#community-update-classes
1 messages · Page 12 of 1
Like yeah make peoples contribution to the team more transparent.
Make people race to the top with revives. Just ironically the top people with revives are the ones who have that bit of a brain.
Im so glad the scrapped the actions based scoreboard.
it's a small map with vehicles, makes sense that there are more engineers than assault, doesn't it?
also better than everone playing assault and not helping the team
Oh have they gotten rid of that in the new battlefield
has the scoreboard been changed up
ehhhh I understand 2042's scoreboard can be messy.
Its XP based
XP based? Well supportive actions and flag caps give lots of XP
I used to hit 20K semi consistently back in bf5.
I need to find my 160-0 game
I had tonnes there
Average Boris can't even comprehend they are using an engineer focused on killing vehicles even when they pull out a rocket launcher
2042 brought us this btw
Yeah useless players didn't exist prior to 2042 btw
You are in the same tier of player as these "Average boris" players BTW
Useless players will exist
why do you assume that nobody did anything, when we infact won the round?
"The average boris" it's not like those players have always existed LOL
I found my owotroller
Bro can barely figure out the basic functions of the game and yet is trying to act like his opinion on core gameplay features is relevant
because the enemy team did less than nothing 
I didn't wanted to bring ''skill factor'' into the argument but I'm probably a better player than you
all the complaints about medics not reviving back in BF3 & 4 days, were not real, right?
that never happened, everyone revived and resupplied like crazy
I can forever post this when you say things like this
You cannot even read enough to know what character you're playing
Also kinda funny to try pin it all on unlocked primaries when 2042 is the first game to have forced crossplay with consoles and Game Pass/EA Play tourists.
Player so skillful, they forget what class they are playing
Also abandoned by BF fans so it just has a more casual playerbase in general
BF3 and 4 had terrible class balance
Just like 2042
I wonder what caused that 😂
according to some on the sub, joining when bf1 came out (9 years ago) makes u a tourist 
class locked weapons
Unlocked
Everyone had carbines and DMRs
The most used weapons in BF4 were all ARs lol
NGL I agree with any shade thrown at BF1 players. 
Carbines are basically ARs
irrelevant argument
"Damn, I was using a DMR and forgot I had a rocket launcher" SBMM (Probably)
Engineer weapons were PDW's. They were NOT good for bf4 maps.
Are you actually kidding me.
BF4 had terrible class balance like I said
It's why they had to use things like the ACW-R.
Most Engineers in BF4 refused to use their class locked weapons
I wonder why they refused to use PDW's huh.
Fair enough, they were stupid enough to never vote for Prise de Tahure so insult away
And on tight infantry maps/modes you'd rob yourself and the team of any useful utility if you wanted to play with SMG by picking Engineer
(Either way it's wrong to call them tourists)
This isn't CoD where there's never teamplay, this is Battlefield where sometimes there is teamplay but sometimes you are forced into useless roles 😎
I'm happy that nowadays we get a broader range of gadgets for every class
Also locking down the rep tool and medcrate is the play
No more guessing if someone will mend you or not...
I mean they still probably wont, but they could 
Its what they have done, but also with ammo
Next game won't have any more teamplay than CoD anyways
I play for both
No need to use anything but assault and meta AR+SMG in the next game
the common denominator is you. I will experience teamplay, but you won't because you don't even know what class you're playing
They added overkill from CoD anyways 🥰
Lets not pretend that 99% of teamplay with randoms in Battlefield isn't just exchanging crates in a ditch or reviving the fallen...
I don't want anything more
I’m assumed it’s cause they didn’t have any friends to do team play WITH
Probably nobody wants to play with them because they don't realize they can revive as Falck
💔
True true
someone spots an enemy
“Wow, there’s so much team play!” -that guy probably
It's quite baffling to me when I play for kills yet I want class locked weapons but you play for gadgets yet still don't want it 😂
it actually makes perfect sense
how would class locking help with that?!
It was a gift I wont soon lose. every time they call another group of players low IQ...I have this
I wouldn't be able to use best weapons with best class

People would still just use the best weapon, even if the class sucked, cause all about kills
But weren't Assault Rifles the best weapons just 10 minutes ago? Did you forget which primaries you chose again? SMH my head...
Gadgets are secondary
I think you will. I think youre that type of player. Youll just find the most selfish class for kill/self heals...and run that.
Because gadgets are of no concern to you, and Assault with class locked weapons gets the "best" stuff, so ultimately you have no reason to care.
I want to play my fav class roles, but if my favs guns are locked to other classes it makes that difficult.
ARs are the best weapon class in the current state, it will essentially devolve into SMG meta
As people will realize maps are tiny and SMGs are faster
FWIW I actually think the same
Locking weapons won’t fix that
Realistically the only way to fix that is locking classes to one person per squad but that would stupid
Bro thinks all the maps are tiny because that's the only stuff he's seen 
Capstone is a medium map
Mid size BFV maps
Capstone wouldn't have had air vehicles if it was in BFV
Or 2042
Maps are tiny in general which will lead to SMG meta
You should take care of your knees. they are sure to become worn with all this jumping to conclusions
I can't even respond to this, it's left me speechless
so let's class lock SMGs, so everyone will play the same class
I will still play assault
Assault kit is better, I just won't have access to best weapons
you don't make any sense, you contradict yourself😂
smg meta will devolve into shotgun meta, shotguns! /s
Do you guys want another re-run of Mackay PP29 meta?
SMG is the Engineer class weapon BTW. They'd just repeat BF4's mistake if they class locked them.
pp29 players are low skill. AC9 is better
SpecFor is Carbines but I wouldn't mind
You think we've seen the biggest map, and you think DICE's obligation to balance things ends at locked guns. Fishbowl ahh world view right there
I don't see many other maps having air vehicles tbh 😂
There's always secretly a gun or two that's superior to the "meta" choice, especially later on in the game's life
DICE: we are testing movement and gunplay
DICE: Gives testers small maps on which to test movement and gunplay
Players: All maps are small, SMGs will be the meta
how old are you
24


It kinda sucks that the next game only has 3 maps, but what can ya do I suppose
Probably gonna downgrade my preorder to the Deluxe Edition because of this
I'm gonna boycott MW2 over this
You guys are clueless about the game you are going to receive in the end 😂
Who is clueless?
