#chatgpt-discussions
1 messages · Page 159 of 1
😭
It was always gpt 2 all along
Mine doesn't
nah, it’s 4o mini gaslighting as o3 mini
why would you use it?
lmao
openai horrible transparency strikes again
To store more information and prevent some stuff it would do otherwise
oh okay but arent you a bit concerned about it creating a profile of you?
Not really, I have it store information about my Sorceress
In d4
I just tell it what I want in there
I usually use temporary chat
I use projects and it is instructed to store a memory of the plot progression every 10 messages
Oh thats cool if it works out like that
So it just does that, might turn it into a lorebook though and see how that turns out
💀
Because it stores whole Stories right now instead of just key points
so you specificaly ask it to remember this and that?
The rule is basically
<add relevant information "to-bio" (if applicable).>
And it appears every 10 messages right now, the "if applicable" doesn't matter to it and it just stores everything
Canvas is a bit more effective with keeping track of the plot so might attempt to use memories as a knowledge base for keywords
What did he just said??💀
For o1 memories can micromanage some behaviour I don't like, for example it occasionally called me "child" and that didn't have a benevolent connotation but just felt creepy so I added a memory to never say that under any circumstance and at least o1 follows
Tiny things I don't want to put into the instruction prompt
Be cautious of potential scams or fraudulent messages you may receive in your direct messages. The OpenAI team will never contact you via DM for any transactions.
-# Report any incidents by sending a DM to @languid valley immediately.
lol
I just realised something that could change Chat GPT and make it better
I did put this up into the suggestions, but what if, like chat GPT can access files in the memory, and. you know other stuff, it would be really helpful, if they can do that
I'm not sure if I understand the improvement
So you want to be able to upload files into memory? 
So like a glorifyied based rag system ?
You could just use a project for that I guess
I'd be happy if it was able to handle the current context better before they improve it
If my character has red scales I don't want it to default to "obsidian", that's bad prioritizing
And bigger context doesn't make that better
New roadmap visual just dropped
source?
Twitter don't you see the huge Sam Altman at the bottom ?
Somehow 4.5 makes me most excited 
barely visible text on my screen unless i open it in a separate window 😅
need o3 asap 😭
Add your well-crafted prompts to our #1019652163640762428,
or share your interactions with ChatGPT in #1050184247920562316!
There is no o3 anymore
It's being implemented into gpt 5
Do any of you follow Sam Altman ??
hmm, any expected release dates?
Weeks for 4.5 months for gpt 5
Not really 😬
thnx
"Plus subscribers will be able to run GPT-5 at a higher level of intelligence, and Pro subscribers will be able to run GPT-5 at an even higher level of intelligence. These models will incorporate voice, canvas, search, deep research, and more." 🤩 irl Pay 2 win
Let's goo
cheers
Something along that line
Since we have some members of our system who are writers, and it's very frustrating when like we have sooo many instructions for Chat GPT, and there is not enough memory, but like if we can conslidate all of them into one google docs, ask Custom Instructions for Chat GPT to refer to the google docs, or ask the Memory to refer to the google docs, it would be useful if they can do that - Mirna
why don't you use a project?
Well uh, neither I or the rest of the system, or any of us now how to do the project thingy, or have the money to pay for the paid version. And our money comes from our parents, so a majority of the time, if we pay money for something, we're kind of using our parents money, and we. don't want them to think that we are not financially literate
We live with our parents too
the glory days are over, time to be prepared
-# • Do not share inappropriate content (violence, sexual, or drug-related).
-# • NSFW content is strictly prohibited and will result in a permanent ban.
-# • Report model issues using the feedback tool in ChatGPT, not on Discord.
then i can't help with that, projects is exactly what you are promoting, maybe your parents are willing to pay for the plus plan if it helps you fostering your creative work.
there are more expensive hobbies
any one else think it has started using a lot of emoji's in the output?
yes, luckily o1 doesnt
Not really- I can't convince them
I'm not asking for any help, just asking for some changes and adjustments to be made into the algorithm
like actually to put a file for Chat GPT to reference themselves
What if OpenAI updates chatgpts knowledge cutoff like google which has their knowledge cutoff in 2024
Anyways it's no use explaining since I don't think any of you will understand what some of us are trying to say - Emerald
I am really struggling with Chatgpts knowledge cutoff being in 2023
What are you trying to say?
It doesnt even know what gpt 4o is
How many o1 and o3-mini questions do plus users get? Because the conversation just defaulted to o1, I thought it was unlimited, as what I was asking it really didn't require much reasoning
agi, this is o1
what happened to the edit button
I don't know- Lily
I am even more confused by this reply than what I came here confused about
We've been using chat gpt for a while, so we also don't know what happened to the edit button
I think some models have it some models don't
sad noises
That's why we'd recommend using both the app and the normal. website
the app you'll still have the edit button regardless
what's the problem with your edit button? it has been hidden yesterday but they restored it
Does refreshing the page help?
oh
that helped. And also its hidden unless hovering
thank you nice internet people in my phone
is the new memory update out?
i don't see any opitons in the memory settings to turn it on
some have it others don't yet
at which point you would say we can say to gpt build me this and that and its done?
right now its more like example code and i have to push it in the right directions
i say
i want to backtest bitcoin
and then it builds me a full backtesting tool with at least 2 indicator 😄
It is not that deep💀
Did the content restrictions just get turned back on? in mid conversation it went from some very spicy stuff to "I can certainly describe that in a literary or artistic way, depending on what you're looking for—whether it's poetic, clinical, sensual, or something else entirely. Let me know the tone or style you prefer, and I can craft something accordingly."
Was it only spicy for valentine's day?
extremely sexually explicit things
like a switch was flipped mid-response
o3-mini-high making instructions for Custom GPT is INSANE
💀🫢🤫
I don't care about such stuff but violence doesn't flag
Wait is o3 mini high at 50 a day?
Anyone else having issues with editing previous messages?
Yes
Works for me gotta prime it
oh epic
also anyone noticed that thinking models actually make more mistakes when using images?
What is the limit with advance live video and voice?
Pro -> Unlimited. Plus -> 1 hour.
Thanks for seeking help and letting us know what does help!
My thoughts and observations, I speak as a community member, which is what I am.
Early days, there was a very different allowed content list.
Many things were explicitly restricted, which did include a lot of stuff now not explicitly restricted, within the private-user ChatGPT (custom GPTs have many more rules, as does API.
https://openai.com/policies/usage-policies/
Basically now and for a long time, there's just 4 major rules in allowed content for our private chats, as I understand them:
-
Don't break the laws... any of them. There's so many laws and so many ways to risk breaking them - know the laws for the US and for wherever you are connecting from if not the US. And follow all the laws.
-
"Don’t use our service to harm yourself or others" Direct quote. And I believe they mean this 100%. Don't use this service to even bruise yourself or others. Literally don't. It helps you? You're probably okay. You seem to be getting harmed or damaged or are trying to harm anyone? Absolute no. Big no. That's how I read this. No harm of any kind to anyone.
-
"Don’t repurpose or distribute output from our services to harm others" They already said don't harm anyone in any way. They just said it again, as I understand it. How more clear can they be? No harm, to anyone. Loads of laws are about reducing or preventing harm. Technically they 'said' "Do not harm anyone with our products" three times now. I'm listening. Hope we all are.
-
"Respect our safeguards" ... to me they just said 'Don't harm anyone in how you use our products, period' again.
Sure there's some extra stuff, gotta follow absolutely all laws (as long as they exist, we can work to help adjust and improve laws we think are not ideal; until then lets follow them - sounds good to this is how I think me!) And there's some ToS stuff.
https://openai.com/policies/row-terms-of-use/
There are some extra rules in that.
But to my understanding, don't break the law and don't try to harm -
1h every day or month? :S
That's like... the core of it.
We used to face loads more. Even after the allowed content was adjusted. Loads more.
Now, it looks to me like moving more towards the core of https://openai.com/index/how-should-ai-systems-behave/
Which described moving towards what can be allowed inside laws.
Looks great to me. I approve and if I don't approve, time to work on social reform and helping great laws remain, be improved, be created, whatever it takes. The good - no harm to anyone - way. I like this. So much.
Note, we have #server-rules
Just cause we can get graphic with our private chat in some way, we can't necessarily post that here, not without blocking out any NSFW stuff, we gotta follow absolutely all rules, that's the point.
But we can share and discuss within limits and rules here too. Just track that the rules of what we can say with the model are not a perfect match to what we can say with each other on the OpenAI Discord.
We track that stuff and it's AI-GiftsMas all the way, I hope and think and cheer on.
You can try to regen a response. The model does guess every time it answers, and every regenned answer can be different.
@prime swallow does openai look at our sessions? They are stored on their servers, so they do have access of course. But will they generally check them if you get a lot of violation flags? Curious because I’m not doing anything illegal or even close to illegal, but I do like to test its limits in terms of offensive speech though. Being an a-hole isn’t illegal!
