#battlefield-2042
1 messages · Page 1679 of 1
I don’t think the Villar Perosa has a bipod
Irl it does
Oh, yeah ofc
It's not very useful, but it does have one
Yeah
Yeah I got confused cause I saw Ian shoot it and go huh
The one in the game is not a real villar perosa
It’s a fake one from a movie
Has like an MG42 pistol grip on it
I just want the next game to have an AN94
I want a full auto FAL.
I need my stupid high rof bursts
give me fully automatic battle rifles, I don't care if they were rarely used like that, it would be cool and fun.
G3 bb
We had two full auto fals in battlefield hardline
SA 58 osw and the fn fal.
That was wild.
We did. But Hardline is dead on PC so
I'd love to see a black ops 2 AN94 where the initial burst isn't a hyper burst but it's mediated with a faster fully automatic?
My point still stands.
Well the way it shoots irl is that it fires the first 2 rounds at 1200 then goes down to what, 650 or something
I think BO2 one does that
It’s such a stupid gun. But that’s why I love it
Nah black ops 2 it's 900 rpm for the first two rounds and it's a fast auto.
I think 650.
?
900 then to 650
I remember stealing some dudes mg42 on vanguard and just beaming some poor bastards on 3200 dpi lamo
Evo is cool.
m5a3 with attachments fires faster with significantly less recoil and spread
Shut up dude.
I hope Bo6 doesn’t have AEK
man's actively refusing to see logic that's crazy
shoot back? then they are also inaccurate, but yeah suppression increasing spread is stupid, should just blurry your vision and maybe lose hearing for a bit
AEK traumas > logic
Get over yourself.
It is not the only gun I do it too
BF4 was 11 years ago and it's not even good in this game.
they're not going to cause Bo1 is an old ass game
the FAMAS isn't even in Bo6.
besides shut up we're in a battlefield discord
OMFG IF THEY ADD AEK
SHUT UP ABOUT THE AEK
IT HASN'T BEEN A GOOD GUN IN A BF GAME IN 11 YEARS, GET OVER IT
I’m gonna play both bo6 and bf6
Funny they’re both 6
But if one game has that fucjing gun
So funny that people trying to shoot back when using the svk is like the worst possible option
2 shots and even standing still is asking to get killed
Don't know how they nerfed the g428 and never the svk
svk is gofd
Is it possible to drop an ammo box inside the helicopter while being inside it?
How do you get inside the ammo box? 
No
😔
If I drop Angel's crate down and switch to Engineer to try to benefit from the replenishing supplies, will the crate disappear or shorten its lifespan?
Pretty sure it'd disappear

What I want is a way to make Angel useful on Redacted
Irish is my go-to on Readacted because it's nade spam central.
Im looking for team mates 😭
avatar checks out
AI was a mistake
Hey!
Draugur was a mistake
Hi guys do you Know somewhere I can find good weapons and loadouts ? Getting tired of being blasted everytime
clearing out opps
@untold flower bro vehicle superiority is out good for training
if you don't join some noob ass randoms flying and doing an airshow crash
rack up free kills ong
can someone help me to fix crash with bf2042, crashed graphics card try reinstalling latest driver
You're the free kill
go in the wildcat and i'll still fold you with the apache
I don't play bf2069
wuss

