#battlefield-labs-discussion
1 messages · Page 96 of 1
I mean you have to get kills to get the objective…?
almost like bad players will always be bad no matter what movement system is in place
Be it outside of objectives or inside of it
wow superiority complex is crazy
Hes not wrong
A very large amount of players barely do anything within the 20-30 minute timespan
nah taking development feedback from bad players who don't know the mechanics of the game they play is always dumb
But capturing the objectives lowers the ticket faster, kills lowers one ticket
You cant capture or defend objectives without killing the enemies regardless
but you had a very low flags capture rate, means you're not entitled to opinion about team play? obviously not.
every one is, no matter their stats
it's just playing to be elite
Its not like you just run into the objective and cross your fingers that your enemy gives up on playing hide and seek with you
i can expect this arguement from a 14 years old
smartest bf discord member
My capture rate is low because theres no reason for me to full cap a flag
you have second place
Aslong as i secure the capture it doesnt matter if i actually stay there to capture it
What matters is keeping the momentum and map controll
If my majority of the team gets stuck on standing on a single flag it means that we are losing momentum and map control
that 1 second is really gonna make or break the game
Seconds matter a lot in battlefield yes
Because you can cover a lot of ground and position pretty quickly in a short time
Point is saying your opinion is more worthy than another based on stats is stupid teenager elitism. games are made to have fun it and they all pay the same for it. this being "better than the mass" has brought 42 fans to delusional claims like the game "being healthy" even though Steams official player base charts clearly indicate otherwise.
Well to be clear I am argument that capturing the objectives should always be top priority over kills
Capture first then kills
Unless it Rush…
Or breakthrough
You cant capture without clearing objectives
You would be surprised how much can happen within the span of 10 seconds.
Steam reviews as of recent has had more posititve reviews than negatives
Its not a great game but its a decent game
Yeah those left are the ones enjoying the game
Id much rather play 2042 over bf1
Yeah no doubt. for kdr farmers weapons with no recoil are a better experience than bf 1 gunplay
what a take
No its because bf2042 has a much higher skill gap
And bf1 weapons might aswell be recoilless anyway
Its like 0. Something horizontal recoil
On pretty much any gun
It was the false promises and the decision to remove the class system that hurt BF2042 the most
It was everything
Bad gunplay, bad maps, lead to bad engagement distances, bad gadget balance, bad vehicle gameplay
I completely agree with.. both. It was everything but EKGERO corretly said "the most". The fact FOR MONTHS we're discussing this subject says a lot.
If the gunplay and map design was good it wouldve been a decent game despite the lack of classes imho
I wouldnt have cared personally
Why do you think I said false promises?
Obviously for every more positive element it would've been a better game. the BF 6 alpha has a open system and is anyway 10000 times better than bf 42.
even though i like it locked
i'd be a liar to say it's not a decent game
I still cant see a thing that makes it matter
A lot of people wont genuinelly care about open vs locked
Its just a very small amount of loud players that think it makes a difference in gameplay
The truth is, they should have never got rid of the class system in BF2042,
Which yes what I mean is the specialist were the problem because it replaced an important feature that no one asked for to be replaced
their favorite youtuber from over a decade ago will make a video about it to tell then how to feel about it tho
I agree again. many of casuals who'll play the beta because it's free they'll just click on the first button they see.
i think it matters alot
100%
anything that reminds people of 2042 will make them not wanna play bf6
No even gameplay wise it just doesnt impact anything
you're again doing elitism. the mass is a band of sheeps and you're the smart one who rises above them.
I can already hear xfactor struggling to breathe while complaining about open weapons
Either you play the game bad, having an open selection or a locked selection of weapons wont change that fact or you play good and it doesnt matter what weapon you play regardless
If they had the class system with the specialist day one, nobody would’ve been complaining but that is my opinion
why do you hate recons, anyway, scott? is it just a 42 thing or in general?
because its a useless class
Specialists shouldnt exist ingeneral
It overcomplicates the game, its easier to have a noname soldier with a role
ive enjoyed each of the games during the time i played them
Battlefield 1 is like painting a super pretty picture on a background that looks like indian streets or something
its actually possible for things not to be hate/love and you can dislike how things were done in each game but im not going to make a whole ordeal about it
They could have went the Rainbow Six Siege route, separated the specialist into two faction, while also having the generic soldiers as a starter
For me 2, 1, 3, BC2, 4, 5, 42
some games are missing
Like yes you open bf1 you hear good music, you have a nice menu, selecting games you want to play is accessible, theres a lot of depth for weapon information, map information, gadgets etc in codexes which is a nice level of detail
But then you go ingame
That's just the ones I played
You have very restrictive movement, sweetspot that rewards lower accuraccy players, suppression that rewards lower accuraccy players, gadget spam thats unavoidable most of the times because you cant throw back grenades
I honestly like 2042 in its current state but it's not the best Battlefield game
pickle bf1 is one of the most successfull games in the framchise
Terrible map design
My from when I started
BF1
BF3
BF4
BF2042
BFV
BFHardline
this doesent just happen thats because the game is very good
I forgot V, I rank it below 3
Its popularity doesnt mean anything though, look at past 10 years of cod
I'm a big fan of sweetspot it made scouts useful and enjoyable. And I never heard much criticism about being killed by a sniper.
Its been way more larger than battlefield, would you say that cod is a good game purely based on the sheer numbers of people that bought the game on release?
Its a very senseless argument to make
The only reason BF2042 is above 5, is because Exposure is the better DLC map then PanzerStorm
it happens because it's the only BF to not be broken as shit at launch
It made scouts boring because it took less effort to confirm kills
lmao what?
I don't mind the restrictive movement, I like the "clunky" feel, I think it fits the setting. I don't mind suppression that much either. Sweetspot is annoying though
In previous titles you had 2 body 1 head rifles, meaning the game rewarded you for being more accurate and hitting headshots
Which = skill rewarding game
And id much rather a game that rewards skill instead of a game that diminishes skill gap purely to appeal to bad players that could get good but are too uninterested
Restrictive movement made grenades unavoidable a lot of the times because theres no real way to avoid them, made rotating between positions harder, made the game too lenient on holding angles leaving very little options to breaking that angle
Also thats why gadgets are semi overpowered because you cant open corners or angles with mixed up peek options or mixed movements through held positions
Which made the game extremely grenade/dynamite heavy
Which again diminishes skill
As long as BF6 has crouch sprinting I am fine with that (-v-;
Also the battlefield has always had a lot of movement options, battlefield 1 is the only exception in the franchise that lacks that skill gap
I understand your point, but I feel like that didn't hinder my enjoyment of the game. Though I play very casually
Like I didn't find the movement was the reason I died a lot, which would be annoying
The movement is very often the reason someone dies tbh because you either fully commit to something or dont without movement
Let’s just hope BF6, doesn’t suffer Air vehicles problems in BF4
It also decreases options within gunfights, for example someone is shooting me from left, i react with a slide to maybe have a chance of him missing which should be relatively low chance for a player within a position and battlefield having very easy to master gunplay mechanics
yeah lets hope no sliding bs
Even if my odds of actually surviving and being able to react to that player is super slow as is it wouldnt even exist if there was no slide at all
And keep in mind it takes much more effort for me to react to someone with a slide, rotate my aim on the enemy player whilist mid movement phase, fix my aim and shoot
Oh and having to react to where the player is even at
Within the duration of the time that it takes for me to do all that he couldve killed me easily if that player didnt miss
So again theres just another skillgap element
Like the reason that player lost the gunfight for example wasnt because of the slide but it was due to him missing on me
slide is already in game 
The players that dont want slide are very delusional ingeneral
Ive had people say bf5 slide is too fast
Slide in question
they're just bad
I was linked this guy's stats. He's a 0.8 K/D player
like sliding or no slide is going to matter for him
in bf4?
