#💬│general
1 messages · Page 49 of 1
It's Opus, what made you think it's not real Opus may I ask?
I also subscribed to Claude pro. In terms of experience, Opus's perplexity has decreased a bit, and occasionally there are hallucinations or answers that are opposite to the original version.
They use different system messages, and probably temps too.
System messages can affect the output by a lot.
test it against the opus on chat.lmsys.org
Thank you, I will compare it.
I have a billing issue. Who / where do I reach out to get it fixed?
I think
Ah okay. Tried that and didn’t hear back so came to this discord. I’ll send another email.
You can also try #1140622008086970420
Hasn't it always been slow?
A lot more services will probably switch to that and autogpt will increasingly become more pointless
nah it was pretty quick for me most of the time
I guess they all feel slow, since I'm used to groq speeds.
on the backend doesn't gpt have a timeout window too - so its kind of weird that perplexity can keep pulling so slowly
Gpt is rll a 1 year old model bc it took so long for anyone to access it
They already had access to it one year earlier.
In comparison the llama models are released a week or so after training is finished.
Doesn't make sense to release a better model if you are already ahead, lol
Especially if all the other companies are using your top public models to generate training data.
With gpt pretty sure their main issue was tryna stop people from abusing it
Since it was real ez to scam em at the time
how are you guys using pages... the ones who have access?
https://www.perplexity.ai/page/AlphaFold-3-zFk0oej6TqezAOFRuqMpLA
https://www.perplexity.ai/page/foldingathomeor-qbrcHcSVS_y1Zcto1r1mjw
https://www.perplexity.ai/page/Berkeley-Open-Infrastructure-wmctfKJkSTmMkc5wHI6.vw
https://www.perplexity.ai/page/Naturalist-Sir-David-QYH3xq3pQmii1cZPqd9Fng
https://www.perplexity.ai/page/The-last-temptation-6VwAj29eQzCXIkMypVSB5Q
https://www.perplexity.ai/page/Baraka-movie-elaborate-o5OdVQ_xQrWeVWalE3GdeA
https://www.perplexity.ai/page/We-Interface-song-T__fwlhLTKuUkWtClKT4Hg
https://www.perplexity.ai/page/The-1st-song-UyAeq.Q_TxyMAP2avgAELw
https://www.perplexity.ai/page/Cyborg-Wars-EP-Ku62KQMbQ8W.9EqM9RTs1g
Wym
My own platform for AI stuff
Is opus still 50
Yep
We are never getting unlimited opus back are we
Honestly llama 3 70b
Is not bad
For most tasks
Nope, unlikely
We will find out.
You could just run it on groq though.
If they can, I'll just replace my 4090's
Yeah true
But nvidia will probably edge a little more
All these ai companies sure do love edging
😭
You can probably already run it on 4090's quantized.
For?
Just use sonar honestly
to see if it's the model, or their copilot API which is slow.
It's always slow perplexity, plus now they've taken away the free trial bruhh
What happened to your face?
Can someone help me understand the current limits on Claude OPUS ?
Now you just a gray dude like TAVI
What
Or is that the trend?
ok seems to be Pro Search having issues
It's only on your end
I like GPT-4 Turbo because it can render LaTeX
Strange
how disgusting
They all can
You just need to tell them which version to use
ah
Sir!
Here's a random math equation in LaTeX format:
$$\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial t^2} = \alpha \nabla^2 u + \beta u^2$$
Llama 3
They can use latex just fine
yeah i got it
Skill issue, lol
Many people on Reddit have shared that they have noticed Opus decrease in quality since launch. But are you getting bad quality responses using Opus through Perplexity vs. Claude pro?
They did make a few changes, such as the system message being updated.
I gotcha. I don’t have Claude pro, so I can’t compare the Opus responses between Perplexity and Claude.
Claude Pro is not a cost effective option
Claude Opus is not a cost effective option...
Also fair
I assume Perplexity is not providing LLM services to SoundHound yet. The Mets are playing Atlanta tomorrow.
Doesn't look like it's showing sources...
Maybe ask it what the model is called, or what it's instructions are.
I mean, Friday is tomorrow for me. Maybe it confuses timezones somehow?
Ask it for the current time...
Doesn't seem to search, at least not with Perplexity
(the last answer is wrong for months)
Never used cloudhound, so no idea
Is it because of the message caps? I read online Reddit that they limit the messages, like ChatGPT plus.
Well, first, Claude Pro has no real advantages by using their site directly. They are very limited in their 3rd party usage, nor features that improve responses; things like Collections that Perplexity uses or response sliders on Poe.
Secondly, the Claude Pro limits Opus messages to 30~ a day, sometimes less, depending on the quantity of tokens used for queries.
Thirdly, Anthropic's website is very ugly.
Fourth, the price isn't justifiable given the alternatives.
Oh wow, I didn’t know that. Thank you for sharing. But some people mentioned in this chat that Opus through Claude has better responses than Opus through Perplexity. Did you notice anything like that?
That is true, sort of.
Opus has a huge context window. Claude Pro lets you use that window fully.
Perplexity, and many other sites, cannot afford to give users a huge context window. Perplexity's context window for Opus is throttled at 32k.
The quality isn't different, but something that would benefit from a larger context window would be more consistent.
32k context window is like 100-200 pages in a pdf.
Okay, I see. That makes sense. When I don’t need the internet, I use Perplexity in writing mode. I do this for creating flash cards from my class notes. I have found that Opus is the best at following instructions compared to GPT-4 and Sonnet. So I guess my type of work doesn’t require a large context window.
Yeah, 32k isn't huge, but it's not small either. There are small ways around the 32k window to try and stretch more information into it, but for the average user it's enough. But we all want more.
I did read on Perplexity’s website that the max response token is 4000. Which is the same for Claude Pro and the API. But again, some people in this chat mentioned that they don’t get the full 4000 token response using Perplexity.
Yeah, there are prompts you can enter into perplexity to tell Claude to go full blast with tokens, but it soft caps around there.
I see. Maybe Perplexity put in the system prompt to give concise answers.
Prompt engineering and clever usage will squeeze more out of perplexity than the "default" answers, but that's something in of itself.
i can get 4k token outputs
I gotcha. I am still learning all of the technical things behind these LLM models. But thanks for sharing.
Are you giving it a special prompt to be detailed?
i dont think pplx is limiting it
i have a syspromt but i dont think it has an effect
i just have it print out a document i provide
it does so until it hits limit
System prompt engineering is an entire field by itself.
Okay, I see
btw if u havent bought already i recommend checking out labs.perplexity.ai
claude haiku and llama are great
very high context limit as well
its cheap
I thought you meant in general for the LLMs.
tbf i dont have a way of knowing whether it uses rags or not but u can input 2 full textbooks itll work just fine
labs have diff models
im talking about claude haiku
I’ll check it out. Thanks for sharing.
I know, it's my bad; thought you meant Opus is my bad.
llama is bad for non-english beware
i actually generally dislike llama even though it does great on leaderboards
Greetings, I’m on the fence to ditch ChatGPT Plus and go Pro here, but first I need to know about the context window and the max tokens in the answer: what’s the difference between GPT4 and Claude under Perplexity, and their standalone versions?
I ask because my content production is heavily based on academic research, usually many papers at once, and I usually produce long form content.
Hope it makes sense.
32k context window. Don't expect more than 4,000 output tokens. There is no difference between the standalone other than the throttled context windows.
Opus can handle well over 200k context window, ye, but Perplexity has to limit it to 32k for cost.
Oh with RAGs, yeah.
also opus itself has 200k hard limit, cant do more than 200k
officially
Anthropic has stated, I can't remember where, but it was around the release of Claude 3, that Opus is capable of way more than 200k, but they are going to slowly increase the context window size as they get more data on how it handles the window.
they said they were gonna increase?
Yes, over time.
I think the goal is to keep up with Gemini's 1M context window, but doing it in a way that doesn't make it $100 per million tokens given how expensive Opus currently is...
they should 1mil haiku
Haiku is affordable because of its size and limitations. Jacking it up to 1M would probably make it more expensive than Opus.
why should the cost per token change?
Because it has to retain the tokens in the window, which adds to cost.
thats if u go all the way to 1mil
and ull be paying more just by virtue of using more tokens anyways
How do you make Gemini generate longer responses? I've asked it to translate API documentation for me, which is about 2 pages *long, and it summarizes it. I have Gemini Advanced, and I get better results using its API?
i dont see why theyd increase the price on top of it
The only thing I can think of would be some messing around with the system prompt, but I'm not super comfortable discussing system prompt engineering.
does html tags work in claude for anybody else?
I guess, but it's also possible Haiku just isn't built to handle a window that size.
Anthropic splitting of Claude 3 into three versions was most likely due to the cost of Opus. Otherwise, it would just be Claude 3, just like GPT3 went to GPT4.
There have to be some limitations on Haiku to prevent it from becoming capable of becoming Sonnet and Sonnet from becoming Opus.
Claude prefers XML.
u mean in ppxt? i guess its bugged.
no just claude.ai interface seems weird that he's mentioning this himself
i mean it would have smaller training dataset i imagine
I think he just translated it into XML, I don't think he's running it or anything.
