#ip_rights_violations
1 messages · Page 40 of 1
@olive sparrow 👏
Just loving that it is called Stolen SFP Wheelchair... 😭
yeah, that's what I named my dummy workshop item to find them 🙃
they copied our original sfp_wheelchair.pbo and changed author in the config
LOL... Oh I see now
have fun dmcaing lul
🍰
steals cake, runs away
Happy dmca
thanks for the clapping lol - was afun day. main thing is we co-operate
we have shared goals, and values, and common enemies
and standing together we can make them respec tthe rules and our licenses
Good to see. Many within the community do... Most do not see this. You need a platform to bring the message to a wider audience
wo this guy... lmao what a tit
MyransGhost - Today at 00:15
Buddy, what the hell is up with you. How about instead of targeting communities and stuff you just enjoy the game. People on life servers have fun. Acusing them of abusing mods is just weak. Indeed I understand you concerns that servers make money with monetazation with help of these mods. But isnt the most important thing that we keep arma alive and we enjoy playing it. Life mods became part of arma so fucking accept it. Rather then finding every reason to make a large community loose their server. You should be ashamed of yourself.```
no need to rtespond to such a lame mentality
just gonna block him hehe
lewis
who are yo udex? not seen you in here defending mod rights before. what did you make bud?
Obviously not Travis since he came on. Shut up after I pointed to Dwardens post though
Dave will fix them if they troll us again
Good to hear
it's about muppet o' clock
ok no worries, we get a lot of "new concerned people" arriving every time certain server hosts or their friends tweet about how unfair it is that we are enforcing our licenses/ rights
😂
Credited? No... under the monetization license, this is required: ```On my server I am using mods created by other people. May I get approval to monetize?
You may, but ONLY if you have proper permission from all of the authors of such mods. Monetizing without it contravenes our licenses.```No question about it. You have a monetized server you have to get the approval of all mod devs
sigh, another troll posting hate wants an apology for not being respected...
the armaverse existed way before monetization and is well capable of continuing without it 😉
@earnest palm
Personally I think BI should ban monetized servers. Never ever ran a monetized server, never will
remember lads don;t feed (or feast on) the trolls - it's bad for your health. just side step them and carry on with your day
If they want people to mod DZSA they really need to get their act together tbh
all i see is blocked message - bleating in the wild there myranblah fella
so jog on out of our channel, you've nothing to contribute here.
And that message Rob... you mod devs are the problem because they expect you to roll over and allow them to use your mods without permission... when if they asked, they might well be granted permission. But that is obviously too much trouble
I swear if someone else posts the snippet from bohemians monetization page where it says you have to ask permission imma go live on twitch and eat my own poop
Nope, that is not the issue
Adam, I would like to see that anyways
Sorry Adam... I had to do it a third time for the new PsiSyn fanboi
Lemme go eat something to stimulate my stomach brb
You would prefer no one to use your mods
as trump like to say: WROOOOOONG
we would prefer noone monetizing our stuff without asking F I R S T
this is how to handle those trolls https://i.imgur.com/1MK3A5Q.jpg
I still don't like the block of text though Rob, it's rather annoying
better discord blocks it fully
Yeah I'd rather see a ban. 
30 years of martial arts taught me some people are worth teaching, others and worth listening to, and some people are like the road you walk on....
having an opinion isnt trolling?
wow its a psisyn party!
Are the PsiSyn folks only allowed on a computer at a certain time by their parents...? Seems like we went through this last night
So it seems that PsiSyn has invaded
🛏
sunday mate - no cup final 😦
keep it civil guys, the banhammer falls fast in here
jinx won''t have it any other way
And now I will repost Dwarden's message from earlier just finished reading of ^all that fuzz ... :facepalm: i don't get why you blame creative content makers to defend theirs own licenses protecting theirs work / rights ... they not the ones who break the rules (of good behaviour, IP rights, licenses ... )
reed == blocked
anyone else want to raise their hand from psisyns farm?
george thanks bud. was nice knowing you too
well it's best not to feed the flame and just block.
Guys when the opinion is dumb, it's not an opinion anymore, it's just a dumb set of words put together 
Do you guys honestly think your cause of persuading Bohemia to let you off the hook is helped by this... or hindered...
don't feed them chris - they're ravenous
forget BI, we're dealing with the isssue together as a team
See the Dwarden message above... he is the Voice of God
dave westwood == blocked
I'm a conservative and I support the mod developers
@smoky thistle Post from Dwarden: just finished reading of ^all that fuzz ... :facepalm: i don't get why you blame creative content makers to defend theirs own licenses protecting theirs work / rights ... they not the ones who break the rules (of good behaviour, IP rights, licenses ... )Last time I will post
When he wakes up he will be pissed off again though...
and he apologised for the mistakes abusing al lthe mod authors, and hopes it can get sorted out. he blamed repentz for doing it, and was really unhappy about it
So why are you hassling the people who keep ARMA alive?
you go talk to the life devs about it. Theyve done the wrong here
so i let him know the point of view of 13 authors whosecontent he has ripped
they fucked you up by doing so
fuck over Life Servers
ofc, if they violate licenses, they feel the mighty power of the modding community
¯_(ツ)_/¯
and he said sorry, and he won't do it again
If they did steal from 13 authors then they should be forced to get proper permission or forced to remove it
you guys can now start a new legit life community
i showed hi ma video he made back i n2014, where he talked extensively about how TFAR was being ripped by arma 3 life, and what a bad thing it was, and he said "i forgot about that"
You guys do know that something like this happened before... and it almost destroyed the ARMA community. Yes? So many good mods left. So many modders refused to put their mods on Steam for years, yes?
theres been enough time to fix it
@silent patrol
we are mighty, but not allmighty and see everyting at the same time like doc strange 😄
i'm not responding - theyre al lblocked lol. im just letting you guys know the latest news in case youe interested, the ycan also read on if they wish
the problem has been always there
you all who haveplayed there have silently accepted it
then blame your devs
Run a server without the mods or get their permission to do so... Neither of which seems to be suggested by the PsiSyn folks here. Your view seems to be that you should be able to run what you want
perhaps they should
Don't break the rules, and you will live peacefully, you break the rules, you pay the consequences. The community will pay because they are part of what fueled this whole deal. They can make a new sever without breaking the rules, simple as. No one is gonna go after them if they fall in line. Now stop voicing opinions that go no where. The matter is simple. **You break the rules, you pay. You follow the rules, you will be left alone. **
bounty bars = blocked
If the mods are removed then everything is golden
If you get permission from a mod to utilize on a monetized server it's best to explain that you got permission to do so instead of blindly operating without care
anyone here not to support IP protecxtion is gonna get blocked by me lol
suggest you all do the same
ok, way too many ppl writing to fast... i'll check back later if this cooled down
this channel if for ip rights violation and discussing such items, coming here to vent/rant/bitch about the issue will not do you any favours, this channel like all the others in this discord has rules, please obey them.
Make a new community if you want, an ask permission or commission your own mods, its simple, but your current life server is gone
Rob... Kid... LMFAO!
Rob is like 100 years old
Hey EggBeast, apparently you have got younger...
No the thing is, he's too old to deal with ur bullshit 
it's funny - ive had a few beers t oconsole myself fro mthe damn football
being a brit
And now I am getting a little pissed at these kids
please take your personal insults to PM, there is no place for such stuff in this discord.
so im in a rare moment of staying to explain the day, maybe not such a good idea, but it was a cool example of teamwork - common values and the brotherhood of mod creators
Oh... gonna be lots of trouble tomorrow when Dwarden wakes up
@carmine folio
we're not there yet
we're degrading discussion to banter now. If we were all to be constructive and civil we are to make great strides in the positive direction.
poweraid == blocked
@carmine folio its gone this far because previous time they were asked they just did not do anything
Someone disperse the spongers please, mods, admins, halp!
Stop, all of you, this is is silly. Its only going to lead to banhammer, bring it back on topic
PsiSyn are doing all the trolling... seems like a directed effort from them, just like last night
@silent patrol
i downloaded the lakeside modpack last night, all mods where still there. also the shop was still online last i checked
Good
@paper prawn, @dull moon stop please, like clearly this is not going anywhere. Let them be and let's stop this nonesense
but you see that nothing happened before today
didn't see the store closed, thx for the headsup
@earnest palm
without monetization? sure, count me in
Good now stop spamming this channel with unrelated messages. Use #offtopic_arma to discuss whatever else you want. Thank you.
