in speed (or downforce produced) with similar concepts
Seems like they found every loophole and abused the hell out of it

That is what engineers are
La F1-75 più vestita con le grandi pance del doppio fondo sarebbe risultata il 7% più efficiente della rossa che era stata sperimentata con un abito nude look in stile Mercedes. Non deve spaventare se nella vista del posteriore, ripresa durante lo shakedown di Fiorano, emergano forme giunoniche: bisogna preservare il motore Superfast capace di a...

Guys, what are those cilinders above the engine?
I know they are called intake manifolds
but what is their purpose, why are they good (or why no), and why is their placement on top?
they're basically just pipes that supply air to the cylinders.
they're on top because that's where the air needs to go (usually the cylinders are mounted so the combustion chamber is up)
wouldn't it be better if they were the exaust manifolds?
I might be wrong here
but could they use the venturi effect created by the rapid air (relative speed) passing by?
use it how?
do u know about the venturi effect?
well then, the air passing by would create a depression in the 'exhaust' manifolds, making the exhaust gases rush out
yeah
that's already a thing on basically all engines
oh really?
but on the exhaust manifolds?
i gotta check it
i mean, pretty much any new idea to improve a car u can think of is already thought by an f1 team
anyways quickly back to the question with the image, the silver thing are individual throttle bodies
each cylinder has it's little throttle body
and they're used in racing because they flow a lot of air
with very little restriction
the reason they're rare in roadcars is because you need a big airbox with a big filter around them, and they're loud, and complicated
AE82 on a wet touge. The 4AGE is perfect for twisty mountain roads. This was a baseline to compare to after the build is done. It's already so damn good, I can't wait to see how much better it can be. Enjoy the wonderful sound of my little corolla.
but they sound nuts
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F6y-sc9hWp0 another view
4AGE 20 Valve Blacktop, the best sounding 4 cylinder engine there is. The sound is incredible and revving it to 8k+ rpms is fun. The engine is the same as Takumi used in Initial D.
correction, engine capacity is 1587cc
-100 mm T3 trumpets
i've looked it up, and it seems they play with pipe widths and connections to do it
pretty interesting
can someone explain the difference between pushrod and pullrod suspension
why choose one over the other, other than the fact that pull rod has a lower centre of gravity
Look on YouTube, many useful vids
The first 1000 people to use this link will get a free trial of Skillshare Premium Membership: https://skl.sh/chainbear02211
Suspension! A bouncy enigma! Even more so in F1 as you can't really see any of it - it's all hidden and tiny inside the nose. So let's have a look at what suspension is, why we need it and how F1 cars' suspension is desig...
They're on top halfly because of rules, and halfly to keep a specific valve angle to get combustion chamber volume exactly how they want
The shape of them is a venturi type shape, and their purpose of length is to have the air pressure waves that bounce back and forth when the valve is closed to bounce into the engine when the valve is open, at the right revs where you need it
This can also be played with with variable length intakes where the band can change based on the engine speed for a wider torque/power band also
That's why Can-Am V8's have huge ones, because their revs for a race engine were relatively low so the "resonance" per se to get the best airflow for peak power was lower
We're on home territory here, but doesn't mean I can't still break down all the details of the Mercedes W13! At first glance many people have been uninspired by the more or less carryover of the rear bodywork, however this car is all about the details.
00:00 Introduction
01:08 Renders vs Real Car
02:04 Front Wing
07:29 Mid Floor
14:10 Cooling...
Welp those waves create vortices and these vortices in turn literally seal the floor allowing no exit of air from the sides which is very useful and effective and thus increases the power of ground effect
Nvm you got the video 
I just read something on the internet about F1 planning to dump the MGU-H in 2026
they also want to increase electric power of the PU up to 50% of the entire power
Well 350kw
that'll power 2 family saloons along quite nicely
Which is 470bhp
and they said F1 would switch to E-fuels entirely? cuz that sounds a bit untrue to me
is this really the plan?
since that would be a massive step to carbon neutrality
What's the problem with 100% Bios?
