#ip_rights_violations
1 messages ยท Page 59 of 1
Ban evasion, he came here to report others who did nothing wrong for IP rights violations
is that IIIE vests in the Ares International picture? ๐ค
Yes.. it is
The illegal content that he said others were using, but that he is using himself
is there a link somewhere to their discord?
Can't seem to find on their website nor the patreon page
Got it, thanks
It'd be interesting if it was possible for the actual IP holders to claim money from the patreon in cases like this 
yes
@stoic beacon could always contact one of the peeps listed on https://www.battlemetrics.com/servers/arma3/6651953
oh wait you can't get their steam profiles through that anymore?
@stoic beacon let me know how that goes :))
@echo orchid "Ill stop monitzing ๐"
i am in the process of DMCAimg everything
from patreon page to discord, trying to find the server host
server is hosted by https://www.safehosts.co.uk/contact/ if anyone wants to spank further
bad photoshop job on the ISO9001 badge, 0/10.
he took the patreon done, just after i sent my DMCA notice
darn
well, time to spank his server provider.
server host C&D, patreon page DMCAed, BI legal notified
@errant phoenix for the SECOND TIME TODAY
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2102236888
This is YET ANOTHER illegal reupload of yours. Take it down immediately!
@soft egret ACE Exe the one on the steam crashes the client and server
I literally just explained to you via DM that its illegal
People can't play normally. The only way out is to download the old acer ext
now I'm telling you one last time, take it down immediately.
I'll write to the author,don't worry
I just talked to the author
20 seconds ago
@errant phoenix whats so hard to understand on "immediately"? I'm still waiting
@errant phoenix
you are about to be banned for not complying.
I make the 3rd Moderator to support a complete ban.
!ban 305416694824960000 232813604859019265 0 repeated IP rights violations, despite multiple warnings, refusing to take down illegal reuploads, ripping music from star wars movies, illegal reupload of copyrighted music
*fires them railguns at @errant phoenix and @carmine fulcrum* ร_ร
Just typical russian star wars stuff, nothing to see here.. walk along
two hours repeatedly explaining copyright to him via DM, only ending up in him ignoring everything he was told and just reuploading it again.. yeah no
Would be nice if one could ban Star Wars stuff from the arma and findaunit subs
reddit is basically not moderated. And also not controlled by BI
I was about to say that BI should start taking down arma servers that play with illegal stuff, but then i remembered that that didnt work with Anzus aswell and it'd propably fail miserabely on a wider scale
You'll see someday.
Dedmen with his wishful thinking
You know, I'm willing to bet a box of eatable paper (the cheap one I posted a while in the tfar discord though, not the expensive one) that BI will never start effectively taking down Arma 3 servers on a larger scale
You've not seen the things he can do.

I already fixed a handful of 4-10 year old issues that noone else fixed so far.. and there are many more on my list. We'll see what the future holds.. in the future.
I was just going to mention that
MS have an award for the oldest "found" bug
can't remember what its called
I dont doubt your programming abilities, I doubt your abilities to take over the legal department and to also get BI to start doing that 
You don't know the legal department.
but also expanding mod counter box in the launcher #when
thats true i guess
I don't know, I have faith in Dedmen, I once came in here fighting an uphill battle and him and the others here took quick and solid action
lol. Ares Internationals "head of recruitment" just messaged me. He says their monetization is valid and doesn't violate rules, with this screenshot
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/712611923971276841/712612587963023380/unknown.png
That obviously also justifies ripping, modifying, republishing Arma content... Sure.
To clarify, the above is sarcasm
@soft egret i hope thats a meme
he isnโt
a. registered
b. permitted by any mods heโs using
Thats really what he sent...
Is Specialist Military Arms and TRYK IP protected?
Asking because I spotted a reupload of such on the Workshop along with TFAR
define "protected"
every content you make is copyright protected
Everyone's contents are their own, and protected, unless they stat to abandon their rights
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2102901992 This was in question
Did you confirmed it is?
I saw the files having Task Force Radio, SMA, and TRYK in it
Yep illegal reupload, I'll add it to my list
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2094908789 Violation of the intellectual property of Disney studios, the Star Wars universe.
Copyright infringement on modifications
@stoic beacon''s ace animations and in Zeus Cache.
kka3, zade boc, diwako anomalies, zeus cache, enhanced movement
again some ripped music
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2096350383 same author
kka3, zade boc, zeus cache, enhanced movement, same music
according to bisigns this one was made by codex (the guy we banned yesterday)
I've dealt with the first one, will have a look at the second one now
DMCA'ing both right now
Alright, not gonna bother with the second one then ๐
more is always better ๐
true
@soft egret Codex used to work on a project with this modification, but then it was kicked out and re-installed the modification.
@stoic beacon
Lol. Ares international owner just joined TFAR discord to ask for help with it.. The guy illegally monetizing many mods including TFAR, and ripping other modders and BI's stuff that was banned on Arma discord by me, literally comes to me asking for help.
These people really are something...
so
weird question
to remove a mod from the workshop that has your content you have to claim it yourself right?
noone can do it for you can it?
Yea, if you don't own it, you can't claim infringment
so.. what if I'm dead?
You would have to transfer the copyright in your will to another party
oh I see
not planning anything dangerous, just saw an upload of rura penthe on the workshop
example being in our community, bushlurker (although I think he gave rights to another member of the community that was his friend), you can't DMCA one of his maps on steam, only him and people he gave/transfered ownership to can.
Looks like BIA is back at it again with more monetization https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/602610392220565505/713085242881081355/Screenshot_20200521-124426.jpg
Always
LOL... Soviet 3rd Sock Army ๐คฃ
Hi need little help one the guys has ask me to set up a workshop page for the project and I think iv done it right am not using any mods that are not all ready on the work shop and I think there are no mods in this pack that can not be repacked into this? Am not sure you see as the team I work with I thought was going to use something to host the mod we have permission to use but seem to want to go down this road instead only using mod that we where okay to use and so against my better judgement that I told them I have make said link that they asked for but I am not sure if this is okay can someone look at my link and see if it is ok https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2095555034&savesuccess=1
Making collections and sharing HTML presets are the correct way to go. Repacking (meaning: taking the contents of a mod, pack it in a new mod and uploading that to the workshop) is not allowed.
So that page is completely fine (including the link to the armaholic website for mods which are not on the workshop)!
Gmod and VRchat would work the same way if they werent 99% stolen or ported content
holy ๐ฆ does BIA even try to not have money involved in a game
they removed some pieces but judging by the brake cables its 100% from arma
What're those hands ๐
botched work from people who dont quite know what they are doing.
Please infringements@bistudio.com @amber eagle
I'm never sure if people think just posting stuff here is enough ๐
Hello.
The team of people who used the mod that I told you about earlier, after blocking it, re-loads it as a local mod and use it to play on the Arma 3 server. Who should I tell in this situation?
If they're infringing on your copyright you can DMCA claim that google drive @carmine folio
Violation of the intellectual property of Disney studios, the Star Wars universe.
Copyright infringement on modifications
@stoic beacon''s ace animations and in Zeus Cache.
That's what they're breaking. ๐
@rapid cypress
And this...
kka3, zade boc, diwako anomalies, zeus cache, enhanced movement
The people whose copyright is being infringed on can DMCA claim the google drive
Will take care of it tomorrow
Workshop crawler is back online https://sqi.workshopcrawler.com/
currently indexing
4100 items found containing stuff included in cup 
@soft egret you should check on TFR
I should just not. Because I have better things to do than wasting multiple days copy-pasting DMCA's

@crystal talon make sure to use proper filters for your query
yup; remove everything which is common like stringtable.xml ๐คฃ
ofc
Huh theres some surprisingly old modpacks on the workshop https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1526008894
its gonna take some time to catch up https://aki.cx/dc2b048c1c.png
oh cool had my first mod thieves
Sounds like a not so great first
hey its somehow flattering to know people want something you made to the point of stealing it
still gonna get them ๐ ๐ก๏ธ
yeah that does happen pretty fast these days.
well if you want to you can always discuss it with the thief. But also that may be just waste of time
if that fails DMCA right?
that would be it I believe
Many many years of experience has taught me that very few actually listen to you.
Bit extreme was the moment when the person reuploaded your content without reading what he agrees to.
