#ip_rights_violations

1 messages · Page 70 of 1

vivid scarab
#

For historical content it's a different issue entirely - this is largely why the miniatures industry isn't bogged down in a constant barrage of legal disputes over representations of military equipment.

#

For fictional content it's much more of a quagmire. That's the main difference between the Humvee issue and Star Wars.

heavy nacelle
#

Lets say I made a game about competition shooting as a civillian. And my artistic goal was max realism, then the 1st amendment gives me the rights to use real manufacturers designs and naming because it does infact further my goal towards realism.

#

Thats what I get from that article.

soft egret
#

More importantly, though, Daniels writes that "if realism is an artistic goal, then the presence in Modern Warfare games of vehicles employed by actual militaries undoubtedly furthers that goal."
He said that, the article didn't say that is a reason for allowing such use.

Him saying that doesn't imply "so if realism is an artistic goal, I can do anything I want"

faint nacelle
#

I'd wager answer would be something along "danger zone"

stiff jasper
#

but as HG said, asking a lawyer specialized in this "branch" would be the best option, such cases are unique in some aspects

soft egret
#

because of the killing civilians hot take
not killing civilians.
Civilians shooting other things

stiff jasper
#

brainlet moment, sorry

chilly silo
#

All, apologies for the interruption again: I've come back briefly to answer the accusations against me and make a suggestion for the rest of the community to consider. But first.

@cold rain - please don't bring my name into your arguments like this. You've quoted me out of context rather a lot.

@soft egret

okey here, all my messages from that evening to next day
How about the rest of it where you're crying about "my aggression" to try and get support of the others? Thats what i read in the morning and was disgusted about. Running off claiming ignorance to get sympathy and support. Even my god kids don't do that they they are 10.


To me it all looks like he's just trying to get people to attack be because "He made Rock leave".
And this, saying he was disgusted by my messages which triggered him to leave, again looks like an attempt of him to attack me and get other people to think I'm a bad person.```

My god you are good at spin and manipulation. You take so many things out of context and order.  Here's the Proper context:

[#ip_rights_violations message](/guild/105462288051380224/channel/105792634995388416/)

"I'm out, cya" refers to my veteran status.  I had already asked for it to be removed.

Blatant spin on your part.
#

See for yourself what he was so "disgusted" about.

As for why i was so disgusted that leaving seemed like the best way forward.

  • I was disgusted because of the way you trolled me and how I fell for it. My bad.
  • I was disgusted (and had been for some time) about the way people are afraid to challenge you for fear of being banned. Mods on here have a bad rep for being heavy handed for good reason.
  • I am still disgusted by the way that when someone disagrees with you, you try and mobilise support by spinning the situation. With hindsight the pattern is obvious.
  • I was disgusted when I realised how futile debating with you was. And how you switched track, and started to pick away at the Valve email. Blatantly trying to save some face as it contradicted your previous policy. It just felt like I'd wasted my time. And still does.
  • I woke up to find your posting in the Veteran's chat (parts that you havent shown I notice) claiming innocence in what looked ot me and others as lobbying for support. how much time i'd wasted debating and explaining.
#

As for mounting a slur campaign I really don't need to. You already have a reputation for being awkward, pedantic and a bully. My only crime is acknowledging that in public. Shame on me.

So moving past all that, here's what bugs me about this entire IP debate. You've all have the ability to ask Valve what thier license means. Everyone of you. Just contact support. Yet when everyone was endlessly debating here. No one emailed and asked. So I did it, I asked the questions I was asked to clarify. We all have the reply. It over turned the previous "policy" that you repeatedly enforced. (Something i dont have evidence for because - surpise - banning someone removes all their posts and evidence of what was said.) So we get the reply and almost immediately start criticising and nit picking what it means in what looks (by more than a few people I've spoken to) as an attempt to save face. Given previous occurances its the consensus that this is your form. So yeah I was both annoyed, frustrated and pissed off at myself that I was so obviously wasting my time.

So that answers some of your slur campaign against me. Which also apparently predates my exit from the server from what I understand. (Moderators talk too.)

So, the suggestion I mentioned.re: Valve the email and further questions.

Why don't we all compile our questions. All the little, nit-picking and obtuse ones that get constantly debated. List them here. Stick them in an email and ask Valve to help us out. Use that reply from the Actual Experts at face value to set the policy.

No more endless debates.
No more nit-picking of clauses to suit personal narratives and egos.
No more circular debates or creative spin.

I would do it myself. But according to dedmen I'm some sort of 'lying monster intent on Discord Domination'. Whomever does it, Should be trusted. So that rules out me an Dedmen doesn't it.

#

So lets start with @soft egret what do you think is not clear or is still debatable?

soft egret
#

How about the rest of it where you're crying about "my aggression" to try and get support of the others?
There is no rest. I screenshotted ALL my messages in the veterans channel between the start of our conversation in #ip_rights_violations and you leaving this discord.

  • I was disgusted because of the way you trolled me and how I fell for it. My bad.
    I never trolled you. I was trying to clarify a incomplete statement and you saw it as a attack towards you and we riled eachother up into a straight out war of you accusing me of trolling you and attacking you and stating you're wrong, and me trying to defend myself and try to explain that its not at all what I meant.

as it contradicted your previous policy.
It doesn't contradict my policy as it doesn't actually talk about that specific thing in the E-Mail.

And you repeatedly saying its "my policy" and I need to "save face" to protect it...
While its NOT my policy.
Quotes from myself from 2018!

ACE Team knows the Steam workshop rules quite well. [...] They can do whatever they want. I just said that Steam technically doesn't allow it. Which is true.
You can just ignore the Steam rules like thousands of other people are already doing though. No one's gonna stop you from doing that. Except the mod author if a author is not fine with you reuploading something

The ACE Team is fine with you uploading stuff. So feel free to do it.
It just technically violates the Steam Subscriber agreement and neither you nor me can do anything about it.
And thousands of people are already reuploading stuff and Steam didn't care till today. And we don't know if they might care in the future

So what I'd say is. Just reupload it.

Or here from me again from feb 2020

Technically yes, you didn't contribute, you can't reupload. But if the Author gave you explicit permission to reupload it, noones gonna bite your hand, except Valve when they notice you broke their subscriber agreement.

#

You are repeatedly making it sound like I'm banning/punishing people for that stuff, while I'm not at all.
You're accusing me of things I haven't done and I don't understand where thats coming from.
Yes I inform people about what the subscriber agreement says if they ask about it, but violations of it are Steams business, not my business as a Moderator.
Though I do know of one case where a moderator perm-banned someone for this (reuploading ACE compats I think), but it wasn't me and it doesn't match up with my views on the matter.

I woke up to find your posting in the Veteran's chat (parts that you havent shown I notice)
I have shown all my messages between your "I'm out. cya" and the time when you left the discord. Even the few days after that I only posted that one message in total.
Both according to the channel now, and our message deletion logs. I don't know what you're on about.

It over turned the previous "policy" that you repeatedly enforced.
No it didn't. As I messaged you in #veterans RIGHT after you got the reply from valve.

Moderators talk too.
The moderators that banned people for the "policy" you're trying to put on me which never was on me?
The moderators sharing lies and accusations about me because I put a stop to them when they went overboard and since then have a grudge against me for that?

I'm some sort of 'lying monster intent on Discord Domination'
Stop putting words in my mouth. The only problem I have with you is you attacking me for things I haven't done.

Stick them in an email and ask Valve to help us out.
As I understand @kind sand is already doing that.
Edit: yes he did, it went out on saturday.
It specifically asks about the "need to be a contributor" claim, and specifically about the steam subscriber agreement 6D (Rock's E-Mail reply talked about "online conduct" and didn't even mention the subscriber agreement that was in question)

#

Here another reply from me towards your ACE problem (someone saying they cannot reupload without being a contributor).
Immediately after you've shown the E-Mail from valve which you said answers that problem.

It was always my stance that we know ACE allows it, and don't take action against it just because steam subscriber agreement says so.
In my view that has never been a problem, which is why I asked that.
Yet you are repeatedly trying to put the opposite into my mouth

echo orchid
#

could you 2 give it a rest already

stiff jasper
#

or keep it on DMs clueless

coral cave
#

drama channel is drama ....

bitter sierra
#

i swear to god if i see people talking about ACE in this channel I am just going to send you raw fish by snail mail.

whole sedge
#

This is what happens when you believe you are never wrong.

tribal crest
#

Hey there, so a quick question for me as a unit mod dev

#

What would the best APL/other mod license be to basically say, "please don't touch our stuff"? 😆

#

Considering going with APL-ND but wanted to ask around about it

dull moon
#

ND is pretty much the definition of "don't edit my 💩"

faint nacelle
#

you can also just write a license file that says "don't touch my 💩"

chilly silo
#

(Rock's E-Mail reply talked about "online conduct" and didn't even mention the subscriber agreement that was in question)
The "online conduct" page is the simplified precis/summary of the "Steam Subscriber Agreement" ie they are the same thing. Just like CC licences have a simple summary, then the full licence.

https://store.steampowered.com/online_conduct/
https://store.steampowered.com/subscriber_agreement/

I thought that was obvious from the text of both pages when you actually read it?

kind sand
#

Again, the email points only to online conduct (which you call a 'simplified summary') rather than the text of the subscriber agreement which is where the text relevant to the particular issue is situated.

#

I know I've talked about this specific issue to death, but I'm just going to say that if a lawyer says 'just follow the simplified summary and you're fine' without acknowledging the potential for weird edge cases contained in the much longer text of the full license, then you should probably fire that lawyer.

chilly silo
#

Splitting hairs.
My original email specifically states Section 6d.
The reply is in context with that email.