@silent patrol
one at a time
@silent patrol you should probably share the details with BI
"Took it down" ??
does not mean any other unauthorized mod using server is any less in the wrong
morally the other one is a lot worse than psisyn
Then make it known, and people will stop playing there. No need to make a stink about it in the context of a PsiSyn problem. Each server with stolen mods will have their chance in the light at some point in time
i never knew about that one tbh
Oh well that's their choice.
You all realise that monetisation licencing was brought in to help server operators out, by enabling them to cover their costs.
By frequently abusing the rules of that system which was designed to help those operators cover costs, you are all slowly pushing the limits of that system.
I for one would not blame Bohemia at all for closing the entire monetisation system down due to your fruitless abuses of the system, disrespecting content creators intellectual property rights and their own content licencing, this will harm the ENTIRE modding community.
If you are not here to discuss an actual IP violation, a workshop item that does so, then please remove your discussion to #offtopic_arma
and this channel is #1 infomation channel to share such things. nobody came by to tell us
@silent patrol
that comment is hardly constructive, keep your personal insults to yourself.
content creators put out dmca notices daily, if you scroll up a good bit you will see them discussing so
@pale palm
all servers that violate our licenses and/or ip rights
one at a time
glad i couldn't see all that spam
was on a call, back now
anyway well done chaps. a bit more work to do tomorrow and this problem is solved for good hopefully
👍
Unsung
no, but Rob has extended insight if it comes to server providers and general DMCA stuff
Neither is Epoch in the pack and the Epoch devs support the position of the mod devs whose mods were installed without permission too
Me too
Dave westwood == blocked
Hopefully dwarden will take out the trash in the morning
This is a channel designed for reporting and remedying IP violations not for mobbing and attacking channel regulars who help npeople with their IP violations
Dex == blocked
That’s 7 of them in the space of an hour.
how interesting
All new guys come to share their opinions about IP rights
So Rob, what mod exactly have u made?
Josef whatisface == blocked
Any more?
This is like a minigame or a black belt grading - how many opponents can you take down at once lol
Could you stop talking about irrelevant stuff please thank you. Your last sentence has nothing to do with the topic. Much appreciated
Rob is one of those kids who go to the park with a helmet
anyone got a TLDR? PsiSyn is trying to weasel out of it once more and sent his fans over here. is that it?
TLDR: Rob spoke with Psisyn who has supposidly promised to abandon the project. Server was given 24hours to shit down all unlawful monetization before DMCAs were filed. Then several pages of people complaining that the mod authors are killing the psisyn life community and how unfair it is.
99% of it isnt worth reading through.
so yeah the question is how long does it take for them to give it another go
Mass ban, If I missed anyone, let me know.
If there was a bit of collateral damage, let me know that as well and it will be rectified.
0.o ⚒
did i really miss all the funny stuff ? 😄
Damn @fossil basalt shoulda banned w/o deleting now they all just look crazy 😂
Deleting was the purpose of the ban
thanks FM - nice clean lawn to hang our flag on this morning, and wave to our neighbours
Ours? I think FM got his citizenship revoked when he moved to a country where they drink tea instead of coffee.
You better buy a tea towel
tea tools in the UK
Nah, I get to keep both
Are you sure?
Yes
I’m good unless I renounce one or become an Officer in yet another Military career
nice
@carmine folio I'm just helping the authors of these mods. Their license clearly says no monetizing. And you never asked them for permission. I'm just doing it for them because their time is worth more than mine.
I don't waste my time witch hunting server, I spend it creating stuff Well then I'd suggest starting to create stuff instead of just taking other peoples stuff.
@olive sparrow well progress has been made today on the psisyn stuff. i spoke to him earlier and he has agreed to abandon the project. So.. That means no progress? Because he already abandoned it like.. last week.
Interesting how there are so many missing messages in this chat... How many people got banned over night? 9 people.. wow..
Interesting how at the same time where PsiSyn's server have the biggest playercounts. This channel also has the biggest trollcount.
PsiSyn told me it's unfair to only target him. So I'll do what he wants me to do and look at the other Life servers today.. But first! Fixing TFAR bugs.
@soft egret yeah please make sure you look into alrp because no kidding.... That shit is actually ran by a pedophile
Don't care who is running what. That doesn't break BI's rules
what the heck happened with VSM, and why no one bothered to ban his ass/
It does... He sells staff ranks and faction ranks for money...
i am really curious to why, despite all the shit he has pulled no one took any actions, on the contrary
anyone else would have had a ban by now\
selling ranks is not against the rules either. Will see later
@soft egret - did you get a reply from BI on that mail?
ye sec
cheers, seen the PM
@safe trellis apparently you missed the bit in the rules about duplicate accounts and ban evasion in general?
What is wrong with VSM @echo orchid ? Is 3 lockdown of thread on the wae? Im just asking, sorry for offtopic dont ban me guys im not from any life server
it looks like he was using ripped models from Battlefield and Rainbow Six I think. All the posts about it on the forum thread were deleted.
He bought them probably, well vsm did nothing wrong as i remeber while thread was locked these sellers got reported and banned and stuff was removed
I’m not going to say it again. This is already being investigated by BI.
Okay then forget about that
Moderators would'nt have unlocked the threat if anything was wrong
Also FM your forum post that said that was also deleted
There is a whole lot of information that the general public is not privy to.
I’m not the top of the food chain, so that comes with the territory.
The Battlefield and Rainbow Six models in VSM were from p3dm, a site dedicated exclusively to ripping models... it's a bit ridiculous to feign ignorance and play the victim when the site explicitly states what game the models are stolen from... https://p3dm.ru/files/characters/soldier/8791-blackbeard-.html
I want to hear his side of the story first. And like -FM- said, I'm sure there is information we are unaware of.
He didn't play victim. He said where his models came from
He also removed permission of EVERYONE to use VSM. Everyone has to remove VSM from their packs now
https://s.sqf.ovh/firefox_2018-07-11_11-00-05.png I think the moderators deleted his post too though.
Not that I’m aware of
Yep. His post is gone.. Like.. Deleting discussion about stealing sounds reasonable. But deleting the author trying to make use of his rights is a very bad idea..
Yes, he definitely did play the victim. that whole post is literally nothing but stubborn indignation... and no, he didn't ever admit to getting models from p3dm, a site dedicated to model theft.
that being said, he doesn't even have permission or IP rights himself for most of the files in "his pack"
so the question is - who managed to take that sort of decission, despite the obvious BIF rules
I was willing to give him the benefit of the doubt when he claimed he got scammed into buying the models, but after seeing that he knowingly got them from p3dm, it's time to call a spade a spade...
have warden send you a PM between this VSM bloke and another one, where he says he knows well enough where that BF4 ripped vest is coming from, and he will try and "slip one through"
there goes the "being scammed into buying the models" shit @ebon sand
Hey everything is in Russian on that website. Maybe he couldn't read the tos 
@echo orchid Wait, are you saying there is a PM where he admits he knows that the BF4 vest and uniform is stolen?
yeah
I'm guessing that PM doesn't exist in the public domain?
I don't think you're lying at all, but when those sort of accusations are given I'd like to see the evidence for myself.
yeah it isn't in public domain, but afaik the "moderation team" has a copy of that
this may be very off-topic, but what gear mod would you lads recommend to replace VSM with?
possibly #arma3_scenario related that one @carmine folio
thanks!
VSM case is hillarious
So that server I mentioned earlier, that was selling shit for $. They had their BE turned off. For like 3 hours.
Tired of this slap on the wrist bullshit.
Crazy Mike - Last Tuesday at 5:20 PM
i have 220k total subs across all my public mods ready when you are!!(edited)
@mint edge It's the O3G servers. I've had their monetization privilages removed 4 times so far, problem is they've gotten smart and started doing everything via PM
Their servers are hosted out of Joe's Datacenter Missouri, but they own the hardware.
its sad but no need to drag this on and on
imo for all his lying he should get banned, but whatever (VSM guy)
well thats up to forum moderations , we shouldnt force it and have patience
Exactly, last time i checked @undone pier you weren't a moderator. Also perhaps spare a thought that all the moderators are volunteer community members. We don't get paid. Except Beck hes BIS Staff.
