#codex-discussions
1 messages Β· Page 18 of 1
@frosty zealot Got another limit reset 
I mean you have more than one repo in the explorer. That's kinda like undefined behavior. The codex app-server does not let you set more than one CWD, so how vscode extension reconciles that difference would be undefined. It probably sets both folders as writable roots
I was given a shipping date of 6 - 8 weeks
Win11 .111 to local WSL
ok. that makes sense, was the 2nd instance for wsl?
Just updated to most recent extension version (pre-release)
But I'm in UK so could be due to that
same WSL, different base folders.
Okay. So I actually use one windows native, and one in wsl. They physically remain separate that way, but if they're both in wsl, then your best bet, is in the root folder or somewhere close that it wont interfere with your work, put a .md file for the project with some instructions for codex to stay within that specific root for that project, and it will. You're basically going to use 1 extra file as a context anchor, and that will stop drift between folders. Just one file per project is all you need. You could set up some worktrees like the codex app has them in wsl as well, but that's up to you.
This is invaluable troubleshooting information
I just completely closed VSC on the two projects. Then I opened app and loaded first workspace from recent. "what's your cwd?" ... correct. I opened a new window, loaded the second from recent. "what's your cwd?" ... also correct. Seems to have been a fluke, maybe due to updating VSC this morning and it auto-reloaded windows for both projects.
I'll keep an eye on this and will resurface if I see it again. Thanks all.
the AI Lawd works in mysterious ways
Robert, because I have the environment locked down from .codex/AGENTS.md and perms for user codex, my set of writables is much more limited:
What's your sandbox and writable roots?
Sandbox: danger-full-access (no filesystem sandbox restrictions from the runtime).
Writable roots I must follow: /opt/codex and /tmp (workspace policy).
Therefore, yes, it does have full access, wherever I limit its scope. All projects are under /opt/codex/projects or /opt/codex/repo, and there are some other files in /opt/codex that I wouldn't care about if they got wiped.
I keep this puppy in a very small cage. πΆ
I gave the builders an entire drive, and that's their sandbox
Sorry I got put in jail for 30 minutes, I found the line... since nobody answered your question I'm pretty sure they formally stated they're not rolling out anymore -codex models its just one unified naming now
~/Code on my machine is a separate partition, so I don't have to TimeMachine all 4 terabytes, just the little code partition
Used your timeout wisely to mock up some rage bait
That's awesome! although I am curious if /mnt/c obeys the same unix permissions as WSL
Not just unified naming but more specifically, the special code abilities are rolled into the default model. This should be a huge benefit for using 5.4 in ChatGPT though I haven't tested that theory yet.
Yes that's correct
A long time ago when I tried WSL it said every file inside /mnt/c was 777 RWX for all users
RIP Codex
That's the only loophole I'm concerned about. I've expressly instructed the assistant to limit all access to the named folders and it is forbidden to even look elsewhere. It has respected that directive but when we rely on instructions and not system-level perms then we're in the area of trust. I'm not liking that. I might look at an ACL specifically for /mnt to ban user 'codex', just in case.
It might even make sense to unmount the c drive. I think mounting requires root perms so they'd be unable to autonomously mount it even in danger-full-access. Although idk if that breaks wsl or not, but might offer better protection
We're on the same page, as usual. I simply don't know yet if WSL requires those mounts so haven't felt pain to justify researching that effort.
I've put more thought into this discussion than I have on that topic, really. π
Which distro do you use on WSL
I've been using ubuntu server LTS 24.04 if you guys have a better recommendation. I'm relatively new to linux in general though
ubuntu is my comfort zone after trying so many others over the years.
I've been playing with Alma because its pretty much 1:1 for RH which is pretty well the most adopted across infra, I've been in the debian universe for forever
Aw dude, you know what? I think windows file sharing is Samba. Would be slower than the kernel-native FS mount but Samba would let you translate the file permissions
I run ubuntu 22 and 24 on cloud VPS and look forward to trusting install/run of Codex in my servers for system management.
Daily driver is MacOS though, I feel it can't be beat tbh
Best thing i did with my windows pc was boot it with Unbuntu instead
I keep Windows on my main desktop for obvi reasons like games and what not, but my Laptop sits on a stand beside it, and I just use Deskflow (https://github.com/deskflow/deskflow) to use it
I've been using Linux since 90's, have weathered all of the fanboi claims and MS insults. Summary: Linux can be fragile in its own ways. The choice isn't for better or worse, it's picking which pains you prefer. I choose to balance my pain between the two.
IT's definitely more approachable now than it was years ago
I remember bricking the family comp growing up a few times trying out some different distros
and then putting windows server on my personal comp and locking down my parents computer with ACL's and Domains lmfao
all for the sake of learning
Now people do the same with AI...
"Hey, I have Codex running in Windows!"
"Hey, why can't I boot my system anymore?"
lol
Codex did actually help me fix the last few pesky microsoft cloud integrations, so I have a fully updated windows 11, but fully local. Forget all of that bloat and cloud crap
You're the only one who got timed out, breaking too many rules
Not saying Microsoft did anything wrong, but they did not design Windows to be LLM friendly lol
cat some_file.txt
Get-Contents-Of-A-Single-File -named C:\\Users\\me\\Project\ Folder\\some_file.txt -with-permissions Read-Only -reservation-time-seconds 5 -requires-user-access-control-escalation False -close-when-content-retreival-complete true
Scariest thing I've done with AI on windows was ask it to disable Nagle's Algorithm which involves regedits
I was like this aint gonna reboot
yes
I spent more time on their limitations then i did developing (not exactly try but it felt like it) so i said screw it and booted unbuntu
Try it and let me know
No thanks
You try
howdy is this channel appropriate for CLI help questions?
That's the sole purpose
I wish more people would start with Howdy when they join
Is everything else just a side quest?
Howdy or meowdy, both work well
using latest codex from latest version from npm on Windows 11, I get this quite often
β Failed to apply patch
β execution error: Io(Custom { kind: Other, error: "windows sandbox: CreateProcessWithLogonW failed: 1326" })
Reconnecting... 4/5 (2m 08s β’ esc to interrupt) β Stream disconnected before completion: error sending request for
url (https://chatgpt.com/backend-api/codex/responses)
Is it just me or is there some kind of down status for Codex right now?
I heard that the experimental features could cause this?
Did you allow Execution Policies or w/e it's called on windows
oh nvm looks like a different error
this is my config.toml
model = "gpt-5.4"
model_reasoning_effort = "medium"
suppress_unstable_features_warning = true
personality = "pragmatic"
approval_policy = "never"
# approval_policy = "untrusted"
sandbox_mode = "workspace-write"
[features]
[projects.'C:\Users\andda\issue-RCP47-ticket-470753']
trust_level = "trusted"
[notice.model_migrations]
"gpt-5.2-codex" = "gpt-5.3-codex"
"gpt-5.3-codex" = "gpt-5.4"
[windows]
sandbox = "elevated"
Get-ExecutionPolicy is ByPass
Wow that's crazy, it wrote all the code into the chat π
You're gonna want to change approval_policy = "on-request" at the very least if you want to make any forward progress
that project directory is where I am having the issue, I added it with /sandbox-add-read-dir
God I hope so
Seems like it
stream disconnected before completion: error sending request for url (http://127.0.0.1:62462/responses)
Same
what's crazy? providing actual config when asking for help?
