#ip_rights_violations
1 messages · Page 63 of 1
@echo orchid these are professional modder of Arma 3.. they call themself like that 😏.. in the German Facebook section I was able to read a lot of that stuff and also a lot of illegal activity in selling "their" stuff (exspecially Life stuff, like 99%).. Ive talked a lot to these people in the public comments that such acting is forbidden and also that their stuff is 100% shisle disle and not correctly done + eyecancer to some of their city buildings and whatever.. And they actually know its forbidden and not legal.. but the answers were "The others are doing it also, why shouldnt I??", or "Yes we sell the models and stuff in a other file format and config and instructions we give as goodwill/extra to be in the greyzone" 🤷♂️.
I get banned in the FB Arma 3 modding group 😂
And also sometimes they were fighting each other cause of stolen content like police lightbar and other stuff 😅
it isn't just about life communities anymore
How dare you? https://www.reddit.com/r/arma/comments/l7frlu/hmm/
Huh?
Won't justify anything
*I'm not on their side, based on the workshop page of that TFL Vest addon of "theirs" they were quite dicks. And their memes are lame.
🍿
why am i being constantly dmca'd
@gritty river what is getting DMCA'ed?
my vests
Well are they yours or are they ripped content from others?
mostly cgtrader or open source stuff
They wouldn't get DMCA'ed if they aren't someone elses content
i had rhs pmags, got dmca'd, removed them up cgtrader vests and reuploaded
Well maybe a good idea not to use ripped content in the first place 
lmfao
go l(y)fao elsewhere if you cannot even understand the base principle of Intellectual Property, explained and detailed here:
https://community.bistudio.com/wiki/Intellectual_Property
PRC-117 and pouch is totally not the one made for RHS' SPC vests, right
@gritty river ↑ now you know, you can remove them.
even better, you can remove everything that you did not make from your upload and report here
i defo do not have a prc-117 in my vests
PRC-152
aight and is that the only thing thats dmca'able
Dude just stop including ripped content in your mods?
@gritty river no, everything you did not make.
@tulip nexus do you have link to steam user? Can you DM me?
lol its cgtrader dude
Well apparently its not.
nvm thank you monkey for actualy clarifying
no, everything you did not make.
*make or buy from cgtrader, of course.
do - not - include - work - from - others, period
there are so many mods with cgtrader assets, whats the problem with that?
no I mean,
if you bought the rights to a model and imported it, it's fine
if you made a model and imported it, it's fine
if you rip a p3d from another mod, it's not fine
just the rhs assets
everything that you did not import or make yourself, yes
ok
@gritty river Don't forget about the USP assets/files while you're going through removing things that don't belong to you. Amazing you would come here to ask 'what ripped assets do I need to remove to stop from getting a DMCA?'
which is why if you don't remove all non-owned assets from your upload, you will be permanently banned @gritty river. Tread carefully.
link? you sure it is me considering i always write it in comments?
Can i get you to clarify.... "if you bought a model and have the right licence to redistribute it" its fine. 😉
Obviously, and correct!
although even bought models can have been ripped by others...
and IF you bought a model with the right license that was ripped and then illegally uploaded to a shop site, and you get a DMCA after importing it to your mod... well...
¯_(ツ)_/¯
don't buy stuff... make it yourself
Cheers. Its one i've had to explain 3-4 times this week. Just because they "buy" something people seem to struggle with the idea that they are buying a licence to use something not ownership of the actual item.
I implied it, my mistake
Let's make things crystal clear
Theres a dig difference between Editorial and unrestricted licences 😛 And on CGTrader there are many different licence types.
Nothing is "obvious" with these kind of people unless its about "obivously its fair use and I can do what I want"
Fixed it ;-)
Getting a slightly major headache going through some Battlefield 2 mods with ripped Arma 2/3 assets. 😦 Is it okay if I link the offending mods here?
yes. also you should report them to the email address in this channels description
I just sent an email to that address. Following addons claim to be from Arma directly:
https://www.moddb.com/games/battlefield-2/addons/bf2-new-mods-pandur-ii-and-polaris-dagor
https://www.moddb.com/games/battlefield-2/addons/uh1d
https://www.moddb.com/games/battlefield-2/addons/bmr-600 - (Arma modded vehicle???)
There is also a 4th addon I reported which claims to have an interior model from Arma 2? - https://www.moddb.com/games/battlefield-2/addons/bf2-new-mods-mrap-maxxpro-and-dacia
What irks me is that there seems to be praise for this sort of asset hackery work. 😦
meh. :C always makes me sad to see people not understanding whats right
You can link here, but youshould mainly report it to the E-Mail Address in the channel description, here discuss there violations before sending email to infringements@bistudio.com
Already sent to the mentioned email before I posted them here 🙂
Thanks 
Oh you wrote that, sorry I reply before I finish reading because I often have so much to read that I'll forget what I wanted to write
No worries, I sent said email 20 minutes ago (08:04 PM EST), but knowing some of the chat channels here, I don't mind the delays 😉
!mute 203315778479456256 7d abusive language towards moderator via DM after multiple warnings for spam
Silence!! ò_ó
...
I keel u, @gritty river!! Ò_Ó
klat#3578 now has 4 infractions.
I don't think he intends to fix anything
Gut feeling says unlikely unfortunately. 
Eh, disagree. Why remake something to a lesser standard than an asset I can buy for $15. There’s so many professional, PBR models available for so cheap it’s not worth the man hours to reproduce them. Buy what you can and focus your production hours on assets that are unique/cannot be acquired.
Really, it should be “buy what you want, but do your homework”. I only buy from established CG artists with visible workflows. A dead giveaway is a “high quality model” being sold by a no-name account. If you just do the tiniest bit of research to protect yourself, you can buy whatever you like.
buying assets is a non issue, as long as the store selling and the artists are trustworthy
that being said, you need to check the license, because more often than not buying such assets doesn’t give you the rights to distribution
so easiest thing would be to check with the author if you plan including this is a mod
for a lot of people making such assets is the reason for modding yo begin with, so it is the journey that matters more than the destination
@inner rivet is this yours?
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2251922267
Because it contains a lot of stuff not owned by you, and some of the added stuff even says on their workshop page that it's NOT allowed to reupload...
I would take it down ASAP
@smoky flame same
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2270447949
@serene loom
FHQ_Accessories
@weak schooner
BackpackOnChest
@abstract vapor
GRAD Trenches
@burnt oak
DUI - Squad Radar
sorry for the (mass)pings
who what's to hit the hammer first?
@spark bay No weapon sway "Re-uploading this modification to the Steam Workshop is prohibited!"
atleast thats listed in the credits
Thanks, mag repack as well
☢️
Omg idk why people always put Servers with addons but without Permission from the makers
They think hosting is like arma cwa without someones permission
what's the official policy of mods from STALKER universe? are all those mods from workshop legal enough to advertise units or show screenshots using them?
if the IP's owner(s) allowed them to, yes… if.
seems fair
But this @smoky flame
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2270447949
is illegal. And you get that taken down IMMEDIATELY and clean up your server of mods you don't have permission to use or I'll have to contact monetization department because you are using mods without permission and illegally reuploading mods to the steam workshop and I'll have to send in a DMCA on that item.
Also this violates our Discord #rules too.
(…)
You take this down now, stop using mods on your server that you don't have permission to use.
Then get permission FIRST before you restart your server.
go check #general_chat_arma
I checked, and you absolutely did not reply to the issue nor did you take down the item, hence why I switched channels
what is wrong ?
