#csla_iron_curtain
1 messages · Page 4 of 1
Editor camera
ah damn it
Note also all the other reviews from that one
Waiting for the DLC got me like 

How to subscribe to closed beta testing
I anyway bought arma and all dlcs twice
take my money 🙂
plus gifted three full copies
a bit too late for that
I am up for all future dlcs

Arent we all up for that hah?
I know people who do not

many former squad members still have only vanilla and playing mods
🍿
I think for many people it's simply a matter of money. While I'd argue all DLC are more than worth it, it's still a fair bit of money. Though the frequent sales make it a lot more bearable.
Either way, probably a discussion for #creator_dlc_discussion
What times it being released today gents?

And how much is it
thats the big question
I'm guessing between 15-20 GBP
Oh we don't even know? Yikes that's good lol
^
Marketing level 100 but anyway tis what it is lol
it baffles us too as the same review exists for all CDLC but imho it's the review for whole game somehow 'appearing across main game and sub-dlcs'
and only for that curator ... but complaining about forums being restricted only to game owners to avoid spam is really next level of criticism 🤣
does anyone know how much left to relase?
No news yet mate
Just keen to know price as it will determine whether people stick with Cold War Rearmed lol
Its probably gonna be similarly priced as sog
Stick with CWR and cup. Same assets as CSLA, quite literally.
Sog had discount on release but that was sogs decision I THINK
But they hyped that one a goodun and the cdlc lived up to it
yeah defo
This one however has been pretty silent in comparison
but this still lives up to me, since alot of stuff was used by my nations army in the early 90's
so I may give it a shot and make some lil reskins
Yea ill probably buy it if it ain't like £25 lol
I just say check the compatibility alongside cwr stuff
the quality will show in what overlap there is
Yea ^^
that whole steam account seems like spam, they just seem to copy paste reviews that have nothing to do with each game across a bunch of games
which is even more strange, the guy buys games just to leave a negative review?!
It will be sometime over the next 2-3 hours I imagine, it is 2pm in central Europe now
i think curators might be able to without buying
It's the countdown to the countdown.
I guess it wasn't 12 UTC. since that moment passed 11 minutes a go
It happens when it happens
No sense in getting worked up. All you can do is hurry up and wait and be excited when it goes up on steam
is it likely to be released on the hour or could it be anytime
you people sure it won't be 18:00 like usually?
12 UTC is the usual, no?
It's out now
Congratulations to CSLA Studio on their release
Have fun everyone! 
Any word on pricing?
Not buyable
Now
nvm, fixed
Congrats 
It's less than 10 bux!
LETS GOO
go go go
You can always select to ignore them no?
Anyways congrats on the release
here we gooo
Downloading now 🙂
Hello stranger
S'up?
No trailer?
So the helicopters are the same as in CUP. Shame.
No they are not?
There is a vid on the Steam product page, might be the trailer, but couldn't watch it yet
It is yea
Welcome behind the Iron Curtain! Take a look at what life behind the barbed wire could have been like in an alternate universe of the 1980s in Czechoslovakia and its border with West Germany. Ride, fly, or run into battle against your enemy in an all-new lush and mountainous terrain. Conduct large-scale mechanized infantry operations, Special Fo...
$11.69
congrats on release for everyone involved CSLA team
Same models, textures and UVs. Compare the CSLA UH-60 to the one in RHS or CUP. They all have the same texture details and mirrored errors. Its a copy paste. :&
... wat
@upper galleonRHS uh60, despite being A2 model at base, has several modifications over it's original brother
it's the same vehicle, it must be a copy-paste
Why would they all then have the same "RESCUE" written correctly on their left and mirrored on their right?
How big is the DLC size?
w00t! congrats!
7.5gb
Thanks mate!
The Mi17 has different UVs, different, not mirrored camo and vastly updated model. The UH-60 had undergone similar changes as though maybe not so drastic.
quite small idk why, must be utilized with other dlcs content
So you are admitting its Arma 2 data recycled. Thanks.
Technically Arma 3 is a recycled Arma 2, the entire game is built on the engine we've had for awhile
not very happy with the mirrored UH60 but the models look neat
Dunno if you were around for this but there were a BUNCH of people like this in the spring of 2013, complete with someone demanding that Arma 3 be cancelled and Arma 2 be updated instead
I remember those times 😄 Good days ^^
the middle one looks different than the outer ones. Besides of it being a UH-60 in general
Because... They used the same technology back in the military... ?
lmao yeah just looks like a bunch of UH-60 textures?
those are different models
Because they clearly all wrote it mirrored "RESCUE" on the one side, and correctly on the other?
i dont really care either way, the other content of this cdlc looks amazing lol
they all had rescue on the door
between different models?
thats where the rescue release is
Anybody else insta crashes when selecting any of the guns with a 203?
Yes, but why write it MIRRORED on one side?
Too much of a coinkidink between two mods and one paid dlc to all have the exact same art errors
I'll fill the bug report if it's not just me, but want to make sure first
it's not an art error, just an arma limitation
it's flipped due to how the textures work
lol what?
that bs
it's not an arma limitation
it just wasn't textured correctly
it's 100% an art error
Its flipped because they all are using the arma 2 uh-60 as a base
both doors use the same part in the texture
the texture flips, vanilla arma 3 also uses that hack
There's no campaign - correct?
I don't think any vanilla vehicles have visible flipped text?
It's a small detail but I agree that it looks bad because of this
because of such a minor thing you can barely notice unless you really focus on it
lol
Guys, if you think you found a bug or if you have other issues/proposals, please post them to feedback tracker https://feedback.bistudio.com/project/view/59/ or at our discord https://discord.gg/NpG4u7TxrW. The input is valuable for future fixes and possible updates. Thank you 😊
it's more so the principle, the fact that it is an Arma 2 asset
people might have issue with that
If it can be fixed and I think it can be fixed, it should be it then
As someone who has tried, it's not an easy fix lol
it may seem like a small, easy thing but it really isn't
It’s impossible to fix with the way the texturing works, it would have to be a complete new model
Maybe not so easy, but if it's doable, I think it should be done
I don't know how the texture is laid out, there's probably space where you could put the UV of the other door
the czechs speak english. 🤦♂️ gotta get a mod to fix that, too? why couldn't the radio stuff be ported from arma 2?
tried the lav. CUP's LAV-25 textures fit onto CSLA's LAV-25 without any issue.
speechless
Remembering that SOGPF did this with some vanilla buildings too...
indeed
Both A2 and A3 buildings, right?
@twilit irisit's very possible to fix, it would not require a new model, please stop typing further if cluless
@scenic coveyes
Congrats CSLA team