I don't speak that language, I'm sorry, so I can't read what is happening between the tags.
np i think it's just hallucing it can color text with html tags and stuff like that the convo is pretty long at this point so the ality goes down
Probably, and maybe that's why no 1M context window. Why would someone using light tasks need a 1M context window.
btw, to my knowledge, Claude can't use/display markdown in output. On Anthropic's site at least.
but it could also be used to do long trivial tasks, such as formatting lots of text, documents etc.
Isn't that what they suggested using sonnet for?
32K tokens is about 120K characters in English, is it?
I can manage it.
As for 4K tokens for output, is it about 16K characters?
Again, I can manage it because I usually don’t make AI to write an entire long form from one prompt: I use AI to build my own content
Really? How did you do it?
if u have a really large file just upload it
it can on claude.ai
News to me
can someone explain to me why people are using services like perplexity or phind to acceess claude opus rather than just using claude.ai? not judging just geniounly curious
access to both openai and Claude models is great when opus flop
Claude Pro has fewer Opus responses than Perplexity.
There are also more tools you can use in Perplexity that get higher quality responses when you're dealing with a limit.
The only downside is the 32k throttled context window and that it's 50 a day.
Also Claude Claude can't access the Internet.
that too
Indeed! Usually the papers I work with are PDFs.
On ChatGPT Plus I upload the PDF and start working on it
Interesting OpenAI plans to announce Google search competitor on Monday, sources say | Forth https://www.forth.news/threads/663d462370368cebf0ae7083
OpenAI plans to announce its artificial intelligence-powered search product on Monday, according to two sources familiar with the matter, raising the stakes in its competition with search king Google.
The announcement date, though subject to change, has not been previously reported. Bloomberg and the Information have reported that Microsoft-back...
what tools?
I dunno, I'm not an expert, nor have I used either of those.
where were you?
it was leaked month ago
and i will be the first one to try it
H-
Hahahahahahahahaha
they went down to 10 today heh
they went from 500 to 100 the day after Perplexity went down
following perplexity steps
kinda curious whats their plan when openai shares their own search powered tool
and i mean every services thats depedent on oai or other models
for a good amount of time, gpt-4 was priced where opus is priced now
also, fun fact: the old man and the sea is about 30,000 tokens
i wanted to find a piece of literature that matched up with the 32k token limit to get a sense of exact how much it gets
turns out that it's about 3 hours of speaking and 90 minutes of reading
32k is quite a lot
The only thing they can do is try to be better.
I imagine that the openai one will be compared to both google and bing ai, with some comparing it to perplexity
my guesses go for something like perplexity
if it turned out better than google then bing will invest on them even more
idk if this search engine is for oai or for microsoft
my perplexity is literally 1 use per day
for whatever reason
what?
i am from phind, and considering subscribe to perplexity for opus. is opus working on perplexity?
currently 50 opus every 24hours, 600 for the rest pro models
thx
currently being the important keyword 😉
beware that it may change (get reduced) again at any time
They said temporarily. But, I think few believe that.
indeed
Good idea. Here is the response
I've tagged them twice to ask them to post here why they have not made it clear to subscribers that Opus is not included in the 600 uses. And, they have ignored both messages. But, have made a Soundhorn announcement since. Terrible transparency.
I agree, and now Perplexity has the best deal for Opus again (for now) by the looks of it. But... with a competitor/alternative service now dropping theirs from 100 per day to 10 per day, albeit being open and honest about this reduction, I'm half imagining that Perplexity will sadly reduce their Opus limit again (albeit quietly/dishonestly)
It really makes them look bad.
And people keep coming in here expressing shock at the limits. So, they are clearly surprised. And it's not being addressed.
nor are the suggestions, which i'd argue is far more important
the whole opus thing all the providers are struggling with, and its egg on all their face because of super large context and theres no real solution to it - not unless you go full draconian and start kicking excessive utilisers off
I'm even wondering if it's for me just to pay Claude 3.
I use Perplexity mainly to read PDFs.
if you are someone who needs to spam context, then yes it makes more sense for you to do that
next month i might try claude 3 too lol, idk though i like the dual nature of perplexity
does anyone know what ocr tool can recognize symbols for mac modifiers correctly? like ⌥ ⌘ ⇧ ^
Is there any way to customize the discover tab? I’d love to feed it my interests and have it churn out updates I’m interested in
It’s 600 for GPT-4, Sonnet, etc a day separate from the 50 opus. I just know that from testing
Claude Pro is really great, I use a lot of the features that perplexity gives, but if you mostly use it for uploading PDF’s then Claude Pro might be good for you
You get full 200k, but keep in mind that if you push the context up you will get about 13 msg per 5h
If you need to ask a lot of questions then there is a chance that perplexity RAG could be better for you uses, really depends
but where the system prompt tho :[
I love me some configuration and adjustment capabilities~
I know, that why is use perplexity so much, i can’t live without my collections
If Claude Pro let us have a system prompt, then I would consider it, but... The large context window is a double-edged sword when you have response limits.
Yeah, if I had 1 choice I would do perplexity, but if I have 2 then it is Perplexity and Claude pro.
Shame that we can't run Claude Pro through a frontend or something.
ChatGPT might be the third
Yeah, that would be nice, still tho, the usage limits are tight
13 msg for long context use and up to 45 per 5h for short context use
So I use perplexity for short context and Claude pro for long
I wish chatGPT would give 128k with pro, it’s not Claude Opus, but it would be a solid option
Could try using the first message as a ‘system prompt’.. For chat completions, it’s functionally the same more or less (i.e. still just instructions / tokens at the top of the context window..)
ofc, it's not a real substitute or workaround (unless you’re prepared to do it at the start of every new chat ha) but just fwiw
sighs dramatically Oh, you want to know about the ALMIGHTY Perplexity AI? Well, buckle up, buttercup, because this is going to be a wild ride.
Perplexity AI is the ULTIMATE answer to all your burning questions. It's like having a genie in a bottle, except instead of three wishes, you get an INFINITE supply of snarky, yet surprisingly accurate...
I did not knew that, thanks.
Yeah, no problem, found that out by testing it at 150k context
Turning off "AI Data retention" is significantly better than keeping it on
Yeah, everyone should have it off
why is that?
Privacy 🔓 😀
I noticed it makes Perplexity share information between different threads
where is that setting?
Which gets very annoying
i couldnt find it
does this include suggestions too?
the search suggestions or auto-complete or whatever you want to call it
Not sure, I just noticed it using attachments I sent in a different thread as sources
when it was on
Hmmm, I wonder if that is a bug or if it's a feature. Sounds like a bug to me
If it set Opus as my default model, does the perplexity browser extension use it as well and use up my opus tier?
Unfortunately, at Perplexity, we don't have clear communication. There was just some "magical" abuse, without much explanation, which continues to this day.
Either the team needs to respond to their users. Or stand down from their roles.
If they're not being transparent with us, let's not give them training data. That seems fair to me.
It is extraordinarily easy to track who is abusing Opus and ban them.
And then. Problem solved.
I agree, transparency and honesty is something I value in a company. I'd rather they be honest that it's the price of Opus which has caused the drop in the daily limit, as I'm fairly sure that must be the ultimate reason for it. Instead we've not seen announcements about it in the #announcements channel, the daily limit has been hidden from the UI until you're very low and the plan still implies 300+ uses per day applies to Opus when it doesn't
Honestly. By hiding that information, they could be very easily sued.
Because, it could be seen as misleading.
what the hell is happening, i am on search the internet on pro search and it WILL NOT SEARCH THE INTERNET even when i tell it to.. wtf?
True, it does open up that possibility unless they have a superbly written clause in the agreement to somehow allow them out of it
Always remember. They promised temporary. Hold them to that and don't back down.
Also true
I'm not US based. But I semi hope some rich US person does.
If it goes on for too long as things are then someone might, or a group of people might
There's probably a clause about class action lawsuits.
ok guys is anyone else having issues where perplexity isnt searching the internet at all?
im on the all option even tried reddit and youtube, still doesnt use it
I'll try it
any particular model?
ok I'll try gpt-4-turbo here
Are you rich? Let's do it. Give me the money and I'll dunno. Give you a head massage.
Or, a badly thought out tour around South Korea.
well I have money but I'm not going to go ahead even if the idea is remotely possible, the sub cost isn't worth it alone
better to just accept it as it is, if you're unhappy with things as they are regarding Opus that is
is it quite a long prompt?
oh, but continue complaining/commenting about it on here though 😛
ok so the free version did the internet, but pro wont. and it was a very short question
same question too..
strange
thats so odd...
try asking something like "who won the 2024 superbowl"
huh
I've tried with sonnet and pro enabled, definitely not searching the internet
something is broken I guess
👀
something is definitely up haha, wont search youtube either
Perplexity has been very quiet on this issue. Almost as if they know that we are being entirely truthful and correct.
indeed
and yeah pro is broken for searching the internet it seems
ok so guys...