blud came here to yap but wuss out lmao
automatic L bud @hard jay
stay outta the franchise
xd
Play bf1 noob
so cumminity servers. seem odd. whats this about bots and grinding rank and what not? i thought the mastery level and everything in bot lobbies was capped ?
Yo I’ll train attack heli
I’m liking it
That way my gunner can train too
you can burst down a wildcat with your co pilot in 1 strafe ngl
consider your duo is capable as you
your duo is the reason why you can get kills since he can spot for you
if he's on the same squad tho
Wow big achievement
Is bf2042 still Active? Pc Europe
has players, yes
I want To Play bf2042 again Till the new Battlefield Release
But only if There Are Players
Very active, matches fast lots of players
This whole hurricane thing is a bf2042 reference
guys how many helis can there be in a game
Year 2025 is a bo2 reference
Bo2 will be real
Off my memory in 128 Conquest it’s like 2 attack and 1-2 transport
I always found it amusing the devs were making a game and in the plot line it predicts Europe will fail and countries like Germany will go defunct 😂 almost sad in a way but good art and portraying a real problem which will be the biggest society has ever dealt with since its inception
anyone got advice for Attack heli
when you press the F key to finish the enemy off with “style” is it just me or are most of the finishes repeated? because... I've seen a few scenes in which players have finished others off in a humiliating way but whenever I go to finish them off with a golden key, it's honestly a few finishes that discourage me.
What?
M416 too I think?
least it’s not MW3 storyline
Russians invade all the way into Paris
Maybe they have a different melee weapon?
so apparently you're not supposed to use only the yaw axis when making turns as a jet ?
Just you bud
But does the type of weapon you are using influence it? It's because in the game's trailer, for example, it only showed a specialist finishing an enemy with a knife
what did you mean by that 
You choose the long form assassination style in your character or whatever there is cattle prod and others
If you’re saying some are too brutal just be thankful it ain’t Muammar Gaddafi style with a sword in the a**hole
1400 hours in game btw
melee weapons can be unlocked with purchasing various cosmetics
there aren't a whole lot of melee weapons in the game
something ea/dice forgot perhaps
each weapon comes with its finisher animation, in fact it's the biggest part of the whole melee weapon
not all finishers are made equal either
You need to provide more info as to what you are talking about, who is 1400 hours in game and literally what are you talking about?
some animations are quicker than others
some leave you more exposed than others, etc
in fact the default finisher is one of the best ones
Gotta be the most cryptic message I’ve ever seen who just leaves little cryptic tidbits in a G.D. BF2042 discord server chat out of nowhere, you must be AI !
This dude repeatedly says the most insane things in this server that could be answered by a child with minimal critical thinking skills. He has 1400 hours in 2042
@minor stream
I can't believe bloody COD has better takedown animations
Aside from the outright dumb ones
I read your message and I kinda figured context that was what you meant, but still was vague I was like what… my apologies for over roasting
If you aren't very active in the chat and you see his messages it will be confusing when you see the responses people give him tbh
Troll or struggling mind? If the former I almost want to give him sympathy point and peers
answers*
I hope the Gaddafi reference was fun at least
He has a very bad case of the skill issues
Lmao
No cure yet
how can you go 1400 hours and only just learn about assassination animations
He recently asked about why there is a hand potion when picking up ammo
Kinda crazy to go that long and just now run over an ammo box
Genuine or troll is the real question here. I’m not saying genuinely “confused” is far-fetched, but my Lord:
.
He is from Brazil and uses translate but I don't dog on him for the mistranslation
Okay still even with translation he barely asked correctly if backstab assassinations were random or chosen and then he expressed a sort of disturbance with not liking some hence my Gaddafi joke
Doubt he would understand the reference anyway
It’s a pretty decent reference imo but potentially niche yeah
Bayonet in the booody hole for Muammar Gaddafi @void gorge if you are disturbed by Sundance smacking someone in the face with cattle prod just be glad you weren’t one of the fighters witnessing Gaddafi’s brutal “assassination”
to be honest finishers are kinda anecdotal
I do have some finisher skins but I don't even equip them because they're worse than the base one, for gameplay
I think it’s more of a lack of exploring and learning after 1400 hours imo
I think in my hundreds of hours, I've only been assassinated a few times, and I remember only once being done with non-default skin
of course
True tho
I mean it could be a bought account.. who knows
@void gorge how you doin’ bud?
Idk your hypothesis there is kind of far fetched it’s a really confused person who does not speak English but not speaking English is not the only issue imo
He's had some interesting talks on ea forums that led to being banned on them i believe as well
I mean hey the more I hear, the funnier the gets.
it gets* thank you for extra info
For what?
I’m just wondering in response to what
Someone saying he doesn’t know how to drive the CAV or somethin?
Being banned on ea forums is one reason I think
Oh okay lawsuit for discrimination
I didn't witness that stuff personally tho
Tbh I feel like I’m learning of a new character
https://twitch.tv/bluedartgaming1559
wanna see me get done over n laugh lol
Others have said he threatened first though
Lol
I have run into quite a number of characters since I started playing BF 2042 so I’m kind of hype hearing about yet another character
Tbh I’m a bit of a character in Breakthrough when I say my team is doing horrible but ya know when the match time is 8 minutes it’s hard to argue that I’m not being truthful
He also got banned in a battlefield easter eggs discord server??? I think
Funny. I mean hey I slapped him with the at sign so we’ll see what his Gaddafi response is if any .
If i were in his shoes, I would not take the time to translate this entire convo
Okay I’m understanding a bit more when you put it that way
Responses are usually a few hours/day later as well
More of a creature than a character it sounds like, wowza.
Thank you for the lore
If I was playing Dragon Ball Sparking Zero and tried hopping into Japanese game forums that I did not understand, just seems strange the question is if you can choose assassination attempts and not liking a couple of the options? And then not following up timely, but potentially in days?? I mean hey I’m not working in the current moment since the assets I own generate enough income, but I will give my honest: “wtf?”
Glad I was around to tell him to get over the ones he didn’t prefer since they aren’t as bad as Gaddafi, and honestly if he gives a take on our analysis of himself that would be 👌🏼
Anybody playing?
Did you say I can choose how to finish the enemy? but where do I choose? because as far as I know the game doesn't allow you to choose, for example, a standard way to finish and this is frustrating for a big game like 2042
Yeah
You said that maybe dice/EA forgot, another thing that the developers must have forgotten to do differently is the effects on the map and I say this because not to mention the discouraging repetition of maps in the main mode, the other day, in the game chat, a player complained that generally on maps there is only the effect of the tornado destroying everything in its path, although I think the effect of the tornado is spectacular, especially when the effect of the tornado dragging and taking heavy things like containers to the sky is spectacular, but I also very much agree that it is boring because the only maps that have different effects are orbital, rubble and melt
The fact that I have almost 2 thousand hours played doesn't mean that I know everything my dear and I bet you don't know everything either and if you do, I ask you to please tell me exactly everything
Idk
I know everything but I'm not telling
@void gorge do you think they should remove the AEK?
it’s too op
AEK =ban was my server rul es back then
Crazy how the Dice writer will probably predict almost everything
Except the redacted stuff
crashing with new update, never happened before
How is Arica still like 0/10 even with frontlines lmao
did you try filling this out www.ea.com/complaintform ?
If there was an actual EA complaint form you have no idea how fast i'd get fucking banned from there.
Not due to the sheer vitriol that I can provide.
But by how much complaints i'd be sending about LMGs, Ximmers and Smoke nades.
Oh and the BC2/Caspian maps.
Anyone know how to fix low bandwidth in?
I got 356kbps but my internet speed is 56mbps
And i got normal latency...
The playstation app allows you to send messages to other players yeah?
I’m pretty sure the game takes in what it needs
Because Rush in this game is genuinely bad.
The maps were not designed for it. And we dont have Rush only maps.
is that what breakthrough is supposed to be?
god I hope they bring back the Assault game mode from BF2
Strike at Karkand assault was my fall time favorite
Kinda sorta. Breakthrough is a nice gamemode. Fills a similar purpose.
There is no such mode in bf2? 🤔
Also I answered my own question.
The level of petty I have achieved.

