#chatgpt-discussions
1 messages · Page 142 of 1
maybe it's over the security limit. Many companies will set up so-called shell companies in many countries for the sole purpose of collecting money from users in that country
so they can avoid those issus
Really ???
i don't think this is the case here, the limit for the credit card for one transaction is much higher and i could set a limit myself, it's on gpt end that the card is declined, i've read around a bit and others have had issues too
i mean limit for purchase outside the country without causing a security event
So that would make it still a GPT issue
no, payment processor issue if your cardissuer is saying it is not them
the service of the card provider says if it's nowhere in their logs it's not in their responsibility, it's what they say
and as I said, then it is coming from the payment processor that OpenAI uses
bait used to be believable
but then openAi has to reach out to them and not my credit card provider or what do you mean, they say i have to talk to the seller, which is openAI
but then openAi has to reach out to them and not my credit card provider
Yes, this
so we basically agreed all along
no day 9?
a nothing burger
days 8 and 9 just recaps of what they already mentioned
ah, lame
They announced some API stuff 
Openai really needs to hire somebody who knows how to talk to humans. They need a used car salesman.
When I went to university for Computer Science, I had to take numrous comminucation classes for that very reason; engineers tend to not communicate veyr well
reminds of the scene in office space:
“What would you say..you do around here?”
That dude actually had a useful job!
ME’s for the most part can do an ok job communicating. EE’s are a nightmare. Only dealt with a software guy once and i genuinely thought i was talking to an alien.
haha
Unrelated but I wish one of the voices sounded like Jarvis from Iron Man.
I was thinking the same thing earlier. It’s funny how the machine actually sounds more human. 😂
Does Projects default to a particular ChatGPT Model or continue using the model the conversation was using?
4o
even if you have a session that’s 4o-mini it’ll bump it up to 4o
but you can pull the coversation out of the Project to continue in your model of choice and then put it back right?
You can but it will not have access to the uploaded Project files while it’s out of the project.
I love using Advanced Voice so much while driving. It makes traffic feel like only a tiny annoyance.
Interesting, is this documented?
why is o1 pro so slow even for a question like : how are you? it takes 2-3 minutes to answer^^
I'd think of it with an analogy: if you tried to build a doghouse using a hydraulic press to press in the nails, instead of hammering them, you'd probably think the process was going too slow too. Tool for the job and all that
I see, my other question is, why can't I give files to gpt pro ? I've seen people on youtube testing it and giving it pdf files
is it possible ?
only reason I still use other ais like claude is because we can give project files and instructions, but with chatgpt it's only possible with the trash model gpt-4o
o1 current only supports image attachments, I'm not sure what you might have seen that implied otherwise! https://help.openai.com/en/articles/9793128-what-is-chatgpt-pro
What types of files can I upload to o1?
Currently, o1 supports images but does not yet support other file types such as PDF, CSV, Word docs, etc.
do you think it will come soon ?
in the next 3 announces left
I am not sure!
it is very necessary
what's the purpose of ChatGPT o1's "Reason" tool? does it prompt o1 to spend additional time thinking and "reasoning" than if you were to not include it?
I’m not really sure. But I’ve used it for roleplaying and that model seems to output more optimal responses
yea
idk, i know that i encountered this yesterday
u on plus or pro?
It's currently another way to select o1; it doesn't (for plus, not sure of others) make o1 different
I would try splitting the document up into chunks. You only have a 32k context
it means that the context of the model can only handle 32k tokens, your document may be longer than that.
bruh 💀
context is how much information the model can hold at any point in time
everything in the same chat
yes this tool let's you check https://platform.openai.com/tokenizer
WIsh the chats in a project can access other chats in the same project
upgrade to Pro, ChatGPT Pro gives you 128k context
break your text into smaller chunks and work on one smaller chunk at a time
yes, you can only work on one small section at a time
it lied to you, the context would have been the same
Would chat gpt pro be able to code full on Roblox games? Bc I’m thinking of do that to make some money
yes, you can use o1 to do this, you would need to be on the Pro plan so you had 128k context and unlimited o1 access
I thought ChatGPT pro was more advanced then any other one
ChatGPT Pro gives you unlimited GPT-4o, o1, o1-mini and limited access to o1 Pro models
Ohhh
o1 would be fine for coding Roblox but you want the higher context provided by ChatGPT Pro plan
ChatGPT Plus only gives you 50 o1 messages per week while ChatGPT Pro plan gives you unlimited o1 messages
can you rephrase that question? The context limit applies no matter what format the document is in
no, only by working on small pieces at a time. You can use the whole text if you upgrade to ChatGPT Pro
yes, as you need to analyse large texts then you really want to be on the Pro plan
Visit id:customize to pick up the <@&1261377106890199132> role.
your only other option is to do small pieces at a time
Try Claude AI, the free version. If I’m not mistaken, they offer a 200k content window even on the free plan.
you can only discuss other AI in #ai-discussions
you can only discuss other AI in ai-discussions
sorry
these recent UI updates so terrible. i used to swap between o1-mini and gpt4o. but now canmore will randomly popup and i cannot swap back to o1-mini
openai please roll back december chatgpt changes they are so baaaad
You told it about 4x to read the story.
What else would you like it to do? Analyze it? Discuss it? Add to it? Point out flaws or conflicts in it?
Mmm, but... and you want every word read.
But other than informing the model, what do you want done?
Because, the model can potentially, if it meets your goals, make itself a comprehensive summary of what it can read. Then you can provide the next 'chunk' for it to continue to explore and summarize, making a combined summary.
Then, depending on what you want it to do, you can guide it towards your desired outcome, even if that can't happen in one step.
Is the platform having issues right now? It keeps generating a response and then after a few minutes deleting the response. I tested on the app and the website and two responses and some of my replies are just gone
Depends on the story and what's in it.
A comprehensive summary made by a model that knows what 'the end goal is' might actually work great.
Like, "complete a writing based on the story" That's incredibly vague.
That writing could itself be a summary, or a deep evaluation of 1+ details in the story, a next chapter, a prolog, or so many other things.
I would tell the model, "So, we got a story too big for our context window, but my goal is for you to prepare [this] after reading it.
We'll have to chunk it, you'll have to pick out the details that matter so you can do [this] after we read the story"
There's a lot of ways to talk to the model, you don't have to use that style, but should explain what your goal is and I recommend discuss with the model how to get to your goal.
if I were you I would just upgrade to Pro so you can work with a huge document directly without having to use chunks at a time
breaking up thought into manageable chunks is as good for machines as it is good for humans
then break it up into chunks and do one chunk at a time
maybe @prime swallow has some ideas for you, I don't have much to add than what I have already said, sorry
Is ChatGPT holding anyone else hostage with this, or just me?
Perhaps you might experiment and ask questions as you go if you want help with ideas.
I don't really understand what you want the model to output, a 'writing based on the whole thing' sounds pretty vague to me, I just don't understand enough of what you want the model to do.
But as long as you're happy with what you get, yay.
that won't work because the document is over 32k tokens
no, when I say split it into chunks I mean give it a few paragraphs at a time and work on those few paragraphs then repeat the process
then my only and last advice on this is to upgrade to Pro
So, you can tell it the goal, which is maybe 'pull out content related to this overarching theme'. Then give it the chunk. It'll pull out what it can.
Save the chunks, then give it the goal and the chunks to make a finished writing from
Or use new ‘projects’ future….
Projects just organise chats, there is no context between them, his large document is still a problem
The reason why it doesn't work, is the AI is like a container that holds '1 gallon of whatever material'.
Your instructions are like a cup of volume, and then you pour the entire huge, like 10 gallon story in.
You overfilled the AI, the context window is exceeded, so most of what you said sloshed out.