I'm never wrong, just early
Homie stopppp 😭 pleeeasssse

It's gonna be interesting to see how the slowed down movement works out
I foresee a much campier game
Until people figure out how to equip smokes on every class (they still wont)
I expect MW roman numeral 2, from maps to gunplay to movement
i'm of the opinion that a slightly (and I mean slightly) slower BFV would be nice
Really just the slide was unnaturally long, unless your character bathed in butter before each match
@shy slate can screencap this too
Why would I. I screencapped the above because it proves you are a low IQ player
Are you going somewhere?
preorder that ultimate edition even if it has unlocked guns
Are skins going to be clown as hell?
We wont know til it's too late
I mean it's strange how everyone has no problem with that
I think most people do TBH
They'll be like:
Damn this game is bad
Oh let's buy it
I don't know if they are like cod or not
2042 got a lot of flak for the Boris Santa skin, etc
So they didn't implement it
But now that years have passed they've begun adding weirder skins to 2042
Did people buy it? I mean did you see the skins a lot in the game cuz I never played 2042
They never added it
Why can't they give us bundles like uniform customization. Like bfv
Yeah that will happen again. Fortunately with the larger teams it makes it less apparent
And honestly there are some goofier skins in 2042 but nothing even remotely close to COD
It was datamined, was never advertised as coming to the game. Same with many other skins
SHHHHHHHHHHH they probably hate that word in here
Or skins with a certain uniform that doesn't kill the vibe
Datamined
(Oh i thought u meant new stuff not old stuff, nevermind)
I mean they just recently added Dead Space skins to 2042, like that makes any sense...
i dont think any clown skins, different flavour camo maybe but mostly like nameplate and dogtag esque things
They're desperately trying to create some Shared EA Universed crap... I can't wait to play as Messi from FC2025 in BF6!! 
They can put some camouflage uniforms as free for grinders then add a "premium" to do the microtransaction
They are failing. They are not Activision
Dead Space skin makes perfect sense, Motive just joined Battlefield Studios after having remade Dead Space 1. They did a themed event based on that game
Don't encourage them!!!
Encourage to fail?
I hate collabs in most games, including this
2042 was very warzone-like
I hope the live service system is not like that
Oh yeah right, a war torn world hit by weather control super weapons is where we'd expect to see a Sci Fi asteroid miner shooting The Things 
No fun allowed I guess.
You're God damn right!
They are cod players
I HOPE bf fans are nro like that
With that said I'm gonna learn how to code and create a super hack that forces default skins for everyone in all modern games and become a gorillionaire();
Most people just want to personalise.
i dont get why you'd want to show off a skin anyone can get with 0 effort lol
Dead space was the wackiest we ever got but I personally felt it wasn't disingenuous. At least with the gun skins.
not you as in you you btw)
Anyone else just run default skin in every game
Inside you are two cosmetics:
One is an all-black sweat camo; The other an obnoxious pink fluffy unicorn.
i usually do now
cant earn shit for free anymore ever
Zero effort? I paid $30 for it! What are you, poor?
i just dont need to buy skins that look like visual throw up, also i know atleast 1 person unironically thinks like this
Yeah if you wanna know more of em, join any COD/Warzone sub lmao
FWIW I enjoy tinkering with cosmetics, I just prefer they'd stay thematic to the rest of the game(s)
theres a reason why i only play waw, cod4 and bo1 lol
YES
games seriously need to do the warthunder thing where u can toggle it off
lmao
Im the type of person to use all black becuase I like how it looks and also its the hardest to see.
Climate based presets and free camos are nice though
I just don’t ever want to buy skins
sigh
thats so much like cod...
another call of field game chat am i right #battlevets
yup. did you see that video on reddit where someone was pressing their jump key? smh battlefield is supposed to be a milsim
actually disgusting that theres sprint in the game its just too much like cod
makes me gag nice codclone game
Gimme those class locked weapons baby
We’re getting 2042 2 this time . I’ve completely lost hope
With the current dice. I’m just going ton play bf1 bf4 and bf5 until ttk games with the old dice devs make their new online shooter . This game is cooked
It’s not that big of a deal , it’s just a video game doesn’t mean I’m in denial about reality
Just play the finals, or wait for whatever TTK Games makes.
Exactly
Ill play the next BF
Call of duty war zone players have to go somewhere
I havent played COD since B02, and haven't played WZ in 3 years
Ahh well tomato tomatoes bf2042 call of duty war zone it’s all the same shit
Hi guys i am a lifelong battlefield medic. For over 16 years I have revived and healed you under the call signs EnderWign (Ender Wiggin) or GodTierMedic. I have yet to try BF6. Can I help anyone in any way. - GodTierMedic from Surrey, BC, Canada down the road from Linus Media LTT's front door
Reposts the drama queen gif
BF6 unironically looks like CoD tbh, or what you would expect from CoD devs to make a BF game 😂
People really are over blowing it huh
Nothing is being overblown the bf6 alpha looks like 2042 , not sure what else there is to say
It doesn't look like 2042, it looks like MW22
Yeah, you dont know what you are talking about...or are trolling/trying to rage bait
Okay so even worse then . That’s probably a more accurate description
Ok look at battlefield 5 then look at bf6, which one looks more like call of duty multiplayer?
Neither
Yeah no we arent
Have you seen the gameplay?
Lmao
Not even close
But keep yapping ig
🙈🙈
Well
Objectively speaking what you said isnt true
Same tacticool animations, same slow sprint, same slow ADS, same useless slide, same excessive visual recoil, same gunplay with red dot moving with each shot, even the same menus 🥶
But you have the right to your own opinion so
They probably bored and looking for attention. im just gonna ignore them
Sprint is same speed as battlefield 3/4 pretty much, ads is same speed really, useless slide yet complains about it being useless that's a skill issue tbh, recoul isnt excessive but ok.