Or just the servers are being overrun
PLEASE let it be down
i've been looking at twitter sorted by latest and no one's saying anything so i thought it was just me
I think its a windows native issue
Noooo the agent was like "I couldn't write the code, so here's the code in the chat"
I need everyone on twitter right now demanding resets for this inconvenience
Ask codex about it
oh yes, and thanks god, it was a python utility script, quite short
It can probably fix itself
I did and it's where I got the policy-approval=never
Try with the --yolo flag and see if it still persists
When you set it to never, that tells Codex that any command violating the sandbox in any way will be completely blocked. If you set it to on-request, that at least allows it to ask permission.
But yeah this might be a matter of powershell fighting the agent
Could also try: codex --sandbox danger-full-access --dangerously-bypass-approvals-and-sandbox
just codex --yolo
I mean yeah you can do that, but on Windows there is quite simply not enough emphasis around danger lol. I'm pretty sure not even C:\\System\ 32 or whatever is safe
My old chat was working but now any new chat has the reconnecting issue
Anyone else?
yes
it doesn't work for me too
not on the cli, nor the app, disabled websockets and tried too
doesn't work
and i see no one else crying on twitter so what is even happening
works on a new chat now
Not for me
can confirm v0.110.0 is stable
Wow, my orchestrator agent just went through auto compact and came out with 56% context remaining π I think it's time to retire the ol chap
Is codex down?
*trying to sew the seeds of doubt *
I'll take a note and try these options. It feels odd to me that I cannot tell codex "do anything you want in this directory"
Yeah, it is odd
thanks for now, cya
I have this in my config.toml:
[mcp_servers.context7]
url = "https://mcp.context7.com/mcp"
http_headers = { "CONTEXT7_API_KEY" = "DtO7Yk-OcU1RdEd-A1Lc-LfYb-T9H9-5IdNdKeS6O??duh" }
Codex never uses it. Instead, it does
β’ Searched WP Discourse plugin option wpdc_options api key url site:github.com discourse wpdc_options
β’ Searched https://github.com/discourse/wp-discourse
β’ Searched site:github.com/discourse/wp-discourse wpdc_options api-key url github
What am I missing?
Gotta have a skill that says "use context7 MCP"
If you put it in the header:
---
name: "context7"
description: "Use this any time you are looking up documentation."
---
That's what the agent sees at all times π
Still reconnecting
Does it actually exist when you /mcp ?
hmmno
Im not sure the many ways you can declare it, mine is declared like:
[mcp_servers.context7]
url = "https://mcp.context7.com/mcp"
http_headers = { "CONTEXT7_API_KEY" = "DtO7Yk-OcU1RdEd-A1Lc-LfYb-T9H9-5IdNdKeS6O??duh" }
I think I copied it from somewhere, let me try yours
[mcp_servers.context7.env]
CONTEXT7_API_KEY = ""
althouhnpx?!
Oh hey, is that a joke API key?
Lol and here I thought you were trying to get the agent to cooperate π
Did the new toml declaration work for you?
that looks awfully like what I do... revising it again
That is for local it semes
I think I already use what they suggest for remote, let me revise
Come on what's wrong with it
I am
Ah fair enough
But it still does not show in your /mcp list?
OK so the /mcp command did work but it takes forever to show the above
Apparently.. perhaps my api key is incorect
Weird, even with new api key - same as above. Enabled but not logged in
I would probably config it like Cantcrit did because then the server runs local & starts up faster
Auth might only be a flag for oauth sign in
The fact its listing tools, when you wouldnt have told it anywhere what tools it has
tells me it likely is connected fine
Queried and knows what tools it has
Its working now, despite the "not logged in"
I get requests (I added the skill Robert said)
I probably will, but for now just testing.
They say MCP are something one should learn, saw it on a bearded-guy video. He clicked buttons in docker MCP and said its cool, so ...
πͺ
codex mcp auth <mcp-server> is for oauth signin, some MCP's support it like Stripe, thats how you would authenticate, since you are using an API-Key I would assume it's just reading Not logged in because you did not use the codex mcp auth method.
Good strategy troubleshooting mcp is to npx @modelcontextprotocol/inspector and replicate the config stuff in the inspector, list tools, make sure it works before the agent goes using it
Its fairly annoying that codex did use the MCP but then googled it anyway after it got reply lol
(In its cache, I suppose, since i have cache search enabled too)
I've had that before lol the agent be like "Ok, I did the mandatory context7 usage to look up the docs, now it's time to search the web for the docs"
I love codex, but honestly, it feels a bit black-boxish sometimes
Just rn I have so much will to create once another brittle app that integrates the raw api that I prefer using it lol
@boreal holly You think its a good idea to instruct it to say do all context7 queries in a sub-agent and only return to the orchestrator the relevant results? Cause itll do a lot of 'googling' in context7
I guess you could just turn off web search?
I meant googling as in searching inside of ocntext7
Like it still fishes around in context7 to find what it needs kinda thing
adding a bit of overhead tokens thats useless
Yeah, I am a huge fan of offloading tasks to other agents like that. I have an agent that lives inside the openai/codex repo cloned on my machine, and other agents are required to ask that one for info about app-server rather than looking it up.
If the source code is available, I don't really use context7, just look at the sources. If it's closed source with only API service docs then context7 is the wey
Also what's cool about making agents talk to each other is user messages are treated as uncompactible, so whatever they get from the other agent survives compaction
When you say talk to other agents, are the agents themselves running like a codex call in their own context, or did you build like a chat framework for your agents to intercommunicate
Still down. π
Yeah each agent on my machine is a peer, and they use the same mechanism as I do to send messages to each other
Idk how the subagents system works, but mine all operate independently and chat with each other by basically sending messages prefixed with [Agent Name]: so they know it's not me sending the message
Did your AI design the system or are you using something akin to ACPX
I think I linked ACPX before
If not: https://github.com/openclaw/acpx
acpx is a headless CLI client for the Agent Client Protocol (ACP), so AI agents and orchestrators can talk to coding agents over a structured protocol instead of PTY scraping.
Mine came out before ACPX. It actually does this:
- A "bridge server" runs, with
codex app-serverin stdio mode with JsonRPC - If an agent wants to send another one a message, they use either the display name or thread ID, and send it to the bridge server
- Bridge server confirms the agent's identity, makes sure they have permission to do this, and inserts either a
thread/steerorthread/startsignal tocodex app-server, which is the same event used by me if I were to enter a prompt into the chat.
Gotcha I need to fresh up on the app-server, it seems extremely useful.
I also think I misunderstood ACPX's intent until I was just looking at it again, its intent is more so for intercommunicating say Codex, Claude, Gemini etc. all under one roof, so rather than the agent doing a claude -p 'run this' and then scraping the pty for all of its results, it will actually run claude natively, and claude will then communicate through teh acpx rpc natively
So you can orchestrate multiple LLMs over one unified network
Not so much for one llm to deal with its own sub agents
Are these agents local or are they injecting steering commands into running loops?