I have no problem with them, I just thought that it'd need a major restructuring of the PU
quite surprising to me
Well yes but the massive restructuring would be in other changes also
Afaik they still wanna stick with the 1.6 V6
Oh yeah
great step forward to become really sustainable
Especially if they find the right mix and don't get too argumentative on refuelling or whatever
would bio fuels with the technology of today and the fuel consumption of this year's cars need refuelling?
Well less that, and more the fact that all the alcohol chains that're used for Fuels have less energy density, and are ran richer
Hence the emphasis on mix
ahh i see
so if one team finds an op mix of fuel it'll go VROOOOOM while the others just go vroom?
Well I assume they'd have moreorless the same mix
But just if you can get it to allow for a good variance in mileage rather than just SAVE FYOOL, SAYV FYOUOL
Good
Maybe the biggest takeaway is how Ferrari’s design (contrary to popular believe) shows 11% reduction in drag vs the base model (when everyone’s CFD eyes thought the concept was draggy)… The model’s aren’t perfect, but they do help understand what is been trying to achieve https://t.co/7q8OGrP9dr
no MGU-H = regular turbos = wastegates actually being used = potentially even better sound
unless you take into account the fact Ethanol is very far from anything "bio" to make
Which one here is more draggy
"base"
Wdym?
you can see on the Ferrari model how it's pushing around the air and high pressure out of the rear wheels
In the feed, there's a second pic of the floor, and there's significantly less wake at the abck
the vids this guy makes are so good
Well he was an aero geez for Merc until 2020
I watch all of his videos about car the car reveals, very informative
Inb4 lacking downforce like 2019
Ohno
Not good
But from this read it seems like they will still get downforce, especially at the rear
Might be wrong tho
you can reduce drag but still make good downforce
Reading from the f1technical Reddit site seems like this article is not accurate at all.
I'm just basing it on comments tbh😂
it's said that it's an approximate 3D model, so it's just indicative
and it's compared to the generic model, which is likely not the best interpretation of the rules
it does show though that the Ferrari sidepod design could work, instead of everywhere ruling it as looking draggy or unefficient
Well at the end of the day we truly know when the cars hit on track
Put more drag on the cars rear to compensate. /s
Breaking news Sebastian Vettel returns to Ferrari
Yeahh
my galactic brain totally understands what's going on in this image
totally
Yes, this is just advanced colouring in, nothing complicated
okay i suppose it's something to do with the outwash coming off the rear wheels or something
interesting louvres
From where did u get this image?
there's quite a bit common with the ferrari
I mean yeah they do receive few components from Ferrari
Y edte es la comparativa del render de la presentación con el coche que hoy ha rodado en Barcelona.
And this is the comparission between the launch render and the real car that run today in Barcelona.
#F12022 https://t.co/baEWiPOhCm
321
so basically
We have
The Ferrari-fied Haas, and the actual Haas
Is the upper pipe the one that usually acts as the wastegate?
They don't have to run dual wastegate pipes anymore?
Detached shark fin
Interesting
Interesting yet weird design
all into one exhaust now
they can run either 1 or 2
To accommodate the louvres on the back, I'm guessing
makes sense
front wing and rear wing seem more T H I C C now
that might be the perspective idk
.
and those intakes though
Congrats @merry delta, you're now on lap 5
Looks like the MCL 36 got some small turning vanes down there
Maybe someone can upscale this
@balmy heath
mhm
thats interesting
how small they are
but also looks neat
good outwash probably
yeah, maybe you can upscale it a bit xD
i think that they are trying to seal the floor with them
Should I try
Yeah I mean why not
Their siedpod looks crazy
Oh fuck off
Just a sec
1: Their sidepod is REALLY interesting
2: Have they got 2 long of those "tings" at the bargeboard
We will see, its for shure a completely different aproach
“Today's leader in the "most impressive rake" during winter testing so far is @ScuderiaFerrari , with this one! #F1 #F1Testing @Circuitcat_eng https://t.co/2rKXHzWFhl“
“Primeras fotos de la nueva unidad de potencia Renault del @AlpineF1Team A522 que lleva el turbo dividido.