What was 16 and 32 player Strike at Karkand called?
I swore it was Assault
Just normal conquest/coop 
ah, I thought it was called like Assault Conquest or something
I know Assault was in there somewhere lol
i see 🤔
it was an attack/defend mode, not a normal conquest mode
Its soo long ago, but i am sure it is only conquest/coop in bf2
Maybe mod or?
Isnt 356kbps too low tho?
🤔
Isn't it still normal conquest though?
technically, conquest assault, the assaulting team is bleeding
Funny enough it's all called assault when i check map file 
they have ot take flags in order to stop it
Ah yeah yeah
defending team isn't bleeding. They hold all the flags at the beginning of the round.
I used to play it comeptitively with a clan, it was so much fun
the immersion of defending and getting setup for the attackers coming...was just fun
I think rush spawned off of that mode
but I wish they would bring it back, conquest assault
It's only assault on that map actually
oh really?
Mhm
Could be interesting. If you ask me normal conquest is fine tbh 🤷
well normal conquest is different from assault lol
Yes 
I swear though there were more maps that had conquest assault
Let me check
I dont remember tbh, but i'll check
Also maybe #battlefield-legacy-titles
It’s the same for me I think
Interesting...
Bf2042 worth To buy? Still Many Players and everytime Full Lobbys?
Yes, everything depends on where you live and time of day tho
As with most games I guess..
Europe and at the evening
AEK
What about the AEK?
Dice remove
Eh. Much more unbalanced guns than the one AR without the LWG.
he‘s trolling, just look at this name 
I'm unsure if hes one of the other ones at-ing too since my notifs thing doesnt show the deleted ones.
And don't get me wrong, G57 is a stupid fucking gun. Its always a god damn Glock being the best handgun in the game.
If you can aim
which its not hard to aim
I had that name when 2042 came out
Haven’t bothered changing it
I mainly see BP50 from sweats/tryhards but even they cant kill without spamming the entire clip.
2042 pistols have nothing on bf3 g18
i miss the rex/mp443 from bf3, the portal stuff always sucks
the 2042 Rex is laughable
M1911 was nice there.
Not the portal's m1911.
Though bf1/5 has the best M1911 model in my opinion.
The BF1/5 Pistols felt like warcrimes.
It did feel like a proper platform for the .45 ACP.
Same how I feel about the desert eagle in 2042.
The 1911 and other pistols felt like actual guns and not backups in most shooters.
Unless it was the Kolibri.
The BP50 in 2042 is sadly just like the G57.
Spray and pray ask questions later
You needed the aftermath dlc for m1911?
At least when i'm on the receiving end of a BP50*
Yeah it feels like it was on the recieving end.
I love hipfiring with it and pacing it.
Cause fuck me the spread and recoil is terrible.
You can pretty much only fan it point blank.
i used pistols alot in tdm 
I used shotties or the PDWR in TDM as a support.
Yeah same. Difference between me and other last genners is that
I only need two shots max to kill someone at any given time and I don't spam unless I can pretty much knife a guy.
There's also the part of the low tick rate that really fucks everyone over.
Yeaaaaah
Btw anyone playing in i5 rtx 2060?
Heads up!
The following titles will be under maintenance for an hour this Tuesday, October 15th at 08:00 UTC.
▪️ #Battlefield 2042
▪️ Battlefield V
▪️ Star Wars™ Battlefront™ II
We anticipate online disruption across all console platforms during this time.
Still supporting SWBFII servers 
banger game
TotalFPS loves droids. So I get it 
Especially in 1 because the map design and effective ranges emphasised close combat, meaning that pistols and melee became hugely important
And when it came to close range effectiveness, only Assaults had primaries that excelled at that distance
So pistols actually stood a chance
I just wish SWBFII was crossplay. PC is sorta dead there now
Now if I want battlefront-type gameplay, I play the Galactic Contention mod in Squad lol
why does everyone forget how oppressive medic SLRs were
1907 factory 3 shot people anywhere at any range
In my experience, semi-auto weapons are heavily slept on by the player base. They’d rather use anything else
Even when an entire class is built around them
They’ll find the sole automatic option
lmao to this day people think the federov is OP when it's a slow 5btk at best
put it on assault or support and people would say it's dogshit
Remember that most players kinda suck
And the point of the fedorov is that it provides an automatic option for medics, but it isn’t supposed to outshine assaults or supports
It’s all part of the balance
Erm actually the cei rigotti and m1907 have select-fire automatics ☝️🤓
Eh you could tap fire that fast
Outside of BT
Yeah especially with the cei-rigotti
How does one spawn on a tower in Kaleidoscope ????
A bunch of snipers kept spawning on top of a tower altough I kept destroying their spawn becon
are they cheatin?
what tower?
you can
same as US home spawn
is it randomized?
no?
They must have a recon spawn beacon up there.
To get up there you can ziptie I believe/jump out of a jet
Or heli
oh yeah there is a zipline to the US spawn building roof
I completely forgot about the PDWR
Id say even faster
checking in on delta force and the devs are all-in on the tarkov-lite mode from the q&a stuff theyve done
there continues to be no competition for battlefield
is there a way to limit fps other than 60 and 144?
Which is funny given they’ve got a whole game for that exact experience
I don't know how to tell you because I don't understand it very well, but if "aek" is a weapon, then the logic would be to leave it in the game for people to take advantage of and also take advantage of the fact that you mentioned "ban", thankfully in main mode of the game that is not the portal, fortunately EA apparently removed the administration system that was in bf 4 and I say this because I have seen countless reports of people saying that sometimes they ended up being banned unnecessarily
Bruh

Should of just ended it after you said you didn't understand it very well

I know when to finish or not 
Not having played Battlefield since BF BC2, is there a video/thread to point me to for best start? I did a couple of searches here on the Discord prior to posting and didn't find anything specific.
you want to know what battlefield you should play after not playing since bc2?
bf4
bf1
bf4 for the fun battlefield only moments
bf1 for beautiful visuals
BF3 then skip to 2042
I am looking for direction on how best to start 2042 for someone who has never played it before.
starting the game for the first time puts you in an "i've never played battlefield before" style tutorial, otherwise just pick conquest or breakthrough from the main menu and play around
it's not significantly different from any other shooter and the games are drop in/drop out matchmaking so nobody's paying attention
there's also an option under the cq/bt categories to start a solo game vs bots, but the servers run at half speed in that mode and the game behaves a bit weird
If you've played any other battlefield game you're good to go already