As for "Any Lawyer telling me to follow the summary" I never said that happened. Only you did. But as you said - its now been done to death.

soft egret
fallen gale
#

Is porting all A2/A2OA/A2PMC campaigns (in their exact form) to A3 allowed?

faint nacelle
#

if they are in the released datapacks

fallen gale
#

do I have to download all of them?! meowsweats
cuz I already installed A2 and everything. I don't want to download the data all over again meowsweats
if anyone has it, can you tell me if they are in the pack?

south egret
wheat wave
#

(specifically a mission)

soft egret
#

Correct there were issues with that in the past @hollow rain

#

Unless he runs a monetized server I guess

fluid jewel
#

he only released that gamemode, he doesn't run any servers

#

and you can only get the actual gamemode files from patreon

#

I think that would count as selling a mod

hollow rain
#

I’ll pass it on, but yeah, needing to pay to get access to a Arma mission you created is not allowed without special circumstances.

burnt oak
#

most of the features listed are made by other community authors as well.

stiff jasper
#

@junior frigate what's the difference between the thing you uploaded on the workshop and the other hidden behind the paywall of your patreon?

junior frigate
#

C2 mod is selling on Patreon too and many others I don't get it?!

stiff jasper
#

what is C2 mod

soft egret
junior frigate
soft egret
#

Selling access to a dev build of a freely available mod is probably a bit different than outright selling a whole gamemode.
And also not allowed sure.

fluid jewel
#

C2 is still available on the workshop for free

rapid cypress
stiff jasper
rapid cypress
#

Aah oki

#

TIL

soft egret
#

As usual the "but others do it too so its fine" defence...
Yeah other people murder people and steal cars and break into peoples homes, that makes it fine right?
no..

junior frigate
#

If having a light version of the content on the workshop page is the point, there is no problem, I make it happen ✌️

rapid cypress
soft egret
#

Actually. Just saw you were already told about everything in CUP Discord, and subsequently banned when you refused to do anything about it.

fluid jewel
#

if you're only going to have a light version on the workshop, you're still selling the full version

soft egret
#

Just to inform you here. @junior frigate violating the Arma 3 EULA will get you banned from this Discord too if you refuse to stop violating it.

junior frigate
#

Sure I will Stop Violation

#

Give me some days

stiff jasper
fluid jewel
#

why do you need "some days" to upload a file to the workshop

stiff jasper
#

btw, how does "illegal" code monetization compare to, for example, paid extended support of my mod? Can I take money from someone in exchange for ad hoc help?

rapid cypress
#

Hm, without being too in-depth I'd say thats fine since you arent selling anything under the eula

#

your personal time/effort isnt covered by the eula, so

junior frigate
#

I'm in the middle of Moving so I don't have Access to any pc just my phone

soft egret
rapid cypress
fallen gale
stiff jasper
soft egret
#

Thats monetizing the mod.

#

Selling access to mod is no go, no matter if it maybe potentially becomes free someday

soft egret
soft egret
stiff jasper
#

oh, so there's no difference then

fallen gale
soft egret
#

Yep. Just saying too.
I called the police on them

fallen gale
#

wtf meowsweats
Is that ok?

brisk nexus
#

What if what you’re building requires arma tools?

faint nacelle
#

would that not be using arma tools commercially

#

if you use them and get paid for the time you use them

bitter sierra
#

Again, I'd be hard pressed to think of any court that would consider using a freely available tool to build something where the something is not being sold commercially as the same as being paid for your time in essentially a consulting role.

#

There is slight but fundamental differences in action.

faint nacelle
#

Id consult BI legal team

bitter sierra
#

I mean, I'd consult my own lawyer. Remember a EULA isn't magical. It has to be tested in court to have teeth.

faint nacelle
#

dangerous game

bitter sierra
#

BI can say their EULA also spawns unicorns on the moon.

river spear
#

I think this logic must have a flaw though. If this was entirely true, I could get visual studio community for my business and use it freely, since I create custom tailed software for each client, so I'm not selling a product created with it, I'm selling my time creating it

#

Or what's the difference I'm not seeing?

bitter sierra
#

It comes down to a product vs. a service and the commercialization of either.

#

And what commercialization actually means.

#

I could argue that every youtuber that has posted a video of Arma and received ad revenue is also commercializing Arma, more directly than if someone was consulting. Would that be the definition of commercialization that a court falls back on? Questionable. There is some case law there (see Nintendo) but its a pretty grey area.

brisk nexus
#

So I’ve always wondered, how do they pay CDLC creators that use Arma Tools to create stuff?

bitter sierra
#

I mean its a EULA, they can just go "doesn't apply to you"

river spear
#

Im pretty sure cdlc creators have special contracts

faint nacelle
#

CDLC teams sign agreement with BI

brisk nexus
#

Ah makes sense

bitter sierra
#

A EULA is just a contract that is possibly enforceable in a court.

#

It's not criminal or even civil code, at least in the US lol (and that'd suck to live in a country where it is).

#

And the entire concept of an EULA is pretty shaky in the US to start with.

coral torrent
#

Nah. Unless the EULA has statements contracting the applicable laws there is nothing to nag about. It's civil rights. If you enter in an agreement with BI not to commercially use the tools and break it the just sue you if they want. End of story. If you sell something that is impossible to be produced without the use of BI tools then you have 0 excuses.

bitter sierra
#

Not really. Again, if I wrote code for you and gave you the code and you then used the tools to build it, did I use the tools commercially?

coral torrent
#

Needless to say the BI EULA and also Steam for this sake was not put together by a few monkeys on a typewriter. Those are done by legal experts because the are the basis the the whole company stands on.

bitter sierra
#

And BI can sue, but that's a meaningless statement, again, because a EULA has to be tested in court and they have to show some sort of damage.

coral torrent
#

Code is fine. You can Programm without the use of BI tools. If you created a binarized p3d for examples ... not so much.

bitter sierra
#

Right, but again, that'd be selling a product, not selling your time.

coral torrent
#

That is not how commercial use works anywhere.

bitter sierra
#

If I give you the unbinarized models then I didn't use the tools, and you paid me for my time to make something.

coral torrent
#

Not in the US. Not in the EU. I download your non commercial use Image and sell it to someone. They don't pay for the image but for my time to find it? That's your logic?

bitter sierra
#

No, because that is copyright there.

bitter sierra
#

Right, so I don't know why you keep making up an argument that I am not even making to argue against me.

#

You're just being a contrarian.

brisk nexus
#

Wouldn’t a unbinarized p3d still be using arma tools?

bitter sierra
#

Doesn't have to.

brisk nexus
#

Don’t you need arma tools for toolbox to export a p3d?

coral torrent
#

Not after the blender plugin was broadly available and BI did not act upon it.

bitter sierra
#

Yea, thats the other thing too, is that BI would also have to be proactively going after these things to establish cause. BI is pretty permissive in what they let their user base do, which is good.

#

I mean almost all the major formats and systems are entirely reverse engineered at this point, sometimes with the direct blessing of C suite level BI people.

coral torrent
#

@bitter sierra there are very few things you can do and still play by the rules in terms of paid work in the BI universe. You made it sound like basically everything is fine. It isn't. 90% of paid work was and will be violating the rules. Because most people don't want a mod they have to finish up themselves.

bitter sierra
#

Again, it depends on how you go about it.

#

That's all I am saying.

#

TBF very few people actually pay anything close enough to be worth doing stuff related to Arma for money. Haha.

coral torrent
#

You'd think so but I can ensure you there are loads of money spent. 2 people I know could buy a house from it in Germany and did so. In 2 years, just from arma. After taxes.

bitter sierra
#

I meant development work, not running a Life server.

coral torrent
#

DayZ is even more valuable. The russians are selling anything they can to each other there. If you take 100€ for a mod pack and have 500 servers willing to buy it ... You do the math.

#

It was all "products" that were pre-made + extra money from specialized support for those who used it

bitter sierra
#

I guess yea. Forgot how many people play DayZ still

coral torrent
#

More players than Arma :)

bitter sierra
#

how far we stray from our milsim roots

faint nacelle
#

The blender plugin uses O2Script.exe to write the p3d

#

so it too fall under the umbrella

#

you can make and sell the .blend

coral torrent
#

Ah good info, I thought it was native. Then p3d is off the list again

faint nacelle
#

and the buyer then handles the importing into game on his own

bitter sierra
#

That easily could be replaced by open source tools.

faint nacelle
#

no problem there

bitter sierra
#

Mikero's entire toolset is basically defunct now.

brisk nexus
#

Yeah I was confused about that since I heard something about that

coral torrent
#

Mikero's tools rely on BI tools in many ways as well ... so don't consider them a replacement

bitter sierra
#

Yea

faint nacelle
bitter sierra
#

there is

#

its just the blender plugin doesn't use it

faint nacelle
#

yes that is what I said

paper prawn
bitter sierra
#

And the answer I provided in there is also:

Am I allowed to seek crowd-funding or other forms of donation towards my modding work?

Yes this is allowed, with the same rules = the access to data/content cannot be limited by any financial contribution.

In no way does this mean that Bohemia guarantees any compatibility or functionality now, or in the future for your modding work or that Bohemia endorses your project.

#

Also lol at the reverse engineering bit, most widely flaunted rule in the entire community

#

There would be no DayZ without reverse engineering

fallen gale
bitter sierra
#

There are better tool suites now like armake2 and HEMTT

tawny berry
#

not the right place to ask but is HEMTT being maintained ?

dull moon
#

yes, that's the totally wrong channel (if you're talking about the build system)

#

according to the github repo, last update was 5 months

crystal talon
#

from comments:

Courtland [author] 19 minutes ago
This is a really unpublished model anywhere and was made for personal use, unfortunately I cannot publish it, because it is the property of Red Hammer Studio.

echo orchid
#

@crystal talon - not much i can do unless that is published...

crystal talon
#

Probably still worth checking the mod if you haven't already

echo orchid
#

i will, tnx for headsup

hoary spear
indigo thorn
#

I still use Mikero’s tools. I’d not even heard of the others!

keen trout
hoary spear
#

👍 on both points.

random marsh
#

Quick question just to be sure. If a mod is released under the APL-SA, and they have the source on GitHub, I can modify anything there under the license and redistribute as long as I release it under the same license, correct?

soft egret
#

redistribute depends on where.
Some people have additional terms on APL-SA that limit where you can redistribute, and of course some hosting platforms too might limit what you can upload to there.