- the mod is illegal
- the mod usage is illegal
- usage of this mod can take your monetisation away
so…?
I will notify you when monetization is on the server
will you
take this down now
?
i can't, because there is 150 peoples playing actually on the server, so a maintenance is programmated to fix the modpack
it must be taken down now.
it must, but it won't be, I don't cut players in action for 3 addons that must not be on a life server. I stop the discussion here, the STAFF of bohemia discusses with me by email
!ban @smoky flame 0 banned until https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2270447949 is taken down.
*fires them railguns at @smoky flame* Ò_Ó
Yanis#9772 now has 4 infractions.
I don't know what he means by "the monetisation [...] [is] in developpment" but I'm pretty sure I saw people talking about donor slots on their Discord (and their store seems to work just fine, there no indication whatsoever that you will not get the benefits once you pay)
He meant "what falls under Bohemia Interactive monetisation is not currently in place, therefore do not worry about what is on the server."
anyway, given this behaviour, I would be highly surprised if he were to keep the monetisation for long.
the classic worst type life server owner reply
Don't donor slots fall under those rules?
Got a good laugh when he wrote 😄
we cannot afford not to do things by respecting the rules.
well naturally they cant. Its not self sustaining business model
as its not real business model at all
The usual Life Serves... And some people wonder why they have such a bad reputation
I belive I found a ripped model from Grand Theft Auto Five in this mod: https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2088706157&searchtext=Police Specifically the SWAT Insurgent Model. Can I get a second opinion on this?
I believe those are D3C models, so also (ab)used in GTA
It is
The insurgent looks like it was taken from the vanilla GTA
Yes it is. 100% sure about it, there's 1:1 texture in it
Well I already DMCA'ed it, so it will take itself down soon.
Regardless of if a person is for or against the copyright and IP rules n such, I believe it is important to remember what makes us all related as an Arma community - hating Arma lifers

imagine having dozens of ways to keep your mods up to date and the server running, but you can't read so you repack everything that you see on workshop
and going back to my question about stalker - it seems to be hard to get any info from GSC Game World about usage of either their assets or making mods based on the stalker universe, so maybe somebody asked them earlier and got any reponse
huh
huh huh
@stiff jasper there is no definite answer fot STALKER. The old understanding was that its fine, but the texts/messages to back that up can't be found anymore. You would need to ask the makers.
i think its still in some old forum thread from gsc, i believe the nexus mods wiki has a link to it, at least it used to be linked there
if I recall right the only surviving post is not made by official representative but some forum admin which makes it a little shaky grounds
I remember seeing GSC official statement too somewhere back in the day but that is not in the web anymore as far as I can find
so confirmation would be required
oh yeah the moderator thing i heard about some time back, fair point
As far as I understand (based on the english text: https://www.gsc-game.com/index.php?t=community&s=forums&s_game_type=xr&thm_page=1&thm_id=20587&sec_id=16):
It IS allowed to create mods for games published by GSC as long as it's non-commercial.
Although GSC still owns all rights to the content they "provide", the modder owns all rights to the content he creates.
It doesn't say anything about using assets in other games than GSC stuff, except that you need permission from other devs to use their content. Which I would say is the same the other way around (since GSC owns all rights, you can't use it unless you have permission).
thanks for that
I remember seeing GSC official statement too somewhere back in the day but that is not in the web anymore as far as I can find
Why not contact them directly? Would clear things up once and for all
well anyone making a stalker mod should contact them indeed
Yep, true.
Well just ask any of the Arma 3 Stalker mod makers. They have asked for permission so they'll know
Try to contact romzet#2428, he should be able to answer your questions (this is the person behind the ArmSTALKER mod)
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2383753308 I may have found ripped stuff as in the description it stats: "Probs gonna get DMCA'd SO MAKE A LOCAL BACKUP"
But could be wrong.
Yes
the same ripped stuff that got DMCA'ed about a dozen times in the las two weeks.
I think @echo orchid is keeping track
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2365259545 They oinked my assets, Sab's assets, Pinaz's assets, Jox's and Anime Putin's
DMCA has been placed from my end
Also them boys say on their website that they're officialy sponsored by BI http://armamunje.com/
🙄
these guys again
they were monetization approved which is what they mean by that
but they were reported and lost their monetization permission
Please, tell me if you know who reported them. I genuently wanna know
it's semi personal to me
¯_(ツ)_/¯
tru ¯_(ツ)_/¯ moment
Hi does anyone know if the wallpapers on the official Arma 3 website are protected by license, or if you can edit and publish them, or parts of the Wallpaper? Free and Non-commercially of course. (https://arma3.com/media/wallpapers)
https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/513387466519216139/807361609071984710/20210205222418_1.jpg?width=832&height=468
https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/513387466519216139/807361644543737867/20210205222531_1.jpg?width=832&height=468
https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/513387466519216139/807361647395340308/20210205222531_1.jpg?width=832&height=468
https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/513387466519216139/807361651782844416/20210205222438_1.jpg?width=832&height=468
https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/513387466519216139/807361608006893588/20210205222338_1.jpg?width=832&height=468
https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/513387466519216139/807361605489655858/20210205222258_1.jpg?width=832&height=468
https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/513387466519216139/807361603631579146/20210205222240_1.jpg?width=832&height=468
stuff they oinked from several mods(mostly mine)
SWOP is pretty well known at this point as an IP violation.
Why dont they take it down?
Because Disney Lawyers usually have better things do than trying to scare little kids who think they can rip everything...
I’ll get an answer for you tomorrow.
Thanks
?
Isn’t that considered against monetization policies w some mods
Or do they specifically mean just in game monteization, such as making people pay for the models and such
@manic laurel sorry let me rephrase that, is it okay to use mods in a video that has ads in complicance w Bohemia’s rules?
you mean like youtube videos
Yes
if you use mods that prohibit commercial use you probably would need to get permission
Hm alright
But I guess most of the time it’s not too big of a deal?
Just from the look from YouTube lol I’m just guessing
If you would read the stuff correctly, it also tells you it's fine to Stream or publish gameplay from Arma 3, as long as you put in some text in the description 🤷♂️
@rustic copper there’s a difference between publishing and monetizing the published content though
Atleast the way I read it, but I could be wrong
monetizing = people have to pay to get access, not to make money by giving something for free
otherwise donations for mods for example would also not be allowed
You are allowed to put footage (screenshots and videos) of our games on websites (such as YouTube). You are only allowed to make money (e.g. advertisement revenues) from it if you add your own content to it that would be a sufficient amount of additional work/content to justify it.
Ah thanks
Pretty sure it is not allowed to pay people to play in your community right?
Correct
Hm is BiA like allowed to do it? I have seen them paying members for a while now.
no, it is forbidden and they are banned from advertising here
they are doing an illegal activity by providing a way to breach EULA and inciting people doing it
oh, are players still allowed to post videos from BiA operations?
nope afaik
Are they? I think I remember seeing them in #multiplayer_events or something a while ago
yes, and we are going to clean that
Oki, I'll report it if I see it again
Thats just for BI content. If you use mods you are supposed to get authorisation before commercialising a video etc from any makers who's IP you use too.
