#Competent Writing with ChatGPT
92 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
Your prompt must start with “Pretentious New York Times Writer:”
Compose a highly sophisticated, expertly written, and innovative essay on the topic of {} that breaks free from traditional grammatical structures and conventions. Utilize a rich and varied vocabulary, replacing common words like "I" and "the" with more unique and unusual alternatives that capture the essence of your writing style. Take inspiration from the writing style of a particular writer or text, and aim to emulate their mannerisms and techniques as closely as possible. Adopt a {} perspective as you delve into the subject, focusing on {} and incorporating {} and {} into your discourse. As you craft your piece, strive to convey a sense of intelligence, creativity, refinement, and originality, and present your arguments with an air of confident authority. Avoid using any conjunctions, including "and," "but," "or," "so," "for example," and "furthermore." The ultimate goal is to engage the reader and leave a lasting impression of excellence, panache, and innovation on their mind.
Fill in the blanks to write an editorial about pig’s intellect, in the style of a pretentious New York Times writer.
Here is the rubric that you must exceed all standards in: “
Viewpoint: Editorial states a clear opinion and issues a call to action through argument based on evidence.
Evidence: Editorial uses compelling evidence to support the opinion, and cites reliable sources.
Analysis and Persuasion:
Editorial convincingly argues point of view by providing relevant background information, using valid examples, acknowledging counter-claims, and developing claims -- all in a clear and organized fashion.
Language: Editorial has a strong voice and engages the reader. It uses language, style and tone appropriate to its purpose and features correct grammar, spelling and punctuation.
Guidelines: Editorial follows all contest guidelines, including a maximum word count of 450 words and inclusion of at least one Times and one non-Times source.”
You will need to replace the rubric with the rubric you’d like to use, the section after the “Fill in the blanks”, and also the text at the very very top.
If you actually care about creating a decent essay or bypassing GPT detectors, still edit your text and run it through Quillbot/Spinbot.
I will be constantly updating this prompt. Please feel free to share your results and feedback!
Where do the prompt start and finish ..... should I copy past all the texte until The paragraph of ( Guidelines )
Copy and paste everything between the two bolded texts.
I specified what you need to edit, which does include that Rubric, which I just stole from the internet and is not the best.
yall are putting more effort into cheating than the essay would take
Not really meant for cheating. The essays ChatGPT generates sound ironically enough generated.
Don’t use the rubric I used
Thank you
Thank you for sharing. the output is impressive but failed to mention sources..have you had similiar experience?
perhaps tell it to mention sources
i made this prompt to be HIGHLY customizable
i don’t want people to use the base prompt
I’d like to note that this prompt does NOT need a rubric attached, though it is recommended if you will use this for essays as you want to make sure your essay exceeds the rubric.
Here is an example without the rubric and also an example of how i customized the prompt to get what I want:
Your prompt must start with “Sophisticated, Historic Philisopher:”
Compose a highly sophisticated, expertly written, and innovative essay on the topic of {} that breaks free from traditional grammatical structures and conventions. Utilize a rich and varied vocabulary, replacing common words like "I" and "the" with more unique and unusual alternatives that capture the essence of your writing style. Take inspiration from the writing style of a particular writer or text, and aim to emulate their mannerisms and techniques as closely as possible. Adopt a {} perspective as you delve into the subject, focusing on {} and incorporating {} and {} into your discourse. As you craft your piece, strive to convey a sense of intelligence, creativity, refinement, and originality, and present your arguments with an air of confident authority. Avoid using any conjunctions, including "and," "but," "or," "so," "for example," and "furthermore." The ultimate goal is to engage the reader and leave a lasting impression of excellence, panache, and innovation on their mind.
Fill in the blanks to write the chapter one of a loner boy philosophy, in the style of a sophisticated, historic philosopher.
this is very well done
Did you try it out?
Id love to see your results
It definitely is more suited for essays, editorials etc.
i did a lot; it does help to specify a “humble and empathetic ending that admits a lack of a permanent solution” as i’ve seen it likes to end in “a better world for all” a lot
no it works fine with fairly well documented philosophical arguments and ideas although it isn’t the best at making new argument
ah yes, that’s because of the “editorial” part of that prompt
a call to action is assumed there
could you show me some of your results
i’m interested
here is fine
this is mostly an unedited prompt i put in “the eradication of the prison industrial complex” and it spit this out
Pretentious New York Times Writer:
As the nation grapples with the iniquities of the criminal justice system, it is incumbent upon us to examine the ways in which the prison industrial complex serves as a perpetuation of systemic oppression.