what's the new worldname?
Take a look at life behind the barbed wire in an alternate universe of the 1980's in Czechoslovakia and its border with West Germany. What if it had ever come to an armed conflict between the East and the West? The Arma 3 Creator DLC: CSLA Iron Curtain is OUT NOW on Steam: https://store.steampowered.com/app/1294440/Arma_3_Creator_DLC_CSLA_Iron_C...
Because it's not complete. You'd need a whole new radio protocol which would require tremendous amount of work on a studio. Not to mention expenses that would in turn raise the price.
why couldn't the radio stuff be ported from arma 2?
People would assuredly complain about that too...
I would say the main battle tanks no interiors, the vests and bags textures are stuck before 2013, it need a lot of polish and retextures
The LAV-25 everyone else is using is a model made by our team over Yani for ArmA 2. While some of the hull textures might fit in general the model is again far from the original. Like, thrall new interior, m240. And multitude of other changes.
but
Anyone know where the servers are for multiplayer missions?
Is there Iron Curtain Warlords?
if the upcoming updates can retexture some the things again, I think its another best dlc arma that always can provide
Yo I never knew about the RG4
some equipment are fantastic, you cant find it in mods
being able to use it as a charge or a grenade is weird and soviet as hell
you mean mission or server?
I love the ragtop pasgt helmet
server isn't on yet, but we have various versions on different parts of the map with different available assets
looking on the mission list rn, we have 8 variants of Warlords
because we wanted some "more intensive" variants of Warlords for smaller squads/teams ... some of them are "less intensive" and on the whole map, some are more intensive and focused on some selected part of the map
Much stuff is remade Arma 2 content, some very poorly - but way more stuff either completely new, or very well remade
and lite has different asset list as for example full or mini
So definitely worth the price, esp half the price of the other CDLCs
Yeah considering the price point it seems legit, with the caveat that it gets similar post release content as GM
yeah the price is legit for sure
and you can drift with motorcycles
The M203 equipped weapons crash the game when selected in the arsenal, has anyone else encountered this, or is it just me?
The terrain is called: Gabreta
Same
are you running any mods?
Yeah
lol
So it's a mod conflict?
holy fuk that m86 on a stick is a masive trip mine
A mod war, so to say 
time to make cold war warfare cti scenarion 😛
try to turn off any mods and launch only CDLC if it happen again or not
what is bruh moment
Same crash
is this like glob mob are they going to add more stuff? if not im sorely disappointed.
thanks, stozec
Q: Are updates planned for the cDLC?
A: Whether official updates to the cDLC happen is again up to BI approval. Anyway, there are undisclosed plans within CSLA Studio to expand the content of the cDLC further after release if BI approves.
from our FAQ - https://discord.gg/pwcnxs7d
Nice hangars but there are no planes to put in them? 
Could try verifying, I'm not getting any CTD when using the CSLA Iron Curtain M16A2 + M203 GL without mods
the an-2
I think there is a AN-2, but yeah, no planes besides the AN-2 yet.
AN-2 from Arma 2 you mean, that doesn't really need to be in a reinforced hangar lmao
True.
you can use GM to properly simulate the autobahn takeoffs tho, the west german airstrip is built into the highway
Same
Right, I'm gonna say it. This feels like an extremely elaborate CUP reskin. Weapons have little to no unique sounds and seem to just be updated CUP ports from Arma 2, some weapons don't even have animations or their animations are so off sync it's not funny. Uniforms themselves look like the old Unsung gear from A1/A2 which is very disappointing. Vehicles do however feel weighty and I'm happy with that considering most feel like they're on ice but again, they feel like CUP ports. The weapons don't feel punchy and they just don't... Idk, feel alive. Vehicles feel like reskins of default Arma 3 stuff
But, the map is pretty cool
Has this dlc his own main menu like sog dlc or contact dlc?
Not as much as priery fire
Saying the DLC is a Glob Mob reskin is giving Glob Mob way to little credit to what they actually pulled off with a lot of things having to be made from scratch, actually, scratch that, most of the stuff they had to make.
They don't completely break it
Ye it do, pretty neat track
But they removed the "3 big buttons"
Only use the Ace Arsenal, the animations for it are same as CUP, even on the... Czech AK
idk what it's called don't execute me
too late (Its called Vz. 58)
Yep that's right
People are talking some mad shit for something that costs 12 dollars and features a campaign, scenarios and a map, even if you ignore the new units and items.
I'm talking mad shit because it's fucking cup reskined with some added shit
Campaign isn't present
oh mb. scratch the campaign bit
the map tho
It feels like a widened and more fleshed out Livonia
It's a great map IMO.
If anyone's using the Scope (FAL) its 'close quarters sight' point of aim is the left edge (from first-person aiming view) of the (dial? knob?) on the top
Oh lord, don't mention the FAL
very, love the diversity in it especially with the towns
I curled up and died
Just their logo replacing the official A3 logo, and as T00T said removing the three big buttons
kinda wished we had more customization with the vics humvees with m2's earlier versions of m113's maybe some planes C-130 with NATO camo ect. kind of also wished the Airborne and special forces had more vest variants, pasgt helmets with goggles, and the special forces uniform thats woodland but i do like the map.
In the end, you're paying indie game money for this, so you should lower the expectations compared to GloMo and SOG.
That being said, I do agree with some of the skins being a bit lazy in terms of mirroring. I have yet to test the guns and anims.
Hunting rifle has the scope 'as part of the weapon' just like A2, no option to detach it
“They made environments look lived in”
cup has replaced almost all of the weapons from a2 with new models
Can't mount the Silencer (M16) to the M16 Car. + M203 GL or the M16A2 + M203 GL despite no obvious-to-me visual obstruction where the tube and the suppressor would collide visually
hold up, the beret has ballistic protection 🤨
the uk59 and dragon are two of the last survivors from a2
I mcrealise this, however, I'm saying it feels like a CUP port my man
Same goes for some of the caps. I assume this is an error, considering it is inconsistent
I had think its so that i can use it in combo with the SOG dlc
idk what 'a CUP port' means
Cup port meaning he feels like they just put cup and called it a dlc
Isn’t that hard to figure out
cup binned most of the a2 weapon models tho
So what you mean is 'Arma 2 port' right?
so to me the shape of the US uniforms resemble CUP uniform models, but that said i kind of dig the old school classic look of the CUP uniforms and A2 uniforms
guess i should be happy cup ports are set apart from all other ports roaming around 🙃
why the hell does the FAL have two round burst??
Clothing choices are good, however the load capacity seems very inconsistent and some helmets have ballistic protection when they really shouldn't
"MPV"
I see what you did there.
Also noticing inconsistencies with weapon attachment choices in other primary weapons too, e.g. the Sa-58P and Sa-58V can both take a Bayonet or a Bipod, but only the Sa-58P can take optics (NPSU (Sa-58) and ZD 4x8° (Sa-58))... meaning that the Sa-58 VG-70 can't take attachments at all
Wow, driveable civilians cars
well uh at the very least I hope this gets people interested in more coldwar groups
Thought that was to much work for a CDLC))
Ok, it seems like a no buy for me
weapon sounds seem fine.
I think most of the issues named today could be fixed within one patch.
Yup, the issues I described above seem like a config mod should be enough to resolve them... although I confess to some 'huh?' at optics being weapon-specific
I guess whomever was doing the configs that day was on too little sleep and too much coffee <insert @mortal ice's emote he always uses here>
If CUP_models can be replaced with new own ones that would be great as a patch 1.1