People dont realize that having movement makes the game easier for even the lower skilled players
Bf6
Bf4 and 3 didnt need slide because bf4 had airstrafing and jump peeking
3 had chain jumping
the finals has a slide, albeit a short one
yeah no shit
but yes, BF6 has a slide
but there is a differ4nce between having slide
A short slide is completely fine
What about bf5 slide
no because it lets you change direction while sliding /s
Imo the best slide so far
bfv idk didnt play much but knowing it was made by what now is embark i would say probably fine
Yeah but its short and slow
it was sarcasm lol (the /s)
BFV slide the best, 2042 slide second best
Yeah
best alide is no slide
Well tbf theres only 3 games with the slide mechanic
4*
no slide, no crouch spamming, lean spamming, etc all bs, if this game is any good they wont have any of those
It wasnt a slide persay
BF6?
Like it was but not really
Bf4 “slide” was more of you gliding across the ground with momentum you got from the air
so you want civil war sim
"HOLD THE LINE MEN, DON'T SHOOT UNTIL YOU SEE THE WHITES OF THEIR EYES"
Which is something used for peeks
bro I think you're just bad 😭
BF1, BFV, 2042, BF6
4 games with slides
You can double crouch mid air and “slide” standing up
i dont want cod sliding in bf games
Oh yeah
LOAD MUSKETS AND FIX BAYONETS LADS!
I thought you meant 4s slide
BF has NEVER had a CoD Slide 
bf2042
no i meant 4 as in 4 games
my bad for not clarifying
the slide in 2042 doesn't really do anything that special
lmao, wrong
It does
whats more important than slide
is to be able to mount player sized peices of cover
2042 slide is crazy useful purely because of the maps
or climb thos whatever
You can cover a lot of the empty areas in like 2-3 seconds with gain momentum slide and bhops
i mean, the jump chain is pretty decent, but predictable and super linear
BF4 is much more unpredictable than 2042 when it comes to movement
not really bf4 had big issues with climbing player sized cover, bfv didnt
okay.
Yeah
Its easier to read but like i can cross the map so fast with bf2042 movement
well that's also cuz 2042 maps are just large af lol
Makes routing so easy if you master it
Yeah
yeup
Its entirely map design but movements usefulness also depends on it
Bf5 movement is entirely useless on strat cq maps because they are like 300km wide and 300km long
With 30 objective flags
ehhh, depends lol
I mean it matters in gunfights but the very large maps are played by the megamind rats
tru tru
panzerstorm and hamas at times
straight pain
It doesnt matter if you slide cover to cover and mix up movements as you go to an objective you will just have a random mg proning in the middle of nowhere
tbh, i think telescopic MGs in BF1 are much more annoying
beaming ya across the map like lazers
Than bf5 mgs?
yes, imho
Ranged combat in bf1 ingeneral was dogshit
me running to an OBJ getting blasted by a telescopic MG from 100-150m was annoying af
I sat prone on verdun cq on D the entire game and got 60 kills for nothing
doesn't make much sense to me needing two bullets for a sniper kill. unless you hit the feet
Just press q and hold mb1
Its simple
You need to make 2 shots, to kill that person you also need to hit both of those shots, it takes more accuraccy to hit 2 consecutive shots in time than it takes to hit 1
yeah so let's make it 3 shots. bigger tryhard challenge. takes even more accuracy
Which allows to react to scout players if they do infact hit body, but if they are accurate and headshot you they get rewarded for being more accurate
Bro wants CoD Snipers in Battlefield?
That would demolish the ttk
bf 1 snipers is equal to cod snipers to you?
basically
alright
Comperable yes
1 shot is requires to get a kill pretty much
BF sniper play is better when 1 shot kills are within 10-15m, but past that needs to be two unless headshot
Even if its an assist the player you shot at is a kill regardless in bf1
snipers should always be 2 body shot or one headshot
Because any weapon in the game will pretty much one shot a softened player from snipers
Would also break the game
In BF1 you actually have to compensate for bullet drop, travel time, and sweet spots — it's about precision and positioning. CoD sniping is mostly hitscan, quickscopes, and arcade-speed reflexes. If both are 'the same' to you, then I guess chess and checkers are the same too because they use a board.
10-15m sweetspot is even more broken than what bf1 has
eh, bf4 has it (12.5m) and it's not as bad you think
Thats also because of the way bf4 maps played, i went pretty ham with scout in locker
granted I'd just prefer BFV sniping (ads time, snappines of bolt actions, etc) with the need one headshot at all ranges and no one shot potential
bf1 and bfv sniping is too easy
Bf4 sniper gameplay was sitting on a different island or having 3 squads of teammates camping on top of buildings
yes it was horrible like in 42
yeah thats what snipers do
wrong, generalizing
they are far away
not all are the same
people asking for 1 shot snipers can't aim
but still. saying bf 1 snipering = cod snipering is a stupid take
Then hit the head next time, skill issue
HERE WE GO
Let me say it needs 4 shots to kill someone so I can say I'm good at it and you need to get good
like in dark souls or something
4 shots sounds a bit excessive if you ask me
Youre overreacting for no reason
it's clearly provocative
the worst players always say the funniest shit 😭😭
I mean you could always play hardcore
Either you -60 someone per shot and make them 1-3 hit for the rest of your team anyway or you hit a headshot and confirm kills
the snipers one shot there
BF 1 doesn't give you a 1 shot kill if you hit legs
Sniper rifles are purely just dps weapons
It does if youre in sweetspot
rarely
BF1 was also casual slop
Theres no such thing as “oh i shot legs so i did less damage”
dark souls isn't that hard
for you nothing is hard sir
Because the damage model is equal accross the body except for the head
just dodge at the right time 😂
yeah I was about to say BF never had seperate body part multipliers
that's a cod thing
Yeah and if you arent doing full damage to someone then its just a client side desync error
me hitting a plane on BFV with bazooka and seeing: Vehicle Hit +75 
Which is common in bf1
The best is when you do -96 to someone in a 5htk range and it being impossible to even get -96
So you turn away early and get full beamed to the head
seeing 99 dmg will forever be frustrating
BF1 absolutely has body part damage differences. Headshots are always 1-hit kills, but shots to the legs or arms do significantly less damage — even inside the sweet spot range. The sweet spot just boosts torso damage within a specific distance. Saying BF1 doesn't have separate multipliers is just wrong
check battlefield wiki for source when it talks about hitspots, sweetsposts etc
dont get me wrong obviously it's not as big as in other games
but to say there isn't at all is false
BF1 does not have body part damage modifiers (from the random guns i checked on the wiki)
Sweetspot range doesnt mean theres limb multipliers
Yup, the uneven numbers people see are due to BFV and older games having sloped damage drop off models compared to 2042 which has stepped damage drop off models
You can shoot someone in the feet from sweetspot it will still do 100 damage
this is just straight up false
The reason why you like sniping in bf1 is very easy to explain, something easy to do will always be more prefered by people like you because it simply requires less effort
The Battlefield Wiki for the hitspots indicates differences. Blame them if it's not true. I can share the link.
