#battlefield-6
1 messages Ā· Page 442 of 1
This is active playtesting that they were invited to. Do you not want the game to be rigorously play-tested before launch to ensure the best possible experience?
"Just wait bro, the game will magically playtest itself before launch" š¤£
And all the leaked gameplay since march or April has been awesome. They knew what they were doing to generate hype
Black ops 7 is going to require secure boot, too, so if he wants to play fps games this fall he'll need to sort that out or buy a console.
All of this, the labs playtesting, the reveal event where they gave early access to the beta through watching gameplay, the trailers, the communcation amongst the dev team. It's all culminated into maybe dare i say it the best marketing campaign for a Battlefield game to date.
He needs a new mobo for that it seems like. Lot's of issues with certain Gigabyte mobo's on the forums. So i guess he won't be playing until the day he upgrades his pc or get's a new one sadly.
That sucks, no firmware updates available? I had to update my Gigabyte bios to enable secure boot
Maybe by now they released some updates for his mobo, idk. He didn't have another try since the open beta. Back then what he told me was he couldn't select secure boot or uefi. And when he finally managed after a following a guide he bricked his pc. Had to flash his bios to make it work again
black ops 7 is havin a identity crisis
I wasnt there to watch what he did so can't say for sure
That's brutal, the nightmare of PC gaming right there
Yeah so he lost all interest for bf6 basicly because of that
what gpu and cpu is he running
If i recall it's a 3060 ti and amd 5600x, but don't think that's the issue. The whole secure boot thing was
I'm just surprised he somehow got a mobo that dosen't support secure boot but supports a 3060
it's wild watching their marketing change in real time - the thumbnail for the gameplay video changed to generic future soldier guy recently, and they redid the whole skin for one of the preorder bonuses
He has no issues with any other game
I thought mine didn't support it until I enabled some crap in my bios and it worked fine.
this was when I was trying to install windows 11 on my 10+ year old PC
I think it was also that he needed to change his harddisk file to another type. I forgot the name
Combination of those 2 issues
hes using an HDD and not an SSD?
Ssd yeah
dude you cannot be serious
he probably installed windows with MBR disk type, instead of GPT
nightmare pc build right there holy shitballs
Yeha that was it
So it was the gigabyte mobo not wanting to enable secure boot and that file type
He pretty much installed his windows with the equivalent of Windows 95 options. VERY OLD Legacy stuff. It can be converted, but it requires more steps.
Yeah i dont think he wants to go through all that effort for playing a game tbhš He said ill just get a new pc or upgrades in a year or so
Worst thing is he bought the pc new like that in a store
Windows XP, supported GPT disks, Windows XP came out in 2001...
bros gonna install dial up internet in his new PC
He didnt install anything regarding windows, it was the shop
well the shop did it wrong (whenever it did it)
Guess I'll have to wait for him to get a new one lol, and not at that shopš
he doesn't really need a new one, all that can be converted, but he needs to do more steps
A shop would have to actively changes settings for secure boot to be disabled in a modern pc.
Need to know precisly how. He knows some pc stuff, just no expert
I had to update my motherboard to stop crashing in bf6
not really
My brother said it could destroy my motherboard if my pc turn off during updates
your brother doesn't know what he's talking about
motherboards gonna burst into flames during the windows update lmfao
I did that plenty of times, it still works
the magic smoke might get out
Windows 11 requires secure boot to install. Modern PCs have it enabled by default.
Motherboard update not windows
You know Iāve been play the playtest the entire time. So sit down my son and silence
what is a motherboard update
bios
never heard bios update been called that lol
Yuh bios update
a computer from 2020 can stil lplay BF6, but Windows 11 didn't exist yet.
a more correct term would be Firmware update
Maybe he'll bring his pc go the a shop to let them fix it. Think that's the cheapest option for him
If he's still willing to try lol
If my power goes out itll brick
Secure boot definitely did though.
He should at least read this article, even if he decides for someone else to do it, so he's more informed: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/deployment/mbr-to-gpt
Im on 10 and for me it all works fine, no issues. But his is a nightmare
Cheers bro. I'll send it to him
Secure Boot has been around since Windows 8, but nobody made a push for it until windows 11 came out, meaning it was VERY common for a retail motherboard from 2020 to not have it on by default.
only branded PCs had Secure Boot back then (by default)
The problem with those mobos from 5+ years ago is that they had CSM enabled default back then, because it was the "most compatible" option and could boot in any mode. But CSM on, forces Secure Boot off.
And the Windows 10 installer will happily install itself with Legacy boot options. if the setup boots in legacy mode, and it will not even give you a hint about it.
That's some nice info. I guess i was lucky then with my mobo that it worked without issues. It's from like 2017 or so.
Can you add me Makaki?
My bro's build is a lot newer so I was surprised it went wrong with his pc
i sent the request
Well I guess I'm going to install on my laptop in case moonlight doesn't work too good
Im back
what do you think of a setting option that lets you set the delay for HOLD actions on controller?
the default delay is sometimes too long in these games.
I need bf6 to drop now⦠cod is dry
were really going to launch the game with no closed weapon playlists or the ability to disable open weapons? are the developers smoking crank?
how many weapons will be at launch?
Open weapons is best
its shit
If youre an engineer, your role is to blow up tanks and jets. Drop the sniper rifle, grab your rockets, and PTFO
At least people donāt pick class for the guns and then donāt bother to play the role
The main issue with open weapons imo is the sniper
this happens anyways with open weapons what even is your argument
Yeah - sniper is the only grey area
I would just class lock the sniper to recon tbh
Agreed
the rest idrc at all.
I don't wanna see an assault having a sniper, an m4a1, and a spawn beacon
they literally moved the spawn beacon away from the recon so there's less degen sniper camping with it
so if were locking recon then why not all of the classes and appease a wider audience? oh right because then the cod boys cry
If you donāt understand - I canāt help you
brother your argument was "players are dumb" yeah no shit sherlock whats your next case
I'm a battlefield veteran myself. The average person is not a hardcore bf fan
this place is literally an echo chamber and you want the game to financially do well
I prefer closed weapons myself but open (imo) will attract a much wider audience
Just lock the sniper it's the only thing that breaks the sandbox when it's in open weapons
The rest of the weapons being open don't really ruin the sandbox or are nearly as class defining as a long range one shot
You are spouting nonsense - SMGs / ARs / MGs have been assigned to different classes in different BFs over the years. How can the gun type define the class?
this is also true
my argument from the beginning was open weapons makes no sense, because even in a closed enviroment you were able to run a DMR, a Carbine, or a Shotgun.
Because I want classes to actually mean something, otherwise why would I ever play outside of my role and experience something new and idk PLAY THE GAME
I would argue closing the smgs, ars, and lmgs is just less expression. They generally play close enough to eachother that I would be fine with them being open
gadgets (and in the case of this bf perks) define a class far more than a weapon can
the only weapons that really stand out in defining classes are
1: snipers
2:shotguns
3: lmgs (if suppression is strong)
exactly so why would I switch to a different class when I can just use another classes weapons on assault
because of the gadgets????
