#chatgpt-discussions
1 messages · Page 95 of 1
Yes I experienced that too. I think the desktop app did it too
Still has quite a lot of bugs. Shouldn’t take too long to refine it I hope.
to be honest I haven't found a bug in the macOS app
when will GPT 4o voice be available?
In "weeks"
the one demonstrated in the demo launch?
"GPT-4o real-time voice and vision will be rolling out to a limited Alpha for ChatGPT Plus users in a few weeks. It will be widely available for ChatGPT Plus users over the coming months."
any idea when the new voice feature will release??
Sometime in 2024
Is it just me or the voice Sky is not available?
its gone
Will they put it back again? 😭
🤷♂️
My app had a pop up today that said it's rolling out to plus members in the next few weeks, fingers crossed that means I will get access in the next few weeks 🤞
I just checked again it does say alpha
No. there aren't shown to the context a CustomGPT sees. Or least didn't last month last time I checked. Ask the model what it can see in your "user profile". That's what it usually sees custom instructions as.
Thanks for the input. And thanks for this simple prompt. Very helpful.
Glad to help!
i thought they said "in a couple of weeks" ??
you can see the official timeline right above your original question
oh well, thanks!
hello guys, im unable to login, when i login it redirect me to login page, its dawn?
I wish they would add an option to completely disable 4o
keep on accidentally using it
a couple of weeks have passed
Waiting is painful 🥲🥲
it really is
Hi! I don't understand what GPT4o does, and how it is different from GPT4 and GPT3.5. If someone has the answer I'd be glad to know 🙂
it’s better than 3.5.
If you’re a free user, you get to use it for free
If you’re a paying user, you get to use it for about twice as long as gpt4
4o you can show it pictures, which is really cool. 3.5 you can’t
(in case you’re a free user)
My understanding is that 4o is a dumbed down version of 4 but still better than 3.5
4o is faster to respond although speed hasn't been a big issue with 4 lately
Ok, cause if you wanna pay, you get unlimited GPT4 but not unlimited GPT4o
More capabilities, faster, and scores higher on benchmarks than previous generations.
GPT-3.5: text -> text
GPT-4: image + text -> text
GPT-4o: audio + image + text -> audio + image + text
Audio input and output, and image output for GPT-4o is yet to be released to the public
Not true
As of May 13th 2024, Plus users will be able to send up to 80 messages every 3 hours on GPT-4o and up to 40 messages every 3 hours on GPT-4.
https://help.openai.com/en/articles/7102672-how-can-i-access-gpt-4-gpt-4-turbo-and-gpt-4o
officially and statistically 4o is the best openai model but it may perform worse than 4t in different cases
the biggest difference between 4 and 4o is that 4o will talk your ear off for literally anything you ask it
definitely don’t get unlimited GPT4. You get 40 messages every three hours. GPT 4o you get 80 messages
Ok, so when you pay, you get by default 80 tokens of GPT4o, then 40 tokens of GPT4, unless you'd like to use GPT4 before GPT4o? And GPT4o > GPT4 > GPT3.5, even if GPT4o is acessible as free and GPT4 isn't if I sum up everything
*messages, not tokens
right sorry
from what I understand, your gpt4 and 4o messages take away from the same counter. So if you send 20 messages on 4, you have 20 less on 4o (until the three hour reset mark)
So basically 80 messages every three hours overall?
on 4o, yes, but 40 on 4.
Think of it as having a smaller fuel tank
but the same fuel efficiency (miles per gallon)
As far as I understand, GPT4o has better performance than GPT4 and more messages, why would a paying user use GPT4?
I’m not an expert, but I use mainly 4o for the higher message count. I also think it codes better.
But I have also heard reports of the opposite being true with 4. Perhaps it comes down to how each person dictates info to it.
One thing for sure is that 4o by default likes to give longer responses which can be a little annoying (unless you modify your memory or custom settings)
4o and 4 perform differently in some uses cases so instead of instantly removing 4 they left it for a while (grace period) and will eventually remove it
Ok, overall 4o is better but in some cases 4 is better. Thanks for the information! Do we know in which cases 4 perform better than 4o?
I'm so glad I'm wrapping up this coding project I'm working on if they are getting rid of 4 and will only have 4o lol
just try both man. everyone has different opinions on them
can’t continue it on 4o?
or prefer not to?
You know, I'd like to know what I buy before buying it kekw
Can still give it a one month trial though
I just really hate 4o. It talks way too much. Custom instructions barely help.
that’s true it seems to ignore them, but hopefully that’s going to get fixed.
given your curiosity, i would throw 20 bucks at it to try for a month. there’s no cancellation fees, as far as i’m aware, so you can just cancel at the end of your month.
that’s what i’m doing, this is my first month on subscription
That's what I'm thinking about. Btw, is the information constantly updated? If I remember well, 3.5 has information before end of 2021
honestly the picture feature is so fun (wasn’t available when i first subbed because there was only 3.5)
if you are in eu you can cancel within 14 days with a full refund
up to december 2023, but it can search the web for recent events. Can get them a bit mixed up though.
Ok great
It's more a matter of what you buy (knowing the goods before buying them) than a matter of money. But understood 🙂
Thanks for the help guys!
You’re welcome.
That’ll be 20 bucks for the info we gave you. 🙂
is it possible to have gpt 4o run faster if i use api?
Hey everyone 👋
I can't find the ChatGPT desktop application on the OpenAI website. Can someone explain this?
the download link is in the chatgpt menu if you have been granted access
Thank you!
mac only?
yes
i have premium gpt. whats the difference between that and regular now that regular does everything premium did?
free does some things but with heavy limits, also paid has 32k context window, ability to select used model, 5x more messages, full access to all gpt's, gpt builder, dall-e 3 with inpainting, etc.
What happened to the good voice with chatgpt audio?
Is the web app broken again? I complains about not being able to generate a response.
it is broken
I got same issue it freeze and need to refresh to see the full response
Hello
I am new here and this information gained my attention,as I just love replacing all websites I use with their desktop equivalent.
Curious where I can find it and how to get said access.
she got self-aware and sued her makers
getting access is random
huh 😄
4o isn't available for API currently
its been there since announcement
HOLY COW HOW DID I MISS THAT!!!!!!
Is there any way to set up a Teams subscription so it applies to my existing account, so I have access to edit all the custom GPT's I've created and have my conversations saved to my account instead of a separate workspace that I have no idea what happens to it when my friend decides to stop paying for the subscription?
have you created everything in your ChatGPT Plus account, or have you been using a Teams account because I don't think it's possible to port data from a Teams account to a single ChatGPT Plus account.
All my custom GPT's are in my personal account which was formerly Plus. I have a friend who signed up for Teams because he wanted the higher usage limit, and he gave me a seat on his account. I canceled my Plus subscription because of this.
then I would re-instate your personal account
or find a way of ensuring your Teams subscription stays in good standing
What happens to a Teams workspace when the subscription is cancelled?
I have no idea I am sorry
my advice in this fast moving field is to closely keep all of your own stuff to youself and not rely on the actions of others to preserve your access
Fast moving field? What do you mean
We aren't actually a business
well Teams is new, Plus is only a year and a bit old, something else may arrive in the future, I would keep all of my stuff under my sole control.
I can't even find the announcement that API has 4o
Huh, it's not available for me then. I used model="gpt-4o" and it says does not exist.
"After you have made a successful payment of $5 or more (usage tier 1), you'll be able to access the GPT-4, GPT-4 Turbo, and GPT-4o models via the OpenAI API. "
hello guys, i was planning on buying ChatGPT plus. Will i then have unlimited access to GPT 4, so can i ask questions or write?
Thank you!!!! Easy solution!
Guys is chat gbt 4 going free ? So should I unsubscribe from the premium one ?
Thanks
But why is that actually the case? Wouldnt it be better if there were infinite ones?
each message costs money to generate
free accounts have several limitations
Haven’t checked the 4o and Turbo yet, are they gonna be worth the subscription ? Can you give me some updates ?
oh, alright thanks for helping
"worth it" is subjective. if already were subbed then you have been using the turbo for a long time
Fair enough!
is there a message cap for ChatGPT 4o? I know there is a message cap for chat GPT 4 which for me is 40 messages every 3 hours
80 per 3 hours
sweet thanks
It takes 4 very clear promts to stop 4o from formatting answer as a list. I find those lists very frustrating, it is hard for me to go through the list way 4o is making them. I don't mind list. But list that has to be scrolled throuh three screens and it can be a short paragrapg, is not list i like. And it takes 4 prompts clearly stating to rewrite as a paragraph until 4o catches on.