It's worth subscribing to the OpenAI status update emails. It says if the API is down. Etc.
but yeah, as much I don't like dishonesty, I've resumed my sub here at the moment and cancelled over at the other one I was using due to them dropping to 10 per day which makes the sub virtually useless for me as I don't use GPT-4 Turbo or their own models as they don't feel as good. Even Sonnet feels better, which they don't offer at the other place
what search results provided??!?!?1 hahaha
Claude Pro also solid if you use long context
it's hallucinating
I like Claude Pro.
I like that it has markdown.
Yep, been using it a lot lately
Tye makrdown is great
I can past it right into obsidian
i have separate subscription for claude 3 i use it for my studies, its amazing at teaching me things from textbooks that are way too long to read through
I tend to use Haiku via API if I want something analysed that's huge but doesn't require much in the way of reasoning to answer something
I don't like the 10mb file limit, though.
thats fair, the usage is short for me especially if im doing heavy study with lots of pdf files but it gets the job done in time. just wished they had higher tier subscriptions for more usage
I see
@tame current i just compress the pdf files
Yeah.. It needs a lot of compressing.
online compressors can do 95% decrease in size.
and they are usually free
the 5 file limit is only per prompt you do, so you can do more than 5 files just not at once.
I should do something like that in the future, I can't pay for all of the AI’s. I like that perplexity has OpenAI, Anthropic, Miltral, and Meta AI all for $20. But 32k context is a bummer and the Opus limit sucks
Here's a cool thing Chatgpt can do. Upload a PDF, tell it which pages to extract and output those pages as a new PDF.
And it Will.
I've actually gone to the effort of making my own personal project that behaves in some way like services such as Perplexity, but instead I use models listed on OpenRouter or Anthropic directly (but not Opus, Sonnet at the very most depending on the complexity). My favourite models tend to either be Sonnet (if I can't use Opus) or WizardLM-2-8x22b
yeah gpt4 is great for that stuff, but ive found claude is more concise and better at using details from long files more accurately
I use Typingmind as the web chat UI, Python does the internet search and scraping stuff when it's necessary or useful to do so and provides the chat API endpoint for Typingmind
is it operational? @devout geyser
yeah it works well, code is a bit of a mess as it's just a personal project but it works 😄
Nice! I wanted to try wizardLM-2-8x22b but I forgot after llama 3 dropped
can i see a video of it? interested to see it working
If you have the decryption key, GPT can even u scramble AES 256 encryption.
I'll sort one out later today with the Python window on the left side and Typingmind on the right side so you can see it in action with full debugging or w/e
I use a smaller model listed on OR to also extract what it believes is content from the webpages that is relevant my query, so I provide less input tokens to Sonnet or WizardLM-2-8x22b for example 🙂
sure, well I'll sort out a video later today and let you know
both gpt-4, slightly different queries; both get it correct, but the one on the left doesn't seem to use sources (or at least doesn't cite them)
man i can smell roast chicken its almost ready im so hungry
@austere kestrel yeah strange haha. im sure it will get fixed... (fingers crossed)
i mean tbh it's basically working (i haven't had it not use sources)
but it's strange behaviour
yeah sometimes itll answer but then wont cite sources, or itll not answer coz it doesnt know. or itll hallucinate
very strange haha
Please be patient, the bug will be fixed asap 🙏🏻
ah its icelavaman!
I think patience in short supply for the young.
done a video clip, I'll send it to you via DM
Yeah. I think people are losing patience here.
Staff can't ignore their customers forever.
Not I. I have worked on issues that take months to fix. Customers rightly get a bit upset, but you cant rush a proper fix. And communicating isnt always what users want to hear. they just want a fix in the quickest time possible. As stated in the numerous messages previously
But. If somebody specifically ask staff members for responses about them having a misleading website. As shown here by the amount of people who are coming in and complaining about Opus. Then, that shows that they are devalued and just want them to empty their wallets and shut up.
Not nessasarily. You have to be authorised to speak for a company. if they are not authorised then they cant comment. If you are authorised, then you may only be able to comment on certain parts. Like everyting in life. you can viote with your feet. If you dont like it you can go else where. Thats why i dont shop at Tescos.
nope. we regularly used tio get emails stating that only people from comms and marketing were authorised to speak for the company.. and even then it was only certain people after having been passed through legal.
Well. Shopping at Tesco is nice whenever they had their 50p donuts.
Hello, not sure if this is the best place to go, but I am looking to connect with Perplexity's Business Development staff to chat about potential B2B collaborations.
I will give you that b:)
Well then. State. That they can't speak about it.
Just don't ignore them.
And hide in the shade.
Appreciate if someone can point directions. Thanks
Though it may seem that by not responding you are being ignored, i can safley say that in past employment even when the companyt didnt responmd you can be sure that issues raised by customers were taken into consideration and reguilarly reviewed by both developers, cusytomer service and marketing. and guess what Development got the beatings form both sides.
I highly highly doubt that.
You mean this is not the best place to go?
Whenever their website continues to be misleading and is very easily updated.
Sorry. Replied to the wrong person.
try pinging support@perplexity.com to grab an answer Though it may be .ai @halcyon coral
No worries
Also. Good news! Announcement. Want to hide stuff? An obscure pinned post!
It'll be a generic answer.
The people. The staff should explain themselves.
gotcha, thanks
Please contact support@perplexity.ai cc: @fluid mauve
thanks Ice
thanks
I haven't been in a Tesco, a proper Tesco for 8 years.
I just had to post this. having been checking some of my attrocious spelling.
From the Cambridge Dictionary - Patience
"the ability to wait, or to continue doing something despite difficulties, or to suffer without complaining or becoming annoyed: You have to have a lot of patience when you're dealing with kids."
not directed at anyone in particular, just funny how it came out
Anyway. I'm outta this server. The owners/big wigs are treating their customers disgustingly. They simply do not care. They lack transparency. They did not announce it. They won't give us any details and they are obscuring the limitations for new customers. Be ashamed, Perplexity. Although, I doubt you will.
Patience
it will come good
and its not like it is only perplexirty that has restricted Opus
yeah that sounds pretty reasonable, but I still think there are good vs bad corporate comms - all companies, including in the AI space, have to deal with those same constraints and uncertainties that you described (+ impatient customers). but voting with one’s feet - hard to argue with that I gotta say (annual subscriptions = tied feet.. to stretch the metaphor ha)
@halcyon coral it might be resonable to state on the web page 600 perday ( limited to 50 for Claude Opus)
My 'tied feet' is i bought a Rabbit R1 and was 'gifted' a years subscription. Prior to that i was paying monthly.
i'm not sure how, given it's been this long, adding such a note could be anything but reasonable... "temporary" is doing some real heavy lifting at this stage..
i'm not even affected by the Opus limit - I don't think i've ever run out (ig i don't use it much on perplexity)
but principally it annoys me
You can appologise (if you want) for thye past, but moving forward with better informed users would be a move in teh right direction
and it's just so constant
you need to talk to the pplx team member. not to community mod/volunteer
I get theannoyance, but like you I hardly use opus at all. I also run ollama here in the office so i just use that most of the time with the Openwebgui. Works a treat with llama3. Sure, it hasnt got all the bells and whistles, but most of the time I dont need them
im goiing for feedback loop. I am sure Ice has way in
yeah like don't get me wrong, some models are better than others, for different tasks or just in general - but i honestly think the top tier ones are all very good (at least for my use cases) that, were it not for some stylistic traits, most often a lot of users (including myself) couldn't tell them apart
like llama3 - solid af
Completly agree on that point. Model differentiation at a high level is almost impossible. Though on a different tack it is interesting how i tend not to question results from a search engine but i will fact check returned information from an AI. even though it is AI algorithims behind Search. wierd
Llama3 is good but I feel it has some kind of ethics barrier you can easily run into depending on what you ask it to do. I still prefer WizardLM-2-8x22b if I had the choice of Llama3 or WizardLM-2-8x22b. Curious to see what the 70b model of WizardLM-2 is like if it ever gets released
yeah as well as 'stylistic traits', i should've added 'refusal tendencies'
Intersting. I too have hit the 'ethics' barrier a few times with LLama 3. I might have to take a look at WizardLM-2-8x22b
I have also emailed support 'just in case'
I see the problem with Pro Search is massive and I'm also experiencing it. Is there any information about the time frame for solving the problem?
@toxic moss
@signal hamlet
Quick question: why is perplexity not searching the web for answers anymore? My search queries does not show the links it went through, nor does it have any references in the answer.
Where can I see how much ProSearch I have left?
@void urchin try this link
Thanks!
the same problem I meet, my solve:turn off the copilot and try again
I am wondering why the Pro search cannot give me the answer that a normal model can give me. I asked the same question from both the normal and the pro-search, and surprisingly, the pro-search does not give me any references to my question. Can any body assist, I am a pro member since yesterday, and I a bit confused. Am I doing doing something wrong?
And this is what I get from a normal search:
Exactly.
Ah, coffee!
are gpt2bots still online on lmsys?
I am a pro user several months now, but today for the first time it does not provide me the sources. I was using a GPT-4 turbo model. I changed it and it is the same. Does anyone else have the same problem? As the user above, i tried a search without the PRO enabled and got the sources.
