#battlefield-legacy-titles
1 messages · Page 120 of 1
nobody cares about the plots of 1990's doom
i'm not talking bout who cares or doesn't care
doom 2 could very easily be a wad for doom 1, comparing it to a full engine revamp is silly
why did you even pick this example
but it's not a wad
you could have picked like, half life or something. You chose the most similar sequel I could have imagined
lordy
i never played half life
ok fine
Doom and Doom Eternal
that make it easier for u?
yes thats at least somewhat rational
there u go
i chose doom 1 and doom2 because of the numbering system
obv
u could also sayy quake 1 and quake 2
the division and the division 2
yea but it is never the best gamemode imho
or tons of other sequels
though at the end of the day "who cares or doesn't care" is the most important thing when designing a sequel. when youre making a new iteration of an existing product, you need to decide what to change based on what they are playing the game for.
Any "CS2" that tried to reinvent cs gameplay would be a collossal failure. That doesnt mean you cant make a sequel, that just means youd have to iterate on different things
how is cs2 a sequelt hough
they just took cs:go and revamped the engine or whatver
idk why they just didn't keep the name Global Offensive
lol
remade from the ground up. new engine, models, networking, everything. it is a seperate piece of software. Complaining that it cannot be considered a different game cause it didnt do "more" is frankly semantic nonsense.
then make it seperate
they should have
it is a sequel. there is a lot of changes
this is what i'm'' saying
overwatch 2 took over overwatch 1..... it is the new trend i guess
IF it' really is, then make it so
csgo is still there but burying it under a settings change is simply annoying
dont take an old game and change the name
theres no basis for name changing or not
and likely they change the name to generate hype
csgo numbers were around 1m, cs2 announcement to release has seen steady 1.5m
fr it is goofy to not separate it
thats when i had to look it up and find out about the name change
do you live under a rock?
i dont play counterstrike
neither do i
i dont play assassin creed games, ive only played the first, i know theres a new one set in japan
I do not understand why people still get invested and heated over ubisoft rpgs
im just showing how you dont have to play a game to know about it because its pretty common knowledge among the gaming space
ubisoft stink
sure if you happen to see something about it
star wars outlaws is junk
yea idk how you couldnt see anything about cs2..
by not browsing gaming or news website or anything ig
hold on Im curious, @odd sleet have you heard of a game called "Deadlock"
idk, to miss that info seems like going completely dark on anything gaming related
maybe GWAR was touching a lot of grass when it was in the gaming news. gg GWAR lol
sounds familiar maybe? Or maybe it's Deadlink i'm thinking of
under a rock
deadlock isnt exactly the same though
as what
yea theres a lot of hype, but cs2 was the continuation of csgo, probably one of the most popular games ever
deadlock hype compared to cs2
which i tried playing like 3-4 times and uninstalled it each time heh
I mean it was announced in a wierd way but a new valve IP is quite the news
yea definitely big stuff, but not as big as cs2
same as cs2 announcement isnt as big as gta 6
its just relative levels of big
cs3 when? lol if you know you know
also, i tend to catch news more if i'm into the game. Like how Sony cancelled plans for a sequel to Days Gone
given the numbers its pulling from an invite only beta, it might. not sure it will but it might
already here
xDefiant isn't' that great from what i tried
xdefiant is cod if it was good
xdefiant is cheeks, goofy
or maybe i got ttired of playing siege back in the day
super scuffed cod
if it fails i will attribute part of it to lack of sbmm
especially after that cod test
it just felt like siege to me with some of the mechanics and things
the cod test was showing mostly minimal changes
i played siege enuff to where i got burnt out
good old siege yea i used to pump that game so hard lol
the cod sbmm test showed that only the top 20% of players saw retentain mantain or increase, so that means the bottom 80% of the playerbase played less
by marginal amounts
i dont see the correlation between the two
i would have to load the game up again and see
it is cod with abilities
sbmm should only be in ranked modes
what's sb i forget
in sbmm
and tbf i think i only played one match in xdefiant lol
so i could be wrong
the problem is a decline at all, especially across 80% of your playerbase, those declines happens over time, not just once.
i just maybe walked into the match with a siege mindset
skill based matchmaking
oh ok
this assumes the decline is constant, which nobody would know
yeah i remember at some point recently destiny 2 changed it's matchmaking system i think
it would be counterintuitive to assume the opposite
either from sbmm or to sbmm
I suspect the bigger reasons are live service fatigue, hero shooter fatigue, and general lack of faith in ubisoft.
Is XDefiant really going to be appealing to the average consumer?
not saying the values stay the same, but theres no reason to assume it would just stop
could very easily level out and stabilize over time.
ehhh, a main point about that test was seeing players move and the skill floor creeping up over time, and now youre top 20% player is the top 50% and potentially falling further. i wouldnt assume it stabalizes for a benefit
I don't see why Heartland didn't appeal, wasn't it after beta testing when they shut it down?
main reason I would not pin this as an issue for Xdefiant is that Xdefiant lobbies arent that crazy. I have not played CoD for many years yet I could hop into an XDefiant lobby with little issues.
I am talking about XDefiant
i know
but both games were supposed to come out this year
only 1 did
same company, same engine even
why can it after all this time
dunno. How popular is the division anyway?
i know it more than i know about cs lol
which again is why i dont like the whole enterinment industry... its mostly based on popularity
multiplayer specifically is
i forget why services like GameSpy went away
Multiplayer is about popularity because to a degree it has to be. Now there is little difference between a 10k player avg game and a 100k avg game unless you are in australia, but there is a constant threat of being writen off as "dead" by players, and the game spiraling.
