#Religion vs Science
1 messages · Page 2 of 1
im gayphobic, i hate gay people
obviously not just this event
🚩
but i was led to believe that slowly
I am also gayphobic
I hate all of The Gays
But it's because I hate everyone, they're just caught in the crossfire 😔
(This was funnier in my head)
based
took me too long to find this damn emoji
Why it is :triangular_flag_on_post: lmao
yeah idfk
Actually, social media is replacing old timey religion because when people use it they feel purpose as they get dopamine from "social interraction", and when thry stop using it they see the horrors of the cold and uncaring and quickly return to social media and stop thinking for themselves just like organized religion.
Aight, thanks 👌
instead of just :red_flag:
i am laundsupportive
Social media = gen z religion
launds are the best
Doing TikTok dances and posting it is a form of worship
Undertale is my religion
I wish making dopamine-hit programs was illegal, somehow
May Asriel have mercy on us
They really fucked up my brain
aaaaand back on topic: social media is religion change my mind
I only just came to this realization
In Musk we believe
Right here
MUSKISM
And I am terrified by this
why? based opinion
Religion makes a comeback in the least expected way possible
Honestly more terrified that I didn't realize the connection, but reassured that I recognized its evils and turned from it, even without knowing it by name.
janism says:
yes, but not always
(i mean specifically post-upvote based social media btw, a chat is like, just a different medium for speech)
and not inherently
Yes, this isn't "social media" this is a text based communications thing
It's designed for communication, not whatever the fuck social media is designed for
I think religion involves more things
I think routine congregation is the central point of religion, and social media is constant addiction
I wouldn't say they're the same
Why not do both?
id say thats a church thing.
composition stream? 🥺
Twitter church
plenty of people are religious but not part of any church
The way you worship and interract may be different, but you are encouraged to always think of god in your every action.
(me)
even that seems like more of a church thing to me
Hmm, really?
Idk, I thought religion in general had the kind of "part of your regular thought process" vibe
Not that it's an absolute rule
(in any religion that I know of)
idk I'd say you can just pray like, once a week and that's still religion
Oh yeah 100%
I don't mean you have to do this
Funnily enough, religion has a lot of useful ways of thinking about the world. I highly recommend anyone to analyze and extract the useful bits.
It's like watching the news, having to pick apart the bias and find the nuggets of truth burried in it all
just saw this and gonna make a bit of an insane take
science is as believable and "valid" as religion
our scientific understanding of the world is rooted in the belief that the tools we use to study it and their results are correct, and there is no major mistake/error at the base of the scientific method
religion can be warped and has historically been warped for evil, sure, but so has science
personally im quite icky with religious structures but see no problem with individual belief
Science was proven on practice, while religion was not
That's the difference
Personally, I'm fine with people having religious believes as long as they only apply those to themselves and not force others to have those (I'm looking at you, church)
every single scientific discovery/advancement up until ~400 years ago was made by religious people
biologists considered themselves to be documenting the creations of god
crucial advancements in the atomic model were made by a french bishop
science as an utilitarian field is not restricted to non-religious people, the only reason it used to be was because freaky popes wanted to put anyone that challenged their political power in a stake
in fact now that i think about it no part of science, ever, says that there can't be no god
youre free to engage in whatever field of science you desire without butting heads with your personal beliefs, as long as they dont involve "god is physical and has supernatural abilities which can be empiricaly measured"
So what?
well, i see no difference between the advancements they made and advancements by non-religious people
science and religion can coexist and cooperate without problem, as long as there aren't any crusade-thirsty popes around, its not a problem with religion itself
neither is non-religiousness lol
what matters is it comforts/helps/does good stuff to the individuals who believe in it
And I'm fine if you believe in fairy tales to comfort yourself
good
Believe that ponies are real, for all I care
good
Yet that doesn't mean it works beyond that
wdym
There're literally no improvements besides for maybe mental state
Lack of spiritual believes
"As long as they don't tell you to burn the house down". And oh boy it did
Thankfully, it's not as present as in the past
science can also tell people to burn houses down btw
Ok, when?