Yeah my method only works with codex app-server over that specific API. I have orchestrator agents, who are allowed to spawn worker agents, and worker agents can't talk to anyone outside of the project. Orchestrators can talk to other project orchestrators, but can't talk to their workers. Also have hidden agents that nobody can talk to except me.
They inject steer, or they start a thread if it's not running. The bridge server determines the best course of action
Interesting, how do you solve issues of loop sprawl and them never ending.
Or overlapping tasks
I'm assuming you've made your own GUI etc. and at this point likely work in your own framework and not Codex App or the CLI
My API keys are looking weird? Anyone else have this issue?
Overlapping tasks is solved by letting them communicate with each other, and actually encouraging it upfront. The orchestrator is aware of all tasks the workers are doing, and I have an "auto-route" for worker final messages so they go straight to the orchestrator. The agents themselves are instructed to actually stop as often as they need, and the orchestrator uses that opportunity to determine progress and continuation
Cool, is this all being live monitored through some Reasonting text logging?
Not really. I just kinda let them do their thing. They stop frequently enough to give milestones that if I just watch the orchestrator chat I get an idea of where everyone's at
@calm sigil I like the telescope in your pfp
That's also why my orchestrator was coming out of auto compact with 56% context remaining lol because it gets each and every agent's final message and intermediate messages sometimes. Fills up quickly
Ahh, ok, I'm creating a Open Source project similar to this but its more of a Codex optimization system. Once I get it finished I will release the repo
π that's all I get?
Its a radar dish. My background is RF automation and other "things"
Nice! The other thing I have them do is when a worker spawns to do something, they have permission to ask for more agents to fan out. Most of the time they decide they are enough, but giving them that option has been beneficial, and they all coordinate cross cutting edits and rebasing together π like a little software company
I pixel drifted it on twitter years ago forgot the original image.
Oops, I thought it was a radio telescope
Same difference. RF is RF just processes another way.
Is the curvature related to the frequency?
Thats cool, I hear all the news of other companies not coding anymore just massively guiding agents like Spotify.. They only thing, is they are special internal tools they have all built. So far no one in the Open Source community has built a system similar.
Yes, but not directly like that, its total radius = lambda = wavelength, then reflectivity calculated for Rx Gain
I mean to be honest I get it. I've built a few janky OSS tools for everyone (don't recommend em, very outdated). The one I have now is very opinionated, and if I wanted to OSS it I would need to do significant refactoring, create a bootstrap installation process, help docs, etc. And maybe a handful of folks are gonna use it, and most of em are gonna hate it. But I'm willing to share the insights at least π
Wavelength = frequency range, and these are so large due to some being used for space which need a ultra low frequency to penetrate or high at massive Tx power.
How much do you think it has increased efficiency
I can't put a number on it. I can say that with command-parser alone I spend 44% fewer of my weekly limit in the same period, but the orchestration layer I can't quantify honestly
and the command-parser you said just simply offloads large output commands to another agent which then only returns the valid result
Exactly! either spark or 5.1-codex-mini. And I see exactly when they use it so it's quantifiably 44% on average savings
That's literally the cost of input tokens from noisy tool calls
I need another limit reset
Childs play, get your numbers up lil gup
Nice, thank you.
Now that I'm at 4% it will be very useful
If you have docker installed then that skill is drop-in ready to use π just need to add a couple profiles and an env switch for spark <-> mini and you're set
kk
Yeah yeah lil bro
Anyone using 5.4 rather than 5.3 codex?
affirmative
This may be a skill issue but ive had an issue with 5.4 where it wastes a bunch of tokens re answering stuff previously in the conversation
It likes to reiterate. If you give it a structured response format (like how you expect them to respond at the end of each turn) they stick with it
oh okay ill try to add that, thank you
I just figured no sense in wasting 9 trillion tokens, it didn't seem that much better to me
I mean codex oneshots basically everything I ask it to
I tell my agents basically
<brief summary>
State:
Classification:
Next action:
Files touched: (and why)
Cleanup Performed:
Validation:
Issues noticed:
as my output contract, and it tells me everything I need to know (Cleanup performed is a good way to catch if they deleted something they shouldn't have, Validation tells me if they actually tested the code, etc.)
themes are out
The penguin is still crying
don't see it on windows yet
idk if its different changelog?
https://developers.openai.com/codex/changelog
what do you guys use automations for?
you're cooked π
Must ask cloud review agent to finish PR π
I havent even got to PR stage yet
gpt-oss-20b to the rescue!
Codex pretty bad
Itβs over
newest version of the Codex app for Windows seems to be broken for me. I can't seem to switch models or reasoning efforts on a new task, and going to a previous thread just says "failed to resume task" and keeps trying to reload the conversation history π€
Its annoying but you have to find what .toml file has incorrect or deprecated syntax
Just rename things in ~/.codex until you narrow it down
ah just as you said that, I was looking through my settings, yeah there's an invalid toml error π
for me it when I Renamed my agents folder it finally worked
Super grief annoying but
yeah, haha, I was curious to see if the new theme system was there but it's not
DMs
hi please i have issues with my codex app, i cant choose 5.4 from the model selection
You must upgrade to plus if you want this model
(v0.114.0) is not working
i am on pro, things kinda scattered after the last update before the app update with the themes
Oh sucks, I didnβt have this problem
Maybe you can use the VSC extension until itβs fixed?
Wait
Yeah, wait for your credits to reset lil bro
My tecnique is using bash comands
lol that "Absolutely" theme is hilarious, the competitor's theme π
presumably in reference to "you're absolutely right"
Codex is gone, start with sh and bash from chatgpt
You can analyze, do backups, etc through bash and sh
Is more mechanic tham codex, but lets you understand the phases done to result
Here is a simple sh script to test commands executed with Bash. It runs several commands, checks their exit status, and reports whether each test passed or failed.
#!/bin/sh
Simple Bash command testing script
echo "Starting tests..."
run_test() {
TEST_NAME=$1
COMMAND=$2
echo "Running test: $TEST_NAME"
bash -c "$COMMAND"
STATUS=$?
if [ $STATUS -eq 0 ]; then
echo "[PASS] $TEST_NAME"
else
echo "[FAIL] $TEST_NAME (exit code: $STATUS)"
fi
echo "---------------------------"
}
Test cases
run_test "List current directory" "ls"
run_test "Print working directory" "pwd"
run_test "Echo test message" "echo Hello World"
run_test "Example failing command" "false"
echo "Tests finished."
How to use it
1. Save the file:
nano test.sh
2. Make it executable:
chmod +x test.sh
3. Run it:
./test.sh
Expected output example
Starting tests...
Running test: List current directory
[PASS] List current directory
Running test: Print working directory
[PASS] Print working directory
Running test: Echo test message
Hello World
[PASS] Echo test message
Running test: Example failing command
[FAIL] Example failing command (exit code: 1)
Tests finished.
If you want, I can also show you a more advanced Bash testing script (with assertions, logging, and parallel tests) that works more like a lightweight CI tester for shell scripts.
Thatβs so smart
I discovered months not using codex hahaha, even though I was pating for it. Didnt know it existes
Paying*
You'll never be able to perform the measurement
Built an algoritmic bot for trading, but move my interest toward investigatiom
In paper the bot worked
Haha
Thatβs crazy, youβre going to be rich!!