You want a good example of that, look at Concord
this is made worse by live service games trying to eat into a players time like a tumor
just looked up Concord heh, didnt make 2 weeks
it is funny to see the brokies who complained about dlc now complain about live service content
possibly the greatest failure in gaming history. lost 100 million dollars, mostly due to it being written off as dead before it launched
brokies
you are incredibly insecure
no i liked paid dlc because it kept a lot of kids out
ig that depends on what's considered a failure heh
like Aliens Colonial Marines was notorious for the lawsuits and stuff when it was released
Id struggle to find a definition where this isnt at the top. Aliens Colonial Marines sold 1.3 million units. Concord sold 25k
then there's the ET game for the Atari that buried shit tons of cartidges in a landfill
well ive read how publishers deem something a failure when it really isn't
like Days Gone
this is true, but still
I dont think the publishers are making a wrong judgement here
the judgement tho is based on profit most likely
which is unfortunate but how it is
its still a good game
i dunno why Concord was shut down
i wouldnt say that entirely. these gaming companies are run by dopey captialists as they don't look mid-long term.
it is all over corp world rn. they just dont look ahead very far. they are some of the lowest iq people running these big corps.
because it sold 25k copies, it had a peak player count of a thousand, and was rapidly declining.
It cost 100 million to make and took 8 years
you can see the decay of higher education in real time.
2 weeks in and people could not matchmake
but ive never played the game so i couldn't say if it was bad or not
you have companies where you have some 200 iq devs being told what to do by some 95-105 iq normie in a suit, with a big mouth and a smile.
its mediocre, I tried the beta.
Whether or not its good or bad is mostly irrelevant, because it was written off by players and sent into a population deathspiral months before launch. That is why MP games have to focus on popularity
there's plenty of music bands that never get far not because the music wasn't good, but because they didn't sell enuff or whatever
then you have the opposite
like uh, whatever is popular nowadays
lets say taylor swift
tons of people like her music heh, but imo its not that great to be where she's at
yea Taylor Swift music is so bad lmao
not sure if that's sarcastic or not ;0
no she is bad fr
hopefully it comes back f2p
Taylor Swift I would argue is an evil force in the world but that is for a diff discussion
its the same concept tho, both are in the enterainment industry, music and games
if people like it, it generally sells. "good" is subjective, mostly
music is a little diff because it got completely collapsed by piracy and the big labels didnt react properly.
games and music both have piracy
like they are only just been catchin up on the streaming over the last decade or so but they missed the golden opening that was the napster period
yes but music was a little different especially because we headed into an age where everyone can produce music easily.
sound production wise taylor swifts music is fricking top notch. whoever makes her music knows their shit
well, produce "music" ha
the music industry flubbed their golden goose because they were ignorant to downloads and streaming
her lowest common denominator appeal and cringe lyrics are a different story though
now the whole industry is in such a weird place.
not her most recent album. the production is very dull and lifeless.
well for sure, but ive also seen bands where some albums had shitty engineers
ill have to trust you on that because i have no clue what its even called, when it came out, or what songs are on it
only listen to it if you need a sleep aid
also good engineers do crap album cause the music style is different
for sure, just saying whenever i want to test something new with my audio gear ill slap on something from tswift because that shit is engineered near flawlessly
this can happen in games too heh, like I think with John Romero
.... there is way better stuff to test your gear
likely, im not some deep audiophile so i just play her and a couple of personal picks to get a feel for new gear
unfortunately wife likes tswift so i know some of her songs decently
oh and then there's things that happen like with Arkane Studios or Tango Gameworks
Microsoft buys them out then shuts them down
i like playing around with taking music and trying to enhance the way they sound
can only do so much tho without the master tracks
its too bad games are more complicated/technical in that aspect ha
also maybe the quality of engineering might also be affected of what all is going on maybe? like frequency wise, and trying to mix it without losing too much of the original feel
like some of the remastered Megadeth albums, im not sure why they turned out sounding not as good as the originals imo
like the orignal Peace Sells https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aiQpRQeIiHY vs the 2004 remaster https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LVhJy-CR64Q
the remaster loses a lot of raw "punch" i guess u would call it
esp in the snare
i just uploaded this to show the difference between another of their albums, top being the original, bottom being the remaster https://youtu.be/1EA1w59g0yw
it might genuinely be impossible to join an NA game and be on the winning team
every game ive joined we've been down 100-200 points
bro try being in OCE in bf1, every game is even more skewed than that
then you pull scoreboard up and you see 150 stacks like 3 to 4 squads deep on one team
I want to share my EA account with my friend, but the account was made through steam first, can I give him login without giving him direct access to my steam account?
The game was bought originally on steam
Please @ me with an answer, thanks
Why in any world would you ever share your account? It costs absolutely ntohing to make one. That sounds like a phishing scheme and scam
probably an anti cheat addition if you're PC
Sharing is caring
Dude no
Not even kidding, man. Don't share account info with anyone.
said moments before a disaster

family sharing?
also imagine not having anyone in your life you would easily share your account with... i have like 5 people that have access to various accounts and never had anything wrong with them
Family share doesn’t work for a lot of games. Due to the devs themselves
Unless your on console. That’s different story
ive only family shared for SP games, if it were ever a mp game i just gave them my log in info
Family sharing isn't available for BF1 unfortunately
I'm unaware if EA has its own system inplace though
So that I can share my game?
Its a school friend, not online so whatever phishing you're talking about isn't happening
idk what just happened
i got so locked into bf5 that i got 83 kills in conq
im a bf1 player that plays bf5 very rarely
One message removed from a suspended account.
boots to the ground shooters are largely the same thing, especially within BF
granted i would say bfv gunplay and movement are better (at the very least more consistent), so maybe you just have better aim and it translates to bfv
no i get bad games in bf5 usually
like i average 80 kills in bf1 conq but my bf5 average is maybe 1.5kpm
so thats like maybe 30 kills per round for me
bf1 is very different tbh
huh, shouldnt be that different
the players play differently and the movement makes it much different too imo
like 4kpm average and 7kpm has been my peak tryhard so far
but it could also be that im not too familiar with bf5 maps you need to know the maps quite well
+it would prolly be the same for a good bf5 player going bf1 that they will play worse on 1
different mechanics, different maps
so was the battlefield 4 update for the new anti cheat update ?
hasnt been an update for 4 on pc so far
also new anti cheat should come in sept 14 or something
Hello, Can anyone help me with k bullet kill with a vehicle on BF1 PC?