But yes

coral torrent
#

What I always wondered about ... if one asset in my mod is ADPL-SA ... do i need to make my whole mod ADPL-SA? Would it not be enough to to have a folder for it with a license file that says "this is ADPL-SA" and while the rest is something more restrictive? Some people seem to split their mods because of this, but i don't find anything regarding that. The SA clause only says Share Alike — If you adapt, or build upon this material, you may distribute the resulting material only under the same license.

hallow idol
#

RHS doesn't allow Retexture on some of their models while allowing it on the rest, I believe that is something along the lines of your question

#

You could read their license or ask PuFu for clarifications on how they wrote their license

coral torrent
#

I understand licenses files as "applies to this folder, and all its subfolders". So if i have two folders at the root, one for licensed content and one of my own stuff (both in the same pbo) but no license file at the root, and the "correct ones" in each of the main folders then I would think i am good to go ...

soft egret
hallow idol
#

I believe that is way overcomplicating it (what Arkensor said) - you can just state which class names fall under what licence

coral torrent
#

Alrighty, thx for the input

outer hamlet
soft egret
#

Don't know.
Easiest way always is to ask the author if he's fine with it

outer hamlet
#

Problem is that its allot of bureaucracy just to check with the author if he did allowed one mod to take it and use it so we mostly have to trust the moder word that he was allowed.

stiff jasper
faint nacelle
#

Only way to be sure is to make stuff yourself.

outer hamlet
#

Yes

crystal talon
#

Been up for a few months now

#

Guy also has reuploads of the other weapons packs

wary hollow
outer hamlet
#

Why was it removed?

rapid cypress
outer hamlet
#

what were the contents? I was interested in ask him about models

rapid cypress
faint nacelle
#

afaik he had nothing self made

soft egret
#

Kickass also contributed to some other bigger mods which caused huge issues down the line when his stuff turned out to be ripped.
But I only remember one case with some Swords from killing floor

#

So.. I'd recommend to keep a good distance

faint nacelle
#

he had stuff from Hitman games at least.

rapid cypress
#

which led to some... interesting steam discussion posts

faint nacelle
#

probably no need to dig that up again. 😛

rapid cypress
#

the thread was deleted, but it was a pretty fun read heh_r

indigo axle
vivid wave
#

It is

indigo axle
#

Thought so

maiden condor
fallen gale
#

This module was not made by me but I had the authorization to post it
thonk

maiden condor
#

Yeah....

glass yacht
#

TFAR reupload

#

@soft egret

rapid cypress
#

ConfusedDog why would anyone reupload tfar

#

it doesnt even say it has anything special

#

What does that reaction mean? @deft gazelle

deft gazelle
#

it means people do things for no reason, he probably reuploaded it just for the sake of reuploading it, i try not to put method to madness because theres rarely ever
it means im giggling because its just how it be sometimes

rapid cypress
#

Ah oki

carmine folio
#

I found good crye uniforms but im 99% sure theyre ripped from cod or some shit

#

BRUH OK I DIDNT LOOK AT HELMETS BUT THERES ONES WITH "COD" AS A PREFIX, 1984

#

dammit

#

Yeah the boots and shadows look similar to mw

#

Ill launch the game tommorow because its 1am and find the one with the funny ripped assets

#

Im not sure about alpha group being it since it looks clean

stiff jasper
#

Alpha group is to ugly to be ripped, and it uses either A2 gorkas or vanilla retextures

#

Why do people put random mods here and call them all ripped? That's cringe

indigo axle
hallow idol
#

Alpha group is all self made by the authors, and I would definitely not call it "too ugly to be ripped"

indigo axle
#

It pays to do just a little research

hallow idol
#

Furthermore having "COD" as a prefix doesn't mean something is taken from another game. Make sure that there is actual CODtent before reporting it through official means)

indigo axle
#

The first link has rips featured in the preview image

hallow idol
#

Wth is a "ripped feature" nvm misread

#

Eitherway I said what I said only for the sake of the pun at the end)

carmine folio
#

I suspected alpha but was like 90% sure on the first one

cinder ridge
hallow idol
#

Not the first time AGE has been posted here either.
Probably a combo of "SF = ripped" , "good looking = ripped" , and "Russian = ripped" train of thought that I see people sharing rather often

cinder ridge
#

Yeah I've seen it being brought up before, hence i'm wondering ¯_(ツ)_/¯

carmine folio
dull moon
#

as a reminder: no accusation stands unless undeniable proof is given. which is still missing...

cinder ridge
carmine folio
#

Literally put a guy with gear from it in a scenario,uninstalled it,and it said tfl packs are missing

stiff jasper
#

you still gave no proof of your words, but if you feel you're 100% right and you are sure you won't hurt your own reputation by wrongly accusing someone than read the channel description and use the email mentioned there to ask for a solution

#

and writing "Ripped from COD" is just a blunt statement, I don't really get what do you want to achieve by doing that tbh

dull moon
#

To cut things short: if content got ripped from a mod, and the creator is here, shoot him a PM.
If it's a user that is notorious for reuploading other mods (repeat offender) contact Dwarden with proof.
For anything else, use the email in the description and / or contact the original game studio

soft egret
#

"models came from great creators in the community"
think_turtle

"Models came from thieves that pretend they made the content they stole from great community modders"
FTFY

carmine folio
#

It literally stated shit like "missing files ade required for this scenario-tfl_nvgs

#

Etc

soft egret
#

Honger is still talking about the Alfa group one

#

not the TFL ripped stuff one

carmine folio
#

Ah

#

I didnt even comment on alfa group

carmine folio
hallow idol
#

@carmine folio
All TFL content isn't automatically ripped, so just because there are TFL requirements doesn't mean it is bad. Since TFL always gets taken down by USP, I guess they have only ripped their content (afaik some Backpacks) - it's either up to you to find what content in the mod is ripped, or up to e.g. Siege to go looking through it himself

carmine folio
#

There were backpacks that were probably ripped

hallow idol
#

Same thing goes for this mod - if it has TFL content which is theirs - it's TFLs problem. If it has TFL content which isn't theirs, it's the og modders problem

#

"probably ripped" isn't evidence, so if you're looking to be a 6 and report ripped content to USP, double your report to actually make sure there is USP there

soft egret
#

Well most stuff in TFL is ripped, and thats only the stuff we know the sources from.

hallow idol
#

Not 'probably', since otherwise you'll waste their time, and possibly the time of the guy who made the mod

carmine folio
#

Dude it had shit ripped from cod

hallow idol
#

Ok, and your proof is?

carmine folio
#

My eyes

#

Download the mod yourself

#

I'm not installing it

hallow idol
#

I also don't see how that is an issue of arma modders, e.g. USP - as somebody said above if you believe you are sure enough it's true, report it to the COD IP people

soft egret
#

I also don't see how that is an issue of arma modders, e.g. USP
Because they ripped stuff from USP and other mod makers too

hallow idol
#

I am reffering to COD things in the mod Dedmen, not the USP stuff

#

Also referring to the Russian mod, not TFL. I haven't seen any evidence that they have the USP stuff, yet

carmine folio
#

They have cod stuff for sure

hallow idol
#

Obv the stuff ripped from USP is USPs issue

soft egret
#

TFL stuff == known proven ripped content including COD and USP.
New mod contains TFL stuff, and just from looking at it you recognize COD content.

Chance that it really is ripped COD content? pretty high
Change that it also contains ripped USP content? pretty high too

#

Which is why he posted that here. Which is the correct thing to do to put it to the attention of the people who got their work stolen

hallow idol
#

Chances are not certainties (and this isn't TFL either, but a mod that ripped TFL) hence my point ot the guy - he should make sure its one or the other, and then report it to COD lawyers/Siege-A

soft egret
#

Which is why he posted it here, so that the people who own the content can look at it (Siege-A)

#

And as it contains ripped content from atleast one Arma mod, chances are it also contains ripped stuff from other mods.
Which is the reason why people post here, to inform modders of it so they can take a look at it.

hallow idol
#

That is fair, but then he went on claiming it already is, without any facts or proof.
I never said he shouldn't post it here, I said that him claiming something he isn't sure about isn't a good thing

#

Since that will start a very usual witch hunt where a mod is assumed to be stolen/ripped content just because some random claimed it here.

soft egret
#

Where did he claim that?

I found good crye uniforms but im 99% sure theyre ripped from cod or some shit
Yeah the boots and shadows look similar to mw
He says he thinks it contains ripped content, which is why he posted it here for people who know to take a look at

hallow idol
#

E.g. VSM being called ripped content still today, even through it never was

soft egret
carmine folio
#

There's also some backpacks and nvgs that i dont recongnize but were also high quality

#

I posted it here because it looked ripped

hallow idol
hallow idol
#

Point is - people claim today that VSM is still ripped content

#

Hence my guess they tried rebranding under MLO, but that's only a guess

soft egret
#

As far as I remember VSM renamed their mod to get rid of the ripped content smell

hallow idol
#

Exactly, but it didn't work so it's back to VSM

soft egret
#

Because back then VSM AIO contained ripped stuff. And people associated VSM == ripped.

#

MLO was known as all the non-ripped stuff from VSM seperated out

#

if they went back to the old name then.. unfortunate PR wise.

hallow idol
#

Well, I still see people claim MLO is ripped, so I'm guessing the name change didn't work

#

I wasn't aware of VSM AiO having ripped content, since when we where using it and it was pulled, and then put back up - nothing was missing from any loadouts, missions, etc

#

Point to this rambling is that people claiming "X is ripped" with the proof of "duude trust me" can and has started issues for mods

#

Since Im a 3rd party, I haven't downloaded the mod so I don't know if to attack it or defending, figuretivly, and all I'm seeing is "dude trust me" and "look at it yourself". When making negative statements such as "they have cod stuff for sure" - I simply ask for proof

soft egret
#

Yes.
But if we know for certain it's just a repack of a mod that we 100% know contains ripped content.
And then someone recognizes content from another game in there that we know was ripped by that first mod.

Then making the connection that its ripped really isn't far fetched or baseless.

#

So yes there are some cases of what you say, but this isn't one of them

hallow idol
#

Ofc, not saying its far fetched or baseless, I think it most probably is exactly that - some kind of illegal content, but point of a lack of proof stands, atleast imo

#

Since if nobody spoke up in the first place - this wouldn't be the only mod that was reported with that label, Alpha Group Equipment would've been under that label too

#

And just like that - the rumour and false info would spread, since people wouldn't check the mod themselves but only read the comments

#

Luckely AGE is pretty big now, but I remember following it when it just started and had a tiny following. Had it been reported then, its very unlikely anybody spoke up against it, and its riputation would be forever stain with those claims

soft egret
#

Alpha Group Equipment would've been under that label too
If people don't actually read what was written then sure..
He never said Alpha contains ripped content.

He said "one of these two mods contains ripped content, and I'm 90% sure its not Alpha, I'll verify it tomorrow"
If people make the connection "Alpha == ripped from that" then oof

#

Same as asking "I think this may be ripped, can anyone confirm?" doesn't mean that something is ripped, just that some user is unsure.

if people make the connection that its ripped then its not the posting users problem

hallow idol
#

Yeah, his words werent attacking AGE as much, your correct. But they are attacking the other mod, which is very likely, almost certainly ripped content, but still have no proof of it being ripped content presented other than "my eyes"

#

Since if AGE got the same treatment, which was my example, sure it wouldn't be true and would most likely get shut down after a few people checked, but the word would still be spread

#

Basically tl;dr: I'm saying to not slander until there is absolute proof of the slander

soft egret
#

But they are attacking the other mod, which is very likely, almost certainly ripped content, but still have no proof of it being ripped content presented other than "my eyes"
He has proof that TFL is in there, and we know TFL is ripped content. Thats pretty sufficient proof

hallow idol
#

Well, some TFL is ripped content, not all, so depends on what part of TFL that mod is using

#

E.g their vests all are completely made inhouse, I believe by a commissioned artist, or a guy in the group

soft egret
#

E.g their vests all are completely made inhouse
I know of several of their vests that have parts ripped from USP

hallow idol
#

Some* of their vests, not all

#

I wont speak for all of them, since I don't know about that. My bad

soft egret
#

Again.