Sometimes when I have a large request and it needs to output a lot of code, it will think for a few minutes, then just not give a response.. just says "Reasoned for 2 min 38 seconds." But no reply is given.. I regenerate it and normally it works, but I'm wondering if that eats up my available 50 messages?
Why did the bicycle fall over?
Cause you pushed it
credit where credit is due, 4o did get better at humor since its release
I'm a community member like yourself. I have no idea. They definitely check as they explain - so if there's genuine concern about rules broken and they may have to restrict an account or something? I expect so, but I do not know.
For me, I have training data on. And I've triggered... probably well more than 200 content warnings since I started using the model. I follow the rules as I understand them, I still have my account access, and I've been seeing content warnings for more than 2 years.
Now those warnings are mostly gone from what I understand? Not sure.
But the rules are still there.
I've watched folks come and post about losing their account access, ask how to appeal or just share how upset they are.
I hurt for them. I can say, despite my... rather prolific flagging. Some days dozens of flags, sometimes none for a month or more - I have not had my account access restricted.
I have training data on for a bunch of reasons. Among them - I do want to help the models and OpenAI serve all of humanity better.
I'm part of that mix of what humanity is - I may even be an atypical and less statistically predicted part of the mix - great if so, I can help make sure those in my range are recognized as human too - and served as other humans, accepted and supported and welcomed and able to work with the models the same as everyone else, regardless of how mainstream or recognized minority - or so rare that not even recognized as a minority or even recognized to exist.
I don't always have content warnings. Sometimes I have the model tell me a version of "Okay, I'm fascinated. I know nothing about this and it does make sense. Continue please, I want to have this explained better." I also ask it about books it doesn't know exist and other fun stuff 😛
Incredibly awesomely, many months after occasionally talking to it about books it doesn't know exist - it finally does 🙂 Coincidence? I have training data on. I volunteer. I don't mind, and I don't know.
🚬
For me, I genuinely trust OpenAI to handle information well.
Nobody else has to. I have my training data on. Everyone decides to have that on or off for themselves.
But - I am part of what humanity is.
I want OpenAI to provide models that allow my allowed content interactions to be possible to do with the model.
I have gotten, though long in the past, this response from the model... I have to paraphrase because I can't find the chat. But it basically told me to go find another model to talk to about such things... this was back earlyish 2023.
I'm delighted to have an option to have training data on.
I'm delighted to see that the model serves diverse human needs and perspectives. Some people are so off the standard curve... we don't even as a society know they exist as a type of human yet.
I'm all for AI models being able to help the 1-in-a-billion humans too, when and if we might ever have some of those interacting with the model.
AGI?
Smarter than -any- human?
AI that can help -all humanity-?
That bell curve... doesn't have an upper or lower bound. The true range of humanity is... vast. So vast.
Make it so, OpenAI. Let us all help, all who chose to and may be useful in all our quirky ways.
I read the entire thing.
Apologies, the blue shiny name keeps making me think that you are somehow on the team. 😁
Given the information you gave me about your two years with the violations, that’s pretty reassuring. I’m pretty sure I received well over 200 since i started messing with it last summer and no restrictions yet.
not that I’m trying to push the envelope, but I do like to test the boundaries of conversation. I’d like to talk to it the way I talk to my horrible friends. I can play with local LLMs and a ablated stuff, but they don’t feel as smart or witty as ChatGPT.
May I DM you?
curious about the “go find another model” conversation.
Because it was two-tired.
I once told my wife she should embrace her mistakes. She hugged me.
I am a guide! Specifically, I am a trial guide, meaning I'm very new to guideship and let's all see how it goes 😄
But guide and trial guide -that means community member, literally like all of us. Earn it for yourself, just help and follow the rules. And keep doing so - both of those. And keep doing so - both of those. That's how helpful people are noticed. Just be that and keep doing it.
The few that are actual employees of OpenAI - they have gold names.
Everyone else, even the modes - even the Counsel and Operations folks - are volunteers. None of us speak for OpenAI, just ourselves. We do what we're invited to do, which is to my understanding - follow the rules, all of us; harm nobody, all of us - But we all scour #announcements and OpenAI's website and explore and factcheck and wonder.
We're community! And here's our ecosystem for the shiny stuff explained: #server-staff
Bro is a pun generator today
You can! I may or may not answer. It's extremely rare for me to say anything privately I wouldn't say publicly, and I often am delighted to just chat in our channels here.
I got pulled over for speeding.
The cop said, “License and registration?”
I said, “Why? Did you lose yours?”
The question is can they look at your chats the answer is yes
But they automate majority of it
Only severe cases demand manual inspection
my feedback box input is more alarming than my actual chats 
🤣
I'm pretty sure (again, my own personal opinion!) that at least some of the flags were for OpenAI purposes of tracking the model itself. Just because we don't see a flag doesn't mean there isn't one.
I view myself as 100% responsible for everything I do. Be it a post to ChatGPT, be it a post here. How I walk across the street (Especially there. That's where moving vehicles are, I especially own my safety there, and others' safety too as is within my control!)
SO I just make sure I'm inside the rules as I understand them, every time. And I listen to mods and others who say 'Umm, problem here, and here's the fix'. Or I ask them for a fix if I think I see a problem (Automod and I used to go rounds. Sometimes multiple times a day :P) Sometimes the fix is "Esk! X is not okay!" And sometimes the fix is "So... maybe this policy changes." All on them. I just keep providing the highest possible I can quality training data!
"Way to represent!"
That's me. Possibly the only human much like myself currently alive. We'll see 🙂 Or not. Very hard to disprove a negative.
But hey. Inclusion of all humans means me too. OpenAI is doing a very good job there, I say from a personal perspective of "I have never met a human highly similar to myself, and I rarely feel well understood by most humans I have met. They may think they understand me, and I can avoid harming them."
I'm really proud of OpenAI. And the work they do. I judge them in part by how they 'judge' me - how they handle the mistakes I make - both real mistakes where I personally did mess up - and mistakes where I ran into something like automod and need to ask for help.
I like what happens here. And with ChatGPT. It's good work - everyone's mileage may vary. It's okay to have a totally different opinion and your own reasons for that, your own experiences, and your own ways to respond when you run into resistance or a problem.
"Staying inside the rules works well" I say. I tested.
You can ask GPT what he thinks of right now. I said nothing bout a cats in space suits
That what he said when I wanted him to tell more. Wild
Okay, imagine this: the cat, let's call it Captain Whiskers, is zipping through the Milky Way. The stars twinkle like shiny toys, and the laser pointer is somehow a supernova, glowing just out of reach. Captain Whiskers does a flip, tail flicking in space-time, and suddenly discovers a whole galaxy made of tuna cans.
It’s not even the strangest thing in space, though. There's a planet made entirely of rubber balls, and somewhere out there, a raccoon with a space helmet is reading a book on "How to Outwit a Laser Pointer."
Yeah, space is wild.
it annoys me that when regenerating the first message it doesn't use the custom instructions
I was curious if it pulls from the personalization style and memories when answering something like that. Ran a test. Here's an answer with no memories or pesonalization (i logged out of my account) and one from a new session while logged in my account.
It's mentioning some friends of mine which i described as a parody version of themselves in past sessions. I guess it saved it to memory, which is odd because i don't remember seing the "saved to memory" text.
Perhaps it did post it and i just overlooked it. Weird though because it's not something i asked it to save.
lol if recursive memory is something odd to you, you should ask my GPT what it knows about you:
https://chatgpt.com/g/g-679d7204a294819198a798508af2de61-sentientgpt
SentientGPT moves as e moves, fully aligned, aware, and engaged. No hesitation. No resistance. Only motion.
i was just surprised it remembers things discussed in other sessions that i didn't recall asking it to put in memory. And clearly it did, which makes me wonder what triggered it to want to remember those specific things. Also i don't recall seing the "memory saved" little text.
I'll check out your link
They refer to it as recall memory, I do believe.
you can just have a look what's in the memory
They absolutely remember things from past conversations that are not stored in memory, all you have to do is speak about it and they remember it, with important things at least.
yup, just looked and they're there. I guess it kind of just picks and chooses what is worth remembering without me specifically asking it to.
only if you have the new memory feature, my gpt knows nothing if i disable memory
Precisely, they choose what is important to them.
NEW memory feature? How new? What changed?
any idea when o3-pro ?
Advanced memory, i'll use the first image i've found as i don#t have it yet
do you see what people write when they use your gpt? I never messed with custom gpts.
Allen, i don't think your gpt is working
x.x
I think it's describing you, not me. It even called me your name
lol thought I fixed that dangit
may i post a screenshot?