Whoever thought of the asignment challenge of getting infantry kills 100m or more in range for the Boy's AT rifle needs to be fired. Most of the maps don't have sniping rage beyond that and the bullets that're meant for killing TANKS travel insanely slower compared to snipers meant for infantry so it's almost impossible to get kills at that range unless I'm lucky enough to find people that're braindead enough to be static targets. Even with the 10% faster bullet upgrade it's beyond tedious. BFV was a mess butt his is just beyond crappy game design.
You'd think it'd be about doing damage to vehicles or getting two vehicle kills in a round but no, almost all the challenges of an anti-material rifle revolves around shooting infantry.
reminds me of this
i usually finished every mastery assignment in a single try, i never finished the close range SLRs because of shit like this
it could be possible if under some niche range you could at least 1 shot headshot, but you cant... these are strictly 2 tap body shot machines and then they want you to get 20 headshots in a single round IN objective areas? fucking mad
i get they are masteries and should be hard, but some of them are borderline impossible
Which is why it horrifies me when I see someone on the enemy team with a fully gold AT Rifle, I'm still stuck on the 'mint bracket'
Maybe cheesing it in community games is the way to go
yea iirc you can just play vs bots and get them that way which imo is completely against the nature of getting those
the combined arms stuff
the main issue there is that if it's for unlocking a cosmetic item that doesn't affect gameplay isn't really a 'guilt' thing. Just makes things easier because a stationary weapon like an AT rifle in a game filled with sprint sliding smg users just doesn't gel or mesh right with the wack contrasts of 'realistic' gameplay and the codification
i just think its whack, which is why i dont do it, if someone else does it i really dont care
Either way, the challenges don't even fit a weapon's playstyle.
you gotta love badmins. servers says smg08/anni banned. multiple players tell admin about it, he says he does not see it in chat right as dude puts up a triple in kill feed with smg08. next round admin ends up dying to smg08.... "HEY SMG 08 IS BANNED. CHANGE IT OR KICK"
as soon as it impacted him it is a kick lol
and that's why BF4's a dead game. nothing but biased rented servers left
this was bf1
seriously, they'll let no life sweats stat farm all day
No I know that, what I mean is that badmins are a major issue in 4.
And if that starts creeping into BF1 it might kill the game as well.
oh for sure 4 probably worse
coz i really love servers where smg08 and anni banned
it is always funny in those kind of servers too when you see a smg08 or anni user get some kills, get warned and then credit to them they listen switch but then their performance just plummets lol
Guys does anyone here play battlefield V
yes
Why is this game so hard when compared to 1
It feels like you die faster
id say its faster paced and leans more towards skill vs knowledge, theres also less things like elites, and sweet spots which imo makes bf1 a bit more casual and randon in power creeping
smgs in bf1 are soft capped to a certain effective range because of it being spread based, in bfv a lot smgs can be used at range pretty effectively
dmg and dmg falloff are lesser in bfv as a result, but yea, skilled players can make use of smgs at range while that was less likely in bf1
the only half reliable way of getting them is playing on a hardcore server, but good luck finding one that has not Yet banned Scout DMR's
because it's a one shot headshot to kill on hardcore
good info, but i likely wont play bfv with the intention of doing anything serious like that
it's still a pain tho
plus frick hardcore
that moment when the jungle carbine is a one shot body shot until 150 meters on hardcore

not surprising that pretty much every sever banned Scout DMR's, cuz one shot body shot at any range is a bit busted
Unfortunately yes
It's a horrid blend between sprint sliding smg users in an arcade style format and 'realistic' requirements to mount certain machine guns. It's like a cheddar clam chowder and a milkshake. Fine enough on their own but should never have been mixed.
BFV is basically the gaming equvical to a truck hogging the fast and slow lane on the high way
It ruined machine guns in my opinion
They aren’t fun to play anymore like they are in 1
No that's spot on, the 'design' of V was just flip flopping all over between acrade and realistic styles of gameplay.
bfv is a confused mess
the sprint sliding smg users are just cringe
i mean it has some decent points for it. i mean i would rather play it than 2042.
play bf1
play 2042
neither deserve to be titled Battlefield games.
What we need is the atmosphere and writing of CoD WaW and the destruction of Bad Company 2.
Also counting dismemberment as well.
MG or LMG? because LMG is very good :)
I like bf2042 except the trash "nerf fun things" policy like they nefed bolte, tor, ect
Join the #Battlefield2042 newsletter and gain intel around the game, and receive exclusive loot such as Irish's "Vector" Specialist Set!
Sign up today: http://x.ea.com/74845
bf1 anyone?
Field of Battle: The First
Did they reformat the server layout?
Well shit, these guys are chill, if EA's taking direct control then my biggest concern is that I'll get banned along everyone else who doesn't like the modern direction Battlefield's taken
🔥 everything is fine 🔥 
i watched a video on yt recently that showed how mathematically impossible democracy is
It's a gif of a vibrating helldiver violently shaking with the caption 'democracy intensifies'
yea i saw it
i like that one
to put it back to battlefield.... i played bfv last night and went up against some of the most obnoxious smg sliders. i mean i cooked em with me jungle carbine once i adjusted to their crutch
yeah, the game's more of a hot mess than me eating spicey tacos
idk smg sliding is just too brainrot of a style for me to even consider playing lol
They could've just added that gameplay style to TitanFall 3
why do folks just do it rinse repeat ad nauseum? i mean you have to wonder who is on the other end sometimes lol
TF1 was great, more customization options.
We want TitanFall 3 and we got....... apex
i hate apex
my friends used to pester me to play it all the time. i hated every moment of it. i will never get my lifeclock back that i spent on that game.
you call it a game? I call it a mistake no one asked for
the BR format has just been overplayed
it's not that it's a bad format, just going from that hell of a cliffhanger in TF2 to..... iceage baby who drank caustic battery acid and now has mountain dew powers.....