TFL == Known and proven to contain ripped content from COD
That mod above == Known and proven that it contains some "TFL" content.
That mod above == User recognised COD content in there.

At that point I would rather ask for proof of it not being ripped than other way around.

hallow idol
#

Well, it's personal preference of when enough proof is sufficient enough. I was just thinking of 'beyond any reasonable doubt' in this case

soft egret
#

Yeah I guess "reasonable doubt" is different for different people.
For me "Mod 1 contains ripped stuff, Mod 2 is repack of Mod 1, Recognized ripped content in Mod 2" is sufficient beyond resonable doubt for me

echo orchid
#

@soft egretit contains a fuckton of RHS ripped content, as with anything FLB

soft egret
#

Well that solves that

echo orchid
#

@hallow idollisten, since i keep seeing you come in here and protect obvious ripped content

#

there is NOTHING with a FLT prefix done by that bloke

#

everything and i actually mean everything contains ripped content from various places

hallow idol
#

As I said, I haven't even downloaded the mod. I didn't defend the mod, or atleast didn't intend for it to seem like I did, I said very most likely is ripped

#

It was more because of AGE being reported, which could've had the same treatment happen with it

#

Luckily it didn't, but seeing the environment here - it could've

#

That mod was just an example used, since even through its very likely ripped, the guy saying "hes sure about it" actually wasn't sure, only assuming (like myself) hence its better to have a more official person, e.g. you - make that call/judgement

echo orchid
#

while in theory i am in agreement, there are various well known exceptions, including everything TFL

#

of course it is advisable to presume nothing, and notify people who's content might have been ripped and/or missued before self-concluding anything, unless the one concluding goes through the obvious steps required to confirm/infirm it

hallow idol
#

That is what I was getting at more or less

#

If its the case that all of TFL is considered ripped, then my bad for the misinformation from my part, I wasn't aware of that

echo orchid
#

that being said, while i actually always not just visually confirm shit, but actually take apart the mod and dig for the files and configs and what not, not everyone has either the know how or the tools to do that

#

and (un)fortunatelly i can only take the necesary legal steps for content that i (co-)own, not everything i have seen (bar notifying the other original creators)

#

and yes, considering i have taken apart TFL pbos/p3ds multiple times now, i know what they contain, and nothing minus some poor ass retextures are self-made

#

the models are, all of them, ripped, either from existing arma mods, dayz sa, and/or other games

carmine folio
worldly condor
#

Has anyone ever seen a mod that has skeletons as zombie entities? I know there was one, but was it removed or something a while back?

faint nacelle
unreal mountain
dull moon
#

@unreal mountainno links without description

unreal mountain
#

Advertisement on YouTube for a mobile game called Battle Warship : Naval Empire using Arma 3 footage

#

I can’t embed pictures one momento

faint nacelle
#

@unreal mountain~~ no advertisment on this server~~ nevermind you meant to report it

unreal mountain
#

Lmfao

faint nacelle
#

always helps to describe what you link

unreal mountain
#

Well lads, I was still typing when the what is the link description was asked.

earnest mirage
#

definetly gonna try that Game now/s

runic wraith
soft egret
last torrent
#

Hey, uh... what's the policy on BankRev-ing BI's own PBOs?

#

And yes, I have read the EULA, and I find the wording finicky for my mind that did not attend six years of law school, since it specifically speaks of modding as well yet here we are.

faint nacelle
#

setting up P drive correctly extracts A3 data on your P drive

#

what you can do with that data is limited though

last torrent
#

I'm mostly curious about the interpretation of "reverse engineering" because as far as I can tell, looking at the configs to find out how things work fits the exact definition of reverse engineering according to Merriam Webster.

faint nacelle
#

configs are straight available through game too

mortal dust
#

With Games Workshop updating the IP guidelines, is the 40k mod for Arma 3 called "There is Only War" at risk?

faint nacelle
#

reverse engineering afaik in this case refers to breaking open the things that are not openable after P drive setup

#

so models

last torrent
#

Yes, through the cfgViewer, but that one is not 1:1 to how the game wants it to look in order to actually work.

faint nacelle
#

and the games DLLs and executables

#

@last torrent Id think 10+ years of modding should have already established that it is ok

last torrent
#

Don't worry. I'm on the paranoid side, and I realized that with the EULA as it is, they could go 180 at literally any moment and claim it has always been written so.

#

Doesn't mean I'm having a reasonable line of thought, but the reverse engineering part made it really... weird. Because, once again, looking at anything seems to fit the definition.

faint nacelle
#

time will tell

stiff jasper
#

if 40k models added to Arma can be used to 3D-print figurines based on those then Games Workshop will probably intervene and ask to cease the development

sinful pivot
#

I don't think there would be any reason to go after mods specifically. To get to the point where you could use a model from a mod downloaded on the workshop, you would have to do enough transformative work that it's arguable the original intent of the author has been lost. If the original author goes and uses the same model for his mod, as he does a custom print, that's a different story

stiff jasper
#

so why do they go after fanfic youtube videos? if those are treated as a threat to IP, then I bet mods are at least in the same category of "danger"

sinful pivot
#

honestly, I don't know why they'd go after fan animations specifically, and not other forms of fan art as well, such as 2d and 3d art pieces, of which I'd say mods are a part of (essentially 3d fan art that you can use). I'd think due to the traction that high quality animations can get they want to control that specific part

soft egret
soft egret
# last torrent Doesn't mean I'm having a reasonable line of thought, but the reverse engineerin...

reverse engineering file formats not intended to be open or the game itself is not allowed.

But BI specifically offers you all configs and scripts ingame (config viewer, function viewer) for you to look at and learn from.
And also distributes official tools to unpack these.

If you have to manually really actually reverse engineer some file format, or use some shady third party tool to unpack/look at a thing, you can assume you're doing something you shouldn't

soft egret
#

unauthorised use of our trademarks - unauthorised use or registration of our trademarks in respect of similar products or services is not permitted.
That depends of course, what do they actually have Trademarks on

#

Games and apps – individuals must not create computer games or apps based on our characters and settings. These are only to be created under licence from Games Workshop.
Depends if you count a free mod == computer game (which would assumably be a paid product)

Ofc the last point on the page is the most critical one, yeah that could mean something

stiff jasper
#

WH40k logo and the eagle are the "most forbidden" trademarks, I believe only the latter shows in the TIOW, but from what I remember it's modified because GW has been sending their sad lawyers everywhere since forever

#

i wonder about imitation models - our products must not be imitated. Imitators produce models which copy heavily from Games Workshop’s artwork, books or products. part, because they do not precise what the models are

#

i mean the figurines or just the project

soft egret
#

Reading that I expect 3D models aka figurines.
Probably best to ask for clarification, they neatly directly provide the email there

stiff jasper
#

GW, Games Workshop, Citadel, Black Library, Forge World, Warhammer, the Twin-tailed Comet logo, Warhammer 40,000, the ‘Aquila’ Double-headed Eagle logo, Space Marine, 40K, 40,000, Warhammer Age of Sigmar, Battletome, Stormcast Eternals, White Dwarf, Blood Bowl, Necromunda, Space Hulk, Battlefleet Gothic, Dreadfleet, Mordheim, Inquisitor, Warmaster, Epic, Gorkamorka, and all associated logos, illustrations, images, names, creatures, races, vehicles, locations, weapons, characters, and the distinctive likenesses thereof, are either ® or TM, and/or © Games Workshop Limited, variably registered around the world. All Rights Reserved.
these are all of their trademarks, always listed everywhere so people don't have to search too long

manic laurel
manic laurel
last torrent
soft egret
#

Same for most other people

last torrent
#

Even the existence of the EBO is annoying but understandable. And even then it's really an annoyance at the fact that some people insisted on being assholes to the point where the need for the EBO arose.

soft egret
#

but even with ebo, functions/config viewer lets you look inside there

last torrent
#

Exactly. Let's be fair: A3 is the one where you guys really out did yourselves in terms of user friendliness.

#

The level of tutorials for literally everything reached a new high, the tools also seem to have a good deal of improvement (can't really judge, haven't used previous tools all that much) and we got a Config, Function and Animation viewer right in the game itself. 3Den is a chapter all of it's own, as is Zeus. In my opinion, the series has seen several times the improvements since the release of three than it has between 2001 and 2013.

#

But yeah. BankRev and Notepad. I don't make models or textures myself (fortunate enough to be in a team and others can make that) so all I need is to know the ins and outs of the configs.

quiet finch
#

EBOs were a step in the wrong direction though.

faint nacelle
#

ebos dont really hinder any legit modding

last torrent
#

No, an inconvenience does not equal hinderance in any meaning of the word that I know of.

rapid cypress
rough ivy
pliant oar
#

see you end with catch 22, some demand no encryption/protection and some demand more than now

quiet finch
#

Why would you demand encryption. It actively reduces modding potential.

dull moon
#

does it tho?

#

configs could still be read via config browser, and for the rest there are countless tutorials

soft egret
#

"reduces modding potential" textures you can still get at if you want to make retextures.
Model files you cannot modify anyway.
Audio files you have no reason to modify? Not sure if allowed either?
Config files and scripts are still completely open to you.

Unless of course you mean the modding potential of removing DRM off of DLC content to be able to use it for free because you don't want to pay for the DLC.
Thats piracy and thats exactly why EBO exists

bitter sierra
#

it is annoying we cant get to the WRP file in ACRE to parse it

#

in an EBO

burnt oak
#

i am wondering when for example contact gets fully de-ebo'd like all other bi dlcs

soft egret
earnest mirage
# burnt oak i am wondering when for example contact gets fully de-ebo'd like all other bi dl...