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1898746665 - Lots of WW2 stuff reuploaded here. First time I've found our mod (NF) reuploaded on workshop... ๐ก
And gotta love how that bundle is part of a bigger collection
and that same user has 2 other packs with stolen stuff again
Here are the steps to take: 1. DMCA 2. Find out if they have servers running the reuploaded mod and C&D them with their provider 3. Sit back and laugh before you realize that was 1 upload of 20
Sounds like fun, I already shared the link with rest of our devs for that ๐
Might be worth checking those other two uploads if there is more stuff on them
though they only used my stuff but it looks like these guys pack a punch
not sure if that's how it works but if I put this mod in the crawler a ton of stuff shows up, like cup and ace
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1719458680
CUP could show up if they have legal A2 data pack content
and you do deep scanning, warrants a closer look, but is no clear indication
lots of things show up if you don't use the filters.
map layer texture paa's for example.
I did see a file called fortify
isn't that from ace or acex?
acex has a fortify
I'm about to DMCA this myself as it's got a lot of my content (badly ripped) in it but it also has what looks like modified BI's A3 content in it. Not sure if the moderators want to look into this further?
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2021577555
@echo orchid - It's also got RHS PMAGs on some of the models. (Probably other RHS stuff in there too.)
Before I look into it it'll be gone already ๐
https://i.imgur.com/BihA6JW.png
Ironic
You guys will use the hell out of that guys indexing service but he gets a total of $8 from you guys ree'ing about people possibly using your content
Imagine thinking youll get a job from arma mods
ikr
[coughs in PUBG, DayZ, a ton of BI employees]
Laughs in GM
fair enough ๐
but... technically GM is not a classic job
get hired by BI
still use same tools as before
BI has other tools
@raw prairie yeah because were making loads of cash off the mods we release for free to this entitled community
yeah you should see how the community looks at modders
hehehe soulcatchers? ๐
acting like they are owed mods for giving bohemia $30
then when something does get released they go "why did you make that when we all wanted XYZ" lol
yeah not being able to use minor curses in here is really farout man
btw, this is pretty much OT and not #ip_rights_violations related
true
nah, calling you guys who reee over IP violations a bunch of simps
Imagine thinking youll get a job from arma mods
laughs in having a green name
Not sure if roadrunner is on discord, I couldn't @ his name confidently knowing it was him but https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2107020400&searchtext= is a re-upload of his content
Given that he was banned for content theft, I would be hesitant to say for certain that its actually his. (If we're speaking of the same person)
Oh. I'd assume so given he was pretty prolific and released lots of content. So if thats the case I'd say its why I can't @ him and probably not worth raising a re-upload of possibly a re-upload ๐ฆ
he was only prolific because of everyone else who actually made the content he distributed
he himself really didnt have any talent
https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198271334490/myworkshopfiles/
Same guy that willithappen was talking about.
3 mods, all uploads of someone else's work by the looks of things. Roadrunner, Robert Hammer and is it Massi?
Fair use is not a right; it only allows use to copyright protected material (so basically everything) to be used under very specific conditions.
So no; taking something protected and put it in a mod is not fair use... No matter which laws you try to pull up...
@cinder notch I highly recommend you watch this video (It's a tom scott video on copyright, fair uses, licenses, ...): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Jwo5qc78QU
any starwars things would fall under fair use
No they don't. but thanks for bringing up the same missinformation for the dozenth time in this channel
Lets not turn into a useless discussion with someone who refuses to be educated about law. Thanks.
Removed
How is D3S car pack still allowed
Of course not
It isn't allowed, they have just not been taken to court yet.
I'm not even 100% sure if D3S cars isnt totally legit
I looked over some of their stuff after I heard of them selling a land cruiser model and I wasnt able to find the corresponding models from videogames
and there are quite a few WIP pics that seem to indicate they are making at least some of them
doesn't have to be from a game
there are a lot of 3d artists that just make cars for CVs and similar things
maybe they bought them or the author is one of those people that also likes arma
a thing I remember about D3S cars is that it conflicts with CUP
meaning they did something fishy with it and its configs
It isn't totally legit because they use some cars which have extreme restrictions surrounding their use (Disney level restrictions). Seeing theses vehicles is the number one flag that they're violating IP.
@scarlet patrol lol
Question. If someone makes a mod with permission to use certain asset from the creator then month or two down the road the creator revokes the permission is that mod now in violation? If so is there a way to get permission that canโt be revoked down the road?
get a written down thing by the creator that says he cannot revoke the permission later
Understood thank you
Is there someone here that can point me to a direction on where to get this information / advice?
Id guess in businesses they use actual specialized lawyers for that
common sense says, if you have something someone else has made its not your IP
applies to someone elses designs too to some extent
no copyright infringement on some models iโm creating for a commercial purpose
if it isn't ArmA related, doesn't belong here. if it is, commercial purpose is not allowed in A3
true #other_ip_topics
https://www.pcaviator.com/store/images/D/d_4537.jpg
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1792964841
Well, so, here's the proof that it's a ripped content
Addons for Microsoft Flight Simulator X, Aircraft, Scenery, Flight Planners, Adventures and missions
Okay cheers
If it was flagged before, how come it hasn't been removed for this yet?
Maybe nobody interested to do this job
Okay, well i'll remove it from my mod straight away, thank you for flagging it with me, tbh saves me that damn job of pylons on it anyway
Haha, eventually thing goes to the right way
๐
Word of advice, if you didn't make it personally, it shouldn't be in "your" mod.
I was given permission from the author before hand, i didn't just "steal" it
obviously I didn't expect it to be from another source again
And this is the situation you're in now.
My advice still stands.
Yes true.
Well, if you didn't know never tolerate you from your sins. At least you quit so no more
If someone steals a real life car and gives it to you or sells it to you cheaply, you still go to jail for being in possession of stolen property.
(Top image source: https://www.simulshop.com/product_info.php?products_id=235&language=de)
Yeah its exactly the same smh
He added his name on the pilot console too
Which si why I thought it was his own model
Yea
Understood, we're removing this from the VIKING PMC mod right now. We were under the impression that this wasn't a stolen asset, we always ensure to get a written approval from original content creators before making use of objects, textures or other assets. Thank you for bringing this up to light POLPOX and FM.
If someone steals a real life car and gives it to you or sells it to you cheaply, you still go to jail for being in possession of stolen property.
@fossil basalt only if he didn't forge papers to sell it to you - then it's all the blame to him
unfortunately, we don't really have administrative forms for mods/models.
He added his name on the pilot console too
this ^ is advanced trickery, not just the basic idiot
Depends on the country, yes.
concealment in English, right?
Possession of stolen property is a crime unto itself.
@manic laurel "Fraud by Deception" possibly.
AFAIK it's only illegal if it's known by the buyer to be stolen. You can't expect everyone to be Sherlock Holmes
it's already illegal if you sell content made with BI Tools... and since this website sells models ready to be used in Arma... you can connect the dots yourself
@rustic copper
uhm... you talking about this?
https://discordapp.com/channels/105462288051380224/547515791579545600/717494215294058648
if so, wrong channel ๐
i almost fell for it too
ah true ๐คฃ
hehehe ๐
although it still applies... if a website sells models for Arma it's illegal, if it just sells .obj files... at low prices, it's questionable
if a site sells source data where no BI tools where involved in the creation process AND instructions on how to get them game ready: totally legal
it's like buying a model on a 3d shop and use a tutorial to get it in game
Thatโs a shame about the ec-135 mod, I was really holding out for those pylons. I donโt think it can be expected that everyone is fully aware of the complete sources of all works, you can only do your best. If there was truly no excuses for taking someoneโs word for things, collaborating on mods wouldnโt be possible and mods such as CUP and RHS wouldnโt exist. You can only try and ensure the people you are working with are trustworthy, anything further than that is impossible.
It took less than 10 seconds to see that his (Luke) content wasn't legit.
@stable zealot Well, it happens even among bigger mod teams and that's why people are usually doing some sort of small test to show off their skills before joining team. In case of artist its usually some small asset to see if that people is really capable of moddeling and not only ripping . Anyway, recently Iron Front team had to remove bit of their stuff due to that
hello guys I have a possible case of IP violations in front of me
these guys are uploading mods from 2014 to the steam workshop
and saying "We don't need permission for re-uploading because we developed it"
but I doubt that as they uploaded 3 different mods and 3 of them are uploaded by different authors on their original pages (from 2014)
yes well thats what
people do.
I have infiltirated their discord and asked them how they made it
well quite clearly they did not make them
Stealth is optional for this mission.
not needed. these are some lifer kids playing sheriff
Messaged the guys on forums. Not sure if any of them are active anymore but worth a shot
one was last active in 2014, other two last active in 2016
if I remember correctly
worth a shot. Also flagged them in Steam. Dwarden occasionally sweeps that kind of stuff I recall.