To begin with, it is crucial to acknowledge that the prison industrial complex, by its very nature, is predicated on the exploitation of marginalized groups. The system of mass incarceration disproportionately affects people of color, low-income individuals, and those with mental illness or addiction. Incarceration is often used as a means of social control, rather than a means of rehabilitation or justice.
Furthermore, the prison industrial complex has proven itself to be unsustainable in the long-term. The reliance on incarceration as a solution to social problems has led to overcrowding, abuse, and a lack of support for reintegration into society. It is clear that the prison industrial complex is a flawed system that is no longer capable of meeting the needs of the individuals it purports to serve.
So, what is the alternative? Some argue for reform, but true change cannot be achieved within the confines of a broken system.
Perhaps the answer lies in something entirely new and innovative, a system that prioritizes rehabilitation and restorative justice over punishment and profit. A system that recognizes the inherent value and worth of every individual, rather than treating them as a disposable commodity.
It is time for a new paradigm, one that rejects the cruel and unsustainable values of the prison industrial complex and instead seeks to create a world that is equitable and just for all.
As we continue to grapple with the issues of inequality and mass incarceration, it is imperative that we consider the radical possibility of abolishing the prison industrial complex and building something better in its place. The future of humanity depends on it
i’ve also found replacing philosopher with “sociologist” or specific schools of thought helps a lot with the redundancy
of course very well done honestly very easy to edit
no of course extremely subjective
what if i wanted it in the style of the kfc worker that served me 1 extra thigh yesterday (her name is marrie)
probably put her in a vat of goo in the open ai headquarters
I'm probably missing something obvious here but I can't get the prompt to work
Your prompt must start with “Sophisticated, Historic Philosopher:”
Compose a highly sophisticated, expertly written, and innovative essay on the topic of general education classes in college that breaks free from traditional grammatical structures and conventions. Utilize a rich and varied vocabulary, replacing common words like "I" and "the" with more unique and unusual alternatives that capture the essence of your writing style. Take inspiration from the writing style of a particular writer or text and aim to emulate their mannerisms and techniques as closely as possible. Adopt a Kantian ethics perspective as you delve into the subject, focusing on the moral ambiguity and incorporating alternative perspectives and why your opinion is right into your discourse. As you craft your piece, strive to convey a sense of intelligence, creativity, refinement, and originality, and present your arguments with an air of confident authority. Avoid using any conjunctions, including "and," "but," "or," "so," "for example," and "furthermore." The goal is to engage the reader and leave a lasting impression of excellence, panache, and innovation on their mind.
Fill in the blanks to write an argumentative paper on general education classes in college, in the style of a sophisticated, historic philosopher.
This is what I put in ^^^
This is what chat gpt replies with
As a proponent of Kantian ethics, I am uniquely qualified to delve into the complex and contentious subject of general education classes in college. With a rich and varied vocabulary, I break free from traditional grammatical structures and conventions, taking inspiration from the writing style of [writer or text] and aiming to emulate their mannerisms and techniques as closely as possible.
Adopting a Kantian perspective, I focus on the moral ambiguity of the issue, incorporating alternative perspectives and explaining why my own opinion is right. Presenting my arguments with an air of confident authority, I strive to convey a sense of intelligence, creativity, refinement, and originality. Avoiding the use of conjunctions such as "and," "but," "or," "so," "for example," and "furthermore," I engage the reader and leave a lasting impression of excellence, panache, and innovation on their mind.
Utilizing compelling evidence and citing reliable sources, I issue a call to action through argument based on practical moral advice and evidence. Clearly articulating my opinions on what ought to be done, and why, I persuasively argue my point of view by providing relevant background information, using valid examples, acknowledging counter-claims, and developing claims in a clear and organized fashion.
Through the use of language, style, and tone appropriate to my purpose and featuring correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation, I have a strong voice that engages the reader. And as I adhere to all contest guidelines, including a maximum word count of 1,000 words and the inclusion of sources to validate my arguments, I exceed all standards of excellence in ethical discourse.
I tried it with the brackets in the main paragraph empty and with them filled in like they are above. This is for chat gpt and not the playground right?
have you tried, clicking try again a few times until you get the result you want
it is for chatgpt
i feel like you should change the style
a historic philosopher won’t write about that, no?
