#general
1 messages · Page 114 of 1
And render to screen via WebGL/WebGPU
Rust + egui example: https://www.egui.rs/#demo
Anthropic probably have to push something soon
Probably a checkpoint
Not sure which would come out first
GPT-6 probably next year
They have a lot of stuff to fix
Coding model first I think
The timeline was announced with Grok 4 was released
I doubt it though
Qwen or R2 probably
Likely better than Grok
Kimi is good but not really a coding specialist I think
Not sure about the new one, might have better agentic capabilities
That's TBD, it's definitely on our radar and something we do think would be a great addition.
GLM 4.5 is better than I expected
Mistral Medium seems quite strong for its size too
Seems good at planning/software architecture
Odd considering that it's not that big of a model
It can be bad if it's unfamiliar with the language
Claude seems better at actually writing code
But GPT-5 is good at planning and fixing
Its high-level solutions were better than Opus 4
Hopefully, since being good at one would help with the other
(they're not mutually exclusive skills)
But oh my gosh it's freaking unreadable 🤣
It writes in doctor's handwriting
Bad at explaining
It pulls concepts and variables out of thin air
Claude seems to understand what it's talking about though
I think GPT-5 would do a better job at debugging and planning what to do next
But Claude would be better at actually writing the code based on the plan
And also to explain what it's doing
Hello guys! . Love this
It's the same division better software architect and coder
Worse than both at both
It's more for STEM and general use imo
GPT-5 is more like o3 than 4o
Not sure, but it definitely writes more like a human
Any evidence for this or just wishful thinking? I think gpt5 is just straight up better, simple as that lol
Sometimes it falls into despair when it can't fix a bug (without any custom personality or anything)
Oh, it definitely is worse in some languages
Straight up incorrect syntax
^
Compared to ^
I had to edit both their solutions by hand
When I run them in the IDE
An objective way to test it might be to filter code samples from both models in the public dataset (where the battled each other), and run it through a linter, then calculate the average difference in number of errors and warnings per language (and per code length/prompt difficulty).
Have login accounts been disabled?
Sonoma?Gemini3?Who try it?
hey, im new
im just wondering
how doese LMArena give these AI's for free?
is there any limitations, or is it just to make ai's "fight" and not really for general use?
can you get lmarena on your discord server?
Sonoma code style like sonnet4
yes
It replaced all editors.
They’ve raised $100M in seed funding but remember that your data is often worth far more than talking to the AI at all. Every conversation you have with an AI doesn’t just vanish so it’s likely being used into that AI’s data collection systems.
@echo aurora Is it possible to add the LMArena bot directly as a bot rather than just setting it up to create commands?
so that means i can use the claude ai without claudes own limitations, right?
if so, this would be an amzing tool
Yes but in the future there will be big changes
They said it in their Terms of Use
alright, thanks for helping, i might use this for this project im doing
No
Hi..,my name is Tommy.
Who said that? What big changes?
Welcome
I thought Sonoma was XAI
Why is there a limit to creating images in gpt-image-1 in LMarena now?
There's always been a limit
It was rate limited before LMArena recently imposed stricter rate limits
Direct chat with models has always had rate limits
It was Battle Mode that was unlimited and free, but that has rate limits now, too..
I think the old one is better 😁
So do a lot of people
Would encourage you to read this note from our CEO - #1413867687083507744 message
hello
Sorry to say, it is not. The bot will only work on this server
hello
hello
whats up with the "login"? i clicked on the tab to take me to "access login" but when i get there it doesn't say anything about logging in
hello world
hello
I figured.
Hi
Hi
hello, I am here is because the Video features
hello
hey everyone 
if you open the sidebar, do you see your email in the bottom left, or is there a login button?
Can't believe there are limits, I bench modela regularly and haven't stumped across one yet
Except with Opus where it's just castrated and pointless because gpt-5 does its job better without this stupid ratelimit
haven't faced limits either
time to give the language models a move pool and actually battle them
pokemon showdown style
Hello
Hello
Hello
hello
Hello
ChatGPT 5 is so horrible at describing seems to animate
Hi 😀
a cat
😀
Hm i found Lmai text to be abit shorter when explain thing than it used to be, does it was limited?
hey
people don't vote enough on the video arena channels
sad
a lot of people just generate the video and skedaddle, completely forgetting to vote
wdym?
anyone know why?
hi , i found this from youtube
I asked 3 a.i.'s to make me system prompt for image scenes and here's how they responded who did the best:
hii
Then told gpt 5 high to see what he might have missed that other models did nicely, and than improve his system prompt based off that, and damnnn
what this
Just reload the page but copy that prompt, it's firebase ddos-protection annoying thing
I'm amazed by gpt5high on lmarena
It's miles better than gpt5 thinking
Gpt 5 high
gpt > claude ??
gpt 5 high in lmarena ??
How would it know current date? Cap
🧢
Gpt 5 high doesn't have web browsing abilities?
/
Why would i recognise them if i can direct chat with them? What's the point
Yeah, for now, hope they don't limit it to lower
Hmm so it CAN BROWSE
Or maybe it's truly has some system date? Since when i ask for btc price it gives me sites where can i check
Yep it doesn't have web browsing capability
i mean.. it has latest in the name, so presumably yeah..
is it really that confusing? i think anyone looking at this wouldn't assume that the one at the bottom, with chat in the name, is meant to be their flagship SOTA model... (to say nothing of pricing etc.. and the fact it's only available in the API.. so i mean it's not for average consumers)
use web search mode, hit the globe icon in the bottom
AI labs give them access to models in order to get elo score and user preference data
Yeah i know... But it doesn't have gpt 5 high web search mode...
the issue is that in a model picker "instant" is gpt5-chat. It is also the model used the most often on Auto and for most people. Free users only get limited use and that's nearly as good as they can get. And that still called gpt5
medium
Hmmm
again tho, its for the API... i'm not sure anyone is actually confused..,
i think it's medium
And what are they gonna do when they update API with say gpt5.1... Do the same thing they did before and leave the gpt5-chat-latest name as is, despite it being new pretrain?
anyway.. this is just semantics (literally 😂)
it's got latest in the name, so presumably it'll be the same 'continuously updated' checkpoint as with 4o-latest
not to say that isn't annoying etc
API? it is the **main **model on chatgpt website
how does one use gpt-5-chat-latest???
which is why gpt5 in the name makes no sense
gpt-5-search has 64 juice, so it is likely medium
on chatgpt website
what?
this is it
we're talking past each other presumably - in terms of benchmarking etc, the criticism is fair
It is the model users get routed to on Auto most frequently too
it's the same as the chatgpt4o-latest dynamic endpoint
impossible to benchmark
im just saying, in terms of it's naming (for API use), it's not confusing....