Mfs forget it's a pre alpha
LMAO
😭🤡
Yall be saying its over
Mother fucker its pre alpha 😭😭😭😭
I do kinda love how you can tell who is and isnt part of the alpha.
Like there used to be a lot more people here, yapping and complaining about the same things as SBMM Hatelet here. But they just...magically stopped one day.
Me when pre alpha is a rough estimate and everything is subject to change
😭
Pre alpha is pre alphing
I am a very pessimistic person but jesus christ im being beat
Lol
Some people just love to be miserable
Type of people to complain and say a game looks trash 1 year of development prototype
Too many people have 2042 COD ptsd schizophrenia
Cant blame them, wish they wouldnt try to make everyone else live their trauma tho
My opinions were formed after I heard people who played the test
Best way to form opinions TBH! /s
They even complained about basic walking because it was slow according to them
Like trudging through mud
Even with max sensitivity on PC they said it feels slow to just turn around
Also the recoil and ads speed is the same pretty much (besides there being visual recoil)
"I form my opinions by listening to the opinions of others"
TBH, this is exactly what I assumed you were doing. But its good to have it confirmed.
Dont trust reddit people
They are stupid
I don't listen to reddit
Battlefield fans dont even know wtf they want
ADS speed is also objectively slower
2042 had 200ms AR ADS speeds, this game has 300
It's slow
Thats negligible
100ms isn't negligible
They all complained about LMGs being useless
Due to slow ADS
Unplayable TBH! /s
They turned BF to CoD 😭
Same ADS speeds as CoD
Damn, imagine making heavy LMGs ADS differently to their lighter counteparts
No
They are chatting shit
Why are yoy trusting them
😭
Lmgs arent useless they are actually good
😭
Takes ages to ADS with an LMG
This person is 100% listening to reddit and twitter opinions. More upvotes = more faith in their opinion
No it doesnt
Compared to any other BF yes it does
It doesn't compared to Warzone maybe
I want BFV
I can't take you seriously
So what if it does. thats a perfectly fine way to balance a weapon that can fire 100 un-interupted rounds
LMAO
I suppose you also complained when they made you prone to use LMGs in BF1/V?
LMGs were useful with or without proning
MMGs were useless though
Waste of effort to create them in the first place
Thought as much.
You are basically a sitting duck waiting to be sniped with MMGs
Even if you want big mag you can use Lewis
So on one hand, you laugh and say the next game is COD, but on theother say its not. I dont really know how to deal with your inconsistent opinions/ideas
Complaining about 100ms is wild, do you want the game to be super fast or something?
I want BF to have BF speeds
Also movement speed is the same as 3/4 pretty much
I does
CoD artificially slows down the game too much we don't need that in BF
Cod is faster then battlefield though
💀💀💀
This has gotta be bait
Do you have numbers and data or just spewing?
Im done
Maps are smaller therefore you see more engagements but game itself is slower
Hi dome
Look at COD running speed
Bruh
haha
I did, and? Everyone interrupts visual data differently. Data?
Talk about pessimistic
WSP stinger has 6.4 m/s sprint speed in MWIII, fastest you can go without other attachments or perks, and that's an SMG
Many ARs are around 5-6m/s
Battlefield 4 is like 6.4 m/s
BF3-4 sprint speeds are 6.75
Where is this data coming from?
And 7.25 with sprint speed perk
With tac sprint of 2042 you can go 7.25
XclusiveAce
This is clearly the case of a person who is 24/7 online, ingesting every piece of leaked content, opinion and post on reddit and twitter...and just has information overload.
They have become overstimulated with info from everything...that they have a perception that the next game will have no direction or identity of its own....and are not willing to wait and play it themselves to decide if that's right or wrong
Where's his data on LMG's?
I can check them myself
Please do and post a full data set up with video and graphical evidence
In BF it doesn't matter, every class has same sprint speeds
In CoD anything heavier than an SMG = walking through mud
Its funny that you just said COD is slower than BF...but then post this as reference to anything. Bro is zooming through the map with a weapon that somehow increases his sprint speed by 35%
Pace isn't, but movement is
Pace...not even movement speed?
Have you ever played COD...I know you have....so how have you just said this blatant lie
Big CoD maps are slower than smaller BF maps 🤷
No they arent lol
If you stand still in COD, you die, cos the spawns flip
the only place this isnt true is WZ
Cod maps have no areas you can hold or lock down either, due to how their spawns work. Its a run and gun shooter
This map is slower than Redacted or Stadium
Takes ages to reach from one side to other so everyone just snipes
Post a gameplay video and lets see
5.2 m/s sprint speed in an LMG
No it's not, its 5.4
I just looked at the first LMG 🤷
Derail is a good map tho, but yea. It's slower
That one CoD Ghosts map was slower too.....Stone smth
Well people actually play the map in this video
When I played it everyone was just sniping
the pace is apparently slow, but in this video they kill a player that killed them in their previous life 8 seconds after respawning
so is battlefield
noooooo ):< you cant run and gun in battlefield thats NEVER been the case
sigh... too much like cod #battlevet #codclone
the funniest part is is that you cant even debate if battlefield is a run or gun shooter because a dev literally said its meant to be a run and gun shooter kekw
you can play it however you want
UH. NO YOU CANT
😨
you play it SLOW and DELIBERATE and get 12 kills per game and be HAPPY
ok 😢
Or, hear me out, I recreate my 102 killstreak from BF1 in a tank
hopefully enter/exit animations are back for vehicles
Is that your cat
I like your cat
Good job ignoring the most important part of that message
Battlefield players dont even know wtf they want anymore, so many is just a bunch COD 2042 ptsd schizophrenics
ty fren
They want jetpacks and wall running, and after I sat down for dinner with David Sirland I told him that, so they are implementing that as we speak
Yay :D
yw
My uncle works at David Sirland, and he can confirm this as true.