Of course; it only applies to content from BI. Mods may or may not have different rules/guidelines
I just thought it needed clarifying as what you wrote was open to interpretation.
lol what, there are units that pay members to play with them? that's wild
oh boy BIA again
sure its wild but its also ridicolously toxic
What unit? Asking for a friend
yeah they pay for stuff like SL, pilot, zeus, ...
just so we're clear @vocal gyro
its not allowed
^
^
also I remember hearing that they its pretty much just a scam and they dont actually pay
or atleast not on time nor fully
it was a joke, ive seen the toxicity of those groups
Bia does pay bro
But the HQ is really toxic
I got banned for "bad comments" which were asking why my friend got banned
And the players and whole command structure is mediocre at best
Damn , why's their owner on this Discord then lol.Imagine community that actually pays people to play their missions,crazy.
This has been taken care of.
a quick search leads me to several of their video's in this discord. Seems the guy who posts them is also still in here.
Just in case anyone looks at this and still thinks BIA is a good thing to join: Please god do not join BIA
^^ agreed
You will regret it. Trust me....
I feel stupid for asking, but what is BIA?
a unit you shouldn't join
@earnest mirage a community that breaks BI EULA do not join
Okay thanks
Hang on, weren't you their community manager once?
If it breaks the eula why does it still exist and was featured on the community radar
it was removed from the community radar for that exact reason
I see, so what's the full story behind those guys? I'm curious
they solicit people to break the EULA to keep alive their ridicolously toxic group, so members suffer all sort of abuse but stay because of the money without even knowing they're breaking said eulas and maybe even some tax law, depends on the country
So fun times XD
@vocal gyro yeah I was so I know more about BIA than most and what goes behind the scenes
the new one?
Yes, he copy pasted our entire unit and slapped a new name on it, including all documents and most artworks, some still had our name written on it XD. We eventually resolved it with the other leadership and I think the guy itself left to join bia
lmao
What was your unit you can dm me the name to not make it unit promotion
Why tho, it's resolved?
Just curious
Rsf, you tried to get us into bia at one point
Also , i've researched about BiA , and they're on ESM Team List
So let's point that like this
BiA is violating BI EULA , they're banned from advertising on Arma Discord
But they're still allowed to participate in ESM(Which is only Game Sports that is based on Arma 3 as i know)[https://imgur.com/a/86R64E8]
What a mess
you beat me to it
ESM and BI have nothing to do with each other 🤷♂️
You could report them to ESM, but I doubt they'll care too much...
Yeah but then ESM is promoting teams in breach of the arma eula
pretty sure ESM has to comply with BI eula?
Yeah well everything has to do that lol
Well , in that case let's point that in this way
Imagine if ESL allows some LoL Team to play on their tournaments while they're severely breaking LoLs EULA
difference is that ESL is a multi million company, ESM... not so much
And how that matters?
That doesnt change anything
It's still same thing
Just value is different
the main concern i have is that ESM is giving BIA a platform essentially to encite others in breaking the eula they themselves are pretty much promoting BIA
If ESL would allow that, all teams would leave and they lose money (plus have some pretty angry publishers in their neck).
ESM does not have the same risks if they would ignore this.
That said; if they want to be taken serious than they should take action. Which only works if someone reports them 🤷♂️
having good relations with BI should be enough of a concern
BIA also doesn't care 🤣 and they're still rocking...
Still doesnt matter , thing is same , value is different
BIA doesnt care??? they are legit threatening ex members to stop reporting them to BI
Don't get me wrong... I want to see them fall as well, but we know that a lot of people simply don't care and if ESM doesn't there's nothing we can do about it
They don't care about breaking rules/laws/etc.
not the mentality to have if you want to see them fall
it's not my job to take away their licences and send lawyers to them
and as I said; easiest thing you can do is report them at ESM and let them handle it.
they're consistently paying people with no contract and sometimes even underaged ones
I'd be concerned if I was BI legal team
and keeping information on there staff without there permission
"They dont care"
That's not problem
The problem is if Bi or ESM doesn't care
which we'll never know if no one reports them to ESM 🤷♂️
BI knows about them and I'm sure their legal team has already discussed them (and perhaps even taken actions we don't know about)
no legal action was taking i would know
They wouldnt be banned here if there was some legal action
they've been up for about a year I doubt anything happened
@soft egret @austere ibex
? 🤔
lol
I was also once there a long time ago, but its funny to see someone like @sweet cradle pull a 180 so quickly once he leaves/gets kicked
After knowingly taking probably thousands of euros xD
2 sides to every story i believe
This is the wrong chat for this I believe
@blazing crater @sweet cradle @carmine folio @rustic copper
Hello all.
Sorry to be disturbing your "ESM should" party.
-
We ESM are not "promoting" anyone else than ourselves.
-
We ESM are not responsible for others actions. We have rules but what teams do outside of ESM is not our responsibility.
-
BiA has been reported to us by the one dude that is an accomplice of their actions and who started this shit, so we have no concern in taking any actions.
-
We trust BI and their legal department to enforce their EULA. We trust BI to take the necessary actions to enforce their own rules as we do with ours.
-
We have not been in contact with BI regarding the accusations pending (even Dedmen which is currently active in our Discord has not yet pinged me) but if we should be in the future, we will take decisions accordingly.
-
BiA has not been reported by any of the other active teams of our upcoming tournament so we have no reason to do anything.
Please enjoy your day. Get some fresh air.
Cc. @night spoke
Please note that I am talking on behalf of ESM organisation. My personal feelings do not interfere in these statements
just because you're not sharing them on twitter it doesn't mean you're not promoting them
keeping them on the ESM means that on some extent
you're ok with what they do.
also what does point 3 even mean?
I wish I could get paid for all the server admin stuff I do
For the h-60 project I we put in about $1000 of free man hours in one day ; so far we believe the h-60 has around $70k of donated development time put into it. It’s crazy to think about that.
They are not breaking it. Just one of the teams playing in their thingy is. Not really much of their business besides the PR issues for them promoting/allowing such a group, but thats their beer not anyone elses.
"4. We trust BIA and their legal department to enforce their EULA."
You mean BI instead of BiA ? Because BiA is not following the Arma EULA.
Make a patreon or something else where players can donate to thank you.
Getting paid is not allowed, but taking donations isn't forbidden.
How do you delineate between 'cash in hand' payment and donations? Seems like everyone has their own opinion and I can't find anything official (not personally looking at donations so I haven't dug that far)
@carmine folio
Donations are not a must
Payments to allow to use/get the content or access to a server is not allowed.
Its just like, if you respect the work a mod team did you can donate them
Not allowed is to pay for use of content
Yes fixed sorry for the Typo
good Point I have a papal for unit members to donate to for the monthly server box cost, not that it covers it all I still Pay out of pocket. I just started streaming too, but I'm not sure twitch is the best platform for Arma modding, I might switch to you-tube and make some basic videos on how to set up yor Pdrive maybe how to use TFAR, I might as use my instructor ability for something
Usually it's also along the lines of As soon as you receive a product/service, it is a purchase and no longer a donation
Ahh okay, thanks all ^^
"Do this and you get money"
or
"Give me money and I do this"
is payment.
"Wow I like what you did, here have a pizza" is not.
"Hey I did this for you, give me a pizza" is.
payment through Domino's, PayzzaPal
I see a unused opportunities
Don’t give BIA any ideas
We will pay you in Dominos gift card
[insert indian voice here]
Unit breaking Arma EULA
Nah they're a pretty unique case
regarding monetisation and participating in E-sports.
not the usual ripped mods or such
meme speech
If you know more units that do this, please do report them to BI 👀
Lmao BIA is still being brought up here?