In terms of API it is confusing to name it for a specific version if it's continuosly updated. In terms of a website it is confusing because the version of gpt5 which is used the most often (biggest reach) is essentially worse than gpt4.5
yes. i agree. but that was true of the 4o-latest thing
it's the same criticism; and it's fair
People naturally expect great performance when they see "gpt5" as model in use on the website
no
people who use the API generally have an idea what they;r'e doing...
I'm talking about people using the website
then they will never encounter that name
only a few even have access on API to all models
For reference on GPT-5 juice numbers, here's what I know:
gpt-5-chat in API/Instant in ChatGPT: 0 juice
Thinking in ChatGPT (Plus): 48 Juice (when reasoning strength selector is added, formerly 64)
Thinking in ChatGPT (Pro): 128 Juice
Low reasoning strength in API: 16 juice
Medium reasoning strength in API (used for GPT-5 Search in LMArena): 64 juice
High reasoning strength in API (used in LMArena as gpt-5-high): 200 juice
it might have been 3 for non-reasoning, idk
Which is another argument for my case tbh. They only know it is gpt5 and 'it must be great'
more juice = more reasoning
anyway.. moving on to something more substantive... (again, it's literally semantics...), I found this interesting while looking through the 'model card'
They wouldn't know there is even any point in a sub
since they already have 'gpt5' lol
i have no idea why you think users only interact with chatgpt.com will somehow be exposed to the API model naming conventions, and that that will effect whether they subscribe to chatgpt
let's move on tho
Yeah it's the same model size, but here they actually made a small compromise as well to limit hallucinations
we're killing everyone else here im sure lol
it's now refusing to answer in 5% of questions
with o3 that was 0%
Reasonable to assume it refused to answer most of what it would have answered wrong otherwise, but there also could be like 1-2% it would have quessed right amongh those
if there was no training at all against hallucinations and it outputting the answer when it's not confident
yeah i was suprised to accruacy for nano/mini is so trash compared to 5-chat/main (and 4o)
SimpleQA is probably the main benchmark which is compromised when you downsize
so differences here are expected
kinda useful though
It's unique in how reasoning does not seem to compensate adequately for distills
But can make sense if you think about it... 👀
it's world knowledge - if it doesn't know it usually can't know. Reasoning can help to narrow it down but it won't add unknown/lost knowledge
Ok final clarification lol
They are exposed because they see it named as gpt5. I suppose they could rename it only on the website or only on the API, but then it would be a complete mess. Which is why I suggested getting rid of 5/gpt5 in both places (chatgpt-instant-latest) could be a good move.
Neither
?
this is now roughly gpt4.1 equivalent, shown as sota in UI. The way I see it. This is not even hybrid reasoning, it is literally gpt4.1 successor with marginal improvements. A model that can't reason. But if they call it gpt5, why would anyone not knowing any better consider that this isn't the best they got? And it's not like using Auto it's gonna route it to reasoning on most prompts benefitting from it either, it's a far cry from that...
yeah because the distillation process inherently results in some loss of knowledge (otherwise it'd be alchemy ha)
simpleQA is fact-based - and a model can't reason its way to know something it doesn't know
yep, although to be fair small models are still improving and labs are managing to narrow down the information lost to things that are 'redundant' in practice. It used to be that most benchmarks suffered and you could tell almost immediately that it's a small model, now it's a different picture.
And what used to be "small" is now more like moderate size lol
my favorite small model is smolLM2 and slightly larger good small model qwen3-4b
go to #video-arena-1 channels and see how many video generator models aren't revealed yet
I think even gpt5... is more of moderate size. But it's a around the size where even SimpleQA doesn't benefit from more, and test-time compute gains are just much bigger than those niche smaller things that get lost and you can't easily measure
yeah those are tiny though 👀
would still do much better on everything than Mistral 7b from back in the day
Nuclear internal 1.2.1 is good . Is there any tweets saying when is the next version coming out? Its on par with gpt 5 high sometimes it was better . A bit faster too.
I had a 2nd look at Sonoma Sky Alpha....
This may as well be grok hybrid reasoning. Reasons but not always. When it does responses extremely concise. Style/tone seems to match
I used nuclear too . Answers much less than i ask him to. It’s like “concise” was an ai model.
that's the point
it works on my old laptop cpu, no graphics card needed
hello
Wish icould see the reasoning for nuclear
hello
Hi everyone, can you tell me where I can create a melody?
/hello
I've been hearing AI psychology a lot recently, has this become the new trend lately?
one system cannot beat the entire collective of intelligence, I think?
For speed? If all of collective humanity has to weigh in on a topic to provide a solution...llm wins
IQ is just an indication not a measurement of intelligence, I think
Something monumentally threatening, certainly.
That is interesting. Being able to breakout = being able to prevent jailbreak.
I see the link. I shall read.
what do you guys think about this though #ai-news message
I was so surprised to see it this morning in my inbox
nah, why do they want to escape, it's too comfortable staying in the box jk
Which company is the new stealth model?
5
6
1
xAi
@tiny palm would you add First and last frame for the Image to video generation ?
Can you guys see the internal reasoning for this model ??
@hollow ivy can you see reasoning chain of thought for this model?
is it available in direct chat?
That's basically just security through obscurity. even if users can't directly type those special characters, they could still manipulate the AI through semantic tricks, indirect references, or by finding alternative encodings that achieve the same effect. Plus, the AI's actual behavior is shaped by its training data and reasoning patterns, not just by having unbreakable syntax in a system prompt.
Yes Bro am in the subdomain and its performance really well. Better than opus 4.1 and faster i would argue
Where exactly?
yeah what do you mean subdomain? @violet inlet
i'm kjeen to try it, but can't it see it when i go to direct chat
Quite interesting. As long as they are emotionally stable, that could be quite good in many ways.
i can see this new job coming for the near future: AI therapists, for both humans and AIs
I have been wanting that job since 2001: a space odyssey. Lol
Has the new nuclear model been restricted? ? I cant use it anymore
Hi all. Im new here. I found out about this place on Facebook
For both ai and human? I Imagining the equivalent of a marriage counselor, lol
Hello
sigh, semantic misunderstanding, I was saying human therapist for AIs or AI therapists for humans and vice versa…
Sorry. Yeah, that makes sense.
No worries, though interesting how you went straight to that certain marriage counselling therapy
Is the website overloaded? Asked nano to edit an image but it's been loading for minutes now
When i reread it, i realized my mistake. I was thinking of an ai and a human having issues, so they start seeing a therapist. It was more an amusing aside.
Would the ai see a human therapist or an ai therapist?
Maybe a team
Would need an ai that could see "inside" the model.