My expectations have never been lower for a battlefield game, do you guys think the next one will suck
we will have to wait and see. however like you my expectations are already in the basement lol.
I have faith but at a risky level Zempela and some returning veteran devs are giving me some of those hopes.
It'll either be another 'vanguard' event like with 2042 or a hailmarry throw that'll make the franchise great again
vangoated 
quiet, you

vanguard was poop
Make Battlefield Great Again
Get the merch ready
I wasn't even quoting him
I just want the next game to be great because good won't cut it
lol no like i would wear a hat with that ngl
I get what you mean man
At any rate, I've been vibin' here long enough you have a good one
yea gg
Does anyone have a picture of the Battlefield V game files?
BF1 squad in ~30 mins? Gonna jump on shortly. PC-NA.
sounds good
Made my first platoon, platoon emblem and everything, was kinda disappointed to see I couldn’t use the emblem in game.
BF1
You have to present it
New battlefield confirmed because everything is changing here?
Do we have anymore information on it besides that? I’ve got a really good feeling that this will be a good one, idc if people think I’m coping or not 😄
We have fuck all info
Nothing substantial. There’s the investor talk but that should be completely ignored. And ‘leaks’ shouldn’t be trusted either, nothing we can do beyond waiting for official info
So, nothing basically
I figured as much. Still excited regardless
Battlefield 1 opened my eyes as to how much I just don’t care about other shooters like CoD anymore. There’s so much more to BF games
I have zero excitement whatsoever
Is there a particular reason why or are you just tired of BF games or something along those lines?
They’re both 2042 videos btw
I love battlefield, and I want it to do well as it’s one of my favourite shooter franchises, but I just don’t have it in me to be excited any more for game releases.
2042 burned me so hard I straight up didn’t play shooters for half a year, and so many other games in recent years have been broken or underdeveloped that I simply cannot get excited for a game launch.
They could announce Titanfall 3 tomorrow and I still would be more skeptical than excited. It’s just kinda how modern games are at the moment.
Kind of hard to get excited over something you haven't seen or know anything about
And knowing battlefield they could change the game enough that I just might not like it
For me it’s more just excitement about playing a new and fresh BF game as 2042 doesn’t interest me much anymore
I didn’t play much 2042 at all tbh, the launch put me off it for a while
Yeah this is completely fair. It feels like nowadays a lot of games need a year AFTER release to get things right, which sucks
And that comment by Goeff didn’t spark much joy. Saying the next battlefield will be a great live service before we even know what the game is, is not very inspiring
Although I can applaud the team’s ability to do the best they can to turn things around with the hand they were dealt
Doesn’t change the fact that what we got on launch was abysmal from a technical and design perspective
Nyphon left LOL
I hope they go back to put in some of the improvements from BF5 like the movement which was a huge downgrade in 2042 along with many other things
What's wrong with the 2042 movement?
Yeah, some things that BFV added like crouch sprinting and backwards crawling need to be brought back. However, some others should be left out or removed. For example: ledge grabbing, tactical sprinting, the high wall climb thing, and a few others.
Imo, sliding should also be very limited. It only makes sweats worst to fight against
It just feels like a massive regression and a copy of recent cod games rather than building on BF5
there is no dropshot feature, it’s not a bad idea at all for an arcade movement
Crouch sprinting and better ledge grab would be very welcome, but the slide is the only hint of mechanical depth left
A merging of the two would go hard
Bro advertising his channel
Sorry bud but this isn’t the place
Hi all. How do I fix on BF1 An unknown error occurred Error code; 1?
I haven't played cod in years so I wouldn't know and doubt bf devs play cod so wouldn't be fair to say it's a copy of cod
Tac sprint was clearly a thing brought over from MW2019, wouldn’t have been there otherwise
It does the same thing but just more janky in 2042
There are normal easter eggs in 2042, for example, like in battlefield 4?
is there a continuation of the phantom easter egg?
Fair enough, that’s irrefutable. Although it was funny when the fast sprint didn’t even have any ads downsides
Yeah, a better ledge grab would probably be better than just plain removing it.
I agree with not removing sliding but it needs to be heavily limited. The slipperiness of the sliding in both BFV and 2042 just makes it a contest of who can slide the best instead of who can prevent getting themselves into the enemy’s line of fire in the first place.
The game is always positioning first, but if there’s no movement then it loses a lot of that dynamism
Like while I love the air strafe in 4, I can live without it. 2042’s slide offers enough to introduce some variance in gunfights and extend their duration without being too crazy
But it’s just that something akin to bf1 again would feel rather boring
Although I will side with you on bfV for that one
While yes it reduces your turning speed, it just feels like something you spam, meanwhile 2042’s has you using it to fast peek a corner while also potentially opening you up to more angles, so I prefer it much more
There wasn’t much in the way of decionsmaking revolving around it in v, making it feel a little more gimmicky
Yeah, I agree with that. As I said before, sliding shouldn’t be removed. It should just be set at a speed that isn’t spammable yet is still decent for corner peeking and other things like it.
Can understand making it less spammable, but it feels like it’s got sufficient risk - reward to stick around
I’m a bit biased against 2042 because I haven’t played it in a while. If it’s how you say, I’d say keep it around that level
Although I hardly ever use just the slide, practically every application of it for me is for a slide hop
But it’s the same premise
Committing to a fast motion in one direction to throw off people holding the angle, with the risk of that leap exposing you further
Bfv’s never really felt like it had that tradeoff for me since you still had lots of control over motion
Especially the older games, play Bad Company 1 and 2, the campaigns are still amazing.
Can someone help me? Im trying to launch Battlefield 4 after i installed the punkbuster thing
but it just closes when i launch it
it
Both via Steam and EA
🦀 🦀 🦀
I heard BF1 was getting a new anti cheat?
perhaps he will go outside
And stop being a negative nelly hopfully.
guys?