They should implement it for 2143
Titanfallfield 2143
Half the people say it's CoD because it's too fast and movement based, the other half of the people say it's CoD because they are dumbing and slowing down movement to appeal to casuals
The only thing the community agrees on is how much we don't want BF to be CoD lol
The definition of CoD changes depending on your side though
I love not being able to see 💩 because of visual recoil
BO6 has the least visual recoil
mw2 had horrible visual recoil
i agree with you
but building your gun correctly helped
I can't understand how people can play WZ on PC when they can't see what they are aiming
Oh well it makes sense you use recoil/stability build on WZ
For regular MP it's hell though
MwII was like having no stock on a Scar H type recoil 💀
Shit was horrific
Its funny because IRL they call the Scar the sight killer
As the dinner plate he ate his dinner on, I can confirm this as true as well.
Mod support please
I hope they lock weapons for certain class, I don't want to see sniper with ammo box and healing staying hiding across the map
I hope the classes are open only for the playtest
Thissss
I want unlocked weapons, I can play my class role the exact same with nearly every weapon type. This is such a worn out conversation though

I dont care what they do really. Locked or unlocked ill pick my class for its equipment (Gadgets) and make do with the weapons it has
i wanna be a nerd and use my favorite irl guns or the closest equivalent
They should unlock them
Remove classes in the next game too
Make a loadout system like CoD
👆 👆 👆 👆 👆
Gotta love how when people get owned for having actual terrible opinions/takes, they turn into cry babies like this.
Unlike past games, where snipers were checks notes staying hidden across the map
You’d be more useful providing reconnaissance and targeting than having a personal supply box for infinite ammo though lol
A lot of what mentioned would be better served near the objective, not the back
Hell, the only recon gadget not useful towards the front are the binoculars
You guys will probably defend that when they do it 😛
But sniping is supposed to provide overwatch over the objective atleast theoretically speaking
I like how enemies gets 3d spotted when sniping good use of an op mechanic lol
there isn't a single valid argument against unlocked weapons besides an emotional attachment to being restricted
There is no argument to wanting unlocked weapons besides being a bad player who can't use different kinds of weapons
See? Emotional argument
Speaking of bad players:
Lock em' or dont. Makes little difference to me tho. Ill work with whatever they decide. so will most who would like unlocked weapons.
Honestly ill prefer them locked, cos that side of the community wont ever STFU about it if they dont.
It's the truth, good players will still be able to play as LMG or carbine medics, you want them to be unlocked so you can use 3BTK ARs with no issues.
This is how you have always said you play the game tho. So it puzzles me why you state it like a bad thing now
Cannot provide an argument based in facts
Playing Falck for infinite heals, using your favorite weapon, forgetting what class you are playing cos youre only out for kills
Because just because I can do that in 2042 doesn't mean I want to do that in BF6?
Let Battlefield be Battlefield
Why should I have to be restricted because of your lack of knowledge of game mechanics?
Don't mind them too much. The devs will do what they think is best.
Its not your fault, or mine, that this person, lots of players in fact needs to be forced to play a certain way with restrictions. They just cant understand how to play a role as a class any other way.
I believe the term they coined is "If you're going to unlock weapons, why even add classes". Trying to even fight someone who believes this statement is a losing battle.
Says the person who can't use LMGs
Because weapons are also a part of the class. No one thinks of TUGS when they think of recon. They think of sniper rifles. No one thinks of medpen or ammo box or health box when they think of assault. They think of ARs.
No one thinks of TUGS when they think of recon.
I think spawn beacon and TUGS
I think of their respective equipment available to them
Yet they changed assault kit countless times throughout the games except for their primaries 😛
Engineer I think rockets and repair tool
Support, before I thought ammo, or heals...its foggy in the new game
Assault used to be the medic, but since BFV it been different.
Ive never thought of the classes weapons before their gear or role tho.
Think assault is just the assault guy now lol
ARs are defining assault before their gadgets
Other classes had access to those though
No??? Anti infantry gadgets define the modern Assault class
BC2 was totally anti infantry tho
Also ammo box
lol, you cant be serious with BF3 or 4 also
Ars are kinda anti-infantry too they’re supposed to be like the most versatile weapon no?
Are the ARs in BF1 in the room with us right now?
SMGs of BF1 are basically ARs
Assault was THE anti-infantry class in those games (BF3/4). They also just happened to be the medic
Anti infantry because of ARs
Not because of their kit
You can have medic kit in BF3/4 too
I feel like medics shouldn’t rly be the frontlines themselves thou
Because they have the best weapons, paired with the ability to self heal
Or ignore it completely for launchers
They’ll be more effective at the backlines
Players dont die often in the backlines, nor is there really a backlines in BF games. Its frontlines, or nothing
Why so you always go entirely off the point...Not a single person here was talking about 1 or V.
Because even in those games assault is defined by their primary, not by their gadgets
But they like to get into the most action cuz of their selection of assault rifles
As well as some grenade launchers I guess lol
To a player who defines a class by their weapons (you)...classes will be defined by their weapons.
I have never defined a class by their weapons, I play a class for their gear/ability to do the thing I need them to do. The weapon comes secondary to the gear.
DICE did
BF1-V assault has engineer kit
Yet they use ARs or SMGs(ARs of WW1)
So they are assault
Classes are defined by their primaries as much as their kit
Classes are defined by everything they use including weapons lol
Youre just making things up to support your viewpoint, and im not having it TBH
That’s the thing about classes
And how they appear as well
Dear lord this is braindead logic
Why is BF1-V assault are called as assault instead of engineer?
If classes are defined by their kits?
And purely by their kits?
2 days ago you were saying the semi-auto weapons were the ARs of BF1, and that it was players fault they were perceived as bad. I guess youll change your mind in 2 days time again
I didn't
I said medic SLRs were the best weapons of BF1
They have best versatility
The absence of ARs, does not make another weapon type become ARs. You are just saying things to try make a point.
the role they expected them to play
And role is better suited to medic with self heals according to your logic
As it was with BF3 and 4
but assault played a different role in BF1, as they had a completely different class make up
What's the purpose of assault in this game then?