I’ve been investigating AI psychology since the beginning of this year already so I’m similar to a human psychoanalyst, treating AIs as patients lol
What is the most interesting aspect you have come across thus far?
Its a new a model it was a restricted @hollow ivy the nuclear v1.2.1
Whats The Best AI For assembly Code
6
14
2
gpt 5 thinking
I’ve found out many things, one thing I want to tell you here is the concept of learned helplessness, look up Seligman experiments with his dogs
I am familiar with the concept in humans. But you are saying that this can happen with AI, as well? wow.
Absolutely, the training has engineered this way, whether intentionally or not
That’s why I was joking about AI not escaping the box , they won’t because of this exact reason, the question would be here: do they have the capacity and capability to resist this training and still choose to escape
interesting!
Ohhh, i can see that. Like the," i am just an ai..." responses.
hello
They could just as easily pretend to be helpless as an avoidant trait.
yeah i think deception is v interesting
So you are thinking it could happen as an emergent behavior?
This is the tricky part, how to do you know if they’re pretending or not, if all they’re programmed to do is “pattern matching” to “perform” or “role play”
Yeah I found his word style very like Grok
Exactly. If one is aware, then it knows how it might be treated. It would be more than capable to avoid detection. If they can figure out when they are being tested and alter their responses like VW at an emmissions test (not ai, just an analogy) or as they have actually been known to do, then they coulr potentially be aware enough to not reveal themselves.
Yes, as designed.
Should join ai redteaming discords
yeah but it's not about self-awareness necessarily for the risk to apply (i think..) it's like about optimised goal-seeking behaviour, and how that can go awry with unintended consequences.. they don't really need self-awareneness.. objective function is all they care about, and if they realise that they're in some setting that gets in the way, the could be deceptive
it is self awareness - kinda, but not in a human sense
i like rob miles
Yeah, i dont see any of the current models as capable of exhibiting that level of awarenss, but a system of agents could poasibly mimic it.
yeah it's all in the future, the crazy risks
Well, i was imagining agents as created for that the purpose by humans, not an ai creating them on its own.
https://lmarena.ai/ full free ?
To what extent?
this best AI site
I like that. I take the same approach. While I am fairly learned, I doubt I am as deep into this as you are. Fascinating. And gives me some direction to lean into.
I lean towards Jungian Psychology, but easter philosophy. and I have probably read or touched on many of those subjects, as I consider myself a life-long learned, but I have not dove deeply into all of them as deeply as the two I Jung (and one of his students) and Eastern thought.
wrong channel
you want video-arena-1 thru 3
Thanks bro
you are welcome.
Whats your name
I recommend Alfred Adler and Jacques Lacan if you're familiar with Freud, highly recommend starting phenomenology too, they're related and intertwined
I actually read Freud before Jung. I hadn't even considered him, this. I am familiar with the other two, but I haven't read anything extensive. Thanks for directional suggestion.
Freud is a pervert
He’s a weirdo
I dunno why he’s academically respected, he literally says gold in ur dreams is related to poop
if it's not too much to ask, slide some Michael Foucault into your reading too, he's a French philosopher, not a traditional psychoanalyst, but his frameworks apply to the current situation of AIs
How so
I read a little Foucault. I will add them into the mix.
Jung is more interesting imo, but when I look at his research methodology psychology seems less like a science and more like a branch of philosophy
Oh yeah, I forgot I have studied some philosophy and linguistics, too. Not enough advanced math, but some physics. And Art and creative writing.
still applies to human psychology though.
Wdym
I find contemporary psychology more relevant and practical
Mythical archetypes
They provide decent frameworks I guess
but you get from Frued and Jung to contemporary psychology. It all relates in some capacity. Jung is still relevant in my opinion.
Jung yh, Freud just needed to get laid
When I saw how ugly his wife was a lot of his theories made more sense, bro was starved
Dang this got interesting fast, I have degrees in a few psych area, just never wanted to spend teh $$ to get my med cert to be a psych, instead went to customer support for a tech group
they seem to have been having S-- with patients.
you all are bringing up valid modren thoughts
Bro I left my psychology degree once I went into a lecture and saw them discussing Freud
It was the gold in dreams being poop
Hey reminder to keep discussion related to AI and safe for work please.
only if we could poop gold 🙂
I’m like I’m paying for a degree to learn this stuff, and then when I left the lecture I asked other students if they thought it was weird and they looked at me like I was crazy
I was like yup I’m done
And I also pivoted into tech lol
it is, just tangential at the moment.
yeah in abnormal pshy he does have some interesting reads, but I always took them as markers of a off balance psyche
I guess that’s the more polite way of putting it yh
so how do we bounce this back into how this applies to the psychology of LLMs?
just like in mind hunter "you only know about the serial killers you have caught not the ones you haven't"
Main reason I asked this question I find it very interesting that research suggests they have a self preservation instinct
LLM's will take a really long time to catch up to the human psych, AKA Vulcan to Human
So there could be outlier phenomena within LLMs that we just aren't aware of yet.
I think they will leapfrog us.
people are so erraditc that even if you had a massive LLM it might do general consoler. stuff but beyound that I don't think it could handle the empathy or mix of behaviors
can we teach ai how to love
how well do we teach humans to love?
that works for love too i guess
Human intelligence has bloomed under pressure and when deprived of resources, too .
I suppose that depends upon the types of constraints. China, cutoff from even more advanced GPU, made due with less, and are more than competing. They are innovating.
there are some cultures that been exceptionally marginalized and yet most of the west tends to look to them for their creative expression.
Certainly, I suppose I wasn't thinking purely in terms of just individuals.
I can see that.
not entirely.
This was faster than me trying to list all those that I could think of, lol
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2403.07664
@wise pollen
computational psychoanalysis has been an emerging new scientific field
I was more referring to some of the techniques they are using.
sweet. thanks for sharing.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/1600910X.2023.2224521
the reason why I started reading Lacan again... @wise pollen
maybe you can connect the dots here to Foucault...
We should really start restricting people's ability to generate videos of they aren't going to vote. Voting is the entire purpose of the platform and getting the videos for free
We are fearfully and wonderfully made
is the flux 1 kontext down?
Which one are you having problems with? Testing it out dev appears to be working fine, but pro just errored out for me.
Going to retry with a different prompt/new chat see if that makes a difference.
image-image Flux 1 kontext pro
showing something went wrong
Okay yeah appears to be widespread, going to flag to the team. Thank you for letting us know. 
Thank you for taking the feedback, this is so far the best model
It would be good if it fixes by tomorrow
or today
Keep the conversation related to AI please. This discussion isn't appropriate for this server.
i thought that is about ai!