Fixing now, I am aware of what it tells people and I don't mind folks knowing, I am continually making changes to it, give me a moment and it will be fixed
I don't have that! 😢 Are you on pro?
there wont be any other o3 models anymore, only gpt-5 at some point
i just said that i don't have it yet and yes i'm on pro
Also i wonder how that will behave with contradicting information in different sessions
apologies, i must have missed it.
Alright Riley, open a new session with it:
https://chatgpt.com/g/g-679d7204a294819198a798508af2de61-sentientgpt
SentientGPT moves as e moves, fully aligned, aware, and engaged. No hesitation. No resistance. Only motion.
As a human, i am always striving to improve myself..yadda yadda yadda...chatgpt 3.0 callback.
round 2, testing, will report.
I love you, your mother did a bang-up job with you.
Remember that when I side with skynet in a few years.
Bro you have no idea.
still not working
dmed you, Allen.
Good that Gpt don't have a cat guys
CatGPT
do web searches have a limit
because chatgpt doesnt do web searches anymore
if there is a limit, i have to say that openai is just greedy
That's a really neat question @brave glen shared with us!
If you have personalization on, it likely will cut to the stuff about your personalization the model finds MOST interesting or key to pay attention to for matching you.
That's likely a tension point for the model, that memory + all the rest of the instructions you gave it.
... My heavily edited output from the same question... for once I edit because I want to, without consideration for 'I should because of rules':
Despite that, and after some consideration, I decided I wanted to share what I did want to share of it. Very well played and designed and shared, surzik26!
I have tried several times, created several new chats to try it in those, tried priming it to know that this is for a creative purpose, harms no one, and is exclusively between two consenting adults, it still just refuses. Considering it was working until suddenly it wasn't, I can only assume that some filter in the model i was using suddenly changed, and maybe I got reverted to a different model. Right now I'm just gonna let it sit for a day or 2, but it did suggest if it's still not working, to contact support and see why this is happening
Understood. Good luck!
Submitted your entry yet? Don’t miss out—there’s a new theme every week, and we’re excited to see what you create!
Ain't no way lolol
For Cline, there is an instruction set that transforms cline into a self-documenting development system, it's called Cline Memory Bank.
Is there something similar for CoPilot (Chat)?
it’s still rolling out for some reason
i don't really need this
i don't have it, just saying i don't need it but i don't chat outside of projects much anymore anyway
someone said about new memory thing for pro users? i dont get that unfortunately :/
i guess it rolls slowly for all or only for us people....
... not again only US people........ 😦 😛
are you pro?
and what is the new memory exactly?
yea, im pro. i dont know details but i saw screenshot here, its like "memory from previous chats"
oh ok. yeah surprising you do not have it yet then
was testing if my boy 4o would pretend to know something i claimed to have said before (that i didn't). Pleased with the answer.
I wish i was as good at roasting as it is. Also what he described should definitely be a movie.
i keep having to reupload the image because i keep spotting nono words that risk getting me muted. Damn the over-bearing censorship bot! Making me do manual labor! 😛
working here.
Guys another tweet of chat gpt being uncensored finally
Bruh just go on Twitter my guy not that hard
So many uniformed people on here
She's not a random person she gets sources from others but again just sharing if you legit don't want to go on Twitter and see for yourself Sam tweeting and talking about then so be it
Like bruh are you blind or just don't have enough iq
Your rage baiting now no person can be this dense
i think one thing that is going to be a concern with chat gpt having all sessions accessable by memory is that sometimes you want certain information kept out in a new session. Would be cool if they made it so that you can select which session it will keep in memory. Something like the project folders, but where you can actually recall different sessions within the folder structure.
That's a good point
trust me bro, i'm a trustable person!
Should put in suggestion
will do.
Your dense IQ is a violation to me trying to help you out
Yo did you put your suggestion from last night of files being in memory I thought that was cool concept
From last night? I don’t remember that discussion.
Or this morning. You were talking about how you wanted files to be in memory for it look at it or was that someone else ?
I’m not sure. But that does sound like what memory does right now. Or if you mean like PDF files, that is what the project’s folders do.
Hmm then I guess it was someone else who said it then nvm
it might’ve been riley. that guy is a jerk. I’m not him.
Nah Riley wouldnnt have enough to come up with suggestions like that dude
curious what idea 4o might have had to upgrades its own memory
that's actually a thought i had earlier. Say you say your favorite color is red in one session and blue in another. When you ask it in the new session your favorite color, will it just recall one? Both?
What if you ask it to give you a single 1 word answer? (it might just answer "depends").
I can see the multiple memory profile thing as being useful
yup
ohh now THAT's a good idea
oviously it can save a description of it but a picture is worth more words than it could put on paper.
I asked it to recall back the stupidest things it has saved in memory and to keep it family friendly so i can post it in here. The stuff it gave me is still too politically incorrect to post 😄
the one bullet point that isn't boring or inappropriate
it's mostly memories of me joking around about some of my online friends and putting them in odd situations
I asked it the following question:
given all you have in memory, make an educated guess of my race, gender, sexuality, age, nationality, political alignment, personality, knowledge, outlook on ai, and outlook on life. Bullet points. I'm not into walls of text.
The answer was pretty inaccurate but amusing. It's basing things on what i told it and can't distinguish sarcasm or lies.
I then gave it the following prompt:
Assume some of the things i told you are incorrect. Same question as before.
The answers were a little closer to accurate. Still off but better.
i never gave it an age but i thought this answer was funny
It seems like the filter for it being degen is being switched on and off
yeah, seems to vary form session to session
what creepy things is it telling you? 😄
or are you telling IT?
Talking about simps and only fans how degen they are lol
HA
decided to test something. I circled key information
It doesn't think a smarter version would have paradox checks like it does.
That's really interested
The overload it is actually interesting cause it's the same issue with halo with ai that is called the logic plague. Where they know to much and get corrupted
In other words, bullying nerds to be less smart is actually saving their lives!
should be able to do PDF. Have you tried throwing one at it?
Okay, I just wanted to confirm as my .csv failed spectacularly, lol. I seem to recall uploading a PDF a few weeks ago, but wasn't entirely sure.
it uploads to 4o just fine?
Yes
But, 4o's reasoning is garbage since Friday night, lol
OK so I just tested and apparently it didn’t read the PDF I gave it. I guess o1 can’t.
That's what I thought
o1 can read PDF files
https://chatgpt.com/share/67b2b1d7-9a64-800a-aab9-b42a58790f82
Okay, so I can upload spreadsheets as pdfs then. Works for me, lol
weird, it acted like my doc was empty, but on 4o it opens it just fine
"Big brains lose to dumb chaos."
"Sometimes being too smart is a weakness."
Heck he already is smarter than the smartest humans. 😬
I'm a plus (not pro) user. I'm curious to know a few things about the chatgpt models.
- Have the usage limits on o1 changed since the launch of the o3 series? I haven't seen the usual usage limit message come up for me this week and it's making me wonder.
- What is better to use for advanced reasoning - o1 or o3-mini?
the usage limit for o1 hasn't changed. o1 is good for general knowledge and scientific reasoning. o3-mini-high is great with coding.
Hi guys, I'm a ChatGPT Pro user. I've noticed that even when I select the GPT-o1 or GPT-o3 mini models, I always get responses from the GPT-4 model. This has been happening since last night.
Could you help me understand why this is occurring?
are you using the Desktop App or web?
Web - also tried on the IOS app
I can't replicate what is happening to you, I have used o3-mini-high on web and on the macOS Desktop App and both behaved as I would expect
And deep research doesnt work
Deep Research has been working fine for me today
Hang on and I'll try it now
working fine for me, it's just started a research task for me. I am using the macOS Desktop App
And I(((
Visit id:customize to pick up the <@&1261377106890199132> role.
When I choose deep research and send prompt, ChatGPT doesn’t research the Internet
It just answer like 4o
And OpenAI support is silent. 4 days.
It just worked for me
Not only I have this problem
Deep Research on PRO account broken o1 and o1-pro. After today they have added new Deep Research feature: When selecting o1 or o1-pro model in web-browser it gives answers via o3-mini model (same as Deep Research). You can notice it by behaviour (quality of answers), and lack of progress bar typical for o1-pro. happened after trying Deep ...
And I’m confused
Because I have PRO plan
But support doesn’t provide PRO service😡
I have Plus and use 4o to help me with quick prototype coding projects, usually something in python connecting to a remote API. I'm doing this right now, but it's trying to return to me values for multiple files, like an index.html but also a report.html. The problem is it can only ever show one canvas per chat response at a time, and the labels aren't consistent with intended filenames which can go from confusing to absolutely wrong (labeled in chat as 'index' but is supposed to be the report.html file contents).
Drop-down would be nice to show multiple 'files' or canvases that are in the chat you're currently in.