I wouldn't recommend BT full of sweats to a new player
Conquest there's alot of new players there for him
Just like every other battlefield, the default guns are some of the best
Join a match late and see people in my squad with a tank on a building on hourglass
Of course the team is losing by a shit ton
Thought it was tk cause he's the only dude thst pings me in here
I’m getting ghost pinged too
This map was horrible after dice redid it and I say this because there are some flags that are very close to each other. Meanwhile, when you go to flags that are between the buildings, there is a huge space of sand there that could easily be used to leave the more "dynamic" game
Dude was yapping a storm telling the team where to go and what to do and ended up 3-8 with 2 caps
Certified bozo
Lol that's funny
What's your Game ID in BF 2042?
people say this, but the worse experience is playing against cq creatures who have 10k hours just sniping from the map edges
easily
and 2042 coincidentally has the maps that allow/encourage that behavior the most
i love dying not because the other guy was better, but because he was sitting 700m outside of the fight with a railgun and clicked once
People that are new are way more likely to be one of the bums that snipe on the edge of maps
80% of caspers that join my squad are like level 6
wow
matchmaking sucks tonight too
always throws me into whatever is available, and 99% (quite literally) are losing matches
guess I gotta queue 100 times to get that one match where my team is actually competent
redacted is such a terrible map
Shut the fuck up nobody cares
lol
I love redacted just be a tunnel rat fr
Even if you lose just disrespect people and then you win in the end
yeah lots of people who like locker room and stuff will like redacted
I personally hate that map a lot, even though visually it looks nice
I wish they increased projectile speed and damage for these launchers
I think their "logic" was that people got sniped from afar, so they wanted to prevent that. idk, maybe just don't camp?
not my problem that people with lack of situational awareness get taken out by a missile
Played a couple of hours with a friend I used to play BF BC2 with and we play the Valparaíso map in Portal mode. Wow! What a blast from the past. Had no idea this game was so much fun and that map was spot on.
Bf3 is my fav game but I went three years or so without playing it, that’s how I felt when i first got Noshar Canals in 2042
I don't buy it. I think they wanted to limit the effectiveness of dumbfire missiles against aircraft but didn't want to actually say it
Because they knew it'd be a deeply unpopular decision
Too bad the gameplay itself is not great
Don't forget they further nerfed missiles by putting in advanced detection systems on all vehicles.
Battlefield is still alive? I want back to game and wait for new BF
2042 is pretty fun for what it is. it's lacking modes though.
plz uninstall minecraft
lol. I actually think there's not enough armor on the conquest maps in this game.
there's too much emphasis on infantry combat. If there were more armor, I think they game would get a little more strategic.
Battlefield should try to be Battlefield instead of a COD-lite.
Bro there's enough armor
What there isn't enough is brain cells
Too many idiots
People actually using soflam like it's useful
Javelin sucks and 90% of the time it's a boris using it so it's even worse
Meanwhile the recon gets to feel like they are contributing but nobody cares about locking on because it's dogshit
One of many reasons why recons are worthless to a team
every time I try to spawn a tank, it tells me it's all full. I look on the map, there's like one tank on our team for conquest. I'm simply saying, either there's a spawn timing issue with the armor, or something else, but the conquest mode in 2042 is very heavy on infantry. I don't play air, so I get it that there's other armor like the jets and choppers, but on the ground armor is scarce it seems to me.
I just remember the old BF games having much more armor on the maps, and the game wasn't just about infantry. Moreover, it's really exhausting to be running the majority of the time in conquest to get from spawn to some place of relevance. Old BF games had four wheelers and other vehicles constantly spawning so you could quickly get into the action.
anyway....just my late night thoughts.
ggs
what is bra saying
Javelin fucks when used with soflam
need chopers limited anti air flares:)
we have limited anti air missle they need limited flares
Except you don’t, aa missiles regenerate just the same as flares do
Assume he means stinger
One ammo box solves that
Infinite flares is fine, but the duration of them is a tad bit long
Can we get a ban on @stuck gust for pinging random people
No idea where to report
Guy left the server earlier and did again now fyi
#how-to-report-and-appeal > create ticket
Seems like an old discord user that's been here since the beginning when discord was kind of shitty and is extremely bored nowadays so he's going around doing that stuff for fun
who pinged me??
Me

The ghost of battlefield past
Can we talk about the fact we have to wait around a year without new content for the new game
The game is still fun bro
But for a year tho
Yeah.
Doesn't matter to me
I only hop on to torture other players
oh I didn't even realized that, since I don't use vehicles too much. What were those "advanced detection systems"?
It can detect whether you're merely locked on or a missile is deployed.
So, the SOFLAM and lock-on missiles can no longer juke vehicles in deploying flares and smokes.
I don't use vehicles either, but I think it can tell if it's a SOFLAM too.
Though, only the pilot can see the difference, so they will deploy their anti-missile systems early because their passengers will bail if the lock-on sound goes on for too long and they don't want that to happen.
Do passengers even hear lock ons anymore tho. Wasn't that removed long ago?
God I hope the next game is good so I can get off this shitheap
Problem is most of the problems I have with it in terms of gameplay are endemic to modern settings
if it isn't then it's another 3 years of titanfall for me
tbf I do still play bf4 so not all is lost
fortunately for me I don't have the same gripes as you
and I will still say this
BF games should have had bots for solo mode
even cod base made custom client and mod support for this crap
i enjoy mw3 and bo2 now
at least they've actually considered it now
I reckon there's a high chance they'll be in the next one
its not even that fantastic
you cant even switch godamn team
how sad
I actually stopped playing 2042
based on what was said 10 minutes ago, yes
Oh I don't read back most times
at this point, if i NEED to play a shooter i'll hop into the primordial soup that is half-life deathmatch
im so tired of modern shooters being built for toddlers and having no mechanics/nothing to learn
Facts
I'm kinda tempted to try old quake
otherwise i've been treating oldschool runescape as the fps waiting room
champions is fun but it's getting harder to find matches
i suppose its too late to ask if qc is fixed now lol
my only playtime is way back when the netcode was fucked and your rockets would fire where you were looking a second ago
I only got into it about a year ago and it seemed mostly fine
bro come on
This is battlefield 2042