^- that one.. those ones..? 
LMFAO

Redditors seething
I think that for the money you pay, you shouldn't really expect brand-spanking new models for everything. I can tell that the map ate a lot of resources (read: money)
the new textures are definitely appreciated, save for some oversights in the mirroring department.
The rest really is just config issues which can be solved in a day.
That being said, ofc I hope that the situation on all fronts will improve.
Let's see them compare Cup T-72)
My take:
It should not have released or even be accepted to be a cDLC in the first place. It is very underwhelming compared to either GM or S.O.G PF.
It fails to add new reloads, sounds or high-quality equipment and weapons. I do not want to sound like a guy and say “it is just a mod” but it is. Telling from the original gameplay of CSLA when it was still a mod (I think), it did not change at all.
If I would compare to a mod like CUP or RHS in terms of said quality (some assets are good, but not many), there will be no winner at all. CLSA also uses some A2 assets (example would be the map assets). I’d say this is also not good, as a) the quality isn’t there and b) we already got those assets through mods which have most of the time the same quality or better and are not anymore A2 models.
Let’s talk about the weapons, they are using “only” standard A3 reloads as far as I can and some of them are wrong too. Such as the reload of the Czech LMG or the Scorpio.
1/2
Or lav
And their sound is also mainly or as far as I can tell standard Arma sounds which are a bit underwhelming in my opinion, but might work for the most people idk.
The vehicles are also not great, some of them are still on par with CUP or RHS (which both don’t use really any A2 models anymore) in terms of quality like the UH-60 (which only got slightly modifications to it) or the LAV IIRC. The interiors themselves are not great but not the end of the world, would have liked better textures overall. But CLSA does add new vehicles which a great nevertheless.
The map is overall a nice addition to the game, it’s big and can be used for a lot of different scenarios, but as mentioned above, it uses (I presume at least) A2 assets which I do not like in terms of their quality.
There is a lack of placeable structures in the editor such as buildings that the map Gabreta uses. It would also be nice to have them added.
The uniforms are also not on par with the rest of Arma 3 itself or the released cDLCs.
It would have been good if there would be a better and more unforgiving control about the content in a cDLC for future creator DLCs, because for now, the reviews are not good at all.
2/2
Or anything else that is way better
It is very underwhelming compared to either GM or S.O.G PF.
you pay basically half the money for it.
Bad take. Imagine spending money for something thats free
I personally prefer giving creators money.
It isn’t even like CoD or A2 reusing assets. This group literally ripped and sold again
"ripped"
A2 assets are 'open source'
Doesn't mean it can't be underwhelming with the price cut. I still wouldn't justify it with half the price at all.
The CDLC has alot of content that no other mod has
I'd pay like
Costs next to nothing
50 cent and half a yorkie bar
it uses (I presume at least) A2 assets
the map uses original assets from what I can tell. Or at least I do not remember these assets being in A2
Ofcourse comparing it to something like rhs will have rhs be a winner, but rhs would've also been a CDLC if it came out today
++
uh, so i saw on the steampage that the dlc has mostly negative reviews, is it really that bad?
The CDLC has lots of content that doesn't exist anywhere, lots of content that is way more improved than anywhere else
I'd say it's "mixed"
Try the compat data and see for yourself.
And some stuff that are same as cup/a2
there's definitely issues and some "uhh" things about it, but I would still argue it's worth the money. Of course, some would disagree.
For 10$/half the price of previous DLCs
Also compared to cup - there are also 19 or so (most likely) very well made missions
Again, all the complainers will cry about "A2 rpg, A2 mi17" etc
But ignore all the things that are incredibly better
So instead of listening to the same loud people who cried at gm - download compat patch and see for yourself
I think that if I were to weigh what you're paying for:
40% map
20% missions
20% new textures
20% new assets
but ofc if you wanna compare it to a full-price cDLC, you're only 50% of the way there in terms of the money
Depends on preference
I just bought it for M1IP alone 😄
For me the Abrams, lav, t72, and all other vics are 50$ alone
the map is worth double price to me
Like with GM, Vehicles > infantry
feel like im getting it at a steal
Atleast imo
The map is very nice
i mean how much are dayz guys paying for the livonia map
just the map makes me happy
I'm comparing to GM/SOG in terms of money.
Ofc SOG and GM both have a lot more unique assets but then again consider this:
If they had stripped all the A2 assets, they still could've asked for the same money and it still would've met the value proposition
Same can be said for sog
It's funny how I'm seeing alot of same people hate on csla and gm, but not saying much on sog. Kinda makes you think 🤔
Well, its Vietnam, people like it, because 'Nam I guess.
hate on gm? i loved gm its great for MilSim
Where is the campaign?
Scenarios, sherm
vietnam is just amazing
There is none IIRC.
No campaign, 19 missions I believe
There is none only Singeplayer Scenarios and Multiplayer Scenarios
where was a campaign promised?
Optionally, players can download a trial version from the Workshop which is intended to be used for multiplayer compatibility purposes. The terrains and campaign are not fully accessible however, and vehicles cannot be driven or commanded outside of the editor without purchasing the DLC.
jesus calm down, they just asked. no need to start beef 
that's a third party source? 
you find the missions under scenarios
Pretty much what I thought was going on with that CDLC as soon as it was announced 🤷
campaign is not mentioned on steam page
Armed assault wiki, also looks like a copy paste from all the other CDLC compat files place
Literally saw like 15 people talk about campaigns in the last 5 minutes lol
^
@timid quartz
Seems like
Choosing your messages suits you
was my mistake
campaign is not mentioned on steam store page, don't make up things that are not promised 😄
Well I am sure it was mentioned some times, not sure where. I start digging.
guys, he's just confused, no need to grab pitchforks.
Calm down guys no need to start beef because you have differing opinions that just perspective and should be viewed as such. Just accept it and make your own mind.
misunderstandings happen
same thing in the announcement, https://arma3.com/news/arma-3-creator-dlc-csla-iron-curtain-is-out-now
it is now very negative, assume yes.
Bombed same way gm was on release
sadly
i mean gm is still mixed reviews
nah GM never reached 20%
They’re just debating tho
Guess the haters couldn't unit as well
I mean I think it would be fair to see the DLC at "mixed" in its present state. But I wouldn't say it's horrible either.
its at 18% rn actually
Yes but if you read a few messages it looks like it's about close to erupt like a volcano if you get me 😄
If you want to test it you can try the compat as well, https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2503886780
GM got mixed reviews at the start, but there was no doubt that it was a labour of love and you can see that in the quality through out the content in GM be it models, textures, or even the music. I'm struggling to see where all the love went in IC.
Like I said, I believe that most of the money went towards the map, where you can definitely see a lot of love. Furnishings just being part of that.
Textures and original assets are a relatively small part compared to that
Mind, GM's reputation was helped in hindsight by the post-launch support... let's not apply nostalgia filters
yeah
the buildings being furnished is really weird
Is CSLA worth it
I see commies in DLC, I buy.
It's a "hell meh". If you're in it for the map, cool! Get it.
If not, then you need to check for yourself
any chance to have the map available for playing to people that don't have the "mod"?
No
you can test it in editor but not play on it
Nope, just like the previous CDLCs and Bohemia Interactive's own terrains
okay
i wouldn’t want it for the map, i would want it for the vehicles/assets and weapons
Super-subjective atm... as you'll see above, plenty of compliments for the terrain but you should follow T00T's link and see for yourself about the guns/gear/vehicles... also, no SP campaign (yet)
the map is the only thing people like in it.
I'm sure if you give it some time someone will do a full youtube review of it, hopefully.
in that case it becomes a bit harder. I highly suggest you try it out yourself
Some are very nice, some are… “meh”.
Rather, the only thing that people definitely like
Though the reviews are saying quite a lot if you read em'. (:
when i saw the pictures for it, it looked just like CUP stuff tbh
12 bucks is kinda lot for one, but it's decent enough to pay for it
if it's worth it for you is entirely dependant on if you're okay with it having a lot of A2 assets that have been slightly updated
"a lot"..?
also a really nice terrain
well, okay. 30% can be considered a lot depending on your POV