Ill show a video of what happens when you give a player with very good aim battlefield 1 sniping mechanics
See you're twisting words. I said I liked it because snipers were more useful. And I was responding to scott who said recon are a useless class and he's not entirely wrong.
I wasn't talking about me
But I should know better and say I don't care at all because I always hit headshots, so get good losers
Not to mention BF1 sniping is exacerbated by the suppression and gunplay mechanics so you have even fewer threats. At least other games someone could pressure you with good spread management within good judgment
Im a 4-5kpm player in bf1
I dont think you should be the one telling me to get good
It isnt less useful in 5 or 4
facepalm
Bolt actions are there to soften enemies
Thats what the idea should be for them
Scout as a class is a recon kitted player
Its an info centered kit
Meaning minimap spots, player spotting, spawn beacons and so on
Yeah true but it's a game and people play it to kill other players.
Sometimes you deny basic facts just to act like a hipster lmao
just remove snipers from battlefield
True yes, in killing effectivness bf1 is the most effective
reason in bf 1 the scout is largely used is because it is easier. and I liked it. it made scouts more common. and i like scouts on the map. if you can't get this simple point, and personal opinionl idk what to say
Yeah but it makes good aimed players even more dominant and cancer to deal with
yeah man I love Sinai Desert
It also ruins engagement distances
such a fun map.
It encourages camping which disencourages ptfo play
When i was moderating a bf1 server i banned scout class entirely
And because it's multiplayer the most important thing is retaining skill gaps so players can express themselves so better players are rewarded
Because the players camped too often with them
So one side got heavily stomped purely for camping
And it makes the gameplay super boring if youre figting against them
Yet bf 1 is the most successful one in terms of sales if I'm not wrong
Scout is by far the most “op” class in battlefield 1
Theres plenty cod games that had more sales than games that are significally better
You cant judge gameplay quality via sales
infinite warfare still outsold 1 lol
Yeah because it was trash for awful players. No surprise the masses of idiots consume garbage, that's nothing new.
I absolutely agree. Or Fornite would be the best game. But you have to reason like a company not like yourself.
Unfortunately
Like music, summer hits aren't better than beatles songs
but they sell
I mean you can watch this, he went 7kpm playing scout
15 meter is too much, 10 meters maybe
BUT, if people are happy, what's wrong with it?
Huge success means it also has good factors in it
can't be all trash
Also the fact that bf1 targets had no movement options made them even more easier to hit so sweetspot was even stronger due to the fact that you cant really make someone miss
but I understand its attractive to always go against the mass, the general public
makes us feel smarter
appealing to the general audience isn't exactly the best thing
A very large majorty of players are just bad, thats why they like simple things with little to no skill requirements
I could care less if some mouth breather is happy, they can jingle keys and get the same entertainment. I want what's good for the genre not the good of some useless people or greedy corporates.
welcome to real world
why you think 42 had specialists
and skins
but I wasn't talking about appealing to them, I was saying if a product has a huge success like BF 1 had it can't be all trash, and sometimes in this channel it looks that way just because we like to go against the majority
Dawg I’m dying this man said jingle some keys lmfao
Nah, that's exactly what it meant and its existence only served to create more problems with trash players asking for bad mechanics that reward them.
CoD hasn't gotten any better by working at mass appeal, more the opposite.
cod has always been a mass appeal product
Fortnite was successful but it also created massive problems with how people perceive development and support and live service monetization/game identity.
Actually, CoD has gotten worse as it's failed to follow mass appeal. It's only appeal now is to those with wallets, same with Apex. The only people who still find appeal in those games are the ones who've already obsessed with the franchise.
Want examples of their failure to appeal to the masses? Look at MWII 2022, look at MWIII, and people already hate BO6 just over half a year later. They fail to please their audience because they only listen to the sounds of the cash register.
Same with Apex. They have turned more to cosmetics and collection events because it makes money.
The only "mass" they're appealing to is the people who want cosmetics.
If the Battlefield devs will listen to what the majority of their players, the ones that have stayed and understand the franchise, want, then the game will be better. We will get systems we like, we will have a more grounded experience, and we will have the gameplay elements that the players perfer. If they listen to the players, it's a democracy.
If you're "against the mass" then you're in the minority, and I'm sorry to say, but games can't be successful with the scale of a AAA company if they're looking to please a small portion of people. The only way they could do that is by appealing to the very people that no true fan of BF wants them to appeal to, the big wallets.
If there's anyone to blame if the game turns to cosmetics and stupid gameplay decisions, it's likely EA execs, as they will do exactly what they do with Apex and ignore the fans and community to pander to the paying few.
Sorry for the essay.
Just my thoughts on the situation.
A college thesis of nonsense, damn.
Well, can't expect someone without an actual profile name to listen to logic. My bad.
If you legitimately believe that Apex, much less CoD is not a product of appealing to mass market you never had logic to work with. They call that delusion.
Where are these majority of players that have stayed with the franchise? Didn’t most of them rage quit during V/2042
And appealing to the masses is not appealing to the core fanbase if that is what you’re trying to get at
Fair points.
At least you can make an argument. Thank you for restoring my faith.
I got ahead of myself with those terms. I apologize. Upon revision, my argument has some errors and lapses in judgement. I am sorry.
Hey I got into the end of may server test when do you think they're gonna do another labs thing?
im so worried that BF6 is going to have the same anti cheat issues as all the other BFs on PC now, "secure boot" and "unistall this driver" would be unacceptable for a fresh release, no one is going to go in and delete a sys32 driver for your game no matter how good i think itll be
its been stated that bf6 is goign to have secure boot
Literally don’t care, it’s brain dead easy to turn it on for the majority of people and if you’re running drivers that it doesn’t like, that’s on you
How is intended secure boot an issue
why no more 5 men squad ?
tbf you onouy relly need 1 role per person and theres 4 roles right?
unless each role has 2 specialisations meaning you woulneed a squad of 8
4 seems fine
They would return if the game is worthy?
What if i have 5 friends to play with? What if i have even more?
make 2 squads and join someone in the ither squads game and dreag yur squad with you
or make a portal match or join one
Why are people deleting sys32 driver to get secure boot working
the BIOS really scary
To be fair I can empathise with it but at the same time people are so dramatic.
i see abrams tanks what about the other side russ side dont see any .?
There is no RUS side
what the other side? what there veciles ?
Leopard MBT and CV90 light armor
lol leopard is for nato so usa vs nato wtf ?
#game-news literally has the lore
This game is NATO vs Pax Armata. What it seems in the trailer, large parts of EU have fallen under Pax Armata control.
Witness the vicious path of destruction carved by Pax Armata, the world’s leading private military company. PAX pursues the destruction of NATO and its allies, stopping at nothing to uphold their motto: “Our Protection, Your Peace.”
