Two of my kids were identified as the same person.

[limber rapids]

I'm going through fixing this. Un-associating with one and correctly associating with the other. Will my efforts be recognized in future imports/scans?

[vagrant viper]

:wave: Hey @limber rapids,

Thanks for reaching out to us. Please follow the recommended actions below; this will help us be more effective in our support effort and leave more time for building Immich .

References

• Container Logs: docker compose logs docs
• Container Status: docker compose ps docs
• Reverse Proxy: https://immich.app/docs/administration/reverse-proxy

Checklist

1. :ballot_box_with_check: I have verified I'm on the latest release(note that mobile app releases may take some time).
2. :ballot_box_with_check: I have read applicable release notes.
3. :ballot_box_with_check: I have reviewed the FAQs for known issues.
4. :ballot_box_with_check: I have reviewed Github for known issues.
5. :ballot_box_with_check: I have tried accessing Immich via local ip (without a custom reverse proxy).
6. :ballot_box_with_check: I have uploaded the relevant logs, docker compose, and .env files, making sure to use code formatting.
7. :ballot_box_with_check: I have tried an incognito window, disabled extensions, cleared mobile app cache, logged out and back in, different browsers, etc. as applicable

(an item can be marked as "complete" by reacting with the appropriate number)

If this ticket can be closed you can use the /close command, and re-open it later if needed.

[sweet hawk]

Face data that is reassigned will be used for future detection I believe

[limber rapids]

That is going to be helpful if so. I'm looking at the 'Maximum recognition distance' setting and wondering if I should tweak that

currently at 0.5 (default) curiuos if I shoud adjust that up

[harsh lava]

You'd need to lower it to get more separated faces

[limber rapids]

2 more questions

1. And will future images benefit from the re-categorizing?
2. Anyway to do a 'select all where 2 of the same person show up in an image'?

[limber rapids]

Btw, dropped it to 0.4 and re-scanned all faces. And I have more individual persons, at least it didn't confuse my two daughters. I can live with this. It literly confused two for 1 over the course of about 5 years of photos

[chrome vigil]

1. Yup
2. This would have had to be a DB query

[chrome vigil]

Yeah, if it mixes them up at the start, it will continue like that for the other images. Manually fixing them would help, but it would probably still mix them up occasionally for new images. A lower threshold was the right call to avoid that