#halfsword-chat-⚔
1 messages · Page 658 of 1
No
Like with your guns?
or maybe a grenade?
LOOK A ROMAN PIKE FORMATION
Bruh remember we are talking 1600-1700 here
Look a man fishing
(prolly a better example)
BRO IF THEY HAD LITERAL GUNS, THROWING A GRENADE INTO A PIKE FORMATION WOULD CERTAINLY NOT END WELL
ah yes, the holy hand grenade of antioch
its one of the relics brother maynard carryies
You are aware pikes are about 5 meters long?
😭
BEFORE GUNPOWDER THEY HAD ARROWS
yeah I'm aware, first image isnt a very good one
WHAT WERE THEY EVEN GONNA DO ABOUT THE ARROWS
Wrong they had grenades
what
THEN THOU SHALL COUNT TO 3
You heard me
3 IS THE NUMBER THOU SHALT COUNT
During the crusades
Hey they were using small hand thrown bombs like grenades since like the 8th century
AND THE NUMBER OF THE COUNTING SHALL BE 3
GUNPOWDER IS THE WHOLE POINT OF GRENADES
Grenades at the time weighted A LOT. And you have to get past both the arquebuses and pikes. And you can’t throw it after formation collide because friendly fire
Plate armor quite often deflected and made arrows not pen very well, there were literally guards to prevent the wooden spalding/shrapnet from entering the helmet on some examples of armor
? Wrong lol
GIVEN THAT THOU THEN PROCEEDETH TO 3
SOME people need to learn where the caps lock key is
THEN, LOBBEST THE HOLY HAND GRENADE AT THY FOE
theres a v shaped extrusion on this armor to stop both thrusts and arrow shrapnel
what the fuck is that thing
V
😭
and give space for nose
ye
Nose? What kinda big ass nose would that guy have
it'd help with glancing blows bro, not full on direct thrusts
armour for minecraft villager
bro how would a pike formation have full sets of armour and chainmails and shield
that would be the most expensive pike formation ever
ARCHERS TAKE A LOT OF FUCKING TRAINING
what is a puke formation
PIKES DO NOT
Even the strongest of bows with bodkin arrows can barely dent a chestplate
No they don't lol just use guns
genuinely
AND THEY ARE WORTH IT
This is exactly why bows and crossbows coexisted for so long
Test of time says otherwise
yeah
until firearms
didn't you guys just say that arrows and spears could easily penetrate armour
a skilled bowsman was fuckin hard to train
Wtf who would wanna set they arms on fire
Chainmail.
Masochists
bodekin arrows could easily piece a chestplate wdym theyb were made for that
No I never said anything close to that
Im going to sleep, y’all behave or im banning everyone in the morning
DEPENDS ON THE CHESTPLATE
we need bows and arrows in half sword so we can penetrate armour
spears can, some arrows were designed to
Tods workshop did an excellent video on this. Any properly made chestplate will not give a flying fuck about arrows
you should kill people
bodekin arrowsn were DESIGNED to piece plate armour
goodnight pookie
Ok yes, but that is not a very deep penetration
thicker armour
at closer range they can be lethal
Chainmail could be penetrated with a strong enough stab. But you ain’t doing shit to plate
spears could 100% get through plate
ow I got warned for referencing north korea
the ones that went straight through were bodkins if i remember properly
This kind of plate often had a thick gambeson under so you would be fine
ye
gambesons are like
leather right?
or like thick cloth?
What's gun powder
No. Just no why tf do you think that
That sounds made up
4 inch thick armour with 20mm thick arrows
cause some were designed for that purpose???? 😭
A very thick padded jacket sometimes made with stab resistant fabric
also reminder when really good armor like this came around, firearms also came around
so
This is me
yeah arrows were really not used against plated knights
Anti armor weapons where made to go through the plate. They either stabbed the gaps that had chainmail or made them fall over before stabbing said gaps. You will never go through the plate
also remember; Crusader armor helped stop arrows from longer ranges
awl pike was designed to pierce plate armour
THEN AS I SAID PLATED KNIGHTS ARE BASICALLY INVINCIBLE
blunt force
what, did they have 20mm armour piercing arrows?
shield
they had armour piercing arrows
N o
you can still get hit sheild cant block everything
anti armour piercing arrow armour
Just like rondel daggers the awl pike is good for punching through chainmail. Still won’t do shit against plate
its designed for plate
Sadly the 20mm aphet arrows are a Hollywood creation
?
also why didn't they have tanks back then anyways
I mean
if we wanna be technical
never would have thought of armour made of arrows
It’s designed for armor. It meant to be effective against the chainmail protecting the gaps of the armor
How about 20 mm automatic cannons
we have 20mm armor piercing arrows IRL
Those where Called heavy cavalry
its just fucking 20mm APFSDS
it can and was used to get through plate armour, but was also used to stab weakpoints
aren't those basically invincible too
swords can't get pass
arrows can't get pass
horse dies, you cant get up
tf they gonna do?
= you die
throw gasoline?
Chief imma need a fucking source on the penetrating plate. Not even poleaxes who are considered THE anti armor melee weapon even try to stab the plate
cause pole axes weren't designed for that
then don't use horses
They where designed to fight armor. Now gimme a fucking source
what do you think cavalry is
use tanks
human tanks
like 40 guys holding 5 inch thick iron plates
then shooting out arrows
Heavy cavalry is the equivalent of today's air force actually
armor piercing arrows
Why not use real tanks we have those
ok buddy
and this is the AI overview
@waxen lance 💋💋
lemme ask chatgpt
how much even is a pound
0.4 kg
many say "plate piercing spears", but dont mention them by nam,e
Being designed to fight armor doesn’t mean it’s supposed to penetrate plate. It means it’s supposed to fight armored opponent. All armored fighting was about trying to stab the gaps in said armor not go through it
That’s not a source
it's not that bad
thats what I said
exactly im looking for one that mentions by name
500 x 0.4
So you agree that it can’t penetrate plate?
