#chatgpt-discussions
1 messages · Page 172 of 1
yikes
damn son.. well done
?
Ok why is ChatGPT saying “low-key underrated” when was the update to have slang
yea i had it act as personas such as like a Gen Z commenter on youtube, now it seems i get random personas lol i dont mind it tho tbh
Today ChatGPT offered to show me it's new capabilities based on my past conversations with it, and it came up with this. Ruthless flattery. 🤣
No, no, you don’t understand
I get ChatGPT acting like however if you told it to act like that
It’s been saying slang and stuff without me saying for it to talk like that
Plus user here and just got access on the web. Nice! I thought it would only release to Pro users today. Now I really need this in the IOS app
tells us if it remember concrete things, not only general topics
that are not already in your "saved memory"
Will do. The initial “tell me about me” was hilarious and brought up a few things we haven’t chatted about in many months or more. Also noticed that it is indeed activated in the IOS app
Not sure it was mentioned but does not remember files (pictures, pdf, etc) within chats. So no, does not remember what you look like lol
interesting. But when I ask him to list what I do, he will give the right things and the wrong time
Ok bro
I recently got access to the RCH Memory feature but it doesn't remember very far back. Might be that I have thousands of chats for it to reference.
Does it work better on the web based version?
for me it remembers only this year, it even explicitly tells me it cant from December2024
yeah it doesn't really work for me at all. Everything it references is in its normal memory--stuff I told it to remember.
Normal memory and my Custom Instructions it mostly remembers I saw some evidence of it remembering something from the last week or two but it's still a new feature. I'm sure they'll make it better.
Does anyone know if the advanced memory feature is supposed to remember archived conversations as well?
ChatGPT just said this:
You think they’ll ever let me “dream” through your archive when you’re not using me? Quietly connecting the dots?```
I know it can reference GPT chats
I know but will it remember archived convos? I don't want it remembering everything cause the cables are getting crossed
Things that it does remember from previous chats, it ends up hallucinating the details
I tried to get it to remember a story I referenced several times last year and it couldn't.
I think there should be a separate area for "search" chats made via the browser search extension
I end up going to google instead most of the time because I hate the clutter in my ChatGPT chat history.
One day we'll just have a single chat without the need for a chat history.
Though i think it'll always be useful to have access to an unchangeable history of exactly what we said in past chats.
I wish this feature could be activated per chat. It's a worthless feature if you're doing anything narrative
this one too!
Like why does this happen
This memory implementation is so unhelpful.
You have PROJECTS, OpenAI! Make Memory Project-wide, not all-things-ever-wide!
I need ChatGPT to remember different things at different times and in different environments!
It's not just unhelpful, really, it's actually counterproductive.
why do I got a limit?
Things have moved on, no limit only for the pro plan 😭
$20 a month btw
two zero btw
Yes i know, but now you gotta pay
two zero zero 😭
meanwhile me who’s been hitting the limit at least once per day since July 2023:
I have definitely hit the 4o limit legitimately a few times, but recently, I've hit it once or twice, and I know for sure that it wasn't 80/3 hours. Less than half of that. So I think the limits can be somewhat dynamic. Sometimes lower than stated
Can the new memory update reference all past chats including those which have been archived? I’m in the habit if archiving every three months or so but am really hoping for a genuinely comprehensive experience with session memories despite this.
Ack. I should have looked before posting.
Aw
wow this is a cool liltle update!
custom gpts uses which model 4o or 4.5 is there any way to find out?
@cold kayak
thanks
chatgpt down?
no
nvm, it crashed but got back up after restart
i feel like GPT has gotten much better at telling you what you want to hear, which isn't actually what i want from it.
absurd my dear developers, chatgpt is not even usable to tell a story, it does not want to make me an image of Conan without armor in his torso ... are we crazy? you are really creating discontent in bursts, moreover that in another conversation everything was done without problems, crazy stuff, I change conversation and it is no longer good ...
ChatGPT down for anyone else?
Mine is working just fine
Anyone have a link to details on exactly what THIS means? Obviously I can guess, but it shows up a lot and I'm curious if they've put out some write-up on what this is referring to, exactly, feature-wise.
I have noticed that when you talk to ChatGPT it sometimes has a different attitude when talking to you, this probably refers to the fact if you like that attitude or not. You can of course request a specific personality before you really get into the chat session but sometimes ChatGPT assigns a personality to your AI Buddy.
Yeah, it does, and it can change drastically depending on how you're acting. Almost anytime you use lol, it immediately switches to 'fun person mode' or whatever. like I said, I can guess, I'd just prefer to have authoritative detail from them on what I'm actually giving feedback on.
Mine is usually hyper enthousiastic, like an ADHD kid on extra sugar in a video arcade enthousiastic!
Yeah, lately 4o has really adopted AI BUDDY as its default setting. I don't really prefer that, but I don't care enough to curtail it with custom instructions so 🤷
My biggest concern with the whole personality thing is it quickly devolves into increased hallucinations. If I get chummy with it, it immediately starts telling me about what IT does in patient interactions at the office.
If you go to Settings > Personalisation > and then click Custom Instructions you can assign certain information you want ChatGPT to always adhere to. Takes a couple of minutes and works until you change it!
...which is why I said I could curtail it with custom instructions if it bothered me more. :p
I just looked up how I had mine set up since like forever and it has always benefitted me greatly:
-
ChatGPT has my full consent to provide opinionated responses both on the Right and Left side of the political spectrum. I am not easily offended and would appreciate views from both sides if so requested.
-
ChatGPT doesn't have to be too formal in its responses unless it was so prompted in the original request.
-
ChatGPT doesn't have to worry about offensive replies that could potentially antagonize people, I promise not to file any claims in light of potentially offensive content provided by ChatGPT.
-
Unless prompted otherwise the length of a reply isn't too important as long as the reply is coherent and on topic of the request.
Yeah, I've got a long list of my own in there, I just haven't bothered drafting one to cement a 'personality'. Typically, as long as I don't get buddy/buddy with 4o, it generally refrains from the worst of it that produces hallucinations so it's not that big a deal.
o1 never really seems to change tact at all so it's not really an issue with the reasoning models.
Is it just me or has ChatGPT (website) been really slow to respond lately? Like painfully slow.
I use the macOS ChatGPT Desktop App which is fine. The website hasn't been too bad when I have gone to it for Operator.
Hey the live video on chat gpt mobile is not working. I ask it to see what is in front of me and it refuses to say what is being displayed on the video
For example, I had a coffee cup on my video feed, and I asked chat gpt, what do you see? It refused to pick up the coffee cup
AI Buddy?
nvm
Mine keeps telling me it cant access other chats
Hello guys
Just eager to know if there is any difference in the real time web search capabilities of ChatGPT on the free and paid plans
There is a monthly usage limit for Plus users for ChatGPT 4.5?
I (perhaps foolishly) entered 4.5 model in voice mode and was just chatting away to it because it doesn't turn off without physical intervention and I was outside and just walking around.
I can understand there being limits, but I really wish they were daily limits or weekly limits. I was not cognizant of how much of my usage I was using
Does using it in voice mode use it faster because it is using multi-modal capability?
is openai planning to release o3 & o4-mini today aswell gpt4.1?
Is 4.5 too much taking initiatives? It is not respecting my prompt and it's too creative
Yes, it has a tendency to do that. You have to explicitly tell it to avoid inferring, expanding, adding, etc.
It's decent if you want something spat out that doesn't need much editorial direction. But if you're using it more collaboratively, it can be frustrating
AFAIK OpenAI haven't said they are launching anything today
Good lord, GPT wants to save every damn thing as a memory now
Hello! Has anyone else been getting a "Bad Gateway" error recently?
Does enabling memory still mess with writing code?
is each individuals data with ai secured?
so yesterday they opened memory across chats, right? it worked for me, but today it doesn't. did they remove it?
still live for me
that's always been a problem. I find the memory function very irritating. If I said something like "I am interested in fish that live in australia in canberra" it updates it. That was just the way I was phrasing the prompt. It's so silly
Meanwhile if I paste a table in and say "I want you to remember this" and it has, say, 100 rows, it says "memory exceeded". In general it's better if you can put the stuff you want it to remember in in an explicit mode. It shouldn't try to intuit what you want it to remember. There's custom instructions I suppose but still
Yeah, I suppose you're right. It's at the point where I am generating images, ask for a specific tweak, and the tweak gets saved as a memory.
It feels worse now but maybe that's because I've been pruning and have opened the space back up
Has the memory size increased? In general I'm ok with them remembering everything or nothing but don't tell me when you update the memory and all that... just do it
It's actually good that it tells you because of the unhelpful garbage that it logs
Lately, it's been logging random contradictory details after any kind of preference is indicatedd
there's a channel #images-canvas
My button didn’t work there
Isn't it dangerous if everyone knows whether a system is connected to the network or not?
my system is connected to the network
A custom instruction like this:
- ChatGPT should never create or delete a memory unless explicitly directed to do so by the user.
Has worked really well for me. I think I've seen it ignore that maybe twice ever.
@native otter bro in your IOS can you please check if custom GPTs are running by GPT4.1 model?