I swap classes all the time based on what my team need lmao.
again, why would I switch my playstyle if I have no incentive to do so
Reviving, healing, spotting, resupplying, blowing things up etc are nothing to do with the guns
but it can, when you LOCK THE CLASSES
the incentive to play engineer: a flipping tank or heli wants to murder you or you want to play vehicles
The incentive to play support: to revive, give ammo, heal, and set up positions
The incentive to play assault: lead pushes with spawn beacon, dual wield, stims, and some gadgets like the ladder
The incentive to play recon: UAV and info that helps you to pre fire engagements
also the perks for these classes incentivize their playstyles heavily
Glad you get it
why would I play engineer when I can just play as a recon, spawn with an smg and c4 and do more than an engineer does in a single match
because if a tank isn't mentally stupid they will kill you before you even try to get a c-4 off
good tank players swap between first and third person a lot to get a 360 view
whenever they load a shot they go into third person and will murder you immediately
like playing baseball out here
The launchers and the motion sensor mine murder tanks
Especially the motion sensor mine have you seen that thing? Shizz does like 40-50 damage alone
either way I dont agree with open weapons, its going to ruin this game in the long run and its a shame to see
Also if you want to play vehicles yourself why would you play recon
you want the engineer's repair tool.... and passives when you're in a vehicle
(there's an engineer skill tree that gives stronger auto repair and other stuff while in a vehicle)
brother in christ, my argument was why would I play as an engineer. go back and read it.
Of course itās not
youre just saying random shit at this point of course I am
If you want to engage vehicles in a far safer manner or if you want to play vehicles: run engineer
why would you run any other class? Trying to c-4 a tank is the most dangerous method of engaging a vehicle
It has the most potential of profit with small effort sure but if you get caught you're flipping dead
k, anything else to add?
I feel like you aren't even reading what I'm saying
I wasnt
ā ļø I noticed.
I told you I wasnt going to either, yet you still did
idk man I generally enter a discord to have a discussion. Not ramble and not listen to anyone else
but you do you ig.
I'm gonna go back to studying for this 6 hour exam
I AM STILL NOT PREORDERING/BUYING UNTIL I SEE THE UCAV OR THE MORTAR IS REMOVED.
EA doesnāt listen to their community what a disgrace
Open Class System, more like CoD 6 than Battlefield 6
Aināt buying this shitty game
Goodbye EAš¤”
is there any way to fast track acceptance in to BF Labs?
Reddit is still coping about this huh?
https://x.com/tiggr_/status/1965857532322443344
lets go gambling
ah dang it
Did bro leave
aint that option? either play server with closed class or open class, it simple button click?
yes but not entirely judging by what we saw in the beta
There are limitations on what modes are available with closed class systems and the default option is open classes
I'm not really too worried bout the open/closed class system btw
with good map design and well balanced weapons, it should be fine even if the open class system is the default option and available in most game modes
I got timeout for 3 days and I donāt know why
They should pick a lane(open weapons) and give other option in portal
What did I do wrong?
Probably due to your name
I think it would work just fine
but I'll be honest, I like the idea of playing support and using ARs
that was may way to go at the beta
Open weapons is more balanced
People wonāt choose weapons, they will choose classes
I mean, there are pretty relevant perks if you use the "prefered" weapon type in the class you're playing
in lots of cases the advantage is clear
reduced sprint out time, no movement penalty for LMGs when using with support class
Is the Phantom edition the only way to get the season pass? can't find any details on the price to add the season pass to say the standard edition of the game
well, said thoughts were about the game being buggy and being potentially straight up bad, performance issues are the main complaint i have seen, although from what i heard the game isnt bad
you'll be able to purchase it separately when the game launches
You a funny guy. Hilarious
They should also increase attachment limit for signature weapons tbh, 110-115 if you are playing as assault-AR or LMG-support
yup, not a bad idea at all
there are pretty relevant attachments that consume just enough to lock you from using another one that's similarlly relevant
mostly grips and barrels
Yeah
but I hope they nerf the grips a lil bit
Grips are mostly useless tbh because they increase your spread
I was laser beaming ppl with M4 and the ACR AR I don't remember the name
Recoil reduction didn't seem to worth it imo, I almost never used grips, mostly used compensators and extended mags
Some weapons with no spread such as AK205 may get the benefits of grips but it's a laser beam by default so grips are still worthless imo
fair point
eu vc bf6 squad 1 for bf2042
the battleroyal is in 11h rigth?
I found the NVO with the accuracy grip+compensator is goated
The compensator makes its recoil pattern ideal for tap firing long distance and it goes directly up making control super easy at cqc
the accuracy grip makes you not have to worry about bloom nearly as much and you can burst/long hold in some mid to longer ranges
m4a1 I barely used. It's definetly the overall best gun of the beta but imo the NVO (Ace) and the kts100 (ultimax) if you got their playstyles were kinda nutty
the kts100 with the headshot attachment could do 50 damage per headshot for the first like 20 ish meters? Maybe a bit more I forget.
40 at range
it straight up could outgun dmrs and some sniper users with how accurate and lacking in recoil it was at the longest of distances
The humble rangefinder:
correct.
just change it into a woodlands camo. keep the color
They are. So suggest fixes rather than crying about something youre not going to change
I donāt really get why monster is so persistent. With cod and now battlefield having their own skins itās just odd why no other drinking companies try to get advertised or potentially challenge.
How come battlefield doesnāt have tac sprint like cod, imma break my controller pressing the left analog stick every single time š
game was bad
personally i found the open weapons to be kinda annoying and took away from the overall class identity in some ways. wasn't alot of recons using snipers... Most of the ones i ran into were medics using snipers. And most recons were running assault rifles and playing more akin to a forward spawn for their team...
engineer was doing engineer things most of the time... Because most of them played inside vehicles XD and Assault... Well... they kinda just did a bit of everything which was crazy as they often swapped between snipers and shotguns or assault weapons... even saw a few running double LMG
Yeah closed weapons is something that would be a good thing in battlefield 6, but at this point I personally dont care that much and I dont think others should either
personally every time i wanted to snipe i'd just pick assault with a sniper + carbine as weapon 3
and i will continue to do it if weapons remain open because holy fuck it was so good to actually be able to defend myself as a sniper
Bf6 should be like realistic warfare in real time places.
It's not cod
Wdym by this
As a gaming experience.
Or that's what I think it would be or maybe become
So you mean battlefield 6 maps should be in a realistic setting, but not gameplay
I would like to see more variety in battlefield 6 maps tbh, but it might be too controversial
Thats what they are doing right now, but they need to try and step outside of their comfort zone a bit
Just saying
I'm still surprised they dont release eastern european maps in battlefield as an infantry map or something
I know. I dont want battlefield to have realistic mechanics or gunplay, I just want a more variety in maps
I'm still not exactly sure what you're asking for
Its a game
yes
Indeed
quite
I'm confused
Exactly
It's a game
Exactly
So what did you mean by realistic warfare
Its a game like you said, but you want the game to have realistic warfare in real time places? What?
How does one get access to labs?
So, what do you want out of battlefield 6 then? Because if it's a realistic experience, then that's not the right game
Not really I like lots of games
Realistic mechanics/gameplay or realistic aesthetic/maps
This is my assumption.
Or wish
Both
It is called battlefield for a reason
Or as i lovingly call it beef
Did you get selected ?
Battlefield is a game. Itās nothing like RL. I was in active duty for yrs. believe me, a lot wouldnāt last a second. Iām not the best at gaming, but exemplary in the military. If you really want it RL - Get only one life a game. I love the game aspect of it.
I like it being close. But to actually crap yourself under fire. You would never do a running slide š¤£
I do wish there was no slide at all lol
ive gotten selected for labs for the pre-alpha. Do I get access to this play test happening now?
I wanted to join.
ewwww why are they doing a battle royale mode gross
And to Seratonins point it's not meant to be full on realistic - I think for that you'd need something more like Arma Reforger or Squad
but I'm still so excited for this game.
I just see a lot of ppl saying it needs to be more RL. Itās as close as it can get I reckon. Yeah I canāt bloody wait lol.
I was glad when my service was over TBH. 18yrs was long enough.
Why ... ?
100% the beta was so much fun feels like an excellent blend of BF3 & 4 they just need to stay on target with realistic teams/camos.