I mean I'm pretty sure that's why he said "in my opinion".
Well i was also making a point, which most of the community seem to forget that moderators are volunteers. Especially how certain members of the community treat us.
Well dammit they pay you enough, fix these issues! /s
Wrong channel? Or did you miss the sarcasm tag. Because I added that for a reason.
i don't see a sarcasm tag, and if you meant it as sarcasm well its not the place here. As i said read the #rules.
Mind if I pm you?
go ahead
my 2 cents, the entire VSM thing is a freaking fiasco, the outright lies he posts and his bunch of minions making a shield around a lier and thief is outstanding. But whatever, the means doesn't matter as long as the end result is what gets a hard on for the "operators" wannabes. a very well managed fiasco, letting all sorts of thievery go by and creating precedence. very well done.
@echo orchid I've been reading up a lot on the VSM affair and rather confused on what's exactly going on. If you have the time, could you explain me in DM what's going on?
no reason to explain it in DM, because it is on the subject of this particular #ip_rights_violations
channel
true, but it's very spread out
- he used ripped models from both BF4 and R6 siege, slightly editing some stuff to cover the origin up.
- he lies about purchasing these models from cg trader and turbosquid - no such models are available from either of these websites, not now, not ever, i have checked myself using cached version of the website just as well.
- there are screenshot PMs available showing he is well aware of the provenience of these meshes - from a russian website that is well known for making available 3d models ripped from different games (including A3 btw), but where the source of said 3d meshes is openly and visible written (Tom Clancy Rainbow Six Siege / Dice - Battlefield 4)
- despite all the evidence available, he gets a pass from BI lead moderation guy, because he allegedly got these models donated and/or purchased from legal websites, and he was simply unware the poor thing, so it isn't really his fault (again, despite the PMs between himself and several people that proove the oposite), he was tricked himself as well, so he is the victim, not the doer...
- he still has no proper credits and sources for any of the stuff he has in that modpack of his, because none of it is made by himself, or from scratch, all of it is "aquired" from different, unknown sources
@carmine folio ^ that is the sumary
alright thanks for clearing it up for me!
this has to be the pinacle of all ip rights enforcement in A3....
I'll miss the gear, but I understand the IP infringement
you won't miss anything, because there was no action against him, he'll just go back to aquiring shit from various places
@echo orchid he wasn't punished, but evidently the guy who first brought attention to the ripped models was... that's the real fucked up part
@ebon sand that's Valve's stance on DMCA rights there - too many DMCAs for infringing IP ownership, you have a ban for bothering us - @dull moon knows that feeling #350
hears his phone goes “bssss bssss“, opens one eye, thinks “If this isn't a fucking hot chick writing, i'm going to kill somebody...!“, sees tag by @echo orchid , close enough
Just read the last 2-3 days-worth of messages in this chat.. good lord.
Also hi, everyone. First time writing in here.
@dull moon 😉 sorry about it man, put it on silent next time
ping ping 😃
@old mauve waste of time
nods
All good... wasn't really sleeping yet, just had my eyes closed and the netflix vietnam war docu playing in the background to Fall asleep.
So what did i miss? Somebody finaly willing to pay me my #350?
and yeah, i know i am hot and smoking sexy, thank you
ahahhah, i do the same with that vietnam war docu for the past week
i only got to ep3, in 20minutes intervals (i put it on sleep after 20 minutes)
Actually, it's too good to fall asleep to. I rewatch all episodes the day after 😂
yeah that is why i am only to EP3
Hi, Chris! And yeah, that doc is great.
On EP4 now 😀
Anyway, back to bed, cya
Later
@old mauve Welcome, glad to see you here.
Hey Volvo! I'm happy to be here? 😄
@ebon sand
“<but evidently the guy who first brought attention to the ripped models was” Yes, but not for bringing the issue up.
and he was simply unware the poor thing Deja'vu I'd say...
If youre all enjoying the vietnam war doc pop along for a members and guests op with the unsung devs some time - its pretty hardcore, we even have a vietnam vet in the team
@olive sparrow wrong channel 😉
Very happy to have gathered some people that will be not allowed onto a few other servers 😃
Ohboy did I mis the fun
so much for A3 assets not being on turbosquid 😛
BI has a Email address for reports about such things.. Dunno which though.. @pliant oar
I think the email in the description can be used also for this
ninjaed FM... YESSS 😀
Only because I have a “real” job 😉
Spice girls touring again? OT, sorry..
🤣
@soft egret email is in description of this channel 😉
@pliant oar it doesn't show on mobile Discord
@stoic beacon Yep, maybe @soft egret was drunk 😄
Dedmen never drunk. Dedmen brain just ded
anyone noticed that after VSM thread was unlocked shitload of reuploads appeared?
he can't excuse it on mobile cause i know he uses desktop too 🤣
🤔
you forgot all the secret services works for me, they just don't know it yet 😉
They do now... 😉
they only think they do know 😉
lol pass the pipe DW
I think that's Defcon Life... But... https://www.bohemia.net/monetization/approved/arma3 Their website.. https://www.defcon-life.fr/
Scratch that Defcon Nations. not Life. Still monetized server.
Well. Next server reported for using atleast 6 mods that explicitly don't allow monetization and probably a dozen more mods that they just don't have permission for.
is that even their website? looks awful af and 1990s
@soft egret the correct link for Defcon Gaming aka Defcon Nations is https://defconnations.com/ and https://steamcommunity.com/groups/defconnationscommunity# .
And this time they even uploaded them to the steam workshop... Which means DMCA incoming :U
PsiSyn guys told me to go after A3PL for all their badness they are doing..
All I could find was TFAR without permission. But that's about it. Though most of their stuff is packed as ebo and they might aswell have repacked stuff into "their" stuff.
need an option for the crawler to run local scans on pbo's downloaded that are not hosted on steam, and ability to scan ebos 😃
As EBO? Isn't that an proprietary file format?
it could be...
I'm pretty confident it is, since it was used by BI to encrypt the contents of LoW, Apex, etc
It's the format generally used for the Arma DLCs
Although there is ways to decrypt it, I wouldn't suggest it 👀
you would have to look up the rights to see if its a prohibited format or something for mods to be in
@west terrace We might be able to include ebos into the workshopcralwer scans. I will discuss that with Optix and see how many files would be affected by that
Overall I would say, that BI does not like people who use ebo for their modded content, as it was not meant for the community to use it, but right now they might be mission enough information on who uses it / or they do not have the time to go after them
im not super familar with webapps as im a backend guy, but is it possible to have an option to scan local files? or is because all your scanner is 100% operating serverside that its not possible without uploading...
We are only scanning what is on the steam workshop
And our structure does not fit custom uploads well at the moment
Might be an option, we will discuss that
prob easier to build a seperate scanner designed for tha tpurpose
hard to say without knowing exactly howit all works 😃
But bare in mind, that you will need to upload the files, so if you have 3GB of mods you need to upload 3GB ... i dont know if your internet can handle that
here in aus not so much 😉
Mine can not XD
not if you're aussie 😛
local scanning and uploading the hashes would be the way to go
but im used to offloading everything to client as much as possible
yeh
thats not a bad idea
only with ebo its a problem as you would expode the format to some extent at least
wouldn't it be enough to just hash the files locally to be able to search them? If you are doing a normal scan, not a deep scan
Wasn't EBO used for VBS? I found a post by the man above me himself (Kju) saying so back in 2014 on the forums.
@undone pier Yes, but that means giving away some details on how we open the ebo then, aaand that wont be a good thing, cause it allows to scan org bi ebos as well, and they wont like that
No its used all the time for arma 3
For all dlcs
thats the issue with anything... giving away the secrets
We have no issues with giving away how the hashing works etc, since no one can defeat it anyway but if we offer ebo that would be a problem
you can still do a hash based search with anything. As you don't need to unpack the pbo for that do you?
is it a hash over the content or just over the raw pbo file
As much as i would like to see ebos disappear, we do not want to harm arma 3 files
no we are hashing the files, not the whole pbo
So we are unpacking the contents virtually
yeh u would have too
u cant just hash the pbo as its a single file.. easy to change
Well, if it's already being used to hide stuff by A3PL the pandoras box is already open.