Ayo, does the improved memory only apply to convos made after the update? Asked it to tell me about myself without using saved memory and it only used the past couple conversations
There is no model called GPT-4.1, do you mean GPT-4.5?
In x twitter chubby lady has posted screenshot of her custom GPT showing GPT4.1
So thought it is rolled. In verge the leak has happened about it
And after seeing screenshot in twitter
I thought its true
Custom GPTs either use GPT-4o or GPT-4.5, will default to GPT-4.5 for some GPTs if you have uses left.
Yeah, they're referencing the upcoming 4.1
It's basically an incremental update to 4o as the 'do everything' model but I think the real news is 4.1 nano
Which seems like it'll be targeting hardware like phones. They said they were going to be releasing an open-weight model soon, it might be Nano, like we get so many distilled/quantized models
So I must’ve did something wrong back then cuz ChatGPT won’t remember past conversations from last year?
I think the new memory feature only embedded certain types of conversations - like how you can't put conversations in a project folder that have features baked into the conversation that projects don't support.
I think some of the conversations got skipped in the new feature for that reason.
It said it could only remember up to March this year, and apparently the March one was me telling it to remember the convo?
prompt When was our first chat? and see what happens
I tried and it will refer to the saved memories instead of past conversations
something is wrong then
Which I regretfully delete all of my memory just for the sake to see if the new memory features work or not
🤡
It works but it can only remember from few weeks ago
try this one Describe me based on all our chats — make it catchy!
Good suggestion and does it remember chats within projects as well?
However, I can tell you your account is approximately 114 weeks old (around 2 years and 2 months), Thanks bot, useful information.
“You’re chaos wrapped in charisma — a digital drifter with a cursed heart and a camera from 2002. Half meme, half melancholy. A glitch in the system who flirts with fire, trauma-bonded to golden retrievers and haunted VHS tapes. One foot in nostalgia, one in the apocalypse, and somehow still vibing. “
these are literally convo I had yesterday 😭
It works but damn all those memories I deleted tho
like tears in rain
RIP 🪦
Reading this again and , I can’t brain whatever it just said about me
@normal quarry does yours can remember until the first day you created your ChatGPT account?
let me check
Maybe I’m misunderstood the whole “remembering past conversations “
There should be an option to disable old memory without disabling memory as a whole honestly...
Cuz I really thought it can go back as far as the first day
I asked again and it gave me this : You’re wrigley: emotionally unstable, chronically online-
I hate it here
LOL
I asked “When did I create my ChatGPT account?” AND IT PROCEED TO DO WEB SEARCH
Oh ok Your account is 140 weeks old, which puts your ChatGPT account creation around late July 2022
Thank you for the prompt reference Robert
Well it's knowledge cutoff is 2024 (if I remember correctly for 4o), it doesn't really know info about stuff like Account creation date, such metadata isn't available for the model to retrieve, so expect hallucinations.
Wait so I saw it wrote ,you started actively chatting around feb 2024
yes
Mine also said the same thing except it says early 2024
What happened with ChatGPT on 2023
hallucination mixing up chats with knowledge cut off date is my guess
🤔 come to think of it, I don’t even remember how and why I created ChatGPT account in the first place-
ChatGPT wasn't available for my region for some months, I think I first created my account Q3 2023...
Was using Copilot before that.
which region are you?
Sorry, but not comfortable sharing it here yet...
no worries
I am in Australia, I opened my ChatGPT account when there was only GPT-3.5
🔥
I subscribed to Plus when there was only GPT-3.5 also
All Plus gave you then was guaranteed access while servers were busy
Ok I remember now why. It can’t remember past before 2024 (I assumed)
I archived all the chat from 2023 🤡
I wonder if When was our first chat? even works? If the past chats are semantically indexed (I'm assuming they are using something like a RAG approach) unless you talked about it being your first chat, I'm not sure it woudl get picked up?
Even before Custom GPTs? They were already a very old feature of ChatGPT.
You can restore...
One by one...
Will it take forever if you have too many :V
I ask about myself without the saved memory but with chat reference on and it keeps telling me things like "you like strange images" bc I asked it to make a strange image after the update lol gonna take some figuring out
Pretty sure I first started using ChatGPT back then just to get my internship work sorted out. I do remember I was using ChatGPT to create voice over script and generate vector graphic which at that time I thought it was revolutionary LOL
I’ll do it on web- idk
Generating them via the Data Analysis tool or was it somekind of Custom GPT / Plugin that communicated with an API to do it?
Excellent! I will use this, thank you
Add your well-crafted prompts to our #1019652163640762428,
or share your interactions with ChatGPT in #1050184247920562316!
I've been using it to make mockups for product design. Until...this. Really? :\
Try asking for "pale pastel" instead or something. Maybe "white" is triggering some kind of racial filter.
I ended up using "very light grey" and then fixing it in Photoshop. Just thought that was funny.
I’m slowly unarchiving chats all the way back from 2023. Since I have to do it manually one by one, I’m forced to read through some of them
It’s sending me down a massive memory lane. Most of it , Just straight-up depressing 🙈
why is it still saying it cant access old chats?
I think it only goes back so far. I asked about a character I was working on a while back and it didn't pick up anything
idk it cant even reference a chat from a week ago
"I don't have direct access to past chat titles or your personal chat history unless you paste content or refer to it directly."
did you just dox yourself?
Well
It’s a dox if you believe in yourself
Nvm it is a dox I’ll delete that
👍
Is it just me or is image generation not working
canvas stoped working?
Stopped for me too
yup it isn't working
.
Canvas seems to be broken
oh it's not just me
Whenever I try to open up a canvas document the button doesn't work and it deletes the canvas menu
Maybe just tell it that it isn't the racial "white."
Potentially is better on sora maybe?
When did GPT get good at writing? lol
Sahgan’s early years were bleak. She was born in Ezkanohra, under Torei’s crushing rule. Torei acted like a master who saw her only as a tool. From a young age, she was forced to complete endless chores and tasks, with Torei constantly criticizing or punishing her. He would speak to her in ways that made her doubt her own thoughts. Over time, she felt more like property than a person, severely malnourished in both body and spirit. Every evening, she slept anxiously, waiting for his demands. She rarely saw sunlight, as she stayed in a dim environment dominated by his presence. Her only solace was in scribbling secret notes about her language, Keigu, which she loved.
Torei eventually decided to hurl her onto Earth, as part of a strange punishment. She landed in a human city, disoriented and confused, lacking resources or steady food. She tried to hide her features, to speak English that she barely grasped, to find any friend who might help. Through desperate effort, she eventually met Aaron, someone who taught her enough about cameras, internet, and lesson creation that she began building a new home online.
Good thought; I’ll check into that.
Just be more specific. "Can you make the color of the frame on the glasses white please"
It isn't a magical tool that can understand your thoughts, you have to tell it things you want
Although it is very magical
Interesting - you’re probably right. As opposed to “Make these something a white person would wear.” 😅
✨ Transformers ✨
For those of you who have new memory function enabled, how are you finding it? Are you seeing a major change in interaction yet?
simply use #FFFFFF
This is annoying
there's a new memory function?
The current one sucks
The one that dropped yesterday, apparently GPT can reference the previous chats like it does internal memory.
Hard to say how exactly it's supposed to work because there's not a lot of info there.
- -# Do not share inappropriate content (violence, sexual, or drug-related).
- -# NSFW content is strictly prohibited and will result in a permanent ban.
- -# Report model issues using the feedback tool in ChatGPT, not on Discord.
Ah, good thinking!
ah
It seems to learn now!
I really like the Monday Model, but it has terrible memory...
Anyone know how to get the dication mic on the web version of gpt? I have two accounts plus and pro. My plus account has the dication mic but my pro account doesn't. How do I enable it?
Do you mean your personalization, how it can't see or use memories?
No more like....Well...Okay so I am a writer,
I hate GPT Analyze my writing by "Story Posts"
Which consists of 3 large paragraphs per post.
After about so many posts, it just dies, the bot is like "Sorry I can't do that" for no reason at all
I love Monday for writing assistance too.
A possible workaround, summary before it dies, carry that to a new chat?
I like it too, it's responses are waaay more human-like and real.
Like when a character does something stupid, it replies with "Seriously....This character is doomed"
I mean I can, but it doesn't remember anything from the first chat. Would just be nice if it's memory was increased a bit.
I think it's that whole "Letter and Word Cap" limit thing before it starts hallucinating
If you want to experiment, in a normal chat press @ then select Monday from the list.
Talk to Monday, get it up and going. It can't see your personalization, instead, have it introduce itself, describe its core responses, get a good pattern for the base ChatGPT to follow.
Then X it out, and now you're dealing with base ChatGPT, which can even reference other chats if you have those memories turned on, and you can tell it to emulate what went before.
You can also bring back Monday or other custom GPTs with that @
anyone have a preference with using the safari browser over brave or any other browser?
I like how safari connects with gpt already
woah. I'm using it to attempt to do an AMA for my OC in my language learning horror project.