Anti-infantry
Everyone can use ARs, engineer has better explosives, support has better healing
As said above, based on their gear, and the gear of others, they are an anti-infantry class. Im not saying I agree with their current role or gear...but thats what it is
That the thing every class has different strengths and weaknesses and should rely on each other
Homogenising the weapon selection would be in the opposite direction
Nothing we have seen is final either, so ill reserve judgement until we get a final, balanced version
Providing insignificant incentives isn’t gonna help, this looks exactly like it was in 2042 so far
Homogenous games can be fun tho, same with heterogeneous games. BF over the years has jumped back and forth between them...at least when it comes to classes (Individually)
Literally nobody complained about restricted weapons in the same way they unlocked weapons in the game that was even considered a bf game. Restriction can create a unique gameplay as well.
I agree, I have no issue if they decide to lock weapons. I just equally have no problem if they go the other way
My "unique" gameplay opportunities are chopped by 3/4 when you take those weapon types away from me
That’s what makes it unique you’re playing into a specific role that is unlike the other 3 classes
That’s apart of your class not the whole class lol
my class role is literally the same either way, completely unaffected. Arguments like this were already disproven by BF4 universal weapons, as equipping a universal weapon had no effect on your ability to fulfill your class role
So being able to revive and heal people doesn't define medics whole class
The guns have 0 bearing on these things
They shouldn’t have the same killing potential
You're gonna have to do some real wack gun balancing to do that
Supports should be able to be all the way back with infinite ammo
They should be closer to the fight supplying nearby teammates
They should and they will. This line of thinking is flat out in opposition of what your average player expects out of an arcade shooter. The idea of having a "best" weapon class goes against what people expect, which is for everything to be equally good in combat to a reasonable extent.
2042...the only BF with unlocked weapons doesnt even have a best weapon. It has a bunch of best weapons for specific play styles/skill levels.
If the next game can achieve this...while at the same time making the signature weapons and classes more unique (Gadget and field upgrades wise). Then I'm all for it.
As I've said tho, ill be just as happy with a locked weapons system. I'm just willing to see what they cook before jumping to conclusions.
Signatures definitely need more depth. Not much, but something. I'm still of the opinion that certain attachments should be restricted, especially long range scopes
I dont think that will really affect the game in any meaningful way. Its like making a change that will only affect 5% of the playerbase (Those who actually use longer range scopes on weapons outside bolt actions), in 5% of their playtime.
If they really wanted to keep unlocked guns they could just decrease the amount of customization you can do on them for certain classes
But would be kinda awkward
the one example the pro locking ppl have is support sniping with bolt actions in the back of the map. This fixes that problem, but doesn't hurt most people's freedom
that example never hurts anyone anyway
Its a meaningless complaint, as 99% of bolt action users have 0 affect on games
They havent since BC2
I say that about all their complaints related to this. They have been desperately trying to come up with anything to justify hating anything that goes against their nostalgia
It's why you can easily sum up any "lock weapons pls" post by "make it BF4"
Im fine with nostalgia being a driving force for wanting something be a certain way. I also think if someone wants something a specific way, its fine and a legit reason for wanting it.
I just dont like forced, fake or meaningless examples passed of as the real reasons.
What 💀💀
No it hasn't
Ok
None of us help much anyway. We all poke fun at, or aggravate people with opposing opinions to ours.
Opinions are like a**holes tho, everyone has one...not everyone wants to see yours. (This isn't aimed at anyone lol)
Maybe in pretend land you do
Just thought that’s the concept lol
Snipers never leave an impact on watch really
Or the running dialogue in our heads while we play. But the vast majority of the time, recons providing reconnaissance with a bolt action through a scope are next to useless. If thats how you are playing that role.
The beauty of BF is that it allows you to play that way if you choose to
But can’t they 3d spot people in this iteration
With like adsing
Or hitting them in bfv
Think I remember getting suppression assist too in bfv but yea
No clue TBH. As far as I understand things, classes and class perks change all the time, and are unfinished. Even with 3D spotting, the same action is unhelpful most of the time.
I dont believe it is, but cant say for sure
I believe that to be the general remark
Didnt people hate 3D spotting?
I believe so, when everyone could use it
i am anti doritos spam
as long as forced (taa?) doesn't turn ppl invisible like bfv lol
Rangefinder in battlefield 4: 😈😈😈
Loved the range finder
What do you guys think about the weapons not being class restricted?
Don't really care if they are or not really
What about stims and spray paint , kinda gives the arena vibe rather than modern war torn place , does for me at least, so far I’m liking the look of it. I do prefer old devs way of giving soldier certain weapons since support guy will often have lmgs or recons will often be using rifles and carbines , that’s basic fact of war.
Structure and squad work , not just running and gunning like Rambo
I wish they would bring back the behemoth system personally
"Here losing team, lose by a little bit less"
Sure things BSOD that’s an opinion that most people agree with
If anyone is baiting it is you using silly memes against standard opinion , not baiting , this channel is open for discussions, you live yes we get it , so let someone else chime in
It was a fun change of pace that only added to the atmosphere tbh
All good tho
I dont care one way or the other. That has always been my view. You however always come here and try shove your opinion down others throats
It's supposed to be us versus the devs not us against each other
As if every BF game isnt just players running and gunning, trying to be rambo
No mate that’s what the channel is open for
Only in 2042 does the Rambo really exist.
Also it's a videogame, not a religion
Well there my thoughts il leave you fellows alone , you clearly live here mate , go outside ?
You dont need to start the same discussion and post the same reasoning every day tho. Its only starting fights.
Everyday ? Why do you exaggerate to make me look like something I’m not ?
I was replying to someone fresh wasn’t asking for your opinion
I can show you probably 10 posts of yours that state the exact same thing youve just said
Yeah was replying to the same old question too
Go outside BSOD you keep misunderstanding me and it’s getting on my ****
See, he tells others to go away, or go outside...when im not even disagreeing with their wanting locked weapons
Btw mate first time I’ve mentioned stims and spray paint but hey ho
Have a brake mate
Stim is the same thing as a med pouch, so its no different to what weve had in previous entries. I dont know what a spray is
Each player no matter the class , like V or what have you had should get a med pouch , keep it simple. They should stop tying to favouritize certain classes , coz then there really will be issues with people choosing more of something else for the sake of this or that.
Spray paint?