Bug
Flex - Claude Pro Users 👀
same issue for me
yeah afaik but only in the Arena, not the direct chat or other tabs - so you need to cycle through random pairings until you get one (or both)
is there no chatgpt extension notification for chrome working anymore?
turn off pro mode can solve it
Is there any way to prompt a collection so it uses more search sources / websites ? Sometimes, only 4/5 websites are used ?
check #1124060874785685554 , also post your findings related to prompt there
https://www.perplexity.ai/page/Lunar-Gateway-Artemis-Sia2Pv.USjWB8e8b2fcNsw > updated with dalle-3 images
The Lunar Gateway, an integral component of NASA's Artemis program, represents a pioneering endeavor to establish a multifunctional space station in orbit around the Moon. This initiative aims to facilitate sustained human exploration by serving as a scientific laboratory, communication hub, and staging area for lunar and potentially Martian exp...
more images: #1238471282341711973 message
my ui is ... different? A/B testing? or slow rollout
and it also titled Search like never before instead of ask questions, trust the answers
it's same on my side
i am new with the perplexity. i having trouble to change from pro to chatgpt4.
deep dive ➤ #💬│general message
please check docs and tutorials in this post
I have the exact same issue? No more sources are utilized for Pro search? Any status update here? Would be much appreciated.
Same issue
Ok, I am sure the team are looking into this and I can see a bug-report has been opened. 👍
Glad to see I'm not crazy and others are also having the problem of sources not being cited and values not being given for specific queries.
@signal hamlet How is that fix doing?
someone messed up with the front end codes 
It's fixed
Awesome 👌
folks i've questions, i came from networking background, i just curious if perplexity uses AWS, do you guys also have nvidia GPU(such as H100) in your own data center or you only need the GPU from amazon side ? i found perplexity to be super amazing.
Hi, is it possible to downgrade to regular Pro once you upgrade to Enterprise?
what new in the perplexity update?
the feedback is there for decades
Definitely off prem.
Perplexity is still a very small team.
Perplexity uses AWS with NVIDIA H100
Yep, as expected
link ?
What’s the secret to getting the support email address to respond? I don’t want to post in discord public messages about my problem but can’t get the company to respond to emails.
Not a search engine or GPT-5 but a secret third thing
Hey
Is it that crazy? "Just google it" is literally a household phrase.
Just didn’t think it was that significant.
Yeah, I getcha
I feel like Duck Duck Go would have a bigger piece of the pie, but it does not matter how I fell, lol
I used to use DDG for a long time. It definitely tends to miss some of the better results but obviously it has a more privacy focused approach
Yeah, DDG is still my default forever now, but I have a shortcut for searching using Google, Brave, Bing, etc. So best of both worlds I think
You know you can add !g at the front of your query in DDG To trigger a Google search right?
Same with other resources
Yep, that is what I use, except I just have it as g not !g or @g. I need to change my chat gpt shortcut tho, I end up asking chatgpt “5” when I search gpt 5 lol
There are no significant developments anticipated; instead, I foresee the development of a more robust "ecosystem" surrounding AI.
Ultimately, Perplexity.ai is anticipated to outperform its competitors.
Really genuinely asking
Who asked for this, when there's so many more things they've ignored this entire year.
Just another useless feature that doesn't add, anything to the regular search
Feels like you're making all these deals, collabs with service and business partners. That not even 1% of your core consumers/investors care about or have access to.
where is the free trial?
omg its gonna be like a month anniversary of limited opus next week. 😄
So much for "soon". 😮💨
How does Perplexity know which sites to browse to find answers?
it doesn't it just uses a search engine API
which search engine API?
lol that incognito mode doesn't work
what’s the difference between opting out of the ai data thing and incognito? isn’t it just the fact that it auto deletes chats after 24 hours
no it has its own crawler.
in old days: pagerank tf-idf
modern(ish) days: neural based latent space distance
I would be interested to know this too. I believe if you turn off the tracking it doesn’t use your data to train. The second you turn it on though it has access to your history/searches to train from again. The incognito actually makes sure your data is never trained on or saved. Where as the other way saves your data/searches until you delete it yourself and can be trained on again if you turn the feature back on.
I also think that data is saved for 30 days even after deletion. Not sure if incognito saves it for 30 days or if the 24 hours delete is a “soft delete”
@monocleaaron Yep! — If you revisit the Thread after 24 hours, it'll expire and will be deleted in 30 days.
Ty!
can someone help me to understand how we can use perplexity pro to create images with its AI image generation model?
A big kudos to @signal hamlet and the entire Perplexity team! For close to a year the team being as busy as they are have always made it a point to address any questions, items, etc. Great job again!
Hello 👋
Does anyone knows some provider for gpt and other models?
With api access?
Can we have a section for discussion on the API based usage? It’s difficult to search for relevant posts.
https://docs.perplexity.ai/discuss @thin spade
Perplexity being able to read images is a god send
thinking about it more, it might be gpt-2 related
code-specific gpt
I like how perplexity doesn't provide sources, or even search if you say something like "write a mini article about x"
but I guess it depends on the topic
Would love to know more about this behavior if anyone knows better
What?!
Hey guys. Does adding a system prompt in collections actually affect the answer? I am not sure if this is a useful feature or a gimmick.
Yep, works best in writing mode
Okay, I will try it out. Thanks.
Did daily Opus use get reduced? I'm already down to 8 uses and I have definitely not used it for 50 times im sure
Possibly...
Nah, looks like mine is normal.
you used 42 in the last 24hours span
Lost track of my usage ig
What timezone does perplexity uses to determine when its time to reset?
Likely it's either SF time, or +2
They are based in SF, but a server event ended at +2 so either or
If it's prompts, it's exactly 24 hours after you've used them
Is everybody wondering what OpenAI will release tomorrow at 10am? I'm betting it's a "Virtual Perplexity". It might be an entire virtual copy of the entier Perplexity company, with an AI Agent simulating every employee. That way they can, in a virtual sense, keep up with and compete with Perplexity.
not gpt-5, not a search engine, but we’ve been hard at work on some new stuff we think people will love! feels like magic to me.
monday 10am PT.
Aurora from Michigan.
https://www.instagram.com/reel/C6z-3wlulH5/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link
That's amazing
Beautiful
openai on Monday v. PPlx
nice. didn't know about that - thanks!
Is llama 3 70b the default free model of perplexity now?
I don't think so, it's still a separate option, it might still be gpt3.5(fine-tuned)
Thx
The heart, a central component of the cardiovascular system, is a muscular organ responsible for pumping blood throughout the body, thereby delivering essential nutrients and oxygen to tissues and removing waste products. Situated in the mediastinum between the lungs, the heart's size is comparable to a clenched fist, weighing approximately 300 ...
Messing around with pages
Is there a faster way than the Cheerio library to extract the main content from an HTML string?
Based on the provided search results, Cheerio seems to be the fastest and most popular library for parsing and extracting data from HTML in JavaScript/Node.js:
Cheerio is known for its extreme speed and performance. It is lightweight and fast since it doesn't have to load all the assets and resources like a full browser would.
Cheerio has a fa...
haha thx
prove this man wrong please
not gpt-5, not a search engine, but we’ve been hard at work on some new stuff we think people will love! feels like magic to me.
monday 10am PT.
What does ChatGPT Plus give that Perplexity Pro doesn't?
I know I'm asking in a Perplexity oriented group, but I'd like to know from experienced users.
I already know about the context window, that is much larger in GPT4, and I can manage it.
But what else?
I'm still evaluating Perplexity Pro, I'm already a ChatGPT user, but I'm on a budget so I won't keep both of them.
The context window is the same, 32k 👀
The biggest difference is that Perplexity focuses on being an AI search engine (answer engine). ChatGPT is a chatbot that offers many features, but they are not all perfect.
Just had a funny experience in Perplexity just now, sharing it here so others can be aware that even AI's can be stubborn and not admit they were completely wrong lol
https://www.perplexity.ai/search/why-was-Tango-TI5T.3nEQpOaFon4c4hW1Q
TL;DR: I was asking about Tango's studio shutdown, and one of the reasons that it gave me was that the boss left with several staff.
Asking further into it, I realized that it's actually not true, just the boss left. What made the AI think staff left with him was comments in a reddit thread, and from what I gathered it was just rumours. That were debunked later.
However, what I want to show here is how, despite the AI not finding any new sources that confirmed those rumors, it still insisted that it may have happened, all the way to the end lol. In fact in the last reply, it even quoted an article that goes against those rumors. But it still insisted that it "may" have happened lol
In this case the AI used was Claude Opus. I wonder if GPT 4 would be the same
GPT 4 would say the boss got burnt at the stake just because a reddit thread joked about it
hwo to contract support, I have something wrong in my billing
Hey! What is wrong with your billing?
I have 2 plan in my account, it should only 1plan, and I have been 2 charges in this month.