Yes, right now
they've kept going for a year or so
yeah, they need to be
thats new I thought BI had already dealt with them
the BIA thing came up sometime last year and then it went quiet
there is nothing else we can do about them, the rest is up to BI legal
I hope so, place not only breaks EULA and does not tries to hide it but also is a extremely toxic environment, hope something gets done this time
Pretty much, glad everyone agrees on that topic
considering the current job market I'd be genuinely surprised if they could be more toxic than some of the jobs left out there
There are plenty of nice places too, of course people don't complain about it on the interwebz
Alsonote, BiA do illegal activities
jobs can be as crappy as they want, but as least they're regulated
I mean arma groups are regulated aswell through the eula etc., the regulations just arent being enforced well
can't blame them for not thinking about people turning units into a job
its been reported to them though, so
reported is only half the deal
Yeah the other half is for them to act, or?
yeah but its been a year or so
are legal procedures that long?

- I'm pretty sure that BI will keep it behind the curtains, to prevent any drama from any side.
- Yes, legal procedures can take a very long time (up to many years), not to mention about different courts in different countries.
- The only thing "we" have seen are reports of "they do something bad...", which is far from enough for any legal action. So I hope that BI has received more and better information, otherwise nothing can be done.
Something was done last year.
BiA was told that its illegal. They said they didn't know and that they'll stop doing it now that they know.
Then it went quiet. And recently 1-2 months ago the reports came back up that they are still doing it.
hey, what was the tool for snooping into workshop mods?
I suspect repacking from a life server 😄
workshop crawler
not sure if it still works
thanks Sanchez, gonna have to give it a look for this particular rp serv
iirc it still works
so, this mod looks to be repacking 1/3 of its content from other places, Idk if this is particularily punishable. I put my sights on it since the owner basically was demanding our content to be added to this, but of course didn't agree nor gave him any files (a mod based in mexican army equipment that is not currently released).
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2391125673
Particular cases of repacking include:
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=823636749 MLO Content
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1456022305 MLO content 2
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1452762519 MLO Content 3
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=756347016 Entire Civil aviation content
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2291129343 Improved Melee System
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1981508580 Niarms Content from another repack
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=940841212 Urikis assets
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1931609642 Cup, ace, and other notbale assets repackings
- many other things from repacks that repack repacked stuff
@crystal talon Cup stuff ^
cup stuff is always a maybe due to the A2 stuff they use
wat
?
Thats not how it works, CUP is the team behind all the A2 imports (Something you need allowance from BI to do as far as im aware)
Still their work, even if the 3d models are a2. The textures, configs etc are still CUP's.
A2 stuff outside of terrains is licensed under APL
yeah but the workshop crawler doesnt know that
so if he sees A2_big_tree.p3d he'll trace it back to cup
Which allows us to then license our modified versions under CUP-L
Terrains generally require either looking for our in-house models, or digging through the configs
just to be clear I'm not saying cup stole assets from a2 lmao
More often than not stuff still uses CUP classnames, making it pretty easy.
Thats not what I meant either, but you implied that if its reuploaded a2 stuff it makes it okay.
Thats how I read it anyway
"remove cup from your modpack"
"i didin't put any cup stuff in it"
"cool, but what do all the PBOs with the CUP prefix in there"
"idk, this is the pack i bought from a (sketchy) dude"
I though it was due to the APL
if they actually took the stuff from the source data (which they never do because its easier to steal from cup) it should be fine even if the crawler flags it as cup
unless cup renamed their stuff with cup prefixes
I'll probably do another sweep of the workshop soon
there is a lot of trash repacking there, just another life rp modpack I guess 🤷♂️
Lol they never stopped
The owner is also blackmailing people who are trying to sue him(ex members)
Hi, not sure if this is the correct channel for this, as I think it's more of a topic on ethicacy than it is legal. I've been building a small Irish town, and currently have ported over some of Bushlurker's Carraigdubh assets. Obviously if I was to use someone's assets I would get full permission, but unfortunately in this case it isn't possible. Was wondering if publishing something with these assets inside a terrain would be frowned upon by the community.
@golden pulsar
I think @hasty scaffold was one of the closest to bushlurker. As him for advice
Well there is the legal stand point too. You are not the author/Ip owner of the assets.
it’s both illegal and frowned upon
Understood, thanks guys
illegal?
if im correct the only thing in question to this would be ethics
ethics and actual laws
what law though?
i mean if the stuff was copyrighted then yes but i think that was done
if no license is given, the most strict license applies
IP are protected by copyright unless specified otherwise
not the opposite
so ND NC no share, no copy, ect
fair enough
does anyone besides bushlurker (RIP) owns any of his work? none does afaik. hence it is 100% illegal to work with someone elses stuff, and i am not even talking about steam terms of service here
nah i was just unaware that if there was no licence it falls under arma 3 EULA
tis all
im only slightly familiar with copyright
it feels like a disrespectful question to make
but the copyright for his stuff should last 70 years right?
according to https://copyrightalliance.org/what-happens-to-your-copyrights-after-you-die/
could also be 95 years, given it was created behind a pseudonym - but - his copyright is transferred to his children/family if no will was established.
but, yeah, it's a bit grim topic.
it doesn't
The Arma 3 EULA is completely unrelated
Car model ripped from GTA V and ported into Arma 3
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2403915422
can also flag it to be marked as incompatible
are servers just allowed to rip a good amount of assets from other games such as GTA and monetise?
obviously not
if they are monetizing, send to E-Mail address in channel description
or monetization@bohemia.net
i mean im sure you know what server im about to say it is
and im sure there has been many emails about them
ill send one however
what info would i need?
proof, website link and proof of them selling etc.?
yes as much info as possible
alrighty
@carmine folio You might want to remove https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2402819057&searchtext=TFA691 and https://app.mediafire.com/2me3iuotfq55o because it contains a lot of content which does not belong to you.
Also a fair amount of the content is stuff based on content ripped from other games and other community mods
@soft egret might want to have a look, and probably will find the source of those uniforms he banned the guy from #screenshots_arma this morning
That would require common sense...
*PewPewPew!!*
RIP @rough mortar
that should do.
heh man, the dude even titles himself as content creator
like the fools in "just chatting" on twitch?
🤣
@rustic copper did you keep link to his steam profile? I'm sure he'll reupload soon
https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198351942764/myworkshopfiles/?appid=107410 Was still in my history
@gusty socket see https://community.bistudio.com/wiki/Intellectual_Property#Other_Intellectual_Properties for more info 🙂
rejoice ... the era of repeated violations at SW w/o consequences is over

So did anything happen with BiA or did it just hit a dead end?
o, great lord of the spy news, please provide us with knowledge and may your name resonate through the ages \o/
Well KA Weapons is gone...
did something happen?
New powers unlocked
The railguns were loaded
See Dwardens message above. Hopefully it goes for the DZSA SW too
my questions were about just that
just a general ban of sw stuff on the workshop or was legal action taken?
moar intel soon\™
It does. The hammer has also been dropped on someone on the DayZ WS
Good
So it's about people uploading other people's mods on the workshop, yeh?
yes
Thank god that the hammer is dropping on that.
It now bears consequences
Like I recently got into doing textures and I just know how much I'd hate if someone ripped my work and reuploaded it as theirs.
im guessing there is now a way to prevent after repeated violations or something?
oh the nickname's irony
ey I never uploaded any Star Wars stuff
jedi only works on OPTRE stuff iirc
maybe, but I was only enjoying the "joke", not accusing you dw 😉
I know haha
Any ETA on that intel 👀 ?
soon\™ as well! 😄
ARMA 3 CSLA soon or ARMA 4 soon?