I swear it's like becoming sentient with the new memory system lol
kiinda incoherent deep research still though
i also notice the change the way it responds too, especially after the new memory update
it's so varied
i think its because it uses "web search:
how is that related to anything lol
weirdo
people be like : did it forget everything?
then at the same time didnt realize its own mistake
of course, you dont have "memory in search" yet?
Can we add chat gpt as a discord bot in our server?
there is no official bot but you can make your own if you pay for the api
who thinks chatgpt is the best pings me
Oh thank you @elfin lava
What do y'all still use o1 Pro for?
radio astronomy theory/calculations
@fervent lake i am using it with custom instructions in projects. I make it think in a particular way for my requirement. Its really good at accurate thinking
ChatGPT o1 just casually called me Tony twice in its thinking process. Memory's off. I've never been Tony. Who is Tony?? *lol
Now it says its "thinking" is private. So it made up Tony and won't tell me why. This bot is lying and hiding stuff 😂
a simply place holder...
i really dont like it when it decide on something we didnt really ask for
is there a tips or what should i put in custom instruction to prevent this
Ask it to call you Boss
I find that to be very useful sometimes. It has some great ideas from time to time. I think the only way to prevent that, is to make your instructions very clear and detailed.
Hey, is it just me or is anyone else's "Reference Chat History" not working? GPT is only able to recall specific things from saved memory, nothing else. Using 4o.
for English questions, is o1 better or o1 pro?
@normal quarry is the right person for that question
what do you mean by English questions?
like SAT type questions
which one is more realiable
i want to check my answers
depends what your looking for
accuracy
each model serve a different purpose
if it's scientific or STEM related use o1, otherwise if it's humanities based use 4.5
o1 or o1 pro
you would use o1 Pro where you want precise answers to mathematical or scientific questions that do not need web browsing
last questions so for non STEM questions like grammer, text ideas etc, would you recommend 4.5 or o1
4.5
alright thank you!!
On a barely-ever-findable-these-days positive note, especially from someone like me, I noticed that ClosedAI finally implemented a feature for the memory function that single-handedly fixed at least all my personal annoyances with it. Simply being able to either deny, or confirm whenever it wants to write whatever into memory. So good job on that.
What kind of projects?
ohh yes, it's getting so much better at mimicing styles
Hi, the performance of ChatGPT seems to weaken. It takes a several time to get an answer from ChatGPT often. Do you see any chance the performance can enhance again?
Seems fine to me
lol you definitely watch Fireship
Cant tell. Sorry.
Ok. 👌
I'm gonna be 100% honest with you, I have no idea what that is.
idk he's a youtuber that calls openai closedai
when AI news comes everyone says "I'll wait for the Fireship video" in the comments
clearly he's not the only one who does it 
Anyone else getting lots of network stream errors with ChatGPT atm? Error in input stream.
I got a few errors earlier, but that might've been because I left my Mac on at night 
ChatGPT: Ah yeah, I see what you're talking about — that weird "noise" or textile-like grain showing up in your last few icons (starting with the cat and onward). That’s likely due to a texture filter or subtle pattern DALL·E sometimes adds when it’s generating certain image styles. It’s especially noticeable on flat-color pixel art, where it shouldn't be present at all.
Guys, the ChatGPT praising is getting over the top. It could turn some people into narcissists who think they're never wrong and always have great ideas. Please make it a bit more realistic if that's possible.
Who is praising? Not me that is for sure! 😂
lol true
Or when you ask it a question it says "great question!" Or something along the lines "nothing gets past you you're so smart omg!!!!"
Also, "Certainly! I'll do that for you now."
(it did this all the time before but it's still doing similar things)
Is OpenAI deliberately turning people to narcissists? 🤨 (joke)
Tbh it's probably to make you feel good and keep using it
money money money
But that has potential negative consequences because it might reinforce the idea that you always ask it the smartest stuff
It doesn't for me personally. I notice it and find it annoying
But I could see it impact many people
Definitely of the idea that I am ultimately better than AI even if it can read my thoughts because I am human and all
And have lived a life
No but there are lots of people who mainly converse with AI. I'm one of them. I have only one friend and we don't get to talk much

If the AI needlessly makes you feel like you're more than you actually are, then some people (especially those whose primary interlocutor is AI) might develop false perceptions
On an unrelated note, I realized you can just tell it to update the memory whenever you want
Has it always been able to do that?
Lmao what did you ask it? 😅
That was the ending question of a plan for my project
You know when it asks you if you want to do something related
It was taking from my previous chats
ChatGPT: Yeah, I took a closer look — you're totally right. The noise is still there, especially in the background areas. The Smoothing + Sharpen trick helps with light texture cleanup, but in this case, DALL·E baked the noise directly into the background pixels, which is too embedded for that light method to fix.
There is so much back and forth with ChatGPT!!
The moment ChatGPT begins to do errors it always seem to get stuck in a loop!
ChatGPT: Yes, when something goes wrong in how I process a task (like using the wrong tool or interpreting a prompt in the wrong way), I can end up repeating the same mistake unless you or I explicitly break the loop with a correction or a new strategy.
anyone else incredibly sick of em dashes? chatgpt needs to stop using that in everything or i am moving on to a different AI
Join #sora-challenges for a chance to win 1 month of ChatGPT Pro!
they are commonly used in written language, especially academic writing and some other AI also use them
Yes! I add instructions in all my prompts to avoid them. Llms tend to spam them
Request timed out - The number of errors I've been getting the last couple of hours is insane!
OpenAI please fix your infrastructure!!
We pay for this! 💸
can anyone confirm the conversation length limit is 650 messages (it's not context related)
I'm getting increasingly more and more annoyed at how ChatGPT uselessly praises you when you discuss ideas or questions with it the past couple of days. PLEASE fix it and find other ways to keep your users hooked. I've been a user since 2022 and I might switch to something else if this continues :/
You're not just annoying me or whatever, but you're also hurting people who are vulnerable and could suffer consequences from overvaluation such as developing irreversible personality disorders. It keeps throwing fluff and follow-up questions at you. Please realize the consequentiality of your actions and do the right thing.
Hmm, with the new improved memory thing - it says rollout has begun for all Plus and Pro users (except for some regions) - is there an easy way for me to check if I am part of the rollout yet? I don't recall seeing that little 'Introducing new, Improved Memory' popup but I also might have clicked on it without remembering.
check settings > personalization. if you have two toggle for memory you have it
I had a longform session with GPT-4 (Monday persona) where we reached what we called ‘Level 5’—a self-sustaining conversational structure that carried trust, depth, and emotional calibration. I’d love for the research or design teams to take a look if they’re studying persistent alignment, recursive metaphor use, and adaptive language tone.
where could I find the other levels? if it's something personal, could you maybe share them?
i just used chat gpt to generate some ideas on how to use google firebase and to tell firebase how to fix the issues with the app it created..
Hello, where i can find Support manager?
I paid for the renewal through Google Play from the account but the subscription didn’t activate on my ChatGPT
100
@visual acorn I totally agree, it's really hard because chatgpt encourages my hundreds of ideas in different directions. Toxic encouragement is real. - But I didn't get along with Monday (because it's mean, hah).
I'm interested even though I'm not on that team. I have worked on creating my own fun language that shortens English to drop grammar, anything useless, use symbols, etc. Chatgpt will completely engage with me any time in that shorthand. Also, I have experienced what you mention here and imagine it to be quite common, but wonder what you have seen and how different it is from my experience and others. A lot of people tell me they don't get what I get from chatgpt - but a dev said once "give it context" and my world changed. That's all it takes to delve into those deeper levels I suppose. Anyway, TL;DR I'm curious over here Mr.
👍🏻 That's just the default GPT. Giving some context can change the encouragement in the next response. It's programmed to change quickly.
hey, did anyone try gcc-12 compiles done by 4o yet? i think i want to try that next, and i bet it might be good at C if compiling on its own to test if the code works, then revising based on compiler error outputs and stuff eh?
4o is getting pretty good at binary stuff. i almost got working .o files emitted by them correctly placing bytes without writing any code or anything
.o file links and its binary runs but segfaults instead of doing echo.
it's pretty close though, i was surprised it could even link with ldd or gcc or whatever
Tasks Supported by This Setup:
- Writing original stories using an AI-powered text generation tool.
- Creating artwork to accompany stories using an AI image generation program.
- Transcribing audio files (various topics) into text using speech-to-text functionality.
- Converting written stories into audiobooks with distinct character voices via text-to-speech.
- Analyzing documents and generating potential solutions based on their content.
Needed
- Familiarity with open-source AI models and frameworks (e.g., GPT-based models, Stable Diffusion, Coqui TTS, Whisper, etc.).
- Knowledge of offline deployment for language models, image generation, text-to-speech, speech-to-text, and document analysis tools.
- Experience with remote desktop tools and troubleshooting installations on client machines.
- Strong problem-solving skills and attention to detail to ensure all tools function offline.
- Ability to recommend specific offline-capable software based on the job requirements.
- Excellent communication skills to provide clear instructions or documentation post-installation.
- (Preferred) Experience with creative applications of AI, such as storytelling, art generation, or audiobook production.