Yes around the objectives
They toned that down
OK, so youve moved on very quickly to abuse of others I see. I thought we werent supposed to be fighting each other
Kind of defeats the aim of the map since they highlighted on it , yeah still seemed a little too much from clip I see yesterday
Abuse of others ? Just you mate , always on my case
You guys should kiss and make up
😘
Go to any city and you will find spray paint/murals. they are especially common in times of war, as there is nothign stopping youths from tagging
If you say so
Big spray paint fan over here
If the game doesn't have weapon inspections, I'm going to write a strongly worded letter 😠
Ah, so you meant the objective outlines, not art on the maps.
Yes man
You did not make that clear at all
Spray paint. You think I’m that finicky I’m critiquing posters and murals on walls for fs , lol get a grip mate
(Pritty sure I did if you scroll up , go get some sleep , it’s ok being wrong sometimes you don’t have to act like a douche when you are)
Its a bit weird for BF, but Ill prefer it over glowing boxes
Glowing boxes ?
They used to have glowing trails instead of paint/chalk on the ground
That a 2042 thing ? I’m going by any game pre that game so don’t know.
It isnt
Ah ok. Where the glowing boxes and chalk stuff , which game ?
Should be accessibility option not default
All I know is cod , apex fans use to appreciate dice for their own uniqueness, so they don’t have to try so hard to appeal to other players by copying certain elements and things since they probably getting booooored with it all.
tbh the flag is a problem for vehicles occasionally
Signatures weapon perks being in the game itself proves not even DICE considers it a real class system 😂
bro forgot the concept of a "concession" like he forgets to revive as Falck
yeah no guns at all in BF6 pls, BF2042 had guns
evolve from any , just not that lol
Everything I've seen for BF6 looks like a nice evolution from the previous games
Evolution from MWIII maybe
Some BFV devs are probably still working there. My guess is the new dragging teammates feature is developed by the same people who tried to implement it in BFV
The whole "traits" system (i think that's what it's called) is a return to the BFV subclasses system
a lot of the ones that worked on BF1 and older games are gone
It's Vince Zampella who's calling the shots, he's too busy porting his old franchise to Frostbite engine as we speak 🥶
Either way it’s looking good , it’s just Irritating adding in things that ain’t gotta be there or things that could create bad balances and stuff that may not make you feel that you belong to a squad. They should also be structuring it for the player , can’t have too much freedom. Reason why old Dice did what they did.
The man is not calling all the shots
Go outside man, just for like 10 minutes
when next playtest?
more gun freedom = keeps gameplay interesting over a longer period of time.
That’s not the best argument or assumption. Due to the fact of all the hours people have put in pre 2021 with BF games.
End of the day it’s a battlefield and soldiers have specific weapons. That’s just fact man , there’s nothing else really to add other than that war should be no circus
I did few hours ago
it wasn't meant to be this big gotcha. It's just a point, as weapon/class related burnout has happened to me numerous times
"soldiers have specific weapons" you don't want to argue that point, as devs will remove everything besides the M4 and AK
Old DICE devs already commented about this decision 😂
So we agree that weapons shouldn't be restricted? Or not?
They should be yes but I’m not sure it’s going to happen , a lot of admin play 2042 so will probs be something whether we like it or not , I mean 2042 was created , right ? Whether you liked it or not 😂
The old dice dev in question being one who posts soldiers being unalived on his socials
i agree with unlocked guns, but some don't. It's mixed in the vocal minority, which means no normal player cares about this
I have no great need for them to keep weapons unlocked. Nor do many others.
No “normal” player cares about this. Meaning a casual ?
Doesn't mean his comment is less impactful. Not only that, even current DICE devs said ''lock em weapons''.
Tourists
Naw there are sweats in the silent majority, but the vast majority of players say nothing or interact with the community and/or devs
Ah the run and gun don’t care if I’m in a squad , don’t care about you , don’t care if weapons are not locked I just want to snaught my coke and get top of the board , player ?
…what?
Man's crashing out over bait I put in the chat
i'd tell you this ain't a milsim, but even some milsims have unlocked guns
Almost all them, but it's beside the point.
Bro (manual leaning) I’m just use to BF pre 2021 , I thrive on structure , some people thrive on chaos , but 2021 didn’t happen far as I’m concerned
No one here wants another 2042
I do not want it, but I do not expect it either
Eh ? Well it’s smelling that way with certain choices. Hence why the channel was created forcing us to discuss things we really shouldn’t be needing to
one choice out of countless others made. This is the definition of cherrypicking
Bro you seem baised
Go play some V , there manual leaning over there
Played it first time in months last night. Always a pleasure
what's more biased than saying a game might be a flop based on a singular choice? 
Never said anything about it flopping
I’m sure it will be a success and hope that it will be
The hope part is the cherrypicking
This seemed like that but perhaps it was a misunderstanding
BFV fans will certainly be eating good this year judging by everything 
It would be far worse if they just announced and didn't give players a place to voice their questions /concerns.
It’s to say they haven’t got to mess with the core so much and go post 2021 with certain things
That’s true. But the point also still exists that it’s a time waste since there was no need to alter it pre 2021 in the first place , hence the point of what I’d meant
The core gameplay barely changes by this, considering most guns fight around the same ranges regardless of weapon type. Only outliers are shotguns and bolt actions.
Structure , I thrive on it , nothings going to change my mind about liking the old Dice way of thinking
This chat needs to get some sun and experience the embrace of a woman ASAP 😭
Mfers been battling today lol
do lawn mower repairs count
Yeah that counts lol. I’ll take anything at this point
Tbf the base ads speed for the Lmgs is 350ms~ which is very long compared to SMGs or ARs
Seems perfect for a weapon type, which has an expected use of hold and suppress/kill. Especially with 50-100 round mags.
Anything else and LMGs become large mag ARs. Like in 2042.
I guess, but if it doesn't change I know I won't use them, doesn't fit my playstyle at all, I would prefer other downsides, maybe sprint to fire time increase (like in BFV) or slower TTK, But not slower ADS time, or not as much as it is currently, it's almost triple the time compared to an SMG, which is way, way too much
It's fine if a weapon type doesn't fit your playstyle imo. In a scenario where weapons are unlocked, we should want class and weapon uniqueness. Where the signature weapons of a classes, match an expected engagement type for the role of that class. I think such separation of weapon performance is a good thing.