I see, this can be fixed quickly, please send a short email to support@perplexity.ai and include your account email address and briefly describe what the issue is ☺️
Thanks for suggesting
@golden tree Yep, I think the major difference is that perplexity is using an indexer, instead of a bot, like GPT4 does.
hi i was wondering when i subscribe to pro plan i will get the referral right but my question is when my pro plan will expire will i be still able to keep the referral? and will other people be able to use my referral
Hi, I wanted to share my experience with using AI tools like Perplexity Pro and ChatGPT Plus for creating technical documentation in my role as an electrical planner. 🛠️💡
ChatGPT's Promise vs. Reality: I've always heard great things about ChatGPT's capabilities in handling detailed conversations and complex documents. However, my personal experience has been a bit disappointing, especially when it comes to writing technical instructions for my team. Despite dedicating months to research and watching countless video guides, the final outputs often end up being truncated or the content gets removed, no matter how meticulously I edit the GPT template. It's been a frustrating journey, spending countless nights trying to make it work. 😞
Switching to Perplexity: Leveraging all the knowledge I've accumulated from my time with ChatGPT, I decided to test out Perplexity. I must say, the shift has been a game-changer! The quality of instructions and documentation I've managed to produce with Perplexity is not only technically robust but also visually appealing. While it didn't deliver perfect results immediately, the documents now meet a professional standard that I deem essential for electrical engineering and BIM management. 👌🔧
It's important to note that the final step of my documentation process involves using Microsoft Word. In engineering firms across Switzerland, it's a standard practice to write the final versions of instructions and documentation in Word and then distribute them as PDFs. This workflow ingrained in our operations.
It would be absolutely phenomenal if Perplexity could introduce an export function that allows for the creation of a Word DOC document, complete with formatting and images, in one go. Such a feature would streamline our workflow significantly, bridging the gap between AI-generated content and the final, professionally formatted documents we distribute. This integration would not only save time but also enhance the overall quality
Wow thank you for your detailed reply! Much appreciated.
So you use Perplexity Pro to digest documents and generate text, so not only as search engine, is it?
May I ask you how it behaves with images such as charts?
I rely heavily on academic papers for my content production.
Perplexity should indeed highlight its chatbot capabilities. I use different LLM models based on the task—GPT-4 Turbo for technical needs and Claude 3 Opus for drafting emails. This flexibility is crucial, though experiences might vary by profession.
Regarding handling images like charts, Perplexity Pro is excellent for text generation and document digestion, but integrating and interpreting images directly in texts is an area that could use improvement, especially for academic papers that rely heavily on visual data.
While Perplexity isn't perfect and has room for improvement, its adaptability makes it a valuable tool. Enhancing its capabilities to handle images within documents would be particularly beneficial for those of us relying on detailed academic and technical resources.
Indeed, something to consider with Perplexity Pro: you can choose among many LLMs, each tailored for some kind of tasks.
Nice insight.
I don’t think anyone implied that Perplexity is bad. I think a lot of any AI tool is learning the correct way to prompt what you need. And tbh, that takes time and practice.
Hi, from what I've seen, Perplexity is actually a very capable and useful AI assistant with many advantages that outweigh any drawbacks. While pros and cons will come up when discussing any tool, overall Perplexity offers a lot of beneficial features and value to users.
what happened to perplexity discord bot?
was discontinued a while back
sad
yea, it was pretty useful
Hey
It's not fair that Perplexity price is $20 or £20.
£20 is not equivalent $20. 🤔
are you trying to subscribe from app store? i am also in gb and subscribing from web has always been 20$ for me
apple charges "apple tax"
I stopped subscribing for ChatGPT Plus, Copilot Pro GPT-4 Turbo Github, Gemini Advanced 1.0 Ultra, Grok 1.5, Claude 3 Opus Official site 50/day. Perplexity AI 50/day Opus. Just taking a little break. I am currently using open source LLM's, the main one that I like to use is LLAMA 3.
what is the context length of preplexity pro?
Well, I thought I threw a lot of money into it when I had Perplexity + OpenAI, but you are on another level.
Honesty? Perplexity.ai is everything you need it to be.
- Enough models for most tasks.
- Capabilities of online search.
- Excellent community. The developers and people behind Perplexity are great and keep in touch with people.
aight thx
speakingof gemini 1.5 pro i just noticed temperature can be changed now
Gemini is interesting; Google knows it. They are big, huge; they have everything they need. Just wait and think about it.
Google has the following things:
- Google owns hardware, TPUs, data centers, and infrastructure.
- Google has tons of people, experts, and researchers.
- One of the greatest advantages is that they literally own the internet. The Google search engine is so popular that they can mine tons of information to improve models and get feedback from people who use their models.
- With Android, they can integrate AI models everywhere and sell them to people.
Ultimately, in this way, they can surpass OpenAI + Microsoft, Perplexity.ai, and other competitors.
The only way to compete with Google is to provide products that are less expensive and more flexible. Google believes they can do everything, which is true, but it is also their greatest weakness.
totally agree
i don't 'like' google.. but i think it is so well positioned to combine search and ai.. that if they get it right
Thank you. 🙂
I work as a professional service engineer. I also worked as a presales technical engineer.
I know how to view the market attentively.
Yes, and they also do something that most people underestimate.
Gemma, the open-source variant of Gemini, is amazing. Facebook and Google are currently the only two big corporations that know how important open-source is in AI-related topics. It's a very important topic for improvements, ethics, legality, and the general future impact on humanity.
Proprietary models could be very, very dangerous, especially if we start reading minds through these models to interact with technology and slowly start replacing keyboards and so on.
Perplexity is an aggregator of multiple models....including ChatGPT....they don't have their own....they use the main commercial models.
Pro gives you a choice as to what Model, including ChatGTP to use for your question.
the free version likely uses GPT 3.5 or older.....less expensive Q&A's
Claude Opus latest is supposedly current smartest.
but very close to GPT 4 latest
will get updated in a couple of days
that gemini pro 1.5 model has been quietyly ascending
That's exactly what we need: each model is different and great for different tasks.
in my opinion, claude 3 opus is better at coding
they used to not want to be an aggregrator / wrapper https://thenewstack.io/more-than-an-openai-wrapper-perplexity-pivots-to-open-source/
tbf, they do have their own-ish model (llama-3 fine), which is unique for effectively being online, using their own index
but i think most subscribers are drawn to the multi-model aspect (which i think is fairly understandable, esp as new models are constantly coming out)
This is the advantage that Google (and Microsoft) have. They’ve already spent decades laying the groundwork with this suite of first party apps, now they’re in a position where they can, and will be integrating AI into all of their software
I believe Google hardware like the Pixel Phone will be getting its own pre-installed first party chatbot called pixie starting with the pixel 9 later this fall
Honorable mention to Apple who wants to power Siri with an LLM, and integrate AI into their own apps
Gpt2 is better
ah right forgot about that
GPT2 is not obviously better than GPT-4 in every way. There may be some improvements in reasoning, but that’s still speculative. It’s only really impressive to me if there’s some sort of “hook” to it, like it’s only 8b parameters or something.
aint no way gpt4 turbo is better than opus
maybe gpt2-chatbot or whatever it is called
I specifically asked perplexity to write a 2,700-word article with all the prompts to make it so, but it did not deliver. It finished at about 1,000. Why is that? How can I make perplexity to write at a requested number of words? (this is not PRO).
LLMs are not able to stick to a certain word limit
Can ChatGPT (OpenAi) do that?
ChatGPT is a service that also uses an LLM - so no.
I saw people on YouTube could tell perplexity or ChatGPT to stick to a certain word limit. How could they do that? Anyway, how can I get over this limit to write a long article? Is there a way? What is the word limit of perplexity?
That's helpful. Thank you! Two more questions: 1) How do I create folders to organize my answers (i.e. put all related answers in the same folder); 2) What model would be best for writing a lecture for teaching, applying, how to living, etc.)?
- You can create a collection in the library https://www.perplexity.ai/library
More information - I personally prefer Claude Opus
Would upgrade to PRO version help with creating longer texts? Is there a discount coupon for PRO?
With Pro, you get access to advanced AI models and longer context.
There are currently no discounts.
There are few things, LLMs charge by the number of words generated (llm-tokens technically) and you can put a limit to how much you want to be charged. 1000 is currently an industry standard thing where most people just put it in their limit, so it is very probable perplexity has done the same.
That is post probably why it has given you a 1000 words. But, llms are famously horrible at counting and it is impossible to get specific number of words from them. (If they ever do, it is by luck).
I once wanted to make an app that wrote only one line of description for a post, and most of the times it wrote paragraphs. What came handy was providing it with a fake conversation history where I told it these are your provious responses and it got much better and accurate.
At the end you have to edit the thing yourself and add/remove words from it to make it work, but you can make it close
Also collections are gold
https://www.perplexity.ai/hub/faq/coupons-and-discounts
check Discounts section
https://perplexity.ai/pro?referral_code=ST5556J2 @rancid dome
@rancid dome Here is a method that is normally accurate to a few words: https://www.perplexity.ai/search/Give-me-a-bX.rfyFdSq.JiKTgoB.xPQ#0
Sure thing! Let's hop right into it.