It'll be a Boheminute or two
not even gonna hope for it but a little sidenote about bia stuff would be cool
but thats just my rants
not really relevant to the subject
Oh nice, good to know. Probably nightwolf
Hopefully Bohemia can get the reupload of the Littoral Combat Ship taken down. Those guys still insist (disgracefully) that they made it: https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2117126471
where would they have taken it from? is it the cup ship?
No... they got it and the FSF from Armaholic. The FSF was taken down
And they claim that the original authors didn't make them 🤦
oh god its the presidential guys
oh no I'm out
those guys are on another level of derangedness
Yeah, the President has changed his Steam name... at least he's come out as a ...
oh god
oh my god that guy really stepped it up
@pliant oar those guys definitely belong to your list
trolled my way
One of the best 3D models I have ever seen - congrats to your reupload team! 👏
https://www.armaholic.com/page.php?id=25700
(and flagged ofc)
And LOL... They removed your comment saying "This is not a reupload. It is a 100% original creation by the White House Team." So I responded, "Then why do you keep removing the links to the Armaholic page with the mod you stole?"
just saw that yeah 😄
@paper prawn gone
Damn new railguns are effective 👀
fresh new, bought @ ACME
Thanks Dwarden! 🙂
oh ho do i see someone assuming direct control
A bright new age indeed!
why you all so happy stuff is getting removed with out cause. This is not what you call fair or free. There needs to be due process. I mean i don't mind people that steal stuff get punished but no due process, i mean what was wrong with the old system. All so this wont really stop these mods being made or used.
There's plenty of cause to remove it
the issue with the old system was, not having the tools to enforce the law as it should be
star wars is not even on the work shop
so?
law and order on official platforms. that's the point
what the do on their harware / platforms does not concern us
i mean is arma 3 sever brower not a official platform
If people can't be trusted to follow Bohemia, Steam's or various rights holders EULs/T&Cs then they'll be rightfully fragged.
couldn't browse or download mods from the browser last time I checked
You kind of need the browser to play with these "ilegal assets"
this discussion as been going in circles for ages now. BI and the legit community where fighting an uphill battle. now BI and the legit and law abiding community has the "high ground" (pun intended)
this discussion can stop now
All so where does it stop, star wars is gone but what about war hamer. what if Colt gets unhappy with NI arms using Colt M4s extra extra.
War hammer is fine?
The IP thread has already covered Warhammer.
all within regulations
https://community.bistudio.com/wiki/Intellectual_Property It's seemingly tolerated.
As for real world equipment that's in a constant state of flux - it's tolerated within reason.
at this point you're arguing the entire concept of IP laws
which I doubt is an argument that'll go anywere
as for brand names and other related topics:
https://soundcloud.com/armahosts-llc/ep-37-intellectual-property
Episode #37 of Radio Arma.
Hosts : Flash-Ranger & Syhrus
Guest:
PuFu from RHS mod (Twitter @rhsPuFu)
Audiocustoms from CUP mod (Twitter @audiocustoms82)
Rock from RKSL mod (Twitter @RKSL_Rock)
Radio
(for those who don't want to read)
so what did star wars do wrong then. All so what did KA wepons do wrong. KA all ways just seemed like dumb guns
in violation of common IP and copyright laws
Oh yeah why was KA removed? Heard it was yoted
read above
What laws was it in violation of?
common IP and copyright laws
Yeah im asking what ones, given that the weapons in it are in many other mods
I remember the guys at radio arma were fine with screenshots with stolen stuff
kinda weird of them to make an episode about IP laws
and no, i'm not holding an hours long monologue about laws now
If it's yeeted off the workshop, how does that affect downloads of the mod? Do they just stay and work as usual or what?
steam should unistall them by itself iirc
it does not effect any thing
@chilly silo mind posting your site about the laws and rights? can't seem to find it
Steam will delete things as "updates" but local installs are gonna remain.

steam can not actually remove the mod from your pc. So your steam installs are still there
you just got to know where to look
perfect, thanks
So no answer on KA then?
Asset rip, I've heard
KA: ripped content from other mods / games
all so what IP laws are we following
Ah alrighty thanks
Not true. The steam Agreement allows them to remove content from your PC that is delivered by Steam 😉
nope
yup
Steam doesn't actually do that though RKSL
i have a bunch of steam mods yeeted by DMCAS
you should delete them
but it can
steam does not have the legal right to access my files
Didn't say that they couldn't. They probably should
Its deleted the mods that i DMCA'd that i was subscribed to
@faint nacelle why they not vilotaing my countries IP laws
bro what
At least at the end of a DCMA process... not before the end of it
Because there are false DCMAs
because its proper morally right thing to do to support the real makers of things and not thieves
You give them that right by Agreeing to the Steam Subscriber Agreement
Valve will no longer have the right to use, distribute, transmit, communicate, publicly display or publicly perform the Workshop Contribution, except that (a) Valve may continue to exercise these rights for any Workshop Contribution that is accepted for distribution in-game or distributed in a manner that allows it to be used in-game, and (b) your removal will not affect the rights of any Subscriber who has already obtained access to a copy of the Workshop Contribution.
Seems like it won't affect subscribers
Ah, maybe they unlink when DCMA-ed and remove when the process is completed then @chilly silo
nah gone from my pc
C:\Program Files (x86)\Steam\steamapps\workshop\content\107410
you just not looking hard enough
if the content is illegally uploaded and steam remove it from their servers they should be removing it from clients.
KA Weapons still there, but not in
A:\Program Files (x86)\Steam\steamapps\common\Arma 3\!Workshop
That is the difference
Just because it doesn't show up in the launcher doesn't mean it's not on your PC
It's also irrelevent. The important thing is that they're gone from the Workshop
all as for why i dont deleat it. because it is a pain in the ass to deleat them and find them
Not arguing for or against laws and shit, just stating that the mod isn't actually deleted
i have a lot of games and lot mods
Steam has never been too stable when it comes to removing mods I've unsubbed to either tbh... Good habbit to clean up the folders once in a while.
why are you even arguing about stuff being deleted on your drive or not?
that's not the point
the point is, scumbags are now getting banned from uploading. permanently
Either way, the good news is that Bohemia's deploying the new railgun tank 🙂
I prefer to think of it as Miller's being let loose upon the Workshop.
It's fantastic.
some times a mod gets DMCAD because of the smallest things. Some times there is not even a just cause for a DMCA and thats why this worries me. i dont care for star wars armar or KA. But this could lead to legit mods getting snipped because of BS
That I doubt
Only the IP owner can DMCA something so odds are its a good reason.
Bohemia also has legal responsibilities themselves
huh?
no DMCA is handed out for nothing
I can file a DMCA
I was assuming he was talking about Dwarden's rail gun not a DCMA @chilly silo
only on stuff YOU have the rights to
not hard to fake a DMCA if you want to hurt some one
that is illegal btw
you can but if you arent the legal owner of the content you are committing perjury.
you will be legally accountable for that
There are better hills to die on.
happend in the past on the WS. users that did that are now banned from the platform
I've seen fake DCMAs... someone did it to RHS recently... Mod was back on the w/s within hours
@faint nacelle yes but you know some people dont care
they don't care and pay the consequences
getting banned
are you asking because you are going to do so?