Lock & load for the ultimate all-out warfare experience. Fight in high-intensity infantry combat. Rip through the skies in aerial dogfights. Demolish your environment for a strategic advantage. In a war of tanks, fighter jets, and massive combat arsenals, your squad is the deadliest weapon.
#ad
Had to copy the text since its hard for others to find things on their own nowadays

Have to say the narrative around this PAX conflict is really interesting, looking forward to the story campaign
but but dualbooting
which can be fixed to work with secure boot anyways too if you actually put in the effort
Pax in latin means peace, pax in hotel reservation means person. Pax Armata is Peace Army or Person Army?
Yes
you think they have proper swimming this time?
Hi, any BF labs this evening? It's been two weeks since the last one. Any info?
if there was,noone here could say
We don’t know any more than you
The story setup gives me MGS4 vibes, with a PMC group fighting/replacing NATO
U mean MAG..OG quality game of FPS
Never got to play MAG, I didn't get a PS3 until long after the servers shut down
MAG was a terrible game. To this day I have no clue why people hype it so much
it was fun
It was a fine time passer when I was younger. But it had nothing memorable, outside of the large player count (Which was mostly irrelevant due to the maps designs)
Smh..the littest game before all the large player count fps
Untrue the Map design was pre-quality before all the other games took BR/BPC too newer heights
Splendid of a game MAG was
What does any of this mean. It reads like gibberish
I mean, so you decide to spam it somewhere else?
You need to claim the Community creations role in id:customize to be able to post in the media channel
OoooAaaahhh🤘🏿🤘🏿
Labs still runs?
You can still sign up for it, yes.
Then you're all set. Lots of people signed up and it's a closed testing environment, so not everybody will get selected.
I know that, thats still under NDA or?
Yep.
gottcha
i ve red somewhere that ppl got inv on diff platform instead of one applied for
is that intended or it mistake?
Can't comment on anything Battlefield Labs invite process specific, sorry.
We'll have updates on that after the Beta announcements.
nice, thx for sharing info , hoping for inv B)
YouTube videos that showed it could have 256 player battles that's it
Never take guys who don't elaborate or just say "it looked cool" seriously 
It was fine, really nothing special tho, and I played it a fair amount 😄
labs is off right? I formatted my PC and I need to reinstall it.
finally out of time out jail for mentioning a popular messaging platfor ffs
They haven't made an announcement like that so I would assume it's still on
Haven’t checked recently, Does anyone know if the maps of bf6 will have a lot of interactions like doors, buttons anf other stuff like in 4? And do they plan on putting entering animations for vehicles like in bf1?
I mean, I hope so. But idk.
I liked the BF1 entering animations, felt very polished.
Newer gameplay looks pretty diff in 60fps
Tho I think the grenade throw anim should be more like bfv
Forgot you could do an underarm throw too.
Could someone please invite me for the ps5 testing
https://www.ea.com/en-gb/games/battlefield/battlefield-labs << Sign-up here
with the open beta coming out, is it useless or to late now ?
Depends on the details about the beta which is not out yet, so we don't know.
ok
I Signed up @spare zephyr where will I receive invite information
you have to be very lucky, it's not because you sign up that u will receive something
Is Labs still like…active? Or has it been closed since May
Why May?
Cause that’s when the playtest ended right?

The 72 hour playtest was not part of Battlfield Labs. Was a designated server stress test.
do u answer to messages ? I asked somthing to the support since month and no one answering
I can't help with account or tech support.
Damn never knew that
it's not really about that

You would get an E-mail if selected, #battlefield-labs-discussion message
I just need an info and i think u could have it
Ask away. I will very likely not have the info.
Hey, can you help me out
I played the May server test thing in labs and I was wondering why I haven't gotten another email and when I go to the website it asks me to like.. take the sign up servey again. What's the deal with that? Thanks
because it was its seperate thing
people who got invited to the may server test got tossed back into the general registration pool
Welp, did it again - thanks for letting me know!
@lyric dust
is there a place to apply for bf6 alpha?
wish there would have been a posibility to give feedback on that regardless
If that leak is true and BF6 comes out in October this year, NO!
If that Beta turns out to be a mess, delay it! Not by a week, not by a month, until it is ready
I do not want to hear anymore excuses
agreed, they would have to delay it but it would have to come out before GTA 6
No that is an excuse as well, they are not making Battlefield 6 to appease Rockstar,
If BF6 has to come out in the same year as GT6 then so be it
I talking about the same month
then it wont sell well
also hope that the br for bf6 isnt doing well, imo that has no place in bf
another thing
the system for healing the same as 2042 hp back to fast to full its mean no need medics = no teamplay
the bf6 trailer was really hype, most cod trailers over the last few years like all mw2019 trailers were made with ingame gameplay, so lets hope we dont get some cinematic trailer for the mp reveal i wanna see a full gameplay trailer
teamplay = begging your clueless support for heals
thats bad
every modern battlefield game has self healing
besides V so I don't see the problem
healing is still important
one of the reasons why modern bf not suecss
the faster you are at full health the more chance you have in a gunfight
yapping
So was was BF2042’s trailer and look what happened to that,
And once again they are not making Battlefield 6 to appease Rockstar
Saying it won’t sale because of GTA6, is the same excuse as when they said Halo Infinite was the reason for BF2042’s failure
Huurrrrr BR’s bad hurrrr
bf3, bf4, bf1, bf hardline, bf 2042 probably even more i didnt count up
yeah thats why i just said that thank you?
bf2042 mp trailer was a cinamatic trailer
no it wasn't, it had gameplay
well a cinematic pre made thing that doesent reflect gameplay
it kinda does?
because it isnt
things like visuals are shown lol
cinematic trailer no gameplay
same with the newest bf6 trailer
ingame renders no gameplay
in game and render is contradictory
no?
in engine = real time
cause a cutscene is rendered in the game
they didn't advertise the bf6 trailer to have gameplay lol
but they should
it's fairly accurate to what the game will look like in gameplay
every battlefield reveal is a cinematic trailer I don't know why people are surprised
no its not
the only trailer that reflects how the game will look is the bf labs one
all the assets in the trailer will look really similar to what's in game
and even that one is outdated
look at the BF1 reveal and tell me if it looks any different to actual gameplay lol
they announced the mp trailer at the end of the bf6 one too
bf1 reveal trailer has actual gameplay
what is this fake outrage
even if like maybe only 5 seconds
people are insanely tech illiterate
yeah i can tell
entire personality is being mad about nothing
last attempt
2042 caused mass psychosis, there's no other explanation
i know its hard maybe i explained it wrong
"a cinematic or cutscene image, often seen in video games, is a non-interactive sequence that tells a story or provides context within the game's narrative. These sequences, sometimes called "in-game movies," are separate from the gameplay and can be used to introduce characters, advance the plot, evoke emotions, or provide background information."
a cutscene still uses the gameplay shaders, art and assets
so with this given information on what a cutsene is
the trailer shown of both bf6 and bf2042 does have very little or no actual gameplay shown
no shit but it still reflects what the game will look like
ragebait
at this point bro is actually just faking being stupid
you telling me a GTA cutscene looks completely different to gameplay?