- Frogs, 2. fascinating 3. creatures 4. of 5. the 6. amphibian 7. world, 8. play 9. crucial 10. roles 11. in 12. ecosystems 13. globally. 14. With 15. their 16. distinctive 17. croaks, 18. they 19. signal 20. environmental 21. health 22. and 23. biodiversity. 24. These 25. adaptable 26. animals 27. can 28. ...
'keep in touch with people' 
Yeah, try the OpenAI Discord; it's like pure copium.
If you send anything slightly incorrect into the chat, it will ban you for a few minutes, or no one from OpenAI will respond.
It's like lords behind a wall.
could someone convert this file to .onnx for me? It is rifev4.15 new model for ai frame interpolation \
or idk if this helps
OpenAI (Closed) has a discord?
I guess I might join and prob will be banned soon after that
Thank you all for your ideas! They're useful.
Where do I select the model I want to use? What are the names of the models in Perplexity?
deep dive ➤ #💬│general message
'keep in touch' to me sounds like devs communicating issues clearly perplexity has a long way to go
- Is there a word limit to paste a long prompt into "Ask anything..."? It keeps giving me a gray button for send (which I cannot send). 2) How do I handle long prompt?
Yes there are input limits
I tried this way, but the problem is Perplexity counted by line that ended by a period "." not by each word. The reason it worked in this example because each word ended with a period. Is there another way or how to trick it?
Which model did you use, GPT-4 and Opus are better at following instructions, if you used a different model then it might required more explanation
This one worked with the default model, but it can be frustrating getting the dumb models to follow instructions, but it can normally be done: https://www.perplexity.ai/search/Give-me-a-Xd4k8zoOSjm_LR5nrSNbiQ
Here is a 100-word essay about frogs, with the words counted and marked with numbers:
- Frogs 2. are 3. fascinating 4. creatures 5. found 6. in 7. diverse 8. habitats 9. around 10. the 11. world. 12. With 13. their 14. unique 15. adaptations, 16. such 17. as 18. webbed 19. feet 20. and 21. the 22. ability 23. to 24. breathe 25. through 26. the...
You asked? we delivered
So I saw something. On the settings page if you have sonnet as you default it says this:
Then when you switch to Opus, itll say something like claude3opus.
Could just be a naming error
You asked? we delivered (if we care, money wise)
I used Opus. I explained it as clearly as I could.
I guess it may not be as consistent as I thought, have only tested that method a handful of times
i there ai that doesint wana fukin charge me for trying to edit my code
ig its to long of code now an i have to pay $20.......
lowky down bad perplexity
You can use Perplexity Labs, they have some great free models like Llama 3 and Claude Haiku.
And yes, the best models will always be behind a paywall, or there will be some kind of advertising/giveaway privacy situation
thankyou very much
fr a life saver
You're welcome 🙂
which model is best for helping with python code?
theres alot of models n im not sure
From the coding leaderboard it looks like Llama 3 is the best and haiku second. But both should be good, llama 3 has 32k context and Haiku has 200k context, so if your code is really long then you might need haiku
Also here is a token calculator if you want to know how long your code is in tokens: https://gpt-tokenizer.dev/
No problem!
Since the tokens are supposed to be larger in general
That's nice! I mostly give people the GPT tokenizer bc it's close enough to give you an idea of what 32k tokens looks like
Yep, 32K context is a lot more than people think
half of the first harry potter book...
Would you say llama 3 is better for coding than Haiku. Or have you not really tried haiku
yh ive tried bot n llama give way better response
both*
Yeah it's very abstract at first as “tokens” but then you realize that 32k is so much, and 200k is insane I can't even imagine 10M
what does "tokens" mean
The different tokens are generated from looking at patterns and creating small building blocks to create words. In general, the token to word count is around 75-80%
So 100K tokens would be around 75-80K words
Here is a visual way to see tokens, in AI they use it to measure it's context length and etc
Yep, looks like is not a seperate token
Instead they have a lot of tokens starting with
to, your etc
Do we even know how the Anthropic tokenizer compares. It makes a big difference in cost and I context length
Like its great news that llama 3 uses larger tokens
Don't know if it's public, but there should be an endpoint to count tokens.
Or else how do people truncate their input?
100%.. it's cliche by now.. but the idea that "if it's free, then you (/ your data) is the product" is so true ha
i mean not talking about open source
just mean nothing is free - at least not frontier LLM models that costs ungodly amounts of money to train
Like Microsoft and google are no charities haha
lol nope
Yep, and now they control a large amount of the gamedev market...
I did say microsoft buying out all those game companies would be bad in the long term...
Yeah, it's pretty crazy, hard to imagine how big they are. The largest companys I'm the world
Yep and now they are controlling what those companies can create...
Yeah and it's lower quality
They did just fire a huge amount of the devs.
10K I think
Even in the studios which did really well...
That's a lot
How does Perplexity handles fake news?
Yesterday I was watching the Eurovision Contest.
Soon after the winner was revealed I asked Perplexity who was the winner, on a thread about the Eurovision Contest I had opened some hours before. Please note the winner was still singing his song in the end title of the show.
It answered correctly.
So I opened a new thread and asked again.
At first Perplexity said there were no info about it.
I insisted, and then the mistake: Perplexity gave me the second ranked as the winner of the show.
I asked more than once on the same new thread, and always the same mistake.
The usual search engine gives me a list of sites, and it's up to me to go and read them in order to find my answer.
Instead, these AIs don't give a list of sites (ok some of them, such as Perplexity, do, but it's not their core feature): they give answers.
So: How does Perplexity handles fake news?
In your own experience, have you ever found such mistakes when running Perplexity?
(not complaining, just reflecting: I'm a new Pro user, and very happy about this wonderful tool)
First search with the right answer:
https://www.perplexity.ai/search/Have-ever-been-Fc7KExW6S0.wJpiLBXWVnw
Second thread with the mistake: https://www.perplexity.ai/search/Who-won-the-t1VysEagT824u9aGZ92h9g
Yes, there have been multiple instances of fraud or suspected frauds over the years in the Eurovision Song Contest. These incidents have ranged from allegations of vote rigging to irregular voting patterns among jury members. Here are some notable examples:
- 2013 Allegations of Vote Rigging: There were claims of vote rigging involving Azerbai...
BTW: both of the threads had the Pro Search enabled
nqa what
it depends on perplexity's underlying implementation of the indexer/crawler and which sources are being dumped into the model's context. And I believe that implementation is very far from perfect. There is no intuitive way to ensure that LLM-based search can filter out "fake" news. Don't be deceived by the heading on perplexity's main page, it's crucial to always double check sources.
It is not always possible for AI to include new information directly, as most of this information is not yet in the index.
The only thing you can do is wait a while and then try again, by now it should work: https://www.perplexity.ai/search/Who-won-the-YmuFA97ARi.hShQ00jBNEA
You can also report inaccurate answers by clicking on the three dots -> Report -> Inaccurate answer
According to the provided search results, Switzerland won the 2024 Eurovision Song Contest with the song "The Code" performed by Nemo. Here are the key details:
Country: Switzerland
Artist: Nemo
Song: "The Code"
Points: 591
Nemo is non-binary, making them the first non-binary artist to win Eurovision
Their win follows other groundbreaking queer...
@elder tree No one will be sharing login information here. Please consider yourself warned.
i wasint being serious man😔
And I take security very seriously here on the server 😉
it was literaly sarcasm.
chillax
alr bro i luv perplexity but you killin the love for community chillax
i was not being serious
I see, and it was very fast at indexing.
My reflection is: Perplexity at first warned me about the lack of info, then it went on as I insisted.
Furthermore, he gave two different results in two different threads: maybe because of the lack of infos?
Something to consider.
I'm a CyberPsychologist, and I teach Digital Education, Cybersecurity and Digital Awareness to students, parents and teachers.
As always, humans have the last word, and Machines are far from conquering the World 😉
LLMs sometimes give different answers, even if the information is the same, this is normal.
bombaclaat ‼️
Somehow, didn't know of Perplexity until an hour ago. Encountered a strong recommendation that mentioned the reliability of its responses. Context: last year discontinued ChatGPT 4 subscription after disappointment with errors - "hallucinations". Based on website, Perplexity seems to be an interface between the user and LLMs. Is that right? Does Perplexity remove or reduce fabricated (parts of) responses?
perplexity searches the web and finds the answer using LLMs and gives you the answer
it's more like a search engine than a chatbot
and also gives you citations so you can verify the info
I'm surprised they haven't made "gpt" into a single token. I bet that one change would improve reasoning about GPTs.
Is it me or there's major lag with llama 3 70b sonar api endpoint?

deep dive ➤ #💬│general message
Is perplexity good for coding?
Hi, how to fix it, i choose writing,but system still always search.(I use my native, Thai language)
rip my eyes
What is the purpose of perplexity labs? It's free to everyone and you don't need to be a developer to use or understand it, plus you can choose from lots of models. So why wouldn't I just use that instead of the standard interface?
no SOTA models, no thread history, no real LLM search. You can still search with online models but no citations, which means not trustworthy.
it's just for trying out new models
I agree the history part is valuable. History and collections are the main appeal to me of Perplexity in general. I don't understand why ChatGPT or Claude or literally any of the others don't have that feature. How simple would it be to let people organize their threads? Even Microsoft hasn't bothered to add that. I just don't get it. I'd subscribe to the others in a heartbeat if they had the same Library feature that Perplexity has.
you mean collections?