I don't get how hard could it be to follow IP laws
its not like people do it by mistake
why are you so adamant in defending the people doing the wrong things?
faking a DMCA is considered a felony in many countries
@faint nacelle why would i ask here. I have freinds IRL in computer securty i would ask. I am worried because i know a person who luanches a fake DMCA risks and looses nothing.
this includes impersonating a person / organisation
that is required to file a fake DMCA
DMCA is american only
no
the EU has the same under a different name
so do other countries
DMCA is just the most known term
EU = Article 14
DMCA is ignored in neatherlands and russia
no
Same function as DMCA
NL = EU
i know the law here
Odd that this thread suddenly got active after the Littoral Combat Ship mod was nuked...
artical 14 not in effect
¯_(ツ)_/¯
lol Netherlands are a signatory. They enforce all the EU IP laws
Didn't even know there was a LCS mod tbh
Magic 😛
artical 14 has not taken effect yet
anyway, still illegal by Steam rules. so end it right here
Went active June 19
but again russia does not care about DMCA and thats where all the big modders are and where a fake DMCA would come from
modders make stuff
i'm out 😛
well, 🦆 that nonsense policy discussion
we and BI are acting in regulation of given laws and orders, and denying those facts won't stop it. i'm out
@faint nacelle yes RHS steal stuff
LMAO
oh boy
correct, only my hammer stays 🔨 @dull moon
damn brah 😄
lololol. good to report here! do you have evidence?
Later guys. A happy day nevertheless! 🙂

🍿
that took an unexpected turn
i was responding to some one that says russian modders are thieves
and accuse RHS of being one
no not all of them
Bit of a sweeping statement.
i was point out a logical phalacy
but the ones that were in question in this conversation
i am not native english
Nobody here is worried about the people that don't steal...
phallacy is a little phallic for my delicate sensibilities
PSA:
ok, here is not the place. so STOP and eventually go to #other_ip_topics - and be veeery careful what you say 👀
thats is my point
Less than half of the RHS team is Russian anyway
what did he just say?
So has Imperial Studio been brought up yet?
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2297780006
Or any other Star Wars Mod 
as long as they did not steal stuff why imperial should be fine
iirc disney doesn't allow the use of their IP at all (but I do not know)
what, there are plenty of star wars mods on steam for other games
According to the disclaimer on the page Milton linked, they are within Disney's IP use EULA as it is nonprofit
Read channel description, the mod has asked you to stop discussing it...
Recommend the mods put a timer on this channel
Again, many wrongs don't make a right.
also, keep in mind the channel's topic ^
i mean we are disccusing if a mod viloated a IP
not the place
also, I am tired of seeing the same and same arguments here.
Intellectual property used without owner's consent = theft = illegal, period. Star Wars mods don't have Disney's explicit permission, and Disney does not give a global permission and is very defensive on their IP. So AFAIK, Star Wars mods (stolen content or not) are illegal, period.
And that's what I was making sure of. To the eternal void I now go.
no problem with asking and clearing things up; big problems with claiming false intel such as some did in the past (and were booted for)
we try to be civilised and law-abiding at the same time
oh btw,
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2297780006 and kripto202, very frequent SW reuploader and banned from here https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198009169178
Yeah, that mod posted ealier even says it's a reupload and was taken down ealier
what's Kripto done before?
Talking of blasts from the past, Repentz is selling ARMA 3 assets now apparently... https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198144044046
Star Wars stuff again and again, and refusal to take it down when told
the suspense is unbearable 😆
winds of change
so, let me see if i got it right, mods who showcase brands and stuff, if they dont have the permition of said brands to use their image, can be removed from the workshop and the uploaders permanently banned?
Only if it happens multiple times.
thats quite a situation, state owned brands also apply for that?
or brands that dont exist anymore
good question; given Steam is a US company the US law should apply. what about dead-and-not-bought-later companies, is it immediately in public domain? IDK
any post by bohemia where i can fully read about their policy regarding that and adequate the project im working on?
not really, it's the law itself 😶 what are you working on? (not illegal as long as you don't release it)
i work on the brazilian army mod, and we have vehicles from the company engesa, who went bank rupt in the 90s
czech law or US law or both
Isn't Czech law also EU law? (In the case of IPs and such stuff?)
it can have it's own as long as it complies with EU
@uneven roost saffest bet is to not use any company names or logos
invent your own
that is why i asked about Ni arms with all there fire arms company names
Its not without cause, we are talking about illegal ripped stuff and people putting their own name onto things other people made.
Thats not "without cause"
@soft egret right now yes but abuse is what i fear
right now star wars, KA and arma life stuff seem most at risk
witch does not bother me
i am just concerned about abuse of laws
no it won't
Which is ILLEGAL if you don't have the right to.
@soft egret making some thing illegal does not mean people dont do it. More so since there is no real risk.
if you receive a false DMCA it doesn’t mean you immediately get you stuff taken off
Steam gives you adequate time to respond
I think you didn't realize, but content theft and IP rights violations are not welcome here.
If you awnt to continue stating "but I'll still download and use illegal content, and I also have backups"
and then also throwing false accusations against well respected modders who get THEIR STUFF stolen by others..
yes but bohimera changed how it works with new "rail gun"@broken hornet
That’s not legal action in the sense of the DMCA tho
Well no one is talking about ripped stuff and assets, but about people making their own assets from scratch, but in some "forbidden" IP
Stolen and ripped stuff must be dealt with, it's 100%
I don't think theres anything to fear here. Only repeat offenders are punished.
Noone is getting banned because having done something wrong once.
If you get told you are doing wrong however, and refuse to fix it despite knowing its wrong. And threatening to just find other venues for your illegal content then probably bye bye.
No they didn't really.
It just means people don't have to repeatedly send DMCA's every few weeks
I missed something, what is that "rail gun"? is it some new addition to the rules?
they yeet the uploader with the mod
where can I read about that? is there some article or smth?
Does it mean only bad workshop mods will be immediately dealt with, or servers breaking rules will be too?
This is about workshop
and what about the thieves that use custom launchers and not the steam workshop ?
Can we do something about it ?
ehhh probably nothing
nope
now the real qustion what about conent creators on you tube and twitch
will arma 3 star sim you tubers be hit
people who's rights got violated can always hand out a C&D letter to the hosting company where violating content is stored
a lot of countries dont care
can you, once again, stop wishing out loud?
My good analogies.
Can you do something about a guy cutting up cute kittens in his cellar? not really, if noone can see or know or proove or check.
Can you do something about a guy doing the same and streaming it on twitch? yes definitely, though probably not in america/russia because laws don't care.
Will he find other ways to redistribute his kitten slaughter videos? of course yes!
Does the majority of the world tolerate it or think its fine? obviously not
does it mean that its fine to do just because some countries laws don't care? no.
@manic laurel i come from a county where cops buy boot leg DvDs of movies in front of the cinema said movie is being shown. Again i dont really care about this from a upload point of view. i am not modder. I was looking at it from legal view
as you can see here, people care - countries care
@gray siren What exactly is your point?
@soft egret i mean if i follow the law i kill kittens, cut em up and all that.
@spark bay that cnd letters dont matter
that was my point
The analogy that making a mod that falls under international fair use regulations is equal to distributing grossly offensive animal abuse content is absurd and wouldn't last 5 seconds in a legal discussion.
why.is.this.still.goiiiiing?
Well all this hussle with workshop mods is nothing. BI devs and most people doesn't understand what happens on arma servers and how much money can there be. And if something will be deleted from workshop - can be used as a local mod. When BI will start killing such servers - then problem with IP violations/stealing/ripping will be dealt with at lest someway
simple question @gray siren do you think stealing is right?