I think it's real enough in the places that count and they're getting better about game-ifying the parts that need to be.
Just dont play it if you dont like the mode
Service is very admirable.
And if I had to i would.
because call of duty can have it, meta for sliding in a game like this would be wild
Call of duty wasnt the first game to have sliding and shouldnt be the only game to have it
If you dont like sliding just dont use it
I agree, but battlefield I don't think should be among em, it's meant to have that grounded feel typically that's what I like anyways I'm just a guy.
š¤£. First time I saw someone slide past me it was like āJesus Christ, itās Jason Bourneā funny as.
Aslong as the slide isnt stupidly long there is no issue with it tbh
And it was very short in the beta and in labs currently
right but the folks that want it in want it to be like a 10ft slide to measure up to their experience in things like apex and cod
Never forget.
Maybe so but its not that long so whats the issue with it
Keep in mind battlefield is meant to be more towards call of duty side of the scale in terms of gameplay instead of arma or squad
Only the older battlefield games like battlefield 2 was more leaning towards squad/arma type of realism
yeah if it's short enough it's fine, but if it becomes "meta" then like wtf lol
Either way its not like sliding does anything bad anyway lol still just as easy to track there head and kill them or just use a grenade
true but we gotta feel out those large maps incoming
totally agree though
It gives you a slight speed boost and gets you lower and even if it becomes meta who cares everyone can use it easily
Karlos ttv
Until you run into a movement demon that sprints jumps and slides and then bunny hops around the corner
I dont mind that type of movement either tbh
that's the slipperly slope I'm worried about - everyone shouldn't be sliding around lmao
It only takes 4 shots to kill someone that wouldnt effect it
apex exists
Yeah this type of movement only affects the player around the corner, and even then it's not a common sight
Why ? If everyone can do it easily whats the issue
You can just jump + crouch and from where they are aiming they will miss most of the shots leading to a easy kill
literally so the experience isn't 60 people sliding all over the screen that's wack and not the bf experience I'm here for
I did this type of movement even in bf4 comp matches, it's extremely hard to counter someone using momentum around the corner unless you're a really good player
Good thing most people wont do that since they will just be camping with a sniper or in a tank either way the sliding just helps them move to points faster
Casual players will not be able to counter someone momentum jumping around corners
fair but depending on the map we should be having more vehicles to get us there too
And its even easier to do with sliding
Meh maybe so but they could just use grenades or sound q to hear them since sliding is very loud
True, it's just the whole point of this movement is that they dont expect you to end up very far right side of their screen, you can go flying if you have enough momentum
Trouser shredding
Lol
also where are y'alls bf helmets? bunch of recruits out here lol
But like you said if you jump to the side you can slightly avoid this if you know the player will do this, only like 1% of players know this tho
Once someone starts a slide there is a slight sound q that you can help you know they are about to slide
Yeah it's a matter of experience and skill of the player, 99% of players in bf6 is not doing anything against someone with good movement
You can always hear someone sliding, but they won't know where to put their mouse, or where the person will end up
Its usually veryyy far right of the screen
Dont need to know where they will end up, aslong as you know they are sliding you can just aim to the floor and shoot with a good gun they die in under 3-4 shots
I dont think you know what type of movement im explaining, im probably just explaining it wrong tho lol
So uhm, I know this isn't the right place to talk but do anyone has a solution to EA launcher being super blurry?
I do, i was using it in the beta and in labs
Im talking about sprinting, slide and then you jump with the momentum you gain you get a few extra hops which makes you end up very far right of the players screen
Yes i know
No casual player is predicting this
The usual player that plays this game will expect the enemy to slide around the corner, not jump 500 yards to the right across their screen
Sure at the start but after awhile of getting used to the game even casuals should be fine against it as more people start doing it
Yeah true, I've been doing this mechanic in 2042 and im yet to die to someone lol
But 2042 has more lenient mechanics compared to bf6
Most of the people playing 2042 are just new players trying to grind battle pass
Its easy to get over 130 kills per game now
Then again, you probably won't be able to bunny hop like i explained in the full game, they did say they nerfed the movement
Oh fair enough then, I would love to try it but you know, battlefield not sending emails
Howās the lab tests going guys? Have they ironed out things? Better?
NDA
Its funny though you can have a team mate put c4 on the front of your car then ram someone and blow them up without dying or taking damage
Thoughts on conquest large?
No
Oh, still a bit of tuning to do then?
pre-order canceled
Howās everyoneās day going
Seriously?
Canāt you just preorder a day before launch and play for two hours then refund if you donāt like it(steams policy)
When you preorder doesnt matter
Oh
If ur gonna do that, try doing it on the EA app, u get 24 hour return period
Iām gonna keep my order. Got the phantom one. I need something, getting bored of hogwarts š¤£. Im confident they will sort on the testing.
I had a blast on the beta. Even with glitches.
All phantoms should squad up on day 1
I even got a new elite controller and headphones for the occasion. Donāt let me down BF. š
Dude, I've been wanting to get one of those controllers, r they worth the money?
What didnt you like about the beta / labs ?
Yeah same
Even if the game is bad who cares ? Its only 100$
Yes, itās got fine tuning, extra pads etc. and you can replace the sticks. Bit expensive though.
I mean itās better than what ever cod has going on
I buy cod every year just for the story mode price is so cheap that it doesnt matter
Yeah right. This game lacks something..this game lacks..nicki minaj
No, I loved the beta, not been invited for the labs, rude but Iām a grown man and can take it š
I've heard that the Sovereign Soldier skin is for NATO support
I expected it to be for assault
If it's really for support, it's kinda disappointing imo
makes you feel any better i have the lab builds, but all it is is just not great specially the br ......idc what people say about it. defending it like white knights or kids trying to play it lowball saying its for income when really they are the kids whining about not having a br game. when they played many others and think they need to force the ideology of battle royal being master race like dumb kids on fortnite lol.
I mean no offense but if you dont like the mode just dont play it ? Whats the big deal.
waste of resources , time , and other content they can improve on if you want me to be blunt about it ......no one wanted it for the last 2 games so why beat a dead horse ?
Battle Royal is trash
They have multiple teams that do nothing while waiting for new stuff it wont waste time nor resources, also they likely have a separate team anyway .
so i am tired of your multiple teams excuse because all it is saying is you want it regardless of what people are saying ......lol and on top of that even if its in labs its in the project of being in a portal game mode.......which we will be forced to download and waste memory for future content that is way better than your stupid battle royal god you so worship. lol idk why you gusy say its a sub teams when its in the project line of being official. you experimenting a game mode no one wants ? so we beating a dead horse and wasting time and money on something we shouldn't ?
I dont even play battle royal why are you assuming that, either way if its not wasting resources and / or time whats the issue ? The size wouldnt be effected much maybe 1-5 gb the textures are reused not remade and either way its the companys money why do you care so much just dont play the game mode, if its a dead horse they will remove it
if its in labs its wasting testing and time when we could be testing the base foundation of maps , weapon tweaks , new concept projects and more !!! lol like why yall defending it .....this is like that reforger is a project more than a game even though you spent 70 on a full game ? like take your mentality check on whats actually good and what doesn't work ...if you played previous bf games you should know better than to say crap like that
100$ is less then 4 hours of work i could care less, either way there is nearly 30 days until the game comes out with testing stopping 5 days before they have plenty of time to test everything
Also dont forget they also have a internal QA team
yeah well their internal qa team ain't listening it seems like when twitter and everyone else on here is not liking the br game mode anyways yet again and telling them to stop beating a dead horse that no one wants in the first place
Internal QA teams are usually good people with terrible leadership though, as an aside. Community testing is only remotely better depending on the company.