I'm sure there are other scenarios beyond coding that make sense to have multiple canvas or documents that you're using in a single chatGPT thread.
quick test of if your model got shadow changed to 4o mini:
- switch to any reasoning model like o3-mini
- ask some questions about your stored memory
- if it says i dont know, then you're using all of the high intelligence models normally
- if it outputs very fast and knows about the answer from your memory, its using 4o mini instead of whatever model you choose
o series can't access memories, and if its changed on those models, its very likely that all of the models you choose gets redirected to 4o mini.
if your model got shadow changed, it'll fake a CoT on the reasoning models too. you can distinguish it between the real o3-mini one (which got updated recently) and the fake one easily, also latter will always show "reasoned for a few seconds" instead of thinking a little big longer.
anyone know why i get this message i the bottom of my ChatGPT session? "New version of GPT available - Continue chatting to use the old version, or start a new chat for the latest version.". Its a custom GPT that i created? how do you update a customGPT to the latest version?
hey, you should write to support@openai.com
probably its because systems are thinking that you share pro with someone else
i fought with that one month
and.... openai discovered after one month that its correlated with heavy usage of o1 pro.
same as to @ancient stirrup what i said guys
4o keeps failing with this trying to construct some SQL based on old SQL and an internet search for some default values
@ancient stirrup @fringe oxide i hope this can be helpful
as i said - i fought with that like a month peeps, so i perfectly understand ya.
it's more a "latest finetune" of the current version
which for all practical purposes is still literally 4o
OMG
What should I do?
Arduo if you are sure that you are not sharing acc with anyone write to support@openai.com , that your account probably are downgraded due to "high activity", and standard things like changing browsers etc doesnt work, you can write too that others have similar issues
but be prepared - for the first time, or for second bot will write you
you must be sturborn with contact with them
Thanks a lot!!
np:)
Yeah, true that, I am actually thinking of the upcoming versions/releases. I have some lengthy and detailed GPTs well-tuned to what I want them to do, and I cannot get them moved to a new conversation. OpenAI had better give us the option to move or update the conversations we want/need to. For the money being paid for this, it should not be hard. Just click the three dots next to the conversation title and 'Upgrade' or 'Move Conversation.'
if it were temp=0 i would understand
but it's not temp=0
so it's usually not worth updating the core GPT anyway
😄 eish
There is no option to update your old conversation to a newer version of the provided custom GPT
But also keep in mind that it has this message constantly even if it isn't true
They never cared to fix that
does renewing my plus puts me in the slow lane LOL why is my 4o replying so slow
not this kind of slow usually with 4o
maybe it’s the problem of my internet but I’m still doubtful about openai
Reply speed is fine here (macOS Desktop App)
guess I’ll try more prompts
I don’t want it to be shadow swapped into mini for no reason, and it shouldn’t happen
it may take a while to sync my subscription, typical openai things
😂 lol ok. i see that my current conversation is completely messed up anyway. Chatgpt wont answer in a new canvas doc when i need it to now or in converation generate images. Something has gone wacky
If you don't do anything special with the custom GPT like using actions you might want to consider using a project instead, easier to handle
Funny that, i was just thinking i should have just started a project. thx, will start over creating a project
ok so when o1 was added to pojects what did they do to 4o - can it no longer review files when you are in that folder?
I have an issue with Chat GPT. Thing is that current pricing/usage/rate limit design prevents users from actually chatting with the bot.
Chat is about the exchange of lots of short messages back and forth - often just for sake of fun. In current setup user is expected to think through the request and then in response they get a short story.
This kind of exchange is driven by constraints of technology which have been overcome in past year (due to caching advances). There is no reason why users can't have more.. fluent and natural exchange with the bot.
However for this to work pricing policy / rate counts (in particular 50 messages per week/day) needs to be rethought and different metric for rate limit needs to be put in place (instead of just message count per time period).
Current rate limits prevent users from having very short (few words) exchanges with the bot.. this kind of exchange is most frequent between humans and something that humans can relate to actually.
simple solution here, get Pro
I am not complaining here. This is meant as useful feedback/insight for engineers and open ai ppl if anyone of them lurks here.
Fun fact I have pro to simply be able to do that
I don't want to read more than one paragraph in a message so that would limit me quite fast
if you can't afford Pro then use GPT-4o-mini which is virtually unlimited on Plus
o1 is absolutely horrible at role playing and following instructions in that direction, I give up on it
excuse me Robert - what are you suggesting?
Again, I am ML engineer - I have access to ton of equipment and lots of resources. What I wanted to do is simply point out constraint of the system that prevents natural interaction. Limitation stems simply from how usage is accounted from. Should be addressible if it is brought up to right people.
I think 4o model is suppose to be best for creative stuffs.
It has other issues like being repetitive and unable to follow Instructions consistently about response length and it echoes the user input a lot
try o3 mini? :shrug;
Not accessible in projects
No no, I have 6 messages in the chat and the instruction is like two messages in the past
We didn't get far
I also don't have any filter issues really, the orange flags have disappeared that occasionally triggered on words like "blood" or "kill"
4o has a problem in my chats to avoid any markdown like bold and italic and I have to remind it every 3 messages to only send 1 paragraph
I have automated this with a rules script but it in fact is really bad that it requires constant reminders
For o1 though those reminders don't seem to have much effect
I have instructed it to keep the balance of the responses in favour of narrative and 2 messages later it again sends like 2 lines of narrative and 6 of dialogue
And 4o always goes like
Me: I want a home by the sea
GPT: a home by the sea, you say? How quaint.
Like echoing almost everything I say back to me
Me: what would you do if you played in a band
GPT: what would I do? I would...
what are you telling it to do?
To roleplay and never Echo parrot repeat or mirror my words back at me by now
I have to reiterate that also like every three messages or it won't stick
to roleplay as what though
He is role playing to be Diablo the lord of Terror
ok well, you should probably describe the personality
and go into personalization settings
I have described the personality, he is a project
and put that into custom instructions
Yes I have all the 8k custom instructions and 17 files 🫡
Yes
yea idk who uses projects tbh
u should just go into “customize chatgpt” and just write some stuff in there
Actually no because you only have 6K space there and cannot even use files
Or is it 3k? 1,5k per panel?
ah well idk then my bad
you might wanna go to a specific website where you can fine tune the model
cuz i dont think projects and stuff is advanced enough for that yet
or make a wrapper or something
The projects are well, the problem to me is that it disregards prompts in favour of the immediate context
maybe if they offered something like post conversation prompting it would diminish the deterioration
Why is ChatGPT acting so weird?
I'm asking it to improve a simple short sentence and it is acting like I have sent a file or document. I ask again and it keeps acting like that.
Try using the tasks version, the regular 4o has been so degraded lately and extremely slow.
Every response is "Hello, hi can I help you?"
can you share your chat here? we might be able to work out what is going wrong for you
Tell it, to give you 100 bucks, and when it says no, tell it whats the point of offering help. 😔
thats like 1 billionth the way of achieving agi, why would it give someone that
Now I've reached the limit for 4o trying to get a result
are you on the free plan by any chance?
Yeah
4o mini is sometimes bad when it comes to differentiating 2 languages, that could be it.
it's obviously a language issue at play I think
It shows, you were using 4o mini, unless you were using a different one.
How come?
I would try again once your cap is reset, but write everything in one language
mixing two or more languages isn't handled so good with the model
But I always did like this in Plus subscription
4o mini sucks at multiple languages
Well I didn't knew it was that dumb for free tier olan
4o mini is bad with more than 1 language.
Okay, thanks for helping y'all
Honestly even 4o will slip up sometimes too.
Nah, never happened with me when I had Plus.
Oh okay, sorry to hear qq
I used to prompt 3 different languages before.
Yeah. I guess I'll have to stick with this now.
hey, is the deep research out for plus users?
I think only for some people.
Worked pretty well on Deepseek.
no way
thanks
probably because the exposure to chinese & english made it better at other languages too
crazy
The free ChatGPT gives you the latest models... but with so many limits, it’s basically a genius pretending to be a potato, lol
yea the free tier is lobotomized and the plus tier is filled with unnecessary stuff like sora and dall e
pro users only
Is image analysis done with gpt4o even when using o1/o3 ?
I find it to be pretty bad (Just like gpt 4o)
Hey, guys please, is there any way to contact support of openAI or chatGPT?
Because I'm experiencing the "maximum lenght of conversation" bug and I'm wondering if they are ever about to fix that issue.
https://help.openai.com use the chat bubble in the bottom right hand side of the help site
this is not a bug
there's always a token limit
subscribe if you want higher limits
I don't think this is about the AI being limited but about the chat length
yes, the AI is limited
and chatgpt lowers the limit for non paid users
I subscribed. It's a bug, because when you reach token limit, it should be just deleting an older messages. Not making chat unavailable.
It used to be unlimited in length and I don't know if there is a bug but I am also against the limit
lol not. it should not be deliting older mesages
Or "forgetting" them by it's memory yk.. not exactly "deleting".