I'd say you can't offer locally checking EBO's
people will just have to upload their stuff as a private workshop item then
And add the ability to scan your own private stuff to the crawler.
yeh i was thnking that was the solution
just upload it privately to steam
and check it that way
tho more of a hassle
@soft egret you could hash the pbo locally, even hash files inside the pbo locally
browser support for file operations is quite good
I wonder what BIs take on it would be
@keen trout normal pbos isnt the issue but ebos
There is no need to allow local scanning of ebo's. Local scanning is for authors searching for their files. They already have the source pbo which they can search with.
@soft egret why should it be limited to your own files? if you find ebo of third party and not on workshop, atm you would need to upload them yourself as workshop mod (not allowed strictly speaking)
Why would you want to search for reuploads of someone elses stuff?
someone tries to hide his stolen stuff in ebo?
in the case of alot of large life mods that are not using steam to avoid the crawler you could just download, and scan the files. Sure its more work for you, but if you know they are using it, but dont have all that much proof for a copystrike against their server provider, this would solve that issue
Just joined a Rule violating life servers Discord because I wanted to notify them about the violations and give them time to fix it.
At first I was told to join their TS and wait for an Admin. I don't have TS.
Then I got told to write an Email. When I asked what Email they told me I should see for myself on their website...
Hey I wanted to be nice.. Now I don't feel like it anymore.
Report is out now.
🔥 cleanses
4th report today.. Though the first one was just a monetized servers website no longer being there so that doesn't really count
I'd really like being able to upload a local file, either pbo or a contained file, and then search for matching hashes
now I have to create a dummy item on steam workshop
especially when looking for older versions of files
ill make it so yo ucan do that when i remake the website for the third time 
im sure following the prototyping model right there
great work so far! 👍
@river spear you should ask a dollar for every IP violation from Valve/BI 😉
pff.... #350 is the minimum to go
😄
@pliant oar
- is the use of the EBO file format permitted for 3rd party use (mods?)
- is redistribution of ARMA / BI binary files (arma3_x64.exe, ect.) via a 3rd party launcher allowed?
no and no
thx for clarification
the 2nd part could be tolerated as long as it's not breaking some EULA/TOS/IP/security concerns but it's simpler to just say no

Reports for both community that do that stuff are out :3
generally any binary or library is risk, hence why i always wanted that security popup (do you want allow this uknown callextension) before new (hash change) callextension is loaded
sadly, i was over-ruled by 'EASY to use' designers who do not care about security
usage of EBO is shady for several reasons
1st) is attempt to hide the content via our private DLC encryption
2nd) it's using shady tools via RE to actually pack that EBO format (irony same tools can be used to unpack it, so it's not unpackable either)
3rd) it can break anytime at any update of engine
4th) usually EBO is used on Workshop to prevent community crawler to analyze it (ofcourse catch 22, because point 2, but ofcourse i do not want to know)
5th) if you upload ebo to Workshop and i find it (private don't work), expect ban of the item w/o mercy
PsiSyn folk talked about A3LP and ALRP. A3LP I found. What is ALRP? https://www.roleplay.co.uk/ That one?
@pliant oar I would personally very much like a engine update that changes the EBO encryption. People are only using it because that one guy made that tool.
Making that tool useless will hopefully make ebo missusage disappear
(Moved my message down to keep yours in one piece)
but that tool is already obsolete and the old tool isn't working anymore so someone already updated it since
This is ALRP Dedmen: https://www.armaliferp.co.uk
Ah that one that I can't find the mods they are using.
Looks like you need to sign up first.
Might be on their Discord?
Yeah that is the one we were talking about
Oops my bad
ALRP doesn't even have monetization permission but they are monetizing 😮 wtf?
Also should I be surprised to see PsiSyn in their forum marked as "Staff"?
Nothingevenmattersanymore.tiff
Do reserved slots count as monetization?
yes
Have you reported them to BI yet?
when you get ANYTHING back for money. It's monetization.
Not yet. Writing it up right now and waiting for statements from some mod authors so that I can put everything into one report
Do you have a file list?
PM. If you find any of your mods in there tell me and I'll add them to the report
Aight
the only reason to be including the arma 3 exe in there is to be doing RE changes to do things like unlock all DLC's etc
OR they are using the performance enhancing exe's of dwarden and making all players use them
@soft egret wheelchair and/or sfp in there?
sfp_bo105. already on the list
And JM_wheelchair.pbo dunno what that is. I'll take a look
Comes from cobra_alrp
Model is just JM_Wheelchair\JM_Wheelchair
AFAIK SFP is the only one that has created a wheelchair model and configured it, but I could be wrong.
that could be just a simple rename
@tawny sentinel i know of at least two other
ALRP is a monetized server running atleast 14 mods that don't allow monetization and all that without monetization approval from BI.
And interestingly... PsiSyn joined ALRP one day after he cut ties with PsiSyn Life. He made the ALRP server announcement post and is now Staff there....
Anyone still believing him that all the mistakes were not his fault? 🤔
I stand by my previously stated opinion on someone allowing monetized servers to utilize their IP as promotion
Not to mention 3/4 of the staff at alrp are script kiddies or hack creators for Arma 3
A good majority of them are on our global ban list at infistar
@dull moon @soft egret Just look at it: ftp://142.44.142.19/@A3PL/addons/
Project life is basicly all ebo and a reupload of TFR XD
I'm not sure wether to laugh or cry.
I know @coral torrent already reported a couple hours ago
The other server that I talked about before who wanted me to find their email on their website and have me write a mail contacted me.. After I sent my report out.
They got "some" mods from "someone" else who assured them that he has permission to use them. Sounds like Cobra ALRP scheme tbh...
I'm fed up with this "we didn't know" "it's someone elses fault" "he said it's fine" crap.
just send a DMCA then?
It's in BI's hands now.
it's not our responsibility to inform them
I already was before they contacted me
🤷
exactly!
They want me to tell them which mods are the problem. It's not my responsibility to watch over their mods and tell them if they don't have permission after the fact. It's their responsibility to take care of that beforehand
BI?
Nope. The Life servers that I reported today.
so BI contacted them and mentioned you as the reporter?
or did you reach out to them?
I tried to reach out to them first before I report them. Couldn't reach a Admin so I reported them to BI. That was a couple hours ago nothing else happened yet
tbh, should we even bother contacting the server owners ourselves?
@fossil basalt ^
I do it for the servers that I can easily reach. Because I'm so nice. I have two other servers on my list of violators but I contacted them and gave them a week to check everything before I report them.
But I don't have time to waste half an hour on trying to find out how to contact someone.
@frank gate i think you could avoid it by reading mods readme / liceses or google some stuff before making server
@frank gate What seems to be the issue?
@soft egret btw alrp keeps changing ip's Everytime they get blacklisted.
well, they can change theit IPs as much as they want. if ine files a DMCA via server provider.......
@soft egret Here's one for ya. In their startup guide they have a screenshot of their modpack showing TFAR - https://arma3projectlife.com/forums/index.php?threads/start-up-guide.32019/
¯_(ツ)_/¯
@frank gate What specifically is your issue with Dedmen and what does it have to do with #ip_rights_violations ?
I don't need any more info @narrow topaz 😄
Wasn't sure if you'd seen that particular server yet. lol
@narrow topaz
we have all we need, thanks tho
As mentioned earlier, I'd hit the server providers.
well they are breaking the rules
so Id say very proud
but its not the topic of this channel
feel free to contact BI for help
if a server breaks rules regardless of their size, they 100% deserve to be taken down.
it's not mod authors destroying community, it's you downy blokes 😂
What will destroy the ARMA community is if access to mods is removed because the mod devs get tired of being slagged off for defending their intellectual property and their rights to say what you can and cannot do with their mod... i.e. monetization!
I mean, your favourite server would be a pile of steaming crap without the mod author's efforts to create the mod
in other words
@frank gate your server is absolutely nothing without mod authors and you still have the audacity to decide what the mod authors should do and not do? You're quite the hypocrite yourself there 🤦
So you think its okay that people can make money off other people's work ?