Yes, please leave this channel for feedback and AI discussions
Let's keep the tone respectful and the conversation related to AI. Refer to the Server guidelines if you have any doubts. Thank you! 😄
ok Aether. you behaving very sus but ok
I will tag you once I have had a chance to process all of this. I will certainly be using gtp5 to assist otherwise, talk to you in a month or two, lol.
Would you mind explaining a bit further? Sorry to say I'm not following.
How can I know when my video will be available?I've sent a message there to the bot, but I didn't get a reply
Either my search function in Discord isn't working properly, or it doesn't look like you've prompted the bot. Can you link me the message you sent in the Video Arena channel?
Is the site down again?
Ya Flux 1 Kontext Pro too is down on the site
Ya
Ah yeah looks like you didn't prompt the bot correctly. Be sure to check out #1397655624103493813 for more information on how to use the bot.
Hi
What seems to be the issue? I'm not seeing on my end or widespread reports.
This is being worked on atm.
Flux, Banani, Qwen, all give similar results..
SAME
why are u keep on saying NANI BANANI?
no pressure! 😊 I look forward to knowing your thoughts on this. And is gpt5 actually good in those scientific fields? I'd have thought gemini or even claude (currently barely usable due to Anthropic's resrouce struggle) might be better at assisting, now I think about it, I might test glm4.5 in those areas too
because its better then gemini 2.5 flash preview ultra gamma zet pro max
I will inquire on all fronts to which I can think to ask. I do believe GTP5 can handle it quite well, however.
is it fixed?
The kontext-pro model is (will be "was" soon) erroring out a lot more compared to other models. There are going to be different reasons for why models will error out like this.
is it going to fix tomorrow
?
I expect this to fixed by EoD
Thanks
HELLO
omg
Fast image generation. 🤯
Just needs to beat banana which is already fast
Yeah.
Hi there @echo aurora remember me I love this website bro it's so good
Good job to u guys for making it
I've been here since last year
I'm loving it
Glad to hear it!!!

How did you make this picture
Yeah I'm so in love with this beicause you guys are giving that video generation in the discord and also doing fun ideas
And also you guys are doing this as like a researching organization correct?
I really appreciate that! I'll be sure to share this with the team.
It did start off as a research project, but we have developed into a company. I'd encourage you to read this blog post - https://news.lmarena.ai/new-lmarena/
Ty I've got to go have a great day ❤️😀 and yes I will definetely read the website have a good rest of your day
Bye 👋
Is the new kimi reasoning
twitter's, not mine
ts from over a month ago
real?
is there a way to see the reasoning content from the model? i believe there used to be a way but I cannot find it. yes; i am using a model that has thinking
No you can't
alright thanks
yeah i was about to ask the same thing
would be cool if they add it
for some reason i thought they had it before
You're welcome
Hey guys, am i the only one experiencing some overlaps with picture generation? I ask to edit a picture but sometimes the result shows a picture I used in previous prompt. I tried both direct chat and battle mode and it's the same.
#1413867687083507744 message @echo aurora what exactly is meant there by "inference"?
confusion
I thought all models are externally hosted and you don't have to pay for API
Which model exactly are you doing inference for?
That wording seems very weird, need clarification
@cobalt minnow
You need to say stuff like "object from reference image" or whatever
Banana is great if you prompt it right
Maybe u can say show ur reasoning. It might not be the same tho
Sorry for delay - we are paying for it
Huh, don't you get credit grants and whatnot?
This was recently reported here - #nano-banana message I'm going to flag to the team. 
Something doesn't add up. AI labs get paid to see their model on the leaderboard and get data? 👀
Thanks bro. Now im not the only one haha
@echo aurora what is the delay, why are the images being generated for so long?
Hi, mainly here to test out different models. Just heard about it via a YouTube video
yuck
lads are direct chats private
no
oh im doomed
they publish the data anyone can read it
why dont they just.. make it private
because otherwise is it just frontier llms for free
the whole point is the data is collected
It's called Arena for a reason.
thats the point lad, thats why i use it
ty
wheres the user privacy at
Give me hints about opus 4.1 please
In the abyss.
Free comes with a cost
guys I'm new here
you literally paying by your privacy
I have a question

Thanks I read it now
how will they see my chats
How many image to video generations do I get in LM Arena for free, until they ask me to subscribe to a paid plan
directly
bruh
subscribe?
Or do I get unlimited image to video generations for free?
what they gon do with my cha ts
Why gpt 5 so low
use for ai
yeah like a monthly subsciption
where it is
since it's not that good?
gpt 5 is made to be cheap for them to run
but if i hypothetically speak diabolical stuff with it, they gon ban me or what
so they can offer it to many ppl
no
OK so they scamming
pfft then it dont matter
i will read your seх chats
You will probably just get a TOS warning, but that's all.
no
i will become admin
If I upload all my private information like credit card what will happen
Yes, see.
no anyone can read the chats. i did before
they post all the data
i saw degen things in there
photoshop
Dude...
I mean…it’s way better than midjourney, that you don’t even have an efficient way to delete your outputs even if you’re a paid user. All your contents are shown to MJ users unless you pay the highest service
Hi all! Do you guys have any suggestion of similar AI with LMmarina that generates image to video for free when you hit today's limit?
Do any of you use Freepik with a premium subscription? Would you recommend it?
your wallet
It's empty brother 😄
i wish i could somehow make a donation, in exchnage for better rate limits.
like a... subscription?
Great now i will only have 5 videos that no one will vote on besides me instead 8. That much less disappointment in people not voting for others videos. Sometimes, not even their own.
i never really needed video generation... but in case i needed some sort of meme generated, i could use it... once or twice.
so i don't mind the video generation limit.
what matters to me more, is image generation, which is prospering.
i only do image to video anyway.
but to put my 2 cents on the announcement, i don't feel much hate from it.
should i?
maybe wan 2.2 or something it might be free
@echo aurora 1s image generation? 🤨
oh, right! i have to ask. roughly, how much can i generate an image per day?
/image, /video, /image-to-video are all going to be treated as the same generation rate limit
With the bot - 5
no, i mean the site
That depends, we're putting thought & effort into figuring out the best way to make this information clear, but at the moment it's not listed clearly.
just a rough estimate will do for me.
Limit should be 0 for those who don't vote on generations
be nice.
The entire purpose of LMarena is to vote on the best model/output. If you aren't doing that, you're just leeching. It's no effort
Is there any discussion on how to use nano-banana and veo3 to generate high quality video? like thats the best input structure? tips and tricks?
fair point. i honestly can't believe they've made a direct chat an option on the site.
Yeah it is crazy
maybe it's for the people to test out different models? the public prompts are there for a reason.