1.5 FUCKING TONS
OK 50 PEOPLE CARRYING THEM AND REOPEN IN TO FIRE OUT ARROWS
FOR A 5 FOOT BY 3 FOOT 5 INCH THICH STEEL SHIELD
@waxen lance why are you even bothering to talk about it this is clearly rage bait
no. It could but was more difficult than finding weak points
cus its fun
to look for information
Fair 💋
honestly I have to study geography but who cares
why are you kissing
That's dumb just stay dim ...
Cuz I lov u
I aint interested
What are you studying
That's fucked
just use oil
Curious
oil doesn't catch on fire
its still hot
Maces is exist
I am once again asking for a fucking source
we need fuel
bruh cant find specific source but all the ai's say it could but was difficult
i asked multiple btw
The point of blunt weapons was to make the opponent fall over so you could shank them
to increase validity
ITS FUCKING AI TRAINED ON HOLLYWOOD BULLSHIT
Nutritious
bro forgot about oil lanterns
oof using AI as a source is a bad move there king
Y'all talking about different sorts of oil
no. Its an ai trained on the information currently present on the internet, you are basically arguing with most of the internet
You did the same shit dumbahh
Not at all dude. You ever been hit in the head through a helmet with a mace? I have, a small mace, very lightly. If he used full strength, even if my helmet didn’t crack or bend into my skull, the concussive force is enough to kill
Ai doesn’t give the correct answer just the one that is regurgitated online more
no i used ai for math that I was too lazy to calculate at the moment
which, if asking somnething historical, would most likely be the most accurant answer
for HISTORICAL THINGS i do not trust ai
I'm much better for math than ai ask me what 4x6 is
construction lumber
obviously
Yeah Even padded longsword to a helmet can SUCK (ask me how I know lol). What I meant is that blunt force was not super effective besides the head
😭
Ai can be accurate, you just gotta ask multiple for validity
I've been hit with a metal bat through a stahlhelm
shit hurt
Also if you ask it to only use trustworthy sources it is even more accurate
my grandfather took it off a dude he killed in berlin
Like tell it to only use information from reputable historical sites
It breaks bones. I've done re-enactment and buhurt. In buhurt which uses way thicker and stronger armour than back in the day, maces and polearm hammers are made hollow because they were designed to break what is beneath the armour
Ai is not good at choosing good sources and just pick whatever thought has the most quantity
Not if asked about a specific topic as to prevent misinformation
And even less so if you specify the types of sources you wat
bro wore it and got hit with a metal bat
Just do your own damm research then
even though its worth money
Then it basically just summarizes ideas from multiple historical websites
crisp 50 dollar bill
I fuckin know its worth money
on ebay
How would that be different from what I did
Id use the same sites
I concede that one. Armored fencing is all about stabbing gaps or bashing what is behind
doesn't even care about money
and chooses to get hit with metal bats
just dodge it
Great. Then tell what sites you used
Id have used the same ones the ai used
and those are? Stop avoiding the question
The most reputable ones idk,
ok but thats actually dependent on what model you use, I am not one to fucking go "Ai is best thing for research hurr durr" but its better then saying bullshit without a source lmfao
Yeah definitely not getting through plate with a sword, but Dane axes were designed to go through helmets. Granted armour strength definitely improved a lot by the time of full plate armour so a poleaxe might struggle a bit to break the armour, but the concussive force is still there
Whatever the premium one is
How’s everyone
JUST GIVE ME THE DAMM SOURCES
do you know shoe???
has anyone noticed how the game doesnt really feel skill based and its whoever swing better wins?
Yes and it’s not impressionable to the point a group of people can get it to only respond the n word to peoples inquires
Ok, Weapon wiki, Wikipedia, Worcester.emuseum.com, met museum.con, academia.edu etc
Nah it’s bait and stab tbh
AI is very wrong when it comes to things
yeah
Hard to argue with 2 museums and an edu site
I mean it’s better up in the higher armored areas
But nah you have to have a disadvantage for it to be fair
And even then
but they can't talk???
Like I’m in commoner area and drop my weapons on carnage and just kinda beat the shit out of em all
'whoever swings better wins' is pretty accurate. I mean, it takes skill to swing better
hey question
Dave you happy with my sources?
ya?
the summarizing part is what makes it bad
I have been coached in poleaxe fencing for the last 6 months (Talhoffer 1467). Although I still lack the gear for sparring.
strikes are almost exclusively against the head or knees. And stabs are ofcourse mostly towards the eye, armpit and sometimes groin
how realistic is this form of polearm combat in a buhurt and how would you feel if you saw it in person IRL(Video from m00)
I would prefer specific articles instead of just the name of websites
Oh for sure. Even though you may break someones finger with it, why waste the energy when you can go for a more lethal strike? HEMA technique is not necessarily based on what is possible, but on what is most effective
i feel like this game hates its players, even tho it's a great game
Bruh... Grasping at straws I see, I'm on a phone so I ain't typing out that much shi
trying the ultimate challenge and i die more to my own weapon or to me flying across the map than i die from getting killed by the enemy
🌲
yeah but in hema thats not really the vision i think a parry system by pressing mouse four would enable a blocking stance
Tree?
like kinstrife
yeah that's you in real life
Asking for the fucking name of the page with said info is too much lol?