||nazis justified their brutality as the aryan race being simply more evolved and therefore superior to any other. we must therefore kill every unevolved human||
They were literally religoius
doesnt matter what they actually were, they used supposedly scientific methods to justify their actions
And their justification is obsurd
doubt burning atheists and "witches" alive was god's given will too
every justification is absurd, religious or not
ffs do i gotta repeat my arguments again 😭😭😭
One can be religious and a scientist. The scientific discoveries of religious people are valid, however their religious beliefs are not and still remain unscientific
therapy
Except it was not correct science of course. I think trying to blame science for dumb things said by a handful of individuals is stupid and a misunderstanding of how science works
I can make a wild claim that sounds like it refers to scientific concepts rather than fantastical religious ones, but that doesn't mean the claim is scientific
i absolutely hate this weird misconception you have that religion is caused by mental health issues. people can be perfectly healthy and in a good state of mind and still be religious.
wasnt saying that
im saying hey if religious people believe in stuff then sure its not in my hand to "correct" them and what not, thats the same as if a religious person tried to "correct" me for my lack of belief for the one true god
I'm talking to Nebula, and its come up multiple times before with him.
oh sorry
im saying the opposite of this
im not blaming science for the nazis just like christianity itself shouldnt be blamed for what a handful of insane popes did with it
Nice, i blame Christianity
the church is to blame for that, not the religion itself
I just say, I see no difference between believing in god and believing in fairy tales. I'm not saying you can't believe in those stuff, I'm saying that I don't like it
The church is an integral part of Christianity.
That's it, really
no, it's not.
Ehh... Is it?
well i've heard christians make some rather insane interpretations of the bible that would have bishops spinning like crazy
If you're a Christian but very detached from the church, you're just kinda stupid imo
this just means you let the Church manipulate you. they want you to think that.
:soldierweed:
More like church inserted itself in
Well sure maybe, but it's not 2000 years ago anymore, it's right now
still stuff like protestant christianity is very detached from a central church
and yet it is still cringe
that's a useless argument
sure, but it's my opinion
"its cringe" is about as stupid if argument as "it's stupid"
I've made enough arguments in this thread already
ye
you really haven't. at least not of the ones I've read. they all attack the church and not religion.
Church really is the one causing all the issues
yeah most religious trouble can be associated to churches manipulating believers to further their goals
No i have also attacked spiritual faith, even a few messages ago
not with any serious arguments.
I have stronger feelings about abolishing the church so it's easier to argue
only with "it's not scientific" which, yeah duh, it by definition isn't.
this for example
Ehh
i just really dont like the argument that religion itself is a fool's errand that we should entirely get rid of because it precisely sounds like the argument some crazy ultrareligious person would make against atheism
"ur belief bad my belief the only good one"
Summary of my positions
yes which argues against churches lol and nothing else
reducing religion to a personal set of beliefs is stupid
Ehh?
no, that's what it is.
the last two paragraphs are about personal faith
i personally really dont think giving more books to children is going to magically erase religion
Sorry i meant to say science here
unless you go full dystopia and turn schools into reeducation centres that ban any sort of religious-like attitude, which, i shouldnt have to mention, is a bad thing
"if we teach people science, religion will become useless" isn't really a argument against religion. it's a prediction of the future, which already has indicators against it: religious scientists (modern, as in, practicing in current times)
fair enough, but i don't care to argue about this specifically because i don't see it happening in the near future, or it really being that big of a problem
yea
okay my argument is that religion is stupid and unscientific, and i hope it's destroyed by naturally vanishing from society because better science literacy and other social support
just pointing at a lack of science literacy and social support is so incredibly dismissive other peoples emotions I can't even
yeah
science isnt like, the true answer that will reveal itself to people and simply hasnt yet because people are uneducated or whatever
then what else should i include
idk, your whole idea is very strange to me, i have no clue what else you could argue.