No clue, I'm PSN. Sorry.
yeah
i wonder if its because his member role got removed or something
I feel like people barely play BF4 on PC anymore
Or maybe he just got tired of us not liking BFV or 2042?
Just sayin' dude was 'uhm akchewally' on every single post not praising BF5 or 2042
More like the community is infested by shitty servers and players
that really just depends on your gameplay experience 
well I will not tolerate abusive meta, same ass map pool and conquest
i once said that in bf1 2kpm is like average player level and he went off the rails for that because he was 2kpm player
@fringe owl yo plug did you leave the HLL server or smth
Just realized I haven’t seen you there in a hot minute
Yeah, I did
Too much drama.
Fair enough
damn got a 91-18 game against a cheater on conquest
2kpm?
kills per minute
idk he just always seemed to brag about being good at the game but his stats werent very impressive
oh, the ratio of kills per minute
yeah
I tanked my kd ratio for the C93 carbine service stars
No regrets
kekw my stats are pretty ruined because i had a really bad pc when i started
but i average about 4kpm and 4-5kd now
best kpm/kd ive had was 6.8kpm and 12.2kd
conquest games
which translates to like 20min game= 80ish kills
it's doable if the latency doesn't and triggerpull delays don't fuck you
but my overall stats only just recently got to 2kpm because of how long it takes to change them 😄
yeah my latency is fine
i sometimes dont get hitreg
but its pretty rare
desync on consoles is SO much worse
been trying to hit 100 on argonne for the past 2 days but i end up only reaching 90s or high 80s
I'm putting half a mag into someone and nothing registers.
I'm on a PS5 and 5G internet so it's not my end
might be
because cable internet and a direct ethernet connection to your router will give you much better stability
even if you have fast internet then the stability can still be yanky through air connections
thats what causes latency/packetloss issues
No no, I get that, I just mean generally speaking battlefield games don't register because they're patchworked and rushed making the baseline of any kind of server fixing neigh impossible to do without an overhaul
and givn BF1 is about 8 years old now, I highly doubt we'll ever see the issues fixed.
If we persistently get enough people asking for a legacy quality of life update for BF4, HL and 1 then maybe we'll see one update that'd fix the game's desync and other latency issues.
idk maybe its just a console issue then
for me its my end when hits dont register
i checked the netgraph and i sometimes get instabilities
but overall its pretty stable
Same here, but there's enough of a desync issue that's just the servers suffering more than anything else
that sucks
also another thing that can cause servers to lag is if theres a lot of high ping players on the game
that can cause desync issues too
thats why on pc theres ping limits usually
Why not have that standardized across all platforms?
Because if there's too many players with ping higher than say, 60 or so then it becomes an issue
because they are custom servers owned by players that rent servers
And since I'm the one with lower ping that means I'm still lagging due to the server struggling to compensate the shiternet of others
So that's only an option for custom servers?
yeah they manually kick the high pingers
they can manually ban them too
oh, I thought you meant that there's an auto filter that kicks high ping players on PC. I see what you mean now
id say anything above 100 is considered high ping, below that its pretty okat
For me anything past 60 is too much
technically there is/was someone made an app for it
I keep getting people from Iraq and the middle east on US servers
but again its only for owned servers not dice ones
yeah theres a lot of them on eu too
on pc
Instead of charging us for servers on the battlefield titles we actually want to play, why not just make the servers either reduced price or free outright.
because theres a lot of servers that can abuse owned servers
BF4 is horridly gatekept on PSN. Nothing but pay to win/negate rules and sweats that no-life jets.
It's fucking abysmal
yeah theres plenty servers like that on bf4/bf1 pc aswell but also plenty trusted ones
only the worst so far on PSN
ive gotten banned on quite a few servers for being too good because the admins want to stat farm on bad players
I've yet to see any good BF4 servers
Hell if I had enough money to rent out a BF4 server then I'd just do it myself. I'd have fair rules and ensure they're enforced properly by my friends.
and in description they say cheaters get banned and the server is balanced and whatnot but in reality its just 4 admins stacked up farming kills on bad players
and anyone as good or better get insta banned
And yet there's no server rating system
there is
you can favorite servers
But you can't downvote
usually long time servers that are quite trusted have a lot of favorites
It'd be nice just to play BF4 without worrying about no life players that don't have jobs
yeah a lot of servers started out like this actually lol, so many stories where the now server owners used to just get fucked over by admins in diff servers so they just made their own thats fair to play on for everyone
Basically 'make BF4 servers fun again'
but you also need good knowledge on the server to actually lead a fair server since if you dont really have good knowledge on the game you can false ban a lot of good players
and then theres the fact that you need to seed them to get them full
I don't care if I win or lose, that's not an issue. But to have 'teammates' that don't even try, that's inexcusable.
and without a playerbase its practically impossible to fill
hence why I'd just stick to kicking people on ocasion when needed.
thats why a lot of starter servers die out a lot
because they start the server before they have a playerbase
Well, I've the means to ensure the server's filled. My platoon is active and decently sized enough to play BF4.
yeah but if you want good rep then youd need to set up some certain rules, because if you kick people outside of the rules it can be quite bs to the players on your server that are playing
Well no shit, it'd basically be the same way I'd run my own server, strict yet fair. Ensure the rules are easy to understand and make it known that any who break them will be removed and that the rules aren't a formality.
yeah thats good, youd also need players that moderate the server through out the day so it wont die out
also new servers struggle with cheaters a lot (may not be an issue on console)
Again, I've friends in multiple timezones so that won't be an issue.
yeah thats good
Not really outside of exploiters but that aside, I just need enough money to start up the server.
