- Allow countries to join multiple organizations and choose the type of organization, e.g. military, economic, etc.
- add new region maps with the ability to change region names and reorganize regions.
- Add more events such as rising global temperatures, countries facing bankruptcy, prevalent drug trade, etc. ......
- If the annexed territory has an army from another country, that army will be annexed directly to your country.
- new civil war system and new civil war map.
#Game suggestions
146 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
No offense
But this suggettion is bad
Joing organazations is a more strict allience
Alejandro wants to stay with the core things that made the game special
If u leave the abilty to name provinces to the players they will make the most horryfying stuff
And will make every province called "my pp"
"cu m"
Or somthing like that
Rising global temprutures in the game
But no game actually uses this
Cuz what tf can u do abt the temprutures lol
Civil wars WONT WORK
Idk why ppl keep wanting civil wars
Like this game is ltlry just big number kill small number
A civil was is just a waste of military
U cant improve stabilty or somthing
So they are unavoidable
Annexing armies.......?
So u used to fight for the freedon of ur nation
But after i took where u are standing u fight for me now??
This 1 doesnt make sense
2 crazy dum
Cuz u ltlry have to kill the army on the province/place to take the damn land
But it can become more realistic.
It also gives the player more room to shine.
But it's more realistic.
Because there are so many ethnic and religious conflicts in the world. It adds to the gameplay.
But what about in some highly corrupt countries?
Some soldiers will be defectors because their country is so bad.
Maybe you could add some kind of censorship to it.
Its not hoi4 the military system is just big number kill small number
Even the CCP(comunist party of china) cant do that
When the censor a word
Another word will pop up
And alejandro is just 1 spanish guy
So its impossible
But not fight for the enemy
Its still ur country
Like a lot of soldiers surrendered to the americans cuz dying for saddam is NOT worth it
But they didnt commit warcrimes against there own ppl
I mean we have forest fires in the game and tempruture stuff but they dont effect much
@balmy valve i am not against suggettions
But everyone keeps making the same suggettion 🥲
Doesn't that mean the players really want this feature?
It means that people are tired of the same/similar suggestions that have flaws or just won’t apply to the game well.
- could just be the “random” events they have appearing on the news
Without a radical new internal politics/stability system 5. is impossible to implement well besides maybe rebellions when you’re being invaded (that is already a slider in this game)
- is basically alliances, and how would you differentiate them in a way? Also not to say I agree with them but the newbies would definitely hate if NATO got stronger.
- just makes no sense. They’ll either be like a Free France and have resistance forces in their other conquered areas or just not accept subjugation. At best they probably wander off into the sunset if their country is conquered, which is what happens in the game.
I don’t think regions are even implemented into the game lol
Just my opinion, but I don’t think any would fit into Dummynation without some radical changes that would probably alienate everybody.
This suggestion applies to the customization mode, which allows the player to play better.
But why would it help the player to play better? The Diplomacy tab already exists, just set alliances that way.
The current organizational system is too homogeneous.
It's also meant to be more realistic.
Countries in the same organization can't resent each other.
It's wrong.
Yeah but its stupid
If everyone wants to genocide another race
Does it make it right?
💀
Nope
Nato article 4
If a nato member attacks another nato member nato will try to di esculate the proplem
And if that doesnt work
They will let them fight without helping any side
Nato members dont attack other nato members because why???
Its only greece and turkey who have a huge beef
That's how it works in the game
As long as they're in the same league
That way they can't intervene and declare war on each other.
I oppose the fifth and three
It doesnt work like that in the game
😭🙏
Turkey attacks greece ALL THE TIME 💀
They have claimed islands
That thry will attack for
Like i played a game where turkey was hated by every single nato member
I atatcked them and only azerbaijan got mad
No they can
Thats what i am saying
Have u played a nato country?
If u did(whice most players do)
Than u can easily invade and destroy any nato member
Like germany invading poland
Taking austria(not a nato member but they have good relation with nato )
And so on
NATO Countries can condemn another NATO country
Not a ruling model
Domination mode doesn't even show any alliances
Yes it does….
Diplomacy Map
Click a country
Or Click a country
Diplomacy Tab
NATO and the Arab League are already implemented through alliances
There is nothing we can do except donate to countries in the same alliance.
Can't criticize
Also applies to your organizations suggestion
And countries can end their diplomatic alliances with other countries
This is not about whether or not you can withdraw from the alliance.
??????
What would criticizing do to help things? That literally strains diplomatic relations
There is nothing you can do except donate.
That’s just random events
And again, how would that apply to your suggestion????
Dummynation doesn’t have the basis to add things other than donating really
You can click on a country to view the alliances that country is a member of.
Yes. That’s the diplomacy map.
now please explain why adding organizations would change things
Not an outsider
Is the organization involved
It's impossible for every country to join only one alliance, right?
If you join an economic organization
Then your finances will be helped
If you join a military organization, your country's military strength will be enhanced.
Otherwise, it is protected
That would be not balanced at all compared to normal alliances
Also these can just be applied to normal alliances with economic and military partnerships
Theres like NATO, BRICKS, ASEAN, the Arab League, but there’s also many non-organization alliances
alright im done arguing
No point in all of this
I think you should recruit some staff who can speak Chinese.
My English is not very good
Bricks is an economic allience
Not even a military allience
ASEAN is also an economic allience
NATO is the only military allience
On dis list
CSTO is a military allience nobody gives a crap abt
I mean he was referring to economic alliances… but yeah how are we supposed to implement those?
10%+ economy when u join them 
If u have the strongest military u own ALL the economy of everyone in the allience
(totaly balanced guys)
Alliences in this game are military and economic alliences
Like if u have a bordee with ur allies u get a better economy and exchange rate