if you're on console or in EU sure, if you're on PC or in NA run away
never pay full price though
Whats wrong with NA? its competitiveness keeps the game fun
low playerbase, difficulty in finding more than one active lobby per gamemode
I find plenty of lobbies 
We have the highest
Crossplay is a thing you know
do people actually prefer bots in multiplayer matches
I understand them for just a firing range mode
but filling matches is kinda lame and I dont want it to be returned
Me personally meh. But in 2042. It’s good for easy kills for unlockables
turns the game into like a MMO destiny equivilant lol
I main destiny 
yeah and every time i back out of a hard lost defense breakthrough lobby, i have to wait 5 minutes for it to end or else i get put in a bunch of empty games
At most I waited a 30s. But most modes it’s insta match
and EU has always always had more players in every BF game historically
That's cause there's a bunch of full lobbies you can't join
uh huh
Yes
That to
why not add a queue similar to bf4
Doing that is a thing in the past
same with the leaderboard
You can be sitting in a queue for ages 
for 64 lobbies? someone will d/c after a couple minutes
most matches are filled with bots too
i keep tryin to give 2042 a chance, but I just end up leaving after 15 minutes
not scratchin my itch
I noticed on BF1/V. the server browser top server in NA normally have 5-12 people and queue and the server below it have 2-3x less 
Real players replace bots. Bots is just there temporarily till it’s full of real players
then why are queue times so long
Prob because all the matches are full. So it tries to make a whole new server. So it can’t fit you into one
its impossible for matches to be full with 64 or 128 players
It’s cross play. How is it impossible
you tell me, i jump into queues and see the exact same shit
What is the same?
because most servers are filled with bots indicating its not full. and the turnover of people leaving and joining should keep the queue times low. in bf4, I can select a server and wait under a minute to join
Bots don't exist
I told you. People replace bots
If the server is full. Means it don’t have bots
It’s self explanatory
I’m not circling back in this convo
Asked the same exact question earlier
I think you are failing to see your circle fallacy
How?
the conclusion is the match making system in bf2042 is poor
You asked the same question again
the 50/50 bot lobbies are cursed to never backfill for some reason
^^^
the vast majority of my lobbies have bots
indicating the server is not full
hence, queue times should be fast, because its proven that all lobbies aren't packed at 100% capacity.
That's your conclusion
2042 is goated
correct!
my counterexample is steam player counts
12,067
playing 2 min ago
12 battlefieldillion players on console obviously
hahaha
we need to put bf2042 to rest
it had a good run

cheers to the next battlefield being a decent modern shooter!
never ask a 2042 player what the steam numbers looked like 3 months after their major AAA multiplayer title launched
I genuinely wonder what happens to the franchise if the next battlefield flops
The revenue loss will impact any research and development of future games and the loss of a customer base is going to be brutal
bf5 was good??
"i had fun" and "it's a good game" are very different, we have a massive back catalog of posts about 5.2 and spread-to-recoil for proof
and the maps... not 2042 bad yet, but pretty bad
Why is the list of recent player only 30 players? In a franchise that’s has had 64 player matches since forever? And in a game with even 128 player matches?
Was reporting a aimbotter who was not hiding it at all, spamming smokes and headshotting everyone through it (second one this week) and before I could press send the round ended and the game forcefully closed the report and now I can’t do it in the menu as they are not in the recent players list of 30 players.

legacy feature sorry
speaking of legacy... fucked up how you can still have origin installed and it works better than the EA app ever did
remember when origin was THE shitty unwanted 3p launcher? how far we've fallen
no condor in BT anymore ? new helicopter kinda suck 😢
just one major gripe issue- no AI bots for multiplayer
attackers really didn't need the help with these BT layouts and ground vehicles, but yeah it's a 3-years-too-late kinda weird change
stop
Ngl, not really super fan of those maps but it's the best ones for CQC in the game
if I could burn Redacted in a bonfire, I would.
Barely any strats in those 2 maps.
You know what's really bad? I came here to vent that and I didn't even realize you guys were actively discussing it

it just drains any sense of fun or accomplishment from me
I just exit the match if I see it coming up.
it came up on TDM Chaos last night and I thought it was a joke. It wasn't. immediate qtd
64 people on a sliver of the map all fighting over whoever gets to sit on top of the trailers with thermal scopes
wee

Redacted wishes it was Operation Underground
And Stadium is just dogshit from top to bottom
The map archetype in general is garbage
But if I had to have one it’d be Fort De Vaux
Paracel pls.
Other way around
this has been said multiple times by various sources iirc but
rushed development time, aprox 9-10 months i think
confusing leadership
game was originally a BR
leadership wanted to chase trends
I think 128 players should be a separate mode, not the main game
i would like to see BF2025 have one map on a conquest large mode with 128p
throwback to the 2042 beta when they said the game was "ahead of schedule" and "this is an old build so it has some bugs"
they're done with 128 outside of whatever the battle royale is supposed to be
and thank god tbh
aged so well didnt it
I sure hope dice learned from their mistakes!
surely seems like it