yeah i read the reviews gonna have to pass on this DLC, i had good hopes for it but :/
arma 2 assets retextured and nothing that free mods already don’t do or have, i don’t really see a point in downloading it
Don't read reviews. Get your own opinion by using the free version on the workshop lmao
well. If that's what you gathered from the reviews, the reviews are incorrect.
There is alot in the CDLC that mod don't already have
There are a bunch of Czechoslovak-specific vehicles that afaik haven't been in A3 mods yet
oh okay
the apologists have arrived
We where here before the cry babies
the reason you may be thinking nothing that free mods already don’t do or have is because to be blunt CSLA Studio is afaik the only group that ever did this setting for A3
I also like the m1008 for america
By which I meant 'Cold War Czechoslovakia'...
Yea but not cold war I dont think
yeah
Yup, two entirely settings and militaries
yea most of the czech vehicles arent present anywhere else
yeah i realize
i guess i’ll download it later and see, don’t have very high expectations tho
To be frank this was (supposed to be) the appeal of this DLC besides the terrain
Vics that no mod has, or has in way worse quality:
Almost all the Czech vehicles, OT-62, OT-65, The AA vic, arty vic, etc
M1IP
LAV-25
T-72s, M, M1
M1008
V3S
Armoured V3S
Armoured "UAZ"s
Some statics
Two bunkers & two towers
Maybe some I forgot
All the support trucks
Yeah, forgot the V3S'
Veteran mod has Armored UAZs, LAV-25
I especially love the lizard
The US trucks aren't as good for me to say they're better than other places
i have always found CDLC’s have really good map assets that are rlly good for missions
I don't count veteran
Why can we not spawn down any of the buildings from the DLC outside of some military ones?
And I noticed that 'hey, the gun truck that ISN'T a Zu-23 on an Ural!'

because most people cant use it due to their game changes
The main selling points for this are the map, which is furnished and very detailed in general, as well as the handling of the vehicles and the (50%?) original assets.
I can guess in a dlc called CSLA yes
for US stuff just get 3CB lol

