#battlefield-labs-discussion
1 messages · Page 69 of 1
It is quite literally the same situation as if guns were class locked and gadgets weren’t
if hes a sniper youll see a bright ass scope glint blinding you
its not nothing, theres a reason 2042 is regarded as the worst entry in the franchise
if you are fighting a sniper you aren't going to rush towards them in a straight line, you'll look for cover and advance quickly, if the enemy has an SMG you don't have to hide as much and if you have an AR you might be able to engage them better than they can engage you
even if "snipers can now use an ammo box and camp" okay so? Better for them to redeploy, waste a jet as air taxi and resume camping 20 seconds later?
it's a game of rock paper scissor
i can blow shit up and i had fun playing it so i dont see it as that bad
bro stfu and go praise this 2042 nonsense system somewhere else
You'll be able to tell what weapon a player is using by the way theyre playing.
Assault rifles and lmgs make it more difficult for sure and there should be ways to incentivise them.
also do you guys fucking identify if someone is a sniper by their clothes?
what good is a medic with a sniper rifle srsly
Posture
if a sniper lets you get that fucking close hes a shitty sniper
ive had my fun with it too but i can recognise its not as good as previous titles and want them to make 6 better
the guiding principle for the new game seems to be "make it as random and unpredictable as possible"
But usually if they sit at a distance its a strong indicator..
yes
you could tell in 3 and 4
Im more sick of 2042's stale meta game to be fair.
not so much in this one cuz all the soldiers look similar tbh
you could definitely indentify snipers in 3 at least at a glance
i identify snipers because they have a bright ass scope glint and take away my entire hp when they shoot me
Guess someone never quickscoped in an fps
yeah no idgaf about quick scoping
and idgaf about tryharding
We can tell
This isnt the 2012s anymore
To be honest, this class system will never work
i dont use scopes with glint, x4 is always enough, what about that
Or 17
I’m more concerned with snipers having anti-air
One of the biggest counters to snipers is helis and jets. Giving snipers anti-air capabilities ruins the whole balance between them
imo bf1 scout ads time was pretty decent
then i die and respawn and go do something else or go hunt you down
2042 ads time is a tad slow
Go back to COD
COD is ass anyways lol
shh, the adults are talking
also the sniper at the back of the map sniping ppl is never going to matter, its the one thats actually in the area, near flags, doing stuff
lmao what is that take
Didn't know quickscoping was game specific cuh
okay, so what? Pop flares/ECM and strafe run the sniper. One stinger missile won't take you out.
just respawn and find him bruh
You guys are talking about wanting the game to be real and then talk about quickscoping
too young to understand
who said "real"
Nah Quick scope only belongs in cod /s
try harding is still lame
💯
imagine not playing games to have fun in 2025
tbh, i love bf1 and bf4 movement than bfv and 2042
i think you can balance the ads time for scouts to be decent bf1 did really good with ads time on scouts
bf4 movement is very clunky
sure. No old game had quick scoping. hahaha
Tryharding ≠ Having skill 😭
better than 1s atleast
atleast it had movement
kek
bf1 and bf4 are complete polar opposites, wdym
bf1 was fun too
every title after 4 had better movement
this tbh
i wish bf4 servers werent like 90% locker
Is battlefield labs in closed beta state rn
you get stuck on so much map geometry on 4
when was the last time you played 1? you get constantly stuck or glitched on micro pixels lol
i never rlly liked locker it was kinda lame
i guess bf1 movement is way better
use Battlelog web browser and search for servers, loads of not lockers servers
theres no movement in 1
Idk. I played BF4 after BF1 and BF4 felt more clunky. ie it is hard to tell what you can vault over and what not
bf4 had air strafing and stabilization jumps
The big issue I have with no class locked weapons is class identity and balance.
Seperate class weapons means that there is never a universally best weapon
i play bf since bf 2 i love this dang ol game
i find the in game server browser for bf4 is really bad
there is a typo in the new bf post about bf labs
every og uses battlelog
Only on pc
On console it’s relatively the same
then why i can move in 1
Yeah this is it for me. I find myself fighting way more weapon variety with class locked
1 is much smoother than 4 for getting around
theres no movement mechanics aside from standard movement options
My issue is the balancing to be honest. I ironically dont care whatever class gets snipers they can still be useless but im more concerned over the same shit of just running medic with zero consequences.
bf1 has... a slide that's slower than just walking
Because that is the actual playerbase lol
in bf5 you had jump leaning, jump shotting, omni slide etc etc bf4 you had air strafing then rouzou vouzou mouzou if you want to count those, stabilization jump, slithering,
I dont mind smgs on medic, true smgs because hey they are still pretty limited.
bf2042 imo had a very well rounded movement system actually
bf1 movement is so heavy with the mix of realistic and arcade
I love bueno sliding.
Never forget release bf1 slide canceling 💔
decent slide mechanic with bhops and good animations
bf5s slide animations are kinda awkward to catch
balancing can benefit from all-class weapons since guns will have to be balanced against each other, not just within the same category
nope.
because its so sudden and semi laggy
That’s because sliding is supposed to be for ducking behind cover in 1. It’s not meant to be a movement tech.
Smgs and DMRs as medic was best imo, gave two types of play styles with each having tradeoffs
That already happens with class locked weapons lol
we should go back to 1942/bf2 dolphin diving and bhopping, can you imagine
bf2 bhopping was so bad some servers would kick you if you did it
we are playing an FPS game where you want to be fighting others and having fun gunfights, having movement mechanic adds more complexity and skill gap
which makes the game imo more interesting to play
imagine battlefield with quake movement 💀
not really, assault rifles were usually the best all-rounders
Titanfall 2 💀
and it's worse in every way than just walking and crouching, how does that work?
what
id be happy with another 2042 or 5 movement mechanics
quake and titanfall are very different
easy to master but adds something to gunfights
Urban Terror! Was a Quake 3 total conversion mod back in the day. with modern guns, strafe & circle jumping lol
someone from the ea team can help me out changing the plattform
team fortress is closer to quake than titnafall
I HOPE THEY ADD ULTRAKILL SLIDING AND GRAPPLING HOOK
whats an ultrakill slide supposed to be
The grappling hook in BF2: Special Forces was pretty cool
Not even close. BFV movement was the best and immersive
Damn didn’t know about that. Quake was a thing a few generations before me.
