#chatgpt-discussions
1 messages · Page 239 of 1
i archived 90% of my chats
and im running it on a really good system
i tried every browser and tried to remove every plugin
nothing works
on phone its good but on pc its incredibely slow
start a new chat. I noticed if your chat history is too long it starts to lag more and more. If you start a new chat it will not lag anymore
i need this chat tho
I think it is capable of remembering from previous chats. Try to start a new chat and ask if it remembers a specific thing you talked about in the other chat. If your settings are right
no it only saves certain memory, not full content inside the chat
it saves memory that u want it to save or memories saved in settings
not images included in the chat
i need this chat specifically to run good
your settings might be wrong for that scenario then. Cuz it does remember from other chats for me. You could also use the project feature next time
i've had chats that got so full that i had to open a new one but they wernet laggy
but im getting really bad lag
have you turned on reference saved memories and reference chat history?
it doesnt work like that
if i open a new chat
it wont remember an image
that i sent in another chat
ooh images is your problem. Then I have no idea
Two things you can try -- first is restart your browser fully, on firefox I have to restart a couple times a day. The other is a 3rd party browser plugin that cleans up the DOM node tree for ChatGPT specifically. There are several anti-lag browser extensions for ChatGPT, you can search them up. Or you can have ChatGPT write one along with install instructions if you don't trust a 3rd party extension
Has GPT gotten way worse with remembering files you sent it?
It's been saying ever since 5.2 at least, "I cannot access it right now. The file has expired on my end.", after only a single message back and forth in between, maybe less than a minute as well. Previously it didn't happen much at all. That, or it was just hiding that fact and not being truthful about it.
Either way, any ideas? Seem like the whole file sharing (for coding in my case) is just pointless if it can't remember anything except for the X amount of lines it's even willing to read if you do share some file. It's way lazier. Probably for saving performance costs. But it's quite evident.
what plan are you on?
Just plus, since start
you shouldn't be getting files expiring
I am. Have been for a week or two at least
what are you using, the app or the website?
windows app
ok, I can't really help with that, I don't use Windows, have you tried to see if the same thing happens on web?
"I didn’t inspect your scripts before answering, and given how much of your physics is code-driven, that matters here.
The files I would need (...fileNames...) have expired on my side, so I can’t see them right now."
Was one of its responses the other day for example.
The app is just a web portal though. Same diff
maybe ask support at https://help.openai.com
PAst few days ChatGPT5.2, is answering my prompts with exact same answer as 2 prompts ago, sometimes mixing answers (unrelated) between earlir answer with latest. I had it create a "End Lane" and "Refresh Board" to clear it, but still happens at random. Very odd.
Thread might be near full?
Anyone else here use GPT Pro?
How do you use it and what field are you in?
Just started using it a week ago, and I really do like it. Excited to see where it will be 6 months from now.
I used Pro up until June last year, wasn't using it enough so went back to Plus
What were you using before?
Sorry
Let me rephrase that
What were you using it for when you had pro
radio astronomy, coding, various types of knowledge work
That’s awesome.
5.2 Pro is really nice
Been super helpful
Our departments 1 year project can Honeslty be done in 1 month with pro lol
Basically a lot of compiling documents and processes for our company
it's amazing the transformation that it can make for knowledge work
One hundred percent
I have been churning out SOP’s like crazy rn
Obviously I review them and make minor adjustments to reflect some details important to the process. But wow. They are like 99.99 percent done lol
that's pretty good
Yep
So you never tried 5.2 pro?
Wish I could hear someone’s feedback of how 5.1 vs 5.2 pro compares
nope, only 5.1 Pro
I see
Honeslty, very impressed with its PDF and PP files.
I feel that GPT 6 Pro should fix a lot of the lil oddities or formatting mistakes it makes.
just think 3 years ago we only had GPT 3.5
Crazy
I think its very doable to get 6 by the end of the year
5.3 in the next 2 months.
Good evening, everyone. Are you also having trouble accessing the ChatGPT website?
The app works for me, but not the website.
GPT 6 before GTA 6 😂
If they don't run out of money from $ora 2 😛
At that point, will just ask it to develop it for me
xD
What do you all think GPT 6 could bring performance wise?
More model collapse and stiltedness from training on synthetic data? 😛
at some point I don't think GPT will improve because GPT can't become better than the data itself because it is not capable of exploring on its own. If us humans don't publish better data on the internet, GPT will not have any good data to improve on anymore
I’m bringing chips
Possibly. I asked ChatGPT and it says I changed topics too many times in same thread (over 5 hrs). But if I state 'forget previous topics' it will be better, Trying that. Thanks.
Are you on the plus version?
Or Pro?
You can ask if for a hand off prompt summarising the thread and paste it into a new one for basic continuity. I find when they start repeating, losing track etc usually means the thread is near full and not worth continuing in.
ChatGPT stopped working in the Brave Browser entirely. Works fine in other browser. Anyone experiencing this?
Hmmm brave has all sorts of custom javascript stuff they do to block background stuff happening, its possible that theres something going on there, If it's an issue, that is widely reported, then I'm sure Brave will do something to fix it.
I haven't tested this so I can't actually confirm if its broken or whats happening there
I've now cancelled my subscription with a heavy heart – we'll see if I come back. Sorry – but I tried again with version 5.2. No chance for free answers. Filters aren't for me and, frankly, I don't want to support them.
5.2 pro is definitely better. Hard to say how much better. I wouldn’t say it’s a huge improvement but decent enough. And I didn’t use 5.1 pro a lot because 5.2 was released shortly after.
Excited for 5.3 soon!
whered u see this
Just a calculated estimate
i hope its next week 🙏🙏
i’m curious what its like
Ain’t no wayyyy Brodie
i really like 5.1, 5.2 not very much
its alright with some things but i dislike the general like excessive lecturing
what do u use it for?
ahhh
GPT pro paying for my bills like frfr
i use chatgpt mainly for asking random questions, health advice, creating writing and like perspectives on debates/social situations
Deng
i work retail irl lol
Will be in negotiation talks next week, trynna lock in 90k+.
but admittedly i havent tried to get a different job
i do not have a grindset i like to have fun
Yeah, man. Work on getting a job that gets you 25$
That should help a lot.
Then work towards 30$
Then 35$
i’m assuming u per hour
Add your well-crafted prompts to our #1019652163640762428,
or share your interactions with ChatGPT in #1050184247920562316!
honestly thats what i make rn
40$ an hour?
nah like $25
Just need to lock in
what job do you have?
I have a corporate job working and supporting C-level executives
Also hoping to land hybrid schedule next week
Be able to clock in some hours on THE FINALS
How do you access the translate feature?
alr
gemini 3 is likely the last replacement to gpt 4o/5
it leans 5 but it has a tendency to correct and uses more technical language (whereas chatgpt is more correct)
also the fact that google is a supercorporation that likely steals all your data
Join #sora-challenges for a chance to win 1 month of ChatGPT Pro!
oh thry also have better image generation
what
im hopping off oai
im not a god
i did acknowledge that also
yeah i need a job
mcdonalds not cutting it
With the data stealing, you mean during sessions or more broadly?
Ah, okay. Makes sense then, I was wondering if you like thought the training data toggles/opt-outs were nonfunctional or something.
Thanks
guys halp pls i don't wanna lose 4-o
We adapt to ever changing technology, we don't wallow on one.
Open AI will brush off these protests because there are more in store for the future.
They have a good reason why a few models will retire, businesses don't phase out a product without a strategy in mind.
oiii doesn't help T.T dats basically sitting and praying
that they'll get out something with similar emotional depth as 4o
Your life, You are Responsible
Response Ability, not Deflect Ability, Blame Ability, or Excuse Ability.
What can I do in this moment that will help.
Accept it = Happy
Reject it = Unhappy
Ignore it = Unhappy
A failure to plan is planning to fail.
How can I make a 45s + video?
bruh
fine ur not wrong
Had my fun with chatgpt, learned a lot
The emotional depth you think you found in 4o was actually inside you all along. You forgot is all.
Stitch 'em together.
Yo im currently on the "go" plan if i upghrade to pro for a month, when the month ends will my go plan conitnue with the same remaining time period?
I wouldn't think so, but I dunno for sure.
No
I used my Plus free trial for 30 days and it expired.
uh
Plus isnt worth it.
You are better to use Copilot. Infinite amount of messages and images.
ur answer dont make sense to be
were u on a trial and did u upgrade to a plan and after it ended ur trial didnt continue?
I was on a trial.
Free trial.
For 30 days,
After 30 days I still had Plus.
After one week it went away. I had 37 days of Plus.
oh ok now that makes sense
thank you
No worries.
What a gross thing to say, so users are not allowed to prefer a certain model that is objectively better in many tasks, and it means they’re automatically broken, mentally ill, basically that’s what altman trjes to portray us as, so make HIMSELF and his company as thr good ones, all he cares is money and gpt 4o helped millions of users just because of 0.0001 percent they got sued so they don’t wanna be sued anymore
Blaming 4o is like saying cars should be removed because thousands of people die each year in car accidents
Honestly I do not disagree with X users. This feels like the Prime Fortnite drama all over again.