I also tried to say that to PsiSyn folk.. What Arma would be without the Mods. And they replied "Hey. Look at all these popular unmodded Life servers"
Why don't they run unmodded themself then?
unmodded life is a pile of hot garbage lol
@frank gate the point went right over your head then. Your favourite server as mentioned in the previous message
🤦
I'm always suprised looking at what some Life servers are able to do completly without mods. Many of them are doing a unbelievably good job.
On the other side you look at the steaming pile of modded servers....
🤦
indeed, the great masters do things on their own
it's the modded that are mostly some content thieves
Yeah there is a lot of bad heavily modded servers too
Remember the reasoning as to why Tonic left? Same thing that is happening now
@frank gate
you seem to not want to understand... if you know nothing about IP, copyrights, DMCA, or any other of that matter, you'd do good to stay out of this
I wish people who created the mods could charge for their work then maybe none of this stuff would be an issue :\
or build some sort of whitelisting system. I.e. break the mod yourself if it's not whitelisted hardware or something 😛
well, i'd sell CUP licenses for montization for like 10k/month
¯_(ツ)_/¯
and a light version for #350
😉
whats that in #350?
@coral tendon they cant. And modders have been shut down for trying, while server owners monetize the **** out of it
daymn
Chris you serious?
why not?
You know what they fish in a month? Before you know they will actually accept that offer
is it possible to let a mod break itself once it detects that the game/instance runs as server? 🤔
@tight copper
Too much, or too less?
Many things are possible. @carmine folio yeah that too
interesting...
@tight copper
I am a monster, but not of that kind 😉
Someone should do a standard bit of code to verify server IP versus a mod blacklist DB and prevent the mod from working properly if the IP is on it...
cant remember who it was that posted something about what one of those servers was pulling in a month, but I get why they run those servers after seeing the sums of money they earn with it
Somewhat between 30k and 120k... many rumors tho
@paper prawn already on the radar. It's just not that easy
Understand that 😉 Hopefully the issues can be worked out
i think the word will spread once a couple of "big" servers are wiped from this earth and sued reparation
¯_(ツ)_/¯
@dull moon put cup on private for 2 weeks
Y?
more then a few illegally monetizing servers use it
I would rather have issues with my server for 2 weeks and possibly have something good come out of it then just keep the current status quo lol
Doesnt it defeat the purpose to have everyone be punished for those servers?
nope
all players and server owners who though violation o licenses weren't an issue for them will be made aware that it IS an issue
same principle as blocking a road in protest xDoccasionally good things do come out of it
The idea for that "strike" was to get the attention of Bohemia. It seems like they have taken notice and the mod devs current strategy seems to be the right one to pursue at the moment. If that fails then, as I've already stated, as a unmonetized server owner running CUP I would support such as "strike"
Well its easy to make copy of it, you should remove all files from it nust keep 1 file named license.txt and upload it as update
@mint edge @dull moon
@mint edge removing mods from the workshop to hit servers won't do jack to those big servers doing clandestine things, all it will do is force them to combine the mods in another modpack to continue what they're doing
It will bring attention to the problem though
It will, but there has to be a way to solve the issue that is better than punishing all of the thousands of legitimate players and their servers.
Correct. BI finally get's their act together and actually punishes rule violations
Let's hope they wake up by getting a dozen reports per week
if all of the legit arma players get inconvenienced that would possibly make bi work faster in resolving the shady business that goes on
Unless they all ask for refunds 😉
so mod removals don't happen frequently
BI don’t really pay attention to most issues, so I’m not sure it’ll help.
well I can garuntee a nice chunk of the community simply will stop playing until they can easily access their favorite mods again
I say do it no balls
Oh definitely
for custom server when Macas a3l went down server population was cut 60% across the board
imagine that for an entire month
Players will migrate to other games and Arma 3 will finally die, sad but true
Yup
I don’t think so.
Well it won't do it any favours
To this day, I still play OFP
Yeah.. Me and any of my community members certainly will not leave just because a mod forces attention to a serious problem
The thing to consider though is that Arma is so much more than a Milsim these days.
Being unable to play a Operation happens after almost every Arma update.
Personally, I'm not too concerned about if Arma 3 "dies" or not. Making the RHS/CUP workshop entries(as a show of solidarity with each other as creators) private for a week is sure to put some fire behind the proverbial buttocks of BI legal management to quit slacking with this stuff.
I agree, doubly so if it’s a coordinated strike.
Note, I'm very adamant about that the it should be stated clearly from the beginning that it's only for a week and then that the workshop entries would return to normal.
Just an idea.
😇
We'll have to do tons of DMCA's before and after the action.. But otherwise I don't see anything against it
Also don't set them to private. I think that might loose subscribers. Remove all pbo's and add a new PBO that shows a message when Arma starts.
Make a config error that will pop up a message and let Arma crash at start
Or just a message in main menu
Need to have a clear explanation so that the less intelligent people also understand
Message in the main menu would probably be the best as to not get massive amounts of technical support requests to BI
Dont think this will target the right people. All those problematic servers we are discussing here are either reuploading their collections on steam workshop or use their own server/google drives etc. They dont use the official workshopfiles most of the time, so they wont care
Can't actually believe what I'm reading....
So punish tens of thousands of servers and the remaining, is it 50k players, just to spank did u say 6 servers...?
No. To spank BI and all the other servers violating
Bear in mind Baron, the alternative that was talked about recently was that the server devs would quit ARMA3 and remove their mods forever...
@safe arrow We want BI to take action. We are not targeting the offenders directly.
Collective action kinda relies on the fact that it mildly inconveniences people to the point where they will take action. For a week.
Please take extreme caution guys before you decide on this cartel style action. That's all I'm saying... For the good and love of everything arma
You guys are re-writing the same things we talked about over and over last week and reiterating the dumb bits of it
You do a 3-way mod strike
No one will care
Before you could have had the support of everyone, you're just going to make people mad
Take CUP down? People will find another mod, no one will care, life goes on
We need trump in here.... Make arma great again..!
I'm all ears Adam for a better suggestion then collective action.
Clearly when people are talking in this channel, everyone is listening to their own
@tawny sentinel as I said, you can scroll up and see all of last week's conversation
If after a week the same things are popping out again not considering 1 second what was discussed
Then honestly, I could care less about mod strikes and all the IP rights shenanigans behind it
He is the one that keeps telling us how easy and time saving it is to force law on each server hoster, facebook, twitter etc.
Eggbeast, me and a few others made some suggestions
You guys don't wanna hear them, you are on your own then
I wasn't aware this was discussed previously, I'll go take a look then. What day?
People will find another mod A CUP alternative? really? 😄 Tell me more
Tell me more how taking down CUP will make a difference
You guys start sounding like a broken record really
It will show BI that we don't play along
Literally no one is listening in here
again. We are not targeting the players
You are targeting everyone but BI
With your useless one sided actions
Do you think BI will give a **** if CUP is removed?
Like really man..
Dear Arma, can't we all just monetise? I mean everyone... Mod makers, server owners, scripters, everyone. Won't that solve this problem once and for all?
imagine if cba went private
Yeah good luck involving other mod makers
@hushed spoke No
But that’s the thing. You’re in the official Arma 3 Discord and BI still aren’t listening, cutting away some mods, when they really really don’t care about them anyway, it won’t make a difference.
When all u do is yapping in here between the 3 of you
@hushed spoke uh wtf
When other people in here try to reach out and help
Literally 1 week later you go back to the same issue
You want to do things your way
Thinking it can make a difference
I think bi would care if there was a suddenly drop in players
which there would be if a majority of modded servers get crippled lol
There will be no drop in players Mike
If you remove a mod, a community will find another one to use
Simple as
what replaces cup that's readily available?
Tell me how the community will find a CUP/RHS alternative in less than a week?
@soft egret you clearly never run a community if you even ask that
I do...
Sure tell me about it
Still got to think that the current DCMA/server takedown route is the best one to pursue though...
How many players does your community have Dedmen, how many users in your discord? How many unique players join your servers every day?
no it isnt
Not at the point where other action is necessary
We don't have a Discord. It's a closed milsim group
So that's not a community, that's a click
alright Id say this is getting again way off topic for this channel
mod authors are sending dmcas more then developing their own mods >.<
You are getting ridiculous now..