this depends on the game and yes they can
that's because cutscenes are directed and curated by artists
bf4 reveal trailer also has no gameplay shown
sometimes cutscenes or cinematic user different models that have higher quality
(thing you barely notice most of the time)
but its not gameplay was my point
yeah bf does this for hype
it's still fairly representitive of gameplay visuals, a slighty lower poly gameplay model does not change the entire visual make up of the game
yea and they release the mp trailer shortly after
Shouldn't be surprised that there's no gameplay, the reveal trailers rarely use much if any. The reveals are kind of just made to look cool, establish the tone, and build hype. Doesn't mean it doesn't look like how the game will play though, necessarily.
fake outrage over nothing
✅
i mean my point was missed
cod reveal trailers mostly consist of gameplay while bf still has to use cinematics
CoD does not use gameplay
is it safe to assume you got so mad that you didnt even finish watching the video to see they said mp reveal trailer a week later?
this feller is a bit slow
If they did, people would see that game sucks. 😂
https://youtu.be/J7Ivdq5E-fs?si=HqhlS3jKXkcPa2oA
only gameplay 🥀 🥀 🥀
that's the multiplayer reveal
thats right
cause that was the point
bf2042 mp reveal was only cinematics
ahh yes there wasnt even a singleplayer it was just that one trailer
this guy has no idea what he's talking about.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uUo5gnaYB_w where is the gameplay in this cod trailer?
Release another trailer with bf4 cutscenes playing “all I wanted was you”
Shut these people up
also need to see carrier assault, hopefully at launch
Is Battlefield 6 Single Player Story Mode?
it has singleplayer, mp and br
oops.. when I think someone's being sarcastic but they aren't 
it wasn't me who was mad about the reveal trailer not having gameplay
yea I saw that after I replied.. mb
not surprising though
rawr why didn't dice give us gameplay in this clearly cinematic trailer
it took a month between bf1 releasing its official reveal trailer and the gameplay reveal trailer
Will this game have more of a WW3 story? Like allies vs allies? Or is it only the US vs. PAX
please let me make keybinds on my mouse in BF6
crazy you can't bind mouse5 or 4 in BF2042
and bring back the server browser!
BF formula is much more closer to BR than any BF player wants to admit:
BF: Large scale battles with vehicles, long engagement distances
BR: Large scale battles with vehicles, long engagement distances
Major difference is BR gives you one life and it's FFA rather than team effort
with the teammates i get it may as well be FFA

1v63 
i have said 1v127 many times in game chat
Hey guys, I just want to ask you if you think any more invites will be sent out for BF labs ? I'd like to try it out
maybe
Can you still join Laps, or are no new people being invited?
Yes, you can, but I don ´t know if they will invite new players
They are still inviting people
Nice, thank you 🙏
How long does it usually take?
You aren't guaranteed to get an invite
Wait really? Praise the Omnissiah, may I get an invite!
This is real😭
No lie bf got some of the worst players I’ve ever seen in over 20 years of fps gaming lol
Either 5 seconds or 2 years
I'll just watch the gameplay people are putting on yt instead lol
Needs more desperation in the voicelines like bf1
And they’re always the first to say movement should be “realistic and grounded”
Is wall climbing a feature in bf labs?
You tell them that you don’t want your feet to be mud covered cinder blocks and they automatically think we want infinite warfare movement 😂
Both of the extreme players on either side of the argument always state that the opponent wants these extremes.
The reality is that most players want this to be a shooter reliant mainly on aim, with movement secondary, not for BF to become a movement shooter
There is a nice grey area in between that the game will actually be. Aim first, complimented by movement ability
BF6 channel the other day was saying that bf1 was a little too fast
💀
bf1 was painfully slow and the mantling mechanics alone were dreadful lol
I do also want this BF to reward great aim, good positioning, etc
How else am I supposed to farm frag grenade kills if my enemies literally can’t move out of the way in time because the movement is so slow
😂😂😂
Imma need an invite stat
Get in line pal
this new generation has no idea, i signed up for labs back in the battlefield 1 days
get in line
😭😭
still not convienced
their trailers are always good, the gameplay on the other hand is ......
i got it but i was in turkey for a week, so i never got the chance
its like reading reddit ragebait amplified by 2
a player with 24 hours in bf4 and 27 in bf5 with 0.5kpm and 1kd in both games tried telling me that 128 players would lowkey work
It would work with maps made for it
Yeah but its meaningless
Either you have way larger maps with more POI’s or smaller maps with lesser POI’s with less players lol
And id much rather not have an insane scale with maps
I legit can’t take anything players like that say seriously. It’s like me going to my 8 year old cousin for car advice rather than my mechanic lmao
Accurate metaphor right there
Fr lol
Welcome to the modern information age where everyone knows everything and simultaneously knows nothing.
“Grok is this true?” mfers lol
Never been so happy to hear the reproduction rate has slowed to a crawl
I saw a video on X last night that was very obviously AI and the first 3-5 comments were all “grok is this real”
We are doomed
That sounds like it may have been sarcasm
Maybe but either way we are experiencing a new level of stupidity lol
Is needed an invitation to play the play test?
Yes
And is it difficult to obtain?
Like winning a lottery
Better to wait for open beta
🥲
Have they announced when the open beta will start?
They will probably announce it with multiplayer reveal trailer
how the kill cam going to be?
More people are uploading gameplay from BF6 now. I thought it was prohibited?
🤫
xD
Is it true that all guns sounds like they are suppressed without having a suppressor on?
Nah they sound pretty good
does anyone know when labs will open to oceanic region?
Only someone from EA/Dice would know that
Is there any info about Levolutions?
We haven't seen gameplay yet officially but from what footage of labs we've seen shared around, destruction in general has seem to have been heavily improved. Nothing on levolution though
Honestly, Labs is really lacking real life skate brands, and the flip to grind transitions seem a bit floaty
I like the skateboard customization in Labs though
wait

I d like to see portal in BF6 and now this time much better with server browser and mode selection
Anyone have a Battlefield labs invite they would like to sure 💀💀
I tried.
I am still waiting for the invitation for the playtesting of battlefield labs 🥲
Mm, they still doing play tests?
Where can I find the discussion about future class system, is there a poll to vote for it?
What's it like to survive in gaza
https://youtube.com/watch?v=WBy5Xonm_I8&si=WqC9HW7t8uciQJ47
I really hope dice announce the beta in August
Like early August after the multiplayer gameplay reveal and everyone will be happy
I don't recall bf betas coming out as early as august but this time I have a feeling we'll get it early.
I hope BF6 lets you customize your kit separately from your appearance, unlike in BF2042. I hate that I have to play a certain skin to get a certain toolkit, often ending up with a skin I don’t like.
I miss the days of Battlefield where it felt like you were a part of a large army but you could customize certain things on your character to show prestige. Not everyone having individual skins, with individual benefits.
I know in some way, this is driven by an ability to create a microtransaction economy. But I think it can be done more tastefully.
im ok with getting some skins sure, but majority of that should be not class locked. Ghilie suit is a sniper skin 100% and should stay there. But if we get any kind of "Named operator" They should fit multi role, otherwise leave it be you blend in with everyone else as another merc/nato unit in the list.
BF V did it decently with the option to customize each class's person per faction imo.
Is there another channel for people who actually got in?