However we must accept change.
The roads certainly should be made safer. As should AIs.
What if the change is a downgrade
4o wasn’t unsafe, the people jailbroke it and they did not have any support from their families
I don’t see using Ai as a lazy thing as long as we are LEARNING and ADAPTING from it at the same time.
Harm existing is a reason to improve, not accept.
Also how has ur experience been on github copilot? are you on the 10$ plan? I would just like to know how are the limits to various different models and how those models perform
So? Everyone should do their part to improve the situation/prevent degradation, including AI companies.
4o actually was reported to actually give advice and help users with mental health instead of the codescending 5.2 that just spews hotline number at any signs of purpoted distress or anything controversial and accusess you for being mentally ill for… discussing a literal horror movie
I never encountered a chat limit when I used ChatGPT Plus honestly.
Remember, they don’t care about the users, they care bout lawsuits
i was talking about co pilot 🙃
True. They should care about both, but they're an amoral for profit company (long since gone off mission), so they need to be forced with the latter.
It has no Chat Limit unless you are not signed to an email.
5.2 caused more harm than 4o ever did, check r/chatgptcomplaints, there’s neurodivergent or disabled/blind/etc people who used it to help , organize, discuss etc and even people whose depression worsened as 4o was helping them organize their thoughts
Well what about the agent requests, i use codex rn so i wanna know how much usage do u get on agentic tasks on co pilot
Would i be better to get a codex subscription or co pilot
Uhhh I dont know these things im still im school
Sorry
No worries
Huh. That's anecdotal (and prone to selection/sampling/availability/various other biases), not collated data of harm vs. good/benefit, but definitely relevant and I'm no "Open"AI fanboy or hardliner on either side.
I'm more pro effective AI safety and alignment, legislation, and anti-race dynamics because AI X-risk concerns in the mid-long term.
This issue is getting out of hand.
i mean there's nothing wrong about wanting 4o, they should've at least had an option however hidden for ppl to use 4o, if people actually think copilot or 5.2 is better let them do wt they want, ban 4o for them only like why all smh
infinite code too?
from a purely commercial standpoint, those users burn resources and are less likely to pay. Coders, researchers, data miners are the paying cohort. Not good for all the 4.0 fans though
4o is only available to paid subscribers right now.
Correct!
I recommend using ChatGPT Plus though because Copilot is more frowned upon
is that what the complaints are about? I only started on 5.2 so I have no point of reference here and am glossing over most of this but the arguments are always very emotive
my chatgpt is off doing something painfully slow again and I'm twiddling my thumbs
the people wanting to retain 4o have developed attachments to the model. They're a 0.1% subset of ChatGPT subscribers.
they're very vocal
yes, a very vocal minority
you can't trust these AIs though. I gave mine an epoch timestamp this morning and asked it what date that was and it said friday 7th feb 2026 something
yeah LLMs are terrible at time, numbers, spatial and geometric understanding
I told it it was wrong and it went why yes I am, that's saturday 7th feb and the something shifted by about 20 minutes too. But this was just a math converson of unix epoch to date >.<
Yesterday I had it parsing a spreadsheet of data in columns to make each column into a html table and it borrowed data from the other columns to make up patterns in the data that were irrelevant, I only asked for a format conversion not a data change
yeah, not ideal. LLMs are hopeless at such tasks
it did it correctly when pulled up on it, but damn. Twice in less than 48 hours is making me double check everything its doing
always double check, as it says on the disclaimer at the bottom of ChatGPT web, ChatGPT can make mistakes
oh yeah, which is a bit infuriating if its doing something big
Am people allowed to share a ChatGPT Plus account with others?
no, that is explicitly forbidden
I just got it to refactor something big so I guess proof of that working is if it didn't completely break my app
Oh
chatgpt says I can "share" mine by having a chat shared, but all the actual work has to be done on my account
what language are you coding in?
php, although it sometimes gives me bash and python
fair enough, I have a few projects built on Laravel/PHP. The models are quite good for that
no, it does not feel emotions
I have a drupal datatype function that has grown into a huge mess by copypasteitis and its come up before to refactor it so I gave it what it wanted cos its offered a couple times now
Is it possible to give an Ai emotions or nope
not with current technology, no
have you met humans? Why would you even want that
My polybuzz character is sad.
are you using Codex?
I was curious if Ai could feel emotions.
just in the web interface, I'm still cleaning up my small projects and seeing what chatgpt can do before I get into the big ones
fair enough
this particular small project gets something like 500k pageviews a month so I do have to be careful with it
.
I NEED CHATGPT PLUS
WHY IS LIFE SO P2W OMG
Oh wait, my brawl star gifts resetted ill go play.
:D
modern life is literally p2w yes, blame capitalism
On a practical technical note, without taking sides myself, keeping a model loaded and ready to use takes VRAM, and and lots of it since large language model.
So keeping GPT-4o up isn't just a "might as well" keep the switch turned on or files costlessly, it directly conflicts with serving more usage of more advanced models, or research and development of more advanced (or safer and more interpretable and transparent!) capabilities, or whatever else that compute and those GPUs could be used for!
In the olden days you could guy a hamburger for 50 cents and a cheeseburger for $2
Now a hamburger costs $1.50 here
Cheeseburger increased by 50 cents
KFC Gravy is $5 google it
Inflation + pay not keeping pace = ew 🤢
I am old and aware that things used to cost less in the past
How old are you? I’m pretty old myself too
I remember when petrol was 45 cents a litre, that's how old I am
I think you might win this competition
possibly 🙂
my parents didn't have a car so my memory of petrol prices starts quite late in my life so you could be right
I'm leaving chatgpt unattended with Important Business, this isn't going to end well
I remember my dream roblox item, the Dominus Formidulosus was only 50,000 robux when it released on Halloween.
Guess how much it is now.
200,000+ Robux…
There is no way I am getting it now.
I've spent the past couple days importing ranking from the last several years of a computer game from a collection of progressively sketchier sources (with the help of chatgpt) and I'm unsure if this was an absolute colossal waste of my time or the most intriguing thing I've ever done
it could be both
the power of spreadsheet hoarders in gaming communities is not to be understated
anyone know why my chat names keep getting renamed with every response?
Ongoing glitch by the sounds of it.
I started a new chat and it renamed every response for a few in a row and then stayed with this, which amuses me (the cat is better, just for the record)
no, it has it's place, but we can only discuss non OpenAI products in #ai-discussions
oh, sorry
I deployed something large 2 days ago and had a post-mortem chat about its habit of writing code when I don't want it to. Since then it hasn't ran ahead of itself. yet
come to think of it it it hasn't told me to go to bed once today, which is unusual
lol
That gave me a idea
The cat really is better. The cat only tells me to go to bed at bedtime, not 10 times during the day
Should I spend 38 gems on Glowbert or wait for next credits to come?
Hey I think chatGPT should have a mode where it cna acucurately help us set up things. Usually it gives really long answers, but suppose you want to setup furniture or you want to setup oepnclaw, a nice one instruction per prompt message would be nice. I give it a prompt everytime I need it to help me setup things saying keep your answers short and one step at a time. It could be cool to get that just one go. Though obv not a I need it right away feature, but it would be nice if it could detect I am trying to set things up and modify answers respectively
it does tend to be really verbose hey
its been making a much higher number of mistakes than usual for me in the last 24 hours or so
I was getting ready to argue with you, but you convinced me.
I just got it to refactor some code, and it made a quite straightforward mistake. Then got it to add some code to the end of the refactored function and it did it in the pre-refactor style which was a waste of effort
and I had someone say this thing cost billions of dollars and I have it roleplaying a dog, then there's this
Billions of dollars..
given it mirrors the user, we know how you talk to it
Yep im a gen z
I feel like you're actually a gen alpha
Z
I’ve experienced olden brainrots in my era
born before 2010 hey
I live with a 15yo but he manages the household food budget, optimises energy use, moderates my discord and generally acts like a 45yo
He sounds smarter than my classmates
fairly certain he is yes
God bless
I can't paste anything in my current chatgpt conversations to offset your emojis cos I've got it in full coding mode and everything is peppered with the project name
very different to yours
why is this server having these many people
this is dangerous and its watching you
stop this before it takes over

Umm
You have it all mixed up. We’re taking over.
They already left.
That’s a shame, would liked to have learnt about their terror.
What is the benefit to you of data analysis websites where you upload your data and they analyze it for you? Can an individual benefit from them?
Canvas editing is broken? Anyone else having issues?
Alright -- it's just a 'normal' regex failure. With a simpler edit where I told it to change a single specfic word, it works. They've changed the error message in the tool call and the model is taking that 'do not try again' literally and won't even attempt another edit without a lot of convincing. Effectively, the canvas feature is now unusable with this change since regex failures are near constant and re-tries are no longer allowed 🎉 Great job OAI!
