#.
351 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
This. This, you cleared up the one part I'd for questions about
"questions about", but "which" i spout
Wonderful! @red spear has just pregressed to level 13!
You are to things meant to glean
Question you and i spout, my answer you've now seen,
Make me wiser, o friend, give your answer yet unseen


Okay, this flows a lot better lol,
Also, I did see this being an antithesis to Blank Wall lol, and I definitely agree with this lol
But sometimes it's good to ruminate in both past and future and the uncertainty that comes with it to be self reflective and learn lol, you just showed the learning part and I defined the ruminating part hehe

-# also, a point for debate, as you say here "Lies should be embraced, implores..." and defend many more narratives supporting those themes, what do you say when somebody has done something truly wrong and requires for them to reflect upon it and realize it and grieve it to make up for it? How does this solve the mentality in long term if all lies and regrets are quickly forgiven? Wont all mistakes be treated with no repercussions then?
No mistake has a "repercussion", only a subjective interpretation of the outcome for which follows.
Ahh, okay...then taking a life, for example won't have a serious repercussions as long as the person judging it may justify it with their subjective view upon it?
incorrect. "serious" is once again a subjective interpretation of the degree for which you're applying the "repercussion" be valued at
So, again, I come back asking the same thing.
If 'serious' is subjective....then can't murder be also subjective? Wouldn't you say that the repercussions should be taken subjectively? Then how should any legal systems work? Then wouldn't the feeling of remorse be useless?
remorse is the subjective interpretation you align with a certain action
Say
@compact lava
We both ride a roller coaster
you close your eyes and scream in fear
i hold my hands up and scream in joy
we both feel the same experience and circumstances, we just use different words to fit our subjective perception of it
and the reprocussion being in the end you both have now experieced a roller coaster and cannot experince it for the first time again. The reprocussion being now the next time you may feel scared or he may feel excited. The reprocussion of the action is how you define the future of the variables involed in any given scenario
who implied first time
what if its our 8th, together
and we react the exact same way
you hold well
convergence
you're asking questions ive already answered
Ahh okay sure, but when talking about regrets and mistakes, we are not talking about a neutral experience like riding a roller coaster, we are talking about actions or experiences with our intent that had bad consequences (this 'bad' can be subjective of course)
But what I ask of you, is where you draw the line of morality, where do you draw the line for self analyzation.
Imo, avoiding any self awareness by avoiding guilt or remorse will only lead to more mistakes being made and more denial. But again, there is a delicate balance and too much of either will negatively haha
Ofc, we can agree to disagree
convergance meaning what
no i don't disagree with you at all
i understand your point and will get to it, respectfully, in a second
oh well
let me ask this
how many numbers are between 1 and 2
an infinate i guess
not you guess
there is
an infinite amount
1.1
1.01
1.001
1.0000000000272827237
yuh
and so on
but if you add them all up
they converge to 2
ding ding
we have a result
1 + 1 = 2
past experiences equate to past experiences
past experiences equate to new experiences
objectively, you can subjectively call each "new" experience or attempt a "new" experience or attempt, but they are still objectively the same attempt
okay but you cant add an infinate amount of numbers and reach a sum that isnt also infinate
oh but you can
ong?
?!
Yo what
I studied physics for 3 years never have I come across such rationalization
1 + (all the numbers between 1 and 2) = less than the numbers between 2 and 3
I'm interested lol
its a bit more complicated than this
but im vastly simplifying
.............................................
-# I think you may need to use a different allegory hehe
yes i may
okay forget the numbers and over complicated theoretic
Wonderful! @naive talon has just pregressed to level 1!