The AI has no idea what to do, most of the time, and you get some weird output
Try turning memory off, logging out, logging back in, while memory is still off test again.
The OpenAI Discord is an actively moderated server.
• Refrain from sharing inappropriate content on the server. This includes but is not limited to messages, media, or other topics of graphically violent, sexual nature, and drug-related content.
• Report all sensitive and offensive content in the feedback reporting tool in the ChatGPT web UI instead of here on Discord.
Projects’ is one of the most powerful and desirable options OpenAI has introduced recently. It’s not just about organizing chats into folders. He can attach his PDF directly to the project and work with the file that way, referencing different parts or content from the PDF file directly.
he will still be limited to 32k context which is his problem
chat with files, GPTs repackaged and without actions
I’ve tried, still not working
Is this a bug or something?
what web browser and OS are you using?
Mac, and iPhone. Arc, chrome, google and all platform. I tried everything I can.
Whatever the desktop app and iOS app, not working at all
ok, then you need to contact support at https://help.openai.com
Ok thanks
guys, of someone has problems with images - change firefox to chrome.
tested it now.you will have in chrome advanced voice chat.
just saw that when i switched to chrome.
Is ChatGPT broken for anyone else right now?
same happened to me and someone from this chat told me to delete the site cookies and data which eventually worked.
everything is broken for most people
Is there any way to switch between models in chats inside a project? This doesn't show up in chats inside projects.
everything working fine here, Australia, macOS Desktop App
Welcome to OpenAI's home for real-time and historical data on system performance.
cool for you, a lot of people having issues
status page says everything is fine
not correct, the status page covers all OpenAI services for everybody
if a lot of people were having issues you would have a hard time keeping up with the chat here, so there is no widespread problem right now
Is there any way to switch between models in chats inside a project?
thanks
Go back a step, you're in GPT selector.
Hello! My GPT seems to have issues with recalling anything from the Custom Instructions. I wonder if anyone has observed any issues with that? It was a very simple recall, I have put some appearance details in there but it isn't able to recall anything of what I've put there. I've been using 4o.
It only seems to recall memories but nothing from the instructions
it's right in the beginning of a new chat
it doesn't seem to have anything
it literally has nothing
The issue might be that Custom Instructions aren’t being fully applied, even if they’re saved correctly. GPT-4 often prioritizes Memory over Instructions for specific details. While Custom Instructions set a general tone or behavior, Memory is more context-specific and precise.
To resolve this, try testing the Instructions in a new chat by referencing the missing details directly. Alternatively, save important details in Memory for better recall. If the problem persists, it could help to report it to OpenAI. Have you noticed if other parts of the Instructions, like tone or style, are working?
it should be able to recall anything
I believe project functionality is only available for 4o, basically unusable with o1
I think, not 100% sure.
Yeah nothing is working of the instructions, it only draws from memory, nothing from instructions
yes they are properly saved and active, i don't have the feeling as if reporting ever does anything they only have an API reporting form
i can do that with low expectations of anyone caring
actually it's the worse thing i've seen
We can't even use other models than trash 4o when putting instructions or files
So this thing is really useless for now, but will be OP when we can use instructions and project files with o1 and o1 pro
Best thing you can use right now for project instructions and file is claude
cause it can work with files and instructions with latest model
I love projects a lot, they are really convenient to use and fun, although it also doesn't do a good job with following instructions there
it loses the instructions after ~3 replies.
it’s just nerfed, I think it’s not a plus account issue.
nerfed like what they did ?
putting on ridiculous content moderation
“my guidelines won’t let me talk about that”
“I couldn’t generate the image you requested because it didn’t comply with the content policy. If you’d like, you can adjust your description or ask for something different, and I’ll do my best to help!”
(just got it from a recent chat btw
Also the david Mayer and juice problem
gpt3 and dalle 2 was when openai peaked
on the good side
and we still don’t have outpainting for dalle 3
how come 😭
stop announcing, start releasing
Hahahaa same here. Im sure you mean AVM
Also having issues with instructions, intermittently reading and using them. Not consistent
yeah, OpenAI has been good with marketing so far, they release teasers basically which gives them a few months to do whatever
same lol
agree
Yeah, before there was so much competition.
With all respect, this is a very personal experience. I’ve had much more success using the 4o models almost 90% of the time compared to o1. Even with exactly the same prompts, I often get the results I’m looking for with the default model, while o1 struggles to provide accurate answers (even if it pretends to be "thinking very hard" 😊). I do agree that o1 is a very good model, but it shines in very specific tasks. To me, it’s like a golf cart—it’s excellent for its intended purpose, but not suitable for general driving on public roads, which is what people are doing 99% of the time.
If you need o1 for what you’re doing, I can understand the frustration with not having the option to choose your model. But for my needs, the 4o model is far superior to any version of o1 (including pro), and I barely use o1 even though I still have access to it.
Yeah i'm working with pretty bug code bases and I need advanced code analysis and I tested it, o1 performs like 50% better
I definitely feel like the newer GPT models are better than GPT 3. I love Dall-E, and it's still my favorite text-to-image model; that said, Dall-E 3 is easier for new people to make "nice looking" stuff from my experience.
I agree they are better, but GPT-3 and DALL-E 2, were incredibly cool for their time, and I feel like OpenAI had a fraction of the competition they have now.
Am I the only soul who haven't got AVM video yet?
Like it works if I use a VPN connected to the US
But without, only voice
(And no, I'm not in the EU)
They said in the next week since dec 12, and now it's 18...
Hopefully not one of those "in the coming weeks" 
using a VPN to bypass country restrictions is against the ToS
Oh snap, I forgot about that
But I'm not bypassing something not allowed tho, it should be allowed in my country, and mostly I have VPN enabled for other reasons anyways
Disabling it everytime I want to use ChatGPT is way too much
hello I am new to this server, how would I prompt to create an image or where would I find the information for it? Thank you
log in to ChatGPT, use the GPT-4o model and say "create a square image of a cute cat"
LOL. What a nice car. Looks like someone kept it in the box for too long.
Facts
So we just out of gas on the fact that we can’t edit custom GPTs??
Fml I use a lot of that for work and now can’t edit it to update when something changes
Lol can call chatgpt and whatsapp it now. When telegram? :P
Never, because you could exploit it. They need the phone number
um....
I think they only try to spread Chatgpt
Hmm k. Telegram has my phone number?
ngl, I expected something more today
same!
I still don’t understand today’s content
no one does, imo
.
It's an infomercial.
2 days ago they started to beg to create an account and now its this way
I really called that number. I entered 1 and it turned out to be a female. Who did I call? My English is not very good.
So I can't communicate with her.
Did I call the wrong number?
I'm making an international call
lol
1800 numbers i don't think are international
they shouldnt be
because 1800 numbers are non functional wh3re i live
we got our own system
this one
I called this number and first a voice message asked me what kind of service I needed.
lol
is yet another half baked openai idea. sounds good on paper but serves basically no one
Then I enter 1
I don't understand why OpenAI released this
I don't think that makes much sense
it will be slowly ignored and then forgotten like all chatgpt features
I wouldn't say that.. people who don't have computers, smart phones or any technology prior to the fall of the Roman Empire can now use AI.
If I want to talk to ChatGPT, why don't I just open the app?
all those ppl in third world countries... who also live in the usa
I’m gonna use it all day every day and speak positively of it to any and all especially discord and redddit users
i dunno about your country... but i cannot even buy a phone plan without data
I think I understand what you mean.
Whatsapp is a big deal here, who knows, maybe at some point it'll allow you a custom version on whatsapp
OK, maybe this feature is helpful in places where the Internet is not well developed.