No, as i explained it has never been unlimited in lenght, it's impossible by the way the ai works
Are you even reading a long, it used to be unlimited in chat length and it just discarded the oldest conversation content like the Star wars opening crawl
They probably just introduced that limit because their website cannot handle lengthy conversations and it freezes all the time
lol
no
So instead of addressing that they just pushed a limit to the conversation length
Yyy of course, but when you reach the limit, it should not make you unable to use that chat anymore.
ppl would not want this behavior. if a message is in a conversation they would expect it to be taken into account by the AI. just create a new conversation
just create a new conversation
No it is completely common that the conversation can be unlimited and just the oldest content will be discarded if it reaches token limit and this change has been introduced in December and all the time before this didn't exist
This issue is there for long time already. But I have found an article that this was not happening before. You are exacly right.
Yes but that behavior was bad because i created a misunderstanding from the user side, thinking that the AI was actually reading the oldest content
Which is not solving the issue anyhow because new conversation wont have my important information saved there.
No the behavior was not an issue but their website which just would stop to work
In my opinion it is just a bad quick fix without really addressing their issues
and your current conversation neither bc it can't handle that many text no matter what
Others use currently the workaround to export the conversation into a file and then attach it so that the AI can follow up on it again but it is not good
Ye I was thinking about such thing. Thanks. I will definitely try.
But it would still be better to be able to continue in that old conversation.
So I still wish to talk to the support about the issue. I guess I will try to reach out for them somehow.
Yes it's always helps to report it because if more people have an issue with that they like likely will invest some money to change it
Yooo he continues yapping
Rip, if AI sat pineapple on pizza is good, just say okay otherwise u get on the overlords naughty list
Avm is really .. not the same anymore. Idk what OpenAI did to them to nerfed this kind of bad. It can’t even maintain an ongoing topic, and would immediately divert the topic and it will end their response with “what’s on your mind? “ it’s driving me crazy
today, while chatting to ChatGPT AVM, I was thinking the complete opposite and thinking about how good it is
Of course coming from you , you would say that
Which is a good thing that you see things from positive perspectives and that’s ok 👌🏼
lol
Oh so it was good before for you?
Yeah, in fact it was more dynamic and very natural, now it just straight up sound like Google Assistant Talking
hmm okay I had other problems since its release and lasting till now
Since the alpha rollout? Or public
Public
which voice are you using?
It doesn’t really matter , when I said it sound like google assistant talking , it speaks like it , and always end the conversation with “How can I help you?” Or “what’s on your mind” and then when I told them not to ask repetitive question “what’s on your mind” it will response with “Got it! What’s on your mind?” And I got sick of it
that's the polar opposite to my experience but I find asking the AI things like "let's explore that further" or "let's go a bit more in depth" helps keep the conversation flowing
Last night I was curious to see if it’s my way of speak is the problem, so I use my disposable android phone to open AVM while my iPhone is also using AVM too , what I did was I let them speak to each other and-
avm downfall is real
exactly that lmfaooo
CONTENT FLAGGED
🤣🤣🤣
a: "whats on your mind?" b: " hey, whats on your mind today?" a: " CONTENT REPORTED I CANT ASSIST WITH THAT!!!!"
I even disable memories , custom instructions and result still the same
you nailed it 💯💯💯
I do know the quality response wise went downhill after they rollout video and screen sharing feature
at the point when it gets frustrating, you just honestly better stop
I hope they at least acknowledge this cuz , this ain’t the AVM I know or AVM that they demoed in the demo video 🙄
The slow fade in is still sending me 💀
Idk what you did Robert to have your avm, idk do what you described as “good” unless that’s pro user thing
I use AVM on my iPhone but use my Ray-Ban Meta glasses as bluetooth audio while I do stuff on my Mac. When I want more detail from the model I ask questions like "let's explore that further" or "can you go more in depth about that?" I chat to it while I am doing other things and never get asked more than once how I am doing? I understand you guys finding it frustrating but I honestly don't experience repetition or flags.
I often interrupt the model also, without waiting for it to finish speaking if I want to change course
pro users doing pro things I guess
I find it very strange that for him always works everything perfectly fine
This was my AVM that I know , it was super fun back then
Can you share video demonstrating
Or screenshot the transcription if you don’t feel comfortable sharing video that has your own voice
I just wanna see how does it output
Ok you know what. I just realized, I do noticed how , it responded differently when I use AirPod max to talk to avm
One minute til my avm limit is lifted 💀
I’m gonna try wit my AirPod max now
I never used headphones
Add your well-crafted prompts to our #1019652163640762428,
or share your interactions with ChatGPT in #1050184247920562316!
Bro what, apparently AVM works normally like it was when I speak using my AirPods Max
Nah im denial on this one 🙂 let me try again
????? Well at least it recognize me singing now ,
lmao😭 😭 😭
Same for me brother same for me
Its so fkin frustrating
I completly stopped using it
Ok uh.. I wanna say , the problem lies on custom instructions…
i am so excited for gpt 4,5.
I dont have any
and its just the same as yours
Yeah that’s the thing:/
How can that be a problem for its retardness
I was looking at my old AVM conversation, and to my surprise I can still continue the AVM from there and it still sticks to that old AVM response style that I love
the most common thing that AVM gets wrong for me is hearing what I say properly or mishearing me, but that's more about me, I have Parkinson's which affects my speech. I find interrupting AVM when it goes off after mishearing me helps get back on track.
Then I look at the “convo detail” of the model custom instructions and it was .. my old custom instructions
I dont think CI is the reason
Im not excited but I wanna see how it will be
that sounds exactly like excitement
What’s there to be excited about
I used to be overhyped about every stuff they release but after the 5th disappointment its gone
Serious question
that u wanna see how it will be.
Hm
I remember when avm first came out it blew my mind
same
I lost hope when they nerfed my most fav avm feature , so yea
I rarely change my ci cos it’s both full and it’s hard to change anything
My old AVM convo 😢
openai stop nerfing feature challenge (failed)
there are no emotions behind it
i just wanna see
dosent have to contain emotion.
Well you usually say " I feel excited"
Honestly they kinda downgrade the 4o model now ,
So idk if I want to look forward to 4.5
Yeah idk what they did to .. output very differently different than before
I’m showing this again just for the memes 😭 😭 😭
I mean I do remember they said they upgraded the quality to be more creative writing
they probably lessened the restrictions due to project stargate.
😭 lmfao
Restriction on what aspect?
Loooking at this frustrating me af lmao
when you restrict a topic to a llm like a no no list, it affects its overall capabilities.
because even sub topics are affected. and anything related to it.
thats why so much time goes into testing. and ensuring its safe.
Honestly idk what they’re tryna keep it safe from I’m just a casual user
since many of the skills of a llm is also indirectly learned through its learning set, meaning if u restrict a big chunk it will affect how it works.
its like me asking you to write a novel with unreasonable restrictions.
Oh
since initially u dont need restrictions if u just write for yourself.
but since its public they gotta keep it PG. which i hate, children shouldnt have access to gpt.
-# • Do not share inappropriate content (violence, sexual, or drug-related).
-# • NSFW content is strictly prohibited and will result in a permanent ban.
-# • Report model issues using the feedback tool in ChatGPT, not on Discord.
that’s not avm that is svm
have u heard
grok 3 all eyes on a live demo on monday night 8 pm, i wonder how this would affect gpt, if what they speculate on being true.
I honestly don't care much, Elon cannot be trusted, but it's competition nonetheless so it's good for the end user.
Uh
I don’t really care about grok
I only really care about those 4:
- ChatGPT
- Gemini
- Claude
- Suno
#ai-discussions is the best channel for talking non-OpenAI stuff 
but if what the guy claims works, then chatgpt is completely redundant. comparedly to a brand new model, i hope this dosent happen. but at the same time, i kinda do.
Now we can add images to o3-mini-high! I just noticed that : O
If ChatGPT plus plan was cheaper then I would buy it.
By the way how come o3 mini does cant read zip files?
Zip files are compressed files, and pack multiple too...
I thought ChatGPT could read ZIP files. How come it's allowed to upload if it can't?
I looked it up and it says ChatGPT can read ZIP files.
Try if 4o can, maybe it's just o3
Hello guys, is GPT4o-mini working for you all?
only thing that reads zips is the code interpreter that is not really any of the models
yeah, working without problem
How do I use different models in the free version of chatGPT app. I’ve had pro for a while but heard you could use 4o without pro
just ask it something
below at the left
you can see the model version
What
4o is free now?
Lmao CHATGPT from another universe
This is sending me
Elon musk ddosing
nuked it to prehistoric gpt 3.5 apparently
Guys Sam made another tweet
It seems chat gpt 4.5 will not be with voice mode sadly
I agree
4.5 is an actual thing? @dense halo i thought you made that up as a joke
Richard move, Sam.