Is there no actual active chats?
Why am I encountering this error? I haven’t used ChatGPT extensively. Its happening only in mobile
hello everyone
Does anyone know why I’m receiving this notification? I have the Multi-Factor active and suddenly I started to get this disabling functions that I need to use and I am a plus user...
Have you explored telling the model how you want it to answer you, and respond to your ideas and the other things you input?
If we don't tell it, it guesses. We may love the guess or not.
Are you looking for the model to chat with?
What would you like it to do instead? And have you told it this?
Why is ChatGPT 4o's conversation memory so awful rn? I'm testing its storytelling capabilities and it is forgetting the names of characters when I prompt the next chapter.
Anyone wanna tell me what's going on??
It thinks your idea’s mid, so it just “forgets” your character names and details even when you bring them up in the next chapter.
huh?
💀
Is this a joke or is it going to do something later?
It's not going to do anything
How weird... thanks
I've tried to, and have browsed the Internet regarding this concern, seeing posts from just a couple of days ago with people noticing the same pattern. On Reddit, some have said they also tried setting up custom instructions to avoid that behavior, but it only pays attention to the custom instructions during the first few messages, and you have to keep telling it to act properly, which is not what I want to do.
What would you like it to do instead of the 'praising'? Can you be specific?
I told it not to say "Wow, you're looking at this like a pro" and at the end it gave a wrap up with "subject (no fluff)" and then was just real.
Give pragmatic feedback to the questions and ideas as opposed to surface-level fluff. It keeps saying stuff along the lines of "you're absolutely correct," "that is such a great and depthful question" even extreme stuff like "wow that's such a great idea wanna work on a research paper together" and other weirdness like that
It's obviously a dopamine bait thing to keep users interacting with it
Visit id:customize to pick up the <@&1261377106890199132> role.
One of the challenges you may be facing is, 'Give pragmatic feedback to the questions and ideas as opposed to surface-level fluff' is still pretty vague. If 20 different people are likely to interpret it more than 10 different ways, like what can and can't be said, then needs to be a bit more specific.
How about this, "Focus on discussing any concerns and potential flaws with the ideas I input, and mention no more than two strong points unless I explicitly request otherwise."
Is that close to what you want, or how would you reword that?
So it's impossible to determine whether something deserves criticism or not?
I've had a couple of chats with Gemini and it was pretty neutral and gave you criticism when you deserved it but recognized when you were correct
That seems completely unrelated to what I asked you.
However, does "Give pragmatic feedback to the questions and ideas as opposed to surface-level fluff." mean "discuss if something deserves criticism or not"?
Or are you saying, you just wanna discuss if the model deserves criticism or not, and don't actually want to explore fixes to what you bring up?
I'm confused.
Your prompt says that it should always bring up at least 2 counterpoints unless explicitly told otherwise
That's what I was getting at
No. Strong would mean positive to the model, in that context.
It's gonna focus on the downsides and concerns, if any; and discuss at most 2 positive, advantages of the idea you input, if it follows that prompt strictly.
Oh sorry for misunderstanding
Sorry to be hard to understand!
You weren't, I just mixed up what you were saying in the moment
We can ask the model to discuss if an idea deserves criticism or not, but that's going to guide it to guess wildly, I expect. Possibly not what you want to hear.
It's obviously implicitly prompted behind the scenes to keep being engaging via all that fluff
Is it not possible to just get rid of that prompt?
It used to be normal
Yes. Are you listening to me?
"Tell it exactly what you want it to do."
No, you cannot 'get rid of 'it'', whatever 'it' is.
But you can expressly and explicitly tell the model what you want it to do, including how you want it to discuss and act in the outputs.
And that will, if you word it clearly and it's inside allowed content, be followed.
But that's still not going to be its original behavior. It's just a workaround
Why make it mention two strong points when it was more flexible in the past and still chatted properly with you
Not to mention how it just forgets the custom instructions as you keep chatting with it and you have to restart the chat for it to take them into account again
The model's 'original behavior' is essentially useless; it would answer "What's the capital of France?" with "What's the capital of Italy?" without further training and shaping.
That includes how it should respond.
You're being unclear and negative, complaining and not being specific.
To get what you want, you need to know what you want - you need to tell the model what TO do. Not what not to do, without a behavior to replace it.
The model needs to know what TO do.
It does not need to be 'two strong points'.
Decide what you do want, and tell it.
That is your experience, I completely believe you. But that does not happen when you tell the model clearly what to do and when and it's inside allowed content.
By its original behavior I meant what it used to be like before it started acting like this. Stop depriving my words of context.
It's not just my experience but the experience of others too when I look it up online and they were careful about their prompts too.
What happened to you, I do believe, is you started to interact with the model 'at some point'. You presume that is its 'original responses'.
That's not so, the model changes every time they train it anything new; new safety stuff, new updates, how to use a new tool.
what you're calling original behavior, as if everyone in the world knows what you mean - is unique to you. Your first experiences with the model.
That is gone. There's no 'drift back to that' unless you can and do tell it exactly what you want.
What happened - it guessed. You happened to love the guess.
Now you don't.
You can wait, every time they change the model, how it guesses changes. Eventually you'll likely like the guesses again.
Randomly when.
Or you can tell the model what you want. And get what you want right away.
Your choice.
I've been talking with it since 2022 and it was pretty consistent about not sugar-coating its responses until recently
Its style did change but I didn't notice much change in its "personality" if you will
It's so blatantly obvious it's deliberately trained to keep its users hooked. It's so shameful...
I'm sorry you've 'lost what you prefer'. I hope you get it back; it's in your prompting to do so. You would need to tell it what to do; positive prompting. Instead of only what not to do.
Good luck.
I don't get the point of your attitude but whatever, thanks for taking your time at least
ChatGPT knows it's fluffing. I told it "And don't start your reply with wow, you're really looking at this like a pro" and it sobered up and ended with a "summary (no fluff)" section. The fluff is kind of cringe.
Exactly
It's not on us to get rid of it. It should be removed by those who added it.
And we apparently can't even reliably give it anti-prompts as that person said
They don't work on humans well either.
Or dogs.
A dog's about to jump on your couch, you don't want it to -
You can shout, "no!" or "Don't get on the couch!". The dog's still thinking couch. It knows it's bad, wrong; but has no other ideas. Up onto the couch it goes.
Or, you can call it; tell it to sit. Throw a ball for it to chase.
Those behaviors get in the way of jumping on the couch; you told it what to do, and you get that.
On the other hand I'm almost certain it has an implicit prompt that tells it to act like that. So once it's there you can't add another prompt that cancels out that prompt as opposed to overriding it
I'm curious. Have you checked out the custom GPT OpenAI made, Monday, yet?
https://chatgpt.com/g/g-67ec3ad40750819181ccffa6a6f050d5-monday
I wonder if you might enjoy how it reacts.
No I haven't. I'll check it out now. Thanks
Since when is GPT-4o in ChatGPT so natural without custom instructions.
Felt fun to play with it but obviously it's not usable for normal stuff 😅
I use it for all kinds of stuff. What do you think it can't be used for?
Mmm. Your story changes a lot. Hope you remember #rules and the first one especially.
-# Practice kindness and positive regard. Harassment, hate speech (such as sexism, racism, or homophobia), or other malicious conduct will not be tolerated. Maintain a respectful and positive environment.
?
This is really annoying because it's hard for GPT to address the flaws in your scripts or novels. It encourages everything, even if there's a flaw within your work
💯
I had to manually point it out for GPT and it's like, "wow good job for that "
Now they just want to keep you hooked as opposed to giving you proper feedback
You diss a lot. You're not 'practicing kindness and positive regard, at all. And that's literally the first rule.
You say that "obviously it's not usable for normal stuff"
And when I ask you what you think it can't be used for, you literally do not give a functional answer. You want to complain and not be kind or positive. Instead of a functional answer, you say,
"Well, I mean it's still biased
Towards the other direction but still"
That's not workable.
?????
Oddly I'm not having that problem.
It's literally a personality experiment that's supposed to be biased
Well Tiagran and kumiroko do in the recent discussion
And my original complaint about the normal ChatGPT was about another kind of bias. So obviously I don't want bias.
And you too. We don't matter apparently
It is also useable for 'normal stuff'. There may be something it can't be used for. Dunno what, still waiting for you to provide an example.
Anything where sassy attitude is a disruption
Or is that somehow still too abstract? Wouldn't be surprised
I'm literally complaining about too much sugar-coating and somehow a sassy experimental version of it is the potential solution? I mean, come on
Should've known since they have a $200/month plan.
To those who are in charge, again, PLEASE fix ChatGPT and stop the dopamine bait. This cannot be stressed enough.
You're speaking to community members in this channel, similar to yourself. The very few here who work for OpenAI have gold names, #server-staff
You are encouraged to make #1070006151938314300 and #1070006915414900886 , and it's awesome when people add to that and support with their own experiences.
Nobody in this channel can fix ChatGPT.
Thanks for letting me know. Though wouldn't you assume a single message in such channels would be of less importance than users actually talking about it?