π
Hahahaha
What are you trading?
Started the project with crypto, then moved to unified indicators data, different indicators tested within temporal loops and only promoting to real production the bigger rentability
But
You need money to try ir
It
So I focus in Aquiles
Haha
A different history maybe not that interesting
Iβm a bit confused
Easily accomplished
Do you trade all the cryptos?
Data driven paper simulations promoted to production throught metrics of KPI
Like what are you buying and selling? Even if only on paper
You analize the flows and cycles of determines assets throught timespaces (1min,5min,15min,etc)
And score them
Then you list those scores, and make them fight for a place in production
Tito, have you ever had Tito's vodka?
Heβs rich, he only drinks Grey Goose
It doesnt need to be only one crypto, metadata allows you tu analyze correlations
So you do all the cryptos?
Depending on the risk
That must be expensive
Is it risky to do all of them?
With microtransactions shouldnt be
Never promoted the idea though
i dont know what happens if the analysis grows macro
So what have you backtested on then?
With low money, the closest I got to profit was not loosing money. Then I had to change projects because of university and personal issues
But
The repo is there waiting to be build
Do you know what a backtest is?
Language confuses me sometimes, its like proven the method?
What is your native language?
It means running your algorithm on old data, as if it hasnβt seen it before
Or explain it to see if I can grasp it
Probably python
eshoomn
Iβm trying to use codex to make pine script for trading view any tips?
Trazability*
I donβt know this word
Traceability
Have a plan, donβt just say make me a trading algorithm like this guy did
What does that even mean in this context?
I do but the strategy report be very poor
You have to understand the basis of the concepto you want to explore
Can't a guy just play WORDLE
I even connected it to quantconnect and itβs giving me bad scripts
Can any one dm me so we can network?
5.4 is a yapper, says way too much words
@kind jay Will gladly DM you
This isnβt for you lil bro
What you mean
Whats he sayin
If it was this easy, everyone and their dog would be rich
Investigate this first:
a) trading algoritms
b) indicators (at least 30)
c) mathematic formulas
And start analysing comportment of data
Yes
I mean I passed 4 accounts from it
I jsut need to built for a PA
just trying to network gang
My bad for hating
Iteration is key to success
The strategies be good but the trading view alert firing is whatβs making me mad
Thatβs why Iβm asking for help
Dont do as me, and leave projects half built
just a lot of repro steps / instructions for QA'ing something
that could be way more concise
Itβs not the strategy but the alerts for trading alerts
DM me, I can look in the morning
I would much rather perfer the prompts/tips I donβt really wanna send out my scripts
Why trading view and not connect directly to the exchanges data?
Itβs prop firms
And do an email agent through imap or SMTP
I use traderspost and it reads my alerts on trading view and make the trades
Fair enough
The alerts are weird, it fires and leaves in like 1min or doesnβt fire at all
What do you use as signal?
Iβm happy Iβm not the only one using codex like this, everyone else was telling me use Claude but I think codex is better
BUY, SELL or hold?
Both, I do scalps, intra day holds. And etc
It buys and sells
Itβs a mix of different strategies for different instruments
I connected my codex to my quant connecter so it run like 1000+ backtest on a concept
Yeah, so, map math interpretation to the signals and then you can analyze when different strategies support a signal
what kpi are u using?
What do you mean by kpi
Indicators
KPI stands for Key Performance Indicator.
A KPI is a measurable value used to evaluate how well a person, team, system, or organization is achieving a specific objective.
Simple definition
A KPI = a metric that tells you if you are succeeding or failing at a goal.
After I get the strategy report I just send it to chat gpt and ask it whatβs the likely hood it could pass and grow a account
But in terms of indicators I donβt use traditional ones, I make them on the spot
Who do you trade with that allow algo trading?
All propfirms do, at least they donβt really know about it
I use apex and topstep
Use data proven indicators
I think they donβt allow it, but youβre right about how would the know
I use traderspost and they make the trades off of my alerts sent from trading view
Only problem is that the alerts fire wrong
Usually they are proven for a reason and correlations can be discovered only through proven methods. Or its just luck
My philosophy is that any indicator thatβs been published loses edge
Which is what personal backtesting and quant connecter is for
Real institutional funds donβt publish there strategy
Dang bro you got a backup acct?
Itβs photoshop, he told me
Unrelenting force
So does anyone else use TradingView alerts? If so dm me but I wonβt be able to see the messages. Iβm really here for that fix
Work through metadata, there you will find relations hidden
I used direct exchange api
So cant help with trading view specificly
You should DM him, maybe you know the fix
You use propfirms?
Unless you create your own systems, your own intelligence networks, you're in the same boat as every other person trying to get rich off automating crypto trading
But maybe you can get to a working MVP before the others
GL
I used my money, but you can start only ingesting data and running the flow in paper
Youβre just jealous youβre not as rich and as handsome as Tito is
My limits reset just now
We can't all be lucky
Like that weekle ussage
Yo Tito you got Insta? Could I add you?
oai is too generous lemme tell ya
Yeah
atomic.tito
But lets connect through linkedin
Dm me
Ah
Self promoting
Right?
has anyone been able to update to latest codex in windows?
You weren't kidding, thanks for the heads up
Rule 12. smh
Itβs
Why do people have their real full name on Discord? It makes no sense
Another philosofy
Some people are just here to network
All people can hack you
Some people are here to disturb the peace
You only have yourself and your mind
Some people donβt care about internet safety
You should start a webinar on it
Thats why I focus on investigating and sharing ideas
I believe in full tracability
If you cant prove I am real
Why should you consider my thoughts
How can I tell what is real, when real is a concept that I've created
Speak for yourself
Then you share it through linkedin
Hahhaja
Yeah imagine having deep and insightful discussions with "Tomato_bandit54" on the internet
Am I the observer or am I being observed?
Reality is like quantum mechanics
Yeaaah
Birds aren't real
Iβm interested in working on quantum mechanical trading algorithms
Novel applications of quantum mechanics
I thought this through quantic computing
You must be really smart
But if it works it would reshape economy
I'll just remain in my superposition
What if money is really a quantum mechanical system?
Is a belief system
And we only see the vibrations?
I trust the thing I buy from you is worth what you are offering
And you trust that I pay you with the same worth
Its like
A inequalityΒΏ?
Life
This could be solved mathematically!!
Doxed yourself again

Mr. internet safety over here
Hahahaha
I find something so ironic about a guy with his PII right there saying he won't click a discord link
Hillariously ironic
im rolling
You have to cut the line somewhere
Bro are you kidding me? Adventure Club is in my top 5
Eoomnmh
They're so good
Sorry the ignorance, whats PII?
Personally identifiable information, its a common acronym in security
- Kill the Noise
- Noisia
- Feed Me
- Gunship
- Deadmau5
if I had to make a list
Very hard list to make cause I like them all, including people that didnt make the list, so much
Security and privacy is a fachade
- Marcin
- Adventure Club
- John Michael Howell
- Zed's Dead
- Gretta Van Fleet (tied with Led Zeppelin)
I've heard a few gretta tunes they're great, I was shocked to see they were so young
A few days ago I left my wallet in a public chair, no one took it
To an extent sure, but you should still lead it with your best foot forward, next thing you know you're gonna have a mortgage and a truck payment in your name
Lucky I wasnβt there
Things that only happens once
Rat mode
I dont use credit or debit cards so, there is that. But other data is very easy to get if getting harassed by some freak dude
If we're being across genres
- Gojira
- Soilwork
- Kill The Noise
- Noisia
- Lamb of God
Today a lot of smaller companies use KYOC or world id
But
You trust them with your info?