Battle Royale is what EA is banking on for their 100 million players goal. That is their metric of success for the title. Delivering a successful Battlefield to appease the burnt fans and revitalize, while pushing the BR to bring player numbers that they are requiring internally.
Internal qa team job isnt to listen to other people what are you talking about
There definitely are people who want a BR, just not a lot of them are here.
so what you are telling me they will most likely add it and it will be forgotten again just like hazard zone and firestorm yet again
ahhhh we wasting money because people don't know how to listen properly and cross reference what works and what doesn't .....ah yes lets be a CEO that forgets the core reason why battlefield was successful in the first place. dumb people be dumb and fired for a reason
CEO's normally dont play games and most of the time they also dont pick what to add to the game either, anyway its there money why do you care ? Just dont play it
ceos don't play games ..... -looks at the ceo of final fantasy 14 online ceo that actually does . looks at the ceo of palword that does .....looks at risk of rain 2 team that does .- hmmmmmm yeahhhhh your statement seems "normal"
Read the second word
"the"
then just say EA ceo doesn't because he is a idiot lol just leave it at that
Ceo of taketwo said he didnt play games does that make him a idiot aswell
Its the game director that makes most of the changes not the ceo
EA is smart to finally listen and put in what we wanted in the first place but its still not perfect
being honest yes lol most games die when people lose out the passion of making good games .....i mean COD is a good example and the fact them merging with blizzard and how they ruined overwatch def say everything about almost all major gaming companies that try so portray. "they care about their users" but never listen
a.k.a activision and blizzard
Players that do as little as install and login once, those probably count towards the "100 million players" goal, which can easily be attained by the F2P model. The shareholders are happy and will stfu, and I'm happy because we have a good paid game that will get the budget it needs 
you mean 10 mill will be alt accounts from EA team to inflate their numbers.
Would probably be from dice not ea if that did happen but either way they wouldn't even need accounts as they could just fake the number
how much you wanna bet the company will give out those free copies so that way they can inflate the player count...... lol imma just wait for jackfrags video drop for the br mode and i bet it will be horrible like always lol
They have no reason to do that
watch em it will happen
So give away copies for no reason ?
i mean its EA they waste money and resources so i mean its true by nature
They would just put the game on sale either way ps5 and xbox numbers cant be tracked so once again they could easily just lie ..
When is BR (that no one asked for) playtest?
in the 8 ft grave where it belongs š¤”
Should start at 7
cornball
this is why the internet is slowly turning AGAINST bf6 and in favor of bo7 again
Cant wait to see all the br leaks
People hate on things they dont want even if it doesnt effect them you shouldnt be surprised kind of like tourist
oh im not surprised
i always imagine that its like a ukraine war against russia where they bomb people with civs in the area because they taunt the enemy to say "you wouldn't"
Even if there wasnt a br people would find something to hate
nah i just hate br because its a valid reason to waste resources and content ........ portal creation is kinda lowkey cool though bc we can make maps and that just makes it awesome
yknow what, maybe i should pre order black ops 7
I preordered it already, along with 9 other games that are coming out soon
jesus okay i guess
BR sucks
Not true
Theyre not
You should also be aware of any EA email talking about play tests and NDA agreements.
What you should do it forward it to me and Iāll thoroughly investigate if itās legit. Gotta keep the community safe and stuff 
Should also send codes for anything steam related as well because that could be potentially harmful. TO ADD TO MY INVESTIGATION
Really?
That was a weird set of shadow deletions.
@civic scarab wrote you a DM
I wonder if it was by I am still here, or someone else.
Well i deleted it myself, don't want to spread wrong information either so i wrote disciple 13 to have a look
I meant my reply to it, it is gone too.
True
I would say because it mentioned their company and the word domain, but even for the shadows that would be quite silly.
Possible, really interested if the mail is fake or not tho, so hopefully i will get an answer from disciple
The domain is real and you can always login to your playtesting profile yourself to do what it may have said.
Instead of clicking through the email.
Yeah that's for sure, maybe i will have a look later, i just woke up and saw it š
didn't need one to begin with waste of time and development... Wasn't their strong suit to begin with either they've tried two times already
Itās just another attempt to win over cod fans. Theyād be better off building a unique battlefield fanbase
Boat goes binted
More players the better, if players dont like the mode they dont need to play it
Easy; you don't.
I saw the leaked skin, if they're gonna advertise it might as well make the camo look like it fits in the terrain
also maybe add the Monster logo as a flag patch
if that's what they're going for
Cool
The collab skin could use some serious overhaul
turn it into a digital camo with some of the green and black on it
yikes man morewisdxm just dropped a compile video of the streamers ruining bf6 with br bois and its a nightmare .....people are even saying its bad like i thought it was lol ......get that crap out of there. they even have recent clips of streamers already hating it even when they whine and begged for it lmaooooooo
Wsg mate
honestly, I don't mind the leaked skin, atleast it's not niki minaj but it could use some seriously overhaul, the skinis basically announcing to everyone that "Hey assholes shoot me"
honestly looking at the skins its pretty decent for what it was i mean i rather have soldiers looking like soldiers and not some crazy looking skin ruining the immersion for the game.
I would honestly like if it has a sort of camo pattern
Imo it's better to draw the line early than let them push the envelope with regard to skins.
maybe insperation from digital or maybe flectarn camo
honestly i can agree having camo variations and different adaptations of the gear would be cool i def agree
like, what if I want my Monster skin to have like an EMR pattern
its already been confirmed we are going to get br months after launch its being cemented even when vast majority is saying no to it
do you think we'll get the skin by buying a monster energy drink with the code on it?
honestly i think so or mnt dew promotion one of the two
I don't mind MTN dew collab
I love drinking MTN dew
glad my country used sugar to make MTN dew
What's next? Guacamole Gamer Fart 9000 use code badger at checkout Camo?
I can imagine the skin looking like someone from the Jungle
actually, it might fit
but I could be wrong
Why do people care what other people have on anyway ? Its just a skin
Because I would rather not have neon signs running about in a game that is supposed to centered around a grounded representation of warfare. While an arcade game, I consider it realism-leaning arcade.
it starts out something small till it eventually goes out of control
But it makes them easier to see does it not ?
and that's exactly what happened with COD
Doesn't matter, it's a slippery slope I would rather not go down.
bum bum bum bum bum bum
people come to BF6 to get away from COD's extreme out of place skins
bf game with movement like battlebit would be decent tbh
So just play battlebit
As I keep saying; I'd rather draw the line too early than too late.
I wanna see wood armour for APC
Noob
Battlebit was the most fun I've had in a BF game
so many friends were playing it on Steam, it was great
Wood armour's entire purpose is to take the first hit preserving the main armour for a good while
Might work for smaller shaped charge projectiles but kinetic penetrators will go through it like butter.
I see wood armour being heavily used during the Marawi siege
especially for their APC and LAV
This doesn't change its practical effectiveness against kinetic energy penetrators.
Depending on aspect, shaped charge projectiles could probably be mildly inconvenienced by it.
could also buy you time to find where the shot comes from and waste a rocket
Yep.
or run away
I want to say only one thing: DU DU DU DUDUDUN -28!
why is Max Verstappen's theme the first that comes to mind
AHAHAH but Max is dududu max Verstappen, our is DU DU DU DUDUN! our is slower and deep, the one from Max is faster and high tone!