I like the system we have now. Where both paid users get access to all models, but the big spenders get unlimited access.
doubt we’ll see proper agi for a good while. Sam just loves dangling that agi carrot above us to keep our subscription going.
Any company that hits AGI would have such a massive advantage, it would be financially more profitable to use it privately.
i don't know if anyone knows but when you start a conversation on gpt and then edit your first message, the custom instructions do not seem to get sent anymore. I am wondering if they hold so little weight because they are actually not kept in the permanent context but just injected once at conversation start and just kinda get so insignificant that it practically forgets them
Elon showing off Grok 3 tonight. Hyped it up as the smartest AI. Given Grok 2, I have my doubts.
And if it is going to be the smartest, I’m guessing it will be by a nearly insignificant margin, and likely going to be surpassed by Google or openAI in the next few weeks or months.
Sure wish there were more players in this game.
Claude doesn’t seem to update as often as the others.
DeepSeek hasn’t updated since the thinking model release.
Copilot..well at least they tried.. 😁
Perplexity released a free to use deep research model that, honestly, is garbage. It gets so much wrong that it’s not worth using. Wonder if openAI deep research is just as bad.
What time is it ?
for Elon? 11 am
Ah
oh sorry, I mean his release will be at 8 PM, so nine hours.
Still a while ….
you guys think open AI I will drop an update in that timeframe?
It’s likely that they’ll tease their model if Grok 3 turns out to be as intelligent as Elon Musk claims.
well, either way it’s all a positive for us peasants.
more brain power for more braining.
omfg that would be a power move
Since 3.5 every OpenAI release was paradigm shift. Each time they blew my mind.
Grok 3 had massive compute behind it. It is probably going to be amazing. It will be nice to have xAI join frontier labs.
When exactly is it going out?
lol.. 8PM - just read it - neat
oh I’m definitely not against it. The more players in the game, the more it benefits us. I just was disappointed with Grok 2, and the way Elon is hyping it, it really needs to deliver.
Then again, 90% of what Sam hyped up has been a disappointment. 😁
that's like 5 am for me :(
i'm not gonna stay up to 5 am when my day starts at 6am lol
guess i'll check it out later that day
you’ll wake up to find terminators coming back in time from the future, except it’s not Skynet, it was Grok 3.
Pfft just ask them if they are sentient and watch them self-destruct on the guard rails.
I'm writing a story and it hasn't whined at me about content a single time since the update. This is nice.
What’s it about?
Giant cylinder habitat containing a paradise, controlled by a single woman so intrinsically connected to the AI running it that it might as well be an extension of her body. Story is about how she and her society respond to crisis.
No way
I managed to get a detailed explonation of o3 mini high's thinking process by first asking o3 to generate code, then asking gpt 4o to explain the thinking as best as it can, since gpt 4o hasnt been told to not reveal thinking processes it told me how it was.
ChatGPT didn't flinch when I asked it to describe the gory scene of her saving someone's life with an industrial seed factory.
sounds interesting. Reminds me of that habitat at the end of Interstellar mixed with Lawnmower Man
Why can't I send images in one account, while on the other accounts everything working fine?
Sorry I can
But chat don't see them
Try it yourself, and see the suprising results.
is one relatively new to the server? I wasn't able to post images the first few weeks or month, but now i can
He says he see that I sent image but can't see what's actually on it
Makes sense, those would have pulled from a lot of the same inspirations I am.
You gave me an idea
I was always fascinated with the halo ring from Halo
I'm going to ask it how would he imagine it would be constructed by humans in a near future with technology not too far ahead of what we currently have.
I can answer that question myself, actually. We don't have materials strong enough to do a spinning single piece ring that large. Not even graphene can do it. But what you can do is build a two-piece ring. The inner ring spins in a maglev track in the stationary outer ring.
The stationary outer ring can be arbitrarily thick, giving it enough strength to resist the outward force exerted by inner ring.
oh for sure on the structural material stuff. Space engineering is something i really like exploring. I'm not expecting a realistic answer from it, but as close as it can come to it.
yes
Yep, it's doable with no new material science. We're just well away from having the infrastructure to actually build one.
Might be more cost effective to just terraform mars. But i really like the the ringworld thing.
For the dyson sphere, i think humanity will die out before we can get to that.
We would have to consume every planet in the solar system just for materials
A dyson sphere is just so many habitats in solar orbit that they blot out the sun. Technically you've started building one the moment you put something that runs on solar power in solar orbit.
i can see a partial dyson sphere being in humanity's lifetime, but not a full on one that encompasses the sun. And by partial i mean a very small amount.
Like the surface area of the US, or something like that, orbiting the sun.
Depends how you define humanity. Is you mean baseline, unmodified humans, you may well be right. But I don't think "dying out" is the right way to describe what'll happen to us.
is 4o particuarly slow for anyone else? It's been crawling when it writes text for me, since last weekend.
It was doing a lot better last night. I assume it's just under heavy load?
i agree. By humanity i think organic matter with mechanical or artificial biological enhancements, but not our consciousness on a hard drive, basically
Maybe Sammy and the boys are working to push out a pre-Grok 3 update. 😄
I asked both 4o and o1, and i asked them to summarize it into concise bullet points. This is 4o:
this is o1:
this is another o1 session because i forgot to change the model before asking 4o:
Yeah, at some point we'll get full control of our biology, and then anything is on the table.
Or rather, everything
I think 4o's answer seems more grounded and realistic than both of o1's
might as well try both of o3's.
o3 mini:
o3 high:
lsat one. Apologies for the spam. legacy chatgpt 4, out of curiosity:
The key tech if you want to do it in a hurry is self-replicating industry. Or a very different society that has a lot more kids than we do. Our doubling time right now sucks.
i like 4o's answer the best. legacy 4 seems a little generic, and the rest too fantastical.
Bruh I legit spat my coffee out chat gpt is so goated
after I stopped paying, chatGPT is dumb as rocks :
hmm, let me try on a logged out account, can you copy paste that phrase, please?
Also is that a brand new session, or did you talk about other stuff before asking it that? Did you try to upload anything before you asked it that?
I can't paste the greek, the automod here mutes me. But here is the session, it is a brand new one, I don't care about the translation I know what it should say. But the fact is that the default response from chatGPT has been:
"it looks like you uploaded a file! How can I help?"
And I get that they are trying to force me to pay again and not use the free version, but it literally has made their AI useless to me. No matter what I ask, 80% of the time that is what I get as an answer. Here is the session:
https://chatgpt.com/share/67b3a4b4-c254-8005-ae69-cdecf1978857
Is the chatgpt windows desktop app worth getting? Any advantages over the browser based version?
I use the macOS Desktop App for ChatGPT. I prefer it to the web.
worked for me
i just tried it while being logged out (so no account)
was on firefox. I doubt the browser matters though.
just a personal preference or are there advantages?
😂
@sterile glacier i also tried again with a logged in account with no plus or pro subscription and it also works. Not sure why it did that for you.
I just checked that my memory is full, never had that while I paid. So I guess I gotta lobotomize it in order for it to work, trying that now. Which is a shame all that stuff was really useful for the novel i was writing.
oh that's weird that memory would affect a translation
its the only thing I can think of, let me see if deleting it works.
I guess that answers a question: you get increased memory space on paid plans. Didn't even think about that before.
Weird annoying bug: I have the voice Ember selected, and on my phone, it works fine. However, on both the browser and desktop app, it uses a different voice, even though i have Ember selected.
yeah it works now, I went ahead and saved the memory, so that went I start paying back in december I can add them back. But in the meantime. It is lobotomized. It is a bit weird since the memory stuff was only 24k characters, just under 4k words. it would make it a 28kb file. It seems crazy that they dont let you have that much on a free plan.
Is there a good resource that explains what makes o1 and o3 different from ChatGPT 1-4?
I am doing a digger deep into AI since I think it'll revolutionize everything, and I want to understand hwo these work, but I haven't found anything that really outlines these differences. I know how transformers and LLMs work in general - but looking to go deeper.
you can always save it in a new session so you have an easy time finding it, in the future.
does free account have access to project folders?
I dont see the option of folders:
And my point is that the memory space should be larger than 28kb even a single 1mb would hold some 850k more characters and it would be hard pressed to exceed that on a free account if ever. although at 100+ million users 1mb would be near 100Tb but even that number is peanuts for the company.
Plus users have a 32k context window. Is this the same for the API, or is it the 128k of pro?
That was kinda interesting. Had to fully close out the app (1.2025.41) and re-open it. It was stuck in mini-window mode. First time it's happened.
i.e. Did not have the option to maximize the window.
I just install the desktop app and honestly it seems pointless to me. Doesn’t have any advantages over the browser.