No u
The size of ones community has nothing to do with this topic
Bohemia need to actually step up and do something, not mods and mod makers.
no personal attacks
Cosmo it has when he says that people can't find alternatives to RHS or CUP
alright then @fossil basalt sorry to bother your evening
Yeah @mint edge ^ I spent about 6 hours today reporting Communities with a dozen violations each
@errant drum you clearly have no idea who I am.
See, this is why communism fell. It just doesn't work. Time to join the 1st World....
And you dont care to explain what makes you so entitled. You just make statements without explanaitions.
people who don't make the mods don't know how much effort goes into defending the IP xd
Ahem....
more effort then development in some cases
@safe arrow have you been reading what we have said the last week in this channel or not?
When mod takedowns were discussed, I stepped in with Eggbeast and G-Dog and a few others
We made suggestions
If after a week the topic is there, same as before
Without any improvement in organizing or listening to anything
Sure. And all that was stated where so called facts and how easy everything is, without explaining anything or how it could be made
Then why even talk about it
It baffles me that people don’t think leaning in BI is the solution here?
You just drift to keep saying "mine is bigger than yours, so i know what to do and you do not". That doesnt bring the topic on or help the discussion to find sollutions
I guess yall need to realize that if you take RHS and CUP down no one will care, then you can come back in here and discuss it again
Can you explain why? Just once?
Read the past week, I don't need to repeat myself over and over
If you are asking this
... helpful...
people will just reupload over and over, you can't beat kids who want to play their servers
That's the beauty of discord, use search function and find your answers
Enough. I'm about to start ejecting people.
I just looked through all your messages last week.
I see you saying the same things you are saying right now.
You said we should collectively try to reach Bohemia. AMA tried that last year. didn't work.
And we are trying that again right now. We'll see if it works.
Instead of spending all your energy with BI, take some action yourself, see if that works, if it doesn't, at least you can prove us wrong at that point and you have nothing to lose? That is what modders have been doing in the past. Over and over again and we are getting fed up with it.
It's not like we didn't try doing anything on our own yet. We aren't thinking about this out of the blue.
We didn't ignore what you told us last week. We already told you last week that it doesn't work. And you just ignored us. So please if you have nothing constructive to add...
It's not like we plan on taking Mods down tomorrow. This is a plan as a last resort after we tried everything else we can do. We can discuss it further if we are at that point. And then you will have your proof that other ways don't work. Till then it's useless to discuss that.
Especially not if you have to go to personal attacks to defend your point. We still have #rules
Back to topic.
Does anyone have contact to berghoff (https://forums.bohemia.net/forums/topic/88465-african-foliage/)
or mattaust (https://forums.bohemia.net/forums/topic/185551-arma-3-custom-buildings/) ?
They have both not been active on BIF for a long time. And there are many monetized servers using their mods.. Which.. If they haven't been active for 2 years probably don't have permission.
MattAust explicitely does not allow monetization. I got explicit permission to use his models only on the understanding that my server was not monetized. He is really nice like that 😃
When was that? He wasn't active for 2 years now
It is advised to collectively try to reach Bohemia peacefully before taking action. I agree with the letter route, perhaps posted and retweeted among many users, communities can also solicit their players to join the cause. Taking action, without everyone's agreement and cohesion, can only cause a sporadic misunderstood statement. 1 letter from 1 person is not enough. 1 letter from many people, many retweetes etc can be something more effective imo. Being drastic like that, no matter how big the lack of communication with Bohemia is, is not the ideal route.```
See it like this: I have a big community, 6000 people on my discord and more than 2-300 new unique players joining my servers. If I have to close my servers for a day, a weekend or even a week, I could yes, join the cause, but what would that do? It could help it, but players who are ignorant about the matter will just lose interest and don't care. The good communities can easily rack up numbers to spread a louder message "threatening" to close/lose the servers because modders are tired. Point being is, don't involve only modders. Use communities, because at the end of the day modders, communities and players are what make Arma.
@Chris_Lutz_(audiocustoms) and I'm saying this because for example, the letter you mentioned. Is probably known to a small circle, and that's the effect it had in general, none, at least from a community or player perspective.```
You can see my request in his mod thread on the BI forum. Was a long time ago... August 21, 2016
Already adressed these messages in my post...
As I said.. Useless to discuss it further. And as I also said.. Back to topic.. Please.
Aight then, not gonna add anything anymore on the argument, clearly reaching out for a hand from someone else is not in your interest. Peace
🤦♂️
MattAust's kind reply was That's not a problem Grahame, It follows my license which allows you to redistribute and modify the content in any shape or form. Just attach the license in a sensible way to the mod (like how I have it), and you are free to do what you like.The license explicitely prohibits monetization
be careful with that "free to do with what you like" part of that statement, most idiots don't actually read licenses and will get the wrong idea and be a nuisance later on
That was his reply to me. I had already said: I have just taken an Epoch Australia server into beta and in order to get your fine food and beer consumable I needed to produce a custom version of your MM_Shopping items (basically I changed the base class for the items to CA_Magazine rather than Item_Watch. The server is, of course, completely unmonetised (I also use the CUP mods so that goes without saying). I was wondering whether I could get your permission to release the mini-mod (just the shopping replacement) on Steam. All license files are intact and I have not altered the credits at all. It would make players lives easier to have it in the workshop rather than as a manual download but, if not I'll live with it ^_^
Thanks.
BTW, in the BI forum thread for MattAust's mod he does state: KLAERWERK Community Untouchable Life Community Arma 3 Project Lifewere approved to use his mod with monetization in the first post
Yep found that too.
Untouchable Life Community doesn't seem to exist anymore.
Arma 3 Project Life doesn't use it anymore.
KLAERWERK Community is running other mods that they don't have permission for..
😒
8th report today. Time to sleep.
Cyberlegion European Community by Macro Network (ISP) - Looks to be using RHS based on their mods page https://arma3walkingdead.it/wds/
Not 100% who (if anyone) in here I could ping to bring it to their attention
Is obfuscating allowed? I've just read through the whole day of messages, someone talked about ebo, which isn't allowed as it's a private tool from BI. Obfuscation is not private and even included in Mikeros tools so I'd guess its fine. Or do you still think someone would hide something?
Obfuscation still shows people want to hide stuff.
That's nothing anyone can do anything against though.
@soft egret where is that from
ahh nevermind, had to scroll up
@narrow topaz are they monetized server or what/
Let's say Ive made a simple UI that comes up in the beginning of a session, that states a few things what you are allowed to do and what not. Basically a license and maybe a contact information for others to contact me if someone is doing something shady with my mod. Then obfuscate it so the server owner cannot simply delete the script. Would you still judge me?
People will judge regardless of the purpose for obfuscation
Yeah @echo orchid, monetized under the name I posted above
already reported
😉
cheers for the headsup
did i miss some 🍿 earlier today
damn
No problem. I'll remember it's you for anything else RHS that I find.
PuFu is RHS
Chris for CUP
👀 for others
Slow day at work; so I have basically nothing better to do but skim the monetization list for blatant offenders and (more often) links that don't exist anymore
well, ping me if you find others as well 😃
this is pure gold even with my limited italian knowledge + google translator
https://arma3walkingdead.it/termini-del-servizio/
that they have a fucking terms of use, but they give no fucks about other people TOS and EULA
ah, so a case of "this is a classic"
"All intellectual property rights in the information and content available on our sites are the property of Macro Network or its partners. Some parts of the contents of the site are our property. Unless otherwise specified, the contents may be copied for personal use only. It is forbidden to modify, publish or transfer the content of the site to others and to use it for commercial purposes." 😃
@echo orchid Have another. - ```
Monetized Name: BJS
Servers Page from Website: https://www.stowmarines.com/servers/
BattleMetrics Link showing Mods: https://www.battlemetrics.com/servers/arma3/1844782
@narrow topaz are they on monetization list
Yep; under the name "BJS"
cheers, reported
They actually do not seem to be using the monetization authority though. All I can find is a patreon page that allows you to You will: Be invited a donator only meeting held once a month to discuss what's changing and any ideas that are wanting to be shared. Get the $5 donator tag on TS (Ask BJS to add it if not automatically done).