I lobe big corporations
I accept there is always a risk when you sign up to something online, or hand out info on forms, but if avoidable I don't
Jane probably already has found my entire PII and built a shrine of me
I know it's out there
lobe is a strong word
You have a mortgage and a truck out in your name
Is that what those missed calls were
Been receiving those for a few years
Sorry
Serve what
Just serve π
Is this correct?
Yes
Got reeference
I was about to post this and say wth
Beauty is in the eye of the observer
How did you get my picture?
Ask chatgpt, varys is daddy of managing PII
Interesting typo, is english not your first language?
e and y are quite spaced, couldn't have simply been a misclick
Hmm, another slip
Timezone, semantics, profile is almost complete
Okay goodbye guys
Goodbye Varys
Gn
I do not appreciate this
Is that a quote from Varys?
Explain this before I leave please
I couldnt get to it before Teamviewer paused
and i cant ssh in now
Im cooked till i get home
:wq
If you disable FileVault you'd be able to set tailscale as a launchagent and it'll reconnect after power failure
How do I power fail it though when itβs plugged in on the charger lol
Sorry I mean when macOS jetsams from running out of memory
I did that with my desktop computer. I have it plugged into a little smart plug, and I put in the bios after power failure
So if it hangs up or something, I just power cycle it
macOS FileVault will not let anything launch until after first login, so if OOM causes a kernel panic you need physical access. With it off, LaunchAgents can run before login and all is good
I think at some point I did turn it off. I'll look into it when I get home
You know if you can enable the developer console inside the Codex app?
It's not an easy process. You have to unpack the asar, force the "if production then no dev tools" branch to never run, and use electron to repackage it as a custom macos app
You can't edit it in place because electron codesigns with a checksum of the asar so if the content changes even 1 byte it refuses to run
Gotcha
Wasnβt sure if there were launch options from terminal
Given they are designing the CLI with Rust, I wonder why they chose Electron and not something like Tauri
@kind jay sorry, my phone battery died
All men must serve means that all human beings have responsability to colective
All men must die means no matter what you do, your cicle everytime ends
You're all good. I think she crawled into her little rat hole for the night, probably doing a couple honk shoo honk shoo mimimi
I have a question, what are spouses here? Little lost in that matter
Like in the English language?
Nono, in the server, they talk about spouses
I'm not sure. I can't honestly say that I've seen that word mentioned in here, in this channel specifically?
If you can give me some more context or where they use it in a sentence
Something to do with roleplay
I mean a spouse would be your husband or your wife
Could be. Without the context in which it was mentioned, I can't really help you
When I see more data, Iβll share it
Okay
Good chat have a good evening
Dumb question, if you fork into new worktree, does it also take the context of all the old conversation, or do you get a fresh thread, only reason I ask is I see the chat history from where it was forked, but that might not make it to the model
it forks with the conversation history
https://www.reddit.com/r/codex/comments/1rrmoqt/54_brilliant_and_lazy/ this has very much been my week, having to do multiple sessions for each task because 5.4 is optimized to basically sacrifice quality for speed. Since agents.md rules don't help with this anymore, has anyone had any success combating this? I'm losing so much time, I'd rather just have the model take the time it needs to produce the best possible outcome, instead of simulating a fast experience by not loading context.
I'm thinking that maybe breaking tasks up in parent and atomic child items with a single pass/fail at the end of each. Really breaking down sessions to tiny tasks that the model won't cut corners on. And maybe a process for triage that assumes the first pass is always incomplete so running triage 3-5 times by default. Or 8 times and picking the best/combining the outcomes....
i havent notice this too much with 5.4 but to handle it with claude i would alway tell it "During investigation it should always step through the code until it reaches concrete implementations so it doesnt miss important details, if it doesnt it can miss details and fail.
And that worked for claude
It stopped reinventing the wheel or having assumptions about implementations
I usually make it to do small tasks every session then ask it for the diff and i send it to gpt to see if it is doing well
Hi
βͺWhy does the codex plugin in vscode open a linked file into a browser (which is obviously not there) when the file it created/edited is already inside the current project folder?β¬
Iβm on windows
Anyone else has same issue?
So if you give it a user story to implement something in an average complexity codebase, and then run another agent with an adversarial review specifically to look for DRY violations and if the implementation is production ready in enterprise environment. It does not come up with a long list of problems that are all clearly from the model not reading the codebase until it knows the existing patterns? For me, both my existing prompts and when I go manual, it just doesn't acquire context. It never produces anything I don't need to revisit multiple times like 5.2 used to do.
I tend to get by pretty well I think because I have a topical skills built around all the different established abstractions and app architecture. Codex just by the nature of it tends to keep those updated as it goes. So I think that mitigates a lot of the problem for me personally. This didn't work so well with Claude because Claude doesn't use skills after the first turn. So with Claude I had a workflow that forced it to find example implementations in the code base and also always step through code until it reaches concrete implementations.
My workflow has always been to run the same prompts over a number of sessions. Triage the issue, resolve it, review the MR, merge to dev for human review. It got so good I have deployed small things without even reviewing. It rarely produced anything that needed a revisit. That's definitely opposite now. So I'm thinking that with the capacity problems quantizing is inevitable and as a product feature openai is faking speed over quality until the chip supply catches up. And maybe atomising the process with constant QC at ever little turn would be a permanent solution to it.
I catch it not reading it's skills, and certainly not reading longer skill files completely
And that's the thing also... All those Claude workarounds I used to do too until I switched to codex and I've been free of all of that haha. But now it's back.
I havent noticed it not using skills, i have caught it a few times not doing what they prescribe so that was probably it not reading them now that i think about it.
I just had to say does this look like it matches the code base architecture in the skills?!?
I don't have skills over 300 lines, they are always broken up into reference files
Yeah I even have skills per tool so it doesn't have to lookup commands. That workflow I mentioned is running all day for months so it has all the tools and all the optimization to do that as efficiently as possible
That's another thing. I have that too. And yesterday it confessed to not reading the references. It just stayed at a certain depth and didn't open the file despite being instructed in the file referencing it
But I have noticed it is quite aggressive about contracts and gates. So each issue I give I had acceptance criteria and hard gates. If there are a few it will ignore some and just decide to pass QA. But I think if I give each issue a single pass fail contract, so a tiny scope that can be captured in just a single pass/fail, I think I can get it to iterate until the gate passes. I'm not sure if this is procedurally feasible but I could force triage to run several times, then break it up in single contract, hard gated sub tasks.
Thatβs annoying so if youβre in a worktree,youβre confined to a single thread for eternity in the app from what I can see, only work around is a new worktree with the other worktree as the base
You can click on the open VS code in the top right hand corner, then open a terminal and you can see the work tree ID. Then you can open it in the left in the left pane. Or you can create a permanent work tree, but that doesn't come with a forked conversation.