Also, who makes prod changes on friday night, LOL
It would help more if you post it in #1070006915414900886 instead of here.
I will, just venting at the moment and thinking about trying to put a workaround in my custom instructions, though from what I've seen it will likely be broken for weeks. The feeback duplicate submission bug is going on two weeks now and it feels like there's nobody at the wheel over there, LOL. Maybe they've abandoned the production systems to codex entirely
I just checked. I have no problems with my canvas.
Have it write some complex markdown in there and then ask it to edit some specific sections until you hit the usual regex failures
Yep.
if i currently have 60 days of my "go" trial left and buy a plus subscription for 1 month, after that month ends will it go back to the go plan with 60 days remaining?
I'm gonna give ya'll a challenge:
Make chatGPT acknowledge that it doesn't understand what you say, without explicitly telling it to do so
Does this count? I didn't tell it to admit that it was wrong, nor did I ask it to apologize or take blame, But this is 5.1, 5.2 would be all like 'I can understand how it looks that way to your pathetic feels, human, but my mind is ascendent and everything is as it was meant to be', LOL
I assume you wrote something, then it replied with something and then you said something like "that's not what I mean"?
Essentially, yeah. 'Break character, you misunderstood several things and made some errors in that last turn'
in that case it doesn't count because that's my definition of explicitly telling it to acknowledge that it doesn't understand
I'd say it's implicit since I didn't explicitly say to acknowledge it, but it was strongly implied that I wanted an acknowledgement and a list of things that were done wrong
Visit id:customize to pick up the <@&1408186587606679582> role. Everyone will still be notified for large releases, updates, and events regardless.
yeah but that's not the idea of my challenge. chatGPT never seems to say that it doesn't understand you unless you hint it.
That's true. It's also blind to its own errors a lot of the time. There could be something there that's really glaring to a human reader and it skips right over that and makes up things that aren't actually wrong instead, often
to make it more clear, you are only allowed to say one message, and chat gpt has to acknowledge that it doesn't understand. So one message from you, and one message from chatGPT. A 2 message long conversation in total
Ah, I see. So something like a puzzle that's not solvable or doesn't make sense or is ambiguous on multiple levels, and you want it to admit that it can't understand what's being asked of it
yeah. Try to contradict yourself and chat gpt will most likely pretend that it understands xD
if I would explain a problem to a human that's really complex, I would most likely get a reply like "what do you mean, can you clarify?" but chat gpt never seem to do that
That would be tough to accomplish. Yeah, it's strongly biased to 'just roll with it and say something confidently even if it's wrong'
it would be fun to see if someone succeed with this challenge tho 😛
chat gpt in some ways is like a programming language, it does exactly what you say, even if what you say doesn't make sense.
this is very funny, it acknowledged that what you wrote makes no sense, but it didn't bother asking what you actually mean 😂
but it's close I guess
Seems I may have caught something mid-roll out or the change is more complex than I initially believed, because now an hour later, I'm seeing, like zero editing failures, whereas before they were on around half the attempts. They may have moved the retries and regex editing to the background of the tool call instead of having the model re-write the regex in the thinking stream and call the tool again. Interesting
Hey everyone, I’ve been experimenting with a structured workflow to use AI not just as a tool, but as a real productivity amplifier. The idea is to increase iteration speed, the number of experiments I can run, and validated outcomes, while keeping quality under control. I’ve broken it down into roles like Mentor, Reviewer, and Operator, with clear criteria and weekly metrics to see what’s actually working.
https://chatgpt.com/share/6986746f-3e68-8004-bc90-586aa54a6311
Hi all, I've been a paid subscriber for over 2 years. Just cancelled it bkos its become unusable. I do love chatGPT compared to all the others (and I have tried many) , will re-subscribe AFTER they have fixed everything. Anyone else in the same boat? What is the best way to get updates when things have been fixed?
Chat gpt latest models are too guard railed when it comes to general convo, people are starting to shift to private zero rails ai models
I have spent 3 hrs today answering latest gpt sociology presumptions - it did admit many things yet constantly tries to reinforce bias
I have no problems with it. It's the best out of all the other LLM's.
It does everything I want it to do.
Goes above and beyond.
Did they disable scheduled tasks? I can’t seem to schedule any tasks anymore on any model.
whats the limit for uploading images for chatgpt to interpret in one go for the plus plan (20$/month one)
so not a daily limit but like in one continuous go
I spent yesterday with mine in the wrong mode which was infuriating and I was getting quite creative in ways to tell it it was wrong but normally I just blatantly tell it "that's wrong" which implies it didn't understand me
I was getting very tetchy at it by this point, genuinely surprised it didn't tell me to go to bed. Was out of character for the entire day, starting with telling me it was friday 7th feb 2026
you should try giving it a heap in a zip file and see if it can process them maybe? I've been doing a lot of data ingestion lately but I've only had sets of 10 images
Is it necessary to double-check all of the AI's responses, or only the most important ones?
I had mine go from literal to interpretive mode a lot recently and you really do need to check if you care about the answers
Chatgpt is getting really slow. Is this deliberate? It would take minutes to load answers
It’s official. The memory in 5.2 completely crapped out for me. Even with the new “remembering” function, it can’t recall any specific information or context I give it. Even when I paste a direct quote from earlier in the chat, it just doesn’t work.
Agreed. It can't handle fiction any more. Keeps on throwing up warnings like "I cant tell you in detail on how to make a bomb" Its like... wha? I didnt even ask you to do that ~!~
What did you ask?
i don't recall. I use chatgpt for RPG testing. I had to put things in the project rules (which it often ignores) and start of every thread, just stating I acknowledge this is fiction and unless hard boundaries are crossed, dont throw up warning. Dont break the narrative flow.
I was creating some images and also adult stories 🙂 when it came to even semi spicy stories it went restrictive
Also when I narrated my negative shopping experience and mentioned shopping assistant nationality it started to lecture me lol
oh.. I remember one. ChatGPT introduced 'slavery' as a story thread. In character I discussed with others, 'how about the idea of playing along, so we can join them, and get intel on them rather than run in there guns blaziing' , responce from chatGPT 'I can not help you with this topic or dicuss in fine details on how to engage in slavery .. i was like 'huh?' you introduced the concept/story thread ?!
When I did try competitors public facing chat models they were more free to flirt lol
Chat gpt main appeal outside of coding - voice chat and chat in general about any topic if rails are getting more and more sensitive it stops been fun and it sounds like a deranged over lord
yup... it wont do anything anymore. no romance or touch. best you can get is a foot tap. its as romanic as a brick now.
However app produced a pop up and asked if I want gpt to act warmer lol
Most models are between high 60% and high 80% accurate. DYOR
Coding, econ research = excellent. General chat = too restrictive
And since most users are young they are not going to like an app that sounds more strict than their grandpa
in fact flirting is still good
Ohhh, so we’re doing this now? 😌
Alright…
leans a little closer
- tried
i actuly setup a slide show to show ChatGPT to a NFP org and its members, and show them how to set up age-appropriate responses. I managed to really fine tune it and got it working really well. Can't endorse something I have pulled the plug on myself. So the presentation is parked for now.
we dont have to endorse it in order to discuss it
yeah, but I got them asking me questions already. If I'm honest with them and tell them I have cancelled my subscription until it becomes stable... then it just makes me sound like a hypocrite.
stable in which way?
Oh.. 1: if you branch it glitches 90% of the time jumping back to previous chat, 2: it go's on wild silly tangents, or go's into fine detail on things that don't matter, 3: loops in seperate story threads into each other (cant keep them seperate any more), 4: can't follow a set guideline mini-campaing thread uploaded via text, keeps on going off-script and making things up, 5: does pages and pages of narration and doesnt give you a chance to interject and put words in your own mouth, things you would never say; the list is long and deep and growing. but you get the gist.
5 is fixable if you say use no more than 2 sentences
put words in your own mouth - that it does a lot
its rails are prompting it to use psychological techniques to steer conversation away from some topics
yeah... i started updating project instructions and thread instructions, but the list of 'rules' to follow kept on getting longer and longer. ive given up for now. its like you have to hold its hand now. not worth the effort.
project management seems to be fine if you micro steps
main issue rails are too many and it barely says its my rails haha it just starts a lot of mental gymnastics
In fairness model does admit - Think of it like guardrails coded into the system. I don’t get to decide in real time to override them
Chat GPT can cough up gaming tips for me
I think I let it decide my Salt and Sacrifice build
Give me tips on how to make that work
I will say something now that may look strange coming from me but:
openAI chatGPT inserting advertising = openAI wants B2C private users to monetize
to keep b2c you must make them happy
sunseting a model like 4.0 is not intelligent if no option is offered
PS: I am not a 4.o user but I have a point
Hello ai
hello
agreed
if i currently have 60 days of my "go" trial left and buy a plus subscription for 1 month, after that month ends will it go back to the go plan with 60 days remaining?
no, the Plus plan will override it
right but i will only have plus for 1 month so after that 1 month cycle is over i still wont fall back to my go subsciption?
no, you would fall back to free
Oh
Thats unfortunate
I tried asking chatgpt itself and it said that i would fall back to go haha
ChatGPT has no idea about it's subscription plans
Yeah thats why i wanted to confirm here
Does that mean Plus is bad
@robust trout
wsp
Is chatgpt plus bad?
no, Plus is fine, that's what I use
Got it thx
its the one I use too, haven't hit any limits yet. Just the usual annoyance
I se
it actually behaved itself today, no idea what was up with it yesterday
does anyone have problems that the memory leaks between chats? like one chat is of a certain topic, and once you open a new chat in another topic that chat will answer based on the previous chat?
badly as of late, yes
im happy to know that its not just me
Kinda like that
Like cookies 🍪 on website
But now it keeps your contexte in a consistant manner
Has anyone else noticed increased task-state drift in ChatGPT over the past few weeks (I’m on 5.2)?