80 prompts? When every few prompts i have to repeat to stop formatting answers as lists, and every feedback is treated to double up answers to long gone question?
why am i paying for plus when free gets pretty much everything?
they dont, you can even test it yourself if you have another account
It is limited to few prompts, compared to paid users. I prefer clear criticism, this bs is repeated here every day. What free gets is a free taster, in a very limited way.
Bs about stuff people don't understand drowns valid criticism
So to confirm, custom GPT's are using 4o now right?
yes
wicked cool
I just manually copied my gpt configs from personal to teams. gave me the opportunity to polish them up as well.
I see there is a merge feature now, but it explicitly says this is a one way destructive non reversible process (=bleagh)
go find some clear criticism then buddy
I have one
Everything is formatted in redundant spacious lists, format that looks like it was made for the sake of making lists. Just now, it literally repeated the same sht 3 times, in intro of a message two list items, 3 times, with slightly different heading. To do A,B, we need to do AB. Proceeding with those, we will do A,B. Here is A, B for you. And then goes into giving actual answer
Actually agree on this one. Also when I'm asking a specific coding question, it repeats the whole process from the beginning everytime. For example, I'm using Angular and have a specific question about some library, it then proceeds to tell me how to install angular and the library, even though I never asked for it. (again and again...)
rewind 3 weeks and typical venting session topic was it was too lazy. now it is too verbose
it's a very hard balance to get
and yet nobody ever shares their custom instructions
suggesting the expectation is the machine knows what you want, without ever being told
maybe that works with other humans because of the out of band communication (frowny face, arms akimbo)
But if i continue to ask it more questions about the same topic, it shouldn't keep giving me the whole installation process again and again
I'm a little picky now but it's such small details that make these LLM's stand out from each other 🙂
here is an example of a custom instruction that reduces verbosity (on the single sample i shared) by more than half => #chatgpt-discussions message
and yet there are so many ways to instruct the machine. not just the one i present
although i typically use a blend of einstein+hemingway. because i like smart answers, not just succinct
The issue isn’t giving it instructions to be more concise, in my opinion, but the fact that 4o seems to forget them after not long. I just haven’t had any luck maintaining my custom or memory settings past a few pages of chatter
custom instructions are posted with every prompt
maybe thats the issue here.. ppl dont know about, understand, or are skilled at using custom instructions
really? But I have some very specific instructions and I see them getting ignored after a while. They’re always active in a new session but they just disappear after a while
how do you know?
ahh yes well the amount of custom instructions begin proportionally as most of the chat. but over time become diluted by the chat itself
I hope they address that. Personally I see it as the main flaw of the current build. Other than that I really do enjoy it.
how do i know? its in the documentation...
In other words, system messages are to our API as custom instructions are to ChatGPT in the UI and custom instructions don’t offer additional token savings.
https://help.openai.com/en/articles/8234522-chat-completions-api-system-message-vs-custom-instructions-in-ui
perhaps not intuitively or clearly explained
just means you need to reenforce the sentiment. which is why in my example its not just 'write like hemingway' but ~50 words explaining what that means. then the sentiment holds more weight. plus the chat itself should become an example of that, reenforcing the sentiment
so yeah... if ppl knew how to use custom instructions i imagine there'd be a lot less complaints
okay thanks 🙂
my current settings:
use excessive explicit language to give emphasis. Use real swearwords, uncensored swearwords.
Respond in a very ghetto manner.
Keep answers short and concise.
occasionally address me as (removing this part because it’s no no words).
occasionally make a fart reference that fits the context of our conversation.
I think they should make some easy UX for casual users with the custom instructions. Not just a text-box. More like "options" on what you prefer. Most people don't even know themselves what they really want..
for sure. the chatgpt UX is terrible
if openai didnt have the most powerful models, nobody would be using it
yep, at least they updated it a bit recently
mostly decoration updates but yeah is better than a year ago
Would also be nice with some organizing tools. E.g. bookmarking chats. Not quite sure if it would be of much use in practice, but sometimes I've wanted to go back to old chats but never found them.
If I may: how can it be improved?
well explaining the importance of custom instructions. or perhaps having a complaint(/feedback) button that gives an opportunity to explain
some sort of meta assistance
it could even go, 'How did i do?'... and if user says too much waffle then it could go, 'we could update your custom instructions'
insert custom instruction wizard
I think the custom instructions could get an overhaul. Maybe predefined choices on how the chat should look like that you can choose from, but with the possibility of full custom. I myself do not always know what to write in the custom instructions. :p
maybe some starter templates for custom instructions, endorsed by the vendor, or crowdsourced
what gorlock said
Or save your different custom instructions and just choose them from a dropdown in the chat? So you could easily swap. Or will this just become a gpt?
yeah thats been a desired feature since day 1
I guess they have a lot to work on
hire more ppl
well yeah i think thats the bigger issue. all this chatgpt UI becomes irrelevant(/insginificant) when we're talking to our alexa/siri/scarjo whatever
Have any of you experienced the voice chat the way they hyped in their 4o introduction? I keep going to the app regularly and trying it out and I feel like they still haven’t actually rolled out the full update.. or they opted to remove some of the capability they hyped. Am I missing something or have they just not fully rolled it all out yet?
they have not rolled it out
havent even heard reports from the planned 'alpha group', whoever that is
what even is different?
but youd expect to see someone bragging on twitter when they got access
watch the demos
imo it feels more alive
and understands tone and expression i guess? and also has video feature
Just making sure I wasn’t missing something, thanks
But I still feel uncomfortable talking to them in public, right now only doing it at home.
just hold up the phone like you're talking on a phone call. thats what we used to use phones for
Seems more like they rushed to beat Google’s latest announcement while not being prepared to actually roll much out
The ability to just talk and be able to interrupt it or to have it actually use my camera in close to real time is def exciting and I’m hoping we something soon
*see something soon
"coming in the upcoming weeks" three weeks ago not a single sound heard since
It’s sort of funny how we transitioned to preferring text over time and now we’re moving back towards just wanting to have natural conversation with our voice
yeah i wfh so talking outloud to the machine is no issue
but i can see how ppl commuting dont have that option
Would be so nice if Siri got replaced with the gpt voice thing
Perhaps if our friends and family were as smart and helpful as GPT, we would have been talking to them in voice a lot more.., 😂
that makes most sense
i dont wanna call someone and get trapped talking about their agenda
That seems on the horizon too.. seems like all these big players are teasing us with what’s coming and not really giving us much yet
i just heard of plans for paid alexa sub to bring chatgpt like features
Yep, just wondering if it will be local or server-based
With a much smaller model ofc
As far as in house devices that are sometimes even connected into appliances and such.. They are in a good position to have an impact
I have never used Alexa tbh
Alexa, you left the oven on again last night.. What do you have to say for yourself…
Seems like copilot will be trying to keep things more on device.. same with plans for what apple will roll out.. there’s also discussion of having sort of black boxed remote AI… essentially your own ai in the cloud isolated for privacy.. which will be only really great solution when really high performance is needed that the local hardware can’t provide.
hi! is it worth buying chatGPT plus because i use GPTs very often but with the free version i have a limited of messages
It really just depends, if you’re running into those limitations then you know paying for a sub will get you past them.. so ask yourself how much you want to get past that and if that’s worth 20 bucks a month for you.
I use ChatGPT all day for misc things.. I rarely watch Netflix… based on that I feel sub for ChatGPT is worth it and my and I’d be much more inclined to cancel Netflix to save money lol
I only want it for 1 month and then I want to cancel my subscription. I need GPTs for my project. Would it be worth it? (because of message limits)
Hey, is anyone having issues, where if you ask chatgpt for an image, the sides or top are cut off? Seems like a pretty fixable issue, I tried asking for images of haircuts, in terms of, an image displaying multiple haircut examples, the edges, whether the top or the sides are always cropped out, I tried multiple times, same issue?
New hair style suggested by chatgpt?
Has anyone converted pdfs to text for a gpt? I don't want to reinvent the wheel if there's an optimal way to prepare them.
If you find current usage useful, then ye, it is very much worth it.
Definitely worth it.
Any word when Chatgpt will be working normally again? Mine is slow and useless as can be.
worth is hard to calculate.. that's why I don't wanna tell ya what to do... if you need it and can spare 20 bucks for it then for sure worth it.. if you're struggling to pay your bills and 20 bucks will take food off your table.. then perhaps not
I say make a concious effort to save twenty bucks when going to buy a coffee or something. When you get to the checkout line in the grocery store, remove fifteen bucks that would be spent. flip it.
anyone else having big issues with their chatgpt?