First pictures of the new Renault Power Unit on the Alpine #A522 with split turbo.
#F12022
👁🏎 https://t.co/ORnUQrd6vi“
959
108
owo
Why do you guys think merc and Ferrari went for a longer nose than other teams

RB has the AM nose concept
Yeah
well it probably just suits their philosophy better. its about the compatibility of the wing, with the sidepods, with the diffuser. i mean, they all work together, so even if doesnt work, you cant blame one single part. its the combination of all the parts
Cool thanks
whats the alfa romeos chassie called
C42 apparently
i thought this was u @civic hedge 
smh same pfp
me too 💀
same pfp
same role
when the guy in the pfp is gr8 several will put it 
does anyone know why none of the 2022 cars have these aerodynamic nose fins?
if i remember correctly, they were only used from 2019-2021
why do the new cars have front mud guards now?
Does anyone have a video or an explanation to why redbull may have done this
They aren't. they help the airflow better over the tyre
nope maybe race will have one tomorrow
Yeah it looks so different almost looks as if it's unfinished lol
probably because it is unfinished lol
How do you know that
I think it measures dirty air
Because the 2022 Cars don't have Bargeboards, the Winglets were used to divert the surrounding Airflow and send it to the bargeboards.
are you sure? do you know where i can learn more about it on YouTube or the F1 website?
I saw a video, when in dirty air, the thing shakes vigorously, but in clean air it stays still
oh, are you able to send me the video?
I can’t find it sorry
i remember some people said those things were flexing for better performance
Jeez what is that gigantic undercut
I think @vale grove is talking about the thin metallic antenna sticking up in front. The wings are used like shawk said to divert air to the bargeboards
Yeah I forgot the name
ohhh, thanks
thank you
is this entire missing piece called a bargeboard?
or is it something else?
Yep
Also part of the floor
Apparently half a Red Bull is still a faster car than a full Haas
Teams such as redbull, ferrari and mclaren have found loopholes in the regulations regarding the front noses - Mercedes and aston martin have chosen not to modify them (as of now)
It is very interesting
Hard to tell for mclaren and alpha tauri, but they’ve altered it
Mercedes, alpine, aston, Williams & haas have made no changes
Loophole how?
^ theres where he got it from
No I got it from sky f1 directly
Meh, not sure detachable nose counts as a loophole, not with regards to performance anyway
That’s how sky described it
As a loophole in the regulations
Latifi- "the vision is limited"
no
no
can you expand on your answer?
It's a good way to avoid the lengthy process of crash tests while developing the nose for sure
why is there wheel fins on the front wheel but not rears?
these things
cant figure out the correct term for them. i forgot
Simple question, what is the exact purpose of the grates behind the wheels? I know they are for aerodynamic purposes, but are they actively collecting data? Or just there to make the airflow go somewhere

For management of airflow around the tyres, not on the rears because they don't matter
They do to the car behind though. Which I imagine is the reason. If you want cars to follow then you don’t want to pull the weird tyre wake downwards into the car behind when the rest of the regs are trying to push wake upwards
Iirc the Ferrari f1-75’s wake may not facilitate the same effect
Mercedes’ sidepod design looks like it’s taken a lot of inspiration from the 2021 car imo
Very very similar
They're called Aero rakes, and they all have mini pitotubes to measure air speed and pressure in order to see how well the Airflow in real conditions matches their CFD, and by extension how well the package actually performs
Ferraris sidepods
Can the porpoising ever throw a driver out of balance under race conditions?