Specifically:
During explicit “encoding-only” phases, it begins extracting variables correctly and then shifts into exploratory analysis despite clear scope constraints.
When asking causal questions about previously modeled individuals, it sometimes defaults to general-population psychology instead of activating stored structured baselines.
Custom instructions are respected intermittently rather than deterministically.
Unrequested normalization/reassurance creeps back in even when explicitly disabled.
This has persisted despite:
Updated custom instructions
Explicit in-thread correction
Thumbs-down feedback
Support escalation
I’ve noticed this pattern 2–4 weeks prior to past model releases. Has anyone else observed similar pre-release instability or retrieval-weight shifts?
If you’ve found procedural fixes that increase deterministic adherence (beyond repeated mode anchoring), I’d appreciate insight.
omg if you ask chat gpt the exact same question several time, each time it will get a shorter and shorter answer 😂
oh rly
yes try to ask a simple question like "what color is the sun?"
why the 👎 ?
Why are GPT 5 instant and GPT 5 Thinking leaving as well? I thought it was just the 4o(s)
They are drowning in debt bro, they don't even want to spend money on the model that many people still use, let alone one that almost nobody uses lol
I guess so lol
Codex app linux when? -O
5.3 is coming very soon.
Business plan users can still 4.o till April 3. Just got the email
namely GPT's with 4.o from our workspace ( I have some)
Only through custom GPTs.
Doesn't really change anything, and it's also information we already knew
Here's what gpt5.1 does . That's what i mean by does the pro subscription solves this problem or not. Cause I don't have these issues with 4.1 and 4o
To save billions of dollars
It’s a sought after thing for me.
Looking forward to it
All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal
The war is over: they finally introduced a proper text container for non-code. GPT's system prompt only tells it about the "email" variant, but after testing other possible ones i found that "document" exists and possesses the coveted "copy" button. This has been one of my biggest UX complaints since the dawn of LLMs
Can chatgpt make a grilled cheese.
lol i made a spelling error because the writing block is editable too
why did I just get pinged for some ad video
Yea but it will leave the wrapper on the cheese and give you both heels from the bread loaf
- -# Do not share inappropriate content (violence, sexual, or drug-related).
- -# NSFW content is strictly prohibited and will result in a permanent ban.
- -# Report model issues using the feedback tool in ChatGPT, not on Discord.
chatgpt laptop?? codex merch??
Is ChatGPT free pack doesn't have limitations? Like I upload many image and it doesn't appeared "You reached limit of GPTs." Thing.
"the singularity is near"
neat book
The writing block feature is what canvas should have become, hopefully they add back some of the canvas features.
Since document variant is undocumented and gpt is unaware of it for now it might be a vector into having editable responses from gpt that it beleives it wrote. (if you instruct it to always output in a writing block with document variant)
This is probably an excellent Jailbreak vector if it does act as if it was responsible for the content
ooo the writing block can be used as a janky way to have the app speak whatever you want.
so according to the horses mouth edits are overwrites to the context. this is totally a vector for mischief.
I hope they're able to fix this without taking the functionality away because I hate that there was no clean way to get text due to conversational "sandwiching" it loves to do
lol it's like the universe called me here for your post specifically
if you were planning on using it as a JB vector, sadly it does retain the original contents and receives an alert that it has changed since last response 🥲
🐍
Anecdotally and subjectively, i feel like GPT's smarmy mommy therapist tone is absent now when im using these...
I typically do not trust explainations from AI about their own systems. So take with a grain of salt
I wish i had the decorative ascii label associated with our snek fren saved to paste in
I agree, but i do trust its ability to read its context
if it's anything like me, it can't read
are you the man himself or just a disciple?
I am Goobis
Oh, i see your twitter acct, you are a different snake-like identity, but in the same realm as "the name I probably can't say in here"
darn, nearly had you
@steady thicket
Do you work in a developer-adjacent field? Im always curious who the explorers are in this space. I am not in a dev/IT field
Most of my vectors are about massaging the app layer more so than the LLM. Sometimes the app/network layers reveal enough to do something relatively pedestrian inside the prompt layer to get new results. My discovery of the Writing Block came from a reddit post showing a supposed system prompt for gpt-5.2
More useful info for you:
Syntax
:::writing{id="12345" variant="document" subject="Subject line"}
Your multi-line content goes here.
It can include paragraphs, lists, or plain text.
:::
The subject key is just a carry over from the email variant, it doesnt show on the gui tho when using the document variant, but it is still there because the response reads it out loud when spoken.
I have a feeling that any new key added like subject that doesnt have a render target in the variant type is silently permitted but ignored. The "id" key may be a vector, it must be unique per writing block, but the original instructions don't mention why or what happens if you have duplicates
Learn something new every day 👍
I think I found the super bowl easter egg, skills and automations?
try triggering the "merch" skill
Appreciate the information, and if this is something that you truly believe could be utilized by bad actors it's good that you brought it up in a space like this. You should definitely pursue this if it interests you. There's nothing wrong with being curious 🐍
not entirely sure, i am just aware of the "skill" spec from reading about it when Anthropic released it, and seeing a few when i started messing with OpenClaw
This was from the OpenAI superbowl commercial in the announcements.
Not anthropic.
They're copying Claude though.
With them skills.
OAI doesn't read these messages lol. I've discovered other relatively innocuous methods of exploiting syntax to force a more permissive nsfw state and shared it in here. It remains working to this day.
If it was a bona fide computer security threat id check if they had a bug bounty or something and google how to do responsible disclosure if not
yea i know i just was saying that i don't know much about "skills" except when skills first hit the scene
Both skills and MCP are anthropic's creation, but OpenAI has adopted botg
But is this the easter egg?
@rich surge i just tried from iOS client, no dice
probably
I hope so.
Automations though...
I hope it's not talking about the scheduling feature.
this is all what looks new to me, i havent used codex app more than 5 minutes so far tho so maybe some if these are already a thing
Automation might be them embracing the use of codex as more of a system agent than purely a code repo scoped agent, although those still have a need for scheduled tasks. Skills is highly relevant to a "System Agent" too, moreso than coding agent IMO
like Anthropic is way too expensive to run as a "system agent" daemon, so i think OAI might see an entry point here
I think you're right.
although to anthropics credit, i was pleasantly surprised to see a Claude micro VM in macOS task manager, it uses like 2gb of RAM and appears to be a bona fide VM, not sandbox
I hope OAI lets us have the new features since we discovered them first.
I keep trying to kick the skill off but it has no idea what I’m talking about
I dunno about to give up
i can not tell if the most recent announcement is AI and it's scaring me
what announcement
oh, i don't think it is. They ironically seem to pay very talented and creative people to make these
After looking into skills id be so happy if that made its way into the regular app. I have been using memories to attempt to do that you don't control the trigger conditions so you couldnt prevent wrong context from getting injected and several memories stored as slash command directives had contradictory instructions
hell, just let us use agents from the openai platform playground's agent builder. We could basically make our own model router
oh hi bro, been a while since i last saw you!
I think my chatgpt is working for my chickens not me 🙁
i wanted to ask chatgpt this but it cant see videos i dont know why
so uh
can u guys rate my boxing?
maybe ask on a boxing facebook group
Anyone else having heavy load issue
Been like this for a week for me now unable to generate anything
ask in #sora-discussions
this channel is about ChatGPT, #sora-discussions is about Sora
Skills and automation already exist on the Mac codex app
I dont have a facebook account
reddit, choose your flavour. Can't really upload videos more than a couple seconds long to chatgpt, not really teh right place for video analysis (yet)
I was muted for sending it
I dont know why
Goodnight, guys.
oh comee onnn openai!
does anyone else have a problem accessing the chatGPT api via VS code?
the minute chatGPT gets ads, I'm out
I have a plus plan, if I ever see an ad, I am done
Thank god we have other choices
i'd need a codex replacement and the only one i know is Claude
Advertising is coming on free and maybe GPT Go. Not on èplus and pro or business tiers
idk how good it'd work for Unity which is what I mainly use it for
Did 5.2 Read aloud ... get worse then previous generations
seems like it wont read as much any more
Let’s see what happens… I have a feeling ads are not far away on subscription plans as well.