Not at all, since PBOs can be sent around, and DePBOd with Programms Like Eliteness, Contact Platform DLC, must be loadet via the Launcher manually while the Basic stuff contact offers (Like all the guns, the map and stuff) is Always available

You wouldn't DeEBO GM, PF or CSLA either, because that could Open These DLCs To Potential piracy (Pls correct me If im wrong, thats how i understood it)

burnt oak
earnest mirage
#

Ahhh okay, didn't know that

rapid cypress
#

Might be something for a FT ticket sippy

#

!ft

little coralBOT
fallen gale
fluid jewel
#

the content that people would want to be able to access for modding isn't singleplayer-only though

#

keep the actual campaign EBO'd, I don't think anyone is interested in looking inside those PBOs

rapid cypress
#

waveboyel I'm interested

#

I want to go poke at their scripting and see how they do stuff

ivory sable
tulip nexus
#

Hat's from RHS at least. @echo orchid will do his thing

dull moon
#

Thx, will have a look later

#

On a first look, the stuff is surprisingly familiar.
Good thing that scans on gmod might be available on the crawler at some point

fluid jewel
#

I don't think either of those addons contain any of those weapons in the images

echo orchid
#

@ivory sable@tulip nexuscheers DMCA filled

fluid jewel
#

was there actually anything from RHS in there?

tulip nexus
#

patrol cap mentioned in the description and shown in the images is from RHS

#

Helmet looks like our too

fluid jewel
#

oh yeah, the patrol cop is very obviously RHS

stiff jasper
#

those uniforms are RHS too or is it custom?

tulip nexus
#

Kneepads in RHS? Don't be daft!

burnt oak
scarlet patrol
#

hey I noticed the crawler is back online but doesnt seem to be working?

#

unless every single rhs repack has been killed

indigo axle
#

It worked for me a couple of days ago

dull moon
#

it's still indexing iirc

river spear
#

yep, 51984 items remaining out of 93k or so

indigo axle
keen trout
#

DO NOT UPLOAD THE HELMETS ON THE WORKSHOP OR OTHER WEBSITES AND CLAIM THAT ITS YOURS, I PAID FOR THE HELMETS, VESTS, UNIFORMS TO GET PORTED!!!

#

🙈

stiff jasper
#

paying for stolen stuff incident incident

#

to be honest this is one of the shittiest looking mod on Workshop I've ever seen, I think I'd rather play with some massi's stuff instead

indigo axle
unreal mountain
#

Don't worry it's not stolen

#

I paid someone to steal them!

faint nacelle
#

You'll need to report to the developer company. They can then dmca it. @indigo axle

carmine folio
#

Erika somethin

#

Dumbass moment

carmine folio
#

Said it in the comments

stuck ledge
fallen gale
#

I think it just went private (according to a comment by the author)

stuck ledge
#

that would make more sense

carmine folio
#

And i have screenshots

#

Too bad he literally said you ported some stuff

wind stirrup
crystal talon
#

It is an IP rights violation

carmine folio
#

So you're incriminated troll

wind stirrup
carmine folio
#

Ok

wind stirrup
#

You're just another clown

carmine folio
#

Well now i have a screenshot of another ripper saying you did stuff

#

The incredibly tough anime fan

wind stirrup
#

Well, it's good that you have this screenshot, I'm really happy for you. Print it out and hang it in a frame on the wall. You will continue to satisfy your ego.

#

Listen, I'm not interested in talking to a person who is getting personal at all.

carmine folio
#

Bruh i just dont support ripping shit

wind stirrup
#

You can write anything and to anyone. And what you want about me. But you should know that I did not start this discussion. So for now.

carmine folio
#

Its more important for bohemia interactive

crystal talon
#

@soft egret @manic laurel

carmine folio
#

Since well,Activision is quite a big company ,also a problem for valve for hosting ripped content

faint nacelle
#

@wind stirrup your mod is ip theft not a port. dont be a dick about it, you are at fault here and have done wrong.

#

if you want make mods, make mods with legit content and not stolen models.

manic laurel
fluid jewel
#

can we maybe not compare ripping a model from some game to bank robbery

#

stealing a pen from a bank might be a more appropriate comparison

manic laurel
#

not the same range, of course
but, you know, it is a figure of speech called "exaggeration" to outline the fault in logic - not rate the fault itself

faint nacelle
#

I dont think hes on the server anymore

#

@fluid jewel wrong is wrong, people seem to not understand that

manic laurel
fluid jewel
#

well yeah, stealing a pen from a bank is technically wrong too

faint nacelle
#

its shitty move to downplay IP theft

manic laurel
plain rivet
#

I still don’t understand how people can claim that IP theft is fine

#

Like, why

echo orchid
indigo axle
#

What even.

#

I obviously missed something

carmine folio
#

Called the guy's friend out

#

And he was incriminated as a ripper

fluid elbow
frozen forge
#

Regarding Mechwarrior on the IP section of the Bohemia community wiki, as far as im aware wouldnt any mods be dealing with Microsoft (and their development rules?) a recent example being Living legends 2 having been greenlit by microsoft. (another fan project being Wolves)

#

(Ie. battletech belongs to them (Topps), all mechwarrior games related content is under a license owned by microsoft)

#

We’ve decided to abandon the MechWarrior 5 mod and publish Living Legends 2 independently under Microsoft’s Game Content Usage Rules! Other games published under the same framework include Wolves, a spiritual successor to MechAssault, and the Halo fan game Installation 01.```
faint nacelle
#

Someone would need to get clarification from MS or whoever holds the license at the moment

#

most latests Battletech games are not by Microsoft

#

MWO/ Mechwarrior 5

frozen forge
#

Microsoft has the Sole right to create and license battletech/Mechwarrior games

faint nacelle
#

alrighto. then clear answer from MS will be needed

#

then again. Arma engine is a bit limited when it comes to mechs

#

so Im a bit doubtful anyone will even try

delicate hamlet
#

LL and Wolves have permission from MS iirc, explicit written permisson. Since MW5/MWO and MechAssault are their property.

faint nacelle
#

mmm no MS does not own those?

#

mechassault yes,

#

MWO and MW5 are made by Piranha Games

#

in act case, if anyone wants to make a Mechwarrior mod for Arma then they will need to contact MS for permission to use the IP

long talon
#

General question: do people consider an excerpt of a mod (taking a single weapon out of a pack) to be an adaptation under Creative Commons-NoDerivs license? I'm reading the exact wording of the license and it appears to be allowed to me.

manic laurel
#

I think it is not
modpack = usage of a piece of work in another one
= derivative

#

the whole mod is one piece, if you take parts of it to assemble something else you derivate it to create a new thing

opal jay
manic laurel
opal jay
manic laurel
manic laurel
opal jay
#

A lot of it is for insurgency too, I'll email BSG, but I thought maybe a dev flagging it to valve might be quicker

long talon
#

NonDeriv section says "an unaltered excerpt" is acceptable and compares it to a book chapter, When translating the wording to pbos it is permissible under the wording, at least to my interpretation

Also it wouldn't be presenting the work as original of course.

#

"an adaptation requires original expression"

opal jay
#

You should most definitely contact the author. I think CCND technically says you can share it unaltered,

But assuming you're pulling one thing out of a pack, you're altering it, literally and creatively.

faint nacelle
#

@long talon in most cases you can't take out some small part of a mod like a weapon without editing config or texture paths. And in most cases mod makers really really hate when people do this.

#

Or try to do it. And it is grounds for DMCA .

long talon
#

Yeah I guess the intent is to disallow excerpts.

The NoDeriv license doesn't seem like the right license to use for them though, something more explicit would be better.

faint nacelle
#

to me its very weird thought that it has to be specifically said that dont take my stuff.

long talon
#

If they say nothing then "don't take my stuff" is the default, I wanted to do this so I checked the license, and couldn't make my mind up on what the intent was.

limpid osprey
carmine folio
#

Dude the patches look shit compared to the uniform

#

Holy shit just looked at the bottom link,clearly a rip SCspin

manic laurel
#

Easy on the language thanks

runic wraith
#

@pliant oar I'd like to see about having a workshop ban placed against the uploader here: https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2567144122&searchtext=Gatekept

Over time we have dmca'd this individual roughly around 3-4 times now. He is part of a group formerly known as TFL, which has been well known to steal assets from other authors in this community, as well as porting ripped content from various games. They have stolen content and been DMCA'd by USP, RHS, S3S, and many other community mod teams. This recent upload once again contains content belonging to USP and undoubtedly several others. Not to mention its riddled with other ripped content taken from Call of Duty. One look at the 'team' he has listed on the workshop page can give an idea of the many undesirables that are a part of it, several individuals which have had multiple violations reported against them and are banned from this community.

manic laurel
#

lovely people indeed

runic wraith
#

Quite the toxic bunch

manic laurel
#

I don't get how it can be that successful in only one day
are they self-attributing points for visibility or what?

faint nacelle
#

pretty much

runic wraith
#

Most likely their fan crowd

faint nacelle
#

such rebels

manic laurel
#

zomg yiss
don't cut yourself with all that edge 😁
anyway, repeated offender should be workshop ban yes

dull moon
#

provide dwarden with enough evidence

rapid cypress
#

wtf is even going on in the comments

runic wraith
#

Man children doing what they do best

#

And here is that users twitter page, where he seems to be proud to be the maker of 'illegal mods'

runic wraith
dull moon
#

don't you keep a log?

#

like, internally?

#

like such

empty heath
runic wraith
#

We do list the URL for every mod that we have DMCA'd in our discord, but linking that here will only result in the page not being found (since it was already taken down) and isn't going to show the uploader

dull moon
#

we link the user accounts

runic wraith
dull moon
#

and a list of the content they have uploaded as TXT

cedar flint
runic wraith
# dull moon and a list of the content they have uploaded as TXT

So this needs to be done for every DMCA that we issue? Just log the username and workshop page in a text document? I still don't see how that would be proper evidence when none of the pages taken down in the past would be accessible anymore. Is there a way for Dwarden to access workshop logs for indivduals, which include items they have previously had dmca'd before?

manic laurel
cedar flint
#

I do hope. But ik what the 'community' can be like

manic laurel
#

@empty heath right 😁

cedar flint
manic laurel
steady hatch
#

Just remove the mod

#

The guy uploaded it as a meme

rapid cypress
#

workshop ban and remove mod

#

I mean 1 includes 2 anyways, but ya know

lapis stratus
#

I mean their mods are cool

brisk nexus
manic laurel
fallen gale
#

it's not their mod to begin with ^^

wheat belfry
# fallen gale it's not their mod to begin with ^^

A fair bit of it is original content that they had commissioned or made but it still has ripped assets. Like the SPC and MPU5s were all modelled by Vielmond. Whereas the JPC and AVS were commissioned a while back. Not saying there's not ripped content but a fair bit of it isn't

rapid cypress
#

Then they should upload the mod with only their own content in it blobdoggoshruggoogly

stiff jasper
echo orchid
lapis stratus
#

Lmfao like you guys asked permission from mechanix to use their gloves in arma

carmine folio
#

Lol

echo orchid
#

where do you some of you people have been hiding til now?

lapis stratus
#

What

charred basalt
#

😅

manic laurel
dull moon
#

And what you are saying is total BS that makes no sense at all

manic laurel
lapis stratus
#

Isn't it spam if it say it repeatedly?

manic laurel
#

spam is "unwanted/unneeded message" basically.

lapis stratus
#

Fine fine won't do it again y'all need to calm down

manic laurel
#

thank you very much.