Also Wikipedia says nothing about its effectiveness on plate
Indeed
everyone looks like their discord pfp btw
Idk bro it used Wikipedia to get the base info on it, when it was used and shi
That's honestly pretty accurate to a buhurt poleaxe duel, not gonna lie haha.
Jokes aside there is a lot more technique involved in buhurt duels, but it's also a lot more 'just swing hard and fast' than an official polearm duels would be. But there was a thrusting or stabbing motion I saw in the video, all thrusts and stabs are banned moves in Buhurt because they were the only way to kill a bloke in full plate with piercing weapons, which poleaxes can be
I'm sorry the side switching is canonically accurate?
And what article did you get said info from.
I’m you are not gonna give me an actual source I’m done with this discussion
I'm just speaking semantically
yeah i get what you were saying
You mean switching the dominate hand?
I think?
the thing were they switch up the arms as they swing to get more angles of attack
I gave you a source lil bro look it up, the titles long as hell
The hand are both protected by gauntlets and can easily be moved out of the way of a strike.
Look up (website name) awl pike/spear
100% it's done in buhurt and was done back in the day. A quick hand switch can catch your opponent by surprise by swinging from a direction they didn't expect, if done well
uuuh guys my character won and died at the same time and now willies willie is out
I did and I’m not finding shit about it piercing plate
he doesn't have one though
its just a moose knuckle
Maybe wrong website then idk or maybe didn't read whole thing
Maybe get chatgpt to summarize lol
We don't use finger gauntlets in buhurt because of how many broken fingers there were, so sure they can be moved out of the way, but by that logic just dodge every attack that comes at you
Im not doing your research for you just because you don’t want to back up your own claim.
Until you give me article supporting you claim I’m done with this argument
there should be a martial art where you shoot each other with muskets and wear modern body armor
What exactly is his claim?
what evidence do you have that says awl spear cant?
ok but what about full armored spinkicks lmfao as a theoretical would a full spinkick in full armor disqualify you
Early 1900's Olympics had pistol dueling as a sport
with blanks???
In buhurt?
yeah
Wax bullets
yeah it def still could
prolly why its still not around today
The knowledge that no other melee weapon (including ones made specifically for armor) and the strongest of arrows arrows can only dent a chestplate at most.
As for the arrows.
https://youtu.be/DBxdTkddHaE?si=mHLGMw7wmpYE3Rw9
NEWSFLASH!
If you liked this, watch the whole new Arrows vs Armour 2 series available here
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLIUWkznLJcsEFvEZdYExu7ffW2Hf5s32k
All films and documentation about both series are housed here http://www.todtodeschini.com
160lbs ENGLISH WARBOW shoots FULL WEIGHT MEDIEVAL ARROWS at reproduced MEDIEVAL ARMOUR. Find ...
I gave bro evidence and he turned it down cause I didn't give him the specific title when a quick google would do 🥀 🥀 \
That an awl pike can penetrate plate armor
and meanwhile he has - actual sources at all
so your source is... arrows vs armour plating?
I'll simplify it. The only rules in Buhurt are -
No stabbing/thrusting. No blows to the back of the knees, feet, groin, base of the skull/back of the neck. No arm bars/joint locks. No attacking someone who's on the ground (except in profights). Basically anything else goes. My old club president who founded the sport in Aus used to do a back kick that you'd never see coming and would send you on your arse
Bruh your source was first ai and then entire wikis not articles
@restive barn make a giant ass weapon for the 1.5x scaled characters since they have no trouble handling a golden halbred like its nothing
was the awl pike actually tested in this?
lmfao that must be a spectacle to see a martial art knight
my source was 2 museum articles about the weapon and an edu site
just like this but triple the size lmao
Along with hands on experience with poleaxes and knowing people who do armored fencing
It could penetrate maille, and could penetrate 15thc armour if there was a weakness from the forging process, but energy wouldn't be wasted on a stabbing strike at the plate itself. It would be used for weakpoints so you're essentially correct
I can link you some videos if you want
does a lance penetrate armor???
send that shit to my dms dawg
goofiest large weapon i could find
we want it too bro
if a lance can't reliably penetrate armor then how can an awl pike
it COULD pierce plate armour, but required a lot of effort to do so, so it was mostly used to stab weaker points. that is my claim
@wise canyon acc send it here lmfao
It's why they were made so long. If it was designed to penetrate armour it would be shorter and less able to bend
Look up dequitem on YouTube
yeah I watch his shit
Sure, if the armour was made badly or if the guy thrusting it had the strength of 2-3 strongman winners
no not nessicerily, but required a lot of force and the effort was better used targeting weak points
ok
like you were better off targeting weak points
buyt it was possible and did happen
that is my argument
also + wear on the armour from deflected blows would weaken it meaning it would be easier to penetrate
On plate armour from the 1400's onwards, everything was rounded and smooth to prevent any sharp objects gaining purchase. instead they would slide off. So very very very unlikely, but still possible
So much force that if the pine was moving at human speeds you would just push him back long before going through
wut
what does this mean
rate my sybau photo
it could and would often happen if armour was damaged at all, which was common since armour was generally not single use
let me ask reddit what that means
If the armour was repaired before that fight, definitely not. Cracked armour when repaired is much much more hardened, but also more brittle. So it would take more force to break it, but the break if it happened would be much worse
it means “silence” or “refrain from speaking”
He would just get pushed backwards
im asking reddit sybau
🥀
if it was repaired before the fight, it would still be easier since repaired steel is much weaker than pristine
make a giant ass sword for the 1.5x scaled enemies
that you can posess
ill show you the biggest weapon i can find compared to them lmao
I KNOOOWWWW!!!!!!!!!!!!!