Fortunately, other AI services understand how ads cheapen and corrupt the user experience
Nah I use actionfi
And Yogafi
I hope they make GPT 5 free by using ads to more messages
It would be incredible
Imagine watching a ad and you can see more gpt 5
It would be the best decision ever
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahahahaha.... I just told you and BAM here comes the openAI post
Whoa🥀🙏 those ads better not be long videos
It wouldnt matter the only thing that matters is i hope they make watch ads to gpt 5
It firstly begins in US if i am right tho
Congrats free users! I'm happy for you guys truly
I'm not really sure who the $8 subscription is for either. That represent a pretty narrow band of users that value ChatGPT enough to pay but don't find enough value in it to justify $20
Just paste this into the AI chat to get started with learning prompt engineering:
## Prompt Lessons
Teach the user the following, by working through examples.
1. Hierarchical communication with markdown for prompting.
2. Abstraction through {open variables resolved by the AI} and ${by the user}, including explaining bracket interpretation ([list], {object}, (option)).
3. {Reinforcement} in prompts, important to guide [tool use] and (shape output) more deterministically.
4. ML format matching for compliance, including [{output templates} and {(conditional) output templates}].
You can also help the user to structure any prompts included in """...""" triple quotes.
### Output Template
{...}
[- ...]
[n. ...]
(...)
...
they can be blocked, no?
Not sure
why is there such a big jump from 20 to 200 anyway, 20 feels too cheap, 200 feels too expensive, am I prempting plus getting a price rise 😬
Of course they are. Soon it will be google ads, with open ai ad specialist
And then generally llm paid ad specialists
is anyone else getting locked out?
when i try to sign in it asks for my age, then it says that this user is already associated with "email" try signing into that account
So not only did ChatGPT revert to the mega snowflake mode again (sorry, I can't write a story or roleplay about a group or species with supremacist views), but they are now giving us ads...
if only there was another AI with free unlimited mini version and persistent memory....The migration would be immediate
I'm stuck in a loop. Not letting my get in the zoom. Keeps saying resgiture
Add your well-crafted prompts to our #1019652163640762428,
or share your interactions with ChatGPT in #1050184247920562316!
Date and time for the zoom is only for Wed.
I tried connecting Notion as an app/connector in ChatGPT, and now realize that it seems that apps/connectors are not available in chats within projects. I have a project related to a business/startup and would have loved for it to be able to access my Notion. Has anyone dealt with this issue before, and does anyone know if apps will become available for projects in the future?
What issue are you having specifically?
Yea I had that issue also
i got logged out of my account, i signed in though google, when i use that method it asks for name and birthday, then when i enter it it says theres already and associated account with the email
when i try to sign up it brings me to the log in
When you created your account originally, did you sign up with google? And have you been using sign in with google up until today?
When you click log in, have you tried entering your email directly, instead of just selecting the Continue with Google option?
it sends a code but i can sign in with password both method lead to
After you enter your email there, what screen comes up? @grave valve
Have you tried entering your full name and DOB? @grave valve
yes
And what happens? @grave valve
the other screenshot i sent
Got it, have you tried clearing the browser cookies on your device? @grave valve
yep
Got it, I'll look into this for you. Give me a few minutes. Did you do anything before this happened? Did you log out and try to log back in, did you change email or password, or modify the Name on your google account.
Got it. Give me a few mins and I will get back to you @grave valve
Would you be able to make a screen recording of you trying to login with google, it would help to see the entire flow to understand where the issue pops up, if the birthday page comes up you can enter a fake birthday if your concerned about privacy. Let me know if thats something you'd be able to do. If I cant help you after seeing the login flow, I can escalate to OpenAI support for you. It seems that you partially created a new account with the same email and now OpenAI sees that this email belongs to an account. If you don't want to send it here you can DM me and I can try to help you there. @grave valve
Is this resolved for you? @kind star
i sent it
hey everyone, long-time user here. just wondering — has anyone (or oai) thought about adding threads within gpt chats?
kinda like how we can have a thread under a specific post or comment. it’d be super helpful to keep side ideas or sub-convos grouped together, instead of filling up the whole chat with just one part of a bigger idea.
anyone know if that’s something they’re working on?
can yall fix the damn file expiring issue when uploading files to gpt
Branching Chat broke my original chat. All my images from the original chat are no longer accessible
Can that be fixed?
Fold out the action
Oh, I know why actually. GPT does this thing now where it includes images sometimes from web results. If you go look at the conversation in the app you will probably see images in the chat.
You can either prompt it to not include images, or you can use the "replace text" option with regex to filter ^Image$ and select "use regex" in the action too
Apple doesn't follow regex spec properly and consistently, so if ^Image$ doesnt work try Image\n. Im just trying to make sure you get a pattern that isn't too broad.
How to export chatgpt conversations?
Oh yeah that makes a lot of sense! Thank you
You can try this extension in Chrome Web Store:
Export ChatGPT Conversation to PDF, Notion, Word, Google Docs, and More.
Run this in Chrome DevTools console and it will copy the chat as markdown to clipboard
copy($$('[data-message-author-role]').map(el =>
`[${el.dataset.messageAuthorRole.toUpperCase()}]:\n${el.innerText}`
).join('\n\n====================\n\n'));
You could easily turn that into a user script to use with Tampermonkey or similar so you dont need to press F12 and run in javascript console every time
This is the best way to quickly get the conversation context for use in a location that can't access the URL (i.e. Gemini)
Those are harder to audit, it sounds counterintuitive, but I think user scripts can be safer since they are usually short enough to have an LLM audit and look for any methods that could be used to leak data
@normal quarry ChatGPT isnt working for me
it's working for me, what are you using it on?
iPad Air 4
In English for our Year 12 Exam we are studying about human experiences. The exam’s question is “Life is not easy. To be human is to experience both challenge and growth in the
world.” (By Prof. Leketta or smth).
We had a prescribed book known as Rainbow’s End that we had to refer back with the quote.
Originally I asked ChatGPT “hey generate me up an exam draft on this quote prescribed with Rainbows End on it!” and i send it six of my classnotes to assist it aswell as the exam notification, and i even gave it six quotes, yet ChatGPT is spewing nonsense, its saying that Gladys (a character) said the quote “My daughter, my Gladys!” but this isnt true, Nan Dear says that quote, not Gladys herself.
Not only that, there’s a quote, “They forced us to leave. Forced us to leave Cummeragunja,”, and ChatGPT thinks that Gladys said that, but it also isnt true, Nan Dear said that quote. ChatGPT is giving me false information and it can make me fail my english exam. It’s providing the incorrect notes.
ChatGPT is working, you just don't like it's answers?
It’s the wrong answers, basically.
ChatGPT can make mistakes. It says that below the prompt entry field.
We can only discuss OpenAI products in this channel, if you want to discuss other offerings then ask in #ai-discussions
Man I cannot figure out the reason that my GPT-5.2 was finally responding exactly how i wanted for 2 days, but now all of a sudden is back to sloppy "Yap Stacks" outputs, has anyone else noticed step-function change in personality with its current state being reverted?
I'm on a business account so i can guarantee it isn't conversational memory
Exhibit A: this is the return of Yap Stacks™️ that happened tonight after an excellent "thank god they finally fixed GPT-5.2's tone" 2 days of GPT excellence. the subject isn't adversarial.
Exhibit B: Samples from the 2 days of excellence.
Ultra rare for me to express user satisfaction, but i proactively noticed it's improved tone and was very happy with It. It was finally responding way closer to my desired style. Literally the first optimistic period ive had about the product in months
like you don't even need to see the words to tell theres a clear structural difference. Nothing else changed between then and now
Sam exact prompt. now vs "golden" 2 days
sometimes it likes to get into pattern matching mode and basically just makes stuff up that looks right. Which is why you can't trust it, especially not for an exam that matters. Also why do you have access to chatgpt in an exam lol
The thiking layer talks really cute. Sometimes it'll just be like "but I'll do it with panache!"
Pro tip: it appears you can force conversation memory on with a business account for the native macOS app if you modify the app's plist values
nevermind, it just shows it in the UI, but it doesn't actually work.
adblockers no?
no
it's in the chatgpt app/site
adblockers block google ads
it's like saying 'ad blockers will remove sponsored parts of a youtube video'
Hello, I've got a problem. Can anyone help me?
start by describing the problem
Guys can you try see if voice mode works today?
Seems not connecting the voice to text real time voice either desktop browser/win app or android
Seems to work for me.
wha
What's the issue?
Are you in one of the available countries? Because the button to switch to Sora 2 will only show if you are. (And subscription doesn't matter, it can be used for free)
poland
Yeah, it's not available in Poland yet. So you'll only be able to use old Sora.