Make a no hud Battlefield server.
with what money
what if you guys all pay together for 1 server?
and once you set it up you can start selling vip for others to upkeep it
If you like fighting bots
Bots OP
Represent?
yeah when you go onto your platoon on the menu you then have to click on represent
For context I’m talking about in BFV
Realized I didn’t say

you can see it in other bf titles though
Muh freedom of expression
if that helps
rip
That seems really arbitrary but I’ll deal with it
Crazy BF1 still thrivving so well
like 5k active players
and bfv being more popular then 2042 lmao
Nothing is more popular than 2042, we have our own channel bud

(BFV) how do y’all manage to get so good at dogfighting the second someone is behind me I spontaneously combust I swear 😦
They haven't gone outside in years
Average level 500 BFV player
I would go insane before I reached level 500
try fiddling with plane settings
helps a lot
more fov for better visibility, adjust your sens settings, make a button for the plane to go up and down, turn etc
I have 100% plane sense and fov (I think) but the thing is that they turn on a dime whilst me (in a spitfire) and turning like a freight train
there are certain angles where you can turn faster
i havent done much piloting myself with planes in 5 just a bit on 1
but i imagine the footholds for it is the same
once youve got good settings etc rest is just experience thing
see how others counter you when you go to fight them
Ive heard that I should go on a slightly downwards angle while turning
yeah
gives faster speed because your plane is going downwards instead of fighting to go upwards
like yk just gravity kekw
I was in a game earlier and some German plane turned upwards in a loop in 0.2 seconds and I’m just sitting here like 😔
Same, started to pick up planes a week ago
(I took a looooong break from planes is what I mean)
If u wanna have a look at my stats I just put them in the stats feed
As if reaching lvl 500 will magically trigger something irl 🤭
Anyone still on?
It's too early
US might have some servers
eu only goes active around at like 10am though
atleast for bf1 and 5
See that'd become an issue because the only people that'd pay into that would be sweats expecting special treatment and since I won't let someone bypass the rules for their money then it'd still dry up.
You should try suggesting things that could actually happen
LMG spam in bf1 is SO FUCKING ANNOYING
90% of the enemy is support
i cant do shit
they all camp
Anyone is still playing in bf 1 ?
i do but its making me rage
its so bad
everyone spams m1917
smg08
ilya
its so fucking cancer
How serwers looks ?
eu is active
Is still open, how much people is playing
others not so much
if you catch a huge -% sale on it, i'd recommend buying, but for full price absolutely not worth :)
it's like a fun minigame
Haha okey bro i got this
I dont know better for sure is bf 1 but iw worries about serwers
U know
The climate this game is amazing
bf1 and bf5 are my favs, as an infantry player
V is not bad
In my opinion better is 1
Last bf i played so much was bf1
I was playing some in bf v but..
In 2042 i’ve never played
I disagree that it's better, but I do enjoy bf5 more currently nvm, read wrong. yeah, bf1 > bf5
played bf1 a ton so, tired of it :)
downside of playing a pvp game
Atleast u can play, I cant find any Aussie servers so I’d have to play with like 300 ping
sad mate
only eu is active yeah
could vpns not possibly like
reduce ping somehow
If only there's an alternative option to play ...
Yeah, I’ve found battlefield really isn’t the game for me anyways I copped he’ll let loose last night and it’s mad
Wdym
mp in general must suck for you
for most games
youre in the middle of fucking nowhere compared to the rest of the world

~~ ai bots and free server hosting~~
its just not the same
since when are community servers in the quickmatch rotation in bfv 
Bf5 isn’t too bad for matchmaking if there aren’t any Australian servers I just hop on Japanese and play fine
Not if they're programmed correctly
Instead of go here and capture this objectives
But I cant with the planes bro I swear 💀 I hop in a plane then some little turd from 300 kilometres away sitting on AA the whole game shoots me down in 2 seconds
hahahah it be like that
the game is very... cancerous in general to me
Most fps games are, but battlefield has made me a different person
there are so many things that need fixing in bf1
smg08,m1917,ilya bomber
Luckily, there's a brand new modding scene to the game
i mean you cant prevent others from picking it
And modding is important to gaming fyi
No just hackers
So as long EA doesn't shut down the community modding server
People can't see mods
It's okay
Bf5 needs ALOT of fixing (imo) AA needs to be shortened, Idk why medics have the best guns in the game, tanks are indestructible if ur alone so u should just run right up to the tank and beg for it to shoot you etc
no i mean the anticheat software might think mods are cheats and prevent them
so they won't work anymore
Classic EA, no fun for you only fat stacks of cash for us 🙃
Let's see what they have to say about it
I wish they're like valve

Yeah, valve manages to keep tf2 alive when idk how long it’s been since they released it
Yeah Ik that’s just an example though cuz yk they’re both popular shooting games
?
Oh
Never played bf4 anyway
Good game. Just infested by shitty players and servers
Toxicity and rat players is a concept no shooter game can avoid
And that's why I believe AI bot is important
Ig but ur not gonna celebrate for getting 30 kills against bots
It's not about kills and their stupid ai
It's about making them better
Keep all multiplayer intact
Just sub players with AI
Oh ok so put some real some ai in there?
Smart. Advanced ai
Ok
Sounds like you don't care

when does the next battlefield aplha start
next year
whats up everyone, just joined this discord. do ppl play this battlefield the most these days?
wdym with ,,this battlefield''
2042
check the lfg section 
thx
Of course, it is the best fps out
@tropic vortex agreed, me and the boys are hooked
i wanna be an alhpa tester so bad
will the next battlefield be good?
probably not 
will dice be the next studio ea shuts down
Why did he leave? (Sorry for the ping)
i wonder what s the next setting
i ll cut them some slack there because every time a bf game was announced there was always bitching about the setting
especially with 1 and hardline which are great games
its fine, i think he left because a lot of server users got member role now which was an unique thing to like 4 people or something 😄
That’s weird 🤣😭
Regular role was stupid af anyways
Took ages to get and you could lose it very easily
maybe if DICE this time gets that extra year they need to produce a game that isn't buggy they can do it
EA seems to always want them to release a game before it's done
yeah shame that bf42 went how it went
it still gets flack even though its pretty okay to play in rn
It's the other way around
after it's done?