Its max, ITS MAAAAX
I hope they have animated lava skins on the guns
I want the game to look like apex legends
bait used to be believable
Not bait I actually want animated lava skins
Maybe we should invite him to play BF6 as well !
bait bait usesd to be believable
Jsmith wants BATTLEROYALE
EA: I CAST "you are invited to the skate playtest"
Well if I canāt have lava skins I at least want LGBT charms for pride month
This is bf, go to cod for that
Nah cod is too realistic
Alr buddy
Iām not your buddy
nah he's just baiting
bait sure used to be believable
I know, cod realistic is enough bait
blueberry here just made his account today
Lol
But ye i remember snoop fighting on the beach of Normandy with his anime m1 garand and nikki tbaging the dead soldiers
welcome John Smith, ima go drink milkshake
What flavour?
strawberry
Ayyy
Now you have
EA: I CAST! "You are invited to the Skate 3 playtest"
oooooooooh ! thanks !
š¤š»š
I dislike tac sprint because itās clunky glad BF6 removed it
Phantom Ops Easter egg please š
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i7GH54nKc6w&ab_channel=Viscose very informative video!
will help you with a clip heavy playstyle that makes you look like an aimbot user
looks sus
the more you practice your aim and a playstyle like this (flank heavy multikill style), you'll realize that it's very possible
Viscose is one of the best mouse aimers in the world at target switching scenarios in aim trainers
Mornin
I'm probably more sus'd out the way you sent the link
god bless battlebit
I bet he isnāt as good IRL. I couldnāt reload a gun or run and aim that fast. They are pretty heavy to throw around. Heās good on a desktop though lol.
Sorry but I'm on controller 
Same here. I always ignore pc players as they will always have an advantage. I was good when I played on a computer. Not as good when swapped to console.
You're wrong that pc has an advantage
Consoles will always have the best advantage and is....
Casuals
Controllers with aim assist have advantages depending on the amouont of assist the devs give them
Controllers also have way less recoil then pc
And we have casuals best advantage
Funny enough if you have a controller connected while playing you get less recoil and aim assist 
I dunno. Was far easier with multiple keys on pc.
yea, that's also an assist the devs give to controller players to make it more even amonst PC and more fun for them
By this i meant just having it plugged in is enough you can use your keyboard and play with controller assistance lmao
hello george. sup
https://preview.redd.it/13eaic63g5281.png?width=847&auto=webp&s=bcae1c5c20b7db7b18e84e5fc76b019a2d426788 famous Halo MNK vs Controller stats in a game where controllers had way too much aim assisstance
you must be blind as a bat if you can't tell when someone is in camo or not i guess thats why you play COD. lol maybe shut that mouth about knowing whats good for the game like a typical idiot only clout chasing stupid streamer games
Just because someone is easy to spot doesnt mean changing there skin wouldnt make them easier to see ... are you slow ?
Oh. I can plug a mouse into a console. Hmm would this give me a mouse and aim assist?
No clue as i dont have a console
you must me slowler to argue that having no camo is better i guess thats why you weren't picked to be in the military you dishonorable discharged man child
I dont think so. as if you are playing on PC, you get aim assist from the controller as well
Holy grammar
Is this another pc vs console debate?
I think the aim assist is linked with the controller not the console
No just talking about a glitch
Yes help me
Ah, got you.
No mickael don't leave me here!!!!!
Nah its that you can plug in a controller on pc to get aim assist even if your playing on keyboard
So fooling the system?
i guess, it also gives you less recoil ĀÆ_(ć)_/ĀÆ
that sir is called exploiting and can def put you on a ban list
Goddam
I mean it might work on console aswell. Bf6 supports keyboard and mouse on console right ?
Don't know
Never tried it, never will, i m to busy having fun
Ill test if its still working in the upcoming labs test
so i guess we are ok with people talking about explioting a game and then try to get away of the rules lol ironic as this is i can def say this chat needs to be purged to even mention exploitation to enhance your winning chances because you can't just get gud like the rest of us of or do research like the rest of the people.
I have a 6.07 kd on my main account in 2042 i think im doing just fine, i was talking about it since i found it while testing controller recoil, either way its a glitch and the game isnt even out yet.
glitch = exploitation ? i think you are defining the word wrong . a glitch would be more like a texture not applying or rendering out right that causes to blanket the screen .....thats a glitch ......an expliot is what you explained earlier.
Everybody who got 7th August invite gets a BR invitation?
Im back from being banned. After 10,000 years I am finally free
What happend?!?!
lowkey not a power ranger ref what so ever
So if you can use a controller on all systems. Even pc. Thereās not a problem? Personal choice?
"Game glitches refer to unexpected software errors or flaws within video games that result in unintended behavior" plugging in a controller and getting less recoil and aim assist would be unintended behavior
I promise to never criticize EA every again
Hahahaha you talked about a map?
I said BF6 should be $65 instead of $70
Hahahahah
but you saying it public and open for everyone to see which can make users abuse this glitch is in fact a exploit. you can define it all you want but you just pulled the "i be stupid and forget to rub my brain cell " moment
Oh nice I use conrtroller on PC. Thanks for the tip 
Game isnt out yet so no one can abuse it in any mindful way, just like the glitch to get on top of roofs in the open beta was allowed to be talked about.
"Game isnt out yet" i mean is it in labs ? yes ? then you be stupid and slow
Labs is a closed beta test, so no it isnt out.
Person below me likes to play CoD
whats your definition of a game being out again ? when its official ? i mean thats a dumb way to look at it ? if its public and open to selected people would that be counted as open ? i mean by your defined thought process you think it isn't but if we can play it i would define that as open and in "TESTING"
Good thing its closed and in beta test ...
good thing its open then right ?
We?
So itās open, but not open open š
Thanks ea_barry for helping !
Girls get in for free, but sorry youre not on the list. Tale as old as nightclubs or something
I identify as a lampshade. But if girls get it free. Yes Iām a woman lol
I saw the countries for NATO and Pax Armata and they go as followed
NATO starring America, the UK, with special guest star Egypt!
Pax Armata featuring definitely not Russia, we promise its not Russia, and finally huh oh yeah this one actually isnt Russia.
I just canāt wait until the 10th. Iām not good enough to even advise on a beta test. I donāt last long enough. Just as long as most things are ironed out Iāve read about before release. All good.
Iām glad they nerfed movement
Game is NOT out yet. Judge on the 10th
It wasnt changed enough to even be noticeable more or less just fixed a few glitches
Damn that sucks. I donāt want people jumping around
I could do the same things i could in the open beta
Makes them a easier target anyway
Nah it makes the game sucky and unrealistic
You want them to stand still so you can shoot them?
Not that big of a deal, almost no one did it in the beta
What ?
No I want people to take cover and fight somewhat realistically. Nobody in real life starts hopping and sliding while theyāre being shot at.
Battlefield isn't about realism
Maybe they will pick this up on beta testing and tweak more. Have you the opportunity to text them things on beta.
Replied to wrong post sorry
Itās not about fantasy either buddy
Itās a video game
And?
at least its not cod š
Jumping while shooting makes it equal to cod
Well there is nothing stopping you from doing that š , as long as you can aim its still easy to kill them.
Not even close.
Completely ruins immersion
It has a class system and you rub a defib on someone for 2 seconds to revive them from getting shot in the chest
Just practice
It's a fantasy
Itās not that it makes the game harder, itās that it makes the game look ridiculous and clown like
Why not play arma or squad ?
Then they shouldnāt use real uniforms and guns. You should probably go play apex
Why not play apex or cod?
They are adding fake uniforms
Best movement Iāve know was in BFV - wish was same as that
What stops me from playing both ?
I could ask you the same question since you proposed the same nonsensical question
We don't even have real guns anymore because EA won't pay the licensing
I mean, against a good player someone running and jumping out in the open is going to get cooked by someone just holding an angle
āI want a feature in Battlefieldā āwhy donāt you play other game which has that feature?ā
I wasnt the one complaining, if you want to be fully immersed play squad or arma
Never played COD. But by the sounds of it, sounds more paintball than anything else.