I sleep now, for many many hours gn
gn
digging into the system prompts to see if this can actually be fixed at that level...
this is why agents.md won't help (anymore) with this issue, same as what the reddit poster reported.
@boreal holly have you seen the other sideβs agent team feature in their code CLI?
Thatβs basically what codex misses and you are doing I think.
Seems like advances are strong in the cloude
They do it with tmux thou
Lucky you. I suffer old manβs syndrome. Sleep at midnight and at 5 itβs like some lights turn on and Iβm just not asleep anymore π΅βπ«
It might contribute to my generally interpreted as βRussianβ social capabilities
Anybody online right now get slapped by the security tag/restriction and have to verify? how long did it take?
I think it was quick for those who had that issue, I recall a few users here mentioning it.
It should be a straight forward process really
It triggers when you do stuff like pentesting and similar
But I guess you also can get flagged for other βhigh riskβ deemed interactions
Never happened to me either that said
I dont know what causes it but I'm working on what would be pretty shady stuff if it wasnt funded research.
u mean cyber?
broadly yes
Yeah so then you know I guess
i verified one of my acounts it was like two minutes
oh good, so I dont have to worry
but that thing works weirdly since they fixed the false flagging
either they are trying to specifically flag "exploit this thing" kind of prompts or they are under-flagging cyber related stuff in general
"Exploit this thing" is almost precisely what the research ends upbeing when you get down to it. Like most cyber relevant prompts. One way or another, on red or blue team you end up with that as the actual unit of work.
But if it only takes a few minutes I'm not worried. Its all above board :p
well i've been asking codex to reproduce different kinds of bugs/vulnerabilities in test conditions a lot and didn't have any flags (on another account that i didnt verify)
π sounds interesting, what kind of things do you target?
blockchain-related
You dont have to say if you dont want to, I do mostly binary exploitation kind of research, in anything that isnt windows.
Routers, desktop, mobile, etc
Since most research code is throwaway anyway, the robots help a lot generating those early exploratory automations that never get committed.
Another question thats more forward engineering focused. Has anyone here built their own front end around the codex app server in order to re-shape the interactions you have with the models to be a different paradigm of tech work? By that I mean things like https://github.com/openai/symphony. Or the strongdm attractor workflows. I'm looking for more perspectives on it, I've built up a pretty thorough graph based workflow manager where the main interactions I have for deliverable software are me specifying user stories and a cascade of agentic stuff happens, then the work is done. Its a lot of code though and something like the "symphony" project above seems like it might be conceptually simpler and I always prefer simplicity...
Anyway, does anyone want to compare notes or know of any more of this sort of project other than symphony or the strongdm one?
Link to spec?
Oh, I wouldnt consider that to be "complex end to end code", but it is a good spec for a quick test.
And the results are interesting
Hi Guys when codex references a file in its output and I click that files name I get taken to browser as
is that a bug in windows?
That link presents the wrong cert, then prompts me to log in lol. Even though all the domains are actually owned by MS and its probably not malicious it gives malicious vibes.
its good, carefully prepared 350+ loc task with multiple possible mistakes to make
so gemini, claude and gpt consider this "complex end to end code" thats feasibly comparable
yeah i have too - the model does not exist in the first place
Pro lite/x5 wen? my Pro is about to run out and I didn't need all that usage......
we need 40$ sub
I would be happy with the $100 sub that has leaked on X
100$ sub would make 200$ users downgrade and make openai lose money
but 40$ sub would make 20$ users upgrade and 200$ users wouldnt downgrade
how the hell can you use up pro
atp use api
Easily...
pro has virtually unlimited quota, are you sure you are logged in?
No, the API is considerably more expensive.
It does not LOL.
yeah thats the point
if you run 300 subagents then you arent getting the discount lol
I know thats the point, and thats also the point of me wanting a bigger pro sub.
enterprise-level usage doesnt get the promo
theres no way you can use pro limits on personal usage
unless you share it with half of city or so π
Your imagination for what kind of workflows are possible now is limiting you.
im literally on plus plan, spamming agents and 50k+ loc per day and im still not using up mine
π
LOC are a terrible metric.
if you tell it to scan 200k loc codebase every prompt then thats on you π , skill issue
does 5.4 even have enough tokens per sec to use up pro plan limits π
Like I said, you're being limited by your imagination.
nah, you would need to run it thru some braindead loop in order to use up pro limits
You do you, guy. Keep churning out 50k LOC per day of plausible bs in your single threaded workflow.
just running a two threads of plan, implement, audit and review is enough to burn through pro on the 2x usage
I don't disagree, but there's front-end code for a $100 plan and Tibo has π-confirmed it
yeah with openai/symphony
Hi
Do you use symphony?
yes
Oh fantastic, did you try any other projects of similar intent? is your implementation public?
Everytime I hear about Symphony I always think first of all of the PHP framework
I just forked it, happy to share my method
But be warned it chows your usage
I have my own system I've built on top of the strongdm attractor. How well does it work for you? Have you tried any other similar projects or did you try to roll your own prior to the symphony spec being open sourced?
@cedar skiff https://gitlab.vialogos.dev/vialogos/codex-strict-profile My attempt at a fix. Uninstall included to cleanly remove
I tried a ralphwiggum type loop but dont like the black box effect it has. I only add tickets to linear that I feel ok to hand off. Not familiar with strongdm attractor?
On plus I hit the 5h limit in like 20 mins of normal usage, and the weekly in 15 hours (not a bug or anything, just extremely normal and expected)
https://github.com/strongdm/attractor. Its more generic, and doesnt include a frontend, but also more flexible to set up workflows that are not super aligned to typical scrum/agile/kanban style forward engineering.
Thanks, will have a looks see!
You mean instead of Linear?
disable all the 800 mcps, and limit yourself to max 1 non recursive workflow, there you go
I have 1 MCP with exactly 1 tool in it lol
That I wrote myself
then what are you doing wrong?
Nothing! It's totally expected consumption
Dude, people have productive workflows that are not "tell codex to do something, wait until its done, tell codex to do another thing, repeat". And those workflows arent wrong
im beginning to believe theres a quota-cism where different people get different ratelimits, based on account standing π€
This says codex
its how I work with data
My recommendation would be to use Symphony-like orchestration for execution management, while keeping the evidence pipeline
independent and deterministic. In Aquiles, the system should first structure the claim, then retrieve and validate evidence, and
only after that allow synthesis. That separation is essential if the goal is not only automation, but also reproducibility,
traceability, and institutional trust.
Aquiles?
YEah
or maybe your codebase is an self contradicting mess and codex doesnt know what to do π
I have between 8-25 agents running concurrently. On plus plan it takes about 20 mins to hit the 5 hour rate limit. On Pro I don't hit the 5hr at all
Broker
you keep this assumption that whatever you do is right, and if anyone has a different experience they're wrong. That is not a good way to go through life.
You better be
see theres your issue. why the hell do you need 25x agents? thats 25x usage waste
you cant even read what 1 agent produces at that speed
Do you think engineering managers of large orgs read every line of code output?
erm YES?