Ahhh, yeah I do
I might have to revise a bit tho
But again, I'm interested how you want to tie this in with the themes
ehh simple things simple things,
oh trust me it all ties back
{1,2,3} ≠ {1,3,2}
if you wanna get deeper
{1,2,3} ≠ {1,2,3}
i mean deeper
{1} ≠ {1}
you diregarded my use of the chaos of the universe by simply saying convergance, without elaboration. Im trying to understand in that specific moment what you meant. Without mathimatical theaory i will never understand, what does that mean.
an infinite series can converge to a finite sum because the interaction between its elements isn’t bound solely by quantity but by the relational structure and the intentionality of the limit guiding it. The ‘infinite’ doesn’t inherently defy finitude; it depends on how its interactions and transcendence are constrained or unified within a defined context
Hmmm....but if these sets have the same elements...how can they be unequal??
need you a mathematical/logical expression?
if me, you, and xkiqb are in a room, (a set of 3) is it the same set as me, you and pixbo in a room (a set of 3)
okay but as time passes and you move toward the convergance every single individual variable is defined to have a input, as its the thing that comes after what came before it, and an output being its destined to move on to what came after it. Therefore the reprocussion of its existance is in time it will either stay exaclty how it is or it will move on aka move through time and reach another definate. Giving it a definable reprocussion.
No....but with pixbo and xkiqb there is a different element,
But in the sets you described here
{1, 2, 3} and {1, 3, 2}
The elements are same
There is a 1 for a 1
There is a 2 for a 2
And there is a 3 for a 3
the elements are the same
me you pixbo and xki are all humans
same elements in the house
or room
so in that sense how are the elements different
(i know they're different)
Uhmm, are you alluding to difference in humanity and variables?
I know, which is why I'm struggling to understand what you mean to say. You so not need to allude to anything by using sets
lets try this example
we have a set of cars
{1,2}
in car 1 = me you and pixbo {1, 2, 3}
in car 2 = just xki (sorry man) {1}
so, in this instance, we have a set of {1,2} but the elements within the elements of that set aren't the same
so in this case
Ouh well yeah
Wonderful! @compact lava has just pregressed to level 25!
Ahh I agree,
But....do come to how you equated 1 is not equal to 1
Hmm no
incorrect, it is
Nah, you will have to define if car 1 is just a car, or is a car with me you and pixbo in it.
It can have the option of either being empty or with people.
It can't choose to be one of both at any given time.
Elements are constants
haha
it cant be one of both at any given time?
tell me
so
are the words im typing or we send in motion, or at rest
Nah lol, that's the thing with numbers in a set lol, if the numbers could have any given value at any time, what's even the point of quantification lol.
That's the first rule of maths
and as you can see
thats where people are restricted
you're denying logicality for what
formality?
Ehhh, it's just a bunch or testing codes in motion
if you are presented with a logical explanation for it, but it goes against something you believe to be correct, youd simply deny it?
Ahem...yes? If not then delusions will become reality.
Again unknown isn't in this territory because that is a part which I havent had a chance to observe, and thus cant make logical assumptions for.
But again, yes, if logic goes against something I believe in, then I will question that belief again and again in hope for the truth to rise
Imo logic is a tool to aid belief in truth
Again....I think this is very convoluted lol....I'm asking you to simplify, I still havent gotten the answer to the question that I asked 10 messages ago lol.
I mean I can entertain 1 more example, but I will have to ask you to "quantify" it lol
Ahh yes, I do
Rest, if you are asking scientifically
If you want to get creative, there are many ways lol
scientifically
Atm of course
is the earth spinning
Mhm, scientifically it's at rest at the moment
Yes it is
so is everything on earth or attached to it moving in accordance with its motion
Nah..have you heard about relative motion?
that's
exactly
what i just
described
in relation to the earth's spin on its axis, your bed is moving
*in relation to
the earth's spin on its axis,
your bed is moving*
Nah that's the opposite to what you described
Its when the motion of the person in the motile mass in not corresponding to the mass upon it in accordance
It's why, when jumping on a train, you land on the same spot instead of landing back a few steps is the train is moving ahead
There are calculations and formulas for this
yea
So technically, in the train, I was at rest
yes obviously technically
So yes, my bed is at rest
Hmm, scientifically? No....earth is in motion
if you
were not
in motion
in relation to the earth
youd be
zooming
somewhere right now
how fasts the earth spin, like, 80 something thousand miles an hour?
so
*how fasts the earth spin,
like, 80 something thousand
miles an hour?*
if you currently were going 0 mph
absolute 0 mph
or
kilometers ph
you would be
left
immediately in your tracks
Ahhh okay gotcha, okay then I'll attach this relative vector to my head
Again...what's your point lol
Yo, scientifically, when talking about relative vectors its subjective. But that's sooo far from what I asked you in the moral reasoning lol
If everything in morality is subjective, what's the use of a legal system then?