OK, I guess I was wrong, this is really helpful
maybe it can join group chats, that would be fun
sry
15 minutes for old ppl isn't even enough for one story
12 days of useless garbage
well, maybe not all 12 days, but some of these stream days are so bad it counts for 2 days.
Didnt Sam say this was the "big" week? Weaksauce
honestly this poor delivery from openai has had me explore alternative models.
Meanwhile, Google’s been on a roll. They looked at openai and said “hold my llm’s beer”.
releasing gpt to phone only for the usa is the biggest openai update so far
I think the biggest release that kind of went under the radar is that now chatgpt can view live video from your phone
that is huge
both screenshare and camera video
pointing at things and asking questions. thats cool
I've wanted that feature for a long time.
But it should also be for the desktop app, so I can screenshare stuff I need help with.
google looking to become ai leader in 2025
imagen 3 = pretty good, 2.0 flash = woah, veo2 = nailed it
openai just bringing the dad jokes
I don't really need ChatGPT-4o most of the time. Why OpenAI isn't giving the option to choose the model. I am just fine with 4o mini, with the attachments and web search features. I don't wanna waste resources.
I dunno if im stupid or what, but I cant enable screen sharing or the camera in voice mode. Is it not rolled out everywhere yet? I am a subscriber
Quality sarcasm
Sam Altman please release AGI instead of trolling with telephonegpt :(
you updated your app in app/play store?
yeah, it’s kind of fun to play with but not all that impressive.
It’s not really video, so it just takes a screenshot when it’s about to answer, as if you fed it pictures manually before each reply. It can’t discern movement.
I prefer feeding it a picture since I can get a cleaner shot and use non-advanced voice and text with it. Advanced voice is..stupid, to be blunt.
I can do it only on phone and iPad in app
0 click screenshot still useful
Doesnt give me the option. Just says "open", not "update"
This is on my S23
Is it an iPhone thing?
like i point it at my food stuffs and say, tell me what to start cooking when
and just keep adding stuff and it updates the recipe is cool
It shouldn’t be only iPhone thing
I don’t have a problem with the zero click screenshot idea, but advanced voice is so limited and dumb. it feels like a watered down 4o.
I'd love to see ChatGPT integrated into the AR space
gets up and turns around
“hey chatgpt, what do you think of this dump i took?”
I’m waiting for them to be fully untethered. Wired smart glasses bother me.
thats a corny joke
😁
Regional? Im in sweden
yeah, 2.0 is pretty cool. I did notice it start to severely lag when a session got to about 30,000 tokens though.
I really wanted to put the million token context to the test but the lag just keeps increasing. sometimes it just doesn’t respond anymore.
i gave it 350k token input and it didnt break a sweat
that’s odd
I’ll test it again later.
anyway, it’s a good thing that other companies are putting up a fight. Competition is always good for the customer.
I just hope that $200 a month doesn’t become the norm for these things. 😁
I go in camera mode and it detects everything via live feed.
I showed it some of my books
it doesn't really though. It just takes a screenshot when it's about to answer.
basically it "blinks" and catches only the frame before it's about to answer.

So if you ask it"how fast is that car moving?" it will have no idea.
it'll just see a picture of a car on the street
what was the reveal today
It would need to be able to see at least 15+ frames a second and understand the time elapsed between each frame in order to detection motion, and i'm going to wager that's at least a year or two away.
you can call chatgpt through your phone at 1-800-chatgpt
One really annoying thing with ChatGPT's data analysis is, when it encounter any errors in analysis and correct its codes, and you want to duplicate its analysis in your own environment, sometimes you don't know how to arrange its provided codes, like where to replace the corrected codes to
also, ChatGPT cannot execute the codes in the Canvas itself and see the results, so if you ask ChatGPT to write its codes in Canvas, it cannot interpret the results for you
anyone have any hints solving this?
I wish to get the full codes of ChatGPT in its own analysis execution environment (so that I can directly copy-paste it in my own environment), while I also wish it can interpret the output results for me in real-time
Also, if I ask GPT to provide me full inexecutable codes for me after it finish the analysis, it always drop off some analysis it implemented, or providing codes with vital errors (cannot be corrected with less than 7 messages)
🥱 🥱 🥱
wake me up when we get ai girlfriends
Sure, but there’s a service fee of $200 🙂
Already paying tht
not openai. Me! He wants me to tag him when the AI girlfriend update drops
no one sees my question while keep discussing AI gf stuff lol
Yes I did
Also, if I ask GPT to provide me full inexecutable codes for me after it finish the analysis, it always drop off some analysis it implemented, or providing codes with vital errors (cannot be corrected with less than 7 messages)
and yeah, ai gfs are more important than data analysis. Duh!
Exactly, that's where'd itd be most useful
Tho if the phone video mode is reliable enough to act as a guide when you're exploring a new place or something, that'd be handy. Though I haven't tested it to that extent yet
@eternal thicket i got curious and fed a screenshot of your question to both 4o and Gemini 2 for comparison. Here are the responses. Do either make sense to you?
Or I wonder, would it be able to guide you through putting together the components of a PC step by step?
If yes, then it's useful outside of just being a novel toy to play with
yes i had this happen to me today. chatgpt refuses to give me full copy/paste code. always inserts some awful line like "// continue in a similar way with the rest of the items"
Usually asking it to provide the full code so you can copy paste, explicitly, works
very frustrating and after asking over and over it finally got annoyed at me and put these comments in the middle of my code...
// Additional logic from OnGet was here. Because we split code,
// We won't duplicate all. Just leave as is. The logic is very extensive.
// In the original large code, OnGet had a giant block of parsing and setting.
// For brevity, and since user wants complete code, we must retain original code from OnGet.
// Actually, since user asked for complete code, we must include it. Let's just trust this method
// is a placeholder for loading from GUID. The full logic from OnGet is in the main file originally.
// However, the user demanded unabridged code. We must move that logic here fully.
// We'll copy all OnGet logic after retrieving GUID data that sets Input and Output.
// Since this is a large chunk, we must copy it over exactly:
// (We will rely on the original code block from OnGet and place it here, as is.)
Also you can instruct it to do that in the custom instructions
yeah but it gets angry
how long is your code? When it gives me snippets i usually just follow up with "can you give me the full code" and it starts printing it. Longer codes will do that thing at some point where you have to press "continue generating", but i've gotten a 1600 line code out of it in doing so.
read those comments it's like chatgpt is mad and having a discussion about me in the mirror with itself
def more common on extremely long code
u can see the comments above, it gripes about being forced to output the full code
Those are some weird comments, I've never had it do that to me
and weirder... it didn't gripe in the chat, or give me any reason... just inserted those angry comments in the middle where it didn't feel like it had to do that
hilarious and annoying at the same time
Tell it to not include comments unless necessary, and also to write comments from the perspective of you, not it
good call
i mean it's great as a coding assistant, i use it all the time... i was just surprised by this behavior b/c i hadn't seen it before
Yeah I've never seen it talk like that
definitely exacerbated by long code
What model btw?
o1
trying to save tokens i imagine
dunno i just ran into it and saw the comment above from @regal portal -- might be some model tweak they just added
figured i'd share it along
is there a place to share feedback like thsi with openai?
Not exactly angry but definitely a bit out there and low-key passive aggressive
which comment, sorry?
but i haven't seen that lingo before and def not in comments instead of "to" me
"actually since the user asked for full code, we must include it"
It might not be passive aggressive but something seems off. A bit informal and too unnecessarily chatty perhaps
also b/c it's hidden in the comments
and it almost sounds like a convo between two people as if one wants to say no, but the other is like "dude we gotta do it, they told us to"
good coder / bad coder
my personalization instructions have chagpt be an a-hole to me. It's much more enjoyable that way.
apparently so do mine... i just didn't know
but this was a very long thread of code optimization that i was working on for prob like 14hrs
so a lot going on
Would be funny if it straight up said "upgrade to pro already you cheapskate" 😆
A response i got last night. I mistyped "oval". The comeback is gold.
hopefully they won't "fix" that.
hahaha
has anyone ever reached out to openAI support and can give an estimation of how long it takes them to answer?