Well seems like arma or hell let loose is the way to go still if they want to go this way lol
Battlefield was always mostly about immersion. It was supposed to feel like a movie. It was cinematic. Jumping isnāt cinematic. It looks ridiculous
"jump" is part of bf, whether you like it or not
Battle field 4 and 2042 ?
Not bunny hopping while shooting
True. I like the huge fights that can just unfold at anytime, explosions and destruction all around
2042 sucks donāt even talk about that trash
None actually bhops while shooting and hits shots past 10m LMAO
Ok so battle field 4 ?
Battlefield has strayed far from its original vision and angered a lot of long time fans. Iām just telling you guys how they can return to their peak.
Yeah because they nerfed jumping. In the beta it was common.
so add back bunny hoping is what you are saying?
Battlefield 4 was fine but not nearly as good as Battlefield 3 or Battlefield 1
In the beta it was not common, i had over 130 hours and only saw 4 people doing it
No nerf it even more
Well I saw a lot. Anecdotal evidence doesnāt help you
Me and the boys rolling up to a tank with a skid loader
I meant nearly everyone in lobbies bunny hops and dives around corners
Strange take
I feel DICE is falsely marketing the PAC skin in BF6, from what I have seen it look nothing a like in game. They make it seem way cooler on the pre order picture. Not okay
Lighting changes alot of stuff.
Yeah thatās why it wasnāt as good as the others. They pandered to cod players
I dont think i ever saw someone bhop spray in my games, saw some twitter clips of crackheads running over dads at close range but thats about it
Like on the pre order page he looked mogged as hell
thats cos you rely cant, even in the weekend beta
Bf4 movement tech was very immersive tbh XDDDD
Itās clothes that you can put on any player model
Well no. Itās only on one class
Either way its not a big deal, you can still do it in labs with little change and it doesnt effect game play much
EEEEH its just a battlefield game calling back to bf3/4 with more modern movement implemented welcome to fps games in 2025
Thatās dumb but yeah it looks like cosmetics will be class specific and nation specific. That means youāll have to buy like 24 cosmetic sets just to look unique on every class on every map
Welcome to trash and the continued failure of Battlefield lol. They should learn from 2042 that people donāt want āmodernā features that were copied from Apex Legends.
Well I canāt tell you here what itās like, cause itās leaking then lol
"unique" there is nothing unique if everybody can buy the same stuff
Itās unique because kids like you canāt afford it LOL
Kids? 𤣠Ya sure
Check the join time.
Labs player respecting NDA holy
Why do mods delete messages that arenāt even offensive? Overmoderation kills communities
We can delete anything we like, its upto our discretion.
We? Bro is impersonating a moderator now lol
Sure.
Maybe they are trying to stop it from becoming a serious thing and not banning you?
We are just having a discussion
Anyone who doesnāt like the discussion doesnāt have to participate
I mean it looked to me like it was getting just a little close to becoming a mess of insults
A discussion xD he just want to troll and insult people
A discussionš¤£
However i'm out, good day
Bro is just mad he canāt afford skins and wants to say I donāt look unique
Already guns drawn and the game ain't out ššš
People be out here getting way too heated about aim assist/movement/bf6br on the daily
The shadows are too afraid to show themselves the majority of the time but enjoy deleting that which is standard conversation. A part of it is an autobot, at least we assume.
aim assist belongs in single player and should stay there
People have opinions people should have opinions it's what makes conversation a thing
I wish br never happens
To my previous point
Im not saying having opinionsbis bad, i just rly dislike people that refuse to hear out the opposite side and shit just devolves into insults
Nah itās definitely some green haired person with a nose ring
Agreed
EXACTLY
In the end of the day no-one wants the same stuff from the game anyways
We just all wish it's a good game
"flip-floppers" yes its an actual saying X)
ŠŃ
I hope battle royale games fail and stop getting made. Itās old and boring.
YES
My man
As someone who while fitting neither of those likely fits into a category of people you hate, I can assure you the shadows here, if part of the Family, are the ones that most of the Family would likely shun.
Speak for yourself, I love being mad at bs all the time
I honestly never thought it would take off lol
Professional hater I see
People are competitive, and especially the idea of being the number 1 out of a large group was a very appealing motivator for a lot of those large player count dwindling number games.
Tbf alot of it rode of the backs of pubg and fortnite, warzone more a mixture of the former losing players and cod as an ip just being that big
Who said I hated them? They just fit a certain personality style
Can someone please confirm if you had to sign up again to get a chance for this week's testing?
Most that talk like that are of a particular type of group that hates not only a particular part of a political party but also the Family.
If you are not one of those, my apologies for the assumption, it is just very very common.
So I just wanted to clarify our distance from the shadows here.
What do you mean by the family?
The LGBT+ and our allies.
do you think battlefield 6 will beat fortnite and marvel rivals?
Man it really feels like you are baiting and will then come back after being banned to complain about it, easiest option it probably to talk to people about the game and not play silly games and not win silly prizes....
Iām unsure. I registered once. Iām on the sidelines ha ha. Never an invite, but get all the feedback here. Doesnāt really bother me.
unlikely, the more mature the game the less players
"adults" (lol) dont have time to game š
Ok I think I just answered my own question lol. Attempting to sign up to labs when already signed up back in February just takes me to portal home
At checkers, or with a tire iron?
I think youāre baiting
neither
The comment I was replying to was nuked.
what time can i play battle royal?
Baiting what man? Just stating my thoughts on it
yes mine got nuked
what time can i play battle royal?
But anyway, if you are not anti-Family I do apologize, I am just very used to that very specific rhetoric extending beyond just hatred for a political party, which that comment usually is directed at.
Rude asking that here when none of us got invited 
Rub it in š. Just rub it in ha ha.
codes have not been given out to anyone yet?
3
Just shoot them? BF6 movement is already worse than BFV, 2042, BF4, Hardline etc.
Closed weapons should be the only way to play. There shouldnāt even be an option
Hmmm. No email yet. Gas bill arrived though š¤¦āāļøš¤£ ā¦.
Open weapons are more balanced
āJust shoot themā š¤¤
Itās not Battlefield. If you want open weapons play Cod. It has open weapons.
And pink ones.
where's the labs channel again?
Yeah thatās what the open weapons people want too
How do closed weapons define Battlefield?
discord is weird and keeps hiding channels. You know the labs channel that is public for everybody no matter if they got an invite or not. Where's that at?
Because every battlefield before 2042 had closed weapons with a few categorical exceptions
Things have been added removed over the years - eg did adding squad revives make it no longer Battlefield?
Itās like saying we should add chess pieces to checkers. Battlefield has always been about classes with closed weapons. Thatās what makes it Battlefield and not just a call of duty clone
They decided to hide the channel from CoD streamers
Imo, open weapons make for more player expression and embrace creative loadout crafting BUT, i personally prefer closed weapons thematically speaking (if done well)
Itās still there. Maybe a glitch š¤£
About classes yes, closed weapons WTF?
First sub-heading under 'information'
Creative loadouts means supports with snipers and unlimited ammo. Itās dumb. Each class has a job and should be structured to do that job
Why should an assault with a spawn beacon also have a sniper???
i see "This is battlefield labs under blogs but that's not the same is it?
Gadgets shape the role of a class much more than weapons do
Not true. You must have only played 2042, literally the worst Battlefield ever made
Well in recent BFs Recons had the spawn beacons
Yeah and there was a camping problem. They moved the spawn beacon to assault to fix the camping problem. Now youāll have assaults camping. Ridiculous.
Battlefield isn't a hero shooter, it's a class shooter. Weapons aren't necessary to be locked to classes to justify existence of classes. Gadgets and perks are far more important now when it comes to choosing classes instead of 40%+ of the players playing assault due to assault having best weapons and best gadgets
How does it change the game if recon runs around with a shotgun
explain why give a good meaningful reason that impacts the game in a positive way. Open weapons has encouraged more people to fulfill roles and utilize their preferred weapon as apposed to having to pick either a weapon you like but gadgets you wont use or care for vis versa.
