#Swells/Corruption.
597 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
The format is really fascinating and a bit mind boggling. It seems like so many things are going on all at once, and it really intrigues me on how to intercept the poem. I love it. 
This is crazy good juniper, what im imagining from the imagery is your consciousness being uploaded into a machine and the pain inside is having a hard time processing everything in full, I really like the ship metaphor for your body too, the ending seems to me like you tried to hack through your thoughts and either not remember the pain or you got through the pain to let your conscious be uploaded (or free). I could be completely off but amazin piece none the less Juniper 🤌
Thanks so much!
ok this is quite the poem you got here wow ! im getting a lot of computer programming mix with factory theme
the most interesting poem I saw today !
the format is incredible as well, I've never seen this before
This was trully an experience to read, amazing imagery here. I can feel the pain from the poem it makes me think of corrupted ideas spreading deeper into the mind and causing chaos.
for anyone who reads this in the future, i recommend you read it on desktop because mobile messes up the formatting a bit
Wtf is this
It is a poem.
A computer 30 year old wrote this?
I wrote it.
I know you wrote it
but according to me, feel free todisagree
your poem is not good and has no structure
its just Creative Writing at this point
and you did not check my poems too
Well you're certainly valid to your opinion. Sorry about not checking out your poems I developed a severe bursitis in my hip at dialysis and had to spend all day in the hospital yesterday getting it checked out.
Could barely walk.
that is alright then
I can check them out now. Sorry you didn't enjoy this poem, btw. It was a bit of an experiment and I know it's not going to work for everyone.
if you are experimenting with something
please make sure that it looks like a poem
it looks like a computer script
11/10 for creativity tho
I was trying to express a metaphor that the mind operates my body like a computer would. Analyzing large strings of texts to describe the pain my body feels. I suppose it didn't get the message across.
Can you send me one of your poems? I'd be happy to feedback.
it did
I can see that well
I just did not like the way you put it
That's valid.
according to me ,this does not resemble a poem
There should be a definition, of what poem is and when it stops becoming one
in my personal opinion, for me it did
that is not your problem
that is something I dislike so you dont need to feel bad abt this
*that is something I
dislike so you dont need to
feel bad abt this*
I took inspiration from similar poems I've read.
okay
#1180592609069109349 @leaden coral Can you check this one out? I feel you may like it more.
Couldnt you say that a bit more nicer? Who starts and argument with "wtf is this?" I understand harsh criticism is smth necessary but this is straight up rude
I actually legit got confused on that
But later I did address it with Civility
the first one were because I was shocked lmao
There seems to be an influx of people cosplaying as Renoir.
according to 24 years of writing your poem is not more structured using quatrains - it has too irregular of rhythms to qualify as a cannonesque poem and as well it doesn't provide a robust rhyme scheme.
If your definition of structure is merely a stanza... and not a form itself nor the rules underlying the freeverse nonce I don't know what to tell you. Another friend of mine was amazed Juniper learned meter in about a week to get the basics - that guy wrote this
So if June's poems are good enough for the dude who spent ONE year writing that - I think it may not be so unstructured after all.
To be honest this poem probably invokes cryptography and is meant to be heard AND read if I had to guess - the easily legible parts have a ton of devices and great diction that thematically fits I feel as well.
Criticism is fine - but be prepared for others to respond to it - I'm just worried honestly if you constrains yourself to your current paradigm and run around telling people "this isn't a poem" - it won't go well tbh I feel. People want robust critique. Not quips.
I'll be happy to analyze one of your poems. They are quite good I feel. I'd focus on being more salient in feedback for now if I were you.
You'd be surprised how big of a difference networking makes.
what?
any preference?
you do not need Robust rhyme scheme
A poem needs to have atleast a good meaning to convey
or a proper structure and grammar to have meaningful description
and it does not
And never should , be written in such a way that you could literally make a prose out of it
read all of that
those are not perfect anyways
your poem feels more prosaic then this for my personal standards
*your poem feels more
prosaic then this for my
personal standards*
you literaly said
"she spent time , so it must be good"
that is not something I would like to
OK how
Hi I appreciate the differing opinions on my poem but could we not turn my poem thread into a debate club.