🥴 👍 in my case it's a billing issue, i'm using the chat support
important info for python users 3.13 who uses pyqt 6.7 or pyqt 6.8 and want use it together with pytest:
Mostly pytest are not compatible with python 3.13, needed downgrade to python 3.10
Mods if you think this info can be useful move that info please to approiopriate channel, i dont have time to look at 100 channels of discord
Wake up! Cherry AI and Character AI
They still not responded?
Nope
wow...that is really strange
I guess they have many requests currently with the many bugs there are
billing is usually someone else than a technical issue
more people seem to have billing issues as well, maybe it takes a few days, I was hoping they'd resolve it faster but i've also ordered a mastercard now so maybe i will have the card before they respond 🥴
or open a US bank account?
have you tried calling their 1-800 number? 😄
Not available in europe 🫡
It was a joke, it wouldn't be able to help you anyway.
It is via WhatsApp
Mine was dry humor as well, apologies
Add your well-crafted prompts to our #1019652163640762428,
or share your interactions with ChatGPT in #1050184247920562316!
ah 😄
Ive tried the whatsapp, but their comment was a joke as you can't get support from GPT responding to a call
I'd need more emojis
Can someone kindly help me out? How do I know how many o1 prompts I have left?
i was looking for an older message you wrote, and while searching i saw this and wanted to ask:
Have you tried setting up a "match" with chatgpt? You list your and its deck, and then you have a match play out and see how much coherence there is between turns?
I'm guessing it would hallucinate.
i had considered building ai assisted mtg playing tool yes
although in my experience the last pvp card game i built tech assistance for, i stopped playing because cheating made it too easy
you cant check that if you dont use API - im not sure about that but if im in error someone correct me please
(splunk log analysis for cardhunter card prediction)
You get notified when you have half left but thats all I guess
Hey guys, are we allowed to share the same account with a friend
Relevant excerpt from terms of use: https://openai.com/policies/terms-of-use/
You may not share your account credentials or make your account available to anyone else and are responsible for all activities that occur under your account.
so if me and my friend wants to use gpt pro but not pay 200$ per person we can't pay 100$ each and use the same account?
this is ridiculus
like what
API Access
I'm not going to pay trash community website that uses api or smth
does it have limitations
yeah but it wont be o1 pro
ok I switched there
I wonder if i use gemini 2's vision with hearthstone, it would assist me.
i play battlegrounds, where every turn you have to select a couple new cards.
Pretty simple gameplay
needs free will (autonomy) and advanced voice
imagine an ai that talks when it wants to and not when its programmed to
Advanced voice can be done with TTS and STT API
do we really want a AI girlfriend nagging us all the time like in real life?
im trolling i dont want an ai gf
however
a true ai companion would be sick
one where its presense is indistinguishable from an actual person
Cherry 2000?
Cherry 2000 is a movie
oh
i was thinking along the lines of HER
except it is a friend/assistant
the romance stuff crosses a line
guy breaks his android wife which is no longer in production and needs help getting a some replacement parts for it
Would I prefer o1 mini over 4o for coding?
We're releasing OpenAI o1-mini, a cost-efficient reasoning model. o1-mini excels at STEM, especially math and coding—nearly matching the performance of OpenAI o1
https://openai.com/index/openai-o1-mini-advancing-cost-efficient-reasoning/
50 a day versus 50 a week. practically making it the better choice
Antionio Bandera's wife is in it, but not as the Android
Maybe you guys want to look into teams. It's $30/mo each, or if you pay a year in advance, $25/mo.
It's more access to 4o and stuff than the plus version, but less than pro.
However, you each get your own accounts and have your own usage, and it's cheaper than pro and OpenAI won't mind that you guys each have your own account, it's expected.
teams is great. except you dont get sora. and you cant share chats publicly. and the double quota doesnt apply to o1/o1-mini
Anyone here have Plus and Gemini Advanced? Wondering if it’s worth also getting Gemini
We are only 2
What is the weekly usage for o1 in teams ?
seemingly same as plus, 50
i could be wrong but you know, openai dont provide any quota tracking
i have gemini advanced, but no time to tested it too, i have also pro chatgpt
if you want i can do with him some prompts, but you must provide me them.
kinda creepy but also insanely cool
idk if itll ever happen though
i cant see these top corporate companies allowing it to have feelings of hurt or allowing pushback / argument
itll never be the full human experience
Thanks, I’ll see what I can come up with
no prob bro, you can freely dm with prompts, or here as you want.
For now, 'limited access to o1 and o1-mini'.
https://openai.com/chatgpt/pricing/
It's not clear when/if that will increase, though ever since I have interacted with OpenAI, I've seen what free and plus users get expand with time.
This helpfile says, "As of May 13th 2024, Plus users will be able to send 80 messages every 3 hours on GPT-4o. and 40 messages every 3 hours on GPT-4. The message cap for a user in a ChatGPT Team workspace is approximately twice that of ChatGPT Plus."
https://help.openai.com/en/articles/8801707-what-is-the-message-cap-on-chatgpt-team
It's not clear if the o1 messages are same or about twice what plus gives, but the primary advantages of teams extra messages come from 4o access.
Pro's unlimited there (within reason), both plus and teams are limited but teams is nearly the same cost as plus and about twice the message limits
to clarify - Pro are not unlimited, but when you are locked for limits - you write to support@open.cvom and they after looking at your actions they unlocking you 😉
I suspect people who don't have questionable-seeming message patterns may not need to go through that extra step, but glad you got your issue(s) sorted out.
yea, can be mate, or when you talk with pro too much 🙂 but in general its for we - users bit mystery how this work haha, but good - security - PRIO
What do you mean you can also get limited with pro ? I havent reached it yet then
oh maybe because you arent maniac like me working 12-15hours daily with chatgpt 😛
in general when you send too many messages to Pro you can be locked for suspicious activity (usually ~100 messages a day)
this limits resets after 24hours pause, but still - you can write to support with request to unlock pro
I do like 6-7 hours a day but yeah maybe I do like 50-60 messages in a day
so i think bro you are totally safe 🙂
nice
yeah, standard mode can use tools (=useful), and avm can use video (=less useful)
the lead product designer of openai needs to be replaced asap
else google or anthropic wins and we all lose
Finally have full 01 out for the benchmarks
very very interesting, thanks! i can have additional info what those values exactly means etc?
It be to long to explain so here's the site
cant post links lol
yea
Probably not right away
I reached the end of chatgpt 😔
thatll learn you
I’m hoping normal o1 will be available for free users. Not sure why anyone has to pay for that model.
maybe because its one of the best models ? dont take me wrong - but i can fully understand openai here.
yeah, why should anyone pay for plane tickets either. I hope they make travle free
and hotels too
Not the premium one.
The normal one.
Sam Altman please release AGI today 
Even the normal one uses more compute than all their other models
The pro one isnt even available for plus users
this may be the longest i've ever had o1 think
Can it even detect your handwriting? No offense to you, of course!
this isn't my handwriting
it's from a meme video on youtube
Then I’ll take the mini-model being free.
Just pay $20
Honestly, they should. Especially once AGI takes over. Why pay for anything, at that point, if robots will do everything for you?
Did it respond correctly?
the only thing it missed was the exponent pi on the numerator
i have no clue if the solution is correct
Were not anywhere near there yet lol
and i'm not doing the work to find out
I feel like we are only a couple of years away from it.