Slam storage when
spam slide and you can go faster than light
That’s their niche? Assault rifles are the all-rounders that suck compared to the intended weapon for each range. They need to be balanced to avoid being too powerful in every range
Previous bad balancing doesn’t mean that it can’t be balanced correctly
no class locked weapons will mean mostly assault rifles/lmgs everywhere too, i think the ideal method is powerful gadgets with class locked weapons
idk jump leaning was kinda difficult to catch/react to
Sure if they cut cross-play
Generations? dang I'm not that old! 😆
Played a bit of champions and live, but playerbase is so low it takes ages to find matches with evenly skilled players
if you have class locked weapons you will see more variety in matches
man Live was cool
haha i fucking wish
same
Was born 2004 xD
legit the only reason why i dont really play 2042 is because of crossplay
This. Instead of just thinking “what’s the best weapon”, people have to think “what’s the best weapon for this class”
the lobbies are so zzz
Id get into champions but too late
i grew up on Quake 3 Arena vs bots and had a lot of fun playing Live when it came out
and locking weapons to specific classes doesn't mean they'll be balanced properly
Not locking weapons to specific classes doesn’t mean they wont be balanced properly
Input based priority would be better, I still like having crossplay
i dont mind playing vs console players as long as the aim assist they get isnt over tuned
I was actually kinda disappointed we got another doom game. Cmon Id, give us a proper quale remake with old school multiplayer
yeah, exactly my point, why limit options if either option can be imbalanced?
they could make it so that when a console player joins with a friend theyll be put into pc lobbies or something theres been similar systems like that before
Im not bothered with battlefields crossplay. Easy game sure but thats that.
For class identity
Why can’t we lock weapons if both can be imbalanced?
could keep crossplay just not filled with ai tier players
Eh Bethesda wants them to do doom so you know.
Can we still join?
Yeah probably makes more money I guess
ADS snap puts in a lot of work for the average roller player in bf
i dont think arena shooters are popular enough anymore, they are pretty basic compared to todays standards, i like them personally bc i grew up with them but lots of ppl didnt and expect more than just a skin shooting a gun, not sure what they need to come back
class identity is still there, medic can't fight vehicles, assault can't revive, support won't put down a spawn beacon
Fr. Console vs Console servers should be preserved. Console and pc have totally different playing styles
but still I remember they teased quake in a video 2 year or so ago
roller players dont even play the game i swear
Class locked weapons automatically makes it a better BF, I don't want to see medic snipers, might as well not have classes at all like 2042 launch
zzz gameplay
you know its bad when Epic just turn off the unreal servers desipte Unreal being the game that made them
they have money to burn they just dont care about arena shooters anymore
and if epic dont, who does
i personally dont care if its class locked or not tbh
Never once seen someone using the medic class with a sniper rifle in all my hours playing 2042, seen plenty of medics running around not reviving people though lol
I saw many PP Mackay users
Tbh the attempts to revive them were pretty bad. There was one arena shooter with rouge lite elements. I forgot the name of that.
Default classes would push it too
The issue isn’t sniper medics. It’s every class getting assault rifles
PP29 Mackay wouldn't exist if SMGs were locked to engineers as it should be
theres a 2nd Splitgate coming out soon I think, that was kinda popular but nevevr went anywhere
ill have to try it
played that one at gamescom last year
Splitgate was fun
isnt mackay supposed to be an assault type character though
I think if medic could only use lmgs and smgs the majority would just use smgs
Which is why they've done that
2042 has that and despite everybody having access to ARs, there's variety. There's always gonna be meta, sure, but at least you're not locked to that particular class anymore.
depends
Assault shouldn't use SMGs, Mackay also has faster strafing, SMG Mackay is as fast as pistols
if pc probs smgs would dominate
LMGs? you mean assault rifles
console players will just prone lmgs
Lmgs
classic
battlefield LMGs are mostly big mag assault rifles half the time anyway
ye
with worse spread, yep
MG4 in BF4 and the AWS were just better ars unless u wanted cqc then u get the AEK
Idk why you think that less player choice is bad. Less player choice can be very fun while more player choice can be detrimental
with slower draw times, slower ads times and more recoil/visual recoil
It just depends on how they do it
And year long reload times
aek my beloved 😍
most of the bf4 lmgs were on par with assault rifles for every stat
but, you had to choose, medic or support
all the 1 frames from zouzouers with 150 ping 🥰
F2000 my beloved
so you saw a mix of both
I didn't say less choice = bad, but valid point
How many got invited today?
imagine if BF4 weapons werent class locked, youd have ppl with med box, ammo and lmgs and nothing else
3x bren was amazing
I hated it xD
ngl i liked bf1s support kit the most
class locked weapons also means each weapon can be a lot more unique and powerful in its own niche
a very wide mix of mgs and lmgs
funny thing about design, when you have restrictions and limits, it tends to bring out more creativity
or get so niche that nobody bothers using them, kinda like half of weapons in BF4 after all the DLCs
The sniping in BF1 felt so good to me
ye
its ass
Anyone knows if there is a preload for labs? And which launcher is it on for PC? purely theoretical
I like the idea of signature weapons and traits but im curious how much it'll do to sway weapon selection in the classes favour.
idk why they thought that sweetspot was a well rounded and balanced mechanic
- it doing like 70-90 damage on regular bodyhits
bf4 just had so many guns, thats inevitable, but none of them are so bad you cant use them
Nah it was just really satisfying not sure why tbh
bf5 did their scout the best imo
The recon one will make exactly 0% more people want to use guns on their proper classes
absolutely nothing, ppl will use what they want unless you force them out of it with class locked stuff
more balanced
I think im done arguing about battlefield. Any mention and my burnout becomes apparent.
It’s literally just better breath holding
Better stabilisation yea
true, but at the same time, a lot of these niche weapons will be outperformed by other weapons more specialised to fulfill that role
And default classes
Easiest Battlefield entry to hit headshots
I know in the case of 2042 its done something.
It won't if 2042 is any indication
Though this is anecdotal.
The metal helmet 'ting sound
2042 has this, and it's at very least noticable
hardest because you cant even see people because it had the worst visibility
the only way the signature weapon buffs would make ppl move towards class weapons if it they were massive buffs like reload speed, recoil control, more attachments
Yea I know I've played 2042.