π
Aquiles is a research-oriented platform for evidence-grounded reasoning. Its objective is to transform natural-language claims into
structured, inspectable workflows where sources, assumptions, and inferential steps remain visible. Rather than replacing human
judgment, it aims to strengthen it through traceability, comparability, and explicit methodological control.
I have command execution delays
the moment someone pushes a SINGLE line that he didnt read, he should be fired
I could say it in spanish but its moderated
No, my title is "Senior Principal Software Architect", if I had to review every line of every project I oversee there would not be any time for anything else and I still wouldnt stay up to date.
Who gave you that title?
Besides they don't spend 100% of their time outputting code
you are a slopmaker and not a software engineer if you dont read what agent produces
Some C suite guy who made it up to justify my salary lol
Nice larp lil bro
bro is flexing corruption/nepotism π
Well this derailed.
get 2 more accounts
"codex run around and pretend you do something, wasting my companys money, so i keep my job by acting useful"
π
Surely itβs cheaper and more proper to start a team
Reading eery line of code is not necessary, large orgs have worked like this for a long time, AI makes it so that ANYONE can have the same throughput with a properly orchestratd agentic system that used to only be available to someone in a position to direct dozens of individual developers effort.
Can i contact your company real quick with screenshot of what you just said?
In my country there is a saying hahaha, don't defend a company in which you don't work. But what I really mean is, your comment is to expose someone or to help them do a better job?
You think this is some kind of statement but its not, it just reveals how little you know about how work happens.
I think the real claim should be "no single person reads all line changes". Everyone collectively reviews each line
my comment is to discourage the most braindead & dangerous practices possible
whats braindead though?
Itβs not a real company, donβt bother
thats not what he said, he said he doesnt have idea what he is pushing
yeah its probably just ragebait i guess
Itβs a larp
Haha
seems to have done the trick
Thats also not what I said... again you're imposing your own assumptions, its the same reason you kept arguing earlier. You keep overlaying this same assumption about your own workflows being the only correct way to work.
Cute
I wonder if thereβs a reasonable was to computer levels to say walk on from a screenshot alone
Like to do you avoid important content?
Could have like a little pet that wanders around
nohejutmine@ll
From screenshot alone though?
i made an extension wheres a little guy walking around my browser and mining parts of websites
no he actually breaks the website π
Thatβs evil!
Intentionally?
well tell that to bobby, he is currently mining you
love chaotic coding
yes bobby is intenionally mining websites, breaking them in process
who do you think has more experience: "ampro" on discord with the student role, or steipete (who works for openai now and founded real companies)
link?
@rocky parcel give me the "explain it like im 5 how you use attractor" my brain is a bit fired today apologies.
There are many, many anecdotes like this.
Theyβre the same person
I think it has to do on how much work you are supervising, but in infinite time, all lines are read
You create .dot files that define the graph that is a workflow, the attractor traverses the graph, taking action based on the nodes and edges, you can use the graph structure to define arbitrarily simple or complex workflows that compose and reference others. What it doesnt do is provide a UI for these things or triggers to start them.
Programming feel of big time
interesting... thanks!
he's built openclaw, got hired by openai, and has founded multiple companies. what have u done?
LMAOOO openclaw? the one FAMOUS FOR BEING TERRIBLY WRTITTEN?
the one famous for changing how companies look at agentic ai? meta, openai, anthropic, etc, are all building their own openclaws now lol
I mean yeah, this has been the weirdest thing to get used to. You could probably scroll back up to August 2025 in this channel and find messages where I'm like "I do the coding, Codex helps with planning and sometimes writes DTOs and boring code tasks." Few months go by and I totally do not write the code anymore.
xDD
show me your project with 100k github stars and no vulnerabilities ever, and then we'll talk
For someone who is so angry about AI generated code not being reviewed, you sure do rely on the robots to form a lot of opinions.
Where are you GitHub stars?
i review the code they write before pushing, thats the difference
"you" write. Edit: nice catch.
im not the one thinking im better than everyone who doesnt do exactly what i think is correct :)
Like youβre talking about one guy who one the lottery (who also happens to have poor habits) vs an average person
This is another assumption that makes no sense. "thinking i'm better than everyone" is exactly what you're doing btw, by dismissing all workflows that dont mirror yours.
donΒ΄t fight guys, people use your fights to retrieve data
no, they write
ai writes, i review and correct
because thats the only good and safe way to use ai
If the goal is to reduce black-box behavior, an explicit state machine is more useful than an attractor, because it makes stages,
transitions, and failure conditions inspectable.
True o not true? for Aquiles
Aquiles
I mean that's a good justification for you to stick with Plus! Sounds like you do not need more usage than what's already provided
There shouldnt be any black box in attractor unless you deliberately implement it in a way that doesnt record whats happening. edit: any further than any LLM based node is already a black box anyway.
It depends on the context though, right? You can write test cases and then just hope for the best
no.
it depends on when you
- i need the code to be safe: YOU MUST READ IT
- its for personal use it doesnt need to work: then sure
Also Iβm trying to point out how yours no longer arguing the point but the character of the person making it
try to use codex only to design and test, but if it doesnt work deterministic I don't accept the outcome
Valid
I know what "need the code to be safe" means, I've written C for...ever. And if you need the code to be safe you MUST PROVE IT. Reading it is not sufficient. Tested, provably correct code is the requirement for safety, formally verified.
and yet you say you dont even read it
reading is the bare minimum
I think conceptos and understanding of them is better that reading what you dont understand. Its not the same for the mind reading 1000lines than 5.
So efficiency also means reducing no necessary read
you still should read the code.
furthermore corrupted tokens are very common with some llms
read is necessary....
or otherwise you get api keys in front end
π
/* security measures here (TBA) */
is this a circle of trust? may i confess something
Verifying correct syntax and not using a lexer/parser? tsk tsk.
wont help with this
yes and in the same time no. Data not only shows with literal text, but also with key conceptos relations
you need to understand.... and to read
I if a write a million "a" line, and a phrase "Hi, my name is John". What info is more useful?
I don't copy paste, I type it off the screen
if you want to know the name
Thats why codex consumes more tokens when paste thousand of line instead of giving them a path
Because copy-paste is unsafe. I manually recompile it with my keyboard.
to a log doc
this is why you need to read the code
ai acts smart.
ai still lacks some common sense
I mean you can set it up to ensure success.
My methodology for running a whole bunch of agents is I supply an environment with a very strict process. The agents do not get to decide how code is validated and ran. Every commit undergoes static code analysis, integration tests are executed, memory leaks are measured using leaks or valgrind and passed back as commit failures. They are required to go back and fix it, and there are agents in charge of detecting drift by looking at their output contract and completion criteria.
They spend maybe 10% of their time actually writing code, maybe 30% researching the issue, and the remainder is rigorous reviewing until it meets the specification. I've put together tools to mitigate waste at every layer so 25 of my agents consume rate limits as though only 15 agents are running.
Why do it this way? Well, it's fun and I enjoy it. Could I do a single agent in a loop? Sure! But it's not fun for me and one agent to be completely honest would not operate as quickly as I would in most cases so in order to extract the most value I want more than 1 running.
pot...?
still doesnt mean you can push it without reading
That ratio is about what it is in professional environments also. Documenting, verifying, and general awareness of the problem space and reviewing prior work (researching) takes the bulk of the time.
if you think you can, then tell that to gpt and you will get humilliated quickly
You keep this double think going that the robots are simultaneously an authority on how work should be done but incapable of doing that work correctly without your help.