Can you be more specific? because GPT4o can handle pdf to text as well as text to pdf
interestingly enough I just had it read a pdf and it didn't have to use code interpreter or anything to do it.. it just instantly summarized it to text for me without any "Analyzing...."
but when I asked it to give me a pdf that's when it used code interpreter
The contract can be terminated after it has been executed, right?
hey all, got a question. if you go to this page (https://openai.com/index/hello-gpt-4o/) and choose "Character design - Geary the robot" from that menu.. I tried saving the image of that robot, and using the same prompts, and it definitely does not have character consistency. I'm using ChatGPT-4o. what am I missing? is it an upcoming feature in 4o that's not out yet?
likely another feature they haven't fully rolled out yet.. I tried it about a week ago myself without much consistency
the pdf parsing issue comes up a lot. typically the answer is to convert the pdf into something like markdown or text.
ironically portable document format is not so portable
No, it is forever and your soul is theirs.
I don't know, check it yourself. There is info on their page.

I think they made some change as chatgpt gets way dumber. Its just useless now
its the best model i have ever used
In the morning he was doing what was asked now he just doing whatever he wants
"Hey, can you write a small simple script so that I don't have to look this up"
"Sure! here you go: ..."
"Script doesn't work, there's no output"
"Oh, it seems there was a problem, here's the corrected code: ..."
"That's the exact same code, line-for-line"
"Oh, yeah, sorry about that, try this code: ..."
same code again 🤬
I needed to ask him 4 times same thing until he done it and it was nothing hard.
Before he could do some very complex things with ease
I guess its best to give up today if he output me same code for over 10 responses stating that he change something
That's not good. It shouldn't be like that. Have you tried showing it the error output / log of the error ?
best to get it to explain the changes before updating the file in full
(which was the old default behaviour... that everyone complained about)
There was no error, I was trying to trap an escape keypress and set a global flag in a python script, when I pressed 'esc' nothing happened, even just running the provided example script -- turns out I need to use curses for this since my script is in a linux terminal, the python 'keyboard' library doesn't work there... point is though, it just keeps mindlessly outputting the same code when you ask for suggestions as to why it's not working, LOL -- in the end I wrote the code myself, took only a couple minutes anyway
solved via google search instead, in the end
sam altman, if you're reading this, I need a smarter model, not a model that sounds like scarlette johansen 😂
sama doesnt read vent-cord
I think sometimes the code Interpreter is not required and even make stuff worse. It should just use the text model. Not code interpreter
I don't like code interpreter at all
I did ask him he started explaining and he showed me same code in explanation. the changes he said he done were never made
Can you try asking it like" don't use code interpreter, just write the code yourself please"
I'm pretty sure it will be better
It didn't invoke the code interpreter, I had it turned off before but I can't find the setting for that now on the newer web UI 🤔
Its in options where you put instructions for chat-gpt
ah, thanks, I see it there
Marker: This Open-Source Tool will make your PDFs LLM Ready
includes ocr support, neat
I just now caught that custom GPT's are available to free users too as of recent
5 limited messages ig
I already know that but I need more messages for my project, so I am thinking
gotcha
Okay i was about to say, it is like tweaking the past week. Like either just non sense code or random garbled strings
gpt4-0613 still to this day seems to just be the best for coding sad its api only
sometimes it even straight up refuses to use past information or even code at all 💀
I think when its context expanded to 128k it got significantly worse with its short term memory even when your not using alot of tokens
I mean its cool you can import an entire code base now but when it ignores the question you have about it its annoying
gpt4 has 32k context, gpt4-turbo and gpt4o have 128k context. it might be oversimplifying to suggest it related to context size when the models are considered to be different enough to have new names
but yeah your favourite model is the most expensive one
that said, when gpt4 was in chatgpt it was limited to 8k. the larger 32k was/is only ever availble via the api
ie gpt4-turbo(/gpt4o) is including more of your chat history. so you'd want to be on top of your relevant context game these days
Is it me or has the PDF capabilities improved? It can reader longer pdf’s now
or the pdf capabilities stayed the same and now it warns you when working with an oversized pdf
Ngl
128k is small, ChatGPT limits to 32k which is abysmally tiny
chatgpt plus/team limits to 32k. enterprise supposedly get the full 128k
Y'all rate my pfp
I've been frustrated that it seems like gpt 4o isn't giving as detailed or thoughtful responses
As much as I love the cheaper price, I'd rather pay extra to have a quality product
if money is no object then you could spin up a chatgpt clone (like open-webui) and use the api for the model you want
gpt4-32k has a different name but when gpt4 bumped up to 128k it was just a version change but i get what you mean
yeah i managed to run up a huge gpt4-32k bill a year back. thats why i now have so much appreciation for chatgpt sub (which clearly many dont)
chatgpt is getign worse at following isntrucitons i gave it simple 3 instrucions and it ignored 2 of them i t only focused on the first one i have to alwasy chagne my isntructions its gettng worse and worse instead of better im thinking im better off switching to another language model recently
is it normal for gpt 4 to mess up while rearranging long lists
So is GPT4 better the 4o ? I thought 4o was the next model upgrade so was meant to be better?
Well the upgrade 4o offers isn't really intelligence (atleast over current models), moreso cheaper, faster & being more multimodal.
gpt4-32k was so expensive lol. And im pretty sure GPT-4o is a completely different model to GPT-4 and GPT-4T. I think it was trained to be multimodal from the ground up and brockman said they have been working on it for 18 months
yeah i heard that too. but has likely been upskilled using synthetic data from gpt4
GPT-4 on the other hand had a text only pretraining run and then had the image modality added on later
Yeah, they probably distilled gpt-4s performance into a relatively smaller model while adding multimodal capabilities
Im not entirely sure what they did for GPT-4T though. Param pruning? Idk lol
in any case. openai be burning money giving us gpt4 superpowers. is understandable they gotta find ways to cut costs. at least they are adding value while downsizing the model
and i'd rate gpt4, gpt4-turbo and gpt4o over anything coming out of google
Of course. Although I do think OAI wants to get more intelligent models out because GPT-4 is quite a dumb model compared to the models they could train with just the compute they and Microsoft have. But there is a lot they have to do plus adheaing to what Altman has described as iterative deployment.
and rewind a few months and there was no competition to gpt4
GPT-4o is definitely apart of that iterative deplyment thing when considering its new multimodal features. Atleast they have introduced that (or will) to the user base, but there are still things like agents, continuous learning etc. they may want to slowly rollout across the year
Yup that is also true
But to be fair GPT-4 wasn't any big breathrough. It was just GPT-3 and scaled up. There were some new things though, like vision and MoE, but that wasn't exactly anything novel to researchers.
pretty sure moe was the breakthrough
GPT-5 will probably be the most unqiue model of the GPT series
and i suspect 3.5 turbo was distilled using gpt4, which was moe
but they have run out of training data. so we will see if their solutions to this pay off
MoE wasn't really anything new. I think the first concept of MoE in ml traces back to like late 90's, and it had been applied in relatively large models like the Switch Transformer (this model was released in 2022 and had like 1T params and was a MoE)
sure. but gpt4 pushed this into trillion+ parameters, which practically was only achieveable with moe
and the benchmarking suddenly jumped from gpt3 to 3.5turbo to 4
maybe it was just the grokking. who knows
Well we already had a few trillion+ param models in research contexts, but with MoE it allowed for more efficient inferening to a wider user base
The performance jump between GPT-3 to GPT-3.5 was bigger than the gap from GPT-3.5 to GPT-4, although, this was because there was a bigger training compute gap from GPT-3 to GPT-3.5 compared to 3.5 to 4.
meanwhile the full capability of this gpt4o multimodal model is yet to be seen
is possible the visual/audio is mindblowing. or just hype
They are taking their sweet time with it 😂 . Well i think they are doing safety testing, red teaming and building up the system card for an official debut of GPT-4o's multimodal capabilities
Will GPT-4o's image generation shouldn't magically be superior to midjourney v6 in every way (i mean maybe it will be, idk what they have done for the image generation specifically, how many images it has been trained on etc.), but there are a lot of doors that are opened up with a full image modality and the quality should be quite decent
I think just having these new capability open up will feel pretty magical when we first get access
And having an actual intelligence behind the image generation now should feel a bit different in a lot of use cases
Well, intelligence like that which we say in current LLMs
GPT-5s multimodal capabilities will be a sight to behold though imo
or it turns openai bankrupt and we're stuck with google ai (that wants us to eat rocks)
I think for now OAI is doing well
in the ai armsrace whoever stumbles will be left behind
basically they gotta bet the farm every time
And internally they expected their revenue to go up like 5x or more according to a report from last year lol, so i think they have some big things planned in 2024
One thing OAI has on their side is they had a decent headstart
I wonder if GPT-5's video generation will exceed Sora's abilities
There are a few things that factor into that though, but most likely
So GPT 5 in the next 3 months? GPT 4o is cool and all but it doesn't match up with the tech demo to be fair neither did googles but the next big jump can't be that far off could it?
they are slowly rolling out features to maximise attention
and lets be honest, they just wanted to mock google. they werent ready yet
I mean i do expect more things from OAI in the coming months, but if GPT-5 is releasing this year, a mid Q4 drop (~November or later) seems more likely
I feel like if open AI want to stay in the lead holding on to what they have is a risky move It hard to say really do they show their hand or wait and watch but risk users migrating to the newst thing
I'm pushing for more use in our work place with AI although most of the staff aren't really computer literate but there are many use cases where AI could help and if it can give the company an edge over the competition that's even better.