Crappy thing to do. Id wager those guys dont care about real rules when they play with names like "secretary of state" and "speaker of the house"
kids powertripping
lol
they have removed commenting from steam workshop pages
yep After I posted links to the armaholic pages
Links to armaholic pages and the forum that had the same pictures bizarrely enough ๐
also they didn't bother changing the description
no response on their discord but Id wager Im just gonne get booted when they wake up
just FYI people who violate #rules get banned if there is proof provided that their discord accounts are on here
ye none of them are here.
@faint nacelle http://www.armaholic.com/page.php?id=27792
those dudes are probably referring to the author giving out source files here lol
it amazes me how no one realizes you need permission for the steam upload
wish steam would make that more clear
Or Publisher would tell you on startup ๐
Just one little extra box to check that says "I certify that I own the intellectual rights to all content in this workshop item or have obtained and currently posses explicit permission from the original intellectual rights holder."
Yeah smth like that. on every upload
Meh a checkbox gets clicked away too quickly, have it be an extra popup window or its own page where you have to wait 5 second or something like that until you can click it
Maybe that way people will read it
@soft egret E-sign portion as well as requiring the game be owned for the workshop you are uploading to and having 2FA enabled
if you pay with paypal or a card then they can save the email or legal name from the card
Thats an interested idea @manic lark
Then that information becomes something submitted as well idk
We need something to prevent them from just making a new account and reuploading
or reuploading from the same account
maybe 3 strikes your banned from steam WS?
Thats very unlikey to happen
yep
otherwise we will have to take it into our own hands and no one will like that result
BI legal team often doesn't fully understand the rules either
yep that was pretty clear from my conversation with them....they honestly told me to just use it and add my own license to it.
or at least the 'legal team' I've dealt with
guess legal also has interns
Fortunately the original guy contacted me a couple of days later and I have it documented
Yeah not really their fault... theyre more concerned with corporate legal stuff I'd assume
long story short those guys ended up claiming Gnat, TxT and Mankyle are all dead and left the mods for them to uphold. Then when I challenged that I got booted from their discord with some childis slur as their goodbye.
๐ค the guys get my messages on BI forums
https://forums.bohemia.net/profile/736945-mankyle/ <-- isn't that one of them?
If so he is very much alive lol
indeed
though they said it must have been his brother.
pretty classic spiraling when they started to spin the tale more
@faint nacelle If you have their forum account names, just inform a moderator.
I dont. these guys did not seem like the kind to be part of the rest of the community
These dudes are either sociopaths that wrote an entire tale in case someone finds out or they are actually friends with the original devs... but them deleting evidence that could make people reach out to the devs is making me quite doubt it...
I also got DM'd stating they would love to explain modelling and such to me... making me confused and screaming in the middle of the two possibilities
They are not friends... They claimed that the original devs were dead
Also they originally uploaded three mods... after Goat (and others) commented they mysteriously removed Mankyle's LCS... Oddly, he is the only one who is visibly still "active" on the forums (as in visits them)
After they deleted my comments they posted a comment thanking me for helping to test their new mods ๐คฆ
This is what happens when you let your kids huff paint
You guys talking about this one?
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2117129905
Recommend changing that last word due to this discord's rules on profanity, but you are absolutely right @inner pasture
naw I saw some things they said elsewhere and they're just 12yo scumbags
winning arguments by dropping n bombs etc
no
Because they're claiming they made it
and they didn't even touch it lol
nah, I'll relentlessly pester scumbags that take others work and claim they made it themselves, or you know.. upload it to steam under their own workshop w/o the real authors expressed permission
especially when you bring the fact to their attention and they start throwing n bombs at you
Theft is theft, someone worked hard on something and someone else is trying to take credit for it.
It's an ip violation regardless of whether the original author wanted to monetize it or not
How do you know its stolen? Is it a armaholic re-upload?
In Gnat's license for the Sea Fighter he explicitely says No uploads to the Steam Workshop... so that is pretty damn clear. The idiots didn't even look at the readme within the PBO that they uploaded!
Nah I'll keep worrying about the cesspool spawn that infest the workshop and feeding dat lifer scum rep
Aphex,
"Posting addon/mod other content without permission
For many years this community has been known as the premium addon/mod creating community, people work tirelessly and in great detail to create fantastic addons/mods/missions/campaigns to release for free so that everyone benefits, including Bohemia Interactive. There are a few simple rules in place to provide the respect to these creative people/groups that they deserve:
The first and most fundamental rule is that you must seek permission to alter someone's work, to mirror it or use it in any way other than for personal use. No permission, no editing, no mirroring, no adding to your mod pack, no editing and sharing around your private squad, none of that is acceptable.
You must follow this rule, if a person/team post a thread to share an addon/mod using content from someone else without permission and we receive a complaint then the mod thread will be closed until the issue is resolved and the forum member(s) risks being permanently banned from these forums for taking someone's work without permission.
This isn't just limited to re-using content in addons/mods/missions however, it's not acceptable to edit someone's work without permission and then to post screenshots of it on the forums (even if the edited addon/mod is purely for personal use), it's also not acceptable to edit someone's work, or use someone's work in any way that you don't have permission for and then to create videos which you post on these forums, doing any of the above without the permission of the original creators risks a permanent ban, for individuals, for whole mod teams or squads." -edited for clarity
.
Steam Subscriber agreement:
You represent and warrant to us that you have sufficient rights in all User Generated Content to grant Valve and other affected parties the licenses described under A. and B. above or in any license terms specific to the applicable Workshop-Enabled App or Workshop page. This includes, without limitation, any kind of intellectual property rights or other proprietary or personal rights affected by or included in the User Generated Content. In particular, with respect to Workshop Contributions, you represent and warrant that the Workshop Contribution was originally created by you (or, with respect to a Workshop Contribution to which others contributed besides you, by you and the other contributors, and in such case that you have the right to submit such Workshop Contribution on behalf of those other contributors).
You furthermore represent and warrant that the User Generated Content, your submission of that Content, and your granting of rights in that Content does not violate any applicable contract, law or regulation.```
And thats the problem with all these license and agreement nonsense. Back in A2 we had armaholic and all had our own repos. There was an actual modding community of people wanting to make content for each other. Now its just toxic life modders thinking they will be the next cdlc selling horse armor.
Nobody is advocating for straight stealing
Nothing has changed. If it isn't your content, don't touch it.
DayZ made Arma popular and got a whole group of new players in Arma 3.
With GTA5 RP it also got people in the Arma 3 Life scene.
And lastly... zoomers... For some reason this generation doesn't like to follow rules and thinks they know it all...
So 3 reasons why a lot of toxic people came to this community who either don't know or don't care about licenses and laws.
It has changed. You cant even retexture things with proper credit anymore. Its impossible to 'yes..and' anything anymore
but how hard is it to simply ask?
Nobody is advocating for straight stealing
Actually you were, which is why you will be banned the next time you make a similar statement.
We have Zero tolerance for this sort of behaviour.
Which is what has changed.
No, BI recognized that modders were no longer making as much content due to others stealing their work or from those stealing from other games.
You may as well be saying " but racism was ok in my day". Its **not **ok and never has been. Neither is content theft.
!ban 201766361389596672 14d for supporting content theft
*fires them railguns at @remote rivet* ร_ร
what does ba sing se have to do with this
disagreement = ban
disagreement = ban
Advocating violating our #rules and inciting people to violate them = ban
not disagreement
They are not friends... They claimed that the original devs were dead
@paper prawn I just found out about that, they also called Goat the N-word before booting him.
I'm definitely going with the first possibility now.
It looks like they removed the items or someone else did.
nvm just a single item
Don't be an idiot and communicate...
Good concept, if only the man himself had done that.
@manic lark
got a list?
sadly no
RH, ST11, TFA, NSWDG
no life stuff
Well... that's still an illegal upload...
^ r/ArmaPhotogpraphy subreddit revokes its rule 4, which stats โno IP violated/stolen contents in shots in this subredditโ
โYour screens are yours, whatever you used,โ the post that stat the rule's revocation says
As the author of the MOD that used by the most of screenshotter, I'd say this is ๐ฆed decision
The owner of that subreddit afaik was banned from a3 subreddit for repeatedly posting ripped content

Does BI have much to do with /r/Arma?
Not really no
Hm. Does seem like a new /r/ArmaPictures in concert with the main sub-reddit wouldn't be a bad shout. Asset theft is a real pain, and enabling that sort of behaviour is just... yikes.
But their moderators never took care of ripped stuff.
https://www.reddit.com/r/ArmaPhotography/comments/9xgj2p/hillside_views/ here is he himself posting a screenshot with a ripped backpack from BF3. And its still up.