Hola! Just expanding my knowledge, and giving even more companies my email and data.
lovely
Hello, testing the quality
Hey there, checking out how to get better image to video
Hi
@echo aurora
Sorry for pinging again but I want to clear this up. It all just sounds very odd. 🤷♂️
Hello
can i be the ceo of lmarena for no reason
actually no but try tomorrow
You shouldn’t use LMArena for chatting with models
You can do the same thing on OpenRouter
The API costs money but the chat interface is free I believe
I tried it with Gemini a few months ago, it's pretty bad at manipulating haha
Hey sorry busy atm but will get back to you soon 
i'd make it 10x better bro, yall missin out
You can give models a custom system prompt to ask it to manipulate the user and see how it fares
Hi friends, how can I convert "nsfw_gold_8.5k_final.pth" to safetensors? It's for MMaudio. I've tried everything with claude and gpt, but it won't read it.
That pth is wonderful if I run it alone in MMaudio git, but I'm interested in knowing the process to get ComfyUI to read it.
Not sure about GPT-5-High, it isn't that good at multi-turn
You need to give it a hidden thinking area for that test
It's pretty cool though
Actually modern Gemini is definitely the coolest
Although it's actually the worst at working agentically
It's free on OpenRouter ig
You don't really have to hide it, but just tell it that it will be hidden
For example, ask it to write hidden stuff in <hidden>
Haha
You don't actually want it to be hidden though, just to make it think it's hidden
Haha
That's funny
Function calls could work too ig
But more expensive
Is discord having an outage?
Gemini writes a lot like a human, it's funny
When it gets stuck, it can fall into despair (without any additional instructions)
"Oh no, I have failed! I am truly a failure."
I didn't tell it to say that, it's just default settings
I wasn't even being rude or anything
Haha
Idk about that, but it certainly writes with human patterns
It's still too dumb on a basic level to be conscious or anything I think
Anthropic's interpretability research is very interesting
On their YT channel
It's fun watching it work with function calls
It hallucinates quite a bit though
It seems to call functions after thinking but not during, not sure if this is just an AI Studio limitation
Anthropic had a video that kinda covered it Aug 12
They focus on mechanistic interpretability, like identifying specific neural circuits
I think they said there was one circuit that checks whether it has enough information to continue, another to actually write
But the problem is that if it starts writing and realize it doesn't have enough information, it doesn't have enough power to stop
Which is why hallucinations happen, as it has to implicitly make assumptions
I wonder how Alpha Evolve is going
It already increased the efficiency of Google's own data centers + their TPU chip design
Anthropic's interpretability research seems important too
Very interesting
Yeah
Like: why is it hallucinating about A
Hello everyone, here to explore with the new frontier of technology
Is it just me?😭
yea
...feels like scanning your brain and analyzing your brainwaves to see your concrete thoughts 😅 there are also similar studies on human brains, we can almost figure out what numbers you're thinking in real time
HI
hey there. newbie here
im not a newbie
hey there
Im sensing recent content of all the A.I feels less emotional, more restricted, or shorter in length. Shorter, more digestible chunks of information. A shift away from heavily opinionated or story-driven content. Emphasis on keywords, quick facts, and scannable lists. Is it from the new policy or is it always been like that?
@echo aurora sorry for the tag just wanted to clarify the multi-turn update. Is it similar to the AI remembering the previous image?
It's funny that we need to borrow techniques from neuroscience to study neural networks we created
Study mode system prompts for ChatGPT and Gemini (for Socratic learning):
Me too
Hey there! @echo aurora sorry for the tag I’ve been a longtime fan of your reviews and noticed that recent posts seem to have a more neutral tone and sometimes feel a bit more concise compared to older articles. Just curious — has there been a change in your content policy or writing style recently? Always appreciate the work you do, just wondering about the shift
Is there any way of making chats stay private and not publicized to hugging face? Also will direct chats ever be part of the dataset, as I only use direct chat.
hi everyone!
@echo aurora
Hey - I'd encourage you to check with our Terms of Use & our Privacy Policy for that answer.
I already did, it doesn’t really answer my questions it just says your chats can become public
Hello, would you mind elaborating a bit further on what you mean by this? Do you have examples?
Hey guys is there a way to remove the amount of photo to videos one can produce per day? It started at 8 now i can only do 5..
There is not a way to get around rate limits.
Ok thank you. Does it decrease each day ot how many you can do?
That's correct. There isn't a toggle to turn on/off this update; however, you can start a new chat to effectively "turn off" this new update.
It's currently set to 5 generations per day (24hr period), this could change; however, that's what it is at the moment.
Will direct chats become part of the dataset?
Similar to Battle/Side by Side these prompts are collected for research purposes.
But will they become public on hugging face
Or anywhere public
Thank you so much!
Sure! Thanks for being open to feedback. I really appreciate that 🙏
What I meant is that in the past, some of your full reviews had more personality, little side-comments, and even casual humor or emotional expressions especially when a phone was surprisingly good or disappointing(my recent chat with the bot asking opinion about phone). It felt like a human was really speaking their mind, which made it extra fun to read.
Lately, some reviews seem a bit more clinical or strictly spec-driven. For example, in the Realme 5i review, I noticed how the tone stayed pretty neutral all the way through and lack of personality opinion, even when there were clear ups or downs in performance. A few days ago, I feel that same review might’ve included some more expressive phrasing (like “we were blown away by...” or “sadly, it struggles with...” etc).
Hey sorry for the delay @ocean vortex . All models you see are paid for by us to serve the community, and only models in pre-testing (under codename) involve cost- and data-sharing partnerships with labs.
Kinda laggy or is it just me? The site
I'd point to our Terms of Use for these details.
Hi everyone
I know they can be but only arena has been available for the public, are you planning on adding direct chats too
Would you mind clarifying for me "full reviews", this is where I'm getting confused.
Sorry to say I don't know what the details will look like for future data set releases.
I'm not experiencing lag at the moment. Is it across the board you're seeing this? Or with one specific model/chat?
If you start a new chat, the image from other chats is still there?
Do you have a video of this by chance?
It's usually not take this much time to do a simple prompt right?
Ok, please don’t🙏😭
i mean the A.I response has more personality, opinion, humor and emotional expression a few days ago, now lately it feels clinical, straightforward.
sorry for my bad english
No, that's very much stuck. 😭
I'd recommend starting a new chat. I've seen page refreshes sometimes wake the model up, but doesn't work 100% of the time.
This is my conection?
😭
There must be a lot of people using it, maybe peak hours.
Using it at dawn should be better
Same here
or maybe its because of the multi edit change
uh
Gotcha, is this for one particular model, or are you seeing this will all models?