I want it to be determined by your kit, like how in Black Ops 1 your appearance depended on what Perk 1 you had, and in Black Ops 2 it was dependant on the weapon.
I like BFV's customization but I think it's important in Battlefield to identify what class an enemy is on sight
I think classes themselves would be better reinforced with weaponry dedicated to em like before but maybe that’s just me and a few others
people who got in get their own server, which we can't access
is there sniper scope zeroing back now?
I hope not
if i already play tested is no way for me to play test again? ive seen lots of new playtest going on but no way to sign up for them
It doesn't matter, you see enemy and you shoot, BF isn't a hero shooter that wants you to deduce enemy class before you engage with them
Give them a class symbol on top of their head, you get the same class identifier like in BF1
This game will have battlepasses and skins might as well have better customization instead
I attempted to sign up hopefully I am not too late to the party.
Unlike other titles, could this Battlefield have a gore system? It would be an interesting addition. While this isn't formal feedback, it's traumatic to see a Pax Armata soldier missing a leg after a grenade or artillery shell explodes at a distance of 5 meters. I believe the revive system would only be possible in unique, hypothetical situations. It wouldn't be interesting if every time you "kill" someone, they were revived.
Or see someone get brutally lacerated by an FPV drone, if that's the case.
It has a 400m dollar budget - I hope there’s a lil amount of gore lol
Eh. Imo no-revive kills should be limited to certain things
Like, the sniper headshot thing or if you die inside of a vehicle
The sniper no-revive headshot requires you to grind to get it + it requires skill
No reviving if you die inside a vehicle adds another drawback of using a heavy vehicle too (stuff like jeeps could allow revives. It’s mostly tanks I’m talking about)
If there was gore, it would have to be on kills when revives aren't possible
But there's no reason it shouldn't be in campaign
Though BF has never been ultra gory in the past
Well yeah. Revives don’t exist in the campaign anyways
The only time I can remember was at the beginning of 4's campaign
The part where you cut off your squad mate’s lower leg?
Yeah
im lowkey scared for this game now that the supposed leak release date is oct 10
I’d actually love to see more scenes like that. Or maybe something like Cod ww2’s save mechanic where you have to drag friendlies away from danger. Would add more to the war theming
The dragging players thing will probably be in campaign as well, since it's a new feature in multiplayer
Which i love as a medic main
The destruction looks really good from what I've seen of the leaks
Yeah. Id honestly rather have the new amazing destruction than levolution. Though, having both wouldn’t be bad
I saw one clip of a tank getting blown up, and the turret that flew off hit a building, causing the wall to collapse, which crushed a car and knocked down a tree at the same time. It looks as good as BF1's destruction did
Is seems America has finally entered the turret toss competition
I agree, but levolution was a fun gimmick on some maps
Yeah. Maps like flood zone were done amazingly
I remember the first time I saw the building in Shanghai collapse, I was thinking "you can do that in an online game!?"
Driving tanks through buildings in BFV was fun too
Yeah. I’m glad they’re most likely bringing that back
Can’t wait to run someone over by smashing through an apartment building
I'm really hoping the A10 Warthog will return, doing gun runs over an objective is super fun
It's also the only air vehicle I'm somewhat good with in BF4 lol
Well hey the F16 is gonna be in the attack role so hopefully it's familiar to you, we'll have to see how it performs
It's time to see guts in Battlefield.
Local toggle, but all that extra effects and objects might impact performance
leave gore to game's built around its gorey-ness
Are people still playing labs?
people always asking for gore (beyond blood spatter) in games are so weird
I remember leading up to Jedi Fallen Order people were having fits about the lack of dismemberment as if Star Wars was historically some slasher
when the play sessions are up
Please add day-night cycles; adds depth
Add server option for start time of day or night, whatever
I think that was mostly because people were complaining that the lightsaber felt more like a baseball bat than a sword. Because there was dismemberment on robots and aliens, but any human enemy that absolutely should have been cut in half just got scorch marks instead. It felt inconsistent.
But Jedi Survivor mostly fixed that for human enemies
Which is super consistent with the movies etc
Depends on the movie. OT has a mix of both due to its age. Prequel mostly has them cut through anything. Sequel treats them like baseball bats unless it’s in a cinematic moment
The sequels they rarely make contact the choreography is so bad 
This would be so freaking awesome.
I modded another game to do it, so I know it can be done; looks cool, too, especially nowadays with today's graphics 😎
Jedi Outcast/Academy games had dismemberment though
It was a core mechanic in them due to how lightsaber controls works, you could pretty much cut stormtroopers in half
Those games aren’t canon
NuSW isn't canon
I don't see any problem or "oddity" in adding gore to the game. It's not meant to be like Hell Let Loose, where a Wehrmacht soldier is completely torn apart by an AP or HE shot. It's that simple gore. I mean, a detail that adds depth to the new game. It would be really cool to see someone lose a leg after a grenade explodes or see pools of blood after death. These are small details that make a game more immersive.
And I haven't played almost any Star Wars games, so I'm not in the know.
Wont happen as that will get the game banned in large regions like China and Australia
Well, it's not up to me.
I know. Im just saying why more games dont do this
Because its not something battlefield players really care for, we are playing an arcade fps game for the action packed fun gameplay
Who is we?
Normal battlefield players
Not sure what game you picked up
Blood cloud that leaves the body of the player is the most gore we should get tbh, I'm not against gore but seems unnecessary tbh, blood cloud also serves the purpose of better feedback of when you kill your enemy and/or as a visual indicator of what's happening near you
Yeah id never look at that
gore is great except it's nonsensical in this game, unless your head explodes after getting headshotted with a sniper, then you can't get revived
cuz it couldn't make sense to get your legs blown away by a tank then just get revived
Blood is enough
Did I really get a EA discord report for complaining that I haven't had an email about the playtest even though I've been signed up six months+? People are so sensitive now 🤣
Didn't even curse or anything, EA are genuine authoritarians I swear
Wow that's crazy and not surprised to be honest.
I have high hopes for this BF6 please bring back the old BF3-BF4 glory days. Especially their single player story mode, and multiplayer.
Nothing will ever beat your nostalgia
Guys what do you think about night modes using NODS and stuff
Make vehicle controls intuitive I beg
don't really need to change much then cause they feel great as is
Bf3/4 had it best
If I missed out on my playtesting for bf6, is there another chance to play in the next playtest?
There's a Beta coming up, so just be waiting and ready for that.
can somebody who tested bf6 with rx 6600 xt+ryzen 5600x or something close to these specs tell me approximate FPS in game ?
Cant wait to see how DICE screws up the next battlefield
Anime waifu skins
600$ epic weapon skins
Sbmm
Best to wait for Open Beta. We will have more up-to-date spec requirements then and you can get a better look at performance for that specifically. More polish and fixing will happen before launch but the requirements from Open Beta to launch shouldn't change too drastically.
You can still sign up for Battlefield Labs and we are still inviting players to playtesting. Open Beta is another way to playtest, more info on that to come soon.
Nah mine is not up to this amount @narrow basalt
Thank you 🙂↔️
The good thing is that once the multiplayer reveal event takes place later this week, Battlefield 6's multiplayer should no longer be under NDA since we're gonna see plenty of gameplay footage from content creators.