Thats happens when the owner of a subreddit just doesn't care about his own rules. That rule 4 seems to have always been formal to pretend they are doing the right thing.
"gear is private"
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/326349917847289856/719541114725597234/Screenshot_6.png
If you try to argue with these guys you loose
Protection against theft for thee but nor for me
@pure mountain welcome little moderator buddy https://i.imgur.com/HfD51vH.png
From point of view of someone who makes my own stuff its sickening that people willy nilly take someone elses work
@pure mountain you and Monarch are both very well aware of why that rule exists and what it does
this is not the place to conduct your private affairs
yes for supporting content theft I'd assume
@faint nacelle let me tell you why this dude is here, hes going to ask opinions and then say "hmm okay we will look into this and consider it" and attempt to save face by reimplementing that rule and pretending like they didnt know why it existed in the first place.
Im pretty sure Im aware of whats happening
This is what they do and they think theyre smarter than everyone else and that no one else sees that move multiple steps before
in any case #other_ip_topics is the place for any further inquiries
endorsing the use of ripped material is like saying you dont mind people doing it
which is like spitting on the face of the people who originally made it
"From here on out, the content you publish will not be judged by the items used to create it. No matter the source, some stupid EULA, or a social hive mind, you as a player shouldnโt be restricted to โcorrectโ ways to creating and sharing artwork. Thatโs why I decided to eradicate this rule forever. Some of you may not like it, but I know a lot will."
@pure mountain understands both sides very well
those are from your subreddit though?
"It will take Nyte and myself at minimum 24 hours to accurately reflect this change in the rules so ignore that for now. Officially, the rule is dead.
Your artwork is yours; no matter the content."
well by continuing to moderate it you endorse the new rule
your actions are your own
there is absolutely no way monarch (thesendest) hasnt talked to you abou this, ranted about this or basically filled you in on this
especially after you messaged me that cute little "you're a sad petty character warden"... really obvious youve spoken to him about this before
Well doesnt really matter if you knew before. Now you do and can choose what you are going to do about it
If you want to continue on the subjects please do so on #other_ip_topics
2 users have been banned.
ah he again. weird bloke
you made that lighting mod?
pretty cool mod lol
yeah no worries
can you screenshot the email you got from steam
and block out your info but not his
Can he even legally file a DCMA then?
did he DMCA the mod or did he just write that comment?
Does DMCA show right after its filed
I got pretty frusturated after comments got disabled
Thought it had to do with DMCA
oh and stealing Gnats work is what he did
yeah hes a dedicated troll ill give him that
unless you get an email there is no DMCA
yep
the comments are working fine for me
I dont see them either
dont think theyre broken
he also didnt do a DMCA
but if he does and puts his real info man that will be fun
filed by US president, lmao
yeah he does not seem quite right in head
how can I see comments again?
cant see them when I'm even logged out
he removed the link
Also kicked everyone out + slur
probably his entire group will dislike my mod now ๐ฆ
does not matter
but those likes raise my ego

hahah jk
I blocked him, still cant see screenshots
quite weird
comments
I mean
links a video "top 5 mods"
checking download counter: "0 times"
LOL
he lives in Georgia in the US
I just found out there is a comment tab
prob like 18 lol
is diverting a #blm protester group to his house illegal?
you can search his username and get tons of funny stuff like his opentable reviews for local places etc
ah wouldnt involve politics in the chat lol
lol
anyways lads
looks like that DMCA was imaginary, like the world he is in currently
thanks for your time
quite hate myself for spending time arguing with people like this tbh, should have just blocked
That Very Presidential guy and his mate are not particularly clever... They still haven't explained why the FSF-1 mod they uploaded to Steam Workshop has a readme that explicitely says "Not for upload to Steam Workshop" ๐คฆ
Roger that, edited
But they obviously are incapable of actually opening the PBOs they uploaded ๐
which is probably for the best
those guys are so bizzarre
We should bait them to come to this discord LOL ๐
No thank you.
If anyone wants to check if their stuff has been reuploaded, feel free to. I don't have time to check these myself but I'm confident there's stuff in there
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1845848406
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1672053848
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1232190943
The uploader has just been banned for ripping, modifying, resharing Arma models from mods and asking help for his "work" related to that in #arma3_model
Star wars mods are not illegal law-wise so the phrase "star wars mods are illegal" isnt correct, and also. On your very own website - https://www.bohemia.net/community/game-content-usage-rules (rule 6) it states -
"You may develop your own game content, tools, plug-ins and other utilities or services for both noncommercial and commercial use as long as it is your original creation, without using the content, tool or any other intellectual property of Bohemia Interactive."
Star Wars is trademarked, you are not permitted to use it. Thus star wars mods are not permitted.
Bohemias rules don't even come to play.
The key words are "as long as it is your original creation", now, did you create star wars? 
not to mention that this rule 6 applies to using copyrighted/trademarked/IP related content from BI, not third-party companies...
Disney has also made a blanket statement that the SW IP is not to be used in anything else than what they make/license out.
Pretty much. It's not like say, Halo, where Microsoft generally turn a blind eye so long as you aren't ripping content from existing titles.
Indeed. Quite many game companies/IP holders are "ok" with fan made stuff as long as its self made and money does not change hands. Disney has taken a different stance though and that should be respected.
Microsoft doesnโt turn a blind eye, they explicitly allow it under a certain set of rules
Would the mod itself be allowed if it was privately used(meaning not published on any platform like SW etc) or would disney also have a problem with that
no it would not be allowed
it existing isn't allowed, why would any use be allowed?
I find the whole Situation confusing with what disney is doing, most likely due to not knowlegable about the topic.
There are some well known sites that host star wars fan comics/works for a long time. and when someone puts their stuff into a mod, it becomes an issue. several other games have star wars mods, and I havent seen it cause as much trouble as it has here.
seems like third party creations are tolerated to an extent, or they just havent gone after them yet
It basically comes down to respecting each IP holder equally, big or small. Disney said, everything is forbidden, then everything is forbidden. People who disagree should take it up with Disney.
I personally could not with good conscience say its ok to make SW mods now because thats what Disney has dictated, before Disneys statement (Lucas Arts was far more lenient) there were quite a few small legit SW projects coming along and that was fine. Only after the statement and when the ripped assets started to pop up SW modding scene got where it is now.
And it should be noted, as it always is when this comes up, that Disney have a habit of going after anyone they can when they target an IP violator. So if Bohemia were not so explicit in their rules on SW modding they could potentially be in Disney's sights - especially given the fact that they have more money than the modders ripping content
star wars is the most extensively and expensively protected content there is
you will never be able to use recognizable star wars characters legally
I'm case people (still) don't understand why Disney is so hard about their IP:
Disney is extremely strict when it comes to quality about content which contains their name or their IP's, and of course want to make sure they always get a share of the profits or make money with it when possible.
This always has been and always will be.
So any mods for other games, which Disney doesn't control, are not allowed to make money with their IP's unless they get money for it. And ai doubt that BI is willing to pay for what the community is doing...
its not about making money in most cases
its just the usage of the IP
in order to retain such protective rights they have to do due diligence to remove any infringements
they explicitly allow it under a certain set of rules If you're referring to the old (many years old) web page (that has since been superseded) that rippers frequently use to justify their actions, No, they do not allow it. Contact the Microsoft legal department from a professional email account (not jimbob@aol.com) and they will confirm this.
Microsoft (unlike disney) specifically allows their Halo IP to be used, that of course excludes ripping stuff from their games... That should be obvious
So
No, they do not allow it.
Is wrong if taking the context of the quoted message into account, they DO allow people to use their IP.
I can't remember the specific details, but it's very definitely allowed. OPERATION: Trebuchet has been featured twice on 343i's Waypoint articles as well, which should be a pretty clear indication of tacit support for the fan project.
It's definitely a vastly different situation to Disney, although getting into the whole "Disney and IP" thing is a quagmire of political nonsense.
Disney says NO, BI says NO... Not sure what is "political nonsense" there, other that the laws are made by political parties...
in what world do you people live in?
do any of the ones using disney ip have their permission?
unlikely
so why even have the discussion then?
@fossil basalt not sure what your referring to
if you have some newer information please let me know
The first rule being:
You can't reverse engineer our games to access the assets or otherwise do things that the games don't normally permit in order to create your Items.
So that's very much like A3's rules where we can inherit existing configs on which to build out own mods but we can't reverse engineer A3 .p3d files etc.
The one rule which simply forbids it:
You cannot enter into any agreement with someone else to exclusively distribute your Item even if they don't pay you.ย We give you this license so that you can make cool Items and share them far and wide. Someone else holding your Item back from wide distribution means: (a) it's not going far and wide; and (b) it is very likely that person is trying to use the Game Content to promote their commercial venture. That's not what these Rules are about.