3CB Factions?
ye
it’s fine for cold war US
Ive never even heard of Czechoslovakia until now, still don't believe they existed.
So... this cDLC and 3CB have something in common? A lot of the new Czech vehicles are awesome but there is a ton of A2 quality struff
lol
No
Is the CSLA RPG-7 just the Apex RPG-7 repackaged and resold...? 😅
Almost no vehicles are "A2 quality stuff"
Half of the infantry gear is through
I would say 90+% of the vics are way better than most other places, def better than A2
Did anyone notice the "Rescue" on the Blackhawks is mirrored on one side?
but infantry gear is the most important
yes we have been over this
Did anybody care?
idk about that, but the PGO-7V is welcome compared to Apex's lack thereof
Yeah, I complained about it a bit earlier on
Cuz tbh - that rescue on the blackhawk is by far the least of its worries
Compare the wooden 'stock' on the Apex RPG-7 vs CSLA RPG-7.
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/237077887117819906/854752887920656424/unknown.png and I mean. I know which one I'd pick, personally.
The blackhawk is by far the worst vehicle of them all
The textures are essentially 1:1.
agreed
Too bad that the M16 that has the m203 crashes the game
What about the motorbikes? They are 1/1 copies
Almost all of the assets are from A2
Just that they have been given different changes
the Motorbike doesn't need to be fancy and incredible
Because you don't buy a DLC for a motorbike
Guys guys do this
Load cup weapons and shoot the m16a2
Then Load this DLC and shoot the m16a2
The cdlc sounds are flat and dull
Cup has a punch to it
the motorcycles in arma dknt even work
The important stuff that most players will use and experience is that matters more
I can't believe bohemia cleared this dlc for release
I mean. In the end you have to ask yourself the following:
Is the map and the original assets that are in there worth 12 bucks to you? If the answer is yes, cool, you also get some "free" A2 assets. If not, then well shit.
After the 'it was decided after the beta that this CDLC needed more time in the oven' delay, at that :/
But why add it in then? 🤔
Some of the CSLA weapon sounds are from the Arma 3 Alpha, like the M16.
Also the mortar shells produce a rocket 'flyby' sound.
This
Like, I fucking LOVE Arma but you can't say this isn't ridiculous
Because why not? I don't think it's bad to add something if your value proposition is already met. This way you don't force people to download CUP on top of it
Kinda the main weapon of the "enemy" in that CDLC
Copy-pasting SunCZu from the CSLA Discord:We did not want to clutter the editor too much so we included only some of the military buildings. We're open to ideas what you think should in the editor. Though we will most likely not put all the houses in there.
My message above is the answer to that
...That model was made in latter half of the 2010s.
Yeah and I am a ballerina dancer
Arma 2 models mostly come from 2005 to 2009.
Been promoting, supporting and praising it to everyone who wanted to hear for almost a decade, but this is ridiculous and they deserve to know that it is, the Store reviews don't lie
If it's made in 2017 idk what to say, it looks before 2010
Agreed
But then there are 10 Alice backpacks that are the exact same in the arsenal 🤷♂️
Unfortunately with all due respect I will be refunding this and sticking with CWR
¯_(ツ)_/¯
Like I've said. I think it would be fair to give this a "mixed" review. Atm I'd give it a 6.5/10 mostly because of the map. But likewise, I don't think it's a 2/10 as steam currently suggests.
That is literally Arma 1 lmao
even if you ignore the map, it'd still be around a 4/10
Better quality lol
No
and that's me looking at it pragmatically and ignoring A2 assets entirely
CWR is arguably worse quality that Arma 1
Because of how much it stands out comapred to everything around it
have you... played that game?
Ah I'd disagree but we both have different opinions I don't wish to get into a yes it is no it isn't battle bud :)
Have you seen CWR?
yes
That is my answer to you too then
CWR3 I think right?
Yes
mhm
It's better.
honestly i dont see the issue with csla, it adds more content and assets to fool around with, a nice map and all that, and for just 12 bucks, plus you're supporting small developers 
COOP feels real buggy, cant find the last guy in a cleaning op
cant wait for future updates
"CWR is on par with alot of mods" lmao
I'm mostly d'accord but I think it's fair to criticize it for feeling a bit "lazy" or "rushed"
Toot I'm not getting into a debate about it we both have opinions that's cool
launch sector scan via GUI
It is. I'd the alone the Cobra Helicopter is a dead give a way.
Cobra is the only good vehicle in it
I hope that the CSLA devs update it and fix many of its issues. If not I'm going to be quite pissed
Even then - not the best cobra on the workshop
i bet it was rushed, maybe in time they will polish those A2 assets or replace them
absolutely fair to criticize, but to absolutely lambaste it like some seem to be doing is silly 
but criticizing it does not equal 20% on steam personally.
CSLA wasn't rushed
at least it has a Cobra, this dlc doesn't
that’s just sad then..
Thats true.
didn't they have more time than Savage tho?
Since back then, it was even worse
Affirm, at least people said that from screens.
good thing about mods, you can download another mod that has a great cobra
And thank god they didn't or the reviews would be in single digits rn
yea
"Reviews matter"
Reviews matter a lot lmao
well, I would say it needs another patch cycle, though. To be what I would deem "release-worthy" (in this context meaning people being generally happy with it)
Are you new to Steam?
Are you clueless? I guess i know the answer already
I wish Bohemia would simply hire the cDLC "partners", teach themselves how to do certain things and release a proper DLC
iff i see a game that has mostly negative, i won’t even bother to look at it
This isn't random game #5893, communities wil lget the CDLC regardless of reviews
bullshit
This CDLC was in development for over 7 years
mega bruh moment
By two people (or 3?)
I understand that most of Arma is American players so they only care about US black hawks and Vietnam, but many places and communities aren't full of Americans
these guys got paid to make this while modders make better or equal content for free 😂
6-8+ IIRC, GM was made by two
what is that argument?
Nvm then
it's not about the theatre of war
pet peeve, I fucking hate that everything is just US
it's about quality of assets you spend money on
Since it's very clear who disliked this CDLC same as GM with the same reasons, but ignored shortcommings of PF

You'd expect that, but not the case
Tell us who disliked it?
GM was made by 2 people but GM is actually really nice other than the campaign
When same peopel say "GM is low quality"