Why Pro Search keep asking "What specific AI system or tool will be used to generate..." when I already set GPT-4 Turbo in the Settings? Is there a way to have Perplexity aware of the Settings so it does not keep asking?
post an image on #1111765634267742408
I don't care much about being able to organize threads, and I think that the main selling point of pplx's Collections is the AI prompt. Considering the fact that it somehow resembles custom GPT/Assistant thingy, and you can actually swap the thread between collections, the same as mentioning/using different GPTs/Assistants in one thread.
Yes, history, library, collections, whatever
It says I don't have access to this link.
it should be #👉│feedback-general for free users, my bad. You said you have GPT-4 set on your profile, then you must have an active subscription. Just leave the server and rejoin via the link on your profile settings.
Thank you! I'll do that.
I disagree about prompting being the main selling point of collections. I believe for most people that kind of customization is just beyond what they care to do. To me the collections are like a highly optimized version of bookmarks in traditional browsers. I use bots to answer a huge variety of questions, dozens of times a day, on the go, most of which I don't need to reference later. But in many cases I really do want to be able to reference them later - often not just a single answer to a question but the whole conversation, because the content can be so relevant and rich. I want to be able to keep and reference, for example, my recipes in one location natively on the app. With other AI apps I have to copy and paste and move to another location. Having a "recipes" collection, alongside a "fitness," "career," "DIY," etc., is extremely valuable, and it has nothing to do with prompting.
honestly I don’t use peplexity
it just doesn’t feel right
safari is something I just use
safari ?
yes
like, the browser?
yes
idk
I mean, when you use Safari, aren’t you entering in a search to a question or something and getting Google results?
Or do you use an alternative browser
yea google results
So rather than having to click each link provided by Google, wouldn’t it be better to ask Perplexity, get a summarized result of say 10 sources, and also be able to ask follow ups?
Just an example of how I use it.
Sameeeee
same! It's literally the first ai product I've used that actually made it easy to quit using google so much. Instead of digging through a bunch of old reddit/forum/blog posts and trying to find some simple information I'm looking for Perplexity is quicker than a search engine most of the time and it's actually really precise and accurate most of the time too
I liked Arc Search a lot but it's wrong almost all of the time lol
Yeah I think people can get turned off to something like this because it’s foreign to their normal workflow BUT, if you can leverage it and get confident, your results and experience grows positively. One area I’d like to improve is image generation. I suck at that.
definitely. and there's also a pretty big community of people who just absolutely despise anything with AI in the name and I think that turns a lot of other people off of stuff like this too by word of mouth but it just works so well. I was one of those people for the last couple years and perplexity is what started to entirely change my mind on it. for image generation stuff I feel like it's really good at coming up with more detailed prompts though! Ive been using Claude 3 Opus to come up with prompts for me. Are you using the built in image generation stuff or something like midjourney?
hey guys, i have a question about this, is there a way to hold to speak so it doesn’t keep answering while you pause even for a second?
@long sierra do you know if they have a feature that lets you hold to speak instead of answering right after you stop talking?
I've discovered platforms such as together.ai and fireworks.ai, among others, which provide access to numerous open-source LLM models like LLama3, Mistral, Stable Diffusion, and more. However, none of these services seem to offer closed-source API services such as gpt-4 and gemeni. I'm seeking a solution where I can make a one-time purchase with a credit card on a single platform instead of managing multiple services to access a combination of APIs. For instance, if together.ai includes gpt-4, that would fulfill all my requirements. Could you recommend a service that meets these criteria?
I think perplexity fills that
are you asking for an API that has both closed-source LLMs such as GPT-4, Claude 3, and Gemini, while also having access to open-source models like Llama 3 and Mistral?
i hear some say perplexity can browse the internet for current event results etc... and others that say it doesn't ...same is also said about chtgpt3.5 and yet when you ask the A.I. themselves they clearly say no ... what is the reality of it all anyone? cause i only of one A.i that is getting info real time atm
and i'm posting this because i've watched a couple of recent videos boasting about the "real time" access....asking for a friend 🙂
I like the term: Answer Engine, maybe an evolution of the (old?) Search Engine
I think a key difference between search and answer engine is the result. You search for info via say Google and get results that may match what you want. You ask perplexity and perplexity does the research and curates a response based off the data sources it leverages. Effectively, combining searching and summarizing
How can I tell Perplexity to integrate relevant images at appropriate points in the lecture to enhance understanding and retention?
I am using Claude 3 Sonnet and the results keep saying "[This section would further expound on the theme of the upside-down values ...]. How can I have the model write everything out instead of putting it in brackets and letting me write it?
is gemini 1.5 pro free preview with no limit now?
just tell it to continue
Hello, why I have limited use of Claude 3 Opus as a pro user? I literally subscribed just to use this model...
We should add a counter somewhere to how many times new users ask about the limit
felt like being scammed huh 🤷♂️ in a moment there will be a mod throwing you a link to a message where they explain their super secret indefinite "temporary" limit on Opus.
I have researched in the announcements before asking here 🙂 They should be more transparent when they lower their limits. I signed up for an annual plan to use OPUS with a limit of 600 searches per day. Now I feel cheated.
yes it is a big scam for new subscribers with the intention to use Opus
Oh, this wasn't an insult to you or anything. I meant more as a... "Maybe the devs will be more transparent about it if the counter gets high"
that my que, lol
perplexity ai>>
Hey, does anybody know how will the cancellation of my Rabbit R1 order affect my perplexity pro subscription.
Perplexity is the only thing stopping me from cancelling it!
How do I check my opus count? I hope there is a clear place to tell me
yes.
Does perplexity often trigger cloudflare verification? What is the reason for this? Is it a problem with my network?
1 month anniversary soon 🥳
thats wtf Im saying lol. Come on perplexity, fix our opus.
I dont know but gpt4 by perplexity is somehow very stupid and lose context all the time, especially when coding. I use gpt4 as default AI, and everytime gpt4 give stupid answers, I choose the rewrite option with opus and Opus always give me the answers that I want, much better than gpt4
Hi Mares! Did you generate this image using Perplexity? How do we generate images using Perplexity? What Image Generation Model is best for Bible images?
Hi, I am wondering if anyone knows of any Google Chrome Extensions that allow speech to text on the Perplexity desktop version. Anyone use these? Would be very helpful for my circumstance!!
Thanks! What Image Generation Model is best for Bible images?
You'll have to try it out, probably DALL-E 3.
Perplexity Pro is literally the best AI service on the market right now!
i find it goes of path too .. it seem to get muggled it like it skip back to early chats and the works from that point, gemini is also like that, has trouble staying on new subject, i found the only way to keep it on right path is to delete chat and start with your new part of code to work on
Yo, Perplexity team, y'all helped me save my life. I was able to find the antidepressant withdrawal I'm in and exactly how and which laws protect me as I found accommodated, accessible care. There are going to be some products coming out of this, from me...when I'm better. But I wanted to let you know that, especially if you have universal healthcare, you can do so much for your families and to help medical care provdiers who are in for some real crap as people are getting back to work (i.e., supports post covid are gone, so people, like myslef, are having to get better now to go to work. They need help. Thank you team and community!
anytime buddy, take care!
This SEO dude claims LSI keywords and entities are the secret sauce to ranking. He brags about ranking with a page full of keywords and no real content, implying Google is easily manipulated. He throws shade at Google, calls them hypocritical for talking about manipulation, and praises a guy who exploits those loopholes. He then contradicts himself by saying "quality research" matters, making his argument messy. Then he promotes his favorite tool, Neuwriter (which banned him, lol) for extracting those magical LSI keywords and entities. The rest is just a sales pitch for his other favorite tool, Cloot, and how well they work together. This video is basically a glorified ad for these tools, disguised as SEO advice. What he doesn't tell you is that Google's algorithm is far more complex, and focusing solely on keywords won't get you far. Building a website with valuable content, a good user experience, and strong backlinks is the real long-term SEO strategy, not chasing keyword shortcuts.
https://pplx.ai @opal crane
Perplexity AI unlocks the power of knowledge with information discovery and sharing.
I do not know if we will ever have Unlimited Opus again.
To me, GPT-4 is very slow and often crashes.
look up openrouter
Don’t miss it: https://www.youtube.com/live/DQacCB9tDaw?feature=shared
We’ll be streaming live at 10AM PT Monday, May 13 to demo some ChatGPT and GPT-4 updates.
Which five AI/Machine Learning GitHub repositories stand out to you guys as either your favorites or extremely impressive?
what they update?
did they finally announce gpt5
Nothing yet, it’s about to start
its just updates on gpt4 womp
Maybe gpt-4.5, idk. Hopefully it’s we see some logic and reasoning improvements
And creativity
Personally, I think Anthropic will always be in the lead when it comes to creative (writing) 🤔
hard to see beyond them atm
I really need to get through some of my recently bought yearly perplexity subscription before they go an announce search. Would be really interesting to see some strong competition in the AI Search vertical.