at least a lot/10
HRRR RNRRRHRHRGGG
dang i wanna clarify but it gonna be buried so ima wait for next comment
weaker in stabby stabby sense i mean
It's not. It's hardened. Hardened things don't bend, they break. To penetrate something at this level of physics, it needs to be soft and bendable. A sharp spike on the end of a stick would not have what it takes to punch a hole into steel plate. Having said that though, longbows with bodkin arrow heads would penetrate steel plate, but that's working with smaller points and much higher speeds
aside from the golden halbred this thing weighs twice as much and is smaller lol
probably
how is willie's chest so sculpted but his arms are weak
i don't understand
And they still have no chance against the chest plate
is it normal that i broke a willies neck and he's still alive ?
Ever seen historical armour in museums? dudees with skinny as shit but insanely fit
then ye didnt break his neck
he just said bodekin arrows could piece
i accidenatlly switched graphics to cinematic now i cant play half swerd how to fix?
i heard the crack and his head is all wiggly
yeah but i feel like his arms should be more defined
Bodkins from longbows could pierce breastplates. But a spear or pike, possible but very very unlikely to ever happen
do you hve my weapon pack
chrome334 weapon pack 2
EXACTLY
THAT WAS MY POINT
was stabbing something meant to be added or did they just make a simple movment of the hand and call it a day
IT COULD HAPPEN
BUT THE EFFGORT WAS BETTER USED AIMING AT WEAK POINTS
brubh
play it
Yes but only under very specific circumstances. It would never happen in a standard duel
then play it dumby
i cant
alamy alamy alamy alamy
im using the katana
EXACTLY
then why not
i literally cant dude
im seeing if its blunt because the other one from vicious pack was shit and blunt
okay but do you have the weapon pack
THATS ANOTHER PART OF WHAT I SAID
i just have the katana not the weapon pack
read man
how tf are we supposed to help you
CAUSE I WAS ALSO TAKING ABOUT LIKE IN A BATTLE
Oh well I didn't see those points
ill get it if it looks cool
brubh download chrome334 weapon pack 2
all you said is you cant
okay
do you have really big swords
so why not
that arent as heavy as a train
yeah all you knew was that other guys bold misinterpretation of what I was saying
alright chrome im gonna test your katana if its blunt i kill you if its not i give you a well done
yes
For this to happen, it would have to be a very strong dude, with a running start, excellent accuracy and hit the flattest part of the plate possible. Then maybe. But again, not likely to ever happen
ima use it
he was also saying bodekin arrows couldn't piece plate armour
based on the pictures of the mod
ill do it
the katana HAS NO PIERCE
💪
not nessicerily, hitting with some force would create a small recess that then, as the spear continues to be pressed, would center it and assist in further puncturing the plate
but it is still very unlikely to happen
after 30 hits...
Bodkin arrows and longbows dominated full plate armour in the battle of Agincourt. Also some videos of people shooting bodkin arrows from long bows at half the poundage of what was used back then and still pierces authentically forged armour
i like the katana design 100 percent its peak
read what brochapacho
yeah he was saying they didn't work at all and I was like, that was kinda their point
katanas are dope
thats the point
its supposed to be agile not heavy and slow
okay buttttt i want it to slice limbs!
maybe ill make one
yess
in pack 3
nagitana
it was also made out of not so great steel
okay now try pack 2
odachi is already done btw
how many do you have
Maybe a divot in plate is one thing, but having the force needed to punch through is something else entirely
or is it in one pack
2 so far
this'll be fun
I said bodkin couldn’t pierce the chestplate
a divot means it is easier to continue puncturing, think like its easier to continue drilling after youvé already made a small hole
yknow the wind sword from elden ring near the end of the DLC? i like those cleaver looking blades
its the coolest one i found
the other guy just agreed it could\
holy shit theres like 50 weapons
what does bro think solid steel plate means
theres armors and no armors
its actually 22 weapons theres just 2 variants each
i think im going for all armored
Drilling is very different. Drilling digs the material out while puncturing moves the material out of the way, which is much harder
each have unique tiers
or do i really want armor actually
i hope MENU.mp4 becomes a playable map, loks sick ngl
is armored the higher damage? or is it just armor only
armored just armor
ok okay thanskz
but also like, its easier to hit a nail into something when youve already made the groove cause it helps straighten it
that was my main point wit that
by far the shovel from another weapon pack was the best and coolest one so far it was like a hammer with blades that could cut properly
(for once)
so the angle doesn't matter if a groove is made in it
did u know theres a song in the game called Warhorns of blood that has never been uploaded to YT?
Sure but that takes two strikes. No way someone has the accuracy to hit that tiny little spot again. In controlled conditions, yes it will go through. But the same can be said of rubbing the metal away with friction from your finger. Possible in a controlled setting, but not gonna happen in a real situation
wait yo you made that pack???
i made a shovel too
Skimmed through the video and could find him penetrating the chestplate.
i saw
which are u referring to
Could or couldn't?
so, we're right??
which weapon pack
a gold long sword
did u make that pack wit like the mancatcher and harpoon?