That's not how that works
It is, arma isn't a fresh trendy game
people actually say that?
Still do
That was a recurring criticism of it at launch
What if I say, that PF and CSLA weren't good. (But I don't really wan't to dive into it.
and before last two updates

Nope, I had the same issue, status access violation
I'd agree that they both have issues, but it's about choosing what parts of it you like
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/237077887117819906/854755929211535400/unknown.png Again, I do believe I know which one I'd pick out of these 2
true, but i never cared for PF in the first place
Well, Campaign is good enough I'd say. Tank mission not so great, but worked out for me atleast. Liked the intro and the briefing a lot as a german.
Is fair, but I'm reffering to the masses, especially the ones spamming the negative reviews
I wouldn't want to be any potential next cDLC in line after this release 
Debatable.
As the menu isn't broken and the base game bullet values aren't changed
is csla worth of buying?
absolutely not

Test out the compat data and make a mind of yourself.
download the free thing and try it
Do you like UAZs?
if you want a map then yeah
if you want assets - no
What Julius and Jish said, so far people are liking the terrain a bunch
anyways this just seems like a "no my stick is longer than your stick!!!11111!" argument at this point lol
very pointless
very dead-ended
very toxic
For me, the map is one of the strongest points for buying CSLA. It's very nice.
what about the campaign? that;s what im most interested
Since in the end of the day - I am paying 10$ for the M1 arbams, the LAV-25, and the T-72, with all the Czech fancy vehicles sprinkled on top of it
I agree, the map is quite good
There's no SP campaign, only ten SP scenarios and MP contents (a total of nineteen when including variations)
SInce it's not an argument that those assets exist nowhere, or nowhere in the same quiality
And add the map to that - definitely worth it
I really like the otter, heavily modified BRDM
Maps good, as long as it is supported as well as gm has been then I am sure most issues will be resolved in time.
I only buy it because of the map to be fair.
It's got a recoiless gun or something
ok so it is not worth it then
"only 10".. what
I am not fully sure on this, somebody correct me if I am wrong pelase
But aren't CDLCs "forced" to update
What VigilVindex said
So they will be supported and updated, regardless of what
Nope, as far as I know they aren't forced to maintain service at all.
Alright, nvm then
They aren't, no. Though they have said already that they will
fwiw apparently Vertexmacht ran into the 'we'll update if Bohemia lets us' issue early on... it's just that people liked the post-launch updates and have since incorporated them into their view of that CDLC
Then I'll say that the Devs said in their discord that there will be updates in the future, atleast planned to be
The map is worth the $10. Everything else is jank
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/671576681932128256/854757151540510730/unknown.png not kidding, I kinda like the csla over GM
Most who I know who complain about CSLA/GM claim that Apex is very good. Wonder if people see it the same way here
The SKOT is nicer too
I must say, it does bother me to some extent that 2 cdlc come up with the same vehicle but they somehow look different 
Also look at the customisation options
I'm excited to get my unit emblem into it
The second time actually
Same goes with the MI-2 of GM and S.O.G PF
All 3 CDLCs
What he said ^
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
Through in that case - the newer CDLC was worse than older
That Mi-2 made me cry inside
GM had a SKOT equivalent?
Oh whoops
Added with Poles in first update
Though imo the GM skot is better
But they are both really good regardless
I have liked all CDLCs so far but im not sure about this one, the map is nice but the assets seem kinda meh to me
Most important part is the interior
which is fair. Overall, I would agree that it's a bit lackluster
As that is what you're seeing for most of the time you play
In that case up to you how much the map is worth to you money-wise out of the current price (in USD $11.69)
Show me the tank interior 
someone said it was worth $10 to them
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/237077887117819906/854758180717068328/unknown.png CSLA LAV (editor, this is NOT full res)
Show me RHS' tank interior
Oh wait, they don't even have one
you dont have to pay for rhs
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/237077887117819906/854758321310924820/unknown.png RHS LAV (editor, this is NOT full res)
You don't have to pay for CSLA, free compat on the workshop
but the tanks don't have interiors
RHS.. LAV?
Pretty sure you cant use assets without watermarks then?
Yes, same restrictions as all DLCs.
If you don't like the interior you don't really need to be inside it
Might be 3CB, sry
Yeah, is 3CB Factions
3cb LAV is the one with the interior
I should mention the following: The CSLA LAV has a full interior.
The other does not
there are no tank interiors in this paid DLC, that you just compared to a FREE MOD 
GM has no tank interiors either
They have usable interiors
"my stick is longer than your stick!!1!!"
3d viewport is not an interior
They aren't pretty through
But... we do. 
TooT talked about RHS, not GM
I have found that 99% of the time it corresponds
ouch, havent seen it in awhile
Fine, I'll get into it
I am just going to the argument the crying people are doing - "why use this when there is one for free"
There is no free M1, interiors or no interiors
https://streamable.com/dbthc1
Comparison video on m16a2 gun noises
Because it's a paid product that people are paying for, and people are not satisfied with the product they spent their money on...?
Doesn't the new CUP Abrams atleast include one (Not released yet)? Well, diffrent time period, but you know what I mean.
It's M1's
luckily they all had the chance to try it for free with the compatibility
But yes, you're correct
pretty sure cwr 3 has m1 with 105
I believe htey have the newest M1A1 and M1A2s
It is also straight outa Arma 1 with how it looks
cup has new abrams models with full interiors
i dont understand these cDLCs phenomenon. If I wanted some cars and a map to drive them somewhere i would download one of bilion mods available on steam workshop. I bought GM but it had kind of a campaign.
there is many free abrams what
only in dev tho
People can complain about a product they paid for, you don't have to whiteknight...
No M1 Abrams compareable to CSLAs, but you're right - forgot CWR3, mb
RHS has M1’s
No
if ur looking for a free m1 abrams with interiors, rhs 🤷🏻♂️
If you mean in the sense of why CDLC is happening at all... there weren't mods out there for GM or CSLA's specific settings 🤷
And I can point out complains are wrong, no need to hide behind calling me a "whiteknight"
RHS neither has interiors or M1 abrams
CSLA is tackling a super niche thing and didn’t do it well, PF could have been the same quality as this CDLC and it would be more popular because everyone has been wanting a vietnam thing that is better than unsung
Actual BI dlcs suck ass value wise
Global mob could be its own game considering how much content there is
It is same quality as this CDLC
No its not
Im lossing Brain cells
Your nose is getting very brown
look at the overlap
Its not worth engaging toot in conversation because he will just shift the goalposts when he is wrong.
It's literally as said - a community full of Americans will obviously prefer the Vietnam war over a European conflict
nobody cares where it is