Every BF has a camping problem. Campers just lose games for the team.
Part of a class playstyle is the weapon choice. You shouldnāt be using an SMG as a recon or a sniper as a support. Itās more than āgadgetsā. That term is also cringe and comes from 2042
I want people picking classes for the role (not to get the meta guns!)
They donāt care about losing they care about KD. Closed weapons force team play based on the job of the class
There shouldnāt be meta guns. Guns should be good at their role.
Person below me plays CoD
And it's a problem. If support had only access to LMGs then I wouldn't play support. There would be less teamplay. If engineer had only access to SMGs in maps that are designed for long range engagements then I wouldn't play engineer, vehicles would dominate matches etc.
If you have the same guns that do the same things with some better then others there will be meta guns no matter what.
No it does not! In BFV the medics are all running around NOT reviving because they only pick the class for the SMGs
If you donāt want to hang back and defend with an LMG then you shouldnāt be playing support at all. Thats what the job is for.
I play COD 
Yeah no surprise there
Support is medic, standing at the back of the map won't make me revive people you know?
What about bf6 supports? Lmgs promote longer play, yet the medic part of their kit incentivises them to be close to the frontline, which smgs are all about. Do they not benefit from the option?
There is a perfectly valid point about offensive capability and balancing the gadgets and perks with said capability, where lmgs are given to them to let them know they arenāt meant to be infantry killers, but when considering engagement ranges and doing their job it seems like an smg would benefit them, potentially even more so than lmgs
Thatās why medic is better with LMGs like in Battlefield 6
I want to be on point reviving people, doing that in BF6 with LMG is awkward
Exactly this is why one class fills the entire team. Seen this in most battlefields I have played.
Isnāt lmg the guns for medics in bf6???
The support having the medical gear incentivizes them to be BEHIND the front line where they can see downed people. A medic with an SMG is killing, not reviving.
Support is medic in BF6
Every class can kill, BF isn't a hero shooter
Ive played every bf since bc2
Wait so weapons are gonna be class specific ?
You should be behind the front line, not running forward.
Same difference - LMGs are no good for the players rushing in to revive
At this point, this guy is just rage baiting
Nobody said it was.
I agree. Plenty of times i wanted to play as medic but I didnt like smgs so I just didn't š¤·āāļø
Check the creation date.
Ah okay, yeah š
"Please die closer to me"
Classic line I would say
And why shouldn't medics use SMGs when they are trying to revive people who are dying on the frontlines? If support was locked to LMGs there would be even less revives in the game
Not true. You clearly havenāt been playing Battlefield long enough to recognize the common problems. Medics with SMGs are the most useless
Medic is my fave class, if Iām forced to play with LMGs I wonāt play it
I get revived most in BFV so clearly not the case š
I played with SMGs on BFV
Medics use a shotgun, more effective
Do mods not exist here?
No
What fo you need help with
What about keeping the defense alive dont have to be on the frontline now because you have weapon options.
Why would you need a mod?
You are right, block exists š
Mods mods someone said something I didnāt agree with about a video game!!!
and have over 66,000 revives on that game
yes #how-to-report-and-appeal, if you feel you must
They are going to be placing supply boxes at their feet while fighting, which directly supports those doing the same thing, benefiting everyone else who is nearby when with lmgs those people would have to make a conscious retreat somewhat to where that support is set up to get said support. which inherently means the support doesnāt get as much use or value
When considering ranges, which is the main reason to lock weapons anyway, I see it as fairly logical
Support should just use a shotgun
The one game aside from bf4 where I can actually get heals regularly. Which is also funny since the bf4 assault is also the frontline medic
That supports realism. A defended command post position where people can resupply makes logical sense, not throwing a bag right into combat.
put cover down then the bag behind it š
Yes but Iām saying thatās why the support class has an LMG
If you want supports to be helping the team, how does making them set up 30m behind the actual combat line make them better at their jobs
People will get more off of supply boxes if they are where the people are already fighting
Reviving is mainly for defensive purposes, not attacking.
Ill make sure to stay in spawn and resupply there since its the realisitc command post
Because battlefield is about attacking and defending. Even when attacking a position you need to defend and fortify your flanks in case of a retreat
Ill wait with you, watch your back
But itās not the most realistic command post. You want a good position to resupply your men. Thatās basic logistics.
If yall need ammo, ill be here. Its crazy out there
Yeah, that would be spawn. Enemy cant go there. Pretty realistic
Yes, people should always be watching thresholds into unknown space, but in that scenario there will be objectively fewer people actually gaining health and ammo from supply boxes
Ok so you think itās better to have a support with an SMG just dying and running into buildings while throwing his bag down randomly?
Or maybe you want a support with a sniper who can camp and have unlimited ammo š
If it means I get a bag placed next to me as Iām peeking a doorway in Cairo then yes
It also falls in the the deployable cover as well. you basically become a temporary mg emplacement Yes. I have enjoyed the combined medic/support role perhaps I have a bias for it I just feel so much more useful as a support in bf6 at least during the beta.
Yes, DMRs have been available to them in many games. Nothing new
You guys are what caused Battlefield 2042. There is no saving this franchise
Whatās the point of deployable cover if you have an SMG???
For supporting the team š¤Æ
block corners/doors entryways etc. make it an obstacle can put explosives behind it for a trap with a recon and tugs plenty of ways to use it.
As mentioned before, medics in bf4 and v were easily the most prevelant and the ones I felt the most present, youād get constant heals in 4 and v because of that proximity to the people who need it most due to the weapon, and it played perfectly
Use deployable cover to make enemies play into your hands in close quaters with smg
@rough olive Its ok to acknowledge DMRs, shotguns, and PWDs have been open to classes in past games. They cant hurt you hurt you anymore, accept your past.
DMRs were historically more broken than snipers too
A compromise is fine but fully open weapons are dumb
Such as ZH29 from BFV and SVK from 2042 š
BF3 AS Val. Boo!
A DMR should support a somewhat long distance play style without being as effective as an actual sniper for the recon class
So scary
Pdw: meh
Smg: š
BF6 also has SVK and it's 2 shot body from seemingly all ranges
Yes a PDW was just a low damage SMG
PDW is the same thing as SMG, just different name
In game it was different
No it isnt, that doesnt fit with my narrative
There is no SMG category in BF4 though, just PDW, there is no PDW category in BF6, just SMG, they are the same class
We had a 2 shot body shot dmr in the beta I didnt feel it was much of an issue I did not see it used much though. Was a nice punchy weapon with beefy feel and recoil to it I wonder how the svk will compare.
@rough olive Why did you go offline? Come back here and save Battlefield
it was good on specific situations. taken the 1000 kill count i'd have made about 50 with dmr. great for picking a fight with a prone'd LMG enemy
You want battlefield to be trash bro
yeah and the twitchy high sensitivity anti air emplacement players š¤£
SVK in 2042 had 200 rpm fire rate I belive, SVK in BF6 has 150 rpm. BF6 SVK isn't as good but still probably can 2 shot body shot at all ranges.
Who said I agreed with them lmao
Arguably more broken than 2042 SVK because 2042 SVK can only do that up to 100 meters.
Idk you seemed kinda sarcastic about it
Best part is I like closed and open equally 
If your claims can be debunked with sarcasm then you need work on your arguements. Now then, I need to get some sleep. I have catch the school bus early or Im gonna get grounded if I miss it again
Someone may have replied to you already, but look under channels and roles at the top of your channel list.