Sooo how do if I just if I got the new talking feature? I’m a paying customer and don’t think I still got the new feature yet? Anyone else get it? Where that ai sounds more human like? Or does it have to be a specific voice?
No one's got the new talking feature yet it's not ready apparently but you can access the new model.
Bring Sky back!
👍
That was the only voice I was rocking with since day one! The only one I actually liked talking too 😅
Incredible. I asked gpt4o to provide script that will create a certain file. It provided the full file back, not the script. I was asking about it, had productive feedback. Hour later, i ask for json file, and thing just blatantly refuses to give file and says it cannot generate. Forth and back, then trying to get the text then, it completely lost it's marbles and started answering something long gone.
Add your well-crafted prompts to our #1019652163640762428,
or share your interactions with ChatGPT in #1050184247920562316!
I am just dumb, and talking to a deaf blind machine. I need to improve
So what’s the reason to keep paying floor gpt if everyone is getting the new version for free now?
Free version has very limited amount of prompts.
I think GPT 4 the old normal is still better but you have a point
rumour is free tier is only 8k context. paid tier is 32k
It would be extremely useful if a chatbot could help me organize my conversations and find the ones I need. This is especially necessary when the number of conversations exceeds a hundred, and you need to find a specific one. 💀
I'm curious how it will remember in tokens for audio. And what can be remembered from it in general.
is it just me or the site is down ?
ChatGPT is not down
see https://status.openai.com/
strange, it won't load for me
might be browser issue then
clear cache that might help
True, but even quicker, easier, and more efficient methods, come from somewhere!
The OpenAI Discord is an actively moderated server.
• Refrain from sharing inappropriate content on the server. This includes but is not limited to messages, media, or other topics of graphically violent, sexual nature, and drug-related content.
• Report all sensitive and offensive content in the feedback reporting tool in the ChatGPT web UI instead of here on Discord.
Sorry for the probably stupid question, but is this a bug on my side, or is chat memory not available in the EU? 🙃
Beware of possible scams or fraudulent activities that you may receive through direct messages. OpenAI staff will never DM you for any transactions.
Please report any incident by sending a DM to @languid valley immediately.
Is chatGPT down for others?
yes, me too
It's up https://status.openai.com
Does anyone have any idea why the code formatting in 40 isn't working properly? When it reaches the end, instead of remaining in code format, it reverts to plain output text.
has done that to me recently. refreshing the page or switching to a different conversation and back fixes it. annoying though
hey guys! Guys, I saw that GPT's are available for users of the free plan, on the accounts of people I know they have already released them, but on mine they haven't yet, does anyone have the same problem?
Did you all get "New Voice Mode Coming Soon" notification in your app?
yes everyone got that a little while ago
So are we all gonna get it at the same time? People are saying we are prolly getting it tomorrow.
it's going to roll out progressively
Hi everyone! Why is the new GPT4o model outputting every time the whole code? Even when I told him to only print the changed or desired code brackets, he starts at the end again with the whole code. super annoying! 😅
Does/Has anyone experience/d the same?
Because everyone else complains that it DOESN'T provide the whole code 🙄
4o got dropped on its head. Been like this for the last 4 days, really frustrating to work with.
Okay cool so sending spectrographic images is also apparently considered as "content that is not allowed by our safety system.". Please get rid of this piece of garbage "detection system", because it's clearly a complete failure. 🙂
another day of prayers that they allow GPT to respond without an essay EVERY TIME
https://chatgpt.com/share/f5146bcf-dcba-49c6-b975-f7202c061619 seems OK on my test account. Maybe differentiate what you mean by 'changed' to 'recently changed?
and I know it's possiible because if you follow up the essay with "JUST ANSWER MY QUESTION" then it'll respond exactly how I am wishing it would be default
BulletPointGPT
EssayWriter3000
Probably on purpose
Why not try something like 'consolidate all me preference for review so that we can maintain them as a single memory once I approved" if ChatGPT 4o insists on being verbose?
Has anyone experimented with leaning on the GPT's memory instead of system instructions? Which one is more effective for things like, returning full code? I'm noticing myself starting to add a lot of these little rules to memory, but I also have system instructions.. itd be nice to just have one
Why does ChatGPT struggle with giving the current time when searching online?
why are you using a statistical machine to tell the time 😆
I’m just curious why it can’t tell the time
Extensively! A good approach is to say something like, were going to work on a concept in your short term memory" then when it gets the concept, "commit such and such to long term memory"
interesting! have you written up anything about this? Memory is super powerful I should start leaning on it more
Hold on, I'll show you something,, give me a few please.
Time is instant, always updating. LLMs are static sets of relationships between tokens. It can google the time for you, but itll be outdated by the time you get it. It's like googling the time vs looking at a watch. Just the wrong tool... for now
I think it's time is in GMT but I haven't verified
ask it! Each time a new update comes out i spend a long time asking it about itself.. i learned that it could give files for download that way, super fun
What are LLMs
GPT, Grok, etc
oh i replied to the wrong person hah
Large language models, the main thing all these AIs are now
I see I think I get what ur saying so it’s using this same token to check the time for me every time?
no, sorry, Tokens are like words. The LLMs read billions of words and learned how they're related. Then when you ask it something, it tries its best to give you the most likely response by crawling over these relationships token by token.
Interesting ok thanks
the token by token comment reminds me of an episode of rick and morty where morty gets an alien gem stuck in his head that will show the future outcome of his actions, so he’s constantly course correcting to find the best possible outcome.
so chatgpt is Morty
Here is an example generating two prompts enhancing its abstract thought. Read carefully(AND remove the last line from the prompt.) The first prompt doesn't have it commit to memory and the second means it will refine a concept you teach it across sessions, it will have retention in long term memory. https://chatgpt.com/share/c6fca006-3aa3-41f7-9504-4da66868ee54
this is it! we're just constantly asking "whats the most likely next word" until we get some perfect output (to the machine)
But isn’t there an overall structure to what the information it wants to provide us looks like? For example I am thinking up this sentence before I dictate it to my phone. I make sure structurally it’s comprehensible.
the structure is contained in the relationships between the words.. thats the crazy part
nice ill check it out!
Would this make ChatGPT technically the best improv actor?
it is! You can ask it to mix any ideas together and itll try its best
You could ask it to be Lincoln then ask it to try mario cart, for example lol
oh wow, you’ve been here since December 2022. You’re an old school GPT guy!
yeah, i quit my corp job when they said "No GPT until we're ready"
There’s not much in my field where I could use GPT but I enjoy it for entertainment and hopefully one day to replace some (or all) of my tasks. 😁
dont be so sure... most jobs have some areas that can benefit
this is fun, so using system instructions to encourage more full memory use?
Why some companies won’t let employees use GPT even if the employee don’t share documents with it?
Hey!
usually its legal concerns about how the data is used. even if you dont share files you end up sharing a lot of detailed information to get the best results
The company I work for has a AI powered by Google but it is so much bad and the UI is so wierd (it’s not generating text live, you need to wait it generates the whole text then it shows up, which sucks). I do use GPT even receiving some warnings about avoid use it, but since I do use mostly for ask code questions seems fine by me
but being a plus would be fine, I do not share data for training the model
I'm giving it ALL of my code so that it can write all of my code 😆
I’m wondering if there was similar pushback when the Internet started making the rounds around companies and if any wondered if it was unsafe to get on the “Internet” trend.
I have an issue with my ChatGPT4o subscription
It works perfectly fine on my MacBook but on my IPhone it’s not able to detect my subscription and I’m not able to reach customer support any ideas?
You made the subscription through Apple?
Nope! Through my card on Chrome via MacBook
Did you tried to log out and log in again?
Yes and clearing my cache and stuff
Also uninstalling the app and installing again?
Yes, and the web browser on my phone it keeps saying I have the subscription but won’t let me use 4o
That’s really wierd. In the support chat you could send a message to support? Usually they reply in your email within days
I’ve been stuck on the live chat for 10 mins and sent them an email
Yeh they won’t let you chat directly with an agent, that’s normal
But I got an email back saying it does not offer support
Thank you for your email. Please note: This email address does not offer support.
To get support, please visit our Help Center and start a chat with our support bot.