Yeah 100% that is probably it just pure dopamine
bf1 you can push an ez 3-4kpm with scouts
at launch maybe. After they kinda fixed that it was easy af imo
same with bf2042
good, I have a feeling a lot of people here didn't
i cant say ive ever considered the class buffs, i just use the gun i want to use with the gadget i want to use and go
That exact thing will happen even if you unlock all weapons?
It’s just caused by bad balancing or having too many weapons
the visibility is til this day garbage
If anything, it’ll happen more
Is it? Haven’t played it since two years at least
yes lol
it had major backlash because of the visibility being so horrid
it also makes games insanely slow to play
too many weapons imo, there's a breaking point at which even if you balance everything well, some options will simply be more viable
bf1 players have higher kpms in a "slower paced game" than bf5 players in a more movement oriented fast game
I see
NGL due to horrible visibility I enjoy BFV more 😂
becuase you just simply cant even ever see what youre shooting at
so you need to hypercancer your positioning
I can smoke and run around without care in BFV, I will be dead the moment I do that in BF1 or 2042
headglitching was also worse in bf5 because the playermodels were super slim compared to 1
And I used to be amazing on that.
Well i just looked up my bfv stats. Got 1733 kills with Kar98 and 1366 of them are headshots
2042 smoke disables any player though it just shuts their brains off its pretty funny
I agree. Unlocking all weapons just makes the issue worse though. Why would someone pick niche guns within the class that are more leaned towards how other guns act when you can just pick the other gun
I like placing claymores in smoke
they just stay still playing dead inside of smokes
nice rat
ratgamingTTV
preference, I 'spose
Damn that makes you mad
prolly claymores on ropes aswell
lol
Not a lot of people go based off of preferences though
Why would anybody use a dmr more leaned towards close engagements when they can just use a carbine or assault rifle
Why would carbines ever be used when you can just pick an assault rifle
I used to think that people will chase meta all the time, but I think you'd be surprised
how it actually plays out
No class based weapons. They will never learn.
I heard SMGs are 💩 in this game which is good
seems boring
probs AR's
I would say carbines
Who said carbines are even a thing?
Assault rifles will be the go to. Especially the m416.
can you talk about alr leaked stuff that youve seen or will i get perma banned the moment i mention anything
Don’t
aight
SMGs should never be the overall meta imo
The assault rifles are meant to be the all-around gun category
Btflabs it’s available on LATAM? Someone know?
siiggghhh, not UN-locked weapons AGAIN.
bf1 had good balance imo
not yet
you could zerg pretty hard with smgs but you could outplay zergers with spacing
eventually, probably it will
and in bf5 you had some semi smg tier assault rifles
Ok
they are actively not listening in this regard 💀
oh yeah in bf1 you also had like for example burton and autoloading you could contest smg players with
you were told that classes must have specific weapons, you said yes, because this change of direction. we cod do not want it, we want the real battlefield. very bad.
SMGs should have an effective range of like 60 meters. Carbines 150 in semi, ARs 250 in semi. Recoil should make it hard to hit targets beyond 60 meters in full auto on all weapons except bipod mounted LMGs, and those should have debuffs to make them require certain playstyles
They’re slightly listening. They’re adding “incentives” to using the correct guns
nah 60m effective range is a very far stretch lol
they did that in 2042 and it did absolutely nothin lol
Is this based on irl or just feeling?
60 meters is not that far in a battlefield game
60m effective range is like 95% of engagements
Please don’t say irl
that would mean that the maps are insanely big and the engagement distances are hyper long again like in 2042
I dont even see the point of smgs if the m416 exists as it does right now and its insane.
in bf2042 maybe
I love support classes at the back of the map sniping hurray!
They need to lock guns to certain classes
exaaaactly
Both. The SIG Spear is meant to address the M4 being kind of a lost cause at longer ranges
Am40 killed smg viability for a good while. You could use a pbx and do well I agree though the hs multiplier broke the weapon in my experience.
The real effective range of an M4 even with an optic is like 300m
5.56 isn’t stable beyond that
700 is like, the absolute maximum range you can touch things with 5.56
Because it was basically an SMG but with AR bonuses
300m is a very far stretch lol and i had a R-20 in military with an optical sight
Well thats what Ive been saying in general for years. But now dead game.
which is like a slightly more updated m4
I’m talking about effective range, not the max range you personally were able to be accurate at.
ah yeah
maybe
Actually being able to shoot 300m with an AR15 is more down to the shooter, which is what I would like BF6 to represent
It should be difficult but not impossible
BF isn't a milisim
that would also mean that the maps are badly designed if its possible
Please shut up and save that BS for Reddit
bf1 it was like max 20m with smgs
that's not effective range lol
semi autos was like max 80 but preferable engagement range was 30-40m
and full auto like 30m max
You can use SMGs in any range but 15 meter was ideal in BFV
yeah
air drag should pull bullets off course imo
bf5 had a pretty decent engagement distance
instead of just slowing them down
too bad that the gunplay itself was ass
Yeah
nah
BFV's gunplay would be better if they had a more natural feeling, less jerky recoil system
the recoil system was entirely random that was the main issue with it
why not? the other alternative is the stupid "cone of fire" random bullet deviation which simulates the same thing except immediately when your bullet leaves the barrel
BFV with proper spread and team balancer would be goated
because its an arcade shooter
some niche irl elements wont really work well imo
No, Battlefield is a milisim 🤣
battlefield is halfway between arcade and tactical
lol no
like tactical obviously but its an arcade game
So are they slowly sending out invites or does everyone already have their invites
Think slowly
like, if I don't have it rn does it mean I just won't have access to this playtest or
yeah, there is such a thing as an arcade tactical shooter. tactical shooter doesn't mean milsim or realistic. it means it's a game that takes more brainpower to play than "press W and left click"
Valorant is a tactical shooter, so is CSGO. they are some of the most unrealistic games ever
yeah but bf has never been about that
yes it has LOL
where
literally since 1942
Clearly battlefield is a procedurally generated open world survival building game
bf4 had a similar spread, visual recoil and mechanical recoil system like csgo has
imo Battlefield’s vehicle gameplay is tactical, but infantry is super arcade
the only BF game that I would say isn't a tactical shooter is the Bad Company spinoff series
people clearly don't remember Lars Gustavson (creator of BF) saying that BF is a run n' gun game 
also BF4 doesn't have visual recoil
Speaking of, when BC3
Probably never
BF4 has visual recoil, it just doesn't effect the reticle. there was a whole big thing about that when bf4 was fresh because originally it did move the reticle, and the reticle didn't match up to your actual point of aim
it does
Had*
no it still does have it
They removed it after a patch
BF has never been on the super tactical side it’s always been an arcade shooter lol
no, they removed reticle bounce
they added it after a patch* iirc
Locked weapon please
Nah, they removed visual recoil from BF4, they added visual recoil to 2042 
that's not really "visual recoil" as it's defined now
visual recoil includes reticle bounce while firing
visual recoil was always in the game and still is. unless your gun sits perfectly still when shooting and your entire screen moves up, there's visual recoil
no it doesn't.