The line for self analyzation is when you think you are already perfect without understanding why you are. for morality, i am not a person to speak to because i speak and prefer the truth, not pitifully told lies that are nothing but facades of the deeper truth
to provide subjective interpretation of what we have subjectively deemed right or wrong
you rob someone = objectively subjectively right and wrong
you get sentenced to community service = objectively subjectively right and wrong punishment
Exactly! So you agree with me on this.
Now if you have done a mistake, without knowing the context of course, what do you think about the feeling of guilt eating you up as a result? Do you think that that's not necessary, or do you think that guilt is necessary
what, guilt? id feel no guilt
i speak with no shame when i say ive reached a level of self actualization where, my choices are mine, my actions are mine, i define me
and so
if i commit a crime or do something
im aware of the consequences
and will feel no guilt
because
i knew it was all my fault or my choices
now
ive ive made a "mistake" then i see what went wront, how it went wrong, understand where it went wrong and then accept it
and either do it correct the next time
or continue to choose making the "mistake" understanding that its no longer a mistake
Well, you can feel both guilt and be aware of the consequences at the same time imo.
I dont think guilt is something like "I think that I shouldn't have done this"
It's the acknowledgment of our mistake and dealing with the grief of it. Of the people you have wronged and the hearts that have suffered.
It's a grieving part of acceptance
i've completed and already accepted it
grief, you say?
define grief
the grief of it
Ahh okay. Maybe we will agree to disagree there lol.
This was a conclusion that I'd come to after a long time of ruminating, because for me, I realized that I'm only accounting for myself when I so readily deny grieving the hearts that I have hurt when I view my mistakes as something to learn from and get over only.
Pf course those are intrinsic parts of moving on, but with time, I have learned to feel guilt right too.
And you asked about grief, grief is thinking about the emotions I have hurt and simply feeling pain because of it.
And honestly? This motivates me to improve more and keep myself happy and hold stronger connections to people hehe
But again, as you said, this is subjective lol
It's like...saying you have to deeply feel the failure in your bones to get over it and succeed the next time, rather than indifferent acceptance lol
Hehe
well, yeah?
that's obvious
try and try, fail and fail, until you get better and better
Yup! Exactly lol.
*try and try, fail
and fail, until you get
better and better*
I just highlighted "deeply feeling failure" part in my poems lol
*I just highlighted
"deeply feeling failure" part
in my poems lol*
Pfft bahahaha
and thats why i understand them
for me
well
if you knew me
i am the epitome of failure
and thus
Hshhe yeah, and that's why, I understand yours as well hhee
*Zeantier im going
to share with you a poem of
mine i actually*
I SWEAR TO GOD
Hehehhehe, I think you are just a person with both failures and successes under your belt lol. And we had a delightful convo rn lol
Bahahhahahha
Sure!
i have a poem
i made
actually because
well
should i say? yes, that
that
what you are telling me
right now
everything youve told me
well, youll see in the poem
...
"Teach...me?"
You speak as though I’m barren ground,
Unbroken, waiting to be found.
Yet every word you strain to say,
Is just a shadow of my day.
Your lessons fall like drops on stone,
No weight, no depth—they’re not your own.
A futile bid to guide my hand,
Through landscapes I already understand.
You point at stars I’ve mapped for years,
Explain the truths I’ve shed in tears.
Each thought you offer, worn and slow,
A futile echo—I already know.
Still, you insist, you cannot see,
The walls you build can’t cage what’s free.
For what you think I’ve yet to learn,
Is ash within my fire’s burn.