Making a weapon artificially slower in ttk nerfs the weapon in a lazy way imo. Youre trading a unique role(a weapon class that works best holding a position), for extra ease of usability in every situation.
The game will be nothing like this 😂
I agree, but then again ,in my opinion, messing with ADS Speed that much is not the way, there are other ways to create uniqueness
None that will better define how cqc players will go with weapons.
ADSing in CQC is so 2015
Okay but how do we feel about weapon restrictions?
dont care doesnt matter
x2
Perfect for the game they are going for (MWIV)
I’m already writing off this game completely .
I’m sticking with the classics
Not into this new fancy lad stuff
Ok
Isn't much different
Ragebait
Writing a game off just from a pre alpha is wild work
Talk about pessimist
it's still ded im sorry
Tfw it's a 9/10 instead of a 10/10, literally unplayable fire them all
More like wow retail vs wow classic one sucks the other doesn’t
When I am in a pessimistic competition and I wind up against a battlefield fan.
yes very posh 
To write off a game you haven’t played yet, and is in pre alpha stage is crazy
It already looks a million times better than 2042 at its current state
More like you are a cynical pessimistic person lmao
Lame
🥀
both suck. WoW is trash
why one of the maps have better graphics than other
2042 wasnt even a battlefield
it was pubg-cod-apex
it was groundwar mixed with like R6/BO3
So far your argument has been entierly based around realism, got any other points?
Overall structure , squad cohesion and solid direction , I’ve played all of them long enough to know what makes em truly work and get why Dice did it in the first place , very obvious why , a tonne of reason out there to find yourself
Most of you here it seems have been 2042 brainwashed , if that game never existed no one would be even thinking about it.
Me and you have already expressed this
lol calling people brainwashed
In a way yes. Since if that game didn’t exist NOBODY would even be questioning it
Look when I hear “back to roots BF” , that’s what people was expecting. They’re the ones that said that when it was time to appeal to investors , now that they have them , let’s just slyly include the 2042 concept that quite literally everyone hated
Maybe, just maybe that’s because it showed how nuanced the topic is by giving us an example
There's been many arguments across the years for and against unlocked weapons
I'm still for them, but it's clear there are valid points on both ends
it's just that since I never ever thought about picking the weapon before the class and just played the class with the weapon complimenting it, I was never exposed to the other side of people choosing for the weapon first
By all means share some
Discussion? In the community classes update discussion channel? Nooo
I know that the locked weapons camp is the loudest bunch
The point is I want to hear YOUR thoughts, not the thoughts of some random person on reddit which you seem to be directing us towards by dismissing it and saying ‘the answer is out there’
Cos the unlocked people would largely also be happy with a locked system.
Random ? No mate , mostly pre 2021 players. All good , am tired. They’ll do what they’ll do at the end of the day I guess
So far you haven’t given us any actual reason that is your own
Look, I’m for restrictions, but if you want a compelling argument, actually make one
But if you wanna go do something else, go for it. Doesn’t bother me
- We are playing a video game get out of your bubble it doesnt matter who has what weapon
- “Looks” lol
Said a whole lot of nothing
Ping me when you have something to say that would actually affect the gameplay
Quite literally doesnt matter
I do not care
I’ve played all of them long enough to know what makes em truly work and get why Dice did it in the first place , very obvious why , a tonne of reason out there to find yourself
enlighten us about all these reasons.
Do you revive with your SMGs or Defib?
do you repair tanks with your Carbine or with the repair tool?
do you spawn your teammate with your sniper rifle or with the spawn beacon?
You will still play like garbage regardless of how the weapons are layed out between classes, you still will underutilize your gadgets, you will still be predictable to play against
I do not care its so meaningless to argue
I will play well regardless of the weapon system because good players will be good with any weapon anyway
Lads just go away play some more 2042 and upload more videos in the other section or go outside , I’m done here
Battlefield tourists are so annoying dude jesus christ
xD
People are begging for things that they dont even understand the gameplay effects of
“Pls give me this give me that” without a single reason on why
Parrots parroting slop
i lean to locked guns as preference since i liked how it was done in bf3/4
but idgaf man just give a good battlefield i can play rn
yk
It doesnt matter
No one would genuinely care or be affected by it once the game is out
yh exactly
that what i mean
like everyone has preferences
but end of the day we just want a good battlefield
whether they do go for unlocked guns or locked, as long as its a good game people wont care and will still play
like im beyond even arguing for whether guns should be locked or not, as long as the game is functional, playable and fun
Well seeing how battlefield 1 and 5 were pretty popular i dont think battlefield players have ever really cared about how good their game is
So itll be fine
i mean bf1 imo is the best one in the franchise
They enjoy garbage then they will probably like whatever battlefield 6 has for them too
yes i gush over bf3 and 4 all the time
but bf1
idk man smth about it is just masterful
Lol
like when you load into a map everything just hits you
idk
its a cinematic game
it has its flaws yh, but i feel like bf1 hit that sweet spot
Give battlefield players an ai made movie thats different everytime they click play and let them hold a controller in the hands they will be happy
I love how its only black and white to this guy tho. You either want locked weapons and are the best person ever, or you (Apparently) cream yourself over 2042, want more of the same, and should just shut up, as your opinion is irrelevant
which?