Your interpretation give AI answer meaning
but interpretation isn't literal
what if I want to provee that 1+1 isnt 2
So in standard arithmetic, itβs actually impossible to prove that β1 + 1 β 2β, because the axioms that define numbers (like the Peano axioms) lead directly to the conclusion that:
1 is the successor of 0
2 is the successor of 1
adding 1 to a number gives its successor
Therefore:
1 + 1 = successor(1) = 2
However, there are a few interesting cases where people say β1 + 1 β 2β:
Metaphorically: β1 + 1 = 3β in teamwork (synergy).
Computer arithmetic with overflow (limited bits).
Boolean logic where 1 + 1 can equal 1 (in OR-like systems).
Modular arithmetic, e.g. mod 2:
1 + 1 = 0
"ai is only correct when it agrees with me"
don't sweet it guys, we all have this coping mechanism when our position is threathened, self trust is a coping mechanism. Better to... focus on science
ai will absolutely replace us
but not yet
maybe in few months
its still not good enough to run unsupervised
cannot wait to never right/write a line of code again... there I said it!!! Phew I feel lighter all ready.
we are all part a of system. As humans need the living to live, AI needs someone to push the button
95% correct vs 99.99% correct is different
is a never ending cycle. human made the IA -- IA influence human --- human act different -- humana influence IA
change the word IA for technology, and its the same
ai is good enough to write code
the code often works
BUT
ai isnt good enough to make the code always secure
thats the issue
it absolutely will be soon, but it isnt yet
Humans arent either, have you ever even glanced at a security conference?
the difference is ai makes mistakes so stupid sometimes that human would see them
wednesday contains letter a
ironically a lot of agentic ai tools are being used to discover security issues in old projects written entirely by humans lmao
humans know that, ai fails sometimes
the problem with autonomous, is that in a long period of time possibilites increase, that doesnt mean they will always happen. But accelerates experiment
yeah
humans write bad code sometimes, ai writes bad code sometimes
ai should review human code, humans should review ai code
Β―_(γ)_/Β―
If AI writes bad code, who do you hold responsible?
the idiot who didnt read it before pushing
the thing is AI and humans aren't different, are secuential instructions given by a subject in the begginig
beggining
whoever signed the commit, if thats an AI? off to the shredder with it.
beginning
that
Please give us a Reset, please
Whatβs this?
codex usage
The idea of First Cause (or prima causa) is one of the classic attempts to explain why anything exists at all. It asks: if everything has a cause, what caused the very first thing? π€
- The classical formulation
The most famous version comes from Thomas Aquinas in his cosmological argument:
Things in the world have causes.
Nothing can cause itself.
A chain of causes cannot go back infinitely.
Therefore there must be a first uncaused cause β the prima causa.
Aquinas identified that first cause with God.
- Earlier roots
The idea already appears in Aristotle with the concept of the Unmoved Mover: something that initiates motion without itself being moved.
- Modern philosophical critiques
Later philosophers questioned the assumptions:
David Hume argued we cannot assume the universe needs a cause just because things inside it do.
Immanuel Kant said causality might only apply within human experience, not necessarily to the universe as a whole.
- Physics complicates it
Modern cosmology adds new layers:
The Big Bang theory suggests the universe had a beginning in time.
But quantum physics allows events without classical causes (e.g., fluctuations in vacuum fields).
So the question becomes deeper:
Is the universe caused, self-contained, or part of a larger system?
- My take
The idea of prima causa is powerful because it exposes a limit of explanation. Eventually every explanation hits one of three walls:
Infinite regress (causes forever).
Self-explaining system (the universe just is).
First cause (something fundamental that needs no cause).
Philosophy hasn't definitively resolved which one is true.
What app?
That looks nice
Iβve been thinking about getting a Mac but I wouldnβt know which it get
Get it! Macbook pro base model is plenty
ez, choose a form factor then max it out.
This looks about right
I was considering getting a few Mac minis and setting up proxmox
(a joke) but really, what form factor are you look at? The base model of any is reasonable for lots of categories of work. If you have specific performance requirements then you probably know them and know what component to pay more for.
@wide schooner a question,why codex lets you don't show snippets?
<pre> - Error al ejecutar:
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version GLIBC_2.38' not found /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6: version GLIBC_2.38' not found</pre>
shoes
well, time to eat breakgast
breakfast
are you working with production code, OR with personal use?
theres your answer.
investigation mainly
the air these days is also pretty good
especially great if you travel or commute
for sure, Boss has one very impressed.
codex works well in linux by the way
haha
ignorance is bliss. Can I send code here?
linux works well in old equipment
old equipment reduce costsΒΏ?
so i made my own operating system and it doesnt look so good can someone help me how can i design this
Neo looks cool yes...
Doubt
Figma, Paper, Magic Path, V0?
what?
Design Tools check out Magic Path and V0
any good example where you have given the same prompt to an average human and an ai and the ai got worse code?
thank you
"make an app that lists all days which dont contain letter a, use no if and simliar statements. hardcode values"
or make a code that draws a pigeon
full screenshot with vbox visible?
idk how can i check
give a subject sufficient time to develop a answer and probably could do it
I'm really confused, how does this get insecure? printf '%s\n' Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday | grep -vi 'a' β how did anyone get a security issue in there?
ehm, ok? There are issues in svg, if that's what you're refering to β¦ but β¦ really β¦ how?
without grep
no but did you try make an operating system trough codex its not fun
echo β I mean, there are no days (in english) without an 'a'. How will this get any security issue?
Are you doing it alone?
first one was this
it's still more fun than coding it by hand π
Reaaz
yes?
yes
Are you using green computing?
Haha, you messure energy consumption and time processes?
I wouldn't start with a GUI, if you are really trying to build an OS, start with a very very simple text interface, maybe just over serial. And then get the basics right, interupts, basic i/o, etc.
You can accelerate results capturing metrics
I vouch for this
should i restart?
What are you using?
I would try doing what @warm pilot says, but implementing green computing to capture process metrics
ok
do you want it?
the operating system
I don't want to discourage you, but building an OS is really a complicated task. It seems like you only have experience "seeing" OSs and most likely always with GUIs. You either need to read quite a lot about how systems work and then start from scratch again or you search for another hobby π βΒ but really, if you want to learn, please do. The world needs more low-level hackers anyway.
yes i see
codex can read for me
why not make your own linux distribution? not that that's an easy task but it will get you a good looking result quicker
and then you'll learn easier because you can study by doing and then bake your own based on that if you need
good luck π
i will try that
Doing LFS with vibes lol
LFV? linux from vibes?
Why do people love waisting their time?
You know why
Most really don't understand the complexity of these things. https://xkcd.com/1425/
But they think they do because I wrote le code (but codex did)
I think thereβs an emerging issue where people think that they are geniuses because codex wrote some code for them and it looks good on the outside, and people feel that they made it themselves
All men are fools
If you look to much into abysm, you can fall in it
you'll see when I make billions with my OS