#

So, just for your information, if something licensed is displayed in RHS, it is highly likely that they have the permission for it - they are very serious about it.
Hence why your comment was dismissed as irrelevant.

lapis stratus
#

Have you guys ever tried to entertain private mod makers? like idk give them a chance

dull moon
#

a chance of what?

manic laurel
#

"private mod makers"? 🤨

brisk nexus
#

Lmfao

dull moon
#

oh for fucks sake

lapis stratus
#

I'm asking

manic laurel
#

have you tried bank robbery? I mean it's illegal but it's good money

dull moon
#

"have your thought of giving the child molester a chance? it's basically just love......." /s

lapis stratus
#

Well excuse me i have limited knowledge that's why i ask

manic laurel
#

if you want to learn, we are all here to explain!

vestal remnant
#

Hi all, a few months ago I sold a model to a customer and after that I saw Intellectual Property page on the Bohemia Interactive and it says selling p3d's are forbidden. I researched on the internet before selling but I couldn't find what I'm looking for which is clearly says what's forbidden and what's not forbidden like in the Intellectual Property page, I always follow rules so doing such a thing annoying me and I want to share this with you to toward me what can I do?

#

also I'm able to contact with him

manic laurel
faint nacelle
#

what you can do is sell source models you make

#

like .blend, .fbx, obj and texture files

#

but Arma Tools are non commercial

#

so anything done with them is not allowed to be sold

#

and ArmaToolbox addon for blender that produces p3d also uses part of the Arma Tools to create the p3d

vestal remnant
#

okay, thanks for your understandings, I'll contact with him and ask if he wants a refund

#

yes now I'm using .blend files

runic wraith
#

Big brain time. What you're essentially saying is the sources that they ripped the content from are the ones responsible for it being high quality. Those sources being COD, RHS, USP, etc etc. While we do appreciate the compliment, some of us actually put quite a bit of time into making those things look high quality as you have described. So we're not too keen on allowing others to take it and claim it as their own, and as the content authors, we are allowed to decide what you can and can't do with our assets. Is it starting to make sense to you now?

lapis stratus
#

sure

echo orchid
#

dude, really?

kindred viper
#

IMO only PuFu and people that are actual IP rights lawyers should be able to speak in here. Everybody else just gets butthurt.

wheat belfry
#

It's basically drama channel

dull moon
#

"boohoo... he made an extreme comparison...!"
unlawful actions are unlawful actions.

wheat belfry
#

by your logic, IP Theft, murder and rape should all have the same repercussions?

#

there's degrees of unlawful action

#

and the fact you made that comparison is wrong at the core

dull moon
#

but sadly IP theft gets sentenced harder than rape

#

not to mention financial crimes

#

oh boy

haughty torrent
dull moon
wheat belfry
#

Could you answer GUS' question though please?

dull moon
#

yes, the mix is not the best.

#

Rock answered it in the podcast

wheat belfry
#

You have a timestamp?

haughty torrent
#

The first few minutes stated to not use the podcast for any legal advice because you two were not professionals in law and are simply discussing your own views

#

@dull moon

kindred viper
#

LOL

haughty torrent
#

So thats crazy, im asking for legal and clear direction to better understand the situation

#

Not a biased podcast

dull moon
#

views, and years of experience in fields that have a lot of IP and copyright stuff going on

#

as for you question (since you don't wanna listen...)
recreating equipment and patterns are an "artistic recreation" like a photo. as long as you can photograph it, you can recreate on the computer (simplified)

#

as long as no trademark is violated (using protected terms or brands in clear name) you are good

haughty torrent
dull moon
#

as long as no trademark is violated (using protected terms or brands in clear name) you are good

haughty torrent
#

In the Case of USP, RHS, CUP all clearly show brands and logos visibly identified on clothing and gear

#

Would that not be a violation??

#

If not how so?

#

Theres a reason why arma didnt have crye or strict patented camos in the base game. They would need the rights no?

dull moon
#

many companies tolerate non-commercial use for artistic recreation, others hand out permissions

haughty torrent
#

Well the Navy is not a company and have pretty strict rights to AOR1 and AOR2, big game companies have struggled at times to get these rights which is why we see “desert digital” instead of “AOR1”

#

USP clearly uses AOR1 and AOR2

#

Also is crye one of these companies that tolerate non commercial use?

wheat belfry
#

I've never seen an official stance from Crye

dull moon
#

to my understanding the name "AOR-1" is a military designation which can not be patented

haughty torrent
dull moon
#

like M4, M16, M-whatever

hushed niche
haughty torrent
#

Point im making is it seems like groups ignore the entire law for the sake of their own personal benefit but then bash others for “ripping” assets

#

When arguably you would be “ripping” off major companies without obtaining the legal rights

knotty pewter
#

big companies probably don't pay much attention to mods for a niche game. Unless people are profiting off there gear or making the company look bad.

wheat belfry
#

I imagine commission stuff is where a red flag is raised

faint nacelle
#

@haughty torrent you will have to consult a lawyer if you want legal advice on such matters.

wheat belfry
#

Should devs not know this?

faint nacelle
#

I understood answers given by people here were not satisfactory

#

-> next step: talk to IP lawyer

haughty torrent
#

Thats funny, bunch of grown men tossing around the law and bashing others based off individual interpretation. As a community how can we all reach an understanding if the side “flashing” creative rights knowledge around or “intellectual property” cant even factually inform their audience

hushed niche
#

“The recent spate of cases discussed above have generally upheld, on First Amendment grounds, a developer’s right to include unlicensed trademarks in video games. Following the Supreme Court’s clarification that video games are expressive works, this right to use trademarks is only becoming even clearer. “ - Sean F Kane. Pillsbury Law Offices

Guess it falls under fair use

#

I can send the full article I found on the topic if required but I think posting an unrequested link is not exactly pretty

fiery dragon
dull moon
#

no, fair use is something different

hushed niche
#

Regardless that’s a statement from a lawyer on the topic

haughty torrent
dull moon
#

(one of many examples)

haughty torrent
dull moon
#

nothing keeps you here

manic laurel
#

we gather and redistribute all the documentation we have.
I also count on everyone to keep it civil, thank you.

steady hatch
echo orchid
#

are you actually comparing digital recreation of product X with reverse engineering/ ripping other people work?

#

because that is what this seems to happen here

#

does any of you comprehend that without these free mods there would be (less) stuff to use for everyone, not just the ones ripping parts?

#

i am already sick of self centered assholes that consider is fine doing that, and will most likely not gonna finish and/or release any of the things i have been working on, because duck you motivation

#

and if brand names (and btw, we have permissions from a few) is something that is bothering any of these companies, or any of the users of our free released content, we could be notified by their representatives

#

most people here doing mods from scratch are not ignorant, nor 2 sided

runic wraith
# haughty torrent When arguably you would be “ripping” off major companies without obtaining the l...

If you have such an issue with it, contact those brands/companies that you believe we are infringing upon and see what they do about it. We are a non-commercial mod and we have yet to receive any sort of C&D letter from any of the brands that we base our creations on. So maybe they don't know or they just don't care. Unfortunately for the guys ripping our stuff, we do care, and as such we do file DMCA's. Sounds to me like some of you are just reaching as hard as you can to justify those ripping content from others.

echo orchid
#

everyone is well within their own rights to protect their own digital products. and btw, a digital representation of a real world object is just that - an artistic, subjective and most likely eyeballed representation of that thing

#

not an 1:1 copy, just like a painting and/or a photo of a car is not a car

#

and if brands would be such an issue, then none of these brands products would be available for purchase on large digital stores like cgtrader and turbosquid

#

you do not need to believe me bluntly you can feel free to have a word with your lawyers

haughty torrent
#

Interesting, so why is it that some game developers do not include licensed products in their games? It seems as if the right to market these products is still necessary as you can easily misrepresent the company. The argument that “what they dont know wont hurt them” seems to be used which is cool, but then you cant blame people for taking the same approach when it comes to ripping other content. I could easily be wrong but that bit of grey area seems to turn into more of a moral argument. I understand the legality of posting copyrighted content so that isnt my argument, but the idea to silence and shun those that want to play “Legos” with assets seems hypocritical. But i suppose thats where we agree to disagree

runic wraith
#

Are those game developers charging money for their game product?

haughty torrent
#

Are people charging who are ripping?

runic wraith
#

You fail to understand that there is a big difference between commercial and non-commerical works. A difference that weighs heavily on whether a company is going to act on those seeking to use their likeness or brands in their mod/game/whatever. Some being more lenient than others.

#

Your comparison is making no sense here

haughty torrent
#

Arguably there are many developers that add free expansions to games that would still follow those limitations and would require permission. While i agree that making profit is an extremely important factor so is public attention or the overall user base when worried about brand misrepresentation

faint nacelle
#

ripping is not same as using a likeness of a thing

#

and both are easy to solve by asking permission and if denied moving on to make something new instead

haughty torrent
#

My problem was that both sides aren’t asking for permission

#

Yet we are judging one and not the other based off of individual interpretation or feelings

faint nacelle
#

like I said its 2 very different things

#

but I feel I dont have the energy to continue this to convince you that ripping is bad and equals to stealing something from the guy who made the model/textures to a possible likeness of a real thing,

haughty torrent
#

Vice versa which is fine, its a great thing we can agree to disagree

faint nacelle
#

sure. If you approve of ripping also dont expect me to help you with your modding questions in the future.

wheat belfry
faint nacelle
#

none.

wheat belfry
faint nacelle
#

I dont recognise your name either tho

#

so blobdoggoshruggoogly

wheat belfry
faint nacelle
#

plenty

#

you can do a search on the maker channels here to see who answers most of the questions,

#

if we are here to measure e-pen

wheat belfry
#

Ite just checking lol, would be weird if you said that about modding questions and had no experience

#

Please chill, I meant it as a genuine question. I don't see the need to get so damn defensive and confrontational

#

Apologies if it came off rude

faint nacelle
#

accepted

manic laurel
torpid hull
#

😐

wheat belfry
#

in a non rude way may have been clearer lol

hushed niche
#

The main takeaway I have from this conversation today is the question of whether or not creating assets using the IP of a company that was not asked can void the right of the creator to defend against derivative works or apply for a Creative Commons license.