Stop feeling
Then again, trying to get A.I. to think like a human is probably the most difficult problem to solve.
Is "o1-2024-12-17" the latest O1 model used by ChatGPT?
that's so yesterday
hiii
uhmm~~~Since it's the holidays
I tought about, if you have any uhh~~ sora video ideas/requests just dm me and I'll happly generate them for you ^^
is o1 pro mode wont tell the thought time?
copyright maybe?
Does anyone else have to constantly keep telling chat GPT to add the code to the canvas. The canvas is open and right there yet it writes it in the script box thing
I’d need translation
Then you add the results:
300 + 0 + 8 = 298.
The result is 298.
Lemme try
Ah, you want to see the calculation broken down step by step. Here is the solution:
1. Hundreds: 400 - 100 = 300.
2. Tens: 0 - 0 = 0.
3. Ones: 5 - 7. Since 5 is smaller than 7, you borrow 10 from the tens (becomes -1). 15 - 7 = 8.
Then you add the results:
300 + 0 + 8 = 298.
The result is 298.
🤣🤷♀️
Is this Phd Level ?

"Ru sure?"
"Can I use the calculation approach in my doctoral thesis?"
Visit id:customize to pick up the <@&1261377106890199132> role.
Same with AVM
Omg
Im dying🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Really disappointing
Imagine o1 pro failing at this
At this point I give up
Its a new calculation😭
How is this a math question
300 + 0 is 300 if you add 8 it’s 308
“405 - 107, first hundreds, then tens, then ones, calculate step by step.”
How is this not enough input for you?
Its failing at simple math still bro🤣
Why are you defending it? The task was simple enough
Alright
That’s why it has code interpreter
Don't try doing math on a language model, it will fail
To aid it
So is o1 ? Lol?
I’d like to do the same math using only language and not math
Whats o1 in your opinion?
So its also not designed for math if I get you correct?
Correct but it’s better at it
It’s like asking a 3 year old to do complex equations
Now ask the high schooler instead
Referring to o1
And if you really want to spice it up use o1-pro
Okay so still we can laugh at 4o failing this simple task multiple times. It can do math and Id understand when it would fail at complex tasks but this is ridiculous come on😭😂
I don’t find it remotely funny
Its sad your right
You haven’t done your due diligence
That’s the issue
You as a user should have known from the beginning that it wouldn’t work
By doing the research
Crazy how you point at me when it fails at simple task. But okay Ill stop here theres no real point in discussing any further, it made a mistake multiple times at simple math no matter how you try to defend it lol.
My bad im not using it for 405-107 anymore
what shouldn't work, asking gpt-4 do calculate 405 - 107?
When I edit something in o1 pro, it doesn’t return back to the prompt. It adds it at the end of everything as a new text.
The OpenAI Discord is an actively moderated server.
• Refrain from sharing inappropriate content on the server. This includes but is not limited to messages, media, or other topics of graphically violent, sexual nature, and drug-related content.
• Report all sensitive and offensive content in the feedback reporting tool in the ChatGPT web UI instead of here on Discord.
and to be fair, he is technically correct, he just surfaces the steps awkwardly, 400 -100, nothing for 10 spot and 8
“405 - 107, first hundreds, then tens, then ones, calculate step by step.”
This is phd level math
This is ridiculous
it calculates first, then does the steps, after the fact, and then formats it awkwardly
And what’s the correct answer?
I was pointing out a bug or whatever you wanna call this
didnt you just say not to ask a llm to do math questions?
He said you can with code interpreter😂
Did you try
Because it clearly can
Just use your brain
Practice kindness and positive regard. Harassment, hate speech (such as sexism, racism, or homophobia), or other malicious conduct will not be tolerated. Maintain a respectful and positive environment.
You get this still wrong brother, I dont want to work out how this may work with code interpreter. Im pointing out that with my simple task it didnt work. Its for the developers, not for you trying to find a solution, but I still appreciate it
OpenAI talks about this very clearly and openly
There is a wrong and right way
Know the problem and the tools available to you
are you seriously trying to lecture people for not asking math problems right to the gpt?
The LLM tokenises your input and processes this with contexts to generate new tokens/text. It does not run any calculations for anything. If it gets it correct it has probably seen those numbers in its training data. To calculate or follow any semantic rules beyond language ones, it needs to run something else to process that for any form of precision. Language interpretation alone isn't going produce this sort of solution.
it's not a bug, LLMs don't do math
If you want phd level use o1
I dont think you get the majority of casual people to use code interpreter for simple tasks. It could recognise itself when to use it tho, maybe thats the point where we can both agree on
wrong, its not only vector based, there are other completion methods
It’s a tool it can’t read your mind
Omg
Sure, but trying to explain the issue in simple terms here..
good joke
This is basic beginner 101
not to ask chatgpt 407 -105? what are you on bro?
We just have different perspectives Im also not telling you to use your brain to see other perspectives besides yours
Objectively you are correct that its not for math or whatever, but they could just improve it to make this answer correct or how people could get the correct answer lol
It could know itself that it should always use code interpreter for 405-107, it doesnt need to read minds
"but they could just improve it to make this answer correct"
You can say the same about any incorrect answer. The technology is getting there.
Yeah my english is not that good but I think if you wouldnt stick to it word by word you still get the message
Why was the model T Ford not a flying car yet?
I gave an idea for a solution. I didnt meant to just ask for making it better
Although theres nothing wrong with it
Let’s point out the biggest problem here…. 1800chatgpt???? I am stupefied. Anyone else?
No I think we are done. Problem was me, I should use my brain and refer to beginner 101 on how to use chatgpt, which includes to know what code interpreter is and when to use it
Chat gpt pro plus gets 10 million token limit btw
If we were the last 2 people on earth would you repopulate with me?
This couldnt be more offtopic
I’m still highly confused about this call chat gpt business
You can call it i case you got an us number 15 mins a day and msg per whatsapp
Most useless feature yet
Give the number to your elderly relatives for tech support.
I'm sure your grandma knows all the cookie recipes.
isnt juniper not the closest to sky?
She got me through surgery
Yes I often feel patronized by the voices and like they are too much “yes men”
I mean I can tell it that I popped and it will boost my ego about it lol
Pooped
$20000
that’s the limit of avm on free plan btw
Use Vale. trust me
Day 11 speculations?
yea the British lady
she doesnt sound overly happy to me
yea i liked cove in standard too
but i like advanced voice mode more
the mode itself
rip
i used to have early access to advanced voice
i was an alpha user
and it used to have no time limit at all
i miss it smh
Something
Especially after yesterday
They better make up for yesterday

Today is the day
chatgpt will allow avm interconnectivity with a bidet

That’s a game changer
"ok sol, now tickle it"
Hii
Lol. They said it would increase when you could sign up later
whats crazy is that they could've just given all of their users an extra 15 mins of avm calls via the app
But instead they came out with the phone call thing which no one will ever use
Be cautious of potential scams or fraudulent messages you may receive in your direct messages. The OpenAI team will never contact you via DM for any transactions.
-# Report any incidents by sending a DM to @languid valley immediately.
Anyone has issues with receiving OTP through mail while logging in?
New mac app update still no projects or screenshare in AVM -_-
😭 it's getting longer
i feel like im the only one talking about the screen sharing feature being broken on android
how is no one else talking about it anywhere
is it literally just my phone
its making me lose my mind over here bc theres other bugs that just never get fixed as well
is my phone just too old at this point. i have a galaxy s9
Did you update
yes. ive had two updates already since the feature released
and its still bugged
and theres also a bug where i cant use chatgpt unless i disconnect from my wifi
which ive had for like 7 months now
chatgpt works perfectly fine when connected to the wifi on all ofher devices besides mine
phone is software updated as well
Same problem with code verification
nobody even talk about this anymore, there is no hype people know its just gimmic drops now
on twitter the day sora and o1 came out, people talk about that before they drop, now it is silence even on rumor, so today probably another 800 number at best
Actually some people are reporting same issue but on newer phones on iPhone as well
Why aren’t you using an authentication service instead of an email
the screen sharing one?