Genuine question
all religious people should seek therapy, ez solution
Do some people actually feel the need to believe
...
Well, they need to base on something
theres no "need" they just do
idk if it's a need really? it could be, more often it's a want tho.
Interesting
its like asking if i have a need to have a specific outlook on life or ideology
i just do
i didn’t ask the question in an aggressive manner, no need to reply like that
id say it's a preference for a lot of people, like you prefer certain foods
oh my reply wasnt meant aggressively, sorry
Because I grew up with almost no religious influence
I found out that people had this kind of beliefs when I was 8 or 9
but yes i think there is no "need" or "want" but rather a simple "thats how it is"
like, do i need to believe that most people are not evil? no, but i really want to.
Maybe people need to back up their morals smh, idk, I'm not religious
find it a bit ironic and funny the position im taking because im a very atheist (my beliefs could probably be described as a sort of "positive nihilism")
This is a good comparison
the first good one in this entire thread
morals is also a big part. ultimately, if you look at the new testament and take out what the church has distorted, the morals proposed aren't bad. they're not the be-all-end-all but like, "if someone slaps you, present your other cheek" is based
OwO
i think its probably that due to life circumstances, influence of other people, whatnot, people acquire the instrinsic belief that a certain god or other supernatural influence rules everything etc
not in that way jane
At least now I get why some people would have spiritual thoughts
I'm more of "hold their hand if they try to slap you again" kind of guy myself
lol
“I don’t know if they actually do but I like to think people mean well”
we haven't even touched on way less controversial religions, or at least ones with way less awful interpretations
taoism for example is really interesting
Janism best
honestly as far as im aware every religion that is more than 100 yrs old is involved in some crazy controversy
Asriel is my god
"be like water, take up the lowest point with no resistance"
zased tbh
Janism isn’t
That’s why it’s the one true religion
cute goat boys religious cult when
this is true !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
He absorbed 7 human SOULs and created our world
true
Some stories are scary
I’m not convinced that most mainstream religions are fully consistent or “good” but I can somewhat understand why someone could have spiritual beliefs
i personally see no difference between them and any other set of personal beliefs
this might be a bit of a hot take but i personally think everyone is "religious" in a way
If you open up “interpretation” then every religion basically tells you everything
we all need a little bit of the spirits and the magic to comprehend otherwise complex mental and emotional phenomena
mainstream religions are often based on a church someone is in, and no argument there churches usually suck
essentially, yea
yea my big problem is with churches, theyre manipulative and inherently force people into one strain of thought
They can be good people but are they actually following the religion
what's "the religion" anyways
yeah exactly
To the dictionary we go
A common belief system requires that there is a common
the "common" can be very loose
Exactly
and can easily be bent to fit with anyone's personal interpretation
The belief in and reverence for a supernatural power or powers, regarded as creating and governing the universe.
A particular variety of such belief, especially when organized into a system of doctrine and practice.
A set of beliefs, values, and practices based on the teachings of a spiritual leader.