Because as we’ve established with ripping from videogames “they don’t care enough to C&D” is not a valid defense of infringing on ip

#

I’m not a lawyer and this is a really complicated question but I think it’s interesting and if somebody knows a lawyer I’d be interested in knowing what the actual answer to that is, especially when you have companies like Crye that don’t publicly have statements regarding digital recreations

hallow idol
#

Somebody once asked in #other_ip_topics how they could go about re-creating some irl assets, to which I told him something along the lines of "you will be making a non-commercial mod for a game and most likely won't get any issues/letters from the company as they most likely won't know or care, so just go for it."
For that my message was deleted and I was told not to give 'possibly illegal and dangerous advice'.
Now a similar answer is being proposed here, so I definitely see the point some people are making of double standards, in this example alone

manic laurel
indigo thorn
# haughty torrent My problem was that both sides aren’t asking for permission

But they are both 2 different things.
As has been stated, making an artistic impression of something is quite different to physically taking the fundamentals of what makes something what it is.

The equivalent of your argument is that if the ‘rippers’ just made artistic impressions of RHS or USP work as opposed to actually using their actual content, it would be fine. And it would be fine!

But they don’t. So instead, it’s the equivalent of me buying a car, dismantling/reverse engineering bits of it, adding a couple of new things and selling it as my own car brand. Which I think you’ll find is in breach of the terms and conditions of the original sale...

So they are very different things.

hallow idol
#

I don't think he is "defending" rippers, but rather calling out others for being selective on which laws they enforce

indigo thorn
#

It’s not selective at all

If the artistic impression of RHS work with a version of the RHS logo was then to be commercialised, that would then fall into the issues of what you can do with your artistic impression.

I’m just trying to use these examples to show that these are very different things and people are not being ‘selective’ about what laws they choose to uphold or not.

haughty torrent
#

But using multicam, aor 1, aor2, marpat which is trademarked is not “artistic impression” is it

#

Like i kinda said earlier, this is why some games have “desert digital” as that is i would say more so “artistic impression”

indigo thorn
#

Not sure what you mean by ‘using’. You mean quoting the name?
Or having an exact template of the camo scheme

haughty torrent
#

Apologies, yes i meant the exact copy of the pattern while using its official name. I don’t think this would be considered artistic interpretation

indigo thorn
#

I’m not sure anyone has an exact copy of the pattern but could be wrong.
Also, a lot of people won’t actually use ‘multi cam’, they might abbreviate to ‘MC’ which could stand for all sorts of things.
Less sure about AOR 1 etc. I thought those were military designations like M4 which can’t be copyrighted.
But genuinely unsure on that last point

haughty torrent
#

Yeah i know trademark is different than copyright as its really pertaining to to the brand or company. So i do not think it would be the “pattern” but more so use of names. Like MARPAT, AOR1, Multicam, ect.

#

Which again is why big dev teams have used names like “desert digital” for aor1 and such

echo orchid
#

plus some of us doing that do have permissions from said brands - because
a. they cannot actually gain something from something that has no commercial income - which they can via licensing deals with commercial products
b. they get free advertising
c. they got nothing to loose or win, so we found out that some are actually very willing to say yes

#

on the very same note, please have a look over eft that has no licenses for any of their content (last i checked anyways)

haughty torrent
#

These would require permission

manic laurel
haughty torrent
#

Relevance is that these are all things i have seen in game by independent developers where the rights to use the above ^ have not been given. So again, it feels like we are selectively following the law. Hope that clarifies

hallow idol
dull moon
#

2: wrong
artistic recreation is the same as taking a photo

hallow idol
#

Not according to the law as its practices, id a company doesn't allow something to be recreated, then it can't, otherwise why would e.g. Disney go after artistic recreations

dull moon
#

according by the law it is

hushed niche
#

I believe from my research since my previous comment that it is possible that in specific circumstances, Colt and Gentex come to mind, that creating mods with these products is simply illegal as in their terms of use they prevent any sort of use without the companies permission

#

I could be wrong

#

But that’s what their TOS say

hallow idol
echo orchid
hallow idol
#

Since he's higher up the chain of knowledge in this regard, I assumed him to be correct

echo orchid
#

it is a fucking artistic representation

#

how can i put it any other simpler way so that you can actually grasp that

#

it is not recreated

#

is not a 3d scan

#

is not based on leaked CAD data

#

it is a 3d paiting of something in existance

#

again, ask your lawyer if you do not believe me, it is something that i have done

hallow idol
echo orchid
#

it is also the reason of existence of several multi million dollar bussiness

#

like turbosquid and the like

dull moon
#

are you refering to the leaked challenger data?

hallow idol
#

No

#

The question I'm referring was before that happened too

dull moon
#

if you can publicly access it, if you can photograph it, you can model it

hallow idol
#

Maybe I'm misunderstanding what was said by Dedmen, but I assumed what you two are saying to be the case myself too before that. I trusted what he said since I assumed a greenname to have more knowledge on the matter

echo orchid
#

trade dress for anything military is set via the activision lawsuit

echo orchid
#

so, in short, and will reiterate, game assets based on referances (3d models) are always an artistic representation of the real thing

dull moon
echo orchid
#

unless i 3d scan parts of it, or used CAD data (and even then, it needs to be overly simplified for game injectionpurposes)

hallow idol
#

With my (deleted) reply being something along the lines you said too "You are making an artistic recreating for a game, there is no reason why the company would sue you, so go for it and make the Challanger"

echo orchid
#

not 2 people will get the same result

haughty torrent
hallow idol
#

Thank you for clarifying. I assumed he was right both for being BI and because nobody spoke up against him then
Or again, perhaps I misunderstood what was said

echo orchid
haughty torrent
#

Ill just use USP posting i believe what was called “military ranks and insignias” mod pack. The rights to use military insignias and service seals was not acquired

dull moon
haughty torrent
#

So how is that not cherry picking

echo orchid
#

again, nothing about that justifies some assholes ripping assets

#

there are 2 separate things

half cosmos
echo orchid
#

the original creator own everything he makes

haughty torrent
#

Not getting permission is not getting permission

hallow idol
dull moon
half cosmos
#

And @hallow idol’s reply was telling him to do it

dull moon
#

since i can't read the original message... ¯_(ツ)_/¯

hallow idol
#

I told you the original message

hushed niche
dull moon
haughty torrent
#

Ah so i get a warning for use of a medical term but directly insulting me is cool. Guess this community thrives off of cherry picking

echo orchid
#

that isn't derivative work @hushed niche

hushed niche
#

Unless Gus is on some complete other track then I am

echo orchid
#

ripping is stealing

#

not "derrivative work"

hushed niche
#

Specifically referring to a ripped asset that contains modifications

half cosmos
echo orchid
#

again, irrelevant, read the CC license, and see what derivative actually entitles

echo orchid
hallow idol
hushed niche
#

I’m literally looking at it, is modifying a previous creation not a “remix, transformation or built upon”

manic laurel
#

@echo orchid @haughty torrent all directed comment aside,

again, nothing about that justifies some assholes ripping assets
do we agree on this or not?

@haughty torrent you may argue that it's two different speeds of justice, but you cannot argue that "if somebody can do wrong, then it's right"

hushed niche
half cosmos
#

I don’t think he’s advocating that any of it is right.

echo orchid
half cosmos
#

Asking that sort of question in itself can be seen as an insult and demeaning lol

hallow idol
#

Don't use the language card here please, I'm pretty sure we both have the same native language - where that is a pretty clear insult, same as English

half cosmos
echo orchid
#

...

haughty torrent
manic laurel
manic laurel
echo orchid
echo orchid
#

modification of these files i own does not go under derivative work

manic laurel
#

so we are having two topics in one conversation here

  • repro without permission: legal or not
  • some people did it and didn't get the hammer

let's not mix them, let's not move goalposts, let's be civil
or I will have (as too often here) to cut the conversation short.

echo orchid
#

plus, for the sake of the conversation, how do you happen to know i have or not permission from FN to use their trademarks? did you ask me before figuring it is ok to reverse engineer my work?

half cosmos
#

I don’t get why this conversation is even happening. I believe that the discussion about recreating IRL assets yourself and discussion about ripping assets someone else created are two completely separate things,

hushed niche
echo orchid
#

one

#

has

#

nothing

#

to do

#

with

#

the other

#

(dot).

half cosmos
#

your single word message spam does not increase the weight of the words

echo orchid
#

your own ignorance is irrelevant to this conversation

dull moon
#

🍿

half cosmos
#

lol

hushed niche
#

Where is your justification that a private mod, that adds on to your work is not a derivative, when a derivative is clearly classified as something that “builds upon” another work, is that not building upon your work

echo orchid
#

that stands true if reverse engineering does not happen

#

and IF the license allows it

#

neither is true

dull moon
#

and unpacking a model to add bits to it is reverse engineering of sorts

#

-> nope

echo orchid
#

and private means private, as in one single guy having access to that, not privately distributed behind curtains

#

so again, ignorance

half cosmos
#

How is the nomenclature of what to call ripping assets even relevant to the original conversation at all. This entire chat is just “let’s start an argument and branch into 10 different unrelated arguments about things irrelevant to the initial discussion”

hushed niche
#

The question is whether or not a hypothetical individual using a trademark on their model they did not ask for voids their right to a license

And private mods at this point is slang

echo orchid
#

not sure why i even bother with people who just type words just for the sake of it

hushed niche
#

I’ve literally done nothing but be reasonable with you

hallow idol
manic laurel
hallow idol
#

Discord did add a thread feature for that 👀

haughty torrent
hallow idol
#

doubt it would be helpful here through

echo orchid
half cosmos
echo orchid
#

there is a secondary topic about trademarks infringements

#

these are separate things

half cosmos
#

A “secondary topic” that took the forefront and was constantly calling back to ripping. That discussion STARTED because someone used it as a point regarding ripping assets.

echo orchid
#

and the only ones that can take action (legal or otherwise) against trademark infringements, are the ones who own these trademarks

hushed niche
#

I am aware of this yes

echo orchid
#

so no, not having trademark permission or license from the trademark owner does not make you entitled to rip an asset

hushed niche
#

That’s not the question for the fifth time

half cosmos
#

That’s not the argument being made at all

echo orchid
#

or the relation between the original topic and the secondary topic?

carmine folio
echo orchid
#

the bloke does not own any trademarks permission for the brand, or the shape of that car

hushed niche
#

Does someone creating an asset, with usage of a logo, ie the colt horse, on an M4 without asking, as colt specifically says this is not allowed without permission void their ability to apply for a Creative Commons license

#

On that specific asset

echo orchid
#

no

manic laurel
echo orchid
#

of course i can sue

hushed niche
# echo orchid no

So I can just use whatever trademarks I want in my models and still claim a Creative Commons

#

Even if the company says I cannot use their trades without asking

dull moon
half cosmos
# echo orchid so no, not having trademark permission or license from the trademark owner does ...