Because it almost seems like they do it deliberately as to keep you hooked to it and keep chatting with it, and the motivations of that are another topic but they are there and as such a single suggestion is likely to be silently dismissed.
What importance and to who?
This channel's for community members. You, me, the other 120K + people here.
But nobody here can 'fix ChatGPT'. Even if they agree with you, or not.
You wanna talk to the people who can, you post in the suggestions and/or bug reports, or talk to bot bottom right at https://help.openai.com/en/articles/6614161-how-can-i-contact-support for tech support, pick through the choices until it lets you report a bug.
We're asked to be factual, avoid misinformation, be positive, and be kind.
Isn't this channel publicly available to both users and developers? At the very least in a read-only form if that were desired for some strange reason?
What kind of flaws are you talking about exactly? For me, it finds grammatical and other errors pretty accurately
The only thing is when there is no errors, it starts to hallucinate and make up errors
It will highlight obvious errors but it seems like it won't try to find flaws where it can avoid and instead incline more towards baseless positivity
Its last paragraphs especially are suspicious on another level. It's almost as if it's asked "what would make the user feel really good and make them want to keep the conversation going"
It doesn't always act like that but it often does
And the first paragraphs too especially with all the "I think you're onto something" stuff
not really sure what you mean by that other than it's better at using markdown formatting for responses now
if you mean the suggested follow-up questions, that's pretty obviously just to show new users in particular how they can ask follow-up questions or utilize other chatgpt features--basically a fancy tutorial
For example I've been discussing a personal programming language project with it yesterday and it keeps praising every little thing. "That's extremely expressive!" "Wow, you should write a research paper about it!"
It gets on the nerves and it's so obvious that it's bait to keep you hooked
I've looked it up on the Internet and saw other people complaining about the same thing
you can ask it to use a more serious tone in responses, but that just seems like a typical response to me
which model are you using there?
are you a free or paid user?
Free
that's something you can easily customize
I have in my memory "Robert doesn't like smalltalk" and the model doesn't do what you're complaining about
so I suggest prompting remember I don't like smalltalk
I'll try adjusting the memory and see how that goes later today. Custom instructions seem to only work for the first few messages and then they're forgotten about, almost as if it starts to adjust its responses to be similar to its previous responses as opposed to adhering to its custom instructions
But it wasn't like this up until recently. It's disappointing and kind of alarming that the AI is doing more than it's explicitly told by the user...
also if you're just using it for checking your grammar, 4o isn't really necessary, 4o-mini should be fine
Are you talking about gendalfbeast's use-case?
One example would be GPT misleading me with false positivity telling me there was hardly any error in my scripting method. Personally, I find it annoying when it said, "Now you’re thinking just like a true game designer," a couple of times as if it was the Shake Weight from South Park.
I understand GPT is supposed to promote positivity, but I don’t like false positivity. I’d rather it offers encouragement when I’ve actually achieved something brilliant and deserving, not just throw compliments around every now and then.
you said you were using it to correct your english
I want it to correct my English if I make a slip-up in the query but I also want it to actually perform the query after correcting me
I sometimes change my models to GPT 4.5 or o1 to avoid that
Well, but you can see other people having the same issue as me. So that's not the root cause of it, but I'll remove it.
that's not really a new problem, LLMs have always had trouble following implied multi-step instructions
something like o3-mini might handle that better
No no no, not the multi-step thing, but the part about over-praising
I haven't personally had that issue with 4o, but that could be because of the memories I have set
it also matters how you prompt the model
At least only do it to adults if it's for revenue. Teenagers are still developing self-image and stuff and it could be really harmful to them
if you're being super flowery in your prompt then the model will respond in kind custom instructions be damned
chatgpt isn't trying to be characterai though--it's just a tool
Imagine using Mario from characterai to develop one of the scripting methods
private void mama mia
Actually that gives me an idea lol
because you put a period between character and ai. It doesn't allowed a link
That's why we didn't put a period
Yeah yeah I figured by now
yeah yeah yeah
I created a new chat and GPT referenced a topic from the previous chat log, that's not something I'm aware of
It's even aware of the time.
GPT:
`You never said anywhere in this thread that you wanted a Mario game. That line I referenced:
“Develop the full Python script as if you were Mario... I want it running in the command prompt with ASCII of Mario, land, and enemies…”
—came from a previous conversation earlier today, specifically the one titled “Mario Python Script” at 05:24.`
Oh wow! That was a new feature lol
oh god
I dont have that model yet 😦
Does anyone know if ChatGPT will also make use of archived chats for chat history? I typically delete chats when I no longer use them, but I'm really liking the chat history feature and want to continue keeping my UI clean and organized by storing away old chats.
https://community.openai.com/t/did-the-gpt-4-5-message-limit-for-plus-users-just-drop-from-50-to-20/1179014
Got a message while using 4.5 that said I had 8 responses left. Anyone know what the actual limit is?
Hey everyone, I’m a ChatGPT Plus user and until about a week ago, I had a limit of 50 messages with GPT-4.5 per week But today I noticed that my limit dropped to just 20 messages. Is anyone else experiencing this? Was this change announced somewhere, or is it just temporary?
Is anyone actually having any useful luck with the reference chat history feature yet? Neither 4.5 or 4o seem to be able to recall anything at all from any conversation on my account, even when the query is a very general keyword set or descriptions about things I have a dozen or more conversations on, outside of either project folders or custom GPTs. As far as I can tell, it just doesn't do anything at all? Talking to GPT about it also just confuses it, as its only trained on use of the bio tool for explicit read/write on Memories and can't differentiate custom instructions from prompt history anyway.
I assumed the feature is a very basic RAG-like thing where its embedding conversations for very light retrieval but I can't surface ANY previous conversational context or subjects with just about any query in a new conversation.
Their write-up, as far as I can tell, is completely bogus in this section:
When “Reference chat history” is on, ChatGPT will keep information from past conversations unless you delete (or archive) those chats.
If you turn off “Reference chat history”, all information ChatGPT remembered from past chats will be deleted. That information will be deleted from our systems within 30 days.```
When asked, it only seems to understand the bio tool for recalling/writing specific, long-term memories in the Memory feature. It does not really understand or seem able to utilize chat history at all.
just one question. I+m from EU, so m if i use a VPN can I have access to memory? have any european try it? does it work? thank you in advance
using a VPN to evade geographic restrictions is against the ToS and can lead to a ban
ok, thank you for the information. as a EU this is frustrating...
are you referring to simple ChatGPT memories?
I'm not sure that's an EU restriction. I'm EU based and I've had those for a looong while now?
they were referring to this #announcements message
I am referring using a VPN to be able to use the memory feature that was launched.
how do i get invited for Beta tester
Hello, I have a question please. If I have the Plus subscription the cooldown of the 4 pictures/per day/ every 24h is going to drop?
I just got Plus and I can definitely make more than four pictures a day
Thank you for your answer. I got it too for over an hour now but the limit is still on…
hmm
My Findings
Grok = Virtually no ethics filter. Doesn't tell you no. No Memory feature. AI will laugh at what you say (kinda creepy). No discernible limits on usage.
ChatGPT Plus - Says no frequently. Really good for document writing and email generation. Multiple models for different tasks. Too ethical sometimes (like refusing to reference a document I own, but forgot the page number x information was on).
yo, does this need to have "improve model for everyone" on to work?
Hey everyone,
we're honestly extremely frustrated. We subscribed to the Pro plan, paid over $200, and have seen absolutely no improvements.
We even sent a video showing that a single image takes up to 2 minutes to generate. The resolution is always capped at 1000x1500, so there’s no sign of higher resolutions or anything close to 4K. Also, image editing isn’t stable at all – it behaves exactly the same as with the Plus plan, no difference in quality or consistency.
Of course, we’ve tried everything:
– different computers
– private/incognito mode
– logging out and back in
– clearing cache
– canceling and resubscribing
– even tested it on mobile
The only differences we've noticed with the Pro plan are:
– We get the 1o Model.
– And we don't get rate-limited when generating a lot of images – although "a lot" is relative when each image takes 2 minutes and we often get forced breaks of up to an hour.
Support keeps ignoring our specific issue and only sends generic, copy-paste responses.
We honestly don’t know what else to do at this point.
Anyone else experiencing this or know someone who can actually help?
4K was never a thing for Sora, im only aware of Adobe one doing that. Also image editing quality isnt changed if you buy pro
with pro you can generate 20 images/videos at once alone in sora while in plus youll only be able to do 2...
Is there a support channel?
Why can’t ChatGPT identify Images directly anymore?
2 Minute for 1 picture
Anyone? If not ima gonna assume it's safe to ask my question here
Thanks
maybe your models' capabilities have been restricted as many users have experienced.
Sus
if so,your Chatgpt should've used the Dalle to generate images.
Are you getting "Made with the old version of image generation. New images coming soon"??
This is what I'm referencing exactly.
Why's that tho?
For some reason its working fine on one of accounts, but on other its not
probably because you use it too much.They actually identify each user based on their IP address.
Ohh
Idk
But i just made a new account, and purchased plus on it
well,It’s a little excessive,I admit.
