#makes the image for the vencord toolbox
1 messages ยท Page 1 of 1 (latest)
makes sense
this one is kinda blurry tho
yeah true
i should probably svg it and lower the res
the lack of consistency between the toolbox icon and every other icon was annoying to me so
why is it so difficult to downscale pixel art ๐
what the fuck is that
spritesheet 
uhh isnt it 32x32
i got 29x29 when i cropped the oneko down
lmfao
the oneko doesnt look blurry at all on my part so maybe thats just imgur being a dick

simply do not the imgur
so true!
ven make it oneko by default
hmm i wonder what this converted oneko svg looks li
the only reasonable place that takes svg is github
Animate on hover ๐คฉ
Oooh that glowing bloom effect is really cool! How did you get that to work?
Wait it's just a coloured drop shadow? Huh, I see. I'll have to mess around with that then
Well, thanks for the help!
content: url(https://i.ibb.co/NjdTQxq/ambient.gif);
width: 24px;
height: 24px;
}
[src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Vencord/Website/main/public/assets/favicon.png"]:hover {
content: url(https://i.ibb.co/RzMdYJp/hover2.gif);
width: 24px;
height: 24px;
}```
that doesnt really look native still and the colour doesnt match
you could use mask maybe https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/mask
similar to here #๐จ-css-snippets message
hmm today i will make it look native by hiding it
also i literally colour picked the exact colour from the rest of them so i have no idea why it doesnt work
thinking about it now i definitely misunderstood what a mask did
however this brings me to another question: can svgs be animated
woag
vencord update broke oneko :( give em back
๐
what the fuck is an 'xmlns'
point is with no easy defined link my previous method wont work. so its spaghetti code time
this is not what im looking for
.vc-toolbox-btn{
content: url(https://i.ibb.co/NjdTQxq/ambient.gif);
width: 24px;
height: 24px;
}
.vc-toolbox-btn:hover{
content: url(https://i.ibb.co/RzMdYJp/hover2.gif);
width: 24px;
height: 24px;
}
๐
good news: tried a svg conversion
bad news: this genuinely looks worse
hmmm
we're getting somewhere but there is a problem
As an XML dialect, SVG is namespaced. It is important to understand the concept of namespaces and how they are used if you plan to author SVG content. Versions of SVG viewers prior to the release of Firefox 1.5 unfortunately paid scant attention to namespaces, but they are essential to multi-XML dialect supporting user agents such as Gecko-based...
thank you but im pretty close to spaghetti coding this one
i just need to find out how to hide the previous svg
all perfect except for that
content: none;
display: inline-block;
width: 24px;
height: 24px;
background-color: var(--interactive-normal);
-webkit-mask: url(https://raw.githubusercontent.com/sI1vre/vencord-assets/main/ambi1.svg);
mask: url(https://raw.githubusercontent.com/sI1vre/vencord-assets/main/ambi1.svg);
image-rendering: auto;
}
.toolbar-3_r2xA .iconWrapper-2awDjA:hover>svg:not(.icon-2xnN2Y) {
content: url(https://i.ibb.co/RzMdYJp/hover2.gif);
background-color: var(--interactive-normal);
-webkit-mask: url(https://raw.githubusercontent.com/sI1vre/vencord-assets/main/hover2.svg);
mask: url(https://raw.githubusercontent.com/sI1vre/vencord-assets/main/hover2.svg);
width: 24px;
height: 24px;
image-rendering: auto;
}```
(testing it through the non hovered one)
wait fuck content is supposed to be ""
still the same result but we ball
i actually got that directly from the discord code
this was genuinely the best way i knew how to make it work
.vc-toolbox-btn svg {https://raw.githubusercontent.com/sI1vre/vencord-assets/main/ambi1.svg}
some shit like this right
something tells me we're on two different wavelengths here- ohhhh
so i had it good the first time?
that's what I said
yeah
you already had it here
So I was asking what the issue with that is
or rather why you're still changing it
sorry for the confusion
everything is set up perfectly but the original svg still somehow peeks out
the problem is that by hiding the svg i would probably have to hide the entire element
wait was that actually it
i feel bad about failing so hard now
im perfectly fine if you post this as a better version of the snippet in #๐จ-css-snippets as long as im given credit for the idea or sum shit idk
I didn't realize this convo was still happing until now, but mine works perfectly with the original fix
also autumn's version isn't animated :(