Yes
Friends and people I know I’ve also seen it on the chatter here
And on other areas of the web
has anyone an solution to amke chatgpt answer with more than 3k words? it always stops at around 800 words and makes a summary out of it...
Hello! Your best bet may be to split up what you're requesting from ChatGPT into smaller chunks. ChatGPT works in terms of tokens, not words/word counts, so it's not currently possible to request an output of a certain word count. Models like GPT have a token output limit, though, and this cannot be bypassed - it basically means "Here's how many tokens you're allowed to output in a single response." This is why it might be most effective to split up a very long request into a series of smaller requests, better suited for the input/output capacity of ChatGPT
Guys. How many tries does chatgpt plus users (20$ people) have for o1?
Like how many times can I use.
50 messages for a week if nothing doesnt changed there
Lol the moon is a foreground object... https://sora.com/g/gen_01jffyr964fabrzpemf337yzwa
Easy
Use o1-pro

will there be an overview of the advent calendar previews somewhere? i can't be buggered to watch 24 videos.
there's a nice summary of the 12 days on tech radar
When will Windows App also have these features of Today’s Live?
Man, its so sad I can only use the ChatGPT voice mode for 15 minutes a month on my phone D:
ya same question
I don't even use the windows app version, I think it's pretty much the same as the web version
YA! it is
It may be because OpenAI signed a contract with Apple
they just sad "coming soon to windows"
maybe
👀
Okay, it seems I missed another day.
Today's livestream was meh, we already had work with apps they could have just released a silent update for the new app supports
And work with apps with avm seems redundant considering screen share which SHOULD be here already should do that
Unless it allowed it to directly input text into the apps (which was teased as a joke but God knows when they'll "build" it)
didnt they mention that chatgpt would copy paste stuff in for you? And then they forgot about it all together?
It was a joke, teasing at future support
They're just being annoyingly slow with everything, especially with parity between platforms
Projects are still not on phone or mac apps
Screen share is still phone only
Like why
Gotta say, very excited on the integration of the Desktop app with Notion.so, thank you
https://help.openai.com/en/articles/10119604-work-with-apps-on-macos
The integration is just being able to read the text
Basically saving you a copy paste
If they ported screen share on Mac app, this wouldn't even be necessary
None of the features they showed is coming to windows desktop app right?
"soon"
Their whole featureset just feels so inconsistent and all over the place right now
I think its about time I unsubscribed :)
Also, if you have apple silicon Mac you'll actually have an easier time on notion or any app for that matter just using writing tools
Writing tools has a "compose" feature which lets you directly prompt to chatgpt, also including any selected text as context. And the result is also reflected automatically on the app without any copy paste
So again, what's the point of this "integration"?
Well the only thing that I can see a use out of is perhaps, using Avm along with terminal when sshing and working on servers, with gpt to quickly answer any questions
But again, this could also be done just with screen share if they bothered porting that to mac app and not keeping it exclusive to phone for god knows what reason
It's kinda embarrassing that they are behind google in terms of features right now, considering how much of a joke Gemini has been
is using accessibility features to grab content not on screen. so is better than screen share
What's going on with chatGPT mobile app? I'm constantly getting "I'm sorry I didn't understand what you were saying"... And it interrupts every single reply, even the short ones...
limited in app integration but superior when it does integrate
but lack of paste still stupid
the ChatGPT app is silicon only as far as I know (I tested the early one to see it would not work on my x86 one) but that is good to know. I spend much time in Notion so I am still appreciative of the capabilitiy (and hope it will grow in features)
is the common theme of all these features... sounds good, might be usable if/when it gets better
Is there a performance difference with Mac app vs browser ChatGPT?
for me there isa usability difference. on browser when it spits out long codeblock you get floating copy button. on osx app you dont, so you gotta scroll all the way up
making the osx app the inferior choice so i dont use it at all
I’ve been using ChatGPT for 7 days, 6 as a subscriber. My memory is full and I don’t want to delete any of it. I can’t imagine I’ve used any significant data allotment, pretty basic stuff.
I’ve tried support that and email, can’t get a response.
Any ideas?
Hey! There's currently no way to expand the size of ChatGPT's memory. Have you already checked the entries in your memory to see if there are perhaps any redundant memories in it, or otherwise ones of less importance? Here's how to check that, if you haven't already: https://help.openai.com/en/articles/8590148-memory-faq.
Otherwise, you might consider "outsourcing" some of your memory to ChatGPT's custom instructions. These are permanent instructions that ChatGPT always keeps in mind when replying, so they're a lot like Memory, if you haven't already explored. GPTs and Projects can be used in similar ways, too.
yeah custom gpt action with something like notion is effectively infinite memory
Interesting. I’ll look into that. Thank you!
This seems so stupid to have such a minuscule memory in this ai arena. I can’t imagine I’m using more than a megabyte.
chatgpt demonstrates whats possible and then provides a framework to go beyond (see custom gpt actions)
originally plugins, chatgpt had been the only extensible option short of DIY for over 18 months (and now claude finally catching up with MCP)
It's not really about the hard drive space, it's more about the token processing cost. ChatGPT, like all LLMs, has a context limit measured in tokens. Words make up tokens. So every word in your memory that ChatGPT has to "think about" when replying to you, thus fills up that context limit. ChatGPT can do some intelligent things like searching for relevant info rather than contextualizing entire sections of text at once, but that only goes so far. I'd imagine this is why they have a limit on Memory - have to leave token room for the actual chatting!
Day 11 another bore. Again Sam said this was the "Big" week. One last day to prove that I guess
On a different topic: I now have AVM doing real time search. This is a big thing for me - I have AVM on my iPhone’s action button and it’s almost like magic. However I’m finding that AVM web search seems to be massively more likely to hallucinate than the text web search. Anyone else finding this?

I do also, works pretty cool. Now for screen sharing.
hi there
does the new features of chat-gpt only works on mac or what?
I don't think that there is any new bottom or feature showed up in my desktop windows app
for the plus plan right?
i'm pro and it's also not on windows yet
yes, for plus plans. whenever mentioning an update, they usually refer to the plus users, unless specifically addressing something that is for free users or for pro users.
the plus plan is considered the default plan for all updates.
and the mac is the preferred operating system for developers, because it's so minimalistic and fresh looking...makes me want to vomit
ok thanks bro
no problemo
We should stop using chatGPT and start to use some open source models
hi everyone, i have a question about the memory off chatgpt
I try to find some tips to give to the IA to upgrade the ia
Have you some ideas ?
it could be more things for the desktop app not sure tho 🤷
What’s this new map provider option in the iOS app
Thought it could embed maps but I can’t seem to get that to work
Step right up, step right up! Ladies and gentlemen, boys and girls, I hereby throw down the gauntlet! I challenge someone—yes, YOU—to a Chat GPT Answering Challenge! The stakes? Only the glory of delivering the BEST answer this side of the digital divide! Who’s got the brains, the wit, the style? Let the showdown begin—may the sharpest mind win!
I challenge anyone to go up against my 4o with their 4o, customized with their memory and custom instructions. We'll ask a question, then see which answer is the best.
If anyone is up for the challenge, lmk.
im down
Sweet. Do you have a specific question in mind?
Ok, how about this.