visual recoil is the "art" side of recoil in video games
it does
any weapon movement onscreen is visual recoil, and mechanical recoil is what moves your screen up or sideways
I’m going to continue to bring up bad company 3 until I’m boots on the ground as Preston Marlowe
visual recoil is just a visual effect of your reticle bouncing when it isnt
that's part of visual recoil, but it's not all encompassing
Unrelated but tinfoil hat theory, I think they will class lock weapons in like a week or two to prove how they are ''listening'' to the community, existence of carbines makes no sense otherwise, they could've been just ARs 
There is so much less recoil in bf4 if compared to bf 5 for example
Lock main types weapons to classes pls, for anyone reading this message in DICE
When I went back to bf 4 after months of bf 5, I could easily notice it
Unlocked classes honestly makes a bit of sense. In BF3/4 the defined meta weapons lead to some classes being overwhelmingly chosen (AEK assault slop in BF4 for example) , whereas for as milquetoast as 2042 is i never felt a defined meta that annoyed me. If they don't add a class lock I think a ban of one weapon category or so per class makes sense
bf4 doesnt really have any recoil yeah
BC3 will be the true “return” of battlefield that saves the franchise— todays announcement told us it probably won’t be this one
its so minimal that its unnoticable
AEK would still be the most picked weapon if they weren't class locked. Idk what your argument is
Exactly
same system in bf1 but the visual recoil is much heavier in bf1
i mean, there was a "defined meta" to be fair
RM68 during s4, VHX during s6(?), pp29 is still meta for SMGs, BSV in S1
BF1 has the best visual recoil imo, i like how the gun rocks back and forth when shooting
bf5 is purely mechanical recoil
its just screen clutter
and confuses players
💀
no it's not lol
you can see the front sight post bouncing in bfv
i dont think bf5 had visual recoil?
bf1 has the worst with all the screen clutter and reticle bouncing so much lol
bf1 has the best <everything>
ftfy
nah
"screen clutter" yall literally have no fucking idea what you're talking about
Yeah but the class roles themselves would have mattered more than funneling into just assault. I'm also hoping that balance is far better this time around as to not allow for something as oppressive as the AEK to take hold
I can stand whatever the fuck theyre doing just as long as armour isnt a deciding factor in gun fights.
the issue was that assault was the medic class. this was fixed in later games with assault providing ammo and medics getting SMGs instead
Nah, BFV has purely mechanical recoil, visual recoil maybe in some DMRs
ye
WW3 did something cool with its armor hitboxes (about the only cool thing it did)
then i remembered correctly
no you didn't
What does mechanical recoil mean? I dont really know
Give us battlefield labs test in the asia region
the part that moves specifically the camera. all weapon movement is visual recoil since it doesn't actually effect your aim, just adds visual flair
its like your gun actually recoiling, visual recoil is fake recoil effect that makes your gun look like its recoiling when it isnt
The selbstlader 1906 was good fun
It's fun but not sure if it had visual or real recoil
generally bf has both visual and mechanical but mechanical recoil isnt very noticable since its so minimal
i don't think you understand how big a percentage of weapon recoil in video games is visual recoil. if a game truly had zero visual recoil it would look like fucking dog piss because the gun would have zero animations whatsoever
Give us battlefield labs test in the asia region
or you could just have better actual recoil
Oh hey mechwarrior 2 has been released on xbox
that's not how recoil works. moving the camera doesn't magically make your gun look like it's shooting
takes more mastery than minimal mechanical recoil with random screen clutter
Basically every CS clone game out there
Snoozefest visually
Man I hope I get an invite to play bf6.
no one wants to see a gun sitting perfectly still but the camera moving jarringly fast up the screen. that's why visual recoil is important, and mechanical recoil doesn't need to be unforgiving in a game that everyone is pretty vehemently saying is an arcade shooter
cs is more about spread control than recoil control anyway tbf
the spread in CSGO is recoil lol
those are 2 entirely seperate mechanics
it's predictive, pattern based recoil
not in CS
As long as the reticle is accurate when the shot actually happens everything else is fine imo
in CS it literally is.
if you played CS you would understand
the spread in CS is very little tbh
recoil is your gun swaying either horizontally or vertically from kickback
I actually play a game with this. It’s incredibly silly looking. It feels like you don’t have any recoil at all even though a lot of guns have very strong recoil
bullet spread is your bullets spreading
you either have predictive spread or random spread
spread increase and spread decrease
CS has basically no bullet spread. it has predictive recoil patterns
is this a new cs2 thing
it's recoil. you pull your mouse down to control it
yup
it's been that way since CSS
ah you just dont understand it then nvm
"you don't understand it"
- guy who VERY OBVIOUSLY doesn't understand it

you think spread and recoil are 1 in the same when they are seprate mechanics lol
CSGO doesn't have "spread patterns" it has spray patterns. you're literally not even using the correct terminology, and it's all recoil
you obviously control recoil and spread but it doesnt mean its 1 mechanic
Recoil pattern: The pattern the bullet follow depending on the recoil
Spread: the RNG the bullets can spread withing the pattern
right?
yes
Hey pickle. This has nothing to do with spread or recoil, but what is your opinion on immersion?
Imo it’s a vital aspect of bf
and in CS you control the recoil pattern, not the spread
i wouldn't ask pickle about anything, dude is confidently wrong all the time
Milsim battlefield time!!!!
I just want to see if he confuses immersion with realism like the guy above me
no shoo
no milsim in BF
Anyone knows if Labs has recoil patters like CS?
It'd be neat
It wouldn’t be battlefield
people who think immersion means milsim rack my brain
there's a plethora of milsims that exist
BF is not one of those
idk i dont care i just play fps games for shooting and gunfights
no one is asking for BF to be a milsim.
you'd be surprised what i've seen...
Putting this here to see what others think ?