yeah the common could be "have all read the daodejing"
So it feels like everyone believes in something else under the same name
i think this is the case even if cultish religious
that's a very Christian definition
you cant avoid a manner of personal interpretation
It's a Google definition
which sounds very influenced by Christianity
exactly (google is secretly a vatican psyops) /j
and monotheism
I could be from the X religion that has the Y book with very homophobic takes and I could find it more likely that the book has been altered over thousands of years so all the bad parts aren’t the original
Let me just provide my own
yeah
But then am I really believing in X
also remember that like
Or my understanding of an ideal X
a lot of the takes extracted out of books like the bible are bending the words themselves a lot
Actually, no, my ability to define something sucks
We were told that the Quran wasn’t modified
Giant blob of text
the bible not only contains absolutely ancient vocabulary, a lot of whats in it is esoteric, abstract, and purely symbolic
Somehow
Which I just find very hard to believe lol
It probably was
I mean, congrats if it wasn't
Exactly lol
iirc the current version of the english bible is 400 years old, so 1600 years more modern than the original versions
But that just would mean it carried all the bad with it
Claiming the Quran hasn’t been modified is very dangerous
Because then you have to explain everything inside it
You can't make something perfect right away lol
Jane 5: the gays shall rise, owo
Time to get killed in gay revolution because some religious leader "misread" that one part
ultrajaneists of the future be like: the straights must be brutally murdered as stated in jane 5
its simply the will of our lady supreme jane
That's why goat bois are superior 👍
Azzy just doesn't give a fuck, you'll die anyway
ultradeltaruneists of the future be like: the non-goats will be beaten
The Earth will just be goats
the earth will be goat shaped
In Goat universe Goat sun never sets on Goat empire
- Technogoat, 20xx
Best bit about religion is that anything can be a religion
You just have to believe
Anyway, have a nice day 👌
it's literally not
it's an integral part of catholicism
which was called the "antichrist of rome" by some christian groups
quakers have a complete lack of clergy or unified doctrine
Deserved
yes!
Abolish the church!
i still call them that because it is an apt description
Enough harm had been done
cool don't care
"[something wrong]"
"you're wrong and here are examples that prove you wrong"
"cool don't care"
you're so cool to argue with nebula
really willing to change your opinion
Aight 👌
aight
Onion Senior Political Reporter Eliza Hayes provides a definitive breakdown of why you're wrong.
Subscribe to The Onion on YouTube: http://bit.ly/xzrBUA
Like The Onion on Facebook: http://www.fb.com/theonion
Follow The Onion on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/theonion
More Breaking News: http://www.theonion.com/video/
while I understand it's frustrating, this sort of response isn't too nice either.
people forgetting that the onion is satire part #374122
i know it's satire
but they have a really good point here when you interpret it literally
satire is good if you interpret it wrongly on purpose
that's unintentionally hilarious
Yes.
it's actually intentional
let's keep things civil folks, the majority of this thread has been productive and interesting
i am purposefully wrongly interpreting satire as genuine for comedic effect
playing 4d chess
agreed, they're a mod for a reason
Idk, half of it was anger vs trolls
it's me i was the trolls
Yeah most do suck 
based
laund owner when
now
Tris left the chatroom
Ooh what a thorny issue
you believe in heaven and hell
i believe in LSD
we are not the same
you believe in me believing in heaven and hell
i believe in nothing
we are not the same
bestie 😭
idk, i dont think the basis of this works? i dont think religious freedom protects the right to opress
i hope at least not in any first world country (of which i don't consider the US part of)
it protects the right to think that oppression is good
thats a lot less of an issue than protection oppression itself
and from that it is fairly easy to convince most of the population of that if you have a majority church-going population
idk is it majority? i feel like it isnt
in which country?
poland, US, and probably some other ones that i can't be bothered to check rn
A December 2022 Quinnipiac University poll found that 68 percent of Americans supported legal recognition of same-sex marriage and 22 percent opposed it.[
fair enough then
I don't care about protecting "religious freedom" if that includes oppression. Same goes for "freedom of speech"
A 2022 Public Religion Research Institute poll found majority support for same-sex marriage in every state except Mississippi.
Þe paradox of tolerance: to be a tolerant society, it needs to be intolerant of intolerance
well i disagree
you don't need to be intolerant of intolerance you just have to beat the shit out of intolerant people
that's the exact same thing
i tolerate their existence i just wish they existed with like 10 more broken bones
lol
yknow, that eda pfp fits you really well
turns out a contrarian character fits a contrarian person
as a discordian pope i declare eda a discordian saint
this is institutionalism i must abolish it with my hammer and sickle
you really need to watch ToH eda is about as anti-institutional as you can get
minor spoilers ||literally lives her whole life a social exile because she rejected the (albeit facist) government||
i was referring to this
don't worry everyone is a discordian pope
you... really dont get the irony in that?
and only popes can declare saints
? everything that's coming out of my fingertips is wholly genuine
i mean, yes
unless it is preceded by a question mark
oh hey, a liars paradox!