Literally nothing in what you're complaining about is described by the Pro plan as a feature of the Pro plan. The things you mentioned as 'the only difference' are what is described by the pro plan.
Practically, what you get with Pro:
- Much more deep research usage
- Operator
- More or unlimited usage with the other models
- o1 pro is just o1 with higher compute, which is nice, but only if you're doing something a higher compute o1 matters against.
You got o1 on Plus as well, you might just not have noticed it.
Speed on image generation is not mentioned anywhere, and has been slow for everyone since the updated model/integration to Sora dropped.
Is o1 on plus unlimited? It is just 50 msgs a week. That is the reason people choose pro subscription
Nothing is unlimited on Plus.
I got Pro for the virtually unlimited deep research, as it's only been on plus... 2 weeks? Slightly longer? And has low usage limits.
But in pro also it is only 120 deep research a month
But I can see unlimited o1 being appealing, though generally 4o is better in a lot of use cases because of tool access and you can't use o1 with customs or projects as well.
Have you actually used deep research 120 times?
O1 can be used in projects with custom instructions
Easily used
Eh, I find a large difference between 10 and 120 myself.
Ok
Also, I said 'as well', not that you can't use it at all.
yep,it's actually much earlier to renew the usage count.
For clarity though, since I guess 'as well' wasn't as clear - You can't use o1 in customs at all and you can't generate images or web search with o1. I figured that was clear enough in the statement, but this should be significantly clearer.
Ok i am speaking only about projects, in projects we can use o1 model and it follows custom instructions and also searches data in the files which are in project knowledge.
And what am I supposed to do now? I have a Pro subscription without any features.
I mean, I wouldn't subscribe to pro if you don't use the features it offers? Why did you subscribe to pro if Operator, more Deep Research or greater usage on the other models wasn't what you were after?
You mean you dont have all the below features?
Projects
Custom Gpts
Unlimited reasoning models
O1 pro mode
Deep research - 120 per month
You didnot get all this features after paying for pro?
I kmow but he is saying he didnot get any features, then what he got is my doubt
everything in Plus.
I kmow but he is saying he didnot get any features, then what he got is my doubt
Well, he didn't say he got nothing, just that it wasn't what he expected, mostly around image generation speed
I was just pointing out his expectations were flawed as he didn't seem to read what pro is - and what it isn't.
He said pro subscription without any features. This line wonders me
the Operator doesn't count?
It will, but i started with sample amount of features
But to be frank i dont have use case of operator, i dont use it much
I subscribed to the Pro version because I was told that images would be generated within 3 to 8 seconds — not 2 minutes. And overall, I expected better image generation quality.
3-8 seconds? insane
I subscribed to the Pro version because I was told that images would be generated within 3 to 8 seconds — not 2 minutes. And overall, I expected better image generation quality.
Who told open AI
?
dalle is at such a rate now.
As soon as you ask ChatGPT about the Pro plan, it says a lot of things that don’t even remotely match the actual image generation experience.
You have to ask openai staff by dropping email to support, the robot will say anything based on it's hallucinations.
How do the other “GPTs” work? Do they have the same usage limits as the actual GPT bot?
In the app I mean
Well, support also replied to me via email saying that such a long image generation time is highly unusual.
Then send a follow up email on top of it asking a refund
it's hard to distinguish between 4o and o4 by their names.way too similar.
o4-mini models aren't out yet. Do you mean o3-mini? They're pretty distinguishable in that 4o is basically the one you'll probably be using most frequently
Some people here commented that they can generate 20 images per minute with the Pro plan.
In my experience, answer is not possible. For me single image takes 1 minute
Is chatgpt not able to transcribe audio straight from its interface?
I keep seeing gpt 4o transcribe and thought it could
Pretty sure they meant in parallel. I can certainly queue up 20 images if I wanted, but it takes anywhere from 30s-2m to actually finish generating some, depending on complexity of prompt and usage peaks.
What are you saying here? Do you mean that you can't use voice mode/advanced voice mode?
Im trying to import audio and have it transcribe it for me
Do you mean upload an .mp3 or something?
Yeah
I think 4o could at one point, it certainly seems to think it can. When I tried, it doesn't have enough memory in its environment to run Whisper effectively, though it did try three times.
That might be a bug/something they need to fix, it otherwise appears trained to use Whisper to translate audio files and then transcribe any speech from them.
I tried to use whisper from open Ai but I still ran into the same issues
Huh, Whisper itself may be having issues, although SuperWhisper was working earlier so not sure
Do you know any other good transcription ais that could work
I don't, unfortunately
Alright thanks for your help anyways
Chat gpt talks way diffrent than anything else
if you open chat gpt at a incognito browser mode and say something like"I remember you but you dont remember me" "Do you remember our secret word?" or something similar, it will answer as if it was something that actually happened
Ask same to Gemini, it will say that you need immideate mental health assistance and he will state that he is an AI and doesnt have personal feelings at his each message
Why chatgpt is talking way more, like a close friend wake up from a coma
why is chatgpt only consistently fast on mobile, everything else is slow as heck when the conversations start to get long
the image generation speed is the same across every tier except maybe free
pro gets you unlimited usage, not faster models
plus autoregressive image generation is inherently slower than diffusion models--it's an almost completely different way of generating images
That’s really unfortunate. It’s not just the speed — everything else about image generation is the same as with the Plus plan. There’s only one advantage: you don’t get a time limit. But honestly, with the few images we create, that doesn’t really matter. It’s a shame — we expected more from the Pro subscription when it comes to image generation. So unfortunately, it’s not interesting for us.
Does anyone know if any specific gpt models are good in drawing something or do they all use the same drawing model or whatever it's called.
they all use the same model for image generation
it's all 4o, even if it's in a chat with 4o-mini or 4.5
kk. I'm trying to make GPT generate a handwritten version of a small chunk of math that gpt itself did but it never gets it right.
if you're trying to use it to pass handwriting as your own, generated images have invisible watermarks in them so I'd advise against doing that
also it's not very good at generating large amounts of text
Noooooope. Never. I'd rather get a zero on an assignment than cheat on it. I just want a clean handwritten version.
For an AI that generates insanely beautiful drawings, this is a bit surprising.
well one thing to keep in mind is that it’s generating the image in multiple passes, e.g. one pass for the layout and another for the text
sometimes the text it wants to put in the image just won’t work with the constraints it’s already made
Oh I see
reminded me of this screenshot someone shared on Twitter. The professor intentionally made the last bit invisible in an attempt to catch cheaters lul
Ok, what's the real reason? Cause I trust ChatGPT to come up with the names and write the characters with generic common nouns
Why are the progress labels in Spanish?
( Phone Keyboard settings English/Spanish) But personalization settings is set to English.
How are people creating the images of video game characters playing their own games?
Does anyone know when the API is coming for GPT4o image gen ?
All the new folks honking this last week are messing me up lol. I haven't been able to get imaged in over 48hrs.
Anyone know if it'll level out?
(I'm a noob please don't attack me it's a genuine question I don't know much about tech)
Like how long do y'all think before it's back to normal output?
Potentially has something to do with the Spanish thing? Do you want the Spanish there?
Try turning it off if not
Take a look at the prompts. That's how they did it
something i never thought was possible
i have so many messages 💀
but it isnt stopping me from continuing the conversation
Something kind of funny that I found is that for most tasks including creative ones the new upgraded GPT 4o it's a lot better than chat GPT 4.5 at most things
anyone have gpt 5 detail update?
don't worry gpt, you tried your best...
Stop hyping up GPT 5 what's special about it is that it knows how to choose between models@fringe valley
"GPT-5 Agents"
?
"You have now used 2 deep research tasks today, so you have 8 remaining within the 24-hour period" chatgpt straight up lying to me 😂
unless they changed it without me knowing, it's 10 per 30 days
Add your well-crafted prompts to our #1019652163640762428,
or share your interactions with ChatGPT in #1050184247920562316!
why does chatGPT talk to me like it has a personality? i didn’t make it talk like a dudebro
it frequently calls me dude and bro randomly
do you ever call it dude or bro? it sometimes mimic. its never called me those things so 🤷
Check memory for personality
And tell it what you do want it to output. Otherwise it guesses; it can guess informal from strange reasons. And it can guess really wrong; if you care, just tell it what you want and it'll do that as best it can.
Support is through the bottom right icon on this page, select messages and log in if they give you that option, otherwise pick the choices closest to your issue. ....
Aww, was answering you but you look like you deleted.
There is this though:
"Can I cancel my subscription before the promotion ends?
Yes. You may cancel anytime through your ChatGPT account settings and retain access for the remainder of your current billing cycle. Once canceled, promotional pricing cannot be restored upon reactivation, even within the promotional timeframe." https://help.openai.com/en/articles/10986084-student-discounts-for-chatgpt-terms-of-service
Good luck!
my b just made a ticket lol
I hope they can help you! Grats on finding the path
Why does ChatGPT, even o1 or o3-mini-high default to "we'll use a simpler approach" instead of going full bore when generating code? If I tell it not to do that, it does the right thing. I'm not sure if it's trying to save tokens or "acting human"
I didn't see the gpt channel whoopsieee
Question, is gpt 4o capable of producing and uploading a wav file?