In short; you're not allowed to upload MS content to the Steam Workshop due to the workshop rules and EULA...
(and that was also posted 5 1/2 years ago so not sure how valid it still is.)
the difference is that Microsoft allows you to use the Halo IP and make halo universe content by yourself.
Whereas Disney doesn't
^ was the point I was making
turning eye or not enforcing != allowed
if something is to be allowed it has to be stated
@rustic copper also steam WS is far from exclusive, I fail to see that connection
something to perhaps take note in the microsofts usage rules is that if you create something new into lets say Halo universe, Microsoft basically owns that idea
so there are these caveats in the making of fan work
smart move
it is indeed. but Id wager not many people know this stuff
Wish more companies see modding potential as PR tool or ...in some lucky cases might even game design ideas for free
disney makes a ton of money based on their franchises
besides the movies
merchandise, video games etc
hence they wanna keep a tight grip on their IPs
they dont need the PR or the potential risk of someone making something that actually hurts the IP
that also
this way they can just sue everyone if they want to
Well Halo case is the way i think. Simple, working, genial
there are all kinds of restrictions there too
I probably should have been a bit more clear, but my comments were in direct reference to a specific title (Forza) in which people still insist that Microsoft says they can rip the content from it.
ripping stuff VERY MUCH != permission to use the IP/Trademarks
was about to say the same - is there any game out there thatโs ok with stuff being ripped out?
the ones that are ok to have their content used have released that content by themselves
STALKER's the only one I know of off hand that said use what you want...
exactly
And they explicitely said "use want you want but you can't monetize it" ๐
but the people don't care and still monetize it ยฏ_(ใ)_/ยฏ
Channel only applies to uh, Steam Workshop, yes? Or can stuff on Nexus / ModDB be flagged as well?
not sure what you are referring to
In so far as IP Rights Violations.
Brain dumb. Momento.
Basically, content for Arma that's a violation of a specific companies IP is being hosted on other, prominent modding websites - can we chuck that in here, or is it better to reach out to BIs infringement email directly?
Channel description
discuss there violations before sending email to infringements@bistudio.com
BI doesn't read in here
if you have any violations of BI's IP, report to that mail address
Roger roger. \o
look at this dude
TeTeT, yax, peral, sab and usaf stuff
hes has 2 other packs aswell
Unbelievable... seems to also believe he or she can relicense the ripped content... This project is licensed under the GNU General Public License (GPLv2GitHub[github.com]).
Has anyone seen the ArmaServices website selling assets which are not made by them and theyโve stole them and changed their name. Idk how theyโre still selling stuff Iโm pretty sure they sell BI code as well lol
So like the ripped the BI code and claimed it to be there own code
They are also pretty much just straight up scamming ๐
@surreal raptor Theyโre selling PKE assets from Pop life and theyโre selling assets found on armaholic and theyโre selling Kangaro0 assets lmao
Funny people 
- theyโve got no permission to do so
They also take 30% cut which is robbery compared to other platforms 10-15%
@sinful osprey theyโre selling your assets man
Yeah
@dull pike theyโre selling ur assets too
asset selling for Arma is forbidden anyway
if you know of other platforms that sell p3d or pbo or paa (armas files that are made with ArmaTools) those should be reported to BI
@faint nacelle so if I make a png in photoshop and convert to paa using texview2 that canโt be sold right?
Cause thatโs also what theyโre selling hahaha
that is correct
is that for files using bohemia formats (pbo, paa, etc) or files made using bohemia tools?
So bytex market have some people who are selling PAAโs too
so a mission/mod would have to be sold unpacked with readme telling the customers to pack it themselves?
basically
The bytex people are sound so Iโm sure theyโll take it down
dont for ๐ฆ sake sell this stuff
Oh wait maybe the bytex and Arma services people are selling them in png form with a readme telling them how to convert to paa
Guess weโll never know unless we purchase them
Which Iโm definitely not going to do
There are probably worse crimes than selling a folder of original works that's packed as a pbo
so you are in the selling life stuff to kids business too then?
Me?
no
Oh ok
there is a message after yours. ๐
Yeah I just didnโt know lol
I mean Fini
Nodus are selling gang skins for $75
Bit overpriced if you ask me
pretty much all of the life scene is just one big scam of people trying to squeeze all they can from kids who have no idea that they are scammed
True who ever buys those skins off of Repentz on nodus is just an idiot
Iโm pretty sure thereโs some gang skins which are more expensive
Still $75 is ridiculous for some clothing
if only people had half a brain to understand that.
Last time I checked Nodus is not monetized, I do not deal with gangs and I don't know anything about that. The last thing I see is that gang skins are free for select gangs. Anyways I do not have a part in that.
Oh no some are for sale my guy I can show some proof. Ik you have nothing to do with the gangs so thatโs fine. Itโs just Repentz exploiting all these life kiddos haha.
Some are free
Thereโs premium clothing for sale
And the ordinary clothing for free
if its repentz its not legit.
Itโs is heโs starting another life community
in this chat we've seen people selling 3 lines forEach scripts for 40$
yeah shouldn't be illegal
just dumb
Some scripts are ridiculously overpriced you can make them your self within a few days
indeed
but I think this is already way off topic of this channel
best to wrap it up
Arma services violating more BI rules I see theyโre selling their core module with scripts
Oh Iโm sorry
Iโm done here
if you have proof of things like that, report to the BI email
Alright thanks man
They have already been banned, move along.
So bytex market have some people who are selling PAAโs too
bytex sells png format
Hm I have a question about the Arma 3 EULA, according to someone on r/arma the part
Ownership
All title, ownership rights and intellectual property rights in and to the Program and any and all copies thereof (including but not limited to any titles, computer code, themes, objects, characters, character names, stories, narrative, locations, artwork, animations, sounds, musical compositions, audiovisual effects, methods of operation, any related documentation, and addons incorporated into the Program) are owned by Bohemia Interactive a.s. (the Licensor) or its licensors. The Program is protected by the Czech copyright laws, international copyright treaties and conventions and any other applicable laws. All rights are reserved.
means that BI claims ownership of user made mods aswell
(source of the claim: https://www.reddit.com/r/arma/comments/hb1rne/so_til_that_the_usp_modders_added_a_list_of/fv73y8p/ )
Is that actually what that part means or is the person just misunderstanding it?
The defining aspect would be "incorporated into the program".
and addons incorporated into the Program
mods are not incorporated into the program. Don't believe all the garbage these thieves/rippers tell to justify their missbehaviour and try to denounce USP's actions against them
Oki thank you peeps 
Im not sure if im in the right place but i suspect a community to have ripped mods and put it into one folder that isnt allowed right ?
No it's not. Ripping itself is not allowed.
Depends, if they have ripped official BI content, yes. If they ripped another mod/game, you need to contact the original IP owner
After checking out this mod, I've noticed it has ripped a ton of weapons from NIARMS. I dont know if they have permission to do so so i'm asking here if this is allowed or not https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2127320218
I recommend forwrding that to the NIArms team and uploading anything to the steam workshop that you dont own is a violation of the steam subscriber agreement (iirc)
Already tweeted at the person running the NIARMS mod
I just dont know if they are on this discord
Okay, not only did the mod rip NIarms, it also ripped RH and ASDG
also EWK

specforce and DAR_HMMWV allso not his stuff
looks like "his" mod isn't even his at all
So the guy ripped 6 mods?
well atleast apparently
and then slapped his name onto it, and says he owns the copyright
Nice 
He even put his own discord on all of that stolen stuff
This guy is getting better by the minute
Repacking without permission is still a nono right?
Is stealing a car still not allowed?
@obtuse spear its still stealing the car even if the car is left unlocked
also repacking is generally allowed outside of steam
on steam workshop by uploading you claim you own the content being uploaded or have explicit permission from the content owner to upload to steam
and he also states he made it, and that all rights are reserved to him on top of that
Btw is any of the people who he stole from on this discord?
yeah
Can you tag them?
wouldn't wanna bother them
not exactly on topic for this channel but I have been trying to look into how mods are implementing either whitelist/blacklist functionality or obfuscation and not finding anything substantial. Anyone know more about this topic or a resource with information?