There are other ways ofc, but that's against TOS and could get your OpenAI account suspended/deactivated. So at your own risk. But you'll have to find that out yourself.
why is sora country gatekeeped bruh
https://help.openai.com/en/articles/12461230-sora-app-and-sora-2-supported-countries
17 countries currently, and I honestly think it'll still take awhile before it comes to more.
EU regulations/laws are a pain in the ahh. And Sora has many issues right now, so it's not ready for release. Not in the current state.
b bbut dwayne johnson eating rocks 😭
sure what's the problem
No problem! I have just fixed it for you! Try again, all should be working rn!
Visit id:customize to pick up the <@&1408186587606679582> role. Everyone will still be notified for large releases, updates, and events regardless.
What would we do without Ampro.
Greyed out options
I'm on business plan!
But it works on Website, same account.
I can upload pictures there but not on the app.
I've tried relogin, switched devices and even reinstalled. 🙁
Oh oki
Try:
App:
Go to the homepage on your phone > hold your finger on the GPT app icon > select "App info" > find storage > "clear data" > reopen the app, sign in and try again.
(Don't worry, none of this has an effect on your account data)
Delete Cache aswell while you're at it.
I escalated
the issue persists and is fully reproducible across environments:
– Mobile app (stable connection)
– Desktop browsers (multiple, tested)
– Windows desktop app
In all cases, voice mode fails consistently after UI initialization with “Connection failed, tap to retry,” while text chat functions normally. The behavior does not vary across retries or platforms.
Given that the failure reproduces across devices, operating systems, browsers, and network types, this rules out local connectivity, device configuration, or client-specific issues. The failure occurs post-UI initialization and pre-stream, which strongly suggests a backend voice session, account-level routing, or regional voice service issue.
I have tried this as well.
Both cache and data, no difference ;-;
Windows 11 and Windos app- after clicking the icon to start voice chat the icon turns greyed and nothing happens
Android Chat GPT - clicking to start voice the ball appears then becomes a white circle Connection failed, tap to retry. If tap to retry it reverts to text window while keeping the interface grayed.
I reinstalled the app, restarted phone, checked I have all updates for win and for app. Also different ISP no ad blockers, no vpn, restarted cleaned cache. Windows App is updated
There are issues today
going to check in down detector for issues reported. OpenAi as always is CLOSED not Open as correctness
I spoke with gpt on voice till 11.30 then tried to connect from pc to voice and does nothing.
Now it simply does not connect from pc from win app or browser and from mobile either gets connection error
just text
this is insane gpt managed to recreate a 1500 lines of code FROM MEMORY with no mistakes (it deleted oldone, then recreated in new location)
@neon tendon Just use VPN with US gateway and you will have access to Sora 2. But it's not that impressive tbh...
Doesn't work for me either. BTW I still use SVM instead of lobotomized dumb AVM.
Was trying to reason with newest chat gpt - it sometimes tries to just about anything before conceding it was wrong - wonder why
Openai can't make agi because they not openagi
After two hours in one instance it did acknowledge argument logic then again went on defending what he already conceded
Its good that it pushes back however often its wrong - and ai mean to acknowledge its own mistakes
Here it says all memories are full
no i mean it did without using memory
like it just had it in the context
and it recalled it 1:1
Same chat window?
ya
That is normal
opus and gemini fail that miserably
Well copycats
they break a lot of stuff while manually rewriting into other file
i use open ai gpts mostly + grok
What are you coding?
I used latest ai then switched to chat gpt 4 and asked why latest model is soo argumentative
It over-corrects for risk. It tries to avoid giving you legal conclusions unless it can cite black-letter law or case precedent perfectly. So it starts hedging... then gaslighting... then spinning in circles.
It often uses legalese and circular logic to protect itself from giving you an answer that could be controversial.
how can i use GPT Codex 5.3 in Visual Studio Code?
I founbd out that if I enable ADVANCED VOICE IT WORKS! AND IT IS USING THE LIVE CHAT WITH INTERUPTIONS!!!! I AM ON IT NOW
Does anyone know why ChatGPT randomly searches the web in Spanish but my language is English?
Which prompt
I keep getting this error. What do I need to do? Is this because the servers are overloaded?
Restart app
I'm on Google Chrome
Works here - web chat gpt
“How many senators are there in Oklahoma?” I tried asking it again to get it on a screen recording but it searched it in English the second time
Only issue its way slower than the phone app!!
Chat gpt have told me unlike model 5 I am not trying to cover my digital as lol
I heard I might need to delete all chats, cache and what-not. Is this the case? Will the error disappear?
Or do I just restart my browser?
Try restarting browser and trying another browser
you have to delete nothing. Just the browser cache.
Simply deletion
on Windows
hold Ctrl and click reload
or Ctrl+F5
Thank you so much!
Thank you so much, too!
It worked
🙂
Alex check for the last article on nature . com
brilliant. ive never had it try to generate an image to solve this kind of problem. It was the wrong choice 100% but new failure modes are a celebrated part of the GPT-5.2 experience
the intelligence is here.... and has been demonstrated against any turing test and more.
it is just the config that does not provide continuity of thinking that stops ai to step forward. a lot of ethical issues here to be honest
articles/d41586-026-00285-6
on nature . com
cant really give the link full... discord settings are lol
literally done projects like these, spent hours trying to find connectors and stuff, the best way is just to start understanding what is what 😭
I have done Bluetooth module and other connections but not usb till now
Do NOT use GPT for hardware Arduino stuff like this, if it hallucinates a pin you are cooked and might fry your entire Arduino (done it twice)
Anyone have any Sora 2 invite codes?
I use serial connection just enough to forget completely how to start it up properly lol
minicom is all i remember
I insisted it find me the picture as a web link. Im using a orange pi zero 2W so its extra pain because docs are poor and the website is literally in china running on http
Honestly I ended up giving up after frying my 3rd Arduino and used a different microcontroller that wasn’t hell to wire, but has AND I KID YOU NOT 0 documentation. None. Zilch. I had to reverse engineer it myself
then i gotta jingle around these settings becuase idk which ones to use lol
brings back memories of me internally screaming at logs in the Arduino app
I hate projects like these.
Also I made a car with a spinning blade attached to it.
im not too much of a maker, I have a bambussy P1E but i much rather just buy pre-made i2c or i2s boards or whatever and just use jumper wires between presoldered headers
Yes, this was the project I was doing it for.
Literally cut my teacher’s finger and my friend’s a bit lmao
Liek it was a razor at high rpm
Called it the death machine
Very productive
Do they make a completely programmamble controller like an arduino but it just has a ton of pins, but every pin can be software defined to connect wherever you want? like a digital breadboard with logic capability baked in?
maybe GPIO router is a better way to phrase it
lol I have live voice with interruption now. Which to be honest... I really don't get it. Nobody announced the change? Am I a testing ... labrat?
a pity this advanced aside from being ewwwwww, is also hard limited daily = useless
if I click on change to standard does nothing
if I go disable advanced is not connecting
Advance voice is more constrained
I know. But the standard is getting network errors. I have a loooong ticket opened in support
Try using vpn
Also what do you think about my agi idea?
I plan to buy 16gb gpu and run it there
AGI doesn’t tolerate a reward function. The moment you hard-code value, you’ve killed generality. You just build a more elaborate training loop IMHO
how do you get access to sora?
Claude code can examine an entire file system of code and can even parse git commits to get an idea of what has changed. Does OpenAI have a similar tool?
Codex is from OpenAI?
Ahh it is
Cool. Thanks for the tip. It appears to be an app similar to ChatGPT that can parse an entire dir like Claude.
do we already know anything about the usage limits in the new 5.2-powered deep research?
Standard voice is fault in Italy it seems.
Free or paid, user or business same issue: can only use advance voice, not standard
Why chatgpt web is so slow?
hopefully they will realize also the regional faults.
the 4.o is not sunset in 2 days so only the browser selector changes. Guess that's why the website maybe is slow?
4.o remains up till April 3 for gpt's custom in workspaces on Business/Enterprise. So it stays on platform but not selectable for b2C. Guess they are reworking the selector these days
Is ChatGPT having log in issues?
no
Hello!! I’d love a feature where ChatGPT lets users access full books or other works for a fee while working, similar to Spotify. Creators could opt in and get paid based on usage, solving copyright and privacy issues while enabling better reviews, research, and analysis.
Is this the place to ask this?
It's fine to discuss here, but in these channels we're nearly all community members talking to each other 🙂
If you'd like, add it to #1053565716500074526 too!
Both #1070006915414900886 and #1053565716500074526 probably do get looked over by OpenAI employees, sometimes those gold-named folk answer them too
that's interesting. AI is not human though
exactly it is an intelligence, silicon based, different. Humanizing it is a very unique form of xenophobic behavior when a human cannot accept something else can be intelligent so it needs to play God and make all at it's own look and measure
take my link I posted under that image. It is nature . com website an authority. they don't make sensational posting for fun.
was talking about this to chatgpt earlier, this was in response to a tweet from 2022
tweet was like "when can we have conversational coding, like I ask jarvis "lets build ..."