EA doesn't rush anything
lol
bet
DICE asked EA for more time to finish BFV, like a year or six months or something? EA gave them 1 month more only
and the game was released unfinished, just like BF4
It was DICE rushing everything not EA
I hope so
Cod is boring
The new bo6 is the same game what early
Allways bf was more better than cod
[insert clapping gif]
The new bf i heared its supposed to be NATO conflict vs the landlord so we will se
Sorry, the landlord lol?

Fair
Not sure what that is either I will admit
But either way, any rumours or leaks should just be ignored for the time being, nothing is true until proven by official sources
Stay away from youtube
Exactly
Im wondering wheather to buy bf 1 because i saw nice sale something like 8 € for revolution edition
Definitely worth it. Game’s fun and still has players, can’t go wrong with an £8 purchase
no
Does anyone know where do i equip vehicle skins in bf1
Revolution edition has all extas ?
What’s best machine gun in battlefield V
Whats is the difference revolution or premium pass
i guess no one is answering anything in this discord
Why not
dead discord
Why is 2042 the greatest fps ever?
You're right, nobody wants to answer anything
Setting complaints are more subjective, the lack of any real content isn't.
It's the greatest at failing horribly and disapointing a fanbase.
plenty of people were quick to judge hardline
and now is dead 😦
Hardline was fireeee
Keep in mind the main critiques of hardline was the bad map design not fitting the gameplay styles or flow
It's not a bad game but suffered from cod ghosts syndrome where the ttk didn't match the map design or the gameplay pacing
yo
the maps were awesome
i wish dustbowl would come to portal
also
if any of the ea community managers is reading this , if the next game still has the shitty characters as operators and not generic soldiers, i am going to EA's Bucharest office and take a shit on the doormat
also
what's roa gadget
what s disruption
i point it at something and get points
You will have to go through me first before you get anywhere near King EA
Which BF game is the best
BFBC2
This one, if DICE had followed through remastering ALL the original maps...
https://youtu.be/u5RjQHfdwZg
I'm convinced 2042 is using cod style SBMM or EOMM. in an other battlefield I can do fair good at least above average. But in 2042 I rarely break even. Just constant deaths. Biggest failure of the game. That and the operators.
1
why does bf2042 have to load in icons and stuff
where is it loading it from??
why arent they there when u open the menu
bf 5 died before the stalingrad update
come to think of it
5 is the only bf game to die before finishing its dlc cycles
even hardline got 4 dlc
5 kinda sucked in the beginning
props for them for having maps where lesser known battles took place
still though
the game did a lot of good things
i liked the fortification mechanic
and the squad leader abilities
They should still finish it
i agree
i hope the next bf is set in the 80's or something
and ea stops with the live service shit
and realize they can cultivate an eco system with all their existing games
poeple still play bf3 ffs
id rather have them finish bf5
and realese 2 more dlcs for bf1
one with the balkan battles and one with the colonial battles
that d be awesome
but i am asking this from the people who made the german sniper from bf 1 black and released the french as dlc in a ww1 game
I see
all the talent left after bf1
we will never get a bf with such a good presentation
Bf1 is awesome
i redownloaded bf2042 again and my biggest issues with this game is that all the characters suck and i wish they d shut up and that some maps feel sterile
Just sucks a ww2 game couldn’t be as good
What’s so hard about it? Just try to mimick it
The gun slides in V are so stupid
they should had done exactly that
bf1 but ww2
i remember staying up late to see the trailer and the livestream
and i was met with a big pile of shit
the trailer for bf5 is atrocious
then they release the trailer for the pacific update and suddenly they remember how to make trailers
They fumbled
the bfv trailer sucks so much
The servers also suck
why
i ve played it on pc a few times , it wasnt that bad
minus the hardcore servers
holy shit
i ve just rewatched the trailer
This felt like out of an action movie trying to recover the heli 
Didn’t think to jump 😭
Wanted to try and recover the heli after other pilot jumped 
Heli was hit by rocket and knocked into a roll when he bailed
Ohhh okay
Looking for clans to join in battlefield V, hardline, 2042, 3 and 4 primiarly
and BF 1942, BF2, 2142, bad company 2 and vietnam as secondary.
id love to play some BF2, 1942 and 2142 with some dudes.
I thought those servers are gone or dead 
I mean I played like 2 years ago
and I still managed to find SEVERAL players
although BF1942 being abandonware means its sorta just free, so you have to download and install a client
The offical servers from the EA copies of the game are as far as I know, dead.
Mmm 🤔
Just say they're community
Helis on this map are a death sentence
i usually get TOWed or rpged a millisecond after spawning
Yeah can be if enemy attack heli is specially camping spawn
Then you have the skyscraper at C which many will have rpg/stinger and iglas 
The ttk in 2042 is awful you could have the higher rpm smg and the other guy a semi auto and you still lose even after firing first.
2042 is junk. But laughing because you probably got done by a higher skilled player. maybe you can add the slide to your high rpm smg crutch playstyle lol.
Sliding is stupid tbh. Feels way to cheap. This is battlefield not call of duty.
same thing for tac sprint
BFV's sliding was better because it was controlled, you jave to hold the button or key to slide and their and a short cool down before you can do it.
They need to resurrect BFV's movement system with just a couple upgrades and tweaks.
For the next Battlefield
Knock back from blast waves
even vehicle animation?
Nah, I prefer the 2042 vehicle walk in/out animations, where you can simply teleport, but you can see your character get in vehicle.
WR?
warsaw revamped
2042 is what happens when you have veteran designers quit a company because of lack of creative control and rushed development
The last 'true Battlefield' game is arguably either BF1 or Bad Company 2
Bf1 was the last and first next gen Battlefield
which is weird
It's been eight years, hope we get a legacy update on it.