BEAUTIFUL
or am i thinking another one
Typo. He never penetrated the chestplate just the aventsil above it
i made chrome334 weapon pack not vicious weapon pack
Couldn’t
There's a hole in the chest plate made in the previous video that you can see in that video. But here is the prpevious video which shows it happening https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ds-Ev5msyzo&t=115s
bitter relative is ridiculously popular so 7/8 time theyre talking about him
ahh i think ive played that one too
uh
i installed both so i didn't know which is fromm which
which betre chrome334 weapon or vicious weapon
why do i see them cutting pillars of thick hide in training grounds but this one cuts like its hitting stone
it didnt really cut but i love it
uhhh\
uhhhhhhh
ong dont know which weapon from which
and why exactly do u think that way
@muted dew about 32 minutes in
yeah, katanas are hard to fine tune
chrome is an architectural genius with how light his blades are when he wants them to be.. you make them look this nice with the littlest of weight
so when i replaced the guard and others something was bound to change
but gonna say yours or else you gonna hunt me down and steal my kidneys\
most the time its by making stuff very thin
fair
but sometimes that doesnt work and the weapon goes off balance
so usually weapons are either too heavy or light
theres an odachi
so i have to refine the scales
yes, however it’s not exactly my proudest work
The hole was done using a hardened bodkin. Tods himself says we got no evidence those existed
bullshit its good
big blade!!
Big Japan sword
Also how do you add these custom titles to yourself
what
join a server that has them and then equip in settings
Aight
have you done one for armour?
Peak
Imagine making weapon pack containing all french polearms
(Theres lot of them)
Lack of evidence is not an evidence of lack. Just gotta use logic to determine the outcome here. If they had access to steel hardening technology, which they did, and they knew they were going up against many heavily armoured targets and their longbows would be their biggest advantage, it's safe to assume until opposing evidence is presented that they used them
i have strength 3.0
if not it'd be great, I really want a greathelm in this game
and its still heavy
odachi for armo?
eh maybe
the last swing is the only good hit i got
what can i say katanas re hard
Fair point. Although since we have no surviving examples we can also assume they where far from standard
i dont know anything about this stuff lol
I love it when someone who hasn't engaged in a discussion once, suddenly decides to comment on a response being longer than 1 sentence
I want a sword
now move on before you lose your braincells
Fair. But they definitely had bodkins. So now we just need to see a video of non hardened bodkins being shot at full plate
add a massive candelstick
I've been here for awhile
Yes but you haven't engaged in this debate
don't think that matters
Or smth
Subjective but I'll take your word for it
ehhhh…
just give up willie 😭
Nice pfp and name
add a mini willie as a weapon

joke weapon pack would go hard
Real
its gonna get worse
and'd fit right in line with what most people do with half sword mods
alot MORE worse
ok
I've seen your horrors
wdym ok
like I wanna be a giant weilding a massive candelstick
@muted dew also just saw this
Computer analysis by Mariusz Magier, Adrian Nowak and others published in 2017 found that heavy bodkin point arrows could penetrate typical plate armour of the time at 225 metres (738 ft).
yes you know of my great sane methods
i saw the big noses emo kid pfp
LOL
The video you sent does that exact thing where they barely leave a dent on the chestplate but pierce the spaulders and chainmail
bro that meme everywhere i swear
Sane is questionable
its confirmed
Barely leave a dent? There's two holes in it from the arrows
😭 😭 😭
did bro watch the video
But where on the body tho? Thickness varies a lot
also those werent even the heaviest bows available
Also what are we talking about
Centre left and lower centre right
I'm not in the loop
modernised bows might aswell be the new snipers
bodkin arrows being able to penetrate breastplates
considering how rediculous their power is
Ohhhh
Look at 9:40
and this dave guy is arguing they couldn't, dispite that being their point
what... bro one failed test doesn't invalidate the others
if you get a single question wrong on a quiz you dont get 0% ong
Yes but that hit at a bad angle. It would have done much more at 90 degree angle. Also the very centre of a breastplate is the strongest part
The arrows still put two holes in the breast plate in other places
If the entire point of the arrow is to be penetrable its gonna penetrate
The ones at 9:40 is non hardened bodkins. The lack of surviving examples means they must have been far from standard issue
@wispy bobcat #general-catfish-🐱🐟 message
Agincourt was far from a standard battle
This can't be allowed right
bro, it was tech they would have had back then
What I’m saying is that non hardened bodkins where far more common
Just stood there and took it
they they would have had hardened bodekins
NO WHAT YOU ARE ARGUING IS THAT HARDENED BODEKINS DIDN'T EXIST
And what I’m saying is since we have no surviving hardened bodkins today they must have been somewhat rare
Of course, but doesn't disprove their use in Agincourt
this is normal
Bro are you even listening to what I’m saying?
maybe its cause hardened= more brittle
so doesn't survive the test of time as well
your arguments insue a lack of existance
Hardened steel doesn't just dissolve over time haha. Not within 1000 years anyway
Kiss already
if i hear anyone argue one more time they're bad at half sword how about that
they will stop arguing
because they dont wanna be bad
im back
at half sword
You filming?
i have pings turned off
if they existed, which they almost certainly did, then they would have been able to piece plate armour, you are saying none could therefore you are saying they didn't exist
i pinged you like once
@restive barn
I concede that a hardened bodkin can penetrate the thinner parts of the chestplate. But once again the lack of surviving examples means that unhardened must have been far more common
i know im just saying
bad at half sword
but how do you know that
Good
for arguing
good, you can see this mans struggle to assemble a consistant and sensical argument
chrome334 pls
Of course. And it's possible they weren't used at Agincourt, but I do find it quite likely considering how effective archery was against full plate in that battle
If there was anywhere close to as many made as the unhardened we would have surviving examples
Yapping
lack of evidence does not equal evidence
bro yall are just so bad at half sword cuz ur arguing its a random lump of steel straightened into something else its not that deep
What do you do for fun?
this or just some other games i play
Are you even listening? I’m not saying they didn’t exists I’m saying they didn’t exist in comparably large numbers since that would make it highly unlikely that we have no surviving examples.