Im yet to be proven wrong, only people saying "we just have different opinions"
i play the shit outta pla mod
very high quality there
you are objectively wrong that no mod has M1’s
It is deficient higher that PF
you dont have stacked textures in sog
Thats RHS
nope, 3CB factions, I checked this time!
have you lost your mind?
when does supporting end and fanboyism starts?
yeah they use the same model
How's the Mono sound effects? you liking them?
think the texture is different but I'll check
I don't care about the guns, they are awful
I care about what doesn't exist anywhere else
sounds like its on burst when suppressed
3CB Factions only retextures it. Like with the AH-1Zs
Which are the tons of vehicles
Higher quality than PF though right?
🤡
Yeah, load up PF)
Check the uniforms and guns
slight retex, as presumed
all of them are same as CSLA, half the guns are same too
Shooting game, dont care about guns bruh what are you playing Czech life
@frigid gorge How much is CSLA "studios" paying you to shill?
So do you hate or love it im confused
Guns, besides two (and maybe the AK) VN guns, are better.
only thing that looks good on the right is the helmet
Because there are better guns available for free. Again - the value of CSLA isn't its guns, but the vics - that isn't available for free
and even then it’s worse
Bruh.
I'd say that's about equal in quality
He don't stop does he lol
Ah yes I love me some paid A2 Vehicles
I pay for everything, not just the part of it
Last time - I bought it for vehicles and map. The infantry stuff is horrendous
the super niche vehicles that liek, 3 people that play arma actually care about
Little Knight
if it's value is a PART of a mod then I want to pay only for a part of it, while I paid for whole.
I'm astonished.
I am not going to defending what is bad - I am defending what is good
Just... wow.
nope, it's trolling.
What is good...
you're disobeying the rules
And the tons of vics and a godtier map is definetely worht little less than lunch money
question
what structures are there in CSLA other than the A2 ones? I only noticed some fences that looked original and those bizzarre 80' colored lamp poles
I bought the vehicles in 2009, I don't want to buy them again lmao
they hidin the buildings
There are like 3 vics that are not available anywhere else. All in all, not a purchase i’ll make
Then don't, I didn't buy them in 2009)
how about make csla a 2 separate cdlcs where first part is only for vehicles and map, and second is for guns and infantry equipment? 
most of the houses from what I understand. Though the A2 fire station deffo isn't 
and they are all vehicles no one really cares about
I think 4-5 (prob. more) buildings haven't existed in A2, not sure though.
^this
this. I can definitely pay for the map only, and directly to the authors, not BI.
Well a lot of Arma 1 models were recycled for Arma 2. So uh...
Third time's the charm?
But I thought you said "Where the war is set doesn't matter"
There's a lot of new village buildings. The villages are mostly made up of those
wasn’t me
ok, I kinda giggled, ngl
GM has czech units right?
Im not american and i dont care about them
Nope.
Nope, it's East Germany, West Germany, Denmark, and Poland
Nor am I and I don't care about them either
https://cdn.cloudflare.steamstatic.com/steam/apps/1294440/ss_3223d9de881a736e0d9e9a6bfd9d44815bde1b48.1920x1080.jpg?t=1623848516
oh saw these and wasn't sure if they were in cup
I didn't say only Americans @plush thunder
I don't really care for the american units, personally
not american and do not give a fuck about some tiny eastern european countries cold war vehicles
Fun fact: Arma 1 and 2, there're a lot of “OFP2” assets which was developed like in 2003-2005
Those are new
They are Tatras right? Don' think so.
you actually said like 10 times that this community is full of americans that dont care about european conflict 
"Tiny eastern european" - the wall between the east and the west in the cold war
You did say only Americans
ok?
they are new, though similar ones exist. Sec
Yes
Most of the community is, hence the outrage and negative feedback spam
Yikes
Funny, that's exactly what this CDLC was advertised as... kind of surprised you even asked whether this was worth the money in the first place
1 to 1 what happened with GM
wait wait wait
are you defending the cdlc only because it's about cold war in Europe?
I guess Europeans and Australians are incapable of perceiving poor quality 
you don't give a damn about how bad the assets are, it's fine for you to them have the Czech flag?
I am defending it because it has alot of thigns which don't exist anywhere, and most of it thsoe things are made very well
Nah he's justifying to himself because steam denied his refund
The assets aren't bad
Ehhhh, it does affect how I weigh the assets quality relative to the other two CDLCs
Store updated, 20%, 90 reviews
GM has 6/10 stars CSLA has 3/10 on steam
D is for Denial.
they are not the same feedback AT ALL
Yeah, it had worse earlier too
GM is good
“A lot” 3 vehicles with a handful of variants…
GM is the best*
Nah, it was mostly mixed worst was maybe 40% or just at 50%
So, I gotta ask, are these the same model pants?
https://steamuserimages-a.akamaihd.net/ugc/867367521940327835/EC1EACB48B4EA8824F8BD7BD99EFD0B7789B6CE7/
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/531196546520317980/854084333845086218/unknown.png
Imagine having to defend your purchase so hard after Steam denied your refund
All conflict in arma happens outside of Americas. What a chill place.
eh, idk. I still stick with what I said, though I can't really say I care for uniforms extremely much. I'd say it's ROUGHLY the same, though. Quality-wise, that is
Guess the Asians who play this game can't understand "low quality" content
well I'm from Poland and I'm jizzing in my pants everytime somebody shows central europe in arma
people wet their pants over vietnam war content, so it’s gonna be the most loved CDLC no matter what
this one is gonna get hated
cope
is it just me or are the campaign lines bugged they repeat over and over
cope indeed
the situation is same as with Remembrance mod
I get that there's no other mod about WW1 and they should be remembered
but I definitely wouldn't want to be remembered as a badly made paint retexture for a even worse mod
and same goes for cdlcs
CSLA is like RHS of arma 3 DLC's, its awful.
LOL
RHS is way higher quality
CSLA is a refurbished massi
lol
calling negative reviews spam
cope more shill
You just reminded me of how... wait, was massi's stuff popular from 2013-2015? Seemed like 'CUP before CUP'
Calling cry babies spam
hmm. I guess left does look a bit better. Though it's hard to compare when it's not 1/1 the same stuff
also nice greentext outside)
reminder: keep it civil
probably yes as there were no other mods at all
True, sorry from my part
implying negativity about CSLA is unwarrented
Cope again
I am just really fucking sad, I love Arma, I have supported BI for years, promoted them to everyone who I could reach. Then they push this cDLC which I think is kind of showing BI seems to not care what they sell to their customers
The unwarranted part it
it literally is though, it is 1/1 the same stuff
the whole Creator Program is a farce
Except they do, because they pushed the CDLC and update arma
I liked GM and SOGPF so far
Don't like the CDLC - don't use it. As the two guys posting pictures here while we've talked - the quality of assets isn't questionable
I'd like them more if their authors were hired by BI and content was released as official DLC
hmm, in that case I would like to see what it is supposed to be like IRL. If it's supposed to be the same but clearly isn't, then one of them has to be wrong
I was really looking forward to this since it was first announced. Its a damn shame.
they are the same, one is just much much worse
Well, I think the GM boys work at BIsim IIRC?
So if your main thing is vics - the DLC is a +
If it's infantry gear - its a big minus
same.
This would be okay as a mod.... but as a paid dlc.... I really cant justify it
I have no idea to be honest
I wish testers had more hands-on time
yeah, QA was non-existent I suppose
there was testing
Well, not at all ignored, they did fixed a lot of stuff which was posted.
by who? the devs?
but "remake all of the assets" isn't really something a tester can really tell the devs
This time testers did get some say - the CDLC was delayed by over a year and lots was improved
Same here. Was hoping CSLA would contend with DHI since it would be a paid DLC. Its crazy that CSLA actually thought this mod was worthy as a follow up to PF.
I wish everyone could understand that literally no matter what they themselves think about these CDLCs / mods and all their qualities, people are going to buy them because it fits their niche and thats fine
if people enjoy something thats aight, just be civil about everything lol
They weren't
I do agree with this, though. There seem to be a few bugs (from what people said), as well as some weirdness and inconsistencies, which should have been caught
How do you know that without knowning what the testers have tested and reported last time?
we're not blaming the purchasers brother
not your brother
sorry bud i just dont know you that well
we blame BI and CSLA dev team for "this"
I know people who spoke of lots of issues, and those issues stayed, easy ones to fix too
lmao imagine actually saying this
You mean like they did with PF?
And where ignored?
bruh i was a beta tester for PF and the shit i reported was fixed
^
such as
I meant CSLA
Fair enough. My issue with that is that, except for 2 or three assets, there are free alternatives that offer the same quality
Keep it civil. If you have nothing nice to say, stay quiet.
It is a bit of buyer beware that alot of folks bought it without testing it
I meant PF, sorry or the missunderstanding
and it wasnt what they imagined
If CSLA was confident and self assured in its quality, it would have been priced higher.
I have compared the ticket numbers, and open vs closed tickets for both SOGPF and CSLA beta tests.
Their rates were about on par.
Need help guys. Since the update, I'm getting a error when the addons are loading, LSYS_C_SETTINGS require addon LSYS_C_F. Anyone know of this and what this is?