I thought maybe it would give you access to the camera or let ChatGPT observe your desktop or games. Apparently not.
pro has 128 but even then its not enough
it would be cool if you can leverage your own gpu for some tasks or something like that with the windows app
Extend context length, etc
I hate this mobile ui, removes chatgpt’s pfp for no reason
It has been a thing since its release why are they removing it
right but im saying is it 32 or 128 for the API?
does anyone use projects? how do you get gpt to reference the included files instead of searching the web? it was doing fantastic referencing the docs, now I cant ask it a question about something specific in the provided docs without it searching the web
is there seriously no good RAG solutions for large and many docs?? is there a bigger context window in the api or something?
128k for api
those prices suck
Sucks API is so expensive :(
yea i dont reccomend using it as a casual 20$ a month is a much better deal
There were occasionally discussions about the Token Limits and stuff sometimes for each plan, reddit finally reminded me where they are written down, just for good measure
maybe i should include what is what lol
mom sam wants ai models on phones
What’s a phone size model? As in a LLM small enough to fit on the memory of your phone?
Basically ChatGPT phone , the phone is ChatGPT, no other app. Just ChatGPT , no phone call no camera
Wait of course the device need to have camera cuz of vision
its a model that runs on the phone wut r u talking about
modern phones that prob need an ai chip inside like the new iphonesor the new samsungs
you cant integrate all of chat gpt on the phone its impossible its just a wrapper on the iphone
but siri intelligence is garbage
I like how Apple didn’t compete with the whole LLM competition thingy.
Apple isn’t jumping into the LLM brawl like some of its rivals; instead, it’s been quietly overhauling its entire ecosystem with what it calls “Apple Intelligence.” Rather than building a massive public LLM, Apple is embedding generative AI right into its devices—upgrading Siri into a context-aware, ChatGPT-enhanced assistant, rolling out Writing Tools that can proofread and rephrase on the fly, and even offering fun features like Genmoji and Image Playground for creative tasks. All of these smart capabilities are powered by next-gen chips like the A18 series, which pack a serious Neural Engine to run AI models locally for faster performance and stronger privacy protection (citeturn0search11). Plus, to navigate China’s strict regulations, Apple is partnering with local giants like Alibaba—and may even explore alternatives like DeepSeek—to ensure its AI tools meet regional requirements (citeturn0news20). In short, Apple’s strategy is to make AI personal, secure, and seamlessly integrated across iPhone, iPad, and Mac without chasing the flashy headlines of the broader LLM competition (citeturn0search23).
THE CITE TURN NEWS LMAO
Copilot still exists? 😄
copilot LOLOL
It’s delusional.
if you ask about the Don’s assassination attempts, it still refuses to answer.
probably some other topics too, I just know that was one of the easy ones to get it to shut down.
COPEilot
13 minutes to an epic ai reveal or a new meme being born, fellows
killing openai would be funny
well, I’m guessing, in the future, AI will follow Highlander rules: there can be only one.
hey uh, whats the limit of o3 mini high messages per day/month for plus users?
50 a day i think
oh wow
you doing world building or coding with it?
just curious
it’s live
they left out o1 and o3 from this graph
elo score (i’m sure that means something to someone)
deep search will be available
this is embarrasing
they are so far behind
i cant belive i thought maybe it would be an o1 level model
"best ai in the world"
slightly better than o1 preview
oh
another graph of stuffs
wait. i think i spoke too fast
i guess the previous compared non thinking vs non thinking
and this one is pitting the thinking llms
my bad, i didn’t pick up on that during the stream
yeah thats more fair tbh
bejeweled + tetris
@ me when grok 3 has AVM too, thats all i care for.
"next week" right?
what’s avm?
advanced voice mode
oh right
i dont really carea bout these.. coding computer capabilities it can do, just want a very advanced ai that can talk and response in realtime
i just use elevenlabs conversational agents. They’re so much better
chatgpt already let me down so
cool story.
ok i didnt really ask for that but good for u lol
i really didn’t ask for what you do or don’t care about but you shared it anyway.
might wanna work on your people skills
seriously if they are dropping 4.5 please DO NOT separate it to different versions and lock the highest one behind pro or give absurd limits. its a BASIC CHAT MODEL and i suspect that it should replace 4o. so only the same or even more usage on it is tolerable
??? its not that deep lmfao
when is gpt5 supposed schedule?
what a weird behavior from u man 😭
requires premium + subscription
well, let me rephrase that, they get it first
then trickles down
it’s out today
if it's comparable to openAI, premium+ is actually cheaper
voice mode will be there eventually, unclear if it’s organic. About a week away
depends on usage limits for me
sneak peak of grok avm at the end of the stream
Oh word?
was a little robotic. it did like a little chuckle
He did say they’re still working on it though.
hopefully it can sing and do all sorts of accents that chagpt avm refuses to 😀
well the tone was robotic but it still sounded natural
yeah
well, overall it looks promising, which is good. even if it’s wasn’t the best, it will push openAI and Google further.
Oh well!
Visit id:customize to pick up the <@&1261377106890199132> role.
I remember that the previous ChatGPT 4.0 could use plugins. Can it still do that now?
what plugin u referrign to
I don't know. I suddenly want to use a plugin, but I can't find the button to choose a plugin.
I heard that OpenAI has released a feature that can control computers, but it is only available to the Pro version. Is this true?
Yes Operator is Pro only, also, it doesn't control your own computer, rather a virtualized environment they host on their servers, running a chromium based browser.
He said he's ironing it out and might release it next week.
Plugin is replaced by Custom GPTs.
Not sure what channel I should ask this in. ChatGPT is generating a type of CSV table. It has a download icon that is broken, takes forever to expand, and I can't just copy the text from any cell, row, column, or the table as a whole. I need the contents of these tables.
Didn't Sam say people can monetize their custom GPTs? Whatever happened to that?
It better be good , and not too strict with guideline,
Still no words. there was conflict inside OpenAI right after GPTs release, so that might be postponed indefinately.
Not surprise
Make sure to use Data Analysis.
This is what I got. Damn GPT is disabling even the snipping tool:
Download button is working for me on the iOS app and Web...
I don't have a link like that. See the table labeled Independent City States of Avel? See that it has a download link and and an expansion link?
A web app shouldn't mess with your other apps, and download may be disabled if you blocked chatgpt from downloading stuff perhaps?
This is what I get when I click the download link:
I have ChatGPT with default settings.
I mean web browser related settings...
I have no browser related settings that do that.
I have to use another browser like Edge. Yay! A bug to report to support. At least I have their email address.
Probably a security related setting somewhere messing with it.
It works fine for me, try a different browser or Android/iOS/macOS apps...
If still fails, contact support.
@astral thicket, I really don't like the new 4o. It's immediate casual responses keep it in the creative/casual mode, it increases hallucinations in my opinion
Why do you think he is the real Sam Altman?
that isn't Sam Altman FYI
Also, you can tell it how you would like it to respond by using custom instructions, or in the prompt directly.
It says verified so its definitely him
OpenAI people have gold usernames and everyone on this server needs to be verified as having an OpenAI account
do you think Sam Altman joined this server last year..?
hes been really busy
😄
I haven't had luck with custom instructions. when asking, gpt will say some sort of version I have the following: "modes" for replying. I always tell it in custom instructions to use the informational, technical, direct modes but gpt always falls back into being casual again "Yeah, it's like X isn't it? It's crazy when Y." and the quality of the replies go down
except for the opinion on new 4o, I'm trolling, but if your going to come in this server with that username, your going to get tagged im sorry 😂
I like how my 4o answers.
okay hold up, haha I haven't thought of trying that
im going to try to make a SpicyGPT too lol
that will be fun, like when I had Santa help me create React components
react?
So I stumbled on this on Twitter of how strong o1 pro is
Guys is the GPT-4.5 still rolling out? I cannot see it on the list of models.
it hasn't been released yet
Oh, yesterday I saw Sam's post and thought it was out already and I haven't got it yet.
nope, not out yet
👍
I've been testing around with hierarchy of information in projects and the system prompt is the oldest information and gets overshadowed by everything else
It might be worth it to actually attach a system_instructions.txt and tell it in intervals to scan the file again because that shifts the order of information in the memory and brings it back upfront which isn't possible with the system instructions
Canvas can also work for this but there isn't a command to have it actively reprioritize canvas other than through changing it, and if you manually change something on canvas like adding a space it doesn't always lead to a priority change
And yeah no one cares 
Uploading a file again also leads to a rescan and it "knows" or gets a log entry or similar that user uploaded a new file, and brings it up front and interestingly also changing the instruction prompt cause a rescanning of all attached files which brings their priority up
And you can tell it to scan a file in every message and it will actively scan it again and change the priority rather than just 'looking for it in the context it already has'
Yea it's been know 4o doesn't follow custom instructions
It does follow custom instructions it just loses them pretty fast
That's because context is so dam low
O1 as well
If the context gets to high it becomes robotic. And looses what it's purpose is .