This may sound odd but i would prefer to have a lower rate of fire wouldnt mind heavy springs and bolt mods could make a very stable platform at the cost of TTK but i know that's a niche thing. I did find bi pods to be abit goofy during the beta but somewhat effective over constantly mounting and unmounting.
Yeah you canāt afford skins unless you stay in school kiddo

2,475,795 seconds remaining until Battlefield 6
That is 2,475,795 seconds too many
How much is this in dog Years ?
i dont know...
When I come out of that after clicking on it, it just dissappears lol
I guess the only way I can access it is by typing out #battlefield-labs-discussion for myself to click on or clicking on it from sonebody else lmao
i hope they do another beta, i wanna see if they actually did anything to the servers and how bad the desync and phantom shots + damage registration being so awful
It never stays in the list no matter how many times I click on #battlefield-labs-discussion š¤£
right click the channel and add it to the channel list
2,475,795 seconds ā 0.55 dog years, or about half a year in dog life
I don't think there will be any. Don't get your hopes up. They already got the servers tested with the Open beta. unless there is something big that they want to test I dont think we will get another beta
Oh sick ty
no problem š
BF6 maps too small
I agree
Like shit, cod gonna have bigger mapsš
Agree to disagree
The BF6 beta garand is amazing
Probably the kind of Iron I can rely on
Garand? You mean the M39 EMR? Which is a derivative of the M21? In turn a derivative of the M14. Which was developed from the T44E1. Which admittedly was an experimental version developed from the Garand.
That one
But havenāt they made bigger maps?
Yeah, one of the best Irons I've used
Not that we, or from leaks know of.
wtf JSmith
Firestorm is a big map
I think there are bigger maps
I'm not exactly surprised, unlike like 95.6% of more modern designs, the M14 was designed to be an iron sight weapon, developed from another iron sight weapon.
Battleroyale. Not playing that crap
Although, admittedly, the aperture we see in games is significantly larger than the real life one.
What's the point of Big maps if only half the areas are gonna be used if we're gonna have big maps might as well give such areas some use
Firestorm is the BR more in BF6z
Operation Firestorm is a map
The fire is literally the shrinking border of the br area
You really don't.
Yea you do lol. As you have a whole mode being called firestorm now
š š
Regarding the bigger maps, I'm not sure it's gonna matter unless they also have higher player counts
Why not have the shrinking boarder be tanks, anti aircraft and military personnel that are slowing closing in
Discussion is maps not modes. Try to keep up
As you could have meant the map in firestorm, try to keep up yourselfš š

So there is around 3 large maps. That will do me. I like to crawl around the outside. Make a quick coffee before I slide in like Jason bourne.
Please, youāre not gonna be right in any way or shape
Anyone else watched the tren twins play battlefield 6?
the context was about maps in MP. no one would bring up BR map in this context
Potentially unpopular opinion but I prefer fairly large maps, gives a bit of a breathing period between objectives instead of immediately attacking the next one.
Yea you could lol. Talking about maps sizes, and I never evidently said MP
He knows he doesn't have a defensive point so he deflected to something only him thought about.
Stay strong guys, we have less than a month
I will get lost with the classes, good for me
I'm personally hoping for more maps like Cairo... Even lib peak felt a bit stretched thin, imo
could be true
Liberation is hot trash
Hamza, we must endure this
I don't have to, when I get 100 assignments and projects to do
I wouldn't say it was hot trash, that honor goes to the beta new York map
Thats good. Keeping yourself busy is how we change the world š³
They are both bad. I donāt see the New York map as a BF map
And I enjoy smaller maps/more cqb and still hated new York
Itās like a COD three lane map
idk about changing the world, but you can change yourself
Itās terrible
It's pretty close to Operation 925 so eh itās whatever.
can you believe it guys
battlefield 6 just 4 weeks away
So far I have only been let down. Only somewhat mediocre map is Cairo.
for me large maps it a must on battlefield, what they could have done is are urban areas to make maps as big as they can (add jeeps ramdomly on the map for faster travel)
Breathe, I know its gonna be hard
Cairo is a great map
Canāt believe 2042 offers better maps
Oh hell nah...
so you are talking about 2042
BF6 maps are way better lmao. BF2042 is like being in a no mans land
2042 maps were amazing !
people don't understand
Brb butchering all the oranges
They better have some real battlefield maps
IMO the best maps of any battlefield game
Itās what I liked about them tbh. And what I liked about BFV, BF1 and BF4
š„
you need to butcher the orange bee. not oranges
Every battlefield is nearly open no manās land maps lol
2042 has bigger maps i agree with that, but i would't say they are better
NO, i need to butcher all of them!
Launch is timing out well with the nvidia 50 series super cards coming out too, so companies are dumping any inventory with non super cards, and prices are already starting to drop to basically full system for the cost of the parts
worst maps I have ever seen
And thats why theyre terrible. Large maps with little to no cover... Too awkward
I think the maps Iāve seen cover most styles. Personally I donāt like small maps. Iām to slow for CQB now. But understand ppl like CQB. Iām a mid range player. Not good enough to sniper. Not fast enough to CQB. But there is a place for me.
the maps on battlefield 6 are great but they are too small
and helis and jets just raining explosives at us
Itās their purpose almost
I love large maps, but they must have areas where you can cover. Too open is just... Too easy for vehicles to mow the lawn
Fr....
Yeah 2042 had no cover. It was dumb.
Very dumb yeah...
Did people not play Battlefield 1, V or 4??
We need to be able to dig tunnels š¤£
Those maps had a ton of trenches as cover dude
They were the same lol
Really hope we get a "shooting range" to learn how to drive or fly the vehicles.... Else my "job" in a helicopter is going to be "survive longer than 5 seconds before dumping into a mountain and dying"
āTrenchesā lol, as if that makes a difference
Me with my thermal 30 mm cannon in your trench
Thatd be beneficial... We got weapons for that, but not vehicles
Well BFV had one
that's something. we didn't even have that in 2042
Felt super bad wasting fliers on lib peak when other players actually knew how to operate them
Yep š and yet ppl prefer BF2042 over BF6?? Big bruh moment
I mean, you literally have solo conquest where you can set the ai to beginner
Thats not the shooting range
Thats a match with ai bots
why do I have to go into a whole match just to test out some guns and vehicles
For vehicle practice
š¤£. Yeah I need to practice on helicopters. I can go up, sometimes down ha ha.
there were plenty of areas that allowed for a full field of view, as a sniper i love it but it didn't feel right. the last map they added felt better but since they are about to relese BF6 it doesn't make much of a difference
Because thatās what every BF did lol
something where you just have vehicles located at the firing range. you jump in and fly/drive. and if it crashes, another spawns immediately
BFV and 4 did that test range
The problem isn't getting down, it's doing so alive xD
Yeah, I feel its a bit too late for them... But at least we're not far away for BF6 now
It still has to load all the instances and the map. So it will be a match
As V and 4 did..
it doesnt need any enemies. so no bots, with like a plain map. with no objects. I dont think that is anywhere close to being a match
Enemies are not a problem in loading a match lol. If itās a fixed map with vehicles, it has to load them
The memeory of the objects (polys of models) needs to be loaded
Unless you want it to constantly be side loaded in the main menu
Just invisible
Can you make your own map, and close it to practice flying etc. no bots like BF3 i recall. We had our own clan server.
Thatās literally portal in BF2042 lol
Battlefield 7?
2042? I was a little sick in my mouth then š
2042 sucks
And BF4 had the best solution. It spawned you on an island with every special weapon, vehicle and unlimited ammo. And a house that could be destroyed to showcase the destruction properties of each weapon, it would then respawn when destroyed
I don't consider whatever that is as part of the Battlefield saga, the last Battlefield was V