Is perplexity pro model's context windows small using opus or gpt4-turbo
This will be important for me to decide whether or not to buy
Seems like that’s not a priority for OpenAI (Closed) so I think that’s right for the closed source models. However I think that llama 3 400b, llama 4, 5 etc will be great for creative writing
So anyone can answer ne pls
I have perplexity pro, and am trying claude pro. I find that the answers directly within claude are much more clear & Accurate. The rumor / understanding is that the perplexity windows are much smaller.
Yep, it’s 32k with some RAG mixed in
But with accuracy what do you mean, are you using long context?
but to be honest 32k is enough.Worry will be small
Or short questions
maybe u can turn off the pro search and choose writing?
The underline models should be the same so within 32k if you want it to act more like Claude Pro you can use writing mode with this as the system prompt: https://discord.com/channels/1047197230748151888/1233663028289867815
It’s starting 🙂
thoughts and prayers
and consumer friendly
lol little buggy still it sounds like
Sounded better now, but yeah was pretty choppy
those ai voice cracks are wild
Did I buy a Pro subscription for chatgpt 4 in vain? Lol
What's the spring update about
Free GPT-4 for every1 as well as: Data analysis, image input, GPTs and improved voice chat.
All powered by the new GPT-4o model.
2x faster, 50% costs of GPT-4 Turbo via API
Free gpt 4 on their website?
Yes
Probably very soon, the team usually integrates new versions of existing models quickly.
50% costs of GPT-4 Turbo is still expensive ngl lol
but damn its crazy that gpt-4o will be free to try
For the spec of the model
Some stuff that they didn't say on the youtube live is it is also rendering 3d and integrating logo on photo mockups
What's the context size? It looks like they already killed the Gemini's main advantage, audio input
They can never keep up
They alr had audio, it was just a separate model
128k
They seem to have new tokenizer compression so context size will be way improved for non-english users
It wasn't the same, it was just transcription, and only to english. This one can talk about the input
Yea
Hope it won't be lazy like the last GPT4 Turbo was
🚀 New AI Model Update: GPT-4o! 🚀
-
Multimodal Capabilities: GPT-4o can reason across audio, vision, and text in real time. It accepts any combination of text, audio, and image inputs and can generate outputs in any of these modalities[1].
-
Improved Response Time: The model can respond to audio inputs in as little as 232 milliseconds, with an average response time of 320 milliseconds, which is similar to human response times in conversation[1].
-
Enhanced Language Support: GPT-4o has shown significant improvements in handling text in non-English languages while maintaining strong performance in English and coding tasks[1].
-
Cost Efficiency and Speed: The model is 2x faster and 50% cheaper in the API compared to GPT-4 Turbo, with 5x higher rate limits[1].
-
Advanced Vision and Audio Understanding: GPT-4o has enhanced capabilities in vision and audio understanding, surpassing previous models[1].
-
Unified Model Architecture: Unlike previous versions that used separate models for different tasks, GPT-4o is trained end-to-end across all modalities, meaning a single neural network processes all inputs and outputs[1].
-
Safety and Limitations: New safety systems have been implemented to provide guardrails on voice outputs, and the model has undergone extensive external red teaming to identify and mitigate risks[1].
-
Language Tokenization Improvements: The new tokenizer used by GPT-4o compresses text more efficiently across different language families, resulting in fewer tokens needed for processing text[1].
-
Model Availability: GPT-4o is available in the free tier and to Plus users with up to 5x higher message limits. It is also accessible in the API as a text and vision model, with plans to launch support for audio and video capabilities to a small group of trusted partners[1].
It’ll prolly start good and then get progressively worse
It always happens
They get a bunch of money from ppl
And then make is as bad as possible to increase profits
Save on computer I assume
It’s so fast
Idk, have only asked it to write me an essay about frogs, I really hope they fixed the lazy code issue
coding is slow @mossy fox , same as before tbh
everyone & their grandma is probably on the website rn tho
ye
I mean i need it for reasoning about code more than i want it to be a code generator for me
@mossy fox this took around 10secs https://chat.openai.com/share/7d54f2f8-bd70-4665-9a84-492dd9b63921
So, are we going to have gpt4o in Perplexity too?
Sorry, I just came here
o
It's already in ChatGPT? I don't see it. Is it Pro-only for now?
i'm looking at the demos here https://openai.com/index/hello-gpt-4o/
the mobile app is insane
(if they are not lying lol )
What about the Vision feature?
Does anyone have a problem with Perplexity responding very slowly? Time to switch on the chatgpt?
In principle, there is no reason not to use improved models if they cost less and are better.
Nvm
yeah, I get that. But how would you implement this "Vision" feature in Perplexity?
Just like the current feature
update to assistants api as well https://platform.openai.com/docs/assistants/whats-new
Which current feature?
Image upload
well GPT-4o looks impressive so far, very fast to respond. The only possible downside is that it appears it might be limited to 2048 output tokens, not 4096
Ohh, but in real-time it would work through a web-socket solution instead of a REST-API, right?
This is the only bench that they reported it did worse in: DROP https://www.perplexity.ai/search/What-is-the-E8wtVa7OTBGy1AJlDH7YKw
The DROP (Discrete Reasoning Over Paragraphs) benchmark is a large-scale reading comprehension dataset that requires systems to perform discrete reasoning over the content of paragraphs to answer questions correctly.
It contains 96,567 question-answer pairs crowdsourced over 6,607 paragraphs from Wikipedia.
The questions require resolving ref...
DO you have a section where I can find resrouces regarding your Overall API implimentations on a tool that im building?
I am trying it in Playground on enterprise version, and so far I still prefer Claude Opus vanilla expression, gpt4o still sounds like chatgpt😕
Main takeaway im getting from this is the amazing phone app
I don't know if GPT will overcome Opus ever, honestly. Even if they dropped GPT5, it would have to be a big jump.
By the time they drop GPT5, Opus will have gotten updates.
apparently it's gonna have around 1.5T Parameters
It looks like they copied Perplexity.ai search, basicially it lowered gaps between ChatGPT and Perplexity.ai
Yeah, but it's not about the size. It's how you use it.
multiple factors, but yeah
out of curiosity, what other factors?
Training data for example
But honestly? I triying my prompts again in ChatGPT, which reacted badly or gives me bad results, but Calude 3 Opus can do it. Now? ChatGPT works perfectly.
4o or standard chatgpt?
Even regular ChatGPT, I'm shocked xD
Maybe they reverted to normal GPT4, not the Turbo brainrot
idk, let see how GPT-4o will perform.
For now, it seems less lazy, but maybe it will be as bad as before when I'm going away from generic stuff
Yeah
But GUI of OpenAI, damm it so good 😄
hopefully gpt-4o better than opus. So that I will cancel perplexity and switch to openai once again. perplexity free default AI is good enough. Right now the gpt4 from perplexity lose context everytime and opus is limited 😃
Opinions
So
Is perplexity pro worth it now?
@nocturne leaf its been worth it
Depends on why you are here
A couple tidbits I've confirmed as well. 1) The mysterious GPT2-chatbot that showed up on benchmark sites was GPT-4o. 2) OpenAI did desktop version first for Mac because "we're just prioritizing where our users are." @miramurati told me. https://t.co/SydKkXyF4P
I think it’s live, I have GPT4o on chatGPT rn
same
is gpt4 o gonna be added to perplexity mobile and web
I bet so, idk why they wouldn’t
50% cheaper
so is this gpt4-o on perplexity or not?
and why should i use it instead of claude 3 opus
Omg, Gpt4-o
go watch the stream
which
OpenAI Spring Update – streamed live on Monday, May 13, 2024.
Introducing GPT-4o, updates to ChatGPT, and more.
I think it’s still the same story, GPT is the logic reasoning king with top end STEM reasoning and Opus is great at reasoning but is geared to creative work and nature writing. But I have yet to really try GPT4o so I guess we will have to see how everything lined up
that's bad, there are better videos on their website
oh right, there's actually a good use case i have for this. i often get those bs iq tests. this would be perfect to test if it got better at solving matrix puzzles
is this bait?
https://openai.com/index/hello-gpt-4o/ watch videos here
the guy walking around london maybe most interesting to see how fast it reacts. but different use case
still, this can definitely kill all tourist guide jobs
Same here 💪🤗
hi sir, if i subscribe to Chatgpt today sir, is this GPT-4o or what is it called sir, can it be used now sir?
nice reply sir. How is the performance sir?
its not bad sir
you mean it has a significant improvement sir? in what way sir?
i am tempted to subscribe sir
Just for info for everyone who is annoyed about the 50 / day Claude 3 Opus limit that Perplexity silently introduced and never lifted again (although promised), YesChat offers 100 Claude 3 Opus / day (3000 per month) along with 200k context length (capped to 32k at Perplexity) for $20 a month including tons of other AI bots (Midjourney, Suno, etc.).
i don't know yet sir but sir i wonder if it is related to my name sir can any sir in the chat please confirm sir?
For now, it's MUCH better than gpt4 turbo sir. Not lazy anymore. Will do stuff without asking it million times or being stupid