Seem more like a MILSIM group than anything else
it doesn't matter, if they are on the monetization list, they need to get permission, and RHS has a strict policy regarding monetization = no such thing
not my rules btw
With that particular group they should be recommended to remove themselves from the list since the patreon donations do not need BI's permission since they are simply donations with a TS tag and inside info on the direction of the group... Maybe they had ideas for a monetized server before and kept the tag... or maybe they though they were covering their arses... But you are right PuFu
And actually I guess they do need to be monetized since the FAQ does say "No, donations are still allowed. But remember – a donation is a gift without any counter value. If your donators receive perks or rewards for donating then we no longer consider it a donation and you have to apply for the approval."
any sort of return for a donation = sale = needs aproval for monetization
I occasionally have to tell people that no, I cannot give you anything for donating. Oh well, do not run a server to make money - and if I could not afford the costs myself I would not run one... A lot of them do not understand that. TBH, even if BI allowed it I would not give someone anything for a donation - hate pay to play games...
crunched it all, again
so just for @soft egret and co. BI already does what it can with the limited 'services' of 3rd party it can do
the problem here i think is some expect that BI will be battling the IP rights of content of others for others (while originally the main aim of the 'monetizing (and the prequel A&V license) license' was to protect BI content
To be fair the monetization faq says: "On my server I am using mods created by other people. May I get approval to monetize?
You may, but ONLY if you have proper permission from all of the authors of such mods. Monetizing without it contravenes our licenses."
I.e. Bohemia's EULA would be infringed if they did so...
i think the main issue is that BI don't own law agency in 50 countries , yet
g-dog the point is approve the monetizing hence we control who and if can do it, hence protect ourself (our IP)
the mod IP is just the bonus control where it all gets complicated ...
as many here know the limitations what e.g. can be done on workshop (no ban threshold for repeated offenders, no reuploads prevention etc.) or no control over server master, make our attempt to keep the order in chaos way harder
Understood and fair points. I understand the frustration of the mod devs and a lot of that comes from the inability to make Steam do the right thing. Guess people just think that as a game company you'd have the clout with them.... But if they don't care then I see it can be tough
Its probably frustrating as hell for you too I'd guess
When VBS achieves sentience things will be different though 😀
Thanks @pliant oar, hopefully this clarification will cease all sorts of misunderstandings and useless conversations about what BI should do and what Modders should do to protect their own IP rights.
Maybe you should pin it so it's always there
Why not just marry up the terms of the licences between the mods and the game?
If Bohemia approve monetisation with their tight checks on no game changing options available, then that passes for mods as well? I mean, the mods are modifications of the game itself, it does seem a bit tricky to have overreaching terms from the mods across the game they sit on.
And before anyone flames me to death, I'm just throwing some suggestions out there...
Plus, I don't mean being able to monetise the mod's assets.
It's a tough one BaroN... based no doubt on all that has happened before, some mod devs specifically say that their mods cannot be run on BI monetized servers - CUP and RHS have this in their licenses. for example the CUP license: * Monetize the content or use all or parts of it on a server that is approved for monetization (you can't get approved for monetization by BI when you use this Addon/Mod).That is their choice and if they say that then the server is not allowed to be approved for monetization by BI (under the terms of BI's monetization license itself) and if they do subsequently run the mods then monetization should be removed
That is, obviously, a separate discussion than the Steam Workshop problem
RHS's license includes: You may not use the material for commercial purposes. This includes running this package on server instances that employ any monetization schemes, including, but not limited to, donate-reward systems. Bohemia Interactive's approval of your monitization scheme does not grant you rights to wave this clause of the EULA.
So they explicitely say that they will not give permission to run on BI approved monetized servers. Look above for BI's FAQ entry on whether you can be monetized if the mod on your monetized server forbids BI monetization...
The grammar nazi in me says that it should be "waive" though 🤔 😉
Yes but, that's what I'm saying....why would/should arma agree to allow 3rd party modded content to have a tighter licence than their own. If it was aligned, this channel would be a lot more quiet.
I know there's the catch all in the arma terms that you need mod approval but, that then means there can't be popular monetised servers.....
Well... BI must remove monetization until mods like these are removed... then they disable BE, then the server changes IP... rinse and repeat 😦
Honestly it shouldn't be up to BI. It should be up to the mod creator itself
BI has no say over mod licenses... if they did then those mods would probably just become private ones shared between like minded communities I would think
Which would be a disaster!
Hi Floss... was reading what you'd written about the Exile monetization policy (though I don't use that mod I checked because of the Italian monetized Exile server this afternoon)
Just marry up the terms so, if bohemia grant monetisation, as it's their game the modification is based on, then it's OK.
Currently it does appear to be upto the mod creator(s)
If they did go private, then that's their choice. Another will pop up though that seeks popularity...
BI cannot do that without destroying the modding community tbh... Better to remove monetization completely. Why not, not that many servers on the list
And many of the most popular servers are not monetized
And many of the monetized servers are hacker incubators
@hushed spoke Just marry up the terms so, if bohemia grant monetisation, as it's their game the modification is based on, then it's OK.
they own the game, not the content i make for the game
you cannot marry up the terms
It is blatantly clear to me that BI can not enforce its monetisation license agreement and it is causing nothing but grief with the content creators. Is it not time this entire experiment with monetised Arma servers was shutdown for good, banned completely?
If they did go private, then that's their choice. Another will pop up though that seeks popularity...
lol, they won't go private, modding will cease to exists
if there is no active modding community for a game francise like arma...
it is NOT up to BI to enforce individual EULAs
Good luck with DZSA nodding if that happens
Anyone remember the poll? https://forums.bohemia.net/forums/topic/201991-server-monetization-program/
The former page was listing the following information:
Quote
We will monitor and evaluate its effect on the community
...
it is ONLY up to BI to verify, respect and enforce their own damn monetization rules
Tbh. Would solve all their problems if they removed monetization
By having them on the monetisation list it is effectively endorsing the breaches of these licenses, BI is actually partly your foe in this as well.
@vast notch 😄 ohh that useless poll i made
[1:57 AM] G-Dog: Tbh. Would solve all their problems if they removed monetization
yeah ^^
or it would partly go underground, but it isn't like nowadays a lot of shit isn't going underground either
but if people/servers are NOT on that list
it is 100% up to me to deal with it
which i have and will most likely continue to do so
i have yet to encoiunter a host that will neglect a C&D
just so some server to stay up for a game
For all the ones on that list that are breaking the license then BI is endorsing, them, so suing BI for copyright breach is completely reasonable honestly. Something has to give here and I think going after the source of the problem is the only way you solve this.
because if they do not act on a C&D
they are, themselves, liable to damages in case it ends up in court
By removing monetization as an approved option the relationship with Bohemia would improve I think
as i have acually spend countless mails with BI on the subject
they are simply not prepped from a human resource point of view
At the very least it is time to send cease and desists to Bohemia itself for its part in breaching copyright and endorsing those that do so
to deal with it
they don't have any bad intentions on the matter, but they simply cannot handle the amount of stuff going towards their otherwise limited legal dep
That is my opinion on the matter, personally got no skin in the game as I release GPL v3, although I probably will find I will have to defend that against cretins that modify my mods without giving back.
Yeah. I don't think BI like Whats happening either.
Doesn't matter whether they have ill will or not, through incompetence or malice they are aiding copyright breaches. They either get the resources and ensure that doesn't happen and they do so now or you ought to prepare to sue them
i can tell you that it doesn't. but on the otherhand is 100% up to them to change the rules of the game
will it solve it? nope
will then be outside of BI's yard
yes
New campaign... Remove monetization completely. Does not work, cannot be enforced
we tried that already
or at least i have
and a few of the old farts (like myself)
in any case, as i previously said, the honest option is to remove monetization altogether
or, option B, much less likely to happen, due to the can of worms that it is
to allow everyone to monetize, addon creators and servers alike
that will most likely end up worse than it is now, considering the existing (or in fact the lack of) infrastructure and access from Valve
on the long term, this can be (partly) solved by
a. having some out of the box MP gamemods
b. having more dedicated servers 24/7
c. having a lot more control over rented servers or server.exe at the very least
also one other option is to remove modding altogether from this franchise = much less headaches 😃
LOL... Had this idea (I know it is a dream thing) of BI having a list of mods that prohibit monetization and their model class names and server owners on non-monetized servers registering with them. Then you could get a "DLC overlay" if you use the classes on a non-approved monetized server 🙃
that's actually possible afaik right now, eventually with some small modifications to the core game
that being said, due to A3 being on its last leg, i doubt anyone would bother
Ikr
But let's get the ideas in for A4
Because we are going to need all these modern weapon, equipment and vehicle mods when BI set A4 on Mars...