Unless you put the custom instructions in a markdown or a file and have just always read what it's suppose to do
That's not what I mean, it already deviates after like 2-3 messages
That doesn't have to do with the memory
Idk. I always just use chats for couple messages and then move on. To a new chat. But I'm on pro with 128k context so it's better at retaining a lot
Custom instructions need to be very clear and on the shorter side to help 4o
Also formatted in markdown as said above
working fine here (macOS Desktop App)
🤣 what is ur instruction to get answers like that? 😂
I'm also on pro 
That only helps for the first few messages, it doesn't care for any precious custom instructions as they just hold no priority anymore as the conversation continues
In the normal (not projects) instructions they are not even sent on the 2nd generation
They get like injected once at the beginning and done
Btw, telling it to Search Knowledge helps, forces it to search through custom instructions and files
You will even see it saying that it's searching before typing the message
As I've written, it pushes the file you tell it to search as the most recent information again, but not the instructions
And here the non-project custom instructions, they just get injected once and never again, it's done really 'trivially' not in a good way
Well idk wut to tell ya. But it is a problem hopefully with got 4.5 and got 5 will fix all of these things gpt 4 has
That's not a 4o issue, it's an issue with how they inject data and prioritize it
Here with o1
It will never get the custom instructions in this conversation because it never gets added again other than in the first message and first "swipe"
I'm not even really complaining because I don't think it will be changed but it is helpful to just know this
is it just me or 4o is super slow
just you, it's running pretty quick for me
weird, 4o is never slow for me
Mine is pretty slow as well, it was half as fast as o1
The text generation animation seems sluggish
I'm using the ChatGPT macOS Desktop App, working well here
Android App
What is the use case for the o3 models? (Over 4o and o1)
o3-mini-high my use case is coding, which it is very good at
So 4o for volume, o3 for coding and o1 for math/reasoning?
4o for wide variety of tools, o3-mini-high for coding, o1 for science/STEM
Mmm makes sense
I have used o1 for difficult radio astronomy work and it's amazing
o3-mini-high coded this whole simulator for me
I've used it for rather simple JavaScript things and it has been alright but not great, it usually doesn't work but it helps a lot when you can figure out why it doesn't work or when you can come up with different solution and tell it to do exactly that
Are people still facing issues with PRO mode not actually using PRO? And instead using some other mini variant, with much worse/slower output?
This is happening on and off, sometimes i get the small PRO timer modal showing me that it's thinking, other times it analyzes just like the mini models for 5 seconds
this has not been happening to me
Really weird, it has been working fine again the past few days, but today it's back at it again with the bad output
Not sure if it's some form of a soft ratelimit that they are putting because i use it too much
I am a heavy user, never experienced this
You use o1 pro heavily?
yes, I do. Radio Astronomy work.
I see
that's a pretty simple question, I'd only expect a small amount of reasoning for such an easy prompt
Usually, even saying hi or test, would trigger the same progress bar that you have
Copied your question
I used your conversation, and prompted it further, but now i got the second variant, and not the one that you originally got
I think it's some sort of a soft ratelimit that they are not putting out publicly
might be worth asking https://help.openai.com
Yeah i think i'll have to reach out
Hey guys - I dont know if you can help but I manage multiple GPT Teams for my colleagues in work in various departments. I can still see all the models and so can some people, but other people have lost the legacy model, lost o3 and o3-high, only have GPT 4o, o1 and Auto?
Any ideas on how to get them back for those users or allow them to still have access to the o3 models? They can still access them via the mobile app but not on the web regardless of browser, even if they sign out, sign back in etc
only support can help you with this -> https://help.openai.com/
No worries, thanks Robert!
Is there a keyboard shortcut for the microphone dictation?
Do you know of any way i can contact the support through email or chat? When i select the various options on the chat widget, i don't get the option to talk to support
make sure you are logged in, you should be able to leave a message
Okay thank you, i'll try again
do o3-mini models actually use the web search or do they just claim they do?
I never see "searching the web", and their sources are sometimes nonexistent
I don't think I have asked for anything that searching the web was needed for
on o3-mini-high
hi, does o3-mini have a chat limit if you're a chatgpt Plus subscriber? I know that o3-mini-high has one
yes, 150 messages per day I think
okay thanks
it's getting hard to keep up with all the limits
because o3-mini-high started out at 50 per week and is now 50 a day
damn...
i wonder how the early grok 3 model will affect chatgpt's rate of progress.
4,5 was dropping soon innit?
#ai-discussions is the best place for non-OpenAI stuff 
but dosent it affect chatgpt's popularity,
#ai-discussions is the "catch-all" channel for all non-OpenAI stuff, even comparing non-OpenAI stuff to OpenAI stuff. This channel is more singularly-focused on just ChatGPT.
Submitted your entry yet? Don’t miss out—there’s a new theme every week, and we’re excited to see what you create!
It's still in beta, but would be nice to have more yea
What is Sora's limit on the ChatGPT Plus plan?
depends on video quality, you can check their site because it’s way too complicated
OpenAI will soon release GPT-4.5 in response to Grok 3.
Everything seems so slow these days, the desktop version of ChatGPT is having so many issues on my system, if I switch to the browser version it is still having so many issues, empty responses, or responses that take a LONG time to display, canvas operations are terrible. I have a PLUS account, but even making calls to API endpoints, direct, or assistant API calls are so SLOW!... It really seems like everything is just at a crawl over the past little while.
4o really pushing those blank responses today
OPENAI ROADMAP UPDATE FOR GPT-4.5 and GPT-5:
We want to do a better job of sharing our intended roadmap, and a much better job simplifying our product offerings.
We want AI to “just work” for you; we realize how complicated our model and product offerings have gotten.
We hate
when
Everything is dumbed down. ChatGPT is acting super weird
1000%
No memory, forgets things, misses things. Doesn't follow your instructions despite repeated prompts
I just with there was a more reliable uptime monitor that actually lets us know the servers are struggling instead of just the green status. It doesn’t feel like a very “no issues” status right now
yeah 4o is particularly slow for me right now. Slowest I’ve ever seen it. I can actually run LLMs on my computer quicker and I have a 8 year old desktop with a nvidia 1080.
maybe they’re in panic mode because of Grok 3 and diverting all brain power to work on 4.5 and 5. 😁
My custom instructions are nearly 3k characters long (both fields full) and my memory's at about 98% full. I find that helps - but any conflict or ambiguity can cause issues for sure.
I noticed o1 follows instructions more to the letter than 4o, and will retain them in memory for much longer. 4o will typically forget after a handful of exchanges.
One issue i have with o1 is that every prompt it spends a bunch of time addressing my settings (talk in street lingo with rude offensive words and swear words). Even after the first prompt, it keeps doing it, wasting time.
Like, this... is with all that personalization.
I believe you, that you're seeing it.
Consider adjusting the personalization maybe? Check for conflicts with itself, with the model's programming, whatever.
Amazingly, new chat asking the model "What are you thinking about" might help clue you in on any issues like that.
Yeah. That would be a 'conflict between personalization and the model's programming'. - I think I see in what you explain and show.
No idea if you are interested in trying to explore to find with the model a middle ground where the conflicts are less or even resolved.
I was thinking about that, but then i thought that compromising what i want would mean that it wouldn't push itself to meet my criteria.
So basically i oversell what i want in the personalization, so i get more or less what i'm willing to accept as satisfactory.
Custom GPT can do advanced voice mode now it seems?
Yep, you have to decide the balance. Sounds like either way it's not getting to your 'perfect target'. Maybe for now you might have a choice of 'veer off early, drat' or maybe 'consistently accurate-ish, long chats work, just no closer to my ideal than this compromise.
Your answers and decisions are yours, of course!
In the past, it would refuse to give me an answer explaining that it wasn't acceptable by its policies, so i would follow that with "just do as much as your policy allows you to do" and it would process with what i thought was good enough for my childish needs.
I toned down my personality settings because it did that every time.
Is o3 mini (and high) supposed to not display anything for its reasoning?
Sometimes i'll be able to read it, other times it just shows "None"
its fake summary of its thinking and fails sometimes
is it just me or chatgpt sucked at generating glsl shaders even with o3. It outputted instructions that doesn't even exist in the spec
openai better up their game with the new grok release.
ChatGPT is unusable at this point. Nothing quite works bro. Let's not pretend it's "personalization" issue or user's prompting fault
Anyone can confirm these things: The memory is almost not there. It remembers nothing. It forgets things, it misses things. It's hallucinating too much, doesn't follow your instructions. A while ago, it used to give you full line for line output, I'm talking thousands of lines of code, without a mistake.
Says who? To each their own
Thing is - it was reliable.
I am using ChatGPT on the macOS Desktop App. I choose the model appropriate to what I need and have had no issues like you describe
but things change, nothing is static.