Can’t wait
Can we play the early alpha of the ps5 version or nah?
So uh, is there anything I can do to get invited to the closed beta besides pray?
Or closed alpha or whatever it is
Closed Alpha is a pray angle. Open Beta not announced yet. 👍
What if I said pretty please and promise that I'm just a chill guy
🥺
I mean how could anyone say no to that face
I don't have powers to get you in, so the face is mega adorbs but won't help in this case. 😄
Ah I see, so who can I put the puppy dog eyes on to up my chances
MUSTARD BOYSSSS
Man I wish there were dedicated cargo helis or planes in BF6
Like sea stallion or Hercules
Anyone know what to do if you get invited to a playtest on a platform you don’t own anymore?
Change your settings in your playtesting profile and hope for another invite with the updated profile. You can also reach out to playtesting@ea.com and see if they can help you directly.
pax armata outfits looks so bf 2042 and the hit marker the same as 2042 thats bad :S
No
Do players in labs can play during this week event ? or is it just for influencers ?
Is the playtest only available for PC? Is there console support?
Anybody can sign up and we have invited players based on our testing needs. It's not just content creators, the vast majority are just normal players.
And I should add, the creators are also under NDA and cannot share any gameplay from Labs.
I mean we know like influencers are going to LA this week to share the game on an event, do labs players could play in the same time ?
Labs is an online environment, has nothing to do with any local events.
Alright ! Thank u !
the pax armata outfits are based on the spanish civil guard
Hi Are there any invitations in the Middle East?
💀
I was in labs one weekend had fun then all of a sudden labs disappeared from my ea app 😦
Is there anyway to increase our chances of getting into the playtest?
What if instead of David Sirland, he was David Sirloin, and instead of cooking with good battlefield games, he cooked with Wagyu A5 steaks?
You weren't really in Labs, you were invited to the stress test which is a different thing that uses Labs. So you were only granted access for one session. You will know if you are invited to the Labs program through email.
Updating your EA Playtesting preferences and hoping to get selected is really the only way. You just need to be selected.
Rough.🥀
Buy me a bag of chips and your chances will go up 5%
Thats insane, this man is just giving an easy way to get in for literally nothing!
there are alot of rumors about the games beta coming out very soon, i think playtests arent even something to think anout anymore
If you read up on it they still are doing playtesting.
game is supposedly coming out in october
How do you do that?
Question in regards to movement, but is there any thought to a mantling system? Like being able to jump and climb up a tall fence yourself and such? It would slow you down a lot so it would come with its share of vulnerability, like "squad" slow. Just thought it could add to verticality in the game and allow people to find new ways to defend or attack points?
Or maybe an item for the engineer that would replace something that would allow him to carry one of those foldable ladders to be able to get to higher places or to gain a tactical advantage for your team
The last thing BF needs is unreadable verticality, 2042 grapple is a clear demonstration of that problem.
Hence the slowing down, never said anything about grapple gear and last I checked, armed forces have used such ladders before, but whatever.
Way to take something that was said and interpret it in the absolute worst possible way
It isn’t really about how slow it takes. Adding another form of verticality means the map designers have to design every map around that feature
It just isn’t worth it for a feature that most people will likely not use
I mean i seem to remember multiple levels to buildings all over the place in bf3 and 4, so youre telling me, the technology has degraded? Yeah I guess no soldier, marine, seaman, or airman, has EVER climbed over something that was taller than them.
No one climbs over stuff, youre right
Anyways, have a night. Im out
There are multiple levels, yeah. But they’re never really at the heights that a mantle system would be useful. It almost always either short enough to climb up normally or tall enough to where you wouldn’t be able to climb it even with a mantle system
Have a good night ❤️
It's been in BF since BF1
Too many tourists man 
Does anyone know if they’re gonna make the voice actors do heavy weights again? 😀
Jump jets, that's what we need
☝️
Not many people know this but 1942 had jetpacks too
In secret weapons of WW2 DLC
and it ruins the flow of urban maps
mantling 6 feet walls adds to the unpredictable flow
You are fighting a strawman. No one said you shouldn't be able to climb at all, but it should be limited to objects shorter than the player character
BF4 wasn't perfect with this, but it was definitely better than bf1 and bfv where there was no way to know where someone might climb from and flank an entire team
Climbing should be at a point where it avoids the feeling of being stuck on a ledge (like bf4) but not allow for scaling entire walls
Guys labs 60hz tickrate ?
They confirmed 60hz several months ago
Ok thanks
Too many random things are happening in a single BF match anyways
Might as well give people option to move around
Might as well give players wall running and jetpacks while we're at it
Yes
2/10 ragebait
No REALY i want another person for confirm that pls
Has anyone noticed that after all the leaks came out, there have been a lot of people saying they played the alpha and liked it
Not to say people have been breaking the NDA but ive seen some stuff and it doesn't look like there's anything there besides going over waist high stuff
Yeah I just think with all the verticalility that BF USUALLY has, it would be nice to be able to climb a bit of a higher wall, like I said, it would make you VERY vulnerable because you have to take into account that they are carrying full battle rattle but it would just be nice to be able to grt over some higher things, but yeah definitely not any super fast BS I cant stand that stuff, its the reason I dont play COD anymore, its for crackheads
In terms of mantling, i don't think its changed much.
Bf4 you could still climb up things like tanks, while 2042 you cant go up a shipping container
Can we play bf6 on the mouse keyboard on console?
leave the hit indicator the same as Battlefield 4 or 1 👍🏻
Just read a leak that wallhacks are being added to bf6 lol
XfactorLaming posting months old news again is it?
the last blog post said the assault class is being reworked, so this is not a concern hopefully. IMO at least they shouldnt exist...but this isnt new info
yeah i don't care for that stuff at all. it cheapens the game
anything we're hoping to see in the MP announcement this week? My big one is wanting to know how many maps the game's launching with
should be 15
that is a LOT
four maps could be remakes of maps from older titles
Its a live gameplay showcase. So there should be a lot shown. They arent gonna fly 100s of people to LA for some 10 minute video
i'm really hoping for ten new maps as the minimum, a few remakes would be fine even if they wanna drop em during season one
but i defs don't wanna see the game launch with eight maps
i did see that map list that shows 15 but i'm fairly certain several of those aren't gonna be launch day
leaks are saying: 14 regular mp maps, 1 br map, 9 campaign maps
4 of those mp maps are remade maps from older titles
surely a few of the BC2 maps are gonna make it in
and since we're all but certain that one BR map isn't coming at launch, I'm kinda thinking at least a few of those 14 aren't either
shit having them in those cq64 playlists in 2042 was probably one of the only things that kept the game afloat
that would be a negative iq moment
Were there any bc2 maps in portal?
Kbm for console on bf6 ?
valparaiso
Ty
i wouldn't be surprised at all if we get some of those classic portal maps ported over. nostalgia makes players happy, and if they're already mostly built it saves time and money
Good points 👍
I don't agree
with what lol
That it's good
ah that's fine
Very good. I never played bc2 mp, just the campaign (laggy microwave internet back then) so nice maps
BC2 in its time was amaaazing, and yeah having those maps in the AoW?/CQ64 portal playlist was so nice because we all know what 2042 maps were like
It definitely has the best campaign: characters, humor and comradery, maps, loyalty,
I miss those in the campaigns that came afterwards
How else would he be able to farm views(still barely gets any) and Reddit karma
Who knows.