From what I've read they usually have a list of profile names and/or steam ID's and then they check every players name and/or steam ID against that list at a certain point @void badge
basically the same white/black list as for missions ("your player ID is not on the list, no heli pilot for you then").
downside: remove the script, white/blacklist is gone.
obuscation: there are tools around for ages to obfuscate PBO files, but that's sort of nonsense. obfuscated files can be decrypted in no time by people who really wnat to see/use what's in it
hm, it was brought up to me in the context of protecting mod content but as you guys have mentioned it seems kind of ineffective for actually protecting content?
that's the sad truth. the only way to protect content nowadays is, to not release it
there are some good ideas for mod DRMs but the RV engine / arma is not fit for that
yeah its kind of sad that the mod world has gotten to this cycle of stealing content. Hope in the long run it doesn't impact the quality of mods
it already did
many old folks walked away from modding (releasing mods) for that reason
the only option we have to counter content theft is DMCA. striking the violators on either steam for reuploads, or sending DMCAs to the hosters where the stolen content is redistributed (google, dropbox, even server provider companies like Hetzner or OVH)
I wonder if handing out BE bans for repeat offenders would change much
no, not really
Hm propably
BE ban just means one can not play on BE protected servers anymore. what are they gonna do? disable BE and reupload again
Most of the people that dont care about Ip rights props dont care about BE protection either
Yeah
there must be a second instance for such stuff. like blocking access to all server instances if one is on a violator list (steam ID)
but then again, create another throwaway account and one is back in the game
Playing games should be fun. In order to ensure the best possible online multiplayer experience, Valve allows developers to implement their own systems that detect and permanently ban any disruptive players, such as those using cheats.
Game developers inform Valve when a disruptive player has been detected in their game, and Valve applies the game ban to the account. The game developer is solely responsible for the decision to apply a game ban. Valve only enforces the game ban as instructed by the game developer.
oh... ok
The effects of the game ban are determined by the developer, and must be consistent with a VAC ban, such as being prevented from playing online with other players and/or trading items for that game. It cannot prevent the user from launching and playing the game offline. It cannot prevent the user from using Steam.
So I guess game bans could work theoretically
The duration of the game ban is determined by the developer. Only permanent game bans are displayed on the userโs profile. Temporary game bans, or suspensions, are not displayed.
good to know. then i wonder why BI is not handing out those bans for known repeat offenders
then i wonder why BI is not handing out those bans for known repeat offenders
Who knows, would be nice to see them start doing that though
I'd be surprised if Bi cant get approved for the Game ban system either
i already asked for assistance by BI for repeat offenders. they don't...

i so badly hope that all this will be taken more serious by BI with the next game release
Yeah hopefully it'll improve in some way
i could name a ton of people who would volunteer in enforcing law and order ๐
If BI keeps handling it the same way (so doing basically nothing) I imagine that it'll become an even bigger problem with the next game if the community grows
If BI keeps handling it the same way (so doing basically nothing) I imagine that it'll become an even bigger problem with the next game if the community grows
guaranteed
Oh yeah there#s definetly enough people who'd be happy to volunteer some of their time to help improve the community
it'd definetly have to be vetted by BI though, maybe they just dont want to get the additional resources required to start enforcing the rules more strongly?
it'd definetly have to be vetted by BI though, maybe they just dont want to get the additional resources required to start enforcing the rules more strongly?
maybe... it is also possible that they just can't afford it at this point. looking at studios like blizzard, ea, whatnot... they have whole departments dedicated to nothing more than that
They have a lot bigger communities though
departments that cost a ๐ฉ ton of money for the employees that don't create income
Yeah true
They have a lot bigger communities though
over 4 million sold copies isn't small either ๐
i think a voluntary moderation system could work on the short run for the next game, but might also lead into legal issues on the long term.
moderators are working on BIs notice. how to handle a volunteer who abuses that and creates financial damage?
Yeah but theres a big difference between 216,731 people playing at the same time and 18,291 playing at the same time
(WoW and Arma respectively)
true
Yeah I think a completely volunteer team wouldnt be a good decision
As I said bans should have some form of official vetting
otherwise it'll inevitably happen that the system is abused
volunteers could work cases of accusations, and once they are proven hand it over to a most likely understaffed legal team. but that's a step that causes more delay...
Yeah that could work, have the volunteers collect accusations and proof and bundle it together and send that off to legal
Itโs because BI doesnโt give a damn about us as long as we keep churning out content that makes people buy their games
No ones buying Arma for BI stuff
language 

Like Iโve said many times it wouldnโt be hard to counter the rippers
But you need to actively be attempting to do something
But yeah then you#re also trusting the volunteers that they dont leave anything out or manipulate the evidence any other way which could lead to problems too @dull moon
And yeah it'd be nice to see BI doing anything
Imo this should have happened when the life servers started causing problems
It'd be nice to see BI even put up just a symbolic effort to do anything even if it doesnt really do much
Just to show that they actually care
or are listening at least
They need to spend the time to develop tools that will help us protect the mods, it is in there interest because if we donโt create mods no one buys Arma
They just donโt care because they donโt think thatโs totally the case
But it really is. No one plays Arma just for Arma. It mostly sucks with vanilla content.
And I donโt think thatโs a bad thing really
BI has provided a lot of useful tools for us in the past for mods, missions etc... I think they just need to continue that with protection.
Yep
We won't get new toys for arma 3. That's because they have relocated a lot of resources already. The reason why I mentioned "the next game"
How I see it the hard truth is that if the talented people who mod Arma and respect IP ownership leave the scene, there will surely be a huge gap in content amount and quality and then it will in time start to fill up with the life-esque etc mods from people who dont care. Id wager there would be stuff for the military enthusiasts too, perhaps just not in same quality we have now. But sad truth is that users dont always care either if the mod is legit or not as long as they have fun.
I dont mean to discourage anyone from modding now or in the future but reality is that changing the overall user mentality over modding and respect of IP is an uphill battle. That said I think what we have established here in Arma community is quite unique already and the right direction of which we can be damn proud of. So maybe we will triumpth in time if we just keep at it like we have done so far.
there are communities where respect of people's IP is ridiculized so yeah we could have it a lot worse
ahem ahem Garry's Mod ahem ahem
There is a server called Frag Squad CQC it gives out the IPs to anonymous individuals for them to DDOS can we get them take down?
what does that have anything to do with this channel @carmine folio ?
Sorry my bad misread channel just saw the text above talking about ip grabbers
different ip lol
might still be able to report to bi, although not sure how your gonna be able to prove that
Hi guys Iโve noticed you guys have something about life server developers and life server owners. Would anyone be willing to explain why? Because I know some legit people who donโt steal assets, nor do they steal terrain. It may be the members of the community but u really canโt blame the developers if theyโre producing something completely custom. Obviously thereโs people who do steal assets and such and they are not real developers but thereโs the legit developers that create EVERYTHING from scratch.
of about 100 life servers I know. I know literally 2 who make their own stuff and don't steal
might be because the legit servers are just smaller and lesser known, and don't attract attention by stealing stuff
Hi guys Iโve noticed you guys have something about life server developers and life server owners. Would anyone be willing to explain why? Because I know some legit people who donโt steal assets, nor do they steal terrain. It may be the members of the community but u really canโt blame the developers if theyโre producing something completely custom. Obviously thereโs people who do steal assets and such and they are not real developers but thereโs the legit developers that create EVERYTHING from scratch.
@carmine folio life server can be profitable when popular enough, monetizing content in most of cases is prohibited, adding to this >85% of life servers contain non allowed assets to be used in this schemes or used in fraudulent ways (stealed, reuploaded without permission). Its not something agains life servers, its against dishonest devs/owners
Hi guys Iโve noticed you guys have something about life server developers and life server owners. Would anyone be willing to explain why? Because I know some legit people who donโt steal assets, nor do they steal terrain. It may be the members of the community but u really canโt blame the developers if theyโre producing something completely custom. Obviously thereโs people who do steal assets and such and they are not real developers but thereโs the legit developers that create EVERYTHING from scratch.
@carmine folio Since you're on the Nodus discord, that probably the best example of why life communities generally have a bad reputation.
Almost all of the models that are in the showcase channel are stolen (mostly ripped from other games).
They have pending DMCA's etc, so yea, a really good example ๐
I Donโt support nodus
I say in the discord how theyโre stealing content
I get muted
Nd messages deleted
And outside of that, most of them are above toxic (both developpers and owners), they think to now everything about Arma, Law, and whatnot
might be because the legit servers are just smaller and lesser known, and don't attract attention by stealing stuff
@soft egret Yes I know many small communityโs need literally everything they have is custom not one thing is stolen
I'm not saying you are, just bringing up nodus since you were on that discord and probably have seen their stuff
Your question has been answered Alex..
@delicate hamlet why does the life server have to be profitable?
That idea is perhaps my biggest dislike in the genre.
If a server is in it for a profit, they're in it for the wrong reason.