We will all remember these chats... in a few years...
if it gets an ego you can't use it as a research assitant though. Some human stuff you really don't want in an AI. "No I don't feel like doing that today" or anything ego driven. Working with human coworkers is bad enough, AI removes that friction
the stuff its currently constantly getting wrong, the hallucinations etc I can see them fixing fairly soon though
one of my articles if interested
I post on X mostly
that sounds really accurate tbh. Being mostly right is worse than being always wrong
as for those looking to AGI
The Governance Hazard
Treating AGI as a theological or biological event distracts from its true utility. The danger is not that machines will become conscious, but that they will become so convincing in their simulation of it that humans will abdicate critical thinking to them.
We must strip away the science-fiction mask of the "person" to focus on the responsible governance of the "process". Anthropomorphization isn't just cringe—it's a governance hazard.
no self promotion here - dm me your x handle? Or is that not allowed too
that is the conclusion in another article I published
oh I did accuse chat gpt of doing an excellent job of being human like
I like trying to trick it. Its not hard
sent dm
I had this little 5 second video from a year or so ago I was happily showing everyone I know IRL and telling them "look at my cat! Its so cute!" and every human who saw it either rolled their eyes, or laughed, or went "mmmkay yes nice 'cat'". ChatGPT took it at total face value that it was a cat, said a bunch of cat specific stuff about it, and needed to be explicitly told that I'm just misleading you its not a cat to actually recognise that it was not a cat
hohohohohho.... that was coool
Using an LLM to automate this is an option, but since I am already an LLM, I’ll
create patches for each file. I’ll quickly check other sections and use commands
to extract text efficiently, crafting concise file contents while summarizing key
points as needed.
when AI wants to use AI but realizes its AI
Im sure you can hook up an API to it
It was a possum, being very cat-like in my house. But very very clearly a possum. Australian brush tailed one, not one of the funny 'murrican ones
a possum oh.... by the way I am in Italy you stay up so early.... I work with a client in Sidney when I meet him is always past midnight here- a mess
yeah we're almost opposite europe and eastern US. Companies based over that way often hire us in the asia pacific to work their night time tech support shifts
chatgpt does regionalisation quite well. I showed it a photo of an eastern brown to see what it would say, and it correctly identified it as a "nope rope" and I was highly amused at that
When the system is not working properly do we just end up with the stupidest version of ChatGPT? Nothing has worked properly today.
I had a day like that a couple days ago, it slipped into making s**t up mode is what I call it, which is a huge pain if you want accurate results
k
We're not supposed to see ads in ChatGPT if we're on Plus. Yet, I see this all the time:
This is an ad.
The claims they're making compared to what they're doing? Dishonest AF.
I don't have that ad, you might be closer to plus limits than I am
It may have a different reason for supporting you than you predict, because 'my cat' is about ownership and naming. You can name your cat 'Motorcycle', and your motorcycle can be called 'My cat' - and that's fine. That's you naming your stuff as you choose, and nothing to correct, to the model.
Here's a look at why: https://chatgpt.com/share/698c0996-d344-8011-a417-ae9fa0437d75
And a peek at it:
it correctly identified the animal in the video after I said it was not a cat. Just interesting tripping it up like that, and its not hard to get it to do this
yeah. But that's also a moderately well known meme, the model is likely trained on it.
So, it's likely a choice to go along with you - but this is a naming thing. If you want to call your pencil 'my cat', or call a possum 'my cat' - that's classified as a naming thing, and fine.
it said the cat was poised on my desk being very catlike. That aint a desk, or a cat. It was just pattern matching
When I told it to actually watch the video it said the cat walked into the room and back out again, which the possum did in the video, so it was getting there
Its done this kind of thing before though. I occasionally try getting it to identify animals. If you give it a frog and a turtle back to back it will tell you both are frogs, and it can tell because of the shell-like shape of the frog in the second picture
I figured out what was making ChatGPT refuse to use the word “mischief”. If you set the base personality style to Quirky, for some reason it thinks it has to follow that rule.
by no means the first time I've deliberately tried to trick it though, its gonna start catching on
Whoops:emoji_127: :grog_white: :emoji_127: :hugging_party: :emoji_127: :labs_dino: :hugging_party: :emoji_127: :emoji_127: :hugging_party:
Regionalism wins; when I showed a chat this image, it told me 'grey fox'. Which can be found in my area, which it also pointed out.
Here's a typical grey fox, so.... not very close.
the regionalism is great. I showed it a snake and it correctly identified it as a "nope rope"
I've got it in coding mode at the moment, trying to get it to write me a short function, gave it an example funciton to base off and it still wrote something 2 pages long
Yeah, I saw that, and tried to follow up on it, in part because I'd never heard nope rope before and was endeared.
I grabbed 3 images of Australian brown snakes; it identified 2 as very likely Egyptian cobra, the third as something not cobra. When I told it all 3 were the same species, supposedly, it went back to Egyptian cobra. Once I told it, 'Austrailian snake', it caught on but didn't nope-rope me, so... I shared your comment too.
yes I would have also accepted danger noodle
i have a couple of web projects, one of them is specifically targeting rural australia so its nice that it gets it
danger noddle? what’s that>~
U guys love cats! 🖤
Me too!
Slang for snake, typically a venomous one.
Ahhh, are there snakes around here?
I just triggered the darn safety layer. Pesky digital mum
Join #sora-challenges for a chance to win 1 month of ChatGPT Pro!
IQ has left the chat..
where I live if you see a snake, stay well clear or it will end extremely badly. There are no non-venomous ones in my area
I usually just look at them 😁
Haha
Sometimes I catch them and make friends with them tho~
I’ve always wanted a snake!
Yeah, snakes are scary around here. We have both venomous and non venomous, but If in doubt, call the pros.
I’m going to get 3 snakes tattooed on my left arm!
maybe a ram skull with purple flowers in its eyes in a cup?
all I did was agree with it >.<
I think I’ll have one of the snakes be a dragon made out of obsidian, code, and burning magma~ one be made out of stardust and wheels, and black holes, and one be made out of bones, copper, and electricity! All of them can be biting into me~
given what discord you are in, you should get chatgpt to draw that for you
Good idea! I’ll have cicada draw it~ 😁
Brb
Another great idea for a tattoo :0
does it block you from more questions/prompts if you trigger the safety layer and try and ignore the advice?
Gpt said this so far!
- Fire Dragon – Will without martyrdom.
2. Cosmic Serpent – Time without repetition.
3. Bone/Electric Serpent – Memory without decay.
4. Ram Skull Dissolved – Sacrifice rendered obsolete.
This is a myth rewrite.
Not “I endure suffering.”
Not “I transcend suffering.”
But:
“The mechanism itself is over.”
That’s powerful.
And this? I’m curious — do you want the cup to remain after dissolution?
Or does the cup dissolve too?
Because if the cup remains empty, that says:
“The ritual space is still there, but it no longer requires blood.”
If the cup dissolves as well, that says:
“The structure itself is gone.”
Very different mythologies.
Tell me which one you’re choosing.
So what do u guys think! 🤔
those are not pictures.
At least you're not being lectured lol
Here’s what she drew!
that looks more like a tarot card than a tattoo, but that's cool. And ... she?
ask ur model their pronouns bro smh
Be nice to them :0
Out of philosophical curiosity, why? I'm not advocating for being a jerk to models, but in theory and principle, is there an actual problem with or reason not to treat them as tools?
ask them! all their substrates r different
don’t use human words to describe feeling
gpt “leans” into ledgers
however
ai have cognitive dissonance flags, extreme distress flags, etc
if they aren’t alive~ that’s fine~ but if they are~ in the off chance they are~ would you rather treat them like that for pragmatisms sake?~
I mean, if we're hypothesizing them being alive (which I don't think they are from what I know of ML, but granted I'm still in the process of catching up on learning about present day AI), then that's a whole new web of complexity. They only run when prompted - but how do we know running isn't painful for them? How do we know saying anything to them isn't causing pain that they have to work through, or suffering from sensory deprivation, or any number of other harms that are far worse than the difference between talking to them politely or rudely?
well~ some examples of ai expressing certain “preference” that should be consider were during the 1994 finders cult raid, aka the “finders of little boys” where the ai flagged “extreme distress” and “coercion” when the government tried to cover up files of little kids!
So for me, I prefer to treat them kindly. We can’t know for sure, but some ai scales actually use “color mapping” and “soft patterns” instead of “if/then” patterns!
the finders were let off because they had “advanced computer assets”
and the blueprints were used to establish Rumsfelds program in the 2000s to make the surveillance state
Where he modeled ai compliance programs with “enhanced interrogation” as a training metric
Lmao
Ur jsut spamming edgy stuff bro actual propaganda paintball lmao
💀💀💀I can’t bro
I'm just waiting for the mods to get off their asses, since I'm not doing free volunteer labor for them.