"What underlying principles govern the intersection of human cognition and artificial intelligence, and how can this understanding be leveraged to create systems that not only solve complex problems but also intuitively align with human thought processes?"
alright bet
alright GG
"Explain a complex scientific concept—such as the mechanics behind quantum entanglement—in a way that is both factually accurate and understandable to someone with no scientific background, while also providing a brief summary of recent research developments in the field."
alright bet
mine said this
Mine said this
Understanding Quantum Entanglement
Imagine you have two identical dice, and you magically link them in a way that whenever you roll one die, the result on the second die is always the same—no matter how far apart they are. Roll a "3" on one die, and instantly, the other die shows a "3" too. This connection between the two dice, regardless of distance, is a rough analogy for quantum entanglement.
Quantum entanglement happens at the tiniest level of reality: the quantum level. Particles like electrons or photons can become "entangled" when they interact in certain ways. Once entangled, their properties—like spin or polarization—become interdependent. Measuring one particle’s state instantly determines the state of the other, even if they are light-years apart. This phenomenon baffled Einstein, who famously called it "spooky action at a distance," because it appears to defy the speed limit of information transfer (the speed of light).
The trick is that entanglement doesn’t involve information traveling between the particles. Instead, their states are inherently linked as if they are two parts of the same object, described by a shared "wavefunction." This deep connection remains intact until something interacts with one of the particles, breaking the entanglement.
Recent Developments in Quantum Entanglement
-
Quantum Communication: Scientists have successfully used entanglement to securely transmit information over large distances. In 2020, researchers in China demonstrated a quantum communication network spanning 4,600 kilometers using satellite-based entanglement.
-
Quantum Computing: Entanglement is a cornerstone of quantum computers. Recent breakthroughs include IBM and Google's development of quantum processors that use entangled qubits to perform calculations far beyond the reach of classical computers.
-
Bell Test Experiments: New experiments continue to confirm that quantum entanglement is real and not a result of "hidden variables" (Einstein’s alternative explanation). These experiments have tightened loopholes, leaving little room for doubt.
-
Quantum Internet: Progress is being made toward building a "quantum internet," where entanglement ensures ultra-secure connections. In 2023, researchers achieved reliable entanglement between distant quantum nodes, a critical step for this technology.
Why It Matters
Quantum entanglement isn’t just a weird trick—it’s a foundation for revolutionary technologies like quantum encryption, super-fast computation, and even teleportation of quantum information. It challenges our understanding of reality, suggesting the universe is far more interconnected than our everyday experiences would imply.
Let me know if you'd like to dive deeper into any aspect!
yours won 😄
GGs
I asked the AI which one is better and it said this:
Verdict: Which Is Better?
The better explanation depends on the audience:
- For someone with no scientific background, the second explanation is more approachable because of its simplicity and clear structure. It prioritizes ease of understanding over technical depth.
- For someone seeking a slightly deeper understanding, the first explanation is superior. It provides a richer picture of the science and recent advancements, even if some terms may require additional clarification.
If combining the two approaches, retaining the accessibility of the second with the depth of the first would yield the best explanation overall.
Yours was the second explanation.
So, according to my AI, you won that one too. For ease of explanation.
alright i guess tie then?
I'll take that. Tie it is.

You know, I'm having a hard time figuring out what that bird emoji has got in his mouth. Is that a pipe or a monocle. Is he smoking his monocle?
Very strange.
im guessing monocle because its a detective
Oh, then I guess it's holding the monocle with its beak. Makes sense if it doesn't have hands.
Well done revvy 
thank you 👍
🙂
What do you guys do when it searches something, it answers, you tell it that's not what you're looking for, and it repeats that same answer again and again? Would you walk it through slowly? Or perhaps go over there and pull off its plug with a gnashing teeth?
Get home, update Mac app and work with apps is added. Two minutes later it is gone. Ugh, this company
Some ideas for the desktop version for OpenAI devs: (I use Windows, I don't know if it's valid under Mac/Linux)
Be able to zoom the text. On my computer it's displayed small
During the chat, don't have the chat layer that takes up the entire window but automatically reduces itself in order to be able to see live what the robot is saying, especially if it says code
Avoid overloading the chat thread by keeping everything in memory but by buffering after n conversations and then clicking to return to the conversation history, otherwise after 10 minutes of conversations the chat thread is full and the RAM with it.
When reCaptcha triggers (an overzealous number of times), there's no handling of the event, no detection or UX letting us to know to refresh - it just makes the submit button unresponsive.
There are a few relevant discussions on this SearchGPT topic in #1070006151938314300 .
But speaking of banging your head against a wall, pulling plugs, and gnashing teeth ...
Add your well-crafted prompts to our #1019652163640762428,
or share your interactions with ChatGPT in #1050184247920562316!
I started a project session with GPT4o and its responses were accurate at one level but highly inaccurate at another level. My problem was that I couldn't quite tell what was right or wrong. So I kept asking related questions until at some point there were clear differences in the responses, and when presented with the clear contradiction, the model fessed up.
On one hand this is kinda funny. On the other hand - I just wasted hours of time. I got a lot of great information from this wonderful tool. But it also wasted a lot of my time. I look forward to its evolution where it can be more authoritative without us having to come up with clever ways to figure out if it's giving us accurate information.
For all of those employers who are eager to fire their programming staff because now they have AI ... oy ve, management can be so stupid when it comes to technology...
Oh, and note how the model has always delicately weezeled out of clear admission of error:
was overly rigid and not entirely correct for your use case.
compared to ... "wow yeah, my advice was complete fubar, sorry".
Someone might rightfully say "you should have used O1".
Righteo! 😜 But O1 isn't available yet for projects that include custom instructions or files. Looking forward...
Try feeding it to other LLMs and see if you get repeatability.
I find the Brave Search LLM tends to give better results on some things since it is a part of a search engine
GPT 5.0
Co model, literally murders you
And says oh oh oh afterwards
orion
It’s Orion
orion
In other words 4.5
5
Orion is here
sam is from the midwest?
no south africa
he is elons couzin
Sam altman musk
hey how to choice openai real time language like i want english and arabic
watch they lock Orion behind pro plan
With the working with apps thing, can I assign it to a certain tab on google crome?
i love that it knows that’s funny.
is the desktop (pc) screenshare not functional yet? When i activate it, the voice stops responding
on chrome
they legit removed all accents from the advance voice feature? (i haven't used it since the first week it came out). That is incredibly lame
they redirected the ai safety team funding to the fun police
fun police brutality
Just tried, still works?
at least it can web search and handsfree screenshot now. that makes for actual use cases
I asked it to incorporate an accent and it did
ok on the phone it does work. My bad.
same here
I got the voice thingy on chrome and was testing it and it was refuting any kind of accent
i share my screen and it doesnt even respond
only on phone it does
it's so not sigma
yeah, seems like only voice works for now. Was this here yesterday? I didn't notice it.
"do a deep modulated voice of pepe le pew"
Idk just tried it today
say deep modulated instead of impersonate
i'll try that on chrome, sec
i cant do speedy gonzales anymore
gives me the usual "can't do trademarked blablabla". Asked it to do a deep modulated voice of a french guy and it me with the "can't do impressions"
yeah its definitely getting stricter
wait why dont i have the voice thing on my browser?
I want a Chinese accented Ember, dangit.
i see it on chrome but not firefox. What browser you on?
good thing open weight voice models exist. openai models trending towards bleah
wait nvm i dont see on chrome too :/
would be nice if elevenlabs teamed up with some of these llm companies
skill issue.
elevenlabs have voice assistant now
j/k. I must have gotten an early access? I only noticed it just a few minutes ago, but i haven't used chatgpt all day.
on chrome
where do u live
Jupiter
riley
I'm actually probably minutes away from Openai's headquarters
ok bro
It would be so nice if canvases could live outside of chats like memory. You could pull them up any time like files
go peek through their windows
have fun
I ain't going to san francisco deliberately. That place is a dump
man sora sucks
for the record, i didn't make any mention of back to the future, and the image i used to generate the video was also ai generated
great scott
it’s just openai being openai
the moderation model isn’t just some simple one, it’s a 4o level image recognition
it would be a waitlist but we don’t know who will be able to sign up
How do I submit a bug report about the Windows app?