we've been praying on a "learn from their mistakes" arc for like 3-4 releases now
i'm not convinced vince zampella is the hot shit everyone else thinks he is
titanfall's core gunplay was very meh and apex was a chased trend that just happened to be successful
I love titanfall but this is someone completely new when it comes to leading battlefield projects
So who knows what’ll happen
And the person leading the franchise isnt going to have all that much say over how its gunplay feels
One thing I’ve always wondered is how much of a say the lead lead guy has in the different departments. Like they’ve got lead vehicle / weapon designers, would Vince just tell them a rough idea and let them work? Or is it more of a ‘here’s what we think would work, what do you think?
lowkey loved the beta dont ask
i am asking
because it was just the launch build but they pretended it wasnt
They did a great job
2042 is 10/10 now
The historic battlefield fans are mad because they didn't turn bfv and bf1 into a perfect fps like they did with 2042
bf4> 2042
i'm starting to warm up to these shitposts
maybe i shouldnt because people might start believing it
Bf1 is pretty fire tho, literally
Dumpster fire
ok but what is the gameplay like?
sweet spot snipers, gas nades, fire nades, nade spam, heavy bomber and light tank farmers, range compressing all the automatics and then dumping medic SLRs in the game...
no movement, no peeking ability, no outplay
I never said It didn’t have flaws, but I like the game because of WW1 and its goofy
But I wasn’t talking abt the looks, I’m just talking about it being goofy and unrealistic with a lot
i will say bf1 had some of the best maps in the franchise, russian dlc aside
Oh yea, Russian maps are garbage
Personally I doubt people like Vince Z. would have, or need to have input on things like these.
The reason a team member is given a lead role, is that they are meant to be trusted to lead that team. Teams generally dont work well when a higher up is allowed to interfere/change things on a whym. Not that they wouldn't be allowed some freedom to suggest changes/improvements, especially if said higher up has actual game dev/Design experience like Vince would
just got the game
i have 7.1 surround headphones
in audio settings should i set to surround and headphones
or use the 3d binural surround
Besides that, anyone down to play?
3d binaural audio
idk i just enjoyed it
So I assume the lead sets the tone and goals for what he wants made at the very least, or else it would be a mishmash of different design philosophies among teams
I just remembered i have the art book for BF1.
so that's cool.
I think it came with an OST CD. I lost that.
sad 😞
and as you lie on your death bed, years from now. you'll look up with tears running down your face and whisper "if only...I could hear...the BF1 soundtrack..." You're doomed
😔
I have screenshots of the ghost pinger
battlefield 2042 good
Can we get rush of ages to stay perm daily? please!
Hey
People who don't attempt objectives need to be flagged as bots honestly lmao
Literally watched an entire team refuse to even look at a MCOM in Frontlines.
you mean 90% of the players that just brrrrr people in the most populated spot
and dont even bother going to flank and get a 7 kill streak on players like that
more of em please
my kd would be crap without them haha
I'm not even worried about flanks because most people just dont. Majority of last genners play worse than bots.
And I mean that genuinely.
Most of my deaths are from bots. Lmao
yeah but then you have to answer questions like "what counts as attempting an objective, exactly?"
because killing players is technically helping with the objective.
The more players that are dead, the less players that are alive to say, defend an objective
How do you define that in a way that a game mechanic would recognize it accurately?
Most players struggle to hit anything over 20 kills, so players who sit in weird corners or prone in the weirdest spots away from any fight or objective might as well not even be playing the game, as their impact is less than meaningless.
Those players would not be helpful even if they were trying to actively cap/take objectives.
Labelling them as bots would not help anything.
I am one of the players who does the whole "The enemy cant capture a point if theyre dead" thing. Because I do genuinely hit 30-60 kills per game (depends on the length of the game) with ease.
However to say I don't objective is wrong.
And last gen only gets 64.
Ahh.
I wish we had a 128 mode.
It would run like ass if it did.
My stats would be so much higher lmao
it would run like ass so probably not
Eh new genners can play on last gen
And I doubt itd genuinely run worse. Maybe 5-10 FPS drops in certain places.
The issue would be the load times.
load times, larger maps, more players to render.
it would run worse.
probably the reason they scrapped 128 on last gen in the first place.
tbh, 128 wasn't a great idea anyway
Don't even need the larger maps, most of the map on 64 is rarely used if ever.
Itd be more chaotic sure but thats the point. Even if the maps were bigger: People conglomerate to certain areas regardless
but even if it were limited to 64, 2042 probably wouldn't have been good.
Its just the maps tbh
it is not just the maps
128 players can work in a game like Battlefield. But 2042 was not the game to push the limits.
nah, we don't need 128 players. 64 is fine. we just need better maps.
We also need a better game.
128 can work, especially considering maps like Giants from BF4 is literally too big for 64
Dice has a bad habit of making these huge ass maps for 64 players IMO
nah, honestly just make smaller and more focused maps for 64.
That'd be fine but i'd still want 128 modes. Havent seen why its an issue outside of performance for some.
Which at that point its Planetside 2 again. Except we get actual optional modes to play with less
something about Frontlines I can't get behind in comparison to Rush.
Like, I don't see any value in stuffing a ton of players in a server.
People don't push nor defend MCOMs all that well now. Early days itd be chaotic on MCOM
Its chaotic. Its fun.
More people to shoot = more dopamine for me
Chaotic doesn't always = fun, that's entirely subjective. BF needs more variety of combat other than infantry.
as someone who regularly wants to die playing a 64 player Locker server, I generally disagree.
More chances of finding someone instead of possibly running to find maybe one guy every 3 minutes outside of main heat point areas
I think infantry combat needs to be more interesting.
in what way?
Locker is kinda meh anyways.
look at BF4, for instance.
Locker is genuinely worse than Reclaimed IMO.
Locker is fine if you're on a decent server playing against decent people.
BF4 had more variety of armor/vehicles in combination with infantry, so the battles were more robust instead of being a COD 2.0
I mean i guess but I don't really care about vehicle gameplay I literally just run infantry.
Locker has the issue of having too many flanks or too much congestion in certain areas which leads to forever stalemates.
Reclaimed has less flanks, much larger areas of contest and typically has better flow than the average Locker map
Also to this day people exploit on Locker.
thing is though, if you're playing anything more than 32v32, the game is always going to be chaotic and unorganized. Beyond 64 players, it's just people wanting an immersion simulator of feeling like they're in some big war.
what do you mean?
Almost every time I played on Locker, there was someone in the outside walls or under some stairs.
To which I would tell those people that they're playing the wrong game.
yeah, but if you want a Battlefield experience that's strategic and more organic/focused, 16v16 max, each side gets equal armor on conquest maps, and increase the spawn rate of the armor, so you have a balance between infantry/armor combat. Makes for better game experiences and outcomes.
That's bannable by BF4DB if reported.
For me its just wanting to scratch that Planetside itch
I've never seen that personally due to that policy.
I never played planet side
I dont think Xbox 360 servers care or follow that policy considering server admins can be present and not ban abusers
ah well there's your problem
Id say do it now but its sadly nearing its death bed.
It was amazing in its prime.
500vs500vs500 or more.
don't play battlefield on last gen
360/Xbox one really.
I forgot what the gamepass version is
Regardless, exploiters arent banned ever even when reported
genuinely just play BF4 on PC
Too poor to afford a PC lmao
well i can't help with that.
Not even the government can at this rate considering I have yet to find a fucking job.
Doesnt help that i'm out in the country now and I dont have a vehicle 🤭
Also just copy Planetside 2 gameplay/gunplay for 128+ players.
No one should be able to hold down M1 besides Miniguns 😤