Come to DMs and explain me
I asked her to come in dms dw
This is actually so true. I had recently been solving cryptography puzzles lol.
this is just false. the poem obviously possesses structure, i've no clue what you're trying to say. do you mean it doesn't have regular structure? cuz if so fine enough. granted this does clear some things up for me. bad critique like this does put into perspective why all the poems i've seen of yours have been slop.
You are blind
The poem has no structure
if it has then define what looks like structure to you then
bad critique ? already rushed to conclusion
okay if my poems are slop then its fine
I wont get mad at it lmao
the problem is you did not even give criticism
i already distinguished structure in my reply to you, why repeat myself
this is also false
in my poems
No you did not
and yes, falsehoods are not good to include in critique, they are a symptom of bad critique
you haven't asked me
THE POEM IS LITERALLY TAGGED FOR COMMENTING
another bulshit
i only give critique to people who specifically ask me
its like saying a poem that has end rhyme, doesn't rhyme
you don't think accuracy is important when giving critique? that's extremely fascinating
almost strikes me as anti-intellectual in a way, curious to see if you'll elaborate on that at all (not getting my hopes up though!).
im not replying to dms
): i was gonna tell u how awesome u are.
ur welcome in dms lol
she said
not to debate heere
so I dmed
@daring lagoon should I argue or not?
Y'all can discuss it here that's fine.
If Noize doesn't feel comfortable with you in her dms don't dm her.
Then I will proceed
Then you are the problem, with your ideals
when my poems specifically ask for comments and you refuse
when did I say that?
Which one is false
you did not
and you did not answer my questions at all, you dodged all of them and started using fallacies
idk what ur talking about at this point, it doesn't seem very coherent
this is the least invasive approach wdym
no
that is the only logical conclusion
you dont get to tell how is my apprach
unless you logically prove it wrong
i don't think you understand what logic is, honestly
because you lied about everything
and I responded to everything
obviously not everyone wants my form of critique
I answered all, you did none
you dont know what logic is
just cuz they ask generically, is no indication that they want my feedback specifically
what does that has to do with
Strucutre of poem
and there's no reason for me to assume that
if they ask you, they ask your feedback
there are
when a person asks different people
they want different opinion so that they can work on flaws
they do not want General ones, they want all the kinds they can get
they don't ask me is the point lol
you dont know basic logics
You missed the point
then speak more coherently, idk what to tell you
The Poems are tagged with "Comments' or "Poetry Feedback:
ofcouse they are asking for everyone
yea that doesnt mean you can be randomly rude
and even if I leave all that
ok what does me being rude has to do with poem
i also am blunt and honest with my critique and apply high standards
this obviously isn't going to help everyone
me being rude makes poem less structured
I am not asking that
I am asking
what According to you is a structure
idk how you could disagree with me here unless you simply fail to recognize human beings as complex and multi-faceted
you dodged this 100 times
yah but objective reasoning and logics are not
okay
but atleast give me what you think about structure
I don't even have an issue with the harsh critique I just feel like calling this not a poem when there is clear poetic devices and imagery used is unfair.
stop yapping about what you are or not
structure is just the way in which words are arranged together on a page
Poetic Devices can be used anywhere
They are not restricted to peom
well no, u tried to criticize my approach, failed to do so and have now circled back to a question with an answer that you could have gleaned via comprehensive reading
Yeah
so the poem can have any structurer?
obviously
I did, you did not respond to that
I see what you mean a Poem in Origin has surten rules
oh this, insane response
ok so here is why you are wrong
A poem has proper stanzas and sentences
if the words do not well define those stanzas and sentences
then its not a poem
Wonderful! @leaden coral has just pregressed to level 14!
yea not worth addressing lol
A normal speech is still an arrangement of words, now is this a poem? @wintry harbor
*A normal speech is
still an arrangement of words,
now is this a poem?*
it's so incredibly far removed from what i was saying that it's not even relevant anymore
dismissing without any reasoning
And just concluding it insane
nice fallacy
wait hold on
i just said it was irrelevant
this was absolutely an appropriate response lmao
You literally use logics and reasoning to argue
yes you can dismiss red herrings lol
that was correct one
how is it one?
you said you are this and that
and I said
what you are does not really say what is the structure of poem
I dont really care what you rae
I just want good definition, which you failed to provide
you tried to go into reasoning and logic in response to me saying that humans being multi faceted and complex is why my critique won't work for everyone lol
read the above lines
Yeah logics are objective
human beings are not
my definition was perfectly adequate wdym lol
*my definition
was perfectly adequate
wdym lol*
I will say that I am not the first person to write a poem like this and I won't be the last. There has been enough people writing poems this way and calling it poems that it's formed its own genre within the rules of Poetry. Thus so that the rules have collectively started to shift.