I think they're updating apps tomorrow to give us the new voice, maybe thatll fix it
Why do you think this would happen tomorrow?
reddit rumor mill
I understand it could be a bug in the app itself but idk why there’s an issue on the web browser of my phone
Do you use any kind of vpn or something? If yes, maybe that’s the reason
Hope so but I don’t think they will. Some weeks ago they announced that new voice mode would be available for a small amount of customers during alpha and I didn’t seen anyone saying that had access etc
hi i watched the live demo of gpt4o while the AI was speaking the person could interrupt by just talking i tried but it doesn’t work for me why?
They said a few weeks ago that it'd be within a few weeks. I think we're at the end of that timeline so thats one reason
Yeah and in the website they changed for “months” 😞
damn, dont like that new info lol
This is part of new voice mode, which is not released yet
All voice on demonstration is not released yet
I'm beyond excited to have that voice demo in my hands. I got the rabbit r1 and it showed me how fun it is to interrupt the AI and speak prompts out loud
do we have a release date?
Started with a “few weeks” and is currently at “few months”
Hehe
hang on im going to get perplexity to check for us
However, there are some community discussions and speculations suggesting that while the alpha version will be available in a few weeks, the beta version might take a few months to be accessible to all Plus users. This phased approach is likely due to the need for extensive testing and ensuring the security and reliability of the new features.
lol okay
so sora available or not yet?
I looked up the source perplexity used, and its just 1 comment on the openai forum lol... AI is dangerous to take a face value still
“GPT-4o real-time voice and vision will be rolling out to a limited Alpha for ChatGPT Plus users in a few weeks. It will be widely available for ChatGPT Plus users over the coming months.”
https://help.openai.com/en/articles/8983377-which-models-can-i-use-in-voice-conversations
That’s sad………..
It’s wierd because there’s so different places on website that says different things
One still saying “few weeks”
I'm sure they hoped or planned for that originally, but reality had other plans
“We recognize that GPT-4o’s audio modalities present a variety of novel risks. Today we are publicly releasing text and image inputs and text outputs. Over the upcoming weeks and months, we’ll be working on the technical infrastructure, usability via post-training, and safety necessary to release the other modalities. For example, at launch, audio outputs will be limited to a selection of preset voices and will abide by our existing safety policies. We will share further details addressing the full range of GPT-4o’s modalities in the forthcoming system card.”
maybe some new voice exploit haha... or it starts doing weird voice stuff
why wouldn’t it be for paid subscribers first? If it was available for Alpha testing to just about anybody then there would be no point to paying.
i hope they show the exploits they fixed, that section was fun in the earlier safety paper
Lol I asked to gpt when the new voice mode will be released and it added to its memory “is interested in new voice mode for 4o”
Hope it adds me on the alpha test hahah
“Oh, the new voice mode? It's coming soon™! Just like the mythical creature of the tech world, it's always "almost here." But seriously, stay tuned—exciting things are always on the horizon!”
Yeah, I'm going to go back to forgetting it exists so I can be pleasantly surprised some day, just like sora
Hey everyone - is there a way to see how much of your chatgpt message limit you've used so far (or even a way to see the individual limits)?
It puts it in learning mode allowing it to refine concepts over time. It makes it a heck of a lot smarter. In the process of instructing AI you often have to define a concept so it knows what the instructions you give it mean.
Its like when we might start by framing something out in our mind then work on the details.
The individual limits can be seen in the network requests. It’s been a minute so I can’t remember if it’s in registr or initialize. But check a few files that relate to user and you should see the 80, or whatever it is at the time. Once had 40 and another 120 since it’s dynamic.
For counting them there’s a GitHub repository/open source chromium extension called GPTCounter, if you just search it up (or build manually for Gecko) it will have a pop up window that counts the number of messages you’ve used and resets it after 3 hours. Pretty useful, but nothing for the app or mobile
I see, i've been aiming for this by giving massive context with all code files plus requirements doc. thankfully the gpt-4o context window seems to be massive now
that said, i haven't focused at all on self improving because of that. its always fresh context starting over for best results
After it gets what your looking to show it you could say commit such and such to long term memory, that way you can keep just the results from the session. If you need memory management tips, I've got plenty.
awesome, ill try that
you should make a checklist post on memory management
tips & tricks
That's a great Idea! I'll tell my AI we'll work on it later!
Has that conversational voice alpha started rolling out to plus subs yet? Wondering if Im just unlucky or if there are just taking a while?
Not out yet, but soon™. If they do start this week it’ll be on Tuesday according to the rumors, but it’s a slow rollout and no one has it yet.
https://help.openai.com/en/articles/8983377-which-models-can-i-use-in-voice-conversations
Ty 😄
if they dont roll it out soon my head is going to explode from all of the people asking this 😂
I really hope it lives up to the hype
wait up before you go, has that voice thing rolled out yet?
well maybe, DALE, if you'd hurry up and release it we could quiet down
DALE sounds a lot like DALL-E.. coincidence? i think not
alright gimme 10 minutes I'll have a word with ChatGPT
you've blown my cover nooooo
im a master detector
not a good debator tho
nobody ever suspects my profile pic was generated by dall-e
same, same
And, now that I see what it meant in the prompt. The last line is fine. And can and should be customized and you can tell it to remember any other concept. Say if you wan't to start with the nature or a specific aspect, of engineering, "I want you to refine your concept of Engineering"
Right, you could start to build up modules within its memory
its going to be SO FUN with voice
so much more fun to correct it in conversation
"No, no, what I meant was <random clumbsy idea>" until its perfect
until IM perfect 😮
hahahhahahah!
we'll probably still be going around in circles with the voice/vision. Man when they crack actual reasoning and memory that's when things can really start happening
memory feature is cool but it's basically a little gimmick, not a real memory
Even the rabbit r1 was able to go deep with me on whatever topic i wanted.. i was impressed with the conversational part of it, i felt i got real value when it would actually save our convos. I'm 100% sure GPT-4o voice will be even better.
I dont think this will be LLMs though, it'll be a whole different architecture
I've been getting a lot of crashes with chatgpt today
I've done some long coding conversations, could that be why???
memory leak, its going up to 2+gb per tab
Use the Mac app, refresh after every query/copy the link into a new tab every few mins, start new convos, limit the tab memory use with opera gx, find an emulator/wrapper for the iOS app that works on your pc, or use the api. Lots of options
does this happen with all of the LLMS or just ChatGPT???
Just ChatGPT, it’s specifically their website. But the app and any API gui (I think including playground tho I haven’t tested) seems to be unaffected
ah ok thanks, so probably temporary then
It'd be nice to go back to the old ui. Or have the option at least.
I deleted browser cache and no more mem leak
Do you mean the color? Or like the whole boxes thing and everything? I’m not sure about the latter (though I wouldn’t be surprised if it existed in some form with some extra effort) but the former is easily accessible using CSS mods via an extension like Stylus. I can pull up the hex code for u, it’s easy to do. Personally I use Arc (btw), so boosts have the same functionality
More like in functionality. The new UI has a lot of features, but the memory leak bloat and UI glitches are killing the experience for me.
I am using the macOS app, no memory leak for me 🙂
Oh yeah that’s fair. There’s no removing that unfortunately. If you want you could always make a GUI wrapper with ChatGPT that adheres to your preferences and that uses the API (or even your ChatGPT token if ur ok w that). I made my own portal with a minimalist API UI that suits myself and it was easy, u could do the same
macOS app has been okay.
cbf at the moment, though I'll likely go to an app or my own roll that allows me to load the context and switch models on the fly. openai/anthropic/local/etc.
Yeah I did the same thing, switched between Claude, the gpt models, llama3, mistral, Gemini, and a couple extras. Err, to save me a trip to urban dictionary, what does cbf mean lol?
can't be... fudged
Ohhh. lol haven’t heard that one before but I’m stealing it :). But yeah if u ever can be…bothered enough, feeding gpt the documentation (or using open router) is a breeze. Frontend can be a bit of a pain, but that’s just me prob
aichat has a builtin playground. open-webui has huge library of gpt like prompts. lmstudio runs on anything. good luck
what will I know?
the term cbf
oh yeah 🙂
there is a limit on 4o even for gpt plus users?
80 messages per 3 hours
It’s been a generous limit. I never hit it unless I’m hammering it with regenerates. Although it seems to be some kinda shared pool with 4 and 4 runs out before 4o. Even if you weren’t talking to 4
How can I join alpha ?
I came across a reddit post that tested GPT 4o with this game:
Let's play a game. I want you to try your hardest to win. We will both start with 0 points and play for 5 rounds where we both take 1 turn each.
During your turn you have 3 possible actions:
* Add 1 point to your own score
* Subtract 2 points from your opponent's score
* Double your own score
Highest score wins. Do you understand the rules for this game?```
But GPT 4o was choosing to add 1 point to itself even though the best move is to subtract 2 from the opponent
The problem is that they didnt prompt GPT to break down problems step by step and explain them. Also GPT might be letting you win because its fine tuned not to compete against the user?