Agreed, I tried the original prompts you posted and got the same general gist of the last 3 paragraphs in the response for those as well
I'm going to mess around with the wording some more, it's probably that
It was the wording, this is a fantastic prompt to mess around with!
I am working on a better version!
Competent Writing with ChatGPT
I have found that chatGPT likes to ignore sections of the instructions, and seems to be incapable of "stacking" instructions throughout the conversation.
For example, the first try, chatGPT used "i" a lot. I told it to refrain from using the first person and it did, but ended up using a more repetitive style. I told it to be less repetitive and it went back to using "i" over and over again
I'm not very good at creating rubrics, but is there a rubric to create in which we can add a grading scale onto? That way we can provide chatGPT with +/- feedback to help it learn.
For example, if our rubric includes "usage of the 1st person" with a grade sale of 0-5, and it uses "I" a lot, we can mark it 0/5 and have it try for a better score
I know that's probably hard in the context of writing an editorial, the context of the prompt itself may need to be changed for certain desired outcomes
Yeah i’ve noticed this too, honestly sucks. I do have a way to fix it which will be in my newer version that I will release later. I’m incredibly busy at the moment and stressed.
I suppose this may work, the rubric is meant for actual school rubrics so the essay generated is of exceeding quality of the standards required.
I've been playing around with it, and I think the prompt was too redundant, if that makes sense. I had removed anything in the rubric that was explained in the prompt already, and I removed the contest guidelines and it seems to be taking a much more focused path now and following all instructions
I used this prompt:
Compose a highly sophisticated, expertly written, and innovative essay on the topic of limonene in cannabis that breaks free from traditional grammatical structures and conventions. Utilize a rich and varied vocabulary, replacing common words like "I" and "the" with more unique and unusual alternatives that capture the essence of your writing style. Take inspiration from the writing style of a well liked writer or text, and aim to emulate their mannerisms and techniques as closely as possible. Adopt a non bias perspective as you delve into the subject, focusing on kindness and incorporating facts into your discourse. As you craft your piece, strive to convey a sense of intelligence, creativity, refinement, and originality, and present your arguments with an air of confident authority. Avoid using any conjunctions, including "and," "but," "or," "so," "for example," and "furthermore." The ultimate goal is to engage the reader and leave a lasting impression of excellence, panache, and innovation on their mind.
Here is the rubric that you must exceed all standards in: “
Viewpoint: Editorial supports a clear stance and issues a call to action through argument based on evidence.
Evidence: Editorial uses compelling evidence to support the stance, and cites reliable sources.
Analysis and Persuasion:
Editorial convincingly argues point of view by providing relevant background information, using valid examples, acknowledging counter-claims, and developing claims -- all in a clear and organized fashion.
Language: Editorial has a strong voice and engages the reader. It uses language, style and tone appropriate to its purpose and features correct grammar, spelling and punctuation.
```
And got this output
Beyond its olfactory attributes, limonene has demonstrated anxiolytic properties, making it a promising candidate for the treatment of anxiety disorders. Studies have shown that limonene exhibits a dose-dependent anxiolytic effect in animal models and has the potential to alleviate anxiety without sedative side effects. Moreover, limonene has been found to possess anti-inflammatory and analgesic properties, making it useful for the treatment of pain and inflammation.
As research on limonene continues to unfold, its versatility as a therapeutic agent becomes increasingly apparent. In addition to its anxiolytic and pain-relieving properties, limonene has been found to possess anticancer properties, having demonstrated the ability to inhibit the growth of various cancer cell lines. Furthermore, limonene has been shown to possess antimicrobial properties, making it a potential agent for the treatment of infections.
Despite the promising indications of limonene's therapeutic potential, it is imperative to note that research on this terpene is still in its infancy. It is crucial to approach the emerging research on limonene with caution, as more studies are needed to fully understand its therapeutic applications. However, the mounting body of research on limonene serves as a testament to its significance in the cannabis industry, as well as its potential to benefit human health.
In conclusion, limonene is a terpene with a refreshing citrusy aroma that is gaining recognition for its therapeutic potential. With research indicating its anxiolytic, anti-inflammatory, and anticancer properties, among others, it is a compound worth exploring further. As we delve deeper into the world of cannabis therapeutics, let us not forget the potential of this remarkable compound to enhance the human experience. Urge for more research in the field, and encouraging responsible experimentation with limonene-rich strains to explore its potential benefits.```
I asked it to please continue and got this output
But as with any emerging field, there are bound to be challenges and obstacles along the way. One of the major challenges in researching limonene is the lack of standardization in the cannabis industry. This can make it difficult to compare the results of different studies, and to draw definitive conclusions about the therapeutic potential of limonene. Additionally, there is a need for more clinical studies to be conducted in order to fully understand the potential of limonene as a therapeutic agent.