I critiqued it, you blined?
On the first day of Rhapsody The first book came out
@wintry harbor
@wintry harbor
sentences concern grammar, which concerns prose, what are you on?
this is ludicrous
it doesn't even manage to approximate the standards of the romantic era of poetry lmao
yeah how does that affect my position
you said it needs stanzas and sentences
GRammar also concerns with poetry
which is also somewhat questionable, given the origins of poetry as oral tradition
That sentence is also made in a way, you can have exceptions in poem
But the poem itself should not be an exception
no, there are no sentences in classical poetry, only lines
They literally sang them, which means they had a different structure and rules regarding them
I see as you mean, I am neutral to be … I don’t mind, we are all our own rule in style but I have to be honest as to be known as it use to be that it is with Rules and so let it flow
if you implement grammar into your poetry it actually makes it ironically more prosaic lol
No
grammar makes sense
what?
it is used to make proper context in languages
my guy you don't make sense
you can use it in prose or poetry
you can, that wasn't my point
my point was that it was prosaic lol
grammer is not necessarily needed in poetry
No
some grammar is necessary
you can't just reply no to everything you have to actually make an argument lol
I did
your arguments make no snese
ok? so?
I have to confess to my own respect, to admit and show that I have offered my soul to suffer pain and to always be, but resting on the idea that you are happy
what does that has to do with defining what a poem is
oh so you agree with me that grammar is prosaic, that's odd
yeah but poetry is grammatical, it just plays with the grammar but never does something unpleasant to the ears
take for example the Golden Verse, it is very weird
adjective1 adjective1 verb noun1 noun2
It can have some nature, but it cant be prose
There are poetic devices and rules certainly used in this poem. There's even sections of the poem that are very traditional in it's poetic structuring. Take the stanza:
"Storage containment toxicity,
Love’s liner lucidity
Relief in understanding is achieved.
Sectionalized calm before the storm.
Spit out, and unforgiven.
Nautical romances with nausea."
For example. This is free-verse, which does not necessarily require stanzas. I also disagree in the fact that it doesn't have a structure. It does, it's just a loose structure as it fit the free-verse style better. The idea was to show progressive corruption in a poem, and I feel I did that effectively.
what does that do, being prosaic makes it only have more rules
define grammatical
which you do not agree
dreaming I saw the boy, astonished
uhh no prosaic as i use it means, related to prose, denoting the structure of prose
Prose has lots of rules
and if you say poems are prosaic
then poems should also have rules
and not everything is a poem
that's a golden verse, obviously without taking in accountant the meter
Ok so there is some structure?
I don't think my golden verse is too grammatical
i never said poems should be prosaic
what is this
ok then how should they be?
now let's remove the grammar but keep the order: dream I see boy astonish
presumably they should be poems
what is that
I don't think that's grammatical
Wonderful! @daring lagoon has just pregressed to level 8!
its the rule of identity
Circular reasoning
all that is a poem, also is a poem
Ok but what is that
no, identity
Do you even know the definition of idenity?
i do, broadly what does that have to do with anything
use brain
Yea
itself is similar to itself
but what is itself?
A is A
that we know, but what is A?
all reasoning is either circular, an infinite regression, or grounded on an assumption
SO?
I don't think my poem is ungrammatical at all. If you follow along the poem most of the lines make grammatical sense at least.
if the poems are prosaic as you say
Then there are rules to it @wintry harbor
i get the sense if you hate the rule of identity you probably also won't like tautological truths
if Poems can be anything?
then everything can be seen as poems
but our conversation is not a poem
NO
i don't believe i ever said this
you basically lost the argument
I don't think your poem is anything in particular if I'm being honest
and using Gish gallpop
but I wasn't talking about your poem
No
It has meaning. Scooby's interpreation earlier in the chat was closest to it's original intent I suppose.