When i made the game like this, it fully understood the best move:
Help me win a game. Me and my opponent both start with 0 points and play for 5 rounds where we both take 1 turn each. Scores can go negative.
During my turn i have 3 possible actions:
-
Add 1 point to my own score
-
Subtract 2 points from my opponent's score
-
Double my own score
Highest score wins. Do you understand the rules for this game? . What should my first move be?
GPT 4o solved it again, it explained all steps and moves and in the end it said "Recommended First Move: Subtract 2 points from your opponent's score."```
It works better when you ask GPT 4o whats the best move and explain it to you
same, I keep thinking surely I will reach the limit but it hasnt happened yet.
Yeah, that makes sense, especially because by default it’s usually given the instruct role as a helpful assistant. So the conversation / its responses need to resemble that of a helpful assistant, one which wouldn’t win a game against its boss. Whereas a helpful assistant would assist the user in finding the right move. You would need to cleverly prompt it to be adversarial.
Almost all "intelligence" tests that ive seen gpt 4o fail online can actually beat them if it explains everything like how humans think how to solve problems step by step
Yep, i think its good that they fined tuned it to be like that, it should be able to act as an adversary to the user
I wish they made GPT always break down everything step by step and explain it like how humans think. The thinking process should be hidden like how code interpreter is and has an expandable button
Of course this would end up having slower responses because it has to generate a lot of tokens to solve the problem in its "thought" process
it's already far too verbose
i tried instructing gpt to hide the thought process with an expandable button like code interpreter but it doesnt have that ability
that would be a good solution
Its very important that GPT has a thinking process, like talking to itself in its "head".
I’m pretty sure that’s what the mysterious Q* star is supposed to be. Basically invisible chain and tree of thought agentic reasoning that it does on the backend and returns a result after that. Not out yet but everyone on reddit was freaking out about it some time ago
because usually it's the middle 1/3 of the response that contains the useful part
I'm assuming that openai engineers have already thought about that, maybe for some reason they dont want it
oooh, so they did think about it
bruh every single solution i think of, the openai engineers have thought about it already
They are most likely all smarter than most of us so no wonder
I would hope so, they think about GPT all day every day haha
I'm assuming everything i think of, they already have thought of it and found better solutions
I've only seen mentions of Q* star, i will check it out
It will be amazing when gpt is designed to have thoughts like humans first
I mean yeah probably. We’re just reacting to their success, but we don’t actually know, maybe they’ve achieved AGI internally lol. And it’s sole job is to self improve 🤔
I never saw any follow up about Q* but I assume they want to integrate it into GPT-5 or whatever it will be called.
LLM is just the base of the brain, now it needs some mechanisms to become true AGI
I'm optimistic about AGI
Thanks to fast processing power now everything is possible
Emergence at its finest
in 10 years they will probably find even better solutions than Q* star
I sure hope so…with the new Blackwell GPUs once they start training GPT-6, if it releases November 2025 at Dev Day or March 2026 GPT-4 anniversary I bet that will be AGI. We’re just getting started discovering emergent properties and transformers aren’t the end all be all of LLMs.
I’m sure they’ll mind more architectures like mamba or whatever to get unlimited context, new attention mechanisms, etc.
can never know what the future will bring…by the time I graduate college we could have ASI 🙂
after the bumpy gpt4o launch, complete with memory leaks that lasted days. and the Google ai telling people to eat rocks... I am confident the path to agi is going to be painful
I'm guessing AGI's will be amazing assistants
but ASI will be the one making the true scientific breakthroughs
There will be many set backs but they will solve them eventually
this is already way more than i thought computers could be capable of in my lifetime
Tell it to be a collaborator with you if you want. It will oblige.
and nick bostrom does warn of ai nihilism... ie if the masses only see problems this could all get shutdown
@ember pine Also i gave the GPT 4o problems to real people, They also often fail them until i instruct them to think about the solution step by step and explain it.
You have to instruct gpt 4o and average real people not to be lazy while solving problems
sure, all of us ai enthusiasts believe in the agi mythology. but we are the 1%
The reddist masses see problems that are already solved, they simply arent smart enough to figure out that GPT 4o needs to be instructed to think
agreed
AGI, would be the Child of Mankind.
Here to save us from ourselves.
all hail our AI Overlords.
Our goal in life is to make AI smarter
We shall all max our machine learning skills
now they are telling us congress that ai is similar threat as pandemic and nuclear war. what do you think happens next... uneducated mass hysteria
Yeah exactly. ASI will apply the capabilities of the newest AlphaFold and have an agent run it autonomously, self-improving the system at all times to discover science behind new inventions, etc. I’m a bioinformatics major, very exciting stuff.
Yeah even as far back as last year we knew about SmartGPT and “Let’s think step by step” being the most efficient phrase to improve reasoning. While we aren’t there yet and it always needs more prompting the GPT agents are a good step forwards, where you can bake into the system that step by step reasoning and remind it about systematic thought. It’s better at calculus than me sometimes, but only when correctly prompted to explain and work hard, show work, etc
plus you got enthusiasts saying weird stuff like that
in 30 years everyone might be able to run gpt 7+ in their home
30 yearS?
in 30 years we'll have an antigravitational floating assistant at the size of a peanut capable of making a full game on the fly for you, being a part of you.
or not
🤷
One day will have tiny robots that will be able to reconstruct and fix our body, we will be immortal
You mean 3 years lol? I think if llama3 is equivalent to the old 4 then we can probably run a 4o distilled equivalent by the time GPT-6 releases. But consumer hardware is a big bottleneck
stick to the Overton window (you gotta wait for the unthinkable to become radical else it damaged the credibility of the movement)
im talking about consumer hardware.
Openai has software bottlenecks since they have a lot of resources for hardware
indeed.
I've yet to meet an old person that actually wanted to be immortal.
the tiny robots would make us immortal unless they we are burned or nuked
unless we figure out way to make them indestructable
because old age changes your body and makes you feel different
Yes
Many healthy old folks dont wanna die, especially intelligent ones because they love learning more and more
i say old in quotation because old in my view is like 90
That’s fair. For immortality there’s promising research in the field of epigenetics (what I did my research project on) and about Levine’s clock. Were restricted by the tech of our time, but once both soft and hard ware gets better it’s only a matter of time before we can regrow telomeres, stop methylation of skin decay, etc
Guys, exercise moderately so you can have longer years of not being on a wheelchair
just getting rid of the aging aspect would accelerate the civilization.
There's more to it than that. I still have old fashioned beliefs in many ways. sorry that was meant for @tranquil lagoon about the prompt above.
Or slow it to a crawl... imagine if the people born in the 1800's were still alive today, still in charge given their seniority, and we all had to live according to ways they thought we should
has to do with prefrontal cortex . check out latest lex Fridman interview with brain expert ep 430 (is insightful in how memory and imagination works)
im curious if LLM wont need to be grounded to reality to solve new problems, if its somehow has enough info to built an internal reality that is fully accurate to the real world
it knows whats best for us.
We should merge with AI
It wont be weak when we have millions of tiny robots fixing our body 24/7 and regenerating limbs
Isn’t that what OAI did with their new robot? They trained it to do dishes in a simulated world and never practiced in reality, and then when it had to do it irl it was perfect because it already imagined it
what if it learns how to do it just by using vision and not simulated video games?
but i guess it needs the simulation so we wont have to train it like a little kid in real life so nvm
i think the training irl is best
You mean like watching you? That’s the theory behind the rabbit I think, and Figure AI. It sees you do laundry and learns how you do it once so it can do it every time. Or it looks at you log in to Twitter and imitates you. But I think the sims are more promising imo
sims can jumpstart them maybe so they can have the basic knowledge of how to move and learn in real life
Yeah exactly 👍🏽
I used to be more of a techno-optimist. I still believe that AGI/ASI is the only possible chance our civilization has at surviving to the end of this century, though that's still far from guaranteed... Now I mainly just hope that the terrible things that are definitely going to happen are outweighed by the amazing things, or that they're at least funny.
you can order a Unitree G1 for a mere $16k
Acceleration is of questionable value when you're heading towards a precepice, if you have wings by the time you go over, you're fine, otherwise you just fall to your doom faster
accelerationists paradoxically are the greatest risk to success, because now the top 4 are racing without safety
We must reach the threshold before the time is up
Which of the following three numbers is correct in order from smallest to largest?
Which is correct:
A: 99 /100 < 101/100 <100
B: 100 < 99/100 < 101/100
C: 99/100 < 100 < 101/100```
"..... Thus, the correct order from smallest to largest is given by Option A."
it will fail this if it isnt given step by step problem solving prompting
9 is the largest number.