what do you mean by out of balance
I mean i'd imagine they'd maybe get a some headaches due to the shaking
maybe nausea
Like maybe snap oversteer, if the floor is damaged bad enough it could cause driving issues
Oh yeah
Oh yeah definitely
floors were being damaged im pretty sure
at testing
That’s strange, I hope it doesn’t creep up in future races as they’re seeing the problems now but I don’t know how they’d fix it
haas has the cuts too
Didn’t see that my bad
I couldnt find a good photo for haas
lol still russian then
Honestly why does that look pretty sick imo
Can someone tell me if haas has actually dropped uralkali or have they just removed it because of all the things that are Happening right now?
no official statements yet
but Uralkali has been removed from all Haas socials, website, trucks and cars
Well i can only see a repeat of 2019 with them not getting payed
I would like to see them get another F2 driver and recive there Sponsors or even someone from a differente motorsport all together and have a team collab
I hope they learned from that and made their sponsors pay upfront
But that wouldn't be a sponser then
You sign the contract with the team and then send the money right then and there for however long it is
That would be a like a license to use the sponsor
i'm pretty sure some of the teams do this with their sponsors
But that's maybe because they did multiple seasons together or they are a decent team
Yes it would, they are still paying you money, for their logo to be put on your car as advertisement
But in a finacial stand point, sponser's shouldn't do that
What if the team is awful or they screw up every race
aka every single sponsor that has sponsored haas from 2019 onwards
We've seen countless times that smaller teams end up getting fucked over by sponsors because they will pull out mid season, despite having an ongoing contract
then that smaller team has to spend even more money on lawsuits to get compensation which they may never see
williams
It would also depent on the type of sponser, if it's a car part sponsor(like rims, race equipment, fuel etc...), they could be spending some of the money they gain, on viewership of ther brand. But if it's a off-topic brand (brand that have low to no impact in F1 like uralkali or rich energy) they would be paying for only viewership, and that risk is, frankly unimaginable for a brand to take
But i get your point
the "off-topic" brands are some of the biggest ones you see in F1
AlphaTauri, 1&1, Oracle, Ceva, Gemini, FTX, INEOS, etc
But the teams are not really on "on the brim" teams
But for all i know, this season, anyone could have a super car
One team just need to find a loophole somewhere
And Boom! Merc 2.0
Do you think any teams will protest the Ferrari sidepods?
I don't see a massive advantage with the curved pods but would it increase dirty air?
Not really.
From amateur CFD models it seems to reduce alot of wake drag
It seems to not
anyone work in F1 here?
The most complex device to make an f1 car be slower, quicker, to be quicker overall

Brakes i suppose (man made it look like a Double Clutch
)
Fr lol
If any sort of aero device was banned including front wings and rear wings
What sort of implications would it cause to the cars
it would be a non-aero series
look at Formula Ford
you would just have a chassis on wheels, as one might expect
How did F1 not predict the car porpoising
they did
they did??
well it was present in the 80s when there was venturi tunnels
Why go ahead with a car that is porpoising
there's no reason it wouldn't reappear now
but like wouldn't they have driven the car like with the show car or something
to test if shit like that happens
No they haven’t driven a showcar
But driver’s aren’t really reporting any problems like I haven’t heard any driver say it’s really uncomfortable even tho it is but yk what I mean
But are the underfloore's durable enough to endure it between races
I mean teams have done full race distances during testing and we haven’t got any news about teams changing floors due to damage
So I’m guessing the floors can take it🤷♂️
I think that the porpoising is going to be a problem on overtaking
Imagin going behind and right at the moment you turn, the car lift's
Ehh I mean yeah cuz porpoising makes the car unsettled so sudden steering movements (like in overtakes) can cause the car to lose control so drivers need to be careful
Car won’t lift
You’ve still got a lot of downforce from the rear wing
But if you’re following another car the slipstream will reduce the downforce which will also reduce porpoising 🤷♂️