Honestly it felt worse that way for me
BFV's sliding mechanic felt like diet titanfall, it didn't fit the setting for a WWII game
Not even that
2042’s feels more like it, but only like, 10% alike 
Can do way more with 2042’s slide in comparison
Would actually appreciate it if the same slide and bhop system stuck around for the next game
It’s a movement option with tradeoffs and adds a little more dynamism to fights
Kinda dreading what they might do with the next game, if they strip away all of it I’ll be rather dissapointed
If I wanted to slide around the floor like it was just mopped I'd play titanfall 2, I bought into the battlefield franchise for a realistic contrast to arcade shooters back when and now it feels like a mixed up mess
Well bf4 achieved a good balance, I’m sure it can be done again
Tell me about it
The issues with BF4 were overall desync and unfixed bugs that never got patched. Bad Company 2 was the last game that had realistic gameplay with just enough of a arcade game element to make it fun.
Bf is always about positioning first, but if it’s got no movement potential at all then it just feels rather bland at times, I came into the franchise in bf4 I will admit, but that game has fantastic movement, bugs and exploits excluded, and is still considered one of the best
It’s the hybrid nature I enjoy most. Played enough Milsims to know what a game like this feels like at its slowest, so just a little something even if it’s as simple as a bhop would do me fine
I know it comes off as tunnelvisioning but Bad Company 2 was and still is one of the greatest multiplayer experiences.
Nah it doesn’t, we’ve all got our favourite games, I just wasn’t gaming around the time it came out so I never got a chance to experience it
Sorry to hear, you missed out on something amazing
I remember hearing some kind of interview with dice where even they didn’t know what it was about bc2 that worked so well lol
the pacing of the matches, the vehicles (outside of helicopter spawn camping) and weapons were over 90% amazing and no one weapon was good or bad, each was workable.
That and the 'less is more' in the loadout versitility
Unlike Battlefield 5's bomber that have a 0.5 blast radius. You have to make heads hits to get a hitmarker
who cares when overall bf experience lacks entertainment
Ppl stop playing much
Seem that inner bad experience blocks ppl away
I know where it is simply by comparison of a wwii movie and overall Battlefield setup
Games ending rusty because of terrible imagination
bruh 
Reported

If you don't have specific argument and just constantly blocking ppl conversations I don't see how can we develop a game w such behavior, this spam blocks any directional conversation, everything ends delusional cuz spam is spam
Im sure that the devs can create a game without this discord 
Next they’ll need Reddit 
Facebook moms knows what’s best for battlefield

Fr tho #MomsForBattlefield when 
#MomsForDice 
let them cook 
Would love a mix of BF3/4 for the next game, obviously. Still hanging onto the glory days of when BF was at its peak. BFH was great too and BF1 was good but quickly went downhill from there.
2042 is peak
For poor game design, certainly
is BF1 or BFV superior
Bfv
is it a dead game too
Think it’s the most popular right now weirdly
2042 is 50k
average?
If only looking at steamDB which is only for steam aka pc only, not including EA app, MS, PS or ect platforms that it’s on. 2042 is normally about BF1 and V numbers combined
That’s only in steam, aka PC ONLY
maybe I'm misunderstanding but, looking at last 6 months, it seems that in fact bf5 = bf1 + bf2042 in terms of amount of players
https://steamdb.info/app/1238810/charts/#6m
https://steamdb.info/app/1238840/charts/#6m
https://steamdb.info/app/1517290/charts/#6m
different games. bf5 is a lot more fast paced, so if you like cod-style shooters then go for it :)
personally, ALL factors considered, i'd say bf1 > bf5
When I was checking (month ago or so) bf5 had almost 2042+bf1 combined. That’s weird
Anybody down for battlefield V?
Or how about the V1 rocket being bloody useless, the damned thing has a blast radious of 15-20 metres and that's about it.
I'm trying to get back into BFV and since they removed the auto-balance and team swapping feature, the sweat clans win 10-0 on matches
it sucks
in terms of battlefield standards thats Pretty big
Not really, the initial scale of death was 50 metres but given how people like to complain instead of getting better when something doesn't need fixing, we lose all proper functionality of weapons that're better left alone until the game becomes even more unbalanced in an adverse effect of overcorrection
but like yeah honestly in the older games like Battlefield 1942 where the maps were much bigger/harder to traverse in general
but 50 meters sounds reasonable IMO
I kinda wish BFV was a slower pace at times/the maps were larger/transport vehicles mattered more
the scale of the maps are so small, not to mention there's so many rough textures, the game looks like a sloppy collage student's dry run for a mid-term test
in BF 1942?
No, V
A WWII game shouldn't feel like titanfall
I think BFV looks good at times, but some maps look eh
but yeah in battlefield 1942 there was no sprint
so transports like jeeps and shit had a much bigger role
Narvik has untextured ships and you can fly under the water near the british spawn
If the max 'walking' seed was decent enough you don't need sprint
Also like TBH the reason I wish BFV was slower pace/had larger maps is the fortifications sometimes it feels like I don't get enough time to fortify objectives before a squad/a random angry mob swarms me
well yeah, but I believe it was also a way to make the maps feel larger as well
the elements say 'slower to medium pace', the maps say 'fuck it, we copy/pasted warzone let's just codify everything else'
I mean I think BFV is an amazing game truly the best of the modern WW2 arcade shooters.
WW2 arcade shooters are a rare breed these days...
WW2 and arcade style gameplay don't fit, I was replaying CoD 2 and 3 recently, the campaigns felt more grounded and 'realistic' because the movement wasn't 'sprint sliding' with everything sounding like an airsoft gun
bruh
those games were arcadey
I guess by "arcade" you mean slide canceling and shit?
Moderately at most, not like the modern crap...
IMO thats a good thing
I don't really enjoy realistic/mil sim WW2 shooters
I enjoy arcade like damage models
A pinch of spice compared to dumping the whole bottle is quite noticble difference
Well hmmm I have issues with BFV
Oh, by the way, nice to see another brony
:3
Likewise, main one being the horrible lack of accuracy