One was delayed by 1 year, the other was released with non-driveable civ vehicles
it still has a price, it means the CSLA devs are self assured in quality enough to sell it
did they even choose the price
non-drivable vehicles that were never supposed to be drivable? what's the issue?
This is true.
I would assume so since it is different than the other CDLCs?
Yeah, not gonna defend that - the pics before the changes where definable not promising
with vastly different # of testers
Biggest example - there where other issues and problems too
And "never supposed to be driveable" is debateable
One was delayed by one year because of QA issues and is now basically being review bombed even after a year of fixing the issues.
The other was released directly after the QA test and is highly praised review wise
no its not.
Talk to the devs.
I know what they will say, as they already did.
A car on a picture of the steam page implies it's drivable, when every other car in the entire game and mod scene I know of. But this is debateble, and also offtopic, so I won't go further
it doesn’t imply anything
Is Creator DLC paid mods?
While we realize that opinions on this will vary, we don't consider Arma 3 Creator DLC to be paid mods. We believe that these DLC packs would not have otherwise existed or be possible as mods of similar quality and scope. It's also important to note that Creator DLC will never replace something that what was available for free.
There are plenty of non drivable vehicles in Arma. The submarine for example. Aircraft carrier. Destroyer. Etc.
oof
I would prefer if your constant shitting on other people and stating wrong things as facts just because you interpreted it that way would stop.
Multiple people called you out as trolling already and as a Moderator you look on edge. So I too suggest you stop that
I mean this is definitely true for the map. I can tell you that much.
what vehicle isn't drivable?
Wasn't there an Arma 2 "Free" I remember that 
pf has car props
This chat has been for hours shitting on other people and stating wrong things as facts about CSLA
I do agree that the map is nice, the custom new buildings are very nice and I like how they differ between the different sides of the border
personally I don't need another eastern/central europe map but that's just me
People who called me out as trollin where sending insults my way while I kept the discussion levelheaded for the most time
Man, I need it. I'm so tired of DesertMap123891723871 
Won't be surprised if I get muted anyway through, so I'll stop now like you said
please, for everyone's sake please stop defending the cDLC just because it's about Czech Republic and Cold War
it’s apparent you’re trolling
it's definitely been a back and forth between the two parties at this rate and it's tiresome
at best fanboying
is there anything like that in csla?
idk
No
not what I was saying

Agreed. Though I do hope interiors will be added
they are just as good as any mod
They're A2
they are? 
Well the Abrams is at least
yes
I think they're referring to the "volkswagen beetle" like vehicle?