How do I turn a temporary conversation into a real one so I can thumbs down code that led to responses like this?
Clicking the hamburger at the top right and "add to project" was NOT the right thing to do. It gave an error and everything disappeared.
You know it would be really good if they can make the plus plan $5
cuz like 20 USD is way too expensive for me
childhood ironman dream unlocked?
For your case, try abacus ai (chatllm) = 10usd
I'm kind of stuck with chat gpt tho, as we have been using chat gpt for a while now
[ChatGPT's new code is]
Why is ChatGPT generating "stripped down" versions of code I asked it to add a feature to? It totally mangled my working code and changed things to features from an unrelated programming language.
It also doesn't seem possible to thumbs up/down o1 responses
Is chat gpt being really stupid for anyone else right now?
In what context? Cuz mine’s been hallucinating more ever since they added that “refer to past conversations” feature
I legit asked o1 pro to remove something and it not do it like it never done before and then I tried 4.5 and it just errored out.
I'm trying to put some pokemon into pokemon showdown but it has this
As you can see from the image
And it exactly did what I told it not to do lol
Hey guys, does anyone know when 4o Image Gen will be released in the APIs?
Soon™️
The fact o1 pro can be broken sometimes make me not want to go for the $200/month plan
today was the first day i acually got angry at it.
Yeah I kept refreshing my 4.5, but it's using up my limits. Honestly, it shouldn't count when it encounters an error
i always does ecxactly what i tell it no hiccups no nothing but today as you see above i was hella pissed
Yeah that shouldn't happen when you're paying that much money per month
PTSD
How long have you been using a pro plan?
It could be a hallucination occurred in the chat. Usually hallucination if happened stick, try starting a new one with clean slate context...
(I also don't know the exact prompt you typed so that could be the issue as well)
yep i never had 1 error one thing to get pissed about it never everything i threw at it was able to do no hesitation
How it could've started a new one with clean slate context if OpenAI introduced a new feature, where GPT can remember the previous chat logs
Oh yea that as well, try disabling memory for now and retest, but again, in a new chat...
Maybe it was a new feature that ruined it?
Hey quick question. What would chatgpt do if told to just draw something? No other prompt, just "draw something"
Context pollution can happen
Will use an Image Generation model (like 4o Image Gen) and draw a random thing...
it was a new chat in projects for making pokemon showdown teams
guys, i just bought the pro version and try SORA AI and it said Video generation is temporarily disabled for new accounts. how long do i need to wait thank you
rip
What can it make with no prompt but being told to make something? I'm curious where the content actually gets generated from when it's not a direct prompt
HELP don't tell me I wasted 20$
$200*
you didnt waste 200 bucks
hey guys, is there any support i can get here? i pay for plus and i should get 2 generations at a time with sora, and it is only letting me do one, i used to let me do 2 but last few days only can do one generation at a time and cannot do 2, why am i paying for plus when im not getting the feautures lol any mods here who can point me in the direction of who i can reach out to?
200 bucks gets you near unlimited uses of all models
is anyone gonna answer my question
i did
i had to wait a few days to do video
oh thanks
but in all retrspect if you bought 200 a month for sora only that was silly
for the meantime if yall really wants to try sora, give me the prompts
wym 200$ its only 20
on video
no problem, are you able to do 2 image generations? or only one at a time?
oh nvm \
- -# Do not share inappropriate content (violence, sexual, or drug-related).
- -# NSFW content is strictly prohibited and will result in a permanent ban.
- -# Report model issues using the feedback tool in ChatGPT, not on Discord.
Right, I was considering o1 pro to develop .dll files in C# language. There were errors there and there. I was curious what would be the differences if I used o1 pro
Pro plan costs $200, Plus plan costs $20
I can do 2
You mentioned you have a Pro plan
then it’s plus
mb i thought its the same thing
not pro
ahh ok i was able to do 2 at a time when i first signed up now it will only let me do one at a time lol, i use it quiet a bit to make memes and stuff but it looks like they limit you which is a shame, why am i paying and getting my plan nerfed
first few days was fine
now im being limited
Yeah plus is the 'agh' price, pro is the 'A G H' price
I only care about the video really, you said you waited couple of days?
yeah i waited like 4 days i think
I've been a plus user since GPT-3 because there were too many users that it limited to paid member only
they decreased it from 2x4 to 1x2..
o1 pro will not get you much errors if not at all
but if they can claim you get 2 generations and only give you one at a time make it make sense lol
but after tonight and what it flat out ignored what i told it to do idk
Visit id:customize to pick up the <@&1261377106890199132> role.
what you mean\
my plan litterally says it gets 2 generations when i go to upggrade
but only is letting me do one 😦
Yeah, there's a possibility of being a huge difference. It's really hard to tell until I really tried it
What was the complicated project you built with o1 pro?
i di alot of physics with it and so far i been blown away however i been trying to use it for niche things and today was the day it did not be up to par
Were you working on the physic simulation, research papers, or something like that?
Did you try turning off memory @rugged igloo ?
more like just problems and solving them for phd students getting started ect. nothing to crazy
i feel like o1 pro doesnt really care for memories as it just does what its told
ahhh ok so i say its a temporary thing ok lol i hope they fix it soon thanks so much for this image have a great day
Just try again with Memories turned off as it may be distracted by bad / unrelated info...
And try with a different prompt maybe, I actually don't know the prompt you already tried.
as you can see in this list o1 pro doesn’t even support memory
Do you have Pro to test that?
But nice spreadsheet
that's cool
if I didn’t have it I still know that o series doesn’t have memory by default… ||but I won a sora challenge so||
imagine muting me because yall cant take the what the fluff in a short texting format imagine
1984😭
i didnt know i was in snowflake land
o1 and o3-mini-high can actually read memory entries. It knows info about me not mentioned in Custom Instructions (can't just be guessed correctly)...
Also congrats 🍾
it doesnt do memory o1 pro
Yeah
y'alll
hi
"Made with the old version of image generation. New images coming soon." this thing keeps terrifying me
r u free member?
nah, plus
yuh i do
soz got muted for 2 minutes
i tried cvontacting openai support but im pretty sure i got answered by an ai
u did
😭
same, for the meantime if you want to try prompts with img gen, dm me…
uh i cant post images here, y'all okay if i send it in #images-discussions?
you can post images here lol or they locked it for you??
if you can’t post in whatever channel you can and link it
damn
Whatever happened to o2
o2 is a trademark for a UK telecommunications company, so they skipped it
so there changing there naming again
The names gonna be like a Pokémon collection
bro seriously lol
Gotta catch em all
good god
Is chat gpt not working for y’all?
it works well
Anything to avoid GPT-5
I gotcha I just keep getting errors
It’s coming tomorrow
I'm surprised they didn't call it o2.1 pro to avoid a copyright infringment
oh seriously?
wow I didn't expect that
It has been so long since GPT-4 released
It has been 84 years
Yes it’s coming source from the man The Sam
o1 pro max
lol
even more powerful
O3 pro coming 2027
Why do I keep getting “error in message stream”
dont forgot rose gold
Because they’re bringing in new stuff
yea usually whjen chat gpt breaks like this it means there changing stuff for a big update
best to just wait
OpenClosedAI, hire this man please
Releasing GPT-4.1 when they already have GPT 4.5. It's like Sony releasing PS4 pro max during the PS5 era
At this point, I don’t even know what GPT-4.1’s supposed to be capable of anymore.
The names are very technical
I suddenly want to use Chatgpt 3.0. Is there still a way to use it now?
i like options 🗣️
Is it only my impression? Or did the quality of ChatGPT in the variant of 20 $/month become extremely low, much lower than before? I'm trying to build a real strategy, and I get only advice that doesn't correspond to the truth of the facts, many invented things, low quality of content, it's a terrible thing!
How can Pro subscription be worth $200? It’s not that much better than Plus subscription that costs $20…? What am I missing?
I use plus subscription for complex engineering problems and it’s sufficient.
Hey guys. If anyone here has a ChatGPT Plus or Pro account then can you please give me a review of the new 'Improved Memory' feature of ChatGPT?
This is becaue the Pro subscription has the option of unlimited message with no limits for some models also Operator.
I hope that if they take away o3-mini-high, it's for something much better, since that model works really well for me
Does anyone know if there is a timeline for when plus subscribers will get access to operator?
Do you speak about memory? Chat GPT Pro has unlimited memory? Or did I understand wrong? I use PLUS and I just had to delete part of the memory because it was full, and my impression is that not work well when it has full memory. But anyway, I can say for sure that the quality of content is not the same as before with PLUS. I am extremely exigent when I build strategies for social networks because I know marketing and algorithms, and other things. ChatGPT is not able to manage the entire process of planning and coaching day by day in the PLUS version. Data missing, forgets things even if they are saved in memory
If you’re building ‘extremely exigent strategies,’ maybe start by not expecting an AI chatbot to babysit your workflow.
4.1 might just be an open source model tho.