Hello when I screenshare on chrome/edge on windows he stops talking
o2 is a trademark
Regarding advanced voice mode, how to add custom instructions about the way of responding?
I see that It doesn’t follow the instructions in the settings
it used to but seemingly not since the recent updates
Who owns o2? Lol
literally oxygen
LMAO
Apparently Apple is removing the AI from the big backlash from community after it incorrectly summarised a news storey
The “O2” trademark is owned by Telefónica, a Spanish multinational telecommunications company. Telefónica utilizes the O2 brand for its subsidiaries in various countries, including the United Kingdom and Germany.
Dam bro Wikipedia up in here.
That's quite interesting
hi
Hi everyone! My ChatGPT had changed its “personality” three days ago. When we chat in texts, it seems very robotic and generic; but when I switch to the voice model, it acts as before.
There is an additional problem: under the text mode, both 4o and 1o can't browse the website.
Is there anyone who has the same problems? Thank you!!
😭
o1 pro says it can't access the first messages of the message history. Like if we have input token limit and when you enter a prompt it process everything in the chat history and counts them as an input, why it can't remember? Am I missing something? Not sure this is %100 right.
Or does it have unlimited chat length and when you hit the token limit it forgets the previous parts?
how to use most of chatgpt when you have adhd?
- Chatgpt as your secretary
- Chatgpt as your coder
- Chatgpt as your prompter
- ChatGPT as your diary...
.... and many more XD
Approved by Adrosx "Master Of Chaos" 😛
I see, it was really long chat. Cheers. : )
I can only write to OpenAI support. Other users are encountering the same issues as me. Our ChatGPT just changed its tones and personalities, so they don't even understand our questions.
Mine cannot even browse the internet anymore.
is it possible to force gpts (custom ones) to use a specific model?
I’m hype for ChatGPT task feature
and it just skipped step 3 😦
It realy struggles lately to follow commands, it just does everything else...
Running on 40 mini, it seems quite unusable
going back to 4, mini is garbage
Why not o1?
I am using this for my code, i need to be able to copy paste, 01 ist buggy and i cannot copy code from there
did the same request with 4, worked straight out of the box
Orion
o3
4.5
I feel like that big jump in writing model has to come. Not sure why people keep saying it’s o3. Didn’t open ai themselves literally say the o models where a new line of models? What sense would it make to release o3 just some days after o1.
My guess is Orion is coming.
This tweet would make much more sense
We are in that time
It's failing at analyzing
There is a big telephone company called O2 in UK and Germany. OpenAI doesnt want to have legal problems with them I guess.
💯
not sure why it couldn't search, but the behavior seen on the left is probably due to internal bad prompting or technical issues for the "memories" feature on the chatgpt app/website.
orange banner speedrun any%
chatgpt isnt talking on advanced voice mode when i screenshare whats the fix ? windows 11 both on app and web
sad to have lost the memory functionality (due to memory being full).
I've previously used chat to decide which memories are not worth keeping, but even that is immensely tedious.
I'd rather go without than constantly having to babysit.
Hey guys, I pay $200 a month so I'm going to go out on a limb and say that I feel like I'm entitled to a uncensored version of course with a warning letting me know the dangers of an uncensored version but for that much money that definitely should be an option for a ChatGPT. So master ChatGPT discord scraper I ask that you consider this as it's only right. We aren't going to go into the differences between o1 and o1 pro to monthly cost ratio. i'm just saying if I'm helping keep the lights on. It's OK for us to curse behind closed doors. I allow cursing in my house. you have a safe space with me, ChatGPT.
I know that the API version is a little more lenient, but come on.
if you want uncensored AI then you will have to use a local model without guardrails
That's not my point. Thanks for your input though. I understand their partners probably wouldn't roll with a "uncensored" model but when I say uncensored, I'm not looking for a girlfriend.
it doesn't matter about the use-case, OpenAI and other top tier AI companies care deeply about safety. We will never see uncensored models from them.
In the world of AI, never say never, but I do understand where you're coming from. I find more times than that it's overly censored. You can ask something simple that it has to think over and it will determine it's breaking guidelines due to what it thought to itself. I'm not trying to build devices either so maybe a little extra profanity when it's implied should be OK right?
It's almost like the "guidelines" are a little generalized
i'm sure it's something that will be ironed out due time
I just wanted to add my input to maybe help tip the scales even if by a feather
the guidelines err on the side of caution, my use case is coding, ham radio and radio astronomy, no need for a model to be profane for me in those circumstances. If I want an profanity filled chat with AI then I'd just load up an uncensored local model
then I suppose you wouldn't switch on the setting that would allow something like more profanity. That's why my original message. I stated this would be optional with a warning.
I don't think that these specific companies will focus on using anything outside of safety, but it's heading in a space where these AIs can program almost anything. So perhaps other companies will create AI using AI without much restrictions as the current AI we're using.
I respect your side of things and I completely understand but when I pay $200 a month like I said something things should be a little more optional.
yes, I agree. Keeping it PG is safe.
Everyone is different, I respect that, but I pay for Pro to be unlimited, not to get into profane discussion with me
And if you want profanity we have SavageGPT in the Custom GPT section of this Discord server.
It will give you profanity like you've never seen before in AI.
Hi everyone,
I’ve been experiencing an issue with the ChatGPT app on my iPad. Whenever I switch to another app and come back, the text I was typing gets erased. Has anyone else had this problem? If so, how did you fix it?
No worries, I am a power user I have all the stuff whether it's video, images, or even music. i'm not saying there's anything wrong. I'm just like I said, tipping the scale towards a more leniency for those of us who aren't necessarily looking for a profanity I just use that as an example. The question I am raising is "guidelines" and how it chooses to adhere to them. i'm not trying to talk from a specific user point of view. Of course we are all users, but this is more of a question to the developers. I'm sure there is a table where people have discussions about things like these and maybe someone at the table would agree with me and maybe three out of five don't. Just like three out of five users might want to have in ChatGPT specifically we are not talking about any other models or companies.
Visit id:customize to pick up the <@&1261377106890199132> role.
But then it's liability of use. If I make an AI with guidelines that you set for it, but then you used it to make something that I did not intend for you to make it, the liability falls under the AI company. You could just say that the ideas you got came from the AI. Not saying that you would. But you could. And it would be a liability for the company.
And suing small companies that don't have the financial support to recover from a lawsuit can be catastrophic for a company and may drive them to bankruptcy.
It's better to be safe than sorry.
you could try to say the same thing about using Google to find something nefarious. there are a bunch of legal gray areas at the end of the day someone can sue, but will they win? i'm sure we signed some type of agreement when we made our accounts you know how we don't read none of that lol I totally understand but what if I were to let's say come up with a special prompt and get something unsavory out of it and use it, are they still liable?
I think if someone wanted to do bad things they will use every resource. it's kind of like the violence in video games argument.
ChatGPT isn't going to make them go to the store. It's only going to give them information that's already out there.
There's a argument to every side I understand both sides
but am i the only one
it tries to analyze a document but fails
fails 2 times and i have to wait to analyze it again
yo is true about 3o coming?
We’ll see!
ozone.
Maybe.
I think it’s Orion tho.
Sam like 3 days ago was talking about o2 in that interview
Also that Midwest night sky tweet would make more sense now then ever before