But did you know he played on a competitive BF4 team?
I have some suggestions for improving the gameplay of Battlefield
1、The map mounted M2 machine guns and TOW missiles won't respawn until some time after the destruction, we hope this can be improved by giving Engineer class the ability to repair.
2、The current map and vehicle based M2 machine gun's iron sight can't be use, it's a special design but I still hope we can use the sights the weapons provide instead of the virtual one.
3、Where's the classic capture point flag ??? Not really helping the gameplay but it's a symbol !!! Watching own side's flag raising, that satisfying feeling is something draws me into the franchise !!!
4、Some weapon's ADS reload animations seems to be missing
Thank you DICE!🌸
and selfheal need to be removed from game eaither why we need medics bags if selfheal access lol
this system break the teamplay !
?Are you talking about the medic's expert supplies? But previous games also allowed self-healing

i talking about all clss they got autoheal
oh~you mean like bf5
my point is who healing is just a medic not self or whatever
But I personally think it is difficult to change, after all, the leader of this production is from the former COD
The only compromise is that the speed of blood recovery from breathing becomes very slow.
or if they want healself make it heal half the hp so its force u to go to medic to heal full
its so dump how they think !!! cant understand
bro
i think you need go to squad
BF2 is indeed a good game, but it is too old, and some new players find it difficult to adapt to such a mechanism, just like the random ballistic dispersion of BF4.
After all, dice is going to make money
Ya and modern gaming has passed you by
for new player
But as a compromise, I support the health mechanism of bf5
Kbm for console on bf6 ?
@severe anvil ^^
i think they posted in a bunch of places
idk how else to tag moderation
#how-to-report-and-appeal no need to ping staff.
thank you!
I was chosen for that bf6 beta last time but I couldnt go through the settings. I was kinda stuck where you can change the settings for the colour blind people. There was no button to start the game. Will it be the same with the upcoming Beta? Any Tips? Help?
They made assault useless and decided to change a basic medpen with a stimulant that boosts your movement speed a bit, highlights enemies when you see them and makes footsteps more audible
give assault like a ladder or something IDK
Issue is none of them are as good as medpen itself, assault had it's purpose before, frontlines soldier with limited self sufficiency, medpens aren't as good as healing crates since you can't recharge them in 2042, but they are faster, you can spam 2 of them in 4 seconds
Now BF6 assault is just a worse support, might as well use support and have both infinite healing and ammo
Assault is being reworked, so whatever.
Assault was good before this change, maybe lacked gadgets besides launchers
They should rework recon before assault anyways, you won't be off the minimap with those gadgets and perks
k
I do find it kinda weird that they had a completely selfish class gadget
that's probably why it's being reworked
Killing enemy team is teamwork
yes but technically every other class can also do that
I wonder if they've removed that one perk that spots people that spot you
I hope they did cause punishing someone for doing what they're supposed to do is quite bad design-wise
but no other class can give out supplies or repair etc
Engineer is selfish by the logic, engineer only cares about killing enemy tanks, not doing teamwork 
It's already in 2042 with Rao/Paik, and it's not a problem there
didn't Paik get nerfed to the ground
That is not at all what I was talking about
oh you talking about the auto spot while scoped?
Nope
I'm talking about the thing where you'd spot a recon and instantly get spotted yourself
I don't see that in either class tree
I swear it was there. Must've been removed then
may have been a perk when recon had the arty stike too
Yeah. I think it was
whats the recons "ult" now?
the uav call in
Iirc it's a UAV for both trees now
in one of the many leaked vid postings on reddit in the last few days there was a few with the map pulled up and you could see it
It sounded interesting. I can see why they removed it tho
apparently it was super spammy
once you'd get like 10-15 mins into a match it was like nonstop from all the recons calling them in
Prolly be less spammable if there was an alternative for the alternative tree or something
So did they walk back the whole "unlocked weapons for all classes" thing yet or are they intent on shipping a dead game again? Any word on the perks being deleted or is that going to ship? I think the perks could be tolerable if you had locked weapons. Otherwise everyone is just going to play the same meta busted class (based on perks) with whatever weapon they want.
Perks have been in each game, they aren't something new
That’ll depend on what the beta is offering to us rly
There has been nothing like "have 3 instant fix everything stims" tier perks before my guy. Not even 2042 had that, but it did have the "fix everything once you kill" which was pretty disgusting. About as disgusting as the new perk system.
Also there were no perks in 1942, BF2, 2142, BC1 & 2 or BF3, you know the good ones'.
Oh ya, 2042 is nothing but meta busted class using whatever weapon they want…
Absolutely no meta sweats in any other BF
BF3 had perks you chimp
More BF boomers unable to cope with an evolving game and shooter market
Extra nade, extra mag, longer sprinting.
These are NOTHING compared to the "enable 4 healthbars mode" in 6.
They already said they removed the healing from stims.
Or "double health driving tank"
https://battlefield.fandom.com/wiki/Specializations also take a look at this lol
Longer spring, extra mag, extra nade, flack for engie. Nothing like double-tank-health, 4x health, 2x repair, or giga-spot.
Longer sprint in a game with limited sprinting is just as “broken” as you’re making increased repair speed look
Or 4x health when the med pen has already been removed
Again, more BF boomers incapable of evolving and stuck in the past
They already removed or reworked a lot of the bad perks/features
- Health Stim is gone for Assault (Imo they should've added a limit instead of fully getting rid of it, but 🤷 )
- Mortar Strikes have been removed from Recon
- Mirror Spotting has been removed from Recon
- Double launchers has been removed from Engi
- Double primaries is either being reworked or removed from Assault
it is yes
Like if i see people say that kd/kpm not only doesnt matter within gameplay and tell me that its not relevant im just automatically going to assume they are bad at the game
Like you cant tell me that kd doesnt matter if you argue that reviving everyone is the most important thing in the game, you cant tell me kpm is unimportant when the entire idea of the game is to have less enemies by killing, more teammates by winning more fights and getting more revives
where is the double tank or the other afformentioned perks
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/239788202745921536/1399898342175281182/image.png?ex=688aac6d&is=68895aed&hm=84a81fa6142c002a4b16277751ba255598f536648bfa32b2214f12d4e364da42& their team had more kills therefor they were also alive more because they were actively winning more gunfights meaning they had more map control
i could possibly not win that game if my team is permanently dead and not killing anything
Does engi still have the instant repair tier-4? That could be what they're talking about
they werent dead more often than the enemy because they werent getting revived, they were dead more often because they lost the gunfights
I bet they probably removed it by now
idk I haven't really paid close attention to the training lines
disgusting sounds a bit too harsh
the BF community is weird . . .
Be nice to add sync kills, ala ghost recon
I suppose we can just do that via voice com, though
But with everyone zipping around like bees...
Just increased repair tool afaik
Wondering if devs could increase incentives for camping
this entirely depends on map design
camping is something that will happen regardless
Why would anyone want more camping
Bc it works; can tell bc it irritates run-n-gun players
It irritates people who actually are playing the game?