This is what I have in my mind but it could work honestly if the community trys it and see how it goes.
Base weapon for Assault Assault Rifles
Field Upgrade for Assault [CQC] - Allows you to use SMGS
Field Upgrade for Assault [Grenadier] - GL noob tube etc.
Base weapon for Engineer Carbine rifles
Field Upgrade for Engineer [Mechanic] - Allows you to use SMGS
Field Upgrade for Engineer [Anti-Tank] - Tank hunter etc
Base weapon for Support SMGS
Field Upgrade for Support [Combat Medic] - Allows you to use AR
Field Upgrade for Support [Perimeter Defense] - Allows you to use LMG
Base weapon for Recon Sniper Rifle
Field Upgrade for Recon [Spec Ops] - Allows you to use SMGS
Field Upgrade for Recon [Sniper] - Allows you to use sniper rifles
battlefield is about vouzou jumping around lockers with an AEK971, eating saltine crackers and wonder bread
im not wrong when im not including spread and recoil to be 1 in the same mechanics lol
but keep telling yourself they are im not going to change your mind anyway
what you're doing is confusing the two
not really
damn needed a heads up for that wall of text
Battlefield isn’t about realism. At its core, it’s an arcade shooter
What it is about is immersion. The feeling that you’re a part of the game’s world

spread is bullets spreading and recoil is your gun swaying vertically or horizontally
2 diff things
BF has a mostly realistic aesthetic
But it is not a milsim
you control both at once obviously
bro fuck off with the AEK such a noob friendly gun LOL I rekt kids with my SCAR-H with that x3 headshot 😛
but they arent in the same mechanics
Only PC battlefield
Recoil patterns in games have nothing to do with realism lmao
you don't control spread goofball
there's no such thing as a "spread pattern"
lmao these people
That message wasn’t part of the recoil discussion lol
ah sry my bad
spread increase and spread decrease
controllable
mic drop etc
No, I wouldn't. You think any realistic feature is "milsim"
Milsim doesn't mean realistic. It literally means military simulation, i.e. taking orders from your commanding officer, acting out real military formations, etc.
Exactly. If battlefield was actually about realism, we wouldn’t have “only in battlefield” moments
people are still asking for milsim elements
spread doesn't increase the longer you shoot in cs. it's always there, and serves to stop recoil spray patterns from being 100% learnable. you can even go through CS console commands yourself and disable spread, and see that the weapons still have a predictive spray pattern
I say milsim battlefield as a joke but simcade elements would add a lot of interesting play
yeah dude find me the guy asking for the military's playbooks to be represented in game i'll wait
this is someting for the war thunder forums lmao
"man battlefield should be 3 hours of walking followed by a 10 minute gunfight where no one can see each other" - literally no one
idk i think battlebit was a bit too heavy with milsim elements
Let go
you sprint 60mph in battlebit and take 40 bullets to kill what
Battlebit had neat features but gimped itself with air strafing and poor class balance
i have never said that "realistic aesthetic is milsim"
In fact, the opposite: #battlefield-labs-discussion message
Arma 3?
arma 3 dead game now
Wdym that would be so much fun /s
pain
bleeding element is a sim mechanic, no health regen is a sim mechanic
Me when I don't know what dead means
like arma life mod is dead now
its quite literally a simcade game lol
no it's not lmao, cod hardcore mode has no health regen, is that a milsim now?
I bought Squad because it looked cool and I spent 2 hours walking and refunded it
damn, reddit is on fire lol
i didnt call ita milsim
Bleeding was one of their best features tbh. Having a fight in BF4 where the enemy lives on 1hp is incredibly frustrating
theres 0 US based Arma life mod servers
i said its a game with milsim elements
you said no health regen is a milsim feature
as always
because it is
BFV has no health regen. is that milsim battlefield?
it does
yes it was
it was crap
Battlebit was cursed. It was intended to be a milsim, but its style invited movement shooter players that eventually made the game less and less milsim
it does but only to 50 hp i think?
it has partial health regen. you can get like 30% of your health back
Wow the RP mod for a non RP game isn't active anymore? Relay this to the milsim groups immediately
ye
battlebit was better when it was a low poly milsim
unironically
The RP mod u can still fight and all
2.0 never LOL
hardline? that was actually a sick game
hardline got a lot of hate for basically no reason. the gunplay was so good
its sad hardline died
the gunplay was like halfway between BF3 and BF4 and i loved it
hardline has the best gunplay of the series (not including the warsaw revamped updated one)
i said what i said
I wish a bf2-level revive would happen with HL
Nobody thinks about ARMA life as the game's life blood. This would be like thinking GTA Online is reduced to those modded super low setting PVP arena servers
minimal spread, super fast bullet velocity, recoil that made sense. i loved it
tbh they fucked up cause in the trailer u can fly a attack jet in hardline but devs never added it to PVP matchs
there was a jet in a bfh trailer??
Maybe because cops could not get a F22 Raptor ?
lol
yeee
Does it have to be wonder bread?
why can't i call in an A-10 gun run on a civilian homestead 😭
You’ve never seen a cop in a jet before?
They had icons for the attack planes but never added it for obvious reasons.
Only the LAPD
Hardline was fun despite its issues.
they should bring back the squad call-ins from BFV. make the final one a nuke instead of a V1
Unsweetened applesauce is also an option
Deal
and have it obliterate the map, and you have to keep fighting in a leveled dark map
levelution 3.0
what happened to commander mode from BF2, 3 and 4 😦
Commander might be brought back
Probably wasn’t used enough that they decided to cut it
lmao BF2 actually had crazy milsim features like the ability to draw formations on the map and call in strikes as the commander
Hadn’t been fully confirmed yet tho
probably why Project Reality worked so well tbh
Hot take but 128 player count matches weren't the problem in 2042, the map design was
128 was still a problem with the godawful server performance and netcode
They had to cater 128p around the maps and everything which is why they hand in hand played like shit
Agreed. They didn’t increase the amount of map objects, so the density was terrible, which made it feel like you were running across a field the whole time
The new game shouldn't demand much more hopefully
2042 had crazy requirements and still felt like shit because of its broken version of the engine.
Welcome to every live service PVP game ever these days
is that new Battlefield leak where everything is in mandarin actually real?
An Asian test just happened, so probably
Yup, apparently the tick rate on 128 would drop to about 20Hz
64p kept it relatively steady at 45Hz
But good thing new bf is going for 60Hz tick rate
Can we atleast have the option in portal?