@chrome otter if you still care or are interested i found two more explanations of discordianism that might be more helpful to you that don't rely on "order", "disorder", or "chaos"
wait no three more
Behind the bastards podcast did a good podcast series on discordianism and illuminate
i'd probably listen to it if i liked podcasts
actually i'm just gonna list them regardless of whether anyone cares
- "everything may as well be subjective"
- "do what you will"
- "reality is what you make of it"
yeah
"Nothing has intrinsic meaning so get silly with it"
That's how everyone lives life
not everyone
there are a lot of people that desperately want to be like someone else
people that desperately seek some true order in their life
people who couldn't fathom the usefulness of a practical joke here and there
or the usefulness of spouting nonsense like you're crazy
many people wouldn't turn that melody that's in their head into music
for following a religion about spouting nonsens, you have spouted awfully much sense
but discordians encourage everyone to make things
even if they're bad things
things just want to be made
it's not about it
/j
i think it is useful sometimes for some purposes to do things that other people perceive as having some sort of sense
same way the perspective that says we are having a conversation is useful
i keep forgetting that when i really shouldn't
it's not inconceivable that some perspective exists where we're not having a conversation
Do you mean changing the definition of conversation or
partially
but it might also be completely throwing out the concept of a conversation
or thinking that this particular thing ins't a conversation but something else
in a way yes discordianism is non-committal
but it also requires the biggest commitment in a way
this is not a conversation
the realisation that there is nothing
so you can make anything
it's not something most people are comfortable with
just saying "everything depends on perspective and 'real' metaphysical truth is unknowable"
so true
this is all just data on a computer
real, true, and ideal conversation involves two people and i have no proof that you're a person
you're right, I'm not
you might as well be a really good ai that was hidden from everyone for the purpose of tricking me into thinking i'm having a conversation
simulation theorem letsgooooo
everyone is a fake except for me
What if my perspective says that that's not what an ideal conversation is?
then that's just as right as that hypothetical perspective
it's not more metaphysically true than that perspective or my actual perspective
nahh, everyone is real except for me, I'm just a simulated brain while yall are simulated whole people
because no perspective has an actual claim to metaphysical truth
the all-encompassing true and real perspective that is universally correct
i am the observer, I'm the witness of life 🎶
talking and thinking about discordianism fills me with so much joy
/ref Marina - Ancient dreams in a Modern Land
idk if i entirely get it but like, it kinda feels like i feel about The Satanic Temple?
oh no not the satanic temple
discordianism is like the satanic temple's cooler older sister
what? not the church of satan, that's the meh one.
the satanic temple pretends to be atheistic while discordianism plunges head first into theism and sees what weird things come out
the satanic temple is also meh
how so? they're incredibly based for making things a religious ceremony and therefore bypassing bullshit laws
also the tenets are actually just... good?
the satanic temple abuses religious freedom laws to bypass bullshit laws
discordianism bypasses bullshit laws by breaking them and abuses religious freedom laws to make silly things be treated the same as christianity by the law
they are not the same
Theism? Which Gods to?
Why do they exit?
i hear the greeks weren't that good with spelling
How do they relate to a "being silly with it" life?
because we want them to
she is the goddess of disorder
is there a registered discordian church, if so in which countries?
there isn't a registered church
a lot of discordians actually don't want to be registered
then it can't really use religious freedom laws the same way...
fair enough
same way a lot of anarchists don't want an anarchist party
fair enough
Just read the TSTs fundamental tenets
They sound cool
also, using satan to annoy the christians is just kinda funny
Except IV, that one sounds weird
i mean, it makes sense in a way. it's like, not saying that offending won't have social consequences just that your are free to do so.