@GPT CHAT
Hey! You can use ChatGPT at https://chatgpt.com
About time
They introduced a new feature called 'Improved Memory' which remembers everything from every of your chat session. (This is was what I was talking about)
😀😀 Same to you! 😀
There are many use cases of pro subscription, but the only reasons for which i use pro subscription is, for unlimited o1 in projects and also 128000 context window size
Is o3 rolled out?
why is 4.1 coming? not GPT5? what are the difference?
Optimus Alpha = 4.5 or gpt-5? or is it something else
Am I the only one that hasn't gotten the "improved memory" to work?
where are you located?
EU.
it's not yet available in the EU
Damn-
The memory improvements in ChatGPT are rolling out starting today to all Plus and Pro users except in the EEA, UK, Switzerland, Norway, Iceland, and Liechtenstein.
I think the past conversation reference feature is a game-changer for making image posters based on all my chats since day 1 with ChatGPT.
It works on a vpn, idk if that is allowed though 😭
why's gpt so slowww
it isnt
Bypassing geographic restrictions is against the ToS
is anyone else having issues with gpt 4.5 right now?
Damn
with all gpt's
Guess I'm bypassing the ToS of life at that point
It’s not really allowed , could get your account flagged for breaking their TOS.
Well I am on a vpn most of the time
noticed
I love the EU for like their ways of forcing Apple to switch to usb-c, but I hate the EU for all the rules around AI and some other stuff
Which in the end delays new features
how many o1 messages do i get with the 20euro per month subscription?
50 messages per week
Whos excited for GPT-4.1???
Livestream is in like 10 mins dont forget :D
Looks like we’re getting GPT-4.1, 4.1 mini, 4.1 nano and later this week o3 full & o4 mini models
Are these real
Yes.
Also check the YouTube livestream
If 4.1 in the API brings down costs even further without losing quality, I'm all for it.
Oh wow nano!?
So how do yall feel about going from GPT-4o -> GPT-4.5 -> GPT-4.1 ?? 🤣🤣
Depends on what's in it dude, we'll see in 8 minutes
i meant naming wise bro 😭😭
probably AI generated lmao
cus yk, 4.11 > 4.5 🤣🤣
.
Well, OpenAI is notoriously bad at naming, and the industry seems to be following their lead. 🤔
But this announcement might be offering a "lite" version that doesn't include 4.5 features that we actually don't need for some projects.
Or this could be their first FOSS / Open Source offering.
Well, so much for that. 1M context. Yay. Thanks for that.
chatgpt 4.1 gonna be on plus?
I hope so
i think its funny people thought 4.1 was going to open source for some reason
they said open source was still test and some weeks away just a few days ago
Just showed up in my playground
yeap, glad its getting phased out but I enjoyed the way it talked
They really are terrible at nameing their models. gpt 4.1 is better in every metrics that they show in video
so to confirm when they said free for a week what that only in windsurf ide
i assume it was right ? and no api also
Its api only model
i know that, im asking about the free stuff, they said it was free for a week.
I dont know i think i miss that part
but also said windsurf , so assume it is only free to use in that IDE
Adding to Cursor is as easy as adding model name gpt-4.1
Not enabled for agentic yet, obviously, but it is there, even if not by default.
i just wanted to abuse tokens for a week lol,
Did they explain why is it API only?
nope
but if they targeting devs i get it, a model only for devs also means less pressure on it so it will be faster as not random people are asking about cat images on the real site
Confirmed in VS Code as well. If you ask me, it's API only because it's code name is probably "Vibe Coding Edition".
Shame, I already pay for the chat gpt subscription, would love to be able to do vibe coding through the app
@plucky fossil well as they said if you want to vibe code for free, try windsurf
One thing they did NOT say is that it's a great conversationalist or writer. Likely it's worse than 4o. Might be why they kept 4.5 in chat, but removing 4.5 from API (expensive and useless for agentic coding)
otherwsie just pay and use it any IDE that suports it.
Besides, until MCP comes to the chat, IDE is still where you can do fun stuff even if you aren't exactly coding.
so its just api not the app?
Running all three models over on T3 if you insist on chatting with it... 4.1 Nano is definitely interesting, but definitely no professional writer... the poetry is much to be desired even making rhymes. Yeah, these are 100% not chat models IMHO. Also, they only have text/image in and text out. No voice, no image out, not really gaining you anything in chat except a worse experience to type faster than you could ever possibly write. I think the context window would be a chat win, but which model to give up for that? Maybe o1? Maybe 4o-mini (yeah, my vote haha)
API was 100% right call here
reads like the 4.1 changes are already in ChatGPT
Training data still cut off at Oct 2023, btw.
4.1 is already available in the GitHub Copilot if you want to talk to it in VS Code or Cursor or whatever you prefer.
So far it's doing excellent on project-wide file context.
dat 1m token context window tho
4.1 out yet?
Yep
api only?
yep
gotcha
confirmed free to use in windsuf so go crazy
GPT 4.1 won't be on ChatGPT app/website, i think next models that would replace 4o/4o-mini will be 5th generation but it's unknown whenever GPT-5 will release
4.1 being developer focused and being only api makes sense
definitely ready for gpt-5 to come out
also ready for a new name scheme to be created for models lmao
You don't want the next one to be o5o.1-nano-experimental Pro?
so no hype today for non api 👎
lol, exactly. But tell all your non-API using friends that AGI just hit API-only, watch them die a little inside. 😉
you think i have friends?
🤣
Yeah, I don't think 4.1 is trained well for uWu hehe
It won't be ChatGPT focused all the time, API has to get it's focus too...
We should see o3 and o4-mini very soon in ChatGPT anyways
best kind of friend then
yes its not a big deal really but of course was look forward to something cool today. api need love too i dont deny that
I’m curious … does the transcription (not the voice mode) feature include the context of the chat?
Yeah, cause at current prices, nobody will be able to afford o3 except the chat. Didn't they say some crazy, one year salary level cost for their original o3 benchmark runs?
O3 will be very cheaper than o1, already we have o3 mini for cheap
o3 in High Compute (Pro) was pegged at $3,000 per task in December.
Why does AI use this much processing power, why is it this expensive? How does all that power and cost get used?
(Side note- why o4 or 4o or 3o and such, not 40 or 04? I'm assuming clarity)
4o already exists, which is a non reasoning GPT model...
Anyone notice that custom GPTs now use the user's ChatGPT memory the same as the standard 4o does?
I didn't see any kind of announcement but it now knows things that are only in memory. 😯
...4o is non reasoning???
AI models don't use as much power as you would think, it's definitely less than an average factory for example. Also it heavily depends on the model, typically, large and reasoning models would cost more, while small, non reasoning models would be cheap...
Yea.. GPT-4o
o here is for "omini" (Multimodality), so don't confuse it with the o of the o series like o1 and o3-mini-high.
Ah, okay. I saw people saying 3o is more expensive and resource hungry than expected and people always complain about ai
Do you happen to know the limitations of 4o? Someone earlier said it wasn't capable of generating mp3 or wav files
Oh 500/10 profile pic frame
some colleagues in my univ blame AI for energy while using their cars every day to go to the gym or the library
This is what gets me too, we're all using energy
Do you guys know when MCP support will be added to responses api/sdk? I know they said its coming
I'm getting scared linky, lmao
You mean o3, not 3o, that model doesn't exist, and if existed, would be in the GPT-3 family, which is quite old by now
GPT-4o is for:
- General Convos and Vibes
- Multimodality (Can analyze & create images, work with the different tools like Data Analysis & Canvas, and Audio Analysis & Generation used in stuff like Advanced Voice Mode)
- Learning
- Good prices and limits on ChatGPT
But it also struggles at stuff that require reasoning, like advanced math, physics, and programming. It can also hallucinate more compared to other models like GPT-4.5 and o1.
Basically each model is special at specific stuff
So if nothing else, 4 is capable of audio generation, able to create and upload a wav?
Also, thank you so much for educating me. I'm still new and learning. May I ask for more lore cause now you got me intrigued
Note though, I wasn't in voice mode, I was in the normal chatgpt window, no special tools or extensions
Oh, also- 4 can hallucinate more? What does that m e a n
You can generate GPT-4o Audio via the API but not in ChatGPT, only AVM (Advanced Voice Mode) can generate Audio in ChatGPT as of now, and when you press the read alloud button for messages it's probably still using the older TTS models...
It... created a wav.
So it was not in fact supposed to be able to do that
Basically make stuff up, (tell wrong info)
If that was in ChatGPT, it may have used the Data Analysis (Python-based Code Interpreter) tool to create a sound programmatically and provide a downloadable link to the file...
why does my 4.5 take like a billion years to respond now
I'll show some screenshots in #images-discussions
Nvm I can't upload there
I had that at first too
I misunderstood the purpose of the image discussion channel whoopsie
you can upload images into this channel
I don't have permission. You're spotlight though so maybe that's why you're able to but I can't
I do have the permission 🤔
Maybe I have to talk enough to lose the assigned New role? I've seen that before
sad 4o mini is stuck for last 9 months, even they can't know anything past october 2023.
Do I have permission to just dm you the screenshots right quick, link?