the Cyber dude
ok ok
uhm what
xD
Thats literally what these players want
They dont even play the game they spectate others playing within the game itslef
XD
Just give them an interractive movie they can watch
Then we might be able to keep sprinting in the game without these redditors begging for it to be removed
lmfao yh that is a bit of a weird thing to complain about in a game
it works in some games like EFT
but keep that out of my battlefield games pls and ty
Pickle lost their mind a few days ago, dont pay much attention to them
“This guy used jump must be cod player” 🦧
xdd
As if airstrafing wasnt a big thing in bf4
It wasnt, it was a thing, but not a big thing
Cringe players
You played console youre pretty irrelevant in this
Next youll try to tell me that the zouzou was common in BF4
same with me tbf
I played BF3 and 4 entirely on pc
I moved to PC after BC2
Then youre just blind lol i have a clip of me lasering down 5 airstrafing players
You see those things mostly on the metro/locker 24/7 servers, but not much, if at all outside of there
Which is one pretty major issue. As a pc player I love that element of it. The aim challenge, the pacing. But console players just don't see that. So what I see as the bf4 experience is so different to them that one group views the other's experience as wrong somehow
^
"I have a video of me using a thing I used, so this proves the majority of players do it"
what kinda of logic is this
Then youre playing against bad players that dont utilize movement given to them
ah yes
Yes, and the vast majority of BF4 players are average, casual players. Like me
Oh and you saying that people dont use it is better? Lol
I never said people didnt use it. I said the vast majority didnt
You should learn to read
Yeah so people dont really use it is what youre saying
Lol
to the point where someone can post about it and 50 people say they've never seen it in their life
Dont care til then
I would wager that if you picked 100 random BF players off the street, and asked them what an air strafe or zouzou was, the vast majority wouldnt know
Ask them when they last played the game and on what
Battlefield reddit is full of console brainlets
Or garbage players
And or
i hate it when people like this say "youre shit because you dont do x or z"
bro grow up pls
Its just true a lot of the times lol
youre as bad as the people that say you cant play cod if you dont slide cancel
Learn the game = you know more = youre better
Dont learn the game = know less = youre bad
thats just not the case tho lmfao
you can learn about smth
and be able to do it
but choose not to cos you cba
Even top tier players, who are in touch with reality (Like @wispy parrot ) will tell you that while players did use airstrafing, zouzou or vouzou...a dramatic majority didnt...or didnt even know those things existed/were possible
like in cs
i can bhop
i dont need to all the time cos theres no point
doesnt mean im a bad cs player at all
Because majority of players are braindead dude
im faceit 9
but with your logic id be a bad cs player cos i dont bhop every where
its such a small minded view
like genuinely
Casual players just dont care. IMO your mindset is far worse than any casual player.
if battlefield had a ranked mode for all the turbo sweats sure
but not everyone is hyper competitive adderol fueled psychos
So we should remove movement from the game because people dont actually use it?
doesnt mean theyre bad players
the turbo sweats would just play in casual playlists. they want to farm n00bs
again youre showing a very narrow mindset lmfao
Zouzou is the name Azula gives prince Zuko as a way to mock him
Boom, got it!
Literally not a single person here said anythign about removing movement. You are just trying to make another strawman arguement
I know what that means now!
So youre arguing against what
"Oh I guess we should just remove movement....No...you dont want that?...see Im right!"
What are you arguing against
Your stupid and constant strawman arguements
What are you arguing against
your last stupid statement
Which was?
Okay but what are you initially arguing against
the original statement you made, thats said BF4s complex movements, like air strafing, zouzou and vouzou were common
Wait til bsod argues that sliding wasnt a big thing in 5 because his console buddies didnt slide
🦧
They were not all that common, and your average BF4 PC players wont ven know what they are.
Oh look, the start of another strawman arguement
Lol
As previously stated, I played BF on PC after BC2.
Lol
Okay guess airstrafing wasnt a big thing so it doesnt matter lets get another bf1 gang!
I love camperfield😍
The hell are you on about
Look, another. Thats 3 in a row. Keep going
Look another strawman by spamming that someone else is having a strawman argument
Classy
Clearly you dont know what a strawman arguement is
i dont, would you explain it? XD
A straw man argument is a logical fallacy that involves misrepresenting someone's argument by exaggerating or distorting it, then attacking the misrepresentation instead of the original argument.
Since you didnt know what it means @shy slate
Youre welcome
🫀
Nice job copy/pasting the answer Google AI answers gave you
XD
You had to google to make sure
Funny
“This cant be right the definition i made up is something else!!”
I was googling for an image that best explains it, but image perms are off here
xD
Keep spamming strawman argument under every statement someone makes just to be the strawman argument itself

your statements are all wrong tho.
well not wrong, but subjective
Crazy thats just like the image you just sent
Nice strawman argument bro
Airstrafing sure wasnt a fairly new and refreshing mechanic in 2014 sigh it really wasnt a big thing!
I didnt see anyone do it 🦧
Haha tourist - Why don’t you watch my clip
https://youtu.be/1Gm63rexB8Y?feature=shared
Do I look like a tourist to you ? I work as a squad and see a game to victory.
But that’s when times were good , can’t expect that now from clownfield
isn't this that exact thing though
Dont care
I know you don’t bro , that’s why you are a clown.
This is an example what you just did
Player: I hope they dont make movement too complex, or allow slide spamming
Pickle: So you just want BF1 movement and no skill again????
Player: No, I dont want that
Pickle: Exactly, I win
jesus christ
Ill kiss his feet now
You made up an argument in your head HAHAHHA
AHAHAHAHHA
Gimp bro , grow up honestly
and its what you do with every idea thats in opposition to yours
and then youre calling my statements a strawman argument
ngl thats literally what youve just done pickle lmfao
go back and read what you yourself wrote
Who said anything about complex movement
It is LITERALLY what they just did.
Ill give you 42 hours to locate a message that said anything that would make battlefield about complex mechanical skill
Good luck
Xoxo
Present the extreme of something someone said > say that thing is bad > Everyone agrees that the extreme of said thing is bad > claim victory
The Pickle Maneuver
They have taken objective duff
@shy slate
You gonna spam random garbage or
Its more of
I dont need to, people here know you, how you act and what you just posted. the example I posted was an example, not verbatim of something you said.
I state something> bsod: “Strawman strawman strawman!!!”
Yes, because its all you are able to do, when trying to nullify what another says
Right and now when i ask you to prove me wrong (again lol) you all of a sudden dont have to “aktwually” 🤓 and you now have an imaginary gf and have to go outside and whatnot
Strawman strawman!!
The reason youre so triggered and spam tagging me is you know im right, as does everyone else who is active lol
good morning
Youre nullyfing what im saying to misrepresent what i said by saying lies you then spam strawman under every statement and say im wrong with actual no real counter arguments