how do you even know what the hell is going on in a game like that?
It's very abstracted iirc, like the map is sectioned off and there's a bunch of smaller maps that are interconnected.
Thats the neat part. Eventually you become so fucking jaded/attuned to the Sensory Overload that you start playing the game like a normal person.
Its like Battlefield. Positioning, map knowledge, gun skill and audio queues.
ah. im not a fan of just mass amounts of players. I used to play BF2 with 8v8s and 16v16, I rarely went above the 32 player maps.
I prefer organized battles where you feel part of the team and you're actually working together.
I am not impressed by massive maps or stuffing a lot of people onto a map.
Battlebit proved to me that just because you can fit 256 players onto a map does not mean you should do that.
Dont get me wrong, alot of the bases in Planetside 2 are literally fit for 48 players MAX
But theres a certain chaotic joy seeing 200 mother fuckers in a single room
Peak gameplay was during the early days where droves of people would rush to the other bases on foot. Seeing hundreds of infantry and tanks coming at you.
Esamirs rework was also this but with construction, so you had constantly changing lines in this one area. Bases quickly being constructed to continue fighting.
Yeah its not for everyone. Nothing you do truly matters in Planetside. Even to the competitive level.
However, I liked the sandbox. I liked dicking around. And I liked 1v20 odds and winning
I think the population of people who played the old Battlefields, like BF1942, and BF2 are probably not really playing Battlefield anymore. The series got overwhelemed by COD players
Well yeah, cause BF came to console and therefore became a lot more arcadey in it's gameplay past BF3. And then BF4/Hardline/BF1 happened, and now the players that really liked and got really good at those games, mostly BF4, aren't playing Battlefield anymore either because DICE cannot keep a handle on what makes the games good and fun to play.
Reboot Battlefield 2. same maps, same modes, just reboot it. Start with that. Start all over with that.
they can't even keep the game functional, 2042's mouse input is busted.
As someone who got into Battlefield with 3, I genuinely think they need to bring back skill based gunplay.
It wasnt perfect in 3-4 but god damn needing to burst was so much more better than "Teehee M4 Shortbarrel go brrrt 80m"
why reboot BF2. Nobody is going to like BF2.
why wouldn't they like BF2?
If anything its either 2142 Reboot or a Coldwar era game.
is it the classes?
Classes, movement, gunplay, basically everything. You have to understand you're talking about people who either started playing BF when BF3 came out, or people who started playing BF when BFV came out.
Neither group of people are gonna really care for BF2.
BF2 is a different kind of game and that's why BF is the way it is after BF3.
eh, you could take BF2 and modernize it to today's gameplay mechanics.
yeah but then it'd annoy the people that like BF2.
BF 2 was more about the maps and modes to be honest. The classes and how you unlocked progression was good. Shooting was much more skillful.
Gulf of Oman was an amazing map
"Shooting was much more skillful" What do you mean?
was always a /shrug map for me.
the ballistics system was more realistic and simulated. bullet drop, etc.
I did play a bit of 2142 and yeah.
2142's gunplay, assuming its anything like BF2s: Is EXTREMELY archaic.
bullet drop is a thing that's never left the series though. Granted, bullet velocities are not realistic at all, but that's mostly done for gameplay/balancing reasons.
The gameplay itself is a little off. Still a great game but even I would rather be playing BF3-4 over 2142/BF2.
also, i don't see how realistic ballistics constitutes more skillful gunplay
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rn9oQR5k8WE this will look dated, but I think DICE could re-boot this in modern times. It's more the whole concept of everything. The commander mode and having a dedicated commander on the team providing drops/artillery strikes, etc. for the squads. Only being able to spawn on your squad leader, otherwise spawn back at base or a flag. There were a lot of awesome concepts in Battlefield 2.
BF4 had a commander mode. granted, it was done through a mobile app and the "commander" was never actually present in a match.
Tbh I dont like the commander option when its straight up a "UAV/Fuck this camper/Focus this good player with a minimap icon" sbility
teehee aek heavy barrel
Refractor era battlefields gameplay is primal as hell but it's expected cause they're older games.
iirc, wasn’t it much better in Hardline, like you had access to in game cameras?
Sorry last time I played Hardline was in 2020
I don't think having a playable commander really adds that much, anyway. At best it's an annoyance, at worst it's literally worthless.
Unless they give UAV to a player whos actually aware.
Then it turns into one girl with a AUG vs the entirety of China and winning.
yeah but then it's an annoyance.
Yeah. Commander mode genuinely needs something other than UAV and "Hey fuck THAT particular guy"
or it could just not be there. I think BF has been fine without it.
4 TDM games in a row with above 3 kd and even a 4kd game... all losses lmao
Game is a f-ing joke at balancing teams and the spawns are f-ing attrocious for a 3 year old game
that's just how it is sometimes.
TDM
Spawns are atrocious
yeah welcome to TDM
why are you surprised
Multi-million dollar game company can't fix a basic system on maps that are that massive
Too be fair the TDM maps arent that big
with all due respect, it's not as simple as you're thinking it is. Neither of the issues you mentioned are. if it were that simple, they wouldn't be there in the first place. TDM is an afterthought anyway, who cares.
Idk but I'm pretty sure even brain dead developers can figure out a system that doesn't spawn people literally into gun fire when there's an entire half of the map BEHIND the team that's spawn trapping
i donno why don't you figure it out then
Cause I don't want a career based on sitting behind a computer forever honestly
I said brain dead "developer" not anybody. And yeah, sitting in a room typing away on a computer for dozens of years in an industry that has some of the worst hours and horrific job protection standards is NOT something I'm going to do
uh huh
But I'd still expect competence from a company with a series as old and storied as Battlefield
i feel like you don't understand anything. Like, you have no idea what you're on about, you're thinking things are way easier than they actually are.
because this isn't like, a problem exclusive to DICE, other games have had issues with spawns as well. Black Ops 6 had massive spawn issues during it's beta.
are you gonna call those devs braindead as well?
you’re fucking based
like, i feel like if you're not even gonna make an attempt to understand what makes doing something like that difficult, then I don't think you get the right to call anyone braindead.
Absolutely, Call of Duty spawns are almost always terrible, BUT their maps are absolutely puny compared to BF's.
point still stands, these are studios with developers that have worked in the industry for a very long time.
And my biggest problem is if Battlefield can sense when people are "in combat" then WHY would it spawn people into the exact space ont he map where upon spawing they are immediately "in combat"
don't you think that if an actual solution to this problem were found and was actually viable, they would use it?
Honestly, not really anymore since most of their development has probably moved on to the next Battlefield since this one is 3 years old
okay but you're missing the point, just because you think it's simple to just spawn someone somewhere else when they're being spawntrapped, does not make actually doing that simple from a coding perspective, especially if you want a theoretical solution that actually works, because multiplayer game development is a massive pain in the ass.
It is certainly not something that someone who's "braindead" would be working at an industry doing.
Because COD is mostly symmetrical maps and lanes whereas BF is NOT designed like that on most maps
that is true
Also COD has terrible spawn traps most times
If anything that makes it better
Less likely to get spawn trapped and spawn killed
issue would be finding spawns that don’t have immediate sight lines
I honestly don’t mind the spawn die spawn die of tdm
because instant respawn
rather instant respawn than wait 10 seconds
COD has some dogshit maps
There's this one, Wasteland, that is more open than most 2042 maps
It's literally nothing but snipers
Even DMRs struggle for relevance there
I just tagged him
Only this server
I'm sure he's doing it to multiple servers
what’s the best sniper?
SWS-10.
The beginner one.
That you can spam bullets.
Does Irish's gadget still negate heli rockets?
nope