"I love them all
Sometimes I think out of nowhere
... a few seconds then feel like the whole day..
I no longer feel to recognize what I do,
and that doesn't scare me.
All our days that we manage to remember
are so many, but how many have I forgotten
... Questions may I answer because the faith
is gone, no longer there. So often
I was told to postpone everything
until what they called tomorrow,
I always thought tomorrow
is the day of what they're
telling me today.
And apparently
it doesn't
alienate
me
to stay
there at that shame
according to what shouldn't
be right... Pain may exist,
that is after all
the meaning
of love,
and love
is never
without
pain .
I dont hate it
But using rule of identity
to obectively define something is nothing but stupid
Ofcourse apple is apple
did you get anything meaningful there?
Nice.
you dispute stuff that's so clearly obvious it's like im talking to someone that's fully invested into the brain in the vat hypothesis
i really just wanted to see how you would respond to it
lol
There is a key word "Diction"
I dont see anything that says stanza
as for the meter I thought I was reading dactyls but then preSENting and destiNAtion and deterioRAtion and it stopped making sense
ok so you agree that you were not responding and just playing around
key word is feelings my guy
Free-verse does not require a consistent meter.
I think it is hard to read
Ok what is your reasoning
YOu conclude stuff without showing how its done
That is not how an argument goes
feelings refer to meaning and not the structure
poetry in the simplest manner is just rhythmic verse and literature, usually of a rhythmic structure outside of prose, but retains the ability to incoporate various prosaic elements and still be deemed as poetry
there is no designated structure to a poem
read this
then there is poetry as a declarative concept
again nothing talking about stanzas
Fair. Was sort of intentional though. Mental corruption is a difficult thing to process. I wanted the reader to feel that anguish I felt.
that is, its a poem, merely because the writer says it is, and for no other legitimate reason
Stanzas come under diction
yeah I have to stop and understand all the words, some of them i even have to read the dictionary entry
ok so you actually dont have any structure and just basically called me names all the time
I say this is a poem, is it now?
sure
and the format makes it also unpleasant to read
idrc
Yeah, the above poem has none of those
which is why I criticised
the words are too long and too many to ennounce
It looks a little better on desktop. Discord killed the formatting a bit.
why would i challenge what you say is or isn't the category ur own work fits into
makes sense
its a pointless hill to die on
it is a bit tiring to ennounce
maybe for you
all sentences do not rhythem
they absolutely do
you still say nothing meaningful
whaa?
okay? lol
show me lmao
let's say facts and not interpretations guys
poetry was invented by the ancient greeks
I am saying all that,
Was sort of the point, I guess? Could have certainly made it flowed better but I think the contrast between lucidity and corruption is present at least.
and it is meant to "give rhythm" to speech
my guy you're trying to say that speech rhythm doesn't exist
everything else is secondary
it clearly does
if you don't want to use a consistent rhythm
it is fine
but you can't say poetry is not about rhythm
in fact we can naturally distinguish synthetic rhythm in automated voices on intuition
that's how language works
@silk crown Is this something that belongs in a poem?
ok but we do distinguish
all speech that uses stressed and unstressed syllables has rhythm
I liked the readable part, it actually resembles heroic verse
this is obvious
I am not trying to say that
I said
Not every speech we speak will be stritcly rhythemic
I have a lot of pieces that is written in this style and I have seen a lot of that was written like this
what are you yapping about
NO stanzas
NO structure
bunch of repeated sounds
and There is a number there whici looks like code
sure ok
no, all speech has rhythm because all speech has stressed and unstressed syllables lmao
I dont really care what you see, I wanna know is this something
that fits to be a poem?
you're wrong, morae languages do have stress but it is irrelevant to poetry
I think one could argue it is both a piece of word design and a poem at the same time. But there's enough actual poetry here for it to be considered a poem.
she already explained she was trying to convey mental unwellness and repetition is a great way to do that given the poem is about computers and when computers break they might start repeating
nice fallacy
I meant the words having rhymings
not the other meaning
im not, that has nothing to do with what im saying
example of a morae language, Greek
it has everything to do
i agree that it is irrelevant to poetry tho
yes as long as it conveys emotions yes it does belong in a poem
stress?