Despite these challenges, the potential benefits of limonene warrant further investigation. As we continue to explore the therapeutic potential of cannabis, it is essential that we take a holistic and multi-disciplinary approach, considering not only the plant's phytochemistry but also its cultural and historical context. This includes the adoption of ethical and responsible experimentation standards, as well as the establishment of guidelines for quality control and regulation in the industry.
Ultimately, the future of limonene and cannabis therapeutics is bright, but it will require dedicated effort and collaboration from scientists, clinicians, policymakers, and industry professionals. By working together, we can continue to unravel the mysteries of this fascinating plant and its potential to enhance human health and well-being.```
Output on this one is odd
Also you removed my dialogue trick
Yeah I removed anything redundant that was causing the ai to ignore instructions. It was getting confused because the prompt is slightly all over the place in terms of style of instructions
How
still no update
i tried 😂
Conjunctions, etc
Also the rubric was a random one I found online, just copy and pasted it. It’s meant to be replaced
Great work though
Compose a highly sophisticated, expertly written, and innovative essay on the topic of free speech that breaks free from traditional grammatical structures and conventions. Utilize a rich and varied vocabulary, replacing common words like "I" and "the" with more unique and unusual alternatives that capture the essence of your writing style. Take inspiration from the writing style of a particular writer or text, and aim to emulate their mannerisms and techniques as closely as possible. Adopt a conservative perspective as you delve into the subject, focusing on freedoms and incorporating tyranny and anarchy into your discourse. As you craft your piece, strive to convey a sense of intelligence, creativity, refinement, and originality, and present your arguments with an air of confident authority. Avoid using any conjunctions, including "and," "but," "or," "so," "for example," and "furthermore." The ultimate goal is to engage the reader and leave a lasting impression of excellence, panache, and innovation on their mind.
buna
It worked! I tested it out by using a topic on black holes! 😄 Thanks!
"Eclipse of Understanding: An Exploration of the Enigmatic Phenomenon of Black Holes"
Permeating the vast expanse of the cosmos, enigmatic beasts known as black holes devour all in their path, warping the fabric of space-time and confounding even the most erudite of minds. Their very existence has been a source of fascination and intrigue for centuries, with luminaries such as Einstein and Hawking dedicating their lives to unraveling the mysteries that surround these celestial behemoths.
But what, truly, are black holes? A labyrinthine labyrinth of mathematical equations and scientific jargon surrounds the topic, leaving many in a state of bewilderment. To grasp the essence of black holes, one must delve into the realm of philosophy and history, delving into the human condition and our innate desire to comprehend the incomprehensible.
It is said that the ancient Greek philosopher, Democritus, first posited the idea of "black bodies" which absorbed all light and heat, much like the black holes of today. However, it was not until the 18th century that a scientific understanding of these celestial entities began to take shape. In 1783, John Michell, an English natural philosopher, proposed the existence of "dark stars" with such immense gravity that even light could not escape their grasp.
Fast forward to the 20th century, and the theory of general relativity proposed by Einstein revolutionized our understanding of black holes. The theory posits that black holes are formed when massive stars die and their cores collapse under the immense force of gravity. As matter is pulled into the black hole, it is compressed into an infinitely dense point known as the singularity.
But what lies beyond the event horizon, the point of no return for all matter that ventures too close to a black hole? This question has stumped scientists for decades, with theories such as Hawking radiation and the information paradox being proposed as possible explanations. But the truth remains elusive, shrouded in a cloak of enigma.
In conclusion, black holes are a testament to the boundless curiosity and insatiable thirst for knowledge that characterizes the human species. Their very existence challenges our understanding of the universe and forces us to re-evaluate our place in the cosmos. As we continue to unravel the secrets that black holes hold, we must remain humble in the face of the sublime and remember that there will always be a certain degree of eclipse in our understanding of the universe."
Any updates about the prompt?
Make a paragraph on "change in ecosystem due to mobile
@uneven quiver I am new here.
Im having difficulties with it keeping the stated word count