The OV-10 Bronco was originally meant to be usable in multiplayer, as seen in a leaked trailer in May 2014.[1] This was later cut from the final game release.
Biggest change I'm hoping for with new battlefield is vehicles becoming more glass cannon adjacent 🙏🙏🙏
However the Squad Icon shows there is a plane Icon so it was gonna be in PVP but scrapped maybe DICE just did not find a cop version for it
give me BF1 vehicle destruction where planes take visible damage from all weapons
i doubt anyone is willing to violate their nda to help you with your recently violated nda
shoulve written a friend of his lol
if you delete this comment before the devs see it there's a chance you won't be banned and sued lol
Im so pumped for this new bf
do they actually care tho? I bet you that 1h leaked vid is still on youtube
what about the user who recorded said video...
they do care. that video being online doesn't mean that person didn't get banned. notice they didn't upload any other videos?
its funny how ppl think they can get away with breaking the nda mate they got IP tracking when u sign the TOS
you're about to know what a "you have been banned from BF labs" notification looks like
"read the fine print" lol
barely but thats the point of NDA
it makes leaks more intriguing
👀
This is not sharing information about the game
you are not allowed to share any info
lol
read the NDA
just saying you got access already breaks nda looool
ppl can't read I swear to god
ye but playtesters are private aswell you cant say if you are a playtester
unless they make playtesters public info
I just wanna play waiting for 23rd of may AND GOD HOPE AUS/NZ players get to test it
either that or the game releases
yes it is. saying you got access violates the NDA.
once its released the NDA is gone
yet these people get invited
beautifully ironic
meanwhile the real BF fans are sitting here twiddling their thumbs hoping and praying for even a hint at an invite
they get banned allows us trusted players to test the game
So what the point of this room
why Break the NDA and leak if u not gonna make money lol
read the fucking description of it?
talking about people breaking NDA's
"Discussion the public information available around Battlefield Labs. For further information see #battlefield-labs-news, or visit battlefield.com/labs"
its like calling a cop out for doing bad shit to the news companys but news companys pay you money if u leak it
yep, you cant read
public information. You getting invited isn't public information
this isn't the playtest discussion room, if there even is one
"Discussion about the public information available around Battlefield Labs" geez, i wonder why this channel exists
I assumed to doom post
Is there public information on how to get into the Labs discord if one got invited?
no
💀
bro how are these people able to play labs
is the requirement to not be able to read?
Yes
yes
maybe they prioritise the illiterate and blind
From those videos that’s for sure clear…
you are not in Labs if you get invited this weekend
this Stress test is isolated from labs and you will only have access to the game for the 72h
after that its gone till you get selected for either labs or a different stresstest
me when i dont get an invite
hahahahaha

It's almost 100% certainly at home unless you were told it was an in-person play test
#ClassLockedWeapons
||
||
I got a an invite for PS5. Though I mainly play on PC. There wasnt an option to exclusively choose PC for the playtesting. Is there even playtesting going on PC this weekend?
there was
Please give meeeeeeee
LMFAO
Speedrunning their labs access 😂
Suprised they don't give you multiple opitions for what platform you can play on then. I know for a fact I also chose PC. Oh well though.
Shows the current state of the franchise
People are so desperate for a good BF again
I thought of choosing pc but it would catch on fire so I stuck with ps5
and im not excluding myself lol
unlucky :|
yeah fps is absolutely barren if you're not an aim assist goblin, shit sucks
Basically smh
Minecraft a better FPS than everything else at this point
“A recon player will automatically spot enemies while aiming down sights” YOOO remove that shit, that is busted as hell lol
is it?
Will have shitters sitting in spawn with 8x scope spotting everyone all game lol
this is more important than class locking right now 
that's stupid strong
pressing q isnt really difficult
at least it's a button press instead of aiming at an enemy and being auto spotted
idk, it doesnt seem op at all to me
Unlike now where people sitting at spawn with 8x
imagine a sniper being able to swipe across a group of people and being able to spot each of them without a q spot which has a cooldown (usually)
Doesn’t seem too OP when 75% of every game is recon players
^
Also there’s def like 30% of console kids that don’t even know how to ping to spot no joke lol. Now they get it automatically
that cooldown would also apply to auto spotting i guess
Is there a feature to use the bathroom
first we need the feature to touch some grass
Yes only to take a shit though
lol
No
Colonel says only shit bucket *insert colonel emoji that doesn't exist in this server
*
xd
yeah lol
Lose the job
nah
You got a girlfriend?
what is a girlfriend?
Excellent
what is a gril?
Lmao
nah broke up last october
more time/money to spend on games
Got a life?
sadly yes
BF is life
Exactly
Dies
You don’t get a 20KD with a life and a job
You’re not playing battlefield without truly giving up your life
actually true
Because now BF is your life
And I’m the guy that’ll sweat on you and headglitch you
😭
lol
Stop inviting kids from everywhere and start inviting BF vets from South America. Do something DICE

Dude fr
Every time I see a leaked clip its always from someone who misses 70% of their shots
I saw one clip on twitter by someone who wasnt disabled
Pft like you could do better
Yaah i have over 15,000 hours in BF and i was one of the guy who playing custom server with DICE Dev in human vs zombies event and i didn’t got invited
Prolly be me unless I can put a keyboard and mouse on my PS5 whole doing the playtest. Pretty sure this playtest is PS5 only from what I'm reading on the playtest website.
Which is weird to me you wouldn't test server stability on all platforms but Im not a professional so.
Nobody whos actually good at the game is willing to nuke their chances at ever being invited back by leaking
#ClassLockedWeapons #No2042features
bf fans are desperate
Ah good to know! Thanks!
Does anyone know if PS+ can be game shared?
Yes it can, you need to set your PS5 as primary on the account that has PS+ tho
when i chose a date for playtest, it says from 12pm to 12am, does that mean i have 24h acces? or it means that i can start within that time period?
one, i believe it means that's start time and goes until end of test
two, ya broken NDA 
so cant even ask something like this?
technically, no 

So if I got invited and it’s actually not there at all do I get to still play…. smfh sorry I had to
#ClassLockedWeapons #No2042features
Is the BF Labs a key or does it appear in EA App?
actually a good question
no class locked weapons? fuck off
It's pre alpha. Give them feedback to change it back to BF3/4/H
can't wait to see a recon kill me with a LMG, what a stupid fucking idea
Oh, thought that info was public, my b I guess lol
where do i go?