(Still have not forgiven them for the 2035 thing)
😂
i could care less about the setting, i said this before, arma for me is more of a lego than anything else. my own personal wishlist doesn't revolve around content
server master list controlled by bohemia - easy to remove offenders from server list.
server "game" having to be purchased on steam, means offenders = game ban possible, easy to game-ban continuously for people re-purchasing the server.
BI could also run a model where they control and then lease servers to people wanting to run them, easy to shut down offenders then.
those are just a few quick future options that come to mind, that would make policing the minority really convenient for them.
true, would like to play arma for the story, or game some SP sense out of it (in a game world where SP is so secondary)
still, i doubt for the francise this will change.
you somehow forgot that before monetization the breaches were happening all the time, the program setup some rules and gave us some ammo for the C&D guns
I was sort of joking PuFu... apart from the fact that I use (almost) no vanilla A3 weapons or vehicles... CUP or RHS and others (UK3CB, Unsung, etc.) for me 😎
the problem is that some somehow think BI can sort any and all IP problems everywhere (while most of the offender don't give squat even when the real lawsuit lands)
@pliant oar well aware david, also well aware that BI did it for its own than for anyone else
that being said, it could have been done completly different
in order to protect BI's IP
btw. our actions still do happen, but lot of ignore the sad fact we must give 'LOT of time' for each 'cycle of please or do'
i still send out C&Ds
for communities that give zero fucks about BI monetization policies
ye but you can decide if the delay is >n days< while we must give way more
there are still plenty people who do it "under the table"
what i still don't get is WHY the rules weren't changed
Surely with a no monetization policy it would be "comply immediately or else"
same goes about the BE slap, it's nice workaround i did for the lack of steam master control but it's not effective enough
considering
___________________________________________________
We will monitor and evaluate its effect on the community```
it works for some but not all
did anyone actually monitored and evaluated the effects on community at large
ye the problem is that those 'cases' are slowly overwhelming the staff (support/ ip infri.)
before same rules, with nil changes was extended/
i understand the lack of infrastructure, i get that
but you cannot safely drive @130 kmh on a damn dirt road
Some of the monetized servers are also hacker incubators but that has not been dealt with either
you cannot expect that to happen, so why do it in the first place
it's not only about the servers
it's about the so call mods
pufu the thing is, we are the maglev highway and everyone is trying go FTL on it 🤣
ripped stuff from all over the place (true, nothing to do with BI, it's not up to BI to slam them for that stuff either)
you are the first ones trying to FTL on it
not anyone else
not talking about us, i said everyone using that highway is 😉 {ok catch 22 that involves us too}
I must say that I do not see how prohibiting monetization would make Bohemia's job more difficult?
you win
yeah but you are the ones that put the minum speed sign up
lets correct it ' many do try go FTL'
😄
but the police only has 0.1 c drives
again, who's fault is that
not our causes we don't have the FTL blueprint, yet
Damn... now I have to go watch a few more episodes of Enterprise on Netflix... back later 😉
Nothing more likely to inspire fear, than being chased down by a BI cop on a snail 😛
i am pretty sure there is little left to do for A3, but what i wanna hear
is someone from BI (except the folks i exchange mails with from legal dep) and david here
it's railgun armed snail with fancyfusion reactor
actually aknoledge the clusterfuck the damn monetization created
you could keep the existing monetisation licence and just not licence anyone. then you still have the same protections as is current and remove monetised servers.
is that so hard, or does anyone actually think it worked/
as i said, the problem existed before the monetization and it was worse, you just forgot it already
i give example, if the monetization system is revoked from now on, the violators will continue to happen and nobody will do anything and you on your own
monetization is by default not allowed (some exceptions to what is monetization there), unless on the list which is manual approval
yeah but no one actually checks that list either
come one, you very well know what i am talking about here
"i give example, if the monetization system is revoked from now on, the violators will continue to happen and nobody will do anything and you on your own" Except you would C&D anyone who monetized if you prohibited it
i know that you have no control over the damn servers
ye but at least there is some list and if someone does something he can point to that, the rules and say 'this is in breach of that, please take it down (e.g. GSP, server host, file host w/e))
i also know that would have been nice to actually be able to shut them down
remove the monetizing ruleset and you back to your own EULA or our basic EULA
just like i know that Valve doesn't actually ban people for IP violations
aka all of sudden you have less guns (or ammo or w/e you use as portrait of picture)
worst case, they revoke their publishing rights
How come BI has such a hard time getting people game banned for this stuff? whereas other games can get it done at the drop of a hat apparently
what you mean game banned ?
locked out on steam
I believe BI are little more restrictive on throwing out game bans
i have yet to see such a game ban for arma
how i can know if jon joe xyz who buys cheap account in sale and publish 255 mods he just downloaded somewhere even uses that account to play game ?
it's as futile as naive
and gamebans aren't blocking access to workshop of the gamebanned game either
I oddly thought BE bans gave game bans for a moment, but it's BE ban and VAC bans so people can't refund the game 😂
Maybe bring in VAC bans for A4?
I know A3 does not support Steam VAC bans
begins going to check one the sitreps where a change was mentioned
if one has the account BE banned, he cannot use BE enabled servers
VAC bans and game bans are the same thing, just done by different anticheat services as source
but that goes to show the effectivness of BE server bans as well
it seems very strange that steam allows people to access workshop for games they do not have
Oh... did not know... so a VAC ban is a BE ban?
VAC ban is just game ban but for service named VAC 😉
because it predates the gameban system and it's Valve's own anticheat service
😉 😉 😉
Thanks Major Mittens
Wait what, are the three emojis different sized for anyone else?
nah, you're just goin mad 😛
@grand oyster lol dude, take a break from the screen
Last time I had looked ARMA was not on the list of VAC ban supported games and I did not read that in the SITREP 🤦
ye banned accounts can't be refunded that's correct @grand oyster and it's good it prevents exploits on the charge backs
yep
anyway until Valve enforces better rules for the workshop (like multiple bans means no more access to upload more items, game banned / vac banned for the game again no more uploads etc.)
there isn't much what can be done against repeated offenders
and what would be the best way to get them to do so? cos it seems like valve does w/e it wants to keep coin rolling in and those who use steam have no say either in how steam works nor its eula.
i still don't get why there is no real control given to the game developers
on the damn SW for their own game
it's hard to convice company which autoprints money by just doing nothing 😁
I'm sure if Bohemia contacted valve on their behalf vs a regular content creator they would listen to you guys more?
lol
and how you come on the idea we didn't raise those issues repeatedly for years with that partner ?
they have a system set in place to protect themselves
let me google this for you
and still not to alienate users to other services
yeah at the very least gamedevs should have control over their own workshop space, how it operates and how it is policed. outside of valve recieving dmca claims on content,. but knowing valve with that responsibility they would also offload dmca claims onto those developers.
Mebbe this has all happened because it's arma3...? we know how valve don't like 3's
for a company as big as valve, shit moves with a completly different speed
now, the good question is what we get first, all the stuff i want for Workshop and STEAM or Half Life 3 😉
Half life 3 will just be a $60 triple a title with no cosmetics
Will we have ARMA4 before HL3?
Arma 4 is like 5 years away so probably not
A4 will have no mods, and will be xbox exclusive
I need my sweet ARMA enfusion fix NOW!
half-life 3 doesn't exist and will most likely never as valve does not have the need to create games to stay afloat anymore, they have steam and just outright buy any title that becomes popular to corner those markets.
go play some dayz
can't even type cause speculations going thru the roof 
Oh man if Arma went to console that's when you know the game is dead
I do PuFu, even have a server - even though I cannot run bloody 0.63 on it
why, the OFP: Elite was actually delivering to consoles stuff they never heard off like mission editor 😉
oof