I believe the argument, and what started this whole thing, was based in people claiming hypocrisy and the similarities between rippers and content creators depicting IRL brands. The two things can barely be compared and none of this should have been a discussion at all. It’s gone in circles and no one is here to have their minds changed, this entire discussion is based on weak ties and is fruitless.

manic laurel
dull moon
#

ok dad

#

laterz

manic laurel
#

bon appétit 😉

dull moon
#

merci

echo orchid
#

most are CC, or variations of these

manic laurel
hushed niche
#

Is this allowed or is it a variation of a company such as CGtrader being too big to care about such violations

echo orchid
#

both cgtrader and turbosquid have seen C&D from bell to have all bell related content removed

#

that was settled in court

#

bell assets are still available for sale

half cosmos
echo orchid
#

so it isn't about size, it is about, as i said, having an accurate representation of the real counterpart

hushed niche
hallow idol
echo orchid
#

again, you are free to ask your lawyer, you do not have to believe myself

echo orchid
#

can you take a photograph of a porsche and sell that photograph without porsche's permission?

#

even better, can you make a painting of a porsche and seel that paiting without porsche's permission?

half cosmos
hushed niche
#

I believe you are confusing me with artistic representation, is an exact recreation of a companies logo, in something such as a texture considered an artistic representation?

echo orchid
#

sure it is

hushed niche
#

How is that even possible

#

It’s a 1-1 recreation with no artistic license taken

#

Your argument previously was that no two recreations were the same so it’s art

echo orchid
#

sure

haughty torrent
upper wing
#

Because if there is no reverse engineering and it’s eye balled, you cannot have an exact recreation

echo orchid
echo orchid
hushed niche
#

Alright well I’ll back down because I was not aware artistic representation could be used as such a strong legal defense when someone intends to make a 1-1 copy even if they do not have the means to do so, it still seems odd to me but none of us are lawyers so

haughty torrent
echo orchid
#

you cannot make an 1-1 digital copy of the real thing for game purposes

haughty torrent
#

If i cannot assume that someone didnt get permission from the Military unit to use their insignias then how can one assume someone didnt obtain the permissions to use Assets from elsewhere based off a screenshot

echo orchid
#

too many assumptions tbh

hushed niche
#

I guess that’s where the whole “prove it in court” thing happens though

echo orchid
#

have a look over the activision vs GM lawsuit

#

where GM sued activision for tradedress for the humvees

#

and lost for obvious reasons

#

in short, the original creator of an asset owns the rights of that asset as being an artistic representation

#

no matter what

hushed niche
echo orchid
#

...

soft egret
soft egret
# hallow idol I assumed so to but was told otherwise by Dedmen when somebody asked "I wanna mo...

You weren't.
Someone asked for legal advice, whether he generally needs permission and how he should approach contacting the owner of the Trademark.
To which you replied "make the mod and don't waste your time trying to talk with them"
And I told you

i will not let you give people advice to do literally potentially illegal stuff so please keep that stuff out of here
When people come in here asking how to do it right, telling them how to do it wrong is absolutely not helpful.
And thats it.

The "best" way is to ask to make sure you're not violating someones Trademark rights.
The "best" way is NOT "Just do it and don't waste your time asking for permission". Which is what you stated and which is what I forbid you to post because it will get other people in trouble who make the mistake of listening to you

soft egret
hallow idol
#

Thats how I understood it, my bad if that wasn't the meaning

soft egret
# half cosmos And <@216558902769221632>’s reply was telling him to do it

TOOT said to not bother asking and just do it no matter if you have permission or not.
That is "wrong".

If I want to borrow my friends car I also don't go "Nah I'll just take it and not bother asking him", that could get me in deep trouble.
As TOOT's statement could've gotten Garfield in deep trouble

hallow idol
#

But isn't it the case that he can create the Challenger just fine without asking for permission, because it's artistic representation?

#

He isn't taking anybodies model, or borrowing anybodies car, he is making an artistic representation which was explained above as being fine to do

carmine folio
#

Alright @runic wraith ,I dmd you some stuff cause a guy is doing le funny "dont make money off it",sorry for the ping

fathom bone
#

Somewhat related as this is my comment being brought up, it was both for the model itself, as well as using the name, instead of just its numeric reference.
Of note, I wasn't just going to base my actions based on comments here, it was just to collate information & experience

hushed niche
# hallow idol But isn't it the case that he can create the Challenger just fine without askin...

Seems to me tbh this entire debate is an example of why legal courts exist, I doubt anyone here would ever get a clear answer unless an actual lawyer gave the answer because it’s so speculative, regardless you should probably still try to get permission, idk why you wouldn’t. There is the Activision case, but who’s to say whether or not a video game mod can use the same defense as a games studio in this specific case, you’d probably have to get sued to know the answer to that question, which nobody wants to get sued, so just ask permission

runic wraith
hushed niche
runic wraith
# hushed niche If you get a C&D I don’t necessarily think that proves that your breaking the le...

Not to disagree because I could be wrong, but for anyone to send out a C&D means they have some form of factual info or evidence that you have violated their trademark/copyright/etc. They wouldn't send one out based off suspicion, not from a major company. So that would essentially be the same as us filing a DMCA against someone. Meaning we have found proof of IP infringement, where they then have the choice to remove it (basically admitting they're guilty) or counterclaim and it gets taken to court to settle.

hushed niche
runic wraith
#

Agreed. I'm no lawyer either, so I can only speculate at this point and only speak from the experience and knowledge I have gained over time, doesn't mean I'm right.

hushed niche
#

Because it seems to me on one hand, one group believes that technically speaking you can use any trademarked item on a mod without permission because it’s artistic representation (without some small legal precedent in the activision suit, but that’s game studios not modders) and the other believes you cannot do that without permission (which to me makes more sense), and this debate is the exact reason we have lawyers

manic laurel
#

(not to intrude here, I just wanted to say that I am happy to see people in this channel exchange in a civil manner!)

hushed niche
#

(I try my best lol)

runic wraith
#

But again I would stand by the fact that if a commercial game company can win a case such as that, there is less risk involved when it comes to a noncommercial mod. But again, thats just an assumption, not fact

sour lava
#

For me it's quite simple: If you are using anything made by some1 else when publishing you own stuff, you HAVE to be sure you are allowed to use that stuff. If you are not sure -> do NOT use it.

hushed niche
#

I’ve just come to conclusion that unless a legal professional says otherwise, permission is required

runic wraith
# hushed niche It’s just a very loaded question tbh because if that is the case, then why is Di...

It would be my own personal belief that the reason Disney is so strict is due to them covering such a broad form of entertainment for people. So someone making a mod, using their likeness/names/etc, can potentially lose them money if they were to do something similar themselves. Regardless of whether that mod is commercial/noncommercial, and in this case non-commercial is even tougher because why would someone pay for a Disney product if they can get something nearly the same for free. Whereas when we look at real world equipment/weapons/etc, no one is going to stop from buying a Crye G3 uniform simply because they can use a digital version of one in a game. Its actually quite the opposite, they would be more likely to go out and buy one if it was something that really caught their interest. Free advertising if you will. Whereas if we suddenly started producing real world copies of their items and giving them out for free, Crye or whoever would most definitely not be so lenient about it. These are entirely different companies which cover entirely different spectrums, so there is no doubt that ones based around entertainment will be much more likely to disapprove of games/mods (whether free or not) using their likeness/brands/etc

hushed niche
# runic wraith It would be my own personal belief that the reason Disney is so strict is due to...

An individual would have to be able to prove in court that the fan creation is not harming revenue for the parent company, which I believe would be possible to do through statistics, if they support the claim, but no one is insane enough to sue Disney over that at least not yet, I believe it’s possible Disney knows that they could possibly lose in a court case over this, as if they were 100% certain they would have struck down SWTheory’s Vader show instead of making the deal with him they did. But again we’re not lawyers and this is not an Arma topic, my bad I did not intend for that to spiral off

echo orchid
#

i asked a my attorney about the above

#

she used to work for google on ip rights

#

you have my answers in PM

#

prior to this discussion

#

it is about likeliness

#

so trade dress

carmine folio
#

Bruh,I just had a guy say the G3s he used arent from COD,but from "Garry's Mod"

#

and link me this

manic laurel
#

ta-daaa

carmine folio
#

guess he got a port of it i to arma

#

lmao

#

yeah thats what i noticed first off

#
  • For models\help
    Martin Freeman
    WINDFURY
    GeneralCucks
    Auditor
    Hauptmann
#

(incriminating others)

#

wants credit for porting stuff

carmine folio
#

HOLY SHIT

#

"I PORTED THEM FROM GMOD SO IT CANCELS OUT"

#

The guy is saying mods like usp and rhs are also breaking the law by using mechanix, crye,and oakley

#

Etc

#

Peltor

manic laurel
#

they are wrong, therefore I am right. nice!

#

@night kiln if I ask you to take it down, should I assume you will not take it down?

manic laurel
#

read above

night kiln
#

Do you want me to take down a mod that I didn’t make on a workshop for a completely different game?

manic laurel
#

yes

night kiln
#

Let me get in contact with the mod developer, I’ll let him know.

manic laurel
#

"your guy"

night kiln
#

Considering I actually have no idea who the person is who created the mod, I would absolutely love to message him out of the blue and tell him “some moderator in the arma discord for a completely different game told me to tell you to take it down”

manic laurel
#

so you are absolutely totally not involved in creation/promotion of this wonderful piece of art right, therefore not actively promoting model ripping and IP infringement, going against our #rules?

night kiln
#

Considering that you can look everywhere around this discord, and see that literally none of that conversation took place here, yes

#

I have literally no involvement in the making of that mod for a completely different game

manic laurel
#

any other illegal one I should know, like, ported to Arma from GMOD?

night kiln
#

Ported to Arma from GMOD, as in assets from the GMOD workshop ported to Arma ?

manic laurel
night kiln
#

We’re referring to the Arma workshop here right because I remember you just told me to PM the creator of a mod of an entirely different game to take down his mod on an completely different workshop

#

I don’t know of, and don’t make any, mods that contain illegal assets from GMOD/ or any other IP

manic laurel
night kiln
#

In the arma workshop

#

because they wouldn’t be on the arma workshop in the first place

#

regardless if i made it or not

#

and im being honest here i didnt

#

i dont think the guy would take it down because someone in a completely different discord for a completely different game told him to take it down lol

manic laurel