I wish there were symbols or tags for what the operators are for my team. It's hard to tell sometimes with all the skins.

Should put age tag too
who want to game
Well, shit. Got some problems with DX12 according to Battlefield 2042, anyone got a fix?
fart
I really really hope that the next battlefield brings back the "adaptive camo" gun skin, where it changes camo colors based on the map you're in
BF4 devs really be thinking into the future back then
That's what 1 and V is
Got Concussion Grenades to T1 
Only two left, throwing knives and AT grenade, but I won’t even try the AT one.
Anyone know why they decreased Assault C5 from 3 to 2? You can't take out most vehicles now as Assault. I get "this isn't how assault should be played" argument but also don't understand why they changed it after so long.
to prevent sundance bombing, mainly
yes it's weird and years too late but whatever
Fair, could have made that restriction just for Sundance instead of punishing all Assault specs.
yeah but it's probably easier to just decrease the amount of C5 Assault gets in general than to make a specific condition where you have one less C5 if you're playing Sundance specifically
You answered your question in the second line (You can't take out most vehicles now as Assault.), but are incorrect with that statement. You just cant EASILY take out vehicles from all angles as Assault now. Most vehicles (CAV Brawler aside) can still be destroyed with 2 C5 placed on the rear of the vehicle.
The reason they changed it was to extend the life of ground vehicles/armor. A life that was before, and still is now laughably low.
Interesting. I wasn't aware that 2 C5 on the rear can take out most vehicles. Will have to put more focus on placement then. It's almost impossible to get up close to the Brawler anyway with the perimeter defence.
Brawler is a strange vehicle. For me it has one of the more fun transport vehicles to play...but its also the most frustrating vehicle to fight. It has really annoying design and weapons
Its really dumb that you can take APS and close defense at the same time...then also outfit it with the hella broken flame nade launcher.
Pair all that with its passive defense against AT mines and C5 (Takes 1.5 extra of both to kill it)...and it makes it a VERY annoying vehicle to fight in my experience.
Like ill legit run at any piece of armor with C5 and kill it easily, but ill basically never engage a brawler when I can help it cos of how annoying they are to fight
Absolutely. I feel the same way about it. When squads stack up in a Brawler it's near impossible to take it on without a full squad focusing on it or have another heavy vehicle assisting.
With a driver that has even just a little brain activity and a gunner with a little bit more, it is better than other tanks too tbh
But that's a rare combo
The 25mm will wreck other armored vehicles
Yeah, its very n00b friendly also, requiring little lead or drop at range adjustment, and it recharges very fast
Well... 9/10 times i am driving, the gunner HAS to test out the main gun on the ground right before we drive up to a tank
Great to know that installing the newest drivers from NVIDIA (for the RTX 3060), absolutely fucks the game up for me
And a lot don't realize that it has the lmg to use against infantry
I also had some issues after latest drivers on 4080S.
how long as 2042 been out and people still dont understand how to play breakthrough/frontline?
it's wild to me that people just treat it like another team deathmatch mode
no one gets into the zone.
No point when there's too many sweats on the defending team and there's none on yours
it's super simple though, overwhelm the otherside in the zone...spawn off your squad...stop sitting in the background sniping. It's so strange to me how pubs just revert everything into a deathmatch game