Respond to the twitter post eg

bro posting stuff and deleting before i can read
fr lmao

I just said pc plays with EA app lol
Hey this is only a hypothetical and I’m not going to out myself for being or not being accepted into BF Labs. Does anyone know of a confidential way to request support from EA/DICE in regard to BF Labs without hanging yourself by asking and therefore giving away the fact that you’re accepted thus breaking NDA. Just thought it would make sense for some place to exist for that stuff.

ah ok, and I guess they will provide a key sometime later this week?
Again this is strictly hypothetical please don’t kill me Mr. DICE
You have to DM John Battlefield
BF Labs users get an own discord server for feedback
of course
And how would one hypothetically get that discord?
cool, but a friend of mine got into the playtest but not the server xD
Can't answer that. I think you can join the server out of the BF Labs game itself.
“It’s an outrage! A scandal!” -Hagrid
Lock Assault Rifles to Assault, PDWs to Engineer, LMGs to Support, and Bolt Actions to Recon, and grant them your proposed “class weapon bonus”.
DMRs, Carbines (SBRs), and Shotguns can be made available to all without the “class weapon bonus.”
That’s the formula, DICE.
Not this universal weapon availability system you are proposing, this is not Call of Duty, and this is CERTAINLY NOT 2042.
lame
Everything you need would be sent to your email
Probably not immediately
Players want weapons to be locked by classes
Sniper shouldn't carry a lmg
then he did something wrong lol
how, he had the right discord connected to his ea account
if it's an invite that was received for this 72hr test, i don't think they would invite the new people to a private discord channel/server just for 72hrs and then remove them
they might just not invite the temporary playtesters to whatever place they have "regular" labs people and just have temps play fri-sun only
🤷♂️
this
Wait so why can't I sign up?
is corrcet
Is the sign up period closed?
no
It's not showing up as being able to sign up
All I see is Skate and Apex Legends
Those are the only tests
did you registter for labs access before?
if so, that's why, it uses normal labs registration/interest to send invites
Yeah, I could have done in-person but it conflicted with my schedule in the past
So I need a new account basically
#ClassLockedWeapons #No2042features
go on shoo, keep the spam in the other channel 
you just need to be lucky again
i'm just surprised they didn't decide to put a slowmode in the new thread 
cuz holy it's wild over there
So, bf6 shouldn't be a live service, it shouldn't have a battlepass
It should be monetized like bf3/bf4 by selling dlc packs
90% random
That kinda sucks, I wanted to sign up and participate this round. Well guess I'll have to wait until next round
Thanks for the info
Agreed,
With less contents
millions of sign ups with a few thousand codes
Premium was the way
Bf5 being a live service resulted in a lot less contents
BF premium doesn't guarantee the same amoutn of content as previous BFs 🤷♂️
especially with how modern games are, it would never be the same as bf3-1
I was talking about the weapons not being locked to each class and a need for having server browser for all modes
Actually map packs are terrible for the overall player base, not everyone buys them, so now players are split up
And once the player count is low, you'll rarely get a chance to play those dlc maps
this is the other issue with a potential premium service like older BFs
BFV being a bad game at launch prevented it from having as much content, not the live service model
New content would be dead content in 6 months
Once they got on their feet the War in the Pacific chapter was about as big as your usual content packs
For what it's worth, I want weapons to be locked to their respective classes.
#ClassLockedWeapons #No2042features
#ClassLockedWeapons#No2042features
no shoo, leave the spam in the other thread 
#ClassLockedWeapons #No2042features
#ClassLockedWeapons #No2042features
🥱
Let me guess, you liked it when you heard that classes were gone in 2042?
I didn’t really care.
And you do care about weapons being locked?
Hmm, I’ve rather they weren’t
Class lock weapons. Don't "fix" what isn't broken and try and re-invent BF's identity again. All this will do is disincentive teamplay and create more complex balance issues. Class locking weapons kneecaps class specific gadgets/abilities which would otherwise be overpowered when paired with non-class weapons. This game seems to be going all-in on "abilities" and I can see whatever is deemed "most powerful" to be the predominantly chosen class now that people can use whatever weapon they want. They specifically reference a mobile spawn beacon for Recon in the post which becomes insanely OP when players can just spec out whatever meta AR is popular and mindlessly push objectives as opposed to being limited by their sniper.
one man army from call of duty modern warfare 2
As opposed to bf4 where you can use any carbine/shotgun/dmr as a recon with a spawn beacon?
why are people spamming this?(i didnt read the new blog yet)
for evreyone
cuz the game will allow every class to get any weapon like in 2042
because class locked weapons akin to older BFs isn't happening (at least not atm)
At least they aren’t calling it a legacy feature like they did with the scoreboard in 2042
Please, bf players hardly do team play as it is.
So let’s make it worse
oh boooooo
We have to be fooled for teamplay
After the community update it feels like Atenborough watching that Monkey(DICE) use a hammer
Cant make it better, bf too casual for serious teamplay
Unless you want it to be like arma or something
Again. Can’t make it better so you want to make it worse?
Come to think of it, does arma have classes?
Cant make something better so lets make it worse? interesting argument
Yes
Don’t think so
Maybe tho
not in the tradittional sense though...
Man if they go through with this it's gonna be hilarious watching the sales olummet
plummet*
although im not sure if its a vanilla feature...
Yes because casuals care so much about this
Not having weapons class locked is not the one!
casuals can f*ck right off
we have to somehow appease both...
we saw how well 2042 did
Apparently not, they want bf to be niche
trying to appeal to a bigger audience
The “casuals” that played the old games do. When you say “no locked weapons”, they say “that’s not battlefield”
Idk, as someone who you to play battlefield back in tue day, “weapons locked by classes” wasn’t what came to mind when someone says battlefield
It was always jumping out of a tank and blow torching a dude
And going brr on an attack boat
There are a few core features of bf and locked weapons is one of them
Idk, I don’t think it’s that core
Considering we’ve slowly moved away from it with bf4
Weapons locked by classes just makes for a batter gameplay loop of mixed team play. You know your role by the weapons and tools your given.
A sniper who can just stim shot themselves after being wacked is a game mechanic that is questionable in any game.