Okay, well you go do that while we do what we find fun
Shh it's entierement for usp
entrainement*
Hell yeah it is. And if you keep going I'm going to argue with you on how it can be fun
what we do in fact KNOW is that hardened bodekins would have successfully pierced plate armour, that hardened bodekins would have been able to be made quite easily at the time, that there were records of archery being very effecting against full plate armoured soldiers and that years of warring would have most likely taught the people what does and doesn't work, and these work.
ig u guys can get warns then if it gets too outta hand
I am once again saying that I don’t think they didn’t exist. Just not in large numbers compared to regular bodkins
what's the point of the argument exactly?
It's extremely hard to get a warn and this will definitely not get them one lol
It's actually a giant medieval conspiracy and their existence was hidden.
Which is actually possible, jokes aside. If they were used at Agincourt for the first time, they may have been kept secret to prevent other nations from learning of them and using them. And pretty much all surivors of the battle on the French side were executed, nobles and all. So it's possible (but far fetched) that the English army at Agincourt were the only ones to ever use them or know of them
to see what lump of steel is better as dookie or bookie
I mean, it's been pretty friendly so far, for the most part
dave, before you say this image from nic\ supports you, id like to point out that you previously dismissed AI as evdidence at all.
google ai i believe searches through every source about the search and gives information about it I think?
I intentionally ignored his image because it was ai
and the lack of insistance from you for sources on this information should thus barr you from referencing this information
Google ai is shit
that was the point I made to him before too lol
Yes but based on common info. And we all know what common info says about Viking helmets and horns
buddy just hates ai, i think it stole his job of someshit
Why are you trying to use someone else’s bad source against me?
What'd I miss
im not im using your own logic to prevent you referencing this
I didn’t refer to it so why did you bring it up?
You have yet to send any type of sources proving it argue how my source is bad but at least send some sources of your own
What exactly is the point here?
I don't get it
EXACTLY THATS WHAT I TOLD HIM BEFORE
This debate has become less about the topic and more about discrediting each other now
What I'm getting is that bro is fighting a losing battle
Best battle to fight
Google ai is notorious for being wrong 50% of the time so it’s best to just ignore it and read up yourself
bro realised his wrong 10 minutes ago just trynna save face ong
So send your own sources
About arrows vs plate? Already did
this is irrelivant to what I am saying. I gave you sources and you tried to discredit them
previously i mean
dont say it was ai i gave you websites
and you couldn't even be bothered reading them
just went "nuh-uh"
Your sources was ai and then it was just different wikis in general. Not specific articles just the whole wiki
so that just proves it shouldn't be revelant because it's a bad source got it but you still have yet to send any sources this is just going to be a back to back and going to end up in everyone insulting each other this argument will be useless until someone sends a source
bro is not anakin skywalker by the lava
I GAVE YOU SPECIFIC ARTICLES WDYM FROM 2 MUSEUMS AND AN EDU SITE
Everyone will think they're right and it won't change until good sources are given
https://youtu.be/ds-Ev5msyzo?si=iBcFXQXkMpZcWD1W
already gave it a while back but here you go
160lbs ENGLISH WARBOW shoots FULL WEIGHT MEDIEVAL ARROWS at reproduced MEDIEVAL ARMOUR. Find out what happens!
‘Arrows vs Armour’ is back and we are shooting medieval war arrows at the top half of an armoured knight using armour and arrows that are correct in every detail. This film shows exactly what happened…….
Thousands of knights ...
BRO YOUR BACK ON THIS
You did?
REALLY
YES DID YOU NOT READ THEM
FROM SOMEONE WHO IS CONSTANTLY INSISTING ON SOURCES YOU SURE HAVE AN ALLERGY TO READING THEM
😭
ikr
I did read the Wikipedia for awl pikes and it said nothing about it’s effectiveness on plate
I am no longer sure what we're arguing about
YOU READ THE FIRST ARTICLE I LINKED EXPLAINING WHAT AN AWL PIKE WAS AND WAS LIKE, THIS ONE DOESN'T MEANTION IT SO NONE OF THEM DO
Neither
unrealistic, where's the gore and the blood? also why's ur character bald
It went back to a different debate
It’s allegedly a discussion about the effectiveness of plate armor
It occurs to me that discord is one of the worst places to have an academic discussion
What the fuck I thought it was about if hardened bodekins were common or whatnot
Allegedly is crazy
its a discussion where all of this persons arguments have been disprooved and dismanteled and he is still arguing for some reason
I would like to discuss this
We aren't in court
Depends on the people I guess
but so far it seems they have been insulting each other
it would have ended ages ago if this guy could just concede defeat 🥀 🥀
Not really, he’s been wrong about one thing but no one knows about whether hardnened bodkins were used
I just mean that anyone can say anything and there is no real peer review
You amaze me.