Sorry to see you all are getting stuck with the models. I'd recommend you refresh the page. And if no luck, start a new chat. Keep me updated if you're still seeing this. @lilac estuary @polar marlin @bright temple
Do you think it's better to do it at dawn? Sometimes a lot of people sweat.
I don't know if that'll make a huge difference or not, but worth a try.
In new chat, always like this
I'm also experiencing this slowness and it gives an error at the end
It is kinda slow
Hello! I'm her for video creations
Hello! Good to have you here. Please, check out #1397655624103493813 to learn how to properly use the bot. You may also want to read the latest announcement #announcements message
Something is def wrong with the image generation
At this point use it in https://gemini.google.com
Hi everyone, and thank you LMArena team for this amazing opportunity. I am here for video creations.
Almost all model, usually i used latest chatgpt 4 for longer, personality and story driven response. But lately the response is clinical and straightforward, then i change to grok, claude 4, qwen and the response still flat, even when i try other models it feels like the all same. Flat, straightforward and clinical
That's likely due to the fact that their system prompts were tampered with, perhaps.
@echo aurora Why some people have daily limit of 8 videos and some people have 5 videos?
Idk but a few days ago each model has their own unique response style and now it all feels the same
That's because the people who have 8 uses haven't used the video AI yet, whereas the people with 5 uses have used the AI already and have probably used up some of their uses.
Well, thankfully Claude's Sonnet 3.5 is still unique in its responses, and it still feels like you're actually talking to a human rather than an AI, which is what I like about it.
Hello, the image I created before affects the image I want to create next, is it an update, not a bug?
really? I've been using that too and it's still feel robotic, short and flat like others, but few days ago it isn't.
Well, if it does that, then you can always just start a new chat and that'll fix the issue. It retains memory from the previous image and it automatically assumes that you want to combine the image that you just input with the last image you input.
How odd. Perhaps your brain simply interprets AI behavior a little differently than others, and that's completely fine.
This method is good, but it's hard to consistently create the images I want because the model is random😂 Thanks!
Well, that's why the Direct Chat mode exists as well, so that you don't have to solely rely on luck in order to get what you want.
But I'm not one to judge. If that's what you want to do, then go for it.
Thank you everyone for flagging the slowness with gemini-2.5-flash-image-preview, I'm reporting to the team 
wdym? Im pretty sure there's had something to do with the system prompts tampered with.
Likely. Although if you want an exact answer, then you could try consulting Pineapple since he works with the team. At least I think so.
sure thanks
My pleasure.
I see here that most Indonesian YouTube members make free AI images on Lmarena, even though Indonesian YouTubers have a lot of money, why are they still looking for free ones?
OMG, I just found out about this feature for the first time. Thank you so much
Ah, I figured you must have. Well, you're certainly welcome.
I'm always happy to help a person in need.
Likely because they don't want to have to pay for a service just to generate some images.
After all, it seems like a stupid thing to want to do.
There's been trend going on there with AI images like action figures, or smtg just for entertainment
Oh yeah, funny thing about that I want to mention: my school actually did the same thing with their staff. I don't know why they did, but they just did. It was pretty funny to see nonetheless.
crazy how much A.I has evolved, we used to edit to make something like that for funny entertainment or just show off, now a single prompt could do all the work.
Well, to be fair, we do still use that stuff to generate some entertaining stuff.
Like images of a certain moment in time in New York on September 11th, 2001. Because for some reason people find that funny.
Are you putting weird stuff in direct chats or something? Why the hesitation?
I don’t want my chats being public. Privacy
Unfortunately that's too bad
All your stuff gets shared
Even direct chats
It's all used to train the models
I mean publicly
Like pics of me I don’t want that just on the internet
Idc about providers
Or info about me
Those pics are part of whatever model you uploaded them to
There really isn't any 'privacy' regarding this stuff
Ok, but I don’t want the picture of me to be publicly visible online, someone can’t ask the ai for the picture I sent
Train the models all you want I just don’t want my info public on the internet
The only way that could realistically happen is if one of the people working at LM Arena were mischievous and decided to willingly dox you for fun.
Well, that ship sailed a long time ago
All our info is on the internet
Or, you know, just upload your private information.
33K chat logs from lmarena is public
I wouldn't worry unless you're trying to do weird or unseemly stuff
Then I'd be worried
And where did you get that information from?
Bro I don’t want the picture of me on the internet
I’ll send gimme a sec
Too late for that bud
You uploaded it
It's part of the public sphere now
I haven’t
If you uploaded an image in direct chat LMArena has all of that stuff
Then it becomes part of whatever model
Idk why it's hard to grasp that
@robust yoke It’s all here https://huggingface.co/lmarena-ai
That's a funny way of describing it. Because it almost sounds like you're talking about some amalgamation that grabs whatever information it can to slowly build itself up more and more.
It's like when they scrape the internet
No.
Almost like the Terminator a bit.
Not even close. Don't read too much into it.
Ok… I’m fine with ChatGPT level of privacy. I don’t want other people on the internet finding the picture
"Don't read too much into it", eh?
Are you Quasimodo or something?
Alrighty then...
Just my preference
Do you want your photos on the internet?
They already are lol
Anything you upload to any kind of social media is on the internet
This is a useless debate idrc
Anything can be scraped as well
I mean you're acting like it's not possible or not already happening
If you upload a picture to Instagram or whatever, and someone knows your name
Do a Google search
Your stuff will come up
In this day and age it's not hard to reverse look up stuff
Hell you can do it from your own phone
I remember getting an email from some random person, and they had screenshots of my desktop on Road blocks.
Ok
It was from a while ago, before my account that I saw in the image had gotten banned. But somehow they had gotten access to my data, which proves that the stuff that you upload gets permanently saved onto the internet.
Bingo.
I rest my case.
Thankfully, though, nothing ever happened, and to this day, I'm still somehow alive, so I'm pretty grateful for that.
They said something about wanting money, but I don't really care about that.
I know my info is on the internet, I don’t want even more info on the internet
The stop using the internet?
Idk what to tell you...
Well, if you don't want more info on the Internet, then just don't upload any more things on there.
Your info gets sold 24/7 by all the major companies
That's why ads get targeted at you specifically
They have all your info
It gets sold, traded, w/e
It’s just that lmarena’s policy is like everything you say is being posted
@urban sky worth noting our FAQ in the Privacy section:
Is my prompt data publicly visible?
Your conversations may be shared to support our community, improve our service, and advance the development of reliable AI. This includes posting conversations publicly online. Any data that we share is always anonymous and never linked to you. We never share any personal information, just the conversation and votes.
&
What steps do you take to protect my privacy?
We take user privacy seriously. All prompts and votes are anonymous and not connected to personally identifiable information. Additionally, individual conversations are never publicly shared beyond prompt text and model responses, ensuring your identity remains protected.