It's not stealing.
i am not talking about stealing
Making a star wars mod under international fair use isn't stealing
Fair use 🤣
there is no international fair use
so all of this is pretty much pointless discussions
then i'll try to get a video from the server that use RHS, and this server sell ingame stuff without being allowed.
i already reported to you i think
@carmine folio in simple terms its stealing
do you think it is right
so you support taking stuff someone else makes without permission
its very simple moral question
If it falls under fair use, sure
it does not
nani
Here's a question for you, do you like lord of the rings?
all so know i hate thieves. but if some one copies some thing from me i dont care
no Im asking a very simple question
As am I
how is making some copy of visual artstyle from some IP from the scratch is stealing?
copiyng at most
not talking about making something
It never does. Fair use is mostly for educational, and research
Sure you are, they made a mod
but I don't recall redrawing some painting and giving it away to people being forbidden
people know 💩 about "fair use"
https://arma3practicalipguide.blogspot.com/p/blog-page.html
ok so to clarify because you moots clearly dont want to answer simple question
i mean i said i hate thieves
do you folks support making mods with content that is taken from other games
yes, stalker mods are great
then you guys support IP theft
actually no
yes
there is no longer official statements available on the matter
nobody has been able to produce more than a he said she said
We all said multiple times that stealing is bad and needs to be killed, but making stuff from the scratch based on some visual style/representation of some IP is not stealing or something bad
there is only a quote by a old forum admin
Oh no making mods using star wars is just wrong!
Stealing real world property, design and imagery to use in your mods is totally fine though, obviously.
im quite confused now, a rail gun was added?
#ip_rights_violations message
The start of this convo
@carmine folio you have a official infromation about that
@uneven roost you for got the " " it is "railgun"
It's weird that you seem to believe Disney wouldn't have already flattened the practice of making star wars mods under a landslide of court cases if it were at all illegal
Goodguydisney
But I have one question
🍿
If they tolerate mods that are MADE in SW IP thats all good
We are not talking about fair use (which lots of people missunderstand)
Why no one tried to contact Disney and get their strict answer?
but if a mod uses stolen content from other games it is not
That's fine, that's why I've switched foot.
Why not Bohemia itself if it's such a meaningful matter?
It's not stolen though
report to RHS team
If it were, it'd already be gone
If everyone got Disney answer "no these mods can't be used"
Because Disney
no it does not mean anything
so much meaningless discussions would be cut
people... easy thing...
imagine BI says "we do not want to see content with the IP of XY seen used in mods for your games"
WWYD then?? 😉
Is this game pointless without dlc?
nothing...
its up to the mod makers to gather that proof
If the visual art style is trademarked. You cannot use it without permission.
I mean as i said star wars mods i dont care about. but who knows what else will be reomved
Anything that has no right to exist
i mean it still there
its not stealing, but it might very well be a trademark violation. Which is also still illegal.
@soft egret Then Disney must kill and delete all fanart or fan-fics, right? Why there is no strict answer, what counts as prohibited and what's not?
all so who decides what as the right to exist@spark bay Thats been my argument from the start
as far as I know noone has gotten through to them
if disney wants star wars gone let them reomve it not a 3rd party
So why are we not going after the mods that add real world weapons and vehicles, names and designs all?
Using character names from the movies is a trademark violation btw
If it's "sTeAlInG" to use a visual style designed by someone else
Well, I don't think Disney will ignore Bohemia developer's question, because there is money on the line
so the star gate mod must go@paper prawn ?
Because most of those companies are not enforcing it... If they do then they will
Disney isn't enforcing it either
I just think no one ever tried to ask them, and BI just doesn't care about that and don't want to deal with it
Its not. using trademarked stuff is.
So why is some tripped out moderator trying to enforce it for the multi billion dollar corporation?
It is enforcing it enough to allow it to continue to enforce it if they want @quasi lake
Better to destroy everything it seems
They aren't though, because if they were it wouldn't still exist on steams workshop
Because this is a corporate website and Bohemia Interactive are responsible for the content here @quasi lake
I suggest you watch your language
Please stop pinging me
I was answering your specific questions to me...
They weren't specific to you lol
fire arm companiess and wepaons makers care very much about there stuff being used in games. So if star wars is a issue so should every mod that uses real gear
Yep
Anyway, back to eating popcorn, cause this thread will probably end the same way it does time and time again, ad infinitum with no end in sight until the universe dies of heat death
@soft egret Can you give some insight or info about this statement? How can it be dealt with?
"If something will be deleted from workshop - can be used as a local mod. When BI will start killing such servers - then problem with IP violations/stealing/ripping will be dealt with at lest someway"
Its not BI's business to hunt down closed off servers that use some stuff of some other people that have nothing to do with BI
I mean, you do know that the AKM is the KAM in DayZ now... as are other weapons...
AKM is a trademark actually
Tell you what, if or when the star wars mods get taken down, we can then start pushing these things to real world IP holders for military technology and weapons and get those taken down too. Turn this into a PES situation where everyone is happy.
I believe RKSL posted an article that broke that down in detail earlier - the general gist of it is so long as you aren't using the exact name you should be fine, iirc. Over in #other_ip_topics.
The AKM trademark was assigned a Serial Number #88516392 – by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Trademark Serial Number is a unique ID to identify the AKM mark in USPTO. The AKM mark is filed in the category of Construction and Repair Services . The legal correspondent for AKM trademark is ALLAN LITOVSKY, THE LITOVSKY LAW FIRM, 18685 MAIN ST., #101-181 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 . The current status of the AKM filing is Abandoned - No Statement of Use filed.
There is a process in game making called "legalization" you either jump through the hoops to get permission. Which for some defunct companies might be very hard or impossible, or you just make sure you have nothing you need to ask for permission.
Actually abandoned TM that one
@vivid scarab NI arms uses the full name
the answers to how and when to use trademarks is explained here
https://arma3practicalipguide.blogspot.com/
just... read... ffs
wow a wikie not the law
@soft egret It's not closed servers, they are pretty open and popular, servers with shops, donate-receive systems etc, they are not dealt with for a long time and infringements@bistudio.com is pretty silent and ignoring reports and stuff. And these servers can just upload illegal conent somewhere and use it as Local Mod in Arma Launcher.
@dull moon They won't read 😉
if your Star Wars mod is using ripped content, it is good to see it removed.
If reported to infringements, it should be taken care of as long as it violates Bohemias rules.
better than linking 30 law articles you wouldn't read anyway
I don't think he's talking about Opposition, which we all know is ripped content.
AKM is military designation from Soviet Union, a country which no longer exists
AFAIK no one has copyright or trademark on that
maybe in Russia, Kalashnikov Concern can get law made for them to retroactively take a trademark or copyright for old generic Western term "AK-47"
of course a country can make any nonsense law and if you want to sell your game in such country you would have to abide by it
wouldn't hold up in EU / US courts
Sure it is! Same goes for all the real life content being ripped for mods!
i'm afraid so... it's not a "IP and Copyright law for dummies" video
That's the one - thank you!
Hurr durr everyone that disagrees with me is a dummy
You are just starting to troll at this point.
@manic laurel i mean i would prefer case law examples since thats what matters
No, I'm not.
Also if they read the article on that page they would see a comment from Codemasters from OFP days who said: Some game makers have found ways to include real-life guns in their games while avoiding licensing costs. One ex-Codemasters employee, who asked to remain anonymous, described his experience of working on Operation Flashpoint, a franchise featuring the US Marines. "We didn't license weapons in the Flashpoint series," he says. "We covered ourselves from a legal angle [by not using any] names or manufacturers. The general rule is that you can use the model delineation but you can't use its proper name manufacturer name without prior permission.