We're hardened bodkins just better against armor?
If you bothered to read my messages you would know I conceded that hardened bodkins could pierce the thinner parts of chestplates although the lack of surviving examples means that there where likely far fewer than regular bodkins
Yes, if they were used back then
hes been wrong on one thing and changed his argument on the other so much the transformers would be impressed
Autobots roll out ahh argument
He's conceded on at least 2 points so far. On your debate on if a pike can pen plate, no. Not in any realistic setting
Anyway gtg
The effectiveness of an argument should not be affected by how much you insult your arguee, but unfortunately with the Internet the loudest people always win
No he never concerned that
Bye guys, girls, gays, and everyone in-between
Would you prefer if I just said Nuh uh instead of responding tocyoue arguments
I didn't say he did on that point
I don't see how they couldn't have been used back then maybe not as common as normal bodkins though
@wise canyon dawg I gotta respect you ability to stay impartial👍
should i grind UC....
hes two face
They definitely could have been, but no historical evidence has been found
I would prefer if you didn't have one argument, keep changing it when presented with evidence and demand evidence while not providing your own.
They where probably used but since there are no surviving examples it can’t have been in large numbers
I try to, but bias is bias haha
I see
So basically hardened bodekins were most likely just not as used as normal bodekins
I don't see what's the debate about
anyway any of yall hate t3 boss
Shall I refer to the video again?
ong I swear the dude has plot armour of somethn
Can't hate on ovrdth
I'm pretty sure he does
Honestly don’t see what python is stuck on
one source is not enough lil bro provide another and that doesn;t proove the point i was making at all
- moved on
im grinding UC no one can stop me
The bodkin debate started off as whether or not they could pen a breastplate, which as the videos I linked showed that hardened bodkins can, but hardened bodkins aren't proven to have been used then
also greetings upon you, o'wise tree
it is
but when you finnaly beat it
but i will remember what i learned
glorious
also, are we talking about if you can pen plate armor or not?
It doesn’t get much more reliable than literally doing shooting a accurate chestplate
well the answer is no, no you realyl cant
I mean not hate tbh I got him on my 2nd try with a sword after surrendering but I know a lot of people died to Him a ton I honestly find him more annoying then anything although I'm not sure why he was a late class weapon for whatever reason at T3
unless you have a gun or something big you are, most likely, not getting through plate
Oh.. my... god..... bro gimmie another source that actually uses the weapon being talked about or hush
You're jumping in quite late here haha. You definitely can, the question though, is with what
two face..
i dont think i have ever heard of any weapon that could reliably go through plate
(at least in real life)
as a note, im excluding gun weapons here. there's a reason plate armor fell out of favor and fast when they became widely available afterall
@tender quest How's this for greatsword
It is literally about longbows. And shooting period accurate armor with period accurate arrows. Doesn’t get much more reliable than that
quite a coincidence
hardened bodekin arrows and it was__ theoretically__ possible for some spears such as the awl pike
ok back to your old argument I see, autobots roll out ahh
Couldn't normal bodekins also pierce chest plate?
you could pierce plate with some arrows
bro what
only things i know of that can puncture plate are lances, gunpowder weaponry and polehammers
Use logic here. A historical long required 180 pounds of force to pull back, the arrows were very thick and the heads were very pointed, and they can still struggle to penetrate. A bloke with a long and likely flexible metal pike would not have the momentum or velocity behind the thrust to do that
(and, evidently, you absolutely could pierce the weaker parts of armor such as shoulders and the open gaps with chain)
very fascinating!
we settled this before thats why i said theoretically
Yea you definitely stand corected
thanks for showing me this ^^
-# not
Tf you mean old argument. It’s the same pne
Theory and practice are different things. Like I said earlier, in a controlled setting it's possible, but extremely unlikely in reality
we agreed upon this
also, this thought occurs to me too
Yep.
in a real battle scenario, you aren't exactly...
ok, what exactly are you arguing here.
taking aimed shots with your bow
it's you and a lot of other dudes firing in volleys
and so we are then talking.. what, a few hundred arrows at a time? flying towards one group of people?
I mean ity could be against one person
could be, but highly, HIGHLY, unlikely
Yep, a lot of chances to not only hit armour gaps, but also poorly forged parts of armour. A few pikemen don't have those same odds, let alone the physics to do it
if you had armour piercing arrows, you'd wanna aim at the guy with armour
mmmm..? well,
speakign a little bit from experience with HEMA and stuff (my old club was centered around polearms and such)
it's... insane luck that lets you through against plate armor, really
One thing I want to throw in here as well though, bodkin arrow tips back in the day were nicknamed 'plate cutters'
you thrust, perfect amount of power, perfect posture, like
the thrust of a lifetime
You said you can't pierce armor excluding guns when it's not exactly true sure I imagine it could be diffcult to hit a knight with a bow in battle(also I think you would shoot during volleys with a couple hundred people less more whatnot but you definitely could pierce armor with it) but I don't think you ever mentioned anything about battles in your first message
why willie kinda
That unhardened bodkins can’t penetrate chestplates.
Hardened bodkins can penetrate the thin parts of chestplates but where very likely very few.