No? 1 had more locked weapons than 4. V did too
2042 is the only game that moved away from it and that’s because it wasn’t designed to be a battlefield game
It's always a sniper in the example people give like they aren't the most useless role in the game
Lets agree to disagree
Frrr, people act like snipers aren’t ALREADY going to camp in one spot
Snipers aren’t really the issue, yeah
Apparently that’s been the number 1 example
I dont care what class someone is when they use a sniper because they aren't going to matter to anyone in the whole match
Imo it’s all classes getting access to smgs and assault rifles
It makes assault basically useless because in this game they basically have no gadgets besides for grenade launchers
They need to make the weapon type class bonuses stronger
The recon one is laughably useless, yeah
I think that would be a fair compromise
Recon is literally just auto pressing Q to spot or Shift to stabilize scope? How is that in any way compelling?
PDWs SMGs and Carbines fit the role of an engineer being close quarter and ballistic.
LMGs assault rifles and shotguns fit a support for suppression and high risk for damage.
Im not complaing. Im saying weapon matching adds identity.
Also make the weapon customization "Pick 10" system have class bonuses and cons, like expensive high zoom scopes for non-Recons, Extendos for Assault, Suppressors for whoever, etc...
Make anything higher than 4x scopes class specific
It isn’t really a pick 10 system. It’s more similar to insurgency’s system
Each attachment has a point value and you get 100 points per weapon
BF4 had the best weapon management system that was carefully plucked to give players freedom but not too much.
Yea people with snipers shoudnt have access to lock ons or medic equipment
Ye
I honestly don't mind the classes, I just hope it's as intuitive to pick up as bfv was, because 2042 was a nightmare to learn all the specialist nonsense
Ah, but virtually kinda the same thing
Another sniper example lol
I never understand when people claim that something should be changed to “give the player more choice” when choice doesn’t mean better
Allowing anybody to use cheats is more choice and it isn’t better
The most important thing is that there is visual consistency, if you see medic you know how ti position yourself, same with recon and everything else
Restricted guns or not, it's all just gonna be high RoF bodyshot spam meta anyhow
Any mods present at all?
its odd, i dont ever see people asking for weapon customization/choice in squad or hell let loose but for some reason in battlefield everything needs to be customizable to some people
we;re not writing the consitution here man
i imagine they're in a sensory deprivation chamber so their heads dont explode from today's onslaught
Thanks Gato. What was the onslaught?
They see how battlefield is an arcade shooter and immediately think that it should be like cod where you’re a super soldier that can customize everything you want
They forget that Battlefield is Battlefield
very thoughtful and greek-forum like discussion about the recent changes to classes that did not devolve into spam or personal attacks at all :D
I’m only after a query and no bashing 😎
oh i see you could probably @ them or something then presumably
or that #how-to-report-and-appeal perhaps
Cheers I’ll try that 👍
Well, i'm prepared to be disappointed anyway...
I heard theres a queue to sign up or something, is there? I dont see one.
Sign Up just fails to redirect, then the Portal/Home appears, with Skate and Apex and nothing else right now.
if this goes sideways, i can have my "semi" "milsim" experience somewhere else.
is the ea playtesting website, although you probably wont be able to join this one if u didnt already sign up
The key is to play 2042 so literally anything will be an upgrade
Yes I see what the page is but like, I think it was never redirecting properly for some reason.
Right, wait so you just sign up to EVERYTHING? Not Battlefield specifically?
In the survey they did ask about BF but I mean, the "Sign Up" is "To The Labs Shit Which Involves Any And All Game Betas" not "Sign up to the Battlefield one"?
I’ve been playing insurgency. It doesn’t have vehicles (except one occasionally), but it’s a slower half arcade shooter with similar immersion to bf
I've been entertaining myself with rising storm 2, quite nice helicopter physics with easy to understand infantry gameplay
But otherwise a really nice shooter
Depends on what you’re playing. Some PvP modes have good synergy + the commander class needs to communicate with the radioman
Maybe battlefield could have an advanced flight model that is realistic -ish, but still arcadey, like rising storm 2.
all i remember doing is singing up and then choosing my preferences
i agree 100%, it also ruins balance when players only use the “meta” class and weapons loadout instead of giving each class a fair shot with their own set of strength and weaknesses. it always strikes me as a little lazy when 2042 and now bf6 just give everyone access to weapons under a guise of “freedom”. it kinda hints that they prob just didn’t want to spend time actually making balanced classes with unique weapons.
just throw something at the wall and see what sticks kind of deal
Right, I think I understand now then, thanks. They could have explained this shit way harder.
Usually you sign up for a specific game's beta. But it looks like you just need to sign up for their Labs in general, it doesnt tell you at all if you did it or are in one or another game's beta, I guess until you either are, or you never get in lol.
they usually send u an email if u get in to a bf labs playtest
Fair enough.
Are you supposed to be notified when you sign up?
My friend didn't get a notification email when he completed it
I did get an email when I did it months ago though
i dont remember, maybe?
i think i got one but it was late as shit
or i redid the preferences and got the verification then
When he clicks sign up again, it takes him to that EA page, so I'm assuming he did put his name in
Discussion has probably been done to death but im just passing through to say lock weapons to classes please thank you DICE pls
The next battlefield is supposed to be like bf3/bf4 so why weapons aren't locked to classes?
lol cry babies
lock weapons behind classes. period
Preordering anyways unlock all weapons for all classes
My feedback: Bring back BF4 classes, with the way it locked weapons to classes and call it a day. Non class specific weapons creates more balance issues than it solves and does bad things to the gameplay flow.
I am wondering if there will be any way to kit/class switch during the round. This feature is imo a key feature for battlefield. Nothing more satisfying to take out the repair guy of an enemy tanker, change to the repair guy's class and start damaging the tank to take it out. Or to revive a teammate with the defibs from the enemy medic that you have just taken out. This was possible in all the great battlefields (bf1942, bf2, bf3, bf4,...) After that it was limited to just switching the weapon with no extra dynamic. Taking away this feature hurt the franchise and it makes up for much less dynamic plays. As a player you need to pay attention who or what you take out and use it to your advantage. I have more than 15 years of experience in battlefield and it seems to amaze me that they keep trying to reinvent the wheel. Battlefield has its own core, but they try to mix it with too many other games. Stick to the basics and work from there.
Preordered
Nobody cares Binsky
Bring back specialists!
or is it a 24 hours slot?
No
Preordered, put a unicorn skin in the game!