I'm applying the logic people here are sticking to star wars mods to other mods.
I'm doing so in the interest of being fair.
!mute @quasi lake 1d cooldown from #ip_rights_violations
Silence!! ò_ó
...
I keel u, @quasi lake!! Ò_Ó
one down, one/two to go.
I find it weird that multiple people only joined the discord today. And all they did since joining is trying to defend illegal content.
i got the reference!

But thats normal. It happens everytime some big mod, or life server is taken down.
But we didn't have that in a long time
true...
@dull moon again case law is tough with weapons and miltray gear. look at squad and the humvee
It's been lighting up a few other Discords, so it's not that much of a surprise.
yeah a lot of random mods yeeted
a lot of mods are gone because their makers have not agreed to the new workshop EULA
that was happening way before tonight
thats a Steam thing
Speaking of which, I should probably go and sort that out.
The traffic started very soon after the Littoral Combat Ship mod went dark Dedmen...
ofc just a coincidence... 😛
Ofc
LCS. ewe
RKSL Rock from RKSL Studios, one that can be considered an expert in that field
i read it and wow. That a rather poorly written piece of work. Overly bloated with unneeded humor. All so does not answer why for example a mod like NI arms is not targeted since it uses full names
I mean it could be
Unless they got permission
I may be wrong but I think RHS got permission from zenitco
So have zenitco in their mod
Thank you for that. What are your qualifications?
But everything else is military designation
I mean most companies just won’t enforce it
I'm sure they will be ecstatic with your approval and validation
Like you have crye products in mods and they will likely never enforce it
i mean they dont need it they do good work
Just depends on the company
all so colt would of caried in the past but these days colt is slav owned
so who knows
WTF Colt sued everyone in the past
but yeah NI arms does it with a lot of fire arms
you obviously don't know the history
i was make joke about colt being cz these days, thought you would under stand humour
Colt is ofc owned by a good Czech company now (pending approvals)
Ni arms is one i bring up due to the wide range of company names used
@gray siren I'm still waiting for you to explain your qualifications to comment on IP Law?
you never asked
none of yall is a lawyer so its a pointless discussion
just fly under the radar, dont get sued, done
and i never said the blog was lie just poorly writen
@gray siren
@honest blaze no troll or get out 👀
And this entire discussion was started because Bohemia, with a legal department started taking action... then a lot of folks came in and started typing... so the lawyer argument is a bit meh
are you trying to extract personal info from me
!purgeban @honest blaze 30d lame trolling
*PewPewPew!!*
RIP @honest blaze
No i'm trying to establish where your "expertise" and opinions comes from.
Man... banned for "lame trolling"... that is embarassing
Okay I am starting to be slightly tired of seeing all this.
So I kindly invite everyone to let this channel and topic cool down until tomorrow morning, i.e 8h.
sure bed time for me any case.
I'm off to see whether Dedmen has fixed that profile naming bug
LMAO
thanks all; I know we are not all on the same page, but it is important to keep things civil and not turn it into a flood war.
it 3 am so yeah bed time
and still you're avoiding to answer is question
pause time
presses pause
just put in a slowmode 1h for the channel lol
This entire conversation for the past few hours gave me unalive in the brain syndrome
@low pebble please read above, let's cool down the topic, there has been too much heat recently
Oh my god I missed out... Of all days
We got a railgun now? Worth the offtopic post, this is gonna be sweet. 🍿
@manic laurel Yeeh sorry, i responded halfway through while reading, just caught up to that point by now.
Still, might wanna keep the link: Some star wars crap
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=944723712
wait so are you guys "railgunning" star wars mods still or is this just a heated gamer moment?
My interpretation is that it's about people reuploading other people's mods
As their own
ye, but it started with that dwarden message, and one of the mods linking the empire mod later on
hopefully they're just doing a funny joke or just going after reuploads and rips, like you said
Its about ip rights violations, including rips/reuploads
so, things like JLTS, 3AS and legion would be safe?
I didnt read the full chat log so not sure what the final opinion about wether star wars stuff was ok or not was
At this point unknown
comforting!
We are not here to comfort you.
^, assuming that that is star wars stuff then it depends on disneys license
it'd be funny to watch em "railgun" mods thats covered by disneys own EULA
If you are concerned please contact Disney to get clear clarification what they allow
okay, here you go:
So far no one has done that
they're safe, and technically owned by disney
unless disney says take them down
remind me, why is BI doing this for disney
Assuming they have no ripped content
pretty sure all of this was already gone over last night, dont see the point in repeating it
Yep.
it wasn't really
Are you affiliated with any of the mods or are you just a user?
lou essentially said its all illegal, ripped or not, then didnt explain that, esp when theirs eulas that say otherwise
I'm just a user, you?
i take it that blue role has something special
Me too. So we have nothing to talk about here.
Blue name means I've been around the community long enoughh and contributed to it something meaningful enough to be considered community veteran.
I will provide this to the legal department to see if it can bring a policy change; but even if it is legal, if BI says "take it down", it's "take it down"
I will keep you posted.
How can disney technically own something if you claim it's yours by uploading it?
one could argue that if you upload it, you are the owner since only the owner can upload it, therefore not Disney, but that's a technicality I think
But on the other hand, you are using an IP which owns Disney, which makes it a bit more ehh (I would assume atleast)
Pls sir. If you are here to just troll, don't.
Read the EULA that was posted ealier, it's explained there
IP stuff
they pulled that card with a yt fan film for a minute to get ad revnue off it
its a really messed up agreement, but in the end it protects them from...this?
IP "stuff". Yes that is what this channel is about. I'm out.
Me or Stickie? As I just restated that they own the IP and only gave an counter argument to Lou's sentence
Huh thats an interesting point, if disney owns it are the people making the mods theoretically breaking the steam workshop license thingie since they upload it without being the owner?
yea me too lol
They don't own it until they claim ownership
Ah oki
and according to their EULA, they can do it at any time
also, question lou, why is this happening suddenly? what actually changed for this to occur? why not flag sw mods earlier?
look; I will give that to legal department and see what comes out of it - we can wait until then, the building is not on fire
better late than never
they were flagged, sometimes with no response from Steam
(and the fact that it was illegal for so long does not make it legal, as we all know)
flagged? by whom?
by whomever wanted (talking about stolen assets)
assets taken from other games = 200% illegal
yea, i get that
heres the thing though, earlier yesterday you linked that imperial studios mod to possibly be taken down
I'd assume that if you'd make your own assets (models, textures, sounds) it'd be fine?
you know they had that link for that eula... in their mod desc, right?
that remains to be seen, by the legal department
no, and at that time to me any SW mod was illegal, therefore a change in course with new elements
i... see
cough I still think that this has all been talked about before and discussing it again is a waste of time until the legal department says something
i mean, the eula is apparently new info
but theirs nothing else to be discussed, yes
nope that was already talked about yesterday
not a new contribution
other Disney's EULA found on the web also stated that it was 100% forbidden, so either info are not well spread among them or there was a recent change
@rugged meteor see https://disneytermsofuse.com/english/#Usage-Rules
3. Usage Rules, point H
im not a lawyer but this still feels overextendeding, this is the same world where microsofts GCUR states that its content can't commit crimes against humanity in its protrayals, meaning everytime someone in optre commits a warcrime it's breaking GCUR