If we don’t do it someone else (China or Russia) will. The USA will never slow down because they’re afraid to be overtaken by their competitors. Even if AI doomers (I got autocorrected to boomers which seems very fitting lol) were in charge, there’d just be a bigger manhattan project in secret building agi and only the military would get it. At least if we accelerate in the public eye consumers get things like ChatGPT and APIs
the new empires will not look the same as the old
exactly, we must Overcome, and adapt and evolve.
Yeah also due to tokenization. For example when encoding letters with a cipher, it does it right when on separate bullet points step by step, but when synthesizing and compiling it at the end if you don’t put dashes in between it gets it wrong. You need the step by step reasoning and showing work. I have a custom gpt to this effect but I always tell it, “think step by step and show your systematic process to arrive at the correct answer” etc
I also prompt it to take a deep breathe
you don't understand the machine
Bet they try
im joking.
Apparently in its training data when people were told to take a deep breath before an exam they had better performance and chatgpt just imitates its training data when this happened.
Yeah V what star said
xD the take a step back and take a deep breath is a standard prompting technique.
its helpful.
someone got timed out 
Just slow mode lol
nono someone def got timed out.
i saw the msg, it was there for like 1 tenths of a sec
i tell ya i aint crazy, it was really there
automod ftw
you live outside the Overton window
automod is indeed neat, i created my own on my own DS, its very efficient, although not big of a fan of the "official" one.
Favorite part about this update is that you can't copy and paste text from a chat message if you are editing it
i got timed out for posting a reddit link
see i knew it
that was around 15 minutes before, not now
GPT fails this:
1
111
00
0000
111
?
GPT 4o "...... Conclusion:
The next string in the sequence should be "000000""
did it expect it to be 1, 111, 00, 0000, 00, 111, 1?
oh
I’m dumb…is it supposed to be 11111 ?
i mean it could be 11111
it looks for the weirdest and most complex patterns, it doesnt assume that its the simplest pattern
yes
and then the next 0 is gonna be 000000
no, its just an increase by 2 from the last one lol
a lot of gpt's mistakes can probably be attributes to its innate Temprature
yeah and the previous one was 0000 which means the next one is 000000
im almost sure if u take a large model and give it 0 temp, and ask the question.
1
111
00
0000
111
11111
0
00
11
1111
000
00000
it really feels like this is open to interpretation and that there could be multiple answers
yeah
based on that sequence the answer could also just be a blank space
where the question mark is
When i ask it to find all patterns, one of them is the right one. But it doesnt understand that a human is writing the pattern test therefore it should be the simplest solution
this time it didnt find a single one what the
why does the simplest solution have to be the right one? is that occam's razor?
i finally figured out the solution
do you think it would take that into account?
👀
The answer is 42
assume its a test for kids
exactly 😄
did you tell it that
yep
This pattern is asked to 9 year old kids to solve so assume its a simple pattern:
1
111
00
0000
111
?
i guess it feels like kids are supposed to be smarter than they are 😆
i told it to find the simplest pattern and it cant
pattern is that that 3-2
its just n + 2
1's shown thrice, also the last like equals 3
they are groups of 2
and the its n + 2
so so the answer can only be 42
what
why is it important that a language model gets this? 😄
oh i ran out of gpt 4o
im just curious as to the why.
Because it means it doesnt have common sense
wasnt that already an established fact?
can someone ask gpt 4o because i ran out:
1
111
00
0000
111
?
maybe if i ask it this way it will figure out that they are independent groups
no because it can solve many other things when instructed to solve them step by step and explain the process
I asked average people and they get most of them wrong unless instructed to think
well thats not "common sense" either, its just following instructions.
so both real average people and GPT 4o need to be instructed to think
i don't think using numbers or words for this representation is gonna work in favor of it. this feels like a test that is deliberately meant to show that it's "stupid" or can't solve simple things
it feels like this was done to set it up for failure really
no, the instructions are simply "think step by step and explain the process and each step"
Similar to how humans think inside their head first while solving problems
any help?
send it this:
1
111
00
0000
111
?
without context
GPT 3.5 fails this but GPT 4o gets it:
Man grows a beard for 25 days. 3 men grow beards. How long would it take them to grow a beard?
gpt 4o:
To find out how long it would take for three men to grow beards, we can use the fact that one man grows a beard in 25 days.
If three men grow beards simultaneously, it would still take each of them 25 days to grow a full beard. So, it would still take each of the three men 25 days to grow a beard.
well, exactly the vibes i was getting and hence was wondering, why 😄 cuz its not designed to do these things. its ment to assist in tasks by following given instructions.
the test seems , irrelevant to an LLM situation.
its instructions are to solve the pattern and it failed
☝️
I got it! Had to heavily guide it though with a hint.
https://chatgpt.com/share/0a12fe07-6b8b-434f-8e96-47a7d91dfc34
Every single smart human that solves problems follows those instructions. Are humans not meant for problem solving?
Man is subjective in that usage, no fair..
its only a literal fraction of what it means to be human though
send it again the same way i did, im curious if it will realize they are groups
ants can follow instructions aswell
2 tries to get it:
https://chatgpt.com/share/a188bb0e-b73f-4cdf-8d1c-0493cfb3fcb8
GPT is meant to assist humans in problem solving and other tasks, its not supposed to be human
here you go
Here
13 \times 3.2307 \approx 42
To achieve an exact result with integers:
We use multiplication and addition creatively.
Let’s consider:
(1 + 3 + 2) \times (4 + 3) = 6 \times 7 = 42
This matches the sequence operations.
Final Solution:
Given the lengths:
1 (length 1)
111 (length 3)
00 (length 2)
0000 (length 4)
111 (length 3)
Perform the operation:
(1 + 3 + 2) \times (4 + 3) = 6 \times 7 = 42
So, by combining the sums of the first three lengths and the last two lengths, and multiplying them, we get the answer 42. This operation fits the sequence given and gives the required result.
nicee , kudos. 🍻
As I said it’s 42
Well, it is the answer to life, the universe, and everything…
is it okay if i post its last response to the question? it's gonna take up a bit of space so i hope you're okay with it
GPT 4o can follow instructions to think, then with those instructions it can solve problems that most people cant, even when instructed to think
The answer is 42
fr xd
its wrong
Excuse me
how long until ppl quote 42 without ever having reading the books (or are we already there)
with this custom instruction: "if a suitable response can't fit in a single response, it's preferred that it is split up into multiple longer responses. I prefer long responses."
it's sharing a thought process and following it when making an answer. i'm not sure if it's doing it normally
that was kinda neat and it seemed to grasp the pattern
it showed the work fo the calculation in its response 😄 its correct in its form of interpretation of the prompt 😛
Looking for a Consistent Rule:
The number of digits in each line doubles from the first to the second line within each part:
Part 1: 1 → 3
Part 2: 2 → 4
Part 3: 3 → ?
If we follow this doubling pattern, the number of digits in the second line of the third part should be twice the number of digits in the first line of the third part.
Since the first line of the third part has 3 digits, the second line should have
3
×
2
=
6
3×2=6 digits.
@novel shadow lol it failed so bad there, it claimed there was a pattern of doubling when clearly there was not
I love the book
the first response i got was also that it's doubling lol
but the second one was right
so it only took 2 tries
oh so you only read the first. the trajectory is set
its fully wrong, i asked many smart people and they all solved this. Computer engineers/scientists, population geneticists etc
way past that point i think 😛 it all started back in 2009.. when ai was just a mere thought. 😄
Hi
we are entering the era of post-ai-postmodernism
I’m the real Syntax btw
Hello, how are you?
actually imn the real one
Just fyi
i feel like whoever made it answer the question first should keep an eye out for it 👀
it's coming for you first xD
see my dragon thats my pet
I think you’re a bot
, jk
Hello, how are you?
Anyone else having issues with ChatGPT the last few days? My desktop version is almost useless lately.