Tods workshops video is as reliable as it gets since its period accurate arrows against period accurate armor
caked up
I've done re-enactment and buhurt as well, and yep. That kind of luck just isn't going to be seen in a battlefield
he ate cake
congrats! it's now going to glance off and do nothing
that is not the heaviest or most powerful bow that was used at the time
I imagine not many people had plate armor either
or, as we almost discovered with sheer horror, you go through the visor. we damn near blinded the guy and i dont think i have seen any of us drop our shit that fast to go make sure someone is okay
Those variables are also applicable. What I'm saying is for a pike to penetrate a breatplate, many variables need to align
expensive, and heavy as hell, very few would be equipped with it
im agreeing with you
Ah, the tone seemed like you weren't haha
im pointing out that even if you have the perfect thrust, even the slightest misalingment will cause the damn thing glance off the armor
impact, and then just.. slide off..
it's fucking absurd to behold, im sure you've seen it in buhurt too
Yep, exactly why breastplates have a curve or even straight ridge down the centre
real question
i really could have been clearer, i will admit this now
in practice your options for beating armor amount to:
guns
blunt force
or a spike like we see on some halberds
No we don't allow any thrusting motions in buhurt. But we do see swords and axes glance off rounded helmets
smell like straight dookie perminently
Bro what???
Like genuinely what
💀
wait seriously?
look at previous messages
safety thing or?
would you rather violently fart every time you laugh or perminently smell real bad
Not that type of confused where I can't understand 💔
bro wants both
Yep. Full force is used in buhurt, and the best way to kill a fully armoured opponent in a duel was to stab their armour gaps, so we don't allow it because it's very very dangerous. I've also stabbed my friend in the neck during a really bad move, luckily I pulled back before any real damage was done
bro trynna fuigure out if they stack with whats currenrtly going on or if nothing changes
are you usign sharps or ...?
i can't imagine any other situation where a thrust could be more than a potential avenue to injury
Blunt, but a blunt sword will still easily pierce flesh
are the tips rounded like we do in HEMA?
wait, do you wear like armour for it
because that, really, REALLY, won't pierce your skin unless you are absolutely trying to
Yep, but we have varying circumference at the tip. Arming swords still have a point, as rounded as it is. But falchions are very very blunt
So many rules in hema and buhurt I personally just buy two real swords no armor and fight to the death with homeless ppl I met on the street
huh
well, the more you know i guess
ong
Yep, full steel plate armour from the 1400's to the 1700's, double the thickness of what was used back in the day for safety reasons because every strike is concussive rather than slice or pierce
I just get a sword and armour and fight the real life beggers
what helmet
There's like 5 rules in Buhurt haha
what helmet u use
I believe two consenting adults should be allowed to duel to the death in knight armor with any weapon that they want that is from the medieval era
It's called a Griffon, doesn't have a surviving phsyical piece but it's based off of paintings
damn i was hoping
greathelm
cause
aura
100% bring back duels
Wasn't it a little impractical compared to others?
(mostly)
I beleive a concenting adult should be able to attack homeless people with a sword
only with impairing vision i thought
Greathelms are batshit. They're called greathelms because they're made to fit over a bascinet, which is the most used helmet of the 1500's
also, since we are talking about helmets
"terrible idea"
I'm gonna go buy a homeless guy on the street 300 euros to fight me to the death in a duel
i thought they were pretty good but impaired vision
They were used in the crusades, wearing one helmet is stiffling enough, but two? No wonder they lost the Holy Land multiple times
I do love a salet but I wouldn't want a bevor / gorget that didn't have a back piece
i mean they were really good against blunt force
I believe because it was square it would not make weapons glance off but I presume it would depend on the great helm itself and how square it is
same
i just grabbed a random image of one
Very protective sure, but insanely hot, quite heavy, hard to breathe
then wear it ithout lower helmet so still aura
Also isn't this why they made helmets have visors so they can see?
Yes and no. Their shape allowed more blows to land instead of glancing off, but wearing two whole helmets will soften the kinetic energy a good amount
It's important to note that the great helm is much earlier, starting around the 12th century and went over a steel skullcap. They were basically obsolete by the fifteenth.
That would be a sugarloaf helmet then, which is the same as the great helm but smaller and less able to absorb energy
I love the hounskull honestly call me simple Idc 💔
No, visors were made so they could still eat, drink, and breathe normally when not in a fight without having to take off their helmet
its like the pumpkin space latte of helmets
But pointy top
everyone likes the damn thing
So less aura
never underestiamte the logistical nightmare that could be armors
I heard some knights would keep their visors up in battle because they couldn't see
It's a very nice helmet
probably happened in contexts where they aren't in the fight
battles are big as shit, and there's plenty of opportunities to be out of active fighting
to be fair you can barely see with some helmets
Getting kitted up in our buhurt gear took roughly 10-20 minutes ( we didn't rush though) and we'd be sweating by the time we were done haha
Let me use a example
exactly!
Definitely happened
imagine if you were in the process of getting your gear on, and suddenly, oh shit
that's a LOT of fucking angry people on horseback with lances coming for us
That's why raiding your enemies camp was so damn effective back then, no time for them to get their kit on
similarly, imagine losing parts of your supply train
suddenly, you have to lug a lot of your shit around personally rather than on a wagon or whatever
but it was real hot and hard to see
Make sure it's not confusing it with the sugarloaf, they're the same shape but not the same helmet
and, well, full plate could come up to 20kg~
Imagine trying to see in this shit bro I would just keep my visor up
(I know it might not be very historically accurate but some historically accurate ones looked like this and worse for vision)
Your squires still did all that for you
which you now have to carry or wear... nearly constantly...
no this references sugarload, but says sugarload is a greathelm with a more rounded top
Imagine making a griffith character if there was detailed customization
Actually visibility is still much better than you'd think in this thing