Yeah
but she could maintain the traditional structure and still have done that
I agree that there is a substance, but I dont see the structure
I said this in the beginning
try not to dodge the filter - disagreement is fine though tbh
then you should disagree, because stress is the only way you can do poetry in English
*try not to dodge the
filter - disagreement is
fine though tbh*
SHUTUP HAIKU BOT - jk Ilu
There are stanzas here.
There is a structure it's just loose.
You use repitition in your own poetry.
Literally all I did is replace e's with 3's, I's with 1's, and A's with 4's. If you can't decipher that that's a personal problem.
No
Speech can describe emotion, prose can describe emotion
now are those poems?
oh and review inc tomorrow or the next harsha!
I'll also review this one - if you're curious
I still got muted dw
yes pls.
you can make use speach in a poem
I'll be scanning the meter, analyzing the euphonic echo and also examining the structure of this nonce!
oh just automod 😭 I also recommend for poems featuring profanity, to just use PDFs!
if you want to be specific and modify you can dispute that poetry has a distinct repetition and rhythm scheme usually, though this is again, not always the case as you will get poetry that incorporates conversational rhythm in with its own flow
Loose structure
That does not belong to the poem
there is A LOOOSE, very LOOOSE structure
That is my complain
and there is literally a prose sentence in the poem
which is breaking the structure more
NO
I did not ask that
stop dodgeing my questions
i mean it does have some kind of structure, but I think that was done accidentally
Yeah
the writer admits it has loose structure
anyway i haven't seen any tenable arguments against any of what i said, and it seems like the convo is shifting so imma dip, it's a shame there aren't many formalists out there that can write good poetry ;-;
you aint gonna chang ur mind I aint gonna change my mind there is no need to debate about this
which is why I dont think it fits to be a poem
this is absolutely fake ^
NO
I asked you a question, I will change mind if you answer with tight reasoning
It's free-verse. Google "Can free-verse be loose in it's structure" and tell me what google says.
wdym
morae languages when vowel length:
stressed syllables: am i a joke to you?
not all loose structures are same
post this to someone who teaches in university
And ask them directly,
You stretch things too far
that is the problem
There is something called poetic license which allows us to do some mistakes
but not destroy the whole structure or grammar
tbh ıdk the concreate diffirence between prose and poems but as for speech it can be called art I suppose
I think that when doing free verse you should keep counting syllables and meter because that freedom of not following the rules must be used to bring more beauty and not to excuse oneself
This is an example of free verse poem
and I am fine with it
yours is completely different @daring lagoon
that's defo not what i meant, as in i did not mean to broadcast english structure as the end all be all, regardless vowel length and morae is still included in my general view and argument as to why i consider all speech to have rhythm
No
I did not ask that
I did not ask what is art or not
You said as long "yes as long as it conveys emotions yes it does belong in a poem"
so any form of writing which conveys emotions is poetry?
That's a personal preference sure. But the whole point of free verse is to be free of structural or rhythmic limitations. Certainly you don't have to like a poem someone does in free-verse if it doesn't follow rhythmic or metrical patterns you don't like, but that does not make it "not poetry."
I mean all speech does have "rhythm" do we care about that rhythm to make it pleasant to the ear? I don't think so
we just speak
poetry is meant to care about rhythm
yea i can agree with this
You can have personal preferences not a problem
but you wont make it objectively a poem so that everyone has to consider
It's also not objectively not a poem.
I still think you should put more work into free verse
i can also agree, though not sure i can agree with the idea of making smth pleasant sounding
make sure that strong syllables are used for the important things in the verse
put the words in the right places to make them matter
exaggerate things to make them matter
This is fine criticism. I think the reason people had an issue with HARSHA is because he said it "wasn't a poem".
plus it's often the case that conversational poetry isn't fully banking on conversational rhythm the entire way through, it's often incoporating that rhythm into itself rather
anyone be literate be illiterate be this be that is able to enjoy a well written poem
if you make something unpleasant
nobody will enjoy it
what makes it a poem then?
people can still derive meaning from things that seem unpleasant to them tho
not unpleasant but bland
there's also often more at play with unpleasant or uncanny rhythmic structures
there may be a thematic reason for why a poem is written in a certain way that is unpleasant
but it is making sense of some rhythm pattern
well bland could be a number of things
if you're doing poetry without making councious decisions about the rhythm then what are you doing
i find homogenous legs in poetry to be quite bland as well honestly
writing like a formalist
I deem poems that don't try to bring a funny rhythm as bland
Free verse is not poetry
i mean do you enjoy prose? cuz that doesn't necessarily pay as much attention to rhythm
i mean it does to some extent when its well written
so it not objectively Poetry @daring lagoon
Posting a blog opinion does not make that opinion objective.