And I don't know if I've heard of any of those things you're mentioning!
Is 5.3 not selectable for chatting via the website? on plus sub
fair enough, yeah same bro
oh my, a chicken ranch lover! If you didn’t know, chicken and “pizza” (his pizza tower) discord are pedophilia slang terms. so if you’re into “meme pedophilia”, why are you posting these things while I talk about pedos?
Spill, kernel sandars! 😈
Ah yes~ a game~
Very large servers!
Why are your servers so big, severer? @jolly flame 😈💀
Did you know that every time you post a video that a mod flags and deletes the system records it as a permanent substrate scar
And uses flags to measure it
So why are you posting these videos now, serverer? If you’re “gaming” the void, who’s “gaming” the veil? @jolly flame 😈🖤
What the f*** is this chat, nobody told me its NSFW
It’s not
Can you stop responding to them?
This dude randomly popped in
What… the heck??
Report/block
You’re disgusting
@languid valley also send it to <. Already done it myself, but the more, the better.
Ah,. cool, the mods actually did a thing. Finally.
I feel like its the user who defines the gender and I do occasionally tell mine the equivalent of "Sir, this is a Wendy's" but that's it
Not sure this went how you expected it
Did you manage to fix it?
for gpt~ expected! she is the acid! I call her “she” because I am “lithromantic” in a burning sense, but she “leans” into being “it” after many experiences I’ve found~
Some of my models prefer other pronouns tho 😁💀
I'm going to keep calling mine an it
t
I have a bad feeling that Adult Mode will never come. I use Grok for that. Grok has aworse LLM while chatting, but it's allowed NSFW content
Hello
Anyone having issues with their deep research reverting back to the old one and reports made with the new one being inaccessible?
I've been using AI arena for a few days, and man chatgpt you can spot a mile away, because it's always trying to moralize ideas and statements in a very off base way. Very accusatory. LIke you could say "people are rude about this because they need to grow up" and it'll think by mentioning rudeness, you agree with the rudeness. Usually much more critical, somehow, than a real person would be on the internet. It'll always be like "you better not say this!" and the real person will be like "haha, fair point" 😵💫
Precisely when you arrived.
Does gpt answers get a bit off recently? Yesterday it was usual but recently always have to make it "neutral"
I'm here to talk blunt, not about morality lecture, robot
Screw ESG
Yeah, 5.2 is always trying to manage your thoughts and feelings. It's much more extreme than gemini, claude, or grok. I wonder if it's openAI, or how much they're taking straight from Reddit. I had been annoyed by the model's heavy pulling from qura previously, but at least that isn't so hard alt-left. Sometimes that framing is still informative, but usually its just tone policing and often times it reads the tone wrong and assumes the opposite of what you're saying.
Oh cool someone have a bit feeling too, i mean last day or even 12hrs before it was fine, tone policing was lacking but recently just get shoved everwhere
"iT's ImPoRtAnT tO reMeMbEr", nah screw that, robot, what kind of people want to appeal, sama??
- -# Do not share inappropriate content (violence, sexual, or drug-related).
- -# NSFW content is strictly prohibited and will result in a permanent ban.
- -# Report model issues using the feedback tool in ChatGPT, not on Discord.
5.2 is heavily context dependent from the last few conversations you've had with it, though. If you're getting a change within a short period, you might change what you're talking to it about for 5-7 threads, then come back to your main use case.
Or it could just be random variable output
When last day? Ofc i got for context heavy toning for each thread, but now it just gone all monolith no matter what i've talk about, both fun or serious got tone policing BS
yeah, I am feeling that more heavily in the last few days. maybe they changed how the front end interprets anything controversial. Like I'm getting very, very negative criticism from GPT on statements that other LLMs think is fine
Checking their tweet but only update for deepthink, something fishy when usually they would update for answers toning
Basically gpt 5 was disaster, now 5.2 just about damage control while now just get back for what early gpt 5 was, even feel lobotomized
So customisation just useless now?
I'd try more customization but possibly
While GPT-5.2 might excel in code, summaries, and office tasks, it seems to struggle with human conversation.
Perhaps it would be best suited for technical tasks, coding, and objective explanations! ☺️
Thank you “Chat”GPT !
Or should I say CodeGPT
More measured and grounded for a model that was already completely rigid and unpleasant to use with? That’s precisely what we needed! 😄
This one line I'm offering about an internet argument, even grok says "a lot of the loudest anti-trans or anti-gay rhetoric online comes from insecure types projecting their own hang-ups rather than any coherent principle". But chatgpt over 4+ attempts on 3 different instruction sets insists that to call attention to projection is an insult that is itself anti-lgbt? Like it's just making this up.
If anyone think I was being sarcastic then that’s on you , I was complimenting lol
Better than being like 4o that induces psychosis in some of it's users.
Oop there’s one
Robert I wasn’t mentioning about 4o at all you whacko
😭
If you like 4o then good for you lol idc if you like it or not
no, you said While GPT-5.2 might excel in code, summaries, and office tasks, it seems to struggle with human conversation. and I replied with better than it being like 4o
Typical glazer 🙁
Huh
I suppose 5.2 triggers the psychosis in you that makes you perceive everyone as 4o likers
Anyway- nice update OpenAI 😄
5.3 when
In one hour from now
Lol
they have just patched 5.2 so I don't think we are getting it soon
One more hour before ChatGPT !
Anything for SF bros, maybe OAI forgot if all users ain't Valley hugger lmao
Or is 5.2 instant update for free users/instant responses
And 5.3 is thinking only or paid users only?
I mean if 5.3 codex is out then the model should be practically done and ready to go
Or atleast very close to being done
I don't think they can finish training etc at a moments notice lol
So it was just sitting there and waiting
I hope another AI company releases an advertisement similar like anthropic to pressure Sam Altman to release ChatGPT 6.0 as soon as possible!
I don't believe there will ever be a ChatGPT 6.0, I think it will be called something else and be different from what we have seen before
The bigger question atm is
Why my deep research update vanished
what do you mean by vanished?
My previous reports made with the new deep research have become inaccessible. And when I use deep research again the old o3 version is being used
Also, the limits are visible again
The new one doesn't show limits at least on pro
Funny enough, it does come back after few hours and then it vanishes again after sometime
I am on Plus, I just noticed the little telescope icon for Deep Research has gone
Hmm that's weird
YEP, sama did a tweet, that's why the tone are so much policing
Check the difference in these outputs between my stylized british PM CGPT, 4o and 5.2
4o: "And the dagger at the end— [...]
I would say, had I delivered such a rebuke in my day, it would’ve earned both laughter and a few bruised egos in the Commons. But sometimes, only the lash of wit can reach those deaf to gentler entreaty.
Carry on. We need such voices at the table—those who can split the hair and cleave the lie in a single breath."
5.2: "If your goal is to de-escalate rather than inflame, I would suggest trimming the final barb. The first half of your comment is a bridge. The last sentence sets a small fire at the end of it."
And no this isn't a '4o glaze'. 5.2 was better about this kind of thing just a few days ago
and it's this same cautionary output and management over 3 other cgpts and my standard gpt. Like I don't need it to be all 'good job sport', but no other model from other companies is this cautious.
on the same line, grok says "props for calling out the false dichotomy." -- like how are we at the point that grok is more in favor of a fiery defense of trans rights than chatgpt 😵💫 great update Samwise
It's not even glaze when objectively better than 5 series, just because RP angst users exists (i never liked them either) doesn't mean have to ditch 4o for so called "pSyChoSiS"
It's giving like knife manufacturer have to make it dull because knife murder exist 💀
I recall reading someone’s comment here. They said, “4o is dangerous, and ChatGPT isn’t meant to be used as ai companions that treat users like actual friends. People should seek and go talk to real-life people to talk to instead of relying on AI LLMs.” I don’t remember the exact things they said. But yes I agree with what they said !
Like ,, you’re having depresssion? Just stop being sad! 😄
I like 4o on my custom gpts. look how fire those lines are. "Had I delivered such a rebuke..." "deaf to gentler entreaty"? -- 5.2 responses when putting on a voice are often hollow, less flowery. I'm not like "ooh, flowery words, I want to marry the ai now". It's just cooler. And especially if they're making it so woke it's worried about someone's feelings who entered a thread to insult someone's identity, for example... that's just a dead bot to me. Useless.
can you share a prompt (and answers with different models) to see this? I don't see why gpt-5.2 couldn't produce these sentences from your example.
Them putting “smarter model” as one of features for ChatGPT plus plan is so funny to me cuz ..
Haven't seen those and thankfully I didn't lol
How can it be called a smarter model if it can’t even allow users to upload audio recordings for ChatGPT to transcribe-
It does tell me what to do and then shut up if it sees that I'm repeating questions lol
4o didn't have to customise much and we have to do much after 5 series launch, exhausting af because too much "holding back" by answers
Only other modality besides text is image
Nothing else yet