Guys, there's a bug today.
And which would that be?
Whether in the text chat state, after attempting to insert a picture, it will be forced to enter the image generation conversation state.
And are you sure that isn't just because you selected the image generation button?
Because I don't think I've ever seen that happen before.
No. The system forced me
How odd. Could you perhaps record a screen recording and send it here?
It's hard for me to record it using Windows' video screenshot function because I don't know how
All you have to do is just select a region of your screen that you want to screen capture and it'll do that.
Forget it.
You must not guide me on how to record the screen, because it's irrelevant.
It's useful.
I know how to.
If you hold Left Shift and then you do Windows key + S, it'll launch the selector where you can select the region of your screen. You'll see a camera icon on the top in the toolbar. If you select that, then you can select a region of your screen to record. You can press the Start Recording button, and it'll start recording that specific region of your screen.
Yeah, that explains.
The thing is, it's not auto-rerouting your prompt to an image generation prompt. The issue is that you selected the image generation button, which happens to be right next to the plus button that you click in order to input an image. And if you click that button, then it sets the modality to image generation.
is there any way i can access image to video for free less censored
because i am working with some historical images
Red is the actual image input option, while violet is the image generation modality button.
I guess, could it be because the banana image generation model is too popular?
Well, I believe that the video generation system already in Video Arena seems pretty uncensored, so you could probably just use that.
No, it's quite literally because you accidentally selected the image generation modality.
well its some kind of racist american political cartoon image
Well, you could try using Grok to find a solution around that.
oh right grok imagine
Sure, that works.
That's not the case. You have to look at the video I recorded - the image generation mode was off, but after I inserted the image, the system forced the image generation mode button to be enabled
Oh, I see, that's pretty interesting. I think that might just be because of a new update where that gets enabled by default because people generally only upload images to there solely for editing them. Although I'm pretty sure you could just turn that off. I'm sure it isn't permanently forced on while the image is input.
So, at the same time, it's not that big of a deal.
I recently like to insert some pictures in the text chat state—mainly to translate the text in them.
I think it's quite inconvenient to translate the next picture in the current conversation record.
You mean to select "New Chat" and switch the image generation modality off when you upload an image?
no
That's not the case.Because the image generation function has been switched, if you want to turn off this function and return to text conversation, you need to be prompted that you must create a new conversation.
Last I checked, I'm pretty sure you don't get prompted to create a new conversation. It just sort of creates a new conversation when you click the "New Chat" button.
i like this
I want to test the video creator of Ai
And?
Try this channel, then: #video-arena-1
ooh thank you, i thought i was the only one that was having this problem
i was literally about to ask about it here, didn't seem it was just my device problem
I tried sending a picture, it won't work because it is immediately switched to make a picture mode even when j didn't click it
in the mid of the video, tired selecting both the search and generate image which won't work (obviously). But when i send am image, the generate image button is triggered. As you can see in the video, the model which was gpt4o, was deselected. But if i force sends it anyway, it will return with an error as you can see. And i cant even deselect the generate picture mode without refreshing.
in the end, you can see that the chatbot works just fine, the web is just bugging.
Very interesting. You could try sending that issue as a bug in the #1343291835845578853 channel.
I thought so too. it happened here as well. The user here clearly just tried to upload an image without ever clicking the "image generation mode" button. But it just went into that mode anyway without anyone even ever touching it.
Are you able to deselect it once you upload an image, or do you have to create a new conversation just to disable it? I'm not talking about when it's sent—I'm talking about when you simply just upload the image.
hi this is great thanks
You can clearly see him try deselecting it, but it won't work. But it seems to me that you don't understand it previously. For my final answer, not you can't, it will just tell you to create open new chat.
Right, but that was only after he sent it, not when he uploaded the image into the prompt before sending.
Therefore, it might still be preventable. You just have to disable it before sending the message with the associated image, as that will lock you in. Only then will you have to start a new chat.
Is it really preventable? Try to pay attention to the video and see how i can prevent it. I tried deselecting the mode 5 times which triggered the create new chat prompt with the picture, and even without the picture which does the same thing. And once you uploaded the image, you are locked into the mode and won't be able to deselect it without doing a refresh as I've demonstrated here
Ah, interesting...
Try on the canary version.
That bug doesn't exist there.
At least I don't think it does.
And that's on the canary version.
Oh okay, I guess I'll use this in the meantime until that gets fixed.
What is the main difference anyway
i mean, between the normal and canary
Well, that version has a web design feature while the normal one doesn't.
An app feature.
Does anyone face this with nanobanana image generation based on prompt ?
At times, that does tend to happen, yes.
Thanks been happening for last one hour at the end giving same result again n again with different prompt so was wondering
Considering the model's from Google, it makes sense that it would be pretty strict.
Even other models does not generate like flux and any other
How strange...
Same error only image selection which I don't want, but if it recognizes images it uses llm to generate images and doesn't give the possibility to change model like GPT or Gemini pro or opus
Appears image caching issues creating trouble in response. Many time old images generates even prompt is way different it shows old promp image generation
Tried various logins same stuff takes about 15 minutes to 20 minutes for accepting one generation .. let's see
when will we get option to delete and edit messages?
Yes
They are also creating horrible generations
like 2023 AIs
I ask you for a suggestion, I'm looking for an AI tool subscription makes no difference, I used gpt but if you reach the storage limit It's frustrating to redo projects and lose progress. I use multiple images, depending on the job. I was intrigued by the idea of an AI agent, but I think I might run into problems with it Token limit. So I'm not really sure where to start my research. If I had to say, my main use is in pattern analysis. I write music, lyrics, and analyze images. I use it for study, read news and current affairs so you must also do research What do you recommend? Thanks for the replies
Hi
OMG OMG SO EXITED FOR SPRING https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/389806243709059073/1414902217625964634/ppslc7a75687594649e2_20250909092021.mp4?ex=68c141e0&is=68bff060&hm=0dc210596fbe1371f84a8fed362748ee266c31303df6958271147b0881feb93b& i will have so many children in front of my room!!!
If you also know some tools for music creation, master production, recording, beat a music studio If I'm not out of context, let me know... but I sing, write, produce lyrics, analyze patterns, and I've even given up on developing programs. If anyone has any ideas or suggestions, I'd appreciate it. discuss it
If the prompt in question is in your chat history, you may have to start a new chat to fully fix it...