So tell me this: if all that is taught is bound by what you perceive,
What remains when perception itself must be deceived?
Ahh hehehe, well then, in that case, I feel like writing an antithesis to my poem blank wall, to show the side of successes as well lol
But yes, I'd love to read yours hehe
I actually love this lol, but I do have a feeling that this was for a specific subject lol
A person's tellings which felt fake to you maybe? Hehe
A mentor figure perhaps?
But well yes hehe, I do connect with this lol.
Every thesis has an antithesis, every antithesis has a synthesis, and every synthesis is thesis.
And we will spiral down the ends of all to gleam the truth hehe
But all we find out is that there is more of truth is to gleam
Wise is the person that understands the unfathomable depths of the misunderstood and unknown
"every thesis has an antithesis, every synthesis has a synthesis, and everything synthesis is a thesis"
@compact lava
do you know
what you just said
Yes lol, that's how my mind works most times
"i have a feeling its for a specific subject"
you just repeated to me
words i have already spoken
and documented
Ahh really! Haha lol. Then we are just two puny students to everything all has to offer then lol.
At least, that's what I identify myself as. Hehe
so
in that exact situation
the poem applies
you said you had a feeling if it was for a specific situation
this is that situation
you're telling me stuff i already know
i've already said
Hahhahaha, am I the person that is showing you the stars that you have mapped hehe
Okay gotcha lol
you are indeed
but
Haha, well then, I still think we differ a bit on our opinions of where to draw the line of subjectivity and objectivity lol
every thesis is a synthesis from a thesis and its antithesis's synthesis
or so i summarize
Mhm, I do agree lol
how about this
the thoughts you think are fissioned out as words that then fuse with my thoughts that then fission out as a response to then fuse with your own thoughts again for a new fission of thoughts
Yeah! But I do have to clarify that this only happens when there is a mutual disagreement to essentially provide the antithesis for a thesis.
So yes, in that sense, it is what you just said
incorrect
no mutual disagreement needed
synthesis through synthesis
no antithesis is needed in the context of this
because think about this
you just told me something i already know
im not disagreeing with you, im just agreeing on a deeper level
Ahh interesting. To conjure up an idea and to build up on it then lol.
That's definently a part of all convos lol, but I was under the impression that we were having a debate upon morality, which is why..."antithesis"
well no
it was never a debate in my opinion
you told me things i all agreed with and understood
i understand the agnostic stance
Yeah lol, I got that now hehe, which is why I was confused a bit.
*Yeah lol, I got that
now hehe, which is why I
was confused a bit.*
to be honest its very hard to debate with me
and i say that because
youd find it very
hard to find a topic
i dont agree with or understand
summon haiku bot one more time and i might have to lose my mind
Hehehhehe, yeah gotcha. You do seem like that.
As a person who likes debates to build up on my thinking tho, I was taking an opposite stance to the view I interpreted from your poem lol.
Which is why I presumed a debate
well yes i do love debating
which is why i didn't agree with what you were saying
not because it was the poems view
but because i wanted to help you grow, if it was your view
want to know a secret

Hmm this is interesting, how tho lol
i just wrote what came to mind to fit the rhyme scheme
Ahhh hahhahahaha, okay lol, so this was something purely instinctual lol. But my point for debate stands tho lol
because by speaking a deeper truth it helps you learn
yes it was instinctual
but
its the fact it was
that supports the fact i understand it
true
but
Hmmm..but again, what we talked about was about what I already knew and you already knew lol. You just probed for more and I gave you more context
Really? I'd love to know at which point was that lol
Ahh, well then, I thought that talking about how I'd built up the thinking process and how I use it will be enough context lol
What else do you call context then? I'd love to know your take on it
uh
hey zeantier quick question before i say what im about to say
well, your answer is what decides if im going to say it or not
but
*well, your answer is
what decides if im going
to say it or not*
Pfft okay lol, I will be truthful
i wrote a dissertation, do you have time to read it right now? i think youd love it entirely if you read it.
its about 20 doc pages, but not a long read i promise
Hehe sure, send it
nice