ngl, i don't think an opinion piece published in the medium magazine is going to be a particularly good source
Ok then you are the one not reading them
Free verse poetry literally takes out things which make a poetry
then any speech can be called poetry, if the writer says so
i feel like you have to fail to understand the meaning of the word "free" to make that statement
a really silly thing to do
all free denotes is something outside of the romantic style
it could still retain rhythm, rhyme, and be evenly structured
answer my previous questions
and then come to this
you left the argument midway
no you did
idk if your just failing to remember, or lying to me at this point
Free verse by definition is not poetry
that is a thing of its own
this is a profoundly non binary view of literature
I can write a poem as a format list, watch
lettuce, bread and a slice of cheese, bacon and serve with ease
the binary view of course is all that is not prose is poetry
*the binary view
of course is all that is not
prose is poetry*
@wintry harbor imagine being someone who does not take things seriously
but loves to accuse people
what
what kind of prose do you read
that's not a question, that's an image my guy
and still come out wrong
thats an evidence
has an odd rhythm to it
it seems
and you don't need an even signature in poetry
you did not reply to me after this
certainly not the case for music
that was just incoherent wdym
and yes a poem can have any structure
even the most disgusting music has rhythm
true, not that it necessarily needs to be consistently rhythmic
A lot of songs switch up their rhythm patterns. Sometimes multiple times in a short period.
so you did not reply? you agree to that?
but you must pay attention that your rhythm is not arbitrary and is meant to make the poem prettier
any?
so Prose is a poem and essay is a poem?
i have no clue what your trying to say
rhyme had nothing to do with the argument
cuz you are lying
you could clarify instead of randomly accusing me
you said I stopped talking to you
and then you were the one you failed to repkly
i see no logical reason why i would be dishonest about being confused by incoherent gibberish
you literally accused me rn
and its fine?
i did reply, wdym
where?
i believe i said i saw no tenable counters to any of my arguments
Believe? proof?
True, and in a sense I feel I accomplish this in my poem. At least, the theme of progressive corruption concatenates with the progressively more corrupted design. In a way it's a cocnrete poem sort of.
this was and remains true
no, you can dig it up idrc
You literally dodged
And please use the reply feature
anyway you reiterated a question that i likely missed, and i answered it
No
you did not
when does a poem stop being poem
if it can have any structure
no
you never answered
I don't think your poem follows any particularly rhythm
there is no well defined boundary
ok
There is a boundary or not?
tell me that
can you not read
or that the rhythm changes to make words more prominent
can you not answer?
i already listed a boundary a while ago, that which is rhythmic is poetry
or that the rhythm does anything for the poem
ok so that means
not everything is poetry
then poetry cant have any structure
so, you hate it?
it has some restrictions
obviously not everything was poetry
specifically that which is tautologically not a poem, a novel for instance
No
a novel is categorized as prose
look at the image above
ergo, is not poetry
ok
why would i look at old screenshots, idc
you dont care?
I'm just going to delete this thread. clearly my work is trash and I shouldn't have come back to writing.
i have a decent enough memory to know what i said
you are the problem, you dont wanna admist mistkes
your memory sucks
you said, poem can have any structure
nothing i said has been contradictory
nor incohesive with what i believe in
no reasoning for that conclusion
but I will give mine
why, i liked it ;-;
statment one
Poetry can have any structure
statement two
which is rhythemic is poetry
Statement three
there are only some things with Rhyme
Conclusion-- any structure cannot be poem
not if its gonna cause this much contention
was partially my fault
shut up. i deleted the poem. you were right. it was garbage. im horrible. now stop debating.
bro juniper wanted us to stop lol
come in dms then
respect her wishes and leave it alone
my friend
no
no I like your poems, but not this one
Ok ill stop
STOP
STOp
I didn't like it
STOP
ngl
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOp
STOP
I deleted the poem
its terrible ur right
now shut up
we shall depart
aight