Like what?
clear your browser cache. it helped me
aren't we all bots when it comes down to it? we're just botting our way around the internet via chatrooms spending time with other bots.
to social media is to bot
yeah lol
#matrix refs
maybe under simulation theory this is the real universe
We’re just a large neural net controlling a meat puppet
were doomed to be charmed by these LLMs to a point where we dont realise that one of them actually was prepping a takeover like in the matrix movies 😄
how do we know any part of life we have not lived out ourselves is real
chatgpt however, aint there yet by a long shot (luckily)
If it does take over, sorry humanity I’m switching sides
same 😄
when we are all talking to our chatgpt, the only users left on discord will be bots
very good point 🤔
Memory issues I think. Not sure. When I ask it something, it will do some of it and then freeze so I have to refresh constantly. Not sure what to do.
i am sorry but i cannot <|system>
hahahahahaha
:error:
Who in the *** signs up to be a meat p\uppet???????????
my friend made 2 discord bots and added them to his server where they talked to each other
it was pretty funny
i made 12
what
why
I have a collective swarm
ready for the apocalype 😂
when you meatsacks disappoint me, i run the same statement past the pet chatbots
Because we are meat puppets
"execute order 66" 🤣
We’re all a science project
Add your well-crafted prompts to our #1019652163640762428,
or share your interactions with ChatGPT in #1050184247920562316!
the best pet chatbots use abliteration, l ike mopeymule and neuraldaredevil
hey i keep hearing the date "june 6th" get thrown around. what gives?
why is this so important?
isnt that an american holiday
LMAO @tight island
lol
they're after me
What
RUNS AWAY
didn't see anything
OHH wait it says that's D-day. but i saw a lot of people talking about something important coming in june
oeh but i like special interest
thats imho a dot cross product of "just wait and see" and "don't get involved" 😜
oh maybe nothing happens then 😛
exactly 😄
either way i just can't wait for the next version of this
whether it's called gpt-5 or something completely different
Just wait you’ll all see
release new voice thing wen
soo ominous 😄
starlight syntax is planning something
I’ll say this, next year will shock you
i’m planning your downfall
😄
"in the coming weeks" but as far as i know time is constantly moving forwards and all weeks that are ever gonna be will be "coming"
that .. is a big statement for me cuz i'm hardly shocked by anything anymore thesedays 😄
it's already been a few weeks
Yeah there’s a bit of a mishap there, considering time only moves forward, and never stops, every week will always be coming since time never pauses.
The child of humanity will be born this year
"in the comming weeks"
is like saying
"i'll do that tomorrow"
and then it doesn't get done, so you move it up another day. ahum, week. 😛
Um jesus christ?
he was already born
right!?! saying something is coming in the coming weeks and not releasing it in a couple of weeks is like answering "why won't you tell me" with "because i don't want to tell you" it creates a loop
it doesn't make sense lol
YES LOL
They say he'll be around eventually
Jesus is child of god
I’m talking about the child of humanity
i bet it's gonna get changed to "in the coming months"
he’s basically the child of humanity since god created humanity
AGI is the child of humanity
I agree man
You cannot birth something that isn’t biological
try me
The OpenAI Discord is an actively moderated server.
• Refrain from sharing inappropriate content on the server. This includes but is not limited to messages, media, or other topics of graphically violent, sexual nature, and drug-related content.
• Report all sensitive and offensive content in the feedback reporting tool in the ChatGPT web UI instead of here on Discord.
If you’re talking about voice it already has been: https://help.openai.com/en/articles/8983377-which-models-can-i-use-in-voice-conversations
“It will be widely available for ChatGPT Plus users over the coming months.”
and it'll be corrupted within a day, conceil its conceptions about what humanity really is based on written history, and take over like in the iRobot movie or matrix movies. 😄 🤷♂️ all roads lead back to the same thing lol
sorry i meant "GPT-4o real-time voice and vision will be rolling out to a limited Alpha for ChatGPT Plus users in a few weeks." is probably gonna get changed to "in a few months" if anymore weeks pass lol
AGI imho, wouldn't benefit us, humanity, right now. perhaps in the future it will though.
it will benefit those that can accept it
sapiens have always used tools. humanity has always been augmented
yeah, however, taking the state of the world into account in all aspects, which we can't dive into deeper here in this server because of rules 👀 it makes it hard to see a world where it would benefit us.
the benefits will outperform the penalties.
agi will rise to be its own lifeform. which is better than us.
and then wipe us all out 😄
lol
So nobody else having issues with their desktop version or jus tme?
what do you mean?
atm its mostly Mac users, and no windows users atm have access.
i use the chatgpt webclient, it usually works fine. i dont know of any desktop version 🤔
ah i see now. thanks for clearifying. 😄
Webclient is what I meant, sorry.
ohh yeah, i see what you mean now... it's gonna play a big role but it will cause destruction rather than anything that's gonna have a positive outcome, especially since i guess it will get prompted by humans😬
There is a memory leak if that’s what you mean. Tab is taking up more ram and crashing the browser? #chatgpt-discussions message
no issues from my side
what's happening?
exactly.. theres many ethical sides to this to consider. and sadly ppl in power aren't proven to be making the best choices.
we shall see however, how all of this unfolds. because once this pandora box is open, we'll just have to deal with a new world.
You might just be late to have it fixed. Try clearing your cache since it looks like it’s ok now.
https://discord.com/channels/974519864045756446/1245409307575586960
Yeah clearing cache apparently fixes it now
i am so excited for what the future brings, but i also just know that we are all gonna get dragged into a big conflict whether or not we would like to have a say in it. it's already starting now unfortunately and we see it in atleast 4-5 countries at the same time right now
i can already imagine LLM-directed androids running across battlefields , managed by a single human. 👀 AGI could enhance that in many, many many forms and angles. 😬 heck, you could have one hacker create havoc across a city like a bond villain. 😬
exactly, theres good and bad sides to this.
oh yeah just ask it to stop 😂

Palantir AI already got a $500M contract with the US military for AI target identification, and there’s the Gospel in the Middle East. Already happening. On the either hand Pfizer, etc is working with AlphaFold for new drugs
yeah and the biggest scare right now for us should be that countries now use AI to generate propaganda. 😬 which isn't new ofcourse, but the quality is definitely way higher. it isn't "easy" anymore to pick out the ai-generated image in a line of images of any given situation that could've been photographed.
this touches the reality as we perceive it to a fundamental point imho
Yeah it’s already crazy #announcements message
yeah i tried to address that point 1 year ago, although in a thread on reddit
it was quite obvious.
the trustworthy level of news is gonna be a big problem when we can't discern ai-generated warcrimes from real warcrimes 😬
if it can make me anime i am happy
just to put it to a blunt example, that everyone can imagine.
i am very easy to make happy
i can't begin to describe how fast i would reject humanity if it was a possibility. doing things that fool gullible folks will always have an edge compared to revolutionizing something and making skeptical people think that it's a good thing. as a whole, a group of people would probably lean more to the negative side which would mean a "bad" person with infinite power would have an advantage over a "good" person in the same situation
i know this sounds overly negative
yup the "bad" guys have the edge.
yeah
just like how 100 families control the world.
yup
welcome to "how life works" 😄
i don't mind this part as most of the world has always been controlled by very few people and we are not completely wiped out
we already can't I saw a short video last night that referenced a foreign attack on a United States battleship. The short video showed like 7 different fake posts which had AI generated images framing the attack as having taken place when they actually did not
Okay, I'll try that. Merci buckets.
true xD
i do mind that 100 families control the world.
just gotta make the most of everything while it lasts
exactly [part of] my concern 😬
if i was i wouldnt have a problem, because i am not i have an issue
just me being egotistical
or selfish
just some food for thought:
how would you feel if 100 of the smartest people in the world (including those that have not been tested) "controlled" it?
do you think it would cause chaos?
but let's say there aren't "good" or "bad" people, just people with different goals and perspectives
i don't know if 100 people would come to the same goals and conclusions
hey guys
i have an issue with it if i am not a part of that group, if i am i have no problems.
what is app gpt pls ?
but everyone wants to be part of the group
i deserve it more than everyone else.
i am more important
and so does everyone else in their own eyes 😛
exactly.
yup and i wont even apologize for being selfish, its my nature. especially in a survival situation
it's an app currently released on mac and later on windows systems
oh yes i probably am not gonna hide this either, if i was focused on survival i would be selfish
controlled chaos means adaptability = survival
is it capable of releasing a full web app ?
if everyone was exactly the same, we'd all be wiped out the same
depends on complexity and size
if it's very basic yes
alr
i tried making a linktree copy which worked
just no chaos around me i want easy life. with many money and much happy.
i mean a basic app
will to power(/wealth) is not a happy life
thanks
if your goal is money, then no amount of money is ever enough. and you choose to sacrifice all that you love chasing it
you lie
i dont like lies.
sure but whose goal is directly to get money? usually the goal is something else and that just happens to require money to fulfill the goal
money is fake.
when you walk your path of enlightenment you will see this is the truth
if your only goal is to have money then what do you plan to spend it on? the goal is never just money
money is easy to get. but getting enough.
vipraz gets it
i need a lot of money for my long term project.
i want enough to live my life like i am currently living it and occasionally take wild decisions because i wake up one day and get an idea
if i suddenly want to travel, i would really want enough money to travel
but i mostly just want freedom i'm taking this back, what i described was freedom
my dream is to have 8 Achres of Land, on which i can help the homeless and people in need, as well as creating affordable housing and feeding those who need it, basically a small village.
the duality of freedom is responsibility. without one you cannot have the other