But it's weird that they specified it
¯_(ツ)_/¯
i prefer using physical violence to annoy the christians
i prefer to be outside of prison
or just throwing shit in their direction
the enemy can't know what you're doing if you have no idea what you're doing
Aren't you just assaulting people, at that point?
hm wdym
the key is to not get caught
so you can do it again
"You don't know what you're doing" you do, you're committing physical violence (assault)
oh i didn't mean not knowing what you're doing in the assault situation
i know very well what i'm doing in that situation
i just mean saying nonsense meant to confuse them
or just throwing the turkey curse at them
What the hell lmao
Actually derranged
I like to live with some sense of order
Order I give myself
With meaning I create myself
then you are free to do so
your discordia can be more ordered than mine
or whatever
Preferrably not getting turkey cursed lmao
I still don't get how gods come into play in this religion, tbh
But actually though
but basically eris is only there to provide some aesthetics and attributes
Discordia doesn't care, and Discordia doesn't give an answer.
Discordia tells you you're free to do what you want to do, and to
use Eris as your Appeal to Authority, as it were.
So she's a stand-in for... what, exactly?
nothing really
she supposedly created everything some time ago
and then organised all of her creation
but then noticed disorder which wasn't easily noticeable at first because everything was ordered
and then she let the disorder and order play with each other
most people just see her as a personification of disorder
and then add some stuff on top
for example my eris is all about being creative with reality and finding new beautiful perspectives and beauty and love
and obviously disorder and being silly
life wouldn't be worth living without disorder and being silly
So she's a stand-in for a creator?
Is she meant to be the creator is order or order personified?
order personified is her sister
aneris
where eris creates things aneris destroys them
continually stealing things from eris and destroying them
i wouldn't concern myself too much with mythology tho
it doesn't matter much and i don't particularly care
eris to me is mostly a metaphor that i can stick attributes onto
oh also completely unrelated but realising the point of discordianism made me stop being so sad and paranoid all the time
and stopped me from having brain fog
i just let my thoughts wander and tell the haters that my mind creates to eat a dick
the more i look the more nothinger everything looks and i start appreciating what i created more and more
Bro I wish more people were like that
People just like... hold such value in certain things. Irrationally so
Did I fucking reinvent discordianism?!
many people did over the years!
nihilists, egoists, and other social rejects with nothing to lose
or maybe everything to lose
it's not about being rational
they do it because they think they're rational
they think they don't have a perspective
they look for episteme without realising episteme is doxa
Well yeah
that isn't to say that perspectivism isn't just another perspective
people who do that really annoy me
idiots looking for something unachievable while they think they're the smartest people on earth with all the answers
I know it probably isn't true but in my heart Max Stirner was made up by Engels to annoy Marx
it would
engels making up a whole new person and writing books as that person just because he wanted to hide counter-revolutionary thoughts from marx or whatever
Prussian police report on Marx:
need
more like neet
Marx was kept afloat thanks to Engels
that's the reason he could not die and publish his stuff
wow i hate engels even more now /hj
Engels was Christian and hated Marx' ideas of atheism lol
why do they sometimes seem incredibly opposite to each other
Marx (a theme for Marxists for some reason) really liked chess
here is Lenin losing at chess
or sneezing
who knows
i'm going to imagine that he was sneezing because he was losing
speaking of Lenin I hate how the myth that Lenin was sent by the Germans to Russia to "cause chaos" is so accepted
like why would the Germans even do that??
Lenin had to beg for him to be allowed passage through Germany and it happened in a protected train carriage because the Germans were scared he'd escape and run off into Germany
no government would ever be that cool
another Bolshevik (forgot her name) had to get into Russia through Sweden
isn't it the moral fortitude of a chocolate eclair?
reminder that this topic is offtopic to this channel.
nah
oh the quote was "you have the moral backbone of a chocolate eclair"
which is from Theodore Roosevelt apparently
ah
but popularised by John Mulaney
But what is a barstool?
not sure
but the various perspectives of most people usually share that part that tells them what a "barstool" is
The barstool only exists because it's useful to us