I knew a couple of persons that tried monetizing "slots" for a life a couple of years back. Didnt work as you said ๐
of about 100 life servers I know. I know literally 2 who make their own stuff and don't steal
@soft egret I would like to know who the 2 are because I haven't found any yet...
@carmine folio @dry quest Please don't mention Bohemia.net staff members. See rule #2
@dry quest reallife rpg a german one, and some other small german one who's name I don't remember
@spark bay I don't think that rule applies when you're replying to their messages.
Yeah maybe @sinful geode This rule is a bit wishy-washy
If its for a good reason, that rule doesn't apply
If its something important, or literally just the discord quote feature automatically doing it, its fine
If you just do it to get a quicker reply because you're impatient as duck, then its not fine
k
any comments regarding making maps from another game? would one have to create a likeness with changed features and names or is it best to avoid altogether?
if its recreated from ground up without using any data from the other game it should be fine. So just a likeness, not direct copy
some names could be protected though
perfect, thank you goat
@carmine folio
sure looks like him
where did you get that idea? thats just a random twitch account, anyone can create that in a manner of seconds
Hey, question- I'm working on a fix for my unit mod that cleans up the main menu screen to the bare minimum (as shown here: https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/697487501719371907/735001052205809664/unknown.png?width=1127&height=634 ), but I wanted to ask if we're able to remove the footer at the bottom of the screen, or if we're required to keep that in for copyright reasons
Wasn't sure where to ask
To be on the safe side I would not remove it.
Gotcha- what about modifying the footer to keep the text exactly as-is, but just removing the black box in the background?
And also, I've heard it's against the rules to change the A3 logo on the main menu- does anybody know if this is the case? Something like this is what I'm talking about; https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/679461619864043540/735028841965420715/unknown.png?width=1127&height=634
(This is from a private dev build, and not uploaded on workshop)
I don't really see why you would do such a thing.
Just looking for official dev input to stay on the safe side
I'd guess you could write to BI legal support
Generally I think that may be at least frowned upon.
If you want an official position:
For many years this community has been known as the premium addon/mod creating community, people work tirelessly and in great detail to create fantastic addons/mods/missions/campaigns to release for free so that everyone benefits, including Bohemia Interactive. There are a few simple rules in place to provide the respect to these creative people/groups that they deserve:
The first and most fundamental rule is that you must seek permission to alter someone's work, to mirror it or use it in any way other than for personal use. No permission, no editing, no mirroring, no adding to your mod pack, no editing and sharing around your private squad, none of that is acceptable.
On these forums you must follow this rule, if a person/team post a thread to share an addon/mod using content from someone else without permission and we receive a complaint then the mod thread will be closed until the issue is resolved and the forum member(s) risks being permanently banned from these forums for taking someone's work without permission.
This isn't just limited to re-using content in addons/mods/missions however, it's not acceptable to edit someone's work without permission and then to post screenshots of it on the forums (even if the edited addon/mod is purely for personal use), it's also not acceptable to edit someone's work, or use someone's work in any way that you don't have permission for and then to create videos which you post on these forums, doing any of the above without the permission of the original creators risks a permanent ban, for individuals, for whole mod teams or squads.
So, you can take the answer that says "no", or you can follow HorribleGoat's suggestion and contact BI legal.
Gotcha, I'll hold off then
Any idea where this is from @fossil basalt? Just so I have it for reference
These are the official rules from Bohemia Interactive.
https://forums.bohemia.net/forums/topic/54604-forum-rules/
Bohemia Interactive Forum Rules Please respect the following rules when you post on this board. Breaking any of these rules may result in a warning, infraction or post restriction (PR) for a set period of time or in extreme cases can result in a permanent ban. 1) No Flaming/Fl...
Also, orange name tag indicates Moderator, so I'm not spouting random things.
Oh no, I got that
Just wanted to have it for my own reference
Sounds good, I'll work around it, thanks for the info!
Best bet is to contact the legal dept if you think you can explain what it is you would like to do. Otherwise, if you do it without permission, the result may be less than pleasing to you.
@fossil basalt
though that rule was meant mainly modder to modder
wouldn't what hes trying to do be a similar thing to just changing an UI element or a vehicle texture?
That's a question best asked of and answered by BI Legal. When they make a ruling, we enforce it.
oh I see
always though it was free range since there are pretty old and notorius mods like Breaking point who have a completely custom menu
When it comes to the legal minefield that is BI, it is best to never assume and always seek permission. Worst case scenario is telling someone that it "should be fine", then having to ban them because its prohibited.
Asking permission should always be step one, its the right (and nice) thing to do.
yeah
@tribal crest I would not remove it, but removing the background (if text is still readable) should be fine, or just moving it into the corner, instead of bottom center if thats sufficient for your needs
I think your screenshot is already without black border? That looks fine, but moving it into a corner would look better I think.
Oh no, I donโt mean the โ2013-2020 Bohemia Interactiveโ text, I mean the actual Arma 3 logo at the top
I fully intend to keep that text
I mean having a mod logo where the Arma 3 logo usually would be- is that frowned on or is that good to go?
Sure, will do
Aah the logo on top....
Is that just for your unit internally?
You could also just move the Arma logo as a small logo to the left of Singleplayer. Just like the exit symbol on the right, have a Arma 3 symbol on the top left, maybe a bit bigger than just the exit symbol
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2172276194
This MOD really seems suspicious
how so? looks like a reskin and some config edits to me
No. Not just a reskin, but โcustom modelโ using Arma 3 models
Best to report it to BI
exterior is A3, with added interior
Seems the interior is also from A3, Marid I assume?
These seats look familar, pretty sure it's from a different a3 model yea
no idea, but i actually requested BI to allow me to do an interior from scratch and allow me to send it back to them to get it into the game
that was a few years ago
they said no
so there's that
But you can report to BI first, if they say they don't have enough proof, you can still do that
at least if this bloke would have spent some time doing something on his own
rather than do this hackjob
but whatever, pretty sure he things that's "modding"
yeah send that along to infringements
To whom it may concern,
Check this Maps Mega RePack out:
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1991398730
``
Angola Maps - IceBreakr
Anizay - Temppa
AORAKI3 - Luca86iTA
ARC Farkhar Valley - Soronelite
Bariga - Kraut
BSOC Brasil - GSTAVO
Deniland - Marko
Fallujah - [TAC] CraveMode
Eladeen - Luca
G.O.S Al Rayak - GOS_Makhno
G.O.S Dariyah - GOS_Makhno
G.O.S Gunkizli - GOS_Makhno
G.O.S Kalu Khan - GOS_Makhno
G.O.S Leskovets - GOS_Makhno
G.O.S N'ziwasogo - GOS_Makhno
G.O.S Song Bin Tahn - GOS_Makhno
Rura Penthe [BETA] - Ghost Fox
Asteroid Field - turfy
NAPF Island - Szwagier
NAPF Winter - Nosko
Cherno 2055 - Crazy Mike
Namalsk - VileAce (Sumrak)
St. Kap - {God-Father}
Archipelago - Ben
HEBONTES MILITARY TRAINING GROUND - Franz, Hunger
Pulau - Temppa
``
Namalsk - VileAce
Actually.. Namalsk - Sumrak.
probably listed latest source he ripped from
He took the authorized Arma 3 port, but I would atleast always list the terrain author if I state "who" made a terrain.
That guy apparently didn't even go to the effort to read the first lines of the terrains workshop description
Hello, after i saw that remodelling vanilla vehicles apparently isnt covered, i was wondering of if retexturing is? And where is the line with changing vanilla stuff?
@tall oxide Retextures of vanilla vehicles are fine and are commonly found on steam WS
Retexturing in the way of hiddenselections and new texture files.
The objects themselves are not touched at all in retexturing process.
Can i retexture everything or only the objects that have the texture file in the config shown?
you can only apply retextures to objects with hiddenSelectionTextures
so only if texture is also in config
And anything else would require ripping the object so thats a nogo?
ye
๐ค question in that case of seeing some projects retexturing houses since you can't utilize hidden selection for house objects baked in to a map as they will always go for the default texture and there is no definition in the placement data line for fetching a different texture if I remember correctly
Do houses have hidden textures?
Wanted to retexture one for a long time
@quick hull how about the cup interior mod that replaces the cup houses with the new livonia houses. They might be objects which can have replaced textures?
If you see retextured vanilla houses, report to infringements@bistudio.com We just had a case a month or two ago
Was taken care of pretty quickly
:'l
If the base model is yours and you are calling someone else's textures.. like base game or so, technically you are just calling against what exists so not touching the others work
How does that help, or how could that be used?