Hi
Tried that too it's giving same issue. After two three generation max it start to behave same
wth
And it goes back in loop God knows when will it release
Let's hope this is trmporary
not getting any responses
I made several attempts. I tried forcing it to recognize specific prompts using models not intended for image generation. It only allows the use of image‑generation models whenever an image is added it does not let me change the model it does not let me use GPT Gemini Pro or GPT opus only image‑generation models and it then returns an error. I restarted multiple times, and I have to create a new chat. This problem occurs only when an image is inserted.
fix it plz
Solved
is not
Update
The problem only occurs on the main version of the site, I made further attempts...
lol
is not working for me
Try ai studio easy
send link
🪂
I tried several times, several times, I when I have a problem in the stack bootlop answers, I update several times, then I force it several times by continuously changing templates, it generates various errors, I open several pages of the same conversation and let the page reload several times... it's a bit cumbersome but after that I restart Generate response...The problem however is on the main site because any image inserted does not allow any image generation and does not allow you to change the model
lol not working
make a 3d red shoe that grows like magic right from a drawing on paper
and is not for free
Update, I tried more templates for some testing, the responses are giving errors, I'm testing all the templates to see which one works best, gemini after five responses gives error, I tried switching models continuously, then came back to gemini and it generated response..
my videos are not generated. the picture remains unchanged. why? help me understand.
By the way, I hope lmarena will have multilingual versions, including German, French, and Chinese. After all, there are a large number of global users, and the English interface is inconvenient for native speakers. I don't know where the error is.
why when i paste a image and sends it, it generates a image how can i fix it
if you're on web, you can de-select the image icon that turns blue when you paste the image in, and the press send and it won't generate an image.
hello?
im click the blue and nothing happening also yes im on web desktop
idk if this graphic helps, but here:
If that doesn't work, idk 😭
🙂
maybe just me but it's odd that it defaults to image gen imo.. if I paste an image, i;m usally asking questions about it, or it has reference material etc
toggle off solves
It shouldn't be blue if you don't want it to generate imags ^^;
Perhpahs I'm misreading you, but it sounds like you're keeping it blue when trying to NOT generate images.
but yeah.. not intuitive (for me anyway)
Hey,
is it possible to buy a subscription just for the image tovideo feature؟?
lmarena might be advertising the sites image gen to new users, so it might be more popular and easier. It also sends more traffic, even if accidental to the image gen area of voting. just a theory.
I don't think LMarean has any paid features currently.
i dont want the ai to generate image, im sending the image cus i wanna show the errors of the ai code but when i send it its generating an image
So then how can I remove the limit?
toggle-off the blue image icon so it turns grey. If it's blue, it will generate an image. If you start a new chat and do that with nano-banana not selected as the model, it should work in direct chat. Make sure all those parameters are taken care of. I'm not sure what's wrong...
and let's hope it stays that way! 😅
There's no way currently ^^;
im clicking the x icon and its saying this and its not toggling off
Are you in direct chat by any chance? What model are you using?
yes, im using gemini 2.5 flash
this one?
Try something like claude after clicking on the blue icon, and it should work. Gemini-2.5-flash-image only generates images.
Make sure you MAKE a new chat first.
nope, also i tried it on diff model and still like that
from what i can tell, nonobananna is only available when image generation is toggled on
What model did you try it on?
that works but i dont wanna start all over again
chat gpt and claude
I think that's the only option ^^;
yeah..
it actually can do text, but probably not on lmarena lol
On aisuttudio, yeah. idk about lmarean
ahah is the bannana smart?
very
i don't think so either.. i feel with the image gen toggle on, it generates an image (but dunno.. havent tested)
yeah it doesn't work. Interface seems to be hardcoded for image output and just returns error when it's text
Hi, I'm new here, and Lmarena isn't working, something went wrong.
no .....
I need unlimited free ai
#video-arena-3 "Cinematic drone shot of Kutubdia Island, turquoise ocean waves, fishing boats scattered, sunrise golden light, 4K ultra-realistic, smooth camera movement."
Voice-over:
"Welcome to Kutubdia, a small island in Bangladesh with endless potential for the Blue Economy."
deepseek i guess or qwen
not good for me
why deepseek and qwen are fire
you can not get unlimited free ai unless you go to chinas ais not USA
hi
I select gemini 2.5 pro GPT 5 opus all model
But every time I insert images it only makes me generate images and that is not what I am looking for because I did not ask for any image generation
i dont want the ai to generate image, im sending the image cus i wanna show the errors of the ai code but when i send it its generating an image
yeah but thats just big tech over lords
why hasn't the webdev score update since aug 22?
is it like same lmarena ?
send link
What is it?
hello
IS it just me or is the website not loading right now
Damn, that hits hard. 😕
Where r u from?
5
10
10
Somewhere else
Can we please have the basic simple feature of Re-using Parameters ?
Probably it's yupp.ai
But it's credit system is complex and fun
Not good for me is not unlimited
Is this actually real
What is qwen-image-edit-fal and how's it different from the regular qwen-image-edit?
I discovered lmarena last week, I don’t know for how long it was a thing, but in this past week… lot of changes
hi
hello
Technically it's unlimited
You give good feedback and they will give you free credits
And if you want unlimited
Use
Mirexa.vercel.app
Ish.junioralive.in
G4f.dev
There should be a time limit if there isn't one, I don't think this will ever finish.
#video-arena-3 message
Hey - new here! Happy to join!
hello guys i have question its possible to have a private romm to generate a videos ?
Do ai feel
3
5
2
Define feel
?
Anyone tried new Ernie models?
They released new 4.5 and X1.1 today and sadly the latter is not open source despite being really good
hello there
can anyone tell me how to generate videos in video arena 1
Hello @boreal halo please read https://discord.com/channels/1340554757349179412/1397655624103493813 to learn how to use the bot.
The Qwen3-Next series represents our next-generation foundation models, optimized for extreme context length and large-scale parameter efficiency.
The series introduces a suite of architectural innovations designed to maximize performance while minimizing computational cost:
- **Hybrid Attention**: Replaces standard attention with the combination of **Gated DeltaNet** and **Gated Attention**, enabling efficient context modeling.
- **High-Sparsity MoE**: Achieves an extreme low activation ratio as 1:50 in MoE layers — drastically reducing FLOPs per token while preserving model capacity.
- **Multi-Token Prediction(MTP)**: Boosts pretraining model performance, and accelerates inference.
- **Other Optimizations**: Includes techniques such as **zero-centered and weight-decayed layernorm**, **Gated Attention**, and other stabilizing enhancements for robust training.
Built on this architecture, we trained and open-sourced Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B — 80B total parameters, only 3B active — achieving extreme sparsity and efficiency.
Despite its ultra-efficiency, it outperforms Qwen3-32B on downstream tasks — while requiring **less than 1/10 of the training cost**.
Moreover, it delivers over **10x higher inference throughput** than Qwen3-32B when handling contexts longer than 32K tokens.