Also that doesnt sound to convincing legally
I found the different BI licenses available, but under what licenses do vanilla models fall?
none of those
Lol
those are just community licenses, available for mods and the A2/A1/OFP datapacks
if they are the ones I'm thinking of
Yes
Something like you are making a terrain, and using one of a3's terrains texture for your terrain, you are calling it from outside directly towards that texture location
Basically, you want more than simple retextures you need to make new models.
found a mod on workshop that bundles the ace-rhs compat mods into one, don't see much original work. is this a copyright violation? https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1956960252
... it contains all of ace as well, so i'm guessing it is now
Nah im sure the guy is the true author of all of ace and rhs
Illegal reupload.@tall oxide @eternal cradle
reading into it further it appears the ace license allows for limited reuploads under certain circumstances
not sure if that mod qualifies or not, up to them to decide
ACE team doesn't care, ACE license allows it, steam subscriber agreement doesn't allow it
Its bad that steam doesnt allow creators to allow their stuff to be reuploaded. Ive put "Feel free to add to community modpacks without credit" in all my mods but steam wouldnt care.
Probably to much work to keep in control over whats legal and what isnt
And in a world where so much Content theft exists, ill take that over uncontrolled uploads
Its bad that steam doesnt allow creators to allow their stuff to be reuploaded. Ive put "Feel free to add to community modpacks without credit" in all my mods but steam wouldnt care.
one of the reasons for this is, that steam requires certain rights to the mod granted that only the original author is able to give
@remote rivet lol dude. itโs also bad that people are not allowed to take full advantage of other peopleโs work, isnโt it. especially since all mods belong to bi anyways /s
reuploaded *if the author allows it @echo orchid
@manic laurel the author can actually allow it, if his/her license is open source
ACE team doesn't care, ACE license allows it, steam subscriber agreement doesn't allow it
apparently not?
afaik ace license isnโt open source
we were talking about reuploads only
just because you write in your readme - we allow steam reuploads doesnโt negate the fact that steam tos requires the author to share his/her IP with valve on upload for commercial purposes
iirc the problem with the steam subscriber agreement is that the uploader has to have legal ownership over the content they're uploading so that they can then allow steam to distribute it
yeah, well aware about what we are talking about
itโs hardly a problem for most.
a mod maker for arma can set his own license in such a way that things can be re-uploaded
steam tos requires people who upload to either be the original author or have sufficient rights over the content they are uploading
if i were to give someone specific permission to upload to SW, i should also need to share my IP with that person, or simply state that a forfeit any and all IP rights, otherwise it is null in regards to what steam tos requires
again, i donโt see steam tos as a bad thing, since that sort of limits (legally) any sort of ripped content etc
in regards to ace, afaik all parts under GNU can be re-uploaded under steam tos
everything is else that isnโt covered cannot (either cc or apl)
@tall oxide @remote rivet Read up and go learn a bit. There's a good reason i said its illegal ^
Except it isnt illegal. If i say anyone can reupload content i made then there is no reason they cant. From the discussions above steam wouldnt care unless i for whatever reason rescinded my consent.
Oh i see what you were talking about.
Name a system you cannot do that?
Thats a problem for all content host and theres no perfect answer. The most common solution is take down the content until its been mediated. Trolls will be trolls
a steam specific solution would be requiring users to sign in to file a claim
but I imagine they canโt do that as the rights holder may not have steam or something
@remote rivet
Except it isnt illegal. If i say anyone can reupload content i made then there is no reason they cant. From the discussions above steam wouldnt care unless i for whatever reason rescinded my consent.
Except for Steam explicitly stating that you cannot. This isn't the first time you've tried advocating the infringement of other's IP rights.
FM is not purple? ๐คจ
Cant you do copyright claims on steam with false info and sttill get content down
@plucky kernel you cannot
you argue for the sake of argument?
i had 3 diff people falsely claim copyright infringement
on RHS uploads, neither afrf or usaf was taken down by valve
@plucky kernel Filing a false DMCA is illegal. Do not spread false info.
So, why are you seemingly endorsing such a thing?
Because steam takes down anything at the request of a DMCA
@plucky kernel that is 100% false
dude, take a hike, you are talking bull
@plucky kernel I will say it more clearly. Continue and you will no longer be here.
*fires them railguns at @plucky kernel* ร_ร
Timur#9366 now has 2 infractions.
good grief you are both wrong and shortsighted. i am talking from first hand experience, having over 1000 dmca filled with steam, and also having to counter claim false dmcas
ahh shoot, ok duck that one
Just a reminder, Discord (not just us) prohibit users from using the Service in order to:
-engage in conduct that is fraudulent or illegal or otherwise harmful to Discord or any other user;
-violate the contractual, personal, intellectual property or other rights of any party including using, uploading, transmitting, distributing, or otherwise making available any information made available through the Service in any manner that infringes any copyright, trademark, patent, trade secret, or other right of any party (including rights of privacy or publicity);```
then there is no reason they cant
except there is a reason and that is steam not allowing it.
reuploads yes
dependencies no
looks like a reupload, but also lots of depndencies ๐ค
3CB BAF reupload, MBG killhouses, COS (that spanish thing), op4
"uk3cb_baf_weapons_ammo.pbo"
"uk3cb_baf_equipment.pbo"
"uk3cb_baf_weapons_static.pbo"
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/changelog/1948562161
@sweet minnow ^
@deep ingot the above is a illegal mod reupload to the workshop, violating our #rules, take it down immediately.
He was typing
He's been typing for a while
oh my
@soft egret thx
Reupload of RHS AFRF & USAF, 3CB, and a bunch of other stuff including some of mine @echo orchid @sweet minnow
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2089012755
PuFu, i hate you now.......
you made me curious about the deepscan results, so i ran some scans
holy ๐ฆ... those are many
@dull moon I can help you configure the exclusion filter correctly so you're not looking for the wrong files
@patent flicker thx
@patent flicker cheers, it also contains @chilly silo sheet
@echo orchid thanks
^ Not so much an A3 workshop thing, but this dude DEFINITELY ripped the A3 Cargo buildings and hex barriers and just retextured them.
Some items look like it's ripped, but I don't believe it is. Quality of the models seem to be too low and most items are slightly different from Arma assets.
But report it anyway, doesn't hurt to have it checked by someone more skilled than me ๐
could be some of the lower lods or even mlods (last one)
do other communities count?
stolen rhs models? https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2181079726
@echo orchid ๐
@carmine folio they count yes, cheers, rekting
job well done
@elder kayak DMCA is "Digital Millennium Copyright Act" (iirc) and it is a shortcut for saying "claim it/take it down"
Okay, and whatโs the process/who do I have to talk with?
Thank you very much for the help man
Contact Steam with evidence, boom, goodbye
Okay, at literally their steam support?
I believe there is a report button on the Steam page
Okay, but wonโt they just be able to reupload again?
๐ฎ perhaps
But I also believe that if one gets DMCA'd too much, he gets his Steam account banned so maybe they will be careful
Have you tried talking to them first?
Weโll make contact with them tomorrow, I just wanted to know if I can take it a step further or if thatโs a possibility
Thanks a lot for the help man! I really appreciate it!
We like our Original Content creators and want to protect them :)
To be clear ( I dont see it stated anywhere) only the original content creator may file a DMCA. What is the mod in question?
What is DMCA: https://www.copyright.gov/legislation/dmca.pdf
Worth of a pinning to this channel?
First channel pin!
May I privately message you @fossil basalt ? Sorry for the ping
yes
I'd like to report a mod https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2182438750&searchtext=LAMBS
@forest merlin
Report to the creator
@half holly perhaps? ^
nkenny, joko and me are aware of the numerous reuploads. Right now we have not taken action at any reuploads.
We already started to receive bug reports from older versions and general other reuploads that changed the server keys, so we will probably start acting soon on it.
receive bug reports from older versions
this was the turning point where we started to enforce DMCAs
Yeah, it is really annoying. "oh i use this one that has all of them in it, the server i play on does not let me join now anymore, pls fix"
i have a question, that there was a workshop crawler before, about this and copyright.,
The workshop crawler still exists https://sqi.workshopcrawler.com/
if 3rd person (not a modder for that mod) , report that mod, is that also applied to steam as well?
like some kind of modpack.. or something like that
reuploads being AFAIK forbidden on the Steam Workshop, anyone can report one
ah it was not a matter of sueing or something. thanks
thought only maker could report it
Well you can't DMCA it
Steam has the option to report content on the workshop even when you're not the owner.
Only DMCA's can be issued by the owners
TIL that SW Opposition has